Who sets the moral limit? Who says "this is the red line?"Posted by I am B (here)
From the point the most basic of rules gets detached from the basic moral value and is put into words, it becomes open to interpretation and corruption of it's meaning. Which makes it completely useless to it's only purpose.
If you describe "The moral value", what would that mean in simple words here?
We live here, at that point, very much"When the state is most corrupt, then the laws are most multiplied. " - Tacitus
There are so many ways to play this ideology around, it would take more life time that i have available. But in short, you can think someone is not "altruistic" to you because they don't like the same purposes you like. Just the other day in Canada people were willing to burn books, is that something "altruistically" you would support? Then you may be an 'enemy' if you dislike it, for the rest of the world, right? Or... not?Happened since forever, therefore, it is not possible to make "everyone become one" like that, but to embrace the differences and goodwillingly jump into the chaos pool of humanity. Then, if everyone does it altruistically, we may get to a point where we will actually end up united.
"Critical relation to the truth regime in which one lives" comes to mindThen we could discuss if it is possible inside human nature. Anyways, the only way to get closer to it, is to sincerely improve oneself instead of trying to change others. There will always be division, but the point is to embrace it, not to fight it.