+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst 1 6 7 LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 127

Thread: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

  1. Link to Post #101
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Genetic baloney in thick slices
    by Jon Rappoport
    July 8, 2021
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...-thick-slices/

    "Gene research companies tend to come and go. They start out banging and popping like fireworks in the sky, and then they fade out—selling themselves to larger outfits who’ve hired better liars…

    Once upon a time, it sounded easy. Start with a disease, find the gene responsible for the disease, and correct the problem.

    Then, researchers wondered, was disease the result of one gene or a group of genes acting together?

    Either way, the proof would be in devising cures for diseases using gene therapy. “Not yet, but soon…”

    And regardless, the major need was: money. Lots and lots of money.

    This need required good PR people. “We have to pump up the idea that we’re on the edge of tremendous breakthroughs. We’re always on that edge…”

    This hype also needed to obscure the fact that there wasn’t (and isn’t) ANY gene cure for ANY disease.

    As time passed, lack of cure could be a problem. In fact, it could mean curing disease was not a genetic undertaking at all. What about environment? Toxicity? Malnutrition? Poverty? In order to raise money, those factors would have to be pushed back out of view.

    Instead, the PR people would need to flood the news with positive glow around the subject of gene research. Also known as exaggeration. Or bull****.

    You can spot the key terms in these articles. POSSIBLE, SHOULD, COULD, EXPECTED TO, SEEMS, ON THE HORIZON, MAY BE, COULD LEAD TO, EVENTUALLY, and of course, the ever-popular BREAKTHROUGH.

    I dug back in my files and found a piece I wrote in 2011. As you’ll see, the “breakthroughs” touted then haven’t panned out so far. You don’t read about them in the press these days. The PR pros have moved on to other exaggerations.

    The first 2011 article I cited was from Reuters, headlined: SCIENTISTS FIND “MASTER SWITCH” GENE FOR OBESITY. Here are a few choice tidbits. Note the key terms I just mentioned.

    “…and say it should help the search for treatments…”

    “…the regulating gene could be [a] target for drugs to treat…”

    “…seems to act as a master switch…”

    “We are working hard…to understand these processes and how we can use this information to improve treatment…”

    Sure. You bet.

    Zero results.

    Next, a 2011 blockbuster piece in the Financial Times. The headline read: SCIENTISTS FIND GENETIC LINK TO DEPRESSION.

    Standard trumpet blaring.

    Here are the text nuggets. Again, note key terms.

    “The discovery…is expected to lead to a better biological understanding of the condition and eventually to more effective antidepressants…”

    “…as possibly for the first time we have found a genetic locus for depression.”

    “…is likely to pin down the gene responsible…”

    “…which may be the basis for designing more effective antidepressants…”

    Sure. You bet.

    Zero results.

    Moving ahead in time—From immunology.org: “On 17 December 2015, the journal Science voted [gene-editing tool] Crispr-Cas9 ‘Breakthrough of the Year’, saying that it had ‘matured into a molecular marvel’. It is already being used in cancer immunotherapy to edit a patient’s own T-cell genome in order to remove the gene that ‘tells’ these immune cells not to target cancerous tissue.

    It’s already being used—but where are the cures? Nowhere.

    Anybody out there want to partner with me in launching a new company? This is a major winner. It covers a very broad area. Actually, there is no human endeavor it doesn’t cover. The name of the company? MAYBE COULD BE INC.

    “We’re always on the edge and the frontier. We’re always breaking through. We’re always raising money. We’re always pumping our stock. We’re always ready to sell the company to a sucker with deep pockets.”

    Let’s look at another type of gene research organization. This one happens to be the largest single medical research outfit in the world. It’s part of the US government: the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Their PR is different. They’re hedging their bets and covering their bases in every possible way. They’re saying YES, NO, AND MAYBE all at once. Of course, they can get away with it, because they run on taxpayer money. Their annual budget is a formidable $30 billion. Grit your teeth and read through their text that explains “genetic diseases”:

    “A genetic disorder is a disease caused in whole or in part by a change in the DNA sequence away from the normal sequence. Genetic disorders can be caused by a mutation in one gene (monogenic disorder), by mutations in multiple genes (multifactorial inheritance disorder), by a combination of gene mutations and environmental factors, or by damage to chromosomes (changes in the number or structure of entire chromosomes, the structures that carry genes).”

    “As we unlock the secrets of the human genome (the complete set of human genes), we are learning that nearly all diseases have a genetic component. Some diseases are caused by mutations that are inherited from the parents and are present in an individual at birth, like sickle cell disease. Other diseases are caused by acquired mutations in a gene or group of genes that occur during a person’s life. Such mutations are not inherited from a parent, but occur either randomly or due to some environmental exposure (such as cigarette smoke). These include many cancers, as well as some forms of neurofibromatosis.”

    That is a DON’T BLAME US statement. “Don’t blame us if a disease we thought was genetic turns out to be something else. Don’t blame us if it’s 65.34 percent environmental, 4.52 percent genetic, and 30.14 percent who knows what. Don’t blame us if toxicity triggers genetic malfunctions and, in the absence of the toxicity, there would be zero cases of the disease. Don’t blame us if a disease has nothing to do with genes. We’re ready to jump in any direction. We may not know much, but we’re sitting on a pile of cash. Don’t blame us if we don’t have any solid genetic cures for anything. We’re working hard. That’s all you can ask us to do.”

    If there is one disease the public tends to believe can be cured by gene therapy, it is sickle cell anemia. The PR pros have done a good job there. However, sicklecellanemianews.com states: “Gene therapy is an experimental technique that aims to treat genetic diseases by altering a disease-causing gene or introducing a healthy copy of a mutated gene to the body.”

    Experimental. Aims to. Not an established cure. The confusion arises because, as with a number of diseases, the researchers and the PR flacks claim they’ve definitely traced the illness to a gene or two. They’ve struck gold. But, as you read further, you discover they’re just not ready to cure the patient. Clinical trials are underway. More work in the lab is necessary. The pudding is there, but the proof of it isn’t. They claim to know the cause; they just don’t know what to do with it.

    In science, that’s known as a hypothesis. Or more simply, a speculation. You say you’ve found an answer, but you can’t apply it. This means: you don’t have an answer.

    “There is no doubt. We went down into the mine and we found evidence of extraordinary amounts of gold. We just don’t know how to get it out. What’s that? You want to see the gold? No, I’m sorry. The public isn’t allowed down there. Only the professionals can enter. But don’t worry. We’re very close to a breakthrough. The gold will emerge soon. Trust us.”

    Trust you? Sure. How much do you need to finish the job? Fifty million? A hundred million? Let me call my broker and sell some stock. I’ll write you a check. Just put a plaque with my name on the wall. Let me know how I’ll profit on this venture. I’m in. I’ve always wanted to invest in MAYBE COULD BE INC.

    In case you need to be reminded, the RNA COVID vaccines are genetic treatments. The PR pros tell us they are working quite well. And they’re remarkably safe.

    If you’re buying that line, I have electric cars for sale. And they have wings. One charge in your garage, and they’ll get you from Earth to Mars in just under two hours."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  2. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (23rd December 2021), Franny (23rd August 2021), kfm27917 (10th July 2021), mojo (23rd August 2021), mountain_jim (9th July 2021), Pam (7th December 2021), Reinhard (9th July 2021), Satori (9th July 2021), wondering (10th July 2021)

  3. Link to Post #102
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    CDC/FDA confess: they had no virus when they concocted the test for the virus
    7/29/21
    by Jon Rappoport
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...for-the-virus/

    "The CDC has issued a document that bulges with interesting and devastating admissions.

    The release is titled, “07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.” It begins explosively:

    “After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.”

    Many people believe this means the CDC is giving up on the PCR test as a means of “detecting the virus.” I don’t think the CDC is saying that at all.

    They’re saying the PCR technology will continue to be used, but they’re replacing what the test is looking FOR with a better “reference sample.” A better marker. A better target. A better piece of RNA supposedly derived from SARS-CoV-2.

    CDC/FDA are confessing there has been a PROBLEM with the PCR test which has been used to detect the virus, starting in February of 2020—right up to this minute.

    In other words, the millions and millions of “COVID cases” based on the PCR test in use are all suspect.

    To confirm this, the CDC document links to an FDA release titled, “SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel Comparative Data.” Here is a killer quote:

    “During the early months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical specimens [of the virus] were not readily available to developers of IVDs [in vitro diagnostics] to detect SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for example, gene specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation. While validation using these contrived specimens provided a measure of confidence in test performance at the beginning of the pandemic, it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”

    Translation: We, at the CDC, did not have a specimen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when we concocted the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. Yes, it’s unbelievable, right? And that’s the test we’ve been using all along. So we CONTRIVED samples of the virus. We fabricated. We lied. We made up [invented] synthetic gene sequences and we SAID these sequences HAD TO BE close to the sequence of SARS-CoV-2, without having the faintest idea of what we were doing, because, again, we didn’t have an actual specimen of the virus. We had no proof THERE WAS something called SARS-CoV-2.

    This amazing FDA document goes to say the Agency has granted emergency approval to 59 different PCR tests since the beginning of the (fake) pandemic. 59. And, “…it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”

    Translation: Each of the 59 different PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 told different lies and concocted different fabrications about the genetic makeup of the virus—the virus we didn’t have. Obviously, then, these tests would give unreliable results.

    BUT, don’t worry, be happy, because NOW, the CDC and the FDA say, they really do have actual virus samples of SARS-CoV-2 from patients; they have better targets for the PCR test, and labs should start gearing up for the new and improved tests.

    In other words, they were lying THEN, but they’re not lying NOW. They were “contriving,” but now they’re telling the truth.

    If you believe that, I have Fountain of Youth water for sale, extracted from the lead-contaminated system of Flint, Michigan.

    Here, once again, I report virology’s version of “we isolated the virus”:

    They have a soup they make in their labs.

    This soup contains human and monkey cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and all sorts of other random genetic material. Because the cells start to die, the researchers ASSUME a bit of mucus from a patient they dropped in the soup is doing the killing, and THE VIRUS must be the killer agent in the mucus.

    This assumption is entirely unwarranted. The drugs and chemicals could be doing the cell-killing, and the researchers are also starving the cells of vital nutrients.

    There is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup, or that it is doing the cell-killing, or that it exists.

    Yet the researchers call cell-death “isolation of the virus.”

    To say this is a non-sequitur is a vast understatement. In their universe, “We have the virus buried in a soup in a dish in the lab” equals, “We’ve separated the virus from all surrounding material.”

    Virology equals “how to spread bull**** for a living and scare the world.” Other than that, it’s perfect.

    SOURCES:

    (forthcoming) "
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  4. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (23rd December 2021), DaveToo (18th August 2021), Franny (23rd August 2021), Maybee (28th March 2022), mojo (23rd August 2021), mountain_jim (29th July 2021), Pam (7th December 2021), Satori (29th July 2021)

  5. Link to Post #103
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Massive fraud in reporting vaccine injuries; withheld data, pretense of “safe and effective”
    by Jon Rappoport
    August 17, 2021
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...tense-of-safe/

    "ONE: A bombshell. Alex Berenson, former New York Times reporter, August 6: “Covid vaccine maker Moderna received 300,000 reports of side effects after vaccinations over a three-month period following the launch of its shot, according to an internal report from a company that helps Moderna manage the reports.”

    “That figure is far higher than the number of side effect reports about Moderna’s vaccine publicly available in the federal system that tracks such adverse events.”

    BOOM. 300,000 vaccine adverse effects NOT reported to VAERS, the federal database.

    Berenson: “The 300,000 figure comes from an internal update provided to employees by IQVIA, a little-known but enormous company that helps drugmakers manage clinical trials. Headquartered in North Carolina, IQVIA has 74,000 employees worldwide and had $11 billion in sales last year.”

    “Earlier this week, Richard Staub, the president of IQVIA’s Research & Development Solutions division, sent a ‘Q2 2021 update’ which was labeled ‘Confidential – For internal distribution only’.”

    “A person with access to the presentation provided screenshots of the relevant slide, which clearly explains the 300,000 side effect reports were received over ‘a three-month span’ – not since the introduction of the vaccine in December…”

    TWO: Independent researcher Virginia Stoner has issued a stunning new report on the VAERS numbers, and the effort by mainstream scientists to minimize the destructive effects of the COVID vaccines. Here are key quotes from her report:

    “More deaths have been reported to VAERS from the covid shots than from all other vaccines combined for the last 30 years.”

    “There’s a code of silence shielding the massive increase in deaths (and other serious injuries) reported to VAERS from the covid shots. Not only do CDC web pages and press releases omit that inconvenient fact—vaccine research studies omit it as well.”

    “The number of covid shots [in the US] administered so far in 2021 (309 million) is roughly the same as all other vaccines administered in 2020 (316 million). But a shocking 36-times more deaths were reported this year from the covid shots than were reported last year from all other vaccines.”

    “Someone died from a vaccine they [a medical provider] administered…could it potentially call their professional judgment into question, or result in a malpractice lawsuit? If you were a doctor, or supervisor at a drive-thru covid vaccination clinic, and you were given a choice between spending the evening filing a VAERS report, or having dinner with friends, which would you choose?”

    “There are reasons to think death may be one of the most underreported vaccine injuries of all—mainly because the victim is dead, and can’t file a VAERS report. Nor can they prod their doctor into filing a VAERS report. Unless they’re fortunate enough to have a relative or doctor who knows they got the vaccine, knows about VAERS, understands the potential for vaccine injury, and is willing to go through the onerous process of filing a VAERS report, it won’t happen.”

    THREE: Open letter from Doctors for COVID Ethics accusing governments and media of lying to the people:

    “Official sources, namely EudraVigilance (EU, EEA, Switzerland), MHRA (UK) and VAERS (USA), have now recorded more Injuries and Deaths from the ‘Covid’ vaccine roll-out than from all previous vaccines combined since records began.”

    “TOTAL for EU/UK/USA – 34,052 Covid-19 injection related deaths and over 5.46 million injuries reported as at 1 August 2021.”

    “It is important to be aware that the official figures above (reported to the health authorities) are but a small percentage of the actual figures. Furthermore, people continue to die (and suffer injury) from the injections with every day which passes.”

    “This catastrophic situation has not been reported by the mainstream media, despite the official figures above being publicly available.”

    “The Signal of Harm is now indisputably overwhelming, and, in line with universally accepted ethical standards for clinical trials, Doctors for Covid Ethics demands that the ‘Covid’ vaccine programme be halted immediately.”

    “Continuation of the programme in the full knowledge of ongoing serious Harm and Death to both adults and children constitutes a Crime Against Humanity/Genocide for which those found to be responsible or complicit will ultimately be held personally liable.”

    “Governments worldwide are lying to you the people, to the populations they purportedly serve.”

    “The figures above demonstrate that the mRNA vaccines are deadly.”

    FOUR: The well-known 2010 Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. study of VAERS bluntly stated: “Adverse events from vaccines are common but underreported, with less than one percent reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Low reporting rates preclude or delay the identification of ‘problem’ vaccines, potentially endangering the health of the public.”

    Following the finding of that study, you would multiply the number of reported vaccine injuries by 100 to arrive at a proper figure.

    FIVE: In view of the massive number of vaccine injuries and deaths, how would we expect the public to react? Here is a major clue. Stat News, July 21: “Millions of unused Covid-19 vaccines are set to go to waste as demand dwindles across the United States and doses likely expire this summer, according to public health officials…”

    “Currently, states have administered 52.36 million fewer doses than have been distributed to them, according to federal data.”

    “A significant tranche of Pfizer doses is expected to expire in August… Given waning domestic vaccine demand, those doses are unlikely to be fully used before they must be tossed.”

    “’We’re seeing demand [for the vaccine] falling off across all the states,’ said Marcus Plescia, chief medical officer at the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials.”

    SIX: Understanding this, government, media, and corporate criminals are ramping up vaccine mandates wherever and however they can, to force the needle into your arm.

    “You’re aware that our product is highly dangerous and destructive? We’ll make you take it.”

    SEVEN: RESIST. REBEL."

    SOURCES:

    https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/some-actual-news

    https://www.virginiastoner.com/writi...r-than-the-cdc

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/jaccus...-serve/5750650

    https://digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded...porting-system

    statnews.com/2021/07/20/states-are-sitting-on-millions-of-surplus-covid-19-vaccine-doses-as-expiration-dates-approach/
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  6. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (23rd December 2021), Franny (23rd August 2021), meat suit (23rd August 2021), mojo (23rd August 2021), mountain_jim (18th August 2021), Pam (7th December 2021), Peace in Oz (19th August 2021)

  7. Link to Post #104
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Breaking: FDA gives full approval to COVID vaccines; no public hearing; no transparency; no open review of vaccine data t
    It all happened behind closed doors

    by Jon Rappoport
    August 23, 2021

    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...-transparency/

    "The fix is in.

    We raced from “emergency use authorization” of experimental vaccines to “full approval.” Boom.

    Despite the promise of “transparency” prior to giving full approval to the COVID vaccines, the FDA gave its final green light today. Slam-dunk.
    https://www.fda.gov/news-events/pres...vid-19-vaccine

    And there was NO public hearing.

    “Full approval” means the vaccine marketing/intimidation/mandate campaigns will ramp up much higher. “Well, now there is NO reason for anyone to refuse the shot. The FDA states it is completely safe and effective.”

    Obviously, the FDA didn’t want to allow even mainstream “experts” to speak in a public hearing before approval; the agency is running a very tight ship. No slip-ups. No defections.

    An 8/20 article in the BMJ https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2086
    ...(“Covid-19: FDA set to grant full approval to Pfizer vaccine without public discussion of data”) quotes a few of these dissenting mainstream pros. For example:

    “Kim Witczak, a drug safety advocate who serves as a consumer representative on the FDA’s Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee, said the decision removed an important mechanism for scrutinising the data.”

    “’These [FDA] public meetings are imperative in building trust and confidence especially when the vaccines came to market at lightning speed under emergency use authorisation,’ she said. ‘The public deserves a transparent process, especially as the call for boosters and mandates are rapidly increasing. These meetings offer a platform where questions can be raised, problems tackled, and data scrutinised in advance of an approval’.”

    “Witczak is one of the more than 30 signatories of a citizen petition calling on the FDA to refrain from fully approving any covid-19 vaccine this year to gather more data. She warned that without a [public FDA] meeting ‘we have no idea what the data looks like’.”

    “’It is already concerning that full approval is being based on 6 months’ worth of data despite the clinical trials designed for two years,’ she said. ‘There is no control group after Pfizer offered the product to placebo participants before the trials were completed’.”

    “’Full approval of covid-19 vaccines must be done in an open public forum for all to see. It could set a precedent of lowered standards for future vaccine approvals’.”

    Understand—this devastating criticism of the FDA is coming from a person who operates WITHIN the public-health establishment.

    Amidst a tsunami of reports of vaccine injuries and deaths from around the world, the FDA is proving it is an agency that will certify maiming and killing without hesitation."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  8. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (23rd August 2021), Bill Ryan (23rd December 2021), celticwarrior (23rd August 2021), Franny (23rd August 2021), gord (23rd August 2021), Gwin Ru (23rd August 2021), mojo (23rd August 2021), mountain_jim (23rd August 2021), Pam (7th December 2021)

  9. Link to Post #105
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,721
    Thanks
    30,817
    Thanked 125,664 times in 20,818 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax


    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/DZUIBSfzxEUC
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  10. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (23rd December 2021), onawah (29th August 2021), Pam (7th December 2021)

  11. Link to Post #106
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    76
    Posts
    28,581
    Thanks
    30,501
    Thanked 138,435 times in 21,490 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Quote Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)
    Does the Virus Exist? Has SARS-CoV-2 Been Isolated?
    My (recent) take on this issue is that it's a bit of a distraction.

    Classic identification of pathogens depends on isolating them, yes.

    Such has not been done with the covid virus, yes.

    But that doesn't mean that we (the biologists studying this) don't know exactly what's in these toxins.

    They do know, exactly, because that's how they (their biologists) engineered the "virus" and the "vaccines" (which train our own cells to manufacture more of the toxic spike proteins, in abundance)

    But they can't tell us that, for they don't want an open discussion of how this "virus" came to be.

    It would be like me claiming I was innocent of murdering someone with a gun on Friday, because I could prove that I had already murdered the victim the day before, with a poison.

    Such a defense would just move me from the frying pan, into the fire.
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  12. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (23rd December 2021), Blacklight43 (29th August 2021), Delight (30th August 2021), ExomatrixTV (29th August 2021), gord (29th August 2021), Pam (7th December 2021), wondering (30th August 2021)

  13. Link to Post #107
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    COVID vaccines were designed to fail; that’s how they won authorization
    by Jon Rappoport
    August 27, 2021
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...authorization/

    "For the past year, I’ve been demonstrating that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is a fake. It doesn’t exist. Now let’s enter the bubble where people assume the virus is real, and examine a few of the major crimes and contradictions that exist inside that lunatic bubble.

    I wrote and posted this piece almost a year ago, while the clinical trials of the COVID vaccine were in progress. It reveals how and why those trials were doomed to fail. They did fail. Since then, nothing has changed.

    The vaccine makers DESIGNED a series of clinical trials that, even on their own terms (“the virus is real, fear the virus”) were destined to be a complete flop.

    Here is the piece I wrote in September 2020, before COVID vaccines were authorized for emergency use.

    PART ONE:

    Peter Doshi, associate editor of the medical journal BMJ, and Eric Topol, Scripps Research professor of molecular medicine, have written a devastating NY Times opinion piece about the ongoing COVID vaccine clinical trials.

    They expose the fatal flaw in the large Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna trials.

    September 22, 2020, the Times: “These Coronavirus Trials Don’t Answer the One Question We Need to Know”:

    “If you were to approve a coronavirus vaccine, would you approve one that you only knew protected people only from the most mild form of Covid-19, or one that would prevent its serious complications?”

    “The answer is obvious. You would want to protect against the worst cases.”

    “But that’s not how the companies testing three of the leading coronavirus vaccine candidates, Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, whose U.S. trial is on hold, are approaching the problem.”

    “According to the protocols for their studies, which they released late last week, a vaccine could meet the companies’ benchmark for success if it lowered the risk of mild Covid-19, but was never shown to reduce moderate or severe forms of the disease, or the risk of hospitalization, admissions to the intensive care unit or death.”

    “To say a vaccine works should mean that most people no longer run the risk of getting seriously sick. That’s not what these trials will determine.”

    This means these clinical trials are dead in the water.

    They are only designed to show effectiveness in preventing “mild cases of COVID,” which nobody should care about, because mild cases (cough, fever) naturally run their course and cause no harm. THERE IS NO NEED FOR A VACCINE THAT PREVENTS MILD CASES.

    The leading vaccine clinical trials are useless, irrelevant, misleading, and deceptive.

    Now let’s go deeper. Read the next section from the Times piece, and then I’ll make comments.

    “The Moderna and AstraZeneca studies will involve about 30,000 participants each; Pfizer’s will have 44,000. Half the participants will receive two doses of vaccines separated by three or four weeks, and the other half will receive saltwater placebo shots. The final determination of efficacy will occur after 150 to 160 participants develop Covid-19…”

    Here’s how it works. The vaccine companies are looking for a total of 150 mild COVID cases to occur, combined, in the two groups— those receiving the placebo and those receiving the vaccine. How would that happen? The researchers believe “the coronavirus is spreading everywhere” and it will pounce on some of the volunteers in the clinical trial.

    Let’s say that, during the trial, 100 people receiving the placebo develop mild COVID-19, and only 50 people receiving the vaccine develop mild COVID.

    The vaccine companies would say, “We just proved the vaccine is 50% effective in preventing COVID, and that’s all we need to do, in order to win emergency authorization from the FDA. Release the vaccine. Inject the world.”

    The outcomes for 150 people equal “let’s shoot up seven billion people.” That’s staggering.

    But it gets even worse. The magic number of 150 COVID cases? How is a COVID case defined? The authors of the Times piece have the answer:

    “In the Moderna and Pfizer trials, even a mild case of Covid-19 — for instance, a cough plus a positive lab test — would qualify and muddy the results. AstraZeneca is slightly more stringent but would still count mild symptoms like a cough plus fever as a case.”

    But wait. The NY Times itself recently published an article stating that up to 90% of US COVID cases could very well be false positives—in other words, not cases at all. Why? Because the diagnostic PCR test, as it is performed by many labs, is too sensitive. It registers “positive for COVID” when it shouldn’t.

    So, in these vaccine clinical trials, the whole process of determining that “150 people developed COVID-19” is completely unreliable, useless, absurd, and nonsensical. On the one hand, a positive PCR test is unreliable and means nothing. On the other hand, a cough and fever (“mild COVID”) are nothing to worry about, and don’t require a vaccine at all. We’re talking about 150 cases of “who cares.” That’s what the COVID vaccine is designed to prevent.

    “So the magic number is 150? That’s the number that will decide the immediate fate of the planet?”

    “Of course.”

    “And these 150 people, who you say develop mild COVID-19…no one should care, because those symptoms cure themselves, and no vaccine is needed.”

    “Correct.”

    “And come to think of it, the people receiving the vaccine in the clinical trials could develop symptoms indistinguishable from mild COVID-19, as a result of the effects of the vaccine.”

    “Yes, that’s right.”

    “But you’re very confident in the success of the vaccine.”

    “Indeed.”

    “Why?”

    “I have to be confident. If we’re exposed as incompetent frauds, our bottom line will take a huge hit. And we’ll wind up in prison.”

    “Thank you, sir. And that’s tonight’s news. Make sure you take the vaccine, everyone. It’s vital. This is Fred J Clown, for CBS-NBC-ABC-CNN-FOX-PBS-AP-Reuters and all official news sources East, West, North, and South. The News, brought to you by Venom-X-2, a medicine that has only 463 adverse effects. Ask your doctor if Venom is right for you.”

    PART TWO: THE DEVIOUS TRICK:

    Now I’m going to go over the vital information again, but this time I’m going to show you how…

    The vaccine companies can use the fatal flaw in their protocol design to…

    Actually win approval of their COVID vaccine.

    Stick with me. This is big.

    Only 150 people are needed to make the major clinical trials of a COVID vaccine look like a success.

    Out of 30,000 volunteers in a trial, researchers are waiting for 150 people to “come down with COVID-19.” MILD cases. They assume this will happen because they believe the coronavirus is everywhere, and it’ll infect their volunteers.

    Of course, their definition of a mild case of COVID-19 is meaningless. Cough plus fever, and a positive PCR test. The test spits out false positives like a rigged slot machine, and the visible mild symptoms could result from flu, polluted air, or too many candy bars.

    Nevertheless, the researchers are waiting for a total of 150 people to “catch a mild case of COVID.” When that number is reached, everything stops.

    Now comes the big moment. How many of those 150 COVID cases occurred in the group that received the vaccine, and how many in the group that received the placebo shot of salt water?

    Let’s say only 50 COVID cases occurred in the vaccine group, and 100 in the placebo group. The researchers pop champagne corks. They say, “Look, the vaccine is 50% effective at preventing COVID, and that’s all we need to win emergency authorization from the FDA.”

    BUT suppose 70 cases occurred in the vaccine group and 80 in the placebo group? No good. No good at all. No way to call the vaccine effective.

    Now comes the “reshaping of the data.”

    HERE WE GO.

    The researchers say, “Wait. Thirty of the COVID cases in the vaccine group were REALLY just adverse reactions to the vaccine. They weren’t cases of COVID. You see, the vaccine can cause symptoms that are indistinguishable from mild COVID. Cough, fever, chills. ACTUALLY, there were only 40 cases of COVID in the vaccine group. Half as many as in the placebo group. The vaccine IS 50% effective. We’re good. We’re golden. We can get emergency authorization from the FDA right now to shoot up everybody.”

    Vaccine manufacturers HAVE KNOWN ALL ALONG that they could pull this trick.

    Why leave things to chance?

    Why risk a few hundred billion dollars of profit on a random distribution of mild COVID cases among the volunteers in their clinical trials?

    The definition of a mild COVID case is EXACTLY what the vaccine manufacturers needed. It enabled them to hatch a plan, to make sure they didn’t fail.

    They could pawn off a MILD case of COVID as a reaction to the vaccine. They could fake that without causing ripples. The FDA would say, “The vaccine reactions aren’t serious. All right, no problem. We’ll approve this vaccine for emergency use.”

    However…If the manufacturers designed their clinical trial protocol to prevent serious cases of COVID, they would be waiting to see 150 cases of really sick people to occur. That might never happen.

    If it did happen, and the manufacturers had to pull their devious switcheroo trick and blame the vaccine for some of these SERIOUS cases…

    They would have to tell the FDA that their vaccine was causing life-threatening pneumonia; and the FDA, under a lot of scrutiny these days, would find it very difficult to overlook that.

    FDA: “We can’t approve this vaccine. It could cause a few million cases of dire pneumonia…”

    The vaccine companies didn’t make a titanic stupid mistake in their protocol design. In gearing the protocol to prevent MILD COVID cases, they did what they did on purpose. It allows them to “reshape their data” and win FDA emergency approval for their vaccine.

    These companies have no intention of failing, starting over, and spending a year recruiting 30,000 new volunteers. They want success and money now. They want to win the race.

    And they will win, if the truth isn’t known and shared widely.

    EPILOGUE:

    The punchline.

    Every “expert,” now, in August 2021, is instructed to say the vaccine is definitely protecting people against severe illness and hospitalization. This is their promotional message to the world.

    “Yes, even if you’re vaccinated, you could become infected with the virus, you could develop COVID, and you could pass the virus to other people, BUT you must take the shot. It will protect you from becoming severely ill.”

    As you can see from what I’ve written above, this is a straight-out lie.

    It was always a fantastic lie, from the beginning of COVID vaccine development."

    SOURCES:

    (rushed sources list; to be indexed)

    nytimes.com/2020/09/22/opinion/covid-vaccine-coronavirus.html

    blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/08/27/smoking-gun-fauci-states-covid-pcr-test-has-fatal-flaw/


    Quote Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
    Quote Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)
    Does the Virus Exist? Has SARS-CoV-2 Been Isolated?
    My (recent) take on this issue is that it's a bit of a distraction.

    Classic identification of pathogens depends on isolating them, yes.

    Such has not been done with the covid virus, yes.

    But that doesn't mean that we (the biologists studying this) don't know exactly what's in these toxins.

    They do know, exactly, because that's how they (their biologists) engineered the "virus" and the "vaccines" (which train our own cells to manufacture more of the toxic spike proteins, in abundance)

    But they can't tell us that, for they don't want an open discussion of how this "virus" came to be.

    It would be like me claiming I was innocent of murdering someone with a gun on Friday, because I could prove that I had already murdered the victim the day before, with a poison.

    Such a defense would just move me from the frying pan, into the fire.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  14. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (30th August 2021), Bill Ryan (23rd December 2021), Delight (30th August 2021), gord (30th August 2021), ThePythonicCow (30th August 2021), wondering (30th August 2021)

  15. Link to Post #108
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    CDC/FDA smoking gun of smoking guns
    Sep 1 2021
    by Jon Rappoport
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...-smoking-guns/

    "They confess: they had no virus when they concocted the test for the virus; they “contrived” a model by pretending to find what they wanted to find; it’s called a self-fulfilling prophecy

    This is the con and the crime that drove millions of lives, and economies, into ruin

    by Jon Rappoport

    September 1, 2021

    (To join our email list, click here.)

    The CDC has issued a document that bulges with devastating admissions.

    The release is titled, “07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.” It begins explosively:

    “After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.”

    Many people believe this means the CDC is giving up on the PCR test as a means of “detecting the virus.” The CDC isn’t saying that at all.

    They’re saying the PCR technology will continue to be used, but they’re replacing what the test is looking FOR with a better “reference sample.” A better marker. A better target. A better piece of RNA supposedly derived from SARS-CoV-2.

    CDC/FDA are confessing there has been a PROBLEM with the PCR test which has been used to detect the virus, starting in February of 2020—right up to this minute.

    In other words, the millions and millions of “COVID cases” based on the PCR test in use are all suspect. Actually, that statement is too generous. Every test result of every PCR test should be thrown out.

    To confirm this, the CDC document links to an FDA release titled, “SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel Comparative Data.” Here is a killer quote:

    “During the early months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical specimens [of the virus] were not readily available to developers of IVDs [in vitro diagnostics] to detect SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for example, gene specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation. While validation using these contrived specimens provided a measure of confidence in test performance at the beginning of the pandemic, it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”

    Translation: We, at the CDC, did not have a specimen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when we concocted the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. Yes, it’s unbelievable, right? And that’s the test we’ve been using all along. So we CONTRIVED samples of the virus. We fabricated. We lied. We made up [invented] synthetic gene sequences and we SAID these sequences HAD TO BE close to the sequence of SARS-CoV-2, without having the faintest idea of what we were doing, because, again, we didn’t have an actual specimen of the virus. We had no proof THERE WAS something called SARS-CoV-2.

    This amazing FDA document goes to say the Agency has granted emergency approval to 59 different PCR tests since the beginning of the (fake) pandemic. 59. And, “…it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources.”

    Translation: Each of the 59 different PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 told different lies and concocted different fabrications about the genetic makeup of the virus—the virus we didn’t have. Obviously, then, these tests would give unreliable results. THE PCR TESTS USED CONTRIVED SPECIMENS OF THE VIRUS WE DIDN’T HAVE.

    BUT, don’t worry, be happy, because NOW, the CDC and the FDA say, they really do have actual virus samples of SARS-CoV-2 from patients; they have better targets for the PCR test, and labs should start gearing up for the new and improved tests.

    In other words, they were lying THEN, but they’re not lying NOW. They were “contriving,” but now they’re telling the truth.

    If you believe that, I have Fountain of Youth water for sale, extracted from the lead-contaminated system of Flint, Michigan.

    Here, once again, I report virology’s version of “we isolated the virus”:

    They have a soup they make in their labs.

    This soup contains human and monkey cells, toxic chemicals and drugs, and all sorts of other random genetic material. Because the cells start to die, the researchers ASSUME a bit of mucus from a patient they dropped in the soup is doing the killing, and THE VIRUS must be the killer agent in the mucus.

    This assumption is entirely unwarranted. The drugs and chemicals could be doing the cell-killing, and the researchers are also starving the cells of vital nutrients, and that starvation could kill the cells.

    There is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup, or that it is doing the cell-killing, or that it exists.

    Yet the researchers call cell-death “isolation of the virus.”

    To say this is a non-sequitur is a vast understatement. In their universe, “We assume, without proof, we have the virus buried in a soup in a dish in the lab” equals, “We’ve separated the virus from all surrounding material.”

    Virology equals “how to spread bull**** for a living and scare the world.” Other than that, it’s perfect."

    There is a number of great comments at the link, starting with this oneL :ReluctantWarrior says:
    September 1, 2021 at 9:36 am
    There is a perfect disease condition storm across the globe. We have reached a tipping point where the Earth’s microbiome has been knocked out of balance.

    “When man becomes greater than nature, nature, which gave us birth, will respond.”
    ― Loren Eiseley

    From an environmental perspective we have antibiotics along with many other toxic pharmaceuticals leeching into the water supply, the food supply and the environment in general. Coupled with the toxic load of pesticides and other chemicals, radiation, EMF radiation the Earth is issuing a warning cry and it might be the last warning cry we get. With all the underlying conditions people have suppressing the immune system and the key vitamin and nutrient deficiencies that are exacerbating the situation we really do have a perfect storm in the making for which COVID-19, COVID-Delta, COVID Lamda etc etc are just cover stories to misdirect our attention from the real problem. Our planet is dying…and we are surely dying with it. We need to return to the wild with gratitude and love for the gifts we have been given. Science has run its course of usefulness. "
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  16. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (3rd September 2021), Bill Ryan (23rd December 2021), Franny (3rd September 2021), leavesoftrees (3rd September 2021), Michel Leclerc (29th September 2021), mountain_jim (3rd September 2021)

  17. Link to Post #109
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    COVID vaccine, lab mistake, gene researcher
    by Jon Rappoport
    September 3, 2021
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...ne-researcher/

    "Last week at the world famous XXXX lab, a widely published gene researcher, Dr. XXXX, wandered into the wrong room and inhaled an experimental truth serum spray, under development by the CIXXXX.

    I caught up with him a few hours later at a small restaurant in rural Virginia. We were the only customers. We sat at back table, ate oysters with mercury sauce, and talked for an hour:

    —Doctor, why are you doing experiments aimed at producing single-sex litters of animals?

    Isn’t it obvious? You want to eliminate a group of animals or people? You knock out procreation as an option. You perform genetic alterations, so all future members of that group are male or female.

    Could you comment on a phrase often applied to genetic technology—“unintended consequences?”

    Yes. You see, we know what we’re doing. But we don’t know what we’re not doing.

    I’m not sure I understand.

    We have a procedure. We follow it. But OFTEN the outcome of that procedure isn’t what we thought it would be. We wanted to make a fish glow, but instead the fish grew an extra eye. Or he did glow, but he also wriggled on to a beach and started eating sand.

    And why did these unexpected changes occur?

    Ripple effect. Down the line from where we edited a gene or inserted a gene or deleted a gene, other genes shifted. They turned on or off. They moved. They became cranky. That sort of thing.

    And this was beyond your control.

    There’s always something beyond our control. The question is, is it trivial or important?

    What’s the answer?

    We have no idea. What looks trivial today could become disastrous six months or six years from now. It’s roulette. A crapshoot.

    That’s not comforting.

    Think of it this way. You strike a simple chord on a piano and let go. A few seconds later, other keys on the piano press down and make sounds on their own. You walk out of the house and while you’re gone, five more keys make sounds. A year later, during the night, the piano plays seven chords.

    So why do you keep on with this research?

    Why does a dog obey his master?

    What about CRISPR, the latest and greatest gene-editing tool?

    For starters, it’s like having a pair of scissors. You cut out a section in a long genetic string. But then you have two ends in the middle of the string. When they grow back together, you get genetic distortions.

    There are lots of amateurs and professionals playing around with CRISPR.

    Yes. Those who are deeply dissatisfied with human beings as they are and want to reduce them, and enthusiastic utopians who believe genetic paradise is just over the hill. They cut and splice. They’re having a field day with the technology.

    Is the RNA COVID vaccine a form of genetic treatment?

    Of course. What else could it be? You inject a piece of RNA into a person’s arm. The theory is, nanoparticles of this RNA get into the body’s cells and make the cells produce a protein. That protein is similar to a protein in [fictitious] SARS-CoV-2. The immune system takes a mug shot of the new protein, thus preparing to meet the actual [fictitious] SARS-CoV-2 on the battlefield, if it comes along later. That’s gene therapy. Why would the cells produce a new protein? Because genes in the body are receiving genetic instructions from the injected RNA.

    Can anything go wrong?

    You’re kidding, right? All sorts of things can go wrong. The cells could produce a few dozen new proteins. Or they could stop making a vital protein. The immune system could go haywire. It could attack organs of the body. We’re not talking precision here. Get that through your head. With new genetic inputs, organisms will radically change their former behavior.

    Some people say genetic engineering of plants is dangerous, but those general processes applied to humans are safe.

    And some people say nuclear bombs are a global threat, but nuclear reactors that produce electricity like Fukushima are fine and dandy.

    Have you taken the COVID vaccine?

    I have a certificate that says I did.

    Someone told me the RNA in the COVID vaccine doesn’t actually initiate a genetic change.

    Really? You think the RNA operates like a grain of sand that irritates the oyster into making a pearl? If cells of the body suddenly make a new protein they would never otherwise manufacture, some genetic information and instruction are being given and received.

    Can anyone prove the COVID vaccine is forcing the cells to make the one desired S-protein?

    Didn’t we just cover that? Listen, we could take five thousand people who just had the Pfizer shot, and we could extract cells samples from them, and we could actually see what’s happening and not happening in the area of protein production. It might be quite shocking. But we won’t do that. We never do large-scale studies that could refute our own central claims.

    Those central claims are the holy of holies?

    You bet. In those instances, we have to be right, especially when we’re wrong. If not, our whole house of cards collapses.

    So when people analyze the COVID vaccine for huge adverse effects…bleeding, miscarriages, heart failure, coma, death…

    They should never overlook the genetics. It’s a gene shot. A GMO shot in the arm. If I make genetic changes in your brain right now, and an hour later you think you’re Magellan circumnavigating the globe, where should people start looking to figure out what happened to you?

    Genetics is playing chess without understanding the rules?

    It’s three-dimensional chess—actually four-dimensional, because unpredictable alterations happen over time. We understand a few of the rules, and then we assume we know a great deal more than we actually do. If we just stuck to what we knew, we’d be doing experiments in the back room of a dry cleaners. The truth doesn’t get you funding. Hype does.

    The military is very interested in—

    They want to create super-soldiers. Doing that through gene therapy is the pot of gold at the end of their rainbow. My guess is eventually they’ll come up with some very strong human robots. After a time of rigidly obeying orders, the robots will go crazy and attack their masters.

    Have you ever considered changing your profession?

    A couple of years ago, I met with a few political consultants. I was mulling a run for public office. But I couldn’t figure out which lies to tell, in order to win an election. In my lab, I know exactly which lies to tell, to keep my job."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (23rd December 2021), wondering (30th September 2021)

  19. Link to Post #110
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Do you have the Delta Variant? It’s illegal for you to know
    The reason why will shock you
    by Jon RappoportSeptember 6, 2021

    "As my long-time readers know, I’ve spent the past year demonstrating that the SARS-CoV-2 virus doesn’t exist. Therefore, the Delta Variant is a fantasy based on a fantasy.

    However, I make forays into the official bubble where, of course, millions of people believe the virus and the Variant are real. I show that within the bubble, all sorts of internal contradictions and absurdities abound.

    Recently, I quoted official sources who stated that the current PCR test can’t differentiate between SARS-CoV-2 and the Delta Variant [1]. Only through deeper genetic sequencing of patients’ swab samples—a procedure that isn’t routinely done—can testers tell whether a person has the original SARS-CoV-2 or the Delta.

    In order to know whether the Delta is widespread, a predictive computer model would have to be assembled. These models are notoriously inaccurate.

    The bottom line? The tidal wave of propaganda asserting the Delta is everywhere, and is responsible for the escalation of COVID cases, is a sheer fabrication. The propaganda is based on a computer model.

    That’s where the official bubble is, or was, when a new revelation surfaced. Buckle up for this one. On the scale of fabrications, it ranks right near the top.

    You see, the genetic sequencing process, carried out to determine whether a patient’s swab sample reveals the original SARS-C0V-2 or the Delta…that process hasn’t obtained certification from the US government.

    It hasn’t been approved in any way, shape, or form.

    The labs who do the genetic sequencing are on their own. They have the final word on their own procedures.

    And because of that, the labs are legally FORBIDDEN from reporting to patients whether they have the original SARS-CoV-2 or the Delta Variant. Yes, FORBIDDEN.

    So a patient can’t learn that information. It would be illegal for the lab to report.

    And since the genetic sequencing process looking for the Delta Variant hasn’t received any sort of government certification…any and all claims about how widespread the Delta is would be based on an unapproved procedure.

    Official Science “experts” always proudly claim their tests have the government seal of approval. But in this instance, the test on which these experts are relying has NO certification whatsoever.

    Getting the picture?

    Here is the source on this latest piece of madness: Business Insider, August 23, 2021, “You aren’t legally allowed to know which variant gave you COVID-19 in the US, even if it’s Delta.” [2]

    “The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service (CMS), which oversees the regulatory process for US labs, requires genome-[genetic] sequencing tests to be federally approved before their results can be disclosed to doctors or patients. These are the tests that pick up on variants, but right now, there’s little incentive for the labs to do the work to validate those tests.”

    “’I don’t think there’s a lot of motivation, quite honestly, to get that done,’ Kelly Wroblewski, director of infectious diseases at the Association of Public Health Laboratories, told Insider.”

    “So far, Wroblewski said, more than 50 public labs in the US are capable of sequencing coronavirus samples to detect variants. But she’s not aware of any labs that have completed the validation process to get federal approval.”

    “’The process of validating a next-generation sequencing test is burdensome,’ Wroblewski said. ‘It takes a lot of time. It takes a lot of data. It takes a lot of resources…’”

    “For a sequencing test to be validated, a manufacturer needs to collect data to show that the test does a good job of detecting a specific variant, then request emergency authorization from the Food and Drug Administration. Alternatively, laboratories can validate their sequencing tests ‘in house,’ meaning they collect the same data so CMS can approve their test.”

    “’The letter of the law from CMS is that if you don’t go through this full validation process, you cannot release the results with patient identifying information,’ Wroblewski said.”

    So…getting any sort of official approval for the genetic-sequencing test is a lot of work. It takes a great of deal of time. Therefore, yawn, why bother? Therefore, shrug, just let each lab set its own standards and make its own claims. Who cares?

    And meanwhile, the patient can’t find out what his test showed.

    And THIS is the insane system forming the foundation of claims that the Delta variant is everywhere.

    Thus ends today’s episode of The Bubble and the Bubble Brains That Populate It."

    SOURCES:

    [1] blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021/08/31/pcr-tests-cant-identify-delta-variant-its-all-fiction/

    [2] businessinsider.com/covid-patients-cant-know-which-variant-infected-them-delta-2021-8

    ************************************

    The five key events in the fake pandemic
    by Jon Rappoport
    September 7, 2021
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...fake-pandemic/

    "This article is a summary. I’ve written extensively on each of the five key events.

    ONE: The false claim that a new virus was discovered and isolated.

    No true isolation has been performed. The so-called genetic sequencing of the virus was actually a concoction, a cobbling together of pieces of data referencing segments of RNA. These segments were PRESUMED to be parts of a new virus—but researchers didn’t have the virus, so their presumptions amounted to fraud.

    TWO: The erecting of a diagnostic test (PCR) for the virus they didn’t have. Obviously, no such test has meaning. It is built on the same sorts of absurd assumptions that led to the fictional “discovery” of the virus. However, strategically speaking, the test has produced millions of “positive results,” which are taken to mean “infected by the virus.” On this foundation of sand, the lockdowns were declared.

    THREE: The Chinese lockdown of 50 million citizens, for no medical reason. This unprecedented event provided the model for other governments, and for the CDC and the World Health Organization. Now it was “acceptable” to imprison the global population and wreak economic devastation across the planet.

    FOUR: The absurd computer prediction of 500,000 deaths in the UK and two million in the US by the summer of 2020, made by historically failed modeler, Neil Ferguson. His institute at the Imperial College of London is bankrolled by Bill Gates. Ferguson’s predictions were used to convince Trump and Boris Johnson that states of emergency and lockdowns were necessary.

    FIVE: The forced premature deaths of millions of elderly people across the world—which were falsely called “COVID-19 deaths.”

    These people were and are suffering from multiple long-term health conditions, made far worse by decades of medical treatment with toxic drugs. Terrified by a COVID diagnosis, then isolated from family and friends, treated with more toxic debilitating drugs, remdesivir and Midazolam (Versed), they give up and die.

    There are other important events, to be sure, but these are the key five.

    The underlying fact that needs to be understood: what is called COVID-19 is not one condition. It is a variety of illnesses and effects stemming from different traditional causes RE-PACKAGED under the label, “COVID.”

    Where authentic new conditions and causes may be involved, independent investigators need to look closely at such clusters of people, where they live. For example, the investigators should find out whether toxic vaccine campaigns were initiated in a community or region prior to declaration of the “COVID outbreak.”

    Here is a short piece of fiction I wrote early on during the “pandemic.” It paints a far different picture of COVID events. At that time, I hoped business leaders would squash the insane lockdowns and economic devastation. That never happened. Instead, these high-powered leaders gladly caved in and took their turn at the bailout trough.

    Coronavirus and Island X-24

    There was a small island.

    Amazingly, it had never been claimed by any country. It just sat there. It was inconsequential. Geographers were irritated that it had no name. In 1998, they named it X-24.

    123 families lived there. They emigrated from 14 countries.

    During the 2019 onset of the trouble in China, 19 citizens had escaped the lockdown in Wuhan and found their way to the island in a small makeshift boat, which broke into pieces near shore. The resident families welcomed them without fanfare, and offered them housing in huts on the north side of the island.

    People on the island practiced agriculture on their tiny farms, and they raised chickens and ate eggs. There was no government. The families met once a month to discuss any issues that might have arisen since their last meeting. They did not vote. They used common sense. They were sensible people. They had no ideology. They had no phones, no computers, no electricity.

    One of the newly arrived Chinese women explained, at a meeting, the coronavirus, the epidemic, the lockdown, the testing. She asked whether anyone was concerned that her people might have brought the virus with them. The people of the island looked around at each other and shrugged. They didn’t seem interested.

    Three weeks later, an article appeared in the mainland Chinese press about X-24 and the 19 escaped Wuhan residents. It was picked up by a wire service and then republished by a number of outlets around the world. It did not become a big story.

    However, a boat soon arrived at the island. A Chinese official and an American public health officer from the CDC stepped off. Several conversations ensued. The two bureaucrats were concerned that the virus might have come to X-24. The residents said they didn’t travel, and they didn’t even fish. Why not? No one had an answer. The bureaucrats took samples of rainwater from a backyard container. They took a look at all the X-24 residents and saw they were healthy. They took throat swabs from the new 19 Chinese residents. There was a bit of tension when the Chinese official told these Wuhan escapees they were living illegally on the island and should return home. The Chinese residents said they wouldn’t, but they had no intention of causing trouble. The visitors left.

    A week later, at a meeting in government offices in Wuhan, CDC and Chinese scientists told a deputy mayor of the city that nine immigrants on X-24 had tested positive for the coronavirus. A call was immediately made to the public health and safety office of the national government, and the news was reported. Two hours later, a message came back: leave the people on X-24 alone for now.

    The government in Beijing took up the X-24 issue in several committees. A decision was made. Drones would do high flyovers and surveil the island. No one would be permitted to leave it.

    Three months later, with the world in lockdown, a small elite government committee met in Beijing. The news: all the residents of X-24 were going about their daily business. No sick people were observed, even among the elderly. No one had tried to leave the island. No one was practicing social distancing. People met and mingled as usual. A CDC/WHO message was read: It expressed concern about X-24. People who were positive for the virus couldn’t be allowed to live outside the limits of control. Something needed to be done.

    Three weeks later, X-24 residents observed a group of armed boats approaching. Maneuvers were executed, and the craft made a ring around the island. They sat about 20 miles offshore. They stayed there.

    This operation was noticed by the press. The X-24 story made a brief limited comeback. INFECTED PEOPLE LIVING ON AN ISLAND. QUARANTINE FORCED. A few reporters tried to get information on the condition of the X-24 residents. They couldn’t.

    CDC meetings took place. The gist was: These people remain healthy. There is no sign of trouble. No disease. No illness. “What happens if THIS becomes a story?”

    The issue was kicked up to the Chinese and American military. Very private meetings took place. “We could launch a drone missile attack and wipe them out.” “We could send in a kill-team.” “How about a massive fire? Drop a few incendiaries.” “Spray them with nasty chemicals. They’ll have a hell of time trying to breathe, they’ll foam at the mouth and die.”

    But in the end, the military held back. A message from a carefully guarded private source came down the line: “Leave them alone. Remove the stupid ships. Observe from drones. Do not attack. They rate as experimental subjects. They constitute a control group. By CDC projections, at least a few of them should become ill. So far, that’s not the case.”

    …A year later, on X-24, the Chinese woman, who had originally told the island residents about the coronavirus, wrote in the diary she had been keeping, “The mainland madness is just a faint memory. My mother here is 93. She is reasonably healthy. A few people get sick, as a matter of course, and then they get well. Nothing unusual. There were two deaths last year. A French woman and an American man. They were both in their 80s. I helped their families make them comfortable. I saw no sudden illness of the lungs. I liked all these island people from the start. I feel close to them now.”

    Old habits die hard. She looked around her small cabin, as if some government authority might be present. She walked to the pile of stones arranged in the corner, where a low fire was burning. It occurred to her there was no reason to continue her diary. She bent down and placed it in the flames and watched it for a minute. The past was past.

    Nothing untoward had happened on the island.

    Back at the CDC, a private analysis was carried out. Nine mitigating factors were listed to explain why no one on the island had fallen ill from the virus. The conclusion was the island was not a proper representation of the real world. The analysis was sent up the line to the guarded source who had ordered the ring of ships to back off. He read the CDC analysis.

    He sent back a message. “I wasn’t asking you to cover your ass or justify your role in this fiasco. Your so-called mitigating factors are a crock. Apparently, you’re unable to be honest. So let me send you my analysis. The people on X-24 didn’t get sick because they didn’t get sick. Remove promoted fear, diagnostic tests, treatment with toxic drugs, and other damage falsely labeled as COVID, and you have nothing. I see why you were disturbed about the story of X-24. But then, accounting for healthy people who stay healthy has never been your strong suit, has it? You’ve gone too far. I should set my hounds loose on you.”

    A colleague of his walked into the steam room, picked up a pitcher of cold water and poured it on the rocks. Steam rose and the rocks hissed. Wrapped in white sheets, the two men sat side by side.

    “Did you tear them a new one?”

    “I gave them something to think about. These people are incorrigible. They really are.”

    “When our friends arrive tonight, we’ll discuss the situation.”

    “Yes. Recess is over. The bureaucrats interrupted business. Products must flow. Money must flow. They don’t understand we’re the engine of the world, for better or worse.”

    “We’ll school these little bureaucrats. They parade around thinking they’re princes. They’re going to pay.”

    The steam spread. The men were invisible."

    *********************************************

    The Quack Theory of Vaccination; idiot’s delight
    “Do I need a vaccination to prepare me for a vaccination?”
    by Jon Rappoport
    September 7, 2021
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...diots-delight/

    "This analysis applies to all vaccines, including the new RNA COVID injections, which are actually genetic treatments.

    In today’s episode of Mainstream Vaccine Quackery, Medical Morons, and How to Make a Fortune Selling Injected Snake Oil, we ask the burning question: How can the body adequately respond to a rehearsal (vaccination) unless it’s ALREADY prepared for the REAL THING?

    Vaccinations are said to be rehearsals. Whatever is injected stimulates the immune system to respond to a harmless version of a germ-invader. As a result, this military exercise prepares the body for the real thing, should it appear in the future.

    But why does the body need a rehearsal?

    If a vaccination does stimulate the immune system to respond, doesn’t this constitute proof that the body is already prepared to defend against real attacks?

    Why does the immune system swing into gear and mount a defense against whatever is in the vaccine? Answer: Because it’s already ready for a) that military exercise and b) the real thing.

    The “prompt” provided by the vaccine was unnecessary.

    The public, however, has a standard reaction to the notion of rehearsals. “It’s a good idea. Soldiers drill to prepare for actual battle. Stage actors rehearse over and over, before the opening night of a play. Makes sense.”

    However, the human body is different. Many functions are automatic. Do babies need stimulants to teach their blood to flow? Must little children engage in breathing exercises in school, so their bodies don’t forget to take in air and expel it?

    Immune defense (however you want describe the process) is one of those automatic functions. If it weren’t, the production of antibodies, which is said to take place after vaccination, wouldn’t occur—and doctors would say, “You need a vaccination to get you ready for vaccination.”

    The typical response to this and all criticisms of vaccines is: Well, through vaccination, we wiped out millions of cases of many diseases.

    But is that claim true?

    I’ve tackled the subject several times. Here is an example:

    “Richard Moskowitz, MD and homeopath, on vaccination,” May 5, 2020.

    In this piece, I want to take a look at a few fundamentals about vaccination. In particular, the claim that vaccines have done a fantastic job of reducing case numbers of diseases, and therefore all criticisms of these injections are irrelevant.

    From his bio: “Richard Moskowitz was born in 1938, and educated at Harvard (B.A.) and New York University (M.D.). After medical school he did 3 years of graduate study in Philosophy at the University of Colorado in Boulder on a U. S. Steel Fellowship.”

    “He took his internship at St. Anthony’s Hospital, Denver, and has been practicing family medicine since 1967, as well as attending about 800 home births. With a background in Oriental medicine and other forms of natural healing, Dr. Moskowitz studied homeopathy with George Vithoulkas in Greece and Rajan Sankaran and others in India.”

    In 1987, while writing my first book, AIDS INC., I had a long conversation with Richard about vaccination. It was my first trip exploring vaccines as a form of immune-system suppression.

    I came away from the conversation with an idea about how vaccines could be touted and trumpeted as the reason for vastly reducing cases of diseases, when in fact the reduction of visible symptoms was occurring—a very different thing.

    If vaccines were lowering immune-system response, then the acute, vigorous, and all-out inflammatory reaction to germs would be eliminated. And it IS that acute reaction which creates the visible symptoms (rashes, spots, etc.).

    After vaccination, “Voila, no measles,” the experts say. But really, as a result of vaccination, it’s just the visible rash that is missing, while something more dangerous, out of view, is going on in the body.

    I’m printing here an excerpt from Richard’s article (written years ago), The Case Against Immunizations. The article is based on a classical view of germs and the action of the human immune system. The pros and cons of germ theory itself are a different matter, about which I’ve spoken and written in other places:

    “It is dangerously misleading, and indeed the exact opposite of the truth, to claim that a vaccine renders us ‘immune’ to or protects us against an acute disease, if in fact it only drives the disease deeper into the interior and causes us to harbor it chronically instead, with the result that our responses to it become progressively weaker, but show less and less of a tendency to heal or resolve themselves spontaneously. What I propose, then, is to investigate as thoroughly and objectively as I can how the vaccines actually work inside the human body, and to begin by simply paying attention to the implications of what we already know. Consider the process of falling ill with and recovering from a typical acute disease, such as the measles, in contrast with what we can observe following administration of the measles vaccine.”

    “…Once inhaled by a susceptible individual, the [measles] virus undergoes a prolonged period of silent multiplication, first in the tonsils, adenoids, and accessory lymphoid aggregations of the nasopharynx; later in the regional lymph nodes of the head and neck; and eventually, several days later, it passes into the blood and enters the spleen, the liver, the thymus, and the bone marrow, the ‘visceral’ organs of the immune system. Throughout this ‘incubation’ period, which lasts from 10 to 14 days, the patient typically feels quite well, and experiences few or no symptoms of any kind.”

    “By the time that the first symptoms of measles appear, circulating antibodies are already detectable in the blood, and the height of the symptomatology coincides with the peak of the antibody response. In other words, the ‘illness’ that we call the measles is simply the definitive effort of the immune system to clear this virus from the blood. Notice also that this expulsion is accomplished by sneezing and coughing, i. e., via the same route through which it entered in the first place. It is abundantly clear from the above that the process of mounting and recovering from an acute illness like the measles involves a general mobilization of the immune system as a whole, including inflammation of the previously sensitized tissues at the portal(s) of entry, activation of leukocytes, macrophages, and the serum complement system, and a host of other mechanisms, of which the production of circulating antibodies is only one, and by no means the most important.”

    “Such splendid outpourings indeed represent the decisive experiences in the normal physiological maturation of the immune system in the life of a healthy child. For recovery from the measles not only protects children from being susceptible to it again, no matter how many more times they may be exposed to it, but also prepares them to respond promptly and effectively to any other infections they may encounter in the future. The ability to mount a vigorous acute response to infection must therefore be reckoned among the most fundamental requirements of health and well-being that we all share.”

    “By contrast, the live but artificially attenuated measles-virus vaccine is injected directly into the blood, by-passing the normal port of entry, and sets up at most a brief inflammatory reaction at the injection site, or perhaps in the regional lymph nodes, with no local sensitization at the normal portal of entry, no ‘incubation period,’ no generalized inflammatory response, and no generalized outpouring. By ‘tricking’ the body in this fashion, we have accomplished precisely what the entire immune system seems to have evolved to prevent: we have placed the virus directly into the blood, and given it free and immediate access to the major immune organs and tissues, without any obvious mechanism or route for getting rid of it.”

    “The result is the production of circulating antibodies against the virus, which can in fact be measured in the blood; but this antibody response occurs as an isolated technical feat, without any overt illness to recover from, or any noticeable improvement in the general health of the recipient. Indeed I submit that exactly the opposite is true, that the price we have to pay for these antibodies is the persistence of viral elements in the blood for long periods of time, perhaps permanently, which in turn carries with it a systematic weakening of our capacity to mount an acute response, not only to the measles, but to other infections as well.”

    “Far from producing a genuine immunity, then, my suspicion and my fear is that vaccines act by interfering with and even suppressing the immune response as a whole, in much the same way that radiation, chemotherapy, corticosteroids, and other anti-inflammatory drugs do. Artificial immunization focuses on antibody production, a single aspect of the immune process, disarticulates it, and allows it to stand for the whole, in much the same way as chemical suppression of an elevated blood pressure is accepted as a valid substitute for genuine healing or cure of the patient whose blood pressure has risen. It is the frosting on the cake, without the cake. The worst part of this counterfeiting is that it becomes more difficult, if not impossible, for vaccinated children to mount a normally acute and vigorous response to infection, by substituting for it a much weaker, essentially chronic response, with little or no tendency to heal itself spontaneously.”

    This is a classical explanation of vaccination which chops down the claim that vaccines are wonderful because they eliminate cases of disease.

    Instead, vaccines engage the body in chronic low-level warfare. The ability to mount a full-force inflammatory response is squelched. As a result, the visible “symptoms” of the illness—which are really the signs of that inflammatory response—disappear. And this is taken to mean “the disease doesn’t occur anymore.”

    Consider this scenario as a rough analogy: a commanding general is surrounded by his troops on top of a hill. He’s viewing his forward forces who are down below in a large field. Those forces are engaging in close combat with the enemy. After a long time, the battle moves off the field into a thick forest. The general on the hill can’t see what’s going on anymore. But he says:

    “We’ve won, boys. The field is empty. No more fighting down there. It’s all over. We’ve wiped out the opposition. Let’s go home and celebrate…” "
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  20. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (8th September 2021), Bill Ryan (23rd December 2021), mountain_jim (8th September 2021), Pam (7th December 2021), wondering (30th September 2021)

  21. Link to Post #111
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    When you take a Person’s Mind
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...-persons-mind/
    Sep 29 2021
    by Jon Rappoport

    "From a great distance
    You see little puppets down there
    Injecting RNA into arms
    Faces behind masks
    People locked up in their houses
    It looks all very normal
    As if people have always done this
    But when you swoop down
    And take a person’s mind in your hands
    And turn it over
    And really look at it
    You see eternity
    Reshaped into a toy
    That buzzes
    This mind couldn’t be what it is unless it was once ENDLESS
    This is obvious to anyone who looks
    In fact there is a museum of misshapen minds
    Relics of bygone ages
    Examples of how you could take infinity and drop it down into compartments and weasel holes and mazes and dead end alleys at midnight
    Each “new” mind is a system
    Bells and lights and buzzers
    Always looking for add-ons
    Because you see
    A planetary vaccine campaign is really just an extension of misshapen minds
    More bells and lights
    From a great distance the whole thing looks like
    A giant tinker toy
    It’s only when you come much closer
    Do you see the swollen hearts and the blood clots
    And the dying
    And the weeping

    I have a collection of my own minds I used to have
    here and there, now and then
    MY minds
    I take them out once in a while
    When I had THIS mind I thought THAT
    And when I had THAT one I thought THIS
    And believed THAT
    So many times and places
    Too many to count
    These minds will get a person embroiled
    In all sorts of trouble
    He’s inside a mechanical buzzard feeding on dead ideas
    He’s crawling up the steps of a cathedral like a toy soldier with a hernia to listen to the sound of velvet Pope money rustling under robes
    He’s clanking like an old rusty robot into a doctor’s office
    And a nurse injects genes on to his iron arm where they sizzle like end-stage breakfast in a pan in a lost diner…
    This is called CIVILIZATION
    This is what people are doing to each other
    700,000 vaccine injuries in America alone and you can multiply those reports by a factor of 100 to get the real number
    And now in Massachusetts they’re testing babies
    Churches are saying the Lord is all right with vaccination
    The Sunday bells are ringing
    Take the shot before you receive the blessing
    Some toy minds are shaped into killers
    They’re issuing the edicts
    And lining up with shields and truncheons on the streets
    And some minds are believing television news
    And submitting with pride
    On the lawns of Concord, where the first shots were fired in the American Revolution
    They’re now injecting children with RNA
    It’s a Saturday picnic
    Balloons, pony rides, ice cream, a laser show in a tent
    A bald man with a drooping moustache calls in the President through a bullhorn
    And the old doddering leader shuffles into view, a ghost, gazing around him in wonder, looking for his childhood or his doctor or a penny piece of gum…"
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  22. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (23rd December 2021), Delight (30th September 2021), mountain_jim (30th September 2021), Satori (30th September 2021), wondering (30th September 2021)

  23. Link to Post #112
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Open letter to a billion Catholics; cc to everyone else; here is the Pope verbatim
    by Jon Rappoport
    October 29, 2021
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021...pope-verbatim/

    "Vatican News: “Press conference on the flight back from his Apostolic Journey in Southern Africa.”

    Read these astounding words from Pope Francis:

    “I would like to repeat what the Doctrine of the Church says about this: When we acknowledge international organisations and we recognise their capacity to give judgment, on a global scale – for example the international tribunal in The Hague, or the United Nations. If we consider ourselves humanity, when they make statements, our duty is to obey. It is true that not all things that appear just for the whole of humanity will also be so for our [Vatican] pockets, but we must obey international institutions. That is why the United Nations were created. That’s why international courts were created.”

    Choose one of the following: The person making that statement is a) utterly naďve; b) a blind secular ideologue; c) surrendering his power and his Church to Earthly authority; d) combining his power and the power of his Church with elite Globalists; e) what?!?!

    And don’t sidestep these choices with, “Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s.”

    If those words of Jesus described His ultimate position, His surrender to the authorities and His Crucifixion would have no more meaning than a man paying his taxes, albeit with a great deal more pain.

    I guess the days of a Pope concealing a broad secret agenda are over. Francis comes right out in the open, as if he were a city council member supporting the local shut down of a factory smokestack, in accordance with a UN climate-change policy.

    Except that’s not who the Pope is.

    He’s an Argentine Jesuit with “the keys to the Kingdom.”

    And to you, his followers, he’s infallible.

    Unless you decide otherwise.

    This would be a good time to reassess his status in your eyes.

    I keep hammering on this point: Jesus served God, not the State.

    The institutions the Pope insists all Catholics must obey are the State, in its widest and most powerful form.

    Therefore, it makes perfect sense that he would say Catholics should line up and take the COVID vaccine, even while acknowledging fetal tissue from abortions has been used in testing those vaccines.

    What’s next? A Vatican treaty with Planned Parenthood?

    The Pope has cast a long shadow on attempts to gain religious exemptions from vaccination. Obviously, he and his secular partners wanted to shrink that loophole.

    The diabolical plan to stick a needle into 8 billion arms, delivering an experimental genetic treatment, whose documented effects have been catastrophic…that plan can’t achieve wide success if a billion of those people—Catholics—believe the shot is founded on a sin.

    The planning for the (false) pandemic had to include Pope Francis. And he was agreeable. Remarkably so.

    Let’s take one more step down the rabbit hole. The reference here is a May 2021 article at The Tablet: “Pope joins global [financial] elite to plan for world after COVID.”

    An unpublicized conference, “Dreaming of a Better Restart,” had already been held at the time of publication. It was sponsored by the Vatican. It took up climate change, economic inequality, and hunger.

    Then we have this from the Tablet article. Buckle up: “Prominent population control advocate and supporter of Chinese Communist Party president Xi Jinping, Professor Jeffrey Sachs, led the group discussion that followed. Sachs has extolled Xi Jinping’s Belt and Road initiative, that aims to extend CCP influence across Asia to Europe, as ‘one of the most important economic development initiatives in the history of contemporary economics’. He is a frequent collaborator with Bishop Sorondo, who in a February 2018 interview said, ‘right now, those who are best implementing the social doctrine of the Church are the Chinese’.”

    “Rockefeller Foundation president Raj Shah was one of the leaders of the general discussion that followed. Along with its humanitarian projects, the Foundation has for years funded worldwide contraception programmes and abortion providers. Shah worked for USAID during the presidency of Barack Obama, and before that served in a range of leadership roles in the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.”

    If all that doesn’t make your head spin, I can’t help you.

    This is your Church. This is your Pope.

    They represent Jesus on Earth.

    Well, actually, the Pope is a stage magician performing a simple trick of hypnosis—otherwise known as the bait and switch.

    You’re sitting at home eating dinner with the family and the phone rings. You look at the screen. There is no number printed on it. You pick up.

    A voice says, “Hello, friend. I want to tell you about a special offer. Jesus in a bottle. $49.95. If you order now, we’ll send you two. And you can move to China. Or wait a year and the Chinese system will come to you. But that’s not all. As a bonus, one absolutely free abortion for a member of your family. You’re Catholic, we’re the improved Catholic Church, so give me your card numbers and your future in all of Eternity.” "
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  24. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (30th October 2021), Bill Ryan (23rd December 2021), Gwin Ru (30th October 2021), Pam (7th December 2021)

  25. Link to Post #113
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    16th September 2018
    Posts
    1,790
    Thanks
    5,347
    Thanked 10,971 times in 1,706 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Another brilliant piece (poem) by Jon.
    It just flows and flows...

    The Gray Man

    The Gray Man
    Reads the New York Times
    He watches CNN
    So he knows who the traitors are:
    The ones who refuse the vaccine
    And want to infect the world
    The night is long
    And only the injection will deliver us from evil
    The Gray Man is beginning to believe
    The virus has always been here
    And only by some miracle have we managed
    To avoid it until now
    The violators must be punished
    They must be thrown into camps
    The kinder and gentler age is over
    Now comes the hammer of reason and science
    And if the backward and uneducated cannot grasp
    The fundamentals they will pay the price
    They will be sacrificed on behalf of all of humanity
    And the survival of the species
    The Gray Man reads the New York Times
    He watches CNN
    The night is long
    But the injection will deliver us from evil
    It is unthinkable that the State itself is corrupt
    And is controlled by banks
    It is unthinkable that the virus itself
    Does not exist
    And a story about a phantom is the pretext
    For a tyranny behind the bland assurances of bureaucrats
    The Gray Man reads the New York Times
    He watches CNN
    He understands the phrase “anti-vaxxers”
    Applies to unhinged lunatics
    Who cling bitterly to their guns and religion
    In the hills of unincorporated territories
    The military must be called in
    To hunt them down and put them in camps
    Where data can be collected from certified medical experiments
    The prisoners must wear prominent marks of their status
    Civilization when all is said and done
    Is a system
    The system is well organized
    It favors The Good
    If no one who is official can be trusted
    Then there is chaos
    Thus and therefore and ipso facto
    The mandates can be deduced
    The Gray Man reads the New York Times
    He watches CNN
    He knows what he knows
    He is eager to serve the force that drives progress
    He will be outfitted with government currency
    And codes of behavior
    This is a permanent emergency
    The police and the courts and judges are backing him up
    We are biological machines awaiting signals
    The night is long
    The injection will deliver us from evil
    The Pope can be trusted
    He is a banker
    The Gray Man reads the New York Times
    He watches CNN
    He knows all there is to know
    There is no other information
    That which has been censored and blacked out
    Would have eaten into his certainty
    It would have served no other purpose
    It stands to reason that corporations and governments
    Are working together to filter out contrarian
    Impulses that spring from
    Lower branches of the evolutionary tree
    Give us your huddled masses
    Yearning to be vaccinated
    The Gray Man
    Knows what he knows
    He reads the New York Times
    He watches CNN
    The ship is coming into the harbor of safety
    Gold bars are moving in tunnels under the streets of New York
    In coordination with Swiss algorithms
    Which govern the inflections of global currency
    The digital framework is building out day and night
    The individual human has always been
    Unreliably programmed and
    This will change
    Money the constant, the human the variable
    “This is to inform you your account is overdrawn”
    The Gray Man reads the New York Times
    He watches CNN
    He knows what Davos and Brussels and the City of London
    And Beijing give him to know
    The medical cartel is neutral
    It flies under no political banner
    It alters all populations
    For the sake of
    Survival of the species
    Stimulus response
    The Gray Man reads the New York Times
    He watches CNN
    He knows what he is supposed to know
    He is educated
    He grasps the essentials
    Every datum proceeds from prior data in an unbroken chain
    The system nods at the Gray Man
    “You’re on the right track, you’ve always been on the right track”
    When the Gray Man hates
    He knows who to attack, who to go after
    He wants to become a sharper instrument
    In the war against the ignorant
    He wants to enlist in an army and wear a uniform
    He dreams of clicking his heels and saluting
    He wants to stand a post
    The Gray Man reads the New York Times
    He watches CNN
    He drives his children to school
    Wearing masks, they enter a shroud of plastic encasing the building
    And disappear
    Inside the gymnasium they stand in a long line
    To receive their shots
    Fired

    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2021.../the-gray-man/


    Do you know any Gray Men?

  26. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DaveToo For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (23rd December 2021), Pam (7th December 2021), Satori (7th December 2021)

  27. Link to Post #114
    Avalon Member Gemma13's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th May 2011
    Location
    Western Australia
    Language
    Australian
    Age
    59
    Posts
    2,568
    Thanks
    8,947
    Thanked 17,554 times in 2,528 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    I want to laugh, but...

    The new sexual mandate
    by Jon Rappoport

    NBC, September 4, 2056. Three hours ago, on the Morning Blow, anchor Rex Regis interviewed US Department of Genetics Chief, Dr. Dove Fauci Gates. Here is a rush transcript excerpt:

    Doctor, can you summarize the new federal mandate? It seems to represent a scientific breakthrough.

    It does, Rex. We’ve discovered that during the act of sexual intercourse, there is a cascade of unmonitored genetic information transferred between partners.

    Hasn’t that always been the case?

    Yes, but we had no idea how extensive the information was.

    So natural birth is on the way out?

    With this new mandate, all sexual acts must now be monitored and tested, before conception is permitted.

    I’m not sure I understand, Doctor.

    Well, ever since the development of RNA vaccines, we’ve had the ability to introduce nanoparticles into the body. And then, we pioneered the insertion of nano sensors, which record, in real time, thousands of biological and chemical processes and changes. We can enable these sensors to report their ongoing findings to a central location---and we can issue instructions from that location back into the body.

    What sorts of instructions?

    For example, an increase or decrease in hormone production. A raising or lowering of blood pressure. An elevation or decline in certain brain processing functions.

    I see. How does all this relate to sexual intercourse?

    Basically, before engaging in sex, people will need to take an injection that inserts nano sensors in their bodies. Then we can monitor key genetic exchanges that occur during sex. If we deem these exchanges to be harmful or counter-productive, that couple will not be permitted to conceive a child.

    And how do you define “harmful” and “counter-productive”?

    We have algorithms. For instance, we don’t want babies with gross anti-social tendencies.

    I see. So all couples would have to engage first in an act of test-sex, so you can discover what genetic information is exchanged.

    That’s right, Rex. Granted, it’s a bit cumbersome, but it’s necessary if we’re going to have the kind of society we all long for.

    Yes, it sounds cumbersome, Doctor. First of all, everyone will need to take a shot.

    Yes, to insert the nano sensors. Then when---

    Suppose my wife and I are planning to have sex after watching a movie on a Tuesday night?

    All right, Rex. You would punch in a code on your cell phone. Now you’re registered for a test-run. During sex that night, the nano sensors in your body and your wife’s body would report certain information to our Division of Jilly.

    Jilly?

    Yes. That’s the name of an experimental female we tested in Indonesia six years ago. She was Patient Zero. She was the first human to have nano monitored sex in the Pfizer facility there. So your sexual act with your wife on that Tuesday night would be monitored. About six weeks later, you would get the results. Either a go to try to conceive a baby, or a full stop.

    Are there any adverse effects from the nano injection or the monitoring of sexual intercourse?

    They’re both remarkably safe and effective, Rex. Perhaps a bit of pain and swelling at the injection site, that’s all. And a rare case, here and there, of myocarditis.

    Well, that’s good news.

    Yes.

    As far as the new mandate goes, what will you do about refusers?

    The “anti-sexers?” We’ll get to them. Since every human is registered on our national database, we can cut off their government-guaranteed income, as well as other privileges.

    Suppose someone wants to have sex while using a condom? Or suppose the woman is taking the pill or has an IUD?

    Well, Rex, studies show those methods are less than a hundred percent effective. So no, those excuses won’t fly. We consider every act of sexual intercourse a potential precursor to pregnancy. If you want to have sex, you must take the injection, do a test run, and then, if certified as safe, you can engage in sex.

    Are there injection boosters?

    Annually. It’s mandatory.

    You’re talking about an enormous undertaking, Doctor.

    Yes, although much of it is handled by AI.

    I assume this is a temporary program on the way to universal conception in laboratories, without sex of any kind. There will be no parents.

    That’s a long way off, Rex. Perhaps 50 years.

    Some people will want to get around this new mandate by applying for religious exemptions.

    The courts have been clear on this issue. And as you know, the Pope himself rejects exemptions.

    But sex is a basic human impulse, no matter what mandates are issued.

    We realize that. But as the Australian Prime Minister declared, an hour ago, “Do you want to have unapproved sex and be cut off from money transactions?”

    I can see some people saying, “We want to have sex, and if we conceive, we promise to abort the fetus.”

    That’s covered in the mandate. It’s not allowed.

    I don’t know, Doctor. If my wife wants me to [censored], am I supposed to say no? That would put me in a difficult spot.

    Rex, this has nothing to do with personal choices. That’s the selfish way to look at things. We have to make sacrifices for the good of everyone. We learned that hard lesson during the COVID pandemic.

    In my first reading of the new mandate, I see it covers companies with more than a hundred employees, plus all government employees and contractors.

    Right. That’s stage one. When we work out any kinks in the system, we’ll extend the mandate to everyone.

    What about boys who are, say, 16 years old? Their hormones are working overtime.

    We’re aware. Of course, parental consent for the injections and the nano-monitoring is not required. Students will have to take the injections in order to attend classes. With nano-sensors in their bodies, we can regulate hormone levels in all teens---if the data show it’s necessary. By the way, there are several fascinating studies that suggest eating a steady diet of GMO breakfast cereals reduces semen volume in boys.

    So, Doctor, this new sexual mandate will definitely impact population numbers.

    It has to. When you discover errant genetic information transferring between people during sex, you have to do something about it. You can’t just stand back and let it happen. That would be cruel.

    Can you describe exactly what kind of genetic information you’re talking about? It seems to be at the heart of the scientific breakthrough which led to this mandate.

    It’s very complex, Rex. I could point you to the important publications on the subject. It takes a molecular biologist to understand the details. Basically, there are gene banks that contain an extraordinary amount of data. New processing capability has enabled us to pinpoint a whole host of A, B, and C neg factors.

    Sorry, what?

    I’m referring to three classes of genetic data that contraindicate birth safety.

    I’m still not getting it, Doctor.

    Well, that’s what I mean, Rex. You’re not a geneticist. If you were, you’d see the insights light up like a Christmas tree. You can’t miss the markers. When they’re transferred and mingled in the prospective parents in certain configurations, which we call the Epsilon 50 and the Beta 20, the baby the couple wants to conceive would pose a clear and present danger to society, or an insupportable burden. Two hundred years of gene research has led us to this remarkable finding.

    Thank you, Doctor. I’m sure we’ll be talking again soon, as this mandate rolls out.

    One more thing, Rex. Transgender males and females are exempt from the new mandate. We’ve discovered that, if they can conceive, they show none of the Epsilon or Delta markers. We don’t yet understand why, but it’s an extraordinary indicator…

    Delta? You said the two key configurations were Epsilon and Beta.

    Delta, Beta---they’re the same. Trust me, Rex. I’m The Science.

    We all trust you, Doctor.

  28. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Gemma13 For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (23rd December 2021), gord (23rd December 2021), onawah (26th January 2022), Satori (23rd December 2021)

  29. Link to Post #115
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    6th February 2021
    Posts
    73
    Thanks
    26
    Thanked 610 times in 67 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Jon Rappoport is the man. He puts out seriously good stuff. He has me thinking about imagination in a different way and he has of course shattered my world when it comes to sickness.

  30. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to waxamillionpehhgasus For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (23rd December 2021), gord (23rd December 2021), onawah (26th January 2022)

  31. Link to Post #116
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Replace Sotomayor with Pinocchio or Bozo the Clown; make idiocy even more visible—if possible
    by Jon Rappoport
    January 10, 2022
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022...ozo-the-clown/

    " During the Supreme Court’s oral arguments over the Biden vaccine mandates, Justice S-Protein issued this gem:

    “We have over 100,000 children, which we’ve never had before, in serious condition and many on ventilators.”

    Even the Washington Post had to admit this was sheer bloviation: “According to HHS data, as of Jan. 8 there are about 5,000 children hospitalized in a pediatric bed, either with suspected covid or a confirmed laboratory test. This figure includes patients in observation beds. So Sotomayor’s number is at least 20 times higher than reality, even before you determine how many are in ‘serious condition’.”

    Senator Rand Paul suggested Soto the Great might be getting her numbers from that serial liar, Fauci.

    Also, during the Court hearing, Justice Clarence Thomas asked, “Is a vaccine the only way to treat COVID?” Unless he was making a joke, he’s been living in cave for the past two years.

    BUT these and other remarks from Justices did something unexpected. They opened the door to a discussion of the mandates based on the merits, on facts, on whether the mandates are scientifically justified.

    From now on, other court challenges to the mandates can refer to the Supremes—attorneys can try to introduce evidence that the mandates are medically and scientifically insane.

    Many legal loons, you see, have argued, for years, that governments can command the citizenry to do anything short of jumping off high rooftops—because in the interest of public safety, and during a declared Emergency, official powers are unlimited. And the standard for imposing mandates is simply: the government believes it is doing the right thing.

    That brutal shut door has now been opened a crack, owing to the crackpot assertion issuing from the mug of Ms. Soto Bozo.

    She Whose Nose Grows Longer has done us all a service.

    Of course there are other mandate issues here: the federal colossus ripping away freedom from the people; the central government overriding the Constitutional powers of the States; religious exemptions; the appointing of OSHA to oversee regulation-and-enforcement, a task the agency was never created to carry out.

    But now one more obvious factor has been introduced. Does the SUBSTANCE of the mandates make any sense at all?

    Reported COVID vaccine injuries have just passed the one-million mark. The well-known Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare study concluded such reports should be multiplied by 100 to arrive at a true figure.

    What would you expect to happen, in the way of injury and death, if the Biden vaccine mandates are upheld and made air tight in every nook and cranny of the country?

    And what would you expect to happen as the number of vaccine-refusers then grows and grows—because there are a whole lot of people who just don’t like to be pushed around, especially when severe health damage is the result.

    The feds are going to book rooms in every venue from the Ritz all the way down to the Seedy Hooker Motel 12, to house resisters from Nome to Key West?

    “President Biden welcomes you. Here is your key. A security guard will take you down the hall. Don’t try to escape. The canine patrol will hunt you down.”

    Maybe the old wobbly on-again-off-again deranged occupant of the Oval Office can’t see the consequences of his actions, but his string-pullers can. Big-time blowback day after day would not be their favorite breakfast cereal.

    Ditto for the Supremes. At least for the time being, it looks like they’re going to figure out a way to pass the buck and stay the execution of the country.

    Even Soto the Clown can read large handwriting on the wall.

    CODA: How can I put this, so self-styled sophisticated tech-heads will grasp it? More and more people are realizing that government science is bull****. It’s one layer of bull**** piled on another layer. It’s a whole slew of overlapping and cross-referenced and integrated data sets of bull****.

    The PCR test, the definition of a COVID case, the case numbers, the vaccine harm—more and more people can spot these fakeries and go down the rabbit hole that far.

    So there’s a limit to the value of virtue signaling designed to support the central government. At some point, the signaler is painting a target on his back.

    Catching my drift? If these vaccine mandates are rigidly enforced, the beauty of being a Collectivist ideologue is going to fade.

    When freedom becomes the only default position, come hell or high water, a virtue signaler looks very much like a jailer.

    People don’t like jailers.

    GET THAT F---ING NEEDLE AWAY FROM MY ARM.

    When 20,000 people at a football game stop shouting, “Let’s go, Brandon,” and opt for that NEEDLE chant instead, virtue signalers will want to test positive, so they can lock themselves in a room and try to develop a Cloak of Invisibility."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  32. The Following User Says Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    mountain_jim (26th January 2022)

  33. Link to Post #117
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  34. Link to Post #118
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Another article too hot to handle; even vaccine critics won’t run with it
    by Jon Rappoport
    February 23, 2022
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022...t-run-with-it/

    "A few days ago — in my article The Test for Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum, I republished my proof that the medical cartel has been routinely killing millions of people, with its treatments, for at least the past 20 years.
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022...conomic-forum/

    And when I say proof, I’m talking about clear mainstream research.

    Virtually no one has taken those research citations and run with them, despite the fact that I’ve highlighted them for years. I’ve highlighted them in articles and interviews.

    What’s the problem?

    Apparently, even many “alternative” journalists and doctors are keeping a piece of their souls in the official prison of fake medicine and fake science. On purpose.

    They want to hedge their bets. They want to go halfway, but not all the way.

    They want to admit some things, but not other things.

    So today, I’m posting another one of my “too hot to handle” pieces. I’ve published this article at least four times. Even doctors who oppose the COVID vaccines won’t pick up on it.

    Why?

    It’s too REAL, because it proves the RNA injections were DESIGNED to fail, to be useless, from the get-go.

    That’s right.

    And if you expose THAT, you burn the whole house down.

    The vaccine establishment collapses.

    No one will believe anything the establishment says about vaccines. Nor should they.

    And many journalists and doctors of all stripes want to “protect the public” from THE TRUTH.

    I don’t want to bury the truth. I’m not settling for half.

    Buckle up—

    I wrote and posted this piece while the clinical trials of the COVID vaccine were in progress. It reveals how and why those trials were constructed and designed to fail. They did fail.

    The vaccine makers DESIGNED a series of clinical trials that, even on their own terms (“the virus is real, fear the virus”) were destined to be a complete flop.

    PART ONE

    Peter Doshi, associate editor of the medical journal BMJ, and Eric Topol, Scripps Research professor of molecular medicine, have written a devastating NY Times opinion piece about the ongoing COVID vaccine clinical trials.

    They expose the fatal flaw in the large Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna trials.

    September 22, 2020, the Times: “These Coronavirus Trials Don’t Answer the One Question We Need to Know” :https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/22/o...ine-coronaviru

    “If you were to approve a coronavirus vaccine, would you approve one that you only knew protected people only from the most mild form of Covid-19, or one that would prevent its serious complications?”

    “The answer is obvious. You would want to protect against the worst cases.”

    “But that’s not how the companies testing three of the leading coronavirus vaccine candidates, Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, whose U.S. trial is on hold, are approaching the problem.”

    “According to the protocols for their studies, which they released late last week, a vaccine could meet the companies’ benchmark for success if it lowered the risk of mild Covid-19, but was never shown to reduce moderate or severe forms of the disease, or the risk of hospitalization, admissions to the intensive care unit or death.”

    BOOM. THE CLINICAL TRIALS WERE NOT DESIGNED TO SHOW THE VACCINE COULD PREVENT SERIOUS ILLNESS. OR HOSPITALIZATION. OR DEATH.

    The Times: “To say a vaccine works should mean that most people no longer run the risk of getting seriously sick. That’s not what these trials will determine.”

    BOOM.

    This means these clinical trials are dead in the water.

    And I could stop this article right here and walk away. Done. Finished. Nothing more need be said.

    And you the reader could walk away. OK, done. The clinical trials of the vaccine were never intended to prevent serious illness of any kind. Never intended to prevent hospitalizations or deaths. End of story.

    Goodbye. Forget the vaccine. Why would anyone want to take it?

    But if you want to know WHY the clinical trials were designed this way, and HOW the con was played, and why it was actually necessary to design the clinical trials to be useless, read on.

    The whole vaccine house is ALREADY burned down, but I’m going to say a lot more. I’m going to burn the ashes.

    First of all, make sure you understand the clinical trials of the RNA vaccines were only designed to show effectiveness in preventing “mild cases of COVID,” which nobody should care about, because mild cases (cough, fever, chills) naturally run their course and cause no harm. THERE IS NO NEED FOR A VACCINE THAT PREVENTS MILD CASES.

    Now let’s go deeper. Read the next section from the Times piece, and then I’ll make comments.

    “The Moderna and AstraZeneca studies will involve about 30,000 participants each; Pfizer’s will have 44,000. Half the participants will receive two doses of vaccines separated by three or four weeks, and the other half will receive saltwater placebo shots. The final determination of efficacy will occur after 150 to 160 participants develop Covid-19…”

    Now pay close attention. Here’s how it works. The vaccine companies are looking for a total of 150 mild COVID cases to occur, combined, in the two groups— those receiving the placebo and those receiving the vaccine. How would that happen? The researchers believe “the coronavirus is spreading everywhere” and it will pounce on some of the volunteers during the clinical trial.

    Let’s say that, during the trial, 100 people receiving the placebo develop mild COVID-19 (cough, chills, fever), and only 50 people receiving the vaccine develop mild COVID.

    The vaccine companies would say, “We just proved the vaccine is 50% effective in preventing COVID, and that’s all we need to do, in order to win emergency authorization from the FDA. Release the vaccine. Inject the world.”

    The outcomes for ONLY 150 people equal “let’s shoot up seven billion people.”

    That’s staggering.

    But it gets even worse. The magic number of 150 COVID cases? How is a COVID case defined? The authors of the Times piece have the answer:

    “In the Moderna and Pfizer trials, even a mild case of Covid-19 — for instance, a cough plus a positive lab test — would qualify and muddy the results. AstraZeneca is slightly more stringent but would still count mild symptoms like a cough plus fever as a case.”

    But wait. The NY Times itself recently published an article stating that up to 90% of US COVID cases could very well be false positives—in other words, not cases at all. Why? Because the diagnostic PCR test, as it is performed by labs, is too sensitive. It registers “positive for COVID” when it shouldn’t.

    So, in these vaccine clinical trials, the whole process of determining that “150 people developed COVID-19” is completely unreliable, useless, absurd, and nonsensical.

    On the one hand, a positive PCR test is unreliable and means nothing. On the other hand, a cough and fever (“mild COVID”) are nothing to worry about, and don’t require a vaccine at all. We’re talking about 150 cases of “who cares.” That’s what the COVID vaccine is DESIGNED to prevent.

    “So, Doctor, the magic number is 150 ‘who cares’ mild cases? That’s the number that will decide the immediate fate of the planet?”

    “Of course.”

    “And these 150 people, who you say develop mild COVID-19…no one should care, because those symptoms cure themselves, and no vaccine is needed.”

    “Correct.”

    “And come to think of it, the people receiving the vaccine in the clinical trials could develop symptoms indistinguishable from mild COVID-19, as a result of the effects of the vaccine.”

    “Yes, that’s right.”

    “But you’re very confident in the success of the vaccine.”

    “Indeed.”

    “Why?”

    “I have to be confident. If we’re exposed as incompetent frauds, our bottom line will take a huge hit. And we’ll wind up in prison.”

    PART TWO: THE DEVIOUS TRICK

    Now I’m going to go over the vital information again, but this time I’m going to show you how…

    The vaccine companies can use the fatal flaw in their protocol design to…

    Actually win approval of their COVID vaccine.

    Stick with me. This is big.

    Only 150 people are needed to make the major clinical trials of a COVID vaccine look like a success.

    Out of 30,000 volunteers in a trial, researchers are waiting for 150 people to “come down with COVID-19.” MILD cases. They assume this will happen because they believe the coronavirus is everywhere, and it’ll infect some of their volunteers.

    Of course, their definition of a mild case of COVID-19 is meaningless. Cough plus fever, and a positive PCR test. The test spits out false positives like a rigged slot machine, and the visible mild symptoms could result from flu, polluted air, or too many candy bars.

    Nevertheless, the researchers are waiting for a total of 150 people to “catch a mild case of COVID.” When that number is reached, everything stops.

    Now comes the big moment. How many of those 150 COVID cases occurred in the group that received the vaccine, and how many in the group that received the placebo shot of salt water?

    Let’s say only 50 COVID cases occurred in the vaccine group, and 100 in the placebo group. The researchers pop champagne corks. They say, “Look, the vaccine is 50% effective at preventing COVID, and that’s all we need to win emergency authorization from the FDA.”

    BUT suppose 75 cases occurred in the vaccine group and 75 in the placebo group? No good. No good at all. No way to call the vaccine effective.

    Now comes the “reshaping of the data.”

    HERE WE GO.

    The researchers say, “Wait. Thirty of the COVID cases in the vaccine group were REALLY just adverse reactions to the vaccine. They weren’t cases of COVID. You see, the vaccine can cause symptoms that are indistinguishable from mild COVID. Cough, fever, chills. ACTUALLY, there were only 30 cases of COVID in the vaccine group. There were 75 in the placebo group. That’s good enough. The vaccine IS effective. We’re golden. We can get emergency authorization from the FDA right now to shoot up everybody.”

    Vaccine manufacturers HAVE KNOWN ALL ALONG that they could pull this trick.

    Why leave things to chance?

    Why risk a few hundred billion dollars of profit on a random distribution of mild COVID cases among the volunteers in their clinical trials?

    The definition of a mild COVID case is EXACTLY what the vaccine manufacturers needed. It enabled them to hatch a plan, to make sure they didn’t fail.

    They could pawn off a MILD case of COVID as a reaction to the vaccine. They could fake that without causing ripples. The FDA would say, “The vaccine reactions aren’t serious. All right, no problem. We’ll approve this vaccine for emergency use.”

    However…If the manufacturers designed their clinical trial protocol to prevent serious cases of COVID—-very serious pneumonia—then first of all, they would be waiting to see 150 cases of really sick people to occur among the volunteers.

    That might never happen. In 100 years.

    And second, if it did happen, and the manufacturers had to pull their devious switcheroo trick and blame the vaccine for some of these SERIOUS cases…

    They would have to tell the FDA that their vaccine was causing life-threatening pneumonia; and the FDA, under a lot of scrutiny these days, would find it very difficult to overlook that.

    FDA: “We can’t approve this vaccine. It could cause a few million cases of dire pneumonia…”

    The vaccine companies didn’t make a titanic stupid mistake in their protocol design. In gearing the protocol to prevent MILD COVID cases, they did what they did on purpose. It allows them to “reshape their data” and win FDA emergency approval for their vaccine.

    These companies have no intention of failing, starting over, and spending a year recruiting 30,000 new volunteers. They want success and money now. They want to win the race.

    And they will win, if the truth isn’t known and shared widely.

    The punchline:

    Every “expert,” in August 2021, is instructed to say the vaccine is definitely protecting people against severe illness and hospitalization. This is their promotional message to the world.

    “Yes, even if you’re vaccinated, you could become infected with the virus, you could develop COVID, and you could pass the virus to other people, BUT you must take the shot. It will protect you from becoming severely ill.”

    As you can see from what I’ve written above, this is a straight-out lie.

    It was always a fantastic lie, from the beginning of COVID vaccine development, because the design of the clinical trials had nothing to do with preventing serious illness.

    —end of article—

    OK, we’re back in the present now; 2022. Everything you’ve just read has been studiously ignored. Shoved to the side.

    The vaccine was only designed, at best, to prevent mild cough, fever, chills. That’s it. A mild case of flu-like illness. Which cures itself.

    That design was intentional. It allowed the vaccine makers to win approval for the injection.

    If they had to wait around for 150 volunteers in the clinical trials to develop serious pneumonia, that could have taken years. Or forever.

    The clinical trials proved nothing.

    The vaccine, even in mainstream scientific terms, was worthless.

    It was designed that way.

    That’s a chunk of blockbuster news anybody with a half a brain should be shouting from the rooftops. Instead: SILENCE.

    Why?

    Again, because this blockbuster news burns the whole house down.

    It takes down the whole vaccine establishment.

    And there are lots of vaccine critics who DON’T WANT TO GO ALL THE WAY.

    EVEN THOUGH THEY SHOULD.

    They back away. They pretend they don’t know what they DO know.

    They could shoot down, overnight, the whole basis for these COVID shots, and they would expose the vaccine that is maiming and killing of millions upon millions of people.

    But they stay silent.

    Show them this information.

    Get them to tell you what their problem is."

    **********************************

    The Test for Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum
    by Jon Rappoport
    February 21, 2022
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022...conomic-forum/

    "Knowing my regular readers can handle more than one major point in an article, I start with this: Justin Trudeau is not serving the interests of Canadians; he is loyal to the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the brand of Globalism it represents.

    Meaning: global governance; the submerging of nations in a scheme of external top-down control; the expansion of poverty; wall to wall surveillance; a currency reset; and other totalitarian transformations.

    If you watch these two brief videos (here and here), you’ll see Klaus Schwab confirm, in Trudeau’s presence, the prime minister’s loyalty to the WEF, as well as the penetration of Trudeau’s cabinet with WEF agents.

    Schwab, the head of WEF, also mentions a new dawn of entrepreneurs who lead corporations dedicated to social responsibility.

    And THAT is a test for Schwab. Because he certainly backs major pharmaceutical companies. Do those businesses display social responsibility?

    I’m not talking about their pricing of drugs or their equitable distribution of drugs. I’m talking about killing and maiming people with the drugs. Many people.

    And so I return to citations I’ve published a number of times. By the way, virtually no one takes these devastating references and runs with them.

    I can only conclude journalists and doctors who otherwise criticize medical policies don’t want to admit the medical cartel has a very long track record of destroying populations.

    These journalists and doctors only want to cherry pick their targets. In fact, they support the overall performance of the medical system. Why? You would have to ask them.

    Here, I’m testing Klaus Schwab. Does he really think he can get away with his talk about “social responsibility” and his simultaneous support of Pharma?

    Buckle up—

    ONE: Journal of the American Medical Association, April 15, 1998: “Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalized Patients.”

    The authors, led by Jason Lazarou, culled 39 previous studies on patients in hospitals. These patients, who received drugs in hospitals, or were admitted to hospitals because they were suffering from the drugs doctors had given them, met the following fate:

    Every year, in the US, between 76,000 and 137,000 hospitalized patients die as a direct result of the drugs.

    Beyond that, every year 2.2 million hospitalized patients experience serious adverse reactions to the drugs.

    The authors write: “…Our study on ADRs [Adverse Drug Reactions], which excludes medication errors, had a different objective: to show that there are a large number of ADRs even when the drugs are properly prescribed and administered.”

    So this study had nothing to do with doctor errors, nurse errors, or improper combining of drugs. And it only counted people killed or maimed who were admitted to hospitals. It didn’t begin to tally all the people taking pharmaceuticals who died as consequence of the drugs, at home.

    TWO: July 26, 2000, Journal of the American Medical Association; author, Dr. Barbara Starfield, revered public health expert at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health; “Is US health really the best in the world?”

    Starfield reported that the US medical system kills 225,000 Americans per year. 106,000 as a result of FDA-approved medical drugs, and 119,000 as a result of mistreatment and errors in hospitals. Extrapolate the numbers to a decade: that’s 2.25 million deaths. You might want to read that last number again.

    I interviewed Starfield in 2009. I asked her whether she was aware of any overall effort by the US government to eliminate this holocaust. She answered a resounding NO. She also said her estimate of medically caused deaths in America was on the conservative side.

    THREE: BMJ June 7, 2012 (BMJ 2012:344:e3989). Author, Jeanne Lenzer. Lenzer refers to a report by the Institute for Safe Medication Practices: “It [the Institute] calculated that in 2011 prescription drugs were associated with two to four million people in the US experiencing ‘serious, disabling, or fatal injuries, including 128,000 deaths.’”

    The report called this “one of the most significant perils to humans resulting from human activity.”

    The report was compiled by outside researchers who went into the FDA’s own database of “serious adverse [medical-drug] events.”

    Therefore, to say the FDA isn’t aware of this finding would be absurd. The FDA knows. The FDA knows and it isn’t saying anything about it, because the FDA certifies, as safe and effective, all the medical drugs that are routinely maiming and killing Americans. Every public health agency knows the truth.

    FOUR: “The Epidemic of Sickness and Death from Prescription Drugs.” The author is Donald Light, who teaches at Rowan University, and was the 2013 recipient of ASA’s [American Sociological Association’s] Distinguished Career Award for the Practice of Sociology. Light is a founding fellow of the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania. In 2013, he was a fellow at the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard. He is a Lokey Visiting Professor at Stanford University.

    Donald Light: “Epidemiologically, appropriately prescribed, prescription drugs are the fourth leading cause of death, tied with stroke at about 2,460 deaths each week in the United States. About 330,000 patients die each year from prescription drugs in the United States and Europe. They [the drugs] cause an epidemic of about 20 times more hospitalizations [6.6 million annually], as well as falls, road accidents, and [annually] about 80 million medically minor problems such as pains, discomforts, and dysfunctions that hobble productivity or the ability to care for others. Deaths and adverse effects from overmedication, errors, and self-medication would increase these figures.” (ASA publication, “Footnotes,” November 2014)

    FIVE: None of the above reports factor in death or injury by vaccine.

    Medical crimes.

    Medically caused deaths of friends, family members, loved ones, who are buried along with the truth.

    No criminal investigations, no prosecutions, no guilty verdicts, no prison sentences.

    But of course, you can believe everything leading lights of the US medical system tell you about COVID.

    You can believe everything the press—who buries the truth about this medical holocaust—tells you about COVID.

    Given the reports on medically caused death and maiming I’ve just cited and described in this article, it’s obvious that…

    Leading medical journals around the world, which routinely publish glowing accounts of clinical trials of medical drugs…

    Are spilling over with rank fraud, on page after page.

    Indeed, here is a stunning quote from an editor who has quite probably read and analyzed more medical-drug studies than any doctor in the world:

    “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” (Dr. Marcia Angell, NY Review of Books, January 15, 2009, “Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption)

    Compare that quote with one from “the father of COVID science,” Anthony Fauci. In an interview with the National Geographic, Fauci stated:

    “Anybody can claim to be an expert even when they have no idea what they’re talking about…If something is published in places like New England Journal of Medicine, Science, Nature, Cell, or JAMA—you know, generally that is quite well peer-reviewed because the editors and the editorial staff of those journals really take things very seriously.”

    They take things so seriously, they routinely publish glowing studies of medical drugs that are killing people in great numbers.

    —So, Mr. Schwab, which is it? You support corporate social responsibility, and therefore you condemn, in the strongest possible way, the ongoing death-and-maiming count achieved by beloved pharmaceutical companies? Or you maintain your unwavering support for Pharma, and admit your pose of “social responsibility” is a complete fraud.

    And to journalists and doctors who refuse to pick up the citations in this article and DO something with them, I ask: what’s holding you back? What’s been holding you back? I’ve been publishing and speaking about this information for more than 10 years.

    What are you afraid of? Where do YOUR loyalties lie?"
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  35. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    gord (26th February 2022), mountain_jim (26th February 2022)

  36. Link to Post #119
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Good to hear that this journalist is getting inspired to do more now
    To My Readers: What I’m doing now and why Mar 28
    by Jon Rappoport
    March 28, 2022
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022...g-now-and-why/

    "Dear Reader,

    Basically, I’m making a lot of moves right now. As I mentioned last week, my new substack blog has launched. Go have a look. It takes no prisoners.

    Soon, I’ll be posting audios there, as well as articles.

    About a year ago, it occurred to me that I was keeping the lid on a lot of issues that were making my blood boil. I was putting them aside because of the COVID insanity.

    I’ve written over 450 articles on that boggling scam and the death march it’s enabled.

    And then it occurred to me that, despite the fact I’ve posted articles here at NoMoreFakeNews almost every day for 21 years—that’s right—I’ve ignored subjects that interested and excited and motivated and outraged me.

    So why not go all out?

    As a friend once told me (dozens of times): A WRITER WRITES.

    So that’s what I’m doing now—on three blogs all at once. NoMoreFakeNews, OutsideTheRealityMachine, and Jon Rappoport on substack.

    But even that isn’t enough. There is flesh and blood experience that fits very well with audio. Spoken narrative.

    Things I think of in the middle of the night that spin themselves out into stories. Which need a storyteller.

    For example: my research on HIV in the 1980s and 90s. There were so many characters and situations and intrigues. I published my book, AIDS INC. in 1988, but I could have written another book about my experiences while writing AIDS INC. The journalists and scientists and politicians of all different types I met and spoke with. The good, the bad, the ugly. How I stumbled into my method of research—which has paid off to this day.

    There are a dozen other books I could write (but storytelling is better) about MANY medical-political scandals I’ve uncovered over the past 30 years. I’ve already published the details of the scandals. I’m talking about the people, the heroes, the crazies, the criminals I met along the way.

    Because that’s part of work and LIFE. It opens up new dimensions. It rarely gets to breathe out in the open. But it should.

    I’ve written a great deal about art and imagination. But inside that are the many artists I’ve known. Who they were, what they were doing, and why.

    And then there is the boundless future ahead. I’ve written about that, too. But there is more to say—including experiences I’ve had that gave me clues and insights and presumptions and a view of time that opened closed doors.

    I have interests that many people don’t share. For instance, sports and television. They’re both absurd farces. But they’re also something else. In my life, I’ve known far more athletes than artists. I was once an athlete myself. I know what makes these people tick. I admire athletes I’ve known. They were ALIVE.

    All in all, ALIVE is good. Knowing it, sensing it along whatever roads it travels makes us better. It keeps us from closing down, from narrowing our focus to the point where we think we know all there is to know.

    I’ve been rebelling and at war since I was 17. I’m 83 now. Rebellion has served me well. Bypassing and refusing possibilities of lucrative careers have served me well. Rebellion has enabled me to CREATE on my own terms.

    Which, quite possibly, was my objective all along.

    So that’s what I continue to do.

    I like beginnings.

    This is one.

    As always, many thanks for your continuing support and interest.

    –Jon

    Update: You’ll see my first podcast pop up on my substack page tomorrow. It’s my personal story behind the story, about a few of the key figures in the HIV wars of the 1980s and 90s—especially Peter Duesberg, the biologist who took on the entire medical research colossus single-handedly. I knew Peter. He reminded me of one of my childhood heroes, Jack London’s Martin Eden.

    The podcast is also about sharp turns in life—key moments when I found gold in unexpected places…from unexpected people…outsiders I never knew existed."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  37. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (28th March 2022), Delight (28th March 2022), Gwin Ru (28th March 2022), Satori (28th March 2022), ulli (28th March 2022), Yoda (28th March 2022)

  38. Link to Post #120
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Jon Rappoport on the Covid Hoax

    Court OKs puberty blockers: medical con for the ages
    May 19 2022
    by Jon Rappoport
    https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2022...-for-the-ages/

    "I’ll expose the con.

    First, the story:

    Information Liberation: “Judge Rules Parents Have ‘Fundamental Right’ to Drug Kids With Puberty Blockers And Cross-Sex Hormones.”

    The National Review: “U.S. District Judge Liles Burke… granted a temporary injunction to block the sections of the law banning prescription of puberty blockers and hormone medication, in response to a lawsuit.”

    “Parents ‘have a fundamental right to direct the medical care of their children,’ Burke wrote in his opinion. ‘This right includes the more specific right to treat their children with transitioning medications subject to medically accepted standards’.”

    “Burke explained that ‘the uncontradicted record [of] evidence is that at least twenty-two major medical associations in the United States endorse transitioning medications as well-established, evidence-based treatments for gender dysphoria in minors’.”

    Can you see where this is going?

    First of all, the Judge accepts the notion that there is a medical condition called gender dysphoria.

    The DSM-5, the bible of the psychiatric profession, lists gender dysphoria as a “clinically significant distress or impairment related to a strong desire to be of another gender, which may include desire to change primary and/or secondary sex characteristics.”

    Once you assume “gender dysphoria” is a medical-psychiatric condition, then the medical treatments—e.g., public blockers—naturally follow. Therefore, parents can OK these treatments for their children.

    But is gender dysphoria a real condition?

    If it is, then there must be a test for it. A physical test. Blood, urine, hair, genetic assay, brain scan. But there is no defining test. None.

    Second, labeling something a disorder or a disease or a medical condition and giving it a name means nothing, unless you can point to a cause. A cause you can prove.

    If you have no cause, you just have a list of symptoms, or thoughts or ideas or feelings going on in the mind and body of the patient. Gathering up these symptoms or thoughts and claiming they add up to a singular CONDITION is arbitrary.

    No matter how many medical societies and drug companies want to claim otherwise.

    There is no defining cause of “gender dysphoria.”

    No defining test, no defining cause.

    It’s all smoke.

    The authorities say: “We have a singular condition called gender dysphoria. We have drugs to treat it (puberty blockers, hormones). Therefore, as with any other medical condition, parents can OK the treatments for their children.”

    Wrong. Wrong on all counts.

    It’s all smoke.

    It’s a devious strategy, applying a fake veneer of medical legitimacy to a situation that has no proven medical basis.

    If you had a vast social/political movement behind you; backed by elite medical groups and federal agencies; supported by schoolteachers and gullible idealistic blind insane parents; you could sell a judge the idea that a condition called PROTEIN DYSPHORIA is at the heart of many of society’s problems.

    You could say, “Many adults, and especially children, are experiencing this condition. They want to stop consuming protein altogether, but traditional destructive habit patterns are being forced on them. This medical-psychiatric condition, PROTEIN DYSPHORIA, can be treated with drugs that block the desire to consume protein. There is no reason to stop parents from permitting their children to undergo this recognized and certified treatment.”

    And the judge would buy it. Idiot that he is, he would cite medical authorities in his ruling.

    The battleground for “gender dysphoria,” and all the implications that follow, has been marked out: IT IS MEDICAL.

    You need to understand that.

    That’s what’s going on here.

    We’ve just had two years of the MEDICAL crossing over into political. It’s called COVID.

    And that war (which is not over) was launched by predatory agencies and politicians and elites who claimed to be taking the medical high ground.

    The strategy is not new.

    As I’ve been writing and saying for 35 years, the medical cartel is the most dangerous cartel in the world.

    Your strategy as a parent, as an interested party, as a citizen, as a human, on the issue of gender change and gender drugs, has to include:

    “You claim gender dysphoria is a real condition, a real medical psychiatric condition. Prove it. Where is the defining test for it? Where is the proven cause? Don’t tell me what doctors SAY. Show me what they can PROVE.” "
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  39. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    DaveToo (19th May 2022), Sadieblue (19th May 2022)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst 1 6 7 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts