Covid19: Global reports, news and updates

[pueblo]

People are going to start dying from the mRNA vaccine in the coming months...


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Dxjp6nkwhWn8/

[greybeard]

Brian Gerrish, Mike Robinson and David Scott with today's UK Column News.

https://www.ukcolumn.org/ukcolumn-ne...h-january-2021

[pueblo]

Human race get up off your knees!

[sunnydaze]

good to see uk column on here thankyou

[greybeard]

Posted by sunnydaze (here)
good to see uk column on here thankyou

Yes professional journalists.
Most of their episodes get posted here on this thead sunnydaze.
Chris

[ExomatrixTV]

Ever seen celebrities & politicians bragging about "taking the shot" promoting & helping to PUSH (indirect) mandatory vaccines agenda?

We are being FOOLED on so many levels ... Lets add this one to the long list of "Weapons of Mass Deceptions" shall we?

• By the way: Even if they use real syringes you have NO PROOF what ingredients they use versus what toxins we are pushed to take!

source

[thepainterdoug]

Not sure how many follow Paul Craig Roberts? Im on his email list and get 3-4 articles a day. Paul is on it big time regarding covid and election fraud.
this is an update on the covid fraud.

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/202...ption-updated/

[Denis]

American pharmacist Stephen Brandenburg, 44, who deliberately spoiled a batch of coronavirus vaccine, believed that it could harm people and change their DNA. This is reported by Business Insider with reference to the court materials.

The incident took place in Wisconsin, in the town of Grafton. A former Aurora Health Care employee removed about 500 doses of Moderna vaccine from the refrigerator and left them outside overnight, rendering the drug unusable

Read more on RBC:
https://www.rbc.ru/rbcfreenews/5ff46e2e9a794758fb1340a7

[Hughe]

Review update of recent science relevant to COVID-19 policy: Denis Rancourt, Ontario Civil Liberties Association (ocla.ca)

Measures do not prevent deaths, transmission is not by contact, masks provide no benefit, vaccines are inherently dangerous:
Review update of recent science relevant to COVID-19 policy

Denis G. Rancourt, PhD
Researcher, Ontario Civil Liberties Association (ocla.ca)
Member scientist, PANDA (pandata.org)
[ See section about the author's expertise, at the end ]

The article is organized into the following sections:
Summary
Introduction - Iatrogenic pandemic of panic
Stringency of measures has no effect on total deaths assigned to COVID-19
Corruption of science is being exposed - Masks and PCR
Transmission is not by contact
Masking of the general-population provides no detectable benefit
Vaccines are inherently dangerous
Endnotes / References

Excerpt:

Vaccines are inherently dangerous
On 13 July 2020, an important reality check was published by Arvin et al. [33] in the pages of the leading scientific journal Nature, in the form of an extensive "Perspective" (review). The paper, on careful reading, is a detailed exposé about human ignorance regarding artificial interference with the human immune system. Any student of science should conclude that "we mostly don't know anything". The authors state this in embellished form as [33]:
Antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of disease is a general concern for the development of vaccines and antibody therapies because the mechanisms that underlie antibody protection against any virus have a theoretical potential to amplify the infection or trigger harmful immunopathology. This possibility requires careful consideration at this critical point in the pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Here we review observations relevant to the risks of ADE of disease, and their potential implications for SARS-CoV-2 infection. At present, there are no known clinical findings, immunological assays or biomarkers that can differentiate any severe viral infection from immune-enhanced disease, whether by measuring antibodies, T cells or intrinsic host responses. In vitro systems and animal models do not predict the risk of ADE of disease, in part because protective and potentially detrimental antibody-mediated mechanisms are the same and designing animal models depends on understanding how antiviral host responses may become harmful in humans. The implications of our lack of knowledge are twofold. First, comprehensive studies are urgently needed to define clinical correlates of protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2. Second, because ADE of disease cannot be reliably predicted after either vaccination or treatment with antibodies—regardless of what virus is the causative agent—it will be essential to depend on careful analysis of safety in humans as immune interventions for COVID-19 move forward. (Abstract)

Given the roll out that followed, this means that we have blindly embarked on a large-scale experiment on human subjects, without animal trials, without scientific transparency, without the possibility of informed consent, driven by pharmaceutical corporations that only want the good of humanity.
On 1 October 2020, Wehenkel [34] published a paper in which he studied 39 countries and found a large association between national influenza vaccination rate (IVR) of people 65 years and older and reported COVID-19 deaths per million inhabitants. The results are preliminary but may be a documented example of "antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of disease" involving COVID-19. All the highest COVID-19 death rates occurred in countries with IVR > 50% (see his figures 1 and 3). I sense a research funding opportunity to undo this finding.

Endnotes / References

[1] 2019--WHO : “Non-pharmaceutical public health measures for mitigating the risk and impact of epidemic and pandemic influenza”, with Annex, World Health Organization, October 2019 : https://www.who.int/influenza/public...ublication/en/ . Report, ISBN: 978-92-4-151683-9, pp 91, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/...516839-eng.pdf / “Annex: Report of systematic literature reviews”, WHO/WHE/IHM/GIP/2019.1, pp 125, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/...2019.1-eng.pdf

[2] 2017--WHO : “PANDEMIC INFLUENZA SEVERITY ASSESSMENT (PISA): A WHO guide to assess the severity of influenza in seasonal epidemics & pandemics”, World health Organization, May 2017, WHO/WHE/IHM/GIP/2017.2, https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/...2017.2-eng.pdf
21

[3] 2011--Bonneux : Luc Bonneux & Wim Van Damme. “Health is more than influenza”. Bulletin of the World Health Organization2011;89:539-540. doi: 10.2471/BLT.11.089086. https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/89/7/11-089086/en/

[4] 2010--Cohen : Cohen, D. and Carter, P. “WHO and the pandemic flu “conspiracies””. BMJ 2010; 340:c2912. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2912 (Published 04 June 2010). https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/340/...ature.full.pdf

[5] 2020--Rancourt : “Masks Don’t Work: a Review of Science Relevant to Covid-19 Social Policy”. Rancourt, DG (11 April 2020) ResearchGate, obtained 400 K reads, then was deplatformed, as per this report: https://archive.org/details/covid-ce...search-gate-2/. Now at: https://vixra.org/abs/2006.0044 , and at: https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/...-social-policy . And see the Digi-Debates about criticism of the article: “Digi-Debates. The Face Mask Debate”, Digi Debates YouTube Channel, 25 July 2020, https://youtu.be/AQyLFdoeUNk , and at: https://www.digi-debates.com/ .

[6] 2020--Rancourt : “Face masks, lies, damn lies, and public health officials: "A growing body of evidence"”. ResearchGate (3 August 2020). DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.25042.58569 - https://www.researchgate.net/publica...dy_of_evidence

[7] 2020--Rancourt : “All-cause mortality during COVID-19: No plague and a likely signature of mass homicide by government response”, by Rancourt, DG (2 June 2020)ResearchGate. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.24350.77125 https://www.researchgate.net/publica...nment_response

[8] 2020--Rancourt : D. G. Rancourt, Marine Baudin, Jérémie Mercier. “Evaluation of the virulence of SARS-CoV-2 in France, from all-cause mortality 1946-2020”. ResearchGate(20 August 2020). DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16836.65920/1 - https://www.researchgate.net/publica...lity_1946-2020

[9] 2020--Chaudhry : Chaudhry, Rabail et al. (2020) “A country level analysis measuring the impact of government actions, country preparedness and socioeconomic factors on COVID-19 mortality and related health outcomes”. EClinicalMedicine, Volume 25, 100464 (21 July 2020) -https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30208-X/fulltext
22

[10] 2020--De Larochelambert : De Larochelambert Q, Marc A, Antero J, Le Bourg E and Toussaint J-F (2020). “Covid-19 Mortality: A Matter of Vulnerability Among Nations Facing Limited Margins of Adaptation”. Frontiers in Public Health8:604339. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.604339 (19 November 2020). - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles...20.604339/full

[11] 2020--AIER : “Lockdowns Do Not Control the Coronavirus: The Evidence”. AIER Staff.American Institute for Economic Research. December 19, 2020. -https://www.aier.org/article/lockdowns-do-not-control-the-coronavirus-the-evidence/

[12] 2020--Yam : Kai Chi Yam, Joshua Conrad Jackson, Christopher M. Barnes, Jenson Lau, Xin Qin, Hin Yeung Lee. “The rise of COVID-19 cases is associated with support for world leaders”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Oct 2020, 117 (41) 25429-25433; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2009252117 - https://www.pnas.org/content/117/41/25429.full

[13] 2020--Abbasi : Abbasi, Kamran (executive editor). “Covid-19: politicisation, “corruption,” and suppression of science”. British Medical Journal. BMJ 2020; 371 :m4425. - https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4425

[14] 2020--Gandhi : Monica Gandhi and George W. Rutherford. “Facial Masking for Covid-19 — Potential for “Variolation” as We Await a Vaccine”. October 29, 2020. N Engl J Med2020; 383:e101. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp2026913 -https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2026913

[15] 2020--Rasmussen : Angela L. Rasmussen et al. “Facial Masking for Covid-19”. The New England Journal of Medicine, nejm.org, 19 November 2020. (criticism of Gandhi et al.)

[16] 2020--Brosseau : Lisa M. Brosseau et al. “Facial Masking for Covid-19”. The New England Journal of Medicine, nejm.org, 19 November 2020. (criticism of Gandhi et al.)

[17] 2020--Gandhi : Monica Gandhi and George W. Rutherford. “Facial Masking for Covid-19”. The New England Journal of Medicine, nejm.org, 19 November 2020. (reply of Gandhi et al.)

[18] 2020--IHME : IHME COVID-19 Forecasting Team., Reiner, R.C., Barber, R.M. et al. “Modeling COVID-19 scenarios for the United States”. Nature Medicine(2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-1132-9 - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-1132-9

[19] 2020--Magness : Phillip W. Magness. “Case for mask mandate rests on bad data”. Wall Street Journal (11 November 2020). - https://www.wsj.com/articles/case-fo...ta-11605113310
23

[20] 2020--Corman : Corman Victor M, Landt Olfert, Kaiser Marco, Molenkamp Richard, Meijer Adam, Chu Daniel KW, Bleicker Tobias, Brünink Sebastian, Schneider Julia, Schmidt Marie Luisa, Mulders Daphne GJC, Haagmans Bart L, van der Veer Bas, van den Brink Sharon, Wijsman Lisa, Goderski Gabriel, Romette Jean-Louis, Ellis Joanna, Zambon Maria, Peiris Malik, Goossens Herman, Reusken Chantal, Koopmans Marion PG, Drosten Christian. “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR”. Euro Surveill.2020;25(3)ii=2000045. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045

[21] 2020--Borger : Borger, Pieter et al. "Review report Corman-Drosten et al. Eurosurveillance 2020 - External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results". International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences (ICSLS). 27 November 2020. - https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/

[22] 2020--Singanayagam : Singanayagam Anika, Patel Monika, Charlett Andre, Lopez Bernal Jamie, Saliba Vanessa, Ellis Joanna, Ladhani Shamez, Zambon Maria, Gopal Robin. “Duration of infectiousness and correlation with RT-PCR cycle threshold values in cases of COVID-19, England, January to May 2020”. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(32)ii=2001483.https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.32.2001483

[23] 2020--Jaafar : Jaafar R, Aherfi S, Wurtz N, Grimaldier C, Hoang VT, Colson P, Raoult D, La Scola B. “Correlation between 3790 qPCR positives samples and positive cell cultures including 1941 SARS-CoV-2 isolates”. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Sep 28:ciaa1491. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1491. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32986798; PMCID: PMC7543373. -https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1491/5912603

[24] 2020--Meyerowitz : Eric A. Meyerowitz, Aaron Richterman, Rajesh T. Gandhi, et al. “Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: A Review of Viral, Host, and Environmental Factors”. Ann Intern Med. [Epub ahead of print 17 September 2020]. doi:10.7326/M20-5008 - https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/full/10.7326/M20-5008

[25] 2020--CBC--The Canadian Press : “Health Canada recalls more than 50 hand sanitizers in evolving list”. (5 August 2020). -https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/sanitizer-recall-expands-canada-1.5675182

[26] 2009--WHO : “Natural ventilation for infection control in health-care settings - WHO guidelines 2009”. Editors: James Atkinson, Yves Chartier, Carmen Lúcia Pessoa-Silva, Paul Jensen, Yuguo Li and Wing-Hong Seto, pp 106, 2009, ISBN: 978 92 4 154785 7 - https://www.who.int/water_sanitation...entilation/en/
24

[27] 2007--Li : Li Y, Leung GM, Tang JW, Yang X, Chao CY, Lin JZ, Lu JW, Nielsen PV, Niu J, Qian H, Sleigh AC, Su HJ, Sundell J, Wong TW, Yuen PL. “Role of ventilation in airborne transmission of infectious agents in the built environment - a multidisciplinary systematic review”. Indoor Air. 2007 Feb;17(1):2-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2006.00445.x. PMID: 17257148.

[28] 2020--Letizia : Letizia AG, Ramos I, Obla A, Goforth C, Weir DL, Ge Y, Bamman MM, Dutta J, Ellis E, Estrella L, George MC, Gonzalez-Reiche AS, Graham WD, van de Guchte A, Gutierrez R, Jones F, Kalomoiri A, Lizewski R, Lizewski S, Marayag J, Marjanovic N, Millar EV, Nair VD, Nudelman G, Nunez E, Pike BL, Porter C, Regeimbal J, Rirak S, Santa Ana E, Sealfon RSG, Sebra R, Simons MP, Soares-Schanoski A, Sugiharto V, Termini M, Vangeti S, Williams C, Troyanskaya OG, van Bakel H, Sealfon SC. “SARS-CoV-2 Transmission among Marine Recruits during Quarantine”. N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 17;383(25):2407-2416. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2029717. Epub 2020 Nov 11. PMID: 33176093; PMCID: PMC7675690. (11 November 2020) - https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2029717

[29] 2018--Brown : “ONA wins second arbitration against hospitals on ‘vaccinate or mask’ policy” (13 September 2018), Canadian Lawyer Magazine. - https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/pr...-policy/275455

[30] 2020--Bundgaard : Bundgaard H, Bundgaard JS, Raaschou-Pedersen DET, von Buchwald C, Todsen T, Norsk JB, Pries-Heje MM, Vissing CR, Nielsen PB, Winsløw UC, Fogh K, Hasselbalch R, Kristensen JH, Ringgaard A, Porsborg Andersen M, Goecke NB, Trebbien R, Skovgaard K, Benfield T, Ullum H, Torp-Pedersen C, Iversen K. “Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers : A Randomized Controlled Trial”. Ann Intern Med. 2020 Nov 18:M20-6817. doi: 10.7326/M20-6817. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33205991; PMCID: PMC7707213. - https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817

[31] 2020--Fikenzer : Fikenzer S, Uhe T, Lavall D, Rudolph U, Falz R, Busse M, Hepp P, Laufs U. “Effects of surgical and FFP2/N95 face masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity”. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Dec;109(12):1522-1530. doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01704-y. Epub 2020 Jul 6. PMID: 32632523; PMCID: PMC7338098. -https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00392-020-01704-y

[32] 2020--Borovoy : Boris Borovoy, Colleen Huber, Maria Crisler. “Masks, false safety and real dangers, Part 2: Microbial challenges from masks”. Primary Doctor Medical Journal. November 2020. - https://pdmj.org/
25

[33] 2020--Arvin : Arvin AM, Fink K, Schmid MA, Cathcart A, Spreafico R, Havenar-Daughton C, Lanzavecchia A, Corti D, Virgin HW. “A perspective on potential antibody-dependent enhancement of SARS-CoV-2”. Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7821):353-363. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2538-8. Epub 2020 Jul 13. PMID: 32659783. -https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2538-8[34] 2020--Wehenkel : Wehenkel C. 2020. “Positive association between COVID-19 deaths and influenza vaccination rates in elderly people worldwide”. PeerJ 8:e10112 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10112

[Savannah]

Sorry if this has already been posted

https://endoftheamericandream.com/th...emely-worried/
This Is Why The New Mutant COVID Strain That Is Ravaging South Africa Has Scientists Extremely Worried…
January 4, 2021

Over the past couple of weeks, the new coronavirus strain known as “Super COVID” has been racing through the UK and making headlines all over the globe, but scientists insist that the new mutant COVID strain in South Africa is potentially much more dangerous. Just like “Super COVID” in the UK, there is evidence that the South African strain spreads faster, and South Africa’s health minister has warned that there is “anecdotal evidence” of a “larger proportion of younger patients with no co-morbidities presenting with critical illness”. But the biggest reason why health authorities are so concerned about this particular strain is because it has mutated so dramatically that the current vaccines that have been developed may not work against it. The following comes from a Reuters article entitled “UK scientists worry vaccines may not protect against S.African coronavirus variant”…

UK scientists expressed concern on Monday that COVID-19 vaccines being rolled out in Britain may not be able to protect against a new variant of the coronavirus that emerged in South Africa and has spread internationally.

Both Britain and South Africa have detected new, more transmissible variants of the COVID-19-causing virus in recent weeks that have driven a surge in cases. British Health Secretary Matt Hancock said on Monday he was now very worried about the variant identified in South Africa.

Even though the UK is the epicenter of the “Super COVID” outbreak, the British are so alarmed by the South African strain that they have banned all flights from South Africa. In an interview with the BBC, Hancock admitted that he is “incredibly worried” about what is happening in South Africa right now…
I’m incredibly worried about the South African variant, and that’s why we took the action that we did to restrict all flights from South Africa,” he told the BBC’s “Today” program.

“This is a very, very significant problem … and it’s even more of a problem than the U.K. new variant.”

As the Daily Mail recently explained, the vaccines that have already been developed are designed to get the body to identify COVID’s “spike protein”, and if this does not happen they will not work properly…

Covid vaccines – including the Pfizer/BioNTech and Oxford University/AstraZeneca jabs currently being rolled out across Britain – work by training the body to spot the virus’s spike protein.

If the spike mutates so much that it becomes unrecognizable then it could render vaccines useless or make them less potent.

Scientists are telling us that the new mutant strain in South Africa has a total of eight changes to the spike protein, and Dr. John Bell of Oxford University is calling them “pretty substantial changes”…

Dr. John Bell of Oxford University said Sunday the variant identified in South Africa was worrisome in this regard, however.

“They both have multiple, different mutations in them, so they’re not a single mutation,” he told Times Radio. “And the mutations associated with the South African form are really pretty substantial changes in the structure of the (virus’ spike) protein.”

At this moment, we do not know if the current vaccines will be rendered useless by this new mutant strain or not.

But it is being reported that early tests have shown that at least one of the mutations appears to have made the virus more resistant to antibodies…

One, called E484K, is particularly alarming, Dr Richard Lessells, an infectious-disease specialist at the KwaZulu-Natal Research Innovation and Sequencing Platform, told the Wall Street Journal.

When he and his team tested antibodies from donated plasma or lab made ones against that mutated bit of the virus variant, the immune cells were less effective.

Of course much more testing needs to be done, and those tests are being conducted right now.

According to a top official in the UK, scientists may be able to come to some sort of a conclusion in a couple of weeks…

Jonathan Van-Tam, England’s deputy chief medical officer, said in response to a question from POLITICO on December 30 that this work can take 12 to 14 days, and that it may be a couple of weeks before scientists can give “a solid steer” on whether the vaccines will be effective on new variants.

So it may be a while before we know for sure if the current vaccines will be effective against this frightening new mutant strain in South Africa or not.

But what we do know is that this new strain is rapidly becoming dominant in large portions of South Africa…

The variant, 501.V2, is more infectious than the original COVID-19 virus and has rapidly become dominant in South Africa’s coastal areas. It is expected that the variant will quickly become dominant inland in Johannesburg, the country’s largest city, and the surrounding Gauteng province, he said.

If it is becoming dominant there, there is a good chance that it will become dominant as it spreads elsewhere as well.

In recent days, two cases of the South African strain have been confirmed in the UK, and there have also been cases detected in Finland, Switzerland and Australia.

Then on Monday, a case popped up in Austria…

On Monday, Austria announced that it had discovered one case of the South African mutation in a 30-year-old woman who returned from a trip on Dec. 6.

And officials in Japan just announced that a case has been identified in their country…
So it appears that the cat is already out of the bag.

A whole host of nations have already put travel restrictions in place to try to keep this deadly new strain from spreading more widely.

But so far the U.S. is not among them. In fact, testing is not even required for people traveling to the U.S. from South Africa.

Just like we have seen with “Super COVID”, it is probably just a matter of time before the South African strain spreads all over the planet.

And if the current vaccines will not work against it, that will put scientists back to square one in fighting this pandemic.

Of course there are tens of millions of people in the United States that will never take any COVID vaccine under any circumstances. Many are deeply concerned about the potential long-term effects of these experimental mRNA vaccines, and there is still so much that we do not know about them.

These are such troubled times, and the “perfect storm” that started in 2020 is only going to get worse in 2021. Scientists thought that the new vaccines would give them the upper hand in dealing with this pandemic, but that may not be the case after all.

And as COVID continues to mutate, it is inevitable that there will be even more surprises for our health authorities in the months ahead…

[greybeard]

UK Column News - 6th January 2021

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=2yoqlbn9Ts0

[ExomatrixTV]

• The FDA, WHO & Fauci Finally Admit Something HUGE About COVID-19 & MSM Ignored It!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=tcY71NUi4Sc

[DaveToo]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

• The FDA, WHO & Fauci Finally Admit Something HUGE About COVID-19 & MSM Ignored It!

We learned scholars here at Avalon have known since May of last year that simply adjusting the number of PCR cycles will dramatically alter the number of CV 'cases'.

And it still holds going forward. If there is a need for more or less cases (vis-a-vis the vaccine)
then directives will go out to governments worldwide to adjust their PCR machines.
Brilliant! Just Brilliant!

[meat suit]

this is a paper on a study of around 10m people in Wuhan.
from what I gather, asymptomatic positives are not infectious...

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w

Results
There were 10,652,513 eligible people aged ≥6 years in Wuhan
(94.1% of the total population). The nucleic acid screening was
completed in 19 days (from May 14, 2020 to Jun 1, 2020), and
tested a total of 9,899,828 persons from the 10,652,513 eligible
people (participation rate, 92.9%). Of the 9899,828 participants,
9,865,404 had no previous diagnosis of COVID-19, and 34,424
were recovered COVID-19 patients.
The screening of the 9,865,404 participants without a history of
COVID-19 found no newly confirmed COVID-19 cases, and
identified 300 asymptomatic positive cases with a detection rate of
0.303 (95% CI 0.270–0.339)/10,000. The median age-stratified Ct-
values of the asymptomatic cases were shown in Supplementary
Table 1. Of the 300 asymptomatic positive cases, two cases came
from one family and another two were from another family.
There were no previously confirmed COVID-19 patients in these
two families. A total of 1174 close contacts of the asymptomatic
positive cases were traced, and they all tested negative for the
COVID-19. There were 34,424 previously recovered COVID-19
cases who participated in the screening. Of the 34,424 partici-
pants with a history of COVID-19, 107 tested positive again,
giving a repositive rate of 0.310% (95% CI 0.423–0.574%).
Virus cultures were negative for all asymptomatic positive and
repositive cases, indicating no “viable virus” in positive cases
detected in this study.

[onawah]

Vaxxed v. Unvaxxed: Lawsuit Seeks to Protect Americans From Discrimination Based on Vaccination Status
1/6/21
By Greg Glaser, Esq.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...iscrimination/

(Hyperlinks in the article not embedded here)

"In a federal complaint filed last month in the U.S. District Court of California, constitutional litigators Greg Glaser and Ray Flores presented results of a pilot study showing unvaccinated adults and children are healthier than their vaccinated counterparts.
On George Washington’s birthday, Feb. 22, constitutional litigators Greg Glaser and Ray Flores will be in federal court in Sacramento to request an order immediately protecting all Americans from discrimination based on vaccination status.

Glaser and Flores represent The Control Group, which is a recently completed pilot survey of unvaccinated Americans showing 1,248% better health for unvaccinated adults and 1,099% better health for unvaccinated children.

In the federal complaint filed December 2020 in the U.S. District Court of California — Eastern District, Sacramento, Glaser and Flores state:

“As a matter of national security, this constitutional case is respectfully brought by scientifically focused patriotic Americans, including United States military family members. The American population is currently in the process of being decimated by chronic illness, due to injured and dysfunctional immune systems … The Control Group dataset provides profound proof that vaccine exposure is in fact the primary cause of this nation’s current public health crisis.”

According to Glaser, here is the case in a nutshell:

“America is dying from the current trajectory of chronic illness. Our Control Group pilot survey proved it is the vaccines causing our nation’s demise. And even the government’s own admissions make it clear vaccines are unavoidably unsafe. There is no single agency such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that can be petitioned to heal the whole nation, nor a single law such as SB277 that can be overturned to heal this nation from the current trajectory. That is why Ray Flores and I are requesting comprehensive relief in the form of an executive order preventing discrimination based on vaccination status. If we prevail, then every American will be protected from mandatory vaccination.”



Glaser said he believes this case is the most comprehensive presentation of evidence to date on vaccine harm. For example, Glaser and Flores have 400+ top-level science exhibits offered for judicial notice, which requires the court to accept certain statements made by government officials and other authoritative sources. A key goal of this judicial notice technique is to help shift the legal burden to the state to prove vaccine safety. According to Glaser, because the State has no vaxxed versus unvaxxed study, the state cannot meet its legal burden.

Judicial Notice #1 connects all these chronic illnesses (i.e., digestive disorders, diabetes) to the immune system with the most authoritative citations on the planet.

Judicial Notice #2 shows that vaccines are dangerous and untested — once again all of these are authoritative citations the government cannot dispute.

And Judicial Notice #3 shows how vaccines are made and distributed through communist China.
Glaser said he believes this case is the most comprehensive presentation of evidence to date on vaccine harm. For example, Glaser and Flores have 400+ top-level science exhibits offered for judicial notice, which requires the court to accept certain statements made by government officials and other authoritative sources. A key goal of this judicial notice technique is to help shift the legal burden to the state to prove vaccine safety. According to Glaser, because the State has no vaxxed versus unvaxxed study, the state cannot meet its legal burden."

[DaveToo]

Posted by meat suit (here)
this is a paper on a study of around 10m people in Wuhan.
from what I gather, asymptomatic positives are not infectious...

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w

Results
There were 10,652,513 eligible people aged ≥6 years in Wuhan
(94.1% of the total population). The nucleic acid screening was
completed in 19 days (from May 14, 2020 to Jun 1, 2020),

Yes that has become a now classic CV testing study.

The problem is that it is considered bogus by the western medical establishment
because they didn't use the officially approved Covid PCR test!

[Baby Steps]

The following comments from a UK doctor, it is important to remember that in the current UK peak, our hospitals have become a meat grinder for their own staff. She has said that she fears for the sanity of colleagues, and some may even be a suicide risk.

So far in the UK more than 600 NHS staff have died from the virus.

Imagine you are part of a medical response to a terrorist attack with a few hundred casualties. You start your 13 hour shift already exhausted. All you can do is triage and treat what's in front of you.You have limited resources, your colleagues are doing the same thing, separately from you.

The picture is constantly changing and no one person on the scene has any real handle on the whole situation.

There are no ambulances or facilities to transfer patients to other places for care.

You are very hot and sweating in full PPE. You are not able to drink, eat or pee for the whole shift. Your colleagues are showing signs of severe stress and at best are grumpy and unpleasant, at worst breaking down with no-one to support them.

At the end of your 13 hour shift, you hand over to the next exhausted looking team.

You try to make up for the severe dehydration by downing litres of water to improve your headache. You go home from your shift to hear comments on coronavirus being a hoax, empty hospital conspiracies, money grabbing doctors, and how 'I am not going to stay at home because ts my right to go out, and nobody is going to stop me' .

You get some patchy disturbed sleep, and go back the next day to do it all over again. And repeat for 3 Months. That's what its like.

Health workers are also victims in all this. They continue the struggle because they care about patients and colleagues. What procedures and drugs they use are determined higher up. The only good news I have heard is that this time round, fewer cases are needing ventilation, the virus appears weaker, they are allowed to damp the cytokine storm with steriods, most have access to oxygen and death rates are lower.

The following emerging protocol may help, but there is huge inertia in the medical systems (or worse) when cheap therapeutics are proposed.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=F6A6RFDprIs

[greybeard]

UK Column News - 8th January 2021

Quite a bit about the protest in USA
Chris

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=P6UAGpRGcQM

[Deborah (ahamkara)]

Hospital staffing has been kept at a bare minimum for many years to increase profits. In an effienct system, adequate resources could be shifted to accommodate more Covid patients- so no staff should be working 13 hour shifts. Our local Kaiser hospital is EMPTY, except for Covid patients. Nurses have been transferred in to accommodate added ICU beds. It is not the hell on Earth frequently described by mainstream media with a narrative to enforce. Speaking directly with nurses, they will verify it is very old, the very sick, the obese and the unhealthy dying from this. Young, healthy people are NOT at great risk. The current narrative is twisted to support Big Pharma and an economic reset. There is a virus, but it is NOT the reason we are in lockdown. There is a reason up to 60% are refusing the vaccine.

[One]

FLORIDA DOCTOR'S DEATH AFTER RECEIVING COVID-19 VACCINE SPARKS INVESTIGATION

Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/K1TSJWLFzD1a