+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Faux checking and not faux checking

  1. Link to Post #1
    Philippines Avalon Member
    Join Date
    29th May 2013
    Age
    55
    Posts
    2,511
    Thanks
    4,148
    Thanked 9,366 times in 2,181 posts

    Default Faux checking and not faux checking

    While FB is faux checking and YT is taking down videos of doctors and scientist, telling us to not take vaccine, the videos of vaccine injuries seem to be immune from censorship. I posted a video of vax injuries and its been there for five or so days. Every time I look expecting to find FB's faux checker but none until now. Is not the videos of vax injuries more damaging than doctors telling us that vax will cause injuries? Is" faux checking doctors" meant to convince the awakes that its really is in the vax and the vax injury videos meant to scare the hell out of the newly awake so they run straight to... SWAB TEST. Will swab test be push as an alternative for those that don't want vaccine? any Idea?

    somethings not right.

    what can you say about this video. Will there be a third player aside from vax and swab test?

    https://odysee.com/@TruthHertz:2/onceweretheliving:9

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bubu For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (24th February 2021), Ernie Nemeth (23rd February 2021), toppy (23rd February 2021)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Portugal Avalon Member gs_powered's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th December 2011
    Age
    40
    Posts
    121
    Thanks
    693
    Thanked 457 times in 102 posts

    Default Re: Faux checking and not faux checking

    Just seen on the news that WHO is creating a no-fault compensation programme for vaccinated people who've had suffered from adverse side effects from the vaccine.

    More here: https://www.who.int/news/item/22-02-...-a-world-first

    Maybe this is the first global program of the sort ever, but there seem to be known cases where the state has already paid settlements do parents of children "damaged" by MMR vaccines in the past.

    edit: forgot to add that this acceptance of side effects by the WHO may justify the non taking down of videos like the ones mentioned in the OP.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to gs_powered For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (24th February 2021)

  5. Link to Post #3
    Philippines Avalon Member
    Join Date
    29th May 2013
    Age
    55
    Posts
    2,511
    Thanks
    4,148
    Thanked 9,366 times in 2,181 posts

    Default Re: Faux checking and not faux checking

    Quote Posted by gs_powered (here)
    Just seen on the news that WHO is creating a no-fault compensation programme for vaccinated people who've had suffered from adverse side effects from the vaccine.

    More here: https://www.who.int/news/item/22-02-...-a-world-first

    Maybe this is the first global program of the sort ever, but there seem to be known cases where the state has already paid settlements do parents of children "damaged" by MMR vaccines in the past.

    edit: forgot to add that this acceptance of side effects by the WHO may justify the non taking down of videos like the ones mentioned in the OP.
    Thanks for your opinion. Firsts should always be red flags. It could also mean the beginning of admittance of vaccine injuries. So probably we are moving on to something less harmful. swabs maybe.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Bubu For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (24th February 2021)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts