Denmark's 9 days of revolution

[Lunesoleil]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=bOAOwpUG-E8

Denmark: the people mobilize against a bill providing for forced isolation, treatment and vaccination

NOVEMBER 27, 2020
In Denmark, a bill which proposes in particular to vaccinate certain people by force against COVID-19 was very badly received by part of the Danish population who demonstrated for several days. If the rumor is circulating via a video on the internet that this mobilization has resulted in the cancellation of this law, according to several official articles, it is not. The Prime Minister declared that she had heard the concerns of the people, that the text of this bill will be discussed with the various parliamentary groups, without however being called into question.

A mobilization announced as victorious

A video titled News from Denmark shows a woman on the verge of tears, she is so happy that the Danish bill aimed at imposing major health constraints in the near future, including forcibly vaccinating part of the population, has fallen apart. population. According to the presenter of this video from the Hugo Talks channel, " after 9 days of demonstrations, the bill was abandoned ", thanks to a mobilization over several days of the Danish population, whose peaceful demonstrations were also the major absent from the international mass media. An article in the BT media described the words of protesters with drums and pots and pans as "The lack of media coverage of the epidemic law, that also makes noise ", or" We do not want a compulsory vaccine of which we have no idea what it contains, and what it will do to people. people in the future ”.

A situation in reality half-fig, half-grape

We would also like to be happy, but an article from LCI urges us to be more reserved, stating that Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has never announced a total withdrawal from the law. Yes, she declared that this text would be discussed with the various parliamentary groups, that her government intends to " reconsider the law relating to epidemics", takes " the criticism seriously", and thinks "that a better balance must be found. But nothing seems to have been won yet. Danish media DR shares that they have " tried to get an answer on whether a brand new bill will be made, which will have to go through a new consultation, or whether it will simply make changes to the current bill. Neither the press service of the Social Democrats, nor the Ministry of Health, nor the Prime Minister's office have yet returned ” with answers to their questions.

An anti-democratic and anti-democratic bill

To see if this bill, which should come into force in March 2021, considered by some as liberticidal and anti-democratic. The stakes concerning the future of the country are major, since it provides that the Ministry of Health can unilaterally have “the possibility of classifying a disease [...] as socially critical”, which would give it “ a wide range of powers, including the ability to isolate, forcibly treat and forcibly vaccinate population groups if it is to curb contagious disease ” . Danish media DR specifies that "In some cases coercion, physical restraint, lockdown of premises can be used, and the police can help if people object ”, and that “ The project, in its current form, has given the government, led by the Minister of Health Magnus Heunicke, the possibility of closing businesses without them being entitled to compensation ”. Inadmissible for certain media, doctors and Danish citizens. It should also be seen whether we will accept, at national, European and international level, that this type of measures become commonplace, or if a large-scale popular mobilization will prevent them from being born, from developing and from lastingly establishing themselves.

Magazine NEXUS

[Billy]

Well done citizens of Denmark.

[amor]

I am one half of Portugal and one half Danish like my great grandmother Dagmar, who from the other side of existence would have cheered her people for refusing a "Wolf in sheep's clothing" law of incremental genocide trying to pass as "protecting the people."