Posted by DaveToo
(here)
Posted by Pam
(here)
Posted by DaveToo
(here)
Well this is a game-changer isn't it?
So almost overnight the jabs have gone from being
life-threatening (those damn pesky circular metallic magnetic disks) to
eternal life-enablers (those cute hydra with multiple appendages) according to Dr. True. (Not to be confused with Dr. Strangelove)
He says, at least initially 'their goal' is NOT to kill off humanity.
The end (goal) is actually immortality.
What I don't get is how we get from these synthetic hydra multiplying like crazy in your body to you becoming immortal?
That is quite a leap that needs to be explained to me.
Anyone?
I think you will find lots of diverse information regarding the ingredients. There is quite a bit of speculation. I remember in a 101 type microbiology lab where we were given substances and critters and had to figure out what they are. Many different hypotheses were formed and then doing testing all of those didn't pan out.
I don't believe that anyone on this thread has stated that every single thing that has been presented is fact and accurate. We all look at what we see through our own perspectives, with our own biases. It seems that True Ott has his own biases but that does not invalidate everything he says. I for one am in the examination phase. Let's look at the information we can find and see how this fits together. I don't intend to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Absolutely. As loathe as I am to use this dreaded phrase "We're all in this together", as far as the jabs go and 'vaccine passports' etc. yes unfortunately we are all in this together.
And I agree, Dr. True might be right about this and wrong about that, but overall I think he adds a lot of important info to the conversation.
I do totally agree that we need to be careful of facts. I have been deceived before and will be again.
I'm not so sure about your issues with Karen Kingston? She did show patents on what she was talking about and gave patent numbers. Did I go to the US patent website to verify? No. She has not yet given me reason to do so. Do I check out a whole lot more than I used to, yes. Unfortunately there is no fact site for the ingredients in this crap they are passing off as a vaccine, so we do what we do to try to figure it out
As I mentioned in my earlier post to you (that I had updated) Karen's latest piece on patents
was spot on. Overall she does quality work that is very valuable to us all.
However in her piece with Stew Peters last week she simply goofed.
And Stew just took her word for what she was saying, without fact-checking anything.
If you go back and read the patent paper carefully that she was referring to, you will understand what I am talking about.
I probably sound like a broken record now, but I simply don't trust all that is talked about in video after video that comes out on a daily basis now. When something sounds "too good to be true" I go to the source (if possible) to read and check it out.
That's just me and my scientific background, haunting me in my head to use due diligence.
If you've seen enough of Stew Peters' videos you know by now that sensationalism
is what drives him and his followers. Yes, overall he puts out "good stuff", but I've witnessed him being off now more than a few times, and that causes me to take everything he says/produces with a grain of salt.