+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 1 3 12 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 235

Thread: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

  1. Link to Post #41
    Great Britain Avalon Member roguemoon's Avatar
    Join Date
    22nd August 2019
    Age
    55
    Posts
    84
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 654 times in 75 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    this has got to be watched, there's tons of info here that's got to be assessed.
    https://stateofthenation.co/?p=50668

  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to roguemoon For This Post:

    Dick (1st February 2021), East Sun (3rd February 2021), enigma3 (17th February 2021), Hym (1st February 2021), Mercedes (2nd February 2021), pueblo (1st February 2021), Zirconian (1st February 2021)

  3. Link to Post #42
    Ireland Avalon Member pueblo's Avatar
    Join Date
    5th February 2016
    Posts
    909
    Thanks
    4,670
    Thanked 6,009 times in 881 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    Quote Posted by roguemoon (here)
    this has got to be watched, there's tons of info here that's got to be assessed.
    https://stateofthenation.co/?p=50668
    I have read multiple sources claiming the PCR test is the vaccine ie. nanotech on the swab inserted through the nasal passage close to the blood brain barrier.

    There is an interesting point raised in the video posted above by roguemoon that I had always thought strange. We are mandated to wear a mask over the mouth and nose to supposedly stop transmission of the virus through particles in our SALIVA.

    If the virus is present in our saliva why can they not just swab the inside of the mouth for the PCR test? Why do they have to stick a swab all the way up your nose to your blood brain barrier??

    I wonder could you bring your own Q-Tip to a PCR test??? I think I can guess the answer to the question.

  4. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to pueblo For This Post:

    ByTheNorthernSea (1st February 2021), haroldsails (3rd February 2021), Hym (1st February 2021), Jill (1st February 2021), Journeyman (1st February 2021), Mercedes (2nd February 2021), Phoenix1304 (7th February 2021), roguemoon (1st February 2021), Sadieblue (2nd February 2021), Trisher (2nd February 2021), Zirconian (1st February 2021)

  5. Link to Post #43
    Great Britain Avalon Member
    Join Date
    21st June 2020
    Language
    English
    Posts
    300
    Thanks
    2,247
    Thanked 2,555 times in 297 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    Quote Posted by roguemoon (here)
    this has got to be watched, there's tons of info here that's got to be assessed.
    https://stateofthenation.co/?p=50668
    Thanks for the information roguemoon.

    The video may explain why people who have had the vaccine (or maybe the tests) are emitting a strange frequency. Question is, have they now got some sort of nano wifi tech in their biology that is now linked up to satellite tech? Is that the frequency I'm feeling?

  6. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Zirconian For This Post:

    Hym (1st February 2021), Mercedes (2nd February 2021), pueblo (1st February 2021), roguemoon (1st February 2021), Sadieblue (2nd February 2021), Sunny (21st March 2021), Trisher (2nd February 2021), XelNaga (1st February 2021)

  7. Link to Post #44
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    26,039
    Thanks
    111,824
    Thanked 331,680 times in 24,528 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    Quote Posted by pueblo (here)
    Quote Posted by roguemoon (here)
    this has got to be watched, there's tons of info here that's got to be assessed.
    https://stateofthenation.co/?p=50668
    I have read multiple sources claiming the PCR test is the vaccine ie. nanotech on the swab inserted through the nasal passage close to the blood brain barrier.
    Mike Adams (naturalnews.com) is aware of the claims, and stated a couple days ago he's going to get hold of some nasal swabs and look at them closely through an electron microscope in his lab.

  8. The Following 24 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    Alan (1st February 2021), anandacate (2nd February 2021), Arcturian108 (1st February 2021), Dick (1st February 2021), enigma3 (17th February 2021), Ernie Nemeth (3rd February 2021), Harmony (4th February 2021), haroldsails (3rd February 2021), Hym (1st February 2021), Journeyman (3rd February 2021), kudzy (2nd February 2021), meat suit (1st February 2021), Mercedes (2nd February 2021), Nasu (11th March 2021), onawah (2nd February 2021), palehorse (1st February 2021), pueblo (1st February 2021), roguemoon (1st February 2021), Sadieblue (2nd February 2021), Soulboy (3rd February 2021), Stephanie (5th March 2021), Sunny (21st March 2021), Yoda (1st February 2021), Zirconian (1st February 2021)

  9. Link to Post #45
    Great Britain Avalon Member
    Join Date
    21st June 2020
    Language
    English
    Posts
    300
    Thanks
    2,247
    Thanked 2,555 times in 297 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    pueblo,

    The UK have brought out saliva tests.
    They are accused of not being accurate.
    The latreral flow tests accuracy has also been questioned.

    This is from the UK Guardian Newspaper

    Experts question claimed accuracy of Covid-19 saliva tests
    (This article is more than 1 month old)

    Two members of the Royal Statistical Society say UK government’s figures rely on spiked lab tests and not real world tests

    Saliva tests for Covid-19, which are being introduced for NHS workers as part of the government’s mass testing programme, pick up only 13% of people with low levels of the virus and not 91%, as the official assessment has claimed, according to experts.

    Two members of the Royal Statistical Society’s working group looking at the accuracy of Covid tests have questioned the results and the way they have been evaluated.

    Prof Jon Deeks from Birmingham University and Prof Sheila Bird, formerly of the MRC Biostatistics Unit at Cambridge University, say the tests perform poorly where people have low levels of the virus, which is often the case in people without symptoms.

    They say the discrepancy in the figures is because the evaluation used “spiked” samples – saliva to which the virus has been added in the lab. Those manufactured samples were picked up efficiently by the test, but “real world” samples from people with asymptomatic Covid were not.
    Quick Guide
    When and how will I be able to get a Covid vaccine in the UK?
    Show

    The OptiGene RT-Lamp test, which can be used with saliva samples or nose swabs, was intended to be part of the Liverpool mass testing programme, routinely offered to asymptomatic NHS workers. People in the community have been given lateral flow tests, which involve nose and throat swabs. Both tests have the advantage of speed, with results within half an hour.

    The accuracy of the Lamp tests came into question last month, however, when a letter emerged from scientists with Greater Manchester’s mass testing expert group (MTEG). They said they found only 47% accuracy and warned that the tests should not be widely used in care homes and hospitals.

    But on Monday, the government said the Lamp tests had passed an evaluation with 79% overall accuracy, which included high and low virus levels using both swabs and saliva samples. Most of the testing took place in a pilot in Southampton, where 55,000 people in the NHS and at the university took part.

    The health minister Lord Bethell said the Optigene Lamp tests’ sensitivity had been confirmed in the lab and in the field.

    But Deeks said the data released on Monday showed that spiked samples had been used to increase the number of samples where the virus levels were low. Using laboratory-made “spiked” samples did not reflect performance in the real world and meant that some people would wrongly think they were in the clear when they had the virus, he said.

    “Before the government decides that these tests are to be used in the population, it is really important that we find out how well they work in people like us. This study has mixed together real clinical data with data from samples that have been made in the laboratory. This has led to its performance on saliva looking better than it is, and wrongly suggests that it can detect Sars-CoV-2 in samples with less virus in them,” he said.
    Quick Guide
    How does the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine work?
    Show

    Both the Lamp tests and the lateral flow tests were part of Operation Moonshot, of which the Liverpool programme is the pilot for the whole country. The government’s hope is to use the saliva tests in care homes, hospitals and universities.

    Bird said tests should be tried out in the context in which they are going to be used. Early on in the development of a test, she said, you would use spiked samples to assess how well it was doing. “Then you gradually move closer and closer to the real world and it is the real world that matters. If you are using the test very widely and helping people to make decisions about their own lives and the lives of their relatives, you want to know about its performance in the context of use.”

    A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: “With up to a third of individuals with Covid-19 not displaying symptoms, broadening testing to identify those showing no symptoms and who can infect people unknowingly will mean finding positive cases more quickly and break chains of transmission.
    Share your story
    Share your stories

    If you have been affected or have any information, we'd like to hear from you. You can get in touch by filling in the form below, anonymously if you wish or contact us via WhatsApp by clicking here or adding the contact +44(0)7867825056. Only the Guardian can see your contributions and one of our journalists may contact you to discuss further.

    “We are committed to using the latest testing technology, and the country’s leading scientists have rigorously evaluated the Optigene Lamp test in the lab and in the field and confirmed its sensitivity for asymptomatic testing.

    “The use of spiked samples is a perfectly valid and standard practice for a study of this sort; it is in accordance with the guidelines laid down by the Technical Validation Group. The inclusion of spiked samples does not change the conclusions made”.

    OptiGene was approached for comment but made no response.

  10. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Zirconian For This Post:

    Harmony (4th February 2021), Hym (1st February 2021), Johan (Keyholder) (3rd February 2021), Mercedes (2nd February 2021), pueblo (1st February 2021), Trisher (2nd February 2021), wondering (1st February 2021)

  11. Link to Post #46
    United States Avalon Member wondering's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th January 2016
    Age
    78
    Posts
    292
    Thanks
    16,089
    Thanked 2,516 times in 284 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    I was required to have a COVID test recently prior to an outpatient procedure, although I would have preferred not to be tested. The swab that was used was small in diameter, but covered in short bristles, nothing like a q-tip. It was not comfortable to have done. Whether it could have been used for innoculation is hard to say, but I suppose anything is possible. I also wonder if there are a variety of different swabs being used?

  12. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to wondering For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (1st February 2021), DaveToo (2nd February 2021), Ernie Nemeth (3rd February 2021), Hym (1st February 2021), Mercedes (2nd February 2021), pueblo (1st February 2021), Sadieblue (2nd February 2021), TomKat (3rd February 2021), Trisher (2nd February 2021), Zirconian (1st February 2021)

  13. Link to Post #47
    Great Britain Avalon Member
    Join Date
    21st June 2020
    Language
    English
    Posts
    300
    Thanks
    2,247
    Thanked 2,555 times in 297 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    Wondering,

    There are a variety of swabs being used depending on the make and type of test.
    You can google it and view the images. I just couldn't upload some of them for this post.

    I'd be very interested to see what Mike Adams finds on the swabs seen through an electron microscope. Personally, I'm not totally sure about nano tech on the swabs but I'm convinced the vax has nano tech within it and it emits out a frequency that has overwhelmed the natural human energy field.

    The Borax Thread has some solutions for it.

  14. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Zirconian For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (1st February 2021), avid (1st February 2021), Harmony (4th February 2021), Hym (1st February 2021), meat suit (1st February 2021), Mercedes (2nd February 2021), pueblo (1st February 2021), Sadieblue (2nd February 2021), Sunny (21st March 2021), Trisher (2nd February 2021), wondering (1st February 2021)

  15. Link to Post #48
    Great Britain Avalon Member roguemoon's Avatar
    Join Date
    22nd August 2019
    Age
    55
    Posts
    84
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 654 times in 75 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    Can i just raise another query that arose from this video representation?

    The NHS are now advising the follow up second jab to be administered 12 weeks after the first instead of the 2 weeks as required by Pfizer.

    I dug up this archive information about professor charles Richet, a French physiologist famed for his work on immunology, the man who discovered anaphylaxis (for which he earned the Nobel prize). He wrote that follow up injection of any protein can induce a violent reaction if administered more than three weeks apart.

    So with that in mind unknown to the patient they may have become more sensitive to anaphylaxis which is why Richet advised double doses be given at the most two weeks apart, according to Doctor Simon Stevens, chief exec of the NHS, he is advising 12 weeks, that’s 84 days between injections!
    see link below (sorry i don't know how to shorten link, forgive me).

    https://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/news/cl...0has%20pledged

  16. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to roguemoon For This Post:

    Harmony (4th February 2021), Hym (1st February 2021), meat suit (1st February 2021), Mercedes (2nd February 2021), pueblo (1st February 2021), Sadieblue (2nd February 2021), Sunny (21st March 2021), Tintin (3rd February 2021), Trisher (2nd February 2021), Zirconian (2nd February 2021)

  17. Link to Post #49
    Aaland Avalon Member Blastolabs's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd November 2020
    Language
    English
    Posts
    105
    Thanks
    243
    Thanked 697 times in 98 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    198 Million Flu Vaccines Given in US in 2020
    78 Flu Vaccine Deaths on CDC VAERS for 2020
    Source:
    https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html
    24 million Doses of Covid-19 Vaccines Given in US 2021
    329 Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths on CDC VAERS
    Source: https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html

    Most deaths do not happen until after the second vaccine and very few people have received both. It appears this might get very bad before people in control take notice

  18. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Blastolabs For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (2nd February 2021), Dorjezigzag (2nd February 2021), Harmony (4th February 2021), Hym (1st February 2021), Mercedes (2nd February 2021), Nasu (11th March 2021), palehorse (1st February 2021), pueblo (1st February 2021), Sadieblue (2nd February 2021), Sunny (21st March 2021), Tintin (3rd February 2021), Trisher (2nd February 2021), Zirconian (2nd February 2021)

  19. Link to Post #50
    Great Britain Avalon Member roguemoon's Avatar
    Join Date
    22nd August 2019
    Age
    55
    Posts
    84
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 654 times in 75 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    and the terrible news just keeps on coming.

    Most post vax deaths do not happen until after the second vaccine and very few people have received both. It appears this might get very bad before people in control take notice

    Here is what the Daily Echo is reporting about the nursing home deaths in Basingstoke in the UK:https://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/190...use-care-home/

    At least twenty-two people have died at a Hampshire care home (Daily Mail is reporting 24 deaths) in one of the worst known outbreaks of the coronavirus pandemic to date.

    The deaths occurred at Pemberley House Care Home in Basingstoke, operated by private firm Avery Healthcare.

    The outbreak was first declared on Tuesday, January 5, with 60 per cent of its residents testing positive for the disease, according to sources.

    Within three weeks, 22 people had died – over one-third of the home’s residents.

    It is understood the outbreak started as residents began to have their first coronavirus vaccines. The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulation Agency (MHRA) said there was no suggestion the vaccine was responsible for the deaths. YEAH RIGHT!

    https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/cn...ons-speak-out/

    12,400 People in Israel Tested Positive for Coronavirus AFTER Being Injected with the Experimental Pfizer COVID Shot
    https://medicalkidnap.com/2021/01/20...er-covid-shot/

  20. The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to roguemoon For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (3rd February 2021), Bassplayer1 (2nd February 2021), Dorjezigzag (2nd February 2021), Hym (1st February 2021), Mercedes (2nd February 2021), Miha (1st February 2021), pueblo (1st February 2021), Sadieblue (2nd February 2021), Stephanie (5th March 2021), Sunny-side-up (2nd February 2021), Tintin (3rd February 2021), Trisher (2nd February 2021), wondering (3rd February 2021), Zirconian (2nd February 2021)

  21. Link to Post #51
    Avalon Member Akasha's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th September 2012
    Location
    Hungary
    Age
    49
    Posts
    1,556
    Thanks
    5,667
    Thanked 4,852 times in 1,340 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    The EU’s Parliamentary Assembly has declared that COVID vaccinations will not be mandatory. Click the link (here) and scroll down to point 7.3.1 but I would recommend reading all of it, particularly if you live in the EU.

    Quote 7.3.1 ensure that citizens are informed that the vaccination is NOT mandatory and that no one is politically, socially, or otherwise pressured to get themselves vaccinated, if they do not wish to do so themselves;
    Point 7.3.2 is also of interest as it states the following:

    Quote 7.3.2 ensure that no one is discriminated against for not having been vaccinated, due to possible health risks or not wanting to be vaccinated;
    I guess the second point stops employers coercing staff into getting the jab or at least will allow employees to sue for loss of earnings if they lose their job for refusing it.

    It may also have positive ramifications against those airlines who have been trying to push the jab and fly agenda.

    But hey, at this stage who knows?
    the greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated --- Gandhi

  22. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Akasha For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (3rd February 2021), Bassplayer1 (2nd February 2021), Dick (3rd February 2021), Dorjezigzag (2nd February 2021), Harmony (3rd February 2021), Johan (Keyholder) (3rd February 2021), Miha (2nd February 2021), Sadieblue (2nd February 2021), Tintin (3rd February 2021), TomKat (3rd February 2021), wondering (3rd February 2021), Zirconian (2nd February 2021)

  23. Link to Post #52
    United States Avalon Member Arcturian108's Avatar
    Join Date
    9th August 2015
    Location
    Blue Ridge Mountains
    Language
    English
    Posts
    484
    Thanks
    4,996
    Thanked 3,463 times in 472 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    One Lab Rat to another: "Are you getting vaccinated?" Second Rat replies: "Are you crazy, They haven't finished the Human trials yet"!
    Last edited by Arcturian108; 3rd February 2021 at 13:37. Reason: for brevity

  24. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Arcturian108 For This Post:

    Akasha (3rd February 2021), Harmony (3rd February 2021), Johan (Keyholder) (3rd February 2021), Tintin (3rd February 2021), Zirconian (3rd February 2021)

  25. Link to Post #53
    UK Avalon Member Journeyman's Avatar
    Join Date
    9th September 2020
    Language
    English
    Posts
    468
    Thanks
    1,870
    Thanked 3,515 times in 449 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    Quote Posted by Blastolabs (here)
    198 Million Flu Vaccines Given in US in 2020
    78 Flu Vaccine Deaths on CDC VAERS for 2020
    Source:
    https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html
    24 million Doses of Covid-19 Vaccines Given in US 2021
    329 Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths on CDC VAERS
    Source: https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html

    Most deaths do not happen until after the second vaccine and very few people have received both. It appears this might get very bad before people in control take notice
    As someone with family members who have had the first jab this is very worrying.

  26. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Journeyman For This Post:

    Bassplayer1 (3rd February 2021), Harmony (3rd February 2021), Johan (Keyholder) (3rd February 2021), Nasu (11th March 2021), pueblo (3rd February 2021), Tintin (3rd February 2021), Zirconian (3rd February 2021)

  27. Link to Post #54
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Location
    Trowbridge/Bath - UK
    Age
    51
    Posts
    3,077
    Thanks
    29,055
    Thanked 21,745 times in 3,047 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    Quote Posted by Akasha (here)
    The EU’s Parliamentary Assembly has declared that COVID vaccinations will not be mandatory. Click the link (here) and scroll down to point 7.3.1 but I would recommend reading all of it, particularly if you live in the EU.

    Quote 7.3.1 ensure that citizens are informed that the vaccination is NOT mandatory and that no one is politically, socially, or otherwise pressured to get themselves vaccinated, if they do not wish to do so themselves;
    Point 7.3.2 is also of interest as it states the following:

    Quote 7.3.2 ensure that no one is discriminated against for not having been vaccinated, due to possible health risks or not wanting to be vaccinated;
    I guess the second point stops employers coercing staff into getting the jab or at least will allow employees to sue for loss of earnings if they lose their job for refusing it.

    It may also have positive ramifications against those airlines who have been trying to push the jab and fly agenda.

    But hey, at this stage who knows?
    Thanks

    Also, the UKMFA (UK Medical Freedom Alliance) has reiterated this along with further guidance on their own website here: https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5fa5...pen_Letter.pdf

    Additionally, as has been pointed out before:

    15. Published claims of effectiveness were based on interim analyses of trial data, assessing an extremely small number of trial participants. This numbered only 94 out of 40,000 participants in the Pfizer trial (0.2% of the total cohort) who were the first participants to develop mild symptoms and who tested PCR positive for SARS-CoV-2. The efficacy claim is based on the fact that 95% of this small group were in the placebo arm. Due to the small numbers, we consider that this has limited statistical significance and , in any case, is only a measure of Relative Risk Reduction. Closer scrutiny of the figures reveals that the Absolute Risk Reduction to an individual inferred by the vaccine is only about 0.4%. In addition, the full raw trial data is yet to be published and multiple cases of clinical disease, including two cases of serious disease in the vaccine group, were not included in the analysis, as they were not confirmed with a positive test.


    ...

    17. For a disease that has an infection fatality rate of <0.1% for most of the population (aged <70 years), the usefulness of mass vaccination programmes is currently questionable, especially in the absence of robust safety data. Even in the elderly, aged >70 years, the recovery rate from Covid-19 is in the range of the claimed effectiveness of the currently approved vaccines


    23. Attempts at developing a vaccine against coronavirus have been in progress for almost 20 years at least since the emergence of *SARS-CoV-2 in 2002. These have been unsuccessful, mainly due to serious safety concerns in the animal trials. Specifically, an effect of immune enhancement or antibody-dependent immune enhancement (ADIE) was observed, which caused animals to develop more severe disease when exposed to the wild virus after immunisation.


    *This appears to have been a typo

    Source documents linked via the pdf link provided.
    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  28. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    Akasha (3rd February 2021), Arcturian108 (3rd February 2021), enigma3 (17th February 2021), Harmony (3rd February 2021), Johan (Keyholder) (3rd February 2021), Karen (Geophyz) (3rd February 2021), pueblo (3rd February 2021), Stephanie (5th March 2021), Zirconian (3rd February 2021)

  29. Link to Post #55
    United States Moderator Sue (Ayt)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd December 2016
    Language
    English
    Posts
    986
    Thanks
    9,492
    Thanked 7,533 times in 979 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    Quote Posted by pueblo (here)
    There is an interesting point raised in the video posted above by roguemoon that I had always thought strange. We are mandated to wear a mask over the mouth and nose to supposedly stop transmission of the virus through particles in our SALIVA.

    If the virus is present in our saliva why can they not just swab the inside of the mouth for the PCR test? Why do they have to stick a swab all the way up your nose to your blood brain barrier??
    I found it odd that the scientist who invented a saliva test for covid died just a few days ago, of a heart attack...

    Andrew Brooks, Designer of COVID-19 Saliva Test, Dies at 51
    The Rutgers University researcher created the first FDA-authorized spit test, which has since been used by millions of people.

    Andrew Brooks, a molecular neuroscientist who developed the first COVID-19 saliva test to receive emergency use authorization by the US Food and Drug Administration, died on January 23 of a heart attack. He was 51.

    In the early days of the pandemic, when testing resources such as swabs and reagents were scarce, Brooks’s saliva test offered a fast and reliable way to screen large numbers of people. The test, which he designed while head of the Rutgers-affiliated biorepository RUCDR Infinite Biologics, protected essential workers from exposure to the virus as they collected samples by doing away with the need for technicians to be on-hand to gather the fluid—people could simply spit into a cup. The FDA first authorized the test in April 2020, and a month later expanded marketing for in-home use.

    “It completely mitigates the risk of contracting the disease while you’re getting a test,” Brooks told The Scientist in a July 2020 interview. “You don’t have to be in someone’s face like you do for a nasopharyngeal swab,” another type of test that faced severe supply shortages beginning in mid-March.

    more: https://www.the-scientist.com/news-o...es-at-51-68414
    "We're all bozos on this bus"

  30. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Sue (Ayt) For This Post:

    Akasha (3rd February 2021), avid (3rd February 2021), enigma3 (17th February 2021), Harmony (4th February 2021), Jill (3rd February 2021), Johan (Keyholder) (3rd February 2021), Karen (Geophyz) (3rd February 2021), kfm27917 (5th March 2021), meat suit (3rd February 2021), pueblo (3rd February 2021), Stephanie (5th March 2021), Tintin (4th February 2021), Zirconian (3rd February 2021)

  31. Link to Post #56
    Ireland Avalon Member pueblo's Avatar
    Join Date
    5th February 2016
    Posts
    909
    Thanks
    4,670
    Thanked 6,009 times in 881 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    Hard to see Vernon get so emotional at the end, he really is a good guy. So many people starting to reach breaking point with this ****. We have to stay strong and end the charade.

    https://brandnewtube.com/v/fRdX4T

  32. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to pueblo For This Post:

    ByTheNorthernSea (3rd February 2021), Dorjezigzag (3rd February 2021), East Sun (3rd February 2021), Jill (3rd February 2021), Johan (Keyholder) (3rd February 2021), Matthew (3rd February 2021), Metaphor (3rd February 2021), Tintin (3rd February 2021), Zirconian (3rd February 2021)

  33. Link to Post #57
    Avalon Member Jill's Avatar
    Join Date
    31st January 2011
    Posts
    728
    Thanks
    4,266
    Thanked 5,362 times in 678 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    This tic-toc video someone who managed to get hold of one of the testing q-tips pulling apart the tip to see the contents - shows a lot of moving silver threads that are labelled as a synthetic life form:
    https://www.facebook.com/masolei.rom...61462250582329

  34. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Jill For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (4th February 2021), ByTheNorthernSea (3rd February 2021), Dick (3rd February 2021), Nasu (12th March 2021), pueblo (3rd February 2021), Stephanie (5th March 2021), Sunny (21st March 2021), Tintin (4th February 2021), Zirconian (3rd February 2021)

  35. Link to Post #58
    UK Avalon Member Matthew's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th July 2015
    Location
    South East England
    Age
    48
    Posts
    927
    Thanks
    8,830
    Thanked 4,913 times in 886 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    Quote Posted by pueblo (here)
    Hard to see Vernon get so emotional at the end, he really is a good guy. So many people starting to reach breaking point with this ****. We have to stay strong and end the charade.

    https://brandnewtube.com/v/fRdX4T
    His opening argument, on the authority of celebrity, was spot-on reasonable - you could show that to your blue-pilled grandma.

    After that he mostly keeps his composure but elevates to being alarmed while making some points. At the end, after he has made his points, he is distressed. Because Vernon has a good grasp of subjects like Agenda 21, I guess having lots of the pieces, and then seeing a horrible, nay evil picture, no wonder he was distressed. The sinister implications his finding make to me (he doesn't spell it out), well, ..I'm finding it hard to elaborate in text-searchable-terms. Imo it's a see for yourself jobby, the video is 15m 18s long

  36. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Matthew For This Post:

    ByTheNorthernSea (3rd February 2021), meat suit (7th February 2021), pueblo (3rd February 2021), Tintin (4th February 2021), Zirconian (3rd February 2021)

  37. Link to Post #59
    Canada Avalon Member Ernie Nemeth's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th January 2011
    Location
    Toronto
    Age
    63
    Posts
    4,580
    Thanks
    19,260
    Thanked 27,190 times in 4,313 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    From now on I will be calling this an inoculation and not a vaccine or gene therapy. It is the most accurate descriptor.
    Empty your mind, be formless, shapeless — like water...Now water can flow or it can crash. Be water, my friend. Bruce Lee

  38. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Ernie Nemeth For This Post:

    enigma3 (17th February 2021), Harmony (4th February 2021), Matthew (3rd February 2021), pueblo (3rd February 2021), Zirconian (3rd February 2021)

  39. Link to Post #60
    Netherlands Avalon Member Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th February 2011
    Location
    Wijchen, Netherlands
    Language
    Dutch
    Age
    54
    Posts
    168
    Thanks
    876
    Thanked 870 times in 146 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    Quote Posted by Jill (here)
    This tic-toc video someone who managed to get hold of one of the testing q-tips pulling apart the tip to see the contents - shows a lot of moving silver threads that are labelled as a synthetic life form:
    https://www.facebook.com/masolei.rom...61462250582329
    Video is taken down, i can’t see it, its “fact-checked” by Facebook, so we know what that means.

  40. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Dick For This Post:

    Harmony (4th February 2021), Matthew (3rd February 2021), Zirconian (3rd February 2021)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 1 3 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts