+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 4
Results 61 to 66 of 66

Thread: Recent Pfizer Covid19 vaccine data - an applied failure

  1. Link to Post #61
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    1,348
    Thanks
    6,708
    Thanked 9,813 times in 1,332 posts

    Default Re: Recent Pfizer Covid19 vaccine data - an applied failure

    ...

    ... from way, way back in Nov. 2020:

    Former Pfizer VP: ‘No need for vaccines,’ ‘the pandemic is effectively over’

    Dr. Mike Yeadon, Pfizer's former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory, states that the drive for a universal vaccine has 'the whiff of evil' which he 'will oppose … vigorously.'

    Mon Nov 23, 2020 - 11:09 am EST

    Dr. Mike Yeadon Arshad Ebrahim / YouTube

    By Patrick Delaney
    November 23, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) –

    While Pfizer pharmaceutical made headlines announcing the imminent release of their COVID-19 vaccine, to much fanfare, a former Vice President and Chief Scientist for the company has flatly rejected the need for any vaccines to bring the COVID-19 pandemic to an end.

    In a recent article, Dr. Michael Yeadon, who “spent over 30 years leading new [allergy and respiratory] medicines research in some of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies,” and retired from Pfizer with “the most senior research position in this field,” wrote:
    There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic. I’ve never heard such nonsense talked about vaccines. You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from a disease. You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects.
    The British national’s comments come at the end of a comprehensive criticism of the Scientific Advisor Group for Emergencies (SAGE), a government agency of the U.K. tasked with advising the central government in emergencies. SAGE has played a predominant role in determining public lockdown policies in the U.K., including those recently implemented, as a response to the COVID-19 virus.

    After pointing out that SAGE lacked essential expertise in the field they are addressing, with “no clinical immunologists” as members, Yeadon highlights two fundamental errors they have made in their presuppositions which cause their overall conclusions to go radically awry leading to the “torturing [of] the population for the last seven months or so.”

    First Fundamental Error: “Ridiculous” presumption of 100% susceptibility
    The first erroneous assumption SAGE makes is that “100% of the population was susceptible to the virus and that no pre-existing immunity existed.”

    Yeadon states this notion is “ridiculous because while SARS-CoV-2 is indeed novel, coronaviruses are not. There’s no such thing as an ‘ancestor-less virus’.” Indeed, he points out, there are at least
    “four, endemic, common-cold inducing coronaviruses … [which] circulate freely in UK and elsewhere.” Those who have been infected by “one or more of these endemic, common-cold producing coronaviruses in the past, have a long-lived and robust [T-cell] immunity, not only to those viruses, but to closely related viruses. SARS-CoV-2 is one such closely-related virus.”
    Striking once again at the competence of SAGE, Dr. Yeadon states, “To not expect such cross-over is … to demonstrate the lack of the requisite understanding to build a model reliable enough to use.”

    Further, he states, that the common PCR test which is used for detecting COVID-19 “cases,” may come out positive when someone is infected with one of these common cold coronaviruses rendering this test that much less reliable. Of course, based on the final results of these tests, many thousands of individuals have been ordered to disrupt their lives and “self-quarantine” for up to 14 days.

    Finally, drawing from the scientific data, Dr. Yeadon concludes that due to previous exposure to common-cold coronaviruses, “a significant proportion (30%) of the population went into 2020 armed with T-cells capable of defending them against SARS-CoV-2, even though they had never seen the virus… SAGE was naively wrong to assume ‘everyone was susceptible’.”

    Second Fundamental Error: An “amateur underestimate” of the infection rate
    SAGE’s second erroneous assumption is “The belief that the percentage of the population that has been infected can be determined by surveying what fraction of the population has antibodies” developed due to infection with COVID-19.

    Because of this assumption, “SAGE believes that less than 10% of the population have so far been infected by SARS-CoV-2.”

    However, Yeadon clarifies that it’s “well understood that not every person, infected by a respiratory virus, goes on to produce antibodies. And many people, having prior immunity, never get properly infected anyway.”

    While almost all of those with significant symptoms, who were admitted to a hospital, produce antibodies, those with “milder responses to the virus” do not “all produce antibodies.” Nevertheless, all of those infected have been shown to have “T-cells in their blood, capable of responding to SARS-CoV-2,” and thus they still develop immunity.

    Drawing from two independent methods, which arrive at the same general conclusion, Yeadon demonstrates that the real infection rate is “in the mid-20s to low-30’s per cent,” and thus SAGE’s estimate of 7% “is a gross and amateur underestimate.”

    Why it matters…“the pandemic is effectively over”
    With a false presumption that 100% of the population is susceptible to the virus, along with only 7% having been infected, it is the view of SAGE, that “the pandemic has only just begun.” Yeadon clarifies, however, that this is “palpable nonsense.”

    Since it is demonstrable that “around 30% of the population had prior immunity,” and if one includes some young children who are “resistant,” 40%, and while considering that the infection rate is “somewhere [in] the mid-20s to low-30s per cent,” this means that around 65 to 72% of the population currently has immunity to COVID-19.

    And considering the reality of herd immunity, when susceptibility to a virus falls this low, at around 28 to 35%, “that population can no longer support an expanding outbreak of disease,” and thus the virus “wanes and disappears.”

    Therefore, Yeadon concludes, “the pandemic is effectively over and can easily be handled by a properly functioning NHS (National Health Service). Accordingly, the country should immediately be permitted to get back to normal life.”

    He further stipulates that he is “incandescent with rage at the damage” SAGE has “inflicted” on the U.K., charging that they have “either been irredeemably incompetent” or “dishonest,” and thus “they should be disbanded immediately and reconstituted,” as “they haven’t a grasp of even the basics required to build a model and because their models are often frighteningly useless.”


    Full article: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/fo...fectively-over

  2. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Bassplayer1 (1st February 2021), Bill Ryan (31st January 2021), Elainie (8th February 2021), fifi (14th April 2021), janette (9th June 2021), Miha (1st February 2021), onawah (8th February 2021), Sunny (2nd February 2021), uzn (9th February 2021)

  3. Link to Post #62
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    15,113
    Thanks
    35,384
    Thanked 70,406 times in 13,580 posts

    Default Re: Recent Pfizer Covid19 vaccine data - an applied failure

    If VR was shocking, this is nuclear. 💣
    Vaccines Revealed COVID Edition email update today
    support@vrevealed.com
    2/8/21

    "I know I’m preaching to the choir here…

    But I’ve just got to make sure that every one of our VR members has a chance to watch VR C0V!D edition.

    What you’ll see in this series is BRAND NEW, and it’s about much more than just the C0V!D V@((!ne.

    It’s vital information about the whole pandemic that you won’t be able to get anywhere else…

    In fact, we are working 24/7 to avoid being shut down (the trailer was already removed from YouTube).

    It’s time you had access to some sensible, REAL, and honest truth about C0V!D and the “shot”...

    Tomorrow, we peel back the wrapping on the most significant power grab in health — perhaps in the history of the world.

    If you’ve been worried, confused, or even angry, this is for you.

    It’s time for answers, AND WE’VE GOT LOTS OF THEM FOR YOU.
    https://vrevealed.com/covid/trailer/...9b088c3&afid=2
    Rest assured, they start coming out in a big way, starting tomorrow.

    See the details below:

    Topic: We’re talking all things C0v!d, masks, misinformation, but especially, V@cc!n&s.
    Date/Time: Starts Tuesday, February 9th at 6 p.m. PST/9 p.m. EST

    Want your family and friends to join in with you, perhaps have a virtual viewing party? Forward this email along so they can register as well.

    Your free registration gets you answers, and it all starts tomorrow.

    Once you’re registered, all you have to do is watch your email. When the first episode goes live, we’ll send you a link that will take you to Episode One."
    https://vrevealed.com/covid/trailer/...6af5c0b&afid=2

    United in the Cause,
    Jessica Porter
    V-Revealed Communications Manager
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    janette (9th June 2021)

  5. Link to Post #63
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    15,113
    Thanks
    35,384
    Thanked 70,406 times in 13,580 posts

    Default Re: Recent Pfizer Covid19 vaccine data - an applied failure

    Former Pfizer VP "They're Going to Kill You and Your Family"
    Reviewed by Alexandra Bruce of Forbidden Knowledge
    https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/for...d-your-family/
    4/13/21

    (Rumble video which I will ask the Mods to embed)
    Note Video is at the bottom of post.

    "Like some other Catholic publishers, such as The Remnant, Life Site News has been putting out some of the most vital and important information during this Unrestricted World War that we are now in.

    In a recent Life Site News interview by Patrick Delaney, former Pfizer Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory, Dr Michael Yeadon, who just retired told him point-blank, “Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death.”

    And why would the government be lying about something so fundamental? “Because, I think the answer is, they are going to kill you using this method. They’re going to kill you and your family.”

    In another interview with American Frontline Doctors, he begged, “Please warn every person not to go near top-up [booster] vaccines. There is absolutely no need to them…If someone wished to harm or kill a significant proportion of the world’s population over the next few years, the systems being put in place right now will enable it. It’s my considered view that it is entirely possible that this will be used for massive-scale depopulation.”

    And of course, if you try to share Dr Yeadon’s interviews on social media, the links are either blocked (Twitter) or your posts are unceremoniously deleted from your timeline, without any notification or explanation (Facebook). I guess these companies have finally realized that they’d end up de-platforming ALL of their users if they continued on the path they were on.

    This interview by James Delingpole published on March 31st is an audio version of Dr Yeadon’s message. Share this with the people you care about. You could save their lives."

    Quote Posted by Gwin Ru (here)
    ...

    ... from way, way back in Nov. 2020:

    Former Pfizer VP: ‘No need for vaccines,’ ‘the pandemic is effectively over’

    Dr. Mike Yeadon, Pfizer's former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory, states that the drive for a universal vaccine has 'the whiff of evil' which he 'will oppose … vigorously.'

    Mon Nov 23, 2020 - 11:09 am EST

    Dr. Mike Yeadon Arshad Ebrahim / YouTube

    By Patrick Delaney
    November 23, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) –

    While Pfizer pharmaceutical made headlines announcing the imminent release of their COVID-19 vaccine, to much fanfare, a former Vice President and Chief Scientist for the company has flatly rejected the need for any vaccines to bring the COVID-19 pandemic to an end.

    In a recent article, Dr. Michael Yeadon, who “spent over 30 years leading new [allergy and respiratory] medicines research in some of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies,” and retired from Pfizer with “the most senior research position in this field,” wrote:
    There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic. I’ve never heard such nonsense talked about vaccines. You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from a disease. You also don’t set about planning to vaccinate millions of fit and healthy people with a vaccine that hasn’t been extensively tested on human subjects.
    The British national’s comments come at the end of a comprehensive criticism of the Scientific Advisor Group for Emergencies (SAGE), a government agency of the U.K. tasked with advising the central government in emergencies. SAGE has played a predominant role in determining public lockdown policies in the U.K., including those recently implemented, as a response to the COVID-19 virus.

    After pointing out that SAGE lacked essential expertise in the field they are addressing, with “no clinical immunologists” as members, Yeadon highlights two fundamental errors they have made in their presuppositions which cause their overall conclusions to go radically awry leading to the “torturing [of] the population for the last seven months or so.”

    First Fundamental Error: “Ridiculous” presumption of 100% susceptibility
    The first erroneous assumption SAGE makes is that “100% of the population was susceptible to the virus and that no pre-existing immunity existed.”

    Yeadon states this notion is “ridiculous because while SARS-CoV-2 is indeed novel, coronaviruses are not. There’s no such thing as an ‘ancestor-less virus’.” Indeed, he points out, there are at least
    “four, endemic, common-cold inducing coronaviruses … [which] circulate freely in UK and elsewhere.” Those who have been infected by “one or more of these endemic, common-cold producing coronaviruses in the past, have a long-lived and robust [T-cell] immunity, not only to those viruses, but to closely related viruses. SARS-CoV-2 is one such closely-related virus.”
    Striking once again at the competence of SAGE, Dr. Yeadon states, “To not expect such cross-over is … to demonstrate the lack of the requisite understanding to build a model reliable enough to use.”

    Further, he states, that the common PCR test which is used for detecting COVID-19 “cases,” may come out positive when someone is infected with one of these common cold coronaviruses rendering this test that much less reliable. Of course, based on the final results of these tests, many thousands of individuals have been ordered to disrupt their lives and “self-quarantine” for up to 14 days.

    Finally, drawing from the scientific data, Dr. Yeadon concludes that due to previous exposure to common-cold coronaviruses, “a significant proportion (30%) of the population went into 2020 armed with T-cells capable of defending them against SARS-CoV-2, even though they had never seen the virus… SAGE was naively wrong to assume ‘everyone was susceptible’.”

    Second Fundamental Error: An “amateur underestimate” of the infection rate
    SAGE’s second erroneous assumption is “The belief that the percentage of the population that has been infected can be determined by surveying what fraction of the population has antibodies” developed due to infection with COVID-19.

    Because of this assumption, “SAGE believes that less than 10% of the population have so far been infected by SARS-CoV-2.”

    However, Yeadon clarifies that it’s “well understood that not every person, infected by a respiratory virus, goes on to produce antibodies. And many people, having prior immunity, never get properly infected anyway.”

    While almost all of those with significant symptoms, who were admitted to a hospital, produce antibodies, those with “milder responses to the virus” do not “all produce antibodies.” Nevertheless, all of those infected have been shown to have “T-cells in their blood, capable of responding to SARS-CoV-2,” and thus they still develop immunity.

    Drawing from two independent methods, which arrive at the same general conclusion, Yeadon demonstrates that the real infection rate is “in the mid-20s to low-30’s per cent,” and thus SAGE’s estimate of 7% “is a gross and amateur underestimate.”

    Why it matters…“the pandemic is effectively over”
    With a false presumption that 100% of the population is susceptible to the virus, along with only 7% having been infected, it is the view of SAGE, that “the pandemic has only just begun.” Yeadon clarifies, however, that this is “palpable nonsense.”

    Since it is demonstrable that “around 30% of the population had prior immunity,” and if one includes some young children who are “resistant,” 40%, and while considering that the infection rate is “somewhere [in] the mid-20s to low-30s per cent,” this means that around 65 to 72% of the population currently has immunity to COVID-19.

    And considering the reality of herd immunity, when susceptibility to a virus falls this low, at around 28 to 35%, “that population can no longer support an expanding outbreak of disease,” and thus the virus “wanes and disappears.”

    Therefore, Yeadon concludes, “the pandemic is effectively over and can easily be handled by a properly functioning NHS (National Health Service). Accordingly, the country should immediately be permitted to get back to normal life.”

    He further stipulates that he is “incandescent with rage at the damage” SAGE has “inflicted” on the U.K., charging that they have “either been irredeemably incompetent” or “dishonest,” and thus “they should be disbanded immediately and reconstituted,” as “they haven’t a grasp of even the basics required to build a model and because their models are often frighteningly useless.”


    Full article: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/fo...fectively-over
    https://rumble.com/embed/vcm9t1/

    Last edited by Harmony; 14th April 2021 at 13:01. Reason: embedding video
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  6. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Constance (13th April 2021), fifi (14th April 2021), Gwin Ru (13th April 2021), janette (9th June 2021), Metaphor (13th April 2021), Paladin14 (30th April 2021), Sue (Ayt) (29th April 2021)

  7. Link to Post #64
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    26,661
    Thanks
    117,122
    Thanked 341,103 times in 25,146 posts

    Default Re: Recent Pfizer Covid19 vaccine data - an applied failure

    From Pfizer: It seems to be a publicly available document. Included in the 146 page report is a detailed risk-benefit analysis concerning AEs and SAEs (Adverse Effects and Serious Adverse Effects).

    https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/...r_BioNTech.pdf

    Last edited by Bill Ryan; 28th April 2021 at 23:59.

  8. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    Constance (29th April 2021), Czarek (29th April 2021), fifi (29th April 2021), graciousb (10th June 2021), Gwin Ru (2nd May 2021), janette (9th June 2021), Operator (29th April 2021), Sunny (29th April 2021), TomKat (29th April 2021), wondering (9th June 2021), Yoda (29th April 2021)

  9. Link to Post #65
    UK Avalon Member Journeyman's Avatar
    Join Date
    9th September 2020
    Language
    English
    Posts
    628
    Thanks
    2,414
    Thanked 4,794 times in 607 posts

    Default Re: Recent Pfizer Covid19 vaccine data - an applied failure

    Deeply worrying...

    https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1...20v1.full-text

    Quote The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses (NOT PEER REVIEWED YET)
    Summary
    The mRNA-based BNT162b2 vaccine from Pfizer/BioNTech was the first registered COVID-19 vaccine and has been shown to be up to 95% effective in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections. Little is known about the broad effects of the new class of mRNA vaccines, especially whether they have combined effects on innate and adaptive immune responses. Here we confirmed that BNT162b2 vaccination of healthy individuals induced effective humoral and cellular immunity against several SARS-CoV-2 variants.Interestingly, however, the BNT162b2 vaccine also modulated the production of inflammatory cytokines by innate immune cells upon stimulation with both specific (SARS-CoV-2) and non-specific (viral, fungal and bacterial) stimuli. The response of innate immune cells to TLR4 and TLR7/8 ligands was lower after BNT162b2 vaccination, while fungi-induced cytokine responses were stronger.In conclusion, the mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine induces complex functional reprogramming of innate immune responses, which should be considered in the development and use of this new class of vaccines.

  10. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Journeyman For This Post:

    atman (15th May 2021), Bill Ryan (15th May 2021), gord (15th May 2021), graciousb (10th June 2021), janette (9th June 2021), wondering (9th June 2021)

  11. Link to Post #66
    Great Britain Avalon Member
    Join Date
    2nd August 2020
    Language
    Dutch
    Age
    50
    Posts
    88
    Thanks
    979
    Thanked 764 times in 87 posts

    Default Re: Recent Pfizer Covid19 vaccine data - an applied failure

    Just now I saw a tweet by Tony Gosling, with a link that was meant to go to a leaked confidential Pfizer document, pertaining to their SARS-CoV-2 jabs on naturalnews.com, except the page had been removed. In the replies, someone else shared a different link to the same document, but from a different website. I've not had much chance to read it yet, but it mentions luciferase in animal tests.

    https://www.docdroid.net/A8A1VBw/pfizer-bio-distribution-confidential-document-translated-to-english-pdf


    Edit: It appears to me, at first glance, that the luciferase is used in tests to see how the 'vaccine' is dispersed throughout the body.
    Last edited by Anna70; 9th June 2021 at 19:38.

  12. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Anna70 For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (9th June 2021), janette (9th June 2021), mountain_jim (9th June 2021), Valle (9th June 2021)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 4

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts