+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: The PCR Deception [New 12-24-2020 Documentary]

  1. Link to Post #1
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,787
    Thanks
    30,923
    Thanked 126,010 times in 20,884 posts

    Exclamation The PCR Deception [New 12-24-2020 Documentary]

    Full HD 1080p Quality Video for as long as Facebook allows this to be shown:



    The Conscious Resistance Network presents: The PCR Deception

    Researched, written, and narrated by Derrick Broze
    Edited by Becca Godwin

    Watch quality videos via: Minds / Flote / Odysee

    Synopsis:

    Reports are streaming in, declaring a Dark Winter for the world due to COVID19. The media rushes to tell the public that case numbers are on the rise again. In response, case numbers are used to support calls for lockdowns, travel and dining restrictions, and the push for compulsory vaccines.

    However, in recent months an abundance of evidence has shown that the “gold standard” procedure for detecting COVID-19 is unreliable and could be producing untold numbers of false positives. If this is the case, why are health officials around the world calling for more tests?

    This report is a brief look into the history of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedure and the evidence that PCR is unreliable and should not be used as a determinant for the number of COVID-19 cases or as a factor in political decisions. Please share with friends and family to keep them informed, and if someone shared this with you, please watch with an open mind.

    The PCR Deception

    In the months since the COVID-19 panic began health authorities around the world have encouraged the public to “get tested” to help track the spread of SARS-CoV-2, the strain of coronavirus that causes COVID19. However, as fear and hysteria subside, the scientific community and public at large are calling into question the efficacy of the test used to determine a patients status.

    The main test that is used to determine an individual status involves the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. This incredibly sensitive technique was developed by Berkeley scientist Kary Mullis, for which he was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1993. The PCR method amplifies a small segment of DNA hundreds of times to make it easier to analyze. For COVID19, a process known as Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is used to detect SARS-CoV-2 by amplifying the virus’ genetic material so it can be detected by scientists.

    PCR is sometimes described as a technique or process, but for simplicity we will refer to it as a test. PCR is viewed as the gold standard, however, it is not without problems. PCR amplifies a virus’s genetic material and then each sample goes through a number of cycles until a virus is recovered. This is known as the “cycle threshold” and has become a key component in the debate around the efficacy of the PCR test.

    In late August 2020, I attended a press conference in Houston, Texas to ask Houston Health Authority Dr. David Persse about concerns about PCR.

    Dr. Persse says that when the labs report numbers of COVID-19 cases to the City of Houston they only offer a binary option of “yes” for positive or “no” for negative. “But, in reality, it comes in what is called cycle-thresholds. It’s an inverse relationship, so the higher the number the less virus there was in the initial sample,” Persse explained. “Some labs will report out to 40 cycle-thresholds, and if they get a positive at 40 – which means there is a tiny, tiny, tiny amount of virus there – that gets reported to us as positive and we don’t know any different.”

    Persse noted that the key question is, at what value is someone considered still infectious?

    “Because if you test me and I have a tiny amount of virus, does that mean I am contagious? that I am still infectious to someone else? If you are shedding a little bit of virus are you just starting? or are you on the downside?.”

    He believes the answer is for the scientific community to set a national standard for cycle-threshold. Unfortunately, a national standard would not solve the problems expressed by Dr. Persse.

    UK Parliament and Scientists Have Concerns About PCR Test

    In the first weeks of September 2020 a number of important revelations regarding PCR came to light. First, new research from the University of Oxford’s Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and the University of the West of England found that the PCR test poses the potential for false positives when testing for COVID-19. Professor Carl Heneghan, one of the authors of the study said there was a risk that an increase in testing in the UK will lead to an increase in the risk of “sample contamination” and thus an increase in COVID-19 cases.

    The team reviewed evidence from 25 studies where virus specimens had positive PCR tests. The researchers state that the “genetic photocopying” technique scientists use to magnify the sample of genetic material collected is so sensitive it could be picking up fragments of dead virus from previous infections. The researchers reach a similar conclusion as Dr. David Persse, specifically they state:

    “A binary Yes/No approach to the interpretation RT-PCR unvalidated against viral culture will result in false positives with segregation of large numbers of people who are no longer infectious and hence not a threat to public health.”

    Heneghan, who is also the the editor of BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, told the BBC that the binary approach is a problem and tests should have a cut-off point so small amounts of virus do not lead to a positive result. This is because of the cycle threshold mentioned by Dr. Persse. A person who is shedding an active virus and someone who has leftover infection could both receive the same positive test result. Heneghan also stated that the test could be detecting old virus which would explain the rise in cases in the UK and said setting a standard for the cycle threshold would eliminate the quarantining and contact tracing of people who are healthy and help the public better understand the true nature of COVID-19.


    Prof. Carl Heneghan on The PCR Test (House of Commons Science & Tech Committee, 17 Sep, 2020)

    backup video:
    Prof. Carl Heneghan on The PCR Test (House of Commons Science & Tech Committee, 17 Sep, 2020)


    Shortly after Heneghan’s criticisms the UK’s leading health agency, Public Health England, released an update on the testing methods used to detect COVID-19 and appeared to agree with Professor Heneghan regarding the concerns on the cycle threshold. On September 9, 2020, PHE released an update which concluded, “all laboratories should determine the threshold for a positive result at the limit of detection.”

    This is not the first time Heneghan’s work has directly impacted the UK’s COVID-19 policies. In July 2020, UK health secretary Matt Hancock called for an “urgent review” of the daily COVID-19 death numbers produced by Public Health England after it was revealed the stats included people who died from other causes. The Guardian reported that Professor Heneghan and a fellow scientist released a paper showing that if someone dies after having tested positive for COVID-19, their death is recorded in the COVID-19 death statistics. A source in the Department of Health and Social Care told The Guadian, “You could have been tested positive in February, have no symptoms, then hit by a bus in July and you’d be recorded as a COVID death.’”

    Heneghan also recently told the BMJ , “one issue in trying to interpret numbers of detected cases is that there is no set definition of a case. At the moment it seems that a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positive result is the only criterion required for a case to be recognised.”

    “In any other disease we would have a clearly defined specification that would usually involve signs, symptoms, and a test result. We are moving into a biotech world where the norms of clinical reasoning are going out of the window. A PCR test does not equal covid-19; it should not, but in some definitions it does.”

    Heneghan says he is concerned that as soon as there is the appearance of an outbreak there is panic and over-reacting. “This is a huge problem because politicians are operating in a non-evidence-based way when it comes to non-drug interventions,” he stated.

    Heneghan is correct that the scientific authorities ought to take false positives seriously, especially when a person can be sent to isolate or quarantine for weeks due to a positive test result. Even the U.S. FDA’s own fact sheet on testing acknowledges the dangers posed by false positives:

    “ in the event of a false positive result, risks to patients could include the following: a recommendation for isolation of the patient…. unnecessary prescription of a treatment or therapy, or other unintended adverse effects.”

    A CDC fact sheet also acknowledges the possibility of false positives with the PCR test.

    Professor Heneghan believes the confusion around COVID-19 has come as a result of a shift away from “evidence-based medicine.” In a recent opinion piece published at The Spectator, Heneghan wrote that patients have become a “prisoner of a system labelling him or her as ‘positive’ when we are not sure what that label means.” He warns:

    “Governments are producing a series of contradictory and confusing policies which have a brief shelf life as the next crisis emerges. It is increasingly clear the evidence is often ignored. Keeping up to date is a full time occupation.”

    More evidence for the unreliability of PCR came on November 11, 2020, when the Lisbon Court of Appeal ruled that PCR ““in view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.”

    The decision relates to an appeal by the Regional Health Administration of the Azores,Portugal which forced four German citizens to comply with a 14 day quarantine in a hotel room. After the four citizens appealed the decision, the panel of judges concluded that “the number of cycles of such amplification results in a greater or lesser reliability of such tests. And the problem is that this reliability shows itself, in terms of scientific evidence (…) as more than debatable.”

    The ruling was criticized by some scientists in Portugal and has been completely ignored by the United States media and politcians.

    More recently, On December 3, 2020, the Florida Department of Health announced a new update requiring all laboratories conducting COVID-19 tests to record new details for the PCR test.

    The update notes that all Florida “laboratories are subject to mandatory reporting to the Florida Department of Health (FDOH),” including for “PCR, other RNA, antigen and antibody results.” The update adds new requirements for the PCR test, asking labs to record the “cycle threshold” (CT) values for the process. The FDOH document states:

    “Cycle threshold (CT) values and their reference ranges, as applicable, must be reported by laboratories to FDOH via electronic laboratory reporting or by fax immediately.”

    On December 14, the World Health Organization (WHO) posted a notice on their website warning that PCR may not be entirely accurate for detecting SARS-CoV-2. The WHO memo admits that using too high of a cycle threshold will likely result in false positives.

    “Users of RT-PCR reagents should read the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is necessary to account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold (Ct) value result being interpreted as a positive result.”

    “The design principle of RT-PCR means that for patients with high levels of circulating virus (viral load), relatively few cycles will be needed to detect virus and so the Ct value will be low. Conversely, when specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.”

    The fact that the Florida Department of Health and the WHO is taking this step is another sign that an increasing number of health professionals and regulators are questioning the accuracy of PCR. Unfortunately, both of these stories have been ignored by the mainstream media.

    As noted earlier, this incredibly sensitive technique was developed by Berkeley scientist Kary Mullis, for which he was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1993. By the mid-90’s, Mullis had become skeptical that PCR was able to detect HIV and made several statements towards the end of his life indicating that he believed the technique was being improperly used by researchers.

    As we approach 2021 the public is being told that a Dark Winter is waiting, with governments and media predicting a rise in cases and deaths. However, it’s important that we pause to acknowledge the many concerns surrounding the PCR test before international health authorities crash the economy, send millions into poverty, and threaten civil liberties. We must help the public understand the limitations of the PCR test and the dangers of resting public health policy on such a flawed process.

    Finally, we must also hold accountable those who continue to promote PCR and refuse to answer these questions or even acknowledge these concerns. We cannot ignore the disastrous results produced by policymakers who failed to heed warnings about PCR.

    Thank you for watching. Please share this video with your friends and family.
    You can also support Derrick Broze via:




    backup video:


    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/hefpyVOWOSt7


    related:

    🌐 TheGreatReset
    🌐 The-Covid-Cult
    🌐 BillGatesTyranny
    🌐 Face-It-Not-Fake-It
    🌐 Risist-Tyranny-2020-2030
    🌐 Mass-AI-Surveillance-State
    🌐 War-on-Independent-Media
    🌐 7ConspiracyTheories-BecameReal
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 25th December 2020 at 11:20.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  2. The Following 33 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    aeclipse2300 (10th February 2021), angelfire (24th December 2020), Bill Ryan (24th December 2020), Brenya (24th December 2020), Bubu (26th May 2021), daddy-keith (25th December 2020), Ewan (25th December 2020), Franny (25th December 2020), haroldsails (24th December 2020), Heart to heart (22nd June 2021), heretogrow (15th August 2021), Hym (13th January 2021), Ioneo (25th December 2020), Lefty Dave (25th December 2020), Mercedes (15th January 2021), norman (24th December 2020), palehorse (24th December 2020), pueblo (25th December 2020), ramus (24th December 2020), Rawhide68 (25th December 2020), Sadieblue (24th December 2020), Samson (24th December 2020), Satori (24th December 2020), Savannah (24th December 2020), Sunny-side-up (8th February 2021), Sunray (24th December 2020), Tintin (7th February 2021), TomKat (25th December 2020), toppy (24th December 2020), TravelerJim (9th February 2021), uzn (9th February 2021), wondering (24th December 2020), Yvanka (24th December 2020)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Avalon Member palehorse's Avatar
    Join Date
    13th April 2020
    Location
    Gaia
    Language
    English
    Age
    46
    Posts
    1,634
    Thanks
    12,046
    Thanked 11,436 times in 1,576 posts

    Default Re: The PCR Deception [New 12-24-2020 Documentary]

    News from a week ago, things are getting worse by the day.. M.D. friend in Brazil is saying doctors feels like slaves with no voice and no way to express their opinions and discoveries, the state is imposing and demanding their absolute silence. Those who are breaking the silence are been prosecuted right now.

    Supreme Court: COVID-19 vaccination may be mandatory in Brazil

    https://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/en/...ndatory-brazil
    --
    A chaos to the sense, a Kosmos to the reason.

  4. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to palehorse For This Post:

    angelfire (24th December 2020), Bill Ryan (8th February 2021), Bubu (26th May 2021), ByTheNorthernSea (24th December 2020), daddy-keith (25th December 2020), Ewan (25th December 2020), ExomatrixTV (24th December 2020), Franny (25th December 2020), greybeard (24th December 2020), haroldsails (24th December 2020), Hym (13th January 2021), Mercedes (24th December 2020), toppy (24th December 2020), uzn (9th February 2021), wondering (24th December 2020), Yvanka (24th December 2020)

  5. Link to Post #3
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,787
    Thanks
    30,923
    Thanked 126,010 times in 20,884 posts

    Default Re: The PCR Deception [New 12-24-2020 Documentary]

    There are currently 103 users browsing this thread. (8 members and 95 guests)
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  6. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (8th February 2021), Bubu (26th May 2021), daddy-keith (25th December 2020), Franny (25th December 2020), Hym (13th January 2021), palehorse (25th December 2020)

  7. Link to Post #4
    United States Avalon Member wondering's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th January 2016
    Age
    81
    Posts
    917
    Thanks
    46,205
    Thanked 10,141 times in 908 posts

    Default Re: The PCR Deception [New 12-24-2020 Documentary]

    Based on what is happening in Brazil, does anyone have a sense of where this is going to end? I am so beyond appalled....😱 And is this what awaits other countries as well? What are our options, this is what I keep asking myself?

  8. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to wondering For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (8th February 2021), Bubu (26th May 2021), ByTheNorthernSea (24th December 2020), daddy-keith (25th December 2020), ExomatrixTV (24th December 2020), Franny (25th December 2020), Hym (13th January 2021), Mercedes (24th December 2020), palehorse (25th December 2020)

  9. Link to Post #5
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,787
    Thanks
    30,923
    Thanked 126,010 times in 20,884 posts

    Default Re: The PCR Deception [New 12-24-2020 Documentary]

    Question:

    How would you rate this "PCR Deception" (Mini) Documentary out of Zero to 10 scale?

    give an overall rating about:
    • sources
    • accuracy
    • relevance
    • coherence
    • pace narration
    • is it informative?
    • educational level
    • presentation/visuals
    • quality video-editing
    • "to the point" summary?
    • does it help raise awareness?
    • do you recommend others to watch it?
    • etc. etc.
    I give it a 9,5/10 overall rating! ... Exceeds all productions made by Mainstream Media last 9 months and MSM have millions of dollars budget at their disposal, go figure.

    cheers,
    John
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 24th December 2020 at 21:51.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  10. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (8th February 2021), Bubu (26th May 2021), daddy-keith (25th December 2020), Franny (25th December 2020), Hym (13th January 2021), Mercedes (24th December 2020), palehorse (25th December 2020), wondering (24th December 2020)

  11. Link to Post #6
    Sweden Avalon Member Rawhide68's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th May 2017
    Age
    55
    Posts
    695
    Thanks
    2,049
    Thanked 4,294 times in 640 posts

    Smile Re: The PCR Deception [New 12-24-2020 Documentary]

    Many thanks!

    It's already 4 in the morning, and I forgot about Xmas (In Nordic countries we celebrate Xmas 24th's don't ask me why maybe a subject for another forum). Merry Christmas!


    To add to this forum subject I watched a clip from a South African podcaster (Jerm Warfare) interviewing a Thai-born virologist, born in the USA, but living in Germany Prof Sucharit Bhakdi.
    It's to be found here

    https://jermdraws.com/blog/prof-such...facts-and-lies


    Another one with well known Dr Judy Mikovits

    https://jermdraws.com/blog/dr-judy-mikovits



    PS: If you haven't yet seen James Corbett's latest clip about this matter, wich I take for granted, it's a must see!!!






    DS
    Last edited by Rawhide68; 25th December 2020 at 04:09.

  12. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Rawhide68 For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (8th February 2021), daddy-keith (25th December 2020), Ewan (25th December 2020), ExomatrixTV (25th December 2020), Hym (13th January 2021), Mike Gorman (25th December 2020), palehorse (25th December 2020), toppy (26th December 2020)

  13. Link to Post #7
    Avalon Member palehorse's Avatar
    Join Date
    13th April 2020
    Location
    Gaia
    Language
    English
    Age
    46
    Posts
    1,634
    Thanks
    12,046
    Thanked 11,436 times in 1,576 posts

    Default Re: The PCR Deception [New 12-24-2020 Documentary]

    Quote Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)
    Question:

    How would you rate this "PCR Deception" (Mini) Documentary out of Zero to 10 scale?

    give an overall rating about:
    • sources
    • accuracy
    • relevance
    • coherence
    • pace narration
    • is it informative?
    • educational level
    • presentation/visuals
    • quality video-editing
    • "to the point" summary?
    • does it help raise awareness?
    • do you recommend others to watch it?
    • etc. etc.
    I give it a 9,5/10 overall rating! ... Exceeds all productions made by Mainstream Media last 9 months and MSM have millions of dollars budget at their disposal, go figure.

    cheers,
    John
    John, thanks for sharing it, the footage in the very beginning I watched before somewhere else, even the creator of PCR test says it not suitable for test corona viruses, well what else can we say about.

    Anyway this whole bull**** is the biggest lie ever, the majority of people do not realize what is going on, they are in fear and begging for vaccines because their mindset was trained that vaccines works and is a solution for any decease. Poor fellas.

    I rate the video as 8.5, the content seems to be very accurate.

    One thing that I would like to point out regards the video production and not the data.. Why all video producers add some sound/music (creepy/scary music) in the background? It is supposed to educate/inform and not to entertain, am I right?


    Quote Posted by Rawhide68 (here)
    To add to this forum subject I watched a clip from a South African podcaster (Jerm Warfare) interviewing a Thai-born virologist, born in the USA, but living in Germany Prof Sucharit Bhakdi.
    It's to be found here

    https://jermdraws.com/blog/prof-such...facts-and-lies
    Kudos for Thai professor, great interview.

    By the way going a little off-topic here sorry:

    The Thai government officially saying the phase II is upon us, Bangkok and another 16 provinces are in lockdown now, here where I am living there is a YELLOW warning it was released few days ago, it may go into lockdown as well if new cases appears.
    They are saying this time even restaurants will be forced to close, that means thousands of people in the whole country out of job!
    The seafood market in Samut Sakorn (Bangkok Surroundings) was the start of this second phase of infections, country Laos announced days ago to halt ALL imported seafood from Thailand, they say the shrimps got viruses as well!!!

    The insults to our intelligence is just absurdly unacceptable, what the hell is going on my friends?
    By the way my Kunais, Tantos and the Katana are all very sharp by now, I won't hesitate to use.

    Back to topic

    Thanks for videos folks all very good info.
    Last edited by palehorse; 25th December 2020 at 07:22.
    --
    A chaos to the sense, a Kosmos to the reason.

  14. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to palehorse For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (8th February 2021), daddy-keith (25th December 2020), Ewan (25th December 2020), ExomatrixTV (25th December 2020), Hym (13th January 2021), Rawhide68 (25th December 2020), Reinhard (14th August 2021)

  15. Link to Post #8
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,787
    Thanks
    30,923
    Thanked 126,010 times in 20,884 posts

    Lightbulb Re: The PCR Deception [New 12-24-2020 Documentary]

    • The Truth About PCR Tests
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  16. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (8th February 2021), Hym (13th January 2021), palehorse (27th January 2021), Reinhard (14th August 2021), the_real_dave-id (14th January 2021)

  17. Link to Post #9
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,787
    Thanks
    30,923
    Thanked 126,010 times in 20,884 posts

    Default Re: The PCR Deception [New 12-24-2020 Documentary]

    • Prof Carl Heneghan: can we trust Covid-19 death numbers?

    Professor Carl Heneghan is Director of the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford University, and has been paying close attention to the Covid-19 statistics. In a post yesterday evening he revealed an extraordinary detail: the Public Health England daily death totals announced to the media include anyone who has ever tested positive for Covid-19 — even if they recovered completely.

    Earlier this week we completed a wide-ranging interview with Professor Heneghan and his CEBM colleague Tom Jefferson on the current state of the Covid-19 pandemic, which we’ll be publishing shortly.

    But I caught up with Prof Heneghan this morning just to hear more about this latest development. Have a watch.
    Key quotes:
    • There was “massive confusion” about different Covid data between England’s health bodies. “Public Health England figures are about double the ONS figures because PHE are reporting anybody who has had a positive Covid death in the past… This will get increasingly confusing as we go into the next Winter because there could be a new outbreak and new deaths while also still reporting on historical deaths… This is a problem for epidemiologists and media… ”
    • Even a “28 period cut-off is still not ideal for accurate death numbers because there is “immediate cause and underlying cause… Immediate cause means you’ve had Covid within 21 days but outside of that, it becomes the underlying cause — something that contributed to your death but wasn’t a direct cause. A 21 day cut-off would be helpful because it gives a clearer understanding of that distinction”
    • “We follow excess deaths which is the most accurate information about what’s going on at that moment, but it can’t tell you what those deaths are caused by” (i.e. people not coming forward with heart attacks etc)
    • “There’s an important distinction between lives lost and life years lost. One of the things we’ll be watching very closely over the next six months is how many people would have actually died in the next six months… That’s where the excess deaths really matter. If we start to see it trend significantly under for the next few months, we’ll start to come forward with information that suggests there was a group of vulnerable people that any respiratory infection would have shortened their life.”
    • “In the media you’ll always hear about catastrophe and the consequences of that. One of the things we notice is that when you don’t hear anything that usually means there’s good news happening. So when Sweden looks worse you hear about it but when it’s not so bad, like now, you never see it in the media.”
    source
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  18. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (8th February 2021), Reinhard (14th August 2021), Tintin (7th February 2021)

  19. Link to Post #10
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,787
    Thanks
    30,923
    Thanked 126,010 times in 20,884 posts

    Default Re: The PCR Deception [New 12-24-2020 Documentary]

    • Oxford Epidemiologists: Suppression Strategy is Not Viable:


    Yesterday we published a short interview with Professor Carl Heneghan about his extraordinary finding that the Public Health England daily death totals included anyone who has ever tested positive for Covid-19 (even if they recovered completely).

    But we wanted to learn more about the current state of the pandemic and the direction it was headed. Joining Freddie Sayers was Prof Heneghan and his Centre for Evidence Based Medicine colleague Tom Jefferson who shared their thoughts in this wide-ranging discussion. Have a watch above, key quotes below…

    On masks:
    • Tom Jefferson: “Aside from people who are exposed on the frontlines, there is no evidence that masks make any difference, but what’s even more extraordinary is the uncertainty: we don’t know if these things make any difference…. We should have done randomised control trials in February, March and April but not anymore because viral circulation is low and we will need huge number of enrolees to show whether there was any difference”.
    • Carl Heneghan: “By all means people can wear masks but they can’t say it’s an evidence-based decision… there is a real separation between an evidence-based decision and the opaque term that ‘we are being led by the science’, which isn’t the evidence”.
    On the life cycle of the pandemic:
    • CH: “One of the keys of the infection is to look at who’s been infected, which shows a crucial difference when comparing the pandemic theory to seasonal theory. In a pandemic you’d expect to see young people disproportionately affected, but in the UK we’ve only had six child deaths, which is far less than we’d normally see in a pandemic. The high number of deaths with over-75s fits with the seasonal theory”.
    On Covid seasonality:
    • CH: “The stability of the virus is far less when the temperature goes up but humidity seems to be particularly important. The lower the humidity, the more stable the virus is in the atmosphere and on surfaces… It’s now winter in the southern hemisphere, which is why places like Australia are suddenly having outbreaks.”
    On lockdown:
    • CH: “Many people said that we should have locked down earlier, but 50% of care homes developed outbreaks during the lockdown period so there are issues within the transmission of this virus that are not clear… Lockdown is a blunt tool and there needs to be intelligent conversations about what mitigation strategies can keep society functioning while we keep the most vulnerable shielded”.
    On Nightingale hospitals:
    • CH: “They are the wrong structure. What you need is fever hospitals which were here until around the 1980s or 90s. They were on single floors and had isolation within isolation. Theere were no lift shafts and staff were trained, which meant that everyone was protected from each other… It looks like at leats 20% of people got the infection while they were in hospital”
    On suppression strategy:
    • CH: “The benefits of the current strategy are outweighed by the harms…When it comes to suppression, only the virus will have a determination in that. If you follow the New Zealand policy of suppressing it to zero and locking down the country forever, then you’re going to have a problem… This virus is so out there now, I cannot see a strategy that makes suppression the viable option. The strategy right now should be how we learn to live with this virus”
    On the response to the virus:
    • TJ: “I am a survivor of four pandemics and for the other three, I didn’t even realise they were going on. People died but nothing changed and none of the fabric of society was eroded like this response… Do I see steps being taken at a European level about learning from our mistakes and changing policies? The answer is no…
    On the politics of the virus:
    • CH: “We as individuals are part of the problem because sensationalism drives people to click and read the information. So it’s a big circle because we’ve created the problem — if we put the worst case scenario out there, we will go and have a look. If you want a solution, you’ve got to get people to stop clicking on this sensationalist stuff”.
    On IFR:
    • CH: “We will be down about where we were with the swine flu: around 0.1-0.3% which is much lower than what we think because at the moment we are seeing the case fatality”.
    • TJ: “If you look at the whole narrative, it was distorted from the very beginning by the obsession with influenza which was just one or two agents and nothing else existed. We’re no different now”.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  20. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (8th February 2021), Franny (8th February 2021), Hym (8th February 2021), Reinhard (14th August 2021)

  21. Link to Post #11
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,787
    Thanks
    30,923
    Thanked 126,010 times in 20,884 posts

    Default Re: The PCR Deception [New 12-24-2020 Documentary]


    source
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  22. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (8th February 2021), Franny (8th February 2021), Hym (8th February 2021), wondering (8th February 2021)

  23. Link to Post #12
    Croatia Administrator Franny's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd January 2011
    Location
    Island Time
    Posts
    3,135
    Thanks
    53,141
    Thanked 14,317 times in 2,099 posts

    Default Re: The PCR Deception [New 12-24-2020 Documentary]

    A post from Dr Rashid Buttar on the PCR that uses the long swab that goes all the way up the the thin, porous bone called Cribriform Plate, between the sinus and brain, and twists the swab against the bone several times.

    Scroll down to Part 1 of 3 PCR Test Danger to open the video, then click on the lower right side to expand it to full screen. You will have to sign up for the platform using an email and password - it's worth it.

    This is something I suspected about the PCR that concerned me enough to decide not to get it done. It just did not seem necessary or right to go nearly to the brain to get a viral sample when they could collect the sample in the nose or mouth. Now it seems we may have the answer.


    Part 1 of 3 PCR Test
    A million galaxies are a little foam on that shoreless sea. ~ Rumi

  24. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Franny For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (8th February 2021), Constance (8th February 2021), Hym (8th February 2021), Reinhard (14th August 2021), Sue (Ayt) (8th February 2021)

  25. Link to Post #13
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,787
    Thanks
    30,923
    Thanked 126,010 times in 20,884 posts

    Default Re: The PCR Deception [New 12-24-2020 Documentary]

    • PCR Pandemic: Interview with Virus Mania's Dr Claus Köhnlein

    Dr Sam talks to Dr Claus Köhnlein (Co-Author, ‘Virus Mania’ ) about everything Covid-19. Diving deep into the reasons for excess mortality, Covid-19 PCR testing, parallels with the HIV epidemic, why coronavirus vaccines are being promoted and much more.



    Review of the book Virus Mania
    Brane Žilavec, 21st December 2020

    Torsten Engelbrecht & Claus Köhnlein, MD
    Virus Mania, 2020

    This is the second, extended edition of the book that was first published in 2007. Its subtitle ‘How the Medical Industry Continually Invents Epidemics, Making Billion-Dollar Profits at Our Expense’, reveals the main aim of authors – one journalist and one medical specialist of internal diseases – to conduct an independent investigation of available scientific evidence about the topic of epidemics. The first two chapters cover a short history of the development of the theory of microbes as agents of diseases established by Louis Pasteur (1822-1895) in France and Robert Koch (1843-1910) in Germany in contradistinction of scientists, such as Claude Bernard (1813-1878) who, like Rudolf Steiner (1861-1925), were pointing attention to the conditions of the terrain (in a person’s body) that enable the multiplication of germs.

    Seeing microbes as the enemies of humanity goes back to Pasteur’s belief that microbes could not be found in a healthy body and that microbes ‘flying through the air on dust particles’ must be responsible for all possible diseases. This view had led him to the conviction that “it must lie within human power to eliminate all diseases caused by parasites from the face of the Earth.”

    The notes of Pasteur’s experiments were not available to the public until the late 20th century, when it was discovered that his experiments paving the way for the prevalent theory of microbes as agents of diseases did not satisfy basic scientific standards. Concerning Koch, we learn about his involvement in the first large scale vaccination fraud with his alleged ‘miracle drug’, Tuberkulin, aimed at people suffering with pulmonary tuberculosis. As this drug contained just a bacillus culture killed by heat, it did not help, on the contrary, many experienced dramatic adverse reactions, such as chills, high fever, and even death.

    However, these inaccuracies and misconducts of pioneers of microbiology did not prevent ‘microbe hunters’ and ‘virus hunters’– as they are named by authors of the book – rising to power inside the medical establishment. The dogma of a single cause for disease was decisively shaped by microbiology at the end of the 19th century, declaring specific microorganisms (viruses, bacteria, fungi) to be the causes of very definite diseases. With this microbe theory the cornerstone was laid for the basic formula of modern biomedicine: one disease - one cause - one cure/miracle pill/vaccine. This simplified formula was embraced and supported with a lot of money by then relatively young pharmaceutical industry; and due to ongoing media’s propaganda – presenting germs and viruses as deadly enemies of humanity – it gradually became deeply entrenched in the collective consciousness.

    The further chapters are dedicated to detailed descriptions of events and main actors that have collaborated at the emergence of epidemic of AIDS, hepatitis C, BSE (mad cow disease), SARS, avian flu, cervical cancer, swine flu, measles, and corona/Covid-19. [1] While reading through them one can start to recognize underlying approaches and the use of methods that have been enabling the recurring ‘inventions’ and propagation of ever-new epidemics.

    One method is glossing over the clear lack of sound scientific evidence for the main claims of the virus hunters. For example, any claim of the existence of so-called ‘killer viruses’ must first be proven. But so far in all epidemics that are surveyed in the book “scientifically-sound evidence has never been provided, even though it’s as easy as taking a sample of patient blood and isolating one of these viruses, in a purified form with its complete genetic material (genome) and virus shell, directly from it, and then imaging it with an electron microscope.” Instead of these verifiable steps we have databases of genetic structures of supposed viruses and indirect ‘proofs’ of their existence by means of antibody tests and PCR (polymerase chain reaction) tests. But antibody tests just prove the existence of antibod­ies – and not the virus or particle itself to which the antibody tests react. That means that “as long as the virus or cell particle (antigen) has not been precisely defined, no one can say what these antibody tests are reacting to; they are thus ‘unspecific’ in medical lingo.”

    The same problem occurs with PCR testing that is used to track down genetic sequences (short DNA or RNA pieces) that are typical for specific virus. Without the complete cleaning (purification/isolation) of particles which is an indispensable pre-requisite for detection of a virus, it cannot be known which specific virus we are dealing with, or if it is a virus at all. For example, in the case of the corona pandemic it cannot be concluded that the RNA gene sequences ‘pulled’ from the swabs and calibrated to the PCR tests belong to a very specific virus, to SARS-CoV-2. It could be any virus from the corona family, or even new non-viral gene sequences created by cells due to various chemical shocks.

    The authors have asked the World Health Organization, the American Center for Disease Control, and its German counterpart, the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin, the following three questions:
    • “Please name the studies that indisputably show that the SARS, hep­atitis C, Ebola, smallpox and polio viruses and the BSE causative agent have been proven to exist (complete purification, isolation and definition of biochemical properties plus electron micrographs).
    • Please name studies that indisputably show that the viruses named above cause disease (and also that other factors like malnutrition, toxins, etc. do not at least co-determine the course of disease).
    • Please name at least two studies that indisputably show that vaccinations are effective and active.”
    And despite repeated questioning they haven’t received any answer. This reveals that scientific studies supporting proclamations of the above listed epidemics in the last decades don’t exist. The same is true in regard to the present corona pandemic.
    Another approach that enable constant invention of epidemics is an unwillingness to investigate any other causative factors that contribute to emergence of infectious diseases, in spite of the fact that “it is also conceivable that toxic drugs like poppers (recreational drugs commonly used by homosexuals), or immunosuppressive medications like antibiotics and antivirals could trigger what is called oxidative stress.

    This means that the blood’s ability to transport oxygen, so important for the life and survival of cells, is compromised. Simultaneously, nitric oxides are produced, which can severely damage cells. As a result, antibody production is ‘stirred up,’ which in turn causes the antibody tests to come out positive. Also, new genetic sequences are generated through this, which are then picked up by the PCR tests – all this, mind you, without a pathogenic virus” entering from outside.

    An illustrative example of ignorance of other causative factors is the historical link of the polio epidemic in the USA with the use of pesticides, among which was the widespread use of DDT: spraying it over fields, countryside and swamps (against mosquitoes); disinfecting flocks of animals (against parasites), and immigrants and children (against lice). There were even advertisements enthusiastically proclaiming DDT as being “good for you,” “harmless,” and a “miracle substance”. However, already at that time there were medical experts providing sound evidence that “toxins like pesticides such as DDT produce the paralysis symptoms so typical of polio.”


    One expert has revealed that “when in 1945 DDT was released for use by the general public in the US and other countries, an impressive body of toxicological investigations had already shown beyond doubt that this compound was dangerous for all animal life, from insects to mammals.” This expert concluded that “the spread of polio after the Second World War was caused by the most intensive campaign of mass poisoning in known human history.” This campaign has been finally halted only due to the impact of Rachel Carson’s book Silent Spring, published in 1962, although it took another ten years before the US government prohibited use of DDT.


    In the book authors analyze in great detail numerous possi­ble causes of so called infectious illnesses such as pharmaceuticals, lifestyle drugs, pesticides, heavy metals, pollution, stress and processed (and genetically modified) foods. [2] They point out that all of these impacts can heavily damage the body of humans and animals and even kill them.

    The third practice we can find in the descriptions of various invented epidemics is the rife corruption at all levels of the public health services that enable the pharmaceutical companies and researchers to make enormous profits. This would not be possible if the present scientific culture were not ruled by secretiveness, privilege-granting, lack of accountability, and by blatant lack of monitoring. Without this the virus hunters could not scare people by ‘deadly viruses’ and hide from them “very basic scientific facts that the existence, the pathogenicity and the deadly effects of viruses have never been proven.” And such acknowledgment would then open the door to investigate another possibility that the alleged con­tagious viruses could be particles produced by the cells themselves as a consequence of certain stress factors such as environmental toxins and drugs. This option is mentioned a few times in the book (including various quoted authors) and would, in my opinion, demand more attention and research.
    The verdict of authors in regard to the present ‘total corona mania’ (designation by authors) is that “it is impossible to conclude that only what is called SARS-CoV-2 can be considered as the cause of the symptoms in patients who have the ‘Covid-19’ label attached.” For such conclusion would be possible only:
    • if there are unmistakable specific symptoms for Covid-19 disease;
    • if it is clinically possible to differentiate pathogens;
    • if one has evidence that SARS-CoV-2 is an exceptional hazard;
    • and if there were no evidence that other “factors such as industrial poisons and various drugs such as antipsychotics, opioid analgesics, anticholinergics or even antidepressants may be a cause of severe respiratory diseases such as pneumonia and thus also of Covid-19.”
    As none of these conditions are fulfilled we must arrive at the conclusion that we are dealing with new case of invented pandemic.
    One of the authors, doctor Köhnlein, has his own medical practice where he also treats hepatitis C and AIDS patients, who are sceptical of mainstream treatments, and offers some basic guidelines about “side effect-free alternatives to medications and vaccinations.” According to him the best way to combat infectious diseases is to detoxify our body as much as possible and to strengthen one’s own immune system by the consumption of natural, enzyme rich foods (such as fresh fruit and vegetables), by replacing refined foods with natural wholefoods and by developing a more holistic view of health instead of ‘pill-popping’. Although these insights are mentioned only very briefly in a few places they are important part of the book. [3]
    The epilogue of the current edition describes the case of celebrity endorsement [4] of the new AIDS industry by movie star Rock Hudson, who was diagnosed as having AIDS just three years after the “discovery of the first cluster of symptomatic patients” [5] in the US. In 1985 Hudson publicly announced that he was dying of AIDS and this created enormous publicity – in spite of the fact that he died due to negative accumulative effects to his liver from decades of smoking, drinking and using recreational drugs [6] – combined in the last year of his life with highly toxic medications that have liver-destroying effects. The boom of the AIDS ‘industry’ paved the way for all consequent epidemics that have been hugely benefiting owners of pharmaceutical companies, politicians, researchers, doctors and journalists alike – all at the expense of patients. For they pay the highest price of all, without getting what they deserve and need most to maintain health: enlightenment about real causes and therapies that could well prevent, and certainly contribute, to the cure of their illnesses.
    This thought provoking in-depth investigation should be mandatory reading for all anthroposophical doctors who are writing or lecturing about the corona pandemic to avoid the spreading of false claims of ‘virus hunters’ that the novel coronavirus was already identified as a cause of Covid-19. [7] For spiritual scientists are obliged to become familiar with all possible explanations of genuine materialistic science about the origins of epidemics before they present to the public also the missing spiritual explanations. Otherwise, people will not be capable of attaining the true understanding of this very complex topic that is at the present time engaging the attention of the whole of humanity.

    NOTES
    • Amongst these diseases there is only one that belongs to the group of typical childhood diseases – that is, measles. Hence the chapter about measles (in comparison to other chapters which deal with the cases of invented epidemics) presents 10 Reasons against Measles Vaccination. The key reason is that comparative studies "definitely indicate better health outcomes in children who did not receive vaccines within their first year of life (Brian S. Hooker, Department of Sciences and Mathematics, Simpson University in California) and "nearly 60 studies have been assembled that find vaccinated cohorts to be far sicker than their unvaccinated peers." (Robert F. Kennedy Jr.)
      See also article Can Vaccines Alter a Child’s Health Trajectory?
      Another reason is that there is no evidence for the effectiveness of vaccination that would comply with the standard of placebo-controlled double-blind study. In 2018 one of the world’s most influential vaccinologists, Dr. Stanley Plotkin, “acknowledged that researchers who try to ascertain vaccine safety without a placebo are in la-la land.” However, there is one study “from 2012, in which an influenza vaccine was compared with a real placebo.” The vaccine caused an increase of “almost six times as many respiratory illnesses” in comparison with placebo. Besides this, the vaccine “actually increased the risk of influenza.” If you look at the American Childhood Vaccine Schedule you’ll find 21 vaccines against influenza until the age of 18 years! If these vaccines were really effective, then Americans should be the most resistant to this – according to the official narrative – “highly contagious viral infection of the respiratory passages” which is “often occurring in epidemics.” As this is not the case we have here one proof for the above finding that vaccines against influenza actually promote its occurrence!
    • One of the rare deficiencies of the book is that the authors in the case of mad cow disease do not mention the feeding of animals with animal products that were never before on their menus as a possible cause of this disease. This link has been described by Steiner already in the beginning of the 20th century.
    • The epilogue of the first edition with the title Side Effect-Free Alternatives to Medications and Vaccinations is wholly dedicated to this topic. Unfortunately for unknown reasons this short epilogue is omitted from the second edition.
    • The tool of celebrity endorsement for a particular product was developed by Edward Bernays (1891–1995), nephew of Sigmund Freud, who used the findings of psychoanalysis for the increase of demand and sale. As in that time there was not a great demand for ‘medical drugs’ against AIDS, the described case was very welcomed, especially due to the fact that many celebrities joined to the ‘actions of raising awareness’ of the danger of being infected with new virus.
    • In the subchapter Clustering: How to Make an Epidemic Out of One Infected Patient is presented this method as one of the basic tools for an invention of new epidemic.
    • The negative impacts of consumption of alcohol and use of heavy drugs on the liver are well known; less known is that “tobacco use leads most commonly to diseases affecting the heart, liver and lungs.” (Wikipedia, Health effects of tobacco, December 2020). From an anthroposophical perspective the liver is the main organ of life forces in the human organism (see FOOD vs STIMULANTS); this is evident from the extraordinary capacity of the liver to regenerate itself.
    • One example of such uncritical use of the claims of pseudo science can be found, for example, at the very beginning of the article by Michaela Glöckler, Questions and Considerations on the Corona Crisis from a Medical Point of View, 2020.


    source
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 8th February 2021 at 15:25.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  26. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Franny (8th February 2021), Hym (8th February 2021), Reinhard (14th August 2021)

  27. Link to Post #14
    Switzerland Avalon Member Helvetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Posts
    3,579
    Thanks
    442
    Thanked 15,468 times in 3,210 posts

    Default Re: The PCR Deception [New 12-24-2020 Documentary]

    Catherine Austin Fitts | Planet Lockdown (Full Interview)


    Source: Watch on Vimeo



    Pison Planet brought to the spotlight Solaris CEO Catherine Austin Fitts, she also is a very well known Investments Advisor.

    Catherine gives her analysis and covers the spectrum in the economical war games that we are currently experiencing and have been planned in many years of advance.

    It was conducted as apart of the full-length documentary and a witness against those who prefer to remain in darkness.



    Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi | Planet Lockdown (Full Interview)


    Source: Watch on Vimeo



    This sit down interview with Sucharit Bhakdi about the current situation we find ourselves in. He is the most cited microbiologist in German academic history, an authority if there ever was one Shocked by the events of this year, he is speaking out about the scientific fallacies and human rights abuses at work now.

    This interview was done as apart of the full length documentary.
    "Earth is currently restricted today for normal development of timeline progress. With us telling you everything would change everything."

    Website: Information Machine

  28. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Helvetic For This Post:

    ExomatrixTV (19th July 2022), Reinhard (14th August 2021)

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts