+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 3 4 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 71

Thread: Bluetooth connectivity of vaccinated people? True or false?

  1. Link to Post #41
    Wales Avalon Member meat suit's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st January 2012
    Location
    on the coast
    Language
    German
    Age
    58
    Posts
    979
    Thanks
    5,725
    Thanked 4,961 times in 900 posts

    Default Re: Bluetooth connectivity of vaccinated people? True or false?

    Quote Posted by chrifri (here)
    Sorry for not having been clear. What I am saying is that apparently cellular phones transmit a 12 digit alpha numerical identity code when bluetooth is switched OFF and transmit/send a different identity information when bluetooth is ON. When bluetooth is ON the phone transmits/send normally the brand name as identity information

    In the case the "other" phone has switched off bluetooth, my cellular phone captures a 12 digit alpha numerical code as for example 64:D2:C4:97:82:1B and in the case that the same "other" phone has bluetooth on, I usually would see, instead of the 12 digit alpha numerical code, the brand name of the other phone, as for example "LG X max" or "Huawei Mate ..." or "Samsung .... "

    If there would be another device with bluetooth on, I would see the name of the device as for example MIBOX4

    In other words, I believe that the 12 digit alpha numerical codes that most cellular phones show when using the bluetooth device connetion search tool, has nothing to do with anything that is in our body or in the body of another person. It is, as I now believe, simply the identity code that a cellular phone transmit when bluetooth is switched off
    I am not able to replicate what you have observed. do you know is wifi neccessary in order for this to work?

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to meat suit For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (12th January 2022), Harmony (16th January 2022), Hermoor (13th January 2022)

  3. Link to Post #42
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    25th September 2014
    Posts
    119
    Thanks
    994
    Thanked 1,059 times in 115 posts

    Default Re: Bluetooth connectivity of vaccinated people? True or false?

    No wifi necessary

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to chrifri For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (12th January 2022), Harmony (16th January 2022), Hermoor (13th January 2022)

  5. Link to Post #43
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,343
    Thanks
    39,271
    Thanked 33,389 times in 4,323 posts

    Default Re: Bluetooth connectivity of vaccinated people? True or false?

    ...

    ... from Jim Stone:

    A well defined and carried out study proves the vax is installing bluetooth

    I have not hit the bluetooth topic hard because all of the studies done so far were not done in a way that could truly pin down what was going on in a scientifically credible way. But for me, today that changed. I finally stumbled across work by Dr. Luis De Benito that was released a month and a half ago that proves it is indeed happening, and the proof was arrived upon in a way that was properly done.

    There is no question the elite are using the vax to put the mark of the beast into people. We are there, at that phase in the timeline that is in the bible. Dr. Benito never mentions this, he just says people are identifiable from 20 meters away, but we all know what that means. Usually on this site I try to get all the facts out, everything relevant, with a short read by editing stuff down to the basics and only writing what needs to be said. I am not going to do that this time, the doctor's entire statement will be posted IN FULL, don't worry about the long read because despite the intro, the read is worth it. Read this, ALL OF IT, to the end. There's no way out of it, the shot is not a vax, it is an attempt to get everyone wired into "the internet of things".


    Dr. Luis Benito: The vaxxed are definitely transmitting

    A video of Dr. Luis giving this testimony is HERE and you know this one is not a psy op because he's not some sort of kook.

    I'm going to tell you today the findings of this summer, which go along the lines of what may be behind all this attempt to vaccinate.

    Why so much interest in jabbing? What's the reason? I'm going to tell you.

    The international organizations that are also investigating this matter asked me for a brief report on what I had done during the summer. And I'm going to read it to you as it is. I'm going to make glosses of what I'm saying. But this is what I've written to them. And the different teams that are investigating this are seeing what part of it is right and what part is not.

    They're translating it into several languages. I say this because, probably, by the 31st it's going to be made public in other places or whatever. It's been hard for me to get here to read it. Do you know why? Because it does weigh a little bit the fact of taking out of the medical issue.

    All this, you know, started as a channel to discuss the evolution of the pandemic, the affected, the treatments, the virus, how the ICUs were. Well, and this no longer makes sense. All that's part of the past. And now, what we're going to do is a recognition of a desire, on the part of the authorities, to take away freedoms from human beings.

    I don't care if you think I'm raving or not. But as I have a moral obligation to report what I have done, I tell you today. And whoever wants to believe it will believe it, and whoever doesn't will judge, criticize and compare it.

    As I say, I've written it, and I have already sent it to the teams that are studying this subject in different parts of the world.

    If from the medical point of view there's no need to administer any preventive measure for a disease with the lethality of 2 per thousand, why so much insistence that everyone should be inoculated? What's the vaccine going to give me that I don't already have? Well, this experiment arose from this reflection.

    Although there are many consultations, during the summer of 2021, in the afternoons, I was the only operative. There wasn't even administrative staff in the afternoons in that building. Under my office, there was occasionally parked an ambulance from SUMA, from the emergency service, because they have a base there. Those were the only "interferences" I detected.

    Most of the observations were carried out without that artifact. I started the consultation at 15:00 and had patients listed every 20 minutes. Due to COVID measures, it was recommended that they come alone and, if possible, at the appointed time. Not before or after.

    Before starting the consultation, I'd connect the Bluetooth application on my cell phone and invariably check that there was no device available to contact. There was no electronic device in range to connect to.

    When a patient appeared, often already up the stairs or at the beginning of the corridor, about 20 meters away from the practice, on my cell phone, I could see if one or two devices to connect to with Bluetooth appeared. One or two or none. On my phone, I could check to see if the Bluetooth was detecting something or nothing.

    And if it was something, it was a device with a MAC Address (Media Access Control) code. This is a unique identifier that electronic device manufacturers assign to a card or item that can be networked.

    After attending to the patient's medical requirements, I'd ask him whether or not he had been vaccinated for COVID. If the answer was affirmative, it was usually quick and without hesitation. And if it was negative, it was often accompanied by a certain wariness, if not anger at the question. A reaction that explained to me that, in general, those who hadn't wanted to be vaccinated had been subjected to some kind of adverse social situation.

    After reassuring the patient, whatever his response, I'd write down on a sheet of paper the answer he gave me. None of the 137 patients I asked refused to answer. If the answer was affirmative, I'd ask them what type of vaccine they had received, when, and if they had had any adverse reactions. I'd then ask them if they had any cell phones or electronic devices such as wireless headsets or tablets on them, and if so, I' ask them to turn it off for a moment. When they turned it off, on my cell phone, usually, one of the devices that registered to Bluetooth would disappear. Out of hundreds, here are the results.

    Of the 137 patients questioned, 112 said they had been vaccinated, and 25 said they hadn't been vaccinated. None of the patients who said they hadn't been vaccinated registered on my cell phone any device available for Bluetooth connection, having ensured the disconnection of their cell phone, if they had one.

    In 96 patients of the 112 who said they had been vaccinated, 96 of the 112 having switched off their electronic devices if they were carrying them, a MAC code remained on the screen of my cell phone, which I had already noted in my notes next to the patient's medical history.

    I interpreted that it was a code that the patient himself was carrying and that, in fact, when he left the office, leaving the building, it disappeared from my cell phone.

    With this simple observation throughout July and August, I've been able to verify that 100% of the patients who say they aren't vaccinated don't raise any contact device with my cell phone via Bluetooth. But 86% of those who said they were vaccinated generated a MAC Address on my cell phone.

    These are the observations made, and many doubts and questions arise from them. Among them, the ones that seem to me be the most significant are:

    First, does the signal detected on my cell phone come from the vaccinated person?

    Well, precisely the isolated environment and not being interfered with by other signals has meant that there's no other source of contamination. In fact, when the SUMA ambulance arrived, apart from other devices such as "SUMA base" and several MAC addresses that I attributed to ambulance personnel who could be vaccinated, I noticed that these signals disappeared when the ambulance left. And when there were suspicions about whether there was some other distorting element, for example, patient escorts in the corridor, accidental operators in the corridor that could be the source or origin of other markers, then I dismissed that case. It's not within the 137 that I have confirmed.

    Second, do all cell phones detect Bluetooth devices with equal capability? My answer is no. My experience is that they don't.

    Third, does the detectable MAC Address on a person allow interaction with him? To what extent? At least I'm sure of one thing: it allows me to know where he is because I knew that someone vaccinated was coming to my office before he showed up.

    The fourth question I asked myself: If the MAC Address is something personal, individual, and unrepeatable, how is it possible that the five people who were injected with the contents of the same vial, from the same distribution of the same batch, don't have 5 different MAC Addresses?

    Well, I consulted with some computer technicians, roboticists and fellow biologists and engineers, experts in computer science, and nanorobotics. And they advocate the possibility that this code is generated as a result of the interaction of what's injected with the genetic material of the patient. Perhaps not so much with their DNA as with the larger compatibility complex, the HLA's, which are ultimately derived from the genome.

    Fifth, if the MAC address is generated by the vaccine, why do only 86% of those who claim to be vaccinated have it? Different answers have been considered to answer this question.
    1. The first one: some of the vials could be placebo.

    2. Second: some vials could be denatured.

    3. Third: a lack of response. In other words, the expected results are not always obtained when a product is applied.

    4. And the fourth, which seems very important to me, is because the patient lies and says he is vaccinated when he isn't to avoid problems or controversies.
    I have many doubts. These are the findings that I've made. They're outside my medical knowledge. I simply attest that when you're in consultation with a person in an isolated environment, that comes up on my cell phone. What does it mean? I have no idea. But I don't like it.

    [Jim Stone's] comment:
    Let's do a little math: 41 out of 137 people did not generate a mac address. that's 29.992 or 30 percent of the population in his area DID NOT GET A SHOT, including those who lied about it. Though that number is a bit low compared to the 40 percent non vaxxed figure I have posted repeatedly, Doc is in a city where vaxxed rates are likely to be higher and that much of a swing fits. Yes, some of the people likely lied about being vaxxed and it is probable that virtually ALL the vaxxed are generating bluetooth, with the few that are not equaling a malfunction in their device.

  6. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    1212is24 (12th January 2022), Ankle Biter (8th January 2022), Bill Ryan (12th January 2022), Harmony (16th January 2022), Hermoor (13th January 2022), Icare (31st December 2022), Michel Leclerc (26th March 2022), Pam (7th January 2022), sms (24th January 2022)

  7. Link to Post #44
    Canada Avalon Member TomKat's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2017
    Posts
    2,616
    Thanks
    2,694
    Thanked 13,328 times in 2,365 posts

    Default Re: Bluetooth connectivity of vaccinated people? True or false?

    Vax victims generating bluetooth mac addresses?

    https://thefreedomarticles.com/vacci...f+January+2022

  8. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to TomKat For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (12th January 2022), Gwin Ru (12th January 2022), Harmony (16th January 2022), Hermoor (13th January 2022), Michel Leclerc (26th March 2022), mountain_jim (12th January 2022), sms (24th January 2022)

  9. Link to Post #45
    UK Avalon Member Matthew's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th July 2015
    Location
    South East England
    Language
    English
    Age
    51
    Posts
    4,127
    Thanks
    25,578
    Thanked 36,102 times in 4,060 posts

    Default Re: Bluetooth connectivity of vaccinated people? True or false?

    Quote Posted by Gwin Ru (here)
    C0r0n @ 2 Inspect

    Review and analysis of scientific articles related to experimental techniques and methods used in vaccines against c0r0n @ v | rus, evidence, damage, hypotheses, opinions and challenges.

    Pattern identification in c0r0n @ v | rus vaccines: nanorouters



    by Mik Andersen, Corona2Inspect
    published in Spanish November 2021
    rough translation via Google translate

    Thursday, November 25, 2021

    Since graphene oxide was discovered in c0r0n @ v | rus vaccines, all the findings and discoveries made only confirm its presence (Campra, P. 2021). To date, more than reasonable evidence and indications have also been found for the existence of carbon nanotubes and nano- octopuses , mesoporous spheres , colloidal nano-robots ; objects that should not be part of any vaccine and that are not declared among the components of the same. Additionally, other types of objects have been identified and evidenced in images of blood samples, of people vaccinated with the c0r0n @ v | rus vaccines, specifically micro-swimmers , crystallized graphene nano-antennas and graphene quantum dots , also known as GQD.

    On this occasion, analyzing one of the images obtained by Dr. Campra , corresponding to a sample of the Pfizer vaccine, see figure 1, it has been discovered, which with great probability, is a nanorouter or part of its circuitry. In the original image, a well-defined drop can be seen in which crystalline structures of a quadrangular or cubic format appear. If you look closely, you can see some marks on these crystals, with a regular pattern, well defined in some cases, but limited by the microscope's optics.


    Fig. 1. Crystalline formations that show markings of what appear to be circuits. Among these objects, the circuit of what could be a nanorouter has been discovered. Image of a sample of the Pfizer vaccine, obtained by (Campra, P. 2021)

    The finding has been made possible by isolating each quadrangular crystal, applying a process of rasterizing, focusing and delineating the edges of the image, in order to further pronounce the observed marks. Once this process was completed, a rough draft was drawn with the lines and patterns inscribed on the glass, creating a clean outline of what actually looked like a circuit. The fact of finding parallel and perpendicular lines with a distribution far from the fractal patterns was very striking, which allowed us to automatically infer the possibility that it had been a product of manufacture. Therefore, similar patterns were searched in the scientific literature, which had a similar scheme, similar to the circuit that had just been drawn. The search result was almost immediate,


    Fig. 2. Possible quantum dot nanorouter observed in a quadrangular crystal, in an image obtained by the doctor (Campra, P. 2021). In the lower right corner, the quantum dot nanorouter circuit published by (Sardinha, LH; Costa, AM; Neto, OPV; Vieira, LF; Vieira, MA 2013) is observed. Note the obvious similarity between the sketch, the shape inscribed in the crystal, and the quantum dot circuit.

    This discovery is of fundamental relevance, not only to understand the true purpose and components of the c0r0n @ v | rus vaccines, but also to explain the existence of the phenomenon of MAC addresses, visible through the bluetooth of many mobile devices.

    Discovery context

    [...]

    Full article: https://corona2inspect.blogspot.com/...norouters.html
    www.orwell.city have published something recently that talks about this subject:


    Complex microtechnology in Pfizer vaccine
    JANUARY 03, 2022
    https://www.orwell.city/2022/01/comp...echnology.html
    If you thought the video about microtechnology detected in a Pfizer vial by La Quinta Columna was shocking enough, the team of Spanish researchers has shared today another one even more impressive.

    In a single drop that has been left to dry, it has been possible to observe microstructures that would explain the phenomenon behind the generation of MAC addresses.

    Orwell City brings to English this new visual material that La Quinta Columna has shared with the world.
    Ricardo Delgado: As we suspected —and as we had been informed by certain people who have worked in the preparation of technical reports, and so on—, as the sample evaporates, this hydrogel solidifies. This substance somehow forms with heat. And we can also understand the fact that these samples were initially frozen. Practically, at an ideal temperature. Now we can understand many things.

    I have subjected the sample to certain experimentation, such as exposing it to electromagnetic fields, magnetic fields from a magnet, and ultraviolet radiation. This is very important because as the days go by, the sample evolves. And that's what you're going to see today.

    Well, I don't know how you're going to assimilate it mentally because the images are extremely shocking. And I believe that this is not news. We'd like to give the good news that all this is over and that it all was just a nightmare. But what we're going to see is very important.

    So we were waiting, José Luis, for you to come in so that you could also see it live. And so that we could all comment on what can be inferred or can be concluded from all this.
    ...

    ...

  10. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Matthew For This Post:

    Alecs (14th January 2022), Bill Ryan (12th January 2022), Gwin Ru (12th January 2022), Harmony (16th January 2022), Hermoor (13th January 2022), mountain_jim (12th January 2022), sms (24th January 2022)

  11. Link to Post #46
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,343
    Thanks
    39,271
    Thanked 33,389 times in 4,323 posts

    Default Re: Bluetooth connectivity of vaccinated people? True or false?

    ...

    ... what's already out there:

    Chemists use DNA to build the world's tiniest antenna

    Université de Montréal
    Mon, 10 Jan 2022 16:27 UTC

    Developed at Université de Montréal, the easy-to-use device promises to help scientists better understand natural and human-designed nanotechnologies - and identify new drugs.

    Like a two-way radio that can both receive and transmit radio waves, the fluorescent nanoantenna designed by Alexis Vallée-Bélisle and his team receives light in one colour and depending on the protein movement it senses, then transmits light back in another colour, which we can detect. One of the main innovations of these nanoantennas is that the receiver part of the antenna (bright green) is also employed to sense the molecular surface of the protein studied via molecular interaction. © CAITLIN MONNEY

    Researchers at Université de Montréal have created a nanoantenna to monitor the motions of proteins.

    Reported this week in Nature Methods, the device is a new method to monitor the structural change of proteins over time - and may go a long way to helping scientists better understand natural and human-designed nanotechnologies.
    "The results are so exciting that we are currently working on setting up a start-up company to commercialize and make this nanoantenna available to most researchers and the pharmaceutical industry," said UdeM chemistry professor Alexis Vallée-Bélisle, the study's senior author.
    Works like a two-way radio

    Alexis Vallée-Bélisle © AMÉLIE PHILIBERT

    Over 40 years ago, researchers invented the first DNA synthesizer to create molecules that encode genetic information.
    "In recent years, chemists have realized that DNA can also be employed to build a variety of nanostructures and nanomachines," said Vallée-Belisle, who also holds the Canada Research Chair in Bioengineering and Bionanotechnology.
    "Inspired by the 'Lego-like' properties of DNA, with building blocks that are typically 20,000 times smaller than a human hair, we have created a DNA-based fluorescent nanoantenna, that can help characterize the function of proteins," he said.

    "Like a two-way radio that can both receive and transmit radio waves, the fluorescent nanoantenna receives light in one colour, or wavelength, and depending on the protein movement it senses, then transmits light back in another colour, which we can detect."
    One of the main innovations of these nanoantennae is that the receiver part of the antenna is also employed to sense the molecular surface of the protein studied via molecular interaction.

    One of the main advantages of using DNA to engineer these nanoantennas is that DNA chemistry is relatively simple and programmable," said Scott Harroun, an UdeM doctoral student in chemistry and the study's first author.
    "The DNA-based nanoantennas can be synthesized with different lengths and flexibilities to optimize their function,""he said. "One can easily attach a fluorescent molecule to the DNA, and then attach this fluorescent nanoantenna to a biological nanomachine, such as an enzyme.

    "By carefully tuning the nanoantenna design, we have created five nanometer-long antenna that produces a distinct signal when the protein is performing its biological function."
    Fluorescent nanoantennas open many exciting avenues in biochemistry and nanotechnology, the scientists believe.
    "For example, we were able to detect, in real time and for the first time, the function of the enzyme alkaline phosphatase with a variety of biological molecules and drugs," said Harroun.

    "This enzyme has been implicated in many diseases, including various cancers and intestinal inflammation."
    Added Dominic Lauzon, a co-author of the study doing his PhD in chemistry at UdeM:
    "In addition to helping us understand how natural nanomachines function or malfunction, consequently leading to disease, this new method can also help chemists identify promising new drugs as well as guide nanoengineers to develop improved nanomachines."
    One main advance enabled by these nanoantennas is also their ease-of-use, the scientists said.
    "Perhaps what we are most excited by is the realization that many labs around the world, equipped with a conventional spectrofluorometer, could readily employ these nanoantennas to study their favourite protein, such as to identify new drugs or to develop new nanotechnologies," said Vallée-Bélisle.
    Related:

  12. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (12th January 2022), Ewan (26th March 2022), Harmony (16th January 2022), Hermoor (13th January 2022), Icare (16th January 2022), Michel Leclerc (26th March 2022), mountain_jim (12th January 2022), sms (24th January 2022), Victoria (13th January 2022)

  13. Link to Post #47
    Avalon Member Hermoor's Avatar
    Join Date
    11th April 2020
    Language
    English
    Posts
    1,087
    Thanks
    5,690
    Thanked 10,820 times in 1,070 posts

    Default Re: Bluetooth connectivity of vaccinated people? True or false?

    This is freaky, sneaky and way too creepy.


  14. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Hermoor For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (4th February 2022), Gwin Ru (14th January 2022), Harmony (16th January 2022), Icare (16th January 2022), Michel Leclerc (26th March 2022), sms (24th January 2022), thepainterdoug (13th January 2022)

  15. Link to Post #48
    United States Avalon Member thepainterdoug's Avatar
    Join Date
    27th November 2013
    Age
    70
    Posts
    3,203
    Thanks
    10,980
    Thanked 33,066 times in 3,146 posts

    Default Re: Bluetooth connectivity of vaccinated people? True or false?

    thats just incredible! i have been reading this for a while from www.orwell.city who translate for la quinta labs

    most people cannot believe this!

  16. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to thepainterdoug For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (4th February 2022), Gwin Ru (14th January 2022), Harmony (16th January 2022), Hermoor (13th January 2022), Icare (16th January 2022), Matthew (29th November 2022), Michel Leclerc (26th March 2022), sms (24th January 2022)

  17. Link to Post #49
    Avalon Member Hermoor's Avatar
    Join Date
    11th April 2020
    Language
    English
    Posts
    1,087
    Thanks
    5,690
    Thanked 10,820 times in 1,070 posts

    Default Re: Bluetooth connectivity of vaccinated people? True or false?

    Quote Posted by thepainterdoug (here)
    most people cannot believe this!
    It's always possible the footage is tricking us, but in this case I doubt it. I just shared it with my uncle and he is freaking out about it. He woke up years ago and understands how fast and evil this thing is moving now.

  18. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Hermoor For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (4th February 2022), Gwin Ru (14th January 2022), Harmony (16th January 2022), Icare (16th January 2022), Jad (13th January 2022), Matthew (29th November 2022), Michel Leclerc (26th March 2022), sms (24th January 2022), thepainterdoug (13th January 2022)

  19. Link to Post #50
    Europe Avalon Member Icare's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th March 2017
    Language
    German
    Posts
    838
    Thanks
    14,359
    Thanked 6,882 times in 830 posts

    Default Re: Bluetooth connectivity of vaccinated people? True or false?

    This should really be publicized widely.

    We know that it's one more step towards the final goal, to connect every single human being on the planet to their AI grid but that sounds so outlandish people think you are crazy even you mention that.

    We shouldn't even be surprised any more, but still, I find this downright scary.

    This is something that potentially can be seen by everybody. I wonder if other vaxxed people can verify this. If so, someone should start a challenge on youtube or wherever so this can be exposed to the masses.

    I still haven't lost all hope of trying to wake people up.

  20. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Icare For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (4th February 2022), Gwin Ru (16th January 2022), Harmony (16th January 2022), Hermoor (4th February 2022), Michel Leclerc (26th March 2022), sms (24th January 2022)

  21. Link to Post #51
    Avalon Member Hermoor's Avatar
    Join Date
    11th April 2020
    Language
    English
    Posts
    1,087
    Thanks
    5,690
    Thanked 10,820 times in 1,070 posts

    Default Re: Bluetooth connectivity of vaccinated people? True or false?

    Goodness me. A rough translation of events said to be from French Polynesia.

    The lady is saying that dead people recently buried in the cemetery are giving off bluetooth signals from jabs they got before they died. She feels like people are being used as guinea pigs in some big experiment. She says there are no other people in the cemetery apart from her and her mother and no electrical installations and buildings are near. Furthermore she says don't take my word for it, go out and research for yourselves.


  22. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Hermoor For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (4th February 2022), Gwin Ru (4th February 2022), Harmony (27th March 2022)

  23. Link to Post #52
    Scotland Avalon Member Ben's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th April 2011
    Age
    43
    Posts
    233
    Thanks
    7,279
    Thanked 2,230 times in 233 posts

    Default Re: Bluetooth connectivity of vaccinated people? True or false?

    Saw this, and although it's entirely within the realms of possibility, I'd still like to do a live experiment with willing vaccinated people.
    It's a big ask, in terms of the implications, but I can think of at least two friends who might be up for it.

    Short video of two people finding non phone IDs for Bluetooth, in a busy restaurant/bar.

    https://www.tiktok.com/@_elect_/vide...90105587191046

    Anyone else come across this?
    Last edited by Ben; 25th March 2022 at 21:22.

  24. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Ben For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (25th March 2022), Gwin Ru (25th March 2022), Harmony (27th March 2022), Michel Leclerc (26th March 2022)

  25. Link to Post #53
    Scotland Avalon Member Ben's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th April 2011
    Age
    43
    Posts
    233
    Thanks
    7,279
    Thanked 2,230 times in 233 posts

    Default Re: Bluetooth connectivity of vaccinated people? True or false?

    Thanks Bill 🙂

  26. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ben For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (25th March 2022), Harmony (27th March 2022), Michel Leclerc (26th March 2022)

  27. Link to Post #54
    Belgium Avalon Member
    Join Date
    6th April 2014
    Location
    France
    Language
    Dutch, French
    Age
    74
    Posts
    751
    Thanks
    10,257
    Thanked 6,085 times in 735 posts

    Default Re: Bluetooth connectivity of vaccinated people? True or false?

    Quoting Gwin Ru’s report about dr. de Benito’s report about the Bluetooth codes being captured from jabbers.


    “ (...°

    ... from Jim Stone:

    (...)


    Dr. Luis Benito: The vaxxed are definitely transmitting

    (...)

    I'm going to tell you today the findings of this summer, which go along the lines of what may be behind all this attempt to vaccinate.

    (...)

    Third, does the detectable MAC Address on a person allow interaction with him? To what extent? At least I'm sure of one thing: it allows me to know where he is because I knew that someone vaccinated was coming to my office before he showed up.

    The fourth question I asked myself: If the MAC Address is something personal, individual, and unrepeatable, how is it possible that the five people who were injected with the contents of the same vial, from the same distribution of the same batch, don't have 5 different MAC Addresses?

    (...)

    Am I mistaken, or is dr. de Benito making a slight logical "lapsus" here, at least in the English translation, and probably in the Spanish also, although right at this spot, he is speaking quite fast and mumbling a little so I can’t understand him well, i.e.: shouldn’t the "don’t have" be "have"? As in:

    “If the MAC Address is something personal, individual, and unrepeatable, how is it possible that the five people who were injected with the contents of the same vial, from the same distribution of the same batch, have 5 different MAC Addresses?”

    Maybe I am missing the point here? Has this struck anybody else?

  28. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Michel Leclerc For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (28th March 2022), Harmony (27th March 2022)

  29. Link to Post #55
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,343
    Thanks
    39,271
    Thanked 33,389 times in 4,323 posts

    Default Re: Bluetooth connectivity of vaccinated people? True or false?

    ...
    • don't have: batches can be tracked
    • have: calls home when activated for the next available MAC address...

  30. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (28th March 2022), eagle0027 (30th March 2022), Harmony (27th March 2022)

  31. Link to Post #56
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,343
    Thanks
    39,271
    Thanked 33,389 times in 4,323 posts

    Default Re: Bluetooth connectivity of vaccinated people? True or false?

    Are You or Someone Around You Chipped? How to Find Out…

    March 25, 2022
    173 views

    Dr Ricardo Delgado of La Quinta Columna shows us how to see if people around us have been nano-chipped by the vaxx.

    TRANSCRIPT/TRANSLATION
    Did you know that if you are vaccinated, you emit a MAC address that is visible on any mobile phone?

    If you’ve received the jab, you’ve been branded like cattle. Regardless of whether you’ve been branded into the herd of Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Janssen or Moderna, your body now appears as a node on an online network that is discoverable via Bluetooth technology.

    At La Quinta Columna, we need not convince you of anything. We want you to see this for yourself.

    It is extremely easy and it will take less than a minute.

    In your phone’s Android system, go to the Play Store and download the free Bluetooth Scanner app.

    Once downloaded, activate your phone’s GPS and Bluetooth capabilities.
    Now, open the Bluetooth Scanner app and choose “Search”.

    You will be able to see a list of MAC addresses, which appear as sets of 12-digit hexadecimal numbers, separated every two digits by a colon or a hyphen (i.e., an octet) and you will be able to distinguish those addresses that don’t correspond with any appliances in your environment.

    If you click to open each of these MAC addresses, you can even get an estimate of the physical distance to which those branded by this technology are from you.

    If you have been vaxxed, one of these MAC addresses will correspond to you and if you drill down on it, you will see your own cellphone’s call record.

    If you find this shocking, wait until you experience the far-reaching consequences of being branded as cattle for the rest of your life.

    Sadly, this is not a hoax.

    They injected you with microtechnology and graphene, which is how this all works.

    We have seen this same microtechnology in all brands of the vaxxines, from samples that we’ve analyzed, taken from all parts of the world.

    They can monitor your specific biomedical data, the consequences of which go way beyond anything you can imagine now.

    The mainstream media is hiding this abomination now being carried out against all human beings, including your children.

    Visit LaQuintaColumna.info and LaQuintaColumna.tv and you will quickly understand the far-ranging implications of this intra-corporeal microtechnology and its humiliating purpose for all of humanity.

    [For English translations of their work, go to Orwell.city].

    ***
    Mik Andersen, publisher of the research blog Corona2Inspect is a renowned scientist now collaborating under a pseudonym with La Quinta Columna and Dr Pablo Campra Madrid.

    The nano-network being deciphered and described by Andersen is one that would allow the neurostimulation of the population through a network designed for this purpose.

    It appears that neuromodulation is the ultimate purpose of the global inoculation operation which has deployed highly-advanced military technology within the general population, 80% of whom still believe this is a vaccine.

    Those who follow the investigations of La Quinta Columna know that, in addition to finding reduced graphene oxide (rGO), microparticles have been observed under the microscope that self-assemble with the appearance of chips, computer cards and strange fibers, similar to Morgellons but that also change over the course of several hours.

    These revelations are so hellacious that people go into denial, because they cannot believe that governments, doctors, journalists, etc have agreed to carry out the most diabolical fraud in human history by fulfilling the Globalists’ long-announced goal of microchipping the human population.

    Contributed by Alexandra Bruce

    Contact

  32. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Ben (29th March 2022), Bill Ryan (28th March 2022), eagle0027 (30th March 2022), Ewan (27th March 2022), Harmony (27th March 2022), meat suit (28th March 2022), mountain_jim (26th May 2022), onawah (28th March 2022)

  33. Link to Post #57
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,190
    Thanks
    47,631
    Thanked 115,973 times in 20,621 posts

    Default Re: Bluetooth connectivity of vaccinated people? True or false?

    WARMED UP PFIZER VIALS EXPLODE WITH SELF ASSEMBLING CIRCUITRY
    March 27, 2022
    https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/war...ing-circuitry/

    "Dr Jane Ruby is back with some jaw-dropping video footage taken by South African Dr Xandre Botha and by Kiwi Dr Matt Shelton of the self-assembling circuits in the Pfizer jab.

    With full chain of custody, both doctors obtained sealed, undiluted vials of the Pfizer product. In the video, the solution almost appears to be “alive” with swarming particles.

    Dr Shelton heated the solution up that of human body temperature (98.6ºF/37ºC) and these crazy branch-like structures began to form. “How horrific is that?” says Dr Ruby.

    Both doctors filmed similar scenes of these particles forming into what look like small circuit boards over the course of several hours. These rectangular structures have been seen emanating from the round, shiny “dots”, as Dr Ruby calls them.

    My favorite part is when Dr Ruby breaks the third wall and begins addressing the audience as a human being, rather than a presenter:

    “It looks like a circuit board, right? How damaging is this to your blood? How damaging is this to your organs? And what is it growing?…“Who the Hell are these people? Who the Hell do they think they are? No informed consent. Technology way before its time. These arrogant bastards!…

    “You have the right to know if someone is changing your God-given DNA, you have the right to know if they’re putting in some electronic, electromagnetic-related circuitry.”


    Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vvwkjj/?pub=4
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  34. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ben (29th March 2022), Bill Ryan (28th March 2022), Bo Atkinson (24th November 2022), eagle0027 (30th March 2022), Gwin Ru (29th March 2022), Harmony (16th May 2022), mojo (16th May 2022), mountain_jim (26th May 2022), Patient (28th March 2022), Peace in Oz (29th March 2022)

  35. Link to Post #58
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,343
    Thanks
    39,271
    Thanked 33,389 times in 4,323 posts

    Default Re: Bluetooth connectivity of vaccinated people? True or false?

    ...

    ... Vaccinated People Emitting MAC Addresses?

    https://www.henrymakow.com/
    hmakow@gmail.com
    May 15, 2022

    Vaccinated People Emitting MAC Addresses; What's Causing This Phenomenon?

    https://expose-news.com/2022/05/15/vaccinated-people-emitting-mac-addresses/

    "Mik Andersen explained that Wireless nano communication networks for intracorporeal nanodevices have two clear goals.

    The first is to monitor and collect data on the parameters, activity or neurological, cardiac and physiological data of the individual, facilitating their transmission to remote servers and databases, on the Internet, to form the Big Data and its analytics through artificial intelligence ("AI") software.

    The second is to interact with individuals, especially in the neural section and the human psyche.

    Mik Andersen recommends watching a three-part documentary, 'Brain Jabbed', made by Richard Hall, host of RichPlanet TV. Here is the link.

    https://www.richplanet.net/richp_gen...5&part=1&gen=0

    There is enough evidence here to present to police forces so that the vaccine centres can be closed down and quarantined, and the perpetrators arrested and sentenced.

    Related:
    ----------------

  36. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (16th May 2022), Harmony (16th May 2022), mojo (16th May 2022), mountain_jim (26th May 2022), onawah (16th May 2022), Peace in Oz (17th May 2022), thepainterdoug (16th May 2022)

  37. Link to Post #59
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,343
    Thanks
    39,271
    Thanked 33,389 times in 4,323 posts

    Default Re: Bluetooth connectivity of vaccinated people? True or false?

    Vaccine nano chips light up inside peoples bodies when they are near cell phones. People are chipped 04:29
    First published at 16:00 UTC on May 25th, 2022.

    Jim Crenshaw
    Jim_Crenshaw

    No surprise here. It will not be long until people are glowing in the dark. People will be walking around glowing on and off like firefly's. Nothing has shocked me in months. This does not either.

    Source: Maria Zeee on Truth Media


  38. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (24th November 2022), Bo Atkinson (24th November 2022), Harmony (27th May 2022), Sunny (28th May 2022)

  39. Link to Post #60
    UK Avalon Member Nick Matkin's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2012
    Posts
    1,674
    Thanks
    1,615
    Thanked 5,741 times in 1,499 posts

    Default Re: Bluetooth connectivity of vaccinated people? True or false?

    I'm all jabbed up and my Blutooth connectivity is just as bad as it was before. Who do I complain to cos it's been a waste of time...?

  40. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Nick Matkin For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (24th November 2022), Bo Atkinson (24th November 2022), Matthew (29th November 2022)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 3 4 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts