+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1 5 7 LastLast
Results 81 to 100 of 127

Thread: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

  1. Link to Post #81
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,351
    Thanks
    39,683
    Thanked 33,454 times in 4,331 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Researchers succeed in taking first 3D photo of coronavirus

    So this is what you look like!

    Until now, there have only been computer graphics of the coronavirus. Now, Austrian researchers have photographed SARS-CoV-2 for the first time in 3D.

    Researchers have succeeded in taking the first 3D photo of coronavirus

    This picture is taken from 3-D images of real SARS-CoV-2 virus from snap-frozen samples. They come from the company Nanographics, a spin-off of the Vienna University of Technology. They are based on data from researchers at Tsinghua University in Beijing.

    The Chinese scientists had succeeded in extracting, scanning and digitizing intact SARS-CoV-2 virus particles in samples. In the process, the scientists managed to preserve the spike proteins of the virus samples in their structure as best as possible.

    On the nanographics images, the coronavirus samples are closely packed together, but individual viruses can also be viewed in isolation, in this 3D picture.

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Deborah (ahamkara) (2nd February 2021), iota (2nd February 2021), Mark (23rd March 2021), onawah (22nd January 2021), pueblo (7th March 2021)

  3. Link to Post #82
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    8th May 2017
    Location
    TX, USA
    Language
    English
    Posts
    2,119
    Thanks
    7,405
    Thanked 14,546 times in 2,065 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    here is the video that Tony Robbins was referencing in the Tweet below from this post on Breaking News here


    i had UPDATED The post to note:

    THIS was seen LIVE by just a little under a million people!! a comment explains:

    Quote
    I saw him say this live in his group "New World New You" on Facebook.

    The Facebook group people freaked out on him.

    This video was captured from his free event. 800,000 people were listening.
    below is the video he was referencing ..


    We should defend our way of life
    to an extent that any attempt on it is crushed,

    so that any adversary
    will never make such an attempt in the future.

  4. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to iota For This Post:

    Deborah (ahamkara) (2nd February 2021), lisalu (29th April 2021), pueblo (7th March 2021), TomKat (4th July 2021)

  5. Link to Post #83
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    28th April 2010
    Posts
    453
    Thanks
    4,020
    Thanked 2,371 times in 388 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Not sure if this impassioned video has been posted yet. I couldn't see it. God bless Vernon. He is a true hero imo.

    VERNON COLEMAN - DOCTORS & NURSES GIVING THE COVID19 VACCINE WILL BE TRIED AS WAR CRIMINALS


    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/3v1tbPeW7yqK

  6. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to One For This Post:

    Dreamer148 (3rd February 2021), Ernie Nemeth (3rd February 2021), lisalu (29th April 2021), Matthew (3rd February 2021), Philippe (6th February 2021), pueblo (7th March 2021)

  7. Link to Post #84
    Canada Avalon Member Ernie Nemeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th January 2011
    Location
    Toronto
    Age
    66
    Posts
    5,659
    Thanks
    26,233
    Thanked 36,600 times in 5,379 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    I remember, long ago, once...I had a doctor like this. Actually, I think, back in the day, most doctors were like this.

    Then the bureaucrats came in and ****ed it all up! Doctors work with their hands, they assume, so they are just glorified laborers - to be told what to do by 'authorities' well removed from the stench and misery of the front line medical staff.

    **** you health care advocates! Get your heads out of arses! There is no health care, only illness management - a whole other animal. We are not test subjects! And one doctor is by far more valuable than a truckload of you paper-pushers...

    edit: no regret. just wish I'd said get your heads out of your arses and your swabs out of ours, that's all
    Last edited by Ernie Nemeth; 3rd February 2021 at 22:07.
    Empty your mind, be formless, shapeless — like water...Now water can flow or it can crash. Be water, my friend. Bruce Lee

    Free will can only be as free as the mind that conceives it.

  8. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Ernie Nemeth For This Post:

    lisalu (29th April 2021), One (3rd February 2021), pueblo (7th March 2021), TomKat (4th February 2021)

  9. Link to Post #85
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,351
    Thanks
    39,683
    Thanked 33,454 times in 4,331 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax



    (Derek Knauss) I have a PhD in virology and immunology. I’m a clinical lab scientist and have tested 1500 “supposed” positive Covid 19 samples collected here in S. California. When my lab team and I did the testing through Koch’s postulates and observation under a SEM (scanning electron microscope), we found NO Covid in any of the 1500 samples.

    What we found was that all of the 1500 samples were mostly Influenza A and some were influenza B, but not a single case of Covid, and we did not use the B.S. PCR test. We then sent the remainder of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a few of the University of California labs and they found the same results as we did, NO COVID. They found influenza A and B. All of us then spoke to the CDC and asked for viable samples of COVID, which CDC said they could not provide as they did not have any samples. We have now come to the firm conclusion through all our research and lab work, that the COVID 19 was imaginary and fictitious.

    The flu was called Covid and most of the 225,000 dead were dead through co-morbidities such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, emphysema etc. and they then got the flu which further weakened their immune system and they died. I have yet to find a single viable sample of Covid 19 to work with. We at the 7 universities that did the lab tests on these 1500 samples are now suing the CDC for Covid 19 fraud. the CDC has yet to send us a single viable, isolated and purifed sample of Covid 19. If they can’t or won’t send us a viable sample, I say there is no Covid 19, it is fictitious. The four research papers that do describe the genomic extracts of the Covid 19 virus never were successful in isolating and purifying the samples. All the four papers written on Covid 19 only describe small bits of RNA which were only 37 to 40 base pairs long which is NOT A VIRUS. A viral genome is typically 30,000 to 40,000 base pairs.

    With as bad as Covid is supposed to be all over the place, how come no one in any lab world wide has ever isolated and purified this virus in its entirety? That’s because they’ve never really found the virus, all they’ve ever found was small pieces of RNA which were never identified as the virus anyway.

    So what we’re dealing with is just another flu strain like every year, COVID 19 does not exist and is fictitious. I believe China and the globalists orchestrated this COVID hoax (the flu disguised as a novel virus) to bring in global tyranny and a worldwide police totalitarian surveillance state, and this plot included massive election fraud to overthrow Trump.


    Related:

  10. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Ernie Nemeth (6th February 2021), fifi (17th March 2021), lisalu (29th April 2021), Philippe (6th February 2021), pueblo (7th March 2021)

  11. Link to Post #86
    Canada Avalon Member Ernie Nemeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th January 2011
    Location
    Toronto
    Age
    66
    Posts
    5,659
    Thanks
    26,233
    Thanked 36,600 times in 5,379 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Very easy for those 2 million chinese spies to spread a new variant of influenza to all corners of the globe on the orders of the CCP. They could slip in and out without anyone being the wiser. All they'd need is a nebulizer, or catch the virus themselves and then just get close to people. Also, I heard rumors that the chinese were using their large cadre of foreign exchange students as spies and disinformation agents. They exist in most major cities in the western world.

    Of course, the far left radicals could have orchestrated the same 'Typhoid Mary' type attack.

    In either case, this tactic could easily make it seem like a pandemic as these despicables spread it around the world.


    On another note. I am happy they finally found the flu bug again. To listen to MSM you'd think the flu had died out completely, like small pox, or something. Just magically disappeared, huh? Ya, right. And imagine, this new bug kills the same number as the flu, no more and no less. What a lucky coincidence.
    Empty your mind, be formless, shapeless — like water...Now water can flow or it can crash. Be water, my friend. Bruce Lee

    Free will can only be as free as the mind that conceives it.

  12. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Ernie Nemeth For This Post:

    fifi (17th March 2021), Gwin Ru (6th February 2021), onawah (18th February 2021), pueblo (7th March 2021)

  13. Link to Post #87
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,091 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Yes, the NY Times exposed the PCR test
    by Jon Rappoport
    February 18, 2021
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...-the-pcr-test/

    "As I’ve been telling readers for many months, even if you assume SARS-CoV-2 is real, the test is useful, and the case and death numbers are meaningful, there are vast and crippling internal contradictions within the official portrait of COVID-19.

    Currently, I’m focusing on the PCR test and its fatal flaws.

    The test is a MAJOR weak point in the enemy’s attack on humanity. If the test falls, the case and death numbers are shown to be wildly false, and the whole pandemic narrative collapses.

    I urge readers to spread this information far and wide.

    On August 29, 2020, the New York Times published a long article headlined, “Your coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn’t be.” [1] [2]
    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/h...s-testing.html

    Its main message? “The standard [COVID PCR] tests are diagnosing huge numbers of people who may be carrying relatively insignificant amounts of the virus…Most of these people are not likely to be contagious…”

    “In three sets of testing data…compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.”

    “On Thursday, the United States recorded 45,604 new coronavirus cases, according to a database maintained by The Times. If the rates of contagiousness in Massachusetts and New York were to apply nationwide, then perhaps only 4,500 of those people may actually need to isolate and submit to contact tracing.”

    TAKEAWAY FROM THE Times: Up to 90% of ALL people who have been labeled “COVID cases” are not COVID cases. This fact would downgrade the pandemic to “just another flu season.” And there would be no reason for lockdowns.

    Of course, the Times goes on to say the solution to this problem is MORE TESTING. Only a moron would accept that notion.

    The enduring message of their article still stands: the PCR test apparatus is a fraud, through and through. It enables the recording of monumentally false case numbers, which are used to declare unnecessary lockdowns and wall-to-wall economic destruction.

    Make the truth known."

    SOURCES:

    [1] nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html

    [2] https://web.archive.org/web/20210217...s-testing.html
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    fifi (17th March 2021)

  15. Link to Post #88
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,091 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    COVID: The predatory testing labs are complicit in the crime
    by Jon Rappoport
    February 17, 2021
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...icit-in-crime/

    "Test lab: “This specimen tests positive. The patient is infected with SARS-CoV-2.”

    Patient: “Wait. How did you run the test? With how many cycles?”

    Test lab: “That information is proprietary. You have no right to know.”

    Patient: “Really? The number of cycles can determine the outcome. Change that number, and ‘infected’ becomes ‘healthy’.”

    Test lab: “We know what we’re doing.”

    Patient: “I’m sure you do. You’re ruining people’s lives and jacking up case numbers.”

    Test lab: “You have no right to question our methods. This is bordering on harassment.”

    Patient: “No, this is bordering on the truth.”

    Test lab: “We’re official. You’re unofficial.”

    I’ve written about this issue before, several times.

    Now, I’m suggesting a solution.

    If you, or someone close to you, is being pressured to take the COVID PCR test, ask the clinic or the doctor’s office how many cycles the test will deploy.

    Chances are high they’ll tell you they don’t know, and only the testing lab has that information. Ask for the name of the lab.

    Call the lab and ask them. Chances are high they won’t tell you. Inform them that the number of cycles affects the outcome of the test. Make them aware you know this.

    Except in Florida [1] [2], US labs are under no obligation to inform the patient or the doctor how many cycles the PCR test deploys. They never inform doctor or patient.

    Why? Because a crime is underway. The positive or negative result of any given PCR test is hanging in the balance, depending on the number of cycles.

    A cycle is a quantum leap in magnification of the swab sample taken from the patient.

    As even Fauci has asserted, at 35 cycles and above, the test result is useless. [3] [4]

    Worse, at 35 cycles and above, the tendency of the test is to spit out false-positives.

    Yet, as I’ve detailed, the CDC and FDA recommend doing the test at up to 40 cycles; and therefore, most if not all labs will follow that guideline. [5; See pdf page 38 (doc page 37)] [6]

    This is a disaster for the patient, and it results in a flagrant inflation of COVID case numbers, which in turn provide a rationale for the lockdowns.

    People at testing labs who have a few active brain cells to rub together know all this. They keep their mouths shut. They’re complicit in the crime.

    They’re part of a silent bureaucracy that is there to rule The People.

    Here is a further variation on a strategy. If you or anyone close to you is under pressure to take the PCR test, obtain the services of a good lawyer. Have the lawyer demand, before the test, a sworn affidavit from the lab stating how many cycles they’re using.

    If necessary, explain why.

    If necessary, go to court.

    If necessary, sue.

    It’s long past the time when labs should be allowed to stay secretive and pose as neutral.

    History is littered with examples of faceless bureaucracies that have enabled leaders to commit crimes against humanity. Nazi Germany, the USSR, post-World War 2 East Germany. These days, China.

    And now, every other country where rulers are declaring brutal lockdowns.

    If a small handful of people who are told to get tested—three or four hundred—demand to know, from the labs, what is going on—how many cycles they’re using—and legal and personal pressure is exerted—the truth will come tumbling out, into the open.

    This target of attack will expose a gaping vulnerability in the enemy’s position.

    Test lab: “All right, you want to know? We run our tests at 40 cycles.”

    Lawyer: “Very good. We are prepared, with a mountain of evidence, to show that you’re violating universally agreed upon science. Your lab is spitting out false-positives like a fire hose. You’re ruining lives and falsely inflating case numbers…”

    Test lab: “We’re just following orders from the FDA and the CDC.”

    Lawyer: “I’M JUST FOLLOWING ORDERS. Where have I heard that before? Oh yes, during the Nuremberg trials, after World War Two. That’s what the Nazi bureaucrats kept saying. It didn’t fly then, and it won’t fly now.” "

    SOURCES:

    [1] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...r-test-cycles/

    [2] https://www.flhealthsource.gov/files...s-12032020.pdf

    [3] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...-want-freedom/

    [4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_Vy6fgaBPE

    [5] https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

    [6] nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    fifi (17th March 2021), pueblo (7th March 2021)

  17. Link to Post #89
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,091 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Confession from Fauci
    Smoking gun: Fauci states COVID PCR test has fatal flaw; confession from the “beloved” expert of experts
    The COVID PCR test is a complete fraud

    by Jon Rappoport
    February 22, 2021
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...aw-confession/

    "This article is part of my current series on the COVID PCR test [1]. These articles prove that the test is fatally flawed, gives rise to hugely inflated and false case numbers, which in turn lead to the unnecessary and brutal lockdowns.

    I’m hoping readers will spread this information far and wide.

    OK, here we go. Smoking gun. Jackpot.

    Right from the horse’s mouth. Right from the man we’re told is the number-one COVID expert in the nation. What Fauci says is golden truth.

    Well, how about THIS?

    July 16, 2020, podcast, “This Week In Virology” [2]: Tony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run at “35 cycles or higher.” A positive result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed.

    Here, in techno-speak, is an excerpt from Fauci’s key quote (starting at the 3m50s mark) [2]: “…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-competent [aka accurate] are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”

    Each “cycle” of the test is a quantum leap in amplification and magnification of the test specimen taken from the patient.

    Too many cycles, and the test will turn up all sorts of irrelevant material that will be wrongly interpreted as relevant.

    That’s called a false positive.

    What Fauci failed to say on the video is: the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not 35.

    Therefore, all labs in the US that follow the FDA guideline are knowingly or unknowingly participating in fraud. Fraud on a monstrous level, because…

    Millions of Americans are being told they are infected with the virus on the basis of a false positive result, and…

    The total number of COVID cases in America—which is based on the test—is a gross falsity.

    The lockdowns and other restraining measures are based on these fraudulent case numbers.

    Let me back up and run that by you again. Fauci says the test is useless when it’s run at 35 cycles or higher. The FDA says run the test up to 40 cycles, in order to determine whether the virus is there. This is the crime in a nutshell.

    “Hello, America, you’ve been tricked, lied to, conned, and taken for a devastating ride. On the basis of fake science, the country was locked down.”

    If anyone in the Congress has a few brain cells operating, pull Fauci into a televised hearing and, in ten minutes, make mincemeat out of the fake science that has driven this whole foul, stench-ridden assault on the global economy and its 8 billion citizens.

    All right, here are two chunks of evidence for what I’ve written above. First, we have a CDC quote on the FDA website, in a document titled [3] [3a] [3b]: “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only.” See pdf page 38 (doc page 37). This document is marked, “Effective: 12/01/2020.” That means, even though the virus is being referred to by its older name, the document is still relevant as of Dec 2020. “For Emergency Use Only” refers to the fact that the FDA has certified the PCR test under a traditional category called “Emergency Use Authorization.”

    FDA: “…a specimen is considered positive for 2019-nCoV [virus] if all 2019-nCoV marker (N1, N2) cycle threshold growth curves cross the threshold line within 40.00 cycles ([less than] 40.00 Ct).”

    Naturally, MANY testing labs reading this guideline would conclude, “Well, to see if the virus is there in a patient, we should run the test all the way to 40 cycles. That’s the official advice.”

    Then we have a New York Times article (August 29/updated September 17) headlined: “Your coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn’t be.” [4] Here are money quotes:

    “Most tests set the limit at 40 [cycles]. A few at 37.”

    “Set the limit” would usually mean, “We’re going to look all the way to 40 cycles, to see if the virus is there.”

    The Times: “This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients…”

    Boom. That’s the capper, the grand finale. Labs don’t or won’t reveal their collusion in this crime.

    Get the picture?

    I hope so.

    If a lawyer won’t go to court with all this, or if a judge won’t pay attention and see the light, they should be stripped of their jobs and sent to the Arctic to sell snow."

    SOURCES:

    [1] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/tag/pcr/

    [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_Vy6fgaBPE

    [3] https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

    [3a] CDC-006-00019, Revision: 06, CDC/DDID/NCIRD/ Division of Viral Diseases, Effective: 12/01/2020; see: https://web.archive.org/web/20210102...34922/download

    [3b] CDC-006-00019, Revision: 05, CDC/DDID/NCIRD/ Division of Viral Diseases, Effective: 07/13/2020; see: https://web.archive.org/web/20200715...34922/download

    [4] nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  18. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    meat suit (22nd February 2021), pueblo (7th March 2021), pyrangello (14th April 2021)

  19. Link to Post #90
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,091 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Tony Fauci and the Swine Flu hoax; betrayal of trust
    by Jon Rappoport
    March 5, 2021
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...ayal-of-trust/

    "In my current series of articles, I’ve taken apart the Ebola and Zika hoaxes.

    Now I take you back to the summer of 2009, when the CDC and the World Health Organization were hyping the “deadly H1N1 Swine Flu pandemic.”

    They were, of course, also urging people to take the new Swine Flu vaccine. On that subject, here is an excerpt from Robert Kennedy Jr.’s Children’s Health Defense (3/27/20):

    “For example, [Dr. Anthony] Fauci once shilled for the fast-tracked H1N1 influenza (‘swine flu’) vaccine on YouTube, reassuring viewers in 2009 that serious adverse events were ‘very, very, very rare.’ Shortly thereafter, the vaccine went on to wreak havoc in multiple countries, increasing miscarriage risks in pregnant women in the U.S., provoking a spike in adolescent narcolepsy in Scandinavia and causing febrile convulsions in one in every 110 vaccinated children in Australia—prompting the latter to suspend its influenza vaccination program in under-fives.”

    However, that is only half the Swine Flu story. The other half—which involves an astounding hoax—was surely something Fauci was aware of at the time.

    Fauci was, in fact, recommending a highly dangerous vaccine for protection against AN EPIDEMIC THAT DIDN’T EXIST AT ALL.

    His friends and professional colleagues at the CDC were creating the hoax.

    Let me run it down for you.

    In the summer of 2009, the CDC was claiming there were thousands of Swine Flu cases in the US. But behind these statistics lay an unnerving secret. A major crime, considering the CDC’s mandate to report the truth to the American people:

    Secretly, the CDC had stopped counting cases of Swine Flu.

    What? Why?

    CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, discovered the CDC secret; and she found out why.

    The routine lab testing of tissue samples from the most likely Swine Flu patients was coming back, in the overwhelming percentage of cases, with: NO SIGN OF SWINE FLU OR ANY OTHER KIND OF FLU.

    Attkisson wrote an article about this scandal, and it was published on the CBS News website. However, the next, bigger step—putting out the story on CBS television news—was waylaid. No deal. And CBS shut down any future investigation on the subject. Attkisson’s article died on the vine. No other major news outlet in the world picked up her article and ran with it deeper into the rabbit hole.

    Here is what Attkisson told me when I interviewed her:

    Rappoport: In 2009, you spearheaded coverage of the so-called Swine Flu pandemic. You discovered that, in the summer of 2009, the Centers for Disease Control, ignoring their federal mandate, [secretly] stopped counting Swine Flu cases in America. Yet they continued to stir up fear about the “pandemic,” without having any real measure of its impact. Wasn’t that another investigation of yours that was shut down? Wasn’t there more to find out?

    Attkisson: The implications of the story were even worse than that. We discovered through our FOI efforts that before the CDC mysteriously stopped counting Swine Flu cases, they had learned that almost none of the cases they had counted as Swine Flu was, in fact, Swine Flu or any sort of flu at all! The interest in the story from one [CBS] executive was very enthusiastic. He said it was “the most original story” he’d seen on the whole Swine Flu epidemic. But others pushed to stop it [after it was published on the CBS News website] and, in the end, no [CBS television news] broadcast wanted to touch it. We aired numerous stories pumping up the idea of an epidemic, but not the one that would shed original, new light on all the hype. It was fair, accurate, legally approved and a heck of a story. With the CDC keeping the true Swine Flu stats secret, it meant that many in the public took and gave their children an experimental vaccine that may not have been necessary.

    —end of interview excerpt—

    So…fake pandemic, CDC crimes, and a damaging vaccine.

    But that wasn’t end of it. The CDC wanted to commit another crime. About three weeks after Attkisson’s findings were published on the CBS News website, the CDC, obviously in a panic, decided to double down. If one lie is exposed, tell an even bigger one. A much bigger one.

    Here, from a November 12, 2009, WebMD article is the CDC’s response: “Shockingly, 14 million to 34 million U.S. residents — the CDC’s best guess is 22 million — came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct. 17 [2009].” (“22 million cases of Swine Flu in US,” by Daniel J. DeNoon).

    Are your eyeballs popping? They should be.

    Fast forward to 2020. Who in his right mind, armed with a little history, would believe anything the CDC is saying about COVID-19? The discovery of a new coronavirus. The case and death numbers, the accuracy of the diagnostic tests, the need for lockdowns and economic devastation, the safety and importance of a vaccine, the fear porn? Who would believe any of it?

    And who would believe anything coming out of the mouth of Dr. Anthony Fauci?

    Only a fool."

    SOURCES:

    [1] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...fake-outbreak/

    [1a] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/category/ebola/

    [2] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...-it-didnt-fly/

    [2a] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/category/zika/

    [3] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/n...accines-later/

    [3a] https://web.archive.org/web/20200328...accines-later/

    [4] https://www.cbsnews.com/news/swine-f...overestimated/

    [4a] https://web.archive.org/web/20140101...overestimated/

    [5] https://www.cdc.gov/media/transcripts/2009/t091009.htm

    [6] https://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/n...n1-swine-flu#1

    [6a] https://web.archive.org/web/20100105...h1n1-swine-flu
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  20. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (7th March 2021), fifi (17th March 2021), mountain_jim (23rd March 2021), pueblo (7th March 2021), Reinhard (7th March 2021), TomKat (7th March 2021)

  21. Link to Post #91
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,091 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    I didn’t order the Fauci baloney on rye with RNA sauce
    by Jon Rappoport
    March 16, 2021
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...ith-rna-sauce/

    "Waiter, I said I didn’t want the Fauci baloney with Birx pickles and Redfield mustard and the RNA sauce.

    The lockdown-vaccine lunatics have a problem. They’re running out of credible front figures.

    Fauci says asymptomatic COVID-19 cases can’t drive an epidemic, and never have, which means most PCR positives are meaningless, and lockdowns are unnecessary. Then he turns around and says we all have to wear masks until the sun burns out.

    He says running the PCR test at more than 35 cycles gives a meaningless result, but the FDA and the CDC advise deploying 40 cycles. Fauci makes no judgment about THAT.

    He says the experimental COVID vaccine is using RNA technology for the first time in history and we’re all guinea pigs; and then he says the vaccine is absolutely safe and effective.

    Biden can’t find his way from the shower to his bedroom without three minders, but he’s “following the science.” His handlers are postponing the State of the Union until he resigns his office owing to health concerns, so KamALA can deliver the address and spell out the new normal.

    Bill Gates keeps pouring his Foundation money into Big Pharma. These donations push up the share prices of the companies, in which he happens to hold said shares. Ordinarily, this would be called some kind of insider trading or money laundering. The perps usually go to prison.

    Credible TV star news anchors? Don’t be silly. Lester Holt is a human cadaver. The other two—David Muir and Norah O’Donnell—are a Sears underwear model and an ex PR flack. Taken together, their gravitas approaches Roger Corman’s Monster from the Ocean Floor. “COVID is coming!”

    The Vatican? Apparently the Pope believes Jesus urged the founding of the Roman Church so everyone could take the COVID shot in the arm. Wafer, wine, Pfizer.

    Cuomo and Newsom, the American bookend lockdown governors? Cuomo’s own Party is doing a Harvey Weinstein Lite on him. The California recall petition against Newsom has gathered 2 million signatures so far.

    Angela Merkel, the chancellor of Germany, in case you missed it (US major media underreporting), has refused to take the AstraZeneca jab in the arm. She states it is only approved in Germany for people 65 and under. She’s 66. Very precise of her.

    US media reports: black Americans, hospital personnel, and soldiers are refusing the jab in droves.

    March 12 (UPI) – “Several more countries have suspended distribution of AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine over concerns about blood clotting that’s been seen in a few isolated cases.”

    “Denmark was the first to suspend giving out the vaccine on Thursday. Thailand, Norway, Iceland, Bulgaria, Luxembourg, Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia had all followed suit by Friday.”

    But don’t worry, be happy. It’s just “a bad batch.”

    That’s what they always say when people start keeling over.

    (Dr. Barbara Starfield, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, July 26, 2000, Journal of the American Medical Association, “Is US Health Really the Best in the World?”—Every year in the US, the medical system kills 225,000 people; 106,000 as a result of FDA approved medical drugs, 119,000 stemming from mistreatment and errors in hospitals. Just a bad batch…)

    Assuming, for the purposes of argument only, that the virus is real; the test is accurate; the case and death numbers are authentic—report after report announce that lockdowns don’t work.

    I have my own “study” on this. I point to US events that should have resulted in MASSIVE super-spreader effects. The three huge Trump rallies in Washington DC, and the BLM/Antifa riots in 315 US cities.

    These vivid “non-lockdown” happenings didn’t lead to millions of COVID cases and people dropping like flies, as millions of Americans from here, there, and everywhere mingled and mixed.

    Here’s an interesting attempt to go “all super-spread”: the August 2020 Sturgis, South Dakota, biker rally. 450,000 bikers pulled into town, as they do every year. A preliminary study out of San Diego State University claims the result was 260,000 new COVID cases in the following month across the US.

    No detailed contact tracing was possible. The real shortcoming of the study was: I see no report on the number of COVID deaths supposedly resulting from the Sturgis rally. People being diagnosed with COVID (a pineapple can register positive on a PCR test) is a far cry from people dying.

    The overwhelming percentage of COVID cases are asymptomatic, or have cough, chills, fever, and nothing more.

    A WebMD article describing the San Diego study only mentions one death in Minnesota claimed to be connected to Sturgis. One. After 450,000 bikers departed town.

    Speaking of pineapples, remember John Magufuli, the president of Tanzania, who last year claimed that samples taken from a goat and pawpaw fruit tested positive on a PCR kit supplied by the African CDC? He’s also refused to allow COVID vaccinations in Tanzania.

    Current reports from the country state he has been missing for two weeks.

    His political opponents say he’s in Kenya (or India), in a hospital, critically ill with COVID-19.

    Last summer, Pierre Nkurunziza, the President of Burundi, another critic of “COVID science,” ordered all World Health Organization (WHO) representatives to leave the country. He suddenly died. His replacement invited WHO back in.

    Of course, these are sheer coincidences. Who would claim otherwise? WHO?

    For those readers who want an antidote to this article, in order to return to oblivion, there is a simple solution: watch Lester Holt, Norah O’Donnell, and David Muir every night, simultaneously, on three TV sets; and on Sunday mornings, deeply inhale the major oily sleazebags of political talk, George Stephanopoulos, Chuck Todd, and Chris Wallace. They’ll set your teeth on edge, but they’ll render your brain nicely helpless and quiescent."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  22. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Deborah (ahamkara) (17th March 2021), fifi (17th March 2021), Karen (Geophyz) (23rd March 2021), mountain_jim (23rd March 2021), wondering (20th March 2021)

  23. Link to Post #92
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,091 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Hollywood movies featuring “deadly viruses” on the loose
    by Jon Rappoport
    March 19, 2021
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...-on-the-loose/

    "Wikipedia has a page listing “films about viral outbreaks.” I count 134 titles. Obviously, the theme has legs.

    A few of the more famous movies: I am Legend; The Omega Man; The Andromeda Strain; Outbreak; Maze Runner: The Death Cure; Resident Evil: Apocalypse; Contagion.

    My overall review: ridiculous plots; fear porn; softens up the public to accept the notion of pandemics.

    Manufacturing 134 movies on the same subject, you can sell almost anything. Zombies, toasters, alarm clocks that have long noses, golf balls from Mars, cave women with flawless teeth and perfect makeup and salon-sculptured hair and carefully engineered cleavage.

    But in this case, it’s viruses.

    At rwjf.org, there’s an interesting interview with Scott Burns, who wrote the screenplay for the 2011 film, Contagion, and the technical consultant on the project, Dr. Ian Lipkin, director of the Center for Infection and Immunity at Columbia University. Here are excerpts:

    Scott Burns: “Obviously I worked with Ian, and early on I also met Dr. Larry Brilliant, who was very helpful [and certainly brilliant]. I had seen Larry’s TED talk where he showed the Malthusian charge through the world the virus would have. I also worked with Laurie Garrett on the movie, because she had written this book, The Coming Plague, which was very, very useful to me in sort of teasing out how these things have a medical component, but they also have a social justice component and a political component and all sorts of interesting aspects of human behavior.”

    Dr. Ian Lipkin: “I started very early with Scott. There were a lot of people who contributed—CDC, WHO and others… Scott would bounce ideas off of me and others in his ‘brain trust’ and most of the time we were in accord. My role grew dramatically over the course of production. It began with just a consultation, and then I rapidly moved into helping the set designer in designing the virus, and we had a few days where we had actors come to the lab and spend some time working at the bench, learning how to pipette and look through microscopes and get into gowns and such. And even at the very end, I was working with the sound engineer, recording sound for the movie—lab background and that sort of thing. I did a lot of traveling with the crew. It was like a circus.”

    “We settled on that virus [a paramyxovirus] within the first half an hour with Laurie and Scott and I, high above Columbus Circle in New York. We threw out a number of possibilities to Scott and he batted them down, and then one came to mind that struck me as the perfect choice, simply because there had been some reports earlier suggesting this virus, which wasn’t readily transmissible, had become readily transmissible to humans—that was Nipah. It also gave Scott and the director and actors an opportunity to do more than just cough and die. They could develop seizures, they could have hallucinations—all sorts of things that were much more interesting than a standard respiratory disease. We settled on that really within the first thirty minutes, and then Scott went back, thought about it and decided it was a good way to run. It doesn’t take much fuel for him to run quite a distance.”

    Turns out that designing a movie about a pandemic is pretty much the same sort of project as designing a fake COVID pandemic in the world.

    You pick out a story about a virus, give it an authentic feel, embroider it, and sell it.

    People buy it.

    In the interest of balance and fairness, I’ve written a few notes for a screenplay that would take a different approach:

    In New York, the body of a dead virologist floats to the surface of the East River.

    After a brief round of speculation that he might have perished from a mysterious viral infection, the coroner announces the cause of death was three gunshot wounds to the head.

    A lone NYPD detective (divorced, alcoholic, disparaged by fellow officers, heroic) discovers the dead virologist’s notebook inside the freezer in the virologist’s apartment.

    He thaws it out and reads this: “The coronavirus has never been isolated. It’s a fake. They’re selling a fairy tale about a virus.”

    Two days later, a beautiful woman doctor (with engineered cleavage) from the CDC shows up at the detective’s apartment. Somehow she knows the cop has found the virologist’s notebook.

    They talk. The mutual attraction should be immediately evident. If not, the brief cuts of sex they’re having on the floor provide sufficient evidence for the audience.

    Two days later, the beautiful CDC doctor disappears.

    The police detective is warned (anonymous phone message) to stay away from the case of the dead virologist.

    Hey, it’s a B movie. Low budget. Could shoot the whole thing over a weekend in Manhattan.

    But we need some kind of twist.

    So it turns out the detective, the dead virologist, and the beautiful woman doctor from the CDC are just story ideas in the mind of a screenwriter, who, in the movie, is pitching the project to producers in an office high above Columbus Circle.

    He’s pitching a movie that exposes a fake virus and a fake pandemic.

    But wait. There’s more. In a mind-bending revelation, we learn that the screenwriter and the producers are secret agents from a distant planet called PROPAGANDA.

    They’ve come to Earth to promote a fake pandemic…but a conflict has developed among them. The screenwriter has decided he wants to blow the whistle on his bosses from PROPAGANDA, and the producers want to carry out their mission to sell the people of Earth fake COVID-19, as if it were real.

    The movie is basically an extended conversation about fake vs. real, virus vs. no virus, pandemic vs. hoax.

    As the screenwriter earnestly pitches his film, his ideas will come to life, briefly, on the screen: there’s enough cleavage, sex, and murder to satisfy the Hollywood code.

    Will the agents from the planet PROPAGANDA succeed in selling Earth the notion that COVID is real? Or will the heroic defector, the screenwriter, succeed in foiling the whole operation?

    Stay tuned…

    The 134 Hollywood movies about outbreaks of viruses aren’t only programming audiences. They’re instruction manuals for planners who launch fake pandemics.

    Definition of “fake pandemic”: a movie that is happening in the world, not on a screen, in which the suffering and the pain are REAL—but are not the result of a virus. For further reference, see “lockdowns, mask mandates, business bankruptcies, suicides, vaccine damage, police state, and true believers (e.g., deranged hostile masked vegan Whole Foods shoppers, so-called science bloggers living in mommy’s basement, etc.).”

    Definition of “virus”: any presumed particle that has never been isolated.

    Definition of “virologist”: any person on the payroll of Bill Gates or entities Gates funds.

    Alternate definition of “fake pandemic”: any medical event involving large numbers of people that never ends. For further reference, see “keep wearing two masks after being vaccinated.”

    Immortal quotes from Hollywood virus-movies:

    Outbreak, Dustin Hoffman—“I’ll say it one last time. These [infected] people that you’re going to bomb are not the enemy. We can kill the virus without killing these people. I swear on my soul that the President does not have the facts. He doesn’t know we have a working serum [antidote].”

    Contagion, Jennifer Ehle—“Somewhere in the world, the wrong pig met up with the wrong bat.”

    I Am Legend, Will Smith— “Blood tests confirm that I am immune to both the airborne and contact strains…Vaccine trials continue, I’m still unable to transfer my immunity to infected hosts. The Krippen Virus is… elegant…Hmm, a behavioral note, um, an infected male exposed himself to sunlight today. Now, it’s possible decreased brain function or the growing scarcity of food is causing them to…ignore their basic survival instincts. Social de-evolution appears complete. Typical human behavior is now entirely absent.”

    Would you buy a used car from these people?"
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  24. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Karen (Geophyz) (23rd March 2021), kfm27917 (23rd March 2021), pyrangello (14th April 2021), wegge (23rd March 2021)

  25. Link to Post #93
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,091 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Vaccine: twenty countries suspend injections; does that make you “hesitant?”
    by Jon Rappoport
    March 19, 2021
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...-you-hesitant/

    "The Guardian: “Several European countries have halted using the Oxford/AstraZeneca Covid vaccine…”

    The Guardian has a brand new definition of “several.” Their own article lists the following nations: Austria, Estonia, Latvia, Luxembourg, Lithuania, Romania, Denmark, Norway, Iceland, The Netherlands, Ireland, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Slovenia, Cyprus, Sweden.

    Bulgaria and Thailand have also stopped the jab.

    The reason for the “pause?” A “small” number of people have developed blood clots.

    And now, as I write this, the Wall St. Journal is reporting that European Union medical regulators have decided everything is OK—“the benefits of the shots outweigh the risks.” Standard boilerplate language for: “we don’t have to explain the vaccine injuries or deaths.”

    If you believe just a few people with blood clots caused 20 countries to stop giving the jabs, I have condos on Mars for sale.

    Hidden behind the firewall of the vaccine establishment, MANY people are keeling over.

    And why wouldn’t they? Governments and pharma companies have rushed a new experimental RNA technology into use, for the first time in history. Prior to the COVID injection, all attempts to force approval of RNA tech had failed; dangerous and deadly over-reaction of the immune system was the reason.

    Since I seem to be one of the only people saying this, I’ll say it again: Bill Gates, Fauci, and other rabid vaccinators are in love with RNA tech. It allows vaccines to be produced far more quickly, easily, and cheaply.

    For any purported virus, at the drop of a hat, companies can come up with a vaccine. It doesn’t take four years. It takes three months.

    “We just discovered a virus that crossed over from geese. And here’s a new one from Easter bunnies. And another new one just drifted in from Jupiter. We’ll have vaccines ready by Christmas. The seventh mutation of SARS-CoV-2 has its own vaccine as of yesterday. If you want to take the kiddies to Disneyland, find one of those pretty pink vans parked in your town, take the shot and receive your updated Immunity Certificate…”

    Then there is this: the COVID vaccines manufactured by AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Moderna are completely ineffective at preventing serious illness. BY DESIGN.

    Months ago, a NY Times piece, by Peter Doshi and Eric Topol, spelled it out.

    September 22, 2020: “These Coronavirus Trials Don’t Answer the One Question We Need to Know”:

    “If you were to approve a coronavirus vaccine, would you approve one that you only knew protected people only from the most mild form of Covid-19, or one that would prevent its serious complications?” [Clue: “most mild” means cough, or chills and fever, which cure themselves without the need for a vaccine.]

    “The answer is obvious. You would want to protect against the worst cases.”

    “But that’s not how the companies testing three of the leading coronavirus vaccine candidates, Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, whose U.S. trial is on hold, are approaching the problem.”

    “According to the protocols for their studies, which they released late last week, a vaccine could meet the companies’ benchmark for success if it lowered the risk of mild Covid-19, but was never shown to reduce moderate or severe forms of the disease, or the risk of hospitalization, admissions to the intensive care unit or death.”

    “To say a vaccine works should mean that most people no longer run the risk of getting seriously sick. That’s not what these trials will determine.”

    The COVID shot: dangerous AND ineffective.

    Trump’s coronavirus task force knew the truth. Biden’s task force knows the truth. But they don’t care.

    The CDC and the WHO know. They don’t care, either.

    But these authorities are very nervous, because droves of people are avoiding the vaccine. It’s not “hesitancy.”

    It’s utter rejection.

    Sensible rejection.

    It began soon after the initial rollout of the Pfizer vaccine. NBC News, December 31, 2020:

    “A large percentage of front-line workers in hospitals and nursing homes have refused to take the Covid-19 vaccine…”

    “About 50 percent of front-line workers in California’s Riverside County have refused to take the vaccine…”

    “Anecdotally, an estimated 60 percent of Ohio nursing home employees have refused the vaccine already…”

    “A survey of 2,053 New York City firefighters found that more than half said they would refuse the Covid-19 vaccine when it became available to them…”

    And all that was long before 20 countries suspended the injection.

    I’ll close, for now, with two statements about the role vaccines have played in eliminating deaths from diseases—because true history matters:

    “The combined death rate from scarlet fever, diphtheria, whooping cough and measles among children up to fifteen shows that nearly 90 percent of the total decline in mortality between 1860 and 1965 had occurred before the introduction of antibiotics and widespread immunization. In part, this recession may be attributed to improved housing and to a decrease in the virulence of micro-organisms, but by far the most important factor was a higher host-resistance due to better nutrition.” Ivan Illich, Medical Nemesis, Bantam Books, 1977

    Robert F Kennedy, Jr.: “After extensively studying a century of recorded data, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Johns Hopkins researchers concluded: ‘Thus vaccinations does not account for the impressive declines in mortality from infectious diseases seen in the first half of the twentieth century’.”

    “Similarly, in 1977, Boston University epidemiologists (and husband and wife) John and Sonja McKinlay published their seminal work in the Millbank Memorial Fund Quarterly on the role that vaccines (and other medical interventions) played in the massive 74% decline in mortality seen in the twentieth century: ‘The Questionable Contribution of Medical Measures to the Decline of Mortality in the United States in the Twentieth Century’.”

    “In this article, which was formerly required reading in U.S. medical schools, the McKinlays pointed out that 92.3% of the mortality rate decline happened between 1900 and 1950, before most vaccines existed, and that all medical measures, including antibiotics and surgeries, ‘appear to have contributed little to the overall decline in mortality in the United States since about 1900 — having in many instances been introduced several decades after a marked decline had already set in and having no detectable influence in most instances’.”
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  26. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (23rd March 2021), Karen (Geophyz) (23rd March 2021), kfm27917 (23rd March 2021), mountain_jim (23rd March 2021), Philippe (21st April 2021), TomKat (23rd March 2021), wegge (23rd March 2021)

  27. Link to Post #94
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    6,081
    Thanks
    8,692
    Thanked 39,308 times in 5,717 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    I have had to apologize to Jon for my frustration last year. I was having extreme cognitive dissonance that the world would NOT be turning upside down over a cold. I was irritated when he seemed to be stuck on a schtick. I was wrong as were we all. He sussed the whole plandemic way back based on all the building blocks he has uncovered all along.

    Memo to Governors: Free states vs. Slave states
    by Jon Rappoport
    April 13, 2021


    (To join our email list, click here.)

    US Supreme Court Justice, Louis Brandeis, 1932: “It is one of the happy incidents of the federal system that a single courageous State may, if its citizens choose, serve as a laboratory; and try novel social and economic experiments without risk to the rest of the country.”

    You governors are now seeing, whether you like it or not, a competitive situation developing among the states.

    Some states are loosening the COVID restrictions; others are tightening them.

    In this ongoing process, for example, a remarkable exodus is occurring—from New York to Florida. From lockdowns to freedom.

    Some of you governors who demand lockdowns, masks, distancing, immunity certificates, etc., are betting the federal government will somehow intercede, back you up, and force the free states to fall in line with your brutal COVID tactics—thus “leveling the playing field.”

    This is unlikely to happen. The White House and the Congress understand there is a limit to how far they can push the states, without fomenting uncontrollable rebellion.

    That means you’ll be caught with your pants down, as your citizens emigrate, in ever larger numbers, to freer states.

    What business owner wouldn’t prefer to set up shop in an open state economy, rather than shutting down and descending into bankruptcy in your state?

    And if you believe the brigades of Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube users who demand the harshest COVID policies are going to win the day, you’re entertaining a delusion.

    You’re going to stand by and watch your economies continue to shrink, while other states flourish.

    Believe it not, this is one of the eventualities the Founders foresaw, when they enshrined the federal/state structure in the Constitution. Limiting the power of central government meant that various individual states could choose their own paths.

    This is happening now.

    It is happening, regardless of media moaning, regardless of Fauci-ist objections and CDC pressure to conform to suicidal COVID policies.

    If you governors of freer states have the courage to double down, and do something that will lift your economies to even greater heights, I have a suggestion.

    Push through a law that permits any healing practitioner to treat patients for any given condition, as long as his remedy creates no greater harm than the orthodox treatment for that same condition.

    You’ll see a huge influx of practitioners and patients to your state. It’s called Health Freedom—and it’s a policy that welcomes adults who are willing to take responsibility for their own health choices. Health Freedom also booms the economy.

    It’s the opposite of forced medical mandates.

    And when, five years from now, that new law provokes an upsurge in the overall vitality of your citizens—with no significant downside—you will have proven something more than the absurdity of the COVID restrictions.

    You will have proven that the overall medical apparatus out of which those restrictions flowed is, in fact, inherently biased, undeservedly monopolistic, financially driven, scientifically corrupt, inhumanly cruel, and politically motivated as a covert means of controlling the lives of The People.

    You will have restored a great portion of the freedom for which men and women have fought, for centuries.

    Isn’t that a goal worth pursuing?

    CODA: As evidence for my assertions about the US medical system, I’m printing here my 2009 interview with the late Dr. Barbara Starfield, a revered public health expert who spent many years at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health.

    On July 26, 2000, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) published her review, “Is US Health Really the Best in the World?”

    Her conclusions: Every year, in America, the medical system kills 225,000 people. 106,000 as a direct result of the administration of FDA approved drugs; 119,000 as a result of mistreatment and errors in hospitals.

    Extrapolate those numbers out to a decade, and the death toll is a staggering 2.25 million people.

    Here is my email interview with Dr. Starfield:

    What has been the level and tenor of the response to your findings, since 2000?

    The American public appears to have been hoodwinked into believing that more interventions lead to better health, and most people that I meet are completely unaware that the US does not have the ‘best health in the world’.

    In the medical research community, have your medically-caused mortality statistics been debated, or have these figures been accepted, albeit with some degree of shame?

    The findings have been accepted by those who study them. There has been only one detractor, a former medical school dean, who has received a lot of attention for claiming that the US health system is the best there is and we need more of it. He has a vested interest in medical schools and teaching hospitals (they are his constituency).

    Have health agencies of the federal government consulted with you on ways to mitigate the [devastating] effects of the US medical system?

    NO.

    Since the FDA approves every medical drug given to the American people, and certifies it as safe and effective, how can that agency remain calm about the fact that these medicines are causing 106,000 deaths per year?

    Even though there will always be adverse events that cannot be anticipated, the fact is that more and more unsafe drugs are being approved for use. Many people attribute that to the fact that the pharmaceutical industry is (for the past ten years or so) required to pay the FDA for reviews [of its new drugs]—which puts the FDA into an untenable position of working for the industry it is regulating. There is a large literature on this.

    Aren’t your 2000 findings a severe indictment of the FDA and its standard practices?

    They are an indictment of the US health care industry: insurance companies, specialty and disease-oriented medical academia, the pharmaceutical and device manufacturing industries, all of which contribute heavily to re-election campaigns of members of Congress. The problem is that we do not have a government that is free of influence of vested interests. Alas, [it] is a general problem of our society—which clearly unbalances democracy.

    Can you offer an opinion about how the FDA can be so mortally wrong about so many drugs?

    Yes, it cannot divest itself from vested interests. (Again, [there is] a large literature about this, mostly unrecognized by the people because the industry-supported media give it no attention.)

    Would it be correct to say that, when your JAMA study was published in 2000, it caused a momentary stir and was thereafter ignored by the medical community and by pharmaceutical companies?

    Are you sure it was a momentary stir? I still get at least one email a day asking for a reprint—ten years later! The problem is that its message is obscured by those that do not want any change in the US health care system.

    Are you aware of any systematic efforts, since your 2000 JAMA study was published, to remedy the main categories of medically caused deaths in the US?

    No systematic efforts; however, there have been a lot of studies. Most of them indicate higher rates [of death] than I calculated.

    What was your personal reaction when you reached the conclusion that the US medical system was the third leading cause of death in the US?

    I had previously done studies on international comparisons and knew that there were serious deficits in the US health care system, most notably in lack of universal coverage and a very poor primary care infrastructure. So I wasn’t surprised.

    Did your 2000 JAMA study sail through peer review, or was there some opposition to publishing it?

    It was rejected by the first journal that I sent it to, on the grounds that ‘it would not be interesting to readers’!

    Do the 106,000 deaths from medical drugs only involve drugs prescribed to patients in hospitals, or does this statistic also cover people prescribed drugs who are not in-patients in hospitals?

    I tried to include everything in my estimates. Since the commentary was written, many more dangerous drugs have been added to the marketplace.

    —end of interview—

    Dr. Starfield’s published JAMA review, and this interview, raise mind-bending implications. Among them: prestigious medical journals routinely print glowing reports on many drugs which are, in fact, killing and maiming patients in great numbers. This means that the journal reports, and the studies on which they are based, are rank with fraud and corruption.

    In that regard, here is a comment from a doctor who has, no doubt, perused as many such studies as any person in the world:

    Dr. Marcia Angell, NY Review of Books, January 15, 2009, “Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption”: “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.”

    This is the overall system that sustains the leading lights who sell COVID policy and “science.”

    Let the buyer beware and rebel.

  28. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    fifi (29th April 2021), kfm27917 (14th April 2021), onawah (29th April 2021), Satori (29th April 2021), TomKat (29th April 2021), ulli (14th April 2021), wondering (14th April 2021)

  29. Link to Post #95
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,091 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Vaccine hustlers can’t keep their story straight; evangelicals, black people, Trumpers; who’s “hesitating"?
    by Jon Rappoport
    April 28, 2021
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...os-hesitating/

    (One more big strike against Donald Trump...and I was hoping he would wake up and smell the coffee re the jab. )

    "First, let’s get this straight. The term “hesitancy” would apply to your pasty-faced nephew, who plays video games 19 hours a day, who’s dragged to the beach one summer afternoon, and is reluctant to stick his toe in the water as he stands near the last little gasp of foam breaking on the sand.

    Most of the people who aren’t taking the COVID vaccine aren’t hesitant at all. They’re determined to reject the shot.

    Most of the people who don’t want the COVID vaccine are quite sure they want to forego genetic damage, blood clots, and death.

    So…who are the “hesitant” ones the vaccine hustlers are going after?

    According to an old desiccated man who could play a mortician in an Abbott and Costello movie without a minute of rehearsal, and who happens to be the director of the largest medical research facility in the world—the US National Institutes of Health—Dr. Francis Collins…

    According to Collins, the prime target of pro-vaccine propaganda is the dastardly evangelical/Trumper crowd.

    Last week, Collins spoke with NBC’s Chuck (aging-wonder-boy) Todd, who made his original journalistic bones deftly pointing a wand at maps of voting districts on Election Night.

    Collins intoned, in the manner of a funeral home director expressing condolences to customers over the accident that took the life of their beloved family member, who was driving while drunk and steered his car over a cliff:

    “Particularly white evangelicals seem to be resistant to the idea that vaccines are something they want to take advantage of.”

    “…certainly Republican men in particular seem to less likely to be interested in the vaccine.”

    But wait. NIH head Collins—playing politics—forgot to mention that, according to a recent Harris poll, a whopping 42% of black Americans don’t want the vaccine.

    Oops.

    Well, no doubt “systemic racism” must be the reason black people are failing to see how glorious the vaccine is. They’re being kept in ignorance by white people.

    Actually, that doesn’t seem to be the case at all. A COVID Collaborative poll discovered black Americans have shockingly low levels of trust in the FDA (29%) and drug companies (19%). I’d say those numbers reveal acute intelligence, not ignorance, on medical issues.

    Any group that distrusts the FDA at the rate of 71% is medically on the ball.

    On the other hand, white Americans are the victims of systemic “safe and effective” lying by The New York Times, CNN, NBC, etc.

    White Republicans are also being lied to by Donald Trump, Mr. Warp Speed, who is pushing the COVID vaccine like a lifeboat on the Titanic.

    Trump is fronting for the COVID shot with a fervor matched only by Biden and Fauci and Bill Gates.

    In an April 16 mass email to his followers (no doubt written by an aide), Trump, a major propaganda whore for Pharma, states:

    Vaccine resistance is “deranged pseudo-science.”

    “The federal pause on the J&J shot makes no sense. Why is the Biden White House letting insanely risk-averse bureaucrats run the show?”

    It’s “sheer lunacy” for Biden “to delay millions of vaccinations and feed fears among the vax-resistant.”

    “Indeed, this moronic move is a gift to the anti-vax movement.”

    I spoke with a born-again Christian the other day. I asked him whether God had told him not to take the vaccine. He laughed. He said, “God told me to trust my research.”

    “When did He say that?”

    “I like to think it was just before I wrote to Trump telling him to wake up.”

    We’re seeing hustlers on all points of the political spectrum pushing the COVID vaccine—the gene therapy that was designed, in clinical trials, to prevent nothing more than a cough, or chills and fever.

    The gene therapy that has never been launched on the public before. The genetic injection that has only gained FDA certification for emergency use—a far lower and looser classification than full approval.

    These criminal vaccine promoters deploy outrage and sob stories—whatever they think will play well—as they target various demographics.

    Thousands of serious adverse effects from the shot are being reported. You can multiply those figures by 10 or 100 to gain a truer estimate of what is happening; and there are NO data on long-term effects.

    You bet your ass people are “hesitant.” Medical authorities are telling them to accept an genetic injection that causes their cells to manufacture a protein they would never make under ordinary conditions.

    Speaking of gene therapy, Dr. Francis Collins, the head of NIH, made his career on the back of discovering “genes associated with various diseases.”

    In all the years of NIH’s existence, with a total budget in the hundreds of billions of dollars, show me ONE genetic cure for ANY disease across the board.

    Just one.

    I’m waiting.

    It turns out that the history of genetics reveals the following: they can ALTER humans with it, but they can’t CURE humans."
    Last edited by onawah; 29th April 2021 at 01:07.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  30. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    fifi (29th April 2021), lisalu (29th April 2021), Satori (29th April 2021), TomKat (29th April 2021)

  31. Link to Post #96
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,091 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Shocker: Why is this substance in the Moderna COVID vaccine?
    May 19 2021
    by Jon Rappoport

    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...covid-vaccine/

    "If you scroll down halfway through the document, you’ll see a chart titled, “Ingredients Included in mRNA COVID vaccines.” (pg 20)

    The right-hand side of the chart shows ingredients in the Moderna vaccine. The fifth ingredient down is “SM-102: heptadecan-9-yl 8-((2-hydroxyethyl) (6-oxo-6-(undecyloxy) hexyl) amino) octanoate.”

    Now we go to a document published by the Cayman Chemical Company of Ann Arbor, Michigan: “Safety Data Sheet acc. to OSHA HCS.” (04/11/2021) [2]

    This data sheet lists the effects of SM-102. Here is the opening note: “For research use only, not for human or veterinary use.”

    Far from comforting.

    Then the safety data sheet lights up with adverse effects/warnings re SM-102. For example: “Suspected of causing cancer. Suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child. Causes damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver and the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure. Very toxic to aquatic life with long lasting effects.”

    Several things to point out here. First, what dosage level of, and what duration of exposure to, SM-102 are we talking about? Details on these toxicity factors need to be known. HOWEVER, all that is overridden by the fact that SM-102 is being INJECTED into the body via the Moderna shot. We’re not just talking about inhalation or skin contact.

    Obviously, the human body has layers of defense against attack. With injection, a number of those layers are bypassed.

    And once deep within the body, where does SM-102 travel as it causes damage along the way?

    I doubt that the Cayman safety data sheet even considered the possibility that SM-102 would be injected.

    The experts and authorities will assure us SM-102 is safe. They’ll say only miniscule amounts are being injected. They’ll say the clinical trials of the vaccine revealed no problems. They’ll parrot, over and over again, as they always do: “safe and effective.”

    You’re walking along a country path. You see a snake lying just ahead of you. He slowly raises his head and looks at you. On his hood, you read the words: “emergency use authorization granted.” "

    SOURCES:

    [1] https://emergency.cdc.gov/coca/ppt/2...-coca-call.pdf

    [1b] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RcgAXSKQyw

    [1b1] https://youtu.be/9RcgAXSKQyw?t=638

    [1b2] https://youtu.be/9RcgAXSKQyw?t=840

    [2] https://www.caymanchem.com/msdss/33474m.pdf
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  32. The Following User Says Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (21st May 2021)

  33. Link to Post #97
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,091 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Wuhan, the lab? No, the other Wuhan nobody is talking about: Opioid Trafficking Headquarters for Death and Destruction
    by Jon Rappoport
    June 1, 2021

    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...rafficking-hq/

    "This article takes off from the work of investigative reporter, Whitney Webb. [1] Much of what I’m laying out here confirms her exposure of “the other Wuhan.” [1a] Webb writes at Unlimited Hangout and The Last American Vagabond. [1b]

    When I put together Webb’s findings with my own COVID research, startling new dimensions of the false “pandemic” story come to light.

    Who would have thought that, in less than a year, the image of the opioid drug, fentanyl, would undergo a face lift, enhancing it from “most destructive killer drug in the world” to “lifesaver in the treatment of COVID patients?”

    And if this PR miracle is not a sufficient stunner, it just so happens that Opioid Central for illegally trafficking fentanyl to the planet is Wuhan, now the focus of claims that COVID was born in a lab there.

    (Fake) pandemic transforms fentanyl into “vital COVID medication.”

    (Fake) pandemic starts in Wuhan.

    Wuhan is the city where killer drug fentanyl is shipped out to dealers all over the world.

    High-level operators, focusing on Wuhan, manage to obscure, from the broad public, the city’s global role in killing millions of people with opioids…by claiming a pandemic was born in Wuhan. “The ONLY thing you have to know about Wuhan is the virus broke out there.”

    This has the earmarks of a highly successful cover story.

    Here’s a prime illustration of fentanyl’s PR facelift:

    NJ [New Jersey] Spotlight News, April 14, 2020, “No Longer a Scourge, Fentanyl Is Now Most-Needed Drug in COVID-19 War.” [2]

    “…fentanyl, one of the drugs given to patients so they can withstand the pain of having a breathing tube inserted, is in short supply along with a handful of other crucial drugs.”

    “The first wave of critical shortages exposed by the coronavirus was medical masks and gowns. Then it was ventilators. Now, a handful of crucial drugs are in short supply in overrun ICUs throughout northern New Jersey and New York City, many of which are needed to use the ventilators.”

    “At the top of the list is fentanyl, the deadly synthetic painkiller — 100 times more powerful than morphine — the very drug that has become public enemy No. 1 in the nation’s war on opioid addiction. Demand for fentanyl has doubled nationwide and shot up more than 500% in the New York/New Jersey metropolitan region, the current global epicenter of the pandemic.”

    “Fentanyl may have been killing people in record numbers on the streets of New Jersey in recent years, but in our hospitals, it is now saving lives.”

    “Demand for fentanyl is followed by Propofol, a sedative also used with ventilators, according to Soumi Saha, Premier’s senior director of advocacy…Close behind those two is a new category of drugs to face shortages — neuromuscular blockers, which are also being used for ventilator patients because they keep them from involuntarily coughing on the healthcare worker inserting the vent tube.”

    “During normal times, patients stay on ventilators for three or four days. Now, not only has the number of ventilated patients spiked, but the time they remain on the device is two to three weeks.”

    I gave you an extended quote from that New Jersey article, because I’ll cover the real story behind ventilators later in this piece.

    Right now, here are a few references pointing to Wuhan as Opioid Central.

    City-journal.org, May 12, 2020, “Wuhan’s other epidemic,” [3] Christopher F. Rufo: “…many don’t know that Wuhan is also the source of another deadly epidemic: America’s fentanyl overdoses… Over the past decade, Wuhan has emerged as the global headquarters for fentanyl production. The city’s chemical and pharmaceutical manufacturers hide production of the drug within their larger, licit manufacturing operations, then ship it abroad using deliberately mislabeled packaging, concealment techniques, and a complex network of forwarding addresses. According to a recent ABC News report, ‘huge amounts of these mail-order [fentanyl] components can be traced to a single, state-subsidized company in Wuhan.’”

    The Atlantic, August 18, 2019, “The Brazen Way a Chinese Company Pumped Fentanyl Ingredients Into the US,” [4] by Ben Westhoff: “According to Bryce Pardo, a fentanyl expert at the Rand Corporation, the two most commonly used fentanyl precursors—think of them as ingredients—are chemicals called NPP and 4-ANPP. When I first started researching them, in early 2017, advertisements for the chemicals were all over the internet, from a wide variety of different companies. Later, I determined that the majority of those companies were under the Yuancheng [company] umbrella.”

    “Posing as a buyer, I answered an online advertisement for fentanyl precursors and was put in touch with a Yuancheng salesman who called himself Sean. We arranged to meet at the company’s main office in Wuhan, in the Wuchang district, near a busy subway station in a blue-collar neighborhood…”

    LA Times, April 24, 2020 [5]: “For drug traffickers interested in getting in on the fentanyl business, all roads once led to Wuhan.”

    “The sprawling industrial city built along the Yangtze River in east-central China is known for its production of chemicals, including the ingredients needed to cook fentanyl and other powerful synthetic opioids.”

    “Vendors there shipped huge quantities around the world. The biggest customers were Mexican drug cartels, which have embraced fentanyl in recent years because it is cheaper and easier to produce than heroin.”

    The Times article cites the pandemic as the reason for a decline in the fentanyl business. But lockdowns increased people’s desires for drugs. And of course, since economies have started loosening up, fentanyl trafficking operations are certainly booming again.

    The highly successful cover story I described above…were there reasons for this cover, other than an attempt to conceal, from the broad public, Wuhan as the global center of opioid trafficking?

    I can think of two other reasons. The first one I would introduce this way: “We’re killing people in the streets with fentanyl, but that’s not enough. We want to kill them in the hospitals, too.”

    Heavy hitters, intent on getting rid of the elderly on a wide scale, saw an opportunity. And now we come to the ventilator story.

    There is no doubt that, globally speaking, there has been a mad and destructive rush to put people diagnosed with COVID on breathing ventilators.

    To deploy these devices in hospitals requires intubation, which is painful and very disruptive. Patients must be sedated. They must be kept sedated, while they’re hooked up to the breathing machines— for days and weeks. [6]

    Enter fentanyl and other opioids.

    Since the whole story of the COVID virus was a fake from the get-go, some group would have to bear the burden of dying, in order to inflate death numbers; in order to make it appear that the “pandemic” was a fire sweeping through the world.

    The group was and is the elderly, and in a series of articles on this gruesome subject a year ago, I left no doubt about the truth staring us in the face. (Note: CDC, May 14, 2021: “8 out 10 COVID-19 deaths reported in the US have been in adults 65 years old and older.”) [7]

    COVID is old people. Their premature deaths are forced. [8] Their statistical numbers are gold for the planners of the operation. And this has nothing to do with a virus.

    The Hill, (undated, late April 2020), reports on “data…gathered at Northwell Health, New York state’s largest hospital system. The study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) examines 5,700 patients hospitalized with coronavirus infections in the New York City region, with final outcomes recorded for 2,634 patients. The average patient age was 63 years old… For the next oldest age group, ages 66 years and older, patients receiving mechanical [breathing] ventilation recorded a 97.2 percent mortality rate.” [9]

    97.2 percent of elderly patients put on breathing ventilators died.

    Just in case other obvious strategies failed to produce premature death in the elderly, ventilators provided the method:

    VENTILATORS PLUS SEDATION WITH OPIOIDS.

    THE OPIOIDS CAUSE SUPPRESSION OF BREATHING AND DEATH.

    OF COURSE, THAT SUPPRESSION OF BREATHING (“HYPOXIA”) IS CALLED A CARDINAL SYMPTOM OF COVID.

    Don’t even think of saying, “Well, you see, those old people put on ventilators were already very sick and close to dying.” NO medical treatment that kills 97.2 percent of patients in a well-defined group is continued, unless there are orders mandating it. Unless there is insurance money to be saved. Unless the doctors are willing to follow orders and keep using the treatment, despite the results. [10] [10a]

    So yes, opioids were transformed, by a cover story, from a killer street drug to a “lifesaving treatment” for COVID—but at the deepest level, that meant murdering the elderly with the drugs.

    The second reason for the cover story would have involved moving up the time table for launching the fake pandemic story in Wuhan.

    Was there some sort of accident, in which the people of Wuhan were exposed to fentanyl, with deadly consequences? Desperately needing a phony cover-up explanation—was “THE VIRUS” story invoked?

    I can only speculate about that possibility. However, China is famous for loose enforcement of safety regulations in factories, and it’s possible that some sort of accident occurred, which blew fentanyl or its components through the city of Wuhan, killing people on the spot.

    There are analogous recent incidents in China.

    The Wikipedia page for the 2019 Xiangshui chemical plant explosion [11], which killed 78 people and injured 617, mentions other events as well:

    “On 27 November 2007, an explosion occurred in one of the chemical factories in Chenjiagang Chemical Zone, with seven killed and around 50 injured…In the early morning of 11 February 2011, rumors of toxic chemical release and potential imminent explosions in the Chenjiagang Chemical Industry Park led over ten thousand residents to evacuate in panic from the towns of Chenjiagang and Shuanggang during which four people died and many were injured. On the afternoon of May 18 and again on July 26 in 2011, there were explosions at local factories.”

    As I keep reminding readers, the whole “pandemic” is a covert op. Such operations always deploy cover stories, in order to hide what is really being done, how it’s being done, and why.

    Speaking of which, there are several major pharmaceutical companies who’ve faced heavy exposure for their roles in the opioid criminal trafficking business. For example, Purdue, and Johnson & Johnson. A third one is (Mossad-connected) Teva. [12]

    If you could offer Warren Buffet an ice cream cone with a truth-serum cherry on top, it would be interesting to ask him whether the PR campaign to push opioids as life-saving COVID treatments helped stabilize his 42,789,295 shares of beleaguered Teva, worth $493,789,000. [13]

    To connect one more dot (for now,) the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation holds 50 million shares, worth $11 billion, in Buffett’s company, Berkshire Hathaway. [14] It is the Gates Foundation’s top investment. "

    SOURCES:

    [1] https://twitter.com/_whitneywebb

    [1a] See the video at the following link: starting at the 38m00s mark: https://www.activistpost.com/2021/05...e-to-pass.html

    [1b] https://linktr.ee/whitneywebb

    [2] https://www.njspotlight.com/2020/04/...-covid-19-war/

    [3] https://www.city-journal.org/wuhan-f...tanyl-epidemic

    [4] https://www.theatlantic.com/health/a...idemic/596254/

    [5] https://www.latimes.com/world-nation...bal-drug-trade

    [6] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/tag/ventilators/

    [7] https://web.archive.org/web/20200515...er-adults.html

    [8] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/tag/old-people/

    [9] https://thehill.com/changing-america...ents-placed-on

    [10] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...d-19-patients/

    [10a] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...ump-on-notice/

    [11] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_X...lant_explosion

    [12] https://www.oag.state.va.us/media-ce...ing-strategies

    [13] https://fintel.io/so/us/teva/berkshire-hathaway

    [14] https://www.investopedia.com/article...olio-looks.asp
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  34. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (2nd June 2021), Pam (2nd June 2021), TomKat (2nd June 2021)

  35. Link to Post #98
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,091 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    COVID: Martyrdom Meets Fascism
    by Jon Rappoport
    June 25, 2021

    "I have a stack of articles I’ve yet to publish. I wrote this one on April 21, 2021.

    Collectivism: “Everybody is connected to everybody. Government decides how they’re connected, and what they must do, to contribute to the Greater Whole.”

    Anytime someone tells you…

    You can’t exercise your freedom…

    Because every move you make adversely affects someone else…

    Know you’re looking at a con.

    “By walking out on the street in New York without a mask, yawning, stretching your arms, looking at the sky, you’re devastating the life of a man in Bombay.”

    It’s the wet dream of every little Collectivist. “We really ARE all in this together. Finally.”

    Meanwhile, every corrupt politician sees the opportunity to tell lies and issue edicts on a larger stage. The curtain is going up, and he can sink his teeth into a leading role. He can bloviate to his heart’s content about The Good. He’s fighting a war and he doesn’t have to expose himself to a single bullet from the enemy. He’s Mussolini and he has medical backup.

    Political Lefties have been waiting for this moment, too. Workers of the world, unite…it never achieved traction in America. It was a loser. But this; this SCIENTIFIC DICTATORSHIP; why didn’t anyone try it before? It’s such an obvious hole card. We’re all equal, we all carry the virus. Beautiful.

    And big money people can gobble up distressed properties and assets at bargain basement prices. Buy a block, buy a town, buy a farm, buy a strip of buildings right through the middle of a city, buy a nation.

    “I’m just trying to do my part and help the economy…”

    “You know, at first I was thinking of moving out of New York. The rampant crime, the horrific taxes. But then I realized I could buy New York.”

    Authors have been launching bad science fiction novels about collective “humanity coming together as one” for a hundred years. There’s an ominous and imminent threat to the planet from an alien force; people of all nations band together and repel the invader.

    The authors omit one factor: who is going to run the newly unified planet, and how are they going to run it?

    The answer is: people you wouldn’t want to allow within ten miles of your children. How are they going to rule? Mechanically. “Humans are units who need to be trained to think the same thoughts.”

    Why is that vicious program hard to understand? Because most people are not independent-minded. They have no history of thinking beyond prescribed borders, on their own, with no concern about consensus.

    Therefore, they believe “a little bit of fascism” might be good for us. It isn’t that far from their own ideas and opinions.

    As for dumb-as-a-rock mainstream medical scientists, it never occurs to them that COVID case and death numbers are being jacked up, rigged, and faked by every possible means, in order to sell the notion that a virus is attacking Earth.

    If this really were a viral pandemic, no faking of numbers would be necessary.

    Why WOULD these medical scientists wake up? Their own “science” is forced and artificial consensus. “We who publish in the most prestigious journals are, by definition, dispensing truth. Everyone else is an outlier.”

    COVID is a system and a syndicate, pushing collectivism like heroin.

    Most political leaders believe the people must be fed a strong diet of maxims, slogans, memes, and headlines. “The masses will always be stupid. Slogans guide and control them. Otherwise, there would be sheer chaos.”

    From that basis, collectivism follows. All problems, at the top, are strategic; how can propaganda work to form bubbles of consent?

    As I’ve warned for the past 30 years, the medical cartel is the most powerful of all information outlets. It can shape public opinion like no other elite group.

    Tests, diagnoses, and treatments are the raw material of the cartel. Shaping that clay into structures of preposterous threats—“a pandemic has reached our shores”—the leverage is magnified beyond the expectations of even the most optimistic propagandists.

    Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Mao never dreamed of such a ploy.

    “You mean, with media and government pronouncements, and just a modest degree of police crackdown, we can cow a whole population into wearing masks and refraining from public gatherings? We can even order them to submit to house arrest without firing a shot? We can tell workers and business proprietors to shut down and they’ll voluntarily follow orders? A miracle.”

    Not only that, the population will believe they’re on the side of justice and truth.

    Until the oppressive collective trance expands to the limit of its elasticity, snaps, and the **** hits the fan."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  36. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Delight (25th June 2021), gord (25th June 2021), mountain_jim (25th June 2021)

  37. Link to Post #99
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,091 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Pandemics are staged on Television
    Network: the last great film about The News

    by Jon Rappoport
    July 2, 2021
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...on-television/

    "When a new epidemic is launched and promoted, despite the lack of good science and good evidence, it is jacked up on television screens. Images begin to flow:

    An emergency medical vehicle on a street. EMT personnel, in hazmat suits, load a man strapped down to a stretcher, into the van. On another street, a man collapses on the sidewalk. We see a quarantined man sitting inside a huge plastic bubble on a third street. Cut to an airport lobby. Soldiers are patrolling the space among the crowds. Cut to a lab. Close-up of vials of liquid. Camera pulls back. Techs in light green scrubs are placing the vials into slots of a table-top machine. Auditorium—a man on a platform, wearing a doctor’s white coat, is pointing a wand at a large screen, on which a chart is displayed, for the audience. Back to the street. People are wearing face masks.

    These images wash over the television viewer. Meanwhile, the anchor is imparting his prepared meaning: “The government today issued a ban on all travel into and out of the city…hundreds of plane flights have been cancelled. Scientists are rushing to develop a vaccine…”

    The television audience has an IMPRESSION of knowing something. They’re in the flow, the flow of the news…they’re in the images…

    —Network, the 1976 film written by Paddy Chayefsky, reveals what media kings would do if they unchained their basic instincts and galloped all the way into the madness of slash-and-burn Roman Circus.

    The audience is jaded beyond recall. It needs new shocks to the system every day. The adrenaline must flow. The line between reporting the news and inventing it? Erase it. Celebrate the erasure. Watch ratings soar.

    Why pretend anymore? Why spend countless hours preparing and broadcasting synthetic artificial news, as if it were real? Does the audience care about such niceties? The audience just wants action.

    The film proceeds from these premises.

    Arthur Jensen, head of the corporation that owns the Network, speaks to unhinged Network newsman, Howard Beale, who has revealed, on-air, a piece of the real planetary power structure in a few moments of sanity: “You have meddled with the primal forces of nature, Mr. Beale, and I won’t have it!! Is that clear?!… You are an old man who thinks in terms of nations and peoples. There are no nations. There are no peoples. There are no Russians. There are no Arabs. There are no third worlds. There is no West. There is only one holistic system of systems, one vast and immane, interwoven, interacting, multivariate, multinational dominion of dollars. Petro-dollars, electro-dollars, multi-dollars, reichmarks, rins, rubles, pounds, and shekels. It is the international system of currency which determines the totality of life on this planet. That is the natural order of things today. That is the atomic and subatomic and galactic structure of things today! And YOU have meddled with the primal forces of nature, and YOU WILL ATONE!”

    Head of programming for the Network, Diana Christensen, shifts the whole news department over to the entertainment division.

    Thus emerge new shows with soaring ratings: Howard Beale, [Religious] Prophet of the Air Waves; The Mao Tse-Tung Hour, in which a guerrilla group films itself carrying out armed bank robberies; and Sybil the Soothsayer, a Tarot reader.

    Diana becomes the network’s new executive star.

    There is no longer even a pretense of a need for news anchors to appear authoritative, objective, or rational.

    Diana Christensen is unstoppable. She sees, with burning clarity, that audiences are bored to the point of exhaustion; they now require, as at the end of the Roman Empire, extreme entertainment. They want more violence, more insanity, out in the open. On television.

    In promoting her kind of news division, she tells network executives:

    “Look, we’ve got a bunch of
    hobgoblin radicals called the
    Ecumenical Liberation Army who
    go around taking home movies
    of themselves robbing banks.
    Maybe they’ll take movies of
    themselves kidnapping heiresses,
    hijacking 747’s, bombing bridges,
    assassinating ambassadors.
    We’d open each week’s segment
    with that authentic footage,
    hire a couple of writers to
    write some story behind that
    footage, and we’ve got
    ourselves a series…

    “Did you see the overnights on the
    Network News? It has an 8 in New
    York and a 9 in L.A. and a 27 share
    in both cities. Last night, Howard
    Beale went on the air [as a newscaster] and yelled
    ‘BULL****’ for two minutes, and I
    can tell you right now that tonight’s
    show will get a 30 share at least.
    I think we’ve lucked into something…

    “I see Howard Beale as a latter-day
    prophet, a magnificent messianic
    figure, inveighing against the
    hypocrisies of our times, a strip
    Savonarola, Monday through Friday.
    I tell you, Frank, that could just
    go through the roof…Do you want to figure out
    the revenues of a strip show that
    sells for a hundred thousand bucks
    a minute? One show like that could
    pull this whole network right out
    of the hole! Now, Frank, it’s being
    handed to us on a plate; let’s not
    blow it!”

    Television in the “real world” isn’t all the way there yet, but it’s close.

    In Network, Diana Christensen personifies the news. She is the electric, thrill-seeking, non-stop force that is terrified of silence.

    She lives and feeds on adrenaline. So does the viewing public. Nothing else ultimately matters. Ratings are the top line and the bottom line. The individual and his thoughts are completely irrelevant.

    Howard Beale, over the cliff, a news man screaming on-air about the insanity of the news, is perfectly acceptable, because the audience is simply responding to Beale’s inchoate outrage and their own. Nothing deeper is explored. What could have resulted in a true popular rebellion is short-circuited. Beale becomes a crazy loon, a novelty item. Yet one more distraction.

    When, in a brief interlude of clarity, he begins telling his audience about the takeover of society by mega-corporations and mega-money, his show droops. Ratings collapse. Diana is no longer interested in him; she wants to sack him.

    However, Arthur Jensen, the head of the corporation that owns the television network, wants to keep Beale on the air, as a messenger of the “galactic truth” about the beneficial integration of all human activity under the rubric of global money and global power. He converts Beale to his cause.

    Diana sees only one way out of this ratings disaster: kill Beale; on-air; during his show. And so it is done.

    Network also shows us the audience becoming actor, player, participant. The audience is jumping out of its skin to be recognized, courted, and adored as a mighty rolling force embodying no particular meaning.

    Audience wants to be a star. Audience wants to BE news; audience wants its actions to be shown on television. That establishes its legitimacy. Nothing else is necessary.

    Diana knows it, and she is more than willing to accommodate this frantic desire, if only her bosses will let her go all the way.

    The best film ever made about television’s war on the population, Network stages only a few minutes of on-air television.

    The rest of the film is dialogue and monologue about television. Thus you could say that, in this case, word defeats image. Which was scriptwriter Paddy Chayefsky’s intent.

    Even when showing what happens on the TV screen, Network bursts forth with lines like these, from newsman Howard Beale, at the end of his rope, on-camera, speaking to his in-studio audience and millions of people in their homes:

    “So, you listen to me. Listen to me! Television is not the truth. Television’s a god-damned amusement park. Television is a circus, a carnival, a traveling troupe of acrobats, storytellers, dancers, singers, jugglers, sideshow freaks, lion tamers, and football players. We’re in the boredom-killing business… We deal in illusions, man. None of it is true! But you people sit there day after day, night after night, all ages, colors, creeds. We’re all you know. You’re beginning to believe the illusions we’re spinning here. You’re beginning to think that the tube is reality and that your own lives are unreal. You do whatever the tube tells you. You dress like the tube, you eat like the tube, you raise your children like the tube. You even think like the tube. This is mass madness. You maniacs. In God’s name, you people are the real thing. We are the illusion.”

    It is Beale’s language and the passion with which he delivers it that constitutes his dangerous weapon. Therefore, the Network transforms him into a cheap religious figure, whose audience slathers him with absurd adoration.

    Television’s enemy is the word. Its currency is image.

    Beale occasionally breaks through the image and defiles it. He cracks the egg. He stops the picture-flow. He brings back the sound and rhythm of spoken poetry. That is his true transgression against the medium that employs him.

    The modern matrix has everything to do with how knowledge is acquired.

    Television, in the main, does not attempt to impart knowledge. It strives to give the viewer the impression that he knows something. There is a difference.

    The impression of knowing is a feeling, a conviction, a belief the viewer holds, after he has watched moving images on a screen and listened to a narrator. THIS is what the viewer prefers. He wants no part of knowledge.

    A basic premise of modern age is: “everything is (connected to) everything.” This fits quite well with the experience of watching video flow.

    Example: we see angry crowds on the street of a foreign city. Then young people on their cell phones sitting in an outdoor café. Then the marble lobby of a government building where men in suits are walking, standing in groups talking to each other. Then at night, rockets exploding in the sky. Then armored vehicles moving through a gate into the city. Then clouds of smoke on another street and people running, chased by police.

    A flow of consecutive images. The sequence, obviously, has been assembled by a news editor, but the viewing audience isn’t aware of that. They’re watching the “interconnected” images and listening to a news anchor tell a story that colors (infects) every image: “This is revolution for democracy, created by the technology of cell phones…”

    Viewers thus believe something. Television has imparted a sensation to them.

    Therefore: a short circuit occurs in the mind.

    When you export this pattern out to a whole society, you are talking about a dominant method through which “knowledge” is groped and held close.

    “Did you see that fantastic video about the Iraq War? It showed that Saddam actually had bioweapons.”

    “Really? How did they show that?”

    “Well, I don’t remember. But watch it. You’ll see.”

    And that’s another feature of the modern acquisition of “knowledge”: amnesia about details.

    The viewer can’t recall key features of what he saw. Or if he can, he can’t describe them, because he was inside them, busy building up his impression of knowing something.

    Narrative-visual-television story strips out and discards conceptual analysis. To the extent it exists, it’s wrapped around and inside the image and the narration.

    Paddy Chayefsky made his pen a sword, because he was writing a movie about television, against television. He was pitting Word against Image.

    When a technology (television) turns into a method of perception, reality is turned inside out. People watch TV through TV eyes.

    Mind control is no longer something merely imposed from the outside. It is a matrix of a self-feeding, self-demanding loop.

    Willing Devotees of the Image WANT images, food stamps of the programmed society.

    The triumph of Network is that it makes its words win over pictures, IN a picture, IN a film.

    A pandemic, the false pandemic I’ve been rejecting in many articles, is delivered through video flow and narration. Stacked and cut images.

    There is no challenge to the flow in any basic way, through the intrusion of actual knowledge, because that would shut down the parade of images and nullify the reasons for broadcasting them in the first place.

    The old theater adage, “the show must go on,” when adapted for television, becomes, “the flow must go on.” Once its course is set, there can be no turning back.

    The television audience, imprisoned in homes, rides the river…"
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  38. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (4th July 2021), Journeyman (4th July 2021), mountain_jim (4th July 2021), thepainterdoug (4th July 2021)

  39. Link to Post #100
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,091 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    The Delta Variant, the unvaccinated, the two Americas, and other propaganda fabrications
    by Jon Rappoport
    July 5, 2021
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...-fabrications/

    "There is no Delta Variant.

    Because there is nothing to vary FROM. In other words, as I’ve been proving for more than a year, SARS-CoV-2 doesn’t exist.

    But the vaccine establishment and public health officials are pumping up the Delta hoax in order to convince more people to take the highly dangerous RNA COVID vaccines (genetic treatments).

    Their narrative is a threat: in unvaccinated pockets, the Delta percolates and then breaks out, infecting many…followed by a further spread into communities of the vaccinated, where…

    It can infect even those people.

    Gibberish.

    Every covert op starts out with a goal, an objective. Then an action-plan for achieving the goal. Then, the story that will be told to make it seem as if the unfolding actions are “responses to actual events in real time.”

    The story about the Delta Variant, for example—from the beginning of the fake pandemic, tales of Variants were always part of the plan, in order to move closer to the goal of universal vaccination.

    “When we see the scale of the resistance against vaccination, we’ll give them a Variant narrative, to induce more people to take the shot.”

    “Right. We’ll say the Variant is more deadly and contagious than the original form of the virus.”

    Another current element of propaganda: “we now have two Americas; the states with high rates of vaccination and those with low rates; this divide is intolerable; we can’t allow it.”

    Why not? If millions of ignorant people insist on taking the destructive injection, and a smaller number refuse, and you have bordering states with vastly different vaccination policies and rates, then people have a choice. Live in state A or B.

    But choice is not what the establishment wants. THAT’s why they whine and moan and warn about two Americas.

    And from the beginning of the op, they knew there would be states with very different vaccination rates—and they knew they would be warning against it.

    But wait. There’s more. The propaganda describes people/areas where the vaccination rates are low as: uneducated and Republican, or “people of color.”

    All along, the planning involved special targeting of these groups. Demonizing the “uneducated Republicans,” and sympathizing with “people of color” as victims of disinformation.

    “You blacks and Hispanics, it’s not your fault you believe the vaccine is dangerous. White anti-vaxxer Devils have been telling you lies.”

    The total sum of all this propaganda? “We don’t want to, but in order to save the nation, we may have to institute mandated vaccination.”

    The technical term is “layers of bull****.”

    In case you’ve missed the last 10,000 years of human history, political leaders have always called for Unity. It’s been their basic con.

    Dissent and freedom of speech have always been afterthoughts, as far as these elitists are concerned.

    Therefore, “some people vaccinated and some people unvaccinated” has nothing to do with science (especially since, as I’ve described in dozens of articles, the whole immunization hypothesis is a rank fake). Rather, it has to do with disunity.

    “We can’t have division. It would destroy the foundation of this great nation. We must censor dissent from the artificial consensus.”

    “Science” is a basic weapon for canceling and burning the 1st Amendment:

    “We know what is true. So we don’t need to permit debate. It’s time-consuming, useless, distracting, and harmful. To be generous, we could say people have a right to be wrong, but why bother?”

    Phalanxes of overgrown children emerging from colleges without a clue about logic or investigation have a special need to assert the value of their education. They fulfill this need by demanding everyone must follow the (unthinking) science they’ve mastered.

    A minor obstacle like the 1st Amendment can be brushed aside as out of date.

    “People used to have a right to argue in the old days, before the truth was established.”

    The COVID narrative, from 2019 up to this moment, was planned. The art of propaganda involves making that narrative seem as if it’s composed of in-the-moment responses to unanticipated reactions of the public.

    And the plan doesn’t require genius or even extensive data collection and profiling. Any reasonably intelligent person could sketch it out on a napkin during lunch. Why?

    Because a hundred years of Rockefeller Germ Theory and vaccination lies have tuned up the population to respond to words like “outbreak” and “epidemic” in predictable ways."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  40. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (5th July 2021), kfm27917 (6th July 2021), mountain_jim (6th July 2021), wondering (5th July 2021)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1 5 7 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts