The UAP Task Force: is this 'disclosure'?

[boja]

GALILEO Project takes on MICHAEL SHERMER & NICK POPE as "affiliate researchers".

That's the end of that then !

Galileo Project
@GalileoProject1
·
12h
We're delighted to welcome Nick Pope, Michael Shermer, Ohad Raveh and Nathan Goldstein, as four new research affiliates of #thegalileoproject. We are extremely grateful to have them on the team!

A statement on “Ground Rules” for the Galileo Project
November 2, 2021
The Galileo Project logo
The Galileo Project has drawn a remarkable base of expert volunteers, from astrophysicists and other scientific researchers, to hardware and software engineers, to non-science investigators and generalists who volunteer their time and effort to the project in various ways. We value the input of many different voices, and the progress we are making on our efforts is a testament to our open approach.

As different as the perspectives of the researchers and affiliates may be, however, every contributor to the Galileo Project is bound by three ground rules, which we have firmly upheld since the launch of the project:

The Galileo Project is only interested in openly available scientific data and a transparent analysis of it. Thus, classified (government-owned) information, which can not be shared with all scientists, can not be used. Such information would compromise the scope of our scientific research program, which is designed to acquire valid scientific data and provide transparent (open to peer review) analysis of this data. Indeed, the Galileo Project will work only with new data, collected from its own telescope systems, which are under the full and exclusive control of Galileo research team members.
The analysis of the data will be based solely on known physics and will not entertain fringe ideas about extensions to the standard model of physics. The data will be freely published and available for peer review as well as to the public, when such information is ready to be made available, but the scope of the research efforts will always remain in the realm of scientific hypotheses, tested through rigorous data collection and sound analysis.
To protect the quality of its scientific research, the Galileo research team will not publicize the details of its internal discussions or share the specifications of its experimental hardware or software before the work is finalized. The data or its analysis will be released through traditional, scientifically-accepted channels of publication, validated through the traditional peer-review process.
Our expectation is that all members of the Galileo Project team, including researchers, advisors and affiliates, share these values and uphold the principles of open and rigorous science upon which the Galileo Project is founded.

Avi Loeb, Head of the Galileo Project
Frank B. Baird Jr. Professor of Science
Harvard University

[aoibhghaire]

This project won't be for disclosure. This project is for making discoveries.

[Agape]

Posted by boja (here)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=cQfySY_2BLc

Another "EX" Spook comes out in an interview with Jay at Project Unity.

John Ramirez is a retired GS-15 rank CIA Officer who served within ‘The Agency’ from 1984 - 2009, serving within the Directorate of Science & Technology, the Directorate of Intelligence and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). In this exclusive interview Mr. Ramirez will be presenting, for the first time publicly, his own presentation on UAP data collection within the United States Intelligence Community, a presentation that aims to, amongst other things, advise members of the UFO Community as to the best approaches for accurate Freedom of Information Act or (FOIA) requests in order to obtain actionable intelligence on UAP data from various keystone U.S Intelligence.

It gets interesting around midway, when he goes into "Speculation" about what's really going on.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=nrA6VwcuUqw

Above - the final 8 Minute segment which got cut off.

I would like to thank him personally for conferring so much information in 2.5 hours that has been left in murky waters for 70 years now.
Some of his information explains the “tipping points” we can’t get over simply because and while we don’t understand the specifications of defence and intelligence agencies and operations - between the UK and the US and where it concerns the OSA for example, such differences can turn substantial.

It’s also - if not finally- clear from the presentation tables that major power players and their militaries tried to “track ET” on their radars for most of that time
and are aware of means how to “provoke ET to action”.

Another relevant confirmation concerns “dragons” and their ancient hybridisation program but synchronistically with my own part of research and awareness , he is getting stopped and prevented from going deeper to the topic
( it has happened to me even recently and while my message about “dragons and nagas” was completely respectful and benevolent , something discouraged me from sharing any of it).

I was more delighted to hear about the “light dome” as UAP appearing at many times and places on globe as it strongly reminded me of my Bodhgaya 2002 encounter.

Also is mentioned: Chase Brandon ( ex-director of Intelligence in CIA) and his book,
“The crypto’s conundrum”, if you find a free copy in your archives please let us know.



Countless thanks for sharing


🙏💫🙏

[aoibhghaire]

An interesting Congressional report was submitted as an amendment proposal by Senator Gillibrand (who sits on both the Senate Armed Services Committee and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence). Very interesting to see a scientific research project mentioned by the US Senate. In particularly, The Galileo Project is mentioned explicitly dated November 4, 2021

The first ground rule that the Galileo Project posted this week,

https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/gali...t-ground-rules
the Galileo research program is focused only on open scientific data.

A scientific forum next week called "Our Future in Space", to take place at the National Cathedral in Washington DC this coming Wednesday, November 10 @ 7PM,

https://cathedral.org/event/our-future-in-space/

Registration for online viewing is available here.

[aoibhghaire]

Following through from Post 424 on the Congressional Report.

Will Congress now boldly go where no Congress has gone before?

The U.S. Senate may soon consider a far-reaching proposal to upgrade military and intelligence investigations of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, and to require annual unclassified reports.

The annual National Defense Authorization Act is one of the few bills that Congress deals with each year that are considered "must pass." Congress has enacted an NDAA in each of the past 60 consecutive years. However, the Senate shepherds of the bill -- Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Sen. Jack Reed (D-RI) and ranking Republican Jim Inhofe (R-OK)-- face an especially challenging legislative environment this year. Although the bill is expected to reach the Senate floor later this month, it will do so during a period of intensive partisan conflict on multiple unrelated legislative issues, and severe time constraints.

Senate floor action will be followed by a House-Senate conference committee that will involve members of the armed services and intelligence committees of both houses, with UAP language only one of scores (if not hundreds) of issues in which incongruent language must be resolved, with a strong impetus to wrap up the bill before the end of the year.

Those who see great merit in the Gillibrand proposal should waste no time in conveying that view to their representatives in Congress. Such communications may be especially helpful if transmitted by constituents of lawmakers who sit on the Senate and House armed services and intelligence committees, who are listed below. The UAP-related language that finally makes it into law this year will be whatever is agreed on in House-Senate conference negotiations among members of those key panels – negotiations that occur mostly behind closed doors.

We live in a time in which there are few public policy issues of major consequence on which there are not sharp partisan divisions. So far, however, no such partisan split is evident with respect to UAP-related concerns. This may be a moment when it is possible for politically diverse lawmakers to act in determined concert, to create a statutory framework that will foster a coherent, well-resourced, and somewhat less opaque governmental posture towards the persistent and perplexing problem of unidentified aerial phenomena. Let's do our best to not miss this opportunity.

(The proposed Gillibrand Amendment to the National Defense Authorization appears on pages S7814-S7816 of the Congressional Record for November 4, 2021, as "SA [Senate Amendment] 4281," as shown below in this link.

https://douglasjohnson.ghost.io/to-b...phenomena-and/

[aoibhghaire]

This is an important juncture in the most recent government announcements. It suggests (my words) that there is the potential for Ufologists.

In reading the Congressional Report has a requirement for 20 members to be part of the Advisory Committee. see link below.

The Advisory Committee is known as the Aerial and Transmedium Phenomenon Advisory Committee.

1. 3 persons appointed by the Director of the Galileo Project at Harvard University.
2. 2 persons appointed by the Board of Directors of the Scientific Coalition for Unidentified Aerial Phenomena.

https://media.discordapp.net/attachm...618/image0.jpg

[aoibhghaire]

Besides the the UAP Task Force and the recent Congressional Report of setting an government advisory committee on UAP, the French have just come out with a technical 2021 report. This is a big technical report in French, but here below in the link is an English summary of 20 pages.

https://www.3af.fr/global/gene/link....c_id=4375&fg=1

TECHNICAL COMMISSION SIGMA 2 – Progress Report 2021 Summary VF3

Here are some brief findings and cooperation with other international government agencies.
The report not only confirms the existence of UAP but is exploring further, hence needs cooperation.
Cooperation agreements have been in place with other countries, but China, Russia and the USA are currently a work in progress.

The SIGMA2 tried to make a preliminary cross-checking between the
electromagnetic observables of different phenomena, comparing the radiation
emitted by plasmas (bluish radiation from atmospheric nitrogen plasmas) with
recordings of electromagnetic signals at 3 GHz (US records). Sigma 2 were also able to
observe electromagnetic disturbances on electronic equipment (on the ground or in
flight) or even observed the effects induced by microwaves on the natural environment
(soil, vegetation) or on humans. These overlaps raise many questions about their origin.

Regarding the kinematic behaviour of UAP, brutal accelerations, passage from a
stationary position to very high speeds, Sigma 2 conclude that they cannot be explained by
plasmas of natural origin, whose speed and accelerations are a priori limited in
particular to the speed of sound. The speed of hypersonic movement and its
accelerations can be explained if they accompany either a hypersonic mobile,
performing brutal accelerations (according to an unknown technology), or by the
projection of energy at a distance (like plasma lasers), but whose technological advances
do not allow, a priori, the formation of plasmas at distances of several tens or hundreds
of km. These findings are only partial and preliminary but constitute a common thread
that could intersect with other research, for example on materials and their interactions
with high frequency EM radiation.

Sigma 2 in conclusion regarding cooperation what would be the information communicated by the USA on the UAP? Which databases? Would there also be a communication of the same nature from Russia on these phenomena, but also from China? From Israel? Other countries ? Would there be a
ripple effect? The reaction to the US UAPTF report have started.

To conclude by returning to the questions at the beginning: where are we on
knowledge? We may be past the stage of prejudice or disbelief.
Are we talking about Facts, Hypotheses, Laws or Theories?

Skepticism could give way to scientific curiosity in the face of the unknown supported
from now on established Facts and inventoried Hypotheses.

Do known Laws explain everything? It seems that some cases are beyond known science
and may prompt research into extensions of known laws or lead to other discoveries,
confirming alternative theories, now qualified as speculative.

To the question do the UAP exist? We leave it to the reader to judge, but the answer is
yes, in multiple and even changing forms during observations.

Progress will come from the collection and sharing of data as well as the interest of
scientists in confronting the Laws and Theories under study.

[boja]

"Watch this video focus on when she uses the term extraterrestrial. She could have stopped at "the main issues congress is concerned about is safety of flight concerns"....but she elaborates turns DIRECTLY to the audience and states ....

https://twitter.com/Disclosure89/sta...47619376029703

"is there something else that we simply do not understand that might come extraterrestrially"

She had the questions in advance.....
She chose to Disclose. This is a very important step forward. Its on the record..."

Quoted from "DR DISCLOSURE" on Twitter today.

[aoibhghaire]

Today, Mr. Luis Elizondo tweeted" Lue Elizondo: "Please, please, please contact your representatives and let them know this is unacceptable and not in the best interest of the American people. The USDI is the one single office that has continuously lied about this topic and persecuted whistleblowers."


So, I wonder if some of the so-called "Beltway Bandits" might oppose greater amounts of civilian-controlled disclosure and defend the unfair & illegal transfer of UAP technology by which some of them may have illegally benefited without free competition. Undue influence on the USDI?

Is this a plausible influence behind the memo redacted and signed while congresspersons are debating Sen. Gillibrand's UAP amendment (SA 4281) to the FY 2022 NDAA?

[Bill Ryan]

https://defense.gov/News/Releases/Re...tion-and-manag

Immediate Release
DoD Announces the Establishment of the Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group (AOIMSG)

Nov. 23, 2021

Today, Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks, in close collaboration with the Director of National Intelligence, directed the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence & Security to establish within the Office of the USD(I&S) the Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group (AOIMSG) as the successor to the U.S. Navy’s Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force. The AOIMSG will synchronize efforts across the Department and the broader U.S. government to detect, identify and attribute objects of interests in Special Use Airspace (SUA), and to assess and mitigate any associated threats to safety of flight and national security. To provide oversight of the AOIMSG, the Deputy Secretary also directed the USD(I&S) to lead an Airborne Object Identification and Management Executive Council (AOIMEXEC) to be comprised of DoD and Intelligence Community membership, and to offer a venue for U.S. government interagency representation.

Incursions by any airborne object into our SUA pose safety of flight and operations security concerns, and may pose national security challenges. DOD takes reports of incursions – by any airborne object, identified or unidentified – very seriously, and investigates each one. This decision is the result of planning efforts and collaboration conducted by OUSD(I&S) and other DoD elements at the direction of Deputy Secretary Hicks, to address the challenges associated with assessing UAP occurring on or near DOD training ranges and installations highlighted in the DNI preliminary assessment report submitted to Congress in June 2021. The report also identified the need to make improvements in processes, policies, technologies, and training to improve our ability to understand UAP.

In coming weeks, the Department will issue implementing guidance, which will contain further details on the AOIMSG Director, organizational structure, authorities, and resourcing.

[Bill Ryan]

And then yesterday, from Zero Hedge: (which isn't usually interested in such things)

• https://zerohedge.com/technology/dod...ional-security

DoD Creates New Group To Investigate Unexplained Aerial Sightings Due To "National Security Risk"

There have been almost 150 reportings of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) over restricted US military areas. The Pentagon announced it would create a new group to search for answers to identify these mysterious objects.

Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks announced Tuesday that the new group would be called the Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group (AOIMSG) and would lead an effort to "detect, identify and attribute objects" in restricted airspace.



"Incursions by any airborne object into our Special Use Airspace (SUA) pose safety of flight and operations security concerns, and may pose national security challenges. DOD takes reports of incursions – by any airborne object, identified or unidentified – very seriously, and investigates each one," the Pentagon said in a statement.

The creation of the group comes in the wake of an Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) report. Since 2004, the report revealed there had been 143 UAP sightings over sensitive areas. The ODNI wasn't able to explain the sightings. About 21 of the sightings demonstrated advanced propulsion systems unknown to the US.

Some have said these UAPs are from another world, while others claim they could be advanced technology from China and Russia.

The Pentagon said it would issue "implementing guidance," which will include further details about AOIMSG's organizational structure. Whoever will lead this group will have the power to standardize incident reporting and examine sighting data -- this will help the military recognize shortfalls in detection capabilities.

[boja]

TOM ROGAN pretty much nails it here in the "Washington Examiner"

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/o...9-dDC3QjVrg0zQ

It looks like this action has provoked a bit of a firestorm.


This MAY even be a good thing for the "Disclosure" cause,
by bringing public attention to the subject.

So far the media & the public are demonstrating they either :-

1) Couldn't care less, or
2) They're scared witless

It will be interesting to watch ....

[ExomatrixTV]

• Luis Elizondo on unidentified aerial phenomena, extraterrestrials and the Pentagon's UFO programme:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=4yX6ETCKyPo

[aoibhghaire]

Congress Tells Pentagon and Intelligence Community: UFOs Are Serious Business!
Dec 7, 2021

Congress appears poised to enact legislation that would command the military and intelligence agencies to get a grip on "unidentified aerial phenomena," and authorizes the resources required.

ENACTMENT OF THIS LANGUAGE WOULD BE UNPRECEDENTED

Congress has never before enacted any statutes that deal explicitly with UFOs or Unidentified Aerial Phenomena. To the extent that various government agencies have dealt with UAP incidents, or sought to manage public concerns about UAP, they have done so under their general operating authorities as they interpret them. In recent years, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence has prodded the Pentagon and Intelligence Community (IC) with language in committee reports, but enactment of sweeping statutory mandates will elevate the subject matter of UAP into an entirely new realm.

DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS

The "Gillibrand-Rubio-Gallego" (GRG) text tells the Secretary, "in coordination with" the DNI, to establish an entity devoted to coordinating Department and IC efforts to gather data on, and study the mysteries of, unidentified aerial phenomena.

The GRG text requires the UAP office to issue annual unclassified reports on UAP, which will be made public.

https://douglasjohnson.ghost.io/unid...ious-business/

[aoibhghaire]

UFOs Are Serious Business!

For those who want to read the outcome from post 434, specific background details are here at the link

https://rules.house.gov/sites/democr...-RCP117-21.pdf

[Bill Ryan]

More from Tucker Carlson (just published) — a short, 3 minute interview with Luis Elizondo.

Why is the Pentagon is still hiding UFO information?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=zVkrhpkjfv0

[holcaul]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
More from Tucker Carlson (just published) — a short, 3 minute interview with Luis Elizondo.

Why is the Pentagon is still hiding UFO information?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=zVkrhpkjfv0

Bill, did you start to buy into this CIA "disclosure"?

[aoibhghaire]

The proposed Project Titan of ICER provides for San Marino to set up a UAP office and Symposia under the United Nations in San Marino.
Project Titan is the initiative of ICER to bridge the gap of mainstream and Ufology of grounding an establishment of this kind. This will help all nations besides the USA's initiative. Project Titan action is in parallel to the US governments agenda of setting up a UAP office in the US..

https://www.liberationtimes.com/home...y0_QUcgPOvYJM8

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by holcaul (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
More from Tucker Carlson (just published) — a short, 3 minute interview with Luis Elizondo.

Why is the Pentagon is still hiding UFO information?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=zVkrhpkjfv0

Bill, did you start to buy into this CIA "disclosure"?

Never.

[holcaul]

I introduce to you... critical thinking!

Please do watch this recent video from the Dark Journalist.

It is lengthy but very much worth it and packed with deep research and yes, critical thinking. I found that watching at x1.5 speed is more efficient.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=5Wg_dLT6vDY