+ Reply to Thread
Page 30 of 31 FirstFirst 1 20 30 31 LastLast
Results 581 to 600 of 602

Thread: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

  1. Link to Post #581
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Location
    Project Avalon library
    Language
    English
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,424
    Thanks
    64,193
    Thanked 46,348 times in 5,391 posts

    Default US Patent US11107588B2 | August 31, 2021 - Ehrlich et al

    A little too large to embed here so the abstract may have to suffice.

    Source: https://patentimages.storage.googlea...US11107588.pdf

    Google Patent link: https://patents.google.com/patent/US...en?oq=11107588

    Methods and systems of prioritizing treatments, vaccination, testing and/or activities while protecting the privacy of individuals
    ABSTRACT
    System and methods for anonymously selecting subjects for
    treatment against an infectious disease caused by a patho
    gen . The system comprises a plurality of electronic devices
    comprising instructions to generate an ID and , when in
    proximity of another such electronic device , one or both
    electronic devices transmit / receive the ID to / from the other
    electronic device . Then , a score is generated based on a
    plurality of such received IDs . Additionally , based on infor
    mation received from a server , relevant treatment instruc
    tions are displayed to the subjects based on the received
    information and the score . The server comprises instructions
    for sending to the plurality of electronic devices the infor
    mation to be displayed with the relevant treatment instruc
    tions , additionally the server and / or the electronic devices
    comprise instructions to generate a prediction of likelihood
    of a subject transmitting the pathogen , based on the score of
    the subject
    An associated tweet:

    Last edited by Tintin; 7th October 2021 at 12:40. Reason: Added Google Patent link
    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  2. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    Ankle Biter (7th November 2021), Arcturian108 (8th October 2021), avid (7th October 2021), Bill Ryan (8th October 2021), Ewan (9th October 2021), fifi (8th October 2021), gord (7th October 2021), Gwin Ru (7th October 2021), Harmony (7th October 2021), Kryztian (8th October 2021), mountain_jim (7th October 2021), Pam (8th October 2021), Reinhard (8th October 2021), RunningDeer (4th November 2021), wondering (9th October 2021)

  3. Link to Post #582
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    8,713
    Thanks
    59,185
    Thanked 77,224 times in 8,550 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    ^
    Based on the links in the post, and while I only skimmed the patent text, I see no indication in that patent that the vaccinated body is the device on the IOT, written more like it's a smart phone and app.

    The What is this? text implies much that is not in that patent, and to me that is a little disingenuous to state that as the clear purpose of the patent until the body contents as a communications device are more proven, and also patented perhaps.

    Not saying it's not possible or planned, but that patent does not cover the body as device component explicitly in my view

    (welcome to change my mind).
    Last edited by mountain_jim; 9th October 2021 at 13:00.
    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  4. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    Alecs (9th October 2021), Ankle Biter (7th November 2021), Bill Ryan (8th October 2021), DeeMetrios (9th October 2021), Ewan (9th October 2021), gord (7th October 2021), Gwin Ru (8th October 2021), Harmony (8th October 2021), Kryztian (8th October 2021), Pam (8th October 2021), RunningDeer (4th November 2021), Tintin (8th October 2021), wondering (9th October 2021)

  5. Link to Post #583
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Location
    Project Avalon library
    Language
    English
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,424
    Thanks
    64,193
    Thanked 46,348 times in 5,391 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    Quote Posted by mountain_jim (here)
    ^
    Based on the links in the post, and while I only skimmed the patent text, I see no indication in that patent that the vaccinated body is the device on the IOT, written more like it's a smart phone and app.

    The What is this? text implies much that is not in that patent, and to me that is a little disingenuous to state that as the clear purpose of the patent until the body contents as a communications device are more proven, and also patented perhaps.

    Not saying it's not possible or planned, but that patent does not cover the body as device component explicitly in my view

    (welcome to change my mind).
    Yes, I actually do concur here - it was an initial thought for me too.

    The speculative conclusion atop the patent clip is I think just that - here's a classic 'watch this space' situation here as it may not be unfounded, in time. Still, that this patent was approved for its stated aims gives one real pause, for concern.
    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  6. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    Ankle Biter (7th November 2021), Bill Ryan (8th October 2021), Ewan (9th October 2021), gord (8th October 2021), Gwin Ru (8th October 2021), Harmony (8th October 2021), Kryztian (8th October 2021), mountain_jim (8th October 2021), Pam (8th October 2021), Reinhard (8th October 2021), RunningDeer (4th November 2021), wondering (9th October 2021)

  7. Link to Post #584
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Location
    Project Avalon library
    Language
    English
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,424
    Thanks
    64,193
    Thanked 46,348 times in 5,391 posts

    Default Reactivation of IgA vasculitis after COVID-19 vaccination

    From The Lancet correspondence page, July 6th, 2021.
    A woman aged 78 years with a history
    of IgA vasculitis with leukocytoclastic
    vasculitis, and renal and gastrointestinal
    involvement, had been in remission for
    2 years with no immunosuppressant
    medication, before receiving the
    mRNA-1273 (Moderna) COVID-19
    vaccine. At day seven post-vaccination,
    the patient had diarrhoea (6 times per
    day) and diffuse abdominal pain with
    acute onset (appendix p 1). Her vaccines
    were up to date, including yearly
    influenza, and previous vaccinations
    had never caused an IgA vasculitis
    reactivation. She had not taken any
    new medication and showed no signs
    of any infection including SARS-CoV-2
    before vaccination with mRNA-1273,
    at admission to hospital, or during
    hospitalisation
    Source: Avalon Library

    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  8. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    Ankle Biter (7th November 2021), Bill Ryan (8th October 2021), Ewan (9th October 2021), fifi (10th October 2021), gord (8th October 2021), Gwin Ru (8th October 2021), Harmony (8th October 2021), mountain_jim (8th October 2021), Pam (7th November 2021), Reinhard (8th October 2021), RunningDeer (4th November 2021), wondering (9th October 2021)

  9. Link to Post #585
    UK Avalon Member Matthew's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th July 2015
    Location
    South East England
    Language
    English
    Age
    51
    Posts
    4,127
    Thanks
    25,578
    Thanked 36,102 times in 4,060 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    Peppa Pig gets a vaccination. Peppa Pig is a VERY popular British children's character.





    Then there's this vaccination Doll. Again, I wonder if it's real, because it looks to me exactly the same as a parody, but that is no guarantee that this is fake. God, I hope it's a great joke

    I HOPE THIS IS FAKE

    Ninnyd Flag of United Kingdom Red heart Flag of United States Waiting~4~the Revolution, @ninnyd101
    Just in time for Christmas a updated covid doll.
    With all the crap that comes with it.
    Indoctrinating the Kids with the toys
    <There's a video of an advert showing a classic child's plastic doll with a range of covid paraphernalia including a heat testing gun, a covid test, a vaccination syringe and a vaccination card/pass ...all for the child to apply to the doll>

  10. The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to Matthew For This Post:

    Ankle Biter (7th November 2021), Arcturian108 (8th October 2021), Bill Ryan (8th October 2021), DaveToo (9th October 2021), Ewan (9th October 2021), fifi (27th October 2021), gord (8th October 2021), Gwin Ru (8th October 2021), Harmony (8th October 2021), Kryztian (8th October 2021), meat suit (9th October 2021), Michel Leclerc (8th October 2021), mountain_jim (8th October 2021), Pam (7th November 2021), RunningDeer (4th November 2021), Tintin (8th October 2021), wondering (9th October 2021)

  11. Link to Post #586
    Avalon Member Kryztian's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th September 2012
    Posts
    3,476
    Thanks
    23,664
    Thanked 29,327 times in 3,414 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    Quote Posted by Matthew (here)
    Then there's this vaccination Doll. Again, I wonder if it's real, because it looks to me exactly the same as a parody, but that is no guarantee that this is fake. God, I hope it's a great joke

    I HOPE THIS IS FAKE

    Ninnyd Flag of United Kingdom Red heart Flag of United States Waiting~4~the Revolution, @ninnyd101
    Just in time for Christmas a updated covid doll.
    With all the crap that comes with it.
    Indoctrinating the Kids with the toys
    <There's a video of an advert showing a classic child's plastic doll with a range of covid paraphernalia including a heat testing gun, a covid test, a vaccination syringe and a vaccination card/pass ...all for the child to apply to the doll>
    Alas, it is a real product.

    https://www.nenucofamosa.es/juguetes...-estas-malito/

    Showing kids how you can be vaccinated over and over again should prepare them for life of continuous booster shots.



    Quote Nenuco, ¿Estás Malito?

    ¿Nenuco está malito? Necesitamos comprobarlo con los accesorios incluidos: termómetro con luz real, test, pañuelo de papel, jarabe, cuchara, chupete, vacuna, tiritas de colores, y cartilla de vacunación en papel con un porta cartillas de tela.
    El termómetro tiene luz de verdad. Y cuando le haces el test a Nenuco, aparecerá una cara roja o verde al azar. Nenuco es un muñeco de 35cm de cuerpo duro. Puedes vestir y desvestir al muñeco y la ropa se puede lavar. El muñeco puede beber agua.
    From Google translate: Is Nenuco sick? We need to check it with the included accessories: thermometer with real light, test, tissue, syrup, spoon, pacifier, vaccine, colored strips, and paper vaccination card with a cloth card holder.
    The thermometer has real light. And when you test Nenuco, a random red or green face will appear. Nenuco is a 35cm doll with a hard body. You can dress and undress the doll and the clothes can be washed. The doll can drink water.
    "If seeds in the black earth can turn into such beautiful roses, what might not the heart of man become in its long journey toward the stars?"
    --- G.K. Chesterton

  12. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to Kryztian For This Post:

    Ankle Biter (7th November 2021), Bill Ryan (8th October 2021), DaveToo (9th October 2021), Ewan (9th October 2021), fifi (27th October 2021), gord (8th October 2021), Gwin Ru (8th October 2021), Harmony (10th October 2021), Matthew (8th October 2021), Michel Leclerc (8th October 2021), mountain_jim (9th October 2021), Pam (7th November 2021), Reinhard (4th November 2021), RunningDeer (4th November 2021), Tintin (27th October 2021), wondering (9th October 2021)

  13. Link to Post #587
    UK Avalon Member Matthew's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th July 2015
    Location
    South East England
    Language
    English
    Age
    51
    Posts
    4,127
    Thanks
    25,578
    Thanked 36,102 times in 4,060 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine




  14. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Matthew For This Post:

    Ankle Biter (7th November 2021), Bill Ryan (8th October 2021), Ewan (9th October 2021), gord (8th October 2021), Gwin Ru (8th October 2021), Harmony (10th October 2021), Kryztian (9th October 2021), Michel Leclerc (8th October 2021), mountain_jim (9th October 2021), Pam (7th November 2021), Reinhard (4th November 2021), RunningDeer (4th November 2021), Tintin (27th October 2021)

  15. Link to Post #588
    Belgium Avalon Member
    Join Date
    6th April 2014
    Location
    France
    Language
    Dutch, French
    Age
    74
    Posts
    751
    Thanks
    10,257
    Thanked 6,085 times in 735 posts

    Post Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    Quote Posted by Kryztian (here)
    Quote Posted by Matthew (here)
    Then there's this vaccination Doll. Again, I wonder if it's real, because it looks to me exactly the same as a parody, but that is no guarantee that this is fake. God, I hope it's a great joke
    (...)

    Alas, it is a real product.

    ¿Nenuco está malito? Necesitamos comprobarlo con los accesorios incluidos: termómetro con luz real, test, pañuelo de papel, jarabe, cuchara, chupete, vacuna, tiritas de colores, y cartilla de vacunación en papel con un porta cartillas de tela.
    El termómetro tiene luz de verdad. Y cuando le haces el test a Nenuco, aparecerá una cara roja o verde al azar. Nenuco es un muñeco de 35cm de cuerpo duro. Puedes vestir y desvestir al muñeco y la ropa se puede lavar. El muñeco puede beber agua.
    From Google translate: Is Nenuco sick? We need to check it with the included accessories: thermometer with real light, test, tissue, syrup, spoon, pacifier, vaccine, colored strips, and paper vaccination card with a cloth card holder.
    The thermometer has real light. And when you test Nenuco, a random red or green face will appear. Nenuco is a 35cm doll with a hard body. You can dress and undress the doll and the clothes can be washed. The doll can drink water.
    For more than half a century children have been taught that they are plastic dolls and have been treated as such, so that when on a whim of one of the parents they get a doll that bites or scratches when they hit their doll bodies, cat and dog pets end up near roadkill hotspots.

    Now, exactly like when teen fashion and ICT geekiness are used to inflect their parents’ buying behaviour, it is the plastic dolls who those kids are will not only want to be injected with all kinds of stuff, but their parents will take their clue and do as they’re told (their kids do).

    Adults are after all only just kids, or even babies, and ultimately dolls.

    They can be infantilised, raped, organ-harvested, and disappeared in the waste incinerators.

  16. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Michel Leclerc For This Post:

    Ankle Biter (7th November 2021), Bill Ryan (9th October 2021), Gwin Ru (19th October 2021), Harmony (10th October 2021), Kryztian (9th October 2021), Pam (7th November 2021), Reinhard (4th November 2021), RunningDeer (4th November 2021), Tintin (27th October 2021)

  17. Link to Post #589
    United States Avalon Member Arcturian108's Avatar
    Join Date
    9th August 2015
    Location
    Blue Ridge Mountains
    Language
    English
    Posts
    943
    Thanks
    9,901
    Thanked 8,326 times in 930 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    This is the attitude that beats the agenda:


    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/6tLTy0vEKJkP
    Last edited by Bill Ryan; 9th October 2021 at 22:04. Reason: embedded the video

  18. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Arcturian108 For This Post:

    Ankle Biter (7th November 2021), Bassplayer1 (9th October 2021), Bill Ryan (9th October 2021), DeeMetrios (20th October 2021), fifi (10th October 2021), gord (10th October 2021), Gwin Ru (19th October 2021), Harmony (10th October 2021), Johan (Keyholder) (19th October 2021), Pam (7th November 2021), Reinhard (4th November 2021), RunningDeer (4th November 2021), Tintin (27th October 2021)

  19. Link to Post #590
    United States Avalon Member Arcturian108's Avatar
    Join Date
    9th August 2015
    Location
    Blue Ridge Mountains
    Language
    English
    Posts
    943
    Thanks
    9,901
    Thanked 8,326 times in 930 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    Mainstream news right now is that Southwest Airlines caved under pressure from their employees, and will not put them on unpaid leave if they are not vaccinated. There is power in collective pushback:
    https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/19/sout...xemptions.html

  20. The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to Arcturian108 For This Post:

    Ankle Biter (7th November 2021), Bill Ryan (26th October 2021), DeeMetrios (20th October 2021), Ernie Nemeth (19th October 2021), Ewan (27th October 2021), fifi (27th October 2021), gini (27th October 2021), gord (19th October 2021), Gwin Ru (19th October 2021), Harmony (20th October 2021), Johan (Keyholder) (19th October 2021), justntime2learn (28th October 2021), Pam (7th November 2021), Peace in Oz (22nd October 2021), Reinhard (4th November 2021), RunningDeer (4th November 2021), Tintin (27th October 2021)

  21. Link to Post #591
    UK Avalon Member Matthew's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th July 2015
    Location
    South East England
    Language
    English
    Age
    51
    Posts
    4,127
    Thanks
    25,578
    Thanked 36,102 times in 4,060 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    Oof. 5-11 year olds are one of the safest groups from covid, so 17-0 is ridiculous.


    Disclose.tv
    @disclosetv
    JUST IN - FDA panel votes 17-0 to endorse #COVID19 vaccines for kids 5-11 years old in the US.

  22. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Matthew For This Post:

    Ankle Biter (7th November 2021), Bill Ryan (26th October 2021), DeeMetrios (27th October 2021), Ewan (27th October 2021), fifi (27th October 2021), gord (27th October 2021), Gwin Ru (26th October 2021), Harmony (27th October 2021), justntime2learn (28th October 2021), mountain_jim (27th October 2021), Pam (7th November 2021), Peace in Oz (27th October 2021), Reinhard (4th November 2021), RunningDeer (4th November 2021), Tintin (27th October 2021)

  23. Link to Post #592
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Location
    Project Avalon library
    Language
    English
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,424
    Thanks
    64,193
    Thanked 46,348 times in 5,391 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    Published 2 days ago in Cellular & Molecular Immunology; (link: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-021-00779-5)

    Source PDF

    The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 variant A.30 is heavily mutated and evades vaccine-induced antibodies with high efficiency

    [Extracted]:
    Compared to the S protein of SARS-CoV-2 B.1, which
    circulated in the early phase of the pandemic, the S protein of
    the A.30 variant contains 10 amino acid substitutions and five
    deletions (Fig. 1a and Supplementary information, Fig. S1a). All
    deletions along with four substitutions are found in the
    N-terminal domain of the surface unit S1, which harbors an
    antigenic supersite that is targeted by most neutralizing
    antibodies not directed against the receptor-binding domain
    (RBD) [5]. In addition, three mutations are located inside the
    RBD, which binds to the cellular receptor ACE2 and constitutes
    the main target of neutralizing antibodies
    ............In summary, A.30 exhibits a cell line preference not observed
    for other viral variants and efficiently evades neutralization by
    antibodies elicited by ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or BNT162b2.
    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  24. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    Ankle Biter (7th November 2021), avid (27th October 2021), Bill Ryan (27th October 2021), Brigantia (27th October 2021), Ewan (27th October 2021), gord (27th October 2021), Gwin Ru (27th October 2021), Harmony (27th October 2021), justntime2learn (28th October 2021), mountain_jim (27th October 2021), Pam (28th January 2022), pueblo (4th November 2021), Reinhard (4th November 2021), RunningDeer (4th November 2021), Sunny (28th October 2021)

  25. Link to Post #593
    United States Avalon Member RunningDeer's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th February 2012
    Location
    Forest Dweller
    Language
    English
    Posts
    18,341
    Thanks
    127,398
    Thanked 168,292 times in 18,139 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    BOOSTER DANGER: 10 Times More Potent Than First Shots (14 min)
    • Note: the article is from the video below.
    EXCLUSIVE – VAERS data shows 100% of reported Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of batches produced and the majority were sent to red Republican States across the USA
    On October 31st we exclusively revealed how an investigation of the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) found extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines numerous times, meaning deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified.

    That investigation also led to the discovery that 130 different lot numbers of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine distributed to more than 13 states, harmed on average 639 times more people, hospitalised on average 109 times more people, and killed on average 22 times more people than the 4,289 different lt number of Pfizer vaccine distributed to 12 states or less.

    However, the most shocking finding of the investigation was that 100% of Covid-19 vaccine deaths reported to VAERS with identified lot numbers had been caused by just 5% of the batches produced. But the deeply troubling findings don’t end there, because we decided to conduct further analysis of the VAERS data on the Covid-19 vaccines, and we’ve discovered that the majority of the deadliest batches were clearly sent to Republican controlled red states across the USA.

    article continues





    BOOSTER DANGER: 10 Times More Potent Than First Shots (14 min)
    • source
    • 10 Times More Potent begins @ 8 min.
    Dr. Jane Ruby joined "The Stew Peters Show" for the weekly "Ask Dr. Jane" segment, at which time Ruby announced that new findings suggest the booster shots are "10 times more potent" than the first series of shots that are responsible for the death of nearly 20,000 documented on just the VAERS site, which it has been said only represents as little as 1% of the actual adverse events.

    The Exposé: VAERS data shows 100% of reported Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of batches produced and the majority were sent to red Republican States across the USA

    Get Dr. Zelenko's Anti-Shedding Treatment, NOW AVAILABLE FOR KIDS: www.zStackProtocol.com

  26. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to RunningDeer For This Post:

    Ankle Biter (7th November 2021), avid (7th November 2021), Bill Ryan (7th November 2021), Gwin Ru (4th November 2021), Harmony (7th November 2021), mountain_jim (4th November 2021), Pam (7th November 2021), Reinhard (4th November 2021), wondering (4th November 2021)

  27. Link to Post #594
    UK Avalon Member Matthew's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th July 2015
    Location
    South East England
    Language
    English
    Age
    51
    Posts
    4,127
    Thanks
    25,578
    Thanked 36,102 times in 4,060 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    Quote Posted by Matthew (here)
    Darren stood as an independent candidate in the previous council elections for Peverell in Plymouth, UK. He tweeted this, below. I didn't notice these figures before but it speaks volumes.

    The volumes speak volumes

    @DarrenPlymouth
    UK population 70 million, give or take.

    UK vaccine stock, 517 million doses.

    Overkill don't you think?



    Source tweet
    >=---={}===-----=<




    The 𝓷th jab will set you free. They said it was 2 jabs for holidays but actually it turns out to be a jab every six months. Holidays have nothing to do with it other than being the blatant anecdotal carrot. We don't seem to be getting closer to the carrot.
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .

    ~-+--<>==##--,'{@}



    EXCLUSIVE: No booster... no hassle-free foreign travel: Ministers are drawing up plans to bring back tests and quarantine for those who refuse third Covid jab
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-fail-jab.html
    Plans to reimpose quarantine and testing for those who have refused third vaccine are currently being drawn up by Ministers to protect UK against spread of new coronavirus variants
    • Likely to prove controversial if introduced before most of those eligible for booster have received it. So far, only 60% have done so
    • The move would change the definition of 'fully vaccinated' from having had two jabs to three
    • Officials are divided over how soon to implement the measure and are discussing a grace period
    • This would let people travel without quarantine if they had sought a booster six months after their second jab but had not yet been offered an appointment
    By GLEN OWEN and ANNA MIKHAILOVA FOR THE MAIL ON SUNDAY
    PUBLISHED: 22:06, 6 November 2021 | UPDATED: 22:21, 6 November 2021

    British travellers who fail to take their booster jabs face renewed restrictions, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.

    Plans to reimpose quarantine and testing for those who have refused their third vaccine are currently being drawn up by Ministers to protect the UK against the spread of new coronavirus variants.

    But they are likely to prove controversial if introduced before most of those eligible for their booster have received it. So far, only 60 per cent have done so.

    The move would change the definition of 'fully vaccinated' from having had two jabs to three.

    Officials are divided over how soon to implement the measure and are discussing a grace period that would allow people to travel without quarantine if they had sought a booster six months after their second jab but had not yet been offered an appointment.
    ...

  28. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Matthew For This Post:

    Ankle Biter (7th November 2021), avid (7th November 2021), Bill Ryan (7th November 2021), Ewan (10th November 2021), gord (7th November 2021), Gwin Ru (7th November 2021), Harmony (7th November 2021), Mare (7th November 2021), Pam (7th November 2021), Reinhard (7th November 2021)

  29. Link to Post #595
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,190
    Thanks
    47,631
    Thanked 115,975 times in 20,621 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    Why No One Can Force You to Get the COVID Jab
    What You Need to Know About Comirnaty

    by Dr. Joseph Mercola
    November 07, 2021
    https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...rid=1315259576


    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/jtMKzuKfAlR3


    "STORY AT-A-GLANCE
    Pfizer/BioNTech’s Comirnaty COVID shot was approved (licensed) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in late August 2021, but only for adults, and only when carrying the Comirnaty label.
    No other COVID shot has been FDA approved. However, Comirnaty is currently not available, and while the experimental, emergency use authorized (EUA) Pfizer shot is substituted for Comirnaty, the two products are clearly legally distinct and not the same
    A licensed vaccine is not shielded from liability until or unless it’s added to the recommended childhood vaccination schedule by the CDC.
    So, if you were injured by Comirnaty, you could sue Pfizer. You cannot sue if injured by the EUA Pfizer shot (or any of the other EUA COVID injections)
    Even though several hundred claims have been filed with the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) for injuries resulting from the COVID shots — which is the only possible avenue to obtain damages — not a single claim has been paid out
    Natural immunity is much stronger than what you can achieve from the injection, which only provides antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and wanes within a few months.
    The shots may in fact permanently limit the kind of immune response you would make were you to later be exposed or infected with COVID
    Children’s Health Defense has filed a lawsuit arguing you cannot have a vaccine that is both an emergency use product and a licensed product at the same time. That's against the law, but the government has done it anyway.
    Remarkably, the request for an injunction was initially thrown out, but the CHD has not given up and is still pursuing the case

    "In this interview, Dr. Meryl Nass, an internist specializing in toxicology, vaccine-induced illnesses and Gulf War illness, shares her insights into the dangers of the COVID jab, which received an emergency use authorization October 26, 2021, for children as young as 5.

    We also discuss the conflicts of interest within the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that seem to be behind this reckless decision, and how the agency pulled the wool over our eyes with its approval of Pfizer/BioNTech’s Comirnaty COVID injection.

    Is the COVID Jab Approved or Not?
    As explained by Nass:

    “All of the COVID ‘vaccines,’ and most of the COVID treatment products, have not been [FDA] approved. Approved means licensed. All except one, which is the Pfizer vaccine for adults, age 16 and up, which got approved, i.e., licensed on August 23 [2021].

    But every other vaccine, and for every other age group, including the boosters, have only been authorized under emergency use authorizations (EUAs). There's a critical difference [between licensing and EUA]. Once a drug is fully licensed, it is subject to liability.

    If the company injures you with that product, you can sue them, unless it later gets put on the CDC’s childhood schedule or is recommended by the CDC [U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] [during] pregnancy, in which case it obtains a different liability shield.

    It then becomes part of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP, established under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act), and 75 cents from every dose of vaccine that is sold in the United States goes into a fund to pay for injuries that way.”

    The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act removed liability for all vaccines recommended by the CDC for children. Since 2016, they’ve also removed liability for vaccines given to pregnant women, a category that has become the latest “gold rush” for vaccines. Naturally, once a company is no longer liable for injuries, the profitability of the product in question increases dramatically.

    Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program Is Nearly Useless
    Products under emergency use have their own special government program for liability called the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP). “It is a terrible program,” Nass says. CICP is an offshoot of the 2005 PREP Act.

    “The PREP act enabled the CICP to be created by Congress,” Nass explains. “Congress has to allocate money for it. If you are injured by an emergency use product, you don't get any legal process. The companies have had all their liability waived. There is a single process that is administered through HHS [Health and Human Services].

    Some employees there decide whether you deserve to be compensated or not. The maximum in damages you can obtain is about $370,000 if you're totally disabled or die, and the money is only to compensate you for lost wages or unpaid medical bills.”

    So far, even though several hundred CICP claims have been filed for injuries resulting from the COVID shots, not a single claim has been paid out. This is important, because the statute of limitations is one year. “It's getting close to running out for people who were vaccinated early,” Nass says.

    If you fail to apply in time, you lose the opportunity to get any compensation entirely. “Of course, in fact, it's really ‘an opportunity’ to apply and get nothing because almost nobody gets paid,” she says. At that point, you have no further recourse. There’s no appeals process to the judicial system.

    “You can ask the HHS twice to compensate you, and if they say no, that's it,” Nass explains. “You can attempt to sue the company that made the product, if you're convinced it was improperly made, but the secretary of HHS has to give you the permission to sue.

    You have to prove that there was willful misconduct and no one has ever reached that bar. So, there has never been a lawsuit under this. Anyway, that's what you're looking at. If you get the vaccine under EUA and are injured, you're on your own. People have no idea about this when they vaccinate themselves or their children.”

    Why Were the Shots Mandated?
    As you know by now, president Biden decided to mandate the COVID jab for most federal employees (but not all) and private companies with 100 employees or more. “We don't know why that is,” Nass says. It doesn't make sense, as large numbers of Americans have already recovered from COVID-19 and have durable, long-lasting immunity already.

    As correctly noted by Nass, natural immunity is much stronger than what you can achieve from the injection, which only provides antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and wears off within a few months. The shots “may in fact permanently limit the kind of immune response you would make were you to be infected with COVID later,” Nass says.

    For these reasons, there’s absolutely no good reason to vaccinate people who have recovered from the infection and several bad reasons. There’s evidence showing the shot can be more harmful for those with existing immunity.

    “But for reasons best known to itself, the Biden administration feels so certain it needs to vaccinate everybody that it has used illegal means to tell employers they will lose federal contracts if they don't force their employees to be vaccinated immediately, and must fire them — if they're health care workers, for example, or government employees, or military — if they have not been vaccinated.

    Obviously that is creating a great deal of chaos, particularly within the health care industry, particularly in my state, Maine, where these draconian rules have gone into effect and many fire department, police, EMTs, nurses and doctors can no longer work.

    The one thing that was necessary to push mandates forward was for the government to be able to say it had a licensed product. Before the emergency use authorization was created in 2005, you had licensed drugs and you had experimental drugs and nothing else.

    There was no gray area between them. Any use of a medication or vaccine that is not fully licensed is still experimental, despite the fact that a new category of drugs has been created with emergency use authorizations.

    These are still experimental drugs, so under emergency use, you can't force people [to take them]. You have to offer them options and they have the right to refuse. Since that is part of the statute, the federal government can't get around it.

    Therefore, attorneys in the Biden administration knew they could not legally impose mandates under an EUA, and so they demanded that FDA provide a COVID vaccine full approval, aka, an unrestricted license. This was believed to enable them to impose mandates.

    They must have put pressure on the FDA, and FDA gave them what they wanted, which was a license for the Pfizer vaccine called Comirnaty on August 23 [2021].”

    Comirnaty Approval Includes Important Caveats
    In the documents released August 23, 2021, by the FDA, there were some interesting caveats. They said the Comirnaty vaccine is essentially equivalent to the EUA vaccine and the two vaccines may be used interchangeably. However, they pointed out that the two are legally distinct. Curiously, FDA didn't specify what these legal distinctions are.

    “I concluded that the legal distinctions were the fact that under EUA, there was essentially no manufacturer liability, but once the vaccine got licensed, the manufacturer would be subject to liability claims unless and until the vaccine was placed on the childhood schedule or recommended in pregnancy, in which case it would then fall ... under the NVICP,” Nass says.

    “Right now, Comirnaty is still not in that injury compensation program, and it's licensed, so it no longer falls under the CICP. So, it is in fact subject to liability if you get injured with a bottle that says Comirnaty on it. Of course, if you’re Pfizer, what do you want to do?

    You don't want to make that licensed product available until several months have gone by and Comirnaty has been put into the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program. So, Pfizer and FDA have not made the licensed product available yet.

    What has happened instead, in the military, is the FDA has made a secret deal with the military and said, certain emergency use lots can be considered equivalent to the licensed vaccine, and [told military medical staff] which QR codes — which lots can be used. [These specific lots] can then be given to soldiers as if they're licensed.

    Subsequently, we're told that military clinics are actually putting Comirnaty labels onto bottles that are under EUA. Now, that probably can happen in the military, but only in the military, because there are likely to be memoranda of understanding within the military that we haven't seen yet that say soldiers cannot sue Pfizer for injuries ...

    In the military, the government and Pfizer feel like they have set up a situation where nobody can sue, but in the civilian world, that has not happened, and so there is no Comirnaty available.

    Yet, on the basis that FDA licensed this product, the federal government is still telling employers that they can mandate it and that they must fire employees that have not taken the vaccine, or they will lose government contracts. We're in a very interesting situation that is ripe for litigation, and Children's Health Defense, which is an organization I represent, is litigating some of this.

    However, the litigation situation has been very difficult since the pandemic began. Cases that normally would've been easy wins are being thrown out by the courts, both in the U.S. and in Europe. Something strange has happened and the judges are looking for any way out, so they don't have to rule on the merits of these cases.”

    The organization Children’s Health Defense has filed a lawsuit arguing you cannot have a vaccine that is both an emergency use product and a licensed product at the same time. That's against the law, but the federal government did it anyway. Remarkably, the request for an injunction was initially thrown out, but Children’s Health Defense hasn’t given up and is still pursuing that case.

    COVID Jab Is Authorized for 5- to 11-Year-Olds in the US
    As mentioned, the FDA recently authorized the EUA COVID jab for children between the ages of 5 and 11, which is simply appalling, considering they are at virtually no risk from COVID-19. I’ve not seen a single recorded case in the entire world of anyone in that age group dying of COVID that didn't have a serious preexisting comorbidity, such as cancer.

    If you have a healthy child, they are at no risk from the infection, so there’s only danger associated with this shot, which in this age group would be one-third the adult dose. Typically, when you’re giving a drug to a child, the dose is calculated based on the child’s weight. Here, they’re giving the same dose to a 5-year-old as an 11-year-old, despite there being a significant difference in weight. So, it’s pure guesswork.

    Worse yet, the mRNA vaccines produce an unpredictable amount of spike protein, and even if they produce much too much, there is no way to turn off the process once you have been injected.

    Despite clear safety signals, the FDA’s advisory committee authorized the Pfizer jab for 5- to 11-year-olds unanimously, 17-to-0 (with one abstaining vote). However, when you look at the roster of the FDA’s committee members1 who reviewed and voted to authorize the Pfizer shot for children as young as 5, the unanimous “yes” vote becomes less of a mystery.

    Abhorrent Conflicts of Interest
    As reported by National File2 and The Defender,3 the membership of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) has had staggering conflicts of interest. Members have included:

    A former vice president of Pfizer Vaccines

    A paid Pfizer consultant

    A recent Pfizer research grant recipient

    A mentor to Raphael Simon, senior director of vaccine research and development at Pfizer

    James Hidreth — President of Meharry Medical College, which administers Pfizer vaccines

    A chair of the Independent Data Monitoring Committee for the Pfizer Group B Streptococcus Vaccine Program

    An individual proudly photographed taking a Pfizer vaccine

    Several people who are already on the record supporting coronavirus vaccines for children, including Ofer Levy, Jay Portnoy and Melinda Wharton

    In addition to that, former FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb is currently on Pfizer’s board of directors. As noted by Nass, two of the members, one permanent and one temporary, are also CDC career employees whose job it is to push vaccines at the CDC.

    “If they voted against authorizing a vaccine, they would be out of a job,” Nass says. “They have no business on that committee ... It's a very unethical stew of advisory committee members ...

    What happened is Pfizer delivered a large package of information to the FDA on October 6, 2021. FDA staff had to go through this large packet of information on the 5- to 11-year-olds and produce their own report, which was about 40 pages long, and create talks to give to the advisory committee, and they did all of this in 17 days.

    There was apparently very little critical thought that went into their presentations. Before the meeting, Children’s Health Defense, and I was one of the authors, wrote to the committee and to FDA officials saying, ‘Look, there's all these reasons that don't make logical or medical sense for vaccinating kids in this age group, because they almost never get very ill or die, and the side effects of the vaccine are essentially unknown.

    We know there are a lot of side effects, but the federal government has concealed from us the rate at which these side effects occur. But we know that the rate from myocarditis is very high, probably at least 1 in 5,000 young males ... which is a very serious side effect. It can lead, probably always leads, to some scarring. It can lead to sudden death, to heart failure.”

    Trials in Young Children Were Insufficient
    As explained by Nass, in the clinical trial, there were two groups of children. The first group was enrolled for two to three months, while the second group was enrolled for just 17 days after receiving the second dose. (Pfizer added the second group because FDA claimed there weren’t enough volunteers in the first group.)

    These two groups comprised over 3,000 children who got the jab and 1,500 or 2,000 who got a placebo. None suffered serious side effects. This was then translated into the claim that the injection was safe. However, as noted by Nass:

    “They didn't look at safety in all these kids. Even though FDA had said, ‘Add kids to your clinical trial,’ Pfizer created a ‘safety subset’ of one-tenth of the vaccinated subjects.

    It was this small number of kids from whom they drew blood to show they had adequate levels of neutralizing antibodies, which was a surrogate for efficacy, because they didn't have enough cases of COVID in this abbreviated trial to show that the vaccine actually works in this age group.”

    Even though the advisory committee acknowledged that the blood test done for efficacy had not been validated, and wasn't reliable evidence of effectiveness, they still decided that all children, regardless of health status, would benefit from the injection.

    They also ignored the fact that at least half the children are already immune, and giving them the injection will provide no additional benefit in terms of immunity, while putting them at increased risk for serious side effects.

    “Nobody said, ‘Look, the parents of healthy kids may be dying for a vaccine, but that's because we haven't told them the truth about the vaccine. We haven't told them their kids don't need it. We haven't told them it's going to potentially damage future immunity.

    We haven't told them they're at higher risk of side effects than if they never had COVID. We're not allowing them to go get antibody tests to establish that they're already immune and therefore should be waved from being vaccinated.’

    The committee members were aware of all this stuff, but in the end [they voted yes] ... apart from one very smart member of the committee who works for the National Institutes of Health. He abstained. He didn't have the guts to vote no, but he knew this was a bad idea.”

    Children Are Being Injected Without Parental Consent
    While all of that is bad enough, parents of young children now face the possibility of their children being injected against their will and without their knowledge. Nass comments:

    “As I said, we don't know why the government wants everybody vaccinated, but there's probably a reason that goes beyond protecting us from COVID.

    The government got the FDA to authorize the vaccine for 12- to 15-year-olds on May 10 [2021], and subsequently that group, which is about 6 million kids, has been getting vaccinated across the country. That's under emergency use so, again, you can't sue.

    But something kind of evil happened, which was many cities began vaccinating 12- to 15-year-olds in the absence of parental permission. So, a child could show up with their friends or a friend's mother at a vaccine center and get vaccinated with no one asking about their medical history, nobody calling the parents. No notation got entered into the child’s medical record that they were vaccinated.

    Vaccinators were told to make their own assessment. If they thought this child could give consent, go ahead and vaccinate. Now, that is a gross violation of our laws, and yet it was happening in Boston, in Philadelphia, in Seattle, in San Francisco, and we have good documentation of it.

    The government currently is planning for mobile vaccination clinics for kids and vaccinations in schools, and they may take this program of vaccinating without parental consent down to the 5- to 11-year-olds ...

    In fact, we may see clinics popping up that don't require informed consent in the 5- to 11-year-old group. Let me just mention that the chief medical officer in Canada's British Columbia said they have brought laws that allow children of any age to consent for themselves. Think about that. A baby can consent for vaccinations for itself. It would be funny if it wasn’t so diabolical.”

    All of this goes against the most basic concept of medical ethics, which is informed consent. No one has the right to perform a medical procedure on you without your consent, or the consent of a legal guardian. The government, again, without establishing any new laws, is simply bypassing the legal system.

    Will Young Children Be at Risk for Myocarditis?
    Based on her review of the scientific literature, Nass suspects younger children in the now COVID jab-approved, 5- to 11-year-old age group will be at exponentially higher risk of myocarditis and other side effects compared to the 12- to 15-year group, where we’ve already seen a documented increase.

    “In the letter that Children’s Health Defense wrote to the advisory committee for the FDA, we created a graph based on the reporting rate of myocarditis versus age, and we showed there was an exponential curve.

    Men aged 65 and up had a rate that was 1/100th the rate of boys aged 12 to 17. If that exponential curve keeps going up, the rate in the 5- to 11-year-olds could be even dramatically higher. In those young men, a 1 in 5,000 rate was reported to VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System]. That's not a real rate.

    That just tells us how many people got diagnosed with myocarditis, and then went to the trouble of reporting it to the FDA. The FDA and CDC have a large number of other databases from which they can gather rates of illness.

    VAERS is considered passive reporting. It is not considered fit for purpose to establish illness rates because we don't know how many people report. Do 1 in 10 report, 1 in 100, 1 in 50? Nobody knows.

    However, again, because everything is crazy since the pandemic came in, the CDC has tried to pull the wool over our eyes and has claimed that the rate of anaphylaxis in the population from COVID vaccines is identical to their reporting rate to VAERS. We know that's not true.

    On the CDC’s website, that's what they have. Elsewhere on the website, they say you can't take a VAERS rate and call it an actual rate of reactions, but they've done that [for anaphylaxis]. And they're trying to obfuscate the fact that they're not giving you real rates, and sort of pretending that the myocarditis rate is probably the VAERS reporting rate of myocarditis, although they're not saying so directly.”

    Nass goes on to recount an example from the smallpox vaccine, which also caused myocarditis. A military study that just looked at cases sent to specialists found roughly 1 in 15,000 developed myocarditis. A military immunologist then dug deeper, and drew blood on soldiers before and after vaccination, and found a myocarditis rate of 1 in 220 after receiving the smallpox vaccine.

    However, 1 soldier in 30 developed subclinical myocarditis where troponin rose from normal to more than two times the upper limits of normal. While asymptomatic, 1 in 30 had measurable inflammation of the heart. “Right now, in terms of what the rate is for COVID, nobody is looking, no federal agency wants to find out the real rate,” Nass says.

    You Can’t Find Problems You Refuse to Look For
    A simple study that measures troponin levels — a marker for heart inflammation and damage — before and after each dose, could easily determine what the real rate of myocarditis is, yet that is not being done.

    “This is what we're dealing with,” Nass says. “All these databases, which is about a dozen different databases, that CDC and FDA said they could access to determine the rates of side effects after vaccination with COVID vaccines, they're either not being used or being used improperly,” Nass says.

    “It was discovered that a new algorithm was being used to study the VAERS database that only came into use in January 2021, immediately after the vaccines were authorized, and the algorithm was developed such that you compare two vaccines to each other.

    If the pattern of side effects was similar between the two vaccines — which is often the case because there's a limited number of general vaccine adverse reactions — even if one vaccine has a thousand times more side effects as the one it is being compared to, by using this flawed algorithm, if the pattern of reactions was the same, even though the rates were 1,000 times higher for one, the algorithm would fail to detect a problem.

    That is the algorithm they're using to analyze VAERS [data]. They're also using bad methods ... to analyze the vaccine safety database, which encompasses 12 million Americans who enrolled in HMOs around the country. The CDC pays for access to their electronic medical records and their data.

    Somehow when these databases have been looked at carefully, they're finding very low rates of myocarditis in boys, approximately equal to the VAERS reporting. It was said months ago, ‘We can't find a safety signal for myocarditis. We're not finding an anaphylaxis signal. we're not finding a Bell's palsy signal.’

    The FDA’s and CDC’s algorithms couldn't pick up for most known side effects. So, there's something wrong with the analytic methods that are being used, but the agencies haven't told us precisely what they are. What we do know is that the rates of side effects that are being reported to VAERS are phenomenal.

    They're orders of magnitude higher than for any previous vaccines used in the United States. An order of magnitude is 10-fold, so rates of reported adverse reactions are 10 to 100 times higher than what has been reported for any other vaccine. Reported deaths after COVID in the United States are 17,000+. It’s off the charts.

    Other side effects reported after COVID vaccinations total over 800,000. Again, more deaths and more side effects than have ever been reported for every vaccine combined in use in the U.S. cumulatively over 30 years.”

    Despite all this shocking data, our federal agencies look the other way, pretending as if nothing is happening, and no matter how many people approach them — with lawsuits, with public comments, reaching out to politicians — they refuse to address blatantly obvious concerns. This is clear evidence that they’re acting with intentional malice.

    FDA has become Clown World, and what they do now is to perform a charade of all the normal regulatory processes that they are expected to perform ... You're the guinea pigs, but they're not collecting the data. Nobody should get these shots. ~ Dr. Meryl Nass
    The FDA and CDC are supposed to protect the public. They're supposed to identify safety concerns. They're not supposed to act as marketing firms for drug companies, but that’s precisely what they've been converted to.

    New Formulations Have Never Been Tested
    Another truly egregious fact is that Pfizer has altered its formulation, allegedly to make it more stable, but this new formulation has never been included in any of the trials. Nass explains:

    “During the October 26, 2021, VRBPAC [Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee] meeting, Pfizer said, ‘Look, we want to give the vaccines in doctor's offices and we've found a way to stabilize the vaccine so we don't need those ultra-cold fridges anymore. We can put these vials in a doctor's office and, once defrosted, they can sit in a regular fridge 10 weeks and they'll be fine.’

    Some committee members asked, ‘OK, what'd you do? How did you make this marvelous discovery?’ And they said, ‘We went from the phosphate buffered saline buffer to a Tris buffer, and we slightly changed some electrolytes.’ A committee member asked, ‘OK, how did that make it so much more stable?’ And everybody in the meeting from FDA and Pfizer looked at each other and said, ‘We don't know.’

    An hour later, Pfizer had one of their chemists get on the line, but he couldn't explain how the change in buffer led to a huge increase in stability, either. Then, later in the meeting, one of the members of the committee asked, ‘Did you use this new formulation in the clinical trial?’

    And Dr. Bill Gruber, the lead Pfizer representative, said, ‘No, we didn't.’ In other words, Pfizer plans, with FDA connivance, to use an entirely new vaccine formulation in children, after their clinical trials used the old formulation. This is grossly illegal. They've got a new formulation of vaccine. It wasn't tested in humans. And they're about to use it on 28 million American kids.”

    It's nothing short of a dystopian nightmare. Completely surreal. You can't make this stuff up. Yet as shocking as all this is, earlier this year, Dr. Anthony Fauci projected that these COVID jabs would be available for everyone, from infants to the elderly. Now they’ve got the 5-year-olds, and there’s every reason to suspect they’ll go after newborns and infants next.

    Whose Babies Will Be Offered Up as Sacrificial Lambs?
    According to Nass, Pfizer and the FDA have struck a deal that will allow Pfizer to test on babies even younger than 6 months old, even if there’s no intention to inject infants that young. Those trials may begin as early as the end of January 2022.

    “This arrangement between FDA and Pfizer will give Pfizer its extra six months of patent protection, whether or not these vaccines are intended to be used in those age groups. So, you can look at these trials as a way of almost sacrificing little children, because when you start a trial, you don't know what the dangers are going to be.

    I could be wrong, but I doubt we're going to give these to newborn babies the way we give the hepatitis B vaccine on the date of birth, yet they will be tested in very young babies. The question is, whose babies get tested? In the past, sometimes the babies that got tested were foster children, wards of the state. Sometimes parents offer up their children. But there will be clinical trials.”

    When will we get the data from those trials? It turns out that in the agreements reached between Pfizer and the FDA, some of those trials won't conclude until 2024, 2025 and 2027. The goal here is to vaccinate all Americans, children and adults, within the coming few months or a year, yet it’ll be five years before we actually know from clinical trials what the side effects may be.

    We’re Living in Clown World
    As noted by Nass, this is yet another crime. It may fulfill the letter of the law, but it doesn’t fulfill the meaning of the law. It makes no sense to run clinical trials that won’t be completed until five years after your mass vaccination program has been completed and the entire population is injected.

    “It's just a joke to do that,” Nass says. “But FDA has become Clown World, and what they do now is to perform a charade of all the normal regulatory processes that they are expected to do, but they're only doing them in an abbreviated or peculiar manner so that they don't really collect the important data.

    For example, the control group has been vaccinated two months into the Pfizer trials, which effectively obscures side effects that develop after two months. Blood is not tested for evidence of myocarditis or blood clots using simple tests (troponin and D-dimer levels).

    For all the Americans out there who haven't spent 20 years examining the FDA procedures like I have, these FDA advisory committee meetings are it's designed to make you think a real regulatory process is going on, when it’s not. Instead we are all guinea pigs, but no one is collecting the data that would normally be required to authorize or approve a vaccine. Therefore, in my opinion, nobody should get these shots.“

    To make matters even worse, it's actually illegal to grant EUAs for these vaccines, because there are drugs that can prevent the condition (COVID), as well as treat it. EUAs can only be granted if there are no existing approved, available alternatives to prevent or treat the infection.

    The effective drugs most have already heard of are ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, but there are a number of other drugs that also have profound effects on COVID, Nass says, including TriCor and cyproheptadine (Periactin).

    TriCor, or fenofibrate, emulsifies lipid nanoparticles and fatty conglomerations that contain viruses and inflammatory substances. The drug essentially allows your body to break down the viral and inflammatory debris better. As such, it might also help combat complications caused by the nanoliposomes in the COVID shot.

    According to Nass, Pepcid at high doses of up to 80 milligrams three times a day is also useful for treatment. Dr. Robert Malone is starting a clinical trial using a combination of Pepcid and celecoxib (brand name Celebrex). Many are also recommending aspirin to prevent platelet activation and clotting.

    I believe a far better alternative to aspirin is lumbrokinase, and/or serapeptase. Both are fibrinolytic enzymes that address blood clotting. You can develop sensitivity to them, so I recommend alternating the two on alternate days for about three months if you’ve had COVID.

    You could rule out blood clotting by doing a D-dimer test. If your D-dimer is normal, you don’t need an anticlotting agent. If clotting is a concern, you could also use NAC in addition to these fibrinolytic enzymes. It too helps break up clots and prevent clot formation.

    More Information
    To learn more, be sure to peruse MerylNassMD.com and anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com. She typically posts something every day to her blogspot blog. In closing, Nass concludes:

    “Remember, all the COVID jabs are authorized [under EUA], not licensed. They're all legally, technically, experimental. I know you can lose your job and all these terrible things can happen if you refuse the vaccine, but if you are injured by the shot, you won’t be able to sue later. You will be on your own.

    Legally, they can't force you to accept the vaccine while it is in EUA status because of the Nuremberg code, because of existing U.S. law about informed consent, and because of the actual statute on emergency use authorization, which says you have the right to refuse. They can't force you to take these [shots].

    I know they are forcing you, but legally they can't, and please keep that in mind. Hopefully these wrongs will be redressed. Mandates are being walked back in many jurisdictions.

    As I've told people, demand to see the bottle that says Comirnaty, because legally, they can force the licensed product on you, but there isn't any right now. So, you have an out for the next few months, hopefully.

    They're really dangerous vaccines. What you don't know will hurt you. Please protect your children. If there's any way, don't get vaccinated. The more people who say no, the more the government is already backing down. In many cities, the imposed dates by which you have to be vaccinated have been pushed back.

    Now Biden's administration is saying, ‘Well, it's not going to be carved in stone. We're going to negotiate with people because they don't want to lose 30% or 40% of their staff.’ So, be strong, protect yourself and your children. Know you're doing the right thing.

    We've got a criminal organization running things now. This is a worldwide program of some kind designed to control us. Once we all figure it out, we can win. There's many, many more of us than there are of them.”

    Sources and References

    1 FDA Members Office of Vaccine Research and Review Meeting Roster
    2 National File October 26, 2021
    3 The Defender November 1, 2021
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  30. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ankle Biter (7th November 2021), Bill Ryan (7th November 2021), Delight (8th November 2021), Ewan (10th November 2021), fifi (24th March 2022), gord (7th November 2021), Harmony (8th November 2021), Matthew (5th January 2022), Sunny (8th November 2021)

  31. Link to Post #596
    UK Avalon Member Matthew's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th July 2015
    Location
    South East England
    Language
    English
    Age
    51
    Posts
    4,127
    Thanks
    25,578
    Thanked 36,102 times in 4,060 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    This might just be a UK thing, but possibly not. I had heard about this way to travel without being vaccinated. It's called 'in transit' I think. STOPCOMMONPASS have made a web page set of steps to help people travel abroad without vaccination. https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1...676692482.html

    Context:

    Silkie Carlo @silkiecarlo
    If you are “fully” vaccinated, you can travel and return to the UK without testing or isolation.

    But if you’re unvaccinated, you need 2 private PCR tests £££ and 10 days isolation.

    Bear in mind.. even if you HAVE covid a LFT suffices and you only have to isolate for 7 days Upside-down face


    STOPCOMMONPASS @org_scp
    Replying to @silkiecarlo
    We recommend people use a landside transit exemption when re-entering #England. It's a Sched. 4 exemption under UK travel regs. No #vaccinepassports, Day 2/8 testing or isolation:

  32. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Matthew For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (28th January 2022), Bill Ryan (5th January 2022), Ewan (5th January 2022), fifi (24th March 2022), Gwin Ru (6th January 2022), Harmony (28th January 2022), meat suit (5th January 2022), Peace in Oz (6th January 2022), Sunny (6th January 2022), wondering (5th January 2022)

  33. Link to Post #597
    Avalon Member gord's Avatar
    Join Date
    13th October 2015
    Location
    The Vampire State
    Language
    English
    Age
    61
    Posts
    693
    Thanks
    14,944
    Thanked 4,593 times in 672 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    Quote Posted by gord (here)
    My brother in law just had a heart attack and is in ICU. I don't think he's ever had heart issues, and I don't know how recently he got the vaccine, or which one. Family is now pushing again for me to get it (to potentially attend a funeral). I won't be coerced by anyone.
    And now gone...
    The only place a perfect right angle ever CAN be, is the mind.

  34. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to gord For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (28th January 2022), Bill Ryan (15th January 2022), Ewan (28th January 2022), Gwin Ru (15th January 2022), Harmony (28th January 2022), Matthew (15th January 2022), meat suit (15th January 2022), Peace in Oz (17th January 2022), pyrangello (23rd March 2022), Tintin (28th January 2022)

  35. Link to Post #598
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Location
    Project Avalon library
    Language
    English
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,424
    Thanks
    64,193
    Thanked 46,348 times in 5,391 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    An excellent summary published January 28th from an anonymous former cell biologist who studied at Cambridge.

    There are a lot of tables and links here so I've refrained from embedding them all - the article link is here: https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/28/va...immune-system/

    With that in mind, I'm providing an abridged sub-edited version here with the critical text.

    ________

    VAIDS – Every 1% fall in Covid-19 Vaccine Effectiveness is the result of a 0.5-1% fall in your Immune System capability

    Official data from around the world does not only show that the Covid-19 vaccines are ineffective, it shows that they have a negative effectiveness that gets worse by the week.

    This doesn’t mean the vaccines are failing, it means they are damaging the immune system, and every 1% fall in Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness is the result of a 0.5%-1% fall in your immune system capability.


    __________

    By a concerned reader for the Daily Expose

    Vaccines program your cells to produce the 1273 Amino Acid Wuhan Alpha (HU1) spike protein and simulate a systemic infection. This trains your immune system to recognise and kill spike proteins as systemic infection causing pathogens.

    The entire process takes around 14 days, the typical length of a viral infection. That is why the government recommends that vulnerable people remain isolated for 14 days post injection and that is why the government produces stats which only recognise injected people as being the singly or doubly vaccinated 14 days after the 1st or the 2nd jab.

    So we know that the work of the vaccine is completed by day 14.

    So they cannot possibly wane in effectiveness themselves after that.

    They conduct a 14 day training course and then they are supposed to clear off. Therefore they do not and they cannot wane in efficiency in months 2/3/4/5/6 because they do not do anything in those months. Their work is finished in 14 days.

    But the work of your immune system in never finished. So it is your immune system which is waning in months 2/3/4/5/6 not the vaccines. Your immune system is being redirected to fight spike proteins and therefore has less and less resources available to fight Covid. So a loss in apparent vaccine effectiveness is in fact a loss in immune system effectiveness.

    There is a 1% drop in immune system capability per 1% drop in vaccine effectiveness (as measured by the case rate ratio between the vaxxed and the unvaxxed) if the vaccine had zero effectiveness upon injection (as is the case for 2 jabs and Omicron according to the University of Toronto study – https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1....30.21268565v1).

    In this case the possible range for vaccine effectiveness is 0 to -100% i.e. 100% total. So a 100% drop in vaccine effectiveness corresponds to a 100% drop in immune system capability. So each percentage drop in vaccine effectiveness corresponds to a one percent drop in Immune effectiveness.

    There is a 0.5% drop in immune system capability per 1% drop in vaccine effectiveness (as measured by the case rate ratio between the vaxxed and the unvaxxed) if the vaccine had 100% effectiveness upon injection (Pfizer claimed 95% effectiveness against Wuhan allpha).

    In this case the possible range for vaccine effectiveness is +100% to -100% i.e. 200% total. So a 200% drop in vaccine effectiveness corresponds to a 100% drop in immune system capability. So each percentage drop in vaccine effectiveness corresponds to a half percent drop in Immune effectiveness.

    All Covid vaccines drop in effectiveness persistently and inexorably until -99% (where case rates in the fully vaccinated are 100x greater than case rates in the unvaxxed – NSW in Australia has already reached 10x). Then they continue to approach 100% presumably, where case rates are hundreds and then thousands of times greater in the vaxxed than in the unvaxxed.

    Therefore all Covid vaccines progressively damage, degrade and destroy your immune system resulting in more infections, longer recovery times from infection and finally in sepsis (no recovery from infection without massive medical intervention).



    Once the Covid vaccines start to show a negative efficiency (which they are all now showing against Omicron), they become Antivaccines rather than vaccines. So the vaccinated have become the antivaccinated. And those who continue to promote vaccines knowing that they have now become antivaccines, are themselves antivaxxers.

    Vaccines cannot wane in efficiency. They are binary. They show your immune system the spike protein antigen and they simulate a systemic attack to convince your immune system to take that spike protein seriously. Then there is NOTHING more for a true vaccine to do.

    They operate for 2-3 weeks, the normal length of a viral infection. Then they are supposed to leave your body. So they do not, they cannot, wane. They do not and cannot themselves drop in efficiency in the 2nd or 3rd or 4th or 5th month because they have nothing to do in those months.

    A worker who has finished his employment contract with a company cannot then work less efficiently for that company. He is no longer employed by that company.

    But genetic vaccines continue to produce spike proteins incessantly. These damage your immune system incessantly. It is your immune system therefore that wanes. In the UK they have damaged our immune systems so much that vaccines now have enormous negative efficiencies up to -60% in the latest UKHSA data for the end of 2021 in certain age groups (Vaccine Surveillance Report Week 1).

    The trouble with the genetic vaccines that NOBODY talks about is that they do not stop producing spike proteins. They continue producing more and more of them.

    I asked AstraZeneca for how long after vaccination would my cells produce spikes? They said we do not know we are still researching that. I do know because I did cell biology at Cambridge. Every vaccinated cell will continue producing spike proteins until it dies or is killed by your killer T cells.

    So the results of the Worldovision Anti-Vaccine Contest are…
    Les résultats du concours worldovision anti-vaccin sont donc…
    Die Ergebnisse des Worldovision Anti-Vaccine Contest sind also…
    Så resultaterne af Worldovision Anti-Vaccine Contest er…



    Let us be perfectly clear here. The table above is more a measure of the corruption of the respective government stats agencies than it is a measure of antivaccine efficiency and immune system degradation in the respective countries.

    The original German and Australian figures will be correct. The Canadian figures are very corrupt. The CDC and UK figures are corrupt. The Danish and Scottish figures are less corrupt.



    Your immune system kills every vaccinated cell in your body

    Vaccination informs your immune system that spike proteins are very dangerous antigens (by simulating a systemic infection coincident with the presentation of the spike protein antigen).

    So it kills the spike proteins and kills every cell in your body that has been vaccinated because all of those cells are genetically reprogrammed by the vaccine to make spike proteins and your immune system identifies and recognises vaccinated cells as spike protein factories..

    So your body goes into a perpetual civil war in which more and more of your immune resources are spent killing vaccinated cells. Pfizer contains 14.4 trillion 1273 Amino Acid spike protein mRNA copies and Moderna contains 48 trillion – see here. You only have between 6 and 36 trillion cells in your body (depending upon how you count them).

    Some of these cells such as heart muscle cells and brain cells do not get replaced. If they become vaccinated, you will lose them indefinitely. Myocarditis is caused by Killer T cells removing vaccinated heart cells. This gets worse at the 2nd jab and worse still at the 3rd.

    You may think that vaccines are safe but your immune system would beg to differ

    Your trusty immune system kills every single vaccinated cell it can find. In deed it is the vaccine which trains it to kill them. It is this civil war which causes the vaccine efficiency to look like it is decreasing.

    But it is not decreasing at all. Your immune system response is decreasing. You are developing VAIDS, Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.

    The law of inverse political results

    Having studied the efficiency of politicians at fulfilling their election promises for 50 years, a family member of mine formulated with law of inverse political results. This law states that politicians always achieve in office the precise opposite of what they promise at elections.

    His theory is that if one wants a true capitalist government, one should vote for Jeremy Corbyn. And if one wants a true communist dictatorship, one should vote for Boris Johnson. To be fair to both politicians, the law does not suggest that said result reversal is entirely the fault of the respective politician.

    A lot of the reversal of their promises comes about due to the reactionary, indignant, incompetent and contrarian nature of the blob of the civil service. But it is a good ‘Yes Minister’ type rule of thumb.

    So when a government recommends and even mandates a medical intervention, the result according to this law will be the precise opposite of what the politicians promise. And indeed that has turned out to be the case.

    The politicians promised that vaccinations would end the pandemic. But vaccinations have not ended the pandemic. They have prolonged the pandemic, by degrading the immune systems of the vaccinated, who are now condemned to be reinfected by previously trivial viruses, indefinitely.

    They promised us vaccines. They gave us antivaccines. That is the law of inverse political results.
    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  36. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (28th January 2022), Bill Ryan (28th January 2022), Ewan (28th January 2022), fifi (24th March 2022), gord (28th January 2022), Gwin Ru (28th January 2022), Harmony (28th January 2022), Johan (Keyholder) (28th January 2022), mizo (28th January 2022), Pam (28th January 2022), Sue (Ayt) (19th March 2022), Sunny (28th January 2022), Trisher (28th January 2022)

  37. Link to Post #599
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,190
    Thanks
    47,631
    Thanked 115,975 times in 20,621 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    First State to Reject CDC Vaccine Recommendations
    Roundtable Discussion on COVID Treatments and Mandates

    by Dr. Joseph Mercola
    March 18, 2022
    https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...rid=1436827960

    "And not only that, they want to hold the decision makers responsible for their harmful public health decisions regarding COVID-19.
    From the very beginning of the pandemic, government officials made poor choices, adopting policies that appeared to be tailor-made to harm certain groups.

    STORY AT-A-GLANCE
    March 7, 2022, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis hosted a roundtable discussion about COVID treatment, early treatment suppression, vaccine risks, the collateral damage from school closures and lockdowns and more
    March 8, 2022, the Florida Department of Health updated its guidance, formally recommending against COVID vaccination for healthy children, 5 to 17. Florida is the first state to go against CDC vaccine recommendations
    Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo stressed that, as we move forward, we must insist on holding decision makers accountable for their harmful public health decisions.
    “Their choices, that they made for everyone, were the wrong choices that led to, basically, no appreciable benefit,” Ladapo said
    According to Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, one of the most egregious mistakes made was to ignore the fact that there’s a thousand-fold difference in risk between the lowest and highest risk groups.
    Children are at virtually no risk of dying from COVID, yet children have been forced to bear the burden of disease prevention.
    “Almost from the very beginning of the pandemic, we adopted policies that seem like they were tailor-made to harm children,” he said
    According to Dr. Sunetra Gupta, what we’ve seen over the past two years is an “inversion of the schedule of uncertainty.”
    Doubt was cast on things that were certain, while certainty was claimed for things we had no clue about.
    Decision makers chose to do the very things we knew, for certain, would cause harm. They inverted the precautionary principle to minimize harm, and chose to maximize harm instead

    March 7, 2022, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis hosted a roundtable discussion1 about COVID treatment, early treatment suppression, vaccine risks, the collateral damage from school closures and lockdowns, and how to end the COVID theatre once and for all. Panelists included physicians, scientists and academics from around the U.S., including:

    Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo, a former National Institutes of Health-funded researcher

    Dr. Robert Malone, a molecular virologist, bioethicist, vaccine researcher and co-developer of the mRNA vaccine platform

    Dr. Tracy Hoeg, Ph.D., an epidemiologist

    Dr. Jill Ackerman, a family physician

    Dr. Christopher D’Adamo, Ph.D., an epidemiologist and integrative medicine specialist

    Dr. Shveta Raju, an internist

    Dr. Harvey Risch, Ph.D., professor of epidemiology trained in mathematical modeling of infectious diseases

    Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Ph.D., professor of health policy at Stanford, research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research and co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration, which calls for focused protection of the most vulnerable2

    Dr. Martin Kulldorff, Ph.D., former professor of medicine at Harvard University, now senior scientific director of the Brownstone Institute, a biostatistician and epidemiologist with expertise in vaccine safety evaluation, co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration

    Dr. Joseph Fraiman, a rural emergency physician and clinical scientist, specializing in harm-benefit analysis

    Dr. Sunetra Gupta, Ph.D., Oxford University professor, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development and mathematical modeling of infectious disease, co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration

    We Must Hold Decision Makers to Account

    As noted by Ladapo, one of the things we must remember and remain intent upon as we move forward is to hold people accountable for their public health decisions. Two years after the “two weeks to slow the spread,” we have ample evidence proving the decision makers “didn’t know what they were talking about,” Ladapo says.

    Their choices, that they made for everyone, were the wrong choices that led to, basically, no appreciable benefit. ~ Joseph Ladapo, Florida Surgeon General
    They abused their power, they manipulated data, they lied, and they now want us all to forget what they said and did. We cannot let them get away with it. Many errors were made, and those responsible must be held to account.

    “Their choices, that they made for everyone, were the wrong choices that led to, basically, no appreciable benefit,” Ladapo says. “We cannot let them forget. We have to hold them accountable. We have to let the country, the world, know what the truth is — because it’s the right thing to do, and because it can happen again if we don’t.”

    Thousand-Fold Difference in Risk Was Ignored
    Bhattacharya was one of the first to investigate the prevalence of COVID-19 in 2020, and he found that by April, the infection was already too prevalent for lockdowns to have any possibility of stopping the spread.

    He points out that one of the most egregious mistakes made was to ignore the fact that there’s a thousand-fold difference in risk between the lowest and highest risk groups. Children and teens are at virtually no risk of dying from COVID. Overall, the risk of COVID is primarily relegated to the very old and those with multiple comorbidities.

    Bhattacharya has called the COVID-19 lockdowns the “biggest public health mistake ever made,”3 stressing that the harms caused have been “absolutely catastrophically devastating,” especially for children and the working class, worldwide.4

    In some areas of the world, children have not been in school for two years, and the ramifications of that will likely reverberate for decades. Public health has also been negatively impacted by lockdowns and other measures — measures which Bhattacharya states were based in fear, not fact.

    Stunning Denials of Science

    Kulldorff, in his opening remarks, points out what he believes is one of the most stunning parts of this pandemic, and that is the denial of the basic science of natural immunity. Even doctors and hospitals that “should know better have demanded vaccine mandates for people who have already had COVID,” he says.

    Perhaps even worse, hospitals have fired staff who have had COVID and have natural immunity, simply because they did not want to get the experimental jab. Those with natural immunity are not just less likely to get COVID again, they’re also far less likely to spread it to others. This makes them among the most valuable staff members a hospital can have, yet they were routinely discarded.

    “That goes against basic principles of public health,” Kulldorff says. “And to have a director of the CDC who questions natural immunity, which we have now, is sort of like having a director of NASA who questions whether the earth is flat or round. It’s just mindboggling that we’ve come into a situation like that.”

    Fraiman, whose clinical research expertise includes risk-benefit analysis, also expresses disbelief and frustration over the scientific censorship we’ve seen in the last two years. He points out that many of his colleagues are simply too afraid of getting fired to speak the truth.

    DeSantis, similarly, highlights how incredibly difficult it has been to publish and find research that contradicted the official narrative, and even when available, the mainstream media would refuse to acknowledge it, whereas they would endlessly publicize speculation and statements of opinion that had no basis in fact or science, but supported — however flimsily — the official narrative.

    I would add that so-called fact checkers have even gone so far as to “fact check” scientific peer-reviewed publications,5,6,7 labeling them as “misinformation” or outright “false,” resulting in their being censored on social media!

    That’s an astounding development. It does not bode well for science when noncredentialed individuals with zero experience in the topic at hand are given the authority to decide the “truthfulness” or accuracy of scientists’ work.

    The Inversion of the Precautionary Principle

    Gupta, who has some 30 years of expertise in mathematical modeling of infectious disease, points out that what we’ve seen over the past two years is an “inversion of the schedule of uncertainty.” In short, doubt was cast on things that were rather certain — so-called “unknowns were not unknown,” Gupta says — while certainty was claimed for things we had no clue about.

    “The powers that be told us the measures and restrictions would work, but we didn’t know they would work,” she says. Moreover, we didn’t know what their purpose actually was. “It was a rather incoherent set of goals,” she says. One thing we knew for certain was that lockdowns and other restrictions “would have enormous cost,” she says.

    “That was the one thing we were certain about, yet that’s what we went ahead and did. We inverted the precautionary principle of trying to minimize harm, by doing the one thing we knew would cause harm.”

    I would add that the scale of that harm was never calculated or addressed at any point along the way. It’s as though it didn’t matter how great the harm was, as long as there was the appearance that we were doing everything in our power to prevent COVID.

    Plausibility Versus Science

    Risch brings up a similar point, saying we’ve seen a lot of misdirection. What’s been conveyed to the public have been things that are plausible, but not scientific. “There’s a big difference between things that seem plausible and things that are scientific,” he says.

    For example, lockdowns are a plausible countermeasure, but they’re not based in science. In fact, all the science we have, show them to be harmful, with little or no benefit whatsoever. “The same has been true for medications,” Rish says.

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration put out warnings saying that hydroxychloroquine should not be used in outpatients, even though they had no data on outpatient use of the drug. They only had data on in-hospital use, and the two situations are not comparable.

    Early COVID symptoms are completely different from symptoms of later-stage, severe infection and the two stages require completely different treatments. Hydroxychloroquine only works well when used very early. It’s not useful in the later stages, and frontline doctors were well aware of this.

    No Justification for Mandating Vaccines for Children

    Malone — speaking on behalf of the International Alliance of Physicians and Medical Scientists,8 which currently has some 17,000 members — stressed that, in terms of COVID policies, the Alliance has “made a series of very clear, unambiguous statements.”

    “There is no justification for mandating vaccines for children. Full stop,” he says. “We’re of the strong opinion that if there is risk there must be choice. This is fundamental bioethics 101.”

    As noted in the second Physicians Declaration9 by dated October 29, 2021, children’s clinical risk from SARS-CoV-2 infection is negligible and long term safety of the shots cannot be determined prior to the enactment of mandatory vaccination policies. Not only are children at high risk for severe adverse events, but having healthy, unvaccinated children in the population is crucial to achieving herd immunity. Malone continues:

    “No. 2, as far as we’re concerned, there is no medical emergency now, and there is therefore no justification for the declaration of medical emergency and the suspension of rights ...”

    The Alliance also condemns “the hunting of physicians and the restriction of physicians’ ability to prescribe and treat with early treatment.” With regard to vaccines, Malone also highlights the fact that while a Pfizer/BioNTech COVID injection has been approved by the FDA, that product is not available.

    So, there is NO FDA approved COVID “vaccine” on the market in the U.S. The only products available in the U.S., for children and adults alike, are emergency use authorization (EUA) products, for which liability is waived.

    Now, in order for the COVID injections to qualify for EUA, there could not be any other treatments available, which appears to have been the driving factor behind the suppression of early treatment with repurposed drugs such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.

    Mask Mandates Have Not Had Any Benefit
    Speaking to the issue of mask mandates, Hoeg has published several studies, looking at the effects of universal mask wearing. One of them assessed compliance and outcomes in the Wisconsin school system. On average, 92% of children complied with the mask wearing, and only seven students out of 7,000 caught COVID during the 2021 school year.

    This was used by media to proclaim that masks work. The problem is, there was no control group, and the low infection rate could have been due to anything. Hoeg points out we have studies from Scandinavia, where masks were not worn, and they too had extremely low infection rates among children.

    Again and again, we’ve seen that children just aren’t susceptible to COVID, especially not severe infection. So, low incidence really says nothing about the effectiveness of masks.

    DeSantis also notes that neighboring schools — one that had a mask mandate and another that did not — had no discernible difference in infection rates, which he believes is rather compelling evidence that mask mandates have no benefit. What’s more, of the two largest randomized controlled trials, both showed that masks do not prevent the spread of infection.

    According to Hoeg, we’ve inverted the precautionary principle with respect to mask wearing as well. Without any high-quality evidence of benefit, we’ve chosen to mask children even though we know there are harms. They interfere with communication, impede learning, hinder breathing, promote bacterial infections and more.

    The Collateral Damage Has Been Immense
    As noted by Fraiman, any time you consider a public health measure, you have to conduct a thorough risk-benefit analysis. Who may benefit and to what degree? What are the harms, who will be harmed the most, what’s the extent of the collateral damage? Do the benefits outweigh all of the risks?

    In the case of school closures, “the collateral damage has been immense,” Fraiman says. Physical and mental health has been impacted. According to Fraiman, there’s been a doubling of obesity and diabetes, for example, during the pandemic. There’s been a dramatic increase in anxiety, depression and stress.

    Recent statistics show a shocking spike in fentanyl overdose deaths among high school-aged adolescents in the U.S. during 2020 and 2021. The following graph, from a December 24, 2021, preprint article10 posted on medRxiv and tweeted11 out by Dr. John B., a scientist, illustrates the situation better than words.

    [IMG]media.mercola.com/ImageServer/public/2022/March/drug-overdose-deaths.jpg[/IMG]

    According to the authors:12

    “Adolescent overdose mortality saw a sharp increase between 2019 and 2020, from 2.35 per 100,000 to 4.58 per 100,000, representing a 94.3% increase, the largest percent increase of any 5-year age group ...

    Trends were driven by fatalities involving IMFs [illicitly-manufactured-fentanyls], which nearly tripled from 2019 to 2020, and represented 76.6% of adolescent overdose deaths in 2021 ... Our results should also be understood in the context of rising rates of adolescent mental illness during the COVID-19 pandemic.”

    “I think it’s quite clear that the collateral damage outweighed any benefit that was there,” Fraiman says. “So, I think we need to take a more systems-level approach before embarking on this kind of policy the next time.”

    Was Harming Children Intentional?
    Bhattacharya adds, “Almost from the very beginning of the pandemic, we adopted policies that seem like they were tailor-made to harm children.” Lower-income children were disproportionally harmed by lockdowns and school closures. “The effect on these kids has been catastrophic,” he says.

    He cites a study that calculated that, as a result of the school closures during the spring of 2020, children in the U.S. will lose 5.5 million life years. Lost learning literally ripples through the child’s entire lifetime. They lead less healthy and shorter lives and are more likely to be steeped in poverty.

    In some areas of the world, schools have been closed for nearly two years. As noted by Bhattacharya, we’ve “robbed an entire generation of their birthright.” Mask mandates have made the impact on children even worse.

    He points out that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is the only public health agency in the world that still recommends masking toddlers, “with literally not a single study showing it has any consequence on the spread of the disease.”

    “The only reason they continue to mask [toddlers] is because [the toddlers] are powerless,” he says. “We’ve adopted this idea that children are the central problem; children are the ones who should bear all the burden of infection control.

    In fact, that’s not true. It has revealed the values we have as a society, and it’s not a pretty picture. None of this has actually worked to protect the vulnerable. Still, 80% of the deaths are in people over 65. What have these restrictions on children bought? Not very much, if at all. And it’s caused tremendous harm that we’re going to have to address for years to come.”

    Florida Recommends Against COVID Shots for Healthy Children
    In late February 2022, Ladapo and DeSantis also updated the state’s policy on masks, formally discouraging mask wearing.13 Toward the end of the roundtable, Ladapo announced the Florida Department of Health would also formally recommend against COVID shots for healthy children, aged 5 to 17,14 as they “may not benefit from receiving the currently available COVID-19 vaccines.”

    During the roundtable, risks such as myocarditis were also discussed. Florida is the first state to go against the CDC’s vaccine recommendations. In a statement published with the new guideline, March 8, 2022,15 Ladapo said:

    “Based on currently available data, the risks of administering COVID-19 vaccination among healthy children may outweigh the benefits. These decisions should be made on an individual basis, and never mandated.” "

    - Sources and References
    1 Epoch Times March 3, 2022 (Archived)
    2 Great Barrington Declaration
    3 Newsweek March 8, 2021
    4 Rumble, Ron DeSantis March 7, 2022, 32:00
    5 Reclaim the Net December 17, 2021
    6 Medscape December 20, 2021
    7 ZeroHedge December 20, 2021
    8 Physicians Declaration by the International Alliance of Physicians and Medical Scientists
    9 Physicians Declaration October 29, 2021
    10, 12 medRxiv December 24, 2021 DOI: 10.1101/2021.12.23.21268284
    11 Twitter Dr. John B December 25, 2021
    13 AP News February 24, 2022
    14 NBC News March 7, 2022, Updated March 8, 2022
    15 Florida Health March 8, 2022


    Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vu3iqj/?pub=4
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  38. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (18th March 2022), Ewan (20th March 2022), fifi (24th March 2022), Harmony (19th March 2022), Sunny (19th March 2022)

  39. Link to Post #600
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,190
    Thanks
    47,631
    Thanked 115,975 times in 20,621 posts

    Default Re: Avoiding the Experimental Vaccine

    CHD Wins Federal District Court Injunction On DC’s Minor Consent for Vaccinations Act
    3/21/22
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/p...6-218cbdf28fa9

    "Press Release

    For Immediate Release

    Washington, DC – On March 18, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued an order granting a preliminary injunction to prohibit the mayor of the District of Columbia, the D.C. Department of Health and D.C. public schools from enforcing the D.C. Minor Consent for Vaccination Act of 2020 until further order of the court.

    “This is a major legal victory for children, parental rights, and informed consent,” said Rolf Hazlehurst, senior staff attorney for Children’s Health Defense (CHD) who argued the case. “Government overreach such as this has dire implications for children’s health and the constitutional rights of citizens.”

    The D.C. Minor Consent for Vaccination Act of 2020, allows children eleven years of age and older to consent to vaccinations without their parents’ knowledge or consent. The law specifically targets children whose parents have religious exemptions for their children. The D.C. Act contains several provisions designed to deceive parents and hide the fact that their children have been vaccinated against their parental judgment, authority or religious convictions.

    The court order states that the parents “have shown they are likely to succeed on the merits because the District’s law requires providers to hide children’s vaccination status from parents who invoke their religious exemption rights…”

    The D.C. Minor Consent Act requires health care providers to falsify records by leaving the child’s school vaccination records “blank.” The doctors may bill the parents’ insurance companies for the vaccines administered to the children against the parents’ written directive. However, to deceive the parents, insurance companies may not send the parents an Explanation of Benefits (EOB).

    CHD and Parental Rights Foundation filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, seeking a court order to declare the D.C. Minor Consent for Vaccinations Amendment Act of 2020 unconstitutional. Plaintiffs, (Booth, et al.) are four parents of minor children who attend public school in Washington, D.C. Oral arguments were heard on March 3, 2022.

    In the opinion issued on Friday, March 18, the court found the parents likely to succeed on the merits in their arguments that the D.C. Act is unconstitutional for two reasons. First, the D.C. Act is preempted by federal law because it directly contradicts the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. The D.C. Act also violates the right to free exercise of religion guaranteed by the First Amendment to the Constitution.

    Hazlehurst argued that the District has created a “pressure-cooker environment, enticing and psychologically manipulating [minor children] to defy their parents and take vaccinations against their parents’ will.”

    The Plaintiffs overcame a high legal hurdle that “threatened injury must be certainly impending” as established by the U.S. Supreme Court precedent Clapper v. Amnesty Int’l., in part by the use of a drawing entitled “Peer Pressure,” drawn by one of the plaintiff’s children. The drawing depicts the dilemma children face at school when they do not want to get the COVID vaccine or have been advised by their parents not to take the shot.

    “This preliminary injunction is part of ongoing litigation in an extremely important national precedent-setting case,” said Hazlehurst. “The rights of parents to decide what is best for their children’s health is at stake. Government can’t be allowed to make such decisions for minor children.”

    Two similar but separate lawsuits, Booth (argued by CHD/Parental Rights Foundation) and Mazer (supported by Informed Consent Action Network), were filed against the D.C. Minor Consent Act. In both Booth and Mazer, the court ruled the plaintiffs have “standing” based on preemption because the D.C. Minor Consent Act conflicts with Congress’ National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. In CHD’s Booth case, the court made the additional finding that the plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits that the D.C. Minor Consent Act violates the free exercise of religion clause in the First Amendment of the Constitution.

    In his ruling, U.S. District Judge Trevor N. McFadden stated, “Removing the law would revert the District to the standard age of consent of 18.” Although the case is not yet final, the preliminary injunction reverts D.C. to the standard age of consent of 18.

    CHD Links:

    a) 1 of 38-page document- PI Memo Opinion DC Minor Case:
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...minor-case.pdf

    b) 1 of 2-page document- Booth Preliminary Injunction Order:
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...tion-Order.pdf

    c) 1 of 88-page document- #31 Amended Complaint:
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...hurst-Rolf.pdf

    d) 1 of 131-page document- #31 Appendix:
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...1-Appendix.pdf

    e) DC Plaintiff Drawing (Exhibit 11 & timestamp included):
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...f-drawing-.png "
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  40. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (23rd March 2022), avid (23rd March 2022), Bill Ryan (23rd March 2022), fifi (24th March 2022), Harmony (23rd March 2022), melissanederland (23rd March 2022), wondering (23rd March 2022)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 30 of 31 FirstFirst 1 20 30 31 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts