Vaccine Crimes

[mountain_jim]

the trials (and hangings?) can't come soon enough



https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/t...-with-seizures

Steve Kirsch's newsletter

Two and 3-year-old kids with seizures is "the new normal"

I'm getting multiple reports from my nurse friends about kids 2 and 3 years old having seizures. It is ONLY happening on vaccinated kids, and symptoms start 2 to 5 days after the COVID vaccine.



Doctors are mystified by a rash of seizures, rashes, etc. happening to 2 and 3-year-old kids.

The only thing these kids have in common is that they were given the COVID vaccine just days earlier (two to five days earlier).

The doctors cannot figure out what is causing the seizures (since it couldn’t be the vaccine since those are safe and effective). The medical staff is not permitted to talk about the cases to the press or on social media or they will be fired.

One nurse posted something to the effect of “how is this legal????” I had to paraphrase to protect the poster.

This is why you are hearing these reports from me. They can’t fire me.

There is nothing on the mainstream media about this since the nurses and doctors aren’t allowed to talk about it.

This will all come out some day, but for now, everyone is keeping quiet about it and the doctors are instructed to convince the parents that it isn’t vaccine related and that they are the only ones having the problem.

Because that’s how science works.

/////////////////
Brian Cates

Blood Thinners for kids. Like this has always been the case and THIS IS NORMAL.

PSA's about kids having heart attacks. Like this has always been the case and THIS IS NORMAL.

Kids having circulatory system-related seizures and they are covering in the news like THIS IS NORMAL.

All while they are still RELENTLESSLY TELLING YOU TO VAXX YOUR KIDS WITH THEIR COOL NEW COVID VACCINES N' BOOSTERS.

WAKE THE F**K UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Anyone buying into the Big Government/Big Pharma/Big Corporate News SADS propaganda - [S]udden [A]rrythmic [D]eath [S]yndrome aka "Sudden Adult Death Syndrome" - like it's completely unrelated to the vaccines they introduced just a year and a half ago?

Is still trapped in the Matrix.

They're lying to you and covering up the truth.

https://my.clevelandclinic.org/healt...death-syndrome

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/he...d1c15baabbc5d4

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/med...mes/ar-AAYQ3HR

[mountain_jim]

@intheMatrixxx
Forwarded from
Gateway Pundit
What a Crock! Here's What the Mainstream Media and So-Called 'Experts' Are Trying to Tell Us About HUGE SPIKE in Sudden Arrhythmic Death Syndrome

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...eath-syndrome/

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/EssexPR/status/1...Q0x4A6f9WG4Iug

[TomKat]

Pfizer's supposedly releasing the vax ingredients since March, but I haven't found it anywhere:

https://christianresearchnetwork.org...r-court-order/

[Delight]

I am posting this FYI... it does have some new info....

Effects of the COVID Jab - Interview with Dr. Ryan Cole (Mercola)
In Search of Truth Published July 6, 2022


Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v18oul1

[TomKat]

Posted by TomKat (here)
Pfizer's supposedly releasing the vax ingredients since March, but I haven't found it anywhere:

https://christianresearchnetwork.org...r-court-order/

Meanwhile, Uruguay is demand the ingredients be released:

"Comprehensive information on the vaccine’s formulation and proof of its safety are among the items that are sought."

https://greatgameindia.com/pfizer-pr...icacy-uruguay/

[onawah]

How Vaccine Trials Routinely Rig the Results
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
July 08, 2022
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...rid=1542733391

(It will be interesting to see any clips that are shown from that meeting and Paul Offit of all people expressing concerns. He has been the vaccine shill of all shills so far.)

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has adopted a “Future Framework” scheme that will allow Pfizer and Moderna to reformulate and release updated COVID shots without conducting any additional clinical trials
This Framework will allow completely untested, reformulated COVID injections to be churned out; the elimination of clinical trial requirements may also, over time, be expanded to other vaccines and drugs
The “Future Framework” will almost certainly guarantee that future COVID shots be less effective and/or more dangerous, because adding more mRNA (to cover more variants) will result in higher adverse event rates, and less mRNA per variant will lower the effectiveness
Over the years, we’ve seen plenty of examples of how vaccine trials are being rigged, and that the “Future Framework” is an extreme expansion and formalization of that rigging
Not recording injuries, or recording them improperly, are a common tactic used to fudge results and make a vaccine appear safer than it is.
Another common strategy is to exclude any parameter that turns out to be problematic, and that includes participants who are injured.
Because this is such a common trick, the fact that 3,000 of the 4,526 children (aged 6 months through 4 years) enrolled in Pfizer’s pediatric COVID trial were excluded is a huge red flag

In a rather shocking turn of events, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration sneaked in a “Future Framework”1 scheme that will allow Pfizer and Moderna to reformulate and release updated COVID shots without conducting any additional human clinical trials, other than what’s already been done.2,3,4

FDA Rewrites the Rules on the Fly
A vote on the Framework was scheduled to be taken June 28, 2022, by the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC), but while the VRBPAC approved (19-2) a bivalent COVID shot for fall 2022,5 the expected voting on the Framework, specifically, didn’t seem to take place — only it DID.

As it turns out, we’ve been bamboozled yet again by an agency that keeps rewriting the rules on the fly. Toby Rogers, Ph.D. — a political economist whose research focus is on regulatory capture and Big Pharma corruption6 — explains how they sneaked this one by us:7

“Yesterday [June 28], the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee approved a bivalent COVID-19 shot with the Wuhan strain and the Omicron variant ...

At the meeting, the manufacturers (Moderna, Pfizer, and Novavax) were asked what their production timelines are… and they said out loud, ‘So long as we don’t have to provide any clinical data, we’ll have them ready by fall.’ No one had a problem with that ...

Wait, hold up, I thought the FDA was voting on the Future Framework yesterday? The policy question was whether reformulated COVID-19 shots would be treated as new molecular entities (which they are) in which case they should be subject to formal review or whether reformulated shots would be treated as ‘biologically similar’ to existing Covid-19 shots and be allowed to skip clinical trials altogether.

Apparently the FDA did not have the votes to just pass this as a policy question. If you ask anyone whether reformulated mRNA represents a new molecular entity, well of course it is, so that would require formal regulatory review.

What the FDA did instead was to smuggle the policy question in disguised as a vote about reformulated ‘boosters’ for the fall.

In essence, the FDA just started doing the Future Framework (picking variants willy nilly, skipping clinical trials) and essentially dared the committee members to turn down a booster dose — knowing that all of the VRBPAC members are hand-picked because they’ve never met a vaccine they did not like.

So of course only two people on the committee had the courage to turn down a booster dose — even though it was based on this preposterous process (that was never formally adopted) where there was literally no data at all ... By stealth, the FDA replaced a system based on evidence with a system based entirely on belief.”

Worst Idea in the History of Public Health
A decision to release reformulated mRNA shots without additional clinical trials is the worst development yet, by far, and has the power to radically change medical science moving forward.

Not only will completely untested COVID injections be churned out, but this “framework” may also, over time, be widened to include other vaccines and drugs that drug makers may want to tinker with. Heck, it could even lower standards for drug trials in general, which historically have required at least 10 years of multi-phase testing.8

In a May 31, 2022, Substack article, Rogers explained the origin and purpose of this incredibly dangerous proposal:9

“Pfizer and Moderna have a problem — their mRNA COVID-19 shots do not stop infection, transmission, hospitalization, nor death from the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Everyone knows this ... Pfizer and Moderna are making about $50 billion a year on these shots and they want that to continue.

So they need to reformulate the shots. Maybe target a new variant, maybe change some of the ingredients — who knows, these shots don’t work so it’s not clear what it will take to get them to work. This is a problem because reformulated shots mean new clinical trials and new regulatory review by the FDA.

There is a decent chance that any reformulated shot might fail a new clinical trial and the public is deeply skeptical of these shots so the scrutiny would be intense.

So Pfizer and Moderna have figured out a way to use regulatory capture to get their reformulated COVID-19 shots approved WITHOUT further clinical trials. Their scheme is called the ‘Future Framework’ ... The purpose of the ‘Future Framework’ is to rig the COVID-19 vaccine regulatory process in perpetuity in favor of the pharmaceutical industry.

If this ‘Future Framework’ is approved all future COVID-19 shots, regardless of the formulation, will automatically be deemed ‘safe and effective’ without additional clinical trials because they are considered ‘biologically similar’ to existing shots.

This is literally the worst idea in the history of public health. If you change a single molecule of mRNA in these shots it will change health outcomes in ways that no one can anticipate. That necessarily requires new clinical trials — which is what the FDA is proposing to skip ...

The FDA authorized COVID-19 shots for kids on June 14 and 15. So if the FDA approves the ‘Future Framework’ on June 28th, the shots that will be given to kids (and Americans of all ages) in the fall will be the reformulated shots that skipped clinical trials.”

SARS-CoV-2 Is a Horrible Vaccine Candidate, and They Know It
Before we continue, let’s review one important factor that tends to get lost. As explained by Rogers,10 “Viruses that evolve rapidly are bad candidates for a vaccine,” for the simple reason that they mutate faster than vaccine development can keep up with.

This is why we don’t have a vaccine against the common cold. It’s’ also why all previous attempts to develop a coronavirus vaccine failed. Those studies never made it past animal trials. The vaccines caused antibody-dependent enhancement, making the animals sicker than normal when exposed to the virus.

Most people are unaware that SARS-CoV-2 mutates at a rate that is two to 10 times faster than the influenza virus,11,12 and these mutations can considerably reduce vaccine effectiveness. Indeed, we’ve seen this both with the seasonal flu vaccine and the COVID shots. When you vaccinate against a rapidly mutating virus you also run the risk of pressuring it into a more virulent and/or vaccine-resistant form. As noted by Rogers:

“The FDA’s ‘expert advisory committee’ (VRBPAC) met on April 6, 2022 to discuss the ‘Future Framework’ for the first time. All of the committee members agreed that COVID-19 shots are not working, that boosting multiple times a year was not feasible, and that the shots need to be reformulated.

They also unanimously agreed that there are no ‘correlates of protection’ that one can use to predict what antibody levels would be sufficient to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection.”

By now, the VRBPAC must know that the only way forward, really, is to withdraw the COVID shots and focus on therapeutics. But they’re not doing that. Instead, they’re doubling down on a failed strategy. On top of that, they’re making the situation even worse by foregoing clinical trials. There’s no doubt in my mind that this will pose grave risks to public health. I agree with Rogers, who said:13

“Think about it. The more mRNA you put into a shot, the higher the adverse event rate (as the genetically modified mRNA hijacks the cell and starts cranking out spike proteins). So if Pfizer and Moderna put more mRNA into these shots (in order to cover multiple variants) adverse event rates will skyrocket.

But if Pfizer and Moderna put less mRNA per variant into a shot (in order to keep the total amount of mRNA at 100 mcg for Moderna and 30 mcg for Pfizer) then the effectiveness against any one particular variant will be reduced. The Future Framework is 100% guaranteed to fail.”

They’re Fudging Effectiveness Too
The FDA also insists that, due to time constraints, evaluation of effectiveness must rely on “measures other than actual health outcomes.”14 In other words, whether the shots actually lower your risk of severe illness, hospitalization and death will have no bearing.

The only measure that will be taken into account is whether or not the jab triggers a rise in antibody levels, which has never been proven to offer significant protection. This also means that as long as antibody levels are through the roof, the death rate could be through the roof too, and the jabs will still be used, because that’s not part of the equation.

The focus on antibody levels to the exclusion of everything else may actually be backfiring. Data from Moderna’s trial suggest the shot actually makes you more prone to repeat infections due to the inhibition of antibodies against a particular portion of the virus.

A preprint study15,16 posted on medRxiv April 19, 2022, found adult participants in Moderna’s trial who got the real injection, and later got a breakthrough infection, did not generate antibodies against the nucleocapsid — a key component of the virus — as frequently as did those in the placebo arm.

Placebo recipients produced anti-nucleocapsid antibodies twice as often as those who got the Moderna shot, and their anti-nucleocapsid response was larger regardless of the viral load. As a result of their inhibited antibody response, those who got the jab may be more prone to repeated COVID infections.

These findings are further corroborated by data from the U.K. Health Security Agency. It publishes weekly COVID-19 vaccine surveillance data, including anti-nucleocapsid antibody levels. The report17,18 for Week 13, issued March 31, 2022, shows that COVID-jabbed individuals with breakthrough infections indeed have lower levels of these antibodies.

There is a whole lot we do not know about this virus, these shots, and the interaction between them. So, allowing the vaccine makers to reformulate the shots without clinical trials is a recipe for disaster.
For clarity, antibodies thought to offer protection against COVID are the antibodies against the spike protein and the receptor binding domain (RBD).19 But this study suggests antibodies against other parts of the virus may play an equally important role, and at least one of them is being inhibited rather than boosted, resulting in a situation where you can get reinfected time and again.

The moral of the story here is that there is a whole lot we do not know about this virus, these shots, and the interaction between them. So, allowing the vaccine makers to reformulate the shots without clinical trials is a recipe for disaster.

Vaccine Trials Are Routinely Rigged
Over the years, we’ve seen plenty of examples of how vaccine trials are being rigged, and what the FDA is now proposing is really just an extreme expansion and formalization of that rigging. For example, in 2017, an eight-month investigation by Slate magazine20 revealed that HPV vaccine trials “weren’t designed to properly assess safety.”

In an internal report about Gardasil 9, obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) had actually called attention to some of these problems, saying Merck’s approach was “unconventional and suboptimal” and that it left “uncertainty” about Gardasil’s safety. Yet nothing was done about it.

Then, in 2020, Dr. Peter Gøtzsche — a Danish physician-researcher, professor and cofounder of the Cochrane Collaboration and the Nordic Cochrane Centre — and two colleagues published a review and meta-analysis21 of the data from 24 HPV vaccine trials. Slate magazine reported those findings as well.22

Again, the conclusion was that HPV trials had put safety on the back burner by failing to conduct proper safety testing. Still, to quote Slate magazine, “The findings don’t affect official recommendations to get vaccinated.” According to Gøtzsche and his coauthors:23

“We judged all 24 studies to be at high risk of bias. Serious harms were incompletely reported for 72% of participants (68,610/95,670). Nearly all control participants received active comparators (48,289/48,595, 99%). No clinical study report included complete case report forms ...

At 4 years follow-up, the HPV vaccines decreased HPV-related cancer precursors and treatment procedures but increased serious nervous system disorders (exploratory analysis) and general harms.

As the included trials were primarily designed to assess benefits and were not adequately designed to assess harms, the extent to which the HPV vaccines’ benefits outweigh their harms is unclear.”

Not recording injuries, or recording them improperly (such as listing an injury as a preexisting condition, for example), is a common tactic used to fudge results and make a vaccine appear safer than it is. Another common strategy is to exclude any parameter that turns out to be problematic, and that includes participants who are injured.

Because this is such a common trick, the fact that 3,000 of the 4,526 children (aged 6 months through 4 years) enrolled in Pfizer’s pediatric COVID trial were excluded is a huge red flag.24 Even more suspicious is the fact that Pfizer doesn’t explain why two-thirds of the children were dropped.

World Health Organization Is Behind Idea to Toss Safety
The FDA did not invent the “Future Framework” idea all by itself, however. According to Rogers, the World Health Organization and other predictable names are the real masterminds:25

“I did not understand until ... I started to write this article, that this entire ‘Future Framework’ is actually coming from the WHO. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the biggest voluntary contributor to the WHO. So Gates is likely directing the play.

Gates requires that WHO use the McKinsey consulting firm so this is probably a McKinsey operation (and McKinsey also works for Pharma so this is a huge conflict of interest). As Naomi Wolf points out, the involvement of the WHO also raises troubling questions about the influence of the Chinese Communist Party over this process.

As far back as January, the WHO/Gates/McKinsey junta realized that these shots were terrible and so they decided to use that as an opportunity to seize even more power and control.

The WHO set up a Technical Advisory Group on COVID-19 Vaccine Composition (TAG-CO-VAC) to implement these Orwellian ‘Future Frameworks’ across the developed world to lower manufacturing costs for Pharma and avoid bothersome health data that might hurt profits. All the messaging we have seen from the FDA and leaked to the press was initially developed and released by TAG-CO-VAC.”

We Must Reject All Future mRNA Shots
This COVID debacle — from its fraudulent PCR test beginnings, to these devastatingly dangerous COVID shots and the intentional negligence by vaccine makers and health authorities — is the most shocking example of a criminal enterprise I’ve ever seen. Nothing else even comes close.

And the proverbial cherry on top that proves none of it is accidental or caused by ignorance is this sneaky and underhanded erasure of the requirement of clinical trials for all future COVID shots in the name of expedience. COVID-19 is not a death sentence — far from it. So, there’s no need for expedience. And since there’s no need for expedience, there’s also no need to accept collateral damage in the form of COVID jab-related injuries and deaths.

So, why are they doing this? That’s the million-dollar question, and the most obvious answers are all disturbing in the extreme. At best, they don’t care how many people, including children, suffer and die. At worst, the intention is to dramatically reduce the population through adverse effects on fertility, reduction of life span and near-term death.

To save ourselves, indeed, to save mankind, we must reject all mRNA shots, present and future. And not just the COVID shots but also any others that are in the pipeline, because if they’re willing to skip the most basic of safety protocols once, you can be sure they’ll do it again.

Skimping on safety assessment has been the secret norm for decades, and now they’re attempting to formalize that process using stealth and subversion. The initial COVID shots haven’t even completed their trials yet, and they want you to believe those incomplete trials are sufficient to “prove” all future reformulations are “safe and effective” too!

We’ve also seen how the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention came out saying they’ve seen no safety signals in the data, only to later discover that the reason they didn’t find any was because they never actually looked.26

It’s nothing short of insanity, and over the past two years, government agencies have proven they are not going to put a stop to the madness. No, they’re going to take this experiment as far as it’ll go, and that means, until people everywhere say “No more,” and leave all their stockpiles to rot.

There’s Help if You’ve Taken the Jab
In closing, if you’ve already taken one or more COVID jabs and now regret it, first, the most important step you can take is to not take any more shots, and that includes conventional vaccines and any other mRNA or gene-based injections as well.

Next, if you suspect your health may have been impacted, check out the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance’s (FLCCC) post-vaccine treatment protocol, I-RECOVER,27 which you can download from covid19criticalcare.com in several different languages."
https://covid19criticalcare.com/covi...ine-treatment/

- Sources and References
1 FDA Briefing Document June 28, 2022
2, 14 The Defender June 27, 2022
3 The Epoch Times June 28, 2022 (Archived)
4 New York Times June 27, 2022 (Archived)
5 The Defender June 29, 2022
6 Brownstone Institute June 22, 2022, Author’s Bio
7 uTobian June 29, 2022
8 Phrma.org Biopharmaceutical research and Development
9, 10, 12, 13 uTobian Substack May 31, 2022
11 VRBPAC Meeting Comments by Trevor Bedford, April 6, 2022
15 medRxiv April 19, 2022 DOI: 10.1101/2022.04.18.22271936
16, 18 The Defender May 4, 2022
17 UK Health Security Agency COVID-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report Week 13
19 CDC.gov MMWR December 10, 2021; 70(49): 1700-1705
20 Slate December 17, 2017
21, 23 BMC Systematic Reviews 2020; 9: article number 43
22 Slate March 11, 2020
24 Rumble June 17, 2022
25 uTobian June 26, 2022
26 Jackanapes Substack June 16, 2022
27 FLCCC I-RECOVER Post-Vaccine Treatment Protocol (PDF)









Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v17qyar/?pub=ijro7

[mountain_jim]

update - just saw that ExomatrixTV posted this yesterday

/////////////////



https://twitter.com/szucs_john/statu...0E6ma_kYkGEDSw

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=XiDjsicCUns

DarkHorse Podcast Clips
421K subscribers
Clip taken from DarkHorse Podcast Livestream #132 (originally streamed live on June 25, 2022): https://youtu.be/usP2D_qGUZs
https://open.spotify.com/episode/0CBE...

Q&A:
https://youtu.be/Fk-FOhbAASM
https://open.spotify.com/episode/1kB0...

Mentioned in this clip:
Guetzkow, for Children’s Health Defense, 6/21/22: CDC Admits It Never Monitored VAERS for COVID Vaccine Safety Signals: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/de...

Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) Standard Operating Procedures for COVID-19, from the CDC, 2021 (updated 2022: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/pdf...

What is this a clip from?
In this 132nd in a series of live discussions with Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying (both PhDs in Biology), discuss the state of the world though an evolutionary lens. Find more from us on Bret’s website (https://bretweinstein.net) or Heather’s website (http://heatherheying.com).


















¤=[Post Update]=¤

https://twitter.com/DavidBCollum/sta...0E6ma_kYkGEDSw

[TomKat]

It's official, mrna vax is changing DNA, per Swedish study:

https://forbiddenknowledgetv.slclktr...c2VuZGVyIjoxfQ

[mizo]

Yes quite peaceful:

A Mostly Peaceful Depopulation


https://margaretannaalice.substack.c...on?r=l2dy4&s=w

interesting read

[mountain_jim]

https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/dr-pe...h-on-treatment

Dr. Peter McCullough On Treatment, Vaccines, and Censorship

KanekoaTheGreat
Jul 7



Dr. Peter McCullough testified to the Texas Senate Committee on Health and Human Services on June 27th, 2022.

Since I listened to him give a https://rumble.com/vlzlr0-dr.-peter-...at-bu.htmllast summer, I have told everyone that I know that Dr. Peter McCullough is the most important doctor in the world.

His knowledge of the medical literature and his work-ethic are world-class, but more importantly, his compassion for his patients and his integrity to the Hippocratic Oath are unshakeable.

If and when Republicans take over Congress, the American people deserve to see a three-hour nationally televised roundtable discussion between Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Anthony Fauci.

Below is a transcript of Dr. Peter McCullough’s latest presentation to the Texas Senate.

Dr. Peter McCullough

I’m a practicing internist and cardiologist in Dallas, Texas, and I'm an expert on covid-19. I have fifty-six peer-reviewed publications on the pandemic particularly on how to treat the infection and over seven hundred and seventy overall publications in the national library of medicine and well over a thousand overall medical communications.

I've served on two dozen data safety monitoring boards for large pharmaceutical and device and individual diagnostic studies and I consider myself both an expert on covid as well as drug and device and biological agent safety.

Here are my comments.

Early Treatment as a Community Standard of Care

There has always been a duty to treat covid-19. It started with the very first case as soon as we recognized that this was a potentially fatal infection.

When a patient could have died of this infection at that moment and we understood it early based on risk stratification, based on age, medical problems, and severity of symptoms upon presentation there was a duty to treat that patient. Period.

If a doctor did not treat that patient when that patient sought help there was a duty to refer. From the very beginning there was a community standard of care. From the beginning, it evolves over time.

In many situations like this or in rare diseases the community standard of care may be one doctor in that community who's going to take on the challenge of treating that patient but that becomes the community standard of care early. There was use of a variety of drugs that became standard of care as evidenced by surges in use of these drugs and they included hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, prednisone, and budesonide.

There were giant surges in use of these drugs as evidence that these were outpatient evolving standard care. Now there's a surge in use of paxlovid and a minor surge in molnupiravir.

There has always been a community standard of care for early treatment. Lesson learned from this committee — there's been eight hours of testimony today — not a single presenter could tell you what patients in these data sets received early treatment and what was their outcomes.

Not a single presenter knew who had received early treatment and what was the degree of complexity of that early treatment. Lesson learned, next pandemic, get immediately an outpatient early treatment committee together.

Their objective is to reduce the risk of hospitalization and death. That is the overall objective of this pandemic keep people out of the hospital and keep them alive.

If they can get through this illness at home that was your mission from the very beginning on early treatment. Fortunately it's now been about 1400 studies there have been hundreds and hundreds of randomized trials and we know that sequenced multi-drug therapy that addresses viral replication, inflammation, or cytokine storm, and thrombosis is the approach in handling this.

Dr. Proctor is here, he's published two very good studies right from the state of Texas. Vladimir Zelenko in Monroe New York, Dr. Raoult in France, all the data are cohesive that the early protocols very early had 85 percent reductions in the risk of hospitalization and death.

Now with monoclonal antibodies, paxlovid, and others, I've testified under oath in the U.S. Senate on January 24th, 2022, based on my expert opinion there is now a 95 percent risk reduction for death and hospitalization if early treatment is provided.

Conversely, I've reviewed hundreds if not thousands of reports of patients who are hospitalized and died, hundreds if not thousands of reports, the outcome of hospitalization and death is a product of not receiving early treatment. Whether someone's vaccinated or not, the vaccination is irrelevant because the vaccination is not a treatment what's relevant is was the patient treated before the hospital.

And every single case and every single patient outcome that I can see the reason why they're in the hospital is they received either zero outpatient treatment or they received inadequate treatment that was received too late. So a committee like this, lesson learned, is always going to be about treating the next infectious disease early.

In terms of inpatient care and the overall landscape of what happened, I think the charge of the committee is pay attention to big developments, pay attention to these in may of 2020, there was a U.S. senate hearing on the use of corticosteroids. Pay attention to that.

That was a big event. You heard confusing testimony, there were some of these doctors who didn’t know if steroids worked or not.

There was a landmark event where it was clear that steroids worked and it should have rapidly been instituted as a standard of care in the hospital. Another giant development was I had published the first overall treatment protocol paper in a major medical journal August 7th of 2020, but rapidly after that in September of 2020 there already was a home treatment guide by the Association of American Physician and Surgeons [AAPS].

When there is a physician group that publishes a home treatment guide pay attention to that. Remember the infectious disease side of America always had the first set of guidelines, and then the NIH, they still to this day do not have a comprehensive outpatient treatment guideline.

That's the reason why AAPS filled in, Frontline Critical Care Network filled in, Truth for Health Foundation, [America’s] Frontline Doctors, and others. When other physician organizations based on consensus and data fill in the gaps — pay attention to that.

Very, very important, when an organization puts out a negative position on a drug. This is really important and it’s a worldwide organization, you must pay attention to this.

November of 2020, the World Health Organization says stop using remdesivir, stop it, it’s bad, it doesn’t work and it’s leading to more deaths, it leads to kidney injury and liver injury. The immediate thing this committee should have done is who’s using remdesivir in the state of Texas and let’s talk about it.

Now whether or not the NIH disagrees with the WHO that's got to be vetted but the question should have been asked we needed to re-examine this. Where Texans going to be hurt by this drug?

The World Health Organization and the European Society for Critical Care said yes and that went on under this committee’s watch. These are very very important lesson learned — pay attention to the big developments.



Vaccine Safety

The covid-19 vaccines went through clinical trials and had two months of observation. The standard regulatory guidance was 24 months for life attenuated, killed, or antigen-based vaccines. These were genetic gene transfer technology vaccines — they're classified that by the FDA, they needed five years of observation — all that was thrown out.

There was no carcinogenicity, no meningitis studies, mutagenicity studies, teratogenicity studies. So when they came out they were, and still are today, emergency use authorized, investigational which means the consent form says we don't know if these work or not, and we don't know if they're safe long term, the consent form still says that.

Under your watch, vaccine mandates started happening in the state for investigational experimental products. We knew by January 22nd there was a problem because the U.S. CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System had too many deaths that have already happened with the covid-19 vaccine than they had from all the prior vaccines combined.

January 22nd of 2021, the warning bells came off and then nothing happened. We knew on January 29th through freedom of information, our FDA and Center for Disease Control was supposed to be putting out monthly safety reports for America.

No safety report, lesson learned from this committee get a vaccine safety committee together get them together and start having them meet if you’re not seeing safety being provided at a Federal level. Remember it's safety, safety, safety.

It would have been wonderful if these vaccines would have worked, but it was all about safety, we now know through court-ordered documents, freedom of information documents, Pfizer knew about 1000 deaths within 90 days of release of their vaccine. Pfizer knew about it, we don't know if the FDA knew about it.

Nobody did anything and the freight train continued. Now, fast forward as death started to occur people started to get very very uncomfortable, you saw all the pushbacks, protests, all kinds of worldwide feelings of great vaccine hesitancy because people were dying shortly after the vaccine.

Papers were published 50 percent of the deaths occurred within 48 hours, 80 percent within a week. We know the vaccines installed the genetic material for the Wuhan spike protein that was manipulated in a biosecurity lab in Wuhan, China.

There are now a thousand papers published on the spike protein and the vaccines. A thousand that deal with vaccine injuries, and they're well characterized, and the FDA agrees the vaccines cause blood clots, the vaccines cause heart damage, the vaccines cause neurological damage.

They also cause well characterized immunologic and hematologic system damage. This is in the peer-reviewed literature, this is not equivocal, this is not a subject of controversy or debate, it's in our literature.

There are now brand new diseases named after covid-19 vaccine injuries. As of June 17th, 2022, our CDC VAERS system has been certified 13,388 Americans who have died with the vaccine so though either they've taken it electively or they were forced into it.

That’s 13,338 people have lost their lives prematurely due to these vaccines. The vaccines qualify by the Bradford Hill Criteria, which is an organized set of criterion on causality, they qualify as causing these deaths according to these epidemiologic criteria.

I'm a trained epidemiologist, I am an expert in applying these criteria on a more probable than not basis, and almost certainly clear and convincing that these vaccines are causing death. This month, the World Council for Health which represents 70 bodies worldwide has called for a global recall of all vaccines because worldwide 40, 000 deaths that these safety databases across the world forty thousand in the big ones VAERS, the Yellow Card System, VigiSafe, and the EUDRA system.

Forty thousand deaths with the vaccines, unacceptably high. Typical standard for any biologic product is 50 deaths, pull it off the market, something's gone wrong.

50, not 40,000. So when there is a global recall by an international organization this committee ought to be having emergency meetings.

What are we going to do? A worldwide body has called for these to pulled off the market, they're still giving.

You just heard from the pharmacy director ahead of me there's still giving them out when there's a worldwide call for a recall. There should be some committee meeting so you have it down.

I mean you can tell something is going wrong here that we're in trouble in terms of vaccine safety. Dr. Malone's covered vaccine efficacy which is largely waned I will just tell you that the CDC told us as of December 10th, 2021, with the omicron strain, 79 percent of people with omicron were fully vaccinated.

That is prima facie evidence that the vaccines have completely failed against omicron variant. Now, it’s inverted, the vast majority of people who are sick with covid-19 and in the hospitals worldwide with the omicron variant are fully vaccinated.



Censorship and Reprisal for Health Professionals

It is clear now that in the area of covid that it's open season for censorship and reprisal not just to physicians but of nurses and patients and family members and others and the censorship is because there is a global effort to mass vaccinate the population every six months and anything that would deter from that is going to be censored. So if a family member has lost a loved one after the vaccine that event if it's written somewhere what have you is censored.

We have widespread censorship in the medical literature now, in social media, and even in oral presentations. I presented here on May 10, 2021.

Five statements that I made here under oath are now subject of censorship and professional reprisal by the American Board of Internal Medicine. Every single statement I made just in my written remarks and my prepared remarks is cited.

The American Board of Internal Medicine and the Texas Medical Board — they don't have a monopoly on the truth. No one holds medical truth, there are always two points of view on everything or more.

So Senator Johnson has stepped in and called the American Board of Internal Medicine out to have a roundtable discussion on what's going on now is a giant sweep through the federation of medical boards through the the American Board of Internal Medicine American Board of Family Medicine, etc., and to have an open conversation.

They have not responded in fact they've doubled down and said they're joining forces with the American Medical Association again in an effort to inflict reprisal on physicians as myself who are attempting to help patients through covid-19 respond to the pandemic in terms of our patient care, our scholarship, and our research, and also give patients a fair appraisal on a brand new set of experimental genetic vaccines which for some patients now represents a mortal threat to them and we must have certainly a conversation about the risks and benefits.

So I think right now the most important thing that this committee can do is this committee probably ought to have a working group on censorship and reprisal at the professional level — doctors, nurses, patients, — who under the watch of DHS is actually incurring their constitutional rights being stripped away from free speech. What is going on in this state to actually impair medical progress, remember medical progress will not happen unless there is a roundtable discussion on something.

Several speakers a few minutes ago talked about a conversation between some doctors and a doctor who wanted to prescribe ivermectin. That conversation to me didn't seem very fair balanced it seemed like a disciplinary conversation.

There is no disciplinary conversations in a brand new novel coronavirus. This is all about getting the patient better.

The other thing I heard in that conversation is a very important act of censorship or a violation of medical ethics is Dr. Bob Hall presented a case where a family member wanted the discussion about ivermectin of a patient in the hospital. There is a principle of medical ethics called shared decision making when you're a patient in the hospital you actually have a right to discuss what you want to have happen with your body.

If you're taking a medicine as an outpatient and you want to take that as an inpatient that's called medication reconciliation you have that full right to do so, no doctor can lord over you, and say no you can't have that medication. If you've had a fair balanced discussion and the drugs like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine are supported by hundreds and hundreds of clinical trials, they're in dozens of government guidelines elsewhere in the world as first line therapy, any American, any Texan has the right to receive these drugs in the hospital when they engage in a discussion with their doctor.

Under no circumstances should any doctor refuse a patient share decision making and their own personal autonomy. It's unethical it's immoral and from a clinical perspective it's illegal and don't let it happen on your watch.

Those are my comments.

Follow Dr. Peter McCullough on TruthSocial, Telegram, Rumble, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, or subscribe to his newsletter.





Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v17qk5v

[Delight]

Dr. David Martin: Alarming Interview With Too Much Evil to Unpack!
Published July 11, 2022


Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v1980wl

[onawah]

COVID-19 Vaccine Injury Compensation Program Described as Legal Black Hole
by Natasha Hobley
Published July 11, 2022
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2022/...al-black-hole/

"Attorneys familiar with vaccine injury claims have described the current compensation program for COVID-19 vaccines as a legal “black hole” and inadequate for addressing the vaccine injury claims associated with the fast-tracked COVID vaccines.1 Attorney Altom Maglio says he has been contacted by hundreds of people who suspect they have suffered COVID vaccine-related injuries but that there is nothing he or other plaintiff attorneys can do because of the underfunded and understaffed Countermeasure Injury Compensation Program (CICP).2 Maglio’s website states:

Our law firm has concluded that there is nothing our attorneys can do to significantly assist you.2

In 2020, Congress assigned COVID vaccine injury claims to the CICP, which is a federal program responsible for compensating injuries that result from use of government recommended drugs, vaccines and other pharmaceutical products developed and used during declared public health emergencies, such as Ebola and anthrax. The CICP is authorized under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act and administered by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

Since its inception in 2010, only 29 claims have been paid by the CICP, which makes up 10 percent of all filed claims.1

CICP Has Reached Unsustainable Growth Due to COVID Product Claims
The CICP has reached “unsustainable” growth since 2020, having received more than 8,000 COVID claims.2 Over 5,000 of those complaints are directly related to injuries or deaths associated with COVID vaccines, citing incidences ranging from sore shoulders and fevers to death.3 According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) latest data, about 260 million people have received at least one dose of the COVID vaccine.4

Some lawyers, who are experienced in filing vaccine injury claims, say that COVID vaccine injuries would be better handled by the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) “vaccine court” created under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which handles claims for childhood vaccines recommended by the CDC, such as the MMR, hepatitis and influenza vaccines.2

However, both the VICP and CICP are facing significant backlogs of vaccine injury claims and pharmaceutical companies, medical trade groups and attorneys believe both programs could collapse entirely.3 Two out of three vaccine injury claimants are turned away without awards in the VICP and often wait years for payouts if they are granted compensation from the U.S. government.5

Compensation Program Could Be Unable to Handle Backlogged Injury Claims
The VICP covers nearly three times the number of shots that it did when it was created in 1986.6 7 If the COVID vaccines are covered by the VICP in the future, there is concern among attorneys that the already overwhelmed VICP will not be able to handle the case load. Several healthcare bills have been proposed in Congress, although none have passed.5

A spokesman for the U.S. Health Resources and Service Administration (HRSA), which runs the CICP program, stated that the program will deny claims that do not have “compelling” scientific evidence that a vaccine directly caused injury."

References
1 Hals T. COVID-19 era highlights U.S. ‘black hole’ compensation fund for pandemic vaccine injuries. Reuters Aug. 21, 2020.
2 Greene J. A ‘black hole’ for COVID vaccine injury claims. Reuters June 29, 2021.
3 Gardner L. Vaccine injury compensation programs overwhelmed as congressional reform languishes. Politico June 1, 2022.
4 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID data tracker.
5 Gardner L. Backlog of vaccine injury claims persists as reform languishes. Politico June 1, 2022.
6 CDC. Recommended schedule for active immunization of normal infants and children 1983.
7 CDC. Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule: Recommendations for Ages 18 Years or Younger, United States, 2022. Feb. 17, 2022.

Altom Maglio, CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CICP, Countermeasure Injury Compensation Program, COVID-19, Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Service Administration, HRSA, Natasha Hobley, National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, National Vaccine Information Center, NVIC, Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, The Vaccine Reaction, Vaccine Court, Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, VICP

[onawah]

New Documentary Exposes WHO’s ‘Diabolical’ Plan to Use Vaccines to Reduce Global Population
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...b-25a6f7d23783
By Dr. Joseph Mercola
07/11/22

(Many hyperlinks in the article not embedded here.)

"Story at a glance:

Infertility: A Diabolical Agenda,” produced by Dr. Andrew Wakefield and Children’s Health Defense, details the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) intentions to produce an anti-fertility vaccine in response to perceived overpopulation, and how such vaccines have been used — without people’s knowledge or consent — since the mid-’90s.
The WHO has been caught more than once deliberately deceiving women into thinking they were vaccinated against tetanus, when in fact they were being sterilized.
The film clearly illustrates the depopulation agenda is not a conspiracy theory.
It’s reality, and it’s happening worldwide. The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine and the COVID-19 shots also have adverse impacts on fertility that are being ignored.
In the decade after the rollout of the HPV vaccine, the teen pregnancy rate dropped by 50%.
While the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is the only publicly available system to assess COVID jab injuries, the U.S. government has at least 10 other reporting systems they’re not sharing data from.
Children’s Health Defense is filing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for the other systems to get a better idea of the scale of harm, but VAERS and anecdotal reports alone suggest the scale of injuries and deaths is enormous. Data from insurance companies around the world also confirm this.
In the interview below, Dr. Andrew Wakefield and Mary Holland, president and chief legal counsel for Children’s Health Defense, discuss their new documentary film, “Infertility: A Diabolical Agenda.”

“Infertility: A Diabolical Agenda” is Wakefield’s fourth film. The first was “Who Killed Alex Spourdalakis?” followed by “Vaxxed” and “1986: The Act.”

This latest film details the WHO’s intentions to produce an anti-fertility vaccine in response to perceived overpopulation, and how such vaccines have been used without people’s knowledge or consent since the mid-’90s.

“It’s a very important story, and it’s a story that I’d been aware of for some years,” Wakefield says. “I think a lot of people heard about this intentional infertility vaccine program being conducted, primarily in women in developing countries such as Africa. But it had gone into abeyance so I hadn’t paid due attention.

“I should have paid more attention to it, because people had asked me over the years, ‘Do you think there is a population control agenda?’ …

“The allegation had been that the World Health Organization, under the guise of a neonatal tetanus prevention program, had been deliberately sterilizing women [in Kenya] — either using a vaccine to abort existing pregnancies or to prevent future pregnancies. They had done this under the guise of protecting children rather than actually reducing the population.”

As explained by Wakefield, it was no secret that the WHO had been working on an anti-fertility vaccine since the 1970s. Papers were published, and the WHO itself even admitted it. The real issue here is that of informed consent.

The WHO has been caught more than once deliberately deceiving women into thinking they were vaccinated against tetanus, when in fact they were being sterilized. This is an ethical and moral low that is hard to beat.

(Rumble video here, which is embedded at the end of this post)

Covert sterilization campaign in the Philippines revealed

The story detailed in this film begins in 1995 when the Kenyan government launched a WHO vaccination campaign against tetanus among women of childbearing age.

Dr. Stephen K. Karanja, former chairman of the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, became suspicious of the program when he learned that involuntary sterilization programs posing as tetanus programs had occurred.

That same year, 1995, the Catholic Women’s League of the Philippines actually won a court order halting a UNICEF tetanus program that was using tetanus vaccine laced with hCG. Anti-hCG-laced vaccines had also been found in at least four other countries.

This anti-hCG-laced tetanus vaccine perfectly matched the anti-fertility vaccine the WHO had announced in 1993.

The paper trail reveals that by 1976, WHO researchers had successfully conjugated, meaning combined or attached, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) onto tetanus toxoid, used in the tetanus vaccine.

As a result, when given to a woman, she develops antibodies against both tetanus and hCG.

HCG is a hormone that is produced as soon as the sperm enters the egg and the embryo begins to form. In response to this signal, the woman’s ovaries then produce progesterone, which maintains the pregnancy to term.

The conjugated vaccine effectively ends and prevents pregnancy as her own immune system will immediately attack and destroy the hCG as soon as it forms.

At the time, Karanja, who passed away in 2021, convinced leaders of the Catholic Church — one of the largest health care providers in Kenya — to test the tetanus vaccine being given, to make sure there was no foul play.

Without explanation, the WHO abandoned the 1995 campaign, but in 2014, they were back with a neonatal tetanus program.

A diabolical agenda

Girls and women, 15 to 49 years of age, were instructed to get vaccinated with a series of five injections, six months apart. Suspiciously, this is the exact schedule required for the anti-fertility vaccine to produce sterility.

Regular tetanus prevention requires only one injection every five to 10 years, and under no circumstance would you need five of them.

The Catholic Church decided to test the vaccines and collected three sample vials directly from clinics during the 2014 campaign.

The samples were tested by three independent laboratories and, as feared, they contained hCG. Another six vials were then collected and tested. This time, half were found to contain hCG.

When the Catholic Church went public with the findings, urging girls and women to not comply with the vaccination campaign, the Kenyan government went on the defensive, insisting there was nothing wrong with the vaccine.

Wakefield says:

“They used the media to demonize the Catholic Church and insinuate there had been deliberate contamination of these samples with hCG to produce the result they wanted.

“That’s where it remained until — and this is where it gets really interesting and where the film really comes into its own — our cameras were invited back into the laboratory where these tests were done … [and] the truth was revealed.

“It came down to a resolution of this key question of who was lying and who was being honest? Who was cheating, who was not? It’s really an extraordinary story that woke me up to the importance of this issue. There is an extraordinary prophetic statement at the end from the late Dr. Karanja, OBGYN from Africa. who was at the heart of all of this.

“He said, ‘When they are finished with Africa they’re coming for you’ … That’s probably a pertinent place to hand over to Mary, because never could a prophecy have been more apt, more true.”

Depopulation agenda is now a conspiracy fact

Holland continues:

“It’s been very hard to answer … when people would ask us, ‘Is there a depopulation agenda?’ People would point to things Bill Gates said, like how vaccines would reduce the population. There was an interpretation that it was going to make people healthier, and therefore they would choose not to have more children.

“It was murky. I think this film really helps us understand that this is not a conspiracy theory. It’s an absolute reality … The film makes that 100% clear. There’s just no question about it. And you see the deceit and deception. Just to point out, the Rome statute for the International Criminal Court that most countries of the world have signed onto … makes forced sterilization a war crime.

“This is not a trivial thing, to deprive people of informed consent and to sterilize them. That’s exactly what happened. One of the interviews in the film that is so poignant is of a woman who cannot carry a pregnancy to term. She comes to realize that she has antibodies to hCG, and she realizes that somebody, somewhere, made her infertile. It is, as she calls it, a diabolical agenda …

“We can now look back at what happened with the HPV vaccine, which I co-wrote a book about in 2018. One of the things we saw was that … the teen pregnancy rate dropped 50% from 2007 to 2018 — 50%! Now, whatever one wants to think about unplanned pregnancies, that is a staggering drop over 10 years.

“People were reporting extreme reproductive effects from the HPV vaccine. Now we’re hearing the same thing, only much more so, with respect to COVID shots. We’re hearing that women are having miscarriages, babies are literally dying from breastfeeding mothers who have been recently vaccinated.

“Congenital deformities are being reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. It’s now, I think, beyond the realm of conspiracy theory to say it is very plausible that these vaccines that are being pushed on the world — particularly the COVID shots — have strong anti-fertility effects.”

Is there such a thing as vaccine safety?

It’s important to realize that no study has ever proven that any of the vaccines on the childhood vaccination schedule are safe, especially when given in various combinations. As noted by Wakefield, vaccine manufacturers and people like Dr. Anthony Fauci present “an almost kindergarten-like approach” to safety.

The blanket statement given is that vaccines in general, and the COVID shots in particular, are “safe and effective,” and that they have no adverse effects on reproduction and fertility. This, despite the fact they’ve done no reproductive studies at all.

Women who hear such assurances will assume the necessary studies HAVE been done when, in fact, that’s a complete lie. The reality is, that you cannot find evidence of harm if you’re not looking for it.

Another reality is that assumptions and guesses about science are not the same as scientific evidence. One major assumption that has now turned out to be completely wrong is that the mRNA injection stays in the deltoid muscle, the site of injection.

“No one has ever sought to determine whether they remain at the site of injection or not, or whether they disseminate throughout the body, which of course they do,” Wakefield says. “So, it’s a naive and completely inappropriate assumption.

“The other assumption that was completely inappropriate was making any assumption at all. You’re going to give this [shot] to seven billion people … and you’re going to assume something about its safety? Then you discover, after giving it to the majority of that seven billion population, that you were completely wrong.

“In fact, it goes throughout the body. The spike protein can be found in tissues throughout the body, including and in particular in the ovaries. There it can set up an inflammatory reaction, autoimmunity, damage and infertility. There is no question that is biologically plausible.

“So here you have the mentality of these people, that after the horse has bolted, they are trying to shut the gate. If there is going to be damage, then the damage is done and it is too late. That is totally irresponsible and people need to know that.”

Wakefield further points out that no clinical trial for any of the vaccines on the childhood vaccination schedule has ever been tested against a true placebo. All have used active placebos, such as an aluminum injection or another vaccine, which effectively hides most of the adverse effects.

Interestingly, in some of the COVID jab trials, they actually used a completely inert placebo (although some vaccine makers used another vaccine). But then note what happened.

Before the trial was over, they unblinded everyone and offered the jab to everyone in the placebo group, effectively eradicating the control group altogether! Then, they tried to bury the data under red tape for 75 years. Thankfully, a sensible judge didn’t let them get away with it.

Wakefield says:

“They [Pfizer] knew there were problems. They had identified the problems doing the appropriate study, at least to start with, until they gave the crossover group the vaccine. Then they tried to hide the data because they knew it revealed the seriousness of the adverse reactions to their vaccine. The court overruled them and now those data are being analyzed, and they are terrifying.”

Stunning abdication of science

What’s worse, the government has incentivized ignorance under the law. They have incentivized not knowing what the long-term effects are.

Holland adds:

“What’s particularly stunning, in terms of the absolute abdication from science, is that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has said it’s perfectly fine to co-administer the COVID shots with everything else on the childhood schedule. That is going to have untold horrific likely effects …

“Most pediatricians will say ‘Hey, the CDC says it’s fine’ … They are going to be co-administering these shots with other things, and there is no science to back that up. None.”

Unfortunately, the future looks grim in this regard, as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is now considering a “Future Framework” in which vaccine makers will be allowed to reformulate and release future COVID shots without any additional testing.

Clinical trials are easy to rig, to begin with, but now they won’t even have to go through the trouble of fabricating desired results.

“And, of course there will be harmful effects on fertility,” Holland says. “I think it’s becoming very clear that we just have to reject all of this. It is corrupted to its core. It’s anti-human, I mean it’s truly anti-human. I think the reality that we’re in is becoming clearer.”

A hopeful note

Wakefield adds:

“To follow-up on that, a note of hope … People coming to this anew may think that we’re in a terribly dark time. I see it differently, having been in this now for 30 years. When I started out, a handful of people around the world were prepared to debate the thorny issue of vaccine safety.

“Now I read the other day that 70% of American adults have rejected the CDC’s recommended protocol for the COVID vaccine. They either didn’t get the first dose, they didn’t get the second dose, or they have refused to get the boosters, saying this is neither necessary nor is it safe.

“Those people — 70% of American adults — according to mainstream media are anti-vaxxers. So, whether they know it or not, they’ve joined our team and the other side has lost.

“This is a desperate, desperate measure; one hail Mary pass after another, and it’s failing very, very badly. For those of you who have not seen it from a historical perspective, take heart, because the world really is waking up in an extraordinary way …

“The silver lining of the dark cloud of COVID is that it has woken so many people … There is an inevitability to what is happening here, and they will not get away with it for very much longer.”

We’ve allowed the creation of an anti-human world

As for those who insist they have no objections to childhood vaccines, only the COVID jab, Wakefield warns just about every vaccine safety advocate began by objecting to a single vaccine or single ingredient before realizing it isn’t that simple:

“We all came to the collective realization that this was far more complex than we had previously imagined. They were making it more and more complex by the year, adding more vaccines into the schedule, lumping them all together. As Mary said, the idea of these vaccines being safe in combination was one they’d never tested but merely assumed to be safe …

“We came to the realization that it is some cumulative toxicity, some interactive effect, some potentiation that is leading to this massive increase in, for example, neurodevelopmental or immunological disorders.

“Had we been allowed to continue the research, any of us, all of us, we would have answers now. But we don’t have answers because the work was sabotaged at every turn, and now we are living in a state of greater ignorance than we were before.

“We’re now living in a world of man-made diseases. It’s absolutely staggering. None of this need ever have happened, and yet here we are with all of these new conditions or new variants on an old theme, like regressive autism, that we did not see before. That is something that man has created.

“Just as easily man could get rid of it if we took the initiative. That’s what, collectively, we have to do, and that’s what Children’s Health Defense is doing. They’re alerting people to this, waking them up, and it’s working.”

In addition to learning about the dangers of vaccines, people are also starting to learn more about other environmental toxins — pesticides, genetically modified organisms (GMOs), air pollution, water pollution, artificial foods, hormone-mimicking plastic chemicals and more, all of which have adverse effects on health and reproductive capacity.

“I think most humans want to live in a pro-human environment,” Holland says. “And I think the corporate government world we’re in right now is genuinely anti-human.”

The scale of harm is staggering

While VAERS is the only publicly available database collecting adverse vaccine reactions, the U.S. government has at least 10 other adverse event reporting systems that they’re not sharing data from.

Children’s Health Defense is filing FOIA requests for the other systems to get a better idea of the scale of harm, but VAERS and anecdotal reports alone suggest the scale of injuries and deaths is enormous. Data from insurance companies around the world also confirm this.

Holland notes:

“In 2021, from one life insurance company in the United States, an Indiana company, we know that 18 to 64-year-olds suffer a 40% excess death rate. They said a 10% shift would be a 1 in 200-year occurrence. A 40% shift is beyond catastrophic, and that’s what we’re looking at. These are secrets that can’t be hidden.”

Panafrican Congress is pushing back

Another piece of positive news is that a Panafrican Congress that was recently convened is starting to push back against the WHO. And, if the WHO were to be banned from a continent like Africa, it would be game over for them.

Holland explains:

“The WHO is following a two-track course to get to what they say, in 2024, will be a new international treaty, which basically will put the WHO at the center of global health and governance de facto. One track was through U.S.-proposed international health regulations.

“The U.S. proposed 12 regulations in December 2021 that would put the WHO at the center of these things and put in place very draconian regulations that would allow the WHO to supersede any decisions at the national government level. In a vote on those new international health regulation amendments, 47 African countries rejected all of them.

“Africa really led the way in saying ‘No, we don’t trust the WHO, we don’t want the WHO in this role.’ That’s very exciting because Africa absolutely has been exploited in every which way by the WHO and their pharmaceutical industry partners. I don’t think the WHO agenda is dead. We still have a lot of work to do.

“But clearly, we did have on Saturday an African sovereignty coalition launch, which you can see on the Children’s Health Defense TV website. There were activists, advocates, physicians, scientists from all over Africa, and then supporters from around the world. It’s very exciting. I think Africa is sending a message loud and clear we will not put up with this …

“We’ll take it one day at a time, but I believe the WHO and its backers will fail, and certainly many people around the world, Children’s Health Defense included, are working on lawsuits to prove there’s fraud going on here, this is criminal activity. Certainly, the authorization for [young] children [is a criminal act].

“We’re going to amend the lawsuit we have, which is to contest the jabs for 5 to 11-year-olds that the FDA authorized. We’ll just amend that for these younger children. This is devastating, this is a crime against humanity. There is no justification for young children getting these shots. They are not at risk of serious injury or death from COVID, but they certainly are at risk from these shots.”

Can the judicial system be trusted?

Speaking of lawsuits, many legal actions over the past two years have failed, but Holland, who is the chief legal counsel for Children’s Health Defense, is optimistic because courts tend to shift with public opinion.

She’s noticed courts are becoming increasingly receptive to the notion that there may be fraud going on with the COVID jabs, and that conflicts of interest play a role.

For example, two judges in New York who were assigned to cases she was representing were recently forced to recuse themselves, after it became known they owned between $50,000 and $500,000 in Pfizer stock.

“I think we’re likely to see many more successful lawsuits going forward in the next two years than in the last two years,” she says. “I think the population is coming to understand that there are conflicts of interest that prevent these people from being unbiased.

“I think it’s a question of time, and I think we’re in a race against time, but I do believe that lawsuits are likely to be more successful as time goes on and I think we’re already seeing that. We struck down the OSHA mandate, we struck down the mask mandates in airline transportation, we got access to the Pfizer documents. I think there’s more good news coming from the courts, I really do.”

The home run, judicially speaking, would be if we could prove vaccine makers committed fraud or “willful misconduct,” as that would eliminate all of their protections against prosecution and liability. The COVID jabs are authorized for emergency use under the 2005 PREP Act — which Holland believes is unconstitutional — and under that law, willful misconduct must be proven by “clear and convincing evidence.”

“I believe that at this point we’re getting very, very close to that threshold where we can prove willful misconduct by clear and convincing evidence,” she says.

“At that point, I think it will be clear to the whole population that it’s the liability protection on the back end and the mandates at the front end that makes this whole enterprise possible. I think there are serious attacks on both of those, and by the time the whole truth comes out, the whole vaccine paradigm disappears.

“I think it’s in our sights, I really do. I think the health of the unvaccinated is overwhelmingly superior to the health of the vaccinated, and that story’s coming out. Children’s Health Defense is coming out with a book this fall by Dr. Brian Hooker and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., about the science showing how much healthier unvaccinated people are.

“I think the truth is coming out, and I think the stakes are very high for the next couple years. But I really do believe that at the end of these couple years we will be in a whole new paradigm of vaccines and health. People have seen enough about the bad side of COVID shots that they are now open to this. I think we’re likely to see a sea change.”

In closing, if you didn’t watch the film yesterday, set aside 30 minutes to do it now. And, be sure to watch it all the way to the end.

The final 10 minutes include an update on the Kenya story, a review of what happened with the HPV vaccine, and an overview of what we know about the COVID shots’ potential impacts on fertility.

It’s important to realize that this depopulation agenda didn’t begin and end in Kenya. It’s happening worldwide.

More movies are coming

Wakefield’s fifth film is already in preproduction and should be ready for release next year. This one will be a full-length narrative feature about the childhood vaccination schedule.

It was co-written by Terry Rossio, who also wrote “Shrek,” “Pirates of the Caribbean,” “Aladdin” and other well-known movie productions.

“It’s a very powerful film, it will really move the mindset,” Wakefield says. “It will take those who have been awoken by the issue of COVID vaccines across the bridge from the adult vaccine schedule to the realization that this has been happening in the childhood vaccine schedule since the very beginning. It’s a very, very important film.”

Children’s Health Defense will also be coming out with a film version of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s book, “The Real Anthony Fauci.” That will be coming out later this year for which I was interviewed."

Originally published by Mercola.



Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v197k6x/?pub=ijro7

[Satori]

Posted by onawah (here)
COVID-19 Vaccine Injury Compensation Program Described as Legal Black Hole
by Natasha Hobley
Published July 11, 2022
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2022/...al-black-hole/

"Attorneys familiar with vaccine injury claims have described the current compensation program for COVID-19 vaccines as a legal “black hole” and inadequate for addressing the vaccine injury claims associated with the fast-tracked COVID vaccines.1 Attorney Altom Maglio says he has been contacted by hundreds of people who suspect they have suffered COVID vaccine-related injuries but that there is nothing he or other plaintiff attorneys can do because of the underfunded and understaffed Countermeasure Injury Compensation Program (CICP).2 Maglio’s website states:

Our law firm has concluded that there is nothing our attorneys can do to significantly assist you.2

In 2020, Congress assigned COVID vaccine injury claims to the CICP, which is a federal program responsible for compensating injuries that result from use of government recommended drugs, vaccines and other pharmaceutical products developed and used during declared public health emergencies, such as Ebola and anthrax. The CICP is authorized under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act and administered by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

Since its inception in 2010, only 29 claims have been paid by the CICP, which makes up 10 percent of all filed claims.1

CICP Has Reached Unsustainable Growth Due to COVID Product Claims
The CICP has reached “unsustainable” growth since 2020, having received more than 8,000 COVID claims.2 Over 5,000 of those complaints are directly related to injuries or deaths associated with COVID vaccines, citing incidences ranging from sore shoulders and fevers to death.3 According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) latest data, about 260 million people have received at least one dose of the COVID vaccine.4

Some lawyers, who are experienced in filing vaccine injury claims, say that COVID vaccine injuries would be better handled by the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) “vaccine court” created under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, which handles claims for childhood vaccines recommended by the CDC, such as the MMR, hepatitis and influenza vaccines.2

However, both the VICP and CICP are facing significant backlogs of vaccine injury claims and pharmaceutical companies, medical trade groups and attorneys believe both programs could collapse entirely.3 Two out of three vaccine injury claimants are turned away without awards in the VICP and often wait years for payouts if they are granted compensation from the U.S. government.5

Compensation Program Could Be Unable to Handle Backlogged Injury Claims
The VICP covers nearly three times the number of shots that it did when it was created in 1986.6 7 If the COVID vaccines are covered by the VICP in the future, there is concern among attorneys that the already overwhelmed VICP will not be able to handle the case load. Several healthcare bills have been proposed in Congress, although none have passed.5

A spokesman for the U.S. Health Resources and Service Administration (HRSA), which runs the CICP program, stated that the program will deny claims that do not have “compelling” scientific evidence that a vaccine directly caused injury."

References
1 Hals T. COVID-19 era highlights U.S. ‘black hole’ compensation fund for pandemic vaccine injuries. Reuters Aug. 21, 2020.
2 Greene J. A ‘black hole’ for COVID vaccine injury claims. Reuters June 29, 2021.
3 Gardner L. Vaccine injury compensation programs overwhelmed as congressional reform languishes. Politico June 1, 2022.
4 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID data tracker.
5 Gardner L. Backlog of vaccine injury claims persists as reform languishes. Politico June 1, 2022.
6 CDC. Recommended schedule for active immunization of normal infants and children 1983.
7 CDC. Child and Adolescent Immunization Schedule: Recommendations for Ages 18 Years or Younger, United States, 2022. Feb. 17, 2022.

Altom Maglio, CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CICP, Countermeasure Injury Compensation Program, COVID-19, Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Service Administration, HRSA, Natasha Hobley, National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, National Vaccine Information Center, NVIC, Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, The Vaccine Reaction, Vaccine Court, Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, VICP

I can attest to the accuracy of what these lawyers are saying. These statutes and other so-called laws regarding compensation for vaccine injuries are illusory to say the least. They appear to provide rights and remedies for the vaccine injured but they do not. To the contrary. They provide cover and liability protection, immunity, for big pharma and others in the medical industry. It’s all eye wash and window dressing. You can thank Congress for this atrocity too.

Look up “moral hazard.” What they are doing is moral hazard on steroids, but with evil intent. There are no consequences to any of them, so far, for their heinous, criminal and often traitorous conduct. In fact, they are excessively rewarded for their conduct.

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/ballyhoo2273/sta...lbtuvP2XgsqSTw

https://twitter.com/DavidBCollum/sta...NRxGsGPDf6xtvQ

https://twitter.com/DrJBhattacharya/...voziGFVUoKpWGA'

[mountain_jim]

Build the FearPorn and offer the “only” solution...

[TomKat]

A Canadian MD has noticed that people who've taken the Covid jab are developing AIDS-like immunodeficiency, and says that the jabs can only harm your immune system:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/wSPhikTOBEZr/

[DaveToo]

Posted by TomKat (here)
A Canadian MD has noticed that people who've taken the Covid jab are developing AIDS-like immunodeficiency, and says that the jabs can only harm your immune system:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/wSPhikTOBEZr/

Thanks TomKat for the video.
It's good to see a 'fresh face' doctor speak out on Covid.

It's sad that the number speaking out, even at this late date, is still relatively small.
There should be thousands and thousands of doctors coming clean about this.

Notice that those who do are often at or close to their retirement age.

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/toadmeister/stat...jPhJGEL3AC9OFg