+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 1 4 5 LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 85

Thread: FDA seems to approve Pfizer Covid shot (but perhaps it hasn't)

  1. Link to Post #61
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    34,268
    Thanks
    208,997
    Thanked 457,535 times in 32,788 posts

    Default Re: FDA seems to approve Pfizer Covid shot (but perhaps it hasn't)

    Chris Martenson had this video deleted from YouTube last night US time — the first time on his channel. Here it is on Odyssey:

    Vaccine Mandates Are Here

    https://odysee.com/@Chris_Martenson:...dates-are-here

    Also here as an MP3:

    https://cm-us-standard.s3.amazonaws....IO+PODCAST.mp3

    At the start of the video, Chris Martenson clarifies what the FDA did and didn't say, accompanied by this useful image:



    Links:
    (looking at these, one can see how strongly Chris Martenson feels about all this. He'd not have been able to attach those to a YouTube video.)
    Last edited by Bill Ryan; 25th August 2021 at 19:05.

  2. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    Catseye (25th August 2021), DeDukshyn (29th August 2021), gord (25th August 2021), Gwin Ru (25th August 2021), Harmony (26th August 2021), leavesoftrees (26th August 2021), Metaphor (25th August 2021), mojo (25th August 2021), mountain_jim (25th August 2021), Pam (28th August 2021), Victoria (25th August 2021), Yoda (26th August 2021)

  3. Link to Post #62
    Morocco Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    23rd January 2011
    Location
    Ignoring Your Outrage
    Language
    Discordian
    Posts
    4,888
    Thanks
    29,096
    Thanked 40,082 times in 4,764 posts

    Default Re: FDA seems to approve Pfizer Covid shot (but perhaps it hasn't)

    Quote Posted by mojo (here)
    Something else that slipped by most people but imo extremely important, was what Dr Jane Ruby said in one of the videos posted here...

    50 percent of all the people that have taken the Covid shot may have received a PLACEBO.

    The Gov is keeping track of those people that got the placebo but individuals do not know if they received the actual Covid shot or the placebo. The Government is not telling the people anything but this would explain why people that thought they got the real Covid shot still ended up getting COVID virus. This is insane... Why hasn't the Gov told people that the reason they got Covid is because they first got a placebo.
    We need to vet Dr. Jane Ruby. Something seems off about her. I think she might be in it for the money and attention.

  4. Link to Post #63
    United States Avalon Member mojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th February 2011
    Posts
    5,996
    Thanks
    33,960
    Thanked 39,425 times in 5,645 posts

    Default Re: FDA seems to approve Pfizer Covid shot (but perhaps it hasn't)

    Bill that was an amazing revelation in the above video about the gaslighting on approval by FDA. How can Biden Admin say that it was approved when it was not? This is shocking and so many people have not heard about this. Now they are using approval as a way to get companies, the military etc. to push vax.

    edit: Bill can we change the title of this thread to FDA does not approve Covid shot
    edit: Thank you for an even better precise title.
    edit: Sometimes the cover-up is worse than the crime... Question to ponder. Why hasn't the FDA come out with a clarification yet? It's disgraceful not to alert the public when even the doctors believe it was approved.

    I see that Bill updated his post above and this was the Brighteon video link.
    https://www.brighteon.com/30271ddf-2...1-012c775ed8cb
    Last edited by mojo; 25th August 2021 at 19:15.

  5. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to mojo For This Post:

    Alan (26th August 2021), avid (25th August 2021), Bill Ryan (25th August 2021), Harmony (26th August 2021), mountain_jim (25th August 2021), Victoria (25th August 2021)

  6. Link to Post #64
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    34,268
    Thanks
    208,997
    Thanked 457,535 times in 32,788 posts

    Default Re: FDA seems to approve Pfizer Covid shot (but perhaps it hasn't)

    Quote Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
    Chris Martenson had this video deleted from YouTube last night US time — the first time on his channel. Here it is on Odyssey:

    Vaccine Mandates Are Here

    https://odysee.com/@Chris_Martenson:...dates-are-here

    Also here as an MP3:

    https://cm-us-standard.s3.amazonaws....IO+PODCAST.mp3

    At the start of the video, Chris Martenson clarifies what the FDA did and didn't say, accompanied by this useful image:



    Links:
    (looking at these, one can see how strongly Chris Martenson feels about all this. He'd not have been able to attach those to a YouTube video.)
    ~~~

    Here's the video embedded. It's a good one. No wonder YouTube deleted it FAST.

    https://projectavalon.net/Vaccine_Ma...Martenson).mp4

    Vaccine Mandates Are Here


  7. The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    Alan (26th August 2021), Arcturian108 (26th August 2021), Brodie75 (27th August 2021), Ewan (26th August 2021), gord (25th August 2021), Gwin Ru (26th August 2021), Harmony (26th August 2021), Houman (26th August 2021), I am B (25th August 2021), Kryztian (26th August 2021), leavesoftrees (26th August 2021), mojo (25th August 2021), mountain_jim (25th August 2021), Reinhard (25th August 2021), Satori (26th August 2021), Tintin (26th August 2021), Victoria (25th August 2021), Yoda (25th August 2021)

  8. Link to Post #65
    United States Avalon Member mojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th February 2011
    Posts
    5,996
    Thanks
    33,960
    Thanked 39,425 times in 5,645 posts

    Default Re: FDA seems to approve Pfizer Covid shot (but perhaps it hasn't)

    Natural Immunity is best

    Looking at the Israel National Health Study that provides real solid factual data to support the best treatment for Covid. The pie chart displayed on social media shows the breakdown. 60% of people currently with Covid are non-vaxed, and 39% of new cases are those that were already vaxed. 1% of current Covid cases are people with natural immunities built up from prior Covid. Another obvious point is we don't hear from the White House or Dr. Fauci about the use of current therapeutics such as anitbody monoclonal treatment. Yet we do see a huge push to force a treatment that is 59% effective.
    Last edited by mojo; 25th August 2021 at 22:51.

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mojo For This Post:

    Harmony (26th August 2021), mountain_jim (27th August 2021)

  10. Link to Post #66
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    26th May 2010
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM, USA
    Age
    73
    Posts
    2,450
    Thanks
    11,327
    Thanked 22,061 times in 2,419 posts

    Default Re: FDA seems to approve Pfizer Covid shot (but perhaps it hasn't)

    COMIRNATY. Why that name? I wondered as soon as I saw it. This may be trivial, but indulge me if you will.

    First, I see MRNA, or mRNA, in the name. It’s right there for all of us to see.

    Second, I see the word COMITY or comity. Comity has two common meanings: a state of social harmony or, in the law, the act of one court or jurisdiction, deferring to another court or jurisdiction and yielding power and control.

    Thus, mRNA comity. The jab brings social harmony. Or, social harmony through the jab.

    And, here, Pfizer is yielding to BioNTech (even though they are essentially the same), and the FDA is going along with it, to allow BnT to take the lead in the next iteration of the poison jab. In the meantime, because there is no COMIRNATY the FDA is authorizing use of the Pfizer EUA poison to be used on people starting at age 12, and, along with the MSM, is misleading people into believing that what they are taking, if you are 16 or older, is FDA approved, when it is not. As if that made a difference.
    Last edited by Satori; 26th August 2021 at 01:09.

  11. The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to Satori For This Post:

    Alan (26th August 2021), Arcturian108 (26th August 2021), Blacklight43 (29th August 2021), BushPilot (27th August 2021), ClearWater (26th August 2021), DSKlausler (26th August 2021), Ewan (26th August 2021), gord (26th August 2021), Harmony (26th August 2021), Journeyman (30th August 2021), Kryztian (26th August 2021), Matthew (28th August 2021), mojo (26th August 2021), mountain_jim (26th August 2021), onawah (27th August 2021), Peace in Oz (26th August 2021), PurpleLama (26th August 2021), Reinhard (28th August 2021), Sue (Ayt) (28th August 2021)

  12. Link to Post #67
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,352
    Thanks
    39,690
    Thanked 33,460 times in 4,332 posts

    Default Re: FDA seems to approve Pfizer Covid shot (but perhaps it hasn't)

    Last edited by Gwin Ru; 27th August 2021 at 00:33.

  13. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    BushPilot (27th August 2021), mojo (27th August 2021), onawah (27th August 2021), Reinhard (28th August 2021), Sue (Ayt) (28th August 2021)

  14. Link to Post #68
    Avalon Member Kryztian's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th September 2012
    Posts
    3,487
    Thanks
    23,704
    Thanked 29,413 times in 3,425 posts

    Default Re: FDA seems to approve Pfizer Covid shot (but perhaps it hasn't)

    Quote Posted by Satori (here)
    COMIRNATY. Why that name? I wondered as soon as I saw it. This may be trivial, but indulge me if you will.
    From https://www.globenewswire.com/news-r...9-Vaccine.html

    Quote The vaccine will be marketed in the EU under the brand name COMIRNATY, which represents a combination of the terms COVID-19, mRNA, community, and immunity
    * * * * *

    Quote Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
    Chris Martenson had this video deleted from YouTube last night US time — the first time on his channel. Here it is on Odyssey:

    Vaccine Mandates Are Here

    https://odysee.com/@Chris_Martenson:...dates-are-here

    At the start of the video, Chris Martenson clarifies what the FDA did and didn't say, accompanied by this useful image:
    I am fairly certain that "Comirnaty", "BNT162b2" and "Tozinameran" are just three different trade names for the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID "vaccine", and there may be more. In the same way, Pfizer manufactures a medication "Sildenafil" which is marketed under different trade names like "Revatio" and most famously "Viagra".

    Pretty sure the original title of this thread was correct. The FDA really did approved a vaccine which has various names, but are all the same thing. (which is "death in a little vial") The only question is why does the FDA, a U.S. organization, use the European trade name in their documents?

    On the other hand, I think Chris Martenson still has a good points that the approval only applies to certain instances - what are those instances???
    Last edited by Kryztian; 27th August 2021 at 02:09.

  15. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Kryztian For This Post:

    Gwin Ru (27th August 2021), onawah (27th August 2021), Reinhard (28th August 2021)

  16. Link to Post #69
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    26th May 2010
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM, USA
    Age
    73
    Posts
    2,450
    Thanks
    11,327
    Thanked 22,061 times in 2,419 posts

    Default Re: FDA seems to approve Pfizer Covid shot (but perhaps it hasn't)

    Quote Posted by Satori (here)
    L””
    Quote Posted by Delight (here)
    The approved jab has not even been produced????


    Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vj06z6
    Yes it is important to understand.

    I just read the FDA letters to Pfizer and BioNTech, essentially the same company for purposes of these “vaccines”, and I also read a 5 or so page bullet point summary of these letters and related issues prepared by Dr. Malone and at least one other qualified person.

    On the issue of what was approved and what a person would allow to be put into his or her body if he or she decided to get the mRNA jab because it has been “approved”, here’s the point Malone is making: if you got this jab today and for the next 6 to 9 months, or more, you would not be getting what the FDA approved. You would not get COMIRNATY. (Which is the same recipe as the EUA stuff.). You would be getting the existing EUA Pfizer jab crap that has been on the market for all this time.

    To allow Pfizer to continue its windfall on the EUA poison, the FDA approved extending its use and shelf life for 6 to 9 months, and probably longer. Thus, if you get this jab, you are getting the EUA stuff, not the so-called approved COMIRNATY. (Which is supposed to be available by the end of 2021 or in 2022.). But they want you to think you are getting the approved stuff.

    And this is only one of the serious problems with this mRNA jab, along with the continued absence of proof of safety, efficacy and necessity.

    Another problem is the FDA is allowing 12 to 15 year old children to be given the EUA poison, while trying to give the impression that somehow there is a difference between the two jabs, when there is not, and one is no better than the other. They are both equally toxic and a threat to health and safety.
    I’m feeling compelled to elaborate on the last paragraph of my post above.

    It seems to me that one very important, if not critical, issue that seems to be overlooked about the FDA “approval” is that in addition to the fact that CORMINATY is not in production, and that anyone getting the Pfizer jab now and for the foreseeable future, is really getting the unapproved EUA crap, this “approval” actually allows Pfizer to market its existing inventory beyond its shelf life and give it to 12 year old children.

    In short, whereas before the FDA “approval”, only people 16 or older were being told to get the Pfizer EUA jab, now parents are being told they can and should give their 12 year old children the Pfizer EUA jab, by misleading them into believing that what they will actually allow to be put into their children’s bodies is approved—when it is not.

    Children are clearly being targeted. Including children as tender as age 2.

    It’s appalling.

  17. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Satori For This Post:

    Alan (29th August 2021), Arcturian108 (28th August 2021), BushPilot (27th August 2021), gord (27th August 2021), Gwin Ru (27th August 2021), mojo (27th August 2021), onawah (27th August 2021), Peace in Oz (27th August 2021), Reinhard (28th August 2021)

  18. Link to Post #70
    Avalon Member Eric J (Viking)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    16th March 2010
    Location
    Stockbridge Hampshire UK
    Posts
    4,623
    Thanks
    13,099
    Thanked 24,157 times in 3,105 posts

    Default Re: FDA seems to approve Pfizer Covid shot (but perhaps it hasn't)

    The FDA did NOT grant full approval to the Pfizer shots

    Further reading here...

    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...zer_shots.html

    You may have heard that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 shot received FDA approval this past Monday. Politicians, national health officials, and journalists are breathless with excitement about how this approval will finally induce the remaining "vaccine-hesitant" into stepping forward to receive their jab. The FDA even has a press release on its website about it.

    Viking
    You decide...your thoughts..your actions..your reality.
    Choose well.
    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...are-the-change

  19. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Eric J (Viking) For This Post:

    BushPilot (27th August 2021), Gwin Ru (27th August 2021), Kryztian (28th August 2021), mojo (27th August 2021), mountain_jim (27th August 2021), Sue (Ayt) (28th August 2021)

  20. Link to Post #71
    Avalon Member Kryztian's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th September 2012
    Posts
    3,487
    Thanks
    23,704
    Thanked 29,413 times in 3,425 posts

    Default Re: FDA seems to approve Pfizer Covid shot (but perhaps it hasn't)

    Quote Posted by Kryztian (here)
    I am fairly certain that "Comirnaty", "BNT162b2" and "Tozinameran" are just three different trade names for the Pfizer–BioNTech COVID "vaccine", and there may be more.
    And now I am 100% certain. I just read the Pfizer approval letter. It states on page 2:

    Quote Pfizer-BioNTech COVID‑19 Vaccine contains a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 formulated in lipid particles. COMIRNATY (COVID-19 Vaccine, mRNA) is the same formulation as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and can be used interchangeably with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to provide the COVID-19 vaccination series.
    It also states on the FDA's Press release:

    Quote Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty (koe-mir’-na-tee), for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older.
    https://www.fda.gov/news-events/pres...vid-19-vaccine

    So Chris Martenson is incorrect. He seems like an intelligent guy, but he did not read this letter very carefully. The FDA's approval extends to the Pfizer vaccine, regardless of whether the bottle says "Comirnaty" on it or not, and probably, soon, all the bottles will be labeled "Comirnaty" if the FDA is accurate in announcing Pfizer's marketing plans.

    However, the post above by Viking with a link American Thinker may have some valid points about whether the vax has "FDA approval" or not.
    Last edited by Kryztian; 28th August 2021 at 00:12.

  21. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Kryztian For This Post:

    Gwin Ru (28th August 2021), mojo (28th August 2021), mountain_jim (28th August 2021), Reinhard (28th August 2021)

  22. Link to Post #72
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,352
    Thanks
    39,690
    Thanked 33,460 times in 4,332 posts

    Default Re: FDA seems to approve Pfizer Covid shot (but perhaps it hasn't)

    ...

    ... AUGUST 27, 2021 DR LI MENG YAN AND KAREN KINGSTON UNRESTRICTED WARFARE 01:25:34 (interview of Karen Kingston starts at 0:30:00)

    https://www.steeltruth.com/?wix-vod-...=comp-kl5lh1zq


    DR LI MENG YAN (interview starts at 43:30): ... mosquitoes as "vaccination" vectors...


    Related:

  23. The Following User Says Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    mojo (28th August 2021)

  24. Link to Post #73
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    8,757
    Thanks
    59,330
    Thanked 77,660 times in 8,595 posts

    Default Re: FDA seems to approve Pfizer Covid shot (but perhaps it hasn't)

    An urgent Message from Chris Martenson (email - images not included here - also posted in Internet Censorship thread)
    https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1448888


    Quote
    Peak Prosperity Censored Again by YouTube!

    No good deed goes unpunished.

    I am sad, annoyed and angered to announce that a video of mine posted to YouTube on Tuesday August 24th entitled “Your Job or the Jab” was stricken by YouTube for “violating community standards.”

    Sad because now tens if not hundreds of thousands of people will be denied access to quality, carefully researched information that could help their health and lives. Angered and annoyed because of the grotesque hypocrisy on display by YouTube, its staff, and every one of Google’s financial partners.

    Such censorship has no place in our society. It is YouTube that is violating our cultural norms. They are acting like petty tyrants and authoritarians. How they are behaving is completely unacceptable to me and it should be completely unacceptable to you as well.

    It bears pointing out that YouTube is a place where you can get your fill of Flat Earth theorists. Somehow that brand of misinformation with vast oceans of countervailing scientific evidence against it is A-OK by YouTube’s community standards.

    Or perhaps we might note that YouTube allows and actively promotes the abusive, extremely creepy, child beauty pageants:

    These are well within YouTube’s “community standards” but they are very far outside of my own.
    The point here is that YouTube is anything but consistent, but they have turned into a censoring monster, actively working to suppress live-saving information in the midst of a critical time in a pandemic.

    What did I do that was so worthy of censoring? I’m not sure because they won’t say, except I can note that I am not allowed to contradict the CDC, NIH or WHO (which I do all the time). Why? Because they get important things wrong all the time. I will place my track record of accuracy against those multibillion-dollar institutions any day and I will come out on top every day.

    But perhaps it was that I dared to observe that hundreds of thousands of women have reported profound disruptions to their menstrual cycles after receiving vaccinations. This is a fact. It is also a fact that YouTube very recently expanded its list of banned topics to include mentioning side effects of “approved” Covid-19 vaccines:

    I suppose the observation that women are experiencing profound disruptions to their menstrual cycles is a little too close to claims that the vaccines will cause infertility.

    So in YouTube’s twisted world-view, it’s perfectly fine to opine that the world is flat while applying a thick coat of makeup to your bikini-clad 5 year-old, but it’s not okay to give voice to millions of women who have been impacted by the vaccines.

    Perhaps most irritatingly, YouTube will be promoting some corporate nonsense about valuing diversity and being for women’s rights and empowerment, while they actively suppress a topic that desperately needs coverage.

    Even if I am wrong about the connection between women’s fertility cycles and the vaccines my observation about cycle disruption should be allowed to stand, be vigorously debated, and then shot down with data.

    But my instincts, and my track record, both say I am not wrong. I’d place a lot of money on being right about this too.
    So let me remind everyone of some other key topics around which I was also badly out of step:

    • Contradicting the WHO back on Jan 23rd 2020 when I first alerted the world to the pandemic on the loose.If YouTube was the same censor-happy company they have since become, that video would have been deleted.
    • I was 100% against the CDC on mask wearing early on when they claimed they were useless, dangerous even, and then again when they failed to be in favor of proper masks worn in a proper way, but were instead for any sort of cottony gauze worn loosely.If YouTube was the same censor-happy company they have since become, those videos would have been deleted.
    • My very early videos revealing the importance of Vitamin D, Zinc, Quercetin and Ivermectin all now proven to be effective at limiting the severity of Covid. If YouTube was the same censor-happy company they have since become millions of people would not have received my messages about the coming pandemic, how to prepare, and what the science was saying.

    I am horrified by what YouTube has come to represent for all sorts of reasons.

    First, I am a huge free-speech champion. If people want to debate the earth’s flatness, they can and should do that to their heart’s content. I simply don’t care to engage with them on that, but they should do that if that’s where they are ideologically.
    Second, the many predicaments we face in the future will necessitate all sorts of extremely uncomfortable conversations and decisions some of which may be deeply embarrassing to the-powers-that-be. How can we have these conversations if simple recitations of the available data aren’t allowed?

    Third, it’s wildly dangerous to assume we know right from wrong at his moment in history. Science is anything but settled. In fact I would submit our most critical learnings are before us not behind us. The only way we have any shot at creating a better future is by being brave enough to seek out and separate fact from fiction.

    My staff and I are very concerned that YouTube will now reach into the past to retroactively label our earliest (and most accurate) Covid coverage as objectionable and cancel our entire channel. If they do this an entire decade of work – encompassing the Crash Course and all of my Covid and other market coverage – would be stricken and we’d lose access to our more than 400,000 subscribers. We’d have zero recourse. There’s nobody to speak to, no persons to appeal.

    This is one of the many dangers of big tech.

    The impact of being censored is chilling. We’ve already lost advertisers, meetings with companies we thought we might do business with, and worst of all, reaching our many subscribers with our special brand of fact-based ideas and concepts.

    If the data provides us clues I will bring them to you. If the data changes, so will I. If that data is inconvenient or embarrassing to the powers that be, I will not flinch from the battle.

    But know this; I will not change, and I will not back down. Wherever this all leads is where I am going, providing the exact same blend of hard-nosed science and intuition that has allowed me to be well in front of the lumbering health authorities and their censor-happy gate keepers.

    Now, more than ever I am going to need your help. How the future turns out is up to all of us. You can help us by sharing our messages especially as we migrate to another much less well-traveled platform besides YouTube. We’re going to have to rebuild our audiences all over again.

    My requests are simple. Help us grow by and reach more people by sharing my work as broadly as you can. Come join us at our new platforms over at Odysee and Rumble. Each has pros and cons, so we’re carefully weighing which will become our new home.

    If you aren’t already, please consider joining our paying members who both receive enormous benefits from their memberships as well as provide us support as we continue to bring truth to a very resistant world. You can join here and continue to support our critical work.

    Yours in Truth,
    Chris
    Last edited by Bill Ryan; 28th August 2021 at 15:11. Reason: added Chris Martenson's name, important for searching
    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  25. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    avid (28th August 2021), Franny (30th August 2021), Gwin Ru (28th August 2021), mojo (28th August 2021), Reinhard (28th August 2021)

  26. Link to Post #74
    United States Moderator Sue (Ayt)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd December 2016
    Language
    English
    Posts
    2,555
    Thanks
    28,317
    Thanked 20,533 times in 2,553 posts

    Default Re: FDA seems to approve Pfizer Covid shot (but perhaps it hasn't)

    Quote Posted by Satori (here)
    COMIRNATY. Why that name? I wondered as soon as I saw it. This may be trivial, but indulge me if you will.

    First, I see MRNA, or mRNA, in the name. It’s right there for all of us to see.

    Second, I see the word COMITY or comity. Comity has two common meanings: a state of social harmony or, in the law, the act of one court or jurisdiction, deferring to another court or jurisdiction and yielding power and control.

    Thus, mRNA comity. The jab brings social harmony. Or, social harmony through the jab.

    And, here, Pfizer is yielding to BioNTech (even though they are essentially the same), and the FDA is going along with it, to allow BnT to take the lead in the next iteration of the poison jab. In the meantime, because there is no COMIRNATY the FDA is authorizing use of the Pfizer EUA poison to be used on people starting at age 12, and, along with the MSM, is misleading people into believing that what they are taking, if you are 16 or older, is FDA approved, when it is not. As if that made a difference.
    Yep.
    Just did an image search for that word - "comity"
    The agenda is blatant.
    Thanks for making this association for us, Satori.
    "We're all bozos on this bus"

  27. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sue (Ayt) For This Post:

    Franny (29th August 2021), mojo (28th August 2021)

  28. Link to Post #75
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    34,268
    Thanks
    208,997
    Thanked 457,535 times in 32,788 posts

    Default Re: FDA seems to approve Pfizer Covid shot (but perhaps it hasn't)

    About the name (which is truly terrible)... for what it may be worth.
    The Pfizer vaccine’s brand name, Comirnaty, is weird for a reason

    (extracted)
    The meaning behind the name ‘Comirnaty’

    The name Comirnaty was constructed with the help of a naming consultancy called the Brand Institute, according to a report in Fierce Pharma, a web site that tracks the drug industry. Comirnaty is an agglomeration of the words “Covid-19 immunity” and “mRNA,” the latter indicating the technology that makes the vaccine work. As a whole, the word is intended to evoke “community,” a Brand Institute executive said.

  29. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    avid (28th August 2021), Franny (29th August 2021), Matthew (28th August 2021), mojo (28th August 2021), mountain_jim (28th August 2021), Sue (Ayt) (28th August 2021), Yoda (28th August 2021)

  30. Link to Post #76
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    26th May 2010
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM, USA
    Age
    73
    Posts
    2,450
    Thanks
    11,327
    Thanked 22,061 times in 2,419 posts

    Default Re: FDA seems to approve Pfizer Covid shot (but perhaps it hasn't)

    Quote Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
    About the name (which is truly terrible)... for what it may be worth.
    The Pfizer vaccine’s brand name, Comirnaty, is weird for a reason

    (extracted)
    The meaning behind the name ‘Comirnaty’

    The name Comirnaty was constructed with the help of a naming consultancy called the Brand Institute, according to a report in Fierce Pharma, a web site that tracks the drug industry. Comirnaty is an agglomeration of the words “Covid-19 immunity” and “mRNA,” the latter indicating the technology that makes the vaccine work. As a whole, the word is intended to evoke “community,” a Brand Institute executive said.
    See, too, post #66 above.

  31. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Satori For This Post:

    Franny (29th August 2021), Matthew (28th August 2021), mojo (28th August 2021), Sue (Ayt) (28th August 2021)

  32. Link to Post #77
    Germany Avalon Member Reinhard's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th February 2011
    Location
    Munich
    Age
    74
    Posts
    142
    Thanks
    65,441
    Thanked 706 times in 127 posts

    Default Re: FDA seems to approve Pfizer Covid shot (but perhaps it hasn't)

    The meaning behind the name ‘Comirnaty’.........


    ........just had to mention it: the mysterious-evil antagonist of Sherlock-Holmes comes to (my) mind: Moriarty.......it has the same energetic ring to it...................
    Ok,ok.....back to topic
    The very moment the caterpillar thought the world would end, it turned into a butterfly.
    Laotse

  33. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Reinhard For This Post:

    Franny (29th August 2021), indiana (28th August 2021), mojo (28th August 2021), Sue (Ayt) (28th August 2021)

  34. Link to Post #78
    United States Avalon Member mojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th February 2011
    Posts
    5,996
    Thanks
    33,960
    Thanked 39,425 times in 5,645 posts

    Default Re: FDA seems to approve Pfizer Covid shot (but perhaps it hasn't)

    When I first heard the new name this came to mind....
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Amity.jpg
Views:	16
Size:	105.3 KB
ID:	47336  

  35. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mojo For This Post:

    Franny (29th August 2021), Pam (1st September 2021)

  36. Link to Post #79
    United States Avalon Member Denise/Dizi's Avatar
    Join Date
    2nd July 2017
    Age
    54
    Posts
    1,716
    Thanks
    26,649
    Thanked 13,481 times in 1,693 posts

    Default Re: FDA seems to approve Pfizer Covid shot (but perhaps it hasn't)

    Quote Posted by Delight (here)
    Cross posting with a breaking bit of news concerning 12,000 adverse reactions within 28days (and no pre-existing diagnosis) in ONE STATE at 23:26



    Quote COVID CON Solution Series: Your Boss Doesn't Own Your Body

    Join esteemed panelists Pam Popper Founder of MakeAmericansFreeAgain.com, Lisa Parker Independent Union Labor Consultant, Lead Attorney Tom Renz and Host Reinette Senum as they show you how to decline getting the COVID shot without losing your job.

    Your company doesn't own your body and therefore can't tell you what to do without your informed consent. Learn what your boss may not want you to know.
    I live in the little town where Reinette became "Mayor", (in this town the title of "Mayor" is a polite formality exchanged between council members... )

    All too often she spoke her opinions, but neglected to differentiate between whether she was speaking her own personal opinions, or speaking as the "Mayor", on behalf of those in our community. And as such, town became a media circus, but not in a way that highlighted any significant issue...But more the drama unfolding around this woman... Any positive momentum she may have gotten, in any real effort to spark creative change? Got lost in the sea of reporters speaking about the chaos in our city, and sparked people to request she step down, or resign. And she had some GOOD IDEAS, but her methods to get those accomplished or even brought out, were a nightmare.

    The aftermath is still being mopped up...

    I will give my own personal opinions.... I didn't attend those circus events, for just that reason... I found it pathetic that our little progressive town be used as some side show. When many in my area ARE living the change they wish to see.. This drama divided the community more than uniting it... And any useful change that could have been moved upon during that time, was lost to this new circus...

    The police, who were respected in our area, are now leaving in droves, and have been rotating out so quickly when she was involved, that it was sad to see... and it hasn't stopped since..

    People are now posting BLM and Gay pride flags on their businesses, which in my belief actually divides the community, as before we never had issues with differences of races, or sexuality. Many business owners were gay, and we do have a substantial black community that blended in seemlessly. Now they cringe when they walk through town or see people holding signs on "Their behalf"... There wasn't a split in these communities, she created them by openly as "Mayor" behaving as if they were issues. She brought big city problems to a small town that wasn't experiencing them....
    We now also have "Vaxers, and Anti-vaxers"... Mask wearers and non mask wearers.. The community is so divided now, that it isn't ev en funny, where as before we all were able to agree to disagree.. It's sad really...

    These are just MY opinions however, I speak only for myself....

    A positive thing... I do not dislike her, just feel she chose the wrong way to go about what she wished to accomplish...

    I do believe that this video, where she is now speaking as a woman with beliefs, and trying to share actual information, without playing "politics" at the same time, is a much better fit for her. And I wish her well....

    It's my opinion, that you aren't going to be able to change the government from within it. That system is already broken. It is better to attempt it in this way. With people of like minds teaching those around them, their true voice, their true rights, etc... I heard she may be trying to run for a larger office position within my state. I truly hope she rethinks this, as this is a much healthier fit for her, and her voice, and for any community that truly wants to change. They don't need to be told that everyone is bad, they need to know what is good. And this video is something people would respond to..

    My community went from friendly and kind, to sarcastic, argumentative, and suspicious overnight after the circus left. Gay flags, police flags, BLM, painting on the streets... We never had any issues with ANY of those things until Reinette, and her supporters made them issues. By her sharing her personal beliefs, as "Mayor", and not suggesting that these were her own private beliefs, she inadvertently was representing the city leaders openly. What a disaster, because it wasn't true. And there are plenty of open disputes and meetings about her doing this... All recorded and can be found online. Just pull up Reinette Senum and Nevada City council, resignation, and the plethora of videos will begin to show up. The news articles, etc...

    I hear she may be running Governor of California... I cringe to think that she may win a race... Not because of what she believes, but what she says.. As it is, in my small community we are still having a difficult time keeping the police chief position filled, and the police on patrol, as they're leaving to go to the town next door. The pay is better and they get treated better.

    You can't have your "Mayor" telling the police that they "Incited" the shootings we recently went through as a nation. And she did this openly, and ended up on the evening news for having done so... It isn't good for local moral, to believe that your "Boss" essentially doesn't respect you... Yet she did, openly... While Mayor, without maintaining that this was her belief specifically, implying she was speaking for our city when making such claims... I really hope that she doesn't win, as she would probably do the same thing and create even more drama for California that isn't needed...

    Stay on youtube Reinette, you can spark more positive change there... You truly can. Good luck, and I truly liked the video above, it IS helpful... And a better way to get across what I believe that you are trying to do...
    Last edited by Denise/Dizi; 29th August 2021 at 20:35.

  37. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Denise/Dizi For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (1st September 2021), Franny (29th August 2021), gord (29th August 2021), Gwin Ru (1st September 2021), mojo (29th August 2021), Pam (1st September 2021)

  38. Link to Post #80
    Avalon Member Pam's Avatar
    Join Date
    29th June 2012
    Posts
    3,370
    Thanks
    42,395
    Thanked 27,393 times in 3,308 posts

    Default Re: FDA seems to approve Pfizer Covid shot (but perhaps it hasn't)

    Mod note from Bill:
    I copied this post from
    its original location on the Vaccine Crimes thread.


    ~~~

    This article is a must read for anyone that wants to understand the FDA "approval" scam, or as Dr. Malone calls it, “bureaucratic shell game”.

    This is a journalistic masterpiece and is well worth your time if you want a glimpse into the evil and corruption of this bait and switch. Here's a little teaser, Guess where the "approved" and unavailable Comirnaty is being manufactured? If you guessed China, bingo!!!!



    Scandal Behind the FDA Fake Approval of Pfizer Jab
    Author: F. William Engdahl


    The US Government regulator for drugs, the Food and Drug Administration, has just announced that it has voted full approval for the mRNA genetic vaccine of Pfizer and BioNTech, or did they? This supposed new status is being used by the Biden Administration and many states and companies to impose mandatory vaccinations. The notoriously conflicted Biden covid adviser, Tony Fauci of the NIAID, using that ruling, is calling for national mandatory vaccination for the country. What is not being revealed is the cesspool of corruption and conflicts of interest between the FDA and the major drug companies, including Pfizer, that stand behind the rushed approval. And it’s not full approval for Pfizer’s jab, only for BioNTech’s legally different vaccine.

    “…final stamp of approval”?

    On August 23 as the FDA announced full approval for the Pfizer mRNA gene-edited substance. Or not quite, when the full papers of FDA are studied. Fauci, whose NIAID has financial interest in the vaccine, referred to the FDA decision as the “final stamp of approval.” It is however anything but final or an impartial, scientific rigorous medical evaluation. Rather it is a politically-motivated decision by an FDA that is corrupt beyond the imagination of most people.

    Backtracking on its statement in 2020 that it would hold normal FDA advisory committee hearings with independent experts to discuss the Pfizer application for full approval, now the FDA told the British Medical Journal that they did not believe a meeting was necessary ahead of granting full approval of what is the most controversial vaccine in modern history. The BMJ quotes Kim Witczak, a drug safety advocate who serves as a consumer representative on the FDA’s Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee, “These [FDA] public meetings are imperative in building trust and confidence especially when the vaccines came to market at lightning speed under emergency use authorization.”

    Witczak continued with the alarming note, “It is already concerning that full approval is being based on 6 months’ worth of data despite the clinical trials designed for two years. There is no control group after Pfizer offered the product to placebo participants before the trials were completed.” Read that again, slowly. Pfizer tests destroyed their own control group mid-stream! And its six month rollout of the mRNA jab worldwide has resulted in catastrophic side effects which have been totally officially ignored. Is this “science” Dr Fauci?

    The refusal of the FDA and its Acting Director, Janet Woodcock, to convene its Drugs Advisory Committee for discussion of the Pfizer and BioNTech decisions is even more shocking as in June three members of that same panel resigned in protest for being disregarded in another drug approval. NPR network reported, “Three experts have now resigned from a Food and Drug Administration advisory committee after the agency approved an Alzheimer’s drug called Aduhelm against the wishes of nearly every member on the panel.” One of the three, Dr. Aaron Kesselheim, in his resignation letter from the FDA Advisory Committee (June 10, 2021), wrote: “For both eteplirsen and aducanumab, the decisions by FDA administrators to ignore the Advisory Committee’s clear recommendations led to their approval of two highly problematic drugs that offered little evidence that they would meaningfully benefit patients…With eteplirsen, the AdComm (Advisory Committee) and FDA’s own scientific staff reported that there was no convincing evidence that the drug worked; both groups were overruled by FDA leadership… “

    Now the FDA refusal to convene their advisory committee for the Pfizer decision is all the more astonishing in light of the fact that the Government Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in its official VAERS data bank for recording vaccine negative effects has recorded 8,508 reports of fatalities following the Pfizer mRNA shot in the past seven months, a number more than for all vaccines combined in the past 30 years. By denying a public hearing the FDA avoided any discussion of these alarming fatality numbers, let alone the tens of thousands of serious side-effects including heart attacks, blood clots, miscarriages, permanent paralysis following the Pfizer-BioNTech jabs. The public declaration by Fauci before approval that he expected it, is also unethical influencing, but that is the least of the crimes.

    Faked Approval

    It seems the FDA executed a clever ruse in which it issued separate rulings for a Pfizer Inc.-BioNTech vaccine which is widely used in the USA, and another ruling for the similar vaccine of Pfizer’s German-based partner and developer of the mRNA platform, BioNTech of Mainz. It is only BioNTech that got FDA approval, but conditioned on completion of a series of further tests on select groups including infants, pregnant women and youth, by 2027. The US vaccine, Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine, only got extension of its Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), not full approval!

    In their separate letter to Pfizer, the FDA stated, “…On August 23, 2021, having concluded that revising this EUA is appropriate to protect the public health or safety under section 564(g)(2) of the Act, FDA is reissuing the August 12, 2021 letter of (Emergency Use) authorization in its entirety with revisions incorporated to clarify that the EUA will remain in place for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for the previously-authorized indication and uses…”(emphasis added).

    Buried in a footnote in the letter the FDA admits there are two legally separate entities and vaccines—Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 Vaccine and BioNTech GmbH of Mainz with its own vaccine trade-named Comrinaty. The FDA writes that “The products are legally distinct with certain differences…” Legally distinct means two separate vaccines. If you find this confusing it is meant to be. Only under an EUA ruling is Pfizer presently exempt from vaccine liability. Some lawyers are calling the FDA ruse a classic “bait and switch” tactic, a form of fraud based on deception.

    US vaccinologist and a developer of the mRNA technique, Dr Robert Malone, has accused the FDA of playing a “bureaucratic shell game” with their supposed early approval of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. He cites the two separate FDA letters, “There is a letter for Pfizer and a letter for BioNTech. The New York Times and the Washington Post got it wrong. The authorization is not for Pfizer. The authorization is for BioNTech, and it will only be initiated at the time BioNTech product becomes available…”

    Adding to the bizarre irregularities, in their two separate letters, one to BioNTech and another to Pfizer, the FDA repeatedly deletes the location of the vaccine manufacturing they approve. Why that? Is it in China where BioNTech has a joint agreement with Fosun Pharma of Shanghai to jointly produce and market Comirnaty vaccine for COVID-19? Why do they need to hide that location data from the public? Would it expose the entire fraud?

    FDA-Pfizer Conflicts of Interest

    In 2019 Pfizer made a very conflicted appointment to its board of directors. It took Scott Gottlieb, who had just resigned as head of the FDA three months earlier. If this gives an appearance of a huge conflict of interest, it is. Alongside Gottlieb at Pfizer’s Board of Directors sits Dr Susan Desmond-Hellmann, who headed the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation until 2020. The Gates Foundation is behind every single key part of the covid vaccine rush and owns stock in Pfizer to boot.

    Another person who links Pfizer and Gates is Prof. Holly Janes, a bio-statistical expert in Gates’ hometown Seattle, at the Fred Huff cancer research center. Janes is also a member of the FDA Vaccine Committee until 2023. Notably, she co-designed the controversial trials for both Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines for Fauci’s NIAID from her Seattle center, which is also funded by the Gates Foundation.

    Janes is Professor at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, known as Fred Hutch. Earlier she received Gates Foundation research money for a six year period when she worked for the Gates Foundation from 2006 to 2012 to develop “statistical and study design support for pre-clinical vaccine performance trials.” Prof. Janes also helped develop the program that tracks vaccine data at John Hopkins University.

    The person who runs FDA as “Acting Director” is Janet Woodcock. To call her tainted is mild. She has been at FDA since 1986, almost as long as Fauci at NIAID. Woodcock was Biden’s choice to head FDA, but a massive opposition from 28 groups including state attorneys general and citizen groups forced him to name her “acting,” which does not need Congressional scrutiny.

    Woodcock was directly responsible for the FDA approval of deadly opioids over the objections of her own scientists and other advisors. Two decades ago as head of the FDA unit responsible, Woodcock was instrumental in the approval of a powerful opioid, Zohydro, even though the FDA’s own scientific advisory committee voted 11-2 to keep the drug off the market because it was unsafe. The online Drugs.com writes, “Hydrocodone (Zohydro) can slow or stop your breathing. Never use Zohydro ER in larger amounts, or for longer than prescribed. .. Swallow it whole to avoid exposure to a potentially fatal dose. Hydrocodone may be habit-forming, even at regular doses.” Woodcock later approved the sale of a high-strength narcotic pill, OxyContin, as “safer and more effective than other painkillers” based on the false claims of the now bankrupt manufacturer, Purdue Pharma. Some 500,000 Americans have since died as a result of opioid addiction.

    Woodcock clearly is the key FDA person behind the duplicitous August 23 Pfizer decision, seeing to it that there were no public advisory hearings to review relevant data. It would be relevant to know what discussions or communications went on with her former boss, now Pfizer director, Scott Gottlieb.

    Why?

    There are many unanswered question in this twisted tale of corruption at FDA and Pfizer. Was this theater rushed through by the Biden Administration to accelerate the forced vaccination of millions of Americans uncertain or skeptical of taking an emergency or experimental jab? Why is there such an incredible pressure from mainstream media and politicians to vaccinate every man, woman and now child in the US? Are the vaccines really safe if there are so many dire cases of adverse events after the Pfizer jab? Why did the FD refuse to allow its independent vaccine committee to weigh in?

    It is worth noting that as of August 14 Pfizer does not mandate vaccines for its own employees. Also the Biden White House does not mandate vaccines for its staff. These are all serious issues that demand serious and honest answers.

    F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.

    https://journal-neo.org/2021/08/30/scandal-behind-the-fda-fake-approval-of-pfizer-jab
    Last edited by Bill Ryan; 1st September 2021 at 13:53.

  39. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Pam For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (1st September 2021), gord (1st September 2021), Gwin Ru (1st September 2021), mojo (1st September 2021), mountain_jim (1st September 2021)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 1 4 5 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts