+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 3
Results 41 to 47 of 47

Thread: They Already Told Us the Plan

  1. Link to Post #41
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,209
    Thanks
    47,682
    Thanked 116,100 times in 20,640 posts

    Default Re: They Already Told Us the Plan

    NIAID, Moderna Had COVID Vaccine Candidate in December 2019
    by Dr. Joseph Mercola
    July 09, 2021
    https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...rid=1203841264

    "STORY AT-A-GLANCE
    Moderna, together with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), sent mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill on December 12, 2019 — raising significant red flags
    The providers agreed to transfer “mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed and jointly-owned by NIAID and Moderna” to the university’s investigator and was signed by Ralph Baric
    Baric pioneered techniques for genetically manipulating coronaviruses, which became a major focus for research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV)
    Baric worked closely with WIV’s Shi Zhengli, Ph.D., on research using genetic engineering to create a “new bat SARS-like virus ... that can jump directly from its bat hosts to humans”
    Serious questions need to be answered, including: Were Moderna, NIAID and Baric aware that COVID-19 was circulating in mid-December 2019, or did they have knowledge far before that such a vaccine would soon be in demand?
    So much has happened over the past year that it may be hard to remember what life was like pre-COVID. But let’s flash back to December 2019, when the idea of social distancing, compulsory masking and lockdowns would have been met with disbelief and outrage by most Americans.

    At that time, most were blissfully unaware of the pandemic that would change the world in the next few months. It wasn’t until December 31, 2019, that the COVID-19 outbreak was first reported from Wuhan, China,1 and at this point it was only referred to as cases of viral pneumonia, not a novel coronavirus.2 I say “most” because it seems some people may have been aware of something lurking much earlier than it appeared.

    In confidential documents3 revealed by the U.K.’s Daily Expose, Moderna, together with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), sent mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill December 12, 2019 — raising significant red flags. As The Daily Expose reported:4

    “What did Moderna [and NIAID] know that we didn’t? In 2019 there was not any singular coronavirus posing a threat to humanity which would warrant a vaccine, and evidence suggests there hasn’t been a singular coronavirus posing a threat to humanity throughout 2020 and 2021 either.”

    COVID-19 Vaccine Candidate Was Released Prior to Pandemic
    The confidential disclosure agreement relays a material transfer agreement between the providers — Moderna, NIAID and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) — and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The providers agreed to transfer “mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed and jointly-owned by NIAID and Moderna” to the university’s investigator.5

    “The material transfer agreement was signed the December 12th 2019 by Ralph Baric, PhD, at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and then signed by Jacqueline Quay, Director of Licensing and Innovation Support at the University of North Carolina on December 16th 2019,” Daily Expose noted.

    At this point, some backstory information is more than relevant. We know with great certainty that researchers at China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) had access to and were doing gain-of-function research on coronaviruses, and manipulating them to become more infectious and to more easily infect humans. We also know that they collaborated with scientists in the U.S. and received funding from the National Institutes of Health for such research.

    Baric, who signed the material transfer agreement to investigate the mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidate before there was a known COVID-19 pandemic, pioneered techniques for genetically manipulating coronaviruses, according to Peter Gøtzsche with the Institute for Scientific Freedom,6 and these became a major focus for WIV.

    Baric worked closely with Shi Zhengli, Ph.D., the director of WIV’s Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases, also known as “bat woman,” on research using genetic engineering to create a “new bat SARS-like virus ... that can jump directly from its bat hosts to humans.” According to Gøtzsche:7

    “Their work focused on enhancing the ability of bat viruses to attack humans so as to ‘examine the emergence potential.’ In 2015, they created a novel virus by taking the backbone of the SARS virus replacing its spike protein with one from another bat virus known as SHC014-CoV. This manufactured virus was able to infect a lab culture of cells from the human airways.

    They wrote that scientific review panels might deem their research too risky to pursue but argued that it had the potential to prepare for and mitigate future outbreaks. However, the value of gain-of-function studies in preventing the COVID-19 pandemic was negative, as this research highly likely created the pandemic.”

    Moderna Gets Emergency Use Approval for COVID Vaccines
    The rest of the story, as the saying goes, is history. December 12, 2019, Amy Petrick, Ph.D., NIAID’s technology transfer specialist, signed the agreement, along with Dr. Barney Graham, an investigator for NIAID, whose signature is undated.8 May 12, 2020, just months later, Moderna was granted a fast-track designation for its mRNA-1273 vaccine by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. According to Moderna’s news release:9

    “mRNA-1273 is an mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 encoding for a prefusion stabilized form of the Spike (S) protein, which was selected by Moderna in collaboration with investigators from Vaccine Research Center (VRC) at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), a part of the NIH.”

    December 18, 2020 — about one year after the material transfer agreement was signed — the FDA issued emergency use authorization for Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine for use in individuals 18 years of age and older.10 June 10, 2021, Moderna also filed for emergency use authorization for its COVID-19 shot to be used in U.S. adolescents aged 12 to 17 years.11 Yet, we still have no answers to some glaring questions:12

    “It was not until January 9th 2020 that the WHO reported13 Chinese authorities had determined the outbreak was due to a novel coronavirus which later became known as SARS-CoV-2 with the alleged resultant disease dubbed COVID-19. So why was an mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidate developed by Moderna being transferred to the University of North Carolina on December 12th 2019?

    … Perhaps Moderna and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases would like to explain themselves in a court of law?”

    SARS-CoV-2 Appears To Be Uniquely Able to Infect Humans
    Nikolai Petrovsky, professor of endocrinology at Flinders University College of Medicine in Adelaide, Australia, is among those who has stated SARS-CoV-2 appears to be optimally designed to infect humans.14

    His team sought to identify a way by which animals might have comingled to give rise to SARS-CoV-2, but concluded that it could not be a naturally occurring virus. Petrovsky has previously stated it appears far more likely that the virus was created in a laboratory without the use of genetic engineering, by growing it in different kinds of animal cells.15

    To adapt the virus to humans, it would have been grown in cells that have the human ACE2 receptor. Over time, the virus would then adapt and eventually gain the ability to bind to the human receptor. U.S. Right to Know (USRTK) pointed out that the issue of binding sites is an important one, as the distinctive binding sites of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein "confer 'near-optimal' binding and entry of the virus into human cells."16

    Scientists have argued that SARS-CoV-2's unique binding sites may be the result of either natural spillover in the wild or deliberate recombination of an unidentified viral ancestor. Baric and others, including Peter Daszak, EcoHealth Alliance president, to which he is closely tied, were quick to dismiss the lab-leak hypothesis, which suggests that SARS-CoV-2 accidently leaked from a laboratory in Wuhan, China. Yet, according to Gøtzsche:17

    “On 9 December 2019, just before the outbreak of the pandemic, Daszak gave an interview in which he talked in glowing terms of how his researchers at the Wuhan Institute had created over 100 new SARS- related coronaviruses, some of which could get into human cells and could cause untreatable SARS disease in humanized mice … ”

    Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance funded controversial GOF research at WIV; NIAID gave funding to the EcoHealth Alliance, which then funneled it to WIV.18 Daszak, despite working closely with WIV, was part of the World Health Organization’s investigative team charged with identifying the origin of SARS-CoV-2. Not surprisingly, the team dismissed the lab-accident theory.

    Baric’s SARS-Like Virus Wasn’t Made Public Until May 2020
    Regarding the novel SARS-like virus that Shi and Baric created in 2015, this research was conducted using a grant from EcoHealth Alliance.

    While the information relating to the virus’ DNA and RNA sequences was supposed to have been submitted to a national biotechnology information database when the research was published, this wasn’t done until years later, in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. As reported by Alexis Baden-Mayer, political director for the Organic Consumers Association:19

    “The work, ‘A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence,’20 published in Nature in 2015 during the NIH’s moratorium21 on gain-of-function research, was grandfathered in because it was initiated before the moratorium … and because the request by Shi and Baric to continue their research during the moratorium was approved by the NIH.

    As a condition of publication, Nature, like most scientific journals, requires22 authors to submit new DNA and RNA sequences to GenBank, the U.S. National Center for Biotechnology Information Database. Yet the new SARS-like virus Shi and Baric created wasn’t deposited23 in GenBank until May 2020.”

    Meanwhile, both Baric24 and Daszak were involved in organizing the publication of a scientific statement, published in The Lancet and signed by 26 additional scientists, condemning inquiries into the lab-leak hypothesis as “conspiracy theory.”25

    Daszak was also made a commissioner of the Lancet Commission on COVID-19, but now that his extreme conflict of interest has been made public, he was recused from the commission.26

    Baric, Daszak Downplay Lab-Leak Theory
    At the time The Lancet statement was released in February 2020, Daszak had advised Baric against adding his signature because he wanted to “put it out in a way that doesn't link it back to our collaboration so we maximize an independent voice.”27 The authors also declared no competing interests.

    In an update published June 21, 2021, The Lancet stated, “Some readers have questioned the validity of this disclosure, particularly as it relates to one of the authors, Peter Daszak.”28 The journal invited the authors to “re-evaluate their competing interests,” and Daszak suddenly had much more to say. His updated disclosure statement reads, in part:29

    “EcoHealth Alliance's work in China includes collaboration with a range of universities and governmental health and environmental science organizations, all of which are listed in prior publications, three of which received funding from US federal agencies as part of EcoHealth Alliance grants or cooperative agreements, as publicly reported by NIH.

    … EcoHealth Alliance's work in China involves assessing the risk of viral spillover across the wildlife–livestock–human interface, and includes behavioral and serological surveys of people, and ecological and virological analyses of animals.

    This work includes the identification of viral sequences in bat samples, and has resulted in the isolation of three bat SARS-related coronaviruses that are now used as reagents to test therapeutics and vaccines.

    It also includes the production of a small number of recombinant bat coronaviruses to analyze cell entry and other characteristics of bat coronaviruses for which only the genetic sequences are available.”

    Also of note, a special review board, the Potential Pandemic Pathogens Control and Oversight (P3CO) committee, was created within the Department of Health and Human Services to evaluate whether grants involving dangerous pathogens are worth the risks.

    Baden-Mayer explained, “This committee was set up as a condition for lifting the 2014-2017 moratorium on gain-of-function research. The P3CO committee operates in secret. Not even a membership list has been released.”30

    Daszak stated in his updated disclosure, “NIH reviewed the planned recombinant virus work and deemed it does not meet the criteria that would warrant further specific review by its Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and Oversight (P3CO) committee.”31

    However, according to Rutgers University professor Richard Ebright, an NIH grant for research involving the modification of bat coronaviruses at the WIV was sneaked through because the NIAID didn’t flag it for review.32 In other words, the WIV received federal funding from the NIAID without the research first receiving a green-light from the HHS review board.

    The NIAID apparently used a convenient loophole in the review framework. As it turns out, it’s the funding agency’s responsibility to flag potential GOF research for review. If it doesn’t, the review board has no knowledge of it. According to Ebright, the NIAID and NIH have “systemically thwarted — indeed systematically nullified — the HHS P3CO Framework by declining to flag and forward proposals for review.”33

    Who Knew What, and When?

    We now have proof that Moderna and NIAID sent their mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates to Baric at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in mid-December 2019. Were they aware that COVID-19 was circulating at that time, or did they have knowledge far before that such a vaccine would soon be in demand? The red flags, and cover-ups, continue to mount, but ultimately the truth will prevail.



    The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) recently posted more than 50 video presentations from the pay-for-view Fifth International Public Conference on Vaccination held online October 16 to 18, 2020, and made them available to everyone for free.

    The conference's theme was "Protecting Health and Autonomy in the 21st Century" and it featured physicians, scientists and other health professionals, human rights activists, faith community leaders, constitutional and civil rights attorneys, authors and parents of vaccine injured children talking about vaccine science, policy, law and ethics and infectious diseases, including coronavirus and COVID-19 vaccines.

    In December 2020, a U.K. company published false and misleading information about NVIC and its conference, which prompted NVIC to open up the whole conference for free viewing. The conference has everything you need to educate yourself and protect your personal freedoms and liberties with respect to your health.

    Don’t miss out on this incredible opportunity. I was a speaker at this empowering conference and urge you to watch these video presentations before they’re censored and taken away by the technocratic elite."



    Sources and References

    2, 4, 5, 8, 12 The Daily Expose June 18, 2021
    3 Confidential Disclosure Agreement
    6, 7, 17 Scientific Freedom May 19, 2021
    9 WHO, COVID-19 Update
    9 Moderna Press Release May 12, 2020
    10 U.S. FDA December 18, 2020
    11 Moderna June 10, 2021
    13 WHO, Timeline: WHO’s COVID-19 response
    14 YouTube June 13, 2021
    15 Live Science April 18, 2020
    16 USRTK December 14, 2020
    18 Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists May 5, 2021
    19, 30 Organic Consumers Association September 3, 2020
    20 Nature Medicine volume 21, pages1508–1513(2015)
    21 PHE.gov October 17, 2014
    22 Nature Research Reporting Standards
    23 Nature Medicine volume 26, page1146(2020)
    24, 27 Yahoo June 21, 2021
    25 USRTK November 18, 2020
    26 New York Post June 22, 2021
    28, 29, 31 The Lancet June 21, 2021
    32, 33 Daily Caller April 4, 2021
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ewan (13th July 2021), mountain_jim (12th July 2021), pueblo (9th July 2021)

  3. Link to Post #42
    UK Avalon Member Matthew's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th July 2015
    Location
    South East England
    Language
    English
    Age
    51
    Posts
    4,138
    Thanks
    25,645
    Thanked 36,192 times in 4,071 posts

    Default Re: They Already Told Us the Plan

    Bump


    I didn't watch Utopia but it is a spooky match with our current situation.

    Here's a summary of how closely Utopia matches


  4. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Matthew For This Post:

    Brigantia (12th July 2021), Ewan (13th July 2021), Gwin Ru (12th July 2021), Harmony (30th July 2021), mountain_jim (12th July 2021), Pam (30th July 2021), pueblo (15th July 2021)

  5. Link to Post #43
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,352
    Thanks
    39,690
    Thanked 33,466 times in 4,332 posts

    Default Re: They Already Told Us the Plan

    ...

    ... the plandemic fakery...

    United Network Europe
    European Virologist Teaches How to Make a Country Believe in a Fake Pandemic 03:41
    Belgian appointed virologist, Marc Van Ranst, teaches international leaders how to use the media to manipulate a country into believing in a fake pandemic and trick them into rushing to vaccinate.

  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Harmony (30th July 2021), Johan (Keyholder) (30th July 2021), Pam (30th July 2021), pueblo (30th July 2021)

  7. Link to Post #44
    Belgium Avalon Member Johan (Keyholder)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    31st January 2018
    Posts
    537
    Thanks
    7,431
    Thanked 4,746 times in 531 posts

    Default Re: They Already Told Us the Plan

    Thanks for the link!

    This guy has political ambinitions, though he says he does not intend to ever become a "politician".
    But with this video, he shows that he is already one, right now.
    And, speaking in/for the Royal Institute of International Affairs... quite clear what his intentions are.

    I have not seen this video in the country here; yet he is "playing the media" and he is even open about this, it seems.

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Johan (Keyholder) For This Post:

    Gwin Ru (30th July 2021), Harmony (30th July 2021), pueblo (30th July 2021)

  9. Link to Post #45
    UK Avalon Member Matthew's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th July 2015
    Location
    South East England
    Language
    English
    Age
    51
    Posts
    4,138
    Thanks
    25,645
    Thanked 36,192 times in 4,071 posts

    Default Re: They Already Told Us the Plan

    Its for your own good


    Global Freedom Movement
    @GlobalFreedomM
    “We can have 1 Billion people with freedom, or 9 Billion slaves. We’re at over 7 Billion right now, so we need to bring that down to 1 Billion.
    I hope that culling can be peaceful and slow and equal between rich and poor.” -Dennis Meadows (author of Limits to Growth) Club of Rome

  10. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Matthew For This Post:

    bluestflame (22nd April 2022), Gwin Ru (19th April 2022), Harmony (19th April 2022), Peace in Oz (19th April 2022)

  11. Link to Post #46
    UK Avalon Member Matthew's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th July 2015
    Location
    South East England
    Language
    English
    Age
    51
    Posts
    4,138
    Thanks
    25,645
    Thanked 36,192 times in 4,071 posts

    Default Re: They Already Told Us the Plan

    Not telling us the plan, but preparing for it - if this is true


    Frank Grimes Jr., @FrankGrimes_Jr
    September 19th, 2019

    Trump signs an Executive Order

    https://govinfo.gov/link/cpd/executiveorder/13887

    To modernize influenza vaccines using novel technologies that allow for quick mass production.

    Using public-private partnerships "which shall include an agreed-upon pricing strategy during a pandemic"
    6:24 am · 15 Dec 2021·Twitter Web App

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Matthew For This Post:

    Gwin Ru (22nd April 2022)

  13. Link to Post #47
    Australia Avalon Member bluestflame's Avatar
    Join Date
    21st April 2010
    Location
    a spark
    Age
    52
    Posts
    2,819
    Thanks
    16,583
    Thanked 8,500 times in 1,808 posts

    Default Re: They Already Told Us the Plan

    see also : the maze runner series

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bluestflame For This Post:

    Gwin Ru (22nd April 2022), Matthew (22nd April 2022)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 3

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts