+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 10 1 10 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 186

Thread: The many side effects of the Covid 'vaccine'

  1. Link to Post #1
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    15,078
    Thanks
    35,244
    Thanked 70,078 times in 13,544 posts

    Default The many side effects of the Covid 'vaccine'

    From https://medium.com/@madmockingbird/h...d-c87dd10f0198

    List of side effects of the Covid vaccine from the FDA
    https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download

    "FDA Safety Surveillance of COVID-19 Vaccines"

    DRAFT Working list of possible adverse event outcomes

    ***Subject to change***
    • Guillain-Barré syndrome
    • Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
    • Transverse myelitis
    • Encephalitis/ myelitis/ encephalomyelitis/ meningoencephalitis/ meningitis/ encepholapathy
    • Convulsions/seizures
    • Stroke
    • Narcolepsy and cataplexy
    • Anaphylaxis
    • Acute myocardial infarction
    • Myocarditis/pericarditis
    • Autoimmune disease
    • Deaths
    • Pregnancy and birth outcomes
    • Other acute demyelinating diseases
    • Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions
    • Thrombocytopenia
    • Disseminated intravascular coagulation
    • Venous thromboembolism
    • Arthritis and arthralgia/joint pain
    • Kawasaki disease
    • Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children
    • Vaccine enhanced disease
    Last edited by Bill Ryan; 11th December 2020 at 21:45. Reason: fixed broken link, and added source article
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  2. The Following 28 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (17th December 2020), Bassplayer1 (11th December 2020), Bill Ryan (11th December 2020), bluestflame (17th February 2021), Constance (11th December 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (20th December 2020), Denis (5th January 2021), Denise/Dizi (11th February 2021), Deux Corbeaux (18th December 2020), Dorjezigzag (11th December 2020), Ewan (11th December 2020), fifi (12th December 2020), Free Thinker (18th April 2021), graciousb (15th January 2021), Gwin Ru (18th December 2020), Harmony (11th December 2020), Icare (11th December 2020), Ioneo (12th December 2020), iota (23rd December 2020), janette (4th May 2021), Karen (Geophyz) (11th December 2020), Rosco1 (11th December 2020), RunningDeer (12th December 2020), Sue (Ayt) (11th December 2020), Tintin (11th December 2020), toppy (11th December 2020), viking (11th December 2020), wondering (11th December 2020)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Ireland Avalon Member pueblo's Avatar
    Join Date
    5th February 2016
    Posts
    1,014
    Thanks
    5,480
    Thanked 7,083 times in 985 posts

    Default Re: The many side effects of the Covid 'vaccine'

    Bells Palsy?

  4. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to pueblo For This Post:

    Alan (20th December 2020), Bassplayer1 (11th December 2020), Bill Ryan (11th December 2020), Constance (11th December 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (20th December 2020), Dorjezigzag (11th December 2020), Ewan (11th December 2020), Gwin Ru (18th December 2020), Harmony (11th December 2020), janette (4th May 2021), Karen (Geophyz) (11th December 2020), onawah (11th December 2020), RunningDeer (12th December 2020), Tintin (11th December 2020), wondering (11th December 2020)

  5. Link to Post #3
    United States Moderator Karen (Geophyz)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    11th February 2020
    Location
    Texas
    Language
    English
    Posts
    532
    Thanks
    6,749
    Thanked 5,327 times in 525 posts

    Default Re: The many side effects of the Covid 'vaccine'

    All those possible side effects and in today's paper I read "It's also not yet known whether the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines protect people from infection. That means vaccinated people might still be able to get infected and pass the virus on, although it would likely be at a much lower rate, said Deborah Fuller, a vaccine expert at the University of Washington."
    "If the doors of perception were cleansed everything would appear to man as it is, Infinite. For man has closed himself up, till he sees all things thro' narrow chinks of his cavern.” William Blake

  6. The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to Karen (Geophyz) For This Post:

    Bassplayer1 (11th December 2020), Bill Ryan (11th December 2020), Constance (11th December 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (20th December 2020), Dorjezigzag (11th December 2020), Ewan (11th December 2020), fifi (12th December 2020), graciousb (27th December 2020), Gwin Ru (18th December 2020), Harmony (11th December 2020), Icare (11th December 2020), Ioneo (12th December 2020), iota (23rd December 2020), janette (4th May 2021), Kryztian (12th December 2020), onawah (11th December 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020), RunningDeer (12th December 2020), Tintin (11th December 2020), wondering (11th December 2020)

  7. Link to Post #4
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    26,601
    Thanks
    116,510
    Thanked 340,100 times in 25,087 posts

    Default Re: The many side effects of the Covid 'vaccine'

    From the Australian The Age, today.

    I searched for this story after Infowars was going crazy-ballistic about this. Their claim is that the HIV positives weren't 'false' at all. Notably, the article heading below puts "false positives" in quotes. Reading the article, all the researchers were pretty surprised.
    Australian COVID vaccine terminated due to HIV ‘false positives’

    A billion-dollar deal for the Morrison government to buy more than 50 million doses of the University of Queensland’s potential coronavirus vaccine has been abruptly terminated after several trial participants returned false positive HIV test results.

    UQ, working in partnership with Australian global biotech company CSL, will abandon its current clinical trials following the discovery. It informed the federal government of the initial data on Monday, which was then referred to health authorities for urgent medical advice.

    Prime Minister Scott Morrison, federal Health Minister Greg Hunt and Department of Health secretary Brendan Murphy addressed the media in Canberra after the University of Queensland-CSL vaccine deal was terminated.

    Sources with knowledge of the current trials said pathology tests had in the past weeks confirmed the positives were in fact false and the health of the participants has not been put at risk.

    Prime Minister Scott Morrison said the national security committee of cabinet agreed to terminate the purchasing agreement on Thursday, following expert health advice and fears the revelation would severely damage the Australian public’s confidence in the COVID-19 vaccination program, which is expected to begin early next year.

    "We have prepared for this. We have planned for this. And now we're making decisions in accordance with this," he said on Friday morning.

    He said the government had "spread the risk" by entering into multiple agreements and had secured 20 million new doses from Oxford University-AstraZeneca and another 11 million from Novavax to cover for the 51 million doses the home-grown product was to supply.

    "The net out-take of this is we are more likely to have the entire population vaccinated earlier rather than later by the ability to bring this manufacturing capability forward," Mr Morrison said.

    The UQ vaccine candidate used a protein and adjuvant platform, containing the COVID-19 spike protein and a "molecular clamp". A small component is derived from the human immunodeficiency virus, known as HIV, that is not able to infect people or replicate.

    A source with knowledge of the clinical results said although the HIV protein fragment posed "absolutely no health risk to people", they had identified that some trial participants who received the vaccine produced a partial antibody response to it.

    Here's what went wrong with UQ's vaccine - and what we do now

    The partial antibody response had the potential to interfere with some HIV screening tests that look for the antibodies – leading to a false positive test result. It is unclear how long participants would continue to return false positive results.
    The source said although all participants had been told there was a remote possibility HIV markers could be found in tests during the trial, medical researchers had not expected it to occur.

    Health department secretary Brendan Murphy said the risk of a false-positive was seen to be "extremely low at the outset".

    "Everyone was very surprised at the unexpected prevalence of the false positive," Professor Murphy said.

    More than 200 volunteers in two groups – aged 18 to 55, and 56 and over – were involved in the phase one trial with a proportion of the participants receiving a placebo.

    Evidence publicly released so far from the clinical trials found the vaccine to be safe and said it produced a strong immune response able to neutralise the COVID-19 virus in laboratory based tests.

    One day after the first person in the world received the Pfizer coronavirus vaccine in the UK outside clinical trials, a warning has been issued to people who have a history of significant allergic reactions.

    A government source said the Australian government’s Science and Industry Technical Advisory Group, headed by Professor Murphy and acting Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly, had reviewed the findings this week and recommended ending the deal.

    An industry source said CSL, Australia’s biggest company, will make a statement to the ASX 200 on Friday before the market opens. Both UQ and CSL will continue their research in the hope of creating a successful vaccine in coming months.


  8. The Following 26 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    Alan (20th December 2020), avid (17th December 2020), Bassplayer1 (11th December 2020), bluestflame (17th February 2021), Constance (11th December 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (20th December 2020), fifi (12th December 2020), greybeard (11th December 2020), Gwin Ru (11th December 2020), Harmony (11th December 2020), Icare (11th December 2020), iota (23rd December 2020), janette (4th May 2021), Jill (11th December 2020), Karen (Geophyz) (11th December 2020), kudzy (12th December 2020), onawah (11th December 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020), RunningDeer (12th December 2020), Samson (11th December 2020), Savannah (12th December 2020), selinam (11th December 2020), Tintin (11th December 2020), Victoria (11th February 2021), wondering (12th December 2020), Yoda (11th December 2020)

  9. Link to Post #5
    Australia Avalon Member Constance's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th January 2011
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Language
    English
    Age
    56
    Posts
    3,331
    Thanks
    20,396
    Thanked 23,756 times in 3,197 posts

    Default Re: The many side effects of the Covid 'vaccine'

    I'm completely against any vaccinations for every reason under the sun but I thought I might share this here because according to Riccardo Bocci, a vaccine developed by Dr. Petrovsky at Adelaide University in Australia in April of this year, has allegedly been found to be safe and effective. According to Petrovsky, it can be tweaked if the virus mutates.




    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-07-...rseas/11279868

  10. The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to Constance For This Post:

    Bassplayer1 (11th December 2020), bennycog (12th December 2020), Bill Ryan (11th December 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (20th December 2020), fifi (12th December 2020), graciousb (10th January 2021), Gwin Ru (18th December 2020), Harmony (11th December 2020), iota (23rd December 2020), janette (4th May 2021), Jill (11th December 2020), Karen (Geophyz) (12th December 2020), Kryztian (12th December 2020), onawah (12th December 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020), RunningDeer (12th December 2020), Savannah (12th December 2020), Tintin (12th December 2020), Victoria (11th February 2021), wondering (12th December 2020)

  11. Link to Post #6
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    15,078
    Thanks
    35,244
    Thanked 70,078 times in 13,544 posts

    Default Re: The many side effects of the Covid 'vaccine'

    Life-Threatening Reactions to Pfizer COVID Experimental Vaccines Results in Warnings to People Who Have Allergies
    12/10/20
    https://vaccineimpact.com/2020/life-...ave-allergies/

    Breaking: CHD Responds to News of Life-Threatening Reaction to Pfizer COVID Vaccine. Will Regulators Take Action?
    In August, CHD asked regulators to investigate the use of polyethylene glycol (PEG) in COVID mRNA vaccines, which could have caused the severe allergic reactions reported this week by two of the first UK recipients of Pfizer’s vaccine.

    by Lyn Redwood, RN, MSN
    Children’s Health Defense

    "Media outlets are reporting that two individuals who received the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine developed severe anaphylactic reactions following the injection.

    England’s National Health Service (NHS) warned Wednesday that people “with a history of a significant allergic reaction to a vaccine, medicine or food” should not be given the COVID-19 vaccine developed by U.S. pharmaceutical giant Pfizer and Germany’s BioNTech.

    UK’s Medical and Health products Regulatory Agency, as reported by The Wall Street Journal, reminded health-care workers that vaccinations should only be carried out in facilities where resuscitation measures are available.

    These warnings came after two National Health Service employees who were part of the first tranche to receive the vaccine on Tuesday suffered adverse reactions.

    NHS England said in a statement that both of the medical workers who experienced anaphylactoid reactions to the Pfizer vaccine had a “strong past history of allergic reactions.”

    According to these news reports, documents published by the two companies showed that people with a history of severe allergic reactions were excluded from the clinical trials. Therefore, this life-threatening adverse safety signal did not appear in their clinical trial safety data.

    On Aug. 26, Children’s Health Defense (CHD) sent a letter to Dr. Jerry Menikoff, director office for Human Research Protections Dept. of Health and Human Services regarding the Phase III Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine. The letter requested the Office for Human Research Protections investigate the use of polyethylene glycol (PEG) in Moderna’s COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. Pfizer’s COVID vaccine, which also uses mRNA technology, also contains PEG.

    Approximately 8% of the U.S. population has highly elevated levels of anti-PEG antibodies. The concerns we laid out in our letter about the Moderna vaccine were related to the fact that injecting a PEG-containing vaccine into individuals with pre-existing PEG antibodies could lead to life-threatening anaphylaxis.

    Such was the case with a member of CHD, Harold Gielow, a retired military Lt. Col USMC who suffers with severe anaphylactic response to polyethylene glycol. In fact, the last time Gielow was exposed to an injected drug that contained PEG, he went pulseless, requiring an injection of epinephrine. His PEG allergy was diagnosed by Johns Hopkins.

    Gielow has voiced outrage that PEG is classified by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as biologically inert/inactive.

    “It is anything but that,” Gielow said. “The incidences of hypersensitivity reactions to PEG are, understandably, increasing, although many with PEG hypersensitivity go undiagnosed, thus presenting an unreasonable hazard to administering these vaccines to a population, the vast majority of which is proven by science to have anti-PEG antibodies.”

    In fact, investigators who once assumed that the polymer was largely “inert” are now questioning its biocompatibility and warning about PEGylated particles’ promotion of tumor growth and adverse immune responses that include “probably underdiagnosed” life-threatening anaphylaxis.

    These undesirable responses have, on occasion, halted clinical trials. As a result, some scientists argue that it is time to develop alternatives to replace PEG. American and Dutch researchers declared in 2013:

    “[T]he accumulating evidence documenting the detrimental effects of PEG on drug delivery make it imperative that scientists in this field break their dependence on PEGylation.”

    Dr. Menikoff recommended that our concerns be sent to Dr. Steven Hahn, director of the FDA and Dr. Marks, director of the FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. On Sept, 25, the letter was sent and included with a cc to Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

    On Dec. 2, we received a response from Dr. Hahn and Dr. Marks with a recommendation that we reach out directly to the mRNA vaccine manufacturers regarding our concerns with the use of PEG in their vaccines.

    What is concerning about the response is the fact that in the letter we acknowledge that we had already reached out to Moderna’s scientists regarding the use of PEG and lack of informing vaccine trial recipients about the use of PEG in the vaccine, soliciting a history of PEG allergies and testing blood antibody levels to PEG.

    Did the FDA officials actually read the letter?

    CHD’s concerns about PEG stem from the fact that PEG-specific immune responses can actually reduce the efficacy of vaccines and increase the occurrence of adverse events.

    A 2016 study in Analytical Chemistry reported detectable and sometimes high levels of anti-PEG antibodies (including first-line-of-defense IgM antibodies and later stage IgG antibodies) in approximately 72% of contemporary human samples and about 56% of historical specimens from the 1970s through the 1990s. Of the 72% with PEG IgG antibodies, 8% had anti-PEG IgG antibodies > 500ng/ml., which is considered extremely elevated. Extrapolated to the U.S. population of 330 million who may receive this vaccine, 16.6 million may have antibody levels associated with adverse effects.

    The researchers confessed that the results were entirely unexpected. The authors concluded that:

    “…sensitive detection and precise quantitation of anti-PEG Ab levels in a clinical setting will be essential to ensuring the safe use of PEGylated drugs in all target patient populations going forward.”

    On July 28, Gielow wrote to CovPN citing the 2016 study’s conclusions and asked the following question:

    “As Moderna’s mRNA-1273 candidate vaccine uses a PEGylated LNP vector, what procedures are included in the trial to mitigate this risk?”

    The response from CovPN was as follows:

    “Thank you so much for this scientific question. I consulted with several of the physician scientists working on the Moderna study, and they have provided me with this response to send on to you:

    “Pre-existing antibody levels, along with various genetic polymorphisms, may impact the safety profile of a biomedical intervention in a variety of populations. If there are significant safety signals from the CoVPN clinical trials, all efforts will be made to understand the mechanisms that may have contributed to these signals. Pre-screening populations based on hypothesized biomarkers, such as anti-PEG antibodies, is not a strategy currently employed in our clinical trials.”

    While the Moderna scientists allege that PEG antibody development is purely hypothetical, the scientific literature clearly documents that the immune system can and does form antibodies against PEG (anti-PEG Abs) in both animals and humans.

    The existence of anti-PEG antibodies threatens patient safety through possible anaphylaxis reactions and re-exposure to PEG-containing drugs may greatly increase the chance for adverse effects due to B cell memory of anti-PEG Abs.

    Thus, screening for and monitoring the levels of anti-PEG antibodies in blood before and during treatment with PEG-containing drugs are of particular importance to improve safety and maintain therapeutic efficacy.

    The 2016 Analytical Chemistry findings and other studies indicate the widespread occurrence of anti-PEG Abs in the general population due to daily exposure to PEG-containing products. The population’s increased exposure to PEG-containing products makes it “natural to assume” that anti-PEG antibodies will continue to be widespread.”

    If high-titer anti-PEG Abs are present in blood, even people without known allergies may have severe hypersensitivity reactions when receiving PEG-containing therapeutics for the first time.

    Moderna documents and publications indicate that the company is well aware of safety risks associated with PEG and other aspects of its mRNA technology. In the corporate prospectus supporting Moderna’s stock market launch in late 2018, the company was frank that its technical approach has numerous risks.

    Specifically, Moderna acknowledged the potential for its proprietary lipid nanoparticles and PEG to produce “systemic side effects,” given the scientific literature’s documentation of these types of side effects for other LNPs. In comments not generally seen by the public, Moderna stated (p. 33):

    [T]here can be no assurance that our LNPs will not have undesired effects. Our LNPs could contribute, in whole or in part, to one or more of the following: immune reactions, infusion reactions, complement reactions, opsonization reactions, [links added] antibody reactions . . . or reactions to the PEG from some lipids or PEG otherwise associated with the LNP. Certain aspects of our investigational medicines may induce immune reactions from either the mRNA or the lipid as well as adverse reactions within liver pathways or degradation of the mRNA or the LNP, any of which could lead to significant adverse events in one or more of our clinical trials.

    Instead of expressing concern over clinical trial participants’ welfare, that section of the prospectus concluded that any one of these problems “could materially harm [the company’s] business, financial conditions and prospects.”

    As the excerpts from the Moderna prospectus illustrate, Moderna scientists are fully aware of PEG-related safety concerns. In the prospectus, Moderna admits that “unacceptable health risks or adverse side effects” could make it difficult to recruit or retain clinical trial participants and also that an “unfavorable benefit risk ratio could inhibit market acceptance” if their product proceeds to market.

    Addressing the efficacy side of the equation, a mid-2019 study by authors who “are or have been employees of Moderna, Inc. and receive salary and stock options from Moderna, Inc.” further admitted that anti-PEG antibodies “present significant challenges to the clinical efficacy of PEGylated therapeutics and will require strategies to overcome [their] effects.”

    In light of the recent acknowledgement of anaphylactic reactions to Pfizers’ PEG-containing COVID-19 vaccine, CHD continues to have grave safety and efficacy concerns about the use of PEG in vaccines due to the high percentage of the population having preexisting antibodies to PEG. While it’s unlikely that everyone with pre-existing PEG antibodies will have a severe reaction to a vaccine containing PEG, it is dangerous to assume that none will.

    While vaccine manufacturers and federal agencies providing oversight on COVID vaccine development are quick to point out that the clinical trials did not identify safety concerns with the vaccine, they fail to mention the fact that the trial participants were excluded from the study if they had a history of severe allergic reactions and those in the trial were never screened for PEG antibodies.

    Multiple previous studies regarding the prevalence of anti-PEG antibodies in the population have stated that pre-screening should be done prior to any administration of a PEG-containing medication. Screening is likely to be even more important in the case of a vaccine intended for parenteral administration to as many people as possible that contains a substance to which the majority of the population unknowingly has antibodies.

    Not characterizing trial participants’ adverse reactions in relation to anti-PEG antibody presence and levels eliminates insights into these interactions is a missed opportunity to prevent harmful adverse events.

    Now we are left in a situation where life-threatening adverse events are occurring after widespread use of the vaccine has begun. A finger needs to be pointed squarely at the vaccine manufacturers and regulatory agencies who buried their heads in the sand to legitimate safety concerns in their rush to approve a COVID vaccine. Unfortunately, the public is now left to bear the burden of exposing these lapses in safety.

    The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

    Lyn Redwood, RN, MSN – Lyn Redwood, R.N., M.S.N., is a Nurse Practitioner who became involved in autism research and advocacy when her son was diagnosed with autism. In 1999 she calculated the level of mercury exposure received from multiple thimerosal (mercury) containing vaccines and found her son was exposed to levels 125 times EPA Federal Safety guidelines and suffered with mercury toxicity. Since that time, Ms. Redwood has testified before the Government Reform Committee on “Mercury in medicine: Are we taking unnecessary risks?” and before a subcommittee on Human Rights and Wellness, “Truth revealed: New scientific discoveries regarding mercury in medicine and autism health in 2004.” "

    Read the full article at Children’s Health Defense:
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...gic-reactions/
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  12. The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (17th December 2020), Bassplayer1 (13th December 2020), Bill Ryan (12th December 2020), Constance (12th December 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (20th December 2020), fifi (12th December 2020), gord (12th December 2020), greybeard (12th December 2020), Gwin Ru (18th December 2020), janette (4th May 2021), Jill (12th December 2020), Karen (Geophyz) (12th December 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020), RunningDeer (12th December 2020), Tintin (12th December 2020), Victoria (11th February 2021), wondering (12th December 2020)

  13. Link to Post #7
    United States Avalon Member RunningDeer's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th February 2012
    Location
    Forest Dweller
    Posts
    15,457
    Thanks
    109,341
    Thanked 136,381 times in 15,209 posts

    Default Re: The many side effects of the Covid 'vaccine'

    The COVID Vaccine Is Here… And So Are Potential Side Effects (18 min)
    The UK and Russia have begun their mass COVID vaccination campaigns and it won’t be long from now until the experimental shot is deployed in your town.

    Meanwhile Canada, the US and Mexico are among a growing list of countries who have approved the Pfizer vaccine.

    In this report, we examine some of the possible adverse events the CDC and FDA will be looking for, according to the agencies’ own virtual meeting on surveillance and vaccine safety held in October 2020.

    We will also take a look at some of the adverse events experienced by the volunteers who participated in the trials according to an FDA review of the trial, as well as those who experienced adverse events outside of the trials.

  14. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to RunningDeer For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (13th December 2020), Bassplayer1 (13th December 2020), Bill Ryan (12th December 2020), Constance (12th December 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (20th December 2020), greybeard (12th December 2020), Gwin Ru (18th December 2020), iota (23rd December 2020), janette (4th May 2021), Karen (Geophyz) (17th December 2020), onawah (12th December 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020), Savannah (12th December 2020), Tintin (12th December 2020), Victoria (11th February 2021), wondering (13th December 2020)

  15. Link to Post #8
    United States Avalon Member Savannah's Avatar
    Join Date
    10th May 2015
    Location
    California
    Age
    64
    Posts
    631
    Thanks
    6,048
    Thanked 4,339 times in 606 posts

    Default Re: The many side effects of the Covid 'vaccine'

    I'm in a bit of a panic. I was just informed Vaccines were coming to the staff at my State work place in 10 days! We don't know if it's going to be mandated yet. I wont take it and that might mean I get fired pretty soon. I don't want to get into too many personal details but at my age I wont start over again and I may loose my house. No matter what the price I wont take it. I don't believe the feds can mandate it but states can mandate it by association with work or travel. Business can refuse service without it. You cant attend college without certain vaccines already. Employers might not hire you with out your "vaccine pass"!

  16. The Following 26 Users Say Thank You to Savannah For This Post:

    Alan (17th December 2020), Arcturian108 (13th December 2020), Ba-ba-Ra (17th December 2020), Bassplayer1 (13th December 2020), Bill Ryan (12th December 2020), Brigantia (13th December 2020), Constance (12th December 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (20th December 2020), Dorjezigzag (29th December 2020), East Sun (29th April 2021), fifi (18th December 2020), George (16th January 2021), Gwin Ru (18th December 2020), iota (23rd December 2020), janette (24th January 2021), Jill (20th December 2020), Karen (Geophyz) (17th December 2020), meat suit (12th December 2020), Miha (14th December 2020), onawah (12th December 2020), pueblo (13th December 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020), RunningDeer (12th December 2020), Sue (Ayt) (17th December 2020), Victoria (11th February 2021), wondering (13th December 2020)

  17. Link to Post #9
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    15,078
    Thanks
    35,244
    Thanked 70,078 times in 13,544 posts

    Default Re: The many side effects of the Covid 'vaccine'

    Sausage Making at FDA: How Human Cancer Cells Got Into Vaccines
    12/10/20
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...2-9e309b779ac5

    (I've put in bold letters the info that applies directly to the Covid vaccine.)

    "In a 2012 meeting, the FDA voted to allow the use of human fetal cells and adult human tumor cells in vaccines, despite acknowledging the many risks, including that vaccine recipients might later develop cancer.

    “If the American people knew some of the things that went on at the FDA, they’d never take anything but Bayer aspirin.” — Len Lutwalk, FDA scientist

    “The FDA, by spinelessly knuckling under to every whim of the drug companies, has thrown away its high reputation, and in doing so, forfeited our trust.” — Drummond Rennie, deputy editor of JAMA

    “[The] honest employee fears the dishonest employee. There is also irrefutable evidence that managers at CDER (Center for Drug Evaluation and Research of the FDA) have placed the nation at risk by corrupting the evaluation of drugs and by interfering with our ability to ensure the safety and efficacy of drugs. While I was at FDA, drug reviewers were clearly told not to question drug companies and that our job was to approve drugs … If we asked questions that could delay or prevent a drug’s approval — which of course was our job as drug reviewers — management would reprimand us, reassign us, hold secret meetings about us or worse … When you are able to dig in, if you found issues that would make you turn down a drug, you could be pressured to reverse your decision, or the review would then be handed off to someone who would simply copy and paste whatever claims the company made in the summary document … I believe I also have documentation of falsification of documents, fraud, perjury and widespread racketeering, including witnesses tampering and witness retaliation.” — Ronald Kavanagh, Ph.D., pharmacist who reviewed medications for the FDA from 1998 to 2008

    Vaccines and related biological products advisory committee today

    Today — Thursday, Dec. 10 — the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC), which is the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) internal panel that licenses new vaccines as “safe and effective,” will meet to consider Pfizer’s COVID vaccine. VRBAC will meet in one week, Dec. 17, to consider approval of the Moderna vaccine.

    The damning safety studies in Pfizer’s late release clinical trial data dump, and the severe (life-threatening) allergic reactions that bedeviled the vaccine’s UK rollout, have raised red flags and public anxiety about the safety of the companies’ mRNA vaccines. Anthony Fauci has addressed growing skepticism about COVID vaccines and the Operation Warp Speed program, by reassuring the public that “VRBPAC” is an “independent panel of leading experts” whom the public can absolutely trust to assure vaccine safety.

    In order to help you make your own conclusion about how reliably VRBPAC will protect your health, I excerpt below the transcripts from the cavalier, ignorant and astonishingly unethical deliberations during the 2012 VRBPAC meeting where panelists voted unanimously to allow use of human tumor cells in vaccines. I urge you to read and make up your own mind whether you want to place your health — and perhaps your life — in the hands of these reckless charlatans and irresponsible clowns.

    How FDA originally approved use of fetal cells in vaccines

    FDA allows both human fetal cells and adult human tumor cells in vaccines. Both types have cancer risks. While both Pfizer and Moderna tested their mRNA vaccine using fetal cells, there are no fetal cells, cell debris or DNA in their final products.

    However, according to company documents, Johnson and Johnson (Janssen) and Altimmune’s COVID vaccines are manufactured in the human fetal cell line PER-C6, and thus the final vaccine products will contain cellular debris and DNA fragments from these cells. Researchers harvested these cell lines from the eyeball of an 18-week-old human fetus aborted in 1985, and then rendered them immortal by making them cancerous.


    The AstraZeneca, Cansino, Gamayela, Vaxart, LongComm and Upitt vaccines are manufactured in the human fetal cell line HEK293, and thus the final vaccine products will contain cellular debris and DNA fragments from the fetal HEK-293 cell line. Scientists harvested this cell line from the kidney of a female Dutch fetus legally aborted in 1973 and then immortalized the cells by rendering them cancerous.

    Normal primary cells, which are unable to replicate indefinitely, ultimately die. Immortalized cell lines are derived from known malignant cancer cells such as those obtained from Henrietta Lacks (HeLa) or created in the laboratory by introducing viral oncogenes or chemical exposures capable of mutating normal primary cells into immortal tumor cells.

    According to FDA’s “The Pink Sheet” dated Nov. 29, 1999, for two decades the agency has been acutely aware of the inherent risks of using immortalized cell lines for vaccine development. The FDA CBER Director Dr. Peter Patriarca, M.D. explained that continuous cell lines are used for their ability to self-propagate, making them an ideal substrate on which to grow viruses, “the worst thing we are concerned about is … malignancy, because some of these continuous cells have the potential for growing tumors in laboratory animals.”

    Patriarca further conceded that “the technology to make these vaccines actually exceeds the science and technology to understand how these vaccines work and to predict how they will work.” This dire “black box” conundrum that Patriarca described in 1999 is even more acute today with the urgent pressure to develop COVID vaccines before manufacturers have tested them in animals or subjected them to long-term safety studies.We call vaccines “biologics” because vaccinologists have traditionally grown their antigens on biological substrates — usually animal tissue. Competing companies culture COVID vaccines on a variety of animal strata. The Merck and IAVA COVID vaccines are manufactured in vero monkey cells, and thus contain cellular debris and DNA fragments from vero monkeys in the final product. The Sanofi, GSK, and Novavax COVID jabs are manufactured in insect cells and thus contain insect cellular debris and DNA fragments in the final products.

    Public health advocates criticize the use of animal tissues in vaccines due to risks that they carry endogenous viruses, microbes, parasites and lack safety testing. (Plague of Corruption, Mikovits 2020).The first use of human fetal cells in vaccines occurred around 60 years ago, but the practice is increasingly popular. It was always controversial. Immunologists long considered using cells from aborted human fetuses in vaccines to be a high-risk gambit; human DNA debris is much more likely to infiltrate cells in vaccinated individuals than insect or monkey DNA.

    Researchers and regulatory agencies have worried for more than 50 years about the potential for injected DNA to cause cancer. According to Dr. Theresa Deisher, a research scientist, primitive (unmethylated) DNA chains from human fetuses have the ability to 1) activate immune receptors that could lead to autoimmune attacks in susceptible individuals who have genetic predispositions that cause their own DNA to be under-methylated, or 2) insert into cells where they could combine with host DNA and cause mutations.

    Regulators have in the past predicted that the odds of that happening were less than 1 in a trillion. However, in early gene therapy trials this event did indeed occur in 4 of 9 boys, 1 of whom died from the leukemia the insertions caused.

    “Researchers have long observed that when introduced DNA enters a cell, it chooses a region of the cell that gives it a survival advantage. These could be the regions that are most likely to produce long-living cancer cells,” Dr. Deisher told me. FDA has never made any effort to test the safety of this practice or to determine whether the epidemic of soft-tissue cancers is “vaccine-generation” children is related to the use of cancerous fetal cells in vaccines. Even worse, in 2002, FDA green-lighted vaccine companies to use cancerous tumor cells from adults in vaccines.

    FDA as an arm of Big Pharma

    Before reviewing the shocking transcript of the FDA meeting that approved this dubious practice, we need to understand the conflicts and corruption that pervade this rogue agency. If we are to ever develop safe, effective COVID vaccines, we need first to stop thinking of the FDA as a regulatory agency; it is an arm of the notoriously corrupt pharmaceutical industry.

    According to a 2017 Emory University study entitled “Thick as Thieves? Big Pharma Wields Its Power with the Help of Government Regulation,” FDA bureaucrats act as “enablers, or perhaps worse still, [they are] complicit in questionable or ethically unsound activity as a result of being driven by self-serving motives ….” A 1992 law that allows drugmakers to buy fast-track approvals for new products from FDA has poured concrete on a regulatory dynamic already corrupted by all the ubiquitous mechanisms of “agency capture.”

    Between 2000 and 2010, pharmaceutical companies paid the FDA $3.4 billion to gain rapid drug approvals. Today, Pharma companies underwrite three-quarters of FDA’s budget for scientific reviews (ProPublica) and fund nearly 50% of the FDA’s total annual budget through PDUFA fees. In exchange, the agency increasingly fast-tracks expensive drugs and vaccines with significant side effects and unproven health benefits.

    No one at FDA wins kudos for slowing down those money flows. To the contrary, according to FDA’s own employees, drug company payments bias regulators, with “an inclination toward approval.”

    According to Dr. Michael Carome, a former Health and Human Services (HHS) official and a director of the advocacy group Public Citizen, “Instead of a regulator and a regulated industry, we now have a partnership … That relationship has tilted [the FDA] away from a public health perspective to an industry friendly perspective.”

    Corrupt vaccine approval panels

    But as corrupt as FDA is, the internal panels — VRBAC — that approve new vaccines make the rest of the agency look like a Sunday church picnic.

    When Dr. Fauci, Paul Offit, Peter Hotez and Bill Gates tell you that you needn’t worry because FDA is the “gold standard” for vaccine safety and that the ultimate licensing decision will be made by an “independent panel of experts,” they are talking about VRBPAC. But VRBPAC is far from “independent.” It is not even comprised exclusively of public officials. Instead, it is populated by outside “experts” who are almost all pharmaceutical industry insiders.



    In 2003, following a 3-year investigation, the United States Congress’s House Oversight Committee found VRBAC was completely dominated by the vaccine industry.

    According to findings of the congressional investigation, VRBAC’s “independent” vaccine panel members often share vaccine patents with the pharmaceutical companies whose products they are evaluating. They “own stock in those vaccine companies, receive payment from those companies for research and paid speeches. They occupy consulting lofty and powerful sinecures and accept payments to monitor vaccine trials and funding for their academic departments.”

    The 2000-2003 U.S. House Government Reform Committee’s investigation of VRBPAC found that: (1) “The overwhelming majority of members, both voting members and consultants, have substantial ties to the pharmaceutical industry.” (2) “Conflict of interest rules employed by the FDA … have been weak, enforcement has been lax and committee members with substantial ties to pharmaceutical companies have been given waivers to participate in committee proceedings … In many cases, significant conflicts of interest are not deemed to be conflicts at all.”

    Congressional investigators offered a typical example of the sort of financial entanglements that put VRBPAC under Pharma’s slavish control. That example was the December 12, 1997, VRBPAC meeting that approved Wyeth’s (now Pfizer’s) rotavirus vaccine, Rotashield.

    The Congressional investigators detailed the committee’s cozy nepotism with vaccine makers.

    “Examples of Conflicts of Interest:

    “For instance, 3 out of 5 FDA advisory committee (VRBPAC) members who voted to approve the rotavirus vaccine in December 1997 had financial ties to pharmaceutical companies that were developing different versions of the vaccine.
    “One out of five voting members’ employer had a $9,586,000 contract for a rotavirus vaccine.
    “One out of five voting members was the principal investigator for a Merck grant to develop a rotavirus vaccine.
    “One out of five voting members received approximately $1 million from vaccine manufacturers toward vaccine development.”
    Congressional investigators concluded that, “Altogether, four out of the five committee members had conflicts of interest that required waivers, and their recommendation for approval of the vaccine was unanimous.”

    Here’s what happened at the 2012 FDA meeting on fetal cells

    HHS acknowledges that the FDA and Centers for Disease Control committees that contract and review new vaccines have historically not used “evidence-based medicine.” To illustrate what this means, one only need read (below) the astonishing transcript of the 2012 panel that first approved the use of adult cancer tumor cells in vaccines.

    This transcript shows what the public is never supposed to see: the behind-the-scenes sausage-making of federal vaccine approvals. Here, you will read for yourself how the “independent,” “gold standard” panelists entrusted with protecting your children made monumentally consequential decisions, not on evidence-based science, but by rolling the dice and taking what they knew was a horrendously risky bet on public health

    In any other realm, this transcript would be proof of negligent homicide. The sickening side-view of VRBAC’s deliberations reveals FDA’s “trusted experts” for what they are; sadistic boys in lab coats giddily discussing the removal of wings from flies. We are all lab rats in their high-risk population-wide experiment. At FDA’s vaccine division, that sort of reckless decision-making is routine.

    In 2012, most live virus vaccines were from animal tissue and the idea of putting potentially cancerous tumor cells from adult “donors” in vaccines was still a daring and audacious gamble. That September, the FDA VRBPAC committee met to discuss this risky innovation. The transcript of that meeting — showing captive FDA officials considering a proposal by the pharma cabal to allow the use of human cancer cells (HeLa) to replace animal tissue in the manufacture of vaccines — is proof of reckless criminal conduct.

    The HeLa cells are well known to cause cancer in animals, but Big Pharma wanted to lower production costs of vaccines and this method is cheaper and faster than using animal tissue for the cultivated media. The obvious question of whether such vaccines might induce cancer in recipients was on the top of the VRBPAC agenda. Health authorities and vaccine manufacturers blatantly acknowledged their uncertainty regarding the safety of vaccines made from HeLa cancer tumors as they voted to make a dangerous high-stakes gamble that would lower costs for vaccine makers

    Unbelievably, FDA voted to allow pharmaceutical companies to produce vaccines using human cells without reviewing a single scientific study to determine if the outcome would be safe.

    Before, I quoted some of the criminally reckless statements from the meeting directly. A more detailed account appears in this article.This was a full meeting of FDA’s VRBPAC in 2012 to decide on the use of human tumor cell lines for the production of vaccines. I list these speakers and their titles at that time:

    Dr. Philip Krause, Acting Deputy Director of OVRR (Office of Vaccine Research and Review) and FDA’s CBER (Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research). Also, Principal Investigator for Vaccine Safety: Virus Detection and Latency.
    Dr. Doug Lowy, Director of the National Cancer Institute of the NIH.
    Dr. Robert Daum, Chair of the VRBPAC.
    Donald W. Jehn M.S., Designated Federal Officer for VRBPAC.
    Keith Peden, PhD, Chief of LDNAV, DVP/OVRR/CBER.
    Dr. Marion Gruber, Director of the FDA’s Office of Vaccines.
    Dr. Nathanial Brady, a self-described clinician.
    Dr. Pamela McInnes, a vaccine development expert and the Director of the Division of Extramural Research at the NIH’s National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, and previously a Deputy Director under Anthony Fauci at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
    Pharma knew that their tumorigenic vaccines might cause tumors in recipients.

    Dr. Philip Krause acknowledged the risks when he said: “We have really identified three major factors that could potentially convey risk from tumor-derived cells. And these include the cells themselves … and if they were tumor-derived cells then maybe they themselves could form tumors in a vaccine recipient.”

    Government regulators acknowledged that tumor cell lines can cause tumors.

    Dr. Doug Lowy acknowledged this when he said: “What I think is qualitatively different about the tumor cell lines is the fact that they can cause tumors.”

    FDA officials knew that tumors might occur decades after vaccination.

    Dr. James Cook acknowledged this when he commented: “But certainly, if you are going to address this question about tumor risk from vaccines made in tumor cell lines, it’s going to have to be a decade’s question.”

    FDA openly acknowledged that its primary objective was not to assure public safety but to help vaccine manufacturers.

    Dr. Robert Daum, the leader of the meeting, commented: “ …but we are here to consider the issues that we would like to advise the agency to consider in helping the company continue the manufacturing process, what should they be concerned about, what should they be watching for.”

    FDA officials knew that they could not prove vaccine safety using test animals to assess oncogenicity.

    Dr. Keith Peden acknowledged this fact when he said: “I’m not optimistic that we’re going to find animal models to assess oncogenicity of DNA. That’s why I’m feeling that maybe it’s the clearance aspect that we have to deal with, with respect to DNA.”

    FDA officials deliberately terminated animal safety tests too early in order to conceal consequences.

    Dr. Robert Daum acknowledged this fact when he said: “Are they watching these animals long enough? Should it be longer?”

    Dr. Keith Peden acknowledged this fact when he said: “Is it relevant to safety that a cell forms a tumor after a year, a year-and-a-half?”

    FDA decided to keep the tumor cell lines secret, because doctors and the public may be alarmed and say “Oh, my God!” if they knew the truth.

    Dr. Nathanael Brady acknowledged this when he said: “How is this group (of vaccines) going to be able to be accepted by the consumers … As soon as you hear “a tumor-derived cell line,” how do you explain that, put the public at ease?”

    Dr. Robert Daum further acknowledged these facts: “ …the practicing medical community and also the lay public. They are going to hear that we are recommending, or that the manufacturers are making, vaccines with tumorigenic cell lines and say, ‘Oh, my God,’ even if there’s no scientific basis to say, ‘Oh, my God.’”

    FDA decided to use deceptive language to convince doctors and the public that the vaccines were safe even when they, themselves, were unconvinced of safety.

    Dr. Philip Krause acknowledged this when he said: “… because it’s a discussion of how one communicates these issues and how the public will perceive them. But I’m not completely sure that we have a complete answer on the fundamental scientific question. So how can you communicate a scientific consensus that the product is safe unless we’re sure that you, the experts we are asking to advise us, are convinced that it’s safe?”

    FDA decided to hide information about their use of tumor cells and omit it from package inserts.

    Dr. Marion Gruber proposed this deception when he said: “The minute you describe something in the package insert in terms of potential clinical safety concerns, I think that really precludes using these cell substrates.”

    Dr. James Cook agreed to the deception when he said: “When it gets right down to what’s in the vial and what the patient is going to ask me about, whether it’s safe, I’m not going to say, well, you know, HeLa cells kill nude mice.”

    Dr. Robert Daum acknowledged the deception when he said: “I don’t know that our charge is to micromanage the package insert today. I think that’s a new discussion, with lots of issues that we haven’t really aired completely.”

    Health authorities were skeptical about safety of the tumor lines, but they decided to subject the public to the risk, so that they could perform a global population-wide live human experiment.

    Dr. Robert Daum agreed to conduct the mass human experiment with the following statement: “So I’m not sure that we can give a certainty there’s no risk — don’t worry about this … It’s sort of a brave new world. We’re all doing it together. But I think that you are doing a beautiful job.”

    FDA officials opted to toss the dice, perform the population-wide human experiment, and learn about the risks as time goes by.

    FDA officials even cast this experiment as a noble venture in the quest for scientific knowledge. Dr. Pamela McInnes made this stunning appeal to her colleagues: “… even though there are challenges [risks to humans] to using the new technologies, they have to be embraced and we have to continue to try to learn from them and struggle through that learning curve.”

    In the end, FDA decided to take the risks. The leader of the committee says, “I’m a vaccine guy,” then urged his cronies to approve.

    Dr. Robert Daum said: “I’m a vaccine guy. They are wonderful to prevent infectious diseases … I hope that I’m speaking for everybody when I say that’s the answer to your question. If not, please chime in now.”
    The committee formally approves the method of making vaccines from human cancer tumors.

    Dr. Robert Daum said: “To come back to the agency’s question of whether this committee believes it’s correct scientifically to go forward with the development of these vaccines, our answer is yes.”

    Prior to voting to go forward, the committee made the following conclusions:

    Making vaccines with cells that are directly derived from human cancer tumors is faster and cheaper than breeding animals for the culture media.
    Millions of potentially cancer-causing vaccines will be produced.
    The vaccines may possibly cause genetic mutations.
    Millions of dollars will be made by vaccine promoters.
    The health of millions of consumers may be jeopardized.
    Information about how vaccines are made will be hidden from doctors and consumers.
    This 2012 VRBPAC meeting perfectly illustrates the reckless, malevolent and murderous zeitgeist underlying the Pharma/HHS partnership. VRBPAC’s “devil-may-care” decision-making allowed pharmaceutical companies to use potentially cancerous fetal cells to make millions of vaccines.

    Since that meeting, vaccines containing cancerous cells and DNA strands from aborted fetuses have become pervasive among the 72 doses of vaccines that FDA has approved, and CDC “recommends” for American children. Today, the vaccines for chickenpox, MMR, hepatitis A and shingles contain fetal DNA.

    There is little chance of consequence to vaccine makers from making this reckless choice, and much potential benefit. The 1986 National Vaccine Injury Act makes pharmaceutical companies immune from negligence claims and from product defect lawsuits by injured plaintiffs. Since cancer takes years to develop, causation is virtually impossible for injured petitioners to prove in the Federal Vaccine Court where HHS is the defendant.

    Furthermore, by the time a tumor develops, the three-year statute of limitations for the vaccine injury has long expired. Pharma is therefore recklessly and pathologically bold about putting carcinogens in vaccines.

    Finally, it’s worth considering that cancer treatment drugs like Keytruda are among pharmaceutical companies’ largest profit makers. Precipitating a cancer epidemic in human populations only benefits vaccine makers’ bottom line.

    Remember, these are the same companies and the same FDA regulators that brought us the opioid epidemic."
    Last edited by onawah; 12th December 2020 at 19:31.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  18. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bassplayer1 (13th December 2020), Bill Ryan (12th December 2020), Constance (12th December 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (20th December 2020), graciousb (27th December 2020), Gwin Ru (18th December 2020), iota (23rd December 2020), janette (4th May 2021), Karen (Geophyz) (17th December 2020), Kryztian (12th December 2020), meat suit (12th December 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020), RunningDeer (12th December 2020), Sue (Ayt) (17th December 2020), Victoria (11th February 2021)

  19. Link to Post #10
    UK Avalon Member
    Join Date
    26th June 2018
    Posts
    328
    Thanks
    1,936
    Thanked 2,946 times in 326 posts

    Default Re: The many side effects of the Covid 'vaccine'

    A new video from Sayer Ji with vaccine facts and figures, speaking about informed consent.



    With the imminent deployment of millions of COVID vaccines in the US, the public is facing an unprecedented situation of uncertainty, fear, and possible adverse effects, which the FDA itself has acknowledged it will be watching out for. What is the public to do? Who do they turn to for accurate information as to risks and benefits? And what are the socio-economic, spiritual, health, and cultural implications of this plan for this country and the world at large? Join us for this important livestream as we dive deep into the situation in an effort to uphold your civil liberties and medical ethical principles of informed consent.

  20. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Trisher For This Post:

    Ba-ba-Ra (17th December 2020), Bassplayer1 (13th December 2020), Bill Ryan (13th December 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (20th December 2020), Gwin Ru (18th December 2020), janette (4th May 2021), Karen (Geophyz) (17th December 2020), onawah (15th December 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020), RunningDeer (13th December 2020), Victoria (11th February 2021), wondering (13th December 2020)

  21. Link to Post #11
    Ireland Avalon Member pueblo's Avatar
    Join Date
    5th February 2016
    Posts
    1,014
    Thanks
    5,480
    Thanked 7,083 times in 985 posts

    Default Re: The many side effects of the Covid 'vaccine'

    Quote Posted by Savannah (here)
    I'm in a bit of a panic. I was just informed Vaccines were coming to the staff at my State work place in 10 days! We don't know if it's going to be mandated yet. I wont take it and that might mean I get fired pretty soon. I don't want to get into too many personal details but at my age I wont start over again and I may loose my house. No matter what the price I wont take it. I don't believe the feds can mandate it but states can mandate it by association with work or travel. Business can refuse service without it. You cant attend college without certain vaccines already. Employers might not hire you with out your "vaccine pass"!
    You are not the only one.

    Stand strong.

    In my opinion there will be enough of us refusing this crap to form a considerable lobby that will not put up with being marginalised purely on the basis of refusing to take their poison vaccine.

  22. The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to pueblo For This Post:

    Ba-ba-Ra (17th December 2020), Bassplayer1 (13th December 2020), Bill Ryan (13th December 2020), Brigantia (13th December 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (20th December 2020), East Sun (29th April 2021), fifi (18th December 2020), George (16th January 2021), Gwin Ru (18th December 2020), iota (23rd December 2020), janette (4th May 2021), Karen (Geophyz) (17th December 2020), Miha (14th December 2020), onawah (15th December 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020), RunningDeer (13th December 2020), Sue (Ayt) (17th December 2020), Victoria (11th February 2021)

  23. Link to Post #12
    UK Avalon Member Brigantia's Avatar
    Join Date
    29th May 2019
    Location
    Near Chizzit Land
    Language
    English
    Posts
    416
    Thanks
    6,349
    Thanked 3,597 times in 412 posts

    Default Re: The many side effects of the Covid 'vaccine'

    Quote Posted by pueblo (here)
    Quote Posted by Savannah (here)
    I'm in a bit of a panic. I was just informed Vaccines were coming to the staff at my State work place in 10 days! We don't know if it's going to be mandated yet. I wont take it and that might mean I get fired pretty soon. I don't want to get into too many personal details but at my age I wont start over again and I may loose my house. No matter what the price I wont take it. I don't believe the feds can mandate it but states can mandate it by association with work or travel. Business can refuse service without it. You cant attend college without certain vaccines already. Employers might not hire you with out your "vaccine pass"!
    You are not the only one.

    Stand strong.

    In my opinion there will be enough of us refusing this crap to form a considerable lobby that will not put up with being marginalised purely on the basis of refusing to take their poison vaccine.
    Me too; whilst not in a health care role I'm in a public facing one, and wonder if I'll be able to work without one if this madness continues.

    I looked at the Human Rights Act to see if that prohibits forced medical procedures; there is a proviso though that the law doesn't apply in the case of a national health crisis (real or not). I wouldn't like to try my luck in persuading the courts that it's a scamdemic.

  24. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to Brigantia For This Post:

    Ba-ba-Ra (17th December 2020), Bassplayer1 (13th December 2020), Bill Ryan (13th December 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (20th December 2020), East Sun (29th April 2021), Gwin Ru (18th December 2020), iota (23rd December 2020), janette (4th May 2021), Karen (Geophyz) (17th December 2020), Miha (14th December 2020), onawah (15th December 2020), pueblo (13th December 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020), RunningDeer (13th December 2020), sunflower (14th December 2020), Victoria (11th February 2021)

  25. Link to Post #13
    Ireland Avalon Member pueblo's Avatar
    Join Date
    5th February 2016
    Posts
    1,014
    Thanks
    5,480
    Thanked 7,083 times in 985 posts

    Default Re: The many side effects of the Covid 'vaccine'

    This lady has no history of allergic reaction to anything....all to be expected....when you are trying to kill people.

    Quote Alaska health-care worker has severe allergic reaction to Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine

    Peter Weber
    Thu, December 17, 2020, 12:05 PM GMT

    A health-care worker in Juneau, Alaska, had a severe allergic reaction to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine Tuesday, the first such reaction in the nascent U.S. coronavirus inoculation effort, Alaska officials said Wednesday. The unidentified woman, described as middle-aged with no history of allergies, had an anaphylactic reaction about 10 minutes after getting the shot at Juneau's Bartlett Regional Hospital. She started flushing, a rash appearing on her face and torso, said Lindy Jones, the attending physician who treated the woman.

    "When she arrived at the emergency room she was feeling short of breath," Jones said. "She was not wheezy. Her heart rate was elevated." She responded to epinephrine, but then the symptoms reappeared, so she was monitored overnight in the intensive care unit. She has been discharged from the hospital.

    A second health-care worker experienced more mild symptoms at the same hospital on Wednesday — puffy eyes, lightheadedness, and a scratchy throat — 10 minutes after the shot. He was treated with epinephrine, Pepcid, and Benadryl, and was back to normal within an hour, the hospital said. Those were the only two adverse reactions out of 144 doses administered at the hospital as of Wednesday night, and Alaska health officials said they have no plans to modify the vaccination campaign.

    Federal health officials lauded Alaska for following guidelines advising that everyone inoculated with the new vaccine be monitored for 15 minutes, and anyone with a history of severe allergic reactions should stay under observation for 30 minutes after the injection. Pfizer did not report any allergic reactions in its large trial of the vaccine, but the company didn't allow people with histories of severe allergic reactions to participate in the trials. American doctors knew to look out for allergic reactions after two British health-care workers experienced them last week.
    https://news.yahoo.com/alaska-health...120539154.html

  26. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to pueblo For This Post:

    Ba-ba-Ra (17th December 2020), Bill Ryan (17th December 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (20th December 2020), fifi (18th December 2020), Gwin Ru (18th December 2020), janette (4th May 2021), Karen (Geophyz) (17th December 2020), onawah (22nd December 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020), RunningDeer (17th December 2020), Victoria (11th February 2021)

  27. Link to Post #14
    Ireland Avalon Member pueblo's Avatar
    Join Date
    5th February 2016
    Posts
    1,014
    Thanks
    5,480
    Thanked 7,083 times in 985 posts

    Default Re: The many side effects of the Covid 'vaccine'

    Even if she actually does have a vagal nerve 'condition' the optics on this are terrible...

    Edit: This is suspicious, if this lady did have this condition surely she would not have been chosen to do an interview shortly after receiving the vaccine, especially if she has a history of passing out from almost anything?.... Wouldn't they have looked hard to find someone with no history of allergies/vagal nerve problems or whatever?

    Tennessee nurse *passes out while talking about the COVID vaccine 10 minutes after receiving it



    Quote Critical care nurse Tiffany Dover at CHI Memorial Hospital in Chattanooga was having a lucid discussion with WRCBtv following her vaccination, when she became visibly impaired - holding her hand to her head and swaying. She then apologized to the news crew, turned away from the camera, and fainted.

    "Ten minutes after the shot, Dover became light-headed and passed out while speaking with us," the outlet reported.

    *She told WRCBtv that this is 'not an uncommon reaction for her,' explaining "I have a history of having an over-reactive vagal response, and so with that if I have pain from anything, hangnail or if I stub my toe, I can just pass out."

    The rest of the vaccinations reportedly went off without a hitch after the hospital received 975 doses.

    The Vagal response occurs when the vagus nerve is stimulated, setting off a chain of events within the body involving the central nervous system, peripheral nervous system and the cardiovascular system.
    https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/t...vid-19-vaccine
    Last edited by pueblo; 18th December 2020 at 09:57.

  28. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to pueblo For This Post:

    Alan (20th December 2020), Bill Ryan (18th December 2020), Chris Gilbert (20th December 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (20th December 2020), Gwin Ru (18th December 2020), janette (4th May 2021), onawah (22nd December 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020), RunningDeer (18th December 2020), Sue (Ayt) (19th December 2020), Victoria (11th February 2021)

  29. Link to Post #15
    United States Avalon Member RunningDeer's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th February 2012
    Location
    Forest Dweller
    Posts
    15,457
    Thanks
    109,341
    Thanked 136,381 times in 15,209 posts

    Default Re: The many side effects of the Covid 'vaccine'

    Apologies. Similar to post above. You're welcome to delete.

    Nurse Collapses on Television Minutes After Receiving Covid Vaccine (2:36 min)

    America’s frontline workers are now receiving the Covid vaccine, it was reported that 2 health care workers who received the experimental shot in Alaska experienced severe adverse events minutes after taking the experimental Covid shot.

    Both were admitted to the ER and one was transferred to the ICU after experiencing severe adverse events both are expected to survive. One of the health care workers had not history of allergies.

    This is similar to two health care workers who also experienced adverse events in the UK after receiving the experimental shot, prompting the government to issue a warning that pregnant women, children and people who have clergies to medicine, vaccines or food avoid the shot for now.

    Today health care workers at Memorial Hospital is a hospital located in Chattanooga, Tennessee. received the vaccine and about 10 minutes later, a nurse who reviewed the vaccine passed out on tv.

    The local media reported that the nurse did regain consciousness and appeared to be ok which is a good thing.

    But remember, this is an experimental vaccine that has not received official approval from government regulators. The Pfizer vaccine has only received EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) and the trials are still ongoing. So that makes this an experimental vaccine in my book and the public appears to be the guinea pigs.
    Last edited by RunningDeer; 18th December 2020 at 15:32.

  30. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to RunningDeer For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (18th December 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (20th December 2020), Gwin Ru (18th December 2020), iota (23rd December 2020), janette (4th May 2021), Miha (20th December 2020), onawah (22nd December 2020), pueblo (18th December 2020), Sue (Ayt) (19th December 2020), Victoria (11th February 2021)

  31. Link to Post #16
    Avalon Member norman's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Location
    too close to the hot air exhaust
    Age
    65
    Posts
    6,164
    Thanks
    8,532
    Thanked 33,303 times in 5,478 posts

    Default Re: The many side effects of the Covid 'vaccine'

    Alex Jones just said people are testing positive for HIV.

    I remember hearing that the virus was tweaked to have a chunk of the HIV trait but this looks like the vaccine is what makes it fully manifest.

    I wonder if the HIV trait includes distribution of whatever the vaccines's purpose is via sexual intercourse, even to people who have not had the injection.
    ..................................................my first language is TYPO..............................................

  32. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to norman For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (20th December 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (20th December 2020), iota (23rd December 2020), janette (4th May 2021), meat suit (19th December 2020), onawah (22nd December 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020), RunningDeer (18th December 2020), Victoria (11th February 2021)

  33. Link to Post #17
    United States Avalon Member RunningDeer's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th February 2012
    Location
    Forest Dweller
    Posts
    15,457
    Thanks
    109,341
    Thanked 136,381 times in 15,209 posts

    Default Re: The many side effects of the Covid 'vaccine'

    From Spiro Skouras: I’d like to make a correction to my last report. I misstated that this took place in Chicago. It was actually Chattanooga, Tennessee.

    Show Notes @ activistpost.com

    @ 11:57 - Fake injection. The plunger is compressed all the way down. The man was not injected with anything, and next is a trick retractable needle.



    Media Blackout: Moderna's FDA Report Lists 13 Total Deaths, 6 In Vaccine Group, 7 In Placebo (13 min)

    The Pfizer Covid vaccine is already being administered to the public in the UK and the first doses have been given in the US ahead of a mass vaccination campaign on a global scale.

    It is important to recognize that the Pfizer Covid vaccine has not been approved by the FDA. It has only received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) meaning the vaccine has not gone through the standard process to get official approval from the regulatory agency.

    Now Moderna’s experimental Covid vaccine is set to get the same Emergency Use Authorization allowing the shot to be distributed to millions of people.

    We have already witnessed short term adverse events (side effects) from the Pfizer vaccine. Truth is, nobody knows what the long term effects could be and it appears the public is being subjected to an experiment on a global scale.

    In this report, we examine discrepancies in the FDA Moderna report that was voted on by an advisory panel. The panel voted 20-0 recommending EUA.

    Some of the discrepancies include cherry picked trial participants to achieve the desired results to gain EUA. As well as 13 total deaths in the trials, 6 in the vaccinated group and 7 in the placebo. Something the media refuses to address.
    Last edited by RunningDeer; 19th December 2020 at 01:20.

  34. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to RunningDeer For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (20th December 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (20th December 2020), Gwin Ru (19th December 2020), iota (23rd December 2020), janette (4th May 2021), Jill (20th December 2020), Miha (20th December 2020), onawah (22nd December 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020), Victoria (11th February 2021)

  35. Link to Post #18
    Avalon Member Jill's Avatar
    Join Date
    31st January 2011
    Posts
    959
    Thanks
    4,970
    Thanked 7,611 times in 909 posts

    Default Re: The many side effects of the Covid 'vaccine'

    'If you Got Tested, You Got Vaccinated" (??)

    https://www.instagram.com/tv/CIjkFHc..._web_copy_link

  36. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Jill For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (20th December 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (20th December 2020), Gwin Ru (20th December 2020), iota (23rd December 2020), janette (4th May 2021), onawah (22nd December 2020), pueblo (20th December 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020), Victoria (11th February 2021)

  37. Link to Post #19
    Ireland Avalon Member pueblo's Avatar
    Join Date
    5th February 2016
    Posts
    1,014
    Thanks
    5,480
    Thanked 7,083 times in 985 posts

    Default Re: The many side effects of the Covid 'vaccine'

    Wow.

    "As of Friday afternoon, CDC had already learned of 3,150 people who'd received the vaccine had already been "unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, [or] required care from doctor or health care professional", figure supposedly represents about 1.5% of the 215,000 that have taken the 1st dose (Pg 6)"


    Anaphylaxis Following m-RNA COVID-19 Vaccine Receipt

    Thomas Clark, MD, MPH December 19, 2020

    https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/me...OVID-CLARK.pdf

  38. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to pueblo For This Post:

    Alan (20th December 2020), Bill Ryan (20th December 2020), graciousb (27th December 2020), Gwin Ru (20th December 2020), iota (23rd December 2020), janette (4th May 2021), Jill (20th December 2020), norman (20th December 2020), onawah (22nd December 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020)

  39. Link to Post #20
    Canada Avalon Member Ernie Nemeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th January 2011
    Location
    Toronto
    Age
    63
    Posts
    4,614
    Thanks
    19,602
    Thanked 27,560 times in 4,348 posts

    Default Re: The many side effects of the Covid 'vaccine'

    Here's the clue about the level of the actual science, and what part is just propaganda.

    They want us to accept that they know how to reprogram our DNA, but they do not know why some of us are having trouble with the vaccine.

    If they actually knew what they were doing they would first know why people get sick from a vaccine before they administer vaccines ad hoc to the populace. And their ignorance is so deep that the long term effects of the vaccination programs are ignored and blamed on other factors - again as if they know something that in fact they do not.

    The bigger the money, the less science and the more hype. Typical for this world.
    Empty your mind, be formless, shapeless — like water...Now water can flow or it can crash. Be water, my friend. Bruce Lee

  40. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Ernie Nemeth For This Post:

    Bassplayer1 (26th December 2020), Deborah (ahamkara) (3rd January 2021), Gwin Ru (20th December 2020), iota (23rd December 2020), janette (4th May 2021), Metaphor (20th December 2020), onawah (22nd December 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020), Victoria (11th February 2021), ZAINA (5th March 2021)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 10 1 10 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts