'Climate Lockdowns' are Coming (Agenda2030) Predicted by Conspiracy Researchers!

[ExomatrixTV]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=TpfhBPDUs9A

[ExomatrixTV]

[ExomatrixTV]

• Nineteen USA States Launch Investigations Into Blackrock And Vanguard For Embracing Climate Tyranny

[ExomatrixTV]

• Technocracy with Patrick M. Wood:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=MNjogIfw3fE

[Vicus]

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by Vicus (here)

• And there are more trees growing faster when there is more CO2 in the air (ppm - parts per million) ... and the only real climate change effect on all planets in our solar system is due to the 11-year cyclical Solar Storms highs & lows <<< that effect is so big, so huge that the transparent "CO2" part effecting the climate is below 0,001% in comparison ...

When the Sun if making all Oceans & Seas (±70% of the Earth Surface which is 2 times the size of all countries on earth combined) create clouds THAT REAL CLIMATE CHANGE PROCESS can never ever be stopped (and they fckn know that!) ... not even with banning CO2 completely everywhere (what plants breathe ffs).

• Cosmic Gamma Rays hitting The Earth are ALSO part of having gigantic Climate Change Effects they do not want you to discuss ... because it will also crush their tunnel vision (WEF) narratives.

"NetZero2050" is a TOTAL SCAM as it will lead to plants having less to breathe and will do the opposite of "greening the planet" ... One of the Green Peace Founders said that the "Green Movement" it totally hijacked by unelected tyrannical Technocrats that seek excuses to impose & drastically change political systems.

They need a perfect excuse to "justify" bypassing current laws ... and PUSH all kinds of unconstitutional actions, and most people have no clue how they being played/used, ... when they ever find out ... the harm is already done on a supermassive scale, and it only could happen if they believed the lies sold to them. So so sad.

• Truly understanding what "Self-Determination Rights" are ... is KNOWING it is the exact opposite of what WEF minions are doing worldwide with their Technocratic Tyrannical Dystopian "Global Governance" aka "Agenda2030" & "NetZero2050"

Maybe the Ultra Elite KNOWS real abundance is coming for humanity ... and know that eventually they lose control over the masses ... thus they are in a big hurry to speed up the Depopulation Agenda and implement all kinds of unconstitutional "(fake) crisis" laws cementing their Future Dystopia aka Agenda2030 & "NetZero2050".

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

* source

• How to be a "Good Citizen":

* Obey without questioning.
* Comply without thinking.
* Worship authority.
* Have blind faith in government.
* Have absolute trust in mainstream media.
* Never question official narratives.

... and how to make sure others know you do/did all the above?

* Wear a face diaper, you know it does not even work.

• Would Abuse of Power on a Massive Scale be Possible Without These 25 Points?

[ExomatrixTV]

A recent article published by The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (PBS) claims that,
"floods and droughts are worsened by climate change."

Various lines of evidence and hard data falsify this claim.

The article, originally by Isabella O'Malley, of the Associated Press (AP) was carried on the PBS Newshour website with the title "Scientists confirm global floods and droughts worsened by climate change".

The article leads with this alarming claim:

The intensity of extreme drought and rainfall has "sharply" increased over the past 20 years, according to a study published Monday in the journal Nature Water.

These aren't merely tough weather events, they are leading to extremes such as crop failure, infrastructure damage and even humanitarian crises.

The big picture on water comes from data from a pair of satellites known as GRACE, or Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment, that were used to measure changes in Earth's water storage - the sum of all the water on and in the land, including groundwater, surface water, ice, and snow.

For good measure, O'Malley adds this unsupportable claim:

The researchers say the data confirms that both the frequency and intensity of rainfall and droughts are increasing due to burning fossil fuels and other human activity that releases greenhouse gases.

"I was surprised to see how well correlated the global intensity was with global mean temperatures," said Matthew Rodell, study author and deputy director of Earth sciences for hydrosphere, biosphere, and geophysics at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.

As any professional scientist will tell you, correlation is not causation.

Wikipedia says,

"The phrase 'correlation does not imply causation' refers to the inability to legitimately deduce a cause-and-effect relationship between two events or variables solely on the basis of an observed association or correlation between them."

For example, data in this graph in Figure 1 below correlates nearly perfectly, but anyone can tell you that the two data items plotted, Ice Cream Sales and Shark Attacks, have no cause-and-effect relationship.

• Figure 1. A highly correlated graph with no relationship between the two datasets. Source: Statology.org

There are other problems with the article, most notably the time period of data involved - 20 years - which by definition does not meet the 30-year period required to determine a climate trend.

Worse than that, the article reports,

"Researchers looked at 1,056 events from 2002-2021 using a novel algorithm that identifies where the land is much wetter or drier than normal."

In other words, in addition to the lack of 30-years of data, this study used a "novel algorithm" that has not been applied to other areas or the same areas in the past for a proper comparison of past and present climate trends and any changes over time.

Also, this data is from a satellite designed to measure variations in Earth's gravity, not climate change...

Therefore, the data produced isn't a direct measurement, but a proxy for what has happened with droughts and floods assumptions about how gravity changes.

These three glaring inconsistencies with regular climate science procedures fail to instill trust in the methods used in, or the conclusions come to, in this particular study.

Real-world data, actually measured on Earth over multiple decades, contradicts the claims made in the study and the AP/PBS story reporting on it.

For example, data on drought in the United States, presented in Climate at a Glance - Drought, show no increasing drought trend whatsoever since January 1895.

The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports,

with "high confidence" that precipitation has increased over mid-latitude land areas of the Northern Hemisphere (including the United States) during the past 70 years, while IPCC has "low confidence" about any negative trends globally.

Likewise, when it comes to flooding, The IPCC reports it has,

"low confidence" climate change is impacting flooding...

The U.N. IPCC admits having "low confidence" in even the "sign" of any changes, in other words,

it is just as likely that climate change is making floods less frequent and less severe...

The latter point highlights another grievous error made in the study hyped by PBS - the researchers involved conflated precipitation and flooding.

The IPCC report indicates climate change is not a factor in flooding.

As Roger Pielke, Jr., said in his summary and analysis of the report,

Heavy precipitation:

"the frequency and intensity of heavy precipitation have likely increased at the global scale over a majority of land regions with good observational coverage" … [yet] "heavier rainfall does not always lead to greater flooding."

To make claims about trends in flooding, one should look at trends in flooding and not precipitation.

The conflation of the two is a common error.

Also of note, what flooding has occurred, has been impact-minimized as costs of flooding have decreased over the last century, as seen in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Cost of U.S. Flood Events since 1903 through 2018.

Dotted red line indicates the trend.

While the rest of the world may not have effective mitigation measures for flooding due to lack of resources, the bottom line is that,

the IPCC has found no global climate induced trends in either droughts or flooding...

Unfortunately, the AP writer O'Malley completely ignores this in favor of the findings of a single study that contains, at a minimum, three major flaws in the way it gathered, analyzed, and reported its results.

This flawed reporting seems to be a sad trend. Just last year, an AP article linked climate change to severe flooding in South Africa.

The widely carried AP story, "Climate change a major factor in fatal South Africa floods," was typical of the media's coverage of flawed and unverified research.

Just as with the recent PBS story, a modicum of basic research proved the earlier claims false.

In, Wrong, CNN, AP, NYT, etc., Climate Change Did Not Cause South Africa's Tragic Floods, my colleague Sterling Burnett showed there was no evidence linking South African flooding to climate change.

Why do mainstream media outlets promote alarming, novel results from unverified studies, while ignoring contrary existing evidence?

It could be simple incompetence, or possibly because disasters and crises sell better than "all is well."

It could also be because they are being directly paid to write articles hawking the narrative that humans are causing a climate crisis...

The AP, received a grant of $8 million over three years, to hire twenty new "climate journalists," who, like O'Malley, seemingly ignore the truth when telling the truth fails to further their funded mission.

Coincidence...?

• source
  

[ExomatrixTV]

[ExomatrixTV]

Patrick Moore, one of the founders of Greenpeace, said that his reasons for leaving Greenpeace were very clear: “Greenpeace was ‘hijacked’ by the political left when they realized there was money and power in the environmental movement. [Left-leaning] political activists in North America and Europe changed Greenpeace from a science-based organization to a political fundraising organization,” Moore said.

Moore left Greenpeace in 1986, 15 years after he co-founded the organization.

“The ‘environmental’ movement has become more of a political movement than an environmental movement,” he said. “They are primarily focused on creating narratives, stories, that are designed to instill fear and guilt into the public so the public will send them money.”

He said they mainly operate behind closed doors with other political operatives at the U.N., World Economic Forum, and so on, all of which are primarily political in nature.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] is “not a science organization,” he said. “It is a political organization composed of the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations Environment Program.

“The IPCC hires scientists to provide them with ‘information’ that supports the overhyped ‘climate emergency’ narrative.

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

[ExomatrixTV]

• AOC Reintroduces $93 TRILLION Bill to Fight "Global Warming"
  

[ExomatrixTV]

• Climate Alarmists Are Getting This All Wrong:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=cGZ7Ktr6Juc

00:00 Intro
00:37 Greta Thunberg’s Deleted Predictions
06:14 Why Climate Change is NOT an Existential Risk
10:39 Bjorn’s Cost-Effective Ways to Improve the World
19:49 Is Bjorn’s Work Close to Effective Altruism?
24:36 The Longest Levers for a Better Future
30:00 Why Climate Change Policy is Counterproductive
37:36 Which is Worse: Cold or Heat?
43:14 The Financial Mess of the Green Movement
50:29 Are Climate Alarmists Really Helping the Polar Bears?
60:12 Bjorn’s Strategy to Engage Sceptics

[ExomatrixTV]

• They Got Rid Of 15 Minute Cities!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=5yEFsayQib4

The people of Giggleswick had enough and took back control and got rid of the dystopian future planned for them. Using allegory, I outline a way to save ourselves.

[ExomatrixTV]

• Dr Richard Lindzen Exposes Climate Change As A Politicised Power Play Motivated By Malice And Profit

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=DYWrehjaMFQ

Veteran climate expert Dr Richard Lindzen made a name for himself before the fundamentally flawed field of climate science that we know today was invented. In an interview with the pioneering atmospheric physicist and former emeritus professor of meteorology at MIT, he recounted events that occurred in the 1980s, which gave birth to the all-consuming climate change narrative that prevails today. Having begun his research on climate change in the mid-70s motivated by a sincere interest in understanding the Earth's climate regimes, Lindzen's assessment of the various elements paraded as scientific evidence of an impending climate catastrophe is remarkably sensible. What's particularly revealing from his recollection of events is how complicit the media and politicians have been in forcing the disastrous climate change narrative upon an unsuspecting and trusting public from the very beginning.

TIMESTAMPS:

00:00 Dr Richard Lindzen on his career as an atmospheric physicist and what drew him to study Earth's climate
01:21 On carbon dioxide and the greenhouse effect
05:02 On politicians, the United Nations, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the enabling of climate hysteria
07:21 On the politicisation of climate change and the significant human progress enabled by the fossil fuel industry
08:45 On the environmental destruction caused by renewable energy sources
09:46 On the cult-like climate activism movement and its demonisation of carbon dioxide
12:41 On the purported scientific consensus on climate change
14:46 On the Clinton-Gore administration's funding of climate impacts between 1989 and 1996
17:35 On Professor Guy McPherson's claim that abrupt climate change will lead to human extinction by 2026
18:22 On the motives behind the climate change/green energy movement
19:23 On his iris hypothesis on climate change proposed in 2001
21:56 On the epistemological issues relating to climate change
23:59 On climate variability vs anthropogenic climate change
27:19 On his experience with institutional bias in favour of scientists who support the official climate change narrative and the influence of institutional funding scientific research
29:50 How the situation is rigged to support the narrative and the complicity of politicians and scientists
32:10 On the climate catastrophe prediction and how this compares to reality

[ExomatrixTV]

European MEP Sounds The Alarm And Explains The Real Purpose Of "15-minute Cities":

The corona pass was introduced to get people used to QR codes. That said MEP Christine Anderson in conversation with The Epoch Times. Now we are everywhere confronted with so-called 15-minute cities. They are not there to make your life easier. It's not about having everything you need close by and it's not about saving the planet, Anderson said.

German MEP, Christine Anderson, on 15 minute cities:

"Make no mistake, it's not about your convenience, and it's not about saving the planet. It will be a complete impoverishment and enslavement of all the people."

That's the next step

The 15-minute cities are meant to lock you in, she stressed. “A climate lockdown can already be imposed in a county in Great Britain. That is the next step.” The next step is that you have to stay within a certain area and that you can only leave that area two to three times a year, the MEP continued.

All people beggars and enslaved

She also referred to the Neom metropolis in Saudi Arabia, which is also known as De Lijn. The city is literally being built on one line 170 kilometers long and can house nine million people. According to her, this is the ideal candidate for a 15-minute city. What is the purpose of the 15-minute city? To impoverish and enslave all people, Anderson warned.

• dutch 🇳🇱 (+ Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳

[ExomatrixTV]

• How to Talk Climate with Your Brainwashed Niece or Anyone Else Watching MSM 24/7:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=lG7kqltJdCM

Every Earth Day, the media run annoying stories about how the young people of the world need to get the grown-ups in their lives educated about the climate and the need to take action. The world's youth have been brainwashed into believing that human activity is leading to a climate catastrophe, and we have to radically change our ways if we're going to save the planet.

Here's a better idea: Grown-ups can impart their knowledge and wisdom in the other direction. Doing all these "little things to save the planet" is not really going to amount to much, and is not the end goal of the climate cult, anyway. They have much bigger plans in mind.

[ExomatrixTV]

• The BEST Climate Clip I've EVER seen - What do you think??:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=L1mjG_F8ppw

Wow - everything summed up in 4 minutes flat - pure hardcore science - truth in science feels so good! I am highly environmentally focused - pollution worldwide and the spoiling of our environment is a disgrace. Be clear on that. However, on the separate 'temperature and trace gas modeling' front, listen carefully to this clip. Only 4 mins long, and corroborated by myriad adjacency data. (they use isotope analysis, not just temp measurement). Watch and judge yourself. Absorb the graph shown, and think on it.

I will be interviewing experts on this over the coming months. With hard science and logic. Not the Neil Ferguson-esque modeling stuff.

• Sarcasm turned on:

"I am a climate research scientist, and my entire career and funding is dependent on ensuring that man made climate change is real. I am also a media mogul who knows that fear and doom sell newspapers and raise revenue through advertising, also my media outlets are affiliated to the government of my country who only want the people to hear what they want them to hear. I am also a government official that knows we can substantially raise taxes, create fear among the populace and thus force sanctions and laws that undermine people's freedom and guarantees that I get to sit on the board of multinational corporations for a hefty fee. I am also a globalist multinational company that relies on selling the climate change prophecy, so my stocks in carbon offsetting, wind, solar and alternative electric are continually rising. So don't listen to anyone who denies man made climate crisis as they are just tin foil hat wearers".

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

[Ernie Nemeth]

"We started to observe meteorology at the coldest spot in the last ten thousand years..."

So, it is very difficult to attribute the warming trend of the last 120 years as due to industrialization because the temperatures have never been colder and the earth is naturally in a warming trend.

[ExomatrixTV]

[ExomatrixTV]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=0uGQLsd-oQo

[TealHorizon]

I wonder if anyone else's' ears have been gently pricking up to El Nino lately? I see a lot of articles from MSM about the coming catastrophe concerning El nino which will cause some crazy drought for two years the likes of which the world has never seen, etc, etc.

of course when you look into it, it's all "experts say", and "scientists warn" with the usual poorly thought out plot graph in the article. Interestingly, I hear of it more and more through those around me. It's a shame because it will be the next artificial cause of panic, even though it has very conveniently came about not just after covid, but also when the threat of nuclear war with Russia has ran out of steam.

Just an additional laugh for those not in the UK - articles were popping up about potential record drought this year, but we've also been hitting record rainfall apparently! Work that one out. Quickly picked linked for reference:

https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/about-u...weather-review
https://www.theguardian.com/environm...-ahead-experts