Covid19: Global reports, news and updates

[greybeard]

UK Column News Friday 15th Jan

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=MzXM2aTRR38

[avid]

These observations and unbiased views in the news are gems, UK Column is well worth a regular visit, and so much information with references enable one to make logical choices.
Thanks Chris, it’s been bookmarked for years now 👍👍

[greybeard]

Thousands of COVID Vaccine Injuries, 13 Deaths Reported in U.S. + WHO: No Guarantee COVID Vaccines Prevent Infections + Scientists Warn of ‘Ghastly Future’



https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...f-3a3b61f97d5a

[greybeard]

30,000 Italian Restaurants Defy Lockdown Rules / Hugo talks

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=7YZGXNwri0o

[uzn]

Court in Peru: COVID-19 invention of a "global criminal elite"

A court in the South American state of Peru is currently attracting attention with a courageous decision. It states that the COVID-19 virus is an invention of a "global criminal elite" made up of billionaires like George Soros, the Rockefeller family and Microsoft entrepreneur and co-founder Bill Gates.

Pandemic "unpredictable, except for its creator"

As the criminal appeals chamber of the Chincha archipelago and the city of Pisco announced in a verdict, the pandemic was "unpredictable", except for its creators, "who have handled and continue to control with extreme secrecy within their environment and global corporations."

The background to this startling verdict was an apology from the judges responsible for the delay in handling the appeal of a defendant who applied for his (preliminary) pre-trial detention to be lifted, but whose application was delayed by the corona pandemic.

In the result, the three judges wrote:

"No world government, natural or legal person, nor the defense of the accused can claim that this pandemic has the quality of 'foreseeable', except for the creators of the new world order like Bill Gates, Soros, Rockefeller, etc."

Proceedings initiated against courageous judges

The statements of the three judges attracted a great deal of attention even beyond the country's borders. The accusation was immediately raised that the officials were serving and spreading conspiracy theories relating to the corona pandemic with their verdict.

The decentralized office for the control of the magistrate (Odecma) of Ica has therefore already initiated a preliminary investigation against the judges who had signed the decision. The aim of the investigation is to gather evidence that will help identify alleged irregularities committed by the judges.

Source:
https://www.20minutos.es/noticia/453...r-la-covid-19/

[Eva2]

'PHYSICIAN SPILLS THE BEANS - LIVE ON AIR'

Canadian doctor doesn't hold back with how he feels about the COVID "phenomenon" and vaccines.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/cBRDR...CsjmhLY4jbE13Q

[greybeard]

Peter Hitchens defends lockdown scepticism: ‘Everything has to be questioned’ | 11-Jan-21

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=vTvRR_XeHbM

[greybeard]

UK Column News - 18th January 2021

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=UGhr9Lv7h-g

[Delight]

I know lots of channels provide info but I watch The Highwire because it has consistently brought out the pertinent info we need to know.

Approaching Herd Stupidity

[Sue (Ayt)]

This video is excellent, in my opinion. It explains the whole situation clearly, as far as the virus itself, and the vaccine, and the remedies.

Bio-warfare & Weaponization of Medicine Amid Covid

n this explosive interview with Senior Editor Alex Newman of The New American magazine, former president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) Dr. Lee Merrit explains her belief that America is currently facing what appears to be biological warfare. Whether the Communist Chinese released the COVID19 virus on purpose or by accident is impossible to know, but the implications are enormous. When it comes to the new vaccines, Dr. Merrit, a former military doctor who studied biological warfare, goes through previous animal studies on the technology and paints a dire picture. However, even though modern medical schools do not often teach it, there are ways to treat viral infections that are time-tested and effective, she concludes.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=mvI-_jXck7Y

[Eva2]

'Why the Pfizer CEO selling 62% of his stock the same day as the vaccine announcement looks bad'

https://financialpost.com/financial-...ment-looks-bad

[meat suit]

Posted by Jill (here)
'Why the Pfizer CEO selling 62% of his stock the same day as the vaccine announcement looks bad'

https://financialpost.com/financial-...ment-looks-bad

this is ancient, 13th of november

[Eva2]

Posted by meat suit (here)

Posted by Jill (here)
'Why the Pfizer CEO selling 62% of his stock the same day as the vaccine announcement looks bad'

https://financialpost.com/financial-...ment-looks-bad

this is ancient, 13th of november

Oh, ok - I hadn't seen it before and it was recently posted to me, so didn't check date.

[Philippe]

Posted by Sue (Ayt) (here)
This video is excellent, in my opinion. It explains the whole situation clearly, as far as the virus itself, and the vaccine, and the remedies.

Bio-warfare & Weaponization of Medicine Amid Covid

n this explosive interview with Senior Editor Alex Newman of The New American magazine, former president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) Dr. Lee Merrit explains her belief that America is currently facing what appears to be biological warfare. Whether the Communist Chinese released the COVID19 virus on purpose or by accident is impossible to know, but the implications are enormous. When it comes to the new vaccines, Dr. Merrit, a former military doctor who studied biological warfare, goes through previous animal studies on the technology and paints a dire picture. However, even though modern medical schools do not often teach it, there are ways to treat viral infections that are time-tested and effective, she concludes.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=mvI-_jXck7Y

I find this highly intelligent and it is clearly explained how a messenger-RNA vaccine can be weaponized. From time to time I have protested against the fear mongering about the virus on this forum, and indeed if it is a bio-weapon the results in terms of direct casualties are ridiculously low. But if the vaccine installs a mechanism in the human cells that can be triggered in the future, that is a real danger. This is a video to be heard twice to really absorb the data and get out the warnings to everybody.

[Ernie Nemeth]

Like many of the side effects of all vaccines, this gene therapy will hyper-sensitize the immune system so that even the smallest irritant can cause a massive immune response. This is how Rheumatoid arthritis most probably occurs, as well as many allergies, not to mention rare and uncommon auto-immune maladies of the blood, organs, and tissues. The body does not like the introduction of foreign elements into its system - especially the adjutants like mercury, glycol, formaldehyde, nano-particles, and gene portions of cross-species, not to mention crude attempts at genetic alterations by the introduction of modified genetic material...these are poisons to the human body!

[ExomatrixTV]

• ⁣Future Effects of Experimental C0VID mRNA Vaccines - Part of Transhumanism Violating Nuremberg Code

Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/cRAzSBCi2ncc

source

[Hughe]

Der Druck zur Impfung wird aufgebaut – Der Arbeitsplatzverlust droht – Na und, wo ist das Problem?
https://volldraht.de/gesellschaft/11...st-das-problem

Jörn Baumann
Erstellt: 10. Januar 2021
Zuletzt aktualisiert: 10. Januar 2021
Zugriffe: 584
Traduction approximative en français ci-dessous

La pression en faveur de la vaccination s'accroît - La perte d'emploi est imminente - Et alors, quel est le problème ?

(Rough translation from German)

The pressure to vaccinate is building - Job loss is looming - So what, what's the problem?

The freedom of choice or the right of self-determination is influenced by subtle peripheral measures. If you are not vaccinated, you lose your job, can't go to the movies, can't shop everywhere, and so on.

The decision to get vaccinated would again be "voluntary" and bang, you have the slave ring around. Because now everything is carried out "voluntarily" by the subtle constraints of a totalitarian system. The example of the alleged Dr. Weiland is particularly perversely set up: "Who does not want the vaccination, is released from work without salary".

photo_2021-01-10_07-05-12.jpg
"FIRST BOSS GETS SERIOUS
No salary without vaccination!

Dr. Maximilian Weiland (...)He has his practice manager send a short message with the appointment. It literally says: "All employees and dentists will be vaccinated. Those who do not want the vaccination will be released from work without pay."(...) How many of the employees followed the request is not clear. Apparently, acceptance among the workforce was high: according to BILD am Sonntag information, 36 to 38 vaccine doses are said to have been ordered. Only four are said not to have been vaccinated because the colleagues were ill or taking antibiotics.(...)"

https://www.bild.de/bild-plus/news/i...8276.bild.html

Such Blender, if it is a real physician, like the radiating smiling Dr. Maximilian Weiland and their imitators will have to pay the price for perfide agitation. The example of the alleged Dr. Weiland is particularly perversely set up: " Who does not want the vaccination, is released without salary from the work", with it the loss of the salary payment is used directly for the production of the existence fear of the employees, in order to pull through an ideologically conditioned culling of humans.

We call it genocide, not so long ago it was said " There are the showers, we delouse you". Today it is the institutes, like the RKI, who treated people like guinea pigs during the Nazi era, who recommend the vaccination circus. We will keep an eye on this "doctor" and his employees, as well as on the nursing homes in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.

The first reports from caregivers reach us that the vaccinated seniors are dying and in some cases only 3 caregivers are still operational because the rest of the staff is lying flat, unable to work. The three caregivers are the ones who refused the vaccination.

And another one who can't talk his way out of it later by saying he didn't know anything.

We are still waiting for the other reports that may or may not confirm our prognosis about the genocide. So far, everything is following the same pattern as the "Spanish flu".

The announcement of the contagious "viral infection" that resembles a flu, then the intervention of the doctors with their "protective vaccinations", and the dying begins. The people culled by syringe are counted as victims of the "viral infection" and already the narrative of the terrible plague fits.

In the present we have the fictitious pandemic and a flu that has disappeared from the media. The need for "vaccinations" is generated via absurd mass testing with the false positives of a PCR test that cannot represent an infection.

With vaccinations already underway, seniors and caregivers are first hosed down or eliminated. The resulting pathogenic declines and vaccine injuries are poo-pooed to the fictitious pandemic, and presto, they have the much-needed increase in mortality statistics, which had been declining up to that point.

Once again, with the onset of vaccination, the declining death statistics become an increasing death rate.

This is the hallmark of every major pandemic from the past, that it was only with the "protective measures" that mass deaths began. So that the required mortality rate is also fulfilled, one suggests the necessary 2nd and 3rd vaccination.

So if you should be forced by your employer to a vaccination on a "voluntary" basis, your protection is to call in sick, to be dismissed or, if possible, to resign yourself.
Version française - traduction approximative


La liberté de choix ou le droit à l'autodétermination sont influencés par des mesures périphériques subtiles. Si vous n'êtes pas vacciné, vous perdez votre emploi, vous ne pouvez pas aller au cinéma, vous ne pouvez pas faire vos courses partout, etc.

La décision de se faire vacciner serait à nouveau "volontaire" et bang, vous avez le cercle d'esclaves autour de vous. Parce que maintenant tout est fait "volontairement" par les contraintes subtiles d'un système totalitaire. L'exemple du prétendu Dr Weiland est particulièrement pervers : "Ceux qui ne veulent pas la vaccination seront libérés du travail sans salaire".

photo_2021-01-10_07-05-12.jpg
"LE PREMIER PATRON FAIT DU SÉRIEUX
Pas de salaire sans vaccination !

Le Dr Maximilian Weiland (...)Il demande à son directeur de cabinet d'envoyer un bref message avec le rendez-vous. Il est littéralement écrit : "Tous les employés et les dentistes seront vaccinés. Ceux qui ne veulent pas la vaccination seront libérés du travail sans rémunération" (...) On ne sait pas exactement combien d'employés se sont conformés à la demande. Apparemment, l'acceptation au sein du personnel était élevée : selon les informations de BILD am Sonntag, 36 à 38 doses de vaccins auraient été commandées. Seuls quatre d'entre eux n'auraient pas été vaccinés parce que les collègues étaient malades ou prenaient des antibiotiques (...)".

https://www.bild.de/bild-plus/news/i...8276.bild.html

Ces faux, s'il s'agit d'un vrai médecin, comme le souriant et rayonnant Dr Maximilian Weiland et leurs imitateurs devront payer le prix d'une perfide agitation. L'exemple du prétendu Dr Weiland est particulièrement pervers : "Celui qui ne veut pas la vaccination sera libéré de son travail sans salaire", la perte du paiement du salaire est donc directement utilisée pour générer la peur existentielle des employés afin de procéder à un abattage de personnes conditionné par l'idéologie.

Nous appelons cela un génocide, il n'y a pas si longtemps c'était "il y a les douches, on vous épouille". Aujourd'hui, ce sont les instituts, comme le RKI, qui traitaient les gens comme des cobayes pendant l'ère nazie, qui recommandent le cirque de la vaccination. Nous allons garder un œil sur ce "docteur" et ses employés, tout comme les maisons de retraite du Mecklembourg-Poméranie occidentale.

Les premiers rapports des soignants nous parviennent indiquant que les personnes âgées vaccinées sont en train de mourir et que, dans certains cas, seuls 3 soignants sont aptes au travail car le reste du personnel est couché à plat, incapable de travailler. Les trois soignants sont ceux qui ont refusé la vaccination.

Et un autre qui ne peut pas s'en sortir en disant plus tard qu'il ne savait pas.

Nous attendons toujours les autres rapports qui pourraient ou non confirmer notre prédiction de génocide. Jusqu'à présent, tout suit le même schéma que la "grippe espagnole".

L'annonce de l'"infection virale" contagieuse qui ressemble à la grippe, puis l'intervention des médecins avec leurs "vaccinations", et les mourants commencent. Les personnes abattues à la seringue sont comptées comme des victimes de "l'infection virale" et le récit de cette terrible peste colle à la réalité.

Nous avons actuellement une pandémie fictive et une grippe qui a disparu des médias. Le besoin de "vaccinations" est généré par des tests de masse absurdes avec les faux positifs d'un test PCR qui ne peut pas représenter une infection.

Les vaccinations étant déjà en cours, les personnes âgées et les soignants sont les premiers à être lésés ou éliminés. Les baisses de pathogènes et les blessures causées par les vaccins qui en résultent sont attribuées à la pandémie fictive, et presto, elles ont l'augmentation bien nécessaire des statistiques de décès, qui étaient jusqu'à présent en baisse.

Une fois de plus, avec le début des vaccinations, la statistique des décès en baisse devient une statistique des décès en hausse.

C'est la caractéristique de toutes les grandes pandémies du passé, que ce n'est qu'avec les "mesures de protection" que les décès en masse ont commencé. Pour que le taux de mortalité requis soit atteint, les gens suggèrent que les 2e et 3e vaccinations sont nécessaires.

Ainsi, si votre employeur vous oblige à vous faire vacciner sur une base "volontaire", votre protection consiste à vous faire porter malade, à vous faire licencier ou, si possible, à démissionner.

[greybeard]

UK Column News - 20th January 2021

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=71QIIrpTDOU

[greybeard]

Coгonaviгus in context

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=5FZvdFpsDTg

[onawah]

Fauci: COVID Vaccine May Become Mandatory
01/20/21
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...ome-mandatory/

(Bold letters my emphasis)

"Dr. Anthony Fauci told media vaccines may be required by some businesses, for overseas travel, and when it comes to schools, “Everything’s on the table.” But as more vaccine-related deaths and injuries are reported, the less likely mandates will become widespread.
Story at-a-glance:

According to Dr. Anthony Fauci, some institutions will undoubtedly require employees to be vaccinated, adding that it’s “quite possible” the vaccine will be required for overseas travel.
The COVID-19 vaccine is still in the experimental stage as they have not completed stage 3 clinical trials yet. The mRNA technology used in these vaccines is also experimental, and the sheer speed at which the vaccines have been developed and tested precludes us from knowing much about their side effects, especially in the long term.
As of Dec. 18, 2020, the adverse event rate in the U.S. was 2.79%. This means your risk of harm from the vaccine is far greater than your risk of dying from COVID-19, which has an overall noninstitutionalized infection fatality rate of just 0.26%.
If an experimental vaccine were to be mandated, it would set a frightening precedent and pave the way for all sorts of nonconsensual medical experimentation on the general public, going forward.
The COVID-19 vaccines are not being evaluated for their ability to actually prevent infection and transmission of the virus. And, if the vaccine cannot reduce infection, hospitalizations or deaths, then it cannot create the vaccine-acquired herd immunity required to end the pandemic.


Will the COVID-19 vaccine become mandatory? That’s a question many are asking these days and, by the looks of it, the answer may well be yes — although as I’ll explain later, I suspect the harms of the vaccine will become so apparent that it’ll kill such efforts before they become widespread.

In a Jan. 1, 2021, Newsweek interview, Dr. Anthony Fauci said he was “sure” some institutions and businesses will require employees to be vaccinated, and that it’s “quite possible” the vaccine will be required for overseas travel.

When asked about the possibility of mandating the vaccine on a local level, such as for children attending school, he stated that “Everything will be on the table for discussion.” That said, he pointed out that since “we almost never mandate things federally” — with regard to health — he doesn’t believe a national vaccine mandate will be enacted.

In related news Dec. 21, 2020, presidential candidate Joe Biden rolled up his sleeve to get publicly inoculated against COVID-19, stating that the vaccine was “nothing to worry about.” He’s also gone on record saying he will push for a 100-day mask mandate in federal buildings if he wins the presidency.

Can experimental vaccines be mandated?
While many vaccines are required by state or local law, the thing that sets the COVID-19 vaccine apart from all others is the fact that it is still an experimental vaccine. While Moderna and Pfizer have been granted emergency use authorization for their respective vaccine candidates, they still haven’t even completed stage 3 clinical trials yet.

The mRNA technology used in these vaccines is also experimental, and the sheer speed at which the vaccines have been developed and tested precludes us from knowing much about their side effects, especially in the long term.

As of Dec. 18, 2020, the adverse event rate in the U.S. was 2.79%. This means your risk of harm from the vaccine is far greater than your risk of dying from COVID-19, which has an overall noninstitutionalized infection fatality rate of just 0.26%. Among those under the age of 40, the infection fatality rate is a mere 0.01%.

If an experimental vaccine were to be mandated, it would set a frightening precedent and pave the way for all sorts of nonconsensual medical experimentation on the general public, going forward.

In a Dec. 29, 2020, article in JAMA, the authors discuss the legal possibility of mandating COVID-19 vaccines, stating that “SARS-CoV-2 vaccines hold promise to control the pandemic and help restore normal social and economic life.”

However, this is questionable, considering the fact that the effectiveness of the vaccines is only measured by their ability to lessen moderate to severe COVID-19 symptoms such as cough and headache. Presumably, this would lower the risk of hospitalization and death for vaccinated individuals.

However, as explained in “How COVID-19 Vaccine Trials Are Rigged,” the vaccines were not evaluated for their ability to actually prevent infection and transmission of the virus. And, if the vaccine cannot reduce infection, hospitalizations or deaths, then it cannot create the vaccine-acquired herd immunity required to end the pandemic.

What’s more, in a Nov. 26, 2020, BMJ article, Peter Doshi, associate editor of The BMJ, points out that while Pfizer claims its vaccine is 95% effective, this is the relative risk reduction. The absolute risk reduction is actually less than 1%. He also stresses that severe side effects appear commonplace:

“Moderna’s press release states that 9% experienced grade 3 myalgia and 10% grade 3 fatigue; Pfizer’s statement reported 3.8% experienced grade 3 fatigue and 2% grade 3 headache. Grade 3 adverse events are considered severe, defined as preventing daily activity. Mild and moderate severity reactions are bound to be far more common.”

New York considers forced vaccination bill
None of these open questions is stopping the New York Senate from considering a forced vaccination bill (A4169). As reported by constitutional attorney KrisAnne Hall:

“January 6 New York Assemblymen will be asked to vote on a bill that will authorize the Governor and/or health officials to seize custody of New Yorkers, imprison, and force vaccinate them without due process.

“This bill is not only a threat to the Constitution of New York, the people of New York, but also everyone in America if you consider the way certain legislation can spread throughout America in the age ‘crisis’ …

“If passed this legislation will place in the hands of the Governor, or his designated agent, the full and autonomous authority to ‘order’ the ‘removal’ and ‘detention’ of every person the Governor or his ‘delegee’ determines ‘may pose’ a ‘significant and imminent threat to public health’ …

“Once some health department worker thinks a New Yorker is a carrier or contact to a carrier, that person will be seized and held without hearing, trial, due process, or bond for a period of time to be determined by the health department.”

As noted by Hall, this bill violates the U.S. Constitution in several different ways. For starters, it eliminates your right to due process before forcing you into the custody of health officials, as well as your right to trial “as required by Article I sec 1 and Article VI Sec 18a of the New York Constitution.”

It also “arbitrarily reduces the well-established standard of strict scrutiny required for the infringement of these fundamental rights to the lesser standard of ‘clear and convincing evidence’ which will be determined solely by the Governor or some worker in the New York Health Department.” This, in turn, violates the constitutional principle of separation of powers.

Thirdly, “A-416 is a bold violation of Article 1 sec 5 and Article 1 sec 12 of the New York Constitution” as it would deprive you of your “inherent rights to due process related to a search and seizure” of your property and/or your body.

“New Yorkers cannot allow that to happen. Everyone in New York needs to contact their Senator and Assemblyman and DEMAND they vote no on A-416. Everyone in America needs to contact their State and demand that such legislation never be drafted,” Hall writes.

In her blog post, Hall includes a sample letter and phone script you can use when contacting your representatives.

Blackmailing the public to force vaccine uptake
Getting back to the JAMA article discussing the legal possibility of mandating COVID-19 vaccines, the authors point out that mandating a vaccine while it’s still under an emergency use approval is “legally and ethically problematic.”

“Vaccine mandates are unjustified because an EUA requires less safety and efficacy data than full Biologics License Application (BLA) approval. Individuals would also likely distrust vaccine mandates under emergency use, viewing it as ongoing medical research,” the article states.

Once the vaccine is fully licensed, however, vaccine mandates “could be imposed in multiple sectors,” according to the authors. Still, they point out that “Given the rarity of adult mandates, states are unlikely to enact mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations for the adult population, especially in the absence of long-term safety data.”

Private companies, on the other hand, can require vaccination as a condition of employment, and according to a Yale CEO survey, 71% of company executives supported the implementation of COVID-19 vaccine mandates in the workplace.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has already ruled that businesses can compel their employees to get vaccinated, and that they may fire those who refuse. Employers must, however, allow for medical exemptions and “offer reasonable accommodations based on religion or disability.”
Schools may also end up requiring COVID-19 vaccination for students, faculty and staff, and it seems likely the vaccine may simply be added to the ACIP-recommended list of childhood vaccinations. Most troubling, however, is the proposal to require vaccination as a condition of service. According to the JAMA article:

“It is foreseeable that businesses in certain high-risk settings could require proof of vaccination as a condition of service, such as in long-distance travel (plane, rail, bus), restaurants, and entertainment (sports, movies, theater).

While states might be constitutionally barred from requiring vaccines to participate in religious worship, it is conceivable that some churches, synagogues, or mosques might consider such conditions for congregants. Local or state governments could also require vaccination as a condition of service.”

To be clear, even if state and federal governments don’t mandate the vaccine, by barring unvaccinated people from traveling, participating in social events and even entering into government buildings, they are essentially mandating it. Unvaccinated people would become second-class citizens that aren’t permitted to work, travel, conduct business or engage socially. What kind of life is that?

Yet this is precisely what we may be facing. As noted by the JAMA authors, “If scientific and logistical challenges can be overcome, linking vaccinations as a condition of providing service could be an effective incentive for vaccination.” They really should call it what it is: blackmail.

Many front-line workers refuse COVID-19 vaccine
Distribution of Pfizer’s and Moderna’s vaccines began at the end of December 2020. In the U.S., most states have elected to begin distribution among front-line health care workers and in senior care facilities. However, despite media fanfare, many health care workers are leery of the vaccine.

According to news reports, about half of all front-line workers in Riverside County, California, have refused the vaccine, as have 60% of nursing home staff in Ohio, 40% of staff at Chicago’s Loretto Hospital and 40% of LA’s front-line workers. Similar rates of vaccine refusal are being reported in several European countries.

Interestingly, a survey by the National Association of Health Care Assistants revealed a whopping 72% of certified nursing assistants plan to refuse the vaccine, as are 55% of firefighters in New York, according to a December 2020 poll by the Uniformed Firefighters Association. The reason for this widespread hesitation is as understandable as it is justifiable. As noted in the Western Journal:

“Throughout the coronavirus pandemic, any skepticism about the virulence of the virus or wisdom of draconian shutdowns was met with the mantra ‘follow the science’ to stifle any serious debate.

“All along the way, however, officials did anything but as they imposed useless mask mandates, allowed Black Lives Matter protests despite closing businesses and imposing social distancing on everyone else, and even expressed skepticism about any vaccine simply because it was developed at the behest of President Donald Trump.

“But worst of all, officials undermined science by suggesting that vaccination distribution begin based on race rather than in the nursing home populations that were actually ravaged by the virus.

“In short, governments and the medical community killed any credibility they had at the beginning of the pandemic with their repeated hypocrisy and mixed messages. It’s no wonder these workers are reluctant to follow them now and are instead relying on their gut instincts to mistrust the untested vaccine and COVID-19 agenda.”

Side effects and deaths are stacking up
The fact that high rates of side effects and sudden deaths are already being reported will hardly improve matters in coming weeks and months. For example, Jan. 4, 2021, RT reported that health authorities in Portugal were “on alert” after the sudden death of a 41-year-old pediatric surgery assistant who had been in good health. She was found dead in her bed just two days after being inoculated with Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.

Dec. 30, 2020, the Daily Star reported the death of an elderly resident in Lucerne, Switzerland, five days after receiving the Pfizer vaccine. The man had previously “reacted negatively” to the seasonal influenza vaccine. According to the report, he suffered from dementia but was otherwise in good health.

Dec. 26, 2020, a Boston doctor with severe shellfish allergy suffered a life-threatening anaphylactic reaction to the Moderna vaccine. As reported by RT:

“Within minutes, Sadrzadeh’s tongue and throat began to tingle and go numb, a reaction that he associated with his shellfish allergy. Even more concerning, his blood pressure then dipped so low that it wasn’t even detectable with a monitor. Luckily, the doctor had brought his own EpiPen, which he administered on himself before hospital staff rushed him to the emergency room …

“‘I feel that if I did not have my EpiPen with me, I would be intubated right now, because it was that severe,’ he said, adding that it was the worst allergic reaction he had experienced since he was 11 years old. The physician said he now recommends that people with allergies receive the vaccine in a hospital setting, instead of getting it from a clinic or local provider …

“The concerning case is the first of its kind to be linked to the Moderna jab. Officials with the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are investigating at least six cases of severe allergic reactions occurring in people who took the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.”

A Dec. 21, 2020, article in The Defender reported the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is investigating a series of allergic reactions to the Pfizer vaccine. Aside from the Boston doctor, other reports of allergic reactions, including anaphylactic shock, include four health care workers in Illinois and three health care workers in Alaska. Cases of anaphylaxis also emerged within days of the rollout of Pfizer’s and Moderna’s vaccines in the U.K.

Thousands injured in mere days
According to the CDC, by Dec. 18, 2020, 112,807 Americans had received their first dose of COVID-19 vaccine. Of those, 3,150 suffered one or more “health impact events,” defined as being “unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required care from doctor or health care professional.”

That’s 2.79%. Extrapolated to the total U.S. population of 328.2 million, we can then expect 9,156,780 Americans to be injured by the vaccine if every single man, woman and child is vaccinated. Is this really reasonable for a virus that has an average survival rate of 99.74%?



In the end, I suspect and predict that widespread mandates for COVID-19 vaccination will not take place. I believe there will simply be too many injuries and deaths from the first and second rounds of vaccinations, and that will destroy any and all vaccine mandate arguments.

Allergy alert
Many suspect polyethylene glycol (PEG), found in both Pfizer’s and Moderna’s vaccines, might be the culprit causing allergic reactions and anaphylaxis. According to Robert F. Kennedy Jr., “studies show that 1 in 7 Americans may unknowingly be at risk of experiencing an allergic reaction to PEG.”

Kennedy believes “everyone should be screened for anti-PEG antibodies before getting the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines,” adding that “It is unconscionable that, instead, the FDA and CDC are encouraging people to go ahead and risk a life-threatening anaphylactic reaction and just assume that someone will be on hand to save them.”It’s worth noting that the CDC has updated its vaccine guidance in response to reports of allergic reactions to the Pfizer vaccine, stating that:

“If you have had a severe allergic reaction to any ingredient in an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, you should not get either of the currently available mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. If you had a severe allergic reaction after getting the first dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, CDC recommends that you should not get the second dose.

“CDC has also learned of reports that some people have experienced non-severe allergic reactions within 4 hours after getting vaccinated (known as immediate allergic reactions), such as hives, swelling, and wheezing (respiratory distress).

“If you have had an immediate allergic reaction — even if it was not severe — to any ingredient in an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, CDC recommends that you should not get either of the currently available mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

“If you had an immediate allergic reaction after getting the first dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, you should not get the second dose … People who are allergic to PEG or polysorbate should not get an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.”

COVID-19 outbreaks occurring among vaccinated
Yet another interesting problem that has arisen is that many newly vaccinated individuals are suddenly testing positive for COVID-19. In a San Jose, California, hospital, 51 employees tested positive within 10 days of vaccination, although it’s unclear whether all of them had actually received the vaccine.

One died from COVID-19 complications. Interestingly, the outbreak is being blamed on an employee who showed up wearing an inflatable Christmas costume. The same pattern has been reported elsewhere.

For example, in Israel, 21 residents of a retirement home tested positive for the virus after receiving the vaccine. Authorities pointed out that since two doses are required to provide protection against SARS-CoV-2, you can still catch it after the first dose. The same argument was made in the San Jose hospital case.

A doctor in Philadelphia also tested positive after taking the vaccine, as did a nurse in San Diego. In each case, health authorities have insisted that it’s not the vaccine causing the problem but, rather, the fact that the shot needs time to work.

Overall, there’s plenty of reason to be cautious and delay COVID-19 vaccination as long as possible. As mentioned earlier, I believe that, in time, the harms will become apparent enough that any talk about mandating these vaccines will simply evaporate."

Originally published by Mercola.https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...andatory.aspx?