+ Reply to Thread
Page 26 of 31 FirstFirst 1 16 26 31 LastLast
Results 501 to 520 of 609

Thread: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

  1. Link to Post #501
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,209
    Thanks
    47,682
    Thanked 116,102 times in 20,640 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    Bombshell interview: the link between EMFs and the current health crisis
    Lloyd Burrell | ElectricSense via aweber.com
    lloyd@electricsense.com
    Feb 18, 2021

    (The audio is still working here: https://electricsenseinterviews101.c...ew-2021-18-02/
    ...for about another 22 hours from the time of this posting. I will ask the Mods if it can be embedded and added to the library.)

    From Bill: here's the audio:


    https://hosting.instantteleseminar.c...165889-001.mp3

    "Today, Thursday 18 February at 12 Noon ET (9 AM PT or 5 PM GMT) I’m interviewing Dr. Beverly Rubik.

    She is the co-author of a new research paper entitled 'Evidence for a Connection Between C*****19 and Exposure to Radiofrequency Radiation from Wireless Telecommunications Including Microwaves and Millimeter Waves'.

    Warning: this interview is more sciencey than my usual interviews but hang on tight it's worth it.

    To connect with this FREE interview go to this page at the designated time: https://electricsenseinterviews101.c...iew-2021-18-02 (there's also a FREE 48-hour replay).

    Listen to my interview with Dr. Beverly Rubik and discover:

    How research shows that carrying your cell phone for just 45 minutes in a backpack (no calling or texting) can cause blood deterioration and stickiness

    How this cell phone-induced blood deterioration can increase your risk of heart attacks and strokes (it’s worse if you use your phone)

    How one of the main symptoms in the current health crisis is also blood deterioration, stickiness (keep reading, the plot thickens)

    How Spanish researchers have found a correlation between 5 g and C19 (note: correlation, not causation)

    How the focus with C19 is on the ‘vy-rus’ and ‘the person’ – little attention is being given to environmental stressors

    How Dr. Beverly’s new research paper (as yet to be accepted by a peer-reviewed journal) reveals an ALARMING link between 5 g and C19

    How too much calcium inside your cells (which wireless exposures are known to create) helps the ‘vy-rus’ to enter your cells

    How Dr. Beverly’s research has identified 5 different ways that wireless exposures and C19 intersect – and the lack of oxygen being observed with C19 patients may be a result of poor blood flow

    How wireless exposures+chemicals (pesticides, herbicides like glyphosate) are a ‘one-two punch’ assault on our bodies, then add in the ‘vy-rus’ can lead to the ‘knock-out’

    How certain frequencies given over the Internet, can counteract the stress response (-ve effects) of wireless

    The EMF meter that Dr. Beverly recommends, which can measure EMFs from wiring but also the lower part of the 5 G spectrum

    How many of us are electron deficient (as demonstrated by blood analysis) – and a simple and quick daily practice which can remedy this

    A wearable device that can offer some protection by boosting the energy field of the body – above all Dr. Beverly recommends a multi-faceted approach

    The safer alternative to 5 G, which is faster and is not a biological hazard
    A powerful supplement that helps the body fight the stress of wireless and also the disease of C19 (backed up by trials)

    To connect with this FREE interview go to this page at the designated time: https://electricsenseinterviews101.c...iew-2021-18-02 (if the page doesn't open just copy/paste this link in your browser).

    You can also listen to the broadcast by telephone so you don't have to spend too much time in front of your computer - details will be on the interview page.

    Lloyd Burrell
    ElectricSense
    Live a naturally healthy life in our electromagnetic world!"
    (You can still listen to the broadcast for 22 more hours from the time of this posting here:
    https://electricsenseinterviews101.c...ew-2021-18-02/
    )


    To read Dr. Beverly Rubik’s study in full click here: https://osf.io/9p8qu/

    To make a DONATION to Dr Beverly’s non-profit lab click here: https://frontiersciences.org/contact-us.html (Dr Beverly really does need funding to carry on this important work. If everyone that came to this page made a donation of just a few dollars even, this would make a tremendous difference.)

    For more information on Dr. Beverly click here: https://www.brubik.com/ "

    Also posted here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1412129
    Last edited by Bill Ryan; 19th February 2021 at 20:22. Reason: added the audio link
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (3rd April 2021), fifi (20th February 2021), gnostic9 (3rd April 2021), Reinhard (27th February 2021), Tintin (27th February 2021)

  3. Link to Post #502
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,209
    Thanks
    47,682
    Thanked 116,102 times in 20,640 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    Vaccines Revealed Covid Edition Bonus re Homeopathy free online for 2 days
    from support@vrevealed.com
    2/26/21

    "Cilla Whatcot is stepping up to the plate to share some brilliant solutions for maximizing immunity and what you can do to protect yourself and your family during the current health scare.

    Her experience in homeopathic remedies and preventive solutions is broad and long-standing.

    If you don’t know what homeopathy is, or if you don’t think it works. This is a must watch!


    She reveals startling data and strategies that some countries have implemented with STUNNING success.


    What are they and how can they benefit you? Cilla will share it all.


    IT’S FREE TO WATCH HERE: https://vrevealed.com/covid/viewing/

    With Purpose,
    Dr. Patrick Gentempo"

    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    Vaccines Revealed COVID Edition--Del Bigtree bonus today
    There are still 2 &1/2 hours left today in which you can watch the bonus interview with Del Bigtree
    Or the regular programming for today, with Dr. Brian Hooker or Tom O'Bryan D.C.
    https://vrevealed.com/covid/viewing/
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  4. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (3rd April 2021), fifi (27th February 2021), gnostic9 (3rd April 2021), meat suit (27th February 2021), Reinhard (27th February 2021)

  5. Link to Post #503
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Location
    Project Avalon library
    Language
    English
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,449
    Thanks
    64,679
    Thanked 46,636 times in 5,417 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    Bombshell interview: the link between EMFs and the current health crisis
    Lloyd Burrell | ElectricSense via aweber.com

    ...for about another 22 hours from the time of this posting. I will ask the Mods if it can be embedded and added to the library.)

    From Bill: here's the audio:

    https://hosting.instantteleseminar.c...165889-001.mp3
    For those of you interested the study blueprint (Rubik and Brown) is available to download from here: https://osf.io/9p8qu/

    Here's the interview video:


    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/sV9Gs8WUbaOm/


    Also downloadable from here: https://seed167.bitchute.com/SqrmDey...9Gs8WUbaOm.mp4
    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  6. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (3rd April 2021), gnostic9 (3rd April 2021), meat suit (27th February 2021), onawah (27th February 2021), Reinhard (27th February 2021)

  7. Link to Post #504
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Location
    Project Avalon library
    Language
    English
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,449
    Thanks
    64,679
    Thanked 46,636 times in 5,417 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    "Given our most basic understanding of how viruses spread from one person to another, any measures that suppress the transmission of viruses should inevitably lead to a reduction in associated mortality. But given that we have never actually investigated this correlation in a real-world setting, perhaps assumptions based on our “most basic understanding” are not sufficient. No matter how certain we are of the outcome, good science is about asking questions. If the answers contradict your assumptions then those answers should bring about a shift in your understanding."


    Source: The Critic

    Given that we must never assume that a variant is conflated to more lethal as with respiratory viruses quite the opposite tends to be the case: viral lethality is often weakened as the virus struggles to remain effective as the environment (and/or host) starts to destabilise it. In the gene sequence it is NOT a given that each change is of necessary grave concern.

    That said the article here does at least flirt with what would make good sense: by not exposing people to the omnipresent virus and bacteria laden environment in which we have been designed to cope and adapted so well to should inevitably make us more vulnerable to new 'strains' of anything; lockdowns are the very antithesis of good health practice may be but one takeaway here.

    ________________

    Mutant variations and the danger of lockdowns
    Have non-pharmaceutical interventions, including lockdowns and social distancing, enabled more dangerous virus variants to thrive?



    By Jemma Moran
    2 March, 2021


    t the beginning of 2020 we embarked upon a nationwide epidemiological experiment in an attempt to reduce the mortality burden of the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus. The premise of the experiment, though never formally defined, was to trial the efficacy of non-pharmaceutical interventions with respect to the infection rate and subsequent death toll of an airborne respiratory virus.

    The hypothesis was treated as a foregone conclusion and presented with little doubt. A significant reduction in person-to-person interactions within a population will lead to a decreased infection rate and reduce the number of deaths associated with the virus. The scientific community were so confident in this hypothesis that they did not present it as a hypothesis at all. The experiment was not defined as an experiment. The resulting data was subsequently ignored.

    It’s easy to see why. Given our most basic understanding of how viruses spread from one person to another, any measures that suppress the transmission of viruses should inevitably lead to a reduction in associated mortality. But given that we have never actually investigated this correlation in a real-world setting, perhaps assumptions based on our “most basic understanding” are not sufficient. No matter how certain we are of the outcome, good science is about asking questions. If the answers contradict your assumptions then those answers should bring about a shift in your understanding.

    One year into the great experiment, we have a wealth of global data to inform our conclusions. This data largely contradicts the confident hypothesis with which we embarked upon this journey and has therefore been ignored. Scientists and politicians have clutched at straws, manipulated data or simply ignored the evidence in an attempt to safeguard the integrity of the original idea.

    But the evidence is clear. The United Kingdom has implemented strict lockdown measures throughout the crisis, intermittently closing down the hospitality industry, mandating face coverings, enforcing social distancing and banning households from mixing. Our friends in Sweden had a much softer lockdown, only closing schools and colleges for older children, never mandating face coverings and keeping pubs and restaurants open throughout. Both the UK and Sweden have lived with SARS-CoV-2 for almost a year with very different results. The logic of our hypothesis dictates that Sweden should have seen a much higher number of coronavirus-related deaths (relative to their population) than the UK. The reality is that Sweden’s death rate is considerably lower.

    This information alone is not enough to refute our hypothesis. We are only comparing two countries after all, and there are many other variables at play such as population density, climate and demography. Simply comparing data from two countries with two very different approaches to the situation is not enough to provide an answer. But it should be enough to warrant more questions.

    Is there a correlation between the stringency of non-pharmaceutical interventions and the mortality burden of SARS-CoV-2? Perhaps the best source of data for this is the USA, where different states implemented different measures.



    There are some caveats to this data. First, New Jersey, with the most “Covid deaths per million”, has the highest population density of all the states. Alaska has the lowest. The simple fact that the red lines on this graph do not cluster on the right extremity does not disprove the efficacy of lockdowns. Furthermore, there is no statistical difference between the lockdown average and non-lockdown average in this data, so no-one could claim that lockdowns lead to more Covid deaths based on this evidence alone.

    South Dakota, with a very low population density, appears to buck the expected trend. Is this because of the lack of lockdown? Possibly. But Florida, with a very high population density (eighth in the country) appears much lower than it should, despite the lack of lockdown. Nebraska and Wyoming are both higher on this list than they should be, while Utah is a bit lower. Georgia and South Carolina are a little lower than we would expect, while Iowa and North Dakota are significantly higher. If we introduce climate as a factor, taking average temperatures into account, then we would expect to see North Dakota somewhere near the top, while New Jersey should be much lower down. There are many variables at play but the data should be sufficient to call the efficacy of lockdowns into question – especially given the high cost of such measures.

    The reason we are so reluctant to accept that lockdowns and indeed other non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) have little to no impact on the mortality burden of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is that it’s difficult to find an explanation for it. However, rather than denying the evidence in the absence of an explanation, the evidence should drive us to reconsider what we know and apply our knowledge in a different way.

    One possible explanation for the ineffectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions lies in our understanding of evolution. We all understand that humans evolved to become more intelligent over millions of years, but this did not happen by design. Humans that were born with larger brains owing to a random, spontaneous, genetic mutation had an advantage over those with smaller brains and were therefore more likely to survive and reproduce. The more intelligent “strain” of humans dominated and displaced the competition. But a species only evolves in this way when it is put under pressure. Without environmental challenges to overcome there would have been no fight for survival and the more intelligent “strains” of human beings would have had no advantage. In other words, if living on earth was easy we would still be apes.

    In the microscopic world, genetic mutations are more common and therefore evolution happens at an accelerated rate. This is why doctors are reluctant to prescribe antibiotics since overuse of this intervention could lead to the evolution of superbugs.

    Some people find this idea hard to grasp. Why and how are bacteria able to mutate in order to overcome threats to their existence? After all, they are not sentient. They do not understand their environment or “decide” to fight back. But in reality it is not the introduction of antibiotics that stimulates the mutation of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. These mutations are happening anyway, spontaneously, randomly. New bacterial variants are emerging all the time and some of them happen to be resistant to antibiotics. This would still be the case if antibiotics didn’t exist.

    In a world without antibiotics, the antibiotic-resistant mutations do not have any advantage over other bacterial variants. They are a flash in the pan. Brief and rare. But when you introduce antibiotics into the mix, you confer an advantage on the antibiotic-resistant bacteria, allowing them to thrive, multiply, dominate and displace. This is why we have to be very careful with antibiotics and consider when it is appropriate and necessary to use them. Antibiotics save many lives, but if used irresponsibly over a long period of time they could wipe out a species.

    Imagine if we were to administer antibiotics to every single member of society once a month to pre-empt any possible infections. It’s likely we would see a sharp reduction in bacteria-related mortality, such as bacterial pneumonia, but only in the short term. Infectious bacteria would quickly evolve into antibiotic-resistant superbugs, rendering our preventative interventions redundant and threatening the safety of everyone on earth.

    Viruses and bacteria are not so very different. Just like bacteria, viruses mutate spontaneously and randomly, giving rise to thousands of different variants or mutations of the same virus. Most of these mutations make no difference to how the virus interacts with our immune system and confers no real advantage on the variant in question. However, some mutations may change the nature of the virus itself in the following key areas:
    - Virulence: how likely the virus is to make us seriously ill, leading to an increased risk of hospitalisation and death;
    - Transmissibility: how easily the virus is passed from one infected individual to another;
    - Detectability: how easily the virus can be detected by certain methods of testing.
    At present, there are over 4000 known variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Some of these viruses will be less virulent than the original; others will be more virulent. Some will be more transmissible than the original; others will be less transmissible. Some will be more easily detected with PCR testing; others will be less easily detected.

    All of these factors confer advantages and disadvantages on the variants in question, but the extent of these advantages is dependent on the pressures of the environment in which they exist. Non-pharmaceutical interventions have, for the first time, dramatically altered the context of that environment.

    In any species, a mutation that leads to increased strength or intelligence is likely to be advantageous and will therefore dominate the competition and become more prevalent. In a hostile environment, the advantage of these mutations is exaggerated and the prevalence of advantageous genetic variants increases even more. This is how organisms evolve to deal with threats.

    A more transmissible variant of a virus has a clear advantage over a less transmissible variant; but if we put pressure on the virus, we confer an even greater advantage on those more contagious variants.

    Imagine two countries at war with one another. One has missiles with a range of 4000 miles, while the other has missiles with a range of 3500 miles. If the countries are only 3000 miles apart neither country has an advantage in the fight. Even though one set of missiles has a longer range, they are no more likely to find their target. Now apply this logic to two variations of a virus, one of which is more transmissible than the other. In an environment with regular close-contact between people as they gather in crowds, the more transmissible variant does not have such a distinct advantage over the others and is less likely to dominate and displace the less-transmissible variant. The less transmissible variant is still finding its target, infecting that person, making them sick and leaving them (in the vast majority of cases) with natural immunity, leaving the more transmissible variant with fewer targets to choose from.

    In a world of social distancing, stay-at-home orders, face coverings and a ban on mass gatherings, we are no-doubt suppressing the virus. But we are conferring a greater advantage on the more transmissible variants of that virus. Effectively we are moving our two warring countries further apart so that only the longer-range missiles are able to find their targets. Suddenly it is clearer which of these countries will win the war. The more-transmissible viral variants will dominate and displace the less transmissible variants at an accelerated rate. In this way, it is possible that our efforts to suppress the virus are hastening the evolution of NPI-resistant variants, much like the use of antibiotics hastens the evolution of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

    In the same way, some random, spontaneous mutations of the SARS-CoV-2 virus will be harder to detect with PCR testing due to differences in their spike protein, for example. If we rely on testing and tracing as a way of controlling the virus, then the less detectable variants will have an advantage over those we can identify, and they will become more prevalent.

    Now to the most important aspect – virulence. In the context of normal human behaviour, variations that have mutated to become more virulent are at a distinct disadvantage. This is because, prior to 2020, we only stayed at home if we were too sick to go out. If we had a bit of a sore throat and a runny nose, we would still go to work. We would still go to school. We would still attend sports events, theatre, cinema, clubs, rock concerts, parties, festivals, protests and religious services. This meant that the more virulent strains, which were more likely to make people very ill, had a naturally occurring disadvantage compared with less virulent strains. This is why viruses usually evolve to become less deadly over time. The less virulent variants tend to dominate because we spread them more, infecting more people and conferring natural immunity before those people come into contact with a rarer, more virulent variant.

    Non-pharmaceutical interventions have essentially levelled the playing field. If everyone is staying at home, regardless of how unwell they might feel, then the less virulent variants lose their advantage. Moreover, it could be argued that we are not levelling the playing field at all, but rather tipping the scales in favour of the more virulent variants. After all, while those with mild symptoms are confined to their homes, those with severe symptoms are forced to leave their homes and transition to a crowded environment full of vulnerable people. Hospital.

    There is already some evidence emerging to support this theory. The Kent variant is reported to be more transmissible and more deadly, while the South Africa variant is more likely to make people severely ill. Is it a coincidence that the prevalence of these variants emerged in countries with very strict measures in place throughout the pandemic? Is it a coincidence that the Kent variant dominated following a period of regional and national UK lockdowns? If lockdowns are the key to stopping these dangerous mutations, then where is the Swedish variant? Where is the India variant?

    The recent USA variant has been branded “the devil”, since it is thought to be more contagious and more likely to make people severely ill. But did this variant become prevalent in Florida or South Dakota where measures are more relaxed? No. It emerged in California following a sustained period of stay-at-home orders and business closures.

    Could these subtle evolutionary mechanisms be the answer to the mystery of lockdowns? While we are reducing the spread of the virus, we are simultaneously encouraging the virus to become more virulent and more transmissible, thus negating any positive effect on the overall mortality burden and diminishing the returns of our interventions? Meanwhile, these interventions are destroying livelihoods, demolishing our culture, threatening our democracy and, by the government’s own admission, putting thousands of lives in danger.

    There are still a great many unsolved mysteries in virology. This global experiment is shedding light on some of those mysteries and we have a collective responsibility to take heed of the evidence.

    We cannot allow NPIs to become the “new normal”. This may be the equivalent of the widespread pre-emptive administration of antibiotics to healthy individuals. Evidence suggests that our old way of life was keeping us safe, protecting the NHS and saving lives, while our new way of life is in danger of ushering in a new era of deadly viral mutations that we cannot hope to control or treat. As in many areas of science, we are attempting to cheat death by manipulating nature (in this case, our own nature) and nature will eventually fight back. If we continue to play God, while ignoring the evidence and data, we may live to regret it.

    Jemma Moran is Head of Communications for the Health Advisory and Recovery Team (HART), an independent group of doctors and academic experts who are working to widen the debate on Covid-19 policy.
    Last edited by Tintin; 3rd March 2021 at 15:22.
    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  8. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    avid (3rd March 2021), Bill Ryan (3rd April 2021), ClearWater (9th March 2021), gnostic9 (3rd April 2021), Journeyman (3rd March 2021), Mark (12th April 2021), Reinhard (3rd April 2021)

  9. Link to Post #505
    Canada Avalon Member kfm27917's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th June 2019
    Location
    Garymede
    Language
    German
    Posts
    712
    Thanks
    14,556
    Thanked 5,414 times in 685 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    Our vaccine programme is world-beating and Covid-19 cases are plummeting, so why does the Deputy Chief Medical Officer keep sparking fear?

    (from the UK)

    Another week, another Covid variant on the loose. Watch out! I refer, of course, to the deeply worrying Whitehall variant.

    The Whitehall variant is rapidly transmitted by scientific advisers whenever there is encouraging news. The better the news, the more aggressive the variant.

    more at
    https://www.sott.net/article/449543-...re-an-own-goal

  10. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to kfm27917 For This Post:

    avid (3rd March 2021), Bill Ryan (3rd April 2021), gnostic9 (3rd April 2021), Journeyman (3rd March 2021), Reinhard (3rd April 2021), Tintin (3rd March 2021), wondering (3rd March 2021)

  11. Link to Post #506
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    16th September 2018
    Posts
    1,790
    Thanks
    5,347
    Thanked 10,971 times in 1,706 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    Quote Posted by kfm27917 (here)
    Our vaccine programme is world-beating and Covid-19 cases are plummeting, so why does the Deputy Chief Medical Officer keep sparking fear?

    (from the UK)

    Another week, another Covid variant on the loose. Watch out! I refer, of course, to the deeply worrying Whitehall variant.

    The Whitehall variant is rapidly transmitted by scientific advisers whenever there is encouraging news. The better the news, the more aggressive the variant.

    more at
    https://www.sott.net/article/449543-...re-an-own-goal
    As I've mentioned in several posts already, we know their game plan.

    If you study the charts from hundreds of countries, you see that most are showing a steady decline in CV cases and deaths.
    But this was the case last summer before the (cough) second wave.

    This is a remarkably robust 'virus'.

    Expect to see third, fourth, fifth and six waves in the coming months.
    Between tweaking the PCR test knobs and ever-changing variant viruses the pandemic
    could continue indefinitely.

    The pandemic will end when they want it to end, not before.

  12. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to DaveToo For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (3rd April 2021), gnostic9 (3rd April 2021), Patient (7th April 2021), Reinhard (3rd April 2021), Watching from Cyprus (5th April 2021)

  13. Link to Post #507
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,352
    Thanks
    39,704
    Thanked 33,467 times in 4,332 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    Vaccines - The Second Oldest Profession

    henrymakow.com
    March 9, 2021

    In 1988, Eustace Mullins blew the whistle on the vaccine scam. Order the book here.

    Not only do drugmakers make huge profits from vaccines, but they continue to profit from the illnesses vaccines cause.

    If vaccines weren't harmful to health, why would pharmaceutical companies be
    exempt from liability?

    This goose has been laying a golden egg for more than a century, at an indescribable toll in human suffering. Now they want to make vaccinations - not one but regular shots - a condition for participation in society and freedom. And the new vaccines may trigger a fatal over-response on exposure to a virus.
    "The practice of medicine may not be the world's oldest profession, but it is often seen to be operating on much the same principles."
    Eustace Mullins
    Updated from Nov 12, 2020
    Excerpts from Murder by Injection (1988)
    by Eustace Mullins
    (henrymakow.com)

    Despite the great power of the hidden rulers, I found that only one group has the power to issue life or death sentences to any American -- our nation's physicians.

    I discovered that these physicians, despite their great power, were themselves subjected to very strict controls over every aspect of their professional lives. These controls, surprisingly enough, were not wielded by any state or federal agency, although almost every other aspect of American life is now under the absolute control of the bureaucracy. The physicians have their own autocracy, a private trade association, the American Medical Association. This group, which is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, had gradually built up its power until it assumed total control over medical schools and the accreditation of physicians.

    ----------------

    From its earliest inception [in 1847], the American Medical Association has had one principal objective, attaining and defending a total monopoly of the practice of medicine in the United States. From its outset, the AMA made allopathy the basis of its practice. Allopathy was a type of medicine whose practitioners had received training in a recognized academic school of medicine, and who relied heavily on surgical procedures and the use of medications.

    --


    (Eustace Mullins 1923-2010)

    The practice of immunization goes directly against the discovery of modern holistic medical experts that the body has a natural immune defense against illness. The Church of Modern Medicine claims that we can only be absolved from the peril of infection by the Holy Water of vaccination, injecting into the system a foreign body of infection, which will then perform a Medical Miracle, and will confer life-long immunity, hence the term, "immunization."

    The greatest heresy any physician can commit is to voice publicly any doubt of any one of the Four Holy Waters, but the most deeply entrenched in modern medical practice is undoubtedly the numerous vaccination programs. They are also the most consistently profitable operations of the Medical Monopoly. Yet one physician, Dr. Henry R. Bybee, of Norfolk, Virginia, has publicly stated, "My honest opinion is that vaccine is the cause of more disease and suffering than anything I could name. I believe that such diseases as cancer, syphilis, cold sores and many other disease conditions are the direct results of vaccination. Yet, in the state of Virginia, and in many other states, parents are compelled to submit their children to this procedure while the medical profession not only receives its pay for this service, but also makes splendid and prospective patients for the future." (p.79) --

    Another practitioner, Dr. W. B. Clarke of Indiana finds that "Cancer was practically unknown until compulsory vaccination with cowpox vaccine began to be introduced. I have had to deal with a least two hundred cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person." (p.81)

    --

    Another well-known medical practitioner, Dr. J. M. Peebles of San Francisco, has written a book on vaccine, in which he says,
    "The vaccination practice, pushed to the front on all occasions by the medical profession through political connivance made compulsory by the state, has not only become the chief menace and the greatest danger to the health of the rising generation, but likewise the crowning outrage upon the personal liberties of the American citizen; compulsory vaccination, poisoning the crimson currents of the human system with brute-extracted lymph under the strange infatuation that it would prevent smallpox, was one of the darkest blots that disfigured the last century."
    Dr. Peebles refers to the fact that the cowpox vaccine was one of the more peculiar "inventions or discoveries of the Age of Enlightenment." However, as I have pointed out in "The Curse of Canaan," the Age of Enlightenment was merely the latest program of the Cult of Baal and its rituals of child sacrifice, which, in one guise or another, has now been with us for some five thousand years. Because of this goal, the Medical Monopoly is also known as "The Society for Crippling Children." (p.81-82)

    -----


    (COVID scam perpetrated by the medical profession)

    However, the peril of even one state legislature foiling their criminal conspiracy caused the Rockefeller Syndicate to concentrate on perfecting an instrument for controlling each and every state legislature in these United States. This was achieved by setting up the Council of State Governments in Chicago. Its ukases are routinely issued to every state legislator, and such is its totalitarian control that not one legislature has ever failed to follow its dictates.

    Edward Jenner (1796-1839) "discovered" that cowpox vaccine would supposedly inoculate persons against the eighteenth-century scourge of smallpox. In fact, smallpox was already on the wane, and some authorities believe it would have vanished by the end of the century, due to a number of contributing factors.

    After the use of the cowpox vaccine became widespread in England, a smallpox epidemic broke out which killed 22,081 people. The smallpox epidemics became worse each year that the vaccine was used. In 1872, 44,480 people were killed by it.

    England finally banned the vaccine in 1948, despite the fact that it was one of the most widely heralded "contributions" which that country had made to modern medicine. This action came after many years of compulsory vaccination, during which period those who refused to submit to its dangers were hurried off to jail. (p. 83) ----Polio has increased 700% in states which have compulsory vaccination. The much-quoted writer on medical problems, Morris Beale, who for years edited his informative publication, Capsule News Digest, from Capitol Hill, offered a standing reward during the years from 1954 to 1960 of $30,000, which he would pay to anyone who could prove that the polio vaccine was not a killer and a fraud. There were no takers.



    Medical historians have finally come to the reluctant conclusion that the great flu "epidemic" of 1918 was solely attributable to the widespread use of vaccines. It was the first war in which vaccination was compulsory for all servicemen. The Boston Herald reported that forty-seven soldiers had been killed by vaccination in one month. As a result, the military hospitals were filled, not with wounded combat casualties, but with casualties of the vaccine. The epidemic was called "the Spanish Influenza," a deliberately misleading appellation, which was intended to conceal its origin. This flu epidemic claimed twenty million victims; those who survived it were the ones who had refused the vaccine. In recent years, annual recurring epidemics of flu are called "the Russian Flu." For some reason, the Russians never protest, perhaps because the Rockefellers make regular trips to Moscow to lay down the party line.

    The perils of vaccination were already known. Plain Talk magazine notes that "during the Franco-Prussian War, every German soldier was vaccinated. The result was that 53,288 otherwise healthy men developed smallpox. The death rate was high."

    In what is now known as "the Great Swine Flu Massacre," the President of the United States, Gerald Ford, was enlisted to persuade the public to undergo a national vaccination campaign. The moving force behind the scheme was a $135 million windfall profit for the major drug manufacturers. They had a "swine flu" vaccine which suspicious pig raisers had refused to touch, fearful it might wipe out their crop. The manufacturers had only tried to get $80 million from the swine breeders; balked in this sale, they turned to the other market, humans.

    The impetus for the national swine flu vaccine came directly from the Disease Control Center in Atlanta, Georgia. Perhaps coincidentally, Jimmy Carter, a member of the Trilateral Commission, was then planning his presidential campaign in Georgia. The incumbent President, Gerald Ford, had all the advantages of a massive bureaucracy to aid him in his election campaign, while the ineffectual and little known Jimmy Carter offered no serious threat in the election.


    (In your face)

    Suddenly, out of Atlanta, came the Center of Disease Control plan for a national immunization campaign against "swine flu." The fact that there was not a single known case of this flu in the United States did not deter the Medical Monopoly from their scheme. The swine breeders had been shocked by the demonstrations of the vaccine on a few pigs, which had collapsed and died. One can imagine the anxious conferences in the headquarters of the great drug firms, until one bright young man remarked, "Well if the swine breeders won't inject it into their animals, our only other market is to inject it into people."

    The Ford sponsored swine flu campaign almost died an early death, when a conscientious public servant, Dr. Anthony Morris, formerly of HEW and then active as director of the Virus Bureau at the Food and Ding Administration, declared that there could be no authentic swine flu vaccine, because there had never been any cases of swine flu on which they could test it. Dr. Morris then went public with his statement that "at no point were the swine flu vaccines effective." He was promptly fired, but the damage had been done. (84-85)

  14. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (9th March 2021), ClearWater (9th March 2021), fifi (10th March 2021), gnostic9 (3rd April 2021), Icare (12th April 2021), Journeyman (9th March 2021), justntime2learn (14th March 2021), Matthew (10th March 2021), Reinhard (14th March 2021), Tintin (14th March 2021), Watching from Cyprus (5th April 2021), wondering (14th March 2021)

  15. Link to Post #508
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Location
    Project Avalon library
    Language
    English
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,449
    Thanks
    64,679
    Thanked 46,636 times in 5,417 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    "In conclusion, using this methodology and current data, in ~ 98% of the comparisons using 87 different regions of the world we found no evidence that the number of deaths/million is reduced by staying at home. Regional differences in treatment methods and the natural course of the virus may also be major factors in this pandemic, and further studies are necessary to better understand it."
    ______________________

    Stay‑at‑home policy is a case of exception fallacy: an internet‑based ecological study
    R. F. Savaris,, G. Pumi, J. Dalzochio3 & R. Kunst

    Nature Magazine Open Scientific Reports

    Last edited by Tintin; 15th March 2021 at 22:05.
    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  16. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (3rd April 2021), gnostic9 (3rd April 2021), Icare (12th April 2021), justntime2learn (14th March 2021), Sue (Ayt) (14th March 2021), Watching from Cyprus (5th April 2021), wondering (14th March 2021)

  17. Link to Post #509
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Location
    Project Avalon library
    Language
    English
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,449
    Thanks
    64,679
    Thanked 46,636 times in 5,417 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    "Positive PCR is not evidence of infectiousness. Finding people who test positive but show no symptoms during an outbreak is often evidence of immunity, not evidence of transmission. Unfortunately, this has been largely overlooked in the current set of assumptions driving policy."

    ____________________

    Many of us at the outset of this whole episode found much to be wary of regarding claims of "asymptomatic spread" and rightly so. It's oxymoronic in its presentation.

    It, I would argue, also makes a total fallacy of the idea that facemasks serve any really useful purpose outside of a controlled healthcare setting which is just about the only environment in which they should ever be worn, and their use limited even there. Anybody advising otherwise is not to be wholly trusted, even if it "sort of makes sense".

    And after 18 months of in-depth study (also the typical active life-cycle span of a respiratory virus' virility) and greater understanding of SARS-CoV-2 it now seems finally to have been acknowledged publicly that the notion of 'asymptomatic spread' was wrong. Whither 'R' numbers too?

    Dr. John Lee, retired Professor of Pathology, here lays out a very good and easy to understand rescuing of medical health science from the jaws of the mendacious actors who have - and continue to - perpetuate pseudoscience to their gullible audiences, with very different aims in mind.

    This article, particularly, helps to clarify the issue well.

    ___________________

    Asymptomatic spread: who can really spread COVID-19?
    By Dr John Lee
    retired Professor of Pathology

    March 27th, 2021

    Source: https://www.hartgroup.org/wp-content...TIC-SPREAD.pdf

    A respiratory virus needs associated symptoms in order to be clinically relevant.

    One year ago, this belief would have been universally accepted by the wider medical community.


    The Health Secretary, addressing the nation on television on 20 December 2020 stated that ‘If you act like you have the virus, then that will stop it from spreading to others.’ This messaging is clear in the many adverts and public health announcements currently circulating.

    The response to COVID-19 has been predicated on the assumption that asymptomatic PCR positive individuals can spread disease. This assumption was simply accepted as fact and, thus far, has never been adequately demonstrated in the available scientific evidence.

    This single assumption is driving most of the restrictions. It is being repeated on radio and other advertisements and is causing the populace great fear and distress. It cannot be left unscrutinised any longer. If there are flaws in PCR testing regimes that have perpetuated this idea, we must now bring them to light.

    The proportion of people who test positive but have no symptoms ranges from 4%1 to 76%.2 This is, in large part, a function of how testing has been carried out. If ‘asymptomatic COVID-19’ was a type of presentation of a disease, like a cough, then you would expect it to occur in the same percentage of the patients no matter where or when you measured it. The large range here demonstrates that it is not measuring a phenomenon related to the disease itself.

    These are the three situations where someone can be ‘PCR positive’ but asymptomatic:
    Pre-symptomatic – people who are in the incubation period of real disease and who go on shortly to develop symptomatic illness. For one to two days these people can transmit the virus to others and account for a maximum of 7% of spread.3

    False Positive test results – people who test positive but are not really infected, the rate of which is unknown, but is estimated to be between 0.8% and 4% of all tests carried out.4 The number increases as Ct cycles are increased. Anything above 25 Ct is now considered ‘uninfectious’. When carrying out hundreds of thousands of tests, and including results up to Ct 30 as is the case in the Government surveys, we are going to inevitably have an enormous amount of false positives. A respiratory virus needs associated symptoms in order to be clinically relevant. One year ago, this belief would have been universally accepted by the wider medical community.

    Immunity – people who have the virus ‘on board’ (detectable) but never develop symptoms. This category used to be referred to as “immunity” or “healthy people”. This occurs where, even if a virus is inhaled and present in the respiratory tract, the person is oblivious and remains completely well, as their immune system deals with the infection and they never develop symptoms. The evidence these individuals are a transmission risk is minimal.
    Positive PCR is not evidence of infectiousness. Finding people who test positive but show no symptoms during an outbreak is often evidence of immunity, not evidence of transmission. Unfortunately, this has been largely overlooked in the current set of assumptions driving policy.

    Evidence of transmission requires that an individual can be shown to be the source of infection for another person who then developed symptoms of a disease/illness.

    Infectiousness or transmission of a virus requires active infection resulting in high levels of viral replication and shedding. Symptoms, such as coughing, are the real drivers of spread.

    When the viral replication process is blocked by a healthy immune system, the virus is neutralised, preventing significant viral replication and shedding. This happens in approximately half the people exposed to the virus. Their immune system’s defences effectively ward off COVID-19 before it can take hold and cause symptomatic disease. It stops it dead in its tracks.

    A review of all the published meta-analyses on asymptomatic transmission reveals that the same few studies have been recycled repeatedly by respectable institutions.5 On deeper inspection of the published studies we find that the evidence is of very poor quality. Robust evidence of asymptomatic spread is lacking and runs counter to all previous understanding of how respiratory viruses transmit.

    The case studies cited as evidence of asymptomatic transmission amount to just 6 individuals who were alleged to have spread COVID-19 to 7 other people. The studies outlined below are the totality of the worldwide evidence for asymptomatic spread.

    ● Two of these case studies, originating from China, may well have been one patient,6 with the story repeated in separate publications.7 This was a situation where neither person involved in transmission had any symptoms. It therefore fails as evidence of disease spread, which requires the presence of symptoms.


    ● Two further cases of possible asymptomatic transmission were from Vo in Italy,8 where the whole town was tested. 1% of the tests were positive in the absence of symptoms. The Government’s own estimates for the percentage of tests that give a false positive result is between 0.8-4.0%9 and as this was a new test, a rate of 1% would have been very respectable. The alleged result of transmission was again claimed to cause ‘cases’ with no symptoms. These were likely false positive PCR test results, and assuming chains of transmission based on the degree of positivity of a test result is bad science.


    ● The final two examples were both from studies in Brunei.10 The evidence is weakened by a poor case definition (any symptom of any severity was considered real symptomatic COVID-19) and a high probability of false positive results. The first case was a father who remained asymptomatic but whose wife briefly had a runny nose and whose baby had a mild cough for one day. In the second case, a 13 yr old girl with no symptoms was alleged to have spread COVID-19 to a middle aged woman who had “a mild cough on one day”.11

    It is therefore arguable that the asymptomatic diagnoses last spring were all due to false positive test results. No testing system is perfect.

    Failure to acknowledge this and misinterpretation of positive results in patients with no symptoms has been hugely damaging.

    It would not be unreasonable to state that the current extreme interventions are entirely based on the assumption of asymptomatic spread of disease, because otherwise simply requiring the symptomatic and their contacts to isolate would be sufficient.

    Given that asymptomatic spread assumptions drive all of the other non-clinical interventions (mass-testing of healthy people, mandatory wearing of masks, social distancing and lockdowns), the evidence here must urgently be re-evaluated by policymakers.

    Endnotes
    1. Follow-up of asymptomatic patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection
    2. Three Quarters of People with SARS-CoV-2 Infection are Asymptomatic: Analysis of English Household
    Survey Data

    3. Presymptomatic Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 — Singapore, January 23–March 16, 2020
    4. Impact of false-positives and false-negative s in the UK’s COVID-19 RT-PCR testing programme
    5. Covid: The woeful case for asymptomatic transmission
    6. Secondary Transmission of Coronavirus Disease from Presymptomatic Persons, China
    7. Modes of contact and risk of transmission in COVID-19 among close contacts
    8. Suppression of a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in the Italian municipality of Vo
    9. Impact of false-positives and false-negative s in the UK’s COVID-19 RT-PCR testing programme
    10. Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Transmission in Different Settings, Brunei
    11. Asymptomatic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and implications for mass gatherings

    --------------------------

    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  18. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    avid (7th April 2021), Bill Ryan (3rd April 2021), gnostic9 (3rd April 2021), gord (31st March 2021), Icare (12th April 2021), mountain_jim (3rd April 2021), Reinhard (30th March 2021), RunningDeer (31st March 2021), Sunny (31st March 2021), Watching from Cyprus (5th April 2021), wondering (31st March 2021)

  19. Link to Post #510
    UK Avalon Member Matthew's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th July 2015
    Location
    South East England
    Language
    English
    Age
    51
    Posts
    4,138
    Thanks
    25,645
    Thanked 36,192 times in 4,071 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    Yet another great article
    ...to add to the pile.
    ----------===========---------



    Cui Bono? The COVID-19 ‘Conspiracy’
    Posted on FEBRUARY 19, 2021

    Source: https://architectsforsocialhousing.c...19-conspiracy/

    Quote
    1. What We Know
    2. The Conspiracy Paradox
    3. The Power of Nightmares
    4. Capitalising on the Crisis
    5. Disruption and Redeployment
    6. The Emerging Ideology
    7. Biosecurity as Cultic Practice
    8. The Authoritarian State
    9. Brave New World
    10. The Time Given to Us
    ...
    • We know now that Government strategies for responding to a viral epidemic that had been in place for years were abandoned in favour of the historically unprecedented policy of national lockdown.
    • We know that Government contracts for the campaign of propaganda worth £119 million were signed with PR firms 3 weeks before the first lockdown.
    • We know that, in April 2020, the Cabinet Office approved over £216 million for advertising on what it called the ‘COVID-19 Campaign 20/21’.
    • We know that the criteria for attributing deaths to COVID-19 were changed back in March to exaggerate the official number of fatalities.
    • We know that 95 per cent of the deaths attributed to the disease are of people with pre-existing health conditions like cancer, dementia, heart disease or diabetes.
    • We know that 84 per cent are over 70 years of age, and that the average age of those whose deaths are attributed to COVID-19 is the average age of death in the UK.
    • We know that, a year into this so-called ‘pandemic’, just over 600 patients under the age of 60 without a pre-existing health condition have had their deaths in English hospitals attributed to COVID-19.
    • ...
    It presents a long and detailed list with links to cross-reference msm sources

  20. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Matthew For This Post:

    avid (3rd April 2021), Bill Ryan (3rd April 2021), gnostic9 (3rd April 2021), Icare (12th April 2021), mountain_jim (3rd April 2021), Reinhard (3rd April 2021), Richard S. (1st April 2021), Tintin (2nd April 2021), Watching from Cyprus (5th April 2021), wondering (31st March 2021)

  21. Link to Post #511
    Ireland Avalon Member gnostic9's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd January 2014
    Age
    62
    Posts
    338
    Thanks
    2,433
    Thanked 1,971 times in 308 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    James Delingpole interviews Mike Yeadon (ex Pfizer research) on the dangers associated with the covid vaccines.


    https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/H/h/N/H/HhNHb.caa.1.mp4?u=0&b=0






    Love peace and joy to all

  22. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to gnostic9 For This Post:

    avid (3rd April 2021), Bill Ryan (3rd April 2021), fifi (3rd April 2021), Gwin Ru (3rd April 2021), Icare (12th April 2021), Matthew (4th April 2021), pueblo (3rd April 2021), Reinhard (3rd April 2021), Tintin (3rd April 2021), Watching from Cyprus (5th April 2021)

  23. Link to Post #512
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    6,081
    Thanks
    8,692
    Thanked 39,309 times in 5,717 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    Last edited by Delight; 3rd April 2021 at 02:30.

  24. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    avid (3rd April 2021), Bill Ryan (3rd April 2021), fifi (3rd April 2021), Gwin Ru (3rd April 2021), Icare (12th April 2021), mountain_jim (3rd April 2021), Reinhard (3rd April 2021), Tintin (3rd April 2021), Watching from Cyprus (5th April 2021)

  25. Link to Post #513
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Location
    Project Avalon library
    Language
    English
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,449
    Thanks
    64,679
    Thanked 46,636 times in 5,417 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    Quote Posted by gnostic9 (here)
    James Delingpole interviews Mike Yeadon (ex Pfizer research) on the dangers associated with the covid vaccines.

    https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/H/h/N/H/HhNHb.caa.1.mp4?u=0&b=0

    Love peace and joy to all
    bumpity

    This is an excellent MUST LISTEN presentation of solid scientific facts from Mike Yeadon here; it could serve as a primer for anybody unfamiliar with the concepts, which would amount - sadly - to far too many people.

    Anybody umming and ahhing about whether to get a vaccine will be much better informed by taking the time (just over an hour) to listen to this and better still share it widely.



    -----------------

    Original source: The Delingpod
    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  26. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    avid (3rd April 2021), Bill Ryan (3rd April 2021), Delight (4th April 2021), fifi (3rd April 2021), Gwin Ru (3rd April 2021), Icare (12th April 2021), Matthew (4th April 2021), meat suit (3rd April 2021), mountain_jim (3rd April 2021), pueblo (3rd April 2021), Reinhard (8th April 2021), Watching from Cyprus (5th April 2021)

  27. Link to Post #514
    UK Avalon Member Matthew's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th July 2015
    Location
    South East England
    Language
    English
    Age
    51
    Posts
    4,138
    Thanks
    25,645
    Thanked 36,192 times in 4,071 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    Quote Posted by Tintin (here)
    Quote Posted by gnostic9 (here)
    James Delingpole interviews Mike Yeadon (ex Pfizer research) on the dangers associated with the covid vaccines.

    https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/H/h/N/H/HhNHb.caa.1.mp4?u=0&b=0

    Love peace and joy to all
    bumpity

    This is an excellent MUST LISTEN presentation of solid scientific facts from Mike Yeadon here; it could serve as a primer for anybody unfamiliar with the concepts, which would amount - sadly - to far too many people.

    Anybody umming and ahhing about whether to get a vaccine will be much better informed by taking the time (just over an hour) to listen to this and better still share it widely.



    -----------------

    Original source: The Delingpod
    Double bump with rainbows and a choral choir going ahhhhhhhhhh


  28. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Matthew For This Post:

    avid (7th April 2021), Bill Ryan (7th April 2021), Delight (4th April 2021), Gwin Ru (7th April 2021), Icare (5th April 2021), meat suit (4th April 2021), mountain_jim (7th April 2021), Reinhard (8th April 2021), Tintin (4th April 2021), Watching from Cyprus (5th April 2021)

  29. Link to Post #515
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Location
    Project Avalon library
    Language
    English
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,449
    Thanks
    64,679
    Thanked 46,636 times in 5,417 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    I'll make some effort to try and pull together all the posts on this Twitter thread into one sensible summary page or two, but in the meantime can suggest that all be reminded, if they haven't already figured this out, that viewed through the lens of eugenics and some knowledge of the background of the individuals and architects behind this aptly named Plandemic is the cipher: all roads ultimately lead there, with its shocking denouement.

    Understand this, and then educate anybody who still isn't clear about it. It can of course be halted by globally collectivising against it, but knowledge is crucial here.

    As I wrote on our PA Twitter feed earlier, in response:

    "This is the BEST summary of the zeitgeist I've yet seen, anywhere. A pocket guide that should be on the state curriculum. Some of us have known early on that it has all (CV19) been openly about eugenics - this thread nails it. Kudos."


    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  30. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    avid (7th April 2021), Bill Ryan (7th April 2021), Gwin Ru (7th April 2021), Matthew (12th April 2021), mountain_jim (7th April 2021), Reinhard (8th April 2021), Sue (Ayt) (12th April 2021)

  31. Link to Post #516
    Wales Avalon Member
    Join Date
    7th April 2021
    Language
    English
    Posts
    220
    Thanks
    936
    Thanked 2,168 times in 218 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    Bumping this again for the reason that Dr Mike Yeadon explains variants using the analogy of a "Baseball Cap"... starting at 36mins...

    Dr Mike checked the molecular biology and it's one of the largest viruses ever sequenced, 10,000 amino acids (the building blocks of protein)

    "The most different variant, that I can find, is 27 amino acids away... so its 99.7% identical. The human immune system is much cleverer than that. It's impossible for a variant that differs by .3% to evade immunity"

    Dr mike calls Bu****it...

    "Get your baseball cap and put it on, your family knows you and loves you, so a .3% change in your appearance to mimic a variant means putting it on backwards"

    "I'm just pointing out that a .3% change in a complex organism that is James Dellingpole or Mike Yeadon is now a different person is what the government are trying to get you to believe with these variants..."

    It's not the exact wording but you get the gist x







    Quote Posted by Matthew (here)
    Quote Posted by Tintin (here)
    Quote Posted by gnostic9 (here)
    James Delingpole interviews Mike Yeadon (ex Pfizer research) on the dangers associated with the covid vaccines.

    https://sp.rmbl.ws/s8/2/H/h/N/H/HhNHb.caa.1.mp4?u=0&b=0

    Love peace and joy to all
    bumpity

    This is an excellent MUST LISTEN presentation of solid scientific facts from Mike Yeadon here; it could serve as a primer for anybody unfamiliar with the concepts, which would amount - sadly - to far too many people.

    Anybody umming and ahhing about whether to get a vaccine will be much better informed by taking the time (just over an hour) to listen to this and better still share it widely.



    -----------------

    Original source: The Delingpod
    Double bump with rainbows and a choral choir going ahhhhhhhhhh


  32. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to EarthGirl For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (12th April 2021), Matthew (12th April 2021), Sunny (14th April 2021), Tintin (22nd April 2021)

  33. Link to Post #517
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Location
    Project Avalon library
    Language
    English
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,449
    Thanks
    64,679
    Thanked 46,636 times in 5,417 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  34. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (22nd April 2021), Constance (22nd April 2021), Gwin Ru (22nd April 2021), Mike Gorman (29th June 2021), Pam (8th July 2021), pueblo (22nd April 2021), wondering (24th June 2021)

  35. Link to Post #518
    Ireland Avalon Member pueblo's Avatar
    Join Date
    5th February 2016
    Posts
    2,201
    Thanks
    9,811
    Thanked 18,256 times in 2,177 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    This video is huge! It breaks down exactly how the excess death mortality figures for Ireland have been manipulated by the state broadcaster, RTE, which is nothing more than a propaganda machine for the government.

    It's all just smoke and mirrors. Lying s***s.

    Video is about 15mins long.

    Direct link to video... https://odysee.com/@IvorCummins:f/Ma...ntric-Manner:e

    Video is at bottom of tweet..'.Mainstream News Dissected'
    Last edited by pueblo; 22nd April 2021 at 18:41.

  36. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to pueblo For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (26th April 2021), Pam (8th July 2021), Patient (11th June 2021), Rawhide68 (3rd June 2021), Reinhard (3rd May 2021), Tintin (27th April 2021)

  37. Link to Post #519
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Location
    Project Avalon library
    Language
    English
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,449
    Thanks
    64,679
    Thanked 46,636 times in 5,417 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    Ah, so the multi-million pound bulging boutique PR companies being used by the UK government simply went on a stealing spree.....



    (Some have avered whether these people at GenesisPR are the main protagonists behind these awful government adverts and slogans.)
    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  38. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (26th April 2021), Constance (26th April 2021), Reinhard (3rd May 2021)

  39. Link to Post #520
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Location
    Project Avalon library
    Language
    English
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,449
    Thanks
    64,679
    Thanked 46,636 times in 5,417 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    A tremendous 40 or so minutes of grounded critique of the adoption of the global narratives, corruption of science, and some simple to understand epidemiological data that would leave the skeptical in absolutely no doubt at all that they were correct to question the official 'story', the official statistics and many other substrates.

    Dr. John Lee has over 30 years experience in the NHS and for anybody not awake yet, I'd suggest this would be as good an introduction as well as overview as you might find.

    ________

    Description:
    Unlocked Exclusive — in a hard-hitting interview, retired NHS pathologist Dr John Lee discusses the government’s response to the pandemic, analyses why proven scientific procedures were abandoned, makes the case for ending Lockdown now, and asks the question most doctors are unable to discuss in public.

    Covid-19: is the cure worse than the disease?

    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  40. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (3rd May 2021), gord (3rd May 2021), Icare (5th May 2021), kfm27917 (3rd June 2021), mountain_jim (3rd June 2021), Reinhard (3rd May 2021), Sue (Ayt) (3rd May 2021), wondering (3rd May 2021)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 26 of 31 FirstFirst 1 16 26 31 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts