+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 28

Thread: Archbishop Viganò: Considerations on the New World Order

  1. Link to Post #1
    United States Avalon Member ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    73
    Posts
    28,007
    Thanks
    29,327
    Thanked 132,292 times in 20,913 posts

    Default Archbishop Viganò: Considerations on the New World Order

    .
    A couple of weeks ago now, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò delivered the following speech.

    This speech provides great insight into the war, now in engaging the minds, bodies and souls of humanity in climatic battle, between those guided by their spiritual connection to a higher being (commonly called "God"), and those guided by their connection to Luciferianism.

    I touched on this war, in a more limited, far less erudite, fashion in my recent thread World War III -- A New World Order. We've been in this war for decades.

    Archbishop Viganò has been mentioned before on Avalon, for his earlier writings warning us of this war, and of the deep state that is now in the final phases of a global, detailed, organized and exceedingly well financed operation to imprison humanity under a New World Order.

    Recent such mentions include:I am now reading Archbishop Viganò's speech from Viganò: Considerations on the Great Reset and the New World Order (lifesitenews.com).

    I will post the entirety of his speech, as translated into English, as well as a video of his actual presentation, in Latin, in the next two posts.

    It's an erudite and deeply informed speech. My understanding of where humanity is at, in this Great Battle, will never be the same again.

    I recommend you set aside a little time and consider what Archbishop Viganò has to share with us.
    Last edited by ThePythonicCow; 16th September 2021 at 10:39.
    My (sometimes rather dormant) blog: theMooster.net

  2. The Following 47 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    Agape (17th September 2021), AlaBil (16th September 2021), Arcturian108 (16th September 2021), atman (16th September 2021), Ben (17th September 2021), Bill Ryan (16th September 2021), bluestflame (16th September 2021), bobme (17th September 2021), ByTheNorthernSea (2nd October 2021), ClearWater (16th September 2021), Daughter of Time (18th September 2021), Denise/Dizi (2nd October 2021), Ewan (16th September 2021), ExomatrixTV (16th September 2021), Gemma13 (16th September 2021), gord (16th September 2021), gs_powered (16th September 2021), Harmony (16th September 2021), Heart to heart (17th September 2021), Ioneo (16th September 2021), Johan (Keyholder) (16th September 2021), Journeyman (16th September 2021), justntime2learn (17th September 2021), lisalu (17th September 2021), mab777 (16th September 2021), Mercedes (16th September 2021), Mike (16th September 2021), mountain_jim (16th September 2021), muxfolder (17th September 2021), pabranno (16th September 2021), palehorse (16th September 2021), Pam (16th September 2021), Peace in Oz (16th September 2021), Reinhard (16th September 2021), rgray222 (22nd September 2021), RingoRon (22nd September 2021), RunningDeer (16th September 2021), Sadieblue (16th September 2021), Snoweagle (16th September 2021), Stephanie (16th September 2021), thepainterdoug (16th September 2021), Tintin (16th September 2021), Tracie (Bodhicee) (17th September 2021), Tyy1907 (16th September 2021), Vangelo (30th September 2021), wondering (16th September 2021), Zirconian (16th September 2021)

  3. Link to Post #2
    United States Avalon Member ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    73
    Posts
    28,007
    Thanks
    29,327
    Thanked 132,292 times in 20,913 posts

    Default Re: Archbishop Viganò: Considerations on the New World Order

    .
    Here is the text of Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò's recent speech, as translated to English, from Viganò: Considerations on the Great Reset and the New World Order (lifesitenews.com):

    === ===

    Viganò: Considerations on the Great Reset and the New World Order

    Only by turning to Christ can the wicked project of the New World Order
    be defeated and the Holy Church be purified of traitors and renegades.


    Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò

    Tue Aug 31, 2021 - 5:38 pm EDT
    (LifeSiteNews) – Editor’s Note: the following is a speech delivered by Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò on August 28, 2021.

    LIBERA NOS A MALO
    Considerations on the Great Reset and the New World Order

    No one will be part of the New World Order
    unless he carries out an act of worship to Lucifer.
    No one will enter the New Age unless he receives Luciferian initiation.

    David Spangler
    Director of the United Nations Planetary Initiative Project
    (Reflections on The Christ, Findhorn, 1978)

    For more than a year and a half we have been helplessly witnessing the succession of incongruent events to which most of us are unable to give a plausible justification. The pandemic emergency has made particularly evident the contradictions and illogicalities of measures nominally intended to limit contagion – lockdowns, curfews, closures of commercial activities, limitations of public services and classes, suspension of citizens’ rights – but which are disavowed daily by conflicting voices, by clear evidence of ineffectiveness, by contradictions on the part of the same health authorities. There is no need to list the measures that almost all the governments of the world have taken without achieving the promised results. If we limit ourselves to the presumed advantages that the experimental gene serum should have brought to the community – above all immunity to the virus and renewed freedom of movement – we discover that an Oxford University study published in The Lancet (here) stated that the viral load of those vaccinated with a double dose is 251 times greater than the first strains of the virus (here), despite the proclamations of world leaders, starting with the Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi, according to whom “whoever gets vaccinated lives, whoever does not get the vaccine dies.” The side effects of the gene serum, cleverly disguised or deliberately not registered by the national health authorities, seem to confirm the danger of taking the vaccine and the disturbing unknowns for the health of citizens which we will soon have to face.

    From science to scientism

    The art of medicine – which is not science, but the application of scientific principles to different cases each time, on an experiential and experimental basis – seems to have renounced its prudence, in the name of an emergency that has risen to the level of priesthood of a religion – the religion of science, in fact – which in order to be such has cloaked itself in a dogmatism bordering on superstition. The ministers of this cult have constituted themselves as a caste of untouchables, exempt from any criticism even when their claims are denied by the evidence of the facts. The principles of medicine, considered universally valid until February 2020, have given way to improvisation, to the point of being advised to vaccinate at the height of the pandemic, the obligation of masks being imposed although they are useless, the arbitrary mandating of bizarre distances, the prohibition of treatments with effective drugs and the imposition of experimental gene therapies in violation of normal safety protocols. And just as there are new Covid priests, so there are also new heretics, that is, those who reject the new pandemic religion and want to remain faithful to the Hippocratic Oath. Not infrequently, the aura of infallibility that surrounds virologists and other more or less titled scientists does not seem to be questioned due to their conflicts of interest or by the substantial financial benefits received by pharmaceutical companies, which under normal conditions would be scandalous and criminal.

    What many fail to understand is the inconsistency between the stated aims and the means that are adopted in a constantly changing manner in order to achieve them. If in Sweden the absence of lockdowns and masks did not lead to higher infection rates than those in countries where people have been confined to their homes or where they have had masks put on even in primary schools, this element is not considered as proof of ineffectiveness of the measures. If in Israel or in Great Britain mass vaccination has increased infections and made them more virulent, their example does not induce the rulers of other countries to be cautious in the vaccination campaign, but rather pushes them to evaluate the mandatory nature of their giving of the vaccine. If ivermectin or hyperimmune plasma prove to be valid treatments, this is not enough to authorize them, let alone recommend them. And those who wonder the reason for this disconcerting irrationality end up refraining from judgment, giving a sort of fideistic acceptance to the pronouncements of the Covid priests, or conversely considering doctors as unreliable sorcerers.

    A single script under a single direction

    As I said earlier, we are faced with a colossal deception, based on lies and fraud. This deception starts from the premise that the justifications put forward by the authorities in support of their actions are sincere. More simply, the mistake consists in believing that the rulers are honest and in assuming that they do not lie to us. So we persist in finding more or less plausible justifications, with the sole purpose of not recognizing that we are the object of a conspiracy planned to the smallest detail. And while we try to rationally explain irrational behavior, while we attribute logic to the illogical actions of those who govern us, cognitive dissonance leads us to close our eyes to reality and to believe the most shameless lies.

    We should have understood – I wrote it some time ago – that the Great Reset plan was not the result of the ravings of some “conspiracy theorist” but the crude evidence of a criminal plan, conceived for decades and aimed at establishing a universal dictatorship in which a minority of immeasurably rich and powerful people intends to enslave and subjugate the whole of humanity to the globalist ideology. The accusation of “conspiracy theory” could perhaps have made sense when the conspiracy was not yet evident, but today denying what the elite has planned since the 1950s is unjustifiable. What Kalergi, the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, Klaus Schwab, Jacques Attali and Bill Gates have been saying since World War II has been published in books and newspapers, commented on and taken up by international bodies and foundations, made up precisely by parties and government majorities. The United States of Europe, uncontrolled immigration, the reduction of wages, the cancellation of trade union guarantees, the renunciation of national sovereignty, the single currency, the control of citizens under the pretext of a pandemic, and the reduction of the population through the use of vaccines with new technologies are not recent inventions, but the result of a planned, organized and coordinated action – an action that clearly shows itself perfectly adhering to a single script under a single direction.

    The criminal mens

    Once it is understood that the present events have been intended in order to obtain certain results – and consequently to pursue certain interests on behalf of a minority part of humanity, with incalculable harm for the majority – we must also have the honesty to recognize the criminal mens [mind] of the authors of this plan. This criminal design also makes us understand the fraud perpetrated by civil authority in presenting certain measures as an unavoidable response to unpredictable events, when the events have been artfully created and magnified with the sole purpose of legitimizing a revolution – which Schwab identifies as the fourth industrial revolution – intended by the elite to the detriment of all humanity. The enslavement of authority is on the other hand the result of a process that began even earlier, with the French Revolution, and which made the political class the servant not of God (whose Lordship it disdainfully disregards) nor of the sovereign people (which it despises and uses only to legitimize itself), but of the economic and financial potentates, of the international oligarchy of bankers and usurers, of multinationals and pharmaceutical companies. In reality, on closer inspection, all these subjects belong to a small number of well-known very rich families.

    Equal enslavement is also evident in the media: journalists have accepted – without any scruple of conscience – prostituting themselves to the powerful, going so far as to censor the truth and spread shameless lies without even trying to give them the appearance of credibility. Up until last year journalists counted the numbers of the “victims” of Covid by presenting anyone who tested positive as terminally ill; today those who die after being vaccinated are always and only taken by a vague “illness,” and even before the post mortem examinations they officially decide that there is no correlation between a person’s death and the administration of the gene serum. They twist the truth with impunity when it does not confirm their narrative, bending it to fit their purposes.

    What has been happening for a year and a half had been widely announced, down to the smallest detail, by the creators of the Great Reset themselves; just as we were told the measures that would be adopted. On February 17, 1950, testifying before the United States Senate, the well-known banker James Warburg said, “We will have a world government, whether you like it or not. The only question that arises is whether this world government will be established by consensus or by force.” Four years later, the Bilderberg Group was born, which has counted among its members characters such as [Italian businessman Gianni] Agnelli, Henry Kissinger, Mario Monti, and the current Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi. In 1991, David Rockefeller wrote: “The world is ready for a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is certainly preferable to the national self-determination practiced in past centuries.” And he added: “We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the ‘right’ global crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.” Today we can affirm that this “right crisis” coincides with the pandemic emergency and with the “lockstep” outlined since 2010 by the Rockefeller Foundation document “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development,” in which the events we are now witnessing are all anticipated (here).

    In short, they have created a false problem in order to be able to impose population control measures as an apparent solution, cancel small and medium-sized businesses with lockdowns and the green pass to the benefit of a few international groups, demolish education by imposing distance learning, lower the cost of manpower and employees with “smart working,” privatize public health for the benefit of Big Pharma, and allow governments to use the state of emergency to legislate in derogation of the law and impose so-called vaccines on the entire population, making citizens traceable in all their movements and either chronically ill or sterile.

    Everything the elite wanted to do, they have done. And what is incomprehensible is that in the face of the evidence of the premeditation of this terrible crime against humanity, which sees the leaders of almost the whole world as accomplices and traitors, there is not a single magistrate who opens a file against them to ascertain the truth and condemn the guilty and complicit. Those who disagree are not only censored but pointed out as public enemies, as infectors, as non-persons for whom no rights are recognized.

    Deep state and deep church

    Now, in the face of a criminal plan it would be at least logical to denounce it and make it known, in order to then be able to avert it and try those who are guilty. The list of traitors should start with the heads of government, with cabinet members and elected officials, and then continue with the virologists and corrupt doctors, the complicit officials, the leaders of the armed forces incapable of opposing the violation of the Constitution, the sold-out journalists, the cowardly judges and the obsequious unions. In that long list that will perhaps be drawn up one day, the leaders of the Catholic Church should also be listed, starting with Bergoglio and not a few of the Bishops, who have become zealous executors of the will of the prince against the mandate received from Christ. And certainly, in that list, one would know the extent of the conspiracy and the number of the conspirators, confirming the crisis of authority and the perversion of civil and religious power. In short, it would be understood that the corrupt part of the civil authority – the deep state – and the corrupt part of ecclesiastical authority – the deep church – are two sides of the same coin, both instrumental to the establishment of the New World Order.

    However, in order to understand this alliance between civil and religious power, it is necessary to recognize the spiritual and eschatological dimension of the present conflict, framing it in the context of the war that Lucifer, ever since his fall, has waged against God. This war, whose outcomes have been decided ab æterno with the inexorable defeat of Satan and the Antichrist and the overwhelming victory of the Woman encircled with the stars, is now approaching its conclusion. This is why the forces of darkness are so wild at present, so impatient to cancel the name of Our Lord from the earth, to not only destroy his tangible presence in our cities by tearing down churches, demolishing crosses, and suppressing Christian holidays; but also by eliminating memory, cancelling Christian civilization, adulterating its teaching, and debasing its worship. And in order to do this, the presence of a faithful and courageous Hierarchy, ready to suffer martyrdom in order to defend Christian faith and moral teaching, is certainly an obstacle. This is why, from the very initial phase of the globalist plan, it was essential to corrupt the Hierarchy in morals and doctrine, to infiltrate it with fifth columns and sleeper cells, to deprive it of any supernatural yearning, and to make it vulnerable to blackmail thanks to financial and sexual scandals; all with the purpose of excluding it and eliminating it once its purpose has been achieved, according to established practice.

    This infiltration operation began at the end of the 1950’s, when the project of the New World Order was just taking shape. It began its own work of subversion a few years later, with the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, in view of which the election of Roncalli and the expulsion of Cardinal Siri, Pacelli’s “dauphin” or probable successor as pope, represented a reason for enthusiasm both for the progressive and modernist element within the Church, as well as for the communist, liberal, and Masonic element of the civil world. Vatican II represented within the ecclesial body what the Tennis Court Oath [of the French Revolution] was for civil society: the beginning of the Revolution. And if on many occasions I have drawn attention to the subversive nature of the Council, today I believe that a historical analysis deserves attention in which apparently disconnected facts acquire a disturbing significance, explaining many things.

    Liaisons dangereuses

    As Michael J. Matt has reported in a recent video at The Remnant (here), today we are beginning to put together all the pieces of the mosaic, and we discover – by the very admission of one of the protagonists – that Msgr. Hélder Câmara, Archbishop of Olinda and Recife in Brazil, had a meeting in those years with the young Klaus Schwab, the founder of the World Economic Forum and theorizer of the Great Reset. Once Schwab recognized Câmara for his opposition to the traditional Church and his revolutionary and pauperist theories, he invited him to the Davos Forum, considering his participation in this event as extremely important in view of the project of the New Order. We know that Hélder Câmara was among the organizers of the “Pact of the Catacombs,” which was signed by about forty ultra-progressivist Bishops on 16 November 1965, a few days before the closing of the Council. Among the heretical theses of that document, there is also collaboration in the establishment of “another, new social order” (here, n. 9) based on justice and equality. And we are not surprised to learn that among the signatories there was also Msgr. Enrique Angelelli, the auxiliary bishop of Cordoba in Argentina, “[a] point of reference for then-Father Jorge Mario Bergoglio” (here). Bergoglio himself declared right from the beginning of his Pontificate that he agreed with the demands of the Pact of the Catacombs. On 20 October 2019, during the Synod on the Amazon, the celebration of the pact between the conspirators was repeated in the Catacombs of Santa Domitilla (here), confirming that the plan begun at the Council had found fulfillment precisely in Jorge Mario Bergoglio. Far from distancing himself from the ultra-progressivists who support him and who determined his election at the last Conclave, Bergoglio never misses an opportunity to give proof of his perfect coherence with the plan of the New World Order, beginning with the collaboration of Vatican commissions and dicasteries with environmentalism of a Malthusian matrix and their participation in the Council for Inclusive Capitalism, a global alliance with the Rothschilds, the Rockefeller Foundation, and large banks. So on the one hand we have David Rockefeller with the Trilateral Commission, and on the other we have Klaus Schwab, who is related by marriage with the Rothschilds (here?), with the World Economic Forum, and both of them are arm-in-arm with the head of the Catholic Church to establish the New Order by means of the Great Reset, as has been planned since the 1950’s.

    The world depopulation plan

    Among the associates of this pactum sceleris there must also be counted some members of the Pontifical Academy for Life, which recently had its organizational structure overturned by Bergoglio himself when he removed the members who were most faithful to the Magisterium, replacing them with supporters of depopulation, contraception, and abortion. There should be no surprise at the Holy See’s support for vaccines: in June 2011 the Sovereign Independent carried the headline on its front page: “Depopulation Through Forced Vaccination: The Zero Carbon Solution!” (here). Beside the headline, a photograph of Bill Gates was accompanied by a quote from him: “The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive services [abortion and contraception], we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.” This is what Bill Gates said eleven years ago. Today he is one of the shareholders of the Black Rock group that finances the pharmaceutical companies that produce the vaccines, one of the main sponsors of the World Health Organization (WHO), and also of a myriad of public and private entities connected to health. At his side we curiously find George Soros, the “philanthropist” of the Open Society, which together with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation recently invested in a British company that produces swabs for Covid testing (here). And since we are talking about economic issues, I would like to recall that the Holy See has held shares worth about €20 million in two pharmaceutical companies that have produced a contraceptive drug (here), and more recently it invested in a fund that guaranteed very high profits in the event of a geopolitical or pandemic crisis thanks to speculation on international currencies, the “Geo-Risk” fund managed by the Merrill Lynch investment bank, which had to close it because of its skyrocketing yields after the first few months of the pandemic (here). Other capital, coming from the “Peter’s Pence” collection, had been used to finance various other initiatives, even collaborating with [Italian businessman] Lapo Elkann, whose endeavors include Rocketman, the autobiographical film of Elton John. To say nothing of the real estate speculations and the purchase of the London building at 60 Sloane Avenue that the news coverage has amply informed us on, a purchase that I know, from a reliable source, was decided on by Bergoglio himself. And then there’s China: always in the name of “coherence” and the “church of the poor for the poor” that is so dear to Bergoglio’s heart, there are those who believe that the secret Accord prepared by the Jesuits and former-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick may have obtained substantial funding from the communist regime in Beijing in exchange for the Vatican’s silence over the persecution of Catholics and the violation of human rights (here).

    Deep state interference

    There have been manifold examples of interference by the deep state in the life of the Church. We cannot forget the emails of John Podesta and Hillary Clinton, which show the intention to oust Benedict XVI from the papacy and so to initiate a new “springtime of the Church” that would be progressivist and globalist, which later came about with the resignation of Benedict and the election of the Argentine. Nor can we overlook the interference of entities and institutions that are anything but close to religion, such as the B’nai B’rith, in dictating the direction of the “renewal” of the Church after Vatican II and most of all under this Pontificate. Finally, we should remember on the one hand the disdainful refusals to grant audiences to conservative political and institutional personalities, and on the other hand the passionate smiling encounters with leaders of the Left and of progressivism, along with expressions of enthusiastic satisfaction on the occasion of their election. Many of them owe their success to having attended universities run by the Society of Jesus or circles of Catholicism that in Italy would be called Dossettian,[1] where the network of social and political relations constitutes a sort of progressive Freemasonry and ensures dazzling careers for so-called “adult Catholics,” those who use the name “Christian” without behaving consistently with Christian faith and morality in their service of public affairs: Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi; Romano Prodi, Mario Monti, Giuseppe Conte, and Mario Draghi; to name only a few. As we can see, the cooperation between the deep state and deep church is long-standing and has now produced the results hoped for by its supporters, with very serious damage to both the State and religion.

    The closure of churches in early 2020, even before the civil authorities imposed the lockdowns; the prohibition of the celebration of Masses and the administration of the Sacraments during the pandemic emergency; the grotesque ceremony performed on 27 March 2020 in Saint Peter’s Square (here); the insistence on vaccines and their promotion as morally legitimate despite having been produced with cell lines originating with aborted fetuses; Bergoglio’s declarations that the genetic serum represents a “moral duty” for every Christian; the introduction of the “Green Pass” health passport in the Vatican and more recently in Catholic schools and in some seminaries; the Holy See prohibiting Bishops from announcing that they are against the vaccination obligation, promptly endorsed by certain Bishops’ Conferences – these are all elements that demonstrate the subordination of the deep church to the orders of the deep state, and the way in which the Bergoglian church is an integral part of the globalist plan. If we combine all this with the idolatrous cult of the pachamama right under the arches of Saint Peter’s Basilica; the insistence on irenicist ecumenism, pacifism, and pauperism; the endorsement of situation ethics and the substantial legitimization of adultery and concubinage in Amoris Laetitia; the declaration that the death penalty is morally illicit; the endorsement of left-wing politicians, revolutionary leaders, and abortion activists; the words of understanding for LGBT issues, homosexuals, and transsexuals; the silence over the legitimization of homosexual unions and the even more disconcerting silence over the blessing of sodomitical couples by German Bishops and priests; and the prohibition of the Tridentine Mass with the abolition of Benedict XVI’s Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum, we realize that Jorge Mario Bergoglio is carrying out the task entrusted to him by the globalist elite, which wants him to be the liquidator of the Catholic Church and the founder of a philanthropic and ecumenical sect of Masonic inspiration that is meant to constitute the Universal Religion in support of the New Order. Whether this action is being carried out with full awareness, out of fear, or under blackmail, nothing detracts from the gravity of what is happening, nor from the moral responsibility of those who promote it.

    The Luciferian matrix of the New World Order

    At this point, it is necessary to clarify what is meant by the “New World Order,” or rather what its creators mean, regardless of what they say publicly. Because on the one hand, it is true that there is a project, that certain people conceived it and are charged with carrying it out; but on the other hand it is also true that the inspiring principles of the project are not always disclosed, or at least they cannot be openly admitted to be closely related to what is happening today, since such an admission would arouse opposition even from those who are the most peaceful and moderate. It is one thing to impose the “Green Pass” with the excuse of the pandemic; but it is quite another to recognize that the purpose of the passport is to accustom us to being tracked; and still another to say that this total control is the “mark of the Beast” of which the Book of the Apocalypse speaks (Rev 13:16-18). The reader will forgive me if, in order to demonstrate my argument, I must resort to using quotations of such gravity and wickedness that they arouse bewilderment and horror – but this is necessary if we are to understand what the real intentions of the architects of this plot really are, and the true nature of the epochal battle they are waging against Christ and His Church.

    In order to understand the esoteric roots of the thought that lies at the foundation of the United Nations, once longed for by [19th-century Italian political activist] Giuseppe Mazzini, we cannot fail to consider characters such as Albert Pike, Eliphas Levi, Helena Blavatsky, Alice Ann Bailey, or other disciples of Luciferian sects. Their writings, published since the late nineteenth century, are quite revealing.

    Albert Pike, a friend of Mazzini and a fellow Freemason, gave an address in 1889 in France to the highest levels of Freemasonry, which was then reprinted on 19 January 1935 by the English journal The Freemason. Pike declared:
    That which we must say to the crowd is, we worship a god, but it is the god one adores without superstition […]. The Masonic religion ought to be maintained in the purity of Luciferian doctrine by all of us who are initiates of the highest degrees. If Lucifer were not God, would Adonay [sic] [the God of the Christians] whose deeds prove his cruelty, perfidy and hatred of man, barbarism and repulsion of science, would Adonay and his priest calumniate him?

    “Yes, Lucifer is God, and unfortunately Adonay is also God. For the eternal law is that there is no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black, for the absolute can only exist as two gods: darkness being necessary to light to serve as its foil as the pedestal is necessary to the statue, and the brake to the locomotive… the doctrine of Satanism is a heresy; and the true and pure philosophical religion is the belief in Lucifer, the equal of Adonay; but Lucifer, God of Light and God of Good, is struggling for humanity against Adonay, the God of Darkness and Evil.
    This profession of faith in the divinity of Satan is not only an admission of who the real Great Architect that Freemasonry adores is, but also a blasphemous political project that passe through the ecumenism of Vatican II, whose first theorist was Freemasonry:

    The Christian, the Jew, the Moslem, the Buddhist, the follower of Confucius and Zoroaster can unite as brothers and join together in prayer to the only god who is above all the other gods (cf. Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma, ed. Bastogi, Foggia 1984, vol. VI, p. 153).


    And the identity of the “only god who is above all the other gods” has been well explained in the preceding quotation.

    In another letter, Pike wrote to Mazzini:

    We will unleash the nihilists and atheists and provoke a formidable social cataclysm that will clearly demonstrate to the nations, in all its horror, the effect of absolute atheism, the origin of barbarism and bloody subversion. Then citizens everywhere, forced to defend themselves against a world minority of revolutionaries, […] will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, finally revealed to the public’s view; a manifestation that will be followed by the destruction of Christianity and also of atheism, which will be conquered and crushed at the same time! (cf. Letter of 15 August 1871 to Giuseppe Mazzini, Library of the British Museum, London).

    It will not escape notice that the “great heresy of separativeness” sounds curiously in agreement with the ecumenism condemned by Pius XI in his Encyclical Mortalium Animos, an ecumenism that was adopted by the Declaration Dignitatis Humanae and recently merged into the doctrine of “inclusivity” formulated by those who allowed idolatrous worship to the pachamama to be offered in Saint Peter’s Basilica. It is clear that the term “separativeness” intends to designate in a negative key the necessary separation of good from evil, of true from false, of the right from wrong that constitutes the criterion of moral judgment of human behavior. “Inclusivity” opposes this distinction, allowing oneself to be deliberately contaminated by evil to adulterate the good, equating the true and the false in order to corrupt the former and give legitimacy to the latter.

    The shared ideological roots of ecumenism

    If one does not understand that the ideological roots of ecumenism are intrinsically linked to Masonic Luciferian esoterism, one cannot grasp the connection that links the doctrinal deviations of Vatican II to the plan of the New World Order. The revolution of 1968 was a sad example of those pacifist and ecumenist ambitions, in which the “Age of Aquarius” was celebrated by the musical Hair (1969) and then by John Lennon with Imagine (1971):
    Imagine there’s no heaven. It’s easy if you try.
    No hell below us. Above us only sky.
    Imagine all the people, living for today.
    Imagine there’s no countries. It isn’t hard to do.
    Nothing to kill or die for, and no religion too.
    Imagine all the people, living life in peace.
    You may say I’m a dreamer, but I’m not the only one.
    I hope someday you’ll join us, and the world will be as one.
    Imagine no possessions. I wonder if you can.
    No need for greed or hunger, a brotherhood of man.
    Imagine all the people, sharing all the world.
    This manifesto of Masonic nihilism can be considered the hymn of globalism and the new universal religion: it is no coincidence that it was used as the theme song for the 2012 Olympic Games in London, and more recently for those in Tokyo. A soul that is not led astray can only feel horror at these blasphemous words. The same is true for the words of Lennon’s no-less-blasphemous song God (1970):

    God is a concept by which we measure our pain. […]
    I just believe in me.


    I understand that for many it is distressing to accept that the Hierarchy may have allowed itself to be deceived by its enemies, making their requests their own in questions that touch the very soul of the Church. It is certain that there were Masonic prelates who succeeded in introducing their ideas into the Council by disguising them, but in the full awareness that they would inexorably lead to the realization of that demolition of Religion that is the premise for the establishment of the New Era – the Age of Aquarius – in which Our Lord is banished from society in order to welcome the Antichrist. One can then understand the winking indulgence given to Freemasonry by many Catholic personalities – I am thinking of Cardinals Martini and Ravasi, among the many – and their opposition to the excommunications that the Popes renewed against the sect. One also understands the reason for the enthusiasm of the Masonic Lodges at the election of Bergoglio, and conversely their ill-concealed hatred toward Benedict XVI, considered as the kathèkon [“the one who restrains” (cfr. 2 Thess 6:7)] to be eliminated.

    It should also be remembered, with some embarrassment, that certain statements by Ratzinger suggest an attempt to “Christianize” the globalist project, without condemning it as antichristic and anti-Christian:
    Let the Child of Bethlehem take you by the hand! Do not fear; put your trust in him! The life-giving power of his light is an incentive for building a new world order (here).
    These words, unfortunately, confirm the fallacy of Hegelian thought, which influenced the professor from Tubingen right up to the Throne. Certainly the Pontiff’s failure to take a position permitted him to be considered in some way an ally of the globalist plan, if Italian President Giorgio Napolitano was able to affirm in his 2006 year-end address speech to the Italian people: “There is harmony between Pope Benedict and me in supporting a New World Order” (31 December 2006). On the other hand, the Hegelian process of thesis-antithesis-synthesis echoes the motto of alchemy, Solve et Coagula, which was adopted by Freemasonry and by Luciferian esoterism. It is the motto that appears on the arms of Baphomet, the infernal idol adored by the highest levels of the Masonic sect, as is admitted by its most authoritative members. In his essay Lucifer Rising, Philip Jones specifies that the Hegelian dialectic “combines a form of Christianity as thesis with a pagan spiritualism as antithesis, with the result of a synthesis that is very similar to the Babylonian mystery religions.”

    The globalist pantheism of Theilard de Chardin

    Ecumenism is one of the key themes of globalist thought. This is confirmed by Robert Muller, who was the Assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations: “We must move as quickly as possible towards a one-world government, a one-world religion, and a single world leader.” Before him, one of the advocates of the League of Nations, Arthur Balfour, created the “Synthetic Society,” which had as its purpose the creation of the “one-world religion.” Pierre Theilard de Chardin himself, a Jesuit heretic condemned by the Holy Office and today a celebrated theologian of progressivism, considered the United Nations as “the progressivist institutional incarnation of his philosophy,” expressing his hope that “a general convergence of religions on a universal Christ who fulfills them all….seems to me to be the only possible conversion of the world, and the only form in which a religion of the future can be conceived” in order to “reduce the gap between pantheism and Christianity by drawing out what could be called the Christian soul of Pantheism or the pantheistic aspect of Christianity.” It will not escape notice that the pachamama and the attribution of Marian connotations to Mother Earth turns these concepts of Theilard de Chardin into a disturbing reality. And that’s not all: Robert Muller, the world government theorist who is also a disciple of the theosophist Alice A. Bailey, declares: “Teilhard de Chardin influenced his companion [the Jesuit Father Emmanuel Saguez de Breuvery, who held important positions at the UN], who in turn inspired his colleagues, and they in turn initiated a rich process of global and long-term thought within the United Nations, which has affected many nations and people all over the world. I was profoundly influenced by Teilhard.” In his book The Future of Man, Theilard writes: “Even if its form is not yet visible, tomorrow humanity will wake up in a pan-organized world.” Muller was the founder of the World Core Curriculum, which aimed “to orient our children towards global citizenship, earth-centered beliefs, socialist values and the collective mindset, which are becoming a requirement for the work force of the 21st century” (New Man Magazine). And if he proudly claims Alice A. Bailey among his inspirers, we discover that she was a disciple of the Theosophic Movement founded by Helena Blavatsky, a declared Luciferian. In order to correctly understand Blavatsky’s character, here are a few citations from her writings:

    Lucifer represents Life, Thought, Progress, Civilization, Liberty, Independence… Lucifer is the Logos, the Serpent, the Savior.

    And, almost anticipating the pachamama:

    The Celestial Virgin thus becomes, at the same time, the Mother of Gods and Demons, because she is the ever-loving beneficent Divinity… But in antiquity and in reality the name [of this god] is Lucifer. Lucifer is the divine and earthly Light, both the Holy Spirit and Satan at the same moment.”


    And last but not least:

    It is Satan who is the god of our planet and the only god.


    It was Alice A. Bailey who founded the Lucifer Publishing Company, which is now known as the Lucis Publishing Company, closely related to the Lucis Trust, formerly the Lucifer Trust, recognized as an NGO by the United Nations. If we add to this heap of infernal ramblings the words of David Spangler, the Director of the Planetary Initiative Project of the United Nations, we will realize how terrible is the threat that is hanging over all of us:

    No one will be part of the New World Order unless he carries out an act of worship to Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he receives a Luciferian initiation (Reflections on the Christ, Findhorn, 1978).


    Alice A. Bailey writes about the New Age:

    The achievements of science, the conquests of nations and the conquests of territory are all indicative of the method of the Age of Pisces [the age of Christ], with its idealism, its militancy, and its separativity in all fields – religious, political, and economic. But the age of synthesis, of inclusivity, and understanding is upon us, and the new education of the Age of Aquarius [the age of the Antichrist] must very delicately begin to penetrate the human aura.


    Today we see how the teaching methods theorized by Muller in the World Core Curriculum have been adopted by almost all nations, including LGBT ideology, gender theory, and all other forms of indoctrination. This is confirmed by the former director of the WHO, Dr. Brock Chisolm, explaining what the UN educational policy would like to achieve:

    In order to achieve a world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, fidelity to family traditions, national patriotism, and religious dogmas (cf. Christian World Report, Marzo 1991, Vol. 3).

    Behold once again the fil rouge that links not only Klaus Schwab to Hélder Câmara, but also Robert Muller and Alice A. Bailey to Pierre Theilard de Chardin and Emmanuel Saguez de Breuvery, always in a globalist key and under the ill-omened inspiration of Luciferian thought. An in-depth analysis of these disturbing aspects will make it possible to shed light on the truth and reveal the complicity and betrayals of not a few churchmen who are enslaved to the enemy.

    Our response to the crisis of authority

    The corruption of authority is such that it is very difficult – at least in human terms – to hypothesize a peaceful way out. In the course of history, totalitarian regimes have been overthrown by force. It is difficult to think that the health dictatorship that has been established in recent months can be fought differently, since all the powers of the State, all of the means of information, all the international public and private institutions, all of the economic and financial potentates are complicit in this crime.

    Faced with this bleak scenario of corruption and conflict of interest, it is indispensable that all those who are not subservient to the globalist plan unite in a compact and cohesive front, in order to defend their natural and religious rights, their own health and that of their loved ones, their freedom, and their goods. Where authority fails in its duties and indeed betrays the purpose for which it has been established, disobedience is not only lawful but obligatory: non-violent disobedience, at least for now, but determined and courageous. Disobedience to the illegitimate and tyrannical diktats of ecclesiastical authority, wherever it shows itself to be an accomplice of the infernal plan of the New World Order.

    Conclusion

    Allow me to conclude this reflection with a brief spiritual thought. Everything that we know, discover, and understand about the global conspiracy currently unfolding shows us a tremendous reality that is also at the same time sharp and clearly-defined: there are two sides, the side of God and the side of Satan, the side of the children of Light and the side of the children of darkness. It is not possible to come to terms with the Enemy, nor is it possible to serve two masters (Mt 6:24). The words of Our Lord must be engraved in our minds: “Whoever is not with Me is against Me, and whoever does not gather with Me scatters” (Mt 12:30). Hoping to build a world government in which the Divine Kingship of Jesus Christ is outlawed is insane and blasphemous, and no one who has such a plan will ever succeed. Where Christ reigns, peace, harmony and justice reign; where Christ does not reign, Satan is a tyrant. Let us consider this well, whenever we have to choose whether to make agreements with the adversary in the name of a false peaceful coexistence! And let those prelates and civil leaders who think that their complicity only affects economic or health issues, pretending not to know what is behind all this, also consider this well.

    Let us turn to Christ, Christ who is the King of hearts, of families, of societies, and of nations. Let us proclaim Him as Our King and Mary Most Holy as Our Queen. Only in this way can the wicked project of the New World Order be defeated. Only in this way can the Holy Church be purified of traitors and renegades. And may God listen to our prayer.

    + Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop

    28 August 2021
    S. Augustini Episcopi et Confessoris et Ecclesiae Doctoris
    ___________

    [1] Father Giuseppe Dossetti (1913-1996) is considered the founder of the “Bologna School” of “progressive Catholicism.” He served as a peritus at Vatican II to Cardinal Giacomo Lercaro, archbishop of Bologna, and was highly influential in controlling the procedures of the Council.
    Last edited by ThePythonicCow; 16th September 2021 at 12:00.
    My (sometimes rather dormant) blog: theMooster.net

  4. The Following 42 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    Agape (17th September 2021), AlaBil (16th September 2021), Alecs (17th September 2021), atman (16th September 2021), Ba-ba-Ra (16th September 2021), Ben (17th September 2021), Bill Ryan (16th September 2021), Bluegreen (18th September 2021), bluestflame (16th September 2021), ByTheNorthernSea (16th September 2021), ClearWater (16th September 2021), Daughter of Time (18th September 2021), East Sun (16th September 2021), EnergyGem (19th September 2021), Ewan (16th September 2021), ExomatrixTV (16th September 2021), Gemma13 (16th September 2021), gord (16th September 2021), Harmony (16th September 2021), Ioneo (16th September 2021), Journeyman (16th September 2021), Kryztian (16th September 2021), lisalu (17th September 2021), mab777 (16th September 2021), meeradas (22nd September 2021), mountain_jim (16th September 2021), pabranno (16th September 2021), palehorse (16th September 2021), Pam (16th September 2021), Peace in Oz (16th September 2021), rgray222 (22nd September 2021), RunningDeer (16th September 2021), Savannah (16th September 2021), Snoweagle (16th September 2021), Stephanie (16th September 2021), Sunny (17th September 2021), Sunny-side-up (16th September 2021), toppy (16th September 2021), Vangelo (30th September 2021), wavydome (18th September 2021), wondering (16th September 2021), Zirconian (16th September 2021)

  5. Link to Post #3
    United States Avalon Member ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    73
    Posts
    28,007
    Thanks
    29,327
    Thanked 132,292 times in 20,913 posts

    Default Re: Archbishop Viganò: Considerations on the New World Order

    .
    Here is the original presentation of Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò's speech, in Latin (that's one way to escape the Youtube censors ).

    My (sometimes rather dormant) blog: theMooster.net

  6. The Following 25 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    atman (16th September 2021), Bill Ryan (16th September 2021), bluestflame (16th September 2021), ByTheNorthernSea (16th September 2021), Ewan (16th September 2021), Gemma13 (16th September 2021), gord (16th September 2021), Harmony (16th September 2021), Journeyman (16th September 2021), mab777 (16th September 2021), meeradas (22nd September 2021), Mercedes (21st September 2021), mountain_jim (16th September 2021), pabranno (17th September 2021), palehorse (16th September 2021), Pam (16th September 2021), rgray222 (22nd September 2021), RunningDeer (16th September 2021), Snoweagle (16th September 2021), Stephanie (16th September 2021), Sunny (17th September 2021), Tracie (Bodhicee) (17th September 2021), wavydome (18th September 2021), wondering (16th September 2021), Zirconian (16th September 2021)

  7. Link to Post #4
    United States Avalon Member Arcturian108's Avatar
    Join Date
    9th August 2015
    Location
    Blue Ridge Mountains
    Language
    English
    Posts
    584
    Thanks
    5,911
    Thanked 4,620 times in 570 posts

    Default Re: Archbishop Viganò: Considerations on the New World Order

    I just discovered this portion of Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò's speech interesting:

    "If one does not understand that the ideological roots of ecumenism are intrinsically linked to Masonic Luciferian esoterism, one cannot grasp the connection that links the doctrinal deviations of Vatican II to the plan of the New World Order. The revolution of 1968 was a sad example of those pacifist and ecumenist ambitions, in which the “Age of Aquarius” was celebrated by the musical Hair (1969) and then by John Lennon with Imagine (1971):

    Imagine there’s no heaven. It’s easy if you try.
    No hell below us. Above us only sky.
    Imagine all the people, living for today.
    Imagine there’s no countries. It isn’t hard to do.
    Nothing to kill or die for, and no religion too.
    Imagine all the people, living life in peace.
    You may say I’m a dreamer, but I’m not the only one.
    I hope someday you’ll join us, and the world will be as one.
    Imagine no possessions. I wonder if you can.
    No need for greed or hunger, a brotherhood of man.
    Imagine all the people, sharing all the world.

    This manifesto of Masonic nihilism can be considered the hymn of globalism and the new universal religion: it is no coincidence that it was used as the theme song for the 2012 Olympic Games in London, and more recently for those in Tokyo. A soul that is not led astray can only feel horror at these blasphemous words. The same is true for the words of Lennon’s no-less-blasphemous song God (1970):

    God is a concept by which we measure our pain. […]
    I just believe in me."

  8. The Following 27 Users Say Thank You to Arcturian108 For This Post:

    AlaBil (16th September 2021), Alecs (17th September 2021), atman (16th September 2021), Ba-ba-Ra (16th September 2021), Ben (17th September 2021), Bill Ryan (16th September 2021), bluestflame (16th September 2021), ClearWater (16th September 2021), Dreamer148 (16th September 2021), Ewan (16th September 2021), Gemma13 (16th September 2021), Harmony (16th September 2021), lisalu (17th September 2021), Mercedes (21st September 2021), mountain_jim (16th September 2021), pabranno (2nd October 2021), palehorse (16th September 2021), Pam (16th September 2021), Reinhard (16th September 2021), RunningDeer (16th September 2021), Snoweagle (16th September 2021), Stephanie (16th September 2021), Sunny-side-up (16th September 2021), ThePythonicCow (16th September 2021), Vangelo (30th September 2021), wondering (16th September 2021), Zirconian (16th September 2021)

  9. Link to Post #5
    United States Avalon Member ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    73
    Posts
    28,007
    Thanks
    29,327
    Thanked 132,292 times in 20,913 posts

    Default Re: Archbishop Viganò: Considerations on the New World Order

    Quote Posted by Arcturian108 (here)
    I just discovered this portion of Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò's speech interesting:
    Yes - it was weird to read those words of Lennon's song, hearing them play again in my mind's ear, from my youth, but realizing what they really meant.
    My (sometimes rather dormant) blog: theMooster.net

  10. The Following 22 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    Alecs (17th September 2021), Arcturian108 (16th September 2021), atman (16th September 2021), Ba-ba-Ra (16th September 2021), Ben (17th September 2021), Bill Ryan (16th September 2021), bluestflame (16th September 2021), ClearWater (16th September 2021), Ewan (16th September 2021), Gemma13 (16th September 2021), lisalu (17th September 2021), Mercedes (21st September 2021), pabranno (2nd October 2021), palehorse (16th September 2021), Pam (16th September 2021), Reinhard (16th September 2021), RunningDeer (16th September 2021), Snoweagle (16th September 2021), Stephanie (16th September 2021), Vangelo (30th September 2021), wondering (16th September 2021), Zirconian (16th September 2021)

  11. Link to Post #6
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    Dutch
    Age
    55
    Posts
    9,090
    Thanks
    8,178
    Thanked 46,870 times in 8,096 posts

    Lightbulb Re: Archbishop Viganò: Considerations on the New World Order

    I think the more people from literally all walks of life have a common understanding of the bigger picture ...

    The moment we all will unite on this common ground, it is over with technocrats and nwo globalists with their "Great Reset" aka "Build Back Better" Tyranny and they know it ...

    When Truth Resonates, Tyranny Falls ...

    cheers,
    John Kuhles aka 'ExomatrixTV'
    September 16th, 2021
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 16th September 2021 at 11:51.
    ~no need to follow anyone, only consider to broaden (y)our horizon of possibilities
    ~Stop5G.net & FB groups/Stop5G

  12. The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    atman (16th September 2021), Ba-ba-Ra (16th September 2021), Bill Ryan (16th September 2021), bluestflame (16th September 2021), ClearWater (16th September 2021), Gemma13 (16th September 2021), gord (16th September 2021), lisalu (17th September 2021), Mercedes (21st September 2021), pabranno (2nd October 2021), palehorse (16th September 2021), Pam (16th September 2021), Reinhard (16th September 2021), RunningDeer (16th September 2021), Stephanie (16th September 2021), Sunny (17th September 2021), ThePythonicCow (16th September 2021), wondering (16th September 2021), Zirconian (16th September 2021)

  13. Link to Post #7
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    Dutch
    Age
    55
    Posts
    9,090
    Thanks
    8,178
    Thanked 46,870 times in 8,096 posts

    Exclamation Re: Archbishop Viganò: Considerations on the New World Order

    • Archbishop Viganò Addresses the Catholic Identity Conference 2020 (Francis & the New World Order):

    As each of us has probably understood, we find ourselves in an historical moment in time; events of the past, which once seemed disconnected, prove now to be unequivocally connected, both in the principles that inspire them and in the goals they seek to achieve. A fair and objective look at the current situation cannot help but grasp the perfect coherence between the evolution of the global political framework and the role that the Catholic Church has assumed in the establishment of the New World Order. To be more precise, one should speak about the role of that apparent majority in the Church, which is actually small in number but extremely powerful, and which, for brevity’s sake, I will summarize as the deep church.

    Obviously, there are not two Churches, something that would be impossible, blasphemous, and heretical. Nor has the one true Church of Christ today failed in her mission, perverting herself into a sect. The Church of Christ has nothing to do with those who, for the past sixty years, have executed a plan to occupy her. The overlap between the Catholic Hierarchy and the members of the deep church is not a theological fact, but rather a historical reality that defies the usual categories and, as such, must be analyzed.

    We know that the New World Order project consists in the establishment of tyranny by Freemasonry: a project that dates back to the French Revolution, the Age of Enlightenment, the end of the Catholic Monarchies, and the declaration of war on the Church. We can say that the New World Order is the antithesis of Christian society, it would be the realization of the diabolical Civitas Diaboli City of the Devilopposed to the Civitas Dei – City of God – in the eternal struggle between Light and Darkness, Good and Evil, God and Satan.

    In this struggle, Providence has placed the Church of Christ, and in particular the Supreme Pontiff, as kathèkon – that is, the one who opposes the manifestation of the mystery of iniquity (2 Thess 2:6-7). And Sacred Scripture warns us that at the manifestation of the Antichrist, this obstacle – the kathèkon – will have ceased to exist. It seems quite evident to me that the end times are now approaching before our eyes, since the mystery of iniquity has spread throughout the world with the disappearance of the courageous opposition of the kathèkon.

    [With regard to the incompatibility between the City of God and the City of Satan, the Jesuit advisor to Francis, Antonio Spadaro, sets aside Sacred Scripture and Tradition, making the Bergoglian embrassons-nous his own. According to the Director of La Civiltà Cattolica, the Encyclical Fratelli Tutti

    also remains a message with a strong political value, because – we could say – it overturns the logic of the apocalypse that prevails today. It is the fundamentalist logic that fights against the world, because it believes that it is the opposite of God, that is, an idol, and therefore to be destroyed as soon as possible in order to accelerate the end of time. The abyss of the apocalypse, in fact, before which there are no more brothers: only apostates or martyrs running “against” time. […] We are not militants or apostates, but all brothers.”[1]

    This strategy of discrediting the interlocutor with the slur of “integralist” is evidently aimed at facilitating the action of the enemy within the Church, seeking to disarm the opposition and discourage dissent. We also find it in the civil sphere, where the democrats and the deep state arrogate to themselves the right to decide whom to grant political legitimacy and whom to condemn without appeal to media ostracism. The method is always the same, because the one inspiring is the same. Just as the falsification of History and of the sources, is always the same: if the past disavows the revolutionary narrative, the followers of the Revolution censor the past and replace historical fact with a myth. Even St. Francis is a victim of this adulteration that would have him be the standard-bearer of poverty and pacifism, that are as alien to the spirit of Catholic orthodoxy as they are instrumental to the dominant ideology. Proof of this is the last, fraudulent recourse to the Poverello of Assisi in Fratelli Tutti to justify dialogue, ecumenism, and the universal brotherhood of the Bergoglian anti-church.]

    Let us not make the mistake of presenting the current events as “normal,” judging what happens with the legal, canonical, and sociological parameters that such normality would presuppose. In extraordinary times – and the present crisis in the Church is indeed extraordinary – events go beyond the ordinary known to our fathers. In extraordinary times, we can hear a Pope deceive the faithful; see Princes of the Church accused of crimes that in other times would have aroused horror and been met with severe punishment; witness in our churches liturgical rites that seem to have been invented by Cranmer’s perverse mind; see Prelates process the unclean idol of the pachamama into St. Peter’s Basilica; and hear the Vicar of Christ apologize to the worshippers of that simulacrum if a Catholic dares to throw it into the Tiber. In these extraordinary times, we hear a conspirator – Cardinal Godfried Danneels – tell us that, since the death of John Paul II, the Mafia of St. Gallen had been plotting to elect one of their own to Peter’s Chair, which later turned out to be Jorge Mario Bergoglio. In the face of this disconcerting revelation, we might well be astonished that neither Cardinals nor Bishops expressed their indignation nor asked that the truth be brought to light.

    [The coexistence of good and evil, of saints and the damned, in the ecclesial body, has always accompanied the earthly events of the Church, beginning with the betrayal of the Judas Iscariot. And it is indeed significant that the anti-church tries to rehabilitate Judas – and with him the worst heresiarchs – as exemplary models, “anti-saints” and “anti-martyrs,” and thereby legitimizing themselves in their own heresies, immorality and vices. The coexistence – I was saying – of the good and the wicked, of which the Gospel speaks in the Parable of the Wheat and the Tares, seems to have morphed into the prevalence of the latter over the former. The difference is that vice and deviations once despised are today not only practiced and tolerated more, but even encouraged and praised, while virtue and fidelity to the teaching of Christ are despised, mocked and even condemned.]

    1. THE ECLIPSE OF THE TRUE CHURCH

    For sixty years, we have witnessed the eclipse of the true Church by an anti-church that has progressively appropriated her name, occupied the Roman Curia and her Dicasteries, Dioceses and Parishes, Seminaries and Universities, Convents and Monasteries. The anti-church has usurped her authority, and its ministers wear her sacred garments; it uses her prestige and power to appropriate her treasures, assets, and finances.

    Just as happens in nature, this eclipse does not take place all at once; it passes from light to darkness when a celestial body inserts itself between the sun and us. This is a relatively slow but inexorable process, in which the moon of the anti-church follows its orbit until it overlaps the sun, generating a cone of shadow that projects over the earth. We now find ourselves in this doctrinal, moral, liturgical, and disciplinary cone of shadow. It is not yet the total eclipse that we will see at the end of time, under the reign of the Antichrist. But it is a partial eclipse, which lets us see the luminous crown of the sun encircling the black disk of the moon.

    The process that led to today’s eclipse of the Church began with Modernism, without a doubt. The anti-church followed its orbit despite the solemn condemnations of the Magisterium, which in that phase shone with the splendor of Truth. But with the Second Vatican Council, the darkness of this spurious entity came over the Church. Initially it obscured only a small part, but the darkness gradually increased. Whoever then pointed to the sun, deducing that the moon would certainly obscure it, was accused of being a “prophet of doom,” with those forms of fanaticism and intemperance that arise from ignorance and prejudice. The case of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre and a few other Prelates confirms, on the one hand, the far-sightedness of these shepherds and, on the other hand, the disjointed reaction of their adversaries; who, out of fear of losing power, used all their authority to deny the evidence and kept hidden their own true intentions.

    To continue the analogy: we can say that, in the sky of the Faith, an eclipse is a rare and extraordinary phenomenon. But to deny that, during the eclipse, darkness spreads – just because this does not happen under ordinary conditions – is not a sign of faith in the indefectibility of the Church, but rather an obstinate denial of the evidence, or bad faith. The Holy Church, according to Christ’s promises, will never be overwhelmed by the gates of hell, but that does not mean that she will not be – or is not already – overshadowed by her infernal forgery, that moon which, not by chance, we see under the feet of the Woman of the Revelation: “A great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars” (Rev 12:1).

    The moon lies under the feet of the Woman who is above all mutability, above all earthly corruption, above the law of fate and the kingdom of the spirit of this world. And this is because that Woman, who is at once the image of Mary Most Holy and of the Church, is amicta sole, clothed with the Sun of Righteousness that is Christ, “exempted from all demonic power as she takes part in the mystery of the immutability of Christ” (Saint Ambrose). She remains unbruised if not in her militant kingdom, certainly in the suffering one in Purgatory and in the triumphant one in Paradise. St. Jerome, commenting on the words of Scripture, reminds us that “the gates of hell are sins and vices, especially the teachings of heretics.” We know therefore that even the “synthesis of all heresies” represented by Modernism and its updated conciliar version, can never definitively obscure the splendor of the Bride of Christ, but only for the brief period of the eclipse that Providence, in its infinite wisdom, has allowed, to draw from it a greater good.

    1. THE ABANDONMENT OF THE SUPERNATURAL DIMENSION

    In this talk, I wish especially to deal with the relationship between the revolution of Vatican II and the establishment of the New World Order. The focal element of this analysis consists in highlighting the abandonment on the part of the ecclesiastical Hierarchy, even at the top, of the supernatural dimension of the Church and its eschatological role. With the Council, the Innovators erased the divine origin of the Church from their theological horizon, creating an entity of human origin similar to a philanthropic organization. The first consequence of this ontological subversionwas the necessary denial of the fact that the Bride of Christ is not, and cannot be, subject to change by those who exercise vicarious authority in the name of the Lord. She is neither the property of the Pope nor of the Bishops or theologians, and, as such, any attempt at “Aggiornamento” lowers her to the level of a company that, in order to garner profit, renews its own commercial offer, sells its leftovers stock, and follows the fashion of the moment. The Church, on the other hand, is a supernatural and divine reality: she adapts the way she preaches the Gospel to the nations, but she can never change the content of a single iota (Mt 5:18), nor deny her transcendent momentum by lowering herself to mere social service. On the opposite side, the anti-church proudly lays claims to the right to perform a paradigm shift not only by changing the way doctrine is expounded, but the doctrine itself. [This is confirmed by the words of Massimo Fagggioli comment on the new Encyclical Fratelli Tutti:

    Pope Francis’ pontificate is like a standard lifted up before Catholic integralists and those who equate material continuity and tradition: Catholic doctrine does not just develop. Sometimes it really changes: for example on [the] death penalty, [and] war.”[2]]

    Insisting on what the Magisterium teaches is useless. The Innovators’ brazen claim to have the right to change the Faith stubbornly follows the modernist approach.

    The Council’s first error consists mainly in the lack of a transcendent perspective – the result of a spiritual crisis that was already latent – and in the attempt to establish paradise on earth, with a sterile human horizon. In line with this approach, Fratelli tutti sees the fulfillment of an earthly utopia and social redemption in human brotherhood, pax œcumenica between religions and welcoming migrants.

    1. THE SENSE OF INFERIORITY AND INADEQUACY

    As I have written on other occasions, the revolutionary demands of the Nouvelle Théologie found fertile ground in the Council Fathers because of a serious inferiority complex vis-à-vis the world. There was a time, in the postwar period, when the revolution led by Freemasonry in the civil, political and cultural spheres, breached the Catholic élite, persuading it of its inadequacy in the face of an epochal challenge that is now inescapable. Instead of questioning themselves and their faith, this élite – bishops, theologians, intellectuals – recklessly attributed responsibility for the imminent failure of the Church to her rock-solid hierarchical structure, and to her monolithic doctrinal and moral teaching. Looking at the defeat of the European civilization that the Church had helped to form, the élite thought that the lack of agreement with the world was caused by the intransigence of the Papacy and the moral rigidity of priests not wanting to come to terms with the Zeitgeist, and “open up.” This ideological approach stems from the false assumption that, between the Church and the contemporary world, there can be an alliance, a consonance of intent, a friendship. Nothing could be further from the truth, since there can be no respite in the struggle between God and Satan, between Light and Darkness. “I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel” (Gen 3:15). This is an enmity willed by God Himself, which places Mary Most Holy – and the Church – as eternal enemies of the ancient serpent. The world has its own prince (Jn 12:31), who is the “enemy” (Mt 13:28), a “murderer from the beginning” (Jn 8:44) and a “liar” (Jn 8:44). Courting a pact of non-belligerence with the world means coming to terms with Satan. This overturns and perverts the very essence of the Church, whose mission is to convert as many souls to Christ for the greater glory of God, without ever laying down arms against those who want to attract them to themselves and to damnation.

    [The Church’s sense of inferiority and failure before the world created the “perfect storm” for the revolution to take root in the Council Fathers and by extension in the Christian people, in whom obedience to the Hierarchy had been cultivated perhaps more than fidelity to the depositum fidei. Let me it be clear: obedience to the Sacred Pastors is certainly praiseworthy if the commands are legitimate. But obedience ceases to be a virtue and, in fact, becomes servility if it is an end in itself and if it contradicts the purpose to which it is ordained, namely Faith and Morals. We should add, that this sense of inferiority was introduced into the ecclesial body with displays of great theater, such as the removal of the tiara by Paul VI, the return of the Ottoman flagship banners conquered at Lepanto, the flaunted ecumenical embraces with the schismatic Athenagoras, the requests for forgiveness for the Crusades, the abolition of the Index, the Clergy’s focus on the poor in place to the alleged triumphalism of Pius XII. The coup de grâce of this attitude was codified in the Reformed Liturgy, which manifests its embarrassment of Catholic dogma by silencing it – and thus denying it indirectly. The ritual change engendered a doctrinal change, which led the faithful to believe that the Mass is a simple fraternal banquet and that the Most Holy Eucharist is merely a symbol of Christ’s presence among us.]

    1. “IDEM SENTIRE” OF REVOLUTION AND COUNCIL

    The Council Fathers’ sense of inadequacy was only increased by the work of the Innovators, whose heretical ideas coincided with the demands of the world. A comparative analysis of modern thought confirms the idem sentire [same feeling or same mind] of the conspirators with every element of the revolutionary ideology:
    [– the acceptance of the democratic principle as the legitimizing source of power, in place of the divine right of the Catholic Monarchy (including the Papacy);
    the creation and accumulation of organs of power, in place of personal responsibility and institutional hierarchy;
    the erasure of the historical past, evaluated with today’s parameters, which fail to defend tradition and cultural heritage;
    – the emphasis on the freedom of individuals and the weakening of the concept of responsibility and duty;
    the continuous evolution of morality and ethics, thus deprived of their immutable nature and of any transcendent reference;
    the presumed secular nature of the State, in place of the rightful submission of civil order to the Kingship of Jesus Christ and the ontological superiority of the Church’s mission over that of the temporal sphere;
    – the equality of religions not only before the State, but even as a general concept to which the Church must conform, against the objective and necessary defense of the Truth and the condemnation of error;
    the false and blasphemous concept of the dignity of man as connatural to him, based on the denial of original sin and of the need for Redemption as a premise for pleasing God, meriting His Grace and attaining eternal beatitude;
    – the undermining of the role of women, the contempt and a contempt for the privilege of motherhood;
    – the primacy of matter over spirit;
    the fideistic relationship with science[3], in the face of a ruthless criticism of religion on false scientific grounds.

    All these principles, propagated by Freemasonry ideologues and New World Order supporters, coincide with the revolutionary ideas of the Council:

    the democratization of the Church began with Lumen Gentium and today it is realized in the Bergoglian synodal path;
    the creation and accumulation of organs of power has been achieved by delegating decision-making roles to Episcopal Conferences, Synods of Bishops, Commissions, Pastoral Councils, etc.;
    the Church’s past and glorious traditions are judged according to the modern mentality and condemned in order to curry favor with the modern world;
    the “freedom of the children of God” theorized by Vatican II has been established regardless of the moral duties of individuals who, according to the conciliar fairytales, are all saved regardless of their inner dispositions and the state of their soul;
    the obfuscating of perennial moral references has led to the revised doctrine on capital punishment; and, with Amoris Laetitia, the admission of public adulterers to the Sacraments, cracking the sacramental edifice;
    the adoption of the concept of secularism has led to the abolition of a State Religion in Catholic nations. Encouraged by the Holy See and the Episcopate, this has led to a loss of religious identity and the recognition of rights of sects, as well as the approval of norms that violate natural and divine law;
    the religious freedom theorized in Dignitatis Humanae is today brought to its logical and extreme consequences with the Declaration of Abu Dhabi and the latest Encyclical Fratelli Tutti, rendering the saving mission of the Church and the Incarnation itself obsolete;
    theories on human dignity in the Catholic sphere have led to confusion about the role of the laity with respect to the ministerial role of the Clergy and a weakening of the hierarchical structure of the Church. While the embrace of feminist ideology is a prelude to the admission of women to the Holy Orders;
    an inordinate preoccupation with the temporal needs of the poor, so typical of the left, has transformed the Church into a sort of welfare association, limiting her activity to the mere material sphere, almost to the point of abandoning the spiritual;
    – subservience to modern science and technological progress has led the Church to disavow the “Queen of the Science” [Faith], to “demythologize” miracles, to deny the inerrancy of Sacred Scripture, to look at the most sacred Mysteries of our Holy Religion as “myths” or “metaphors,” sacrilegiously suggesting that Transubstantiation and the Resurrection itself are “magic” (not to be taken literally but rather symbolically), and to describe the sublime Marian dogmas are “tonterias” [nonsense].]

    There is an almost grotesque aspect of this leveling and dumbing down of the Hierarchy to comply with mainstream thought. The hierarchy’s desire to please its persecutors and serve its enemies always comes too late and is out of sync, giving the impression that the Bishops are irremediably outdated, indeed not in step with the times. They lead those who see them so enthusiastically conniving with their own extinction to believe that this demonstration of courtesan submission to politically correct comes not so much from a true ideological persuasion, but rather from the fear of being swept away, of losing power, and no longer having that prestige that the world still pays them, nonetheless. They do not realize – or do not want to admit – that the prestige and authority whose custodians they are, comes from the authority and prestige of the Church of Christ, and not from the miserable, pitiful counterfeit of her which they have fashioned.

    When this anti-church is fully established in the total eclipse of the Catholic Church, the authority of its leaders will depend on the degree of subjugation to the New World Order, which will not tolerate any divergence from its own creed and will ruthlessly apply that dogmatism, t fanaticism and fundamentalism that many Prelates and self-styled intellectuals criticize in those who remain faithful to the Magisterium today. In this way, the deep church may continue to bear the trademark “Catholic Church,” but it will be the slave of the New Order thinking, reminiscent of the Jews who, after denying the Kingship of Christ before Pilate, were enslaved to the civil authority of their time: “We have no other king but Caesar” (Jn 19:15). Today’s Caesar commands us to close the churches, wear a mask, and suspend the celebrations under the pretext of a pseudo-pandemic. The communist regime persecutes the Chinese Catholics, and the world hears nothing but silence from Rome. Tomorrow a new Titus will sack the Council temple, transporting its remains to some museum, and divine vengeance at the hands of the pagans will have been achieved once again.

    1. THE INSTRUMENTAL ROLE OF THE MODERATE CATHOLICS IN THE REVOLUTION

    Some might say that the Council Fathers and Popes who presided over that assembly, did not realize the implications that their approval of the Vatican II documents would have for the future of the Church. If this were the case – i.e., if there had been any subsequent regrets in their hasty approval of heretical texts or texts close to heresy – it is difficult to understand why they were unable to put an immediate stop to abuses, correct errors, clarify misunderstandings and omissions. And above all, it is incomprehensible why the ecclesiastical Authority has been so ruthless against those who defended the Catholic Truth, and, at the same time, were so terribly accommodating to rebels and heretics. In any case, the responsibility for the conciliar crisis must be laid at the feet of the Authority which, even amid a thousand appeals to collegiality and pastoralism, has jealously guarded its prerogatives, exercising them only in one direction, that is, against the pusillus grex [little flock] and never against the enemies of God and of the Church. The very rare exceptions, when a heretic theologian or revolutionary religious has been censored by the Holy Office, only offer tragic confirmation of a rule that has been enforced for decades; not to mention that many of them, in recent times, have been rehabilitated without any abjuration of their errors and even promoted to institutional positions in the Roman Curia or Pontifical Athenaeums.

    This is the reality, as it emerges from my analysis. However, we know that, in addition to the progressive wing of the Council and the traditional Catholic wing, there is a part of the Episcopate, the clergy, and the people that attempts to keep equal distance from what it considers two extremes. I am talking about the so-called “conservatives, that is, a centrist part of the ecclesial body that ends up “carrying water” for the Revolutionaries because, while rejecting their excesses, it shares the same principles. The error of the “conservatives” lies in giving a negative connotation to traditionalism and in placing it on the opposite side of progressivism. Their aurea mediocritas [via media] consists in arbitrarily placing themselves not between two vices, but between virtue and vice. They are the ones who criticize the excesses of the pachamama or of the most extreme of Bergoglio’s statements, but who do not tolerate the Council’s being questioned, let alone the intrinsic link between the conciliar cancer and the current metastasis. The correlation between political conservatism and religious conservatism consists in adopting the “center,” a synthesis between the “right” thesis and the “left” antithesis, according to the Hegelian approach so cherished by moderate supporters of the Council.

    [In the civil sphere, the deep state has managed political and social dissent by using organizations and movements that are only apparently opposition, but which are actually instrumental to maintaining power. Similarly, in the ecclesial sphere, the deep church uses the moderate “conservatives” to give an appearance of offering freedom to the faithful. The Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum itself, for example, while granting the celebration in the extraordinary form, demands saltem impliciter [at least implicitly] that we accept the Council and recognize the lawfulness of the reformed liturgy. This ploy prevents those who benefit from the Motu Proprio from raising any objection, or they risk the dissolution of the Ecclesia Dei communities. And it instills in the Christian people the dangerous idea that a good thing, in order to have legitimacy in the Church and society, must necessarily be accompanied by a bad thing or at least something less good. However, only a misguided mind would seek to afford equal rights to both good and evil. It matters little if one is personally in favor of good, when he recognizes the legitimacy of those who are in favor of evil. In this sense, the “freedom to choose” abortion theorized by democratic politicians finds its counterbalance in the no less aberrant “religious freedom” theorized by the Council, which today is stubbornly defended by the anti-church. If it is not permissible for a Catholic to support a politician who defends the right to abortion, it is even less permissible to approve a Prelate who defends the “freedom” of an individual to endanger his immortal soul by “choosing” to remain in mortal sin. This is not mercy; this is gross dereliction of spiritual duty before God in order to curry the favor and approval of Man.

    1. “OPEN SOCIETY” AND “OPEN RELIGION”

    This analysis would hardly be complete without a word on the neo-language so popular in the ecclesiastical sphere. Traditional Catholic vocabulary has been deliberately modified, in order to change the content it expresses. The same has happened in the liturgy and preaching, where the clarity of the Catholic exposition has been replaced by ambiguity or the implicit denial of dogmatic truth. The examples are endless. This phenomenon also goes back to Vatican II, which sought to develop “Catholic” versions of the slogans of the world. Nevertheless, I would like to emphasize that all those expressions that are borrowed from secularist lexicons are also part of the neo-language. Let us consider the Bergoglio’s insistence on the “outgoing church,” on openness as a positive value. Similarly, I quote now from Fratelli tutti:

    A living and dynamic people, a people with a future, is one constantly open to a new synthesis through its ability to welcome differences” (Fratelli Tutti, 160).
    The Church is a home with open doors” (ibid. 276).
    We want to be a Church that serves, that leaves home and goes forth from its places of worship, goes forth from its sacristies, in order to accompany life, to sustain hope, to be the sign of unity… to build bridges, to break down walls, to sow seeds of reconciliation” (ibid.).

    The similarity with the Open Society sought after by Soros’ globalist ideology is so striking as to almost constitute an Open Religion counterpoint to it.

    And this Open Religion is perfectly in tune with the intentions of globalism. From the political meetings “for a New Humanism” blessed by the leaders of the Church to the participation of the progressive intelligentsia in green propaganda, it all chases after the mainstream thought, in the sad and grotesque attempt to please the world. The stark contrast with the words of the Apostle is clear: “Am I now trying to win the approval of human beings, or of God? Or am I trying to please people? If I were still trying to please people, I would not be a servant of Christ” (Gal. 1:10).

    The Catholic Church lives under the gaze of God; she exists for His glory and for the salvation of souls. The anti-church lives under the gaze of the world, pandering to the blasphemous apotheosis of man and the damnation of souls. During the last session of the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, before all the Synod Fathers, these astonishing words of Paul VI resounded in the Vatican Basilica:

    The religion of the God who became man has met the religion (for such it is) of man who makes himself God. And what happened? Was there a clash, a battle, a condemnation? There could have been, but there was none. The old story of the Samaritan has been the model of the spirituality of the council. A feeling of boundless sympathy has permeated the whole of it. The attention of our council has been absorbed by the discovery of human needs (and these needs grow in proportion to the greatness which the son of the earth claims for himself). But we call upon those who term themselves modern humanists, and who have renounced the transcendent value of the highest realities, to give the council credit at least for one quality and to recognize our own new type of humanism: we, too, in fact, we more than any others, honor mankind.”[4]

    This sympathy [– in the etymological sense of συμπάϑεια, that is, participation in the sentiment of the other –] is the figure of the Council and of the new religion (for such it is) of the anti-church. An anti-church born of the unclean union between the Church and the world, between the heavenly Jerusalem and hellish Babylon. Note well: the first time a Pontiff mentioned the “new humanism” was at the final session of Vatican II, and today we find it repeated as a mantra by those who consider it a perfect and coherent expression of the revolutionary mens [frame of mind] of the Council.[5]

    Always in view of this communion of intent between the New World Order and the anti-church, we must remember the Global Compact on Education, a project designed by Bergoglio “to generate a change on a planetary scale, so that education is a creator of brotherhood, peace and justice. An even more urgent need in this time marked by the pandemic”.[6] Promoted in collaboration with the United Nations, this “process of formation in the relationship and culture of encounter also finds space and value in the common home with all creatures, since people, just as they are formed to the logic of communion and solidarity, are already working “to recover serene harmony with creation”, and to configure the world as “a space of true brotherhood” (Gaudium et Spes, 37).”[7] As can be seen, the ideological reference is always and only to Vatican II, because only from that moment on did the anti-church place man in the place of God, the creature in the place of the Creator.

    The “new humanism” obviously has an environmental and ecological frame into which are grafted both the Encyclical Laudato Sì and Green Theology – the “Church with an Amazonian face” of the 2019 Synod of Bishops, with its idolatrous worship of pachamama (mother earth) in the presence of the Roman Sanhedrin. The Church’s attitude during Covid-19 demonstrated, on the one hand, the hierarchy’s submission to the diktats of the State, in violation of the Libertas Ecclesiae, which the Pope should have firmly defended. It also put on display the denial of any supernatural meaning of the pandemic, replacing the righteous wrath of God offended by the countless sins of humanity and nations with a more disturbing and destructive fury of Nature, offended by the lack of respect for the environment. I would like to emphasize that attributing a personal identity to Nature, almost endowed with intellect and will, is a prelude to her divinization. We have already seen a sacrilegious prelude to this, under the very dome of St. Peter’s Basilica.

    The bottom line is this: conformity on the part of the anti-church with the dominant ideology of the modern world establishes a real cooperation with powerful representatives of the deep state, starting with those working towards a “sustainable economy” involving Jorge Mario Bergoglio, Bill Gates, Jeffrey Sachs, John Elkann, Gunter Pauli.[8]

    [It will be useful to remember that the sustainable economy also has implications for agriculture and the world of work in general. The deep state needs to secure low-cost labor through immigration, which at the same time contributes to the cancellation of the religious, cultural and linguistic identity of the nations involved. The deep church lends an ideological and pseudo-theological basis to this invasion plan, and at the same time guarantees a share in the lucrative business of hospitality. We can understand Bergoglio’s insistence on the theme of migrants, also reiterated in Fratelli Tutti: “A xenophobic mentality of closure and self-restraint is spreading” (ibid. 39. “Migrations will constitute a founding element of the future of the world” (ibid. 40). Bergoglio used the expression “founding element,” stating that it is not possible to hypothesize a future without migrations.]

    Allow me a brief word about the political situation in the United States on the eve of the presidential election. Fratelli Tutti seems to be a form of Vatican endorsement of the Democratic candidate, in clear opposition to Donald Trump, and come a few days after Francis refused to grant audience to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in Rome. This confirms which side the children of light are on, and who the children of darkness are.


    1. THE IDEOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF “BROTHERHOOD”

    The theme of brotherhood, an obsession for Bergoglio, finds its first formulation in Nostra Ætate and Dignitatis Humanae. The latest Encyclical, Fratelli Tutti, is the manifesto of this Masonic vision, in which the cry Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité replaced the Gospel, for the sake of a unity among men that leaves out God. Note that the Document on Human Fraternity for World Peace and Living Together signed in Abu Dhabi on February 4, 2019 was proudly defended by Bergoglio with these words:

    From the Catholic point of view the document did not go one millimeter beyond the Second Vatican Council.

    Cardinal Miguel Ayuso Guixot, President of the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue, comments in La Civiltà Cattolica:

    [With the Council, the embankment gradually cracked and then broke: The river of dialogue has spread with the Council Declarations Nostra Ætate on the relationship between the Church and believers of other religions and Dignitatis Humanae on religious freedom, themes and documents that are closely linked to each other, and have allowed St. John Paul II to give life to meetings such as the World Day of Prayer for Peace in Assisi on October 27, 1986 and Benedict XVI, twenty-five years later, to make us live in the city of St. Francis the Day of Reflection, Dialogue and Prayer for Peace and Justice in the World – Pilgrims of Truth, Pilgrims of Peace. Therefore,] the Catholic Church’s commitment to interreligious dialogue, which opens the way to peace and fraternity, is part of her original mission and has its roots in the Council event.”[9]

    Once again, the cancer of Vatican II confirms that it is at the origin of Bergoglian metastasis. The fil rouge [common thread] that unites the Council with the cult of the pachamama also passes through Assisi, as my Brother Athanasius Schneider rightly pointed out in his recent speech.[10]

    And speaking of the anti-church, Bishop Fulton Sheen describes the Antichrist: “Since his religion will be brotherhood without the paternity of God, he will deceive even the elect.”[11] We seem to see the prophecy of the venerable American Archbishop coming true before our eyes.

    It is no surprise, therefore, that the infamous Grand Lodge of Spain, after having warmly congratulated its paladin raised to the Throne, has once again paid homage to Bergoglio with these words:

    [The great principle of this initiatory school has not changed in three centuries: the construction of a universal brotherhood where human beings call themselves brothers to each other beyond their specific beliefs, their ideologies, the color of their skin, their social extraction, their language, their culture or their nationality. This fraternal dream clashed with religious fundamentalism which, in the case of the Catholic Church, led to harsh texts condemning the tolerance of Freemasonry in the 19th century.] Pope Francis’ latest encyclical shows how far the present Catholic Church is from its previous positions. In “Fratelli Tutti”, the pope embraced the Universal Brotherhood, the great principle of modern Freemasonry.”[12]

    The reaction of the Grande Oriente of Italy is not dissimilar:

    These are the principles that Freemasonry has always pursued and guarded for the elevation of Humanity.”[13]

    [Austen Ivereigh, the hagiographer of Bergoglio, confirms with satisfaction this interpretation that a Catholic would rightly consider at least disturbing.[14]]

    I remember that in the masonic documents of the Alta Vendita, since the nineteenth century, an infiltration of Free Masonry into the Church was planned:

    You, too, will fish some friends and lead them to the feet of the Apostolic See. You will have preached revolution in Tiara and Cope, proceeded under the cross and banner, a revolution that will need only a little help to set the quarters of the world on fire.”[15]

    [9. THE SUBVERSION OF THE INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIAL RELATIONSHIP WITH GOD

    Allow me to conclude this examination of the links between the Council and the present crisis by emphasizing a reversal that I consider extremely important and significant. I am referring the relationship of the individual layman and community of the faithful with God. While in the Church of Christ the relationship of the soul with the Lord is eminently personal even when it is conveyed by the Sacred Minister in the liturgical action, in the conciliar church the community and the group relationship prevails. Think of their insistence in wanting to make the Baptism of a child, or the wedding of a married couple, “an act of the community”; or the impossibility of receiving holy Communion individually outside of Mass, and of the common practice of approaching Communion during Mass even without the necessary conditions. All of this is sanctioned on the basis of a Protestantized concept of participation in the Eucharistic banquet, from which no guest is excluded. Under this understanding of community, the person loses his individuality, losing himself in the anonymous community of the celebration. So too, the relationship of the social body with God disappears in a personalism that eliminates the role of mediation of both the Church and the State. Individualization in the moral field enters into this as well, where the rights and preferences of the individual become grounds for the eradication of social morality. This is done in the name of an “inclusiveness” that legitimates every vice and moral aberration. Societyunderstood as the union of several individuals aimed at the pursuit of a common goalis divided into a multiplicity of individuals, each of whom has his own purpose. This is the result of an ideological upheaval that deserves to be analyzed in depth, because of its implications both in the ecclesial and civil spheres. It is evident, however, that the first step of this revolution is to be found in the conciliar mens, beginning with the indoctrination of the Christian people constituted by the Reformed Liturgy, in which the individual merges into the assembly by depersonalizing himself, and the community devolves into a collection of individuals by losing their identity.]

    1. CAUSE AND EFFECT

    Philosophy teaches us that to a cause always corresponds a certain effect. We have seen that the actions carried out during Vatican II have had the desired effect, giving concrete form to that anthropological turning point which today has led to the apostasy of the anti-church and the eclipse of the true Church of Christ. We must therefore understand that, if we want to undo the harmful effects we see before us, it is necessary and indispensable to remove the factors that caused them. If this is our goal, it is clear that accepting – or even partially accepting – those revolutionary principles would make our efforts useless and counterproductive. We must therefore be clear about the objectives to be achieved, ordering our action to the goals. But we must all be aware that in this work of restoration no exceptions to the principles are possible, precisely because failure to share them would prevent any chance of success.

    Therefore, let us put aside, once and for all, the vain distinctions concerning the presumed goodness of the Council, the betrayal of the will of the Synod Fathers, the letter and spirit of Vatican II, the magisterial weight (or lack thereof) of its acts, and the hermeneutic of continuity versus that of rupture. The anti-church has used the label “Ecumenical Council” to give authority and legal force to its revolutionary agenda, just as Bergoglio calls his political manifesto of allegiance to the New World Order an “encyclical letter.” The cunning of the enemy has isolated the healthy part of the Church, torn between having to recognize the subversive nature of the Council documents, thus having to exclude them from the Magisterial corpus, and having to deny reality by declaring them apodictically orthodox in order to safeguard the infallibility of the Magisterium. The Dubia represented a humiliation for those Princes of the Church, but without untying the doctrinal knots brought to the attention of the Roman Pontiff. Bergoglio does not respond, precisely because he does not want to deny or confirm the implied errors, thus exposing himself to the risk of being declared a heretic and losing the papacy. This is the same method used with the Council, where ambiguity and the use of imprecise terminology prevent the condemnation of the error that has been implied. But the jurist knows very well that, in addition to the blatant violation of the law, one can also commit a crime by circumventing it, using it for evil purposes: contra legem fit, quod in fraudem legis fit. [what circumvents the law is against it.]

    1. CONCLUSION

    The only way to win this battle is to go back to doing what the Church has always done, and to stop doing what the anti-church asks of us today – that which the true Church has always condemned. Let us put Our Lord Jesus Christ, King and High Priest, back at the center of the life of the Church; and before that, at the center of the life of our communities, of our families, of ourselves. Let us restore the crown to Our Lady Mary Most Holy, Queen and Mother of the Church.

    Let us return to celebrate the traditional Holy Liturgy worthily, and to pray with the words of the Saints, not with the ramblings of the modernists and heretics. Let us begin again to savor the writings of the Fathers of the Church and the Mystics, and to throw into the fire the works imbued with modernism and immanentist sentimentalism. Let us support, with prayer and material help, the many good priests who remain faithful to the true Faith, and withdraw all support from those who have come to terms with the world and its lies.

    And above all I ask you in the name of God! let us abandon that sense of inferiority that our adversaries have accustomed us to accept: in the Lord’s war, they do not humiliate us (we certainly deserve every humiliation for our sins). No, they humiliate the Majesty of God and the Bride of the Immaculate Lamb. The Truth that we embrace does not come from us, but from God! Let Trutht be denied, accept that it must justify itself before the heresies and errors of the anti-church, is not an act of humility, but of cowardice and pusillanimity. Let us be inspired by the example of the Holy Maccabees Martyrs, before a new Antiochus who asks us to sacrifice to idols and to abandon the true God. Let us respond with their words, praying to the Lord: “So now, O Sovereign of the heavens, send a good angel to spread terror and trembling before us. By the might of your arm may these blasphemers who come against your holy people be struck down” (2 Mac 15:23).

    Let me conclude my talk today with a personal memory. When I was Apostolic Nuncio in Nigeria, I learned about a magnificent popular tradition that came out from the terrible war in Biafra, and which continues to this day. I personally took part in it during a pastoral visit to the Archdiocese of Onitsha, and I was very impressed by it. This tradition – called “Block Rosary Children” – consists in gathering thousands of children (even very young ones) in each village or neighborhood for the recitation of the Holy Rosary to implore peace – each child holding a little piece of wood, like a mini altar, with an image of Our Lady and a small candle on it.

    In the days leading up to November 3rd, I invite everyone to join in a Rosary Crusade: a sort of siege of Jericho, not with seven trumpets made of ram’s horns sounded by priests, but with the Hail Mary’s of the little ones and the innocent to bring down the walls of the deep state and of deep church.

    Let us join with little ones in a Block Rosary Children, imploring the Woman clothed with the Sun, that the Reign of Our Lady and Mother may be restored, and the eclipse that afflicts us shortened.

    And may God bless these holy intentions.

    [1] Padre Antonio Spadaro sj, Fratelli Tutti, la risposta di Francesco alla crisi del nostro tempo, in Formiche, 4 Ottobre 2020 (qui).
    [2] «Pope Francis’ pontificate is like a standard lifted up before Catholic integralists and those who equate material continuity and tradition: Catholic doctrine does not just develop. Sometimes it really changes: for example on death penalty, war»,
    ~no need to follow anyone, only consider to broaden (y)our horizon of possibilities
    ~Stop5G.net & FB groups/Stop5G

  14. The Following 26 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    AlaBil (16th September 2021), atman (16th September 2021), avid (16th September 2021), Ba-ba-Ra (16th September 2021), Bill Ryan (16th September 2021), bluestflame (16th September 2021), ClearWater (16th September 2021), East Sun (16th September 2021), Gemma13 (16th September 2021), gord (16th September 2021), lisalu (17th September 2021), mab777 (16th September 2021), meeradas (22nd September 2021), Mercedes (21st September 2021), pabranno (17th September 2021), palehorse (16th September 2021), Pam (16th September 2021), RunningDeer (16th September 2021), Snoweagle (16th September 2021), Stephanie (16th September 2021), Sunny (17th September 2021), ThePythonicCow (16th September 2021), Vangelo (30th September 2021), wavydome (19th September 2021), wondering (16th September 2021), Zirconian (16th September 2021)

  15. Link to Post #8
    United States Avalon Member ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    73
    Posts
    28,007
    Thanks
    29,327
    Thanked 132,292 times in 20,913 posts

    Default Re: Archbishop Viganò: Considerations on the New World Order

    Excellent find, ExomatrixTV. Thank-you for posting it.
    My (sometimes rather dormant) blog: theMooster.net

  16. The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    atman (16th September 2021), avid (16th September 2021), Bill Ryan (16th September 2021), bluestflame (16th September 2021), Ewan (16th September 2021), ExomatrixTV (16th September 2021), Gemma13 (16th September 2021), gord (16th September 2021), lisalu (17th September 2021), Mercedes (21st September 2021), pabranno (17th September 2021), Pam (16th September 2021), RunningDeer (16th September 2021), Snoweagle (16th September 2021), Stephanie (16th September 2021), Vangelo (30th September 2021), wondering (16th September 2021), Zirconian (16th September 2021)

  17. Link to Post #9
    Avalon Member Pam's Avatar
    Join Date
    29th June 2012
    Posts
    2,296
    Thanks
    26,049
    Thanked 15,466 times in 2,229 posts

    Default Re: Archbishop Viganò: Considerations on the New World Order

    Quote Let us turn to Christ, Christ who is the King of hearts, of families, of societies, and of nations. Let us proclaim Him as Our King and Mary Most Holy as Our Queen. Only in this way can the wicked project of the New World Order be defeated. Only in this way can the Holy Church be purified of traitors and renegades. And may God listen to our prayer.
    Archbishop Vigano is definitely taking a trip deep down the rabbit hole and I appreciate that he may be opening the minds of millions that otherwise have their heads totally in the sand. Then he comes up with the part about the Holy Church being purified of traiters. My response to that would be "you can't put lipstick on a pig and expect beauty".

    I do appreciate his commentary and do believe that non violent non participation is the best solution for this time but was there ever a time that the "Holy Church" was non corrupt?
    Last edited by Pam; 16th September 2021 at 18:59.

  18. The Following 24 Users Say Thank You to Pam For This Post:

    atman (16th September 2021), avid (16th September 2021), Ba-ba-Ra (16th September 2021), Bill Ryan (16th September 2021), bluestflame (16th September 2021), ByTheNorthernSea (16th September 2021), ClearWater (16th September 2021), Ewan (16th September 2021), Franny (2nd October 2021), Gemma13 (16th September 2021), gord (16th September 2021), lisalu (17th September 2021), Mercedes (21st September 2021), mountain_jim (16th September 2021), pabranno (17th September 2021), palehorse (16th September 2021), RunningDeer (16th September 2021), Snoweagle (16th September 2021), Stephanie (16th September 2021), ThePythonicCow (16th September 2021), Tracie (Bodhicee) (17th September 2021), Vangelo (30th September 2021), Vicus (22nd September 2021), wondering (16th September 2021)

  19. Link to Post #10
    United States Avalon Member ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    73
    Posts
    28,007
    Thanks
    29,327
    Thanked 132,292 times in 20,913 posts

    Default Re: Archbishop Viganò: Considerations on the New World Order

    Quote Posted by Pam (here)
    I do appreciate his commentary and do believe that non violent non participation is the best solution for this time but was there ever a time that the "Holy Church" was non corrupt?
    Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. -- Lord Acton

    Perhaps before the Church assumed its power as an Institution of Men, back when humble apostles sought their personal connection to a higher spirit, it was not corrupt. But back then "it" was not an Institution of Men. So my counter-example to your implication is hardly a counter-example.
    My (sometimes rather dormant) blog: theMooster.net

  20. The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    atman (16th September 2021), avid (16th September 2021), Ba-ba-Ra (16th September 2021), Bill Ryan (16th September 2021), bluestflame (16th September 2021), ClearWater (16th September 2021), East Sun (16th September 2021), Ewan (16th September 2021), Franny (2nd October 2021), Gemma13 (16th September 2021), gord (16th September 2021), Isserley (16th September 2021), lisalu (17th September 2021), Mercedes (21st September 2021), pabranno (17th September 2021), palehorse (16th September 2021), Pam (16th September 2021), RunningDeer (16th September 2021), Stephanie (16th September 2021), wondering (16th September 2021)

  21. Link to Post #11
    Australia Avalon Member bluestflame's Avatar
    Join Date
    21st April 2010
    Location
    a spark
    Age
    50
    Posts
    2,741
    Thanks
    13,343
    Thanked 7,813 times in 1,730 posts

    Default Re: Archbishop Viganò: Considerations on the New World Order


  22. The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to bluestflame For This Post:

    atman (16th September 2021), Ba-ba-Ra (16th September 2021), Bill Ryan (16th September 2021), ClearWater (16th September 2021), Ewan (16th September 2021), Gemma13 (16th September 2021), lisalu (17th September 2021), meeradas (22nd September 2021), Mercedes (21st September 2021), pabranno (17th September 2021), Pam (16th September 2021), Reinhard (17th September 2021), rgray222 (22nd September 2021), RunningDeer (16th September 2021), Snoweagle (21st September 2021), Stephanie (16th September 2021), Vangelo (30th September 2021), wondering (16th September 2021)

  23. Link to Post #12
    Scotland Avalon Member Ewan's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th February 2015
    Age
    59
    Posts
    1,615
    Thanks
    18,013
    Thanked 10,652 times in 1,569 posts

    Default Re: Archbishop Viganò: Considerations on the New World Order

    Quote Posted by ThePythonicCow (here)
    Quote Posted by Arcturian108 (here)
    I just discovered this portion of Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò's speech interesting:
    Yes - it was weird to read those words of Lennon's song, hearing them play again in my mind's ear, from my youth, but realizing what they really meant.
    Imagine there’s no heaven. It’s easy if you try.
    No hell below us. Above us only sky.
    Imagine all the people, living for today.
    Imagine there’s no countries. It isn’t hard to do.
    Nothing to kill or die for, and no religion too.
    Imagine all the people, living life in peace.
    You may say I’m a dreamer, but I’m not the only one.
    I hope someday you’ll join us, and the world will be as one.
    Imagine no possessions. I wonder if you can.
    No need for greed or hunger, a brotherhood of man.
    Imagine all the people, sharing all the world.


    These words could still be born from naive innocence, or is it I that am being naive?
    Could not the Luciferians have adopted them as they interpreted them another way?
    Last edited by Ewan; 16th September 2021 at 18:45.

  24. The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to Ewan For This Post:

    Alan (16th September 2021), atman (16th September 2021), Bill Ryan (16th September 2021), bluestflame (16th September 2021), Franny (2nd October 2021), Gemma13 (16th September 2021), gord (16th September 2021), meeradas (22nd September 2021), Mercedes (21st September 2021), mountain_jim (17th September 2021), pabranno (17th September 2021), Pam (16th September 2021), Reinhard (17th September 2021), RunningDeer (16th September 2021), Satori (17th September 2021), ThePythonicCow (16th September 2021), Tracie (Bodhicee) (17th September 2021), Wind (17th September 2021), wondering (16th September 2021)

  25. Link to Post #13
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    Dutch
    Age
    55
    Posts
    9,090
    Thanks
    8,178
    Thanked 46,870 times in 8,096 posts

    Default Re: Archbishop Viganò: Considerations on the New World Order

    • Mel Gibson chimes in to support 'canceled' priests like Fr. James Altman:


    Mel Gibson speaks from Malibu, California, in a video presented at the Sept. 10 rally in Chicago hosted by the Coalition for Canceled Priests. (NCR screenshot)
    In a recent video appearance, Hollywood actor Mel Gibson espoused anti-Vatican II views and endorsed a new organization for so-called "canceled" priests whose bishops have removed them from ministry for defying church authorities or expressing controversial opinions.

    Gibson, also a producer and director who is reportedly filming a sequel to his 2004 blockbuster "The Passion of the Christ," attacked bishops as "hirelings" and said he agreed with Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, a former Vatican ambassador to the U.S. who has taken to writing conspiratorial missives alleging a parallel counterfeit church was set up after the Second Vatican Council to eclipse the real church.

    "And my question is, who's hiring [the bishops]? I don't think it's Jesus. Is it [Pope] Francis? Who's hiring Francis? Is it Pachamama?" Gibson said at one point in the rambling five-minute video, where he rarely looks at the camera while railing against the post-conciliar church.

    "There was nothing wrong" with the Catholic Church before Vatican II's reforms, Gibson said, adding: "It didn't need to be fixed. It was doing pretty well."

    Gibson's remote endorsement provided some star power for a Sept. 10 rally that the Coalition for Canceled Priests held at Lincoln Park in Chicago. The event, advertised as "a rally and rosary of reparation," featured right-wing Catholic radio hosts David Gray and Jason Jones as speakers.

    The event's other headline personality was Fr. James Altman, the rogue priest from the Diocese of La Crosse, Wisconsin, whose bishop issued a decree in early July removing him from parish ministry and restricting his priestly faculties because of his divisive style.

    Altman, who was also ordered to meet monthly with his diocesan vicar for clergy and undergo a monthlong retreat for spiritual renewal, showed he intends to continue defying his bishop. While speaking at the rally, he ripped up a piece of paper.
    "Here's what you can do with your decree," Altman said. "Toilet paper is worth more than your decree."

    The Coalition for Canceled Priests was incorporated June 15, 2021, in Illinois. Fr. John Lovell, a priest whose ministry has been restricted by the Diocese of Rockford, Illinois, is identified as a co-founder of the group.

    Several dozen people, many of them holding signs, attended the Sept. 10 rally. They cheered loudly as Altman referred to bishops as "monsters in miters" and called on them to "repent" for their support of vaccines against the coronavirus.

    Altman also made a thinly veiled anti-gay slur aimed at the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops; invoked those who hid Anne Frank and her family from the Nazis as he argued against having so-called blind obedience to bishops; and accused Pope Francis of betraying Jesus like Judas.

    "He is no longer the vicar of Christ. He threw out that title," said Altman, who donated $100,000 to the Coalition for Canceled Priests in late July.

    In his video, Gibson said he would also "throw something in the hat" to show his support, adding that he personally knows "many priests who have been canceled."
    "I'm really sorry about that. It's a really grave injustice, and a really kind of white martyrdom, and it's nothing new," Gibson said, adding that the supposed persecution of faithful priests is "a really deep symptom that afflicts the church, and that did not happen overnight."

    "The Passion of the Christ" was a box office hit, generating more than $600 million worldwide, but was not without controversy, as the film's portrayal of Jews and Gibson's connections to hardline Catholic traditionalism raised concerns about anti-Semitic themes in the movie. Those criticisms took on new salience when Gibson made overt anti-Semitic statements during a 2006 arrest for drunken driving in Malibu, California.

    Over the past year, various published reports have indicated that Gibson is working on a sequel to "The Passion of the Christ" that could bring back some of the original cast, including actor Jim Caviezel as Jesus.
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 16th September 2021 at 19:01.
    ~no need to follow anyone, only consider to broaden (y)our horizon of possibilities
    ~Stop5G.net & FB groups/Stop5G

  26. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    atman (16th September 2021), Bill Ryan (16th September 2021), bluestflame (16th September 2021), ClearWater (17th September 2021), Gemma13 (16th September 2021), lisalu (17th September 2021), Mercedes (21st September 2021), pabranno (17th September 2021), Pam (16th September 2021), Reinhard (17th September 2021), RunningDeer (16th September 2021), Satori (17th September 2021), Snoweagle (21st September 2021), Sunny (17th September 2021), ThePythonicCow (16th September 2021), wavydome (19th September 2021)

  27. Link to Post #14
    United States Avalon Member ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    73
    Posts
    28,007
    Thanks
    29,327
    Thanked 132,292 times in 20,913 posts

    Default Re: Archbishop Viganò: Considerations on the New World Order

    Quote Posted by Ewan (here)
    These words could still be born from naive innocence, or is it I that am being naive?
    Could not the Luciferians have adopted them as they interpreted them another way?
    Good point. I doubt that John Lennon was aware of some of the meanings that we here, reading this thread, are placing in his words.

    Most of us, most of the time, do not spend much (if any) time consciously considering the question of where or what is "the highest good."

    Is it in our physical strength over others, like a school yard bully?
    Is it in our accumulated wealth, our mansions and gold, like King Midas?
    Is it in our minds, striving to have the most published papers in some difficult subject?
    Is it in our power over others, like the most notorious dictators and tyrants?
    Is it "Mother Earth", whose well being we should support, above all else?

    ... or is there a higher spiritual order or master (whom many call "God"), more subtle, more vast in space, time and power, to which we should seek to connect, to become more aware of, to let guide our lives on this earthly plane?

    From what I have seen, most of us, most of the time live rather unquestioned lives, within, but with out question, in some such awareness as one of the above.

    As we grow up, from infant to elder, our awareness will likely shift, sometimes dramatically, sometimes quietly or easily.

    I don't know if John Lennon gave these matters anywhere near as much thought, when he wrote those words to his song, as did Archbishop Viganò when he wrote such speeches as above in this thread. I doubt Lennon did, but I don't know. Thus it could fairly be said that Lennon was probably "naive".

    I am quite certain however, that few of the billions of people (certainly not myself at least) who have heard and enjoyed that song, even "as the theme song for the 2012 Olympic Games in London, and more recently for those in Tokyo" (as noted by Archbishop Viganò in the first speech posted above of his) routinely noticed that they were hearing a hymn to earthly power and peaceful co-existence, that would guide us to obeying whomever or whatever appeared as the Greatest amongst us who promised to place such Earthly well being and Peaceful co-existence above all else.
    Last edited by ThePythonicCow; 16th September 2021 at 20:11.
    My (sometimes rather dormant) blog: theMooster.net

  28. The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    atman (16th September 2021), Bill Ryan (16th September 2021), bluestflame (16th September 2021), ClearWater (17th September 2021), Ewan (17th September 2021), Gemma13 (16th September 2021), gord (17th September 2021), Mercedes (21st September 2021), mountain_jim (17th September 2021), Orph (16th September 2021), pabranno (17th September 2021), Pam (17th September 2021), Reinhard (17th September 2021), RunningDeer (16th September 2021), Snoweagle (21st September 2021), Stephanie (16th September 2021), Tracie (Bodhicee) (17th September 2021)

  29. Link to Post #15
    United States Avalon Member ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    73
    Posts
    28,007
    Thanks
    29,327
    Thanked 132,292 times in 20,913 posts

    Default Re: Archbishop Viganò: Considerations on the New World Order

    Quote Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)
    • Mel Gibson chimes in to support 'canceled' priests like Fr. James Altman:
    ...
    I get the sense, reading this piece that its author, Brian Fraga of the National Catholic Reporter, is less sympathetic to the Coalition for Canceled Priests than is Mel Gibson
    My (sometimes rather dormant) blog: theMooster.net

  30. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    atman (16th September 2021), Bill Ryan (16th September 2021), bluestflame (16th September 2021), ExomatrixTV (16th September 2021), Gemma13 (16th September 2021), gord (17th September 2021), Mercedes (21st September 2021), pabranno (17th September 2021), Pam (17th September 2021), Reinhard (17th September 2021), RunningDeer (16th September 2021), wondering (16th September 2021)

  31. Link to Post #16
    United States Avalon Member wondering's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th January 2016
    Age
    78
    Posts
    471
    Thanks
    24,716
    Thanked 4,480 times in 463 posts

    Default Re: Archbishop Viganò: Considerations on the New World Order

    Ewan, After I read Imagine again, I thought, well, maybe, but maybe not. I agree with you that it could have had an entirely lovely and idealistic meaning. I will continue to hear it in that way for myself. Diane

  32. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to wondering For This Post:

    atman (16th September 2021), Bill Ryan (17th September 2021), Gemma13 (16th September 2021), Mercedes (21st September 2021), mountain_jim (17th September 2021), pabranno (17th September 2021), Pam (17th September 2021), RunningDeer (17th September 2021), Snoweagle (21st September 2021), ThePythonicCow (17th September 2021), Tracie (Bodhicee) (17th September 2021)

  33. Link to Post #17
    United States Avalon Member Mike's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th January 2011
    Location
    journeying to the end of the night
    Age
    44
    Posts
    5,149
    Thanks
    31,822
    Thanked 43,276 times in 5,039 posts

    Default Re: Archbishop Viganò: Considerations on the New World Order

    Quote Posted by wondering (here)
    Ewan, After I read Imagine again, I thought, well, maybe, but maybe not. I agree with you that it could have had an entirely lovely and idealistic meaning. I will continue to hear it in that way for myself. Diane

    I think 'Imagine' was intended that way too Diane.

    The song "God" begins, "God is a concept by which we measure our pain..." Lennon is merely saying that the more pain one is in, the more gods one needs. It was an artistic statement and I took it in that spirit. He explained this pretty matter of factly in his infamous post-Beatles Rolling Stone interview.

    The ending includes a litany of things he no longer believes in: Beatles, Bob Dylan (who he addresses as Zimmerman..his birth name), magic, I,-Ching, Bible, tarot etc. Lennon never had a father really. His mother died tragically when he was very young. He was always looking outside himself to sort of remedy that pain, and he was taken for a ride more than once when he placed his faith in this or that. Personally, I think he just expected too much from those things. He was seeking cures, and when they didn't deliver he got bitter. He was known to throw himself head first into whatever he was into at the time (Janov therapy, Masharisi's trancedental meditation, etc) , speak glowingly of it initially only to ridicule it later. He was impulsive and fickle. But he was no Satanist.

    The lyrics to the song 'Imagine' are lifted mostly from Yoko Ono's book "Grapefruit". She really should have gotten a songwriting credit for that. She heavily influnced John, for better or worse (mostly for the worse, in my view, and not because I think she broke up the Beatles or anything like that, but because she saw a desperate, vulnerable man and completely exploited and manipulated him).

    Lennon has always been a hero of mine but in a way he was the ultimate social justice warrior. Ono was behind much of that, but he allowed himself to become fertile ground for her bullsh!t, so it's his fault as well. I firmly believe much of what we see now with social justice, postmodernism, and neo marxism is indeed Satanic. And Lennon was representing many of those views back then, knowingly or unknowingly. 'Imagine' sounds lovely but it really is the ultimate "woke" anthem, when broken down verse by verse. But I truly think Lennon had the best intentions when he wrote it

  34. The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to Mike For This Post:

    Agape (17th September 2021), atman (16th September 2021), Bill Ryan (17th September 2021), ClearWater (17th September 2021), Gemma13 (16th September 2021), Mercedes (21st September 2021), mountain_jim (17th September 2021), pabranno (17th September 2021), Pam (30th September 2021), Reinhard (17th September 2021), rgray222 (22nd September 2021), RunningDeer (17th September 2021), Satori (16th September 2021), Star Mariner (19th September 2021), ThePythonicCow (17th September 2021), Tracie (Bodhicee) (17th September 2021), wondering (16th September 2021)

  35. Link to Post #18
    Aaland Avalon Member Agape's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th March 2010
    Posts
    5,221
    Thanks
    12,990
    Thanked 22,873 times in 4,255 posts

    Default Re: Archbishop Viganò: Considerations on the New World Order

    I’m in India you know so my views on catholic Christianity - in its current form of manifestation- could sound quite negative from certain perspective considering those people consider themselves “spiritual” and live super safe lives in their gold plated sanctuaries and ornate robes,
    I wonder when will your blindfolds fall down when visiting these mentally fragile people, men with high pitches trying to mimic angelic choirs, spotless men with ocd and suppressed neurosis, people detached from life on the planet yet enjoying immense wealth and liberty of proclamation,
    followed by millions of faithful “sheeple” but missing the fact that this planet and humanity is much bigger,
    longer in its history than they dare to “imagine”.

    I think it’s nearly absurd if not sickening that the church - miniature entity compared to human intelligence - responsible for centuries of abuse of humans and passing a message of rather very narrow minded convictions about your life in the universe “only discovered” its own “new world order” taking place in front of our eyes
    as something “alienated” from its own claustrophobic principle including that of “monopoly of silence”.


    Something we clearly do need to happen in the “new world” no matter how and when it happens is place for spiritual people, genuine seekers, monks, nuns, recluses, teenagers in spiritual crisis, people in life crisis searching for the meaning, philosophers, meditators, yogis and so forth.
    We need that space globally and many are calling for it because most of spiritual institutions, individuals and efforts have been hijacked and monetized,
    muddled and dirtied by politics, money, scandals and opinions as “educated” as Boko Haram,
    most of us - are running from power of the “systems” and the kind of dumbing indoctrination they provide.

    Picking on “John Lennon” and the power of Imagine is a misdirect in my opinion and people who hate John Lennon should not be here with us, sorry ..

    If there is anything the overlords of the world - many other worlds too perhaps- fear the most it IS the power of human imagination,
    it’s ability to create, re-create, evolve , the power to reconcile and rise beyond conflicts , the power of hope in moments void of any hope at all,
    and every human child carries a gift of that power

    unless: you told them they are inherently “guilty” and from modern psychological perspective, dear Father, you have to STOP doing that and stop telling people they are born guilty because it leads to terrible psychological effects on life of individuals and the society as a whole.

    I know the Catholic Church always blamed people “with gifts” and the gifts itself as if they were the source of danger

    and it was the Catholic Church who popularized the term “faithful sheeple” after all which isn’t very different from makings of any “new world order” with people in simple clothing, no soul , performing tasks ..

    I agree with most that you said ..

    but you are still not different from “them”.

    And if there is a power to save this world in human way, it is the spiritual power of pure vision and imagination that can do that.

    Forgetting your ornate world with people who only want to “sit it out” because they are too vulnerable on inside to come down to where people need them in its own time if that’s intended because no one deserves to be so tortured, so blindfolded as they are unless it was for their own conviction.


    Just don’t take it personally: the principles are the same and the same endangered everywhere you go.
    Also the amount of real education and spiritual blessings on this planet is grossly insufficient so far but we won’t give up

    It’s good that you also count yourself in , after all


    Thanks

    🙏🌎🙏

    Last edited by Agape; 17th September 2021 at 03:28.

  36. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Agape For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (17th September 2021), gord (17th September 2021), Jad (18th September 2021), Mercedes (21st September 2021), Mike (17th September 2021), mountain_jim (17th September 2021), pabranno (2nd October 2021), Pam (17th September 2021), Reinhard (17th September 2021), RunningDeer (17th September 2021), ThePythonicCow (17th September 2021), wavydome (19th September 2021), wondering (17th September 2021)

  37. Link to Post #19
    United States Avalon Member ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    73
    Posts
    28,007
    Thanks
    29,327
    Thanked 132,292 times in 20,913 posts

    Default Re: Archbishop Viganò: Considerations on the New World Order

    Quote Posted by Agape (here)
    IPicking on “John Lennon” and the power of Imagine is a misdirect in my opinion and people who hate John Lennon should not be here with us, sorry ..

    If there is anything the overlords of the world - many other worlds too perhaps- fear the most it IS the power of human imagination,
    it’s ability to create, re-create, evolve , the power to reconcile and rise beyond conflicts , the power of hope in moments void of any hope at all,
    and every human child carries a gift of that power
    I quite agree with you on the importance of imagination, and the dangers of the ornate, controlling hierarchies of organized religions, of which the Vatican is the premier example.

    My criticisms of Lennon's "Imagine ..." song were perhaps a bit more subtle. What he was imagining, at least as it being used by Western powers, strikes me as a chimera, a false hope, that empowers not the individual imagination, but rather empowers those institutions and wanna-be tyrants who promise to deliver a Luciferean dream of "heaven on earth".
    Last edited by ThePythonicCow; 17th September 2021 at 18:51.
    My (sometimes rather dormant) blog: theMooster.net

  38. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (17th September 2021), bluestflame (17th September 2021), Brigantia (22nd September 2021), gord (17th September 2021), Jad (18th September 2021), Mercedes (21st September 2021), Mike (17th September 2021), mountain_jim (17th September 2021), pabranno (2nd October 2021), Pam (17th September 2021), Peace in Oz (17th September 2021), Reinhard (17th September 2021), rgray222 (22nd September 2021), RunningDeer (17th September 2021), wavydome (19th September 2021), wondering (17th September 2021)

  39. Link to Post #20
    United States Avalon Member wavydome's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th January 2011
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    833
    Thanks
    2,308
    Thanked 2,863 times in 728 posts

    Default Re: Archbishop Viganò: Considerations on the New World Order

    Quote Here is the text of Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò's recent speech, as translated to English, from Viganò: Considerations on the Great Reset and the New World Order (lifesitenews.com):

    === ===

    Viganò: Considerations on the Great Reset and the New World Order

    Only by turning to Christ can the wicked project of the New World Order
    be defeated and the Holy Church be purified of traitors and renegades.


    Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò

    Tue Aug 31, 2021 - 5:38 pm EDT
    (LifeSiteNews) – Editor’s Note: the following is a speech delivered by Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò on August 28, 2021.

    I appreciated hearing from Archbishop of the Vatican in this OP, thanks so much. The linked translated transcript recognizes the fact of covert-manipulations of governance, which must be publicly understood, at a very, very local level, explaining the NWO plans for genocide, to church people and their communities.

    At the same time I object to his denunciation of Helena Blavatsky, where she produced many pages by super normal abilities, to read from unknown texts preserved on our planet, which speak from entirely different contexts of spirituality little known otherwise, (and perhaps Blavadsky even read books located in the underground libraries at the Vatican or other unknown places). She dictated her publications by reading out verbatim from those texts through her abilities, and she did not need to credit authors, as her mission was not for academia.

    Also A.A.Bailey deserves support for her Christ like efforts of serving her followers, (by honoring her human inspiration, even if it was not a final perfection, she basically just let it all out, and her spiritual source simply had to make the best of the circumstances, with her state of being, more so, rather than finalize a perfected truth. Inevitably, the Theosophical organization was heavily predated upon negatively, and parasitized as well, which ultimately crushed the creditability of Theosophy. A take over was made of Theosophy as a legal entity, and any number of confusions are blamed on A.A.B. and Blavatsky. I studied this at length through laurency.com which goes to great lengths explaining their difficult mission on planet earth, which generally began in 1875. The mission achieved the needed break through for eastern and western cooperation, for sort of jump starting consciousness development worldwide, allowing many subsequent figures and mystics to continue independent progress, gradually, (and without dogma handed down from a centralized control group). This was the intended purpose, to break free from the old world order before 1875.

    The take over of Theosophy, was done by the same Satanic psychopathy which took over his Vatican, and Viganò's missed this side of the story in his speech. Granted that few if any know of Theosophy and its founders, but Viganò did accuse Blavatsky of personally inventing texts which she had instead only referenced, in the process of introducing different cultures for a contrast to the 1800s level of dogma. Viganò's speech is a bit complicated for the average mindset, so he needs to join forces with all who are innately agreeable to opposing the New World Order satanists, or what ever label is most clear. The only connection to the original Theosophy was corporate theft as it's legal owners since Blavadsky and Bailey passed.

    Viganò need not create unnecessary delays in developing consensus, where he almost equates psychopaths with mystics and originators of little known studies, like the misunderstood founders and independent followers, like Blavadsky and Bailey, (towards the end of his speech). Such confusion is exactly what Satanists want, hoping to water down the real issues like genocide. Viganò may yet see this as a hasty error and quit inviting conflicts, of this kind, conflicts which could ultimately slow down whistleblowing efforts, making us all sound like splinters breaking apart.


    ~Bo
    Last edited by wavydome; 19th September 2021 at 01:03. Reason: needed some corrections

  40. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to wavydome For This Post:

    pabranno (2nd October 2021), RunningDeer (21st September 2021), Snoweagle (21st September 2021), wondering (19th September 2021)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts