+ Reply to Thread
Page 15 of 22 FirstFirst 1 5 15 22 LastLast
Results 281 to 300 of 425

Thread: Ivermectin

  1. Link to Post #281
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,088 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    So I guess my big question now is do we need something more that can protect us from the synthetic hydras which are discussed here:

    https://rumble.com/vqui76-the-evil-o...-creation.html

    Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vo8c30
    Last edited by Bill Ryan; 18th December 2021 at 07:41. Reason: embedded the video
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  2. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (18th December 2021), Ewan (18th December 2021), fifi (20th December 2021), Gwin Ru (21st December 2021), Harmony (20th December 2021), jaybee (18th December 2021), Mike Gorman (20th December 2021), mojo (18th December 2021), mountain_jim (18th December 2021), Pam (18th December 2021), Reinhard (2nd January 2022), Sadieblue (19th December 2021), Sunny (18th December 2021), Tintin (7th January 2022), wondering (18th December 2021)

  3. Link to Post #282
    Avalon Member East Sun's Avatar
    Join Date
    13th May 2010
    Location
    USA
    Language
    English
    Posts
    2,108
    Thanks
    6,997
    Thanked 8,484 times in 1,711 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    https://drjockers.com/12-herbs-kill-...tes-naturally/

    Here is a list of what I think are very valuable herbs etc. for
    treatment of parasites and viruses.

    Big Pharma. Take your drugs and shove them...
    Question Everything, always speak truth... Make the best of today, for there may not be a tomorrow!!! But, that's OK because tomorrow never comes, so we have nothing to worry about!!!

  4. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to East Sun For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (18th December 2021), Ewan (18th December 2021), fifi (20th December 2021), Gwin Ru (21st December 2021), Harmony (20th December 2021), jaybee (18th December 2021), meat suit (18th December 2021), mojo (18th December 2021), mountain_jim (19th December 2021), Pam (18th December 2021), Reinhard (2nd January 2022), Sadieblue (19th December 2021), Sunny (18th December 2021), Tintin (7th January 2022), wondering (18th December 2021)

  5. Link to Post #283
    Avalon Member jaybee's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Midlands England
    Posts
    2,633
    Thanks
    8,381
    Thanked 15,959 times in 2,206 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    So I guess my big question now is do we need something more that can protect us from the synthetic hydras which are discussed here:

    [video snipped - see above post 281]
    excellent video - thank you - it's hard to take in the enormity of what's taking place and I just went up a couple of notches watching that and the chemtrails video on previous page (#279 - from Delight ).... it's like everything is under attack ... humans, all life forms, nature, the earth herself ----- I wish 'they' would just stop it and leave us alone - having too much money, accumulating vast wealth and therefore power is what enables this war against us - it has always been so but seriously this is getting completely out of hand and going onto the next level - no wonder there are stories of future humans time travelling back to these times to try and sort it out - perhaps they will and that's what will happen soon - a sudden change of direction....?

    Re the question you posed... I think they definitely fear Ivermectin - not just because it prevents and cures 'covid' but because it might be able to clear out the nasty stuff they are getting nurses to pump into everyone - (they may fear other anti parasitic drugs and herbs as well...?)

    Had a thought as well.... what about ORMUS and White Powder of Gold....? those are two substances that are said to repair DNA -
    Last edited by jaybee; 18th December 2021 at 11:35.

  6. The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to jaybee For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (18th December 2021), East Sun (18th December 2021), Ewan (18th December 2021), fifi (20th December 2021), Gwin Ru (21st December 2021), Harmony (20th December 2021), mojo (18th December 2021), mountain_jim (19th December 2021), onawah (18th December 2021), Pam (18th December 2021), Reinhard (18th December 2021), Sadieblue (19th December 2021), Tintin (7th January 2022), wondering (18th December 2021)

  7. Link to Post #284
    Avalon Member East Sun's Avatar
    Join Date
    13th May 2010
    Location
    USA
    Language
    English
    Posts
    2,108
    Thanks
    6,997
    Thanked 8,484 times in 1,711 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    jaybee

    We need to get real and realize we have been fooled by the B.....ds. who have been planning our demise for a long time.
    They have made it clear, sort of, because they have to, according to their weird beliefs, spelled out on the Georgia 'guide' stones.

    They are devious, as we know, saying, KEEP the POPULATION down to 500, 000 million world wide.
    That goes right over some people's heads. That means eliminate 90% of the Earth's people. Those remaining would be slaves to them. But then it would be obvious, unlike now as we are finding out.
    Last edited by East Sun; 20th December 2021 at 13:33.
    Question Everything, always speak truth... Make the best of today, for there may not be a tomorrow!!! But, that's OK because tomorrow never comes, so we have nothing to worry about!!!

  8. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to East Sun For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (18th December 2021), Ernie Nemeth (18th December 2021), ExomatrixTV (19th December 2021), fifi (20th December 2021), Gwin Ru (21st December 2021), Harmony (20th December 2021), Hym (20th December 2021), mojo (18th December 2021), mountain_jim (19th December 2021), Pam (18th December 2021), Sadieblue (19th December 2021), Tintin (7th January 2022), wondering (18th December 2021)

  9. Link to Post #285
    United States Avalon Member mojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th February 2011
    Posts
    5,994
    Thanks
    33,959
    Thanked 39,413 times in 5,643 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    Rumble channel And We Know's recent video mentioned that big pharma has a pill for Covid and it contains the oral form of the bioweapon. It's crazy but they will not stop until every human gets the ingredients of the jab, it means they have to stop any obstacles of the plan and after people get the jab to remove any source that kills the bioweapon. It's great to see hour early on the forum has picked up on this possibility and more and more are looking at this. It certainly explains why they are seriously going after stopping Ivermectin supplies. The price of Ivermectin has gone up so the price to get the prescription legally is now looking like a good option for some.

    Has anyone gone to the link below which charges $90 to get an on-line Doctor in your state to prescribe Ivermectin?
    https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org...rly-treatment/

    Here's part of the procedure.
    Quote Click on the contact a physician button below. Fill out the form and pay $90. The physician will call you typically within 2-7 days (not counting weekends). Please keep your phone with you. After your telemed appointment, the pharmacy will contact you for your payment information and mailing address to send the prescription to you. If you have questions for the pharmacy, please use the pharmacy contact information which was provided to you in an email or text confirming that your prescription was sent to the pharmacy and they will be able to help you.
    Last edited by mojo; 19th December 2021 at 19:02.

  10. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to mojo For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (19th December 2021), East Sun (20th December 2021), fifi (20th December 2021), Gwin Ru (21st December 2021), Harmony (20th December 2021), Hym (20th December 2021), mountain_jim (19th December 2021), Pam (2nd January 2022), Sadieblue (19th December 2021), Tintin (7th January 2022), Vangelo (19th December 2021), wondering (19th December 2021)

  11. Link to Post #286
    United States Avalon Member Vangelo's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th January 2011
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    586
    Thanks
    11,251
    Thanked 4,564 times in 567 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    Quote Posted by mojo (here)
    ...

    Has anyone gone to the link below which charges $90 to get an on-line Doctor in your state to prescribe Ivermectin?
    https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org...rly-treatment/

    Here's part of the procedure.
    Quote Click on the contact a physician button below. Fill out the form and pay $90. The physician will call you typically within 2-7 days (not counting weekends). Please keep your phone with you. After your telemed appointment, the pharmacy will contact you for your payment information and mailing address to send the prescription to you. If you have questions for the pharmacy, please use the pharmacy contact information which was provided to you in an email or text confirming that your prescription was sent to the pharmacy and they will be able to help you.
    Yes, I did it in February 2021. The quote above is exactly what happened with me and my wife (had to do it for each of us individually). I also used the pharmacy they recommended.

    About 6 months later I also used: PushHealth.com

    When you sign up they will ask for a pharmacy.  You should use an online pharmacy unless you know for certain that your neighborhood pharmacy will fill it.  I used:  Honeybee ( https://honeybeehealth.com/ ).  It should show up as one of the option.
    Last edited by Vangelo; 19th December 2021 at 21:59.
    Happiness comes from within, nowhere else.

  12. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Vangelo For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (20th December 2021), fifi (20th December 2021), Gwin Ru (21st December 2021), Harmony (20th December 2021), mojo (20th December 2021), Pam (2nd January 2022), Sadieblue (21st December 2021), Sunny (20th December 2021), Tintin (7th January 2022), wondering (19th December 2021)

  13. Link to Post #287
    United States Avalon Member mojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th February 2011
    Posts
    5,994
    Thanks
    33,959
    Thanked 39,413 times in 5,643 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    Thank you Vangelo for replying. Do you recall what the cost for the pills were? The Veritas Korean Doctors are delving into the living organisms found in the Covid vials when heated to room temp. I truly wish they would look at what Ivermectin might do if added to the Covid vials. There is definitely something living in them and even those that aren't vaccinated could get these organisms other ways. Dr Jane Ruby and the Stew Peters show is all over this subject and the bigger picture is becoming clear. I think we are ahead of the curve but it's great to plan ahead. Also hydroxycloroquine should be tested to see if it has the same effect at removing parasites or the other remedies that were posted here on the thread.
    Last edited by mojo; 20th December 2021 at 01:04.

  14. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to mojo For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (20th December 2021), fifi (20th December 2021), Gwin Ru (21st December 2021), Harmony (20th December 2021), onawah (1st January 2022), Pam (2nd January 2022), Sadieblue (21st December 2021), Tintin (7th January 2022), Vangelo (20th December 2021), wondering (20th December 2021)

  15. Link to Post #288
    Aaland Avalon Member Blastolabs's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd November 2020
    Language
    English
    Posts
    442
    Thanks
    1,649
    Thanked 3,352 times in 432 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    Keep in mind that massive expensive and well executed PSYOPS do indeed exist.

    I do not know if there is anything unknown in the vaccines besides MRNA, but I do know that blatantly lying to the public and setting themselves up to be caught red handed IS NOT how those in power typically do things.

    More than likely the spike proteins created by the mRNA is what causes the issues and since they have been open about this they have plausible deniability.

    Also that first study that was published in Spain that so many people quote, seems to show what looks like 95% like lipid nanoparticles, a known vaccine ingredient, while the vaccine contents look maybe 5% like graphene oxide.

  16. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Blastolabs For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (20th December 2021), East Sun (20th December 2021), fifi (20th December 2021), Gwin Ru (21st December 2021), Harmony (20th December 2021), mojo (20th December 2021), onawah (1st January 2022), Pam (2nd January 2022), Sadieblue (21st December 2021), Tintin (7th January 2022), wondering (20th December 2021)

  17. Link to Post #289
    United States Avalon Member Vangelo's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th January 2011
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    586
    Thanks
    11,251
    Thanked 4,564 times in 567 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    Quote Posted by mojo (here)
    Thank you Vangelo for replying. Do you recall what the cost for the pills were? ...
    Under $200 USD for a course of treatment presuming I got infected. My dose is 8 pills which is 24mg. So far I have only taken 2 doses (16 pills total). I took the pills for prophylactic reasons. It had no adverse effect on me.
    Happiness comes from within, nowhere else.

  18. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Vangelo For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (20th December 2021), East Sun (20th December 2021), fifi (20th December 2021), Gwin Ru (21st December 2021), Harmony (20th December 2021), mojo (20th December 2021), onawah (1st January 2022), Pam (2nd January 2022), pyrangello (27th December 2021), Sadieblue (21st December 2021), Tintin (7th January 2022)

  19. Link to Post #290
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    8,754
    Thanks
    59,307
    Thanked 77,630 times in 8,592 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    https://gab.com/QAnon211/posts/107479855702847413

    Quote Black cumin seed is an alternative for Ivermectin??

    Last edited by mountain_jim; 20th December 2021 at 16:01.
    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  20. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (20th December 2021), ClearWater (20th December 2021), earthdreamer (21st December 2021), fifi (20th December 2021), Gwin Ru (21st December 2021), Harmony (21st December 2021), mojo (20th December 2021), onawah (1st January 2022), Pam (2nd January 2022), pyrangello (21st December 2021), Sadieblue (21st December 2021), Sue (Ayt) (20th December 2021), Sunny (21st December 2021), Tintin (6th January 2022), Vangelo (20th December 2021)

  21. Link to Post #291
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Location
    Project Avalon library
    Language
    English
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,442
    Thanks
    64,660
    Thanked 46,592 times in 5,410 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    "Lawrie then asks again: ‘Would you tell me? I would like to know who pays you as a consultant through WHO?’

    Hill: ‘It’s Unitaid.’"
    Back in January this year Lawrie and Hill had a discussion around his published paper on the effectiveness of Ivermectin with which Dr Lawrie had some bonafide concerns with surrounding the conclusion and content.

    Here she presents a video update and provides insights:

    Avalon Library here



    ---------------------

    Original source: World Council for Health

    ----------------------

    Related article: The Conservative Woman

    The vaccine gold rush and the damning ivermectin tape
    By Neville Hodgkinson - December 2, 2021

    CORRUPTION in medicine, as detailed in a new book by American trial lawyer Robert Kennedy Jr, is nothing new.

    A leading UK cancer specialist told me years ago how he was blackmailed by the Imperial Cancer Research Fund into staying silent over a fraudulent study the fund had sponsored.

    Published in the Lancet, the study purported to show that patients treated holistically through the Bristol Cancer Help Centre did worse than those who had only orthodox treatment. It was junk science, aimed at discrediting the charity whose work had gained prominence – and funds – after being championed by Prince Charles.

    The specialist was outraged when he had a preview of the study, and told the ICRF that he intended to challenge its findings at an upcoming press conference. Shortly afterwards a top official rang him to say that if he did so, his unit would lose its entire ICRF grant – which meant it would have to close. He consulted the dean of his medical school, and agreed not to go. He had worried ever since over whether he made the right decision.

    Fortunately, the help centre recovered from the attack and its work has been transformative in encouraging cancer treatment approaches that attend as much to a patient’s general wellbeing as to diagnosing and treating symptoms.

    As detailed by Kennedy, however, medical corruption has today become so widespread as to compromise the lives and wellbeing of us all.

    A stark example came in the response last week to a report from the US that many patients who received the Pfizer and Moderna Covid vaccines show signs of increased risk of a heart attack. Dr Aseem Malhotra, an NHS consultant, told GB News that a cardiology researcher colleague in the UK found similar results but was not prepared to publish for fear of the repercussions. ‘They aren’t going to publish their findings, they are concerned about losing research money,’ Malhotra said.

    Later he told LBC Radio that he had been contacted by several others, raising more concerns about the findings. One was an eminent consultant cardiologist, fit and well and with no previous history of heart problems. ‘He informed me that within ten days of receiving a second dose of the Pfizer shot, he had a heart attack – a clot in his left anterior descending artery, the most important artery in the heart. Fortunately he survived and is doing OK now.’

    Malhotra added that his own father, a GP, died from a heart attack in July. ‘This was a 73-year-old man who during lockdown ate very healthily – partly because he listens to his son, who is an obesity campaigner – but also was walking 10,000-15,000 steps every day. So, very fit and active.

    ‘Out of the blue, he had a heart attack with chest pain. I didn’t understand what had happened. The post-mortem showed a 90 per cent blockage. What I have determined, very clearly, knowing everything about my father’s history, is that he had rapid progression of coronary artery disease.

    ‘Let’s not just say this could be the vaccine. Until his data became available, I had narrowed it down to stress in the pandemic, and losing my mother three years ago. So he was diseased, stressed, living alone in the pandemic . . . that could have been a factor as well. But now this data has come in, I’m concerned that the vaccine may have played a significant role.’

    It’s heartening to hear from doctors sharing their concerns like this, but Robert Kennedy’s book demonstrates the rich incentives many receive to support the vaccine ‘gold rush’ – and do nothing to obstruct it. He writes, for example, that at the outset of the pandemic, Dr Anthony Fauci, the American government’s lead on Covid, ‘used wildly inaccurate modelling that overestimated US deaths by 525 per cent’. Neil Ferguson of Imperial College London was the author, with funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation of $148.8million. ‘Dr Fauci used this model as justification for his lockdowns.’

    Bill Gates is principal investor in many of the new Covid vaccines, Kennedy adds, and Fauci has been championing a vaccine (Moderna) from which his agency and employees expect a lucrative outcome.

    Kennedy describes multiple studies of the protective power of the cheap, long-established drug ivermectin in countering Covid, and estimates of hundreds of thousands of lives lost as a result of suppression of its use. Under US law, the Covid vaccines could not have received emergency approval if effective treatments for the disease had been acknowledged as available.

    The book includes a riveting account of an exchange last January between Dr Tess Lawrie, director of the Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy in Bath, England, and Dr Andrew Hill, author of a favourable analysis of ivermectin studies. He had subsequently performed a ‘neck-wrenching’ U-turn on the issue, claiming the studies comprised ‘low certainty’ of value and that more trials were needed.

    Lawrie was trying to persuade Hill to participate in and co-author an immediate review of all published ivermectin studies in the medical literature, to be conducted by the eminent Cochrane Network, which uses thousands of volunteers to make high-quality, independent treatment recommendations.

    ‘It was an exciting opportunity,’ Kennedy writes. ‘Under normal circumstances, Hill should have pounced on this chance to serve as lead author with some of the world’s most prestigious researchers. He was nevertheless noncommittal.

    ‘The following week, she spoke to Hill again, this time by Zoom. The Zoom call was recorded.

    ‘Dr Lawrie asked Hill to explain his U-turn on ivermectin, which his own analysis found overwhelmingly effective. “How can you do this?” she inquired politely. “You are causing irreparable harm.” Hill explained that he was in a “tricky situation” because his sponsors had put pressure on him. Hill is a University of Liverpool virologist who serves as an adviser to Bill Gates and the Clinton Foundation. He told me his sponsor was Unitaid.

    ‘Unitaid is a quasi-governmental advocacy organisation funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) and several countries – France, the United Kingdom, Norway, Brazil, Spain, the Republic of Korea and Chile – to lobby governments to finance the purchase of medicines from pharmaceutical multinationals for distribution to the African poor.

    Its primary purpose seems to be protecting the patent and intellectual property rights of pharmaceutical companies – which, as we shall see, is the priority passion for Bill Gates – and to insure their prompt and full payment. About 63 per cent of its funding comes from a surtax on airline tickets.

    The BMGF holds a board seat and chairs Unitaid’s Executive Committee, and the BMGF has given Unitaid $150million since 2005. Various Gates-funded surrogate and front organisations also contribute, as does the pharmaceutical industry.

    ‘The BMGF and Gates personally own large stakes in many of the pharmaceutical companies that profit from this boondoggle. Gates also uses Unitaid to fund corrupt science by tame and compromised researchers like Hill that legitimises his policy directives to the WHO.

    ‘Unitaid gave $40million to Andrew Hill’s employer, the University of Liverpool, four days before the publication of Hill’s study. Hill, a PhD, confessed that the sponsors were pressuring him to influence his conclusion. When Dr Lawrie asked who was trying to influence him, Hill said, “I mean, I, I think I’m in a very sensitive position here . . .”.’
    Lawrie: ‘Lots of people are in sensitive positions; they’re in hospital, in ICUs dying, and they need this medicine.’

    Hill: ‘Well . . .’

    Lawrie: ‘This is what I don’t get, you know, because you’re not a clinician. You’re not seeing people dying every day. And this medicine prevents deaths by 80 per cent. So 80 per cent of those people who are dying today don’t need to die because there’s ivermectin.’

    Hill: ‘There are a lot, as I said, there are a lot of different opinions about this. As I say, some people simply . . .’

    Lawrie: ‘We are looking at the data; it doesn’t matter what other people say. We are the ones who are tasked with looking at the data and reassuring everybody that this cheap and effective treatment will save lives. It’s clear. You don’t have to say, well, so-and-so says this, and so-and-so says that. It’s absolutely crystal clear. We can save lives today. If we can get the government to buy ivermectin.’

    Hill: ‘Well, I don’t think it’s as simple as that, because you’ve got trials . . .’

    Lawrie: ‘It is as simple as that. We don’t have to wait for studies . . . we have enough evidence now that shows that ivermectin saves lives, it prevents hospitalisation. It saves the clinical staff going to work every day and being exposed. And frankly, I’m shocked at how you are not taking responsibility for that decision. And you still haven’t told me who is [influencing you]? Who is giving you that opinion? Because you keep saying you’re in a sensitive position. I appreciate you are in a sensitive position, if you’re being paid for something and you’re being told [to support] a certain narrative . . . that is a sensitive position. So, then you kind of have to decide, well, do I take this payment? Because in actual fact, [you] can see [your false] conclusions are going to harm people. So maybe you need to say, I’m not going to be paid for this. I can see the evidence, and I will join the Cochrane team as a volunteer, like everybody on the Cochrane team is a volunteer. Nobody’s being paid for this work.’

    Hill: ‘I think fundamentally, we’re reaching the [same] conclusion about the survival benefit. We’re both finding a significant effect on survival.’

    Lawrie: ‘No, I’m grading my evidence. I’m saying I’m sure of this evidence. I’m saying I’m absolutely sure it prevents deaths. There is nothing as effective as this treatment. What is your reluctance? Whose conclusion is that?’
    Hill complains again that outsiders are influencing him.
    Lawrie: ‘You keep referring to other people. It’s like you don’t trust yourself. If you were to trust yourself, you would know that you have made an error and you need to correct it because you know, in your heart, that this treatment prevents death.’

    Hill: ‘Well, I know, I know for a fact that the data right now is not going to get the drug approved.’

    Lawrie: ‘But, Andy – know this will come out. It will come out that there were all these barriers to the truth being told to the public and to the evidence being presented. So please, this is your opportunity just to acknowledge [the truth] in your review, change your conclusions, and come on board with this Cochrane Review, which will be definitive. It will be the review that shows the evidence and gives the proof. This was the consensus on Wednesday night’s meeting with 20 experts.’
    Hill protests that the US National Institutes of Health will not agree to recommend ivermectin.
    Lawrie: ‘Yeah, because the NIH is owned by the vaccine lobby.’

    Hill: ‘That’s not something I know about.’

    Lawrie: ‘Well, all I’m saying is this smacks of corruption and you are being played.’

    Hill: ‘I don’t think so.’

    Lawrie: ‘Well then, you have no excuse because your work in that review is flawed. It’s rushed. It is not properly put together.’
    Lawrie points out that Hill’s study ignores a host of clinical outcomes that affect patients. She scolds Hill for ignoring the beneficial effects of ivermectin as prophylaxis, its effect on speed to testing negative for the virus, on the need for mechanical ventilation, on reduced admissions to intensive care, and other outcomes that are clinically meaningful. ‘This is bad research . . . bad research. So, at this point, I don’t know . . . you seem like a nice guy, but I am really, really worried about you.’
    Hill: ‘Okay. Yeah. I mean, it’s, it’s a difficult situation.’

    Lawrie: ‘No, you might be in a difficult situation. I’m not, because I have no paymaster. I can tell the truth. How can you deliberately try and mess it up . . . you know?’

    Hill: ‘It’s not messing it up. It’s saying that we need, we need a short time to look at some more studies.’

    Lawrie: ‘So, how long are you going to let people carry on dying unnecessarily – up to you? What is, what is the timeline that you’ve allowed for this, then?’

    Hill: ‘Well, I think . . . I think that it goes to WHO and the NIH and the FDA [US Food and Drug Administration] and the EMA [European Medicines Agency]. And they’ve got to decide when they think enough’s enough.’

    Lawrie: ‘How do they decide? Because there’s nobody giving them good evidence synthesis, because yours is certainly not good.’

    Hill: ‘Well, when yours comes out, which will be in the very near future . . . at the same time, there’ll be other trials producing results, which will nail it with a bit of luck. And we’ll be there.’

    Lawrie: ‘It’s already nailed.’

    Hill: ‘No, that’s, that’s not the view of the WHO and the FDA.’

    Lawrie: ‘You’d rather risk loads of people’s lives. Do you know if you and I stood together on this, we could present a united front and we could get this thing. We could make it happen. We could save lives; we could prevent [British National Health Service doctors and nurses] people from getting infected. We could prevent the elderly from dying.

    ‘These are studies conducted around the world in several different countries. And they’re all saying the same thing. Plus there’s all sorts of other evidence to show that it works. Randomised controlled trials do not need to be the be-all and end-all. But [even] based on the randomised controlled trials, it is clear that ivermectin works. It prevents deaths and it prevents harms and it improves outcomes for people . . .

    ‘I can see we’re getting nowhere because you have an agenda, whether you like it or not, whether you admit to it or not, you have an agenda. And the agenda is to kick this down the road as far as you can. So . . . we are trying to save lives. That’s what we do. I’m a doctor and I’m going to save as many lives as I can. And I’m going to do that through getting the message [out] on ivermectin. Okay. Unfortunately, your work is going to impair that, and you seem to be able to bear the burden of many, many deaths, which I cannot do.’

    Lawrie then asks again: ‘Would you tell me? I would like to know who pays you as a consultant through WHO?’

    Hill: ‘It’s Unitaid.’

    Lawrie: ‘All right. So who helped to . . . Whose conclusions are those on the review that you’ve done? Who is not listed as an author? Who’s actually contributed?’

    Hill: ‘Well, I mean, I don’t really want to get into, I mean, it . . . Unitaid . . .’

    Lawrie: ‘I think that . . . it needs to be clear. I would like to know who, who are these other voices that are in your paper that are not acknowledged? Does Unitaid have a say? Do they influence what you write?’

    Hill: ‘Unitaid has a say in the conclusions of the paper. Yeah.’

    Lawrie: ‘Okay. So, who is it in Unitaid, then? Who is giving you opinions on your evidence?’

    Hill: ‘Well, it’s just the people there. I don’t . . .’

    Lawrie: ‘So they have a say in your conclusions.’

    Hill: ‘Yeah.’

    Lawrie: ‘Could you please give me a name of someone in Unitaid I could speak to, so that I can share my evidence and hope to try and persuade them to understand it?’

    Hill: ‘Oh, I’ll have a think about who to, to offer you with a name . . . but I mean, this is very difficult because I’m, you know, I’ve, I’ve got this role where I’m supposed to produce this paper and we’re in a very difficult, delicate balance . . .’

    Lawrie: ‘Who are these people? Who are these people saying this?’

    Hill: ‘Yeah . . . it’s a very strong lobby . . .’

    Lawrie: ‘Okay. Look, I think I can see kind of a dead end, because you seem to have a whole lot of excuses, but, um, you know, that to, to justify bad research practice. So I’m really, really sorry about this, Andy. I really, really wish, and you’ve explained quite clearly to me, in both what you’ve been saying and in your body language that you’re not entirely comfortable with your conclusions, and that you’re in a tricky position because of whatever influence people are having on you, and including the people who have paid you and who have basically written that conclusion for you.’

    Hill: ‘You’ve just got to understand I’m in a difficult position. I’m trying to steer a middle ground and it’s extremely hard.’

    Lawrie: ‘Yeah. Middle ground. The middle ground is not a middle ground . . . You’ve taken a position right to the other extreme calling for further trials that are going to kill people. So this will come out, and you will be culpable. And I can’t understand why you don’t see that, because the evidence is there and you are not just denying it, but your work’s actually actively obfuscating the truth. And this will come out. So I’m really sorry . . . As I say, you seem like a nice guy, but I think you’ve just kind of been misled somehow.’
    Hill promises he will do everything in his power to get ivermectin approved if she will give him six weeks.
    Hill: ‘Well, what I hope is that this, this stalemate that we’re in doesn’t last very long. It lasts a matter of weeks. And I guarantee I will push for this to last for as short amount of time as possible.’

    Lawrie: ‘So, how long do you think the stalemate will go on for? How long do you think you will be paid to [make] the stalemate go on?’

    Hill: ‘From my side. Okay . . . I think end of February, we will be there, six weeks.’

    Lawrie: ‘How many people die every day?’

    Hill: ‘Oh, sure. I mean, you know, 15,000 people a day.’

    Lawrie: ‘Fifteen thousand people a day times six weeks . . . because at this rate, all other countries are getting ivermectin except the UK and the USA, because the UK and the USA and Europe are owned by the vaccine lobby.’

    Hill: ‘My goal is to get the drug approved and to do everything I can to get it approved so that it reaches the maximum . . .’

    Lawrie: ‘You’re not doing everything you can, because everything you can would involve saying to those people who are paying you, “I can see this prevents deaths. So I’m not going to support this conclusion any more, and I’m going to tell the truth”.’

    Hill: ‘What, I’ve got to do my responsibilities to get as much support as I can to get this drug approved as quickly as possible.’

    Lawrie: ‘Well, you’re not going to get it approved the way you’ve written that conclusion. You’ve actually shot yourself in the foot, and you’ve shot us all in the foot. All of . . . everybody trying to do something good. You have actually completely destroyed it.’

    Hill: ‘Okay. Well, that’s where we’ll, I guess we’ll have to agree to differ.’

    Lawrie: ‘Yeah. Well, I don’t know how you sleep at night, honestly.’
    Kennedy adds that at the conclusion of a January 14, 2021 conference on ivermectin, Dr Lawrie declared that had the drug been employed in 2020, ‘when medical colleagues around the world first alerted the authorities to its efficacy, millions of lives could have been saved, and the pandemic with all its associated suffering and loss brought to a rapid and timely end’.
    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  22. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (21st December 2021), Denise/Dizi (21st December 2021), East Sun (23rd December 2021), Ewan (21st December 2021), gord (21st December 2021), Gwin Ru (21st December 2021), Harmony (21st December 2021), mojo (21st December 2021), Pam (2nd January 2022), pyrangello (27th December 2021), Reinhard (2nd January 2022), Sadieblue (1st January 2022), Sue (Ayt) (21st December 2021), Sunny (3rd January 2022), Vangelo (22nd December 2021)

  23. Link to Post #292
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,088 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    Homemade Hydroxychloroquine
    12/24/21
    Riverside Homestead Life
    61.7K subscribers

    ( I can't vouch for this personally, but the recipe is simple enough and wouldn't it be great if it really works?)

    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  24. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (1st January 2022), Harmony (2nd January 2022), Hym (3rd January 2022), Pam (2nd January 2022), Reinhard (2nd January 2022), Sadieblue (1st January 2022), Tintin (6th January 2022), wondering (2nd January 2022)

  25. Link to Post #293
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    24th January 2014
    Location
    Boulder, Colorado
    Language
    English
    Age
    65
    Posts
    282
    Thanks
    397
    Thanked 2,504 times in 274 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    From personal experience through a friend I can confirm that the US Gov is confiscating at least some IVM shipments coming into the US from India.

  26. The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to TravelerJim For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (1st January 2022), fifi (5th January 2022), Harmony (2nd January 2022), Hym (3rd January 2022), Jad (1st January 2022), Kryztian (7th January 2022), onawah (2nd January 2022), Pam (2nd January 2022), Sadieblue (1st January 2022), Spiral (1st January 2022), Sunny (1st January 2022), Tintin (6th January 2022), Vangelo (2nd January 2022), wondering (2nd January 2022)

  27. Link to Post #294
    Philippines Avalon Member
    Join Date
    29th May 2013
    Age
    58
    Posts
    3,059
    Thanks
    4,661
    Thanked 13,266 times in 2,725 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    So I guess my big question now is do we need something more that can protect us from the synthetic hydras which are discussed here:

    https://rumble.com/vqui76-the-evil-o...-creation.html

    Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vo8c30
    good speculation. Dr Judy Mikovits seem to have a different opinion.

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/8Of90szs9CcF/

  28. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Bubu For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (2nd January 2022), Harmony (2nd January 2022), Hym (3rd January 2022), Pam (2nd January 2022), Sadieblue (2nd January 2022), Sunny (3rd January 2022), Tintin (6th January 2022), wondering (2nd January 2022)

  29. Link to Post #295
    Bulgaria Avalon Member
    Join Date
    19th October 2021
    Language
    English
    Age
    55
    Posts
    77
    Thanks
    28
    Thanked 324 times in 69 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    Quote Posted by Bubu (here)
    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    So I guess my big question now is do we need something more that can protect us from the synthetic hydras which are discussed here:

    https://rumble.com/vqui76-the-evil-o...-creation.html

    Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vo8c30
    good speculation. Dr Judy Mikovits seem to have a different opinion.

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/8Of90szs9CcF/
    the great deception is to believe that GOD is separate from His creation ... and this because we do not understand the why of it ...

  30. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to mozo33 For This Post:

    Bubu (2nd January 2022), Hym (3rd January 2022), onawah (2nd January 2022), Pam (2nd January 2022), Sadieblue (2nd January 2022), Tintin (6th January 2022), wondering (2nd January 2022)

  31. Link to Post #296
    Philippines Avalon Member
    Join Date
    29th May 2013
    Age
    58
    Posts
    3,059
    Thanks
    4,661
    Thanked 13,266 times in 2,725 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    Quote Posted by mozo33 (here)
    Quote Posted by Bubu (here)
    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    So I guess my big question now is do we need something more that can protect us from the synthetic hydras which are discussed here:

    https://rumble.com/vqui76-the-evil-o...-creation.html

    Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vo8c30
    good speculation. Dr Judy Mikovits seem to have a different opinion.

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/8Of90szs9CcF/
    the great deception is to believe that GOD is separate from His creation ... and this because we do not understand the why of it ...
    So true. we also need to understand that most people dont understand because of the great deception. Whenever a self proclaimed knowledge guru starts talking/ insinuating of a separate god I stop listening at once.

  32. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Bubu For This Post:

    Hym (3rd January 2022), onawah (2nd January 2022), Sadieblue (2nd January 2022), Tintin (6th January 2022), wondering (5th January 2022)

  33. Link to Post #297
    Bulgaria Avalon Member
    Join Date
    19th October 2021
    Language
    English
    Age
    55
    Posts
    77
    Thanks
    28
    Thanked 324 times in 69 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    Quote Posted by Bubu (here)
    Quote Posted by mozo33 (here)
    Quote Posted by Bubu (here)
    Quote Posted by onawah (here)
    So I guess my big question now is do we need something more that can protect us from the synthetic hydras which are discussed here:

    https://rumble.com/vqui76-the-evil-o...-creation.html

    Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vo8c30
    good speculation. Dr Judy Mikovits seem to have a different opinion.

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/8Of90szs9CcF/
    the great deception is to believe that GOD is separate from His creation ... and this because we do not understand the why of it ...
    So true. we also need to understand that most people dont understand because of the great deception. Whenever a self proclaimed knowledge guru starts talking/ insinuating of a separate god I stop listening at once.
    for this reason Jesus said all who came before him were robbers and thieves .... robbers and thieves being liars ... ( the prophets before him all speaking to a god separate from themselves ) not that it is/was out of the order of things, as without division there would be no multiplication ... division being separation as in the death of a seed/son ... John 12:24 ...

  34. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mozo33 For This Post:

    Sadieblue (6th January 2022), Tintin (6th January 2022)

  35. Link to Post #298
    United States Avalon Member WhiteFeather's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th July 2011
    Location
    Grounded With Gaia
    Posts
    6,060
    Thanks
    39,262
    Thanked 36,971 times in 5,651 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    I'm not sure if this video was posted. If so please remove it.
    Rather long video but worth the watch. I'll try and post a summary of the video shortly. In what I have read, this video has been removed several times on YouTube. So watch it before it's lifted.



    Mod note from Bill:

    This was the Joe Rogan and Dr Robert Malone interview, highly recommended and important — but also fast disappearing from YouTube whenever anyone posts it. But there are other versions available on this thread:
    Joe Rogan interview with Dr. Robert Malone | December 2021

    Last edited by Bill Ryan; 5th January 2022 at 13:26.
    "Although I Live On This World, I Choose Not To Live In It"
    <:~W.F.~:>

    "The answer to every question can be found in nature, if one knows how to look and listen”
    Gwilda Wiyaka

    "Everything on the Earth has a purpose, Every disease a herb to cure it, and every person a mission. This is the Indian theory of existence".
    Mourning Dove Salish


  36. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to WhiteFeather For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (5th January 2022), Sadieblue (6th January 2022), Tintin (6th January 2022), wondering (5th January 2022)

  37. Link to Post #299
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    34,268
    Thanks
    208,939
    Thanked 457,518 times in 32,788 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    Another video from Chris Martenson, with a clever title once again... it's largely about Ivermectin. Interestingly, Chris is no longer self-censoring the word in his presentation.

    (Also here on Odysee if YouTube takes this down)


  38. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    ClearWater (7th January 2022), Ewan (5th January 2022), Gwin Ru (5th January 2022), Jambo (5th January 2022), kudzy (6th January 2022), lisalu (5th January 2022), mojo (6th January 2022), Sadieblue (6th January 2022), Tintin (6th January 2022), Vangelo (6th January 2022), wondering (5th January 2022), Yoda (5th January 2022)

  39. Link to Post #300
    UK Moderator/Librarian/Administrator Tintin's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd June 2017
    Location
    Project Avalon library
    Language
    English
    Age
    54
    Posts
    5,442
    Thanks
    64,660
    Thanked 46,592 times in 5,410 posts

    Default Re: Ivermectin

    A wonderful neat 12 minute video here that summarises Ivermectin's history, and which might be a very good introduction for anyone you may know who may have any trepidation about using this drug.

    Original source: https://odysee.com/@FrontlineCovid19...NAL_CUT_H264:e

    Brief description
    Discover the truth about Ivermectin in this enlightening documentary. Director Adrian Ursu travels back in time to share the facts about its natural origins and how it earned the name, “The Wonder Drug.”

    Avalon Library

    “If a man does not keep pace with [fall into line with] his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away.” - Thoreau

  40. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Tintin For This Post:

    avid (6th January 2022), Bill Ryan (6th January 2022), ClearWater (7th January 2022), mojo (6th January 2022), RunningDeer (6th January 2022), Sadieblue (6th January 2022), Vangelo (6th January 2022)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 15 of 22 FirstFirst 1 5 15 22 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts