Posted by Delight
(here)
Posted by Bill Ryan
(here)
This is so important, I'm now convinced it deserves its own thread.
There are three levels of introduction. Here's a short (rather flowery, but worthwhile) summary 13 minute piece that was nicely edited from a recent interview with
Dr Robert Malone. It's already been posted several times, deservedly so.
The source interview for that, twice as long (25 mins), is here:
https://freeworldnews.tv/watch?id=619daea08153a665791f3fb6
But the
pièce de résistance is Chris Martenson's new interview with the man himself,
Mattias Desmet.
This presentation (69 mins) is a critically important work of what I think might qualify as near-genius. It explains all the human behavior we've been seeing —
everywhere. I cannot recommend this too highly.
It's the kind of detailed thesis that (if one had time!) one might want to pause the video frequently and take good notes. It's here on YouTube right now, but is also
on Odysee here if YT removes it. Again, I stress: this is really, really good.
"What is at risk? EVERYTHING"
I have been contemplating this really thought provoking interview Chris Marten has with Mattias Desmet. Mr Desmet states that about 30% are absolutely hypnotized by this propaganda. The hynotic event doesn't have to makes sense or add up logically but it does seem to need ritualistic elements and the concept of self sacrifices, like wearing a mask. This 30 percent are the ones that could be readily manipulated into all sorts of destructive behavior that would previously have been considered totally unacceptable under the guise of righteous indignation. Rationalization for committing atrocities for the greater good, although many genocidal movements could fit the bill here in some ways I see the the Christian Crusades as having some of the same energetic similarities as those that embrace the Dogma of Covidian Extremism which is a weird form of faith based extremism at it's worse. Zealots using CNN editorialized propaganda as support for their stance feeling this has as much validity as any valid scientific study, in fact they wouldn't probably know the difference. As I write this we are getting familiarized with the concepts of "quarantine" camps that are established for the common good and health primarily those that were willing to sacrifice for the common good and can get that dopamine rush that being righteously indignant can provide. I wonder how long it will take for the "quarantine" camps to take on a different purpose. I am guessing they will serve nicely to isolate the "domestic terrorists"(anyone of the 30% that aren't mass hypnotized and eventually most of the others as well. I doubt very many will pass the test of worthiness of survival into the new world order.
Next we have the 40% that see that something isn't adding up but are unwilling to rock the boat or make any waves. These are the folks that would prefer not to engage in any debate because they can see the fallacy of arguments that would support this. They may also have convinced themselves that they just don't get it and if they totally understood the whole thing would make more sense. I feel there are many times in my life where I have defaulted to this position, albeit under conditions not anywhere near as dire as this.
The rest which would seem to be about 30% are just not subject to the mass hypnosis and they are not going to excuse it or accept it.
Mr. Desmet states that one might get a totally hypnotized individual to lighten the stance somewhat, that it is possible with some of them. My take on this is that the the ones that will matter are the 40% who see some fallacy but can't or won't take any action or say anything. To be able to approach these people and get a change in willingness to take a stand could change the numbers of 30% to upwards of 70% that are not going to blindly follow and cooperate these insane would be rulers. I love the idea that Chris has in that approaching those 40% it might be better to do it by not addressing , for instance the mask agenda or the injection agenda but the implications of technocracy. The other implications that we can all agree are not desirable nor something we want in any way. Particularly if we have children or grandchildren.
This is a refreshing understanding and a workable and doable approach that anyone can do.
I have signed up for a neighborhood forum for practical reasons, such as sharing reputable companies and help in finding lost dogs ect. I have been kind of blown away how all roads always seems to lead a few to bringing up vaccination and relating it to political party affiliation and other needless unproductive dissension mongering based on political affiliation Some guy is spouting this ludicrous story line that has Trump supporters refusing to get vaccinated???? I ended having my email address takien off their list because it is a senseless source of mindless , nonsensical hate mongering.
Maybe popping in and approaching topics at a totally different level could assist those 40 % who see the nuttiness but are at a loss to do anything or say anything because they don't want to get attacted by radicalized Covidians or those that see political affiliation as the be all end all. Maybe finding a common ground that most could agree on and working from there is a possibility.
I really did appreciate the interview and the possibility of offering solutions.
Mass hypnosis, or "Mass formation": how large populations become extreme
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks