+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 1 2 11 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 220

Thread: 'Climate Lockdowns' are Coming (Agenda2030) Predicted by Conspiracy Researchers!

  1. Link to Post #21
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,711
    Thanks
    30,808
    Thanked 125,636 times in 20,812 posts

    Default Re: 'Climate Lockdowns' are Coming (Agenda2030) Predicted by Conspiracy Researchers!


    --o-O-o--

    • Your "Carbon Footprint" is a LIE (and we all fell for it):

    • Canadian University Blocks Polar Bear Researcher’s Academic:Freedom:
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 27th March 2023 at 16:11.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Docim369 (22nd November 2021), Elainie (12th October 2021), Mari (23rd February 2022), mountain_jim (16th November 2021), Reinhard (13th September 2021)

  3. Link to Post #22
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,711
    Thanks
    30,808
    Thanked 125,636 times in 20,812 posts

    Default Re: 'Climate Lockdowns' are Coming (Agenda2030) Predicted by Conspiracy Researchers!

    • ‘Republicans got it right’ in recent climate change survey:
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Reinhard (13th September 2021)

  5. Link to Post #23
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,711
    Thanks
    30,808
    Thanked 125,636 times in 20,812 posts

    Exclamation Re: 'Climate Lockdowns' are Coming (Agenda2030) Predicted by Conspiracy Researchers!

    • The Truth About the 'Green Economy'
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Ba-ba-Ra (13th October 2021)

  7. Link to Post #24
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,711
    Thanks
    30,808
    Thanked 125,636 times in 20,812 posts

    Exclamation Re: 'Climate Lockdowns' are Coming (Agenda2030) Predicted by Conspiracy Researchers!

    • Cabin Talk discussing Climate Lockdowns

    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/6u8Azpm3NL8v
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 18th August 2022 at 19:07.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  8. Link to Post #25
    Aaland Avalon Member Blastolabs's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd November 2020
    Language
    English
    Posts
    442
    Thanks
    1,649
    Thanked 3,352 times in 432 posts

    Default Re: 'Climate Lockdowns' are Coming (Agenda2030) Predicted by Conspiracy Researchers!

    Prince Charles gave a speech at the UN Climate Change Conference last that is very relevant here.

    It is clear they are trying to use "climate change" as an excuse to consolidate power.

    In reality they simply do not want the "slave class" using their resources...



    Transcript Highlights:
    Your excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, the COVID-19 pandemic has shown us just how devastating a global cross border threat can be. Climate change and biodiversity loss are no different. In fact, they pose an even greater existential threat to the extent that we have to put ourselves on what might be called a war like footing.

    Putting a value on carbon, thus making carbon capture solutions more economical, is therefore absolutely critical. Similarly, after billions of years of evolution, nature is our best teacher. In this regard, restoring natural capital, accelerating nature based solutions, and leveraging the circular bio economy will be vital to our efforts. As we tackle this crisis, our efforts cannot be a series of independent initiatives running in parallel. The scale and scope of the threat we face call for a global systems level solution based on radically transforming our current fossil fuel based economy to one that is genuinely renewable and sustainable. So ladies and gentleman, my plea today is for countries to come together to create the environment that enables every sector of industry to take the action required. We know this will take trillions, not billions of dollars.

    We also know that countries, many of whom are burdened by growing levels of debt, simply cannot afford to go green. Here we need a vast military style campaign to marsh the strength of the global private sector, with trillions at his disposal far beyond global GDP, and with the greatest respect, beyond even the governments of the world’s leaders. It offers the only real prospect of achieving fundamental economic transition. So how do we do it? First, how do we get the private sector all pulling in the same direction? After nearly two years now of consultation, CEOs have told me that we need to bring together global industries to map out in very practical terms what it will take to make the transition. We know from the pandemic that the private sector can speed up timelines dramatically when everyone agrees on the urgency and the direction. So each sector needs a clear strategy to speed up the process of getting innovations to market.

  9. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Blastolabs For This Post:

    ExomatrixTV (21st November 2021), gord (4th November 2021), jaybee (3rd November 2021), mountain_jim (16th November 2021), Reinhard (15th November 2021)

  10. Link to Post #26
    Avalon Member jaybee's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Midlands England
    Posts
    2,633
    Thanks
    8,381
    Thanked 15,959 times in 2,206 posts

    Default Re: 'Climate Lockdowns' are Coming (Agenda2030) Predicted by Conspiracy Researchers!

    People outside Britain might not realize that Prince Charles is not popular - in fact he is unpopular...

    If and when he becomes King he will not have much influence at all on what people think and do... in fact they / we will resent his meddling in politics... he could actually hinder the cause he is involved in - and then there's the friendship with Jimmy Savile - now deceased - notorious for being a pedophile and abuser of children and vulnerable people...

    The Public were on Diana's side and although it's a long time ago now when she died in what many people think were suspicious circumstances.... it's not forgotten and in polls the public would rather Charles was skipped over and William become King... but that can't happen in the normal protocols of succession -

    He is not liked -

  11. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to jaybee For This Post:

    Blastolabs (22nd November 2021), ExomatrixTV (21st November 2021), gord (4th November 2021), mountain_jim (16th November 2021), Reinhard (15th November 2021)

  12. Link to Post #27
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,711
    Thanks
    30,808
    Thanked 125,636 times in 20,812 posts

    Default Re: 'Climate Lockdowns' are Coming (Agenda2030) Predicted by Conspiracy Researchers!

    • 50 Years of FAILED Climate Predictions in 15 Minutes (or Less!):
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Brigantia (16th November 2021), mountain_jim (15th February 2022)

  14. Link to Post #28
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,711
    Thanks
    30,808
    Thanked 125,636 times in 20,812 posts

    Default Re: 'Climate Lockdowns' are Coming (Agenda2030) Predicted by Conspiracy Researchers!

    • "Pollution Lockdown has never happened before. It will be an extreme step."
    --- WARNING: ONE SIDED (corrupt) PROPAGANDA BRAINWASHING: ---

    New Delhi authorities announced Saturday a one-week closure of schools and said they would consider a "pollution lockdown" to protect citizens from toxic smog.
    "Schools will be shut so that children don't have to breathe polluted air," Delhi's chief minister Arvind Kejriwal told reporters.

    Delhi is ranked one of the world's most polluted cities, with a hazardous melange of factory and vehicle emissions, and smoke from agricultural fires, settling in the skies over its 20 million people each winter.

    On Saturday, the Supreme Court suggested imposing a lockdown on Delhi to combat the air quality crisis.

    "How will we live otherwise?" Chief Justice N.V. Ramana said.

    Kejriwal said his government would consider the court's suggestion after consulting with stakeholders.

    "Pollution lockdown has never happened before. It will be an extreme step," he said.
    Kejriwal said that construction activity would be halted for four days to cut down dust from vast, open sites.

    Government offices were asked to operate from home and private businesses advised to stick to work-from-home options as much as possible.

    The Central Pollution Control Board on Friday advised authorities to prepare "for implementation of measures under 'emergency' category".

    It added the poor air quality would likely run until at least November 18 due to "low winds with calm conditions during the night".

    On Saturday, levels of PM 2.5 particles—the smallest and most harmful, which can enter the bloodstream—topped 300 on the air quality index.

    That is 20 times the maximum daily limit recommended by the World Health Organization.

    Hospitals were reporting a sharp rise in patients complaining of breathing difficulties, the Times of India reported.

    "We are getting 12-14 patients daily in the emergency, mostly at night, when the symptoms cause disturbed sleep and panic," Dr. Suranjit Chatterjee from Apollo Hospitals told the paper.

    Stubble smog

    Delhi's government has been vowing for years to clean up the city's air.
    The burning of agricultural waste in Delhi's neighbouring states—a major contributor to the city's pollution levels every winter—has continued despite a Supreme Court ban.
    Tens of thousands of farmers around the capital burn their stubble—or crop residue—at the start of every winter, clearing fields from recently harvested paddies to make way for wheat.

    The number of farm fires this season has been the highest in the past four years, according to government data.

    Earlier this year, the Delhi government opened its first "smog tower" containing 40 giant fans that pump 1,000 cubic metres of air per second through filters.

    The $2 million installation halves the amount of harmful particulates in the air but only within a radius of one square kilometre (0.4 square miles), according to engineers.
    A 2020 report by Swiss organisation IQAir found that 22 of the world's 30 most polluted cities were in India, with Delhi ranked the most polluted capital globally.


    The same year, The Lancet said 1.67 million deaths were attributable to air pollution in India in 2019, including almost 17,500 in the capital.

    In recent days the river flowing through Delhi, the Yamuna, was also choked with sickly white foam.

    The city government has blamed the blight on "heavy sewage and industrial waste" discharged into the river from further upstream.
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 14th November 2021 at 13:32.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  15. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    avid (14th November 2021), Brigantia (16th November 2021), Harmony (15th November 2021), mountain_jim (16th November 2021), Tintin (16th November 2021)

  16. Link to Post #29
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,711
    Thanks
    30,808
    Thanked 125,636 times in 20,812 posts

    Default Re: 'Climate Lockdowns' are Coming (Agenda2030) Predicted by Conspiracy Researchers!

    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Harmony (15th November 2021)

  18. Link to Post #30
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,711
    Thanks
    30,808
    Thanked 125,636 times in 20,812 posts

    Default Re: 'Climate Lockdowns' are Coming (Agenda2030) Predicted by Conspiracy Researchers!

    • Jordan Peterson - This Is The BIGGEST SCAM In The History Of Mankind (NEW):
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 18th August 2022 at 19:09.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  19. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Brigantia (16th November 2021), Harmony (15th November 2021), Operator (21st November 2021), Reinhard (15th November 2021), Tintin (16th November 2021), wondering (16th November 2021)

  20. Link to Post #31
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Location
    Project Avalon library
    Language
    English
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,442
    Thanks
    64,660
    Thanked 46,592 times in 5,410 posts

    Default Re: 'Climate Lockdowns' are Coming (Agenda2030) Predicted by Conspiracy Researchers!

    As this commentator has correctly pointed out....



    Source: https://twitter.com/HannibalWesley/s...84211551100929





    Related post from John here
    Last edited by Tintin; 16th November 2021 at 11:51.
    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  21. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    Brigantia (16th November 2021), ExomatrixTV (18th August 2022), gord (16th November 2021), Harmony (16th November 2021), mountain_jim (16th November 2021), wondering (16th November 2021)

  22. Link to Post #32
    UK Avalon Member Brigantia's Avatar
    Join Date
    29th May 2019
    Location
    Near Chizzit Land
    Language
    English
    Posts
    1,352
    Thanks
    25,327
    Thanked 12,975 times in 1,342 posts

    Default Re: 'Climate Lockdowns' are Coming (Agenda2030) Predicted by Conspiracy Researchers!

    Quote Posted by jaybee (here)
    People outside Britain might not realize that Prince Charles is not popular - in fact he is unpopular...

    If and when he becomes King he will not have much influence at all on what people think and do... in fact they / we will resent his meddling in politics... he could actually hinder the cause he is involved in - and then there's the friendship with Jimmy Savile - now deceased - notorious for being a pedophile and abuser of children and vulnerable people...

    The Public were on Diana's side and although it's a long time ago now when she died in what many people think were suspicious circumstances.... it's not forgotten and in polls the public would rather Charles was skipped over and William become King... but that can't happen in the normal protocols of succession -

    He is not liked -
    Indeed; he also once sent back his gas-guzzler car from London to his Highgrove estate to fetch his favourite pen that he had forgotten to bring with him, which is about a 200 mile round trip. Hypocrite.

  23. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Brigantia For This Post:

    ExomatrixTV (21st November 2021), gord (16th November 2021), Harmony (16th November 2021), mountain_jim (16th November 2021), wondering (16th November 2021)

  24. Link to Post #33
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,711
    Thanks
    30,808
    Thanked 125,636 times in 20,812 posts

    Default Re: 'Climate Lockdowns' are Coming (Agenda2030) Predicted by Conspiracy Researchers!

    • A Bit Of A Joke': Dan Crenshaw Speaks About Hypocrisy Surrounding Green Energy And Mining:
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  25. The Following User Says Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Brigantia (27th November 2021)

  26. Link to Post #34
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,711
    Thanks
    30,808
    Thanked 125,636 times in 20,812 posts

    Exclamation Re: 'Climate Lockdowns' are Coming (Agenda2030) Predicted by Conspiracy Researchers!

    Critics of climate alarmism often level the charge that activists are engaging in a kind of religious fervour, and now Nancy Pelosi has provided more ammunition on this very front by calling the Democrats’ massive spending on ‘green’ policies “a religious thing.”

    Describing the House passage of the massive ‘Build Back’ spending bill this past weekend, of which $550 billion is earmarked for combating climate change, Pelosi said “For me, it’s a religious thing.”

    She explained, “I believe this is God’s creation and we have a moral obligation to be good stewards.”

    Pelosi continued, “But if you don’t share that view, you must share the view that we have an obligation to future generations. So we’re very excited about what is in there and it is paid for.”

    Watch (but don’t try to watch all of it for your own sanity):


    • "Moral obligation?"
    One that will cost $4.79 trillion if its policies become permanent, according to the Committee for a Responsible Budget.

    An “obligation” that will, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) increase the federal budget deficit by $367 billion over the next 10 years.


    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 22nd November 2021 at 17:07.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  27. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Brigantia (27th November 2021), mountain_jim (15th February 2022)

  28. Link to Post #35
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,711
    Thanks
    30,808
    Thanked 125,636 times in 20,812 posts

    Exclamation Re: 'Climate Lockdowns' are Coming (Agenda2030) Predicted by Conspiracy Researchers!

    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  29. The Following User Says Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Brigantia (27th November 2021)

  30. Link to Post #36
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,711
    Thanks
    30,808
    Thanked 125,636 times in 20,812 posts

    Default Re: 'Climate Lockdowns' are Coming (Agenda2030) Predicted by Conspiracy Researchers!

    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  31. The Following User Says Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Tyy1907 (23rd February 2022)

  32. Link to Post #37
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,711
    Thanks
    30,808
    Thanked 125,636 times in 20,812 posts

    Lightbulb Re: 'Climate Lockdowns' are Coming (Agenda2030) Predicted by Conspiracy Researchers!

    • Michael Savage Debates Larry King on "CO2 & Global Warming" and The "97% Consensus" Myth:


    • Quantifying the Consensus on Anthropogenic "Global Warming" in the Scientific Literature PDF
    • 'Climate Change' Hijacked:

    The new Cook et al. survey of the scientific literature is attracting worldwide media attention and even the American president tweeted (“Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree: #climate change is real, man-made and dangerous.”) about it. Yesterday my own first reaction on twitter was: “All this talking about consensus http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/8/2/024024/pdf/1748-9326_8_2_024024.pdf … doesn’t improve our understanding of climate even a tiny bit” And I added that “it shows again how meaningless this kind of consensus analysis is”.

    Now I still support the label “meaningless” but today I will add “misleading” to the list.
    So what’s all the fuzz about? Cook et al. selected around 12,000 scientific abstracts that contained the words “global warming” or “global climate change” published in the period 1991-2011. With a large group of volunteers they then rated the papers using 7 categories. Around 8000 of the abstracts (2/3) take no clear position on Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW). Of the remaining ~4000 abstracts more than 97% “endorse AGW” according to the paper. Only a tiny amount (78 papers) “reject AGW”. Hence they claim again that there is a consensus, that the debate is over and also that there is a gap between scientists and the public (see graph above). A much larger percentage of the scientists “endorses AGW” than the public at large.
    • Misleading
    Now here comes the misleading part. If an abstract/paper “endorses AGW”, what would this mean for most people? Let’s look again at the tweet of Obama: “#climate change is real, man-made and dangerous”. If this is what it means for the president of the US, it probably means the same for many citizens who heard the news in the media. However, can this be sustantiated by the survey results? In no way.
    To the credit of the researchers they made all their results available in a searchable database. Their rating system is online as well. There are 7 levels of endorsement, going from quantified endorsement of AGW all the way down to a quantified rejection of AGW. Seems fair enough. But here is the issue. Only the first category can be regarded as a real or strong endorsement of AGW. Here is the description of category 1:
    1. Explicit Endorsement of AGW with quantification
    1.1 Mention that human activity is a dominant influence or has caused most of recent climate change (>50%).
    1.2 Endorsing the IPCC without explicitly quantifying doesnt count as explicit endorsement – that would be implicit.
    Now specifically look at 1.1. This comes close to the iconic statement from the IPCC AR4 report which said that “Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.” Now if 97% of the abstracts would repeat in slightly varying terms this major conclusion, than at least the conclusion of the survey would be more or less fair. However the survey doesn’t come even close.
    Brandon Shollenberger, who is guest blogger at The Blackboard, was the first who reported that actually only 65 papers have been rated “category 1”. Yes that’s right, only 65 abstracts clearly “mention that human activity is a dominant influence or has caused most of recent climate change (>50%)”. 65 on a total of 12,000 is 0.5%. So a completely fair conclusion from their survey is that only 1 in 200 abstracts explicitly mentioned that humans are dominating climate. If you ignore the 8000 papers that were labelled category 4 (neutral, meaning having no position on AGW) the 65 would be 1.6%. The paper reported that only 78 papers (1.9% if you ignore the 8000 neutral abstracts) rejected AGW. (to be fair, as you can see in the table below only 10 papers fall in category 7 and therefore (7.1) “explicitly reject or minimise anthropogenic warming with a specific figure”.)

    Now where is the 97% endorsement of AGW coming from? What the authors did is to add up the numbers of category 1 to 3 and of the category 5 to 7 which I show below*:
    Category 1: 65
    Category 2: 934
    Category 3: 2933
    Category 4: 8261
    Category 5: 53
    Category 6: 15
    Category 7: 10
    Total: 12271

    As you can see the 78 “rejection of AGW” abstracts are the added number of category 5-7. Category 1-3 together adds up to 3932 papers. This 3932 divided by 4010 (the total of category 1-3 + 5-7) gives their impressive 97% (with the above numbers it is even 98%, see * for more explanation about how these numbers were found). However of these 3932 abstracts 2933 (75%) fall in category 3. Now how strong is the endorsement of AGW in this category? Here is the description:
    3. Implicit Endorsement of AGW
    3.1 Mitigation papers that examine GHG emission reduction or carbon sequestration, linking it to climate change
    3.2 Climate modelling papers that talks about emission scenarios and subsequent warming or other climate impacts from increased CO2 in the abstract implicitly endorse that GHGs cause warming
    3.3 Paleoclimate papers that link CO2 to climate change
    3.4 Papers about climate policy (specifically mitigation of GHG emissions) unless they restrict their focus to non-GHG issues like CFC emissions in which case neutral
    3.5 Modelling of increased CO2 effect on regional temperature – not explicitly saying global warming but implying warming from CO2
    3.6 Endorsement of IPCC findings is usually an implicit endorsement. (updated this so it is more than just reference to IPCC but actual endorsement of IPCC)
    I like 3.2: “endorse that GHG’s cause warming”. I also strongly agree with this part of 3.5: “implying warming from CO2”. The meaningless result of their whole exercise is that 75% of the abstracts that say something about AGW at all “link CO2 to climate change” or “imply warming from CO2″.
    The misleading part is that they didn’t specify this result in their paper. Nowhere in their paper or in the supplementary material they even mentioned the total numbers in the different categories like I did in the simple table above. They only showed the total of category 1-3 in their figure 1(a):

    Even the other >24% of AGW endorsement (based on the 4010) in category 2 is pretty meaningless:
    2. Explicit Endorsement of AGW without quantification
    2.1 Mention of anthropogenic global warming or anthropogenic climate change as a given fact.
    2.2 Mention of increased CO2 leading to higher temperatures without including anthropogenic or reference to human influence/activity relegates to implicit endorsement.
    In a comment under his post Shollenberger nicely explains who the different categories skew the result towards “endorsement of AGW”:
    To give an example, if we say, “Humans are responsible for 40% of global warming,” that puts us in the bottom category. Change the number to 60%, and suddenly we’re in the top category. But what if we don’t give a number at all? If we just say “Humans cause some global warming,” we could be supporting a value 20% or 90%. Despite being able to support either position, we’d land in the top categories. That means the results will automatically be skewed toward the top.
    • Self Confirming
    Now for anyone who reads climate papers frequently this is totally obvious. Climate scientists have to frame their research in the abstract and there wouldn’t be so much climate papers if there was no concern for CO2.

    So the whole result of this survey is completely self confirming. Because there is a concern for CO2 there is a lot of funding of climate science. This then generates a lot of climate science papers (they surveyed 12,000 but mention there are many more). In the abstracts scientists refer to the concern about CO2. The abstract then falls into category 2 or 3 and therefore almost all the papers “endorse AGW”.

    * This is how you can replicate the numbers. Go to http://www.skepticalscience.com/tcp.php?t=search and type just a single letter in the search term box (I used “a”). This generates the total of 12,271 abstracts. Then select the whole period 1991-2011 and just search the 7 different categories. This generates the table from the blog post above.
    • "The Eternal (Bogus) 97% Consensus"


    Leonardo da Vinci, homo universalis.

    A contribution by Jeroen Hetzler.

    How is it possible that the NOS continues to cling so uncritically to the weakness of the 97% consensus that is nonsense, if not scientific manipulation. So no science. I fear that it is Henk Hagoort's legacy to take a position and afterwards grab the arguments, which is highly unscientific.
    Henk Hagoort, until recently boss of the Dutch Public Broadcasting, has admitted several times that he does not want objective reporting on the climate. He believes that NPO should encourage Dutch politicians to take stronger action against climate change. During a radio discussion (This is the day, November 23, 2015) Hagoort said that he would refuse to make programs that discuss whether there is actually a climate problem. source.
    Turning away from a journalistic critical attitude with regard to climate reporting seems to have been in the NOS's genes ever since, because the NOS again invokes the worst imaginable of all arguments, namely that 97% of the scientists. It is just an authority argument that has been canonized, because in reality there is no scientific evidence to support the CAGW (alleged dominant human influence on catastrophic warming) hypothesis. This so-called 97% proof is based, among other things, on the research of Cook et al. The position is thus:
    the percentage of endorsements among papers expressing a position on AGW marginally increased over time. Our analysis indicates that the number of papers rejecting the consensus on AGW is a vanishingly small proportion of the published research.”
    However, as usual it is different. How did Cook et al proceed? They read the summary of 11,944 climate publications (or had them read) and filled in a matrix based on that. Below the matrix you can read:
    32.6% support AGW, 66.7% of the summaries show no position on AGW and 0.3% reject AGW. How does one arrive at that 97% consensus? That is the consequence of what Cook et al subsequently do with this result. They set aside the largest part (66.7%) of the results ('no position' and 'uncertain') and look at the percentage of the remaining categories that “endorsed the consensus position that humans are causing global warming”: 97.1%. So that is the source of the well-known statement “97% of scientists….” etcetera.

    The next step is: if we look at the percentages of the summaries that have been examined, 32.6% support the AGW hypothesis.

    Finally: It is a fact that CO2 influences the temperature on earth. It is therefore not surprising that only a very small percentage of the publications and of the respondents reject AGW. The crucial question, however, is TO what extent (anthropogenic) CO2 affects temperature. The fact that only 0.5% of the publications make an explicit statement about this speaks volumes: people don't know (yet). That great uncertainty in climatology did not stop the IPCC from stating in the Summary of the latest report:
    It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century.
    If the AR5 report of the IPCC were included in the study by Cook et al, that position would fall in category 1, the 0.5% of the publications that explicitly support AGW ( explicit endorsement with quantification ). Source.
    The cause can be traced back to the unilateral politicization of the IPCC, as witnessed by the mandate when it was founded. The NOS follows this position uncritically. Want another example of the refutation of that 97% consensus? See here: there are 75 out of 77 calling themselves climate scientists who consider human influence significant and so there is 97% consensus; this, however, on the approximately 3,000 respondents, because then it will be 2.4%. The conclusion is therefore:
    It seems that the debate on the authenticity of global warming and the role played by human activity is largely nonexistent among those who understand the nuances and scientific basis of long-term climate processes. The challenge, rather, appears to be how to effectively communicate this fact to policy makers and to a public that continues to mistakenly perceive debate among scientists . source.
    The NOS should take this to heart. However, what does the NOS say? “We believe the message because we believe the messengers and that 'proves' the overwhelming 97% consensus” among those messengers. Well, strange kind of witness journalism.
    By the way, what is a climate scientist anyway?

    Jeroen Hetzler.

    If you were to believe the mainstream media, which is of course not self-evident or sensible these days, you will undoubtedly think that a new homo universalis has arisen. A homo universalis to whom Albert Einstein, with his theory of relativity and his prediction of gravitational waves, was no more than a little scribbler. A homo universalis who not only masters all conceivable branches of science and mysticism down to the fingertips, but who also protects us and our children and grandchildren from a premature and unpleasant end due to global warming. I am of course referring to the climatologist. source

    Ceterum censeo Legem Climaedelendam esse.
    (By the way, I believe that the climate law should be overturned).

    Quantifying the Consensus on Anthropogenic "Global Warming" in the Scientific Literature PDF
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 3rd February 2022 at 23:45.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  33. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    gini (15th February 2022), mountain_jim (15th February 2022)

  34. Link to Post #38
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,711
    Thanks
    30,808
    Thanked 125,636 times in 20,812 posts

    Default Re: 'Climate Lockdowns' are Coming (Agenda2030) Predicted by Conspiracy Researchers!

    woops wrong thread
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 23rd February 2022 at 13:44.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  35. Link to Post #39
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,088 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: 'Climate Lockdowns' are Coming (Agenda2030) Predicted by Conspiracy Researchers!

    The debate about manmade climate change is demonstrably irrelevant if Ben Davidson of SuspiciousObservers is right, and I'm afraid that he is.

    See:


    I don't mean to harp on this subject ( I keep bringing it up), but it's not getting near enough attention if there are to be enough survivors to start anew besides the elites in their DUMBS and space colonies.

    Like the coming mini Ice Age, it's a lot to take in, but if conspiracy theorists don't do the initial ground work of understanding, verifying and sharing the information, who will?
    You can bet the controllers don't want us to know what to prepare for, or to understand what they are preparing for.
    It's clear by now we can't count on the prevailing Quackademia to tell us the truth, or even to know it.

    The Magnetic Pole Reversal is a cycle that appears to be coming due again soon (within the next 20 years by Davidson's and others' estimates).
    Preceded by increasingly severe weather changes as well as increases in quakes, tornadoes, volcanoes (which we are already seeing), the final, nova-like killshot from the Sun will be devastating planet-wide, with huge tsunamis and crustal displacement, and lands sinking and rising from the oceans.

    Updates from Davidson which are posted for the most part daily are on this thread started by Herve in 2019:
    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...-and-Ice-Ages:
    ..include reports from other scientists and provide links to their research, as well as many excellent playlists from Davidson, such as at the link above.
    I don't think anyone with a brain who studies enough of these would come away with doubts about the strong possibility that this is what we should be concerned about.
    Not global warming (I think that debate is just a big, deliberate distraction), or even global cooling, though the latter is going to be a problem too, but in comparison to what the Magnetic Pole Reversal causes, even a mini Ice Age is not such a big deal.

    Edgar Cayce's predictions (and his predictions continue to come true) concur with what Davidson and others are predicting.
    See: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1442161

    Quote Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)
    [LIST][*][B][FONT=Trebuchet MS][SIZE=3]Michael Savage Debates Larry King on "CO2 & Global Warming" and The "97% Consensus" Myth:
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  36. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (15th February 2022), gini (15th February 2022), Johnnycomelately (15th February 2022), meat suit (15th February 2022), mountain_jim (15th February 2022), The KMan (16th February 2022)

  37. Link to Post #40
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,711
    Thanks
    30,808
    Thanked 125,636 times in 20,812 posts

    Default Re: 'Climate Lockdowns' are Coming (Agenda2030) Predicted by Conspiracy Researchers!

    • Jordan Peterson - Population Collapse Is Coming
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  38. The Following User Says Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Bo Atkinson (26th August 2022)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 11 FirstFirst 1 2 11 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts