Clinton, Brennan & Biden: Benghazi

[Gemma13]

Haven't had chance to watch yet but I think there may be more evidence released in this vid.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=pWUs6bQlz98

[ExomatrixTV]

BREAKING: CIA WHISTLEBLOWER'S EVIDENCE GOES PUBLIC, DEEP STATE SCRAMBLING IN DAMAGE CONTROL MODE:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=pWUs6bQlz98

Trump hits out at 'corrupt Obama-Biden administration, Hunter's Ukraine dealings, lamestream media':

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Z6JOg9N9Qrg

[Bluegreen]

DOXORSTFU

https://twitter.com/Annakhait/status...93180388773895

[ExomatrixTV]

AUDIO: Biden & Obama Reportedly 'Did NOT Really Want To Get' Bin Laden, 'He [Was] Being Protected'


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/embed/A9c8pfKBtBeH

• Source

[greybeard]

I cant see how any one would be stupid enough to leave evidence of this.
There are more secure ways of corresponding than e mails surely?
Not doubting -- just being open minded.
Chris

[T Smith]

Posted by RunningDeer (here)
Interview with Benghazi Whistleblower Nick Noe shares his story and information that will be released through Media outlets soon. This is the BIGGEST STORY to break in American History!!

Yes, it may be released through Media outlets soon... but if so, this will be the spin.

We are living in a world where countering the Ministry of Truth with facts, hard evidence, and our critical thought renders its challengers "unhinged" (per Kamala Harris's tweet), as cited in the one mainstream article that has thus far dared to touch this story.

I have held for a while now that until we break up the information cartel, i.e. the 5 corporations on the proverbial board of the Ministry of Truth that controls the minds of the public, evidence, truth, hard facts, testimony, etc., etc., are largely irrelevant. Reality is what the MoT tells us reality is, not what we experience with our senses and critical ability to think.

We all rail about the media but I have yet to see any significant activism to break up the cartel deploying anti-trust arguments such as those deployed against Rockefeller Standard Oil and later Gates Microsoft; the information cartel oligarchy is far more insidious and dangerous to the public than Standard Oil or Microsoft monopolies ever were...

Let's see how far this goes. If it dies on the vine we need to start going after the cartel folks...

[norman]

Alex Jones, Jason Goodman, Steve Pieczenik and others are calling this a Hoax narrative.

A hit sting op as part of their attempt to take down Qannon

Tread very carefully.

[T Smith]

Posted by norman (here)
Alex Jones, Jason Goodman, Steve Pieczenik and others are calling this a Hoax narrative.

A hit sting op as part of their attempt to take down Qannon

Tread very carefully.

To be clear, the premise of this scenario is plausible and likely true based on facts irrespective of these new revelations, even if the narrative is a hoax. It is a classic way to discredit the truth. For example, Bin Laden wasn't hiding in Iran; the real Bin Laden had died in December 2001 from kidney failure and the alphabet agencies had been employing doubles ever since to advance its interests.

So Seal Team 6 did murder a double, it was staged as a trophy kill, and the members of Seal Team 6 were likely murdered to cover up the crimes, but not per the holes of this fiction.

Also, why is the whistleblower wearing a MAGA hat? That's a little suspicious and unnecessary, unless the aim is to discredit Trump supporters or apply motive to the narrative. Doesn't make sense.

If you want to get rid of the baby, all you need to do is poison the bath water...

[Gracy May]

Something I've noticed over the last 4 years, is the explosive rise in the term "Bombshell" by mainstream news outlets. For the longest time it was from anti Trump outlets such as MSNBC's Rachel Maddow grasping at straws for the big take down with non stop "bombshell!", "bombshell!", "bombshell!", but now the shoe is on the other foot. Fair enough I reckon .

So as much as I'm trying to stay below the fray on this these days, there's a couple of things that I'd like to bring to the table.

With all the "bombshell" news coming from both US political camps now, I'm still seeing virtually nothing along the lines of offers to do anything very much different in DC. No matter who wins this thing, the military industrial complex remains fat and happy, as do the big corporations, and Wall Street... while still leaving John Q. Public in the dust to continue going at it on their own despite all odds. As MLK Jr. noted decades ago: "Socialism for the rich and rugged free enterprise capitalism for the poor.

I'm not seeing anything new on the horizon from the great duopoly, no great new ideas, nothing. Just a food fight...

So the other thing: Just to be clear, what actually is, "the media" that is always so vilified? It seems that conservative media here is exempt, such as Natural News, FOX NEWS, Gary Franchi's NEXTNEWSNETWORK, etc. Is this indeed the general sentiment, that conservative media has it nailed in an unbiased manner every single time, while any other form of media is basically Mockingbird and to be summarily dismissed out of hand?

With apologies, I may have stumbled a bit off topic, maybe I'll start a new thread at some point with a poll or something on this.

[HikerChick]

Posted by T Smith (here)

Posted by norman (here)
Alex Jones, Jason Goodman, Steve Pieczenik and others are calling this a Hoax narrative.

A hit sting op as part of their attempt to take down Qannon

Tread very carefully.

To be clear, the premise of this scenario is plausible and likely true based on facts irrespective of these new revelations, even if the narrative is a hoax. It is a classic way to discredit the truth. For example, Bin Laden wasn't hiding in Iran; the real Bin Laden had died in December 2001 from kidney failure and the alphabet agencies had been employing doubles ever since to advance its interests.

So Seal Team 6 did murder a double, it was staged as a trophy kill, and the members of Seal Team 6 were likely murdered to cover up the crimes, but not per the holes of this fiction.

Also, why is the whistleblower wearing a MAGA hat? That's a little suspicious and unnecessary, unless the aim is to discredit Trump supporters or apply motive to the narrative. Doesn't make sense.

If you want to get rid of the baby, all you need to do is poison the bath water...

Benazir Bhutto said that bin Laden died in 2007, I would think that she had access to good intel. She met a sticky end herself.
She says that at about 2:15.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=OQMAG59y6_Q

[Gwin Ru]

Posted by HikerChick (here)
[...]
Benazir Bhutto said that bin Laden died in 2007, I would think that she had access to good intel. She met a sticky end herself.
She says that at about 2:15.
[...]

That ^^^ seems closer to reality:

Posted by Hervé (here)
Well, well, well... what do we know with certainty? That it's a true psyop disinfo sandwich of lies.

Thtat's the only certainty one can rely on.

Why?

According to this other high ranking CIA whistleblower -- Dr. Sue Ann Arrigo, nephrologist -- OBL was still alive, although unwell, in 2004 as she treated him for his renal condition on American soil! That's right, he was in the US in 2004 for a kidney transplant!

She stated this on the Michael Herzog's American Awakening radio show on May 1st, 2008.

Hence the very clever question asked regarding that stormed compound: Where's the dialysis equipment?

Other infos from Dr. Arrigo can be found here:

http://coverthistory.blogspot.com/20...yville-dr.html (read the comments as well)

http://avalonlibrary.net/Sue_Arrigo/

http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/chan...contentid=4451

[ExomatrixTV]

BREAKING: Audio Pt. 1 of CIA whistleblower Alan Parrot with Congressman Weldon, Osama, Obama, Biden.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=iyYX2fiUZOc

BREAKING: Audio Pt. 2 of CIA whistleblower Alan Parrot with Congressman Weldon, Osama, Obama, Biden.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=2et2Cru2Mn8

[AuCo]

Posted by Gwin Ru (here)

Posted by HikerChick (here)
[...]
Benazir Bhutto said that bin Laden died in 2007, I would think that she had access to good intel. She met a sticky end herself.
She says that at about 2:15.
[...]

That ^^^ seems closer to reality:

Posted by Hervé (here)
Well, well, well... what do we know with certainty? That it's a true psyop disinfo sandwich of lies.

Thtat's the only certainty one can rely on.

Why?

According to this other high ranking CIA whistleblower -- Dr. Sue Ann Arrigo, nephrologist -- OBL was still alive, although unwell, in 2004 as she treated him for his renal condition on American soil! That's right, he was in the US in 2004 for a kidney transplant!

She stated this on the Michael Herzog's American Awakening radio show on May 1st, 2008.

Hence the very clever question asked regarding that stormed compound: Where's the dialysis equipment?

Other infos from Dr. Arrigo can be found here:

http://coverthistory.blogspot.com/20...yville-dr.html (read the comments as well)

http://avalonlibrary.net/Sue_Arrigo/

http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/chan...contentid=4451

Madam Secretary Albright did mention at one point in the past that the Bush Admin had a hold of Bin Laden. Not the best source of news but this is what I could quickly find searching:

"Former U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said that she was just kidding when she wondered aloud whether the Bush administration is holding Osama bin Laden captive, waiting to break him out at the best political moment.


Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright
It was a "tongue-in-cheek comment and was not intended in any other way," Albright told Fox News.

But witnesses to Albright's comment said the ambassador did not appear to be joking Tuesday when she suggested U.S. President Bush may reveal bin Laden's capture as an "October (2004) surprise" before next November's presidential election."

Source: https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/en/doc...ent_291414.htm

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by norman (here)
Alex Jones, Jason Goodman, Steve Pieczenik and others are calling this a Hoax narrative.

A hit sting op as part of their attempt to take down Qannon

Tread very carefully.

I follow Alex Jones, Jason Goodman, Steve Pieczenik for a long long time (am pro-active for 30 years now) ... and I know most of their flaws (shortcomings/imperfections) and I really truly appreciate all their good work that turned out to be correct!

But ... I also noticed if they are not "the first" if they are not the ones that has all the in-depth data about what is claimed ... They tend to be (in my view) somehow jealous or feel at least awkward they did not have the scoop!

Similar to the superior bs "logic": "if it was any good, we would know about it" attitude.

• And I quote Nick Nolte: "I have spoken"
  

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=afwQhtNgAPg

cheers,
John

[norman]

Don't get me wrong John, I know Bengazi was a crock and I know the team six Binladen hit was a crock. The bottom line story in this covers the truth ( more or less ). It's the planted easter eggs in this scoop that's going to taint it and the info traffic about it ( that Facebook, Twitter and Youtube are NOT restricting ).

[T Smith]

Posted by HikerChick (here)

Posted by T Smith (here)

Posted by norman (here)
Alex Jones, Jason Goodman, Steve Pieczenik and others are calling this a Hoax narrative.

A hit sting op as part of their attempt to take down Qannon

Tread very carefully.

To be clear, the premise of this scenario is plausible and likely true based on facts irrespective of these new revelations, even if the narrative is a hoax. It is a classic way to discredit the truth. For example, Bin Laden wasn't hiding in Iran; the real Bin Laden had died in December 2001 from kidney failure and the alphabet agencies had been employing doubles ever since to advance its interests.

So Seal Team 6 did murder a double, it was staged as a trophy kill, and the members of Seal Team 6 were likely murdered to cover up the crimes, but not per the holes of this fiction.

Also, why is the whistleblower wearing a MAGA hat? That's a little suspicious and unnecessary, unless the aim is to discredit Trump supporters or apply motive to the narrative. Doesn't make sense.

If you want to get rid of the baby, all you need to do is poison the bath water...

Benazir Bhutto said that bin Laden died in 2007, I would think that she had access to good intel. She met a sticky end herself.
She says that at about 2:15.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=OQMAG59y6_Q

Yup. I do recall that interview now. I do know he was also seriously ill in 2001 (essentially on his death bed on dialysis)... but either way the Obama Administration did not kill him in 2011 per the official narrative.

[Maia Gabrial]

Trump and Biden are scheduled to do townhalls on the same day; however, Biden will be on ABC and Trump will be on NBC.

Trump WILL bring up the audios and papers on his interview. How else will the news get coverage? We already know that Lamestream and twitter and facebook are not going to say a word about it....

Trump did mention something about it on his first day back on the campaign trail, the one where he's out on the ledge of the White House overlooking the Rose Garden. He said it would be mind blowing.

And the left is scrambling to cover up....

[Maia Gabrial]

BREAKING: Full interview HERE about the blackmail /extortion of 152 Billion US dollars sent to Iran to coverup the deaths of seal team 6 by the Obama/Biden administration.

As I understood it, Obummer was being blackmailed by Iran to keep quiet about bin Laden not being killed by Seal Team 6, but was being hidden by Iran, this being the truth being kept from the American ppl. Seal Team 6 was assassinated to hide all that....

[Gracy May]

What are the odds that a deeply Shiite country like Iran, was harboring a Sunni extremist like Bin Laden? That's like a Hatfield harboring a McCoy.

So far as I understand it, the money given to Iran was part of the deal with them, and had been their money in the first place.

[norman]

Posted by Gracy May (here)
What are the odds that a deeply Shiite country like Iran, was harboring a Sunni extremist like Bin Laden? That's like a Hatfield harboring a McCoy.

So far as I understand it, the money given to Iran was part of the deal with them, and had been their money in the first place.

If an entire US governement can act from a handed down script, I reckon an Iranian government can too.


But, I'm not ready to believe any of this package yet.