Vaccine Crimes

[DaveToo]

Posted by Michel Leclerc (here)
Dr. David Martin.
Excellent in all respects.
The Inalienable Condition: brilliant synthesis. Excellent the idea that one cannot have or hence be denied "rights" to this inalienable condition.
Dovetails, a contrario, with the idea that the inoculated human (with a modified genome) is not the human we know-or-alas-knew, whose condition is-or-alas-was inalienable.
Human release 2.0: entire condition alienable.

Yes an extremely powerful point that we can all use if someone tries to coerce us into taking the jab.

It is written in U.S. law that if any part of your genome (or a plant's genome) is altered, the person/business/government etc. who altered your genome owns you by patent principles.

So no need to argue against the jab on health, moral, religious principles etc.
Just draw the "inalienable right to be free" card.
You do not consent to anyone altering your genes and thus owning you.

[Tintin]

Posted by Gwin Ru (here)
...

A Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in Association with COVID-19 Injectable Biological Products

Jessica Rose, PhD, MSc, BSc1,⁎ and Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH1

Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer

Great find I was hoping someone would hunt this down

Now in the Avalon Library

[jaybee]

Posted by Tintin (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
Please listen to Dr David Martin, in the above post. He's brilliant. His speech is powerful. His words inspiring.

I entirely agree. This is important. Here's the video embedded again.

Library update from Tintin - both the video and slides are now in the library

Video: https://avalonlibrary.net/Coronaviru...er_06_2021.mp4

Slides: https://avalonlibrary.net/Coronaviru...2021-11-06.pdf

Thanks - you can see everything a lot better in the pdf of the slide presentation -

(cheers to gord as well who posted it earlier from Odysee link.... )

re page 7 of the pdf ... 'the Covid Orchestra' - - Board of Trustees...

would this be the Trustees of all the companies involved combined or is there one specific company they are trustees for - ? (maybe I missed this info in David Martin's speech) - as there are 36 of them I suppose it must be all the company trustees combined.....?

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b...oftrustees.asp

A board of trustees is an appointed or elected group of individuals that has overall responsibility for the management of an organization. The board of trustees is typically the governing body of an organization and seeks to ensure the best interest of stakeholders in all types of management decisions.

[Pam]

Posted by jaybee (here)

Posted by Pam (here)

This is so incredibly powerful and extremely important. I wonder, does anyone have the technical savvy to to increase the size of the chart of criminals that would like to remain behind the scenes so it is easier to view? It would be greatly appreciated.

I'll second that -

I was thinking this Water Shed moment speech deserves it's own thread because there is so much information in it that needs focusing on - the companies revealed - the individuals behind it all - the organizations and universities -

Dr David Martin was on fire - no more Mr Nice Guy.... thank heaven for people like this who have the knowledge and skills to get into this at a deeper level - we can all do our bit at whatever level we are at but he has the ammunition and the leadership skills to take it to a higher, legal level ... hopefully...

What we are going to do if there is a complete failure of the legal system and no one is held accountable for anything and the mass poisoning / mass murder ( + covert genetic engineering) just rolls on - I don't know -

I tried to read the names etc on the slides but was having difficulty ... it really needs focusing on in detail...

jaybee, we are thinking the same thing. I didn't think about a separate thread but that is perfect. I would be honored to bring these people out in the open with as much as we can dig up on them.

Later down the thread, I see good old Tintin has helped out with the slides. Thank you Tintin for all that you do for the forum, you are dearly appreciated.

[onawah]

JUDY MIKOVITS PHD; ANTIDOTE FOR VACCINE TOXIN AND WARNING AGAINST DANGEROUS FAKE ONE
November 15, 2021
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/jud...rous-fake-one/

(Video at that link which I could not find a way to embed)

"Dr Judy Mikovits joins Ann Vandersteel, who asks her whether COVID-19 is a real virus.

Dr Judy, who worked at Fort Detrick and who worked for years with Anthony Fauci at NIH replies, “No, COVID-19, the disease is not caused by SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus.

“SARS-CoV-2 is not a real human virus, it’s a monkey virus grown in the vero monkey cell line, always has been, just as SARS was created in that cell line and the variants are in that cell line.

“So the disease, COVID never satisfied any of Koch’s Postulates or the Hill’s Criteria for a causative agent of a disease, because in order for the virus, SARS-CoV-2 to have caused COVID, everybody with evidence of infection has to have disease.

“And what we know is, essentially, nobody with evidence of infection by that fraudulent PCR test – that is not testing for SARS-C0V-2 – and PCR does not test for an infectious virus.

“Nobody’s sick. This has a 99.7% survival rate, so there’s no such thing as an ‘asymptomatic carrier’ of a disease-causing virus. A virus either makes you sick or it doesn’t.

“And what we know is this disease called COVID was caused by contaminated flu shots – which are all contaminated with coronaviruses – and they are, every year and that those viruses recombine – the test was testing for the influenza, so this, at 4,000 people a day, in January of 2021 were dying of influenza and the CDC was labeling it, calling it “COVID”.

“We know that 5G and the measures; the remdesevir, so that which is killing people by shutting down their kidneys. Everything that’s been done: the masks, the shots, the isolation have caused the death and the destruction worldwide, not SARS-CoV-2.”

Ann says, “So, essentially, COVID-19 is a marketing hype name to promote fear and get people running to the doctors to get these PCR tests, which are, of course, completely falsely-calibrated and they’re not measuring COVID-19. So, has COVID-19 ever been isolated in a lab, then?”

Dr Judy replies, “SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated from vero monkey kidney cells – in a lab, grown in –”

Ann interrupts, “But not in people.”

“Not from people-to-people,” Dr Judy says, “Not from a person with disease and sending it to another…It’s a lab virus. All the variants are, they’re sequences in a database and they always have been, since 2003 and SARS.”

Ann asks, “OK, so these COVID vaccines – or what they’re touting to be vaccines, these shots. I call them Clot Shots, Kill Shots. What are they, if they’re not supposedly treating or preventing coronavirus?”

“Well, they’re synthetic, they’re gene therapy, number one. They’re not vaccines, they don’t meet the legal or scientific definition of a vaccine, which is usually a piece of a virus or a bacteria or an ‘attenuated virus’, means weakened, you took out the part that usually kills you and then you use that in a vaccine…

“The simple answer is they are injecting in you a deadly synthetic virus. Synthetic virus. You are expressing the deadliest – the spike protein from HIV, the XMRV and SARS, so the three deadliest plandemics of our time. You’re injecting the disease and you are shedding and spreading it, if your immune system cannot break down that synthetic lipid nanoparticle.

“It’s a synthetic virus. It’s not a vaccine, never was, never was intended – and it’s why we’ve been spreading the news.”

Dr Judy says that the spike proteins in the flu and COVID vaccines are shed and spread and have been for years but the good news, she says is that whether you get a real virus or a synthetic virus, the treatment is the same: ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine and ozonated creams on your skin.

“Keep your immune system healthy, don’t ever wear a mask, because that cripples your own immune system, as you know from our book, ‘The Truth About Masks’…

“The good news is, as long as people stop, right now getting any other shot, we can heal this world. Because any other shot is going to kill you and I mean a flu shot, because they have coronaviruses…

“This is how they’ve driven this agenda for the past 30 years. They’ve weaponized SARS, they’ve weaponized Ebola – and that was 2014, when Tony Fauci released that virus on the Sierra Leone, on the Liberians, you know by way of a vaccine program.

“You know, ‘We’re gonna go over there and help you!’ with Christian missionaries, and that’s all described in our New York Times Bestseller, ‘Plague of Corruption’, which came out April 14th, 2020.

“I was first on the Epoch Times, April 8th, 2020, telling them all of this, showing them the Journal of Virology paper that showed hydroxychloroquine is a prophylactic treatment strategy for HIV, for SARS. And that means it’s a vaccine!

“Every 21 days, you got a booster shot, so the entire world could have been saved by hydroxychloroquine, just as in this book, ‘Called for Life’, by Kent and Amber Brantly. He’s the doctor that got infected with Ebola when Ebola was aerosolized.

“And this was in the summer of 2014 and this was the cover-up by Tony Fauci of the William Thompson confession, after 15 years that MMR, giving Blacks and people of color, Hispanics, before the age of 3 had a 2-to-4 times greater risk of getting autism or severe neuro-developmental disease from that shot.

“So yes, MMR in susceptible populations, three RNA viruses that’ll cause autism. So what does Tony Fauci do? Oh, he released contagious Ebola on Black people, to take everybody’s attention away, just like the game they played in COVID, to take everybody’s attention away from the corruption…

“We caught them. Not ‘we’, Judy Mikovits, the Royal We: Children’s Health Defense, The Highwire, the Informed Consent Action Network. Lawsuit, lawsuit, lawsuit. Proved that vaccines are not safe, have never been tested since 1989, not a single double-blind placebo controlled study, safe study has been done, as required by Federal Law, by the HHS.

“That was the proof in the Fall of 2019…Was COVID started because they cloned the deadly H1N1 in 2005 – cloned – from people who died of the Spanish Flu?

“It’s all in here. And in our latest book, ‘Ending Plague’, because we tell you the solutions are there. We tell you ozone therapy, we tell you Type 1 Interferon, we tell you Peptide T and immune modulation peptides could have stopped AIDS, could have stopped all of these diseases.

“And the biggest thing our books tell you is that, ‘Never again get another injection’ and you will live and we as a world will experience health.”

MANY, MANY vital details in this talk, check it out.

The Vaxx Kills :https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/vaxx-kills/

Stop the #CLOTSHOT! "



******************
This is a different video, but it's with Judy Mikovitz and is recent :
" In a rare dual interview, Dr. Judy Mikovits and Mikki Willis, producer of the Plandemic Series and Author of Plandemic Series https://plandemicseries.com/ at the Health and Freedom Conference.

We discuss who's responsible, who's caught and why the data will take them all down."

https://rumble.com/vp6utd-november-1...ki-willis.html

[Delight]

Posted by Pam (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
Please listen to Dr David Martin, in the above post. He's brilliant. His speech is powerful. His words inspiring.

I entirely agree. This is important. Here's the video embedded again.

This is so incredibly powerful and extremely important. I wonder, does anyone have the technical savvy to to increase the size of the chart of criminals that would like to remain behind the scenes so it is easier to view? It would be greatly appreciated.

This is a power point that may have the same info?

RedPill Expo Dr David Martin Presentation November 7,2021

This is the Weston Price Video


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/fHhniBm4cyiM

[Gwin Ru]

PROOF: KIDS WILL DIE, PFIZER KNEW 11:26

Stew Peters Show
Published November 17, 2021

Rumble — The vaccines haven’t worked the way our leaders told us they would. Now, they need to force them into our children. It’s a religious imperative for the left, in their new coronavirus death cult. The CEO of Pfizer is going around saying that people who question the official story on the vaccines are “criminals.” Karen Kingston joins Stew to discuss who the real criminals are, especially those involved in disabling and killing kids through vaccine trials.

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vmrtkn

[Gwin Ru]

REAL LIFE MEDICAL MURDER: HUSBAND BEING KILLED, DENIED, REQUESTED TREATMENT 12:31

Stew Peters Show
Published November 17, 2021

Rumble — We’ve received letter after letter telling us horrifying stories of what’s going on in the nation’s hospitals. One letter was from Erin Jones, who is desperately trying to save her husband Jason, after he was placed on a ventilator, now, for more than a month. The doctors of Hugly Memorial Hospital in Texas have refused alternative treatments, and is essentially being killed by lack of care.

Dr. Jason Andrew Seiden
Phone # for Huguley Memorial Hospital in Ft Worth, TX: 817-293-1200

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vmrr24

[mountain_jim]

If true, horrific, as so much of this is now.

https://twitter.com/YoukoskvArt/stat...738878976?s=20

[DaveToo]

Posted by Gwin Ru (here)
PROOF: KIDS WILL DIE, PFIZER KNEW 11:26

Stew Peters Show
Published November 17, 2021

Rumble — The vaccines haven’t worked the way our leaders told us they would. Now, they need to force them into our children. It’s a religious imperative for the left, in their new coronavirus death cult. The CEO of Pfizer is going around saying that people who question the official story on the vaccines are “criminals.” Karen Kingston joins Stew to discuss who the real criminals are, especially those involved in disabling and killing kids through vaccine trials.

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vmrtkn

I think once again we should use caution and not jump quickly to any conclusions with a Stew Peters/Karen Kingston video.

I'm quoting Karen now from the video:

"Maybe your audience or naysayers are saying you have no evidence this is a bioweapon.
Yes I do. Take a look at the biological license application that was submitted in May of this year.
And what it says under the product description, verbatim."

She reads the product description, but nowhere does it say it's a bioweapon.

"It is the bioweapon. That's what it is. And it's literally called the Wuhan-Hu-1 spike protein. We know that's the bioweapon.
If you still don't believe me, take a look at the patent that was issued
on Jan 10, 2017.

And it was issued to actually MIT and Harvard. But this all roles up into the master patent, and who funded this? It says under state govt. support the invention was made with the govt. support awarded by the NIH.

But if you go to Section 9, what does it say Stew?
It says that this nano-technology vaccine will deliver a molecule.
In some embodiments, the small molecule is a toxin. In some embodiments the toxin is from a chemical weapon, (or) an agent of biowarefare.

The NIH patented a vaccine to deliver a bioweapon.
That's what we are administering right now.”


What Karen did was pull up a patent that was finally granted in 2017, first filed in 2013 and related to an application from 2007 by the NIH.
She shows no ties whatsoever between this patent and anything Pfizer or Moderna patented.

She also cherry-picked one (1) of 857 possible embodiments mentioned in the patent.
The one she chose mentions chemical weapon/agent of biowarfare. But she chose not
to mention any of the other 856 possible embodiments for possible use for the vaccine.

The abstract for the patent states:

"The invention provides vaccine nanocarriers capable of stimulating an immune response in T cells and/or B cells, in some embodiments...
The invention provides methods of prophylaxis and/or treatment of diseases, disorders, and conditions comprising administering at least one inventive vaccine nanocarrier to a subject in need thereof."

[onawah]

NIH and EcoHealth Colluded to Evade Research Restrictions
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
November 18, 2021
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...rid=1325636047

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Emails reveal the National Institutes of Health colluded with EcoHealth Alliance to circumvent federal restrictions on gain-of-function (GOF) research and avoid oversight
NIH officials allowed EcoHealth Alliance to craft oversight language governing its own GOF experiments
At least two NIH officials expressed concern that the experiment might fall under the designation of GOF banned under federal moratorium.
They later accepted EcoHealth’s illogical justification for why the research should not be restricted
The NIH is now trying to evade responsibility by shifting blame for the unlawful research onto EcoHealth Alliance, saying they violated the grant rules
According to EcoHealth president Peter Daszak, the parent virus for his proposed chimeric SARS-like viruses, WIV1, had “never been demonstrated to infect humans.”
Yet three months earlier, his collaborator, Ralph Baric, Ph.D., had published a paper showing WIV1 did indeed have the ability to infect humans and posed a threat to the human population

The walls are closing in on Dr. Anthony Fauci as emails reveal the National Institutes of Health colluded with EcoHealth Alliance to circumvent federal restrictions on gain-of-function (GOF) research.

The damning revelations were published by The Intercept1 and Daily Caller,2 November 3, 2021. While the NIH has kept the grant correspondence secret, only allowing select congressional staff to review the documentation in a private session, The Intercept was given access to their personal notes.

Considering federal grants are of clear public interest, the NIH’s decision to not make the correspondence public is suspicious in and of itself. Are they hiding something? You bet. As reported by Intercept journalists Sharon Lerner and Mara Hvistendahl:3

“Emails show that NIH officials allowed EcoHealth Alliance to craft oversight language governing its own gain-of-function research ...

Detailed notes on NIH communications obtained by The Intercept show that beginning in May 2016, agency staff had an unusual exchange with Peter Daszak, the head of EcoHealth Alliance, about experiments his group was planning to conduct on coronaviruses under an NIH grant called ‘Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence’4 ...

EcoHealth was entering the third year of the five-year, $3.1 million grant that included research with the Wuhan Institute of Virology and other partners. In a 2016 progress report, the group described to NIH its plans to carry out two planned experiments infecting humanized mice with hybrid viruses, known as ‘chimeras.’

The plans triggered concerns at NIH. Two staff members — Jenny Greer, a grants management specialist, and Erik Stemmy, a program officer handling coronavirus research — wrote to EcoHealth Alliance to say that the experiments ‘appear to involve research covered under the pause,’ referring to a temporary moratorium5 on funding for gain-of-function research that would be reasonably anticipated to make MERS and SARS viruses more pathogenic or transmissible in mammals ...

Initially, NIH staff appeared intent on enforcing the funding pause ... But what happened next sets off alarm bells for biosafety advocates: Agency staff adopted language that EcoHealth Alliance crafted to govern its own work.

The agency inserted several sentences into grant materials describing immediate actions the group would take if the viruses they created proved to become more transmissible or disease-causing as the result of the experiments.”

NIH Tries to Evade Responsibility
The NIH is now trying to evade responsibility by shifting blame for the unlawful research onto EcoHealth Alliance. October 21, 2021, NIH principal deputy director Lawrence Tabak, Ph.D., sent a letter6,7,8 to James Comer, ranking member of the Committee on Oversight and Reform, “to provide additional information and documents regarding NIH's grant to EcoHealth Alliance Inc.”

In the letter, Tabak acknowledged that Fauci lied to Congress when he emphatically insisted the NIH/NIAID have never funded GOF research. However, when it comes to circumventing the research moratorium, Tabak lays the blame squarely at the feet of EcoHealth. According to Tabak:9

“The limited experiment described in the final progress report provided by EcoHealth Alliance was testing if spike proteins from naturally occurring bat coronaviruses circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model ...

In this limited experiment, laboratory mice infected with the SHC014 WIV 1 bat coronavirus became sicker than those infected with the WIV1 bat coronavirus. As sometimes occurs in science, this was an unexpected result of the research, as opposed to something that the researchers set out to do ...

The research plan was reviewed by NIH in advance of funding, and NIH determined that it did not to fit the definition of research involving enhanced pathogens of pandemic potential (ePPP) because these bat coronaviruses had not been shown to infect humans. As such, the research was not subject to departmental review under the HHS P3CO Framework.

However, out of an abundance of caution and as an additional layer of oversight, language was included in the terms and conditions of the grant award to EcoHealth that outlined criteria for a secondary review, such as a requirement that the grantee report immediately a one log increase in growth.

These measures would prompt a secondary review to determine whether the research aims should be re-evaluated or new biosafety measures should be enacted. EcoHealth failed to report this finding right away, as was required by the terms of the grant.”

In other words, EcoHealth’s experiment “accidentally” turned into GOF. At that point, EcoHealth should have alerted the NIH, but allegedly didn’t. So, according to Tabak, NIH bears no responsibility as they relied on EcoHealth to follow the terms of the grant.

EcoHealth has denied this charge, saying “These data were reported as soon as we were made aware, in our year four report in April 2018 ... At no time did program staff indicate to us that this work required further clarification or secondary review.”10,11

As noted by The Intercept,12 Tabak implies the NIH created that reporting rule “out of an abundance of caution,” but according to the correspondence The Intercept reviewed, “the language was inserted at Daszak’s suggestion,” and “the NIH and EcoHealth Alliance worked together to evade additional oversight.”

Illogical Justifications
How did they evade additional oversight? Through illogical and contradictory risk assessments. While Tabak claims the resulting virulence was unintentional, how could that be, since the experiment in question was supposed to test the “emergency potential” of bat coronaviruses in the human population?

The name of the grant itself tells us they’re going to assess the possibility of a bat coronavirus mutating into something that can affect humans, and to do that, they will likely try to manipulate the virus to see if it can gain that function.

EcoHealth president, zoologist Peter Daszak, suggested to the NIH that the experiment should not be categorized as restricted GOF because his proposed hybrid viruses were so different from the SARS virus (which is known to infect humans). The Intercept continues:13

“Daszak also pointed out that WIV1, the parent of the proposed chimeric SARS-like viruses, ‘has never been demonstrated to infect humans or cause human disease,’ according to the transcribed emails.

And he said that previous research ‘strongly suggests that the chimeric bat spike/bat backbone viruses should not have enhanced pathogenicity in animals.’ The NIH would go on to accept these arguments.

But the group’s argument that its viral research did not pose a risk of infection appears to contradict the justification for the work: that these pathogens could potentially cause a pandemic.

‘The entire rationale of EcoHealth’s grant renewal on SARS-related CoVs is that viruses with spikes substantially (10-25%) diverged from SARS-CoV-1 pose a pandemic risk,’ said [Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center virologist, Jesse] Bloom.

‘Given that this is the entire rationale for the work, how can they simultaneously argue these viruses should not be regulated as potential pandemic pathogens?’”

But Daszak’s justification makes no sense for yet another reason. Three months before Daszak wrote that determination for the NIH — where he suggests the WIV1 virus they were going to use as the backbone for the chimeras had “never been demonstrated to infect humans or cause human disease” — his collaborator, Ralph Baric, Ph.D., had published a paper14 showing WIV1 did indeed have the ability to infect humans.15

This is terrific! We are very happy to hear that our Gain of Function research funding pause has been lifted. ~ Dr. Peter Daszak, email to NIH
Baric, who works at UNC Chapel Hill, had found the WIV1 virus “readily replicated efficiently in human airway cultures and in vivo,” and posed an “ongoing threat” to the human population. This completely contradicts Daszak’s statement, and it’s doubtful that Daszak would not be aware of the paper published by Baric three months earlier. It’s doubtful the NIH would be ignorant of Baric’s finding as well.

NIH Accepted Daszak’s Escape Clause
As explained by The Intercept, Daszak came up with a solution that would allow his group and the NIH to perform research they all knew was prohibited at the time:16

“If the recombinant viruses grew more quickly than the original viruses on which they were based, [Daszak] suggested, EcoHealth Alliance and its collaborators would immediately stop its research and inform their NIAID program officer ...

In a July 7 letter to EcoHealth Alliance, NIH’s Greer and Stemmy formally accepted Daszak’s proposed rule. The chimeric viruses were ‘not reasonably anticipated’ to ‘have enhanced pathogenicity and/or transmissibility in mammals via the respiratory route,’ the administrators concluded ...

The language that the NIH later inserted into the grant was strikingly similar to what Daszak proposed: ‘Should any of the MERS-like or SARS-like chimeras generated under this grant show evidence of enhanced virus growth greater than 1 log over the parental backbone strain you must stop all experiments with these viruses.’”

In a July 2016 email to the NIH, Daszak expresses his satisfaction that the agency decided to accept his justifications for why the research should not be considered restricted GOF. “This is terrific!” he wrote. “We are very happy to hear that our Gain of Function research funding pause has been lifted.”17 Daszak even admits that what they’re REALLY doing is GOF right in that email.

Clear Regulatory Failure
When EcoHealth’s scientists performed the experiment, one of the chimeric viruses grew much faster than the others during the first week of the experiment, producing a viral load that was four logs greater than the parent virus.

As noted earlier, Tabak claims EcoHealth didn’t inform the NIH program officer about this gain of function, and EcoHealth claims it did, and was permitted by default to continue, as no one at the NIH objected.

Incidentally, Daszak was relying on Wuhan Institute of Virology researcher Shi Zhengli — known to have ties to the Chinese military — to notify him if any of the viruses in the experiment had enhanced replication. Daszak in turn informed the NIH about this chain of reporting, so they knew the legality of the research basically rested in the hands of a Chinese operative, who may or may not have incentive to downplay such findings.

Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University who has criticized the lack of oversight of gain-of-function research, told The Intercept that the correspondence between the NIH and EcoHealth points to clear regulatory failure. “The oversight process clearly failed,” he said. Ebright also spoke to the Daily Caller, stating:18

“The NIH, incredibly, accepted EcoHealth’s belief that this work would not be considered gain of function, and accepted EcoHealth’s rationale for this belief, and accepted EcoHealth’s policy-noncompliant proposal for a [10 times] allowance for increased viral growth before stopping work and reporting results.

The NIH, in effect, delegated to EcoHealth Alliance the authority to determine whether its research was, or was not gain of function research subject to the funding pause, the authority to set criteria for the determination, and the authority to over-ride federal policies implemented by the White House ...”

The same sentiment was expressed by House Energy and Commerce Committee ranking member Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers and several other Republican lawmakers in an October 27, 2021, letter19,20 to NIH director Dr. Francis Collins. As reported by Daily Caller:21

“’EcoHealth portrayed the risks of these experiments as if they were not of concern, and the NIH accepted EcoHealth’s assertions without a searching inquiry,’ the Republican lawmakers told Collins. ‘However, the assessment of the risks by both EcoHealth and the NIH do not seem to square with the understanding of the research risks at that time ...

Although the engineered viruses at the WIV were far from SARS CoV-2 on the coronavirus family tree, this research reflected a high tolerance for risk,’ the lawmakers said, adding that there is no evidence that EcoHealth took action to notify the NIH that it created viruses that exhibited enhanced growth in humanized cells.

‘If EcoHealth and NIH could not handle compliance and oversight of such a basic policy, it raises more concerns about the overall adequacy of the oversight of this research, which leaves the public vulnerable to a serious lab accident,’ the lawmakers wrote.”

CNN Grills NIH Director
(Rumble video embedded below this article)
In a rare attempt at real journalism, CNN’s Pamela Brown kept Collins strapped to the hot seat in a recent interview, repeatedly grilling him about why the NIH was funding dangerous GOF research.22 Even Josh Rogin from the liberal Washington Post picked up on Brown’s dogged demands for Collins to come clean on the issue in the face of Collins’ attempts to sidetrack her:

“Everyone should watch this interview with outgoing NIH director Francis Collins to see how Collins uses misleading talking points to avoid any acknowledgement NIH was caught completely unaware its grantee was doing risky bat coronavirus research in Wuhan ... Collins uses every rhetoric trick to dissemble and distract ...” Rogin tweeted.23

To her credit, Brown repeatedly brought the interview back on track, pressing Collins for answers, demanding to know:

“Why should Americans trust you and the NIH on the issue of COVID origins, when you didn’t even know about the programs it was funding with taxpayer dollars in China?"

When Collins tried to circumvent the question by diving into semantics about the definition of GOF, Brown interrupted him, again asking how he can be so certain that NIH funding isn’t being used for GOF, when he claims the NIH only recently found out about how the money was used in 2016?

Collins also reiterated that while EcoHealth “did some things they should have told us about ... they did not do the kind of gain-of-function research that requires special, high-level oversight.” Really? As noted by ZeroHedge:24

“... if EcoHealth HAD reported its research results, it WOULD HAVE triggered extra, high-level oversight. Why is Collins pretending he knows they would have been exempt from that?”

Despite Collins’ insistence that the NIH was above-board and honest in all its communications, Brown refused to let him off the hook, ending the interview with: “This is U.S. taxpayer dollars going to risky research and I believe every American deserves to know about it.”

On a sidenote, like Fauci’s, Collins’ halo is rapidly tarnishing as alternative media have started digging into their backgrounds. While appearing squeaky clean on the surface, a closer look reveals both men have supported all sorts of questionable research, including research on aborted fetuses.

For an overview of Collins’ alleged sins, see First Things’ article, “The Cautionary Tale of Francis Collins.”25 Unlike Fauci, though, Collins seems to sense he won’t escape public judgment. In October 2021, he announced his retirement from the NIH. He’s reportedly planning to step down by the end of the year. Time will tell if Fauci will have the good sense to resign, or if our political leaders will finally boot him out and press charges.

We Must Ban GOF Research
The evidence of regulatory failure by the NIH further strengthens the call for a permanent ban on most kinds of GOF. As Bloom told The Intercept:26

“We urgently need a broader discussion about whether it’s a good idea to be making novel chimeras of coronaviruses that are at this point universally acknowledged to pose a pandemic risk to humans.”

Indeed, it appears we got off easy this time. SARS-CoV-2 has a very low mortality rate, despite spreading quite easily. The next Frankenstein pathogen to escape from a lab might not be as benign.

Seeing how the people in charge of making decisions about what research is to be allowed cannot be trusted with making sensible decisions, the public really needs to step up and let our representatives know we will not tolerate federal funds — taxpayer money — being used for research that has the potential to wipe us all out. "

Sources and References
1, 3, 12, 13, 16, 26 The Intercept November 3, 2021
2, 15, 17, 18, 21 Daily Caller November 3, 2021 (Archived)
4 NIH Notice of Award, Understanding Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence
5 PHE.gov US Gov. GoF Research Pause
6 Twitter Richard Ebright NIH Letter dated October 20, 2021
7, 9 NIH Letter dated October 20, 2021
8, 10 Vanity Fair October 22, 2021
11 ZeroHedge October 25, 2021
14 PNAS March 15, 2016 113 (11) 3048-3053
19 Congressional Letter to Francis Collins October 27, 2021
20 E&C Republicans November 3, 2021
22, 24 ZeroHedge October 27, 2021
23 Twitter Josh Rogin October 25, 2021
25 First Things October 29, 2021


Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vlnekg

[mountain_jim]

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
If true, horrific, as so much of this is now.

https://twitter.com/YoukoskvArt/stat...738878976?s=20

later added

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/f...e-data-lawsuit



https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/fda...ge-to-grant-it

FDA Asks Federal Judge to Grant it Until the Year 2076 to Fully Release Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Data
The fed gov’t shields Pfizer from liability. Gives it billions of dollars. Makes Americans take its product. But won’t let you see the data supporting its safety/efficacy. Who does the gov't work for?

Aaron Siri

The FDA has asked a federal judge to make the public wait until the year 2076 to disclose all of the data and information it relied upon to license Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. That is not a typo. It wants 55 years to produce this information to the public.

As explained in a prior article, the FDA repeatedly promised “full transparency” with regard to Covid-19 vaccines, including reaffirming “the FDA’s commitment to transparency” when licensing Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.

With that promise in mind, in August and immediately following approval of the vaccine, more than 30 academics, professors, and scientists from this country’s most prestigious universities requested the data and information submitted to the FDA by Pfizer to license its COVID-19 vaccine.

The FDA’s response? It produced nothing. So, in September, my firm filed a lawsuit against the FDA on behalf of this group to demand this information. To date, almost three months after it licensed Pfizer’s vaccine, the FDA still has not released a single page. Not one.

Instead, two days ago, the FDA asked a federal judge to give it until 2076 to fully produce this information. The FDA asked the judge to let it produce the 329,000+ pages of documents Pfizer provided to the FDA to license its vaccine at the rate of 500 pages per month, which means its production would not be completed earlier than 2076. The FDA’s promise of transparency is, to put it mildly, a pile of illusions.

It took the FDA precisely 108 days from when Pfizer started producing the records for licensure (on May 7, 2021) to when the FDA licensed the Pfizer vaccine (on August 23, 2021). Taking the FDA at its word, it conducted an intense, robust, thorough, and complete review and analysis of those documents in order to assure that the Pfizer vaccine was safe and effective for licensure. While it can conduct that intense review of Pfizer’s documents in 108 days, it now asks for over 20,000 days to make these documents available to the public.

So, let’s get this straight. The federal government shields Pfizer from liability. Gives it billions of dollars. Makes Americans take its product. But won’t let you see the data supporting its product’s safety and efficacy. Who does the government work for?

The lesson yet again is that civil and individual rights should never be contingent upon a medical procedure. Everyone who wants to get vaccinated and boosted should be free to do so. But nobody should be coerced by the government to partake in any medical procedure. Certainly not one where the government wants to hide the full information relied upon for its licensure until the year 2076!

https://www.sirillp.com/wp-content/u...df1978006e.pdf

[gord]

FDA Asks Federal Judge to Grant it Until the Year 2076 to Fully Release Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Data

Sure, after everyone who would have been prosecutable is already dead. Typical.

[mountain_jim]

Posted by gord (here)

FDA Asks Federal Judge to Grant it Until the Year 2076 to Fully Release Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Data

Sure, after everyone who would have been prosecutable is already dead. Typical.

https://twitter.com/RealCandaceO/sta...213491204?s=20

https://twitter.com/MaajidNawaz/stat...621500928?s=20

[Gwin Ru]

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny joins Mike Adams with latest update on covid vaccines and the fate of humanity 52:54

Health Ranger Report
Published an hour ago

Source: https://www.brighteon.com/embed/7d55613e-a983-4b52-b884-23d423771900

[Gwin Ru]

NOVEMBER 19, 2021 ⚠️ MEDICAL COVER-UP! IS THE CDC GUILTY? KAREN KINGSTON ON STEEL TRUTH EXPOSES BIO HAZARD! 14:44

Steel Truth Media
Published November 19, 2021

Rumble — Pfizer broke the law and Karen Kingston is on Steel Truth to prove it! Boom! Exclusive with Karen Kingston, next!

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vmvtfv

[Matthew]

By Alex Berenson, "Independent, citizen-funded journalism"

Vaccinated English adults under 60 are dying at twice the rate of unvaccinated people the same age
And have been for six months.
This chart may seem unbelievable or impossible, but it's correct, based on weekly data from the British government.
Alex Berenson

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/...dults-under-60
The brown line represents weekly deaths from all causes of vaccinated people aged 10-59, per 100,000 people.

The blue line represents weekly deaths from all causes of unvaccinated people per 100,000 in the same age range.

I have checked the underlying dataset myself and this graph is correct. Vaccinated people under 60 are twice as likely to die as unvaccinated people. And overall deaths in Britain are running well above normal.

I don’t know how to explain this other than vaccine-caused mortality.

The basic data is available here, download the Excel file and see table 4:

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulat...nstatusengland

Subscribe to Unreported Truths
By Alex Berenson · Hundreds of thousands of subscribers

Independent, citizen-funded journalism

[Ankle Biter]

Posted by Pam (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
Please listen to Dr David Martin, in the above post. He's brilliant. His speech is powerful. His words inspiring.

I entirely agree. This is important. Here's the video embedded again.

This is so incredibly powerful and extremely important. I wonder, does anyone have the technical savvy to to increase the size of the chart of criminals that would like to remain behind the scenes so it is easier to view? It would be greatly appreciated.

Hi Pam, this is the image you were referring to I think yeah?


https://static.wixstatic.com/media/2...a208e8~mv2.jpg

Ok, Klaus Schwab and some other usual suspects won't surprise any of us... but Yo-Yo Ma?.. Very unexpected.

[DaveToo]

Posted by Matthew (here)
By Alex Berenson, "Independent, citizen-funded journalism"


Vaccinated English adults under 60 are dying at twice the rate of unvaccinated people the same age
And have been for six months.
[/SIZE]This chart may seem unbelievable or impossible, but it's correct, based on weekly data from the British government. Alex Berenson


I don’t know how to explain this other than vaccine-caused mortality.

The basic data is available here, download the Excel file and see table 4:

I haven't done a deep dive into this (too busy) but what I have discovered is that one can cherry-pick
even this basic info and that is what has happened.

For example, the data is divided into 4 groups of people:

1. Unvaxxed
2. Within 21 days of 1st vax
3. 21 days or more after 1st vax
4. Second dose people

If we just compare total deaths from these groups (not focusing on a particular age grouping)
we find:

1. 34,474
2. 3,880
3. 6,663
4. 4,479

So with the above cherry-picking we find far more deaths in the un-vaxxed.

So it all depends on how you want to slice it.

[Delight]

FRONT LINE WHISTLEBLOWERS (AUSTRALIA) TELL ALL ABOUT THE VACCINE INJURIES AND DEATHS THEY ARE SEEING
November 20th, 2021


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Q70wrpDcxwPZ