Vaccination Injuries On Record for Covid19

[greybeard]

CHD Calls on FDA to Take COVID Vaccines Off the Market - Sign the Petition



Big Pharma › News
Employers May Be Held Liable for ‘Any Adverse Reaction’ if They Mandate COVID Vaccines

New OSHA guidance holds employers liable for adverse reactions if they require employees be vaccinated for COVID as a condition of employment, which could negatively impact the employer’s safety rating.
By
Megan Redshaw
1

Link copied
New guidance from OSHA is making employers think twice about their COVID vaccine requirements.

The Defender is experiencing censorship on many social channels. Be sure to stay in touch with the news that matters by subscribing to our top news of the day. It's free.

New guidance from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is making employers think twice about their COVID vaccine requirements.

On April 20, companies were put on notice they’ll be responsible for any adverse reaction should they require their employees be vaccinated with a COVID vaccine.

In the Frequently Asked Questions section of OSHA’s website having to do with COVID safety compliance, a question was asked whether an adverse reaction to a COVID vaccine had to be recorded if an employer mandated vaccination as a condition for employment.

OSHA stated:

“If you require your employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment (i.e., for work-related reasons), then any adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is work-related. The adverse reaction is recordable if it is a new case under 29 CFR 1904.6 and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7.”

In general, an adverse reaction to the COVID vaccine is recordable if the reaction is: (1) work-related, (2) a new case and (3) meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7 (e.g., days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job, medical treatment beyond first aid).

According to OSHA, recording requirements of serious work-related injuries and illness may leave employers with worker’s compensation claims and impact their safety record.

Conversely, OSHA states it will exercise enforcement discretion and will not require adverse reactions be recorded when an employer only “recommends” that employees receive the vaccine, while noting that for this discretion to apply, the vaccine must be truly voluntary.

In determining whether a vaccine is “voluntary,” the website states, “an employee’s choice to accept or reject the vaccine cannot affect [his or her] performance rating or professional advancement,” and that an “employee who chooses not to receive the vaccine cannot suffer any repercussions from this choice.”

If employees are not free to choose whether or not to receive the vaccine without fearing negative recourse, then the vaccine is required and employers should refer to the section on COVID vaccines as a condition to employment.

In response to the news that COVID vaccine adverse reactions suffered by workers are reportable incidents, or incidents that count against a company’s safety record, several large contractors said they have changed or will change their vaccination policy to only recommend — not require — a vaccine.
CHD Calls on FDA to Take COVID Vaccines Off the Market - Sign the Petition

Construction firm Clayco stepped back from a previously announced firmwide vaccine mandate in response to the recent federal guideline.

“We, sadly, had to back off our [employee vaccination] mandate because OSHA did something I don’t understand at all,” said Bob Clark, founder and executive chairman of Clayco in a recent ENR Critical Path podcast. “I side with OSHA frequently, we’re in its VIP program, but on this they’re just wrong. It’s a terrible decision they’ve made and I think it’ll be overturned.”

“What they put forward could potentially discourage employers from supporting their workers getting the vaccine,” said Kevin Cannon, senior director of safety and health services at the Associated General Contractors of America (ACG).

ACG is not in support of any vaccine mandate, however the company participated in vaccine awareness week in April and hosted vaccine clinics on an active job site and in its offices.

Cannon said some contractors may have changed their approach to those events had they known, at the time, they could potentially “be on the hook for recording these potential adverse reactions.”

All businesses and institutions will be very reluctant to mandate vaccinations if OSHA says adverse reactions count as reportable against a company’s “experience modification rate.” It’s honestly ridiculous, Clark said.

An experience modification rate, or EMR, is a safety rating insurers use in calculating workers’ compensation. Part of the calculation includes reportable incidents — a higher number of reportable incidents damages the company’s safety ratings and could hike up the price of insurance, St. Louis Business Journal reported.

Clark noted that Clayco wants to set an example and plans to challenge the guidance through lobbying and outreach to senators, and it’s not alone in that effort. The company also will continue to strongly encourage employees to get vaccinated, log which employees do and are considering “vaccinated only” areas within its workspace.

According to the National Law Review, employers may want to make it clear in communications to employees whether COVID vaccines are required or voluntary.

Employers may also consider circumstances in which OSHA will investigate an employer’s recordkeeping practices. If an employer’s vaccination program is voluntary, an employer may not have any entries resulting from adverse reactions. Under those circumstances, OSHA will have to ask the employer about the vaccination program and whether any employee suffered an adverse reaction.

Employees may be more likely to make a complaint to OSHA when they have been denied time off for an illness that they consider to be work-related, which means post-vaccination paid time off may be helpful.

Although OSHA is facing scrutiny for its guidance, it is consistent with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), which requires any product with this designation to be voluntary. Currently, Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson are only approved for emergency use.

As reported by The Defender, this was reiterated in August 2020 at a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, where its executive secretary, Dr. Amanda Cohn, stated:

“I just wanted to add that, just wanted to remind everybody, that under an Emergency Use Authorization, an EUA, vaccines are not allowed to be mandatory. So, early in this vaccination phase, individuals will have to be consented and they won’t be able to be mandated.”




https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...f-514a76bebf14

[Eva2]

Just got this from someone I "met":
My friend whose best friend’s husband - who was PERFECTLY HEALTHY AT 58, by the way - DIED TODAY after battling two brain surgeries among other things JUST HOURS AFTER GETTING THE AZ SYNTHETIC MOLECULE COCKTAIL OF POISONS.

[Delight]

Posting this because it has had hundreds of responses...

[greybeard]

DR VERNON COLEMAN - LET'S DUMP THE QUEEN AND THE REST OF THE

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/dr-ve...EZHVCPmYg.html

[greybeard]

More deaths in just 4 month with the cv19 Vaccine than all combined so far

https://new.awakeningchannel.com/mor...mbined-so-far/

[Eva2]

'Sweden: Damaging Side Effects From Vaccines Tops 31,000
Sweden is experiencing a groundswell of reports the likes of which have never seen with past vaccines. The majority of these are associated with AstraZeneca, but side effects are serious enough to be reported to the Medical Products Agency.'

[Patient]

We should also remind people to be conscious of the fact that only a small percentage of side effects are actually reported.

Another point, I heard in an interview a couple days ago that the VAERS site was about 3 months behind in their reporting due to the amount being reported. I expect that delay to increase as more people get the jab.

[Hermoor]

Posted by TargeT (here)
WTF?

We're starting to see significant numbers of people now admitted to UK hospitals with adverse reactions to the vax.

The point being abominable evil released something in to nature which Mother Nature didn't agree with.

And now Mother Nature is disagreeing with the abominable evil in the vax too.

These are just the early days. The tip of the tip of the iceberg. Mother Nature always knows best and can't be outsmarted or fooled.

There is going to be an almighty price to pay for this before too long. The pity is, as always, on the unfortunate decent folks who fall victim to the treachery of great evil.

[syrwong]

Posted by Patient (here)
We should also remind people to be conscious of the fact that only a small percentage of side effects are actually reported.

Another point, I heard in an interview a couple days ago that the VAERS site was about 3 months behind in their reporting due to the amount being reported. I expect that delay to increase as more people get the jab.

Could it be that some or many reports are not just delayed, but simply deleted? The actual number of initial reactions may then be 1000 times that reported. If this is only the start, I can see why they laid down the bold figure of 500 million.

[Hermoor]

It is being reported in a few places that shingles is a side effect of getting the jab.

It is also being reported in many places that getting shingles is not a side effect of being jabbed.

For the record. My favourite uncle is in his 70s and was otherwise fit as a fiddle until medical treatment for a serious illness left him with virtually no immune system. He didn't want the jab, yet felt it only prudent in light of his age and lack of immune system.

Shortly after receiving the jab he got a really bad case of shingles. Bad cases of shingles can have very serious health consequences in the over 65s.

I talked with him over the phone and he of course tried to be positive about his situation. My father visited him in person and later said to me "Poor bloke. He looks horrendous. He's not doing well at all."

I feel very uncomfortable about all of this. What a mess.

[Hermoor]

TargeT posted this up recently on another thread.

Posted by TargeT (here)
WTF?

Handful Of Black COVID Survivors Experience Massively Enlarged Tongues
The condition, called macroglossia, makes it impossible for patients to eat, drink or talk. Last fall, KHOU reported that there were two documented cases in the United States, which has swelled to nine patients - eight of whom are black, according to Dr. James Melville of the UTHealth School of Dentistry, who has become an expert in the condition.

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/h...larged-tongues

Yes, WTF indeed.

[Hermoor]

Posted by syrwong (here)
Could it be that some or many reports are not just delayed, but simply deleted?

It's looking like the answer to your question could be answered with other questions. Like what happened to the reports on JFK? 9/11? And so on.

How many delays and deletions were involved in trying to hush up those events?

Once we've seen the historical laundry machine in action a few times its current and future actions become kinda predictable.

[Eva2]

'How Many Have Died from COVID vaccines'
'STORY AT-A-GLANCE

Each year, more than 165 million Americans get the flu shot. There were 85 reported deaths following influenza vaccination in 2017; 119 deaths in 2018; and 203 deaths in 2019
Between mid-December 2020 and April 23, 2021, at which point between 95 million and 100 million Americans had received their COVID-19 shots, there were 3,544 reported deaths following COVID vaccination, or about 30 per day
In just four months, the COVID-19 vaccines have killed more people than all available vaccines combined from mid-1997 until the end of 2013 — a period of 15.5 years
As of April 23, 2021, VAERS had also received 12,618 reports of serious adverse events. In total, 118,902 adverse event reports had been filed
In the European Union, the EudraVigilance system had as of April 17, 2021, received 330,218 injury reports after vaccination with one of the four available COVID vaccines, including 7,766 deaths
Each year, more than 165 million Americans get the flu shot, and according to the U.S. vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS), there were 85 reported deaths following influenza vaccination in 2017; 119 deaths in 2018; and 203 deaths in 2019. “How do those rates compare to the death rates from the coronavirus vaccine?” Carlson asks. The answer is, there’s really no comparison.

How Many Have Died From COVID Vaccines?

Between mid-December 2020, when the first COVID-19 shots were rolled out, and April 23, 2021, at which point between 95 million and 100 million Americans had received their COVID-19 shots, there were 3,544 reported deaths following COVID vaccination.2

That’s 182 more deaths than cited by Carlson. As of April 23, 2021, VAERS had also received 12,618 reports of serious adverse events. In total, 118,902 adverse event reports had been filed. If, like Carlson estimates, about 30 people per day are dying from the shots, these numbers will grow by the hundreds each week.

Carlson also cites data from an investigation by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which found that VAERS catches a mere 1% of vaccine injuries,3,4 primarily because it’s a passive system and reports are filed voluntarily.

Many Americans don’t even know that the system exists, or that they can file a report, and most doctors won’t file reports when injuries are brought to their attention because the medical system doesn’t reward such fastidiousness. At most, 10% of vaccine side effects are ever reported to VAERS, according to a 2005 study in the BMJ.5

What this means is that side effects may actually be 10 times or even 100 times higher than reported. We could, in reality, be looking at anywhere from 126,000 to 1.2 million serious side effects, and anywhere from 35,440 to 354,400 vaccine-related deaths.

While Carlson refuses to speculate about what the actual death toll might be, he does stress that what we’re seeing is clearly out of the norm, and by a tremendous margin. In just four months, the COVID-19 vaccines have killed more people than all available vaccines combined from mid-1997 until the end of 2013 — a period of 15.5 years.

Gamble Your Life or Lose Your Freedom?

While the data show there are clear risks, Americans are urged, cajoled, shamed and threatened into getting the shot in any number of ways. President Biden recently warned that people who are not fully vaccinated against COVID-19 “can still die every day” from the infection, adding “This is your choice: It’s life and death.”


They’re pretending that everyone’s risk is the same and, therefore, everyone must get vaccinated, or at bare minimum, they want 70% of the American adult population vaccinated by July 4, 2021.

Carlson points out that this policy might be deemed acceptable if it could be conclusively shown that the “vaccines” are safe, and if we had a thorough understanding of the long-term effects of these mRNA and viral vector DNA shots. However, we can’t and we don’t.

Thousands have died, and many of the side effects reported defy easy explanation. For example, COVID shots now account for one-third of all tinnitus side effects in VAERS. Oxford and UCLA researchers, who are now tracking side effects across eight different countries, report finding that “women aged 18 to 34 years had a higher rate of deep vein thrombosis than men of the same age,” Carlson says. Why? No one knows.

Stunning Lack of Reaction to Mounting Death Toll

Perhaps most stunning of all is that these thousands of deaths and serious reactions are receiving no attention whatsoever. In 1976, the U.S. government vaccinated an estimated 45 million people against pandemic swine flu.

The 1976 pandemic swine flu mass vaccination campaign was canceled after 53 people died. Authorities decided the vaccine was too risky to continue the campaign. Now, health authorities are shrugging off more than 3,500 deaths following COVID-19 vaccination as either coincidental or inconsequential.
The program was canceled, Carlson reports, after only 53 people died. Authorities decided the vaccine was too risky to continue the campaign. Now, health authorities are shrugging off more than 3,500 deaths after COVID-19 vaccination as either coincidental or inconsequential.

Folks, this is 70 times more deaths than the swine flu vaccine, which was halted. If this isn’t insanity on steroids, please tell me what is. Maybe murder? This doesn’t even include the deaths of thousands, and potentially tens of thousands of miscarriages, which is now becoming rapidly recognized as a possible complication of COVID-19 “vaccines.”

In fact, an April 2021 report in The New England Journal of Medicine6 said that miscarriage was the most common condition reported after a COVID vaccine, and that “there is probably substantial underreporting of pregnancy- and neonatal-specific adverse events” connected with the vaccine. But rather than posting a warning that the vaccine may be causing miscarriages, health officials simply urged “continued monitoring” of the issue.

EU Reports Hundreds of Thousands of Side Effects

In the European Union, we find more of the same. Its EudraVigilance system, to which suspected drug reactions are reported, had as of April 17, 2021, received 330,218 injury reports after vaccination with one of the four available COVID vaccines (Moderna, Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson), including 7,766 deaths.7

Of these, Pfizer’s mRNA injection accounted for the largest number of deaths at 4,293, followed by Moderna with 2,094 deaths, AstraZeneca with 1,360 deaths and Johnson & Johnson with 19 deaths. The most commonly reported injuries were cardiac-related problems and blood/lymphatic disorders.

In related news, the Israeli People Committee (IPC), a civilian body of health experts, has published a report detailing side effects from the Pfizer vaccine, concluding “there has never been a vaccine that has harmed as many people.” The Committee received 288 reports of death, 90% of which occurred within 10 days after the vaccination; 64% of them were men.

This contradicts data from the Israeli Ministry of Health, which claims only 45 deaths were vaccine related. According to this report (translated from Hebrew):8

“According to Central Bureau of Statistics data during January-February 2021, at the peak of the Israeli mass vaccination campaign, there was a 22% increase in overall mortality in Israel compared with the previous year.

In fact, January-February 2021 have been the deadliest months in the last decade, with the highest overall mortality rates compared to corresponding months in the last 10 years.

Amongst the 20-29 age group the increase in overall mortality has been most dramatic. In this age group, we detect an increase of 32% in overall mortality in comparison with previous year.

Statistical analysis of information from the Central Bureau of Statistics, combined with information from the Ministry of Health, leads to the conclusion that the mortality rate amongst the vaccinated is estimated at about 1: 5000 (1: 13000 at ages 20-49, 1: 6000 at ages 50-69, 1: 1600 at ages 70+).

According to this estimate, it is possible to estimate the number of deaths in Israel in proximity of the vaccine, as of today, at about 1000-1100 people.”

Reproductive Effects

In the U.S., we’re now starting to see thousands of reports of menstrual problems among women who have received the COVID-19 vaccine. As reported by The Defender:9

“Women have reported hemorrhagic bleeding with clots, delayed or absent periods, sudden pre-menopausal symptoms, month-long periods and heavy irregular bleeding after being vaccinated with one or both doses of a COVID vaccine.

There’s no data linking COVID vaccines to changes in menstruation because clinical trials omit tracking menstrual cycles. But two Yale University experts wrote in The New York Times … there could be a connection.

‘There are many reasons vaccination could alter menstruation,’ wrote Alice Lu-Culligan, an M.D./Ph.D. student at Yale School of Medicine, and Dr. Randi Epstein, writer in residence at Yale School of Medicine.

‘Periods involve the immune system, as the thickening and thinning of the uterine lining are facilitated by different teams of immune cells and signals moving in and out of the reproductive tract,’ Lu-Culligan and Epstein explained.

‘Vaccines are designed to ignite an immune response, and the female cycle is supported by the immune system, so it’s possible vaccines could temporarily change the normal course of events.’”

Even more bizarre, there are hundreds of anecdotal reports of women who have not gotten the vaccine, but spent time in close proximity to someone who did, who are experiencing the same kind of abnormal menses and bleeding irregularities. Some doctors are hypothesizing that some sort of shedding may be taking place, although the mechanism is unknown. As yet, it’s too early to speculate further.

Interestingly, a Chinese study10 published in Reproductive BioMedicine Online, which looked at sex hormones and menstruation in unvaccinated women of reproductive age who were diagnosed with COVID-19, found 28% had a change in the length of their cycle, 19% had prolonged cycles and 25% had a change in menstrual blood volume.

The researchers hypothesize that “the menstruation changes of these patients might be the consequence of transient sex hormone changes” caused by a temporary suppression of ovarian function during infection.

Dr. Natalie Crawford, a fertility specialist, told The Defender11 that the menstrual irregularities seen in female COVID-19 patients may be linked to a cellular immunity response, and since the vaccine instructs your body to make the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which your immune system then responds to, the effects of the vaccine may be similar to the natural infection.

Death Tally May Spike During Fall and Winter

While the death toll from COVID-19 vaccines is already at a historical level, I fear it may shoot far higher as we move through fall and winter. The reason for this is because one of the greatest risk factors and wild cards of these vaccines is antibody‐dependent enhancement (ADE) or paradoxical immune enhancement (PIE).

I’ve detailed this issue in several articles, including “How COVID-19 Vaccine Can Destroy Your Immune System” and “Will Vaccinated People Be More Vulnerable to Variants?” In summary, ADE means that rather than enhance your immunity against the infection, the vaccine actually enhances the virus’ ability to enter and infect your cells, resulting in more severe disease than had you not been vaccinated.12

The 2003 review paper “Antibody-Dependent Enhancement of Virus Infection and Disease” explains it this way:13

“In general, virus-specific antibodies are considered antiviral and play an important role in the control of virus infections in a number of ways. However, in some instances, the presence of specific antibodies can be beneficial to the virus. This activity is known as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of virus infection.

The ADE of virus infection is a phenomenon in which virus-specific antibodies enhance the entry of virus, and in some cases the replication of virus, into monocytes/macrophages and granulocytic cells through interaction with Fc and/or complement receptors.

This phenomenon has been reported in vitro and in vivo for viruses representing numerous families and genera of public health and veterinary importance … For some viruses, ADE of infection has become a great concern to disease control by vaccination.”

Fall and winter are the seasons in which most coronavirus infections occur, be it SARS-CoV-2 or other coronaviruses responsible for the common cold. If ADE does turn out to be a common problem with these injections, then vaccinated individuals may be at significantly higher risk of severe COVID-19 and a potentially lethal immune reaction due to pathogenic priming.

Another potential risk is that of Th2 immunopathology, especially among the elderly. As reported in a PNAS news feature:14

“Since the 1960s, tests of vaccine candidates for diseases such as dengue, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) have shown a paradoxical phenomenon: Some animals or people who received the vaccine and were later exposed to the virus developed more severe disease than those who had not been vaccinated.

The vaccine-primed immune system, in certain cases, seemed to launch a shoddy response to the natural infection …

This immune backfiring, or so-called immune enhancement, may manifest in different ways such as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), a process in which a virus leverages antibodies to aid infection; or cell-based enhancement, a category that includes allergic inflammation caused by Th2 immunopathology.

In some cases, the enhancement processes might overlap … Some researchers argue that although ADE has received the most attention to date, it is less likely than the other immune enhancement pathways to cause a dysregulated response to COVID-19, given what is known about the epidemiology of the virus and its behavior in the human body.

‘There is the potential for ADE, but the bigger problem is probably Th2 immunopathology,’ says Ralph Baric, an epidemiologist and expert in coronaviruses … at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

In previous studies of SARS, aged mice were found to have particularly high risks of life-threatening Th2 immunopathology ... in which a faulty T cell response triggers allergic inflammation, and poorly functional antibodies that form immune complexes, activating the complement system and potentially damaging the airways.”


https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...rid=1164010405

[Tintin]

Posted by Anna70 (here)
Important interview on the Delingpod (James Delingpole Podcast) with 'Nina', the receptionist of a large NHS medical practice. She tells him the true shocking story about adverse reactions to the 'jab'.

Well worth a listen.

https://mcdn.podbean.com/mf/web/dkwmhz/nina_MMM_128.mp3

This really needs to be listened to.

"James talks to the receptionist of a large NHS medical practice. She tells him the true shocking story about adverse reactions to the 'jab'. Please note - Nina's name has been changed and her voice has been altered to protect her identity."

[Hermoor]

Further to my uncle getting a very serious case of shingles.

He believes it to be directly related to getting the jab and is refusing to have another one.

At the same time he said hospitals and GP surgeries in his area of Glasgow were INUNDATED with people with bad cases of shingles. The doctors and nurses told him they had never seen anything like it before. It was an all time high number of cases for them by quite some margin.

None of this was reported in the Glaswegian and Scottish media outlets as far as I am aware.

The information he got from his doctors and nurses was as follows. He's on immunosuppressant drugs and the jab has further lowered his immune system. Shingles lives in all of our bodies (after going through chickenpox) and it came to the fore as a result of his immune system being so low.

My uncle also told me that he knows a number of otherwise healthy people in his neighbourhood who became significantly ill 6-8 weeks after the jab. They are all refusing to take a second jab too.

[Pam]

Posted by Patient (here)
We should also remind people to be conscious of the fact that only a small percentage of side effects are actually reported.

Another point, I heard in an interview a couple days ago that the VAERS site was about 3 months behind in their reporting due to the amount being reported. I expect that delay to increase as more people get the jab.

I have heard about the delay with the VAERS site as well. I just checked it out and the VAERS system is totally automated unless you want to generate specific information from the data. Another thing is that there are sometimes double reporting incidents. It gives no appearance of human monitoring or reviewing. How could it really be "backed up" if no one is personally entering data except the person making the VAERS report? Another red flag on that one. Is it backed up or intentionally being withheld?

[pyrangello]

I've already had 2 family members pass away in the last month who 1 did die, and 2 got this experimental shot. Both had historical past other illnesses but at the end of the day the facts are what they are. Now we wait til fall for this next flu season for those that took this shot. God help us all should this turn.

[Hermoor]

So, worthy of further study, is a part of the potential overall covid strategy now perhaps beginning to show its hand in the early stages.

The jabs are lowering peoples' immune systems and interfering with its natural processes.

The full immunosuppressant effect of the covid vaccine takes time to bed in and reach full effect.

By which time it is winter again and another season of traditional colds and flus starts to move amongst us.

More people than normal get colds and flus BECAUSE THEIR IMMUNE SYSTEMS HAVE BEEN COMPROMISED BY THE COVID JABS. Yet the controllers sweep all of this under the carpet again and sell it to us as a 'new covid variant' or whatnot. Uninformed folks get alarmed and rush off again to get their third and fourth jabs.

And so the great evil continues and grows. And the slippery slope gets slippier and bigger and steeper.

Unfortunately even now I see this as being all too plausible. Plausible does not equate to 'gonna happen for sure'. But my guard is right up. It has many of the historically favoured traits of great evil about it.

[Chris Gilbert]

Would've posted it from NYT but it was behind a paywall.

Heart condition in some young people linked to vaccine

Top U.S. health officials recommended further study into a rare heart condition possibly linked to COVID-19 vaccines.

A statement dated May 17 from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said some teens and young adults, mostly male, had developed an inflammation of the heart muscle called myocarditis after receiving their vaccine.

The CDC added that the condition often goes away on its own and the number of cases so far have not been cause for major concern.

They did not say how many people had been affected, but said cases typically occurred within four days after receiving mRNA vaccines, without specifying which.

The U.S. granted emergency authorization to two mRNA vaccines - from Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech.

In April, Israel's Health Ministry started examining similar cases tied to Pfizer's vaccine.

It has yet to draw any conclusions, though most of the cases in Israel were reported among young adults under the age of 30.

Pfizer at the time said it had not found a causal link.

Neither Pfizer nor Moderna responded immediately to requests for comment on Saturday.

[Eva2]

'COVID Vaccines May Bring Avalanche of Neurological Disease
STORY AT-A-GLANCE

The typical unprecedented vaccine takes 12 years to develop, and of all the unprecedented vaccines in development, only 2% are projected to ever make it through all Phase 2 and 3 clinical phases of testing
The COVID-19 vaccine was developed with Operation Warp Speed in less than one year, which makes it virtually impossible to assess safety and efficacy, as the vaccine has not been adequately tested
Five months into the vaccination campaign, statistics tell a frightening story. Research shows deaths are 15 times higher during the first 14 days after the first COVID injection among people over the age of 60, compared to those who aren't vaccinated
Another study shows that after COVID-19 vaccines were implemented, overall death rates have increased, with the exception of a few areas. It appears countries in which COVID-19 vaccines have not raised mortality rates are also not using glyphosate
In the next 10 to 15 years, we are likely to see spikes in prion diseases, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases at younger ages, and blood disorders such as blood clots, hemorrhaging, stroke and heart failure

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...qsDBNjUf0rqykE