+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst 1 6 8 LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 144

Thread: Ivermectin - Why is it banned? - Senator Malcolm Roberts Destroys COVID Vaccine Narrative!

  1. Link to Post #101
    Avalon Member jaybee's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Midlands England
    Posts
    2,631
    Thanks
    8,377
    Thanked 15,937 times in 2,204 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin - Why is it banned? - Senator Malcolm Roberts Destroys COVID Vaccine Narrative!

    Quote Posted by Spiral (here)
    Quote Posted by Mike Gorman (here)
    What is the consensus regarding Ivermectin as a means for preventing Vax injury from the mRNA products? I might be in the difficult position of needing to get a double shot just so I can work here in Perth, those of us who work in the IT industry have to be Vaxed so we can attend businesses and clients - aarggh! I have heard Ivermectin can prevent the spike protein from proliferating and causing clots e.tc, sounds plausible: any trench experiences?
    For Gods sake don't do it, there is no cure for that s***, any more there is for shooting yourself in the head with a .375 ....do anything you can to to avoid it.

    @Mike Gorman - you could try and hang on a bit longer - like a year or so...?

    I know the situation in Australia is pretty dire and it looks like your political leaders are collaborating with the Globalists, big time... using your country as a test for how far people will go accepting draconian measures and curbs on freedom - (as a prelude and softening up to introducing the Central Banker's Digital Currency linked to a Chinese style social credit score system using 5G and AI..that will involve injecting nano technology into people)

    I seem to remember that Western Australia was having it a bit more easy than other states at one time but looks like they have been told to toughen up and they are now coming down heavy...

    We don't know how 2022 is going to go yet and there could be big changes coming hopefully in the right (our) direction - so if you could hold on for a bit longer and delay risking the jab... you never know...???

    It's not so harsh in the UK (at the moment) and they are in the process of removing the mandates for NHS and Care Staff.... so that means that all those in the Health Sector, who succumbed to the jab against their better judgment didn't need to have had it - and if they had held on for longer they would have... 1. helped prevent the mandate and 2. not have had the risky jab...

    Of course you will have to weigh everything up yourself and make your own decision at the end of the day... sorry this is not answering your original question but wanted to chip in with the 'wait a bit longer if you can' option...

    good luck

  2. The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to jaybee For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (4th February 2022), ClearWater (4th February 2022), earthdreamer (4th February 2022), Ewan (26th February 2022), fifi (26th February 2022), Franny (27th February 2022), gord (4th February 2022), happyuk (4th February 2022), haroldsails (5th February 2022), Hermoor (10th March 2022), Mercedes (9th March 2022), Michel Leclerc (27th February 2022), Mike Gorman (8th March 2022), Sadieblue (4th February 2022), Spiral (4th February 2022), The KMan (28th February 2022), Victoria (9th March 2022)

  3. Link to Post #102
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,190
    Thanks
    47,631
    Thanked 115,973 times in 20,621 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin - Why is it banned? - Senator Malcolm Roberts Destroys COVID Vaccine Narrative!

    Mike, if you take a look at this: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1480227
    and ask yourself if it's really worth the risk, I think you will have the answer to the real, underlying question.
    There is no lack of similar evidence demonstrating that what is in those vials is monstrous, and it's not just spike proteins.
    Plenty of that evidence on Stew Peters channel here: https://rumble.com/c/StewPeters
    Last edited by onawah; 4th February 2022 at 21:53.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  4. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (16th February 2022), Ewan (26th February 2022), fifi (26th February 2022), Franny (27th February 2022), happyuk (6th February 2022), Hermoor (10th March 2022), Mercedes (9th March 2022), Mike Gorman (8th March 2022), pyrangello (26th February 2022), Sadieblue (16th February 2022), The KMan (28th February 2022), Victoria (9th March 2022)

  5. Link to Post #103
    United States Avalon Member Vangelo's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th January 2011
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    586
    Thanks
    11,075
    Thanked 4,561 times in 567 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin - Why is it banned? - Senator Malcolm Roberts Destroys COVID Vaccine Narrative!

    Attorney General O'Connor Assures Oklahoma Physicians Are Not Prohibited From Prescribing Off-Label Medicines to Fight COVID-19

    OKLAHOMA CITY - Today, Attorney General John O’Connor responded to inquiries about whether an Oklahoma licensed physician is prohibited from prescribing a drug approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the “off-label” purpose of treating or preventing COVID-19.

    The Attorney General’s office finds no legal basis for a state medical licensure board to discipline a licensed physician for exercising sound judgement and safely prescribing an FDA-approved drug – like ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine – for the off-label purpose of treating a patient with COVID-19.

    “I stand behind doctors who believe it is in their patients’ best interests to receive ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine,” said Attorney General O’Connor. “Our healthcare professionals should have every tool available to combat COVID-19. Public safety demands this. Physicians who prescribe medications and follow the law should not fear disciplinary action for prescribing such drugs.”

    The Attorney General’s office neither condones nor condemns a specific course of treatment for COVID-19. Our office maintains that proper healthcare decisions are to be made between a patient and his or her physician, and the government should not interfere with their relationship.
    Happiness comes from within, nowhere else.

  6. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Vangelo For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (12th March 2022), Bill Ryan (16th February 2022), Ewan (26th February 2022), fifi (26th February 2022), Franny (27th February 2022), Harmony (26th February 2022), Hermoor (10th March 2022), Johnnycomelately (16th February 2022), Mercedes (9th March 2022), Michel Leclerc (27th February 2022), onawah (27th February 2022), Sadieblue (16th February 2022), Sue (Ayt) (16th February 2022), The KMan (28th February 2022), ulli (16th February 2022)

  7. Link to Post #104
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,586
    Thanks
    30,551
    Thanked 124,905 times in 20,684 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin - Why is it banned? - Senator Malcolm Roberts Destroys COVID Vaccine Narrative!

    • Dr Michael Mcdowell – Explains The True Agenda Behind The Creation Of Covid-19 – A Must-listen:

    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/OKz06MpT2BuJ
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  8. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (26th February 2022), Ewan (26th February 2022), fifi (26th February 2022), Franny (27th February 2022), Harmony (26th February 2022), Hermoor (10th March 2022), lisalu (15th March 2022), Mercedes (9th March 2022), Michel Leclerc (27th February 2022), onawah (27th February 2022), Sadieblue (26th February 2022), The KMan (28th February 2022), wondering (26th February 2022)

  9. Link to Post #105
    United States Avalon Member wondering's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th January 2016
    Age
    81
    Posts
    911
    Thanks
    45,817
    Thanked 10,063 times in 902 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin - Why is it banned? - Senator Malcolm Roberts Destroys COVID Vaccine Narrative!

    The GOP led Michigan House has approved a modification to a bill that allows the use of experimental drugs for off label purpose. Ivermectin and Hydrochloroquine are specifically mentioned. specifically, Doctors would not be held liable. It goes to the Senate now. I have become enough of a cynic that I wonder if the purpose is also to remove Drs. liability for the use of vaccines, another experimental drug. If it frees up Ivermectin, that would be great, providing the Pharmacists will dispense it.

  10. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to wondering For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (26th February 2022), fifi (27th February 2022), Franny (27th February 2022), Harmony (26th February 2022), Hermoor (10th March 2022), Mercedes (9th March 2022), mountain_jim (26th February 2022), onawah (27th February 2022), pyrangello (26th February 2022), Sadieblue (26th February 2022), The KMan (28th February 2022)

  11. Link to Post #106
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,343
    Thanks
    39,271
    Thanked 33,389 times in 4,323 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin - Why is it banned? - Senator Malcolm Roberts Destroys COVID Vaccine Narrative!

    ...

    ... Does Ivermectin Cure Cancer? 12:58

    Stew Peters Show
    Published February 25, 2022
    15,807 Views

    On today’s episode of the Dr. Jane Ruby Show, Dr.Jane explores the evidence coming forward about the effects of Ivermectin on cancers of all types and how this is another reason it has been blocked by governments and corrupted elected officials.

  12. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    avid (26th February 2022), Bill Ryan (26th February 2022), fifi (27th February 2022), Franny (27th February 2022), Hermoor (10th March 2022), lisalu (15th March 2022), Mercedes (9th March 2022), mountain_jim (26th February 2022), onawah (27th February 2022), pyrangello (26th February 2022), Sadieblue (26th February 2022), The KMan (28th February 2022)

  13. Link to Post #107
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Location
    Northern Michigan
    Age
    61
    Posts
    2,246
    Thanks
    8,466
    Thanked 18,661 times in 2,080 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin - Why is it banned? - Senator Malcolm Roberts Destroys COVID Vaccine Narrative!

    Thanks Gwin ru for the link and wondering boy is that an interesting revelation on the proposed Bill going thru the legislature here in Michigan even more interesting is i sent that idea to a congressional rep here in the state 2 months ago. See our beloved governor on a broom banned hydroxichloriquin at the beginning of the covid here in the state. Since she is not from any medical background I thought to myself why would she do that? Of all the drugs in existence our governor bans this drug and why? Then she started shipping people around in nursing homes to their death. Now since the election is coming here she is handing out millions every few days to this group and that group trying to buy her way to get reelected. The schools in this state now have so much money they don't know what to do with all this cash, really.

    So I suggested propose ivermectin as readily available thru the legislature, if it passes the house and Senate that only leaves the governor to veto and with her thirst be be reelected , well now this poses a quagmire doesn't it.

    I have talked to 4 cattle ranchers in the last 6 weeks, all of them used the ivermectin on covid, the Amish use ivermectin, paste, liquid, pills , it all works, you just need to take the right dosage based on your weight and typically 2 or 3 days is all you need if you use it early. I've heard of ivermectin being applied to the bottom of your feet, rubbed on your stomach and taken orally. It seems to all have the same effect or at least the same outcome of kicking covid out of your system, one rancher told me the ivermectin kills the virus then your immune system gets rid of it after that. 4 billion human beings have used ivermectin on this planet, I was even told the illegals crossing the southern border are being given ivermectin before they are turned loose. Another story was that 200 people in Congress or their family members haved been treated with ivermectin since they are exempt from the infamous jab.

    Starting to have some serious doubts about who's jabbing who?You should be questioning why they want to ban this? It's because it's cheap and it works, and who knows about the cancer application?

  14. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to pyrangello For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (27th February 2022), fifi (27th February 2022), Franny (27th February 2022), Hermoor (10th March 2022), Mercedes (9th March 2022), onawah (27th February 2022), Sadieblue (27th February 2022), wondering (26th February 2022)

  15. Link to Post #108
    Canada Avalon Member TomKat's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2017
    Posts
    2,616
    Thanks
    2,694
    Thanked 13,328 times in 2,365 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin - Why is it banned? - Senator Malcolm Roberts Destroys COVID Vaccine Narrative!


  16. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to TomKat For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (27th February 2022), bluestflame (15th March 2022), fifi (27th February 2022), Franny (27th February 2022), Hermoor (10th March 2022), Mercedes (9th March 2022), onawah (27th February 2022), pyrangello (27th February 2022), Sadieblue (27th February 2022), The KMan (28th February 2022)

  17. Link to Post #109
    United States Avalon Member wondering's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th January 2016
    Age
    81
    Posts
    911
    Thanks
    45,817
    Thanked 10,063 times in 902 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin - Why is it banned? - Senator Malcolm Roberts Destroys COVID Vaccine Narrative!

    pyrangello, Very well done, indeed, for helping the Ivermetic issue along. Fingers crossed it goes through the Senate...🤞🤞🤞🤞

  18. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to wondering For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (27th February 2022), bluestflame (15th March 2022), fifi (27th February 2022), Franny (27th February 2022), Gwin Ru (27th February 2022), Hermoor (10th March 2022), Mercedes (9th March 2022), onawah (27th February 2022), pyrangello (27th February 2022), Sadieblue (27th February 2022), The KMan (28th February 2022)

  19. Link to Post #110
    Belgium Avalon Member
    Join Date
    6th April 2014
    Location
    France
    Language
    Dutch, French
    Age
    74
    Posts
    751
    Thanks
    10,257
    Thanked 6,085 times in 735 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin - Why is it banned? - Senator Malcolm Roberts Destroys COVID Vaccine Narrative!

    Quote Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)
    • Dr Michael Mcdowell – Explains The True Agenda Behind The Creation Of Covid-19 – A Must-listen:

    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/OKz06MpT2BuJ
    An excellent overview brought with passion John. A few points were new to me.

    Unbreakable commitment to truth, as Dr McDowell shows, needs the marriage of brain and heart, of mind and soul. Clarity and empathy.

  20. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Michel Leclerc For This Post:

    avid (8th March 2022), Bill Ryan (27th February 2022), ExomatrixTV (27th February 2022), Franny (27th February 2022), Hermoor (10th March 2022), Jambo (8th March 2022), Mercedes (9th March 2022), mountain_jim (8th March 2022), onawah (27th February 2022), pyrangello (27th February 2022), Sadieblue (27th February 2022), The KMan (28th February 2022), wondering (27th February 2022)

  21. Link to Post #111
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,586
    Thanks
    30,551
    Thanked 124,905 times in 20,684 posts

    Thumbs up Re: Ivermectin - Why is it banned? - Senator Malcolm Roberts Destroys COVID Vaccine Narrative!

    • Ivermectin, more evidence:
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 8th March 2022 at 16:54.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  22. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    avid (8th March 2022), Bill Ryan (8th March 2022), bluestflame (15th March 2022), ClearWater (8th March 2022), Hermoor (10th March 2022), Jambo (8th March 2022), Mercedes (9th March 2022), Mike Gorman (8th March 2022), mountain_jim (8th March 2022), Sadieblue (9th March 2022), Vangelo (9th March 2022), wondering (8th March 2022)

  23. Link to Post #112
    UK Avalon Member Mike Gorman's Avatar
    Join Date
    31st May 2010
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Language
    English
    Age
    65
    Posts
    1,868
    Thanks
    5,827
    Thanked 13,983 times in 1,749 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin - Why is it banned? - Senator Malcolm Roberts Destroys COVID Vaccine Narrative!

    I have since given it some serious thought, it just isn't worth the strong possibility of shortening my precious few years left even more - 64 isn't old, but I could have 10-15 good years ahead.
    Thanks for the support and advice, this can't stand much longer, the evidence is massively coming out, even with the public domain being curtained off by the MSM.

  24. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Mike Gorman For This Post:

    Alecs (10th March 2022), avid (8th March 2022), Bill Ryan (8th March 2022), ClearWater (8th March 2022), ExomatrixTV (8th March 2022), Hermoor (10th March 2022), Jambo (8th March 2022), Mercedes (9th March 2022), mountain_jim (10th March 2022), Sadieblue (9th March 2022), shaberon (8th March 2022), wondering (8th March 2022)

  25. Link to Post #113
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    1st April 2016
    Posts
    4,329
    Thanks
    16,221
    Thanked 21,166 times in 3,979 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin - Why is it banned? - Senator Malcolm Roberts Destroys COVID Vaccine Narrative!

    I am not sure what kind of poison control you might need if you did overdose on the stuff, but, that would usually be hard to do unless you are very sloppy.


    On an industrial scale, is it not just a replacement for wormwood?

    Wasn't a certain wormwood studied in China against 2012 SARS and found to be the second-most effective treatment?

    Either one of those, Ivermectin or wormwood, is already recommendable for general maintenance purposes. So much free health advice based in cheap and abundant sources would surely drive the medical industry bankrupt. Stroke of genius!

    I personally have boycotted them for almost thirty years, and, the less I hear about them, the better I feel. Compared to what was "supposed to happen", I suppose I have inflicted massive, intractable damage on a number of industries, but, they keep popping up and interfering with things like Ivermectin that I actually buy.

  26. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to shaberon For This Post:

    Alecs (10th March 2022), Bill Ryan (8th March 2022), ClearWater (8th March 2022), ExomatrixTV (9th March 2022), Hermoor (10th March 2022), Jambo (8th March 2022), Mercedes (9th March 2022), Sadieblue (9th March 2022), wondering (10th March 2022)

  27. Link to Post #114
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,190
    Thanks
    47,631
    Thanked 115,973 times in 20,621 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin - Why is it banned? - Senator Malcolm Roberts Destroys COVID Vaccine Narrative!

    Who Changed the Scientific Conclusions of a Paper that Could Have Saved Millions?
    FLCCC Alliance
    Mar 8 2022
    https://flccc.substack.com/p/who-cha...yfBkNTvnewjL4I

    "At Last, We May Have a Name.
    This is a scandal of immense proportions that warrants an immediate investigation.
    If what you are about to learn was playing out onscreen, the collective gasp of the audience at the moment of reveal would register at deafening decibels.

    First, let’s set the stage:

    — Over one year ago, there were ample peer-reviewed, randomized controlled trials that provided strong evidence on ivermectin’s efficacy as a treatment for COVID in every disease phase.

    — A paper considering these many studies was written by lead author Dr. Andrew Hill at the University of Liverpool for the World Health Organization’s COVID Guideline Development Group. Hill was an early and vigorous proponent for ivermectin. His paper showed that ivermectin could reduce deaths by 75% if used throughout the world.

    — Inexplicably, just days before its publication, the paper appeared on a pre-print server, with its conclusions changed. Instead of concluding that ivermectin—one of the world’s safest and most inexpensive drugs— should be rolled out globally, it now concluded that more studies on ivermectin were needed before it could be recommended worldwide. Given the totality of scientific evidence for ivermectin, it was a stunning—actually shocking—reversal by Dr. Hill.



    —In an urgent Zoom call to Dr. Hill initiated by Dr. Tess Lawrie, Director of the Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy, Dr. Hill admitted to her that one of his study’s sponsors, Unitaid, had a say in the conclusions of his paper. But he would not divulge the name(s) of those who altered the paper’s conclusions.

    But now, “The Digger” on Substack (aka producer/director Phil Harper) has revealed the name of the person who could have edited the paper’s conclusions—which led to the WHO’s non-recommendation of the use of ivermectin. That decision could have led to the unnecessary deaths of millions across the world.

    GASP.
    Mr. Harper studied the PDF of the paper, wanting to learn the identity of its “ghost” author. “The hope was that some artifact on the PDF would reveal something, maybe a font was different, maybe there was a hidden comment, maybe some tracked changes had been saved to the document,” said Harper. “None of those lines of inquiry came to anything.”

    Then it came to him. Was it in the PDF’s metadata? “Sometimes it's the most obvious of things,” Harper writes. “The ‘v1_stamped’ version of the paper did indeed have metadata. It even had author information inside the metadata. Expecting to see Andrew Hill listed as the author, instead, I saw a name I recognized. Andrew Owen.

    “Unless someone used his computer, Andrew Owen has his digital fingerprint on the Andrew Hill paper.”


    Professor Andrew Owen is the person who allegedly edited the critical Andrew Hill paper on Ivermectin. He was also in receipt of consultancy fees from pharmaceutical companies with competing products.

    As it turns out, Andrew Owen is a Professor of Pharmacology & Therapeutics and co-Director of the Centre of Excellence in Long-acting Therapeutics (CELT) at the University of Liverpool. He is also scientific advisor to the WHO’s COVID-19 Guideline Development Group. Just days before Dr. Hill’s paper was to be published, a $40M grant from Unitaid, the paper’s sponsor, was given to CELT —of which Owen is the project lead. “The $40 million contract was actually a commercial agreement between Unitaid, the University of Liverpool and Tandem Nano Ltd (a start-up company that commercializes ‘Solid Lipid Nanoparticle’ delivery mechanisms)— for which Andrew Owen is a top shareholder,” says Harper.



    Furthermore, Harper writes that, “Andrew Owen is prolific in the art of receiving money from pharmaceutical companies. He’s received research funding from ViiV Healthcare, Merck, Janssen, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Abbott Laboratories, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Tibotec, Roche Pharmaceuticals and Bristol-Myers Squibb.”


    Read the entire essay HERE. https://philharper.substack.com/p/pr...m_medium=webIn it, Harper reveals much, much more. This is just the latest in a series of postings on ‘The Digger’ exposing the machinations and the backdoor wheeling and dealing to prevent ivermectin from saving lives so that other, more profitable (and scientifically proven more dangerous) designer drugs could take center stage and make bank."

    Phil Harper will be the featured guest on this week’s FLCCC Weekly Webinar—Wednesday, March 9 at 7PM ET. Register HERE. https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_...Rk6NeDPZOpzKyQ

    Subscribe to The FLCCC Alliance Community: https://covid19criticalcare.com/abou...e-for-updates/
    By FLCCC Alliance · Launched 9 months ago
    https://flccc.substack.com/
    The FLCCC is dedicated to developing highly effective treatment protocols to prevent the transmission of COVID-19 and to improve the outcomes for patients with the disease.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  28. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Alecs (10th March 2022), Ba-ba-Ra (10th March 2022), Bill Ryan (12th March 2022), bluestflame (15th March 2022), ClearWater (10th March 2022), ExomatrixTV (12th March 2022), Hermoor (10th March 2022), Johnnycomelately (12th March 2022), mountain_jim (10th March 2022), pyrangello (11th March 2022), Sadieblue (11th March 2022), shaberon (11th March 2022), wondering (10th March 2022)

  29. Link to Post #115
    United States Avalon Member Vangelo's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th January 2011
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    586
    Thanks
    11,075
    Thanked 4,561 times in 567 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin - Why is it banned? - Senator Malcolm Roberts Destroys COVID Vaccine Narrative!

    Dr. Tess Lawrie confronts Liverpool researcher who published lie about ivermectin

    The link above is from naturalnews.com.

    The short version is that Lawrie did a meta-analysis of all the ivermectin studies which conclusively showed a 70-80% protection from death. Dr. Andrew Hill either participated in the work she did or he did his own meta-analysis that concluded the same thing. She asked him to co-publish. Instead, he published his results independently and then stated in his conclusion that further study is required which effectively destroyed the positive results.

    Here is the link to the video of Dr. Tess Lawrie confronting Hill... I found the video powerful and worth my time. Dr. John Campbell's site has 2 very good interviews with her if you are interested in more details.

    https://www.brighteon.com/2df07bc2-c...5-5fa00df581b5

    Source: https://www.brighteon.com/embed/2df07bc2-ca46-4159-8975-5fa00df581b5
    Last edited by Bill Ryan; 12th March 2022 at 01:04. Reason: embedded the video
    Happiness comes from within, nowhere else.

  30. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Vangelo For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (12th March 2022), ClearWater (11th March 2022), ExomatrixTV (12th March 2022), Hermoor (12th March 2022), Johnnycomelately (12th March 2022), onawah (13th March 2022), Sadieblue (15th March 2022), The KMan (16th March 2022)

  31. Link to Post #116
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,586
    Thanks
    30,551
    Thanked 124,905 times in 20,684 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin - Why is it banned? - Senator Malcolm Roberts Destroys COVID Vaccine Narrative!

    • Study: Ivermectin VINDICATED?!? – Media Silent!:
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  32. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (12th March 2022), bluestflame (15th March 2022), Hermoor (12th March 2022), Johnnycomelately (12th March 2022), onawah (13th March 2022), Sadieblue (15th March 2022), Vangelo (12th March 2022)

  33. Link to Post #117
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,586
    Thanks
    30,551
    Thanked 124,905 times in 20,684 posts

    Thumbs up Re: Ivermectin - Why is it banned? - Senator Malcolm Roberts Destroys COVID Vaccine Narrative!

    Quote Posted by Vangelo (here)
    ...
    • Ivermectin Evidence with Dr Tess Lawrie:

    707,028+ views in 1 year and 5 days.
    • Dr. Tess Lawrie: The Conscience of Medicine

    Dr. Tess Lawrie

    History is highlighted by turning points, moments of brilliance in the journey of humanity, episodes that changed civilization. These junctures often took place at times of great tragedy, during wars, famines, plagues, and revolution. Because at precisely those times, when the worst of human depravity became evident, we also witnessed the emergence of some of our greatest humanitarians, those who withstood opposition with grace and wisdom.

    As steel is forged in a blast furnace, the best in humanity can only arise out of its cruelest chapters. Oskar Schindler, a Nazi, gave away all his wealth to safeguard vulnerable Jewish people out of harm’s way, away from the gas chambers. Oskar devoted his life at significant personal risk to saving others less fortunate; this is perhaps the fundamental principle of humanity.

    Mohandas Gandhi raised a family as a successful lawyer in South Africa yet chose to return to India to stop genocide. He traded a life of comfort for one of fasting, nonviolent protests, and personal risk. An assassin's bullet took his life in 1948, but not before he had spent 78 years on the planet and changed it forever. He is revered by many as the Father of India. His nonviolent protests to further social change inspired others to do the same, like Martin Luther King Jr, Robert Kennedy, and Nelson Mandela.

    Nelson Mandela paid his price of tribulation with 27 years in a prison cell, one without a bed or plumbing. He spent his days breaking rocks and his free time writing. His manuscripts were scrutinized, restricted, censored, or destroyed. Nonetheless, he smuggled out a 500-page autobiography in 1976 and led a protest movement for prison rights.

    This expanded into the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa. Out of Mandela's great suffering arose the principle of racial equality for South Africa, where he would ultimately be elected its first president. He remains affectionately known today as Madiba and is widely regarded as the Father of the Nation. He won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1993 for his nonviolent protests that proved victorious in ending the apartheid regime.

    Dr. Tess Lawrie is a world-class researcher and consultant to the World Health Organization. Her biggest clients happen to be those who are involved in the suppression of repurposed drugs. She has decided to speak out in protest against the current medical establishment at considerable personal risk.

    She co-founded the BIRD panel, an international group of experts dedicated to the transparent and accurate scientific research of Ivermectin.

    On April 24, 2021, she convened the International Ivermectin for COVID Conference, the first such symposium in the world held to focus on Ivermectin to prevent and treat COVID-19.
    • During this conference, she delivered a monumental closing address, one that will be recorded in the annals of medical history:
    Quote "They (W.H.O.) design the trials and control the data also control the outcome. So, this system of industry-led trials needs to be put to an end. Data from ongoing and future trials of novel COVID treatments must be independently controlled and analyzed. Anything less than total transparency cannot be trusted."
    Dr. Lawrie called for reform of the method used to analyze scientific evidence.
    She reported, "The story of Ivermectin has highlighted that we are at a remarkable juncture in medical history. The tools that we use to heal and our connection with our patients are being systematically undermined by relentless disinformation stemming from corporate greed. The story of Ivermectin shows that we as a public have misplaced our trust in the authorities and have underestimated the extent to which money and power corrupts.

    Had Ivermectin being employed in 2020 when medical colleagues around the world first alerted the authorities to its efficacy, millions of lives could have been saved, and the pandemic with all its associated suffering and loss brought to a rapid and timely end."
    Dr. Lawrie called out the corruption of modern medicine by Big Pharma and other interests.

    She went on, "Since then, hundreds of millions of people have been involved in the largest medical experiment in human history. Mass vaccination was an unproven novel therapy. Hundreds of billions will be made by Big Pharma and paid for by the public. With politicians and other nonmedical individuals dictating to us what we are allowed to prescribe to the ill, we as doctors, have been put in a position such that our ability to uphold the Hippocratic oath is under attack.

    At this fateful juncture, we must therefore choose, will we continue to be held ransom by corrupt organizations, health authorities, Big Pharma, and billionaire sociopaths, or will we do our moral and professional duty to do no harm and always do the best for those in our care? The latter includes urgently reaching out to colleagues around the world to discuss which of our tried and tested safe older medicines can be used against COVID."

    Finally, Dr. Lawrie suggested that physicians form a new World Health Organization that represents the interests of the people, not corporations and billionaires, a people-centered organization.

    "Never before has our role as doctors been so important because never before have we become complicit in causing so much harm."

    Dr. Albert Schweitzer would be proud. A Nobel laureate from 1952, Dr. Schweitzer won the Nobel Prize not for his work as a renowned medical missionary physician, but "for his altruism, reverence for life, and tireless humanitarian work which has helped make the idea of brotherhood between men and nations a living one."

    While Mandela and King fought for equality in human rights, Dr. Schweitzer is most remembered for his principle of the ethic of "reverence for life."

    Schweitzer wrote, "Ethics is nothing other than reverence for life. Reverence for life affords me my fundamental principle of morality, namely, that good consists of maintaining, assisting, and enhancing life, and to destroy, harm or hinder life is evil."
    Dr. Tess Lawrie knows that scientifically, Ivermectin saves lives. But moreover, she knows beyond any doubt that corruption has prevented Ivermectin from saving millions, caused untold suffering and horror, and a human economic toll of unimaginable proportions.

    Out of this Pandemic have risen the true healers, those physicians who will be forever revered for risking their careers to save lives. When they could have remained silent and allowed the pandemic to take its course without rocking the boat, they chose to act.
    Dr. George Fareed, Dr. Harvey Risch, and Dr. Peter McCullough traveled to the US Capitol and addressed the US Senate on November 19, 2020 and pleaded for the FDA and NIH to institute early outpatient treatment. They warned of the surge in deaths that would come. No answer. However, now during the current deadly second surge in India, on April 22, the Indian Council of Medical Research has just adopted Ivermectin and Budesonide for early outpatient therapy.

    So why couldn’t the US have done the same and heed the advice of Fareed and others, and with the stroke of a pen in November accord Ivermectin Emergency Use Authorization? Fully 300,000 lives could have been saved.

    These physicians are the pandemic humanitarians; to Dr. George Fareed, who stood up to Dr. Anthony Fauci; to Dr. Brian Tyson, who borrowed $250,000 in a personal loan to save the Imperial Valley; and to Dr. Harvey Risch, who risked his professorship at Yale to speak out; to Dr. Peter McCullough of Texas, who authored the first study on early outpatient treatment; to Dr. Pierre Kory, who put his career on the line, to Dr. Tess Lawrie, physician, humanitarian, and reformer, who is leading the path to victory over the pandemic, a beacon of hope for human rights and the conscience of medicine.

    Signed,
    Justus R. Hope, MD
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 12th March 2022 at 14:39.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  34. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (16th March 2022), bluestflame (15th March 2022), ClearWater (15th March 2022), mountain_jim (14th March 2022), onawah (13th March 2022), Sadieblue (15th March 2022), Vangelo (12th March 2022)

  35. Link to Post #118
    United States Avalon Member Vangelo's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th January 2011
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    586
    Thanks
    11,075
    Thanked 4,561 times in 567 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin - Why is it banned? - Senator Malcolm Roberts Destroys COVID Vaccine Narrative!

    Quote Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)
    Quote Posted by Vangelo (here)
    ...
    • Ivermectin Evidence with Dr Tess Lawrie:

    707,028+ views in 1 year and 5 days.
    • Dr. Tess Lawrie: The Conscience of Medicine

    Dr. Tess Lawrie

    History is highlighted by turning points, moments of brilliance in the journey of humanity, episodes that changed civilization. These junctures often took place at times of great tragedy, during wars, famines, plagues, and revolution. Because at precisely those times, when the worst of human depravity became evident, we also witnessed the emergence of some of our greatest humanitarians, those who withstood opposition with grace and wisdom.

    As steel is forged in a blast furnace, the best in humanity can only arise out of its cruelest chapters. Oskar Schindler, a Nazi, gave away all his wealth to safeguard vulnerable Jewish people out of harm’s way, away from the gas chambers. Oskar devoted his life at significant personal risk to saving others less fortunate; this is perhaps the fundamental principle of humanity.

    Mohandas Gandhi raised a family as a successful lawyer in South Africa yet chose to return to India to stop genocide. He traded a life of comfort for one of fasting, nonviolent protests, and personal risk. An assassin's bullet took his life in 1948, but not before he had spent 78 years on the planet and changed it forever. He is revered by many as the Father of India. His nonviolent protests to further social change inspired others to do the same, like Martin Luther King Jr, Robert Kennedy, and Nelson Mandela.

    Nelson Mandela paid his price of tribulation with 27 years in a prison cell, one without a bed or plumbing. He spent his days breaking rocks and his free time writing. His manuscripts were scrutinized, restricted, censored, or destroyed. Nonetheless, he smuggled out a 500-page autobiography in 1976 and led a protest movement for prison rights.

    This expanded into the anti-apartheid movement in South Africa. Out of Mandela's great suffering arose the principle of racial equality for South Africa, where he would ultimately be elected its first president. He remains affectionately known today as Madiba and is widely regarded as the Father of the Nation. He won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1993 for his nonviolent protests that proved victorious in ending the apartheid regime.

    Dr. Tess Lawrie is a world-class researcher and consultant to the World Health Organization. Her biggest clients happen to be those who are involved in the suppression of repurposed drugs. She has decided to speak out in protest against the current medical establishment at considerable personal risk.

    She co-founded the BIRD panel, an international group of experts dedicated to the transparent and accurate scientific research of Ivermectin.

    On April 24, 2021, she convened the International Ivermectin for COVID Conference, the first such symposium in the world held to focus on Ivermectin to prevent and treat COVID-19.
    • During this conference, she delivered a monumental closing address, one that will be recorded in the annals of medical history:
    Quote "They (W.H.O.) design the trials and control the data also control the outcome. So, this system of industry-led trials needs to be put to an end. Data from ongoing and future trials of novel COVID treatments must be independently controlled and analyzed. Anything less than total transparency cannot be trusted."
    Dr. Lawrie called for reform of the method used to analyze scientific evidence.
    She reported, "The story of Ivermectin has highlighted that we are at a remarkable juncture in medical history. The tools that we use to heal and our connection with our patients are being systematically undermined by relentless disinformation stemming from corporate greed. The story of Ivermectin shows that we as a public have misplaced our trust in the authorities and have underestimated the extent to which money and power corrupts.

    Had Ivermectin being employed in 2020 when medical colleagues around the world first alerted the authorities to its efficacy, millions of lives could have been saved, and the pandemic with all its associated suffering and loss brought to a rapid and timely end."
    Dr. Lawrie called out the corruption of modern medicine by Big Pharma and other interests.

    She went on, "Since then, hundreds of millions of people have been involved in the largest medical experiment in human history. Mass vaccination was an unproven novel therapy. Hundreds of billions will be made by Big Pharma and paid for by the public. With politicians and other nonmedical individuals dictating to us what we are allowed to prescribe to the ill, we as doctors, have been put in a position such that our ability to uphold the Hippocratic oath is under attack.

    At this fateful juncture, we must therefore choose, will we continue to be held ransom by corrupt organizations, health authorities, Big Pharma, and billionaire sociopaths, or will we do our moral and professional duty to do no harm and always do the best for those in our care? The latter includes urgently reaching out to colleagues around the world to discuss which of our tried and tested safe older medicines can be used against COVID."

    Finally, Dr. Lawrie suggested that physicians form a new World Health Organization that represents the interests of the people, not corporations and billionaires, a people-centered organization.

    "Never before has our role as doctors been so important because never before have we become complicit in causing so much harm."

    Dr. Albert Schweitzer would be proud. A Nobel laureate from 1952, Dr. Schweitzer won the Nobel Prize not for his work as a renowned medical missionary physician, but "for his altruism, reverence for life, and tireless humanitarian work which has helped make the idea of brotherhood between men and nations a living one."

    While Mandela and King fought for equality in human rights, Dr. Schweitzer is most remembered for his principle of the ethic of "reverence for life."

    Schweitzer wrote, "Ethics is nothing other than reverence for life. Reverence for life affords me my fundamental principle of morality, namely, that good consists of maintaining, assisting, and enhancing life, and to destroy, harm or hinder life is evil."
    Dr. Tess Lawrie knows that scientifically, Ivermectin saves lives. But moreover, she knows beyond any doubt that corruption has prevented Ivermectin from saving millions, caused untold suffering and horror, and a human economic toll of unimaginable proportions.

    Out of this Pandemic have risen the true healers, those physicians who will be forever revered for risking their careers to save lives. When they could have remained silent and allowed the pandemic to take its course without rocking the boat, they chose to act.
    Dr. George Fareed, Dr. Harvey Risch, and Dr. Peter McCullough traveled to the US Capitol and addressed the US Senate on November 19, 2020 and pleaded for the FDA and NIH to institute early outpatient treatment. They warned of the surge in deaths that would come. No answer. However, now during the current deadly second surge in India, on April 22, the Indian Council of Medical Research has just adopted Ivermectin and Budesonide for early outpatient therapy.

    So why couldn’t the US have done the same and heed the advice of Fareed and others, and with the stroke of a pen in November accord Ivermectin Emergency Use Authorization? Fully 300,000 lives could have been saved.

    These physicians are the pandemic humanitarians; to Dr. George Fareed, who stood up to Dr. Anthony Fauci; to Dr. Brian Tyson, who borrowed $250,000 in a personal loan to save the Imperial Valley; and to Dr. Harvey Risch, who risked his professorship at Yale to speak out; to Dr. Peter McCullough of Texas, who authored the first study on early outpatient treatment; to Dr. Pierre Kory, who put his career on the line, to Dr. Tess Lawrie, physician, humanitarian, and reformer, who is leading the path to victory over the pandemic, a beacon of hope for human rights and the conscience of medicine.

    Signed,
    Justus R. Hope, MD
    Dr. Tess Lawrie is indeed an extraordinary woman of intellect, courage and grace. We are blessed to have people like her, Dr. Kory, Dr. Marik and the others listed above standing tall.

    On a somewhat tangential note, I have become more optimistic that the truth will come out and people like Dr. Hill & Fauci will atone for their crimes. This is because I believe more and more people are awakening. Dr. Campbell is my evidence of someone who was deeply entrenched in the status quo. I have watched 95% of Dr. Campbell videos from the start of this mess. My observation of his life paradigm was that the 'authorities' and 'experts' know best and we should blindly accept their decisions. As time passed, and he reviewed all the scientific literature which he presented to us through his podcasts, he slowly awakened and transformed. His 'British Politeness' and his wording changed week by week. He keeps what he says within the YoutTube Terms of Service but I am certain, he has undergone the painful awakening of realizing that his life-long blind faith in the authorities and experts has been misguided. For me, seeing someone like him awaken, is an optimistic sign.
    Happiness comes from within, nowhere else.

  36. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Vangelo For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (16th March 2022), bluestflame (15th March 2022), ExomatrixTV (12th March 2022), mountain_jim (14th March 2022), onawah (13th March 2022), Sadieblue (15th March 2022)

  37. Link to Post #119
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,586
    Thanks
    30,551
    Thanked 124,905 times in 20,684 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin - Why is it banned? - Senator Malcolm Roberts Destroys COVID Vaccine Narrative!

    Quote Posted by Vangelo (here)
    .....
    • True or False?: Almost all government & corporate "experts" are payed to (willfully?) act stupid, not to outsmart nor to expose their own corrupted system.
    cheers,
    John Kuhles aka "ExomatrixTV"
    March 12th, 2022 🦜🦋🌳
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 12th March 2022 at 23:03.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  38. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (16th March 2022), bluestflame (15th March 2022), Sadieblue (15th March 2022), Vangelo (12th March 2022)

  39. Link to Post #120
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    8,713
    Thanks
    59,185
    Thanked 77,220 times in 8,550 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin - Why is it banned? - Senator Malcolm Roberts Destroys COVID Vaccine Narrative!

    https://www.theepochtimes.com/new-st...rur4fY3A%3D%3D

    Quote


    New Study Confirms Ivermectin Outperforms Other Options
    BY Joseph Mercola TIMEMarch 8, 2022

    Tested on the Omicron variant, ivermectin outperformed 10 medications, including one approved for emergency use. Early treatment can lower hospitalization, mortality and symptoms of long COVID.

    At nearly no other time in history has there been this level of fear generated across the world as experienced thus far in 2020 and 2021. The depth and breadth of the strategies used to stoke those fears has been overwhelming.

    Emergency use authorizations for drugs that have not proven to be effective in trials, public mask mandates for which there is no scientific evidence and the suppression and censorship of health information has boosted public fear over a viral illness with a survival rate of over 99%.

    Unfortunately, many of the early effective treatment strategies that can be used at home have also fallen victim to censorship. Ivermectin is one of those strategies. In a computational analysis of the Omicron variant against several therapeutic agents, data show that ivermectin had the best results.

    Yet, as you look objectively at what’s been happening across the world, the fear being generated is not one-sided. The suppression of information by corporations, government agencies and the pharmaceutical industry is one indication of their concern and how far they’re willing to go to ensure the level of fear remains high enough to manipulate behavior.

    Consider the statistics from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In 2019, 4.6% of the U.S. population was diagnosed with heart disease. The population at the end of 2019 was 328,239,523. This means there were 15,099,018 people with heart disease in the U.S. in 2019. There were 696,962 people who died that year from heart disease, which is a death rate of 4.6%.

    This is 20 times greater than the death rate from COVID-19. Yet these same agencies were not lobbying for mandates against soda or sugar-laden foods; they weren’t banning smoking and they weren’t mandating exercise — all heart disease risk factors.

    The censorship and suppression of information has hobbled early treatment of COVID-19 in many western nations. Through 2020, public health experts and the mainstream media warned against the use of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. Both are on the World Health Organization’s list of essential drugs, but the benefits have been ignored by public health officials and buried by the media.

    Newest Ivermectin Study Showed Best Results Against COVID

    This study on Cornell University’s preprint website has not yet been peer-reviewed. Researchers used a computational analysis to look at the Omicron variant, which has demonstrated a lower clinical presentation and lower hospital admission rates.

    After having retrieved the complete genome sequence and collecting 30 variants from the database, the researchers analyzed 10 drugs against the virus, including:
    • Nirmatrelvir
    • Ritonvir
    • Ivermectin
    • Lopinavir
    • Boceprevir
    • MPro 13b
    • MPro N3
    • GC-373
    • GC376
    • PF-00835231

    The researchers found that each of the drugs had some degree of effectiveness against the virus and most were currently in clinical trials. They used molecular docking to find that the mutations in the Omicron variant didn’t significantly affect the interaction between the drugs and the main protease.

    An analysis of all 10 drugs found that ivermectin was the most effective drug candidate against the Omicron variant. The testing included Nirmatrelvir (Paxlovid), which is the new protease inhibitor for which the FDA provided an emergency use authorization against COVID in December 2021.

    In other words, Pfizer released a new drug which cost the U.S. taxpayers $5.29 billion or $529 per course of treatment and which received an EUA despite the availability of a similar drug that has proven to be more effective and is cheaper, priced between $48 and $95 for 20 pills depending on your location.

    How Ivermectin Works

    Ivermectin is best known for its antiparasitic properties. Yet, the drug also has antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties. Studies have shown that ivermectin helps to lower the viral load by inhibiting replication. A single dose of ivermectin can kill 99.8% of the virus within 48 hours.

    A meta-analysis in the American Journal of Therapeutics showed the drug reduced infection by an average of 86% when used preventively. An observational study in Bangladesh evaluated the effectiveness of ivermectin as a prophylaxis for COVID-19 in health care workers.

    The data showed four of the 58 volunteers who took 12 mg of ivermectin once a month for four months developed mild COVID symptoms as compared to 44 of the 60 health care workers who declined the medication.

    Ivermectin has also been shown to speed recovery, in part by inhibiting inflammation and protecting against organ damage.27 This pathway also lowers the risk of hospitalization and death. Meta analyses have shown an average reduction in mortality that ranges from 75%28 to 83%.29 30

    Additionally, the drug also prevents transmission of SARS-CoV-2 when taken before or after exposure.31 Added together, these benefits make it clear that ivermectin could all but eliminate this pandemic.

    Early Intervention Lowers Long COVID and Hospitalization

    Some people who have had COVID-19 seem to be unable to fully recover and complain of lingering symptoms of chronic fatigue. Others struggle with mental health problems. One study, in November 2020, found 18.1% of people who had COVID-19 received their first psychiatric diagnosis in the 14 to 90 days after recovery. Most commonly diagnosed conditions were anxiety disorders, insomnia and dementia.

    These symptoms have come to be called long COVID, long-haul COVID, post-COVID syndrome, chronic COVID or long-haul syndrome. They all refer to symptoms that persist for four more weeks after an initial COVID-19 infection. According to Dr. Peter McCullough, board-certified internist and cardiologist, 50% of those who have been sick enough to be hospitalized will have symptoms of long COVID:

    “So, the sicker someone is, and the longer the duration of COVID, the more likely they are to have long COVID syndrome. That’s the reason why we like early treatment. We shorten the duration of symptoms and there’s less of a chance for long COVID syndrome.”

    Some of the common symptoms of long COVID include shortness of breath, joint pain, memory, concentration or sleeping problems, muscle pain or headache and loss of smell or taste. According to McCullough, a paper presented by Dr. Bruce Patterson at the International COVID Summit in Rome, September 11 to 14, 2021:

    “… showed that in individuals who’ve had significant COVID illness, 15 months later the s1 segment of the spike protein is recoverable from human monocytes. That means the body literally has been sprayed with the virus and it spends 15 months, in a sense, trying to clean out the spike protein from our tissues. No wonder people have long COVID syndrome.”

    It should come as no surprise that studies have also confirmed that early intervention improves mortality and reduces hospitalizations. Perhaps one of the greatest crimes in this whole pandemic is the refusal by reigning health authorities to issue early treatment guidance.

    Instead, they’ve done everything possible to suppress remedies shown to work. Patients were simply told to stay home and do nothing. Once the infection had worsened to the point of near-death, patients were told to go to the hospital, where most were routinely placed on mechanical ventilation — a practice that was quickly discovered to be lethal.

    However, as the featured study and others have demonstrated, ivermectin is one of the successful treatment protocols that can be used against SARS-CoV-2.

    Africa Has Lowest Case and Death Rate, Likely From Ivermectin

    Across the world, countries have taken different approaches to address the spread of the virus. The steps taken in Africa varied depending on the country, yet the infection and death rates were relatively stable and low across the continent.

    In the last year there have been reports of small areas in the world where the number of infections, deaths or case-fatality rates have been significantly lower than the rest of the world. For example, India’s Uttar Pradesh State reported a recovery rate of 98.6% and no further infections.

    However, the entire continent of Africa appears to have sidestepped the massive number of infections and deaths predicted for these poorly funded countries with overcrowded cities. Early estimations were that millions would die, but that scenario has not materialized. The World Health Organization has called Africa “one of the least affected regions in the world.”

    There are several factors that may influence the infection rate in Africa. A study from Japan demonstrates that after just 12 days that doctors were allowed to legally prescribe Ivermectin to their patients, the cases dropped dramatically.

    The chairman of the Tokyo Medical Associatio had noticed the low number of infections and deaths in Africa, where many use ivermectin prophylactically and as the core strategy to treat onchocerciasis, a parasitic disease also known as river blindness. More than 99% of people infected with river blindness live in 31 African countries.

    In addition to ivermectin use in Africa, other medications are also commonly available, such as hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine, which have long been used in the treatment and prevention of malaria, also endemic in Africa. In America, Dr. Vladimir Zelenko has published successful results using hydroxychloroquine and zinc against COVID-19.

    Finally, Artemisia annua, also known as sweet wormwood, is an herb used in combination therapies to treat malaria. It was used in traditional Chinese medicine for more than 2,000 years to treat fever. Today artemisinin, a metabolite of Artemisia, is the current therapeutic option for malaria. The plant has also been studied since the 2003 SARS outbreak for the treatment of coronaviruses, with good results.

    In other words, whether by design or default, the medications that have proven to be successful against the virus are commonly used in Africa for other health conditions. While Pfizer tests the short- and long-term effects of a genetic experiment on Israel’s population, it appears one continent has demonstrated administration of a 30-year-old, inexpensive drug with a known safety profile could reduce the cases, severity and mortality from this infection.

    The question that must be asked and answered to get to the bottom of this pandemic is what is blinding mainstream media, government agencies, public health experts, medical associations, doctors, nurses, and your next-door neighbor from recognizing and speaking out in support of science?


    References

    < at link >
    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  40. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (16th March 2022), bluestflame (15th March 2022), ClearWater (15th March 2022), ExomatrixTV (15th March 2022), Sadieblue (15th March 2022), shaberon (16th March 2022), Vangelo (15th March 2022)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst 1 6 8 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts