PCR Test is Deliberately Contaminated says Ex Police Officer Mark Sexton!

[ExomatrixTV]

• Ex Police Officer Mark Sexton: “PCR Test is Deliberately Contaminated”

Following Mark Sexton’s appeal a reader has sent a letter to Greewich Council and the police with the evidence:

I would be grateful to you for placing the attached document with the Council Leader and Director of Public Health. It indicates serious problems with the PCR and LF tests being promoted by the Council. See this reference: PDF

There is profound danger to the whole community and especially to our children. They need to be discontinued immediately and urgent investigation begun as to how our children could have been submitted to biological weapons assault. You will be receiving the notice in the post. The Police is being included in this communication. I am placing with them evidence of the complicity of the Council – in particular of the Council Leader and Director of Health – with biological weapon assault. Please acknowledge this letter. The matter concerns the Health and Wellbeing Board, the CCG and the Overview and Scrutiny Panel. Can I rely on you to ensure all members are apprised of this urgent and life-threatening matter?

• source

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=jbD5tBvz0V0

Above YouTube version will most likely be taken down soon.


🌐 tinyurl.com/PCR-Deception-Exposed-Docu

[danstar]

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?sto...&id=1348501653

Here is another video a few days old where he goes to police station voicing his concerns about the vaccine and pcr testing and asks the police to do their duty and investigate.

[Hym]

Dr. Madej's talks on her early meeting with health officials who told of the future use of hydrogels as contaminants, are well worth the listen and the note taking preservation of the facts she outlines.

"Hydrogel and lithium causing blood clots", mimicking the eventual and more deadly multi-symptom, multi-targeted injuries, illnesses and deaths that are caused by stimulating the system to create it's own spike proteins, which not coincidentally mimic the previously released bio-weaponized corona strains.

Ethylene oxide causing cancers are also included in those testing kits.
Propylene glycol is also included in many vaccines.

I applaud this officer's call for public action AND his suggestion to take the test kits, isolate them and send them into the police is laudable. Cleanly dispersing them, dividing the test matter into segments, keeping at least one and sending partials to various independent laboratories is a much safer means of investigation.

A friend went in for work but, like all in his union based trade, was told testing is a prerequisite for working. He reluctantly went in and was given a test, wherein the person testing irritated both of his nasal passages by keeping the swab moving around, over and over again. Within a short time he was very ill and the systemic response he had was easy for him to conclude as a foreign irritant entering his blood stream, and not a result of his nasal passages being irritated.

He did say that the swab did not go very far up his nasal passages, and not far enough up to touch the blood brain barrier. He then went and purchased Ivermectin and is now, a week later, still ill, but getting better and not yet 'cleared' to go to the work that the illness from the test prevented him from ever starting.

The test was contaminated, but with what he doesn't know. He was not told what was in the swab, nor was he legally informed of anything it might have contained, whether a preservative agent, or a mixture of some deliberately infective ingredient, including what any chemist would classify as a bio-weapon.

I suggest that if anyone does choose to take a test that they keep an unopened swab, or two, and while at home-not at the testing site, separate it from its package, re-seal it in another envelope and send it off to an independent lab, without revealing its origin, which is legal as your taxpayer monies have paid for it.

Of course, my friend knew from years of union membership, annual dues paying, percentage of wages paid to the union, in this case 3%, many unions are in fact not there to protect the health and safety of their members. They are set up to be corrupt and to constantly discriminate against any member that doesn't fall in line.

Add to that most all lawyers are masons, or daughters of the eastern star, same thing, and it's clear how difficult it is to protect human rights when not one actively employed member is willing to stand up for their health rights, and lawyers are most often locked into the industries, colluding with them, that should be their adversaries.

The worker knew not to even complain to his business agent, his union president, the union elected president of the department his skills covered, nor even the appointed safety officer/union officer on site for the job he was on. He also knew of unsuccessful efforts to retain a lawyer to fight for health rights and the constitutional rights that should protect workers from all of the highly unnecessary testing, that is now at one pre-work test and 2 more tests per week.

It's a wonder that the enormity of the imposition upon workers health is not discussed at all, except that a quorum for voting on important legal matters in many unions is only 2 to 3% of active, dues paid members, showing that union matters and members welfare are not meant to be based on common, ethical rights.

You can't stand up when you're bent over.

[pueblo]

I have to go for a test tomorrow for travel but it is a Rapid Antigen test, not a PCR though I believe the swabbing procedure is the same for both.

I have been taking Ivermectin for a week and will take a small top up dose for a week or two afterwards.

If I can manage to get my hands on one of the swabs I will, I am going to ask can I have one to get it tested, it will be interesting to see the testers reaction, I doubt they will have been asked for a 'takeaway' swab before!

[ExomatrixTV]

• source

[ExomatrixTV]

• Former Police Officer Mark Sexton talks about our Rights and taking back our Freedoms:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=uVaxMIZEUSs

[ExomatrixTV]

Now it’s Mark Sexton‘s turn to present his evidence of government crimes against the people, which he did at Leamington Spa police station last Friday, June 18. (Danny Cook and some friends had already done this at the Bromley Police Station last week – see MUST-SEE VIDEO: “When a Child Dies From the Vaccine, You Will Be Accountable For Murder” – Bromley Police Confronted.) Leamington Spa is a town near Warwick, both of which lie south-east of Birmingham. The UK government minister responsible for the Covid vaccine programme is Nadhim Zahawi, also MP for nearby Stratford-on-Avon. It is to him that Sexton’s research and evidence has been sent.



Sexton introduces his interview with P.C. Bower with his intention to report a criminal offense of misconduct in public office against a Warwickshire MP. We assume this is Zahawi.

Using data from the UK government’s own website, 1,295 to date have died following Covid vaccination; 922,000 adverse reactions have been recorded following vaccination. Which is close to a MILLION people.

On May 25, 2021, Sexton went to four hospitals in the Birmingham area, due to information he had obtained that the PCR test, made in China, is contaminated with ethylene oxide, lithium and hydrogel. He reported this at Leamington Spa police station on the same day. It was forwarded to Special Branch because Sexton had claimed it was a terrorist attack. This information at the hospitals was passed onto senior staff. There he learned that there were massive influxes of people with serious adverse events following the ‘vaccines’ such as blood clots, menstrual problems, neurological issues, &etc. So he contacted Nadhim Zahawi, MP for Stratford, who is in charge of vaccine rollout in the UK.

Sexton then takes P.C. Bower through the relevant documents. The evidence he gives to the officer is drawn from Dr. Byram Bridle, the Canadian vaccinologist; Dr. A.H. Khan Zaheed re. evidence from Pfizer; a report from Slovakia re. contamination of the PCR test; and a letter from Dr. Tess Lawrie re. vaccine harms.
Sexton is thus demanding a halt to the use of the PCR test AND the vaccine programme.

All roads lead to you, Mr. Zahawi

He then presents other evidence including: MHRA vaccine data; Dr. Jenny Harries’ (UK deputy chief medical officer) comments about Covid and children; evidence from Boris Johnson; the success of alternative therapies such as ivermectin, HCQ and vitamin D; the UK government being guilty of the criminal offence of blackmail; death and burial statistics showing that 2020 had lower fatalities than the previous six years; the falsity of claiming there are ‘variants’; police are independent of government and sworn to protect the people, &etc. The video stops abruptly at around the 30 minute mark.
The UK government is planning mass vaccination of children starting in September.
********

• Ex-Policeman Mark Sexton Reports Crimes against Humanity to the Police – Arrest Hancock, Boris, Whitty:

• (extra embedded backup video mp4, just in case if others are taken down).

[ExomatrixTV]

[ExomatrixTV]

• A Group of Dads Confront Bromley Police and State Their Concerns Over the Vaccine Injurys and Deaths and Warn the Police They Are Going to Be Held Accountable for Murder When a Child Is Murdered if They Don't Do Their Jobs and Investigate the Deadly Vax Kill Shot.

Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/V1kHYU2FwAAm



ER Editor: Bromley is a town in the south-east of the Greater London area. Danny Cook, who had already gathered evidence to successfully convict pedophiles he says on camera, takes files of evidence to Bromley Police Station accompanied by 5 friends. These are people who have truly done their research on this so-called ‘pandemic’.
Ideally, they were seeking to serve a liability form on the superior officer at the station, as well as a ream of evidence and research, in order that the police at this station conduct an investigation into it, or failing that, be held responsible when the first child dies after receiving one of the Covid vaccines. Vaccines for UK children are expected to be rolled out in September.

It is clear they’re done their research into the PCR test, actual death rates for the year 2020 through FOI requests at hospitals, statistics on harm and death following the vaccinations, &etc. They’ve included research from the UK government’s very own website, which shows that 80% of the vaccinated are expected to die.
At the end of the video, having left without achieving their goal, Cook says he will serve his evidence on the station via registered mail.

Importantly, they appeal to the legal concept of Gillick Competence, applicable in England and Wales, which determines if a child under 16 can be held responsible for their own medical decision-making. Obviously, this could be invoked over vaccinating children, especially as parents have to expressly OPT OUT to avoid having their child vaccinated.

Their plan is to do the same at several police stations. They rightly complain that all they’ve seen the police do in the past few months is to walk into children’s parties and into funerals where they tear people apart. All they’re now asking for is an investigation into proof of fraud and harm. Kudos to them.

This is basic research and we’re doing your job

You’re fine. You’re still getting a wage. Our businesses are destroyed, our families are destroyed …

You know in your heart where this is going …

• source

[Denise/Dizi]

Good for them! I wish those that knew the true way the "System" works, would grow a backbone and expose all the corruption and those doing it.

I have long felt there are two ways of thought about those that "Work in the system"... Either they're unaware of what they're truly supporting, and they believe it is "Just"... In which case, that alone is frightening, when one person ACTUALLY BELIEVES that just because someone hands them a badge, and tells them they're "Allowed" to imprison, maime, or possibly even kill another is "OK" because their boss says so... Not to mention determining that another somehow owes their system money for somehow breaking a rule that one side creates.... It's all a sham....

(Imagine working in a fast food restaurant, and your boss telling you it is ok to shoot anyone who cuts in line, and for such, they will protect you from prosecution. Because this is about as morally correct as this profession) So if these people are truly clueless that they're really the pawn of others over the power of suggestion and pomp and circumstance, those ignorant people should be the last to wield power over anyone!

And second, They are aware, or become aware of how corrupt things are, at some point, yet stay there, rather than speaking out as this officer does... I think this is worse as it shows they're either cowards, and fear bucking the status quo, or they LIKE to rule over others, as if they're in some way superior...

I have to believe that at some point, most aware people who join the police, truly want to do good, but quickly learn the system isn't set up for the people, but to support control over the masses, where the few rule the many, and they're just the "brute force" to make others comply, and for that I would feel a great sense of shame, not honor... Same with the military... Sadly.

I am sure they get jaded when they run into individuals who just can't manage their own affairs, and they do begin to believe that they need to do what they're doing... But they begin to get jaded against all "Common People"...

It is going to take a great awakening of THOSE people, to wake them up to what they're truly supporting, to help support them when they revolt and lose their gravy train, and make a huge turn around on this planet. Sadly many like to feel they have power over others, or are somehow protected from the same behaviors they inflict upon others.

We are in a mess indeed, and it is going to take more individuals like this officer to begin to make these people openly realize, perhaps by being embarrassed in such a way that they cannot deny the facts that what they're truly supporting is not at all serving "The People"...

If they can't see their role, that is frightening, if they can that is even more frightening...

[Hym]

Following up about that incredible police officer, Mark Sexton, the former constable. His actions have been exactly what others in his position should do.

His constant attention to the legal details for filing a complaint, recording each interaction with officials, and following through to confirm if action has been taken on behalf of the safety of all, is the blueprint for others living in democracies, worldwide.

In addition to collecting any testing swabs and inoculation samples/shots and sending them into private testing laboratories, it is up to citizens affected by the entire agenda to peacefully follow thru with these legal actions, especially since most representatives are asleep at the wheel.

Cudos to Mark Sexton!

[felix roseczky]

https://www.journalofinfection.com/a...265-6/fulltext

Worldwide, detection and monitoring of SARS CoV-2 infection continues to be based on results of the real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. A recent scoping review in this journal reported that assessment of the diagnostic accuracy of the RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 has been less than perfect [1
]. We analysed real-world data from a large laboratory in the city of Münster (population 313,000), Germany, derived from a single fully automated high throughput RT-PCR platform (cobas SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR system, Roche Diagnostics) utilizing the same two gene targets for the entire study period (weeks 10-49, 2020). This laboratory performed about 80% of all SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests in the Münster region during this time. We explored changes in the percentage of positive RT-PCR tests (positive rate) over time. In addition, we assessed the influence of covariates such as age, sex, calendar time, and symptoms at the time of first RT-PCR test on the distribution of cycle threshold (Ct) values.
Nearly all swab specimens were tested within 24 hours of collection. The tests and their interpretation were carried out in accordance with the Roche cobas SARS-CoV-2 emergency use authorization (EUA) protocol, the specific targets of the test being the open reading frame (ORF) 1ab and the pan-Sarbecovirus E genes. The limit of detection, defined as the concentration of analyte that will be detected in 95% of replicate tests was 0.007 median tissue culture infectious doses (TCID50) per ml for target 1 and 0.004 TCID50/ml for target 2, corresponding to Ct values of approximately 33 and 36, respectively (cobas® SARS-CoV-2 package insert, version 1.0).
RT-PCR tests that had not crossed the positivity threshold after the 40th cycle were reported as “negative”. The Ct value is inversely proportional to the initial amount of target nucleic acid and is thus a relative indicator of the concentration of viral particles in the clinical specimen. An increase in Ct value of three points indicates that the initial amount of viral particles was smaller by a factor of about ten.
We categorized our population-based Ct values according to the recommendations of the UK Office for National Statistics (ONS) COVID-19 household survey as < 25 and ≥ 25 [2
]. Since there has been some discussion regarding this Ct-threshold [3
, 4
, 5
], we performed a second categorization using a cutoff of < 30 versus ≥ 30. For a small subset of 58 people, sufficient clinical information was available to allow classification as symptomatic or asymptomatic.
Of 162,457 tested individuals, 4,164 (2.6%) had a positive RT-PCR test. The positive rate was lower among children aged 0-9 years (2.2%) and among adults aged 70 or more (1.6%), compared to the intermediate group aged 10-69 years (2.8%). The positive rate was strongly linked to the national SARS-CoV-2 test strategy. During the first and third phase of national testing, predominantly symptomatic people were tested. During these phases, the positive rates were higher than during the intermittent second phase corresponding to the summer season, when predominantly asymptomatic individuals were tested. The positive rate during the third phase was considerably higher than during the first phase. During the peak of testing asymptomatic individuals, only 0.4% tested positive with a mean Ct value of 28.8. Higher mean Ct values were observed among children aged 0-9 years (28.6) and adults above 70 years (27.0). Only 40.6% of positive tests showed Ct values below the threshold of 25, indicating a likelihood of the person being infectious (Table 1). In the small group of individuals for whom clinical information was available, symptomatic subjects had a markedly lower mean Ct value of 25.5 compared to asymptomatic subjects, who showed a mean Ct value of 29.6 (Figure 1).

Interesting...thats what CTs say for more than a jear....

[ExomatrixTV]

• Full HD 1080p Quality Video for as long as Facebook allows this to be shown:

• source

The Conscious Resistance Network presents: The PCR Deception

Researched, written, and narrated by Derrick Broze
Edited by Becca Godwin

Watch quality videos via: Minds / Flote / Odysee

Synopsis:

Reports are streaming in, declaring a Dark Winter for the world due to COVID19. The media rushes to tell the public that case numbers are on the rise again. In response, case numbers are used to support calls for lockdowns, travel and dining restrictions, and the push for compulsory vaccines.

However, in recent months an abundance of evidence has shown that the “gold standard” procedure for detecting COVID-19 is unreliable and could be producing untold numbers of false positives. If this is the case, why are health officials around the world calling for more tests?

This report is a brief look into the history of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) procedure and the evidence that PCR is unreliable and should not be used as a determinant for the number of COVID-19 cases or as a factor in political decisions. Please share with friends and family to keep them informed, and if someone shared this with you, please watch with an open mind.

The PCR Deception

In the months since the COVID-19 panic began health authorities around the world have encouraged the public to “get tested” to help track the spread of SARS-CoV-2, the strain of coronavirus that causes COVID19. However, as fear and hysteria subside, the scientific community and public at large are calling into question the efficacy of the test used to determine a patients status.

The main test that is used to determine an individual status involves the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. This incredibly sensitive technique was developed by Berkeley scientist Kary Mullis, for which he was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1993. The PCR method amplifies a small segment of DNA hundreds of times to make it easier to analyze. For COVID19, a process known as Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is used to detect SARS-CoV-2 by amplifying the virus’ genetic material so it can be detected by scientists.

PCR is sometimes described as a technique or process, but for simplicity we will refer to it as a test. PCR is viewed as the gold standard, however, it is not without problems. PCR amplifies a virus’s genetic material and then each sample goes through a number of cycles until a virus is recovered. This is known as the “cycle threshold” and has become a key component in the debate around the efficacy of the PCR test.

In late August 2020, I attended a press conference in Houston, Texas to ask Houston Health Authority Dr. David Persse about concerns about PCR.

Dr. Persse says that when the labs report numbers of COVID-19 cases to the City of Houston they only offer a binary option of “yes” for positive or “no” for negative. “But, in reality, it comes in what is called cycle-thresholds. It’s an inverse relationship, so the higher the number the less virus there was in the initial sample,” Persse explained. “Some labs will report out to 40 cycle-thresholds, and if they get a positive at 40 – which means there is a tiny, tiny, tiny amount of virus there – that gets reported to us as positive and we don’t know any different.”

Persse noted that the key question is, at what value is someone considered still infectious?

“Because if you test me and I have a tiny amount of virus, does that mean I am contagious? that I am still infectious to someone else? If you are shedding a little bit of virus are you just starting? or are you on the downside?.”

He believes the answer is for the scientific community to set a national standard for cycle-threshold. Unfortunately, a national standard would not solve the problems expressed by Dr. Persse.

UK Parliament and Scientists Have Concerns About PCR Test

In the first weeks of September 2020 a number of important revelations regarding PCR came to light. First, new research from the University of Oxford’s Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and the University of the West of England found that the PCR test poses the potential for false positives when testing for COVID-19. Professor Carl Heneghan, one of the authors of the study said there was a risk that an increase in testing in the UK will lead to an increase in the risk of “sample contamination” and thus an increase in COVID-19 cases.

The team reviewed evidence from 25 studies where virus specimens had positive PCR tests. The researchers state that the “genetic photocopying” technique scientists use to magnify the sample of genetic material collected is so sensitive it could be picking up fragments of dead virus from previous infections. The researchers reach a similar conclusion as Dr. David Persse, specifically they state:

“A binary Yes/No approach to the interpretation RT-PCR unvalidated against viral culture will result in false positives with segregation of large numbers of people who are no longer infectious and hence not a threat to public health.”

Heneghan, who is also the the editor of BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, told the BBC that the binary approach is a problem and tests should have a cut-off point so small amounts of virus do not lead to a positive result. This is because of the cycle threshold mentioned by Dr. Persse. A person who is shedding an active virus and someone who has leftover infection could both receive the same positive test result. Heneghan also stated that the test could be detecting old virus which would explain the rise in cases in the UK and said setting a standard for the cycle threshold would eliminate the quarantining and contact tracing of people who are healthy and help the public better understand the true nature of COVID-19.

• Prof. Carl Heneghan on The PCR Test (House of Commons Science & Tech Committee, 17 Sep, 2020)

See: PDF & Video (Banned by YouTube!)

• Prof. Carl Heneghan on The PCR Test (House of Commons Science & Tech Committee, 17 Sep, 2020):

• source

Shortly after Heneghan’s criticisms the UK’s leading health agency, Public Health England, released an update on the testing methods used to detect COVID-19 and appeared to agree with Professor Heneghan regarding the concerns on the cycle threshold. On September 9, 2020, PHE released an update which concluded, “all laboratories should determine the threshold for a positive result at the limit of detection.”

This is not the first time Heneghan’s work has directly impacted the UK’s COVID-19 policies. In July 2020, UK health secretary Matt Hancock called for an “urgent review” of the daily COVID-19 death numbers produced by Public Health England after it was revealed the stats included people who died from other causes. The Guardian reported that Professor Heneghan and a fellow scientist released a paper showing that if someone dies after having tested positive for COVID-19, their death is recorded in the COVID-19 death statistics. A source in the Department of Health and Social Care told The Guadian, “You could have been tested positive in February, have no symptoms, then hit by a bus in July and you’d be recorded as a COVID death.’”

Heneghan also recently told the BMJ , “one issue in trying to interpret numbers of detected cases is that there is no set definition of a case. At the moment it seems that a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positive result is the only criterion required for a case to be recognised.”

“In any other disease we would have a clearly defined specification that would usually involve signs, symptoms, and a test result. We are moving into a biotech world where the norms of clinical reasoning are going out of the window. A PCR test does not equal covid-19; it should not, but in some definitions it does.”

Heneghan says he is concerned that as soon as there is the appearance of an outbreak there is panic and over-reacting. “This is a huge problem because politicians are operating in a non-evidence-based way when it comes to non-drug interventions,” he stated.

Heneghan is correct that the scientific authorities ought to take false positives seriously, especially when a person can be sent to isolate or quarantine for weeks due to a positive test result. Even the U.S. FDA’s own fact sheet on testing acknowledges the dangers posed by false positives:

“ in the event of a false positive result, risks to patients could include the following: a recommendation for isolation of the patient…. unnecessary prescription of a treatment or therapy, or other unintended adverse effects.”

A CDC fact sheet also acknowledges the possibility of false positives with the PCR test.

Professor Heneghan believes the confusion around COVID-19 has come as a result of a shift away from “evidence-based medicine.” In a recent opinion piece published at The Spectator, Heneghan wrote that patients have become a “prisoner of a system labelling him or her as ‘positive’ when we are not sure what that label means.” He warns:

“Governments are producing a series of contradictory and confusing policies which have a brief shelf life as the next crisis emerges. It is increasingly clear the evidence is often ignored. Keeping up to date is a full time occupation.”

More evidence for the unreliability of PCR came on November 11, 2020, when the Lisbon Court of Appeal ruled that PCR ““in view of current scientific evidence, this test shows itself to be unable to determine beyond reasonable doubt that such positivity corresponds to the infection of a person by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.”

The decision relates to an appeal by the Regional Health Administration of the Azores,Portugal which forced four German citizens to comply with a 14 day quarantine in a hotel room. After the four citizens appealed the decision, the panel of judges concluded that “the number of cycles of such amplification results in a greater or lesser reliability of such tests. And the problem is that this reliability shows itself, in terms of scientific evidence (…) as more than debatable.”

The ruling was criticized by some scientists in Portugal and has been completely ignored by the United States media and politcians.

More recently, On December 3, 2020, the Florida Department of Health announced a new update requiring all laboratories conducting COVID-19 tests to record new details for the PCR test.

The update notes that all Florida “laboratories are subject to mandatory reporting to the Florida Department of Health (FDOH),” including for “PCR, other RNA, antigen and antibody results.” The update adds new requirements for the PCR test, asking labs to record the “cycle threshold” (CT) values for the process. The FDOH document states:

“Cycle threshold (CT) values and their reference ranges, as applicable, must be reported by laboratories to FDOH via electronic laboratory reporting or by fax immediately.”

On December 14, the World Health Organization (WHO) posted a notice on their website warning that PCR may not be entirely accurate for detecting SARS-CoV-2. The WHO memo admits that using too high of a cycle threshold will likely result in false positives.

“Users of RT-PCR reagents should read the IFU carefully to determine if manual adjustment of the PCR positivity threshold is necessary to account for any background noise which may lead to a specimen with a high cycle threshold (Ct) value result being interpreted as a positive result.”

“The design principle of RT-PCR means that for patients with high levels of circulating virus (viral load), relatively few cycles will be needed to detect virus and so the Ct value will be low. Conversely, when specimens return a high Ct value, it means that many cycles were required to detect virus. In some circumstances, the distinction between background noise and actual presence of the target virus is difficult to ascertain.”

The fact that the Florida Department of Health and the WHO is taking this step is another sign that an increasing number of health professionals and regulators are questioning the accuracy of PCR. Unfortunately, both of these stories have been ignored by the mainstream media.

As noted earlier, this incredibly sensitive technique was developed by Berkeley scientist Kary Mullis, for which he was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1993. By the mid-90’s, Mullis had become skeptical that PCR was able to detect HIV and made several statements towards the end of his life indicating that he believed the technique was being improperly used by researchers.

As we approach 2021 the public is being told that a Dark Winter is waiting, with governments and media predicting a rise in cases and deaths. However, it’s important that we pause to acknowledge the many concerns surrounding the PCR test before international health authorities crash the economy, send millions into poverty, and threaten civil liberties. We must help the public understand the limitations of the PCR test and the dangers of resting public health policy on such a flawed process.

Finally, we must also hold accountable those who continue to promote PCR and refuse to answer these questions or even acknowledge these concerns. We cannot ignore the disastrous results produced by policymakers who failed to heed warnings about PCR.

Thank you for watching. Please share this video with your friends and family.

• source

[Sérénité]

I’ve had a bad feeling about the PCR tests from day one. Not just the fact it’s the huge amount of false positives of the tests that’s allowing to push their agenda, but that there is something more nefarious on the whole about them.

I watched this video last night;

https://mypatriotsnetwork.com/wp-con...1-1024x575.png

https://mypatriotsnetwork.com/patrio...d-dna-control/

It’s a Professor called Charles Morgan giving a talk to Soldiers about Human mind control technology using dna manipulation that has already been trialled on over 500 people and has shown an 85% success rate.
The video was filmed in 2008. It was already good to go 13 years ago.

In summary the nanogel can be administered, then binding to proteins and entering the DNA to change it at a molecular level.
They person can then be ‘controlled’ both physically and mentally. They can implant false memories, take away real memories. They can control people’s physical body overriding that persons own body, making involuntary movements for them. He says all that is needed to do this is the correct sequence of that persons DNA data...they can control
the person like a drone, via human to human control, robotic control or like a drone with software.
The tech just sits dormant, awaiting its command to fire up as and when required.

I guess they have everything they need for this to now be possible...

(Charles Morgan’s resume reads as following;
Dr. Morgan is a Professor in the Department of National Security at the University of New Havens Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and Forensic Sciences. Dr. Morgan is a Forensic Psychiatrist, former intelligence officer, and Neuroscientist. The focus of his teaching is, national security (domestic and international intelligence analysis), issues in deception and psychological operations. Dr. Morgan is the Director of the National Security Research Laboratory at UNH and has grants from the US Government. His research is focused on enhancing the detection of deception and on improving the indirect assessments of human personalities.)

[Pam]

Posted by Sérénité (here)
I’ve had a bad feeling about the PCR tests from day one. Not just the fact it’s the huge amount of false positives of the tests that’s allowing to push their agenda, but that there is something more nefarious on the whole about them.

I watched this video last night;

https://mypatriotsnetwork.com/wp-con...1-1024x575.png

https://mypatriotsnetwork.com/patrio...d-dna-control/

It’s a Professor called Charles Morgan giving a talk to Soldiers about Human mind control technology using dna manipulation that has already been trialled on over 500 people and has shown an 85% success rate.
The video was filmed in 2008. It was already good to go 13 years ago.

In summary the nanogel can be administered, then binding to proteins and entering the DNA to change it at a molecular level.
They person can then be ‘controlled’ both physically and mentally. They can implant false memories, take away real memories. They can control people’s physical body overriding that persons own body, making involuntary movements for them. He says all that is needed to do this is the correct sequence of that persons DNA data...they can control
the person like a drone, via human to human control, robotic control or like a drone with software.
The tech just sits dormant, awaiting its command to fire up as and when required.

I guess they have everything they need for this to now be possible...

(Charles Morgan’s resume reads as following;
Dr. Morgan is a Professor in the Department of National Security at the University of New Havens Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and Forensic Sciences. Dr. Morgan is a Forensic Psychiatrist, former intelligence officer, and Neuroscientist. The focus of his teaching is, national security (domestic and international intelligence analysis), issues in deception and psychological operations. Dr. Morgan is the Director of the National Security Research Laboratory at UNH and has grants from the US Government. His research is focused on enhancing the detection of deception and on improving the indirect assessments of human personalities.)

He says all that is needed to do this is the correct sequence of that persons DNA data...[

They could potentially have that information from anyone that has taken a swab test.. add a little DNA altering brew and a local 5G tower and you have a whole new breed of Zombie.......that is some scary shiiiiit.

[I am B]

I have plenty of friends who got tested and nothing weird with it so far. I got an antigen test myself and no problem neither. I think its more about data collection. Genetical data mostly, but I don't see the way "they" can end up processing and recieving such info.

One way or another, I'm not getting any more tests done, I'll just photoshop the paper whenever I need it. In europe its starting to be required for EVERYTHING. But it also means it is hella easy to "crack", controls are a joke so far.

Maybe theyre paving the way to regular bio/genetical identification. (that could be why big tech is so interested too)

[pueblo]

I have just arrived home after having a Rapid Antigen test so I can travel.

The experience was nowhere near as bad as I was expecting, the swab only reached the top of my nasal cavity, I didn't feel it go any higher than around the bridge of my nose. I am taking Ivermectin as a precaution.

I also managed to get a sealed swab to take away! I said I was doing an art project on the pandemic and asked if I could have a swab to take away to use in the "project".

Now that I have the swab does anyone know of anyone who is interested in receiving it for testing???

[Sunny-side-up]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

• Former Police Officer Mark Sexton talks about our Rights and taking back our Freedoms:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=uVaxMIZEUSs

This OP needs to be kept current and observed, so I'm

[Hym]

Bueno, Pueblito. Remember that the antigen test, depending on the manufacturer, the method it uses for sampling and the chemicals used for activating the sample to get a positive or negative result, cannot be trusted as to what they are looking for. Rapid antigen testing is a sham in many cases. As Exomatrix has stated often, there are no grounds established so far to trust a single thing any lab or government based testing method claims to be, nor an accurate measure of the presence or absence of any pathogen, especially now.

I just got a call from a friend on his first day at work and he tells me that he just had an antigen test that "proved" he didn't have covidious insanitum/sars cv 2. Luckily he's smart and aware of the cons. I reminded him that the test proves absolutely nothing, and even more nothing since that mysterious bio-weapon has never been isolated, only computer modeled to match some b.s. input. Free to now get the shot, WTF!

The expected follow-up to him from the highly UNqualified Nurse Ratchet, a man by the way, who administered the test, giving him the results just 10 minutes later, was that he could now safely take the "vaccine". Union medics often get bonuses, did I really mean kickbacks?, from giving union members totally unnecessary and likely dangerous vaccines. How many knew that? In fact, from my first job in a different union setting just a few years ago, I was asked if I'd "like" a "free" shot to increase my health. That soulless creep knew never to ask me that again.

As for sending in samples of testing materials, it is best to combine efforts and resources with others in your area in order to afford sending a sample to a testing lab.

It should be noted that if you make a somewhat sterile environment, using proper gloves on a clean surface, remove the swab, and using a very thin bladed knife, like a razor sharp utility knife, which you've sterilized with alcohol using gauze, then properly dried the knife, it would be the best to cut the swab into segments, then immediately put one segment into a sterilized container to send out for testing, saving other segments for further testing.

The best is to use a vacuum sealer, one we have for home use, to seal the sample and then send it out. During every step of the process it is best to video record the time, date and the general location (without identifying your location or who you are, unless you want to) where you are preparing the sample to be sent out for testing. Document at least 3 times and send copies to some, hand deliver them to others. I know it's a lot, but it's a fun time to be had by all, when you are standing up for your health rights.

You can't stand up if you're bending over ( and taking it in the bum ).

[Hym]

Here is further proof from a friend who was given a swab nasal test, which was with a deliberately infected swab. Whatever it was, ethyl oxide, or another contaminant, the man was targeted for questioning much of the unnecessary protocol.

In his own words he went into a sneezing episode for 20 minutes after the test and then was sent home. Listening to his accounting of how he dealt with the entire issue of even having to be tested when neither he, nor any of his fellow workers or family members, had any symptoms of a viral infection, it seems as if he was targeted due to discussions he had with the testing person earlier on.

The tester, who has a thoroughly unpleasant and quite distasteful outlook on fellow humans, had several discussions with my friend before the test, proving her lack of understanding of viral spread, with no idea as to what is a valid or an unreasonable basis for testing, along with her unquestioning acceptance of the highly questionable safety of experimental injections.

When she asked him for his phone number, tho it was on many of the forms needed to even work on productions at all, it was a sign of her trained diligence at targeting any dissenting workers. Not one other of the 40 or so workers tested that day was directed to be tested by her, the covid coordinator, and not one other worker had such a reaction after their test.

This is just as another friend was given b.s. reasons for getting a shot after a quick antigen test, with a supposed negative result in 10 minutes, by another covid coordinator. That friend was then "approved" to have a shot. It is clear that the coordinators are getting some incentive or bonus/kickback for directing both those who have a so-called negative test result and those who tested positive, for anything.

The same friend, sick from the test was then told over the phone that he was also now eligible to get a shot, even though he should supposedly have a long, if not lifetime, immunity from whatever virus he was exposed to, thus making taking a shot a dangerous proposition, in a cytokiney storm-like way. You know, basic virology and immunology protocols, proving the dangers of synthetically reactivating a system that has already fought off a pathogen, or it's toxic byproducts, by giving an inoculation after exposure.

This is another description of, and translation of, the military term "gain of function", as those who are behind the twisted protocol variants, not a viral variant, are told to encourage the tested into then taking the shot, whether the dubious result is positive or negative, even if it will purposely induce a more dangerous, if not deadly, reaction.

Health researchers call those testers, like the covid coordinators, wherever they may be, in whatever industry they are in, union or private..... 2nd level Pushers, the ones who get minimal rewards for their crimes. Their incentives are more lucrative when they can convince as many workers to get the shot as they can. It's a numbers game to them, and in private their daily talk amongst themselves and their supervisors, the overall coordinator and the onsite union rep, is all about the numbers. Most of them, by the way, are trained by the CDC.

My friend was also told that when he was clear to go back to work in a week that he didn't have to pre-test or take any of the 2 a week tests that all other workers had to, all for a full 3 month period. I have advised him not to go back, but like other of my friends in the same position, it takes some savings and some conscious planning to change careers, with so much skill committed to becoming and then being good at any craft in a union setting.

Now that they deliberately targeted him, poisoned him and paid him 3/5ths of his weekly earned income for 2 weeks, he could then rejoin the workforce, where there will likely be many workers shedding/transmitting the spike proteins back at him after they complied with the corporate ownership of their liberties by being heavily coerced into taking the jab. That's unionism in the states, just as useless, and now as dangerous, as it can be.

Another friend in another craft and tired of having endless intrusive testing done on him, said that he has saved testing samples from a while back. With further inquiry and now with most pre-work paperwork being done online, he noticed a very strange anomaly when he was signing into his most recent gig, and dealing with the endless 'deal memos' union members have to fill out.

When he was looking thru signing the testing data, the pages that describe the testing method in detail can never be pulled up. That page is instantly switched over to the last page where only the workers signature is required. Productions do not want anyone accessing the true details of the medical experimentations, the capitulation to the producer's guild's white paper, and the removal of decades of OSHA regulations concerning health statutes and limitations on mask usage....those things that they are subjecting union workers to.

You can be damn sure that there is not one single union representative who will ever challenge the company that hides that information, even if it means earning their income as representatives of fellow union members and protecting the health of those they are paid to serve.

I'm not surprised B**tches.....unions have bent over this far into the lies, and I doubt their consciences have been affected by all of the corporate enemas they've asked for and duly received, as long as they're getting paid. Maybe I'll be able to recognize them by their walks, the next time I'm in their area.

Though I write with as much biting humor as I can, this is a very serious dilemma for my friends and millions of others who all have a well informed understanding of the crimes being committed against them and many others. Though I hold out for my specific trade, I have already decided to leave any career that forces unhealthy mandates as a basis for employment.

I'd prefer, likely love, the fight to be public, if it ever happens and I am forced to defend my health rights and challenge the union, though not one lawyer has been willing to even talk to me on the subject. I get it, that particular union sucks. Even so, those of us grunts who do the day to days, the long hours, when we are there, we are there for each other...we are all that matters... union or not.

Since that union royally sucks it is not a big loss to me....and if you knew me like my friends do, I've been very tame in my comments here, about just what unionism really is in the states. It has taken a long time and a lot of training for unions to be that bad.

May we also support each other in our new lives, adapting wisely, recognizing opportunities and creating some new ones along the way. Until then I'll keep writing my short stories ......