I wish to clarify, first of all, that this post does not invite debate on the veracity of Q, or whether people should start looking into Q or not. That's basic personal choice. These materials either appeal or they don't. This isn't an advertisement. Neither is this shouting about Q from a pulpit. It serves merely as an introduction to Q and to Q Research. For those interested. It is a tad lengthy, but the devil's in the details as they say.
Its aim is to advise, inform, describe and explain Q a little more deeply, and to help those who are curious or interested in it to be brought up to speed more quickly. Because the main thread is now over 600 pages long (and counting). That's quite overwhelming for anyone coming in fresh. I shall also offer salient evidence for Q, something required if one is to give it one's time, and, for the sake of precision, provide some...candid reflections on one or two common misperceptions surrounding Qanon in general.
Comments on the summary presented are welcomed, and any further or deeper insights even more welcomed. I am by no means an expert, just an observer. Questions also welcomed (straight answers not guaranteed).
----
On the surface, Qanon sounds little more than whacky nonsense, and those who follow it whacky conspiracy theorists. But enough of us should know by now that the term 'conspiracy theorist', if that’s what we are, carries a lot of negative baggage – and on purpose. That term has been weaponized to character-assassinate anyone who dares to think outside the conventional mainstream view. But this is not the mainstream. We operate on a different frequency here, one where investigation and diligent analysis carries the day, not bias, not expectation, and not preconception.
So this is where to begin with Q.
Before tackling the complexity of the Q drops and what they amount to, it's important first to recognise their validity – to establish that Q is authentic, whoever he/she/they are. This can be accomplished by examining the coincidences.
LOTS of coincidences. Random and remarkable coincidences, one following another. Q provides these to certify his or her credentials. Q appropriately asks, "At what point do so many coincidences become mathematically impossible?"
I don't have an answer for that. Determining mathematical probabilities is not my forte. But I, like many others, after studying rather too many coincidences, arrived at the inescapable conclusion that these coincidences simply could not be coincidences.
They serve only as a preface to Q, however. An introduction-level outer layer that should in the very least appeal to one's basic awareness. Once realized, it should oblige that awareness to further recognise this is coordinated, this is by design. Many more layers lie beneath.
Consider, for a moment, the following coincidences. Below, just a few, described by these infographics. In some, the timestamps are important. (There are hundreds of these archived).
Larger
Again, just a preface. A sort of proof of concept, demonstrating that this is not an illusion, and not a game. These are by no means the most compelling coincidences. Many others are intricately connected, in some cases over multiple weeks/months of drops – so too dense and complex to reproduce and explain here. You'll have to discover them for yourself.
Q began posting originally on 4Chan, in October 2017. Q posts under the unique moniker "Q", with a login protected by a virtually unhackable 'tripcode' (appears in the top left of each post). The "drops" arrive most often in a sort of cryptic shorthand. Some observers were immediately jolted by that, and were quick to discount the whole thing as nothing more than a distraction, a larp, and a wild goose chase. Because a real whistle-blower wouldn't do this, they said. They'd get straight to the point and post their information clearly and precisely.
Not necessarily. Firstly, Q is not a whistleblower, not a witness. Q is an insider. And not a low-level observer leaking information. This comes from the very top, as part of a deliberate and highly coordinated campaign to disclose classified information, as tips, clues, and hints. These are cryptographic missives of disclosure, coming from official channels, but disseminated unofficially – via a backchannel – so as to circumvent national security laws. Being any clearer would probably constitute a violation of those national security laws.
Additional confusion arises from the drops that contain only raw code, that Anons call "stringers".
Example:
What are these confusing alphanumeric strings or stringers? Some have been unscrambled, others not. Resembling authorization codes, or computer instructions, Anons have suggested they might be IDs/commands for surveillance satellites. The phrase "message not meant for Anons" has been posted once or twice in this regard. So it leads us to believe – however crazy this may sound – that Q is using open comms to also pass commands/messages to people in the Intel community, or the military.
Wait, top secret comms on the internet, for all to see? That's crazy! But consider, such messages would only mean something to those they specifically target, or, that a cipher is only useful to those who have the key. It could also be Q saying "we have your commands/codes" (to the enemy). The fact these messages were posted in the open for all to see suggests they may also be relevant in the future. A common phrase Q likes to use is "future proves past". We'll see an example of future proving past shortly.
To understand the breakdown of a typical Q post (with analysis), here is one such example, as decoded by Anons. A summary of which (beneath) is drawn from the original compilation made by Neonrevolt.
This is written somewhat as a flowchart, with each line finding causation from the previous.
We can decode the following, beginning with [SR]> (line 4).
[SR]> = Seth Rich (the murdered DNC staffer)
[WL]> = Wikileaks - He gave the DNC files to Wikileaks.
HUSSEIN> = Word gets out to Obama (Hussein)
DNI DIR> = DNI (Director of National Intelligence) is assigned damage control.
CLOWN DIR> = James Clapper is DNI director, and he goes to John Brennan, the CIA's director. (CLOWN is euphemism for CIA – Clowns in America).
Subsequent lines Indicate formulation for the basis of the Russian Collusion hoax, to cover the DNC's behinds, they hire Google and Crowdstrike to perpetuate lie, that the DNC was hacked by "Russians."
DNC> = A hit is then asked for by the DNC (Democratic National Committee).
(SR 187) = Hit on Seth Rich (187 is slang for murder - California penal code).
(MS13 (2) 187) = Hit was carried out by two MS-13 gangmembers. They were 187'd themselves as part of cleanup.
DWS_DIR> = Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, as Director of the DNC)
F-I/D-J ASSIST> = FBI and DOJ assist with cover-up.
"INSURANCE" = Reference to Peter Strzok's texts, where he said:
/_\ > = An image of a pyramid (with the top knocked off). Again, a reference to "the cult" ("eye of providence"), also a deliberate note that they've lost power and control. To try and regain control, they go into overdrive and eventually come up with the "Russian Dossier", which tries to link Trump to "Russian Hackers" in order to kill two birds with one stone."I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy's office — that there's no way he gets elected — but I'm afraid we can't take that risk. It's like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you're 40."
HUSSEIN> = Barrack Obama
HRC> = Hillary Rodham Clinton
LL> = Loretta Lynch
JC> = James Comey
AM> = Andrew McCabe
PS> = Peter Strzok
BRIT INTEL> / HRC CAMP PAY> / DNC PAY> / CLAS: 1-4 PAY> / STEELE> = They go through the Five Eyes members (Intel communities of US, Canada, UK, Australia and New Zealand), and end up working with Christopher Steele of MI6.
PODESTA> / HOLDER RELAY SPEC RUSSIA> = Phony dossier produced, with Steele's primary points of contact being John Podesta and Eric Holder.
HUSSEIN> / PRES DAILY B> / US SEN NO NAME> / NEWS SHOP> / BUZZF> = Obama uses phony dossier as "evidence" to justify spying on Trump's presidential campaign. John McCain (known as "No Name McCain") then leaks the dossier to Buzzfeed in an attempt to shape the public narrative.
Q's purpose here was to bring into the public awareness crimes being committed, severe crimes, treasonous crimes, in the background, out of view, and beyond (normal) accountability. And these are by no means the most severe crimes Q sheds a light on.
As seen, Q will use terminology sourced from intelligence, military and even police lexicons. Such as [DECLAS] (declassification), [187] (murder), and [5:5]. (loud and clear in ham radio slang). Symbols and abbreviations too. Q provides certain legends throughout. Phrases appear regularly that have layers of meaning, such as "Alice in Wonderland", and codes like "+++", which refers to Saudi Arabia, or "++" meaning the Rothschilds, and "+" is George Soros. When Q uses squared brackets [...] for something, it is called, euphemistically, a [kill box]. It basically means [target], over the target, or an item of special focus.
Another point: supposedly unintelligible cryptic messages are sort of steganographic, meaning what appears at first glance to be unintelligible strings of text actually contain hidden meanings.
Example:
Note top line,
Term_[#2]19_y
Meaning is laid out in following infographic.
Larger
***
The drop below established early confirmation of POTUS involvement. Minutes after Trump confirmed, the Q drop was deleted.
The meaning is laid out in the following infographic.
Larger
Meanings often become clear after an event – thus "future proving past". Drops like these also confirm that the Q team is certainly – zero percent doubt – working with Trump or inside his administration.
Spelling out the posts in more simple language (beyond crumbs and code and abbreviations) would, not to belabour the point, jeopardise National Security laws. Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) is used as a work around. People following through on the Q posts with their own research hone their own OSINT intelligence collection and analysis skill-sets. Very often Q engages the research of Anons and then asks further questions, or makes a comment, to deepen the thinking around that find. A lot of the Q-proofs have come from specific Anon requests. It's a collaborative process in which Anons actively contribute to that process.
But Q can't start a blog, a radio show, or sit down in front of a webcam. This should be obvious to everyone, given the sensitivity of Q's supposed identity, position, location, and clearance. How else would one uphold the law AND leak classified information to the public at the same time? How else would one get the message out while safeguarding strategically important ongoing operations (or those that are planned)? In precisely the way I think Q has done it. With crumbs, clues, codes, and signposts. With dots, that the Anons must join together themselves.
Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 564897 No.1002729 📁
Apr 11 2018 18:13:36 (EST)
>>1002693
Our comms must be this way. <---
Refer back - the ‘Why?’
NAT SEC laws. <---
Trust the plan.
April Showers.
Q
For the first time ever, the average Joe or Jane has been made party to classified, highly compartmentalized, up-to-date information. Or at least its crumbs. Q tasks YOU, the civilian, to fill in the blanks. This way laws and oaths are protected. Perhaps it can only be this way.
Games of political chess are being played here. Again, Q asks: "Do comms only go to Anons?" No, they're visible to all. As such, we've seen Q use his platform to also issue threats to the enemy with "we have the server", or "we have the source". That's psychological warfare. This is also part of 'the game'.
Crumbs are spread out for the Anons – or Autists as they are also known – to follow. "Autists" because they possess a certain practical analytical gift, common in autistic people, which is often called upon to piece this material together.
Delivered in the Socratic method, the drops are designed to appeal to basic human logic. They invite you to think, to ask questions, and make connections yourself. The crumbs are dropped into the crowd-sourced arena 8Chan (or today 8kun), a perfect platform because it is anonymous, resilient, and serves as the last bastion of free speech on the internet [or was until, shock of shocks, 8Chan was taken down!] 8kun eventually replaced it, with even tougher controls and safeguards, however that still doesn't preclude the constant and coordinated shilling attacks it receives on a daily basis. I say coordinated, as there is an organized and quite malicious campaign to repeatedly smear and discredit Q and the Anons, not only with disinformation, but verbal attacks. That is clear to anyone who has spent more than 5 minutes on the boards.
When navigating the breads of 8kun, you must filter constantly. The most frequent offender is racism and hate speech. These are "Slides", which often come from the same group of posters. A slide is a piece of spurious, irrelevant, or provocative information inserted by a fake Anon. The goal is to anger and divide Anons, consume their attention, and slide it from the task at hand, which is Q research. Anons must also put up with sometimes really horrible things like images of death, gore and dismemberment, and copious pornographic images of the most twisted and despicable kind. You name it, it's there. Blur scripts have lately been incorporated as a defence, which is a welcome feature. It blurs all images until you hover your mouse over it. 8kun is still not for the faint of heart, nor for the casual seeker. It must be understood this toxic environment is NOT made by Q, or by the Anons. The attacks come from the outside. Because this is NOT a larp, not a joke. Some of the information Q is sharing is absolutely not in the best interests of certain agencies, powers, and factions. These agencies/factions employ round-the-clock counter intelligence operations. Q research is in the crosshairs of those operations, and the barrage of interference is abhorrent and constant. Sadly it's to considerable effect. It scares all but the most stalwart autists away, and slanders the movement in one stroke. Fortunately, most genuine Anons are very thick-skinned, and utterly indefatigable. Many work in shifts, researching, or "digging" as they call it, night and day, 24/7.
Q posts on what is called a "bread" (which is a thread). A bread is of course made up of many crumbs, crumbs being research data-points, which could be the Q-drops themselves, or various images, articles, and documents. Almost anything. When multiple Anons contribute to a single topic or issue, a "bun" is baked, and written out in a list of "Notables". These are the highlighted issues of the bread, and are archived for future reference. The Notables could number as many as two dozen per bread, but only a portion will be Q-related (depending on whether Q has posted on that bread). Topics usually involve current and relevant news items, but many autists run side-projects, in areas of special interest, and regularly present original research material for the scrutiny of peers. It is the closest thing you will find to independent, on the pulse, on the money, real-time citizen journalism. But written and compiled Anonymously. No credit, no name, and no fame. When a new bread is "baked", a new bread/thread is created (accessed from the Q Research Catalog). Each bread holds 750 replies. At peak traffic they can tick over at the rate of 2 per hour. That's a lot of accumulated bread in the last three years...
A typical Notables list for one bread (Bread number #11,760, May 15th 2020)
Crumbs have led to many important bakes. Russia-gate. These machinations were laid out piecemeal over many months throughout most of 2018. A frame-job from the outset, it was alleged, with methods used and guilty parties named. Much of this has now come to (public) light, though Q-followers knew the details long ago. North Korea, and the settling of tensions there. This unfolded on the chans, with Q, in real-time. Q researchers learned all about Jeffery Epstein before he hit the headlines. Corruption at the DOJ is an ongoing matter, as is the pit of corruption that is Ukraine. The Clinton Foundation, too (pure evil, deeper than anyone could guess). And FISA abuse. These are just a tiny few in a (now) vast array of heinous goings-on that Q has unravelled in the drops, and the Anons have pieced together.
You have to admit (if you by now accept this as real), it is very, very clever. When zooming out to take in the whole body of the material, the smooth elegance of it is obvious, and quite remarkable. Those who follow Qanon, or at least cast an interested eye in its direction, believe what's happening is a deliberate, strategic, and coordinated intel dump, on a scale never before seen in history. If this is true, it suggests we have entered a brand new era of openness and transparency, where deep government assets with the very highest security clearance have chosen to actively brief the general public on what's really been going on – for the first time ever. But piecemeal. As crumbs. And not only due to NAT SEC. The full truth, Q has explained, is so huge, and so terrible, few would be able to handle it – at least in one go. Thus the drops. Small steps.
Many of the drops chiefly involve American politics, activities, and crimes – this is true. But if Q is, as many believe, operating at the highest level of US Intelligence, and within the US Government (on the side of the white hats), then this is obviously going to be the case. This is what the Q-team has access to, information on, and potentially jurisdiction over. This makes sense. This is logical. However, Q and the Great Awakening reaches worldwide, and is known and followed worldwide.
Beyond the crumbs, beyond the data, there are many numbers, patterns and codes to keep track of. Not all carry significance I suspect. There is what is called the Q-Clock, which is like the grand unified theory of Q, but this is only for the most advanced autist. There are so many levels to grasp, and few if any grasp all of it. This is modern game theory meets the Art of War, with schemes laid and moves made and traps sprung along the way. Many specifics are dropped, just not explicit timelines, for obvious reasons.
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 03c2f4 No.127154 📁 Post 381
Dec 19 2017 18:00:02 (EST)
We won't telegraph our moves to the ENEMY.
We will however light a FIRE to flush them out.
Q
Note the secondary meaning: the phrase 'ENEMY FIRE' in caps. Nothing is posted randomly or by mistake.
But game theory, what is it?
Game Theory has a central theme of complications that arise between two entities who can reason through each other’s success rates and expected moves.
"This dilemma, you realize with dread, is general: you must do what your pursuer least expects; but whatever you most expect her to least expect is automatically what she will most expect. You appear to be trapped in indecision. All that might console you a bit here is that, on the other side of the river, your pursuer is trapped in exactly the same quandary, unable to decide which bridge to wait at because as soon as she imagines committing to one, she will notice that if she can find a best reason to pick a bridge, you can anticipate that same reason and then avoid her."
For a journey of understanding Game Theory: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/game-theory/
Here, Jayke described it thus:
"Think logically" is a mantra that describes the level 7 archetype rather well, whereas the level 6 archetype is all about "subjective feelings of the group taking prominence over objective reality". It's a culture war between ideologies that's been raging for the past few years.
And then with planetary cycles catalysing "The Great Societal reset" in a few short months, it's really not surprising that so much chaos and turmoil is occurring globally.
We've covered these deeper archetypal patterns and dynamics quite extensively in the various Q threads (and other places across the forum), such as in the 'mechanism of addiction' thread and how these global movements can be predicted using Systems Theory.
-
In systems/chaos theory, it only requires change in 1 part of the system, for that change to cascade through the rest of the system. America is one of the biggest globalist countries, if the country that promotes hegemony makes the paradigm shift, the rest of the world will naturally follow along. Which is why it's unnecessary for Q-anon to be an ambassador of global outrage and can just focus on American geopolitics.
The Q movement is a facet of a broader global movement for sure, one that's helping English speaking countries (a wide demographic beyond just America) make the transition.
Continued...