As usual, my dear Gracy you ask thoughtful, very intelligent questions. Of course, I don't have definitive answers so my thoughts are merely that, speculations.Posted by Gracy May (here)
Hey there Pam,Posted by Pam (here)
Most certainly, if this is the case, some would be placebo. That makes sense.
Here are some things I don't get about the placebo theory. Of course placebos are a vital part of medical research and experimentation, but they're always used under very tightly monitored control groups with half (almost always) getting the real deal, the other half the placebo. That of course makes a lot of sense as the monitors would know precisely which half got which, and then see what happens.
So here are some problems I have with this, and if anyone can explain them away, I'm all ears and will have learned something new:
- How could results possibly be kept track of nationwide, using the United States as our example. To say this would be a massive undertaking would be a massive understatement.
The complexities would be astronomical, with just making sure vials are correctly matched to individuals, then properly categorized to individual charts being a biggie. Each of these individuals would need close monitoring for a considerable length of time.
If any given person got sick anyway after the placebo, but self treated and wound up fine again, how could this ever be known to add to their chart? What if they went to the hospital, got treated there and released, how could this be known on a national scale? I suppose going to the hospital, and then dying would be the "easiest" to be made aware of, but even then, sheesh, that's an awful lot of widely scattered lines of communications there with lots of room for just human error alone. OMG!
Or how is that same person who got sick, but self treated and was fine, deciphered from them being just fine the whole way through? Who would know?
- How about people moving? People move all the time. Someone may move from small town California to small town Georgia, they can still be tracked that precisely for results? Or what if they got their initial jab in small town California, the second in small town Georgia? That's some tracking...
All I see is a big muddled mess, what results could possibly be gleaned from this? That's everything but, a control group...
- I've yet to hear a report of someone getting the jab who didn't feel bad for about a day. If so many are getting these placebos, it sure seems like I'd be hearing of them here and there.
- So what percentage of the population is supposedly receiving these placebos? Is it 10, 25, 50%? Control groups are usually 50% half and half. If it's half and half seems that would really be altering general results already seen; if it's less, it almost certainly adds even more to the complexity of it all, and what results would "they" likely be looking find with a small control group within the larger control group?
If it's closer to 100% as I saw mentioned, well, I don't even know what to make of that with all the injuries being reported here. Did the placebo do that?
I could probably think of more, but y'all get the gist, so again if someone has some good sound reasoning as a work around for just these couple or so problems I have with this theory, I'm all ears.
So far anyway, most of what I'm hearing about this is in explanation as to why one wasn't injured, or magnetized, after receiving the jab. "It's simple, you just got the placebo". But it's not that simple, it's just an easy way out of having to explain the accompanying discrepancies.
And finally, if nothing is being tracked at all, then it's something other than the definition of placebo being discussed.
Each person that got a vaccine had the batch number and the expiration date in pharmacy records and on your little card. I just saw the headline on a Tim Poole video that the FDA is going to assemble a list of those that have been vaccinated.I don't know if that is accurate or not but data bases for drugs in not new. So even though there are allegedly strict HIPPA laws about patient privacy there is a data base.( I am speaking US here, guys) I don't know how accurate that is. What I do know is that they have other data bases regarding other drugs. For instance, at least in Washington state if I want a prescription for sudafed it is registered on a data base. That way I am not able to go from store to store and buy a bunch to make meth amphetemines, which some used to do. Another data base is for opiate prescription. The idea is that someone won't be able to doctor shop and get multiple opiate prescriptions because any doctor can check the data base to see how many opiates one has been prescribed.
As far as this being a sort of experiment in neural linking the human body to 5G, I don't believe that they are at the point that it matters what each and every participant does and feels. The placebo aspect would be more about having some people that are fine, not a careful study. I believe in reality that they have done all the experimentation on a smaller level. This is a sort of do or die mass experiment. The exact numbers don't matter in the least any more. If they did, they wouldn't have the horrible VAERS system. They wouldn't discourage doctors from looking into vaccine injury.
The world you are talking about and what I am perceiving now are in many respects 2 different worlds. In my version we are long done with careful trials and exhaustive documentation. It is a experiment on the level of doing this world wide, but the experimentation has already been (I believe) on animals and humans. The more accurate word would be implementation. Another aspect of experimentation may be the various brands of the vaccine, I am only speculating.
I think you could get an overall picture if you were a drug company selling one of these vaccines. You would be able to know what vaccine, which batch and when the vaccine was given on an individual. You would be able to track deaths, hospitalizations and doctor visits and the complaints of the patients. Kind of like Tuskegee. That was about observing a disease process but you didn't have to do intensive following of the "patients". You monitored them periodiy and got an overall pictures.
The final picture, whether this all fits together has yet to be seen. They will know if it works.
I am not stating any of this as fact. As I am beginning to study Neural linking of the synthetic sort it seems to make sense. I think the whole Elon Musk thing about putting a "chip" in your brain to hook up to the internet of things is a big red herring. As always "I reserve the right to be batshiiiiit crazy.
I also want you to know that any of this stuff I am saying on this forum is in no way meant to be disrespectful of anyone, nor am I trying to scare or shame anyone if they have taken the vaccines. I have had vaccines in the past. I fully vaccinated one of my kids and partially vaccinated the other one. I don't get to stand on any soap box and preach to anyone about anything. You have a wonderful, keen, fair mind and I totally appreciate that. Your questions are valid and fair.
If I missed something let me know. I will not be offended in any way if you blow what I have said to hell and back. I wish you would and I hope you can. There really is no pleasure in what I am looking into, in fact, I wish I could stop, but I just can't.