+ Reply to Thread
Page 27 of 31 FirstFirst 1 17 27 31 LastLast
Results 521 to 540 of 609

Thread: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

  1. Link to Post #521
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Location
    Project Avalon library
    Language
    English
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,447
    Thanks
    64,676
    Thanked 46,617 times in 5,415 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    "“Flu year” versus calendar year: Many calculate mortality statistics according to the Gregorian calendar, but December 31st is not a meaningful end date for winter mortality in the northern hemisphere. The flu wave and the associated wave of mortality reach the peak at various dates, and sometimes secondary waves appear. Furthermore, the use of the Gregorian calendar combines the mortality in the first part of one winter (sometimes mild) with mortality in the second part of the previous winter (sometimes severe). There is no scientific justification for this grouping when analyzing historical trends.

    The statistical alternative, which may be called “flu year”, contains a full winter season. Annual mortality is calculated from the beginning of the flu season, which is usually counted from week 40 (early October), till week 39 in the following year (end of September). Thus, the coronavirus waves in the spring and summer of 2020 belong to the 2019–2020 flu year, whereas the last winter wave belongs to the current flu year which will end in September."

    - Eyal Shahar, May 29 2021

    -----------------

    Not a shred of doubt: Sweden was right

    Source: Eyal Shahar on Medium

    Counting the dead used to be the work of epidemiologists, statisticians and demographers. So was analyzing the numbers and drawing conclusions. In the past year many are counting deaths, but the numbers have no meaning without the context of a relevant time period, population and history. That is, epidemiology.
    The most counted country is probably Sweden, a stubborn dissenter that refused lockdowns, mask mandates and contact tracing. By the time of this writing, 14,349 Swedes have reportedly died from the coronavirus. Has the Swedish model failed? Were the lockdowns justified? Were the economic and social upheavals in most of the world an unavoidable necessity?

    The answer to all is a resounding no. The first (and not the only) witness: Sweden. To understand the testimony, we need to learn only two concepts: “flu year” and “excess mortality”.

    “Flu year” versus calendar year
    Many calculate mortality statistics according to the Gregorian calendar, but December 31st is not a meaningful end date for winter mortality in the northern hemisphere. The flu wave and the associated wave of mortality reach the peak at various dates, and sometimes secondary waves appear. Furthermore, the use of the Gregorian calendar combines the mortality in the first part of one winter (sometimes mild) with mortality in the second part of the previous winter (sometimes severe).

    There is no scientific justification for this grouping when analyzing historical trends.
    The statistical alternative, which may be called “flu year”, contains a full winter season. Annual mortality is calculated from the beginning of the flu season, which is usually counted from week 40 (early October), till week 39 in the following year (end of September). Thus, the coronavirus waves in the spring and summer of 2020 belong to the 2019–2020 flu year, whereas the last winter wave belongs to the current flu year which will end in September.

    Excess mortality
    The concept of “excess mortality” is a little abstract. We need to compare actual mortality with “expected mortality”, but the latter is a theoretical idea that cannot be verified: what would the mortality in the 2019–2020 flu year have been, had there not been a pandemic? How do we calculate “expected mortality”?
    One method uses a statistical model called linear regression. We fit a line to the mortality data from previous years, check its past performance, and use the continuation of the line to compute expected mortality. The distance between a data point of actual mortality and expected mortality on the line is excess mortality (or “mortality deficit”).

    Mortality in Sweden by flu year
    The graph shows the annual mortality in Sweden per million people in the last 22 flu years, where each flu year is labeled according to the calendar year in which it ends. For example, the last data point on the graph is mortality between October 2019 and September 2020: 9,234 per million people (95,365 deaths). To magnify, the vertical axis starts at 7,000.

    https://miro.medium.com/max/1916/1*C...0lpLIJbOQ.jpeg

    It is easy to see that the points are located close to a straight line, until the flu year that ended in September 2018. The general downward trend reflects a consistent increase in life expectancy in Sweden for many years.

    Experienced data analysts will attest that the fluctuations around the line are generally small and expected until 2018 (explained variation: 0.96). In contrast, both the flu year that preceded the pandemic (2018–2019) and the pandemic year (2019–2020) substantially deviate from the line: the former — in lower than expected mortality, and the latter — in higher than expected mortality.

    Excess mortality in Sweden in flu year 2019–2020
    Continuation of the line, which was fit by the statistical model, yields the following estimates: In 2018–2019 there was “mortality deficit” in Sweden of 300 per million people (-3.3%) whereas in 2019–2020, the pandemic year, there was excess mortality of 364 per million people (+4.1%). Excess mortality following mortality deficit, and vice versa, are well known and expected, as the main source of mortality is an elderly population with limited life expectancy. (The sequence “excess after deficit” is, of course, better than the reverse order.)

    Assuming the excess mortality in 2019–2020 “fully balanced” the mortality deficit in the previous flu year, the true excess mortality in Sweden was less than 1% (about 700 deaths). And if we assume, absurdly, that the mortality in 2019–2020 was not affected at all by the mortality deficit in the previous flu year, then the excess mortality in Sweden did not exceed 4.1% (about 3,800 deaths). Excess mortality of a few percentage points, or more, has been calculated in many countries where life has been severely disrupted. Part of that excess has been attributed to lockdown and panic.

    To remind us, the hysterical response to the pandemic was not due to fear of an excess annual mortality of 4% or even 10%. The apocalyptic forecasts, which caused the world to shut down, predicted about 90,000 deaths from the coronavirus in Sweden by the summer of 2020: 100% excess mortality! No wonder policy makers around the world prefer to forget those predictions.

    https://miro.medium.com/max/868/1*IP...srnqwQ4yg.jpeg

    Mortality in Sweden in the current flu year
    The final summary of the current flu year (October 2020 — September 2021) will be known in the fall, but the data accumulated more than halfway through allow for interim conclusions. As many know, the coronavirus replaced the flu viruses this year, and there was no flu in Sweden, either. Nor were there apocalyptic predictions; only warnings about the number of accumulated deaths.

    I chose to compare the mortality in Sweden in the current flu year (week 40, 2020 till week 15, 2021) to the corresponding mortality in 2017–2018. Two reasons for this choice: First, Europe experienced a severe flu season in that winter, which makes it an appropriate comparison. Second, although the flu season was severe in Sweden compared to previous years, it was still substantially milder than in Europe as a whole.

    The graph shows a low mortality wave at the end of 2017 and a noticeable wave in February-March 2018 (another example of why a December 31st cutoff might distort historical trends). This winter, the mortality wave coincided with the coronavirus wave and its peak in late December. (In 2020 there were 53 weeks, so the dates do not exactly match.) A secondary coronavirus wave, which appeared in mid-February, half way through the decline of the former, did not result in a secondary mortality wave.

    https://miro.medium.com/max/868/1*yV...R89rTpU7A.jpeg

    The all-cause death toll in Sweden in the first 29 weeks of the current flu year is 56,452 (5,441 per million people) compared to 55,967 (5,544 per million people) in the same period in 2017–2018. In that winter, the excess mortality rate in Europe attributed to the flu was at least twice as high as in Sweden.
    Sweden proved right in the retest.

    A colossal mistake
    The pandemic has taken its death toll, ranging from large to small in different countries and within countries, and mostly affected the frail elderly. But the lockdowns and panic were unsubstantiated, prevented nothing, and caused indescribable damage to society. Sweden’s statistics tell us, unequivocally, that in much of the world lives have been lost and livelihoods have been destroyed — in vain.

    Will anyone, in any country, be held accountable?
    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  2. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    atman (3rd June 2021), Bill Ryan (3rd June 2021), DaveToo (4th June 2021), fifi (11th June 2021), Gwin Ru (3rd June 2021), kfm27917 (3rd June 2021), mountain_jim (3rd June 2021), pueblo (11th June 2021), Rawhide68 (3rd June 2021), ronny (3rd June 2021)

  3. Link to Post #522
    Sweden Avalon Member Rawhide68's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th May 2017
    Age
    55
    Posts
    694
    Thanks
    2,048
    Thanked 4,284 times in 639 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    Thanks for posting Tintin, I'm Swedish and will read your article in detail at a later moment, need to warm up my school English brain synapsis to be able to try comprehend words such as " unequivocally "and such.

    Pub's & Restaurants can server alcohol until 10 pm from June 1st in Sweden, (It was 8 pm before) I just tried it out tonight, met a friend, played some bowling, and finished dinner at 9 pm in a local chineese restaurant before I went home.

  4. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Rawhide68 For This Post:

    DaveToo (4th June 2021), gord (7th June 2021), Gwin Ru (3rd June 2021), Tintin (4th June 2021)

  5. Link to Post #523
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,681
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    COVID Vaccines May Bring Avalanche of Neurological Disease
    Dr. Joseph Mercola
    June 06, 2021
    Download PDF:https://media.mercola.com/ImageServe...accine-pdf.pdf

    https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...-vaccine.aspx?

    (Video at the foot of the post)

    STORY AT-A-GLANCE

    The typical unprecedented vaccine takes 12 years to develop, and of all the unprecedented vaccines in development, only 2% are projected to ever make it through all Phase 2 and 3 clinical phases of testing
    The COVID-19 vaccine was developed with Operation Warp Speed in less than one year, which makes it virtually impossible to assess safety and efficacy, as the vaccine has not been adequately tested
    Five months into the vaccination campaign, statistics tell a frightening story. Research shows deaths are 15 times higher during the first 14 days after the first COVID injection among people over the age of 60, compared to those who aren't vaccinated
    Another study shows that after COVID-19 vaccines were implemented, overall death rates have increased, with the exception of a few areas. It appears countries in which COVID-19 vaccines have not raised mortality rates are also not using glyphosate
    In the next 10 to 15 years, we are likely to see spikes in prion diseases, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases at younger ages, and blood disorders such as blood clots, hemorrhaging, stroke and heart failure

    Dr. Mercola Interviews the Experts
    This article is part of a weekly series in which Dr. Mercola interviews various experts on a variety of health issues. To see more expert interviews, click here:https://interviews.mercola.com/

    In this interview, return guest Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., a senior research scientist at MIT for over five decades, discusses the COVID-19 vaccines. Since 2008, her primary focus has been glyphosate and sulfur, but in the last year, she took a deep-dive into the science of these novel injections and recently published an excellent paper1 on this topic.

    “To have developed this incredibly new technology so quickly, and to skip so many steps in the process of evaluating [its safety], it's an insanely reckless thing that they've done,” she says. “My instinct was that this is bad, and I needed to know [the truth].

    So, I really dug into the research literature by the people who've developed these vaccines, and then more extensive research literature around those topics. And I don't see how these vaccines can possibly be doing anything good. When you weigh the good against the bad, I can't see how they could possibly be winning, from what I've seen.”

    Significant Death Toll Will Rise in Months and Years to Come

    Five months into the vaccination campaign, statistics tell a frightening story. Seneff cites research2 showing deaths are 14.6 times more frequent during the first 14 days after the first COVID injection among people over the age of 60, compared to those who aren't vaccinated. That is extraordinary. You can read the full paper here: https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org...9-vaccination/



    Other data,3,4 reviewed in the video above, show that after COVID-19 vaccines were implemented, overall death rates have increased, with the exception of a few areas. Interestingly, Seneff believes she may have discovered why. It appears countries in which COVID-19 vaccines have not raised mortality rates are also not using glyphosate.

    “I immediately suspected glyphosate when I started to see COVID-19,” Seneff says. “I've written a book on glyphosate called ‘Toxic Legacy,’ and I have an entire chapter in that book on the immune system. Glyphosate, I believe, is a train wreck for the innate immune system, and when your immune system is weak, your body has to overreact to the virus. It can't kill the virus.

    So, it ends up [causing] collateral damage and wrecking your tissues. You get into this cytokine storm kind of situation where you destroy your lungs and you can't cope. It's not really the virus. It's the immune reaction to the virus that's killing you, and that's because your immune system is too weak. If you have a strong innate immune system, I believe you wouldn't even get symptoms from COVID-19.

    When you look at the statistics on which countries are hit hard and just can't get ahead of this virus, they're clearly the countries that use a lot of glyphosate and developing biofuels based on glyphosate-exposed plants. So, I think that's a critical piece of the puzzle as well. Glyphosate is in the atmosphere … [and] people are breathing it. So now you're getting a direct attack on the lungs immune system, which makes you very susceptible to COVID.”

    Ultimately, Seneff believes, as I do, that the COVID-19 “vaccines” will end up killing far more people than the disease itself, and will in fact make the disease worse. Seneff cites a disturbing case history of a cancer patient in the U.K. who was treated for severe COVID-19 for 101 days.

    The antibody cocktails they gave him didn’t work, and after his death, they concluded that the predominant SARS-CoV-2 variant in his body had a dozen different mutations in the spike protein. Somehow, his body figured out how to evade the antibodies, which is a critical piece of the puzzle.

    “I think the vaccines are doing the same thing,” Seneff says, adding that, among the immune compromised, only 17% of vaccinated individuals actually produce antibodies.5 Surprisingly, these people may actually have drawn the short end of the stick. The antibodies may not work because their immune function is low, thereby allowing the virus to build resistance and mutate.

    “I think you have a lot of immune compromised people in a country where glyphosate is destroying people’s immune system, and that gives tremendous opportunity for the virus to mutate. The vaccine is going to accelerate that process because we're vaccinating immune compromised people left and right.”


    COVID-19 Vaccines Are a Public Health Disaster

    The typical unprecedented vaccine takes 12 years to develop, and of all the unprecedented vaccines in development, only 2% are projected to ever make it through phases 2 and 3 of clinical testing.

    The COVID-19 vaccine was developed with Operation Warp Speed in less than one year, which makes it virtually impossible for this vaccine to be adequately tested for safety and efficacy.

    Hundreds of millions of people are now being vaccinated around the world, based on nothing more than preliminary efficacy data. Disturbingly, while sudden death is one apparent side effect, the vast majority of side effects won’t be known until a decade or more from now.

    Seneff predicts that in the next 10 to 15 years, we’ll see a sudden spike in prion diseases, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases at younger ages, and blood disorders such as blood clots, hemorrhaging, stroke and heart failure.

    “It’s a nightmare,” she says. “And I can see how it can happen. Basically, the vaccine is so unbelievably unnatural, and it has a single-minded goal, which is to get your body to produce antibodies to the spike protein. The RNA has been manipulated. It's not natural RNA because it has methyl-pseudouridine on it … And the goal is to keep it alive.

    Normally, if you get injected with RNA, you have enzymes in your system, in your tissues, that will immediately break it down. Your body knows it must get rid of the RNA. What you do with the vaccine is you make sure [your body] can't get at it …

    Then there's the lipid [that the RNA is encased in]. The lipids are very abnormal, very weird … They're not natural but they have some cholesterol in there, probably to help it look like a natural LDL particle so that your cells will take it up. It's not being taken up by the ACE2 receptor.

    It's not being taken up the same way that the virus is being taken up. It's a totally different mechanism that brings it into all the cells. You've gone past all the mucosal membranes. Usually, a virus is going to come into the lungs or any kind of cavity where there's a mucosal system that's going to hit the virus first.

    The virus [will trigger] your natural mucosal system to respond to it and clear it if you're a healthy person, and that's the end of it. [With the vaccine], we never get a chance to do that. You're just getting it shot right into your muscle, past all the barriers and the muscle goes crazy … sending out all kinds of alarms.”

    Understanding Your Immune System
    As your cells start producing the viral spike proteins, your immune cells rally to mop up the proteins and dump them into your lymphatic system. This is why many report swollen lymph nodes under the arms. This is also a sign of breast cancer. The antibody response is part of your humoral immunity. You also have cellular immunity, which is part of your innate immune system.

    Your innate immune system is very powerful. And, if you're healthy, it can clear viruses without ever producing a single antibody. Antibodies are actually a second-tier effect when your innate immune system fails. The problem is your innate immune system is definitely going to fail if you get a COVID-19 shot, because it’s bypassing all of the areas where your innate immune system would be brought to bear.

    Your body will essentially believe that the innate immune system has failed, which means it must bring in the backup cavalry. In essence, your body is now over-reacting to something that isn’t true. You’re not actually infected with a virus and your innate immune system has not failed, but your body is forced to respond as if both are true.

    How COVID-19 Vaccine Circumvents Healthy Immune Responses
    But there’s more. As explained by Seneff, the synthetic RNA in the mRNA vaccines contains a nucleotide called methyl-pseudouridine, which your body cannot break down, and the RNA is programmed to trigger maximum protein production. So, we’re looking at completely untested manipulation of RNA.

    It is very important to recognize that this is a genetically engineered mRNA for the spike protein. It is in no way shape or form the same that SARS-CoV-2 produces. It’s been significantly altered to avoid being metabolized by your body. Additionally, the spike protein your body produces in response to the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA locks into your ACE2 receptor.

    This is because the genetically engineered NEW spike protein has additional prolines inserted that prevent the receptors from properly closing, which then cause you to downregulate ACE2. That’s partially how you end up with problems such as pulmonary hypertension, ventricular heart failure and stroke.6,7

    As noted in a 2020 paper,8 there’s a “pivotal link” between ACE2 deficiency and SARS-CoV-2 infection. People with ACE2 deficiency tend to be more prone to severe COVID-19. The spike protein suppresses ACE2,9 making the deficiency even worse. As it turns out, the vaccines essentially do the same thing.

    How Long Might Effects Last?
    As mentioned, RNA is highly perishable, so to get it past the enzymes that would normally break down free mRNA, it’s encased in a lipid nanoparticle combined with polyethylene glycol or PEG. The PEG helps protect the RNA from breaking down. The RNA can easily enter the cell via natural endocytosis pathways, taking advantage of the nanoparticle design made to look like an LDL particle.

    They strategically chose a cationic lipid, meaning it’s positively charged. “Usually you have phospholipids in your membranes that are negatively charged,” Seneff explains. The problem with cationic lipids is they disturb the plasma membrane and cause an immune response.

    However, that may also be a key reason for why they were used. Typically, conventional vaccines contain an aluminum adjuvant to initiate an immune response. Aluminum was not appropriate for the COVID-19 vaccines, but the cationic lipids serve a similar function spectacularly well.

    Being extremely toxic to the cell membranes, the positively charged lipids trigger immune cells to rush in to aid the cells and mop up the spike protein now being produced, while also being the vehicle that allows the RNA to slip into the cells. Once inside the cell, the mRNA delivers the instructions to produce enormous amounts of spike proteins.

    The really worrisome thing is there's potential for it to become part of the DNA and then it will last forever. ~ Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D.
    Importantly, there’s no telling how long these instructions will persist. Manufacturers are guessing the synthetic RNA may survive in the human body for about six months, but we really don’t know if that’s true or not.

    Again, the alterations they’ve done to the synthetic RNA are meant to prevent it from breaking down. It could be years or even decades that these spike proteins are being produced, and you will find out shortly why this is a really bad scenario.

    “The really worrisome thing, which I talk about in the paper, is there's potential for it to become integrated into your DNA,” Seneff says. “If that happens, it will last your entire lifetime, and you may pass this new genetic code on to your offspring.”

    Tracing Spike Protein From Cells to Lymph to Spleen

    As explained by Seneff, your immune cells mop up mRNA and spike protein and dump them into your lymphatic system. From there, they make their way into your spleen, where they can remain for quite a long time.

    “There are all these different immune cells that have different roles, but it's the dendritic cells and the macrophages that are initially going into the muscle, picking up the mRNA, taking it over to the lymph system, traveling through the lymph system to the spleen and piling it up there. The spleen was the highest concentration of all the organs they looked at in animal studies. The liver was second.

    It wasn’t the COVID-19 vaccine, but it was a messenger RNA vaccine. So, it was the same concept. The other vaccines, the ones that are based on a DNA vector, they also go to the spleen. I think they like it when they see that it's going to the spleen because you have these germinal centers in the spleen that are focus groups for making antibodies.

    So these dendritic cells are in these germinal centers in the spleen, and then they bring in the B-cells and T-cells, and those are the ones that make and perfect the antibodies, because you need to go through a whole training mode to get the antibiotics to be exactly matched to that particular spike protein. That happens predominantly in the spleen.”

    Potential Vaccine Shedding Mechanism Revealed

    Seneff also sheds light on the mysterious reports of unvaccinated individuals experiencing unusual bleeding symptoms after spending time in proximity to a newly vaccinated person. She believes this may be due to exosomes being released from the lungs.

    “If you are a person who's producing these exosomes from your spleen and shipping them out, there's no reason why you can't ship them out to the lungs. In fact, they've shown experimentally that those exosomes do get released from the lungs,” Seneff says.

    So, to be clear, what's being “shed” or spread by vaccinated individuals is the spike protein — which is itself toxic — not the SARS-CoV-2. So, it’s not an infection but rather the shedding of a toxic protein.

    “If you're breathing it in, you could be getting an increased risk, it seems to me. I mean, it sounds really farfetched, but it looks like it could happen, just from the logic of what goes on in biology. It could happen that you would breathe in these exosomes containing these misfolded prion proteins, which are not good for you, and exactly what happens when they go into the lungs, I don't know. I have no idea.”

    Can mRNA Vaccines Change Your DNA? That Is the Question
    Getting back to the potential issue of gene editing, I’ve been accused of being scientifically ignorant for stating that COVID-19 vaccines are not vaccines but rather a form of gene therapy. But when you delve into the genetics and molecular biology of this vaccine you discover that they are in fact a form of a stealth gene editing tool that can change your DNA and integrate instructions to make even more spike proteins.

    It’s counterintuitive because, typically, mRNA cannot be integrated directly into your genes because you need reverse transcriptase. Reverse transcriptase converts RNA back into DNA (reverse transcription). Seneff, however, discovered there’s a wide variety of reverse transcriptase systems already embedded in our DNA, which makes this possible. She explains:

    “There was this long period of time in which we had the mantra that transcription is DNA to RNA to protein. That's basic biology — DNA, RNA, protein. But then, in 1970, David Baltimore at MIT… discovered reverse transcriptase in retroviruses (RNA tumor viruses), which he won the Nobel Prize for.

    It turns out, and I didn't know this until I started digging into these vaccines, that we actually have plenty of reverse transcriptase in our own cells. We have plenty of it. And it's these long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs) and short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs) that are able to take our RNA back to DNA and to put that DNA back into the genome.”

    LINEs and SINEs are sequences of nucleotides, pieces of DNA, and they make up a huge percentage of the genome. For example, LINE1 is 10% of your genome. Most of the time they're inactive and scientists were puzzled about what they actually do. They’re rather strange, as they fold DNA backward and stick it back in different areas. For example, in people with Alzheimer's, the amyloid beta protein gets duplicated all over the place in their genome.

    “They get like a big fat genome with extra copies with different variations in those copies. And they do that through RNA,” Seneff says. “So, you have a mechanism for evolution. The primary mechanism, I would guess, is through taking the DNA, turning it into RNA, mutating the RNA because RNA mutates much more easily than DNA does, and then turning it back into DNA and sticking it back into the genome.”

    In a nutshell, LINEs and SINEs appear to be activated when an alternative solution for a problem is needed. One such problem could be glyphosate exposure. When the body is too sick to function normally, it finds a way around the problem by mutating proteins. “It's a process that we use to deal with environmental toxic chemicals that we're confronted with generally,” Seneff says.

    So, in summary, mRNA can be reverse transcribed and converted back to DNA by LINEs and SINEs in your body. This cloned DNA can then be integrated into your genome. In this way, it truly is genetic editing.

    Are We Creating a Generation of Super-Spreaders?

    What comes next is truly chilling. Seneff cites research10 showing that sperm has this ability to take exogenous mRNA, either from a virus or an mRNA vaccine, and reverse transcribe it into DNA and then produce plasmids that contain this cloned DNA. The sperm then releases these plasmids around the egg, which takes them up.

    The egg hangs on to those plasmids and puts the new code into the cells of the growing fetus. Hypothetically, a man having been vaccinated with a COVID-19 vaccine could produce a child born with the genetic code to make the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

    This is not a good thing, because this means the child will not have antibodies against the spike protein. Since it’s part of their genetic code, it registers as one of their own proteins and their body won’t produce antibodies against it. If that child is exposed to SARS-CoV-2, their immune system won’t react at all. What happens next is anyone’s guess, but it’s bound to be severely problematic in one way or another.

    “Exactly how sick they'll get or whether they'll get sick at all, I don't know,” Seneff says, “but their immune system won't react and they'll be able to carry that virus for their entire life and then pass [that genomic trait] on down to their children …

    Now, if I don't react to [the virus] and I let it grow, what happens? Do I get sick? To what extent is the illness [COVID-19] the consequence of the immune response, rather than the virus itself? We don't know that, really, but many say the real problem is the overactive immune response.

    People are dying of the immune response to COVID, they're not dying from the virus. The virus is not killing them. It's the immune response to the virus that's killing them. So, if you don't have an immune response, what happens? Nobody knows.”

    Even if such a child were to be unaffected by the virus, we could be looking at a serious problem, as they could turn into lifelong super-spreaders and a chronic hazard to everyone around them. At least that’s what happened in cows.

    Seneff recounts a story of herds plagued by a viral diarrhea. They finally realized that “killer calves” were the problem. Calves were being born that had viral protein integrated into their genome. When exposed to the virus, these calves, unable to clear the virus naturally, then spread it to the adult cows, which got sick.

    “I don't see why the same thing couldn't happen with COVID — that a baby could be born who has this humanized version of that protein, catches the [wild] virus and then it spreads it to the adult population,” Seneff says.

    Such children would be true super-spreaders, and the indoctrination we’re currently seeing, where children are told their mere presence could pose a mortal risk to the people they love, would then turn into grim reality. The calves in question were euthanized to safeguard the rest of the herds. How would we address human equivalents?

    Hopefully, this nightmare scenario will not occur, but it appears biologically possible, and that is the problem. The fact that the available science allows for this kind of speculation is reason enough to put the brakes on this vaccination campaign. We have no clue what the long-term consequences are. We don't even know what the short-term consequences are, other than more vaccinated people are dying, collectively, compared to unvaccinated ones.

    Spike Protein Appears Highly Problematic
    A particularly fascinating part of Seneff’s paper addresses the toxicity of the spike protein. A key problem with all of these gene-based COVID-19 vaccines is that the spike protein itself appears toxic, and your body is now a spike protein-producing factory.

    “Right. They have done studies where they only expose the [animal] to the spike protein, showing it was toxic in the brain and the blood vessels. So, it's causing immune reactions all by itself that is damaging to the tissues.

    It's basically a toxic molecule, and I think it's toxic possibly because of it being a prion protein …

    I'm going to do more research on it. I don't know enough yet, but it looks horrendous to me. I think it may be the most worrisome thing. There are two big things that are going to happen in the future.

    They're going to take time [to develop], so we're not going to see it immediately. And, of course, we're not going to blame the vaccine because rates will start going up for these horrible diseases and no one will link them to it.”

    Why Spike Protein May Cause Serious Neurodegenerative Disease
    Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CKD), the human version of mad cow disease, is a prion disease. Other human forms of prion disease include Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and Lou Gehrig's disease (ALS). “You have all these horrible neurodegenerative diseases and each one is tied to specific prion proteins,” Seneff says. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein also appears to be a prion protein, although this has yet to be thoroughly verified.

    Disturbingly, the spike protein produced by COVID-19 vaccines, due to the modifications made, may make it more of a prion than the spike protein in the actual virus, and a more effective one.

    “Papers are showing that those germinal centers in the spleen … are a primary source of the prion proteins that eventually get taken up the vagus nerve and delivered to the brainstem nuclei. That's how you can get Parkinson's disease, for example …

    There's so much we need to learn, but it looks to me like it's a setup here. They're really inviting this kind of thing to happen with these vaccines, where they're focusing on those germinal centers [because] those are the very same place where these prion proteins often get started.”

    Why Long-Term Neurological Damage Is To Be Expected
    In her paper, Seneff describes key characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that suggests it’s a prion:11

    “Neurological symptoms associated with COVID-19, such as headache, nausea and dizziness, encephalitis and fatal brain blood clots are all indicators of damaging viral effects on the brain. Buzhdygan et al. (2020) proposed that primary human brain microvascular endothelial cells could cause these symptoms ...

    In an in vitro study of the blood-brain barrier, the S1 component of the spike protein promoted loss of barrier integrity, suggesting that the spike protein acting alone triggers a pro-inflammatory response in brain endothelial cells, which could explain the neurological consequences of the disease.

    The implications of this observation are disturbing because the mRNA vaccines induce synthesis of the spike protein, which could theoretically act in a similar way to harm the brain. The spike protein generated endogenously by the vaccine could also negatively impact the male testes, as the ACE2 receptor is highly expressed in Leydig cells in the testes ...

    Prion diseases are a collection of neurodegenerative diseases that are induced through the misfolding of important bodily proteins, which form toxic oligomers that eventually precipitate out as fibrils causing widespread damage to neurons …

    Furthermore, researchers have identified a signature motif linked to susceptibility to misfolding into toxic oligomers, called the glycine zipper motif … Prion proteins become toxic when the α-helices misfold as β-sheets, and the protein is then impaired in its ability to enter the membrane.

    Glycines within the glycine zipper transmembrane motifs in the amyloid-β precursor protein (APP) play a central role in the misfolding of amyloid-β linked to Alzheimer’s disease. APP contains a total of four GxxxG motifs. When considering that the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is a transmembrane protein, and that it contains five GxxxG motifs in its sequence,12 it becomes extremely plausible that it could behave as a prion.

    One of the GxxxG sequences is present within its membrane fusion domain. Recall that the mRNA vaccines are designed with an altered sequence that replaces two adjacent amino acids in the fusion domain with a pair of prolines.

    This is done intentionally in order to force the protein to remain in its open state and make it harder for it to fuse with the membrane. This seems to us like a dangerous step towards misfolding potentially leading to prion disease …

    A paper published by J. Bart Classen (2021) proposed that the spike protein in the mRNA vaccines could cause prion-like diseases, in part through its ability to bind to many known proteins and induce their misfolding into potential prions.

    Idrees and Kumar (2021) have proposed that the spike protein’s S1 component is prone to act as a functional amyloid and form toxic aggregates … and can ultimately lead to neurodegeneration.”

    So, in summary, the take-home here is that COVID-19 vaccines, offered to hundreds of millions of people, are instruction sets for your body to make a toxic protein that will eventually wind up concentrated in your spleen, from where prion-like protein instructions will be sent out, leading to neurodegenerative diseases.

    Vaccine Remedy May Be Worse Than the Disease
    In her paper, Seneff goes into far more detail in her description of the spike protein as a metabolic poison. While I recommend reading Seneff’s paper in its entirety, I’ve extracted key sections below, starting with how the spike protein can trigger pathological damage leading to lung damage and heart and brain diseases:13

    “The picture is now emerging that SARS-CoV-2 has serious effects on the vasculature in multiple organs, including the brain vasculature … In a series of papers, Yuichiro Suzuki in collaboration with other authors presented a strong argument that the spike protein by itself can cause a signaling response in the vasculature with potentially widespread consequences.

    These authors observed that, in severe cases of COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 causes significant morphological changes to the pulmonary vasculature … Furthermore, they showed that exposure of cultured human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 subunit was sufficient to promote cell signaling without the rest of the virus components.

    Follow-on papers showed that the spike protein S1 subunit suppresses ACE2, causing a condition resembling pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a severe lung disease with very high mortality … The ‘in vivo studies’ they referred to … had shown that SARS coronavirus-induced lung injury was primarily due to inhibition of ACE2 by the SARS-CoV spike protein, causing a large increase in angiotensin-II.

    Suzuki et al. (2021) went on to demonstrate experimentally that the S1 component of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, at a low concentration … activated the MEK/ERK/MAPK signaling pathway to promote cell growth. They speculated that these effects would not be restricted to the lung vasculature.

    The signaling cascade triggered in the heart vasculature would cause coronary artery disease, and activation in the brain could lead to stroke. Systemic hypertension would also be predicted. They hypothesized that this ability of the spike protein to promote pulmonary arterial hypertension could predispose patients who recover from SARS-CoV-2 to later develop right ventricular heart failure.

    Furthermore, they suggested that a similar effect could happen in response to the mRNA vaccines, and they warned of potential long-term consequences to both children and adults who received COVID-19 vaccines based on the spike protein.

    An interesting study by Lei et. al. (2021) found that pseudovirus — spheres decorated with the SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein but lacking any viral DNA in their core — caused inflammation and damage in both the arteries and lungs of mice exposed intratracheally.

    They then exposed healthy human endothelial cells to the same pseudovirus particles. Binding of these particles to endothelial ACE2 receptors led to mitochondrial damage and fragmentation in those endothelial cells, leading to the characteristic pathological changes in the associated tissue.

    This study makes it clear that spike protein alone, unassociated with the rest of the viral genome, is sufficient to cause the endothelial damage associated with COVID-19. The implications for vaccines intended to cause cells to manufacture the spike protein are clear and are an obvious cause for concern."

    Commercial Vaccines Are Not as ‘Clean’ as Trial Vaccines
    Seneff’s paper also highlights the unknown hazard of injecting fragmented RNA, found in greater quantity in the commercially manufactured Pfizer vaccine compared to the vaccine used in the initial trials:14

    “The EMA Public Assessment Report … describes in detail a review of the [Pfizer] manufacturing process … One concerning revelation is the presence of ‘fragmented species’ of RNA in the injection solution. These are RNA fragments resulting from early termination of the process of transcription from the DNA template.

    These fragments, if translated by the cell following injection, would generate incomplete spike proteins, again resulting in altered and unpredictable three-dimensional structure and a physiological impact that is at best neutral and at worst detrimental to cellular functioning.

    There were considerably more of these fragmented forms of RNA found in the commercially manufactured products than in the products used in clinical trials. The latter were produced via a much more tightly controlled manufacturing process ...

    While we are not asserting that non-spike proteins generated from fragmented RNA would be misfolded or otherwise pathological, we believe they would at least contribute to the cellular stress that promotes prion-associated conformational changes in the spike protein that is present.”

    More Information
    Seneff and I cover a great deal more than I’ve covered in this article, including how the vaccines may trigger autoimmune problems by way of molecular mimicry. This includes things like celiac disease, Hashimoto's thyroiditis and lupus. So, if you have ANY interest in learning more about this vaccine I strongly suggest you watch the entire video.

    We also discuss how the shots are causing idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), a rare blood disorder in which you end up with blood clots, a drop in platelet count and hemorrhages, all at the same time.

    Also, be sure to read through Seneff’s paper, “Worse Than The Disease: Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19,” published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research.15

    How Can You Protect Yourself From the Vaccine or Exposure to Those That Were Vaccinated?
    Indeed, that is the question of the day. We talked about shedding from the vaccine. Obviously, the vaccine does not classically shed virus particles but it can easily cause people to shed spike proteins, and it is these spike proteins that may cause just as much damage as the virus.

    While Seneff’s paper didn’t delve deeply into solutions, it provides a major clue, which is that your body has the capacity to address many of these problems through a process called autophagy. This is the process of removal of damaged proteins in your body.

    One effective strategy that will upregulate autophagy is periodic fasting or time-restricted eating. Most people eat more than 12 hours a day. Gradually lowering that to a six- to eight-hour window will radically improve your metabolic flexibility and decrease insulin resistance.

    Another beneficial practice is sauna therapy, which upregulates heat shock proteins. I have discussed this extensively in previous articles. Heat shock proteins work by refolding proteins that are misfolded. They also tag damaged proteins and target them for removal.

    Another vital strategy is to eliminate all processed vegetable oils (seed oils), which means eliminating virtually all processed foods as they are loaded with them. Seed oils will radically impair mitochondrial energy production, increase oxidative stress and damage your immune system.

    Seed oils also are likely to contain glyphosate, as it is heavily used on the crops that produce them. Obviously, it is important to avoid glyphosate contamination in all your food, which you can minimize by buying only certified organic foods.

    Finally, you want to optimize your innate immune system and one of the best ways to do that is to get enough sun exposure, wearing in your bathing suit, to have your vitamin level reach 60 to 80 ng/ml (100 to 150 nmol/l).


    + Sources and References

    1, 11, 13, 14, 15 International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research May 10, 2021; 2(1): 402-444
    2 America's Frontline Doctors May 9, 2021
    3 Covid19.healthdata.org
    4 The UNZ Review May 15, 2021
    5 JAMA. March 15, 2021 doi:10.1001/jama.2021.4385
    6 European Heart Journal July 20, 2020: ehaa534
    7, 9 Circulation Research 2021; 128: 1323-1326
    8 European Journal of Internal Medicine June 2020; 76:14-20
    10 Molecular Reproduction and Development 2006; 73(10):1239-1246
    12 UniProtKB P0DTC2 (Spike SARS2)


    Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vevftt
    Last edited by Bill Ryan; 6th June 2021 at 21:33. Reason: embedded the video
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  6. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ewan (8th June 2021), fifi (11th June 2021), gord (7th June 2021), kfm27917 (6th June 2021), mountain_jim (6th June 2021), Sunny (7th June 2021), Tintin (6th June 2021), Unicorn (6th July 2021), wondering (6th June 2021)

  7. Link to Post #524
    Avalon Member Eva2's Avatar
    Join Date
    31st January 2011
    Posts
    2,600
    Thanks
    10,046
    Thanked 22,758 times in 2,555 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    I didn't see this posted earlier so hope its not a repeat - from May 18
    'The swab used to test for Covid is not only Made in China, but its saturated with Ethylene Oxide (EO), which is a carcinogen, damages DNA and fertility.'
    An RN from The Purple Lion Project

    '

  8. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Eva2 For This Post:

    fifi (11th June 2021), Karen (Geophyz) (7th June 2021), RunningDeer (7th June 2021), Tintin (10th June 2021), wondering (11th June 2021)

  9. Link to Post #525
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Location
    Project Avalon library
    Language
    English
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,447
    Thanks
    64,676
    Thanked 46,617 times in 5,415 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    More evidence for immune system effectiveness in combating the virus.

    SARS-CoV-2 elicits robust adaptive immune responses regardless of
    disease severity

    Stine SF Nielsen et al

    Source: The Lancet
    Findings: We report broad serological profiles within the cohort, detecting antibody binding to other human coronaviruses. 202(>99%) participants had SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies, with SARS-CoV-2 neutralization and spike-ACE2 receptor interaction blocking observed in 193(95%) individuals. A significant positive correlation (r=0.7804) between spike-ACE2 blocking antibody titers and neutralization potency was observed. Further, SARS-CoV-2 specific CD8+ T-cell responses were clear and quantifiable in 95 of 106(90%) HLA-A2+ individuals.
    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  10. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (11th June 2021), Delight (10th June 2021), Ewan (10th June 2021), fifi (11th June 2021), mountain_jim (11th June 2021), ronny (10th June 2021), wondering (11th June 2021)

  11. Link to Post #526
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    6,081
    Thanks
    8,692
    Thanked 39,308 times in 5,717 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    Quote The Trueman Show #29 Dr Reiner Fuellmich
    Jun 10, 2021

    German/American lawyer Dr. Reiner Fuellmich. Reiner has done very big business against corrupt big corporations like Deutsche Bank, Volkswagen and Kuehne Nagel. Since March of last year, he and his international colleagues have also been doing many international lawsuits against governments for taking unnecessary and harmful 'measures'. I talked to him about what he's working on right now, about the theory that the 'virus' comes from a lab, who's behind this plan, what the plan really entails, how they put the 'virus' in the so-called 'vaccines', what the future holds, what we can do ourselves, are upcoming lawsuits and much more.

  12. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (11th June 2021), Ewan (24th June 2021), fifi (11th June 2021), mountain_jim (11th June 2021), Tintin (11th June 2021), wondering (11th June 2021)

  13. Link to Post #527
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,352
    Thanks
    39,686
    Thanked 33,459 times in 4,332 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    ...

    ... getting closer to the truth of a matter in order to forward a lie: "The vaxx did it!"

    NHS Told to Identify Patients Actually Sick From Covid-19 Rather Than Those Testing Positive

    UK Independent
    Fri, 11 Jun 2021 10:52 UTC

    SOTT Comment: In an outrageous development that has not produced the appropriate condemnation and questioning, changes to the way UK hospitals collect data will correct the way covid cases and deaths have been reported. Unlike the last 14 months where anyone who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, or died with a positive test for SARS-CoV-2, were deemed to be "positive cases" or have died "from covid", regardless of whether or not that was the actual cause of death, the new method will clinically define covid cases and deaths. This will create the necessary appearance that the vaccines are working and make the impact of the virus on the NHS "look better".
    Hospitals have been told to change the way they collect data on patients infected with coronavirus to differentiate between those actually sick with symptoms and those who test positive while seeking treatment for something else.

    [...]


    Full article: https://www.sott.net/article/454002-...sting-Positive

  14. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    avid (24th June 2021), Bill Ryan (11th June 2021), Ewan (24th June 2021), fifi (11th June 2021), Mike Gorman (29th June 2021), mountain_jim (11th June 2021), Sue (Ayt) (11th June 2021), Sunny (12th June 2021), Tintin (11th June 2021), wondering (11th June 2021)

  15. Link to Post #528
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Location
    Project Avalon library
    Language
    English
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,447
    Thanks
    64,676
    Thanked 46,617 times in 5,415 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    Source: UK Column



    Most people believe that the PCR test is a simple test to take samples to establish whether COVID-19 is present in an individual. Some people, perhaps better informed, may know that the PCR test does not have a good reputation for accuracy in results and may give false readings. Despite this significant weakness in efficacy and accuracy, the PCR test has been promoted with almost religious zeal to the wider population by the UK Government. "Everyone should be regularly PCR tested" is the constant government line.

    But is the drive for COVID-19 testing just a smokescreen with regard to the PCR test? The answer to this simple question is a straightforward yes, it is. In reality, the PCR tests have another much more important role, and that is sampling DNA data to facilitate genome sequencing, the name for reading the genetic code for the makeup of the human body.

    Before COVID, the DNA sampling industry was limited to working on the medical samples to which it could gain access, together with voluntary DNA samples which an individual might offer if they passed a sample to a genealogy site to determine their family history, for example.

    COVID-19 PCR tests, undertaken by millions of people, have changed this dearth of DNA data to a flood of data. And that data is worth money — a lot of money, as we shall see.

    In this latest edition of No Smoke Without Fire, entitled PCR Testing and the Genome Beast, Brian Gerrish discusses with Debi Evans her research into the whole subject of genome sequencing and where it leads.

    Hidden in plain sight, the genome sequencing industry is a beast of huge scale. Globally, the industry is already worth trillions of pounds, and it is expected to grow rapidly from this already immense financial base. The top ten genome sequencing companies alone had a value of over Ł635,000,000,000 in 2020.

    Debi's interest in the PCR test began when she discovered that Illumina was the company responsible for COVID-19 PCR testing. Yet it was quickly clear that Illumina was a lot more than it might appear. As Illumina says of itself:

    "At Illumina, our goal is to apply innovative technologies to the analysis of genetic variation and function, making studies possible that were not even imaginable just a few years ago. It is mission critical for us to deliver innovative, flexible, and scalable solutions to meet the needs of our customers. As a global company that places high value on collaborative interactions, rapid delivery of solutions, and providing the highest level of quality, we strive to meet this challenge. Illumina innovative sequencing and array technologies are fueling groundbreaking advancements in life science research, translational and consumer genomics, and molecular diagnostics."


    - illumina.com

    But Illumina turned out to be just one company of many. The trail led to a very large and murky pond of genome sequencing and related companies, such as Grail, the Wellcome Sanger Institute, UK Biobank, TwinsUK, Amgen, the Mayo Clinic and Genomics England — all of which overlaps with gene editing technology such as CRISPR. Governments and military also come into the picture, with ARIA and ARPA in the UK and DARPA in the USA. British academia is also well entrenched in the system, with Oxford University and Imperial College London being just two of the many institutions at the forefront.

    In the mix, the UK's Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) appeared strangely silent on the subject of vaccine data. After all, it collected Yellow Card vaccine adverse reaction (ADR) data, but published no details of any safety analysis of the very data it had collected. So where does that vaccine ADR data go?

    Similarly with the National Health Service (NHS): a prime collector of DNA data, but producing little public explanation as to where that data has been going and why.

    Our discussion also moves on to the people involved in the Genome Sequencing trail. Professor Sally Davies stated in her Annual Report of the Chief Medical Officer 2016 that:

    "Genomics is not tomorrow. It is here today. I believe genomic services should be available to more patients, whilst being a cost-effective service in the NHS. This is an exciting science with the potential for fantastic improvements in prevention, health protection and patient outcomes. Now we need to welcome the genomic era and deliver the genomic dream!"


    - Sally C. Davies, Chief Medical Officer for England, 2016

    But if Dame Sally's professional enthusiasm is understandable, just why is former Prime Ministerial chief adviser Dominic Cummings almost high on the subject of genomes? In his personal blog, his language, thoughts, and, we may say, fantasies are both breathtaking and very dark. He clearly speaks of the idea that people can and will be changed, re-engineered and 'improved'. By implication, we can discern that there is no room in Cummings' world for the weak and vulnerable. And if people can be integrated with computers and AI, then so much the better.

    If Cummings is at least constricted in his efforts within the scope of the British government, we get a better feel for the worldwide power of the Genome Sequencing medico-military industry by reading the World Economic Forum's white paper of June 2020 entitled Genomic Data Policy Framework and Ethical Tensions, and the World Health Organisation's Report of the Advisory Committee on Health Research 2002.

    Ultimately, our research touches on even wider plans for the 'benefits' of genome sequencing and editing: Behavioural Insights, where people can be re-engineered to have the right thoughts, emotions and behaviours, including their being suitably politically aligned in these areas.

    It is against this background that we should consider the words of Boris Johnson, UK Prime Minister, who has stated that the UK can become a "scientific superpower" leading the world in these areas.

    Would you like to know more? Then please do join us for our initial overview of PCR Testing and the Genome Beast.
    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  16. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    avid (24th June 2021), Bill Ryan (28th June 2021), Brigantia (24th June 2021), Ewan (24th June 2021), Gwin Ru (24th June 2021), Sunny (25th June 2021), wondering (24th June 2021)

  17. Link to Post #529
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,352
    Thanks
    39,686
    Thanked 33,459 times in 4,332 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    ...

    ... Delta Variant COVID Scam Exposed 2:19

    HealthImpactNews Published June 28, 2021 108 Views


    Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vgk2nt

    Rumble — Originally posted on Twitter by Ivor Cummins @FatEmperor
    https://twitter.com/FatEmperor/statu...54265784930311



    Dr. Michael Yeadon on Why Variants of COVID-19 are Harmless 3:48

    HealthImpactNews Published June 28, 2021 52 Views


    Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vgk4kd

    Rumble — Former Vice President of Pfizer Dr. Michael Yeadon shines the light of the truth on the COVID-19 variant scam.
    https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/th...ore-lockdowns/

  18. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    avid (28th June 2021), Bill Ryan (28th June 2021), Blacklight43 (28th June 2021), DaveToo (29th June 2021), Matthew (29th June 2021), Mike Gorman (29th June 2021), mountain_jim (28th June 2021), Tintin (2nd July 2021), wondering (29th June 2021)

  19. Link to Post #530
    UK Avalon Member Matthew's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th July 2015
    Location
    South East England
    Language
    English
    Age
    51
    Posts
    4,138
    Thanks
    25,644
    Thanked 36,191 times in 4,071 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    Month old news, probably posted elsewhere. But it is good

    https://greatgameindia.com/lisbon-co...h-covid-cases/


    Lisbon Court Rules Only 0.9% Of ‘Verified Cases’ Died Of COVID, Numbering 152, Not 17,000 As Claimed June 28, 2021

    As per a ruling by the Lisbon court, only 0.9% of ‘verified cases’ died of COVID, numbering 152, and not 17,000 as claimed by the government. The ruling has proved that the government faked COVID-19 death statistics.

    Following a citizen’s petition, a Lisbon court was forced to provide verified COVID-19 mortality data.

    According to the ruling (read full judgment below), the number of verified COVID-19 deaths from January 2020 to April 2021 is only 152, not about 17,000 as claimed by government ministries.

    All the “others” died for various reasons, although their PCR test was positive.

    The data are from the Sistema de Informaçăo dos Certificados de Óbito (Death Certificate Information System – SICO), the only such system in Portugal.

    ...

  20. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Matthew For This Post:

    avid (6th July 2021), Bill Ryan (29th June 2021), DaveToo (29th June 2021), Gwin Ru (29th June 2021), meat suit (29th June 2021), Pam (9th July 2021), Sunny (29th June 2021), Tintin (2nd July 2021)

  21. Link to Post #531
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Location
    Project Avalon library
    Language
    English
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,447
    Thanks
    64,676
    Thanked 46,617 times in 5,415 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    Nicely timed post Matthew.

    Here's a very revealing FOI request response from a UK NHS Foundation Trust, which, bearing in mind that health trust has over or around 200 hospitals and clinics under its remit throws the 'official' figures into a stark light. It's also reminded me that I am going to do similarly with a sample of local trusts in my area, and see what they get back with, using the same date range here for comparison:

    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  22. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    avid (6th July 2021), Bill Ryan (2nd July 2021), Brigantia (2nd July 2021), gini (6th July 2021), Matthew (6th July 2021), meat suit (6th July 2021), mountain_jim (2nd July 2021), Pam (9th July 2021), Richard S. (3rd July 2021)

  23. Link to Post #532
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,681
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    DR DAVID MARTIN – THE ILLUSION OF KNOWLEDGE
    July 3, 2021
    https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/dr-...-of-knowledge/

    "Dr David E Martin begins by saying, “I think every conversation about COVID and every conversation about SARS-Coronavirus is the wrong conversation for humanity to be having. And I think that we have been seduced into a distraction of epic proportions while a greater evil is being done.

    “So I am not gonna fall for it! If you thought this was gonna be the ‘Find the Fauci’ moment, I’ve got a little teaser in there, you’ll get a little Fauci but that’s not what this is about. This is about the illusion of knowledge.

    “And I have at the bottom of this slide, one of my favorite quotes from Hosea 4:6, “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.”

    ***

    In our quest to figure out how this genocidal global CoronaHoax was pulled off, we’ve looked at the Globalists, the central bankers, the corporatists, the pedophiles, the Communists, the British Crown, the Tavistock Institute, the CCP, the Illuminati, the Jesuits, Bill Gates, the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, the Sabbateans, the Bilderbergers, Klaus Schwab, the Satanists, the Freemasons – and even the Mantids from Hyperspace – but today, we can add another culprit, who the brilliant Dr Dave E Martin informs us, “For the last 145 years, they have done a wonderful job of making sure you never knew they’re behind it all. And by ‘all’, I mean ALL. And I don’t mean ‘some of all.’ I mean ‘All of All.'”

    And who might that be?

    The life insurance industry.

    Yes. We haven’t heard a peep from anyone about the insurance companies throughout our dystopian COVID interlude – let alone, ever – but Dr Martin assures us that it was the insurance companies who actually set up the central bankers to be the “Fall Guy” (!)

    Dr Martin says, “It turns out, the thing that makes life insurance work is a thing called ‘Term Life Policies’…and what you do is you pay your life insurance premiums and you do that for a long time and after a while, you kind of go, ‘I’m paying a lot in and I’m not sure what I’m getting for the return and it turns out that, for most of us, after 17 and a half to 18 and a half years, we stop paying.

    “That’s a great business, isn’t it? To tax people for 18 years, to offer them nothing and in return for the favor, keep all their money, plus all the money you made on their money and offer them no benefit. Pretty goo racket! Best part about it is they actually figured out that it was important to support the Eugenics Movement.

    “You heard what I said, People! Turns out that the thing that throws a curve ball into life insurance policies is people that die when you don’t want them to die. That’s a curve ball. That means you have to pay out.

    “So, surprisingly, in 1904 to 1910, Andrew Carnegie, who was very much affiliated with several of the boards of the life insurance companies decided that we needed to institutionalize medicine…institutionalize health research and pay for it for life insurance companies. Because controlling your death was big business. And people who didn’t match the actuarial models were bad for business.

    “Lo and behold! What did we start doing? I love it when people tell me that eugenics was a ‘Hitler thing’! Hahaha! Nice try! And thank you, once again to the life insurance companies for marketing that piece of bullsh*t – but this particular pursuit of this particular situation was born in 1910.

    “Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory…Isn’t it funny how we’ve been sucker-punched into believing that the Bad Guy is a Rothschild or the Bad Guy is a part of this nefarious, Deep Underlord, Dark Underworld, Pentagram-laden, candle ceremony, séance bullsh*t story? Isn’t it great to have a cover story, when nobody then asks the right question, which is, ‘Hold on a minute, if somebody’s marketing a story to me, I wonder if that marketing of a story is so I don’t ask any more questions?

    “And by the way, anybody who thinks that the world is run by the Rothschilds has their head up their ass. And I’m dead serious. The world is actually run by life insurance executives.

    “Bad news! And it turns out we’re going to get to why that’s so damned important…

    “What happened in 1914 is an unforgivable mortal sin…It turns out that World War I was good business for life insurers. You know what happened when we sent…young men to their deaths in Europe? Life insurers pocketed a sh*tload of money. Because it turns out that few people knew how to file claims. The Department of Defense didn’t have a mechanism to actually process those things and it turns out that, in fact, the First World War, if you look at it from an economic perspective, the biggest winner of the First World War were life insurance companies.”

    ***

    Dr David E Martin is so incredible and I got so much positive feedback from yesterday’s Q&A session at a screening of Plandemic and so many reader requests to see the main event that I found it (or at least part of it) and it is even more incredible than the Q&A. Watching this video is like having paid $60,000 tuition to attend the highest-level university – a hypothetical university that is actually worth that.

    He shares, “One of the experiences I had in my life was to be invited into the very heart of the organization that is running this very destruction. And in 1998, you can read about it in my novel, Coup d’Twelve…I was actually invited to take a very senior role in destroying this planet. And like everything else, the deal was a good deal…but at what price your soul?…

    He says that Cabal agents tried bribing him with women, money – you name it – and that if he hadn’t been raised as a Mennonite, these might have worked.

    “This particular campaign began in 1804. Edward Jenner who is the person who gave us the opportunity to call a thing a ‘vaccine’…decided there was actually an opportunity and a risk to play around with the weaponization of nature. And in 1803, he decided to coin a conversation that lasted for 80 years, which was ‘How can we use the plague constructively?’…

    “And in 1883, Francis Galton came up with the answer to the question – and the answer to the question was these beautiful things called bacterium, viruses, plague could be very interestingly described into a term he decided to publish in 1883 as ‘Eugenics’ and ‘Wouldn’t it be interesting if we could actually harness nature to actually be weaponized against humanity?’

    “If we were to examine the business plan that gave rise to what we’re experiencing now – and by the way, that business plan included an industry that mysteriously, for the last 15 months, none of us have heard anybody talking about – except a bald-headed, bowtie-wearing idiot from Virginia, you didn’t hear about life insurance!

    “Oooh. Now we’re gonna get real. Because, it turns out that between 1883 and 1893, the largest growth contributor to the GDP of this country was the trade in the fear of death. The life insurance industry represented more than the combined contribution to the economy of the coal, steel and manufacturing – COMBINED. In the ten years from 1883 and 1893.

    “And the reason why none of your are talking about this is because, if you want to know who runs the world, you’ve got it all wrong, ever since you were fooled into believing that the Federal Reserve was a central bank money-grab by bankers and by the Cabal in 1913, because it turns out, conveniently, insurance companies – not banks – put up banks to be the Fall Guy.

    “In 1904, all you have to do is look at who was on the dais when the President was sworn into to office, the following year, 1905. And you see, quite mysteriously, standing next to the President of the United States were the executives of New York Life, of Aetna and of the major life insurance companies of America.”

    I can’t transcribe it all – and I don’t think you want to read the entire transcript, either but he gets into so many vital riffs, he is a thing of wonder. Here’s one last point I can’t resist sharing:

    “Isn’t interesting, that we’re marching for Civil Rights when we’re murdering people? Isn’t that a really cool paradox, where our official cover story is all about ‘equal access’ and ‘let’s let everybody to the drinking fountain’, to ‘let’s have less people to the drinking fountain,’ to the point where we could maybe get nobody to the drinking fountain…

    “Now here’s, in my view, the long arc of the insurance companies’ story, the Original Sin. And I am going to offend almost everybody in the room with what I’m going to say about science…It turns out, you don’t have DNA. You have chromosomes. Nature made chromosomes…DNA is not a product of nature. It is a model of human manipulation. Listen carefully to what I’m saying: DNA is not a product of nature, it is a characteristic, it is a model of human manipulation…

    “Why do you think the Nobel Prize was awarded to the people who didn’t even discover the thing (DNA)? They didn’t! Watson and Crick had nothing to do – seriously – nothing to do with discovering anything. They happened to be eugenicists who would support a cover story that would tell science, ‘Don’t look anywhere else, only look to the double helix.

    “Going to go out on a limb here, for ya. Chromosomes, being paramagnetic, wound, helical coils of conductive material are quite possibly antennae. They’re quite possibly not chemistry, at all. And it turns out, I’ve proven that in the lab.

    “If you wonder why the magnet experiment, that you’re going to hear about from Dr Carrie [?] is so damned interesting. It’s not because of DNA. It’s not because of RNA. It’s because they are putting an antenna into your body to screw up the transmissions of all of the wisdom of the Cosmos, so that you are detached from being human.” "


    Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vflco3
    Last edited by Bill Ryan; 6th July 2021 at 01:41. Reason: embedded the video
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  24. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (6th July 2021), Charles Harris (6th July 2021), Constance (6th July 2021), DaveToo (6th July 2021), Ernie Nemeth (6th July 2021), gord (6th July 2021), Gwin Ru (6th July 2021), kfm27917 (8th July 2021), mountain_jim (6th July 2021), Pam (9th July 2021), ronny (6th July 2021)

  25. Link to Post #533
    Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Language
    English
    Posts
    3,453
    Thanks
    20,718
    Thanked 25,435 times in 3,321 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
    Last edited by Constance; 13th November 2021 at 22:45.

  26. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Constance For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (6th July 2021), DaveToo (8th July 2021), gord (6th July 2021), onawah (7th July 2021), Tintin (6th July 2021)

  27. Link to Post #534
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Location
    Project Avalon library
    Language
    English
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,447
    Thanks
    64,676
    Thanked 46,617 times in 5,415 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    "The manner in which society has accepted this kind of gobbledegook from politicians, SAGE, SPI-B, public health directors and epidemiologists is frightening."
    - John A. Fairclough

    ----------

    Covid and the Death of the Scientific Method
    4 July 2021 / Updated 7 July 2021
    by John A Fairclough B.M. B.S. B Med Sci FRCS FFSEM

    Source: Lockdown Sceptics



    While Matt Hancock was running around in nursery, I managed a polio epidemic, had malaria, treated leprosy and Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease in cannibals (Mad Cow) – also abandoned my pregnant wife for safety in a convent in Papua New Guinea to rescue a voluntary worker, had a career in medicine of over five decades, published widely, including on infection ritual, the wearing of masks, and once appeared in the Times Top 10 surgeons.

    I was married to a Welsh geography teacher who survived eclampsia, cerebral oedema in ITU and fractured jaw, breast cancer and ectopic pregnancy.

    I lectured Internationally on the Myth of Surgical Ritual (including the nonsense of cloth masks). The above photo is a slide from the lecture.

    We are now the grannies and grandads whom Matt Hancock patronised by asking the younger generation to save. We can’t apparently assess our own risk.

    The absence of scientists in the political masters and some media correspondents has rendered them incapable of interrogating the validity of data suggested by some scientists. It may be a surprise to many that epidemiologists are mainly mathematicians not medics and that most scientists on SAGE are not practising clinicians who wear masks as surgeons do as part of their practice.

    We now have a new Health Secretary but still the lamentable voices of SAGE, the BMA and a host of individuals who appear incapable of distinguishing scientific data from opinion.

    The latest entreaty from the BMA made by Chaand Nagpaul, a GP who is registered at the aptly named “Honeypot Medical Centre Surgery” apparently supported by Chris Whitty, is that “face masks may be needed after July 19th amid fears over ‘alarming’ rise in Covid cases”.

    I have fought over the five decades of my career to ensure that treatment is based not only on the science but on the relevance to the individual. Hence as a clinician I discuss management and we discuss risks including doing nothing. It is mandated that we indicate the scientific basis on which our decisions are made. When we now observe masks being given a magical property and the vaccination of children as part of the programme, we are hurtling headlong into a completely new moral and ethical paradigm. We do not know what happens to an individual who has had a COVID-19 vaccine in the long term. We do, however, know the generalised risk of mortality and the essential safety of COVID-19 in the younger generation but yet are demanding vaccination in the young. Any demand to vaccinate the under 16s is fraught with a legal challenge as the ‘best interest’ test will not be passed; sadly there is an absence of practising clinicians being listened to.

    Covid has now been inculcated into the very essence of life such that society now believes that to question non-adherence to manufactured ‘rules’ or question their relevance is akin to blasphemy.

    Today we attended an open-air restaurant. If we sat and had a coffee, we did not need masks, but as we walk between the tables we would all suddenly have to put masks on. (I sat next to a man on chemotherapy for terminal prostate cancer at lunch.)

    The manner in which society has accepted this kind of gobbledegook from politicians, SAGE, SPI-B, public health directors and epidemiologists is frightening. It is perhaps because journalists do not understand science. Science is not pure or constant and medicine is littered with failed good ideas from aspirin in children, to gynaecological mesh, thalidomide, etc. Furthermore, academics and departments are developed from funding related to publications they produce.

    When Neil Ferguson et al. in 2002 generated their fear of mad cow disease (I had already seen it in the cannibals in Papua New Guinea), they essentially panicked society in the U.K. and required a mass slaughter of cattle to treat an unknown risk which they overestimated (parallels with Covid?). What is not generally known is the immense knock-on costs this caused, e.g. in orthopaedic surgery where we were told to use disposable instruments with new protocols adding time and expense. The newspapers, TV and radio were filled with gloomy prediction of Armageddon in years to come and panic raged. When a vegetarian developed CJD there was not a sensible scientific view that this occurrence should question the assumption that CJD was related to eating meat. Scientific gymnastics were employed, not to explain that perhaps the cause (a prion) was elsewhere in the environment but that his mother had worked in an abattoir, which was ludicrous. Why? Because vast sums were given to departments to support jobs and projects and if it had been shown that the disease was not an existential threat, then research would be less important. Recognise the similarity now with the supporters of continuation of the Covid regulations? Once it is over, all the media hungry scientists, public health doctors, etc. will return to their previous anonymity and struggle to get funds unless they can continue with the fear, i.e., they are motivated to continue.

    The ability to dissent from the consensus view of society is equated with either a charge of ignorance or selfishness and with becoming a social pariah.

    The dystopian nature of how society has become was demonstrated in a poll by IPSOS.

    The questions do not ask about knowledge of dangers, etc.

    If you provide the public with essentially one-sided data, you will get the response you choose. It is horrific that the Government would feel emboldened by a public poll to start vaccinating children.

    The question the poll did not ask is: If there is any possibility however remote that your child will die or be seriously ill after vaccination, would you support its use?

    When Tim Spector tweeted that children may need to be vaccinated to achieve herd immunity, we have little hope, because there is no discussion of potential harm vs. benefit for them and it is another voice in the gobbledegook science that is so prevalent today.

    Perhaps the biggest casualty of the pandemic has been the death of the scientific method. The acquisition of knowledge that has characterised the development of science requires applying rigorous scepticism about what is observed, as preformed opinion or assumptions can distort how one interprets the data. The process involves making hypotheses and testing these by conducting experiments or studies. In human disease experiments, unless you have a controlled experimental population exposed to a measurable intervention which can be compared with a matched experimental group who have no intervention, then data is always subject to marked error.

    The papers published on the virus have encompassed the very best of science with the development of understanding of the genomic sequence of SARS COV-2 and vaccine development, but have also been redolent with observational studies most of which in normal time would never be published.

    The silly ‘rules’ of mask wearing and social distancing have now been brought to a new sense of ridicule with the inability to sing in church or at a wedding, while we are ‘permitted’ to go to large alcohol-fuelled football matches.

    The present Government has made society believe that it is more important not to die than to have the ability to live. Sadly, we will all die, but they have shown that they can stop us living.

    I, along with my wife, will no longer wear a mask. Not because we are intending to be criminals but because the masking policy is based on the distorted paranoid views of a few media voices.

    John A. Fairclough is Hon. Consultant Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgeon University Hospital of Wales and Professor Emeritus at Cardiff Metropolitan University
    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  28. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    Bassplayer1 (8th July 2021), Bill Ryan (8th July 2021), Ewan (8th July 2021), Gwin Ru (8th July 2021), Harmony (8th July 2021), leavesoftrees (9th July 2021), Matthew (8th July 2021), mountain_jim (8th July 2021), ronny (8th July 2021), Sue (Ayt) (8th July 2021), wondering (8th July 2021)

  29. Link to Post #535
    Avalon Member Pam's Avatar
    Join Date
    29th June 2012
    Posts
    3,370
    Thanks
    42,395
    Thanked 27,393 times in 3,308 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    I am not sure how to intro this information but I feel it may be very important. This forum is actually about capitol markets and analysis for investing. There is a person that follows employment stats in the US and has inadvertently come across some very interesting information involving considerable reduction in numbers. It looks sort of dry at first glance but it is well worth the consideration. What do you statisticians think of this?

    https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=242844

    I don't know if this can be imbedded.

  30. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Pam For This Post:

    Alan (8th July 2021), Bill Ryan (8th July 2021), Gwin Ru (8th July 2021), kfm27917 (8th July 2021), Matthew (8th July 2021), Tintin (8th July 2021), wondering (8th July 2021)

  31. Link to Post #536
    UK Avalon Member Matthew's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th July 2015
    Location
    South East England
    Language
    English
    Age
    51
    Posts
    4,138
    Thanks
    25,644
    Thanked 36,191 times in 4,071 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    Death Certificate Clerk confirms deaths were wrongly labelled as Covid-19 to boost numbers
    BY THE DAILY EXPOSE ON JULY 7, 2021
    https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/07/07...boost-numbers/

    Although revered as the guiding star for science, clinical practice and legislation aimed to save lives, cause-of-death reporting does not meet any basic criteria of objective fact. Across continents, from 40 years ago to present day, death certificates, which provide the basis for our beliefs as to why we die, have been found to be erroneous in their causal conclusions 20-60% of the time according to the peer-reviewed literature.

    The daily process of obtaining cause-of-death information, which I was an eyewitness to, is not a process of careful investigation, but rather a rushed and apathetic bureaucratic tumbling machine that incentivizes compliance over recording the complexity of truth.

    By Joy Fritz – a former Death Certificate Clerk who worked at two separate mortuary firms for over 6 years

    In this piece I offer a personal account, a logical argument and the scientific evidence for the claim that mortality statistics derived from cause-of-death reporting on death certificates are an unstable material upon which to build actionable scientific or societal beliefs about risk. Then I provide an in-depth examination of the very particular situation of COVID death reporting manipulation that happened beginning in March of 2020, infused politicized bias into an already defunct system.

    Lastly, you will find a call to action, with steps that we, the individuals affected by the inaccurate data capture, can take to hold the regulatory bodies responsible for this to account, as well as volunteer and support opportunities to help those who need to get erroneous death certificates officially amended.

    Being a former death certificate clerk, and having spent nearly 7 years in the funeral home industry ushering thousands of death certificates from digital creation to final registration, I am appalled that death certificate data is codified for use as our national mortality statistics.

    ...

  32. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Matthew For This Post:

    Alan (8th July 2021), Bill Ryan (8th July 2021), Ewan (9th July 2021), Gwin Ru (8th July 2021), Pam (9th July 2021), Sue (Ayt) (9th July 2021), Tintin (9th July 2021), wondering (8th July 2021)

  33. Link to Post #537
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,352
    Thanks
    39,686
    Thanked 33,459 times in 4,332 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    ...

    ... if this is true: 45,000 death within 3 days after inoculation... pitchfork manufactures should see their profits skyrocket!

  34. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (19th July 2021), bluestflame (20th July 2021), mountain_jim (19th July 2021), onawah (27th July 2021), Pam (20th July 2021), pyrangello (19th July 2021), wondering (19th July 2021)

  35. Link to Post #538
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    34,268
    Thanks
    208,959
    Thanked 457,531 times in 32,788 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    Quote Posted by Gwin Ru (here)

    ... if this is true: 45,000 death within 3 days after inoculation... pitchfork manufactures should see their profits skyrocket!
    I'd suspect it's more likely that whatever stats were the source (do we know what they are??), they've just suddenly jumped because they were all compiled or updated at once.

    It's a horrific number, whether over a 3 day period or a 3 month period, but I really do think it's more likely to be the latter.

  36. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    Alan (19th July 2021), bluestflame (20th July 2021), Gwin Ru (19th July 2021), mountain_jim (19th July 2021), pyrangello (19th July 2021), Sirus (19th July 2021), wondering (19th July 2021), Yoda (19th July 2021)

  37. Link to Post #539
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    34,268
    Thanks
    208,959
    Thanked 457,531 times in 32,788 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    Quote Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
    Quote Posted by Gwin Ru (here)

    ... if this is true: 45,000 death within 3 days after inoculation... pitchfork manufactures should see their profits skyrocket!
    I'd suspect it's more likely that whatever stats were the source (do we know what they are??), they've just suddenly jumped because they were all compiled or updated at once.

    It's a horrific number, whether over a 3 day period or a 3 month period, but I really do think it's more likely to be the latter.
    Ah.... now I understand. Bear of very little brain here, so please forgive me.

    It's not that 45,000 people all died in a 3 day period. 45,000 people each, at different times, died within 3 days of getting their shot. It was this article that clarified that for me.

    https://vaccineimpact.com/2021/attor...covid-19-shots

    Attorney Files Lawsuit Against CDC Based on “Sworn Declaration” from Whistleblower Claiming 45,000 Deaths are Reported to VAERS – All Within 3 Days of COVID-19 Shots

  38. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    Alan (19th July 2021), All is one (27th July 2021), Ankle Biter (21st July 2021), bluestflame (20th July 2021), Ewan (20th July 2021), Gwin Ru (19th July 2021), meat suit (20th July 2021), onawah (27th July 2021), Pam (20th July 2021), Reinhard (21st July 2021), Satori (21st July 2021), Siphonemis (21st July 2021), Tintin (20th July 2021), wondering (19th July 2021), Yoda (19th July 2021)

  39. Link to Post #540
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Location
    Northern Michigan
    Age
    61
    Posts
    2,255
    Thanks
    8,500
    Thanked 18,725 times in 2,088 posts

    Default Re: Covid19: Don't trust the statistics (or the science re the tests/the cause of the sickness)

    Go to the 40 minute mark of this video, watch for 11 miniutes, stats are given , this was before this suit, Remember this VAERS data reporting is 3 months behind.

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/WXEeUj6PJ9tN/

  40. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to pyrangello For This Post:

    Ankle Biter (21st July 2021), Bill Ryan (20th July 2021), bluestflame (20th July 2021), Brigantia (21st July 2021), Gwin Ru (19th July 2021), Pam (20th July 2021), Reinhard (21st July 2021), Tintin (21st July 2021), wondering (19th July 2021)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 27 of 31 FirstFirst 1 17 27 31 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts