+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 21 to 33 of 33

Thread: "Public Health" Handmaids of Genocide

  1. Link to Post #21
    UK Avalon Member Mike Gorman's Avatar
    Join Date
    31st May 2010
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Language
    English
    Age
    65
    Posts
    1,868
    Thanks
    5,830
    Thanked 13,989 times in 1,749 posts

    Default Re: "Public Health" Handmaids of Genocide

    There is a steady, consistent movement towards a highly cynical view of our old favorite general demographic 'The Public' - there is a definite figuring of ordinary people as being stupid and of little value. I see this among the ultra high tech medicine community, the 'first of all do no harm' aspect of the Hippocratic Oath has been dispensed with and replaced by this 'Common Purpose' ultra rational, and incredibly arrogant attitude among the doctors and nurses ( with nurses now going through university their traditional codes of caring are thrown aside and they compete with the doctors on the arrogance stakes) - it is just not good enough, the humanity and basis of service to humanity has been completely trashed!
    Public Health is now the big lever to usher in this rationalist Billionaire-technocrat ideology, which has very strong roots in the Eugenics movements, and the Green C02/Carbon/anti Human league.
    This all actually had its beginning with the antismoking public health mind control campaign, they have seen just how easy it was to turn everyone's mind against smokers, and regard them with hatred and outright hostility-whereas only 30 years ago Doctors were appearing in cigarette commercials and claiming Camel/Rothmans as being their brand.
    Public Health is the stealth mode of this growing tyranny, unless we can inform the normies fast enough, we will have a hell of a job regaining the liberties we have lost already.

  2. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Mike Gorman For This Post:

    Blacklight43 (30th March 2021), Delight (30th March 2021), Ewan (27th January 2023), happyuk (30th March 2021), Harmony (9th April 2021), Hym (9th April 2021), Journeyman (6th April 2021), onawah (1st July 2021), Sue (Ayt) (30th March 2021)

  3. Link to Post #22
    Wales Avalon Member
    Join Date
    8th October 2012
    Location
    Wales, UK
    Language
    English
    Age
    55
    Posts
    978
    Thanks
    5,974
    Thanked 7,223 times in 940 posts

    Default Re: "Public Health" Handmaids of Genocide

    Like many a viceroy in colonial India, these people are getting above their station.
    They're beginning to think they're royalty itself.
    They're no longer about carrying out the wishes of those they are supposedly serving, and becoming tyrants in their own right.
    We all know what happens to viceroys who try to set up thrones for themselves, look what happened to Mark Anthony!

    My own personal vitriol is towards to "science" of psychiatric drugs, a band-aid remedy with terrible long-term consequences.
    I personally do not subscribe the hypothesis that depression is merely an 'chemical imbalance'.

    When we give people Prozac their pre-frontal lobe function will get better while they are taking it.
    Unfortunately, as soon as you take away the Prozac, they tend to drift back toward their old pre-treatment function.
    The human body is a series of checks and balances, and by artificially boosting your serotonin levels, the brain will compensate by producing less of it.
    So you'll be dependent for life unless you can overcome the withdrawal that lasts months or even years, during which you'll be borderline suicidal at times due to lack of the chemicals.
    SSRIs, benzos, and all brain-altering drugs work like this.
    You'd be trading a few days of feeling good for a lifetime of struggle and dependence, and that's the Pharma aim.

    Why so little emphasis on hard, strenuous outdoor exercise, a proper diet, good company, good music, good sleeping habits, proven meditation / pranayama techniques?
    There is a wealth of research that proves how a person’s brain function is changed by religious and spiritual practices.
    With the brain imaging tools we now have, researchers can observe what happens in the brain when someone sits down to pray.
    They are also able to see which areas of the brain become activated when someone does a rhythmic chant or chants AUM.
    In time, we will also learn more about the long-term effects of spiritual practices on the brain.

    At least encourage people to try something like this for a few weeks before screwing up your brain.

  4. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to happyuk For This Post:

    Delight (30th March 2021), Ewan (27th January 2023), Harmony (9th April 2021), Hym (9th April 2021), onawah (1st July 2021)

  5. Link to Post #23
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    6,081
    Thanks
    8,692
    Thanked 39,308 times in 5,717 posts

    Default Re: "Public Health" Handmaids of Genocide

    The stories of ancient conflicts that our ancestors recorded... the story of an alien presence... with a stakeholder on planet earth?


  6. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Constance (4th April 2021), Ewan (27th January 2023), Hym (9th April 2021), Journeyman (13th June 2021), onawah (1st July 2021)

  7. Link to Post #24
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    6,081
    Thanks
    8,692
    Thanked 39,308 times in 5,717 posts

    Default Re: "Public Health" Handmaids of Genocide

    Not posting all of the articles. Please see the articles pages for continuation plus many graphs and additions

    Quote FORMER CHIEF SCIENCE OFFICER AT PFIZER SAYS HE FEARS “MASSIVE DEPOPULATION” THROUGH MASS ‘VACCINATIONS’
    APRIL 4, 2021


    A former Chief Science Officer and VP for Pfizer, who has been known for choosing his words cautiously, now concludes, from what appears to him to be an orchestrated wall of falsehoods being played out by governments and media, that “we are in the presence of evil” and “dangerous products,” referring to the so-called COVID vaccines, which he calls biological “agents.“

    Dr. Mike Yeadon was a Chief Science Officer and VP for treatments for respiratory illnesses at Pfizer for 16 years. He now licenses biotechnology owned by his biotech start-up to companies such as Novartis.

    After nearly a year of swatting away what he used to call “conspiracy theories,” Dr. Yeadon now warns against the mass vaccination agenda.

    In a recent interview Dr. Yeadon said:

    ““In the U.K., it’s abundantly clear that the authorities are bent on a course which will result in administering ‘vaccines’ to as many of the population as they can. This is madness, because even if these agents were legitimate, protection is needed only by those at notably elevated risk of death from the virus. In those people, there might even be an argument that the risks are worth bearing. And there definitely are risks which are what I call ‘mechanistic’: inbuilt in the way they work.”

    “But all the other people, those in good health and younger than 60 years, perhaps a little older, they don’t perish from the virus. In this large group, it’s wholly unethical to administer something novel and for which the potential for unwanted effects after a few months is completely uncharacterized.”

    [Full Interview]

    Yeadon described a recent disillusionment of sorts, and pointed out what he suggested was the corrupting influence of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation:

    “Until recently, I had high regard for global medicines regulators. When I was in Pfizer, and later CEO of a biotech I founded (Ziarco, later acquired by Novartis), we interacted respectfully with FDA, EMA, and the U.K. MHRA.
    Always good quality interactions.”

    “Recently, I noticed that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) had made a grant to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)! Can that ever be appropriate? They’re funded by public money. They should never accept money from a private body.”

    The MHRA is the British equivalent of the FDA. Dr. Yeadon said:

    “For example, if someone wished to harm or kill a significant proportion of the worlds population over the next few years, the systems being put in place right now will enable it.”

    “It’s my considered view that it is entirely possible that this will be used for massive-scale depopulation.”

    Dr. Yeadon previously shied away from ascribing bad motives to governments, preferring to put the devastating effects of lockdowns, which he considers absurd, down to bungling and incompetence. He once said that his own government, in the UK, could not make a “jam sandwich” without bungling it. Dr. Yeadon’s most recent remarks are a shift to something far more sinister.

    Dr. Yeadon said:

    “I have absolutely no doubt that we are in the presence of evil – not a determination I’ve ever made before in a 40-year research career – and dangerous products.”

    Yeadon said, as he has many times in the past, that all current COVID tests are inaccurate and prone to mostly false positives, which then are used by governments to unnecessarily prolong the public health emergency. He called present policies of lockdowns, forced testing, coerced “vaccinations,” and deprivation of liberties “global crimes against humanity.”

    Dr. Yeadon said in the interview:

    “…you’re suspected as a source of infection until proven otherwise. You shouldn’t need to be proving you’re not a health risk to others. Those without symptoms are never a health threat to others. And in any case, once those who are concerned about the virus are vaccinated, there is just no argument for anyone else needing to be vaccinated.”

    Dr. Yeadon Not Alone
    Dr. Yeadon is the latest high-profile scientist to warn against mass vaccinations. Last month, a former Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Senior Program Officer in Vaccine Discovery, and former Head of the Vaccine Development Office in Germany, the German equivalent of the CDC, called for a halt to all mass COVID “vaccinations.” Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche released an open letter to the scientific community and to the world warning that the present mass vaccination program may “wipe out large parts of our human population.”

    Dr. Bossche writes in his Open Letter:

    “…it’s becoming increasingly difficult to imagine how the consequences of the extensive and erroneous human intervention in this pandemic are not going to wipe out large parts of our human population. One could only think of very few other strategies to achieve the same level of efficiency in turning a relatively harmless virus into a bioweapon of mass destruction…”

    Dr. Yeadon holds scientific disagreements with Dr. Bossche, but both conclude that indiscriminate mass vaccinations may contain the seeds of a coming genocide.

    The Pfizer and Moderna injections are not technically vaccines, but a new technology using genetic engineering.

    To date, well over 1,600 deaths have been reported to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS). One-third of the deaths were within 48 hours of the injections, in many healthy adults reporting no pre-existing conditions.

    Dr. Yeadon works and co-authors with other renown scientists and doctors now demanding a halt to mass “vaccinations,” including Doctors for COVID Ethics, In February, Yeadon and German Dr. Wolfgang Wodard, MD, penned an open letter, after a period of private lobbying, to the European Medicines Agency, a sort of European FDA.. The letter described in scientific detail the dangers of the COVID “vaccines” in causing bloodclots.

    Although Doctors for COVID Ethics did not receive a reply, soon after, a cascade of countries began to suspend Astrazeneca injections over bloodclots.

    Dr. Yeadon has said that he believes the pandemic is essentially over, and that now many deaths being reported as due to COVID are actually from other causes. Last December an audit of nearly 3,000 death certificates in the state of Minnesota found that 40% of deaths marked down as COVID were actually of a different primary cause.

    Last April Dr. Deboroah Birx of the White House Coronavirus Task Force said candidly that anyone who dies “with COVID” will be counted as dying of COVID:

    “to mark it as COVID-19 infection the intent is right now that those if someone dies with COVID-19, we are counting that as a COVID-19.”

    In an interesting coincidence, flu deaths this winter, which normally run into the many tens of thousands, have gone down to nothing, leading skeptics to wonder if flu deaths are not being counted as COVID, given strong financial incentives for hospitals. The medical establishment’s explanation is that distancing and hand-washing have cut down drastically on flu. Unanswered is why COVID wouldn’t disappear as well.

    A renown microbiologist, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, has also sounded an impassioned plea to governments to halt mass “vaccinations” (video below, at Bitchute)

    [BITCHUTE]VDyGjd1mn7yn/[BITCHUTE]

    Dr. Bhakdi is the co-author of “Corona, False Alarm? Facts and Figures,” an Amazon bestseller since its publication in October 2020

    Dr. Yeadon says that health authorities are misrepresenting an already high level of immunity and resistance among populations to COVID-19, due to the wide circulation of other coronaviruses across the globe, which most often result in a common cold. He contends that most populations where deaths tolls have been high have long since reached a functional herd immunity, and that Dr. Anthony Fauci is outright lying about 90% of the US population needing to be “vaccinated” in order to reach herd immunity.

    If COVID deaths in the US are 500,000, and the CDC overall survival rate of 99.8% holds true, then the math dictates that 250 million Americans have been infected, recovered, and are immune, or 75% of the population.

    Peer reviewed science pegs herd immunity for COVID at anywhere between 50% of population and 67%.

    Dr. Yeadon has lately been the target of a medical establishment campaign to portray him as an “anti-vaxxer,” as in a Reuters piece, although he is nothing of the sort. Yeadon consistently says he values necessary, safe, extensively tested vaccines and drugs, as this has been his career. Yeadon and others have also described mechanisms, without claiming conclusive evidence, by which the COVID injections may cause infertility.

    Although he is frequently attacked, one eye-opening documentary which rips the lid off how the medical establishment lies, including the most prestigious universities, hospitals, and journals, is Journeyman Pictures’ “The Illusion of Evidence-Based Medicine.” The film documents how institutions are beholden to Big Pharma billions in grants and research funds, and will in essence say whatever Big Pharma wants them to say, including about dissidents like Dr. Yeadon.

    No less than the editor of The Lancet, Richard Horton, wrote scathingly in 2011:

    “Journals have devolved into information laundering operations for the pharmaceutical industry.”
    continue here
    Quote CONSENT FACTORY, INC.
    Manufacturing consent for private and public sector clients for over 250 years

    https://cjhopkins.substack.comThe “Unvaccinated” Question
    So, the New Normals are discussing the Unvaccinated Question. What is to be done with us? No, not those who haven’t been “vaccinated” yet. Us. The “Covidiots.” The “Covid deniers.” The “science deniers.” The “reality deniers.” Those who refuse to get “vaccinated,” ever.

    There is no place for us in New Normal society. The New Normals know this and so do we. To them, we are a suspicious, alien tribe of people. We do not share their ideological beliefs. We do not perform their loyalty rituals, or we do so only grudgingly, because they force us to do so. We traffic in arcane “conspiracy theories,” like “pre-March-2020 science,” “natural herd immunity,” “population-adjusted death rates,” “Sweden,” “Florida,” and other heresies.

    They do not trust us. We are strangers among them. They suspect we feel superior to them. They believe we are conspiring against them, that we want to deceive them, confuse them, cheat them, pervert their culture, abuse their children, contaminate their precious bodily fluids, and perpetrate God knows what other horrors.

    So they are discussing the need to segregate us, how to segregate us, when to segregate us, in order to protect society from us. In their eyes, we are no more than criminals, or, worse, a plague, an infestation. In the words of someone (I can’t quite recall who), “getting rid of the Unvaccinated is not a question of ideology. It is a question of cleanliness,” or something like that. (I’ll have to hunt down and fact-check that quote. I might have taken it out of context.)

    In Israel, Estonia, Denmark, Germany, the USA, and other New Normal countries, they have already begun the segregation process. In the UK, it’s just a matter of time. The WEF, WHO, EU, and other transnational entities are helping to streamline the new segregation system, which, according to the WEF, “will need to be harmonized by a normative body, such as the WHO, to ensure that is ethical.”

    Here in Germany, the government is considering banning us from working outside our homes. We are already banned from flying on commercial airlines. (We can still use the trains, if we dress up like New Normals.) In the village of Potsdam, just down the road from Wannsee (which name you might recall from your 20th-Century history lessons), we are banned from entering shops and restaurants. (I’m not sure whether we can still use the sidewalks, or whether we have to walk in the gutters.) In Saxony, we are forbidden from attending schools. At the Berliner Ensemble (the theater founded by Bertolt Brecht and Helene Weigel, lifelong opponents of totalitarianism and fascism), we are banned from attending New Normal performances.

    In the USA, we are being banned by universities. Our children are being banned from public schools. In New York, the new “Excelsior Pass” will allow New Normals to attend cultural and sports events (and patronize bars and restaurants, eventually) secure in the knowledge that the Unvaccinated have been prevented from entering or segregated in an “Unvaccinated Only” section. The pass system, designed by IBM, which, if history is any guide, is pretty good at designing such systems (OK, technically, it was Deutsche Hollerith Maschinen Gesellschaft, IBM’s Nazi-Germany subsidiary), was launched this past weekend to considerable fanfare.

    And this is only the very beginning.

  8. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Constance (9th April 2021), Ewan (27th January 2023), Harmony (9th April 2021), Hym (9th April 2021), Icare (6th April 2021), Journeyman (6th April 2021)

  9. Link to Post #25
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    6,081
    Thanks
    8,692
    Thanked 39,308 times in 5,717 posts

    Default Re: "Public Health" Handmaids of Genocide

    More Mike Yeadon



    Quote “But this is not going away. It won’t go away until enough people, if they ever do, say ‘you’re a bunch of frauds and we are taking our freedoms back, so you can just stop doing this.’

    “Because one person shouting into the wilderness and all of the other academics looking the other way, will have us just going down this pipe maybe a week later than if I hadn’t said anything, but we’re still going down to hell.

    “So, that’s why I’m frightened.

    “The variants aren’t different. I call them ‘samiants’… they’re pretty much the same. They’re not different. Therefore, you don’t need a top-up vaccine, so don’t go near any of them.”

    ‘Why is my government lying to me?’ Because ‘they are going to kill you.’
    “[And if you recognize that our governments are involved in a major verifiable lie], don’t just turn your computer off and go to supper. Stop. Look out the window, and think, ‘why is my government lying to me about something so fundamental?’ Because, I think the answer is, they are going to kill you using this method. They’re going to kill you and your family.

    “The eugenicists have got hold of the levers of power and this is a really artful way of getting you to line-up and receive some unspecified thing that will damage you. I have no idea what it will actually be, but it won’t be a vaccine because you don’t need one. And it won’t kill you on the end of the needle because you would spot that.

    “It could be something that will produce normal pathology, it will be at various times between vaccination and the event, it will be plausibly deniable because there will be something else going on in the world at that time, in the context of which your demise, or that of your children will look normal.

    “That’s what I would do if I wanted to get rid of 90 or 95% of the world’s population. And I think that’s what they’re doing.”

    “Now I don’t know [for certain] that they’re going to use that [system] to kill you, but I can’t think of a benign reason, and with that power they certainly could harm you, or control you, so you should object [and strenuously oppose it].”

    People can’t deal with this level of evil, but Soviets, Hitler, Mao show its possibility
    “It’s become absolutely clear to me, even when I talk to intelligent people, friends, acquaintances … and they can tell I’m telling them something important, but they get to the point [where I say] ‘your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death and that of your children,’ and they can’t begin to engage with it. And I think maybe 10% of them understand what I said, and 90% of those blank their understanding of it because it is too difficult. And my concern is, we are going to lose this, because people will not deal with the possibility that anyone is so evil…

    “But I remind you of what happened in Russia in the 20th Century, what happened in 1933 to 1945, what happened in, you know, Southeast Asia in some of the most awful times in the post-war era. And, what happened in China with Mao and so on.

    “We’ve only got to look back two or three generations. All around us there are people who are as bad as the people doing this. They’re all around us. So, I say to folks, the only thing that really marks this one out, is its scale.

    “But actually, this is probably less bloody, it’s less personal, isn’t it? The people who are steering this … it’s going to be much easier for them. They don’t have to shoot anyone in the face. They don’t have to beat someone to death with a baseball bat, or freeze them, starve them, make them work until they die. All of those things did happen two or three generations back and our grandparents or great grandparents were either victims of this, or they were actually members of it, or at least they witnessed it from overseas. That’s how close we are.

    “And all I’m saying is, some shifts like that are happening again, but now they are using molecular biology.

    “And the people going along with it, I think they would probably say, ‘I was only following orders,’ which we have heard before.

    “But I know, because I have talked to lots of people, and some of them have said ‘I don’t want to believe that you are right, so I’m going to just put it away because if it is true, I can’t handle it.’ And I think … all you need to do is find a good reason to tell people, ‘Don’t take the vaccine unless you’re a medical risk of dying from the virus!’ That seems to me a pretty good line!”

    Towards a solution – ‘We need God’
    “I’m a scientist, and I can tell you, talking to non-scientists, using science as a tool, will not work. It will fail.

    “So, we need philosophers, people who understand logic, religion, something like that, [they have] got to wrestle with this, and start talking in a language people will understand. Because if we leave it with scientists, people like me, even though I’m well-intentioned, I’m a gabbling alien as far as most people in the street are concerned. They won’t believe the government will lie to them, they don’t believe the government would ever do anything that will harm them, but they are [doing such things].”

    Finally, in an email correspondence, Dr. Yeadon concluded, “I have latest taken to signing off with ‘May God save us’, because I think we need God now more than at any time since WW2.”

  10. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Constance (9th April 2021), Ewan (27th January 2023), Harmony (9th April 2021), Hym (9th April 2021), Pam (29th August 2021)

  11. Link to Post #26
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,681
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: "Public Health" Handmaids of Genocide

    World Health Organization Enters Damage Control Mode
    by Dr. Joseph Mercola
    April 09, 2021
    https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...rid=1128208762

    "STORY AT-A-GLANCE

    The Wuhan Institute of Virology is the only biosafety lab in China that studies human coronaviruses.
    These viruses include RaTG13, the closest known ancestor to SARS-CoV-2, obtained from miners who fell ill with severe respiratory illness after working in a Mojiang mine in 2012
    The World Health Organization’s investigative team charged with identifying the origin of SARS-CoV-2 has issued a highly-criticized report in which it dismisses the lab-accident theory offhand
    Molecular biologist Richard Ebright, Ph.D., member of the Institutional Biosafety Committee of Rutgers University and the Working Group on Pathogen Security of the state of New Jersey, recently called out the members of the WHO-instigated investigative team as “participants in disinformation”
    In response to growing critique, WHO director general and 13 other world leaders have joined the U.S. government in expressing “frustration with the level of access China granted an international mission to Wuhan,” and agree additional collaborative studies that include more comprehensive data sharing are needed
    A number of U.S. officials have admitted that the lab-accident theory either remains the most credible, or needs to remain an option open for inquiry.
    These include former CDC director Dr. Robert Redfield, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, former deputy national security adviser Matthew Pottinger, former lead investigator for the U.S. State Department’s COVID-19 task force David Asher and an assessment report by the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency

    *********************

    While the mainstream media has, by and large, dismissed the theory that SARS-CoV-2 was created and leaked from a high-security biocontainment lab in Wuhan, China, a number of high-ranking U.S. officials are sticking to it, and there’s probably good reason for this.

    On the whole, if the virus was actually a natural occurrence, a series of improbable coincidences would have had to transpire. Meanwhile, a series of highly probable “coincidences” point to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) being the most likely source, and to dismiss them as a whole simply doesn’t make sense.


    Media Struggle to Prop Up Unproven Zoonotic Theory

    I first mentioned that the outbreak had the hallmarks of a laboratory escape in an article we posted well over a year ago, February 4, 2020. On the upside, some members of the media are now finally starting to inch toward more honest reporting on this — probably because U.S. officials keep leaning that way.

    That doesn’t mean some aren’t still trying to defend the official narrative. Take The New York Times, for example. The original headline of its March 26, 2021, article about Dr. Robert Redfield, former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, read: "Ex-CDC Director Favors Debunked Covid-19 Origin Theory."1

    Three days later, that headline was toned down to: “The CDC’s Ex-Director Offers No Evidence in Favoring Speculation That the Coronavirus Originated in a Lab,”2 with a correction notice noting that the earlier headline “referred incorrectly to a theory on the origins of the coronavirus. The theory is unproven, not debunked.”

    Well, the truth is, all other theories are equally unproven — and are riddled with far more holes. The theory that the virus arose through natural mutation, for example, looks like Swiss cheese in comparison to the lab-leak theory.

    In a February 16, 2021, article3 in Independent Science News, molecular biologist and virologist Jonathan Latham, Ph.D., and Allison Wilson, Ph.D., a molecular biologist, reviewed the evidence for a laboratory origin and the reasons why a zoonotic origin “will never be found.” I also summarized their review in “How We Know SARS-CoV-2 Leaked From a Chinese Lab.”

    The half-baked idea brought forth by the World Health Organization’s investigative team, that the virus somehow naturally evolved in some unknown part of the world and then piggy-backed into Wuhan on top of frozen food, is held together by even fewer facts.

    Among the more compelling “coincidences” that hint at lab-origin are the facts that the WIV has admitted storing and working with bat coronaviruses collected significant distances away from the lab, and that it’s the only biosafety lab in China that studies human coronaviruses. These viruses include RaTG13,4 the closest known ancestor to SARS-CoV-2, obtained from miners who fell ill with severe respiratory illness after working in a Mojiang mine in 2012.
    COVID Report ‘Totally Flawed’

    WHO In a March 30, 2021, opinion piece in The Washington Post,5 Josh Rogin accurately points out that the WHO’s report6 on the origin of SARS-CoV-2 is so flawed, “a real investigation has yet to take place.” We simply cannot count that report as the result of a true investigative effort.

    “Determining the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus should have nothing to do with politics,” he writes.7 “It is a forensic question, one that requires thorough investigation of all possible theories, and one that should encompass both the scenario that the virus jumped from animals to humans in nature as well as one related to human error in a Wuhan lab.

    But a fatally flawed investigation by the World Health Organization and Chinese officials and experts only muddies the waters, and it places the WHO further at odds with the U.S. government and the Biden administration.”

    As noted by Rogin and many others, the investigation was far from independent and transparent, as China was allowed to select its members, who then relied on their Chinese counterparts when it came to data collection. It’s no surprise then that this team decided the natural origin theory is the most credible, while the lab-accident theory is summarily dismissed as unworthy of further consideration and study.

    In a March 25, 2021, CNN interview,8 Secretary of State Antony Blinken stated, “We’ve got real concerns about the methodology and the process that went into that report, including the fact that the government in Beijing apparently helped to write it.” Rogin adds:9

    “Specifically, declassified U.S. intelligence, confirmed by Blinken’s own State Department,10 alleges that the WIV was conducting undisclosed research on bat coronaviruses, had secret research projects with the Chinese military, and failed to disclose that several lab workers got sick with COVID-like symptoms in autumn 2019.”

    Someone’s Not Telling the Truth

    According to the WHO report, the labs “were well-managed, with a staff health monitoring program with no reporting of COVID-19 compatible respiratory illness during the weeks/months prior to December 2019.” “In other words, the WHO is saying the U.S. intelligence is wrong,” Rogin writes.11

    Not a word is mentioned in the report about U.S. government claims that the WIV engaged in the very research required to create a novel coronavirus with the specific affinity to infect human cells.

    Recently, Shi Zhengli, who heads bat coronavirus research at the WIV spoke at a Rutgers University seminar, calling the WIV’s research “open“ and ”transparent.” Former deputy national security adviser Matthew Pottinger disagrees. In an interview with Lesley Stahl on 60 Minutes, he said:12

    “There was a direct order from Beijing to destroy all viral samples — and they didn’t volunteer to share the genetic sequences. There is a body of research that’s been taking place, conducted by the Chinese military in collaboration with the WIV, which has not been acknowledged by the Chinese government.

    We’ve seen the data. I’ve personally seen the data. We don't know [why the military were in that lab]. It is a major lead that needs to be pursued by the press, certainly by the WHO.”

    As noted by Pottinger, Shi published studies showing how bat coronaviruses were manipulated to render them more infectious to humans, and the U.S. government has in the past received reports of safety concerns due to lax standards at the WIV.

    “They were doing research specifically on coronaviruses that attach to the ACE2 receptors in human lungs just like the COVID-19 virus,” Pottinger told Stahl.13 “It’s circumstantial evidence. But it's a pretty potent bullet point when you consider that the place where this pandemic emerged was a few kilometers away from the WIV.”

    US State Department Suspects Lab Leak

    In a March 21, 2021, interview with Sky News Australia,14 David Asher, former lead investigator for the U.S. State Department’s task force that looked into the origins of COVID-19, also stated that the data they collected “made us feel the Wuhan Institute was highly probably the source of the COVID pandemic.”

    According to Asher, three workers at the WIV who worked with the RatG13 coronavirus — the closest relative to SARS-CoV-2 identified to date — appear to have actually been the first cluster of cases of COVID-19. They fell ill with symptoms consistent with COVID-19 as early as October 2019. At least one of the workers required hospitalization.

    He also pointed out there is evidence in the genetic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 suggesting it’s been synthetically altered. It has the backbone of a bat coronavirus, combined with a pangolin receptor and “some sort of humanized mice transceptor.” “These things don’t naturally make sense,” Asher said, adding that experts around the world agree that the odds of this configuration occurring naturally is “very low.”

    Another troubling indicator that something was amiss at the WIV was the Chinese government’s taking down of a WIV database in September 2019. According to the Chinese, this was done because of “thousands of hacking attempts.”

    However, Asher pointed out many other databases were taken offline around the same time as well.15 The Chinese even tried to remove data posted in a European database containing viral sequencing from patients exhibiting COVID-19-related symptoms. Interestingly, those sequences included adenovirus, which is a vaccine vector. This, Asher said, could indicate that SARS-CoV-2 is part of a vaccine developed in response to a biological weapon.

    In an earlier article16 by The Sun, Asher is quoted saying the WIV “was operating a secret, classified program,” and that “In my view … it was a biological weapons program.” He stops short of accusing China of intentional release, however, which also would not make sense from a bioweapon point of view. Instead, he said he believes it was a weapon vector that, during development, “somehow leaked.”17

    They were using these viruses in a BSL-2 lab and, we now know, infecting animals. So that creates the opportunity for a lab leak. It might not be the most likely scenario on how this virus got out, but it has to remain a scenario. ~ Dr. Scott Gottlieb
    A March 27, 2020, assessment report by the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency also concluded SARS-CoV-2 was likely an accidental release from an infectious diseases laboratory, but stops short of calling it a biological weapon.18 Asher also told Sky News19 he’s never seen a more systematic cover-up, and The Sun20 quotes him as saying that “Motive, cover-up, conspiracy, all the hallmarks of guilt are associated with this.”

    Former FDA Commissioner Weighs in on Lab Origin

    March 28, 2021, former FDA commissioner Dr. Scott Gottlieb, now a board member of Pfizer (producer of one of the COVID vaccines), weighed in on the origin of the pandemic in a Face the Nation interview, saying:21

    “It looks like the WHO report was an attempt to try to support the Chinese narrative … You know, the lab leak theory doesn't seem like a plausible theory unless you aggregate the biggest collection of coronaviruses and put them in a lab, a minimum-security lab in the middle of a densely-populated center and experiment on animals, which is exactly what the Wuhan Institute of Virology did.

    They were using these viruses in a BSL-2 lab and, we now know, infecting animals. So that creates the opportunity for a lab leak. It might not be the most likely scenario on how this virus got out, but it has to remain a scenario. And I think at the end of the day, we're never going to fully discharge that possibility. What we're going to have here is a battle of competing narratives.”

    WHO Enters Damage Control Mode

    In response to growing critique, WHO director general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and 13 other world leaders have joined the U.S. government in expressing “frustration with the level of access China granted an international mission to Wuhan.” As reported by The Washington Post, March 30, 2021:22

    “Ghebreyesus said in a briefing to member states … that he expected ‘future collaborative studies to include more timely and comprehensive data sharing’ — the most pointed comments to date from an agency that has been solicitous toward China through most of the pandemic.

    He said there is a particular need for a ‘full analysis’ of the role of animal markets in Wuhan and that the report did not conduct an ‘extensive enough’ assessment of the possibility the virus was introduced to humans through a laboratory incident …

    The United States, Britain, South Korea, Israel, Japan and others issued a joint statement23 … expressing concern. ‘Together, we support a transparent and independent analysis and evaluation, free from interference and undue influence,’ it reads …

    Tedros said24 … that mission team members raised concerns to him about access to raw data needed for the report … ‘The team reports that the first detected case had symptom onset on the 8th of December 2019. But to understand the earliest cases, scientists would benefit from full access to data, including biological samples from at least September 2019,’ he said.”

    WHO Investigation Team Accused of Spreading Disinformation

    In a March 2020 interview with Independent Science News,25 molecular biologist Richard Ebright, Ph.D., laboratory director at the Waksman Institute of Microbiology and member of the Institutional Biosafety Committee of Rutgers University and the Working Group on Pathogen Security of the state of New Jersey, called out the members of the WHO-instigated investigative team as “participants in disinformation.”

    Ebright was one of 26 scientists who signed an open letter26 demanding a full and unrestricted forensic investigation into the origins of the pandemic, published in the Wall Street Journal and French Le Monde, March 4, 2021. When asked to describe the shortcomings of the WHO-China team’s investigation, he responded:

    “A credible investigation would have had Terms of Reference that: 1) Acknowledged the possibility of laboratory origin, 2) Ensured access of investigators to records, samples, personnel, and facilities at the Wuhan laboratories that handle bat SARS-related coronaviruses,

    3) Enabled collection of evidence, not mere meet-and-greet photo-ops, 4) Authorized an investigation of months, not mere days, and 5) A credible investigation also would have had conflict-of-interest-free investigators, not persons who were subjects of the research and/or closely associated with subjects of the investigation …

    It is crucial that any team reviewing the issues include not only research scientists, but also biosafety, biosecurity, and science policy specialists.”

    Ebright, who has repeatedly called the WHO mission “a charade,” stated that “its members were willing — and, in at least one case, enthusiastic — participants in disinformation.” Importantly, the terms of reference for the investigation were prenegotiated, and did not include even the possibility of a laboratory origin. He’s also highly critical of the inclusion of Peter Daszak, whose conflicts of interest alone are enough to invalidate the investigation.

    “Daszak was the contractor who funded the laboratory at WIV that potentially was the source of the virus (with subcontracts from $200 million from the US Department of State and $7 million from the US National Institutes of Health), and he was a collaborator and co-author on research projects at the laboratory,” Ebright noted.

    What Do We Know?

    While another signer of the open letter, Dr. Steven Quay, claims to have calculated27 the lab-origin hypothesis as having a 99.8% probability of being correct, Ebright is unwilling to assign relative probabilities to either theory. Rather, he insists a truly thorough forensic investigation and analysis is what is required, as there is biological evidence going in both directions. He explains:

    “The genome sequence of the outbreak virus indicates that its progenitor was either the horseshoe-bat coronavirus RaTG13, or a closely related bat coronavirus.

    RaTG13 was collected by Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2013 from a horseshoe-bat colony in a mine in Yunnan province, where miners had died from a SARS-like pneumonia in 2012, was partly sequenced by WIV in 2013-2016, was fully sequenced by WIV in 2018-2019, and was published by WIV in 2020.

    Bat coronaviruses are present in nature in multiple parts of China. Therefore, the first human infection could have occurred as a natural accident, with a virus passing from a bat to a human, possibly through another animal. There is clear precedent for this. The first entry of the SARS virus into the human population occurred as a natural accident in a rural part of Guangdong province in 2002.

    But bat coronaviruses are also collected and studied by laboratories in multiple parts of China, including the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Therefore, the first human infection also could have occurred as a laboratory accident, with a virus accidentally infecting a field collection staffer, a field survey staffer, or a laboratory staffer, followed by transmission from the staffer to the public.

    There also is clear precedent for this. The second, third, fourth and fifth entries of the SARS virus into human populations occurred as a laboratory accident in Singapore in 2003, a laboratory accident in Taipei in 2003, and two separate laboratory accidents in Beijing in 2004.

    At this point in time, there is no secure basis to assign relative probabilities to the natural-accident hypothesis and the laboratory-accident hypothesis. Nevertheless, there are three lines of circumstantial evidence that are worth noting.

    1.First, the outbreak occurred in Wuhan, a city of 11 million persons that does not contain horseshoe-bat colonies; that is tens of kilometers from, and that is outside the flight range of, the nearest known horseshoe-bat colonies. Furthermore, the outbreak occurred at a time of year when horseshoe bats are in hibernation and do not leave colonies.

    2.Second, the outbreak occurred in Wuhan, on the doorstep of the laboratory that conducts the world’s largest research project on horseshoe bat viruses, that has the world’s largest collection of horseshoe-bat viruses, and that possessed and worked with the world’s closest sequenced relative of the outbreak virus …

    3.Third, the bat-SARS-related-coronavirus projects at the Wuhan Institute of Virology used personal protective equipment (usually just gloves; sometimes not even gloves) and biosafety standards (usually just biosafety level 2) that would pose very high risk of infection of field-collection, field-survey, or laboratory staff upon contact with a virus having the transmission properties of SARS-CoV-2.”

    Who’s Qualified to Opine on Viral Origin?

    When asked “What would you say to the scientists who declined to comment on the open letter because it does not come from virologists?” Ebright responded:28

    “The claim is unsound. There were virologists among the signers of the Open Letter. There even were coronavirologists among the signers of the Open Letter. More important, COVID-19 affects every person on the planet. Not just virologists …

    Microbiologists and molecular biologists are as qualified as virologists to assess the relevant science and science policies. Virology is a subset, not a superset, of microbiology and molecular biology. The sequencing, sequence analysis, cell culture, animal-infection studies and other laboratory procedures used by virologists are not materially different from the procedures used by other microbiologists and molecular biologists.”

    Is Gain-of-Function Research Ever Justifiable?

    Clearly, getting to the bottom of the origin of SARS-CoV-2 is crucial if we are to prevent a similar pandemic from erupting in the future. If gain-of-function research was in fact involved, we need to know, so that steps can either be taken to prevent another leak (which is not likely possible) or to dismantle and ban such research altogether for the common good.

    As long as we are creating the risk, the benefit will be secondary. Any scientific or medical gains made from this kind of research pales in comparison to the incredible risks involved if weaponized pathogens are released, and it doesn’t matter if it’s by accident or on purpose. This sentiment has been echoed by others in a variety of scientific publications.29,30,31,32

    Considering the potential for a massively lethal pandemic, I believe it’s safe to say that BSL 3 and 4 laboratories pose a very real and serious existential threat to humanity.

    Historical facts tell us accidental exposures and releases have already happened, and we only have our lucky stars to thank that none have turned into pandemics taking the lives of tens of millions, as was predicted at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Seeing how scientists have already figured out a way to mutate SARS-CoV-2 such that it evades human antibodies, as detailed in “Lab Just Made a More Dangerous COVID Virus,” having a frank, open discussion about the scientific merits of this kind of work is more pertinent than ever before.

    If SARS-CoV-2 really was the result of zoonotic spillover, the easiest and most effective way to quash “conspiracy theories” about a lab origin would be to present compelling evidence for a plausible theory. So far, that hasn’t happened, and as noted by Latham and Wilson, the most likely reason for that is because the virus does not have a natural zoonotic origin, and you cannot find that which does not exist.

    Summary

    Ideally, we need to reevaluate the usefulness of the WHO. Strong evidence indicates it is heavily influenced, if not outright controlled by Bill Gates. On the whole, it seems it would be far wiser to decentralize pandemic planning from the global and federal levels to the state and local levels. Both medicine and government work best when individualized and locally applied.

    Sadly, even though this is clearly the best strategy for successfully addressing any truly serious infectious threat, the likelihood of this happening is very close to zero.

    This is largely due to decades of careful planning by the technocrats that have carefully placed their surrogates in virtually every arena of global government, finances and media, which allows them to easily dictate their propaganda campaigns and censor or deplatform virtually anyone who disagrees and seeks to provide a balanced counter-narrative."

    Sources and References
    1 Twitter Jerry Dunleavy March 27, 2021
    2 The New York Times March 26, 2021
    3 Independent Science News February 16, 2021
    4 Nature 2020; 588: E6
    5, 7, 9, 11 Washington Post March 30, 2021 (Archived)
    6 WHO Report on COVID-19 (Archived)
    8 US Dept of State March 25, 2021
    10 Washington Post March 9, 2021
    12, 13 60 Minutes March 28, 2021 (Archived)
    14, 19 Sky News March 21, 2021
    15 The Sun March 2, 2021
    16, 17, 20 The Sun March 13, 2021
    18 Newsweek April 27, 2020
    21 Face the Nation March 28, 2021
    22 Washington Post March 30, 2021
    23 US Department of State Joint Statement on the WHO-Convened COVID-19 Origins Study March 30, 2021
    24 WHO Director-General’s Remarks March 30, 2021 (Archived)
    25, 28 Independent Science News March 24, 2021
    26 Open Letter March 4, 2021 (PDF)
    27 Zenodo January 29, 2021
    29 mBio 2012 Sep-Oct; 3(5): e00360-12
    30 The Human Fatality Burden of Gain of Function Flu Research: A Risk Assessment by Lynn Klotz (PDF)
    31 BMC Medicine 2013; 11, Article number 252
    32 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists February 25, 2019
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  12. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Constance (12th April 2021), Delight (10th April 2021), Ewan (27th January 2023), Harmony (9th April 2021), Hym (9th April 2021), Icare (12th April 2021)

  13. Link to Post #27
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    6,081
    Thanks
    8,692
    Thanked 39,308 times in 5,717 posts

    Default Re: "Public Health" Handmaids of Genocide

    Nurses speaking out about the genocidal actions coming from "healthcare"

    NHS whistleblower Nurse Kirsty, blows the lid on the lies, deceptions and vaccine injuries in UK hospital and care home.


    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/HagzSZ5ohXHQ/


    Quote Kate Shemirani has been a nurse for 36 years. She is also a personal nutritionist advisor and nurse practitioner. Kate Shemirani’s inspiring story about how she came to stand up against the tyranny of mandatory vaccines, and as a result, she was arrested and charged with six felonies, JUST for standing up For The People. Kate is also a Christian that puts God's Will in the center of her life. Be inspired!
    Dr Tenpenny and Kate Shimerani - What's new with Kate?
    Published April 10, 2021
    Last edited by Delight; 12th April 2021 at 04:42.

  14. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Ewan (27th January 2023), Icare (12th April 2021), Matthew (24th July 2021), onawah (1st July 2021)

  15. Link to Post #28
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    6,081
    Thanks
    8,692
    Thanked 39,308 times in 5,717 posts

    Default Re: "Public Health" Handmaids of Genocide

    Posted a tweet that showed homebound disabled people being given vaccination by LA County Sheriffs program despite resisting. This was disappeared from twitter and internet within hours.
    Last edited by Delight; 12th April 2021 at 15:05.

  16. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Constance (12th April 2021), Ewan (27th January 2023), onawah (1st July 2021)

  17. Link to Post #29
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    6,081
    Thanks
    8,692
    Thanked 39,308 times in 5,717 posts

    Default Re: "Public Health" Handmaids of Genocide

    I saw an interview with Peter Breggin last year. He worked for the NIH before Fauci's reign and has been a vocal opponent of the weaponization of psychiatry. "What I wasn't prepared to do was look at the depths of evil".

    He has a new book Covid-19 and the Global Predators



    starts at 5:25


    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/LlHUjl4ELsrf

  18. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Ewan (27th January 2023), gord (14th June 2021), Journeyman (13th June 2021), onawah (1st July 2021), Sue (Ayt) (13th June 2021)

  19. Link to Post #30
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    6,081
    Thanks
    8,692
    Thanked 39,308 times in 5,717 posts

    Default Re: "Public Health" Handmaids of Genocide

    In a recent interview Dr Lee Merritt: The vaccine is preparing the world for a mass death event, she reported on the HIV/AIDS and "gulf war syndrome" episodes.

    This Nurse with a Phd in Medical Anthropology can see that this is the same playbook but on a global scale. It is NOT that people were not ill and died but the CAUSE and reason for the playbook is a destruction of the spirit of health care. I again have to apologize to Jon Rappaport. I feel I have been blown far from what I ever believed this year. This is an important interview.

    Quote THE NAZIFICATION OF MEDICINE
    AN INTERVIEW WITH KEVIN P. CORBETT PHD

    ALARMING PARALLELS BETWEEN NAZI AND COVID MEDICINE


    Brasscheck TV
    https://www.brasscheck.com/

    In this exclusive Brasscheck interview, Kevin Corbett goes into detail about an aspect of the CoVid Crisis Con that is being otherwise actively ignored: The use of the “threat” to justify the suspension – and perversion – of normal medical practice.

    The focus is on the sinister distortions taking place in the UK, but they apply to other countries including the United States.

    As a trained nurse who worked with the first generation of AIDS patients in the UK and became a PhD university lecturer educating nurses, Kevin Corbett is uniquely qualified to address this issue.

    Resources from Kevin Corbett

    The CoronaHysteria part of my website:

    https://kevinpcorbett.com/coronahysteria/index.html

    The Anti-Coronvirus Toolkit

    https://kevinpcorbett.com/

    https://kevinpcorbett.com/coronahyst...s-toolkit.html

    “The Covid Nazification of the National Health Service”:
    http://www.thetruthbarrier.com/2020/...ealth-service/

    You can follow Corbett’s work here:
    Twitter:
    @KPCResearch

    Linkedin Profile:
    https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-kevin...-phd-7a176b71/

    Publications:
    http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/view/creato...vin=3A=3A.html

    Website: www.kevinpcorbett.com

    SUPPORT BRASSCHECK TV
    https://www.brasscheck.com/
    Last edited by Delight; 29th August 2021 at 03:30.

  20. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Ewan (27th January 2023), gord (14th September 2021), Pam (29th August 2021)

  21. Link to Post #31
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    6,081
    Thanks
    8,692
    Thanked 39,308 times in 5,717 posts

    Default Re: "Public Health" Handmaids of Genocide

    This is a discussion of the murders happening by omission, commission throughout the USA and other places... a must hear. IMO to go to a hospital now for any reason is terrifying. "There is no more medicine, it's all protocol".



    Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vjhdr5

  22. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Ewan (27th January 2023), gord (14th September 2021)

  23. Link to Post #32
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    6,081
    Thanks
    8,692
    Thanked 39,308 times in 5,717 posts

    Default Re: "Public Health" Handmaids of Genocide

    This is an example of a major issue where people are just not able to get the care they want to receive.



    Posting this here but only has a few moments of importance. Veronica had been an activist who was visible. Apparently her illness was not treated the way she wanted and she was not allowed to have advocates with her. Due to the protocols that others have reported, she was not able to have Ivermectin, was not supplied with nutrition and though several people tried to help her she became weaker and died before being able to leave AMA.

    Last edited by Delight; 13th September 2021 at 19:41.

  24. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Ewan (27th January 2023), gord (14th September 2021)

  25. Link to Post #33
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    6,081
    Thanks
    8,692
    Thanked 39,308 times in 5,717 posts

    Default Re: "Public Health" Handmaids of Genocide

    Episode 304: Never Again 1:10:35 Vera Sharav PLEASE LISTEN to this and watch her documentary and tell people. Democide on a Global Scale is real and happening. Our health care system has become Handmaiden to Genocide in OUR time.

    Here is the trailer for "Never Again is Now".


    Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v24hgm8/?pub=mpxgj

  26. The Following User Says Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Ewan (27th January 2023)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts