+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 26

Thread: Was the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption Artificially Engineered?

  1. Link to Post #1
    UK Avalon Member lightpotential's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    England
    Language
    English
    Age
    45
    Posts
    149
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 883 times in 124 posts

    Default Was the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption Artificially Engineered?

    I am sure by now we have all seen the satellite images of the eruption of the Hunga Tonga volcano. Prima Facie it just blatantly looks like a nuclear explosion.

    Hunga Tonga volcano Eruption

    I suspect it was artificially triggered by scalar beam technology, as with the 11 March 2011 Japanese earthquake.

    A couple of months ago there was a lot of talk about La Palma being stimulated by earthquakes triggering low level seismic-volcanic activity. I did an analysis of this at the time, and concluded that the critical earthquakes that preceded the activity were artificial. I think the La Palma activity may well have been a test run for a larger operation, which in this case was triggering the eruption of the Hunga Tonga volcano.

    My detailed video on this science is as follows:



    Keith
    Visit my website Lost Age Secrets

  2. The Following 34 Users Say Thank You to lightpotential For This Post:

    Alecs (15th January 2022), angelfire (15th January 2022), Arcturian108 (15th January 2022), Ba-ba-Ra (19th January 2022), Blastolabs (19th January 2022), Brigantia (16th January 2022), Cognitive Dissident (16th January 2022), cursichella1 (17th January 2022), Deux Corbeaux (18th January 2022), edina (19th January 2022), fifi (20th January 2022), Franny (15th January 2022), Harmony (15th January 2022), Icare (15th January 2022), Inversion (20th January 2022), jaybee (18th January 2022), Journeyman (18th January 2022), kfm27917 (16th January 2022), leavesoftrees (22nd January 2022), Mare (15th January 2022), Matthew (18th January 2022), Mike Gorman (18th January 2022), mountain_jim (18th January 2022), palehorse (19th January 2022), Pam (15th January 2022), pyrangello (18th January 2022), Spiral (19th January 2022), Sunny (16th January 2022), toppy (16th January 2022), Tyy1907 (16th January 2022), Vangelo (15th January 2022), Violet3 (16th January 2022), Wind (16th January 2022), wondering (15th January 2022)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Scotland Avalon Member angelfire's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd May 2014
    Posts
    246
    Thanks
    5,295
    Thanked 2,119 times in 230 posts

    Default Re: Was the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption Artificially Engineered?

    Hmmmmm....


    https://cointelegraph.com/news/tonga...qDzWVQVBZHmOdM


    Tonga to copy El Salvador’s bill making Bitcoin legal tender, says former MP
    In a ruling that is “almost identical to the El Salvador bill,” Tongan bigwig Lord Fusitu’a anticipates that his country could adopt Bitcoin by November.
    Another domino is lined up to fall down the route to Bitcoinization. On Wednesday, a former lawmaker of the Pacific island nation of Tonga shared a play-by-play approach to adopting Bitcoin (BTC) as legal tender.

    In a series of tweets, Lord Fusitu’a, a former member of parliament for Tonga, released an ETA for Bitcoin becoming legal tender in Tonga. Copying El Salvador’s playbook, the move could onboard more than 100,000 Tongans onto the Bitcoin network.

    In his five-point plan, the chairman of the Oceania chapter of the Global Organization of Parliamentarians Against Corruption describes the adoption path:
    n a follow-up comment, Fusitu’a said the bill is “modeled on and is almost identical to the El Salvador bill.”

    The announcement sowed the seeds for questions, predictions and outright jubilation from Bitcoin Twitter before the Tongan set the record straight. He enthusiastically replied that the timeline for BTC becoming legal tender could happen as early as November or December this year, replying, “Boom! That’s us, brother!” in a tweet.

    In 2021, it was widely speculated that Tonga would become one of the next countries to adopt BTC as legal tender. Speculation reached a fever peak following a podcast Lord Fusitu’a undertook with Bedford-based Bitcoiner Peter McCormack.

    During the conversation, the then-member of parliament shared the remittance case for adopting BTC as legal tender. He said adoption would provoke:

    “A disposable income increase by 30%. With that extra 30%, some (people) are going to be saving it rather than putting it into the economy and stacking sats.”
    Tonga is a remote island nation that relies upon remittances from countries, including Australia, New Zealand and the United States. The International Finance Corporation estimates that Tonga receives more income from remittances than any other country in the world, contributing up to 30% of household income.

    Furthermore, while the Tongan population numbers just six figures, the Tongan diaspora is vast. The International Organization for Migration estimates the Tongan population living abroad at 126,000, with up to 18,000 Tongans in Australia.

    The remittance use case was one of the primary drivers for El Salvador adopting BTC as legal tender. According to the World Bank, Tonga’s remittance as a percentage of gross domestic product is substantially higher than El Salvador, at 39% vs. 24%, respectively.

    Related: El Salvador: How it started vs. how it went with the Bitcoin Law in 2021

    Remittance aside, the Lord brought up domestic advantages for adopting the open-source protocol. He agreed that Tonga could create a BTC circular economy and that it’s “one of the few instances in which being a sparsely populated small island kingdom archipelago is an advantage.”

    When the islands’ internet infrastructure was brought into question, the Tongan claimed internet and smartphone penetration rates exceeded 90%. The World Bank’s most recent figures — albeit from five years ago in 2017 — show Tonga at 50% internet penetration.

    Bringing the islands online may take some time, but Fusitu’a is adamant about his country’s BTC future:

  4. The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to angelfire For This Post:

    Ba-ba-Ra (19th January 2022), Blastolabs (19th January 2022), cursichella1 (17th January 2022), DNA (18th January 2022), fifi (20th January 2022), Harmony (15th January 2022), Icare (15th January 2022), jaybee (18th January 2022), Johan (Keyholder) (15th January 2022), Mare (15th January 2022), Matthew (18th January 2022), mountain_jim (18th January 2022), pyrangello (18th January 2022), Spiral (19th January 2022), Sunny (16th January 2022), Violet3 (16th January 2022)

  5. Link to Post #3
    Germany Avalon Member Icare's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th March 2017
    Posts
    326
    Thanks
    8,336
    Thanked 2,584 times in 318 posts

    Default Re: Was the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption Artificially Engineered?

    Why the volcanic eruption in Tonga was so violent and what to expect from "theconversation.com"

    https://theconversation.com/why-the-...ct-next-175035

    And things could get worse (from the article in the link):

    What we can expect to happen now

    We’re still in the middle of this major eruptive sequence and many aspects remain unclear, partly because the island is currently obscured by ash clouds.

    The two earlier eruptions on December 20 2021 and January 13 2022 were of moderate size. They produced clouds of up to 17km elevation and added new land to the 2014/15 combined island.

    The latest eruption has stepped up the scale in terms of violence. The ash plume is already about 20km high. Most remarkably, it spread out almost concentrically over a distance of about 130km from the volcano, creating a plume with a 260km diameter, before it was distorted by the wind.
    Last edited by Icare; 15th January 2022 at 23:04.

  6. The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to Icare For This Post:

    angelfire (15th January 2022), Arcturian108 (18th January 2022), Ba-ba-Ra (19th January 2022), cursichella1 (17th January 2022), DNA (18th January 2022), fifi (20th January 2022), Harmony (16th January 2022), jaybee (18th January 2022), Johan (Keyholder) (15th January 2022), kfm27917 (16th January 2022), Lilyofthestars (16th January 2022), Mare (15th January 2022), Matthew (18th January 2022), mountain_jim (18th January 2022), onevoice (22nd January 2022), pyrangello (18th January 2022), Spiral (19th January 2022), Sunny (16th January 2022), Violet3 (16th January 2022)

  7. Link to Post #4
    UK Avalon Member Sunny-side-up's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th April 2013
    Location
    Between here & there
    Age
    62
    Posts
    4,099
    Thanks
    44,661
    Thanked 19,959 times in 3,808 posts

    Default Re: Was the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption Artificially Engineered?

    One thing I noticed about the vid of the eruption was the direction of the dust plume in relation to the other weather directions.
    I guess it shows how different the wind flow is at different heights
    I'm a simple easy going guy that is very upset/sad with the worlds hidden controllers!
    We need LEADERS who bat from the HEART!
    Rise up above them Dark evil doers, not within anger but with LOVE

  8. The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Sunny-side-up For This Post:

    angelfire (15th January 2022), Ba-ba-Ra (19th January 2022), cursichella1 (17th January 2022), DNA (18th January 2022), Harmony (15th January 2022), Icare (15th January 2022), jaybee (18th January 2022), kfm27917 (16th January 2022), Mare (15th January 2022), pyrangello (18th January 2022), scotslad (16th January 2022), Spiral (19th January 2022), Sunny (16th January 2022), Violet3 (16th January 2022)

  9. Link to Post #5
    Avalon Member jaybee's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Midlands England
    Posts
    1,849
    Thanks
    4,508
    Thanked 8,637 times in 1,413 posts

    Default Re: Was the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption Artificially Engineered?

    Quote Posted by lightpotential (here)
    I am sure by now we have all seen the satellite images of the eruption of the Hunga Tonga volcano. Prima Facie it just blatantly looks like a nuclear explosion.

    Hunga Tonga volcano Eruption

    I suspect it was artificially triggered by scalar beam technology, as with the 11 March 2011 Japanese earthquake.

    A couple of months ago there was a lot of talk about La Palma being stimulated by earthquakes triggering low level seismic-volcanic activity. I did an analysis of this at the time, and concluded that the critical earthquakes that preceded the activity were artificial. I think the La Palma activity may well have been a test run for a larger operation, which in this case was triggering the eruption of the Hunga Tonga volcano.

    My detailed video on this science is as follows:



    Keith

    very interesting - thank you - a glimpse into the secret war going on ....

    top notch video

    have you studied the data for the Hunga Tonga 'eruption' yet - and got any firm connections... ?

    one thing I happened to notice, but it could be stretching it - around the approximate 32:00 time mark, when you are discussing the Hiroshima bomb you say that as the bomb was falling for those 43 seconds the sun was moving it's longitude position over the equator at 1522 feet per second... I wonder if that could be linking to 15th of 2022.... the fifteenth day of year '22......... dunno......


    I have only just started taking proper notice of the Tonga event...
    Last edited by jaybee; 18th January 2022 at 12:40.

  10. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to jaybee For This Post:

    Ba-ba-Ra (19th January 2022), DNA (18th January 2022), edina (19th January 2022), Harmony (19th January 2022), Matthew (18th January 2022), mountain_jim (18th January 2022), Spiral (19th January 2022), Sunny (18th January 2022)

  11. Link to Post #6
    United States Avalon Member DNA's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th May 2011
    Location
    Arizona
    Age
    49
    Posts
    4,109
    Thanks
    29,062
    Thanked 22,851 times in 3,824 posts

    Default Re: Was the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption Artificially Engineered?

    Quote Posted by lightpotential (here)
    I am sure by now we have all seen the satellite images of the eruption of the Hunga Tonga volcano. Prima Facie it just blatantly looks like a nuclear explosion.

    Hunga Tonga volcano Eruption

    I suspect it was artificially triggered by scalar beam technology, as with the 11 March 2011 Japanese earthquake.

    A couple of months ago there was a lot of talk about La Palma being stimulated by earthquakes triggering low level seismic-volcanic activity. I did an analysis of this at the time, and concluded that the critical earthquakes that preceded the activity were artificial. I think the La Palma activity may well have been a test run for a larger operation, which in this case was triggering the eruption of the Hunga Tonga volcano.

    My detailed video on this science is as follows:



    Keith
    Indeed

    If world war 3 happens this technology will be utilized like crazy.
    It's no small wonder that in the Edgar Cayce prophecies WW3 always came right before the shifting of the axis which ushers in global catastrophies on the scale of continents sinking and rising from the oceans.
    The conquering of self is truly greater than were one to conquer many worlds.
    --Edgar Cayce



    Troll-hood motto: Never, ever, however, whatsoever, to anyone, a point concede. -- Herve

  12. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to DNA For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (18th January 2022), Ba-ba-Ra (19th January 2022), edina (19th January 2022), fifi (20th January 2022), Harmony (18th January 2022), jaybee (22nd January 2022), Matthew (18th January 2022), mountain_jim (18th January 2022), palehorse (19th January 2022), Spiral (19th January 2022), Sunny (18th January 2022)

  13. Link to Post #7
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    4,893
    Thanks
    41,007
    Thanked 44,410 times in 4,737 posts

    Default Re: Was the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption Artificially Engineered?

    Cliff retweeted this - if not faked, appears to show a missile-like object entering sea prior to explosion.

    https://twitter.com/clif_high/status...869425153?s=20

    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  14. The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    Ba-ba-Ra (19th January 2022), ByTheNorthernSea (18th January 2022), Carlitos (25th January 2022), DNA (18th January 2022), edina (19th January 2022), fifi (20th January 2022), Harmony (19th January 2022), jaybee (22nd January 2022), Lilyofthestars (19th January 2022), Matthew (18th January 2022), meat suit (18th January 2022), pyrangello (18th January 2022), Sadieblue (19th January 2022), Spiral (19th January 2022), Sunny (18th January 2022), The KMan (18th January 2022), Vicus (23rd January 2022)

  15. Link to Post #8
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    2,841
    Thanks
    19,730
    Thanked 22,456 times in 2,820 posts

    Default Re: Was the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption Artificially Engineered?

    ...

    ... from Jim Stone:
    More garbage on the Tonga volcano "nuke"

    Someone wants this hoax enforced. So I will make a few salient points that kill it

    First of all, a lot of hoaxes get launched for the sole purpose of making alt media people look stupid. This happens constantly, and it is so prevalent that I would venture to guess that over half of what is found in alt media is complete fabrication pushed by hoaxers seeking clicks, and/or paid operatives poisoning the well from cushy seats in Maryland.

    When wading through the resulting cesspool you need hip waders and crap filters. So here are a few obvious killers of the Tonga nuke hoax which is really a dive into total abject stupidity.

    In order, from most stupid:
    1. Some idiot thought he saw a missile on a weather satellite feed. Actually, I doubt whoever initially fronted the hoax actually believed it, this came out of a think tank somewhere because there's not a chance a random joe that stupid who could actually get hits would ever say it. Satellite feeds are so crude they don't have a chance of picking up a jumbo jet. They don't even pick up warships, they can't even see cities. They are SO CRUDE they cannot even pick up the prop wash from an aircraft carrier, which is ENORMOUS and "goes forever".
    Weather satellites are SO CRUDE they would not pick up the prop wash from a giant container vessel making no effort to conceal it.
    They make a huge scar on the surface of the water that extends back many miles, at least 20. Add to that the fact that you get one frame every two minutes or so, and there is no chance any weather satellite is going to pick up jack. The entire concept of this is so stupid. How is a missile the size of a bus going to show up on a sat feed that can't resolve a container vessel with a giant prop wash behind it?
    1a. So once it was pointed out that there is no way a weather sat resolves well enough to ever pick up a missile (and I mean a thousand times incapable at least,) the story line evolved to "A russian sub did it". Because it had to have. Because the nuke story had to stay alive come hell or high water. How stupid.
    2. I don't know what was more stupid, the missile or this next one, but I will make it number 2. There was a hoax video someone posted of hearing the blast from 700 kilometers away. The cloud from the volcano was absolutely ENORMOUS in the sky, looming far overhead, as seen 700 kilometers away and suddenly a nice fresh clear bang bang bang was heard. How fast does sound travel? How long would it take to get the cloud to look like that 700 kilometers away? I'd guess the timing of that was off by 15:1. And worse? The sound was fresh. And sounded just like huge firecrackers. I know why. Because that's what it was. If a sound from a blast like that arrived with that level of freshness from 700 kilometers away, it would have ripped every tree out and probably would have even removed the beach. THAT was NOT POSSIBLE. And idiots seeking the nuke story just gobbled it right up.
    2a. We have precedent. The Nevada nuclear tests. How far away were they audible? They were not audible in Las Vegas, which was only 100 miles away. Vegas could see the flashes, see the mushroom clouds, feel the ground shake, and they could not hear jack. So if the blast in Tonga was a nuke, how was it heard 700 kilometers away? People experienced the effects of Tsar Bomba from that far away but the effects took the form of a pressure wave, not a sharp crack.
    3. The whole story started because of the symmetrical shape of the blast. The symmetrical shape is standard. Any time you get an absolutely enormous explosion, the shape is symmetrical. The explosion OWNS the environment when the energy goes past a certain point, and the result is a symmetrical shape. Additionally, this blast happened underwater supposedly despite what the pictures and video looked like, which would have directed the blast symmetrically upward. The fact it happened underwater is supported by the fact that Tonga's internet cable got cut by the blast out in the ocean. An underwater blast would cause the explosion to be symmetrical on satellite, it would follow the path of least resistance which would be straight up.
    Reputable people ran with the Tonga nuke story, which is impossible on it's face. None of the evidence presented washed in any way whatsoever. You cannot see missiles on weather satellites, you cannot hear nukes that far away, sometimes a volcano is just a volcano, what??? Did big volcanic blasts become history????

    Tonga not a volcano??
    I'd bet that if I posted it was a nuke like what some people are trying to spread I would get TONS of hits, because every time I post B.S. that's exactly what happens. "they" censor the real stuff so thoroghly that every time a report REALLY takes off I assume I must have posted a hoax so "they" take the censor filters off. To make sure everyone sees me look stupid. In fact, that's a key indicator I use CONSTANTLY. It is like a parity check. If anything I post spreads like wildfire it goes under the magnifying glass, and sure enough there will be info I did not hit that proves it false. That does not happen a lot, and when it does I issue a redaction.

    FACT: Tonga was a volcano, nukes simply don't make that much ash, not even tsar bomba. Why on earth would anyone want to set off a sub surface nuke in Tonga anyway?

    And the tsunami was not big enough for a nuke that would do what happened, by at least an order of magnitude. Nukes make HUGE tsunamis because rather than sliding land, the water gets launched by steam pressure. THERE WAS NO NUKE IN TONGA. I don't care if North Korea launched during the volcanic blasts, IF they could even reach that far it would take hours for the missiles to arrive. More flat earf. Flat earf serves the tribe well.

    By the way, the sat footage people are using to "prove" a missile has ONE FRAME EVERY 2 MINUTES, which would never in a million years cut it for a missile or anything else. How would a missile show up in sat footage that only resolves to 5 kilometers anyway? You can't even see ships on that. That is just STUPID.

    I don't care who is posting this, NO BANDWAGON FOR ME, or should I say someone fell off the apple cart?

    ________________


  16. The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (18th January 2022), Ba-ba-Ra (19th January 2022), edina (19th January 2022), fifi (20th January 2022), Harmony (19th January 2022), Journeyman (18th January 2022), kfm27917 (18th January 2022), Lilyofthestars (19th January 2022), Matthew (18th January 2022), meat suit (18th January 2022), Mike Gorman (18th January 2022), mountain_jim (18th January 2022), onevoice (22nd January 2022), Orph (18th January 2022), Reinhard (18th January 2022), Spiral (19th January 2022), Sunny (18th January 2022), The KMan (18th January 2022)

  17. Link to Post #9
    Fiji Avalon Member Sunny's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th December 2014
    Posts
    164
    Thanks
    6,148
    Thanked 1,055 times in 155 posts

    Default Re: Was the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption Artificially Engineered?

    I live 400 miles from the volcano, and we heard sonic booms for several hours. From the explosion, not nukes.

  18. The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Sunny For This Post:

    Ba-ba-Ra (19th January 2022), Blastolabs (19th January 2022), DNA (18th January 2022), edina (19th January 2022), fifi (20th January 2022), Gwin Ru (20th January 2022), Harmony (19th January 2022), Journeyman (18th January 2022), meat suit (18th January 2022), Mike Gorman (18th January 2022), mountain_jim (18th January 2022), onevoice (22nd January 2022), Orph (18th January 2022), Spiral (19th January 2022), The KMan (18th January 2022)

  19. Link to Post #10
    UK Avalon Member Mike Gorman's Avatar
    Join Date
    31st May 2010
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Language
    English
    Age
    64
    Posts
    1,649
    Thanks
    4,977
    Thanked 11,292 times in 1,528 posts

    Default Re: Was the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption Artificially Engineered?

    This British chap, Keith remember Kerry doing an interview with him post-Bill's involvement with Proj Camelot, I just cannot see how Arc distances are going to assist you with nuclear explosions, it is all very esoteric and clever sounding, but originally I think Keith used to assert that a nuclear explosion could not even occur unless these critical distances and Arc calculations were done, he seems to have come back from this original point and now suggests the resonances enhance and control the nuke power: well it is a pretty idea but somehow I think E=MC2 just works regardless of the time, regardless of the arc distances, but some of those coincidences are intriguing, I am not immersed in this calculation paradigm so perhaps I am not fully qualified to speak, but I have, shame about that.

  20. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Mike Gorman For This Post:

    Ba-ba-Ra (19th January 2022), DNA (18th January 2022), Harmony (19th January 2022), Spiral (19th January 2022), Sunny (18th January 2022)

  21. Link to Post #11
    UK Avalon Member lightpotential's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    England
    Language
    English
    Age
    45
    Posts
    149
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 883 times in 124 posts

    Default Re: Was the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption Artificially Engineered?

    I have done an analysis and I am convinced that the volcanic eruption was unnatural. I do not believe that it was caused by a nuclear device that was placed on site at the volcano, or that a nuclear missile was fired at the volcano.

    In my opinion the entire event was artificially engineered by scalar beam technology. Two scalar wave beams were intersected at the target site; having been generated from facilities thousands of miles away from the volcano itself.

    This is the same technology that Thomas Bearden speaks about in his book “Excalibur briefing.”

    I am shortly off to bed, and have only partially done the mathematical analysis in-line with what I discuss in my video. I will try to post the full results tomorrow.

    Keith
    Visit my website Lost Age Secrets

  22. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to lightpotential For This Post:

    Blastolabs (19th January 2022), DNA (19th January 2022), edina (19th January 2022), fifi (20th January 2022), Harmony (19th January 2022), jaybee (19th January 2022), leavesoftrees (22nd January 2022), mountain_jim (19th January 2022), Spiral (19th January 2022), Sunny (19th January 2022)

  23. Link to Post #12
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    17,306
    Thanks
    40,702
    Thanked 86,009 times in 15,776 posts

    Default Re: Was the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption Artificially Engineered?

    Ben Davidson of Suspicious Observes may have more to say about the Tonga event, but judging from his comments today, he didn't think it was all that remarkable.

    and later...
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  24. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (19th January 2022), Harmony (19th January 2022), meat suit (19th January 2022), mountain_jim (19th January 2022), Spiral (19th January 2022), Sunny (19th January 2022)

  25. Link to Post #13
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    12th September 2016
    Posts
    1,736
    Thanks
    4,490
    Thanked 13,457 times in 1,694 posts

    Default Re: Was the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption Artificially Engineered?

    In the Extreme Weather thread, there is a video recently posted that shows a large flash of light that occurs just prior to an earthquake in China.

  26. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Patient For This Post:

    Harmony (19th January 2022), jaybee (19th January 2022), Spiral (19th January 2022), Sunny (19th January 2022)

  27. Link to Post #14
    Thailand Avalon Member palehorse's Avatar
    Join Date
    13th April 2020
    Location
    Thailand
    Language
    English
    Age
    44
    Posts
    1,007
    Thanks
    8,360
    Thanked 6,804 times in 964 posts

    Default Re: Was the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption Artificially Engineered?

    I did read Krakatoa many years ago and the descriptions of the witnesses does not describe the one in Tonga, a very large eruption send to the air large chunks of extremely hot lava which cool down pretty fast forming some sort of porous stones (forgot the name of those stones), then it falls back to shore, in Krakatoa there were reports for those who managed to survive the event, that those stones which can be many inches large, came all the way down to the ship's deck.
    In this large eruption in Tonga, there were no reports of volcanic stones falling, quite the contrary, there were reports people saying it was almost like vaporized ashes coming out of the supposedly volcano eruption. This alone is at least very interesting to investigate.
    --
    A chaos to the sense, a Kosmos to the reason.

  28. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to palehorse For This Post:

    Harmony (19th January 2022), jaybee (19th January 2022), Lilyofthestars (19th January 2022), Sunny (19th January 2022)

  29. Link to Post #15
    Avalon Member jaybee's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Midlands England
    Posts
    1,849
    Thanks
    4,508
    Thanked 8,637 times in 1,413 posts

    Default Re: Was the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption Artificially Engineered?

    The late, great Bruce Cathie ..... fascinating stuff touching on the 'meaning of life the universe and everything' from a regular guy from New Zealand (airline pilot) who discovered secrets of the scientific elite doing his own research -

    Loads of interesting things in this presentation - but on the topic of this thread... a piece about volcanoes starting @47:20.... ...'volcanic activity is manifested by the same forces that they use for an atomic bomb...'




    I love Bruce Cathie... he must have lead such an interesting life... with his wife Wendy - when he was offered fantastic things so he and his family would never want for anything again - but he would have to sign official secret acts and whatnot... Wendy his wife immediately said.... 'no way' and although Bruce admits he was briefly tempted by the money and the chance to work in that field and learn more... he quickly realized his wife was right and he needed to be free so he could do his own thing and share his findings....... a real man of the people...
    Last edited by jaybee; 19th January 2022 at 06:27.

  30. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to jaybee For This Post:

    eagle0027 (21st January 2022), fifi (20th January 2022), Harmony (20th January 2022), Lilyofthestars (19th January 2022), mountain_jim (19th January 2022), palehorse (19th January 2022), Sunny (19th January 2022)

  31. Link to Post #16
    Avalon Member jaybee's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Midlands England
    Posts
    1,849
    Thanks
    4,508
    Thanked 8,637 times in 1,413 posts

    Default Re: Was the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption Artificially Engineered?

    Quote Posted by lightpotential (here)
    I have done an analysis and I am convinced that the volcanic eruption was unnatural. I do not believe that it was caused by a nuclear device that was placed on site at the volcano, or that a nuclear missile was fired at the volcano.

    In my opinion the entire event was artificially engineered by scalar beam technology. Two scalar wave beams were intersected at the target site; having been generated from facilities thousands of miles away from the volcano itself.

    This is the same technology that Thomas Bearden speaks about in his book “Excalibur briefing.”

    I am shortly off to bed, and have only partially done the mathematical analysis in-line with what I discuss in my video. I will try to post the full results tomorrow.

    Keith

    Thanks Keith - looking forward to that ---

    we are living through such extraordinary times..... everything that happens at the moment could be significant - we don't know what we are going to have to deal with next...

  32. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to jaybee For This Post:

    eagle0027 (21st January 2022), Harmony (20th January 2022), Lilyofthestars (19th January 2022), mountain_jim (19th January 2022), palehorse (19th January 2022), Sunny (19th January 2022)

  33. Link to Post #17
    UK Avalon Member lightpotential's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    England
    Language
    English
    Age
    45
    Posts
    149
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 883 times in 124 posts

    Default Re: Was the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption Artificially Engineered?

    Hello Everybody

    The following analysis does ideally presuppose that you have reviewed my video, as embedded in my opening post:



    It is a two-hour presentation to be sure, but it explains essentially from first principles just exactly how nuclear weapons are oftentimes triggered, only when a special relationship exists between the devices themselves, and the location of the sun at the instant they explode.

    Now that being said, I will give a brief summary here by way of introduction, to those who may not have the time to watch the video in full.

    Let me begin this way:

    Consider an evaluation of a given nuclear device. You will firstly have the longitude and latitude coordinates where the device was activated. You will also have the time - even to the nearest second - as to when the device was activated (the archives being currently de-classified). Now in knowing the time, you can then use special astronomical software to work out the location of the sun at the precise moment when the bomb goes off.

    Essentially, if we were to freeze time at that instant, and draw a straight line from the centre of the sun to the centre of the Earth, then that line would pass through the surface of the Earth at some point. That point gives us a set of longitude and latitude coordinates for the sun, as mapped onto the Earth.

    It would appear following a very detailed analysis of the many nuclear tests that have been conducted throughout history, that certain arc length measures over the surface of the Earth, connecting the location of a nuclear device upon activation, and the sun itself, were very carefully chosen.

    In this regard, one cannot look at these curved arc length distances as merely arbitrary, but in fact as actual wavelength distances - with an associated frequency - with nested sets of harmonics and sub harmonics.

    The scientists exploring nuclear technology therefore realised that the precise location of the sun relative to a nuclear device upon activation, could significantly affect the actual yields of such devices. And that this had to be controlled for.

    In this regard, the scientists discovered that certain arc length distances separating the coordinates of a bomb and the coordinates of the sun, were actively propitious in optimising the destructive effects of these devices, including their sub-harmonics and associated ratios.

    Now because of this reality, it is also possible to examine earthquakes in like manner - or in this case a volcanic eruption - and look at the precise times they occur, and also where they occur (their latitude longitude coordinates), to see if there is essentially a ‘nuclear signature,’ as would suggest that they were artificially generated.

    Extending the analysis further, in my video I also show that scalar beams - in line with the writings of Thomas Bearden - can also be used to generate high magnitude explosive effects, either atmospheric - in terms of strange expanding spheres of light - or underground, in terms of extreme seismic activity i.e. earthquakes.

    One could therefore have two facilities greatly separated spatially, each of which could generate a scalar beam, both of which could be fired into the ground. NB: Scalar beams are a type of beam that have extremely low mass interference. Essentially, unlike standard electromagnetic waves, they can pass through the material Earth unimpeded.

    If the beams are very carefully directed, then they could be made to intersect one another many thousands of miles away, even many hundreds of miles below ground, if necessary. The intersection of two scalar beams at a distance, is what actually unlocks the electromagnetic energy enfolded within. In essence, the scalar beams are transformed into electromagnetic energy when intersected (at a distance).

    When a country is wanting to produce an earthquake effect using this technology by intersecting scalar beams at some remote location, they will invariably do so making use of certain special sun relations, as with nuclear weapons.

    Now this allows us to determine if an earthquake is natural or artificial.

    The various arc length measures on the surface of the Earth that link the epicentre point of the earthquake to the position of the sun, at the very moment the seismic activity begins, were the earthquake unnatural - should have a close affinity to the known arc length measures associated with various historically significant nuclear tests.

    And this indeed proves to be the case with respect to the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption. The reason why it looks so much like a nuclear explosion from the images of the event, is because it is one. Albeit triggered by set of scalar beams, producing a nuclear explosion upon intersection.


    USGS data

    When the eruption first occurred and was mentioned in the press, I immediately looked to the USGS website (United States Geological Survey) to see if it were recorded as a seismic signature. It was not - at least not at first. Several hours later on Saturday it was finally recorded. If one looks at the USGS website it will have a diamond symbol indicating the location of the volcano when it erupted, along with its accompanying seismic signature.

    The critical data taken from the USGS of the event is as follows:

    5.8 Volcanic Eruption / Earthquake
    2022-01-15 04:14:45 (UTC)
    20.546°S 175.390°W
    0.0 km depth

    (It is interesting that the first articles that came out noted the magnitude of the event as a 7.4 earthquake. When it appeared on the USGS website however, it shows a magnitude of only 5.8).

    The critical point to note here then, is that we have a precise set of coordinates for the epicentre of the event, and the precise time of the event - to the nearest second. Using the US Naval Observatory's own software (ICE 0.51 Interactive Computer Ephemeris), for the time in question, we can work out the latitude and longitude coordinates of the sun, as mapped onto the Earth at the precise given time: 2022-01-15 04:14:45 (UTC). They are as follows:

    Sun coordinates:

    Latitude (Geodetic) = 21.27369636 S
    Longitude = 118.6316666666 E


    The Nuclear Analysis

    If you were to consider the following devices from history, along with their associated arc length measures tying them to the sun, you will find certain special basic mathematical ratios linking them to those associated with Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption.

    The devices in question are as follows - all of them of extreme historical significance for one reason or another:

    Bravo (1954) – 15 MT - the highest yield thermonuclear US test ever conducted
    King (1952) – 0.5 MT - the highest yield pure fission test by the US ever conducted
    Mike – (1952) 10.4 MT - the very first thermonuclear test conducted by the US
    Grapple Y ( 1958) – 3.0 MT - the highest yield thermonuclear test ever conducted by the UK
    Canopus – 2.6 MT (1968) - the highest yield thermonuclear test ever conducted by France.

    Now consider the types of arc length measures that are significant for optimising a nuclear explosion. Each of them involve a separation arc distance between the nuclear devices themselves, and the ground coordinates of the sun at the moment of detonation:

    1) The direct great circle arc (GCA) connecting the location of a nuclear device to the sun:
    2) The elliptical arc measure from the equator to the latitude (EL) of the nuclear device (in either hemisphere)
    3) The elliptical arc measure separating the latitude of the nuclear device from the latitude of the sun: latitude separation (LS)
    4) The circular arc length measure along the equator that separates the longitude of a nuclear device from the longitude of the sun: Equatorial Longitude Separation (ELS)

    In my video, I show several diagrams detailing these various arc length measures, as are adapted from my book Occult Physics, in which I have a major chapter on the secrets of nuclear weapons.

    Now in this analysis, I have already worked out the arc length measures associated with the various nuclear devices, as given above. They are all detailed in my book Occult Physics, where I go into them in some depth. Here then, I am just going to show you the basic mathematical relations / ‘musical fractions’ that linkup the arc measures of the various nuclear devices (above), to those of the Hunga Tonga Volcano event.

    Firstly, here are the arc measures associated with the Hunga Tonga Volcano event at the precise time of the eruption, as recorded by USGS (above):

    Great Circle Arc (GCA) = 22341927.213269215 feet
    Equator to Latitude (EL) = 7456734.4815364145 feet (south)
    Latitude Separation (LS) = 264329.18300848466 feet
    Equatorial Longitude Separation (ELS) = 24096701.01725671 feet

    NB: All the values given here are in feet for accuracy.

    Now consider the following arc measures in summary, that tied-in to the listed nuclear devices above:

    Mike: Great Circle Arc (GCA) = 32123600.77 feet
    Grapple Y: Great Circle Arc (GCA) = 18734896.30 feet
    Bravo: Great Circle Arc (GCA) = 35807863.08
    King: Great Circle Arc (GCA) = 13428155.35 feet
    King: Latitude Separation (LS) = 11012894.51 feet
    King: Equator to latitude of bomb (EL) = 4195109.612 feet
    Canopus: latitude Separation (LS) = 12048521.52 feet


    In view of this data, consider the basic mathematical ratios present, when one divides the arc measures associated with the Tonga Volcano event with those of the listed nuclear devices.

    Herein I will show you what the ratios are in their raw form, and what the intended ideal ratios would appear to be, and also, what the error from perfection is (in terms of feet):


    Canopus LS / Hunga Tonga ELS
    = 12048521.52 / 24096701.01
    = 0.500007097
    Ideal = 0.5
    Error = 171 feet

    Mike GCA / Hunga Tonga ELS
    = 32123600.77 / 24096701.02
    = 1.333111978
    Ideal = 1.333333333… (4/3)
    Error = 4000.4 feet

    Grapple Y GCA / Hunga Tonga ELS
    = 18734896.30 / 24096701.02
    = 0.777488017
    Ideal = 0.7776 (486/625)
    Error = 3470 feet
    NB: 0.7776 is of the primary base-60 system
    e.g. 7776 / 6 = 1296, 1296 / 6 = 216, 216 / 6 = 36, 36 / 6 = 6

    Hunga Tonga LS / King LS
    = 264329.183 / 11012894.51
    = 0.024001790
    Ideal = 0.024 (3/125)
    Error = 19.7 feet

    King GCA / Hunga Tonga EL
    = 13428155.35 / 7456734.482
    = 1.800809105
    Ideal = 1.8 (9/5)
    Error = 3351.8 feet

    Bravo GCA / Hunga Tonga EL
    = 35807863.08 / 7456734.482
    = 4.802083695
    Ideal = 4.8 (24/5)
    Error = 3236.9 feet


    From careful consideration of the above, we can see a very close affinity between the arc length measures associated with the Tonga Volcano event, and those of known historical nuclear tests of great prominence. The basic fractional relations imply that the Tonga Volcano event was itself a nuclear event.

    Now this is something that you need to think very carefully about. All of the arc length measures as noted are dynamically established by the active movement of the sun's ground position over the Earth, which is dependent upon the rotation of the Earth on its axis. As the Earth is continually in motion, the arc length measures of all of the events listed are only fleetingly established.

    Indeed, in one single second of time, at the equator of the Earth, the Sun sweeps out just over 1500 feet. When you consider this fact, and then consider the error rates as noted, one should realise the extreme accuracy in timing – of what can only be described as an attack - on the Tonga Volcano. The precision targeting and production of an emergent explosion within the Volcano via intersecting Scalar beams was timed with almost split-second accuracy.

    The relations as thus detailed, would appear to decisively confirm that the event was entirely artificial, having all the hallmarks of a nuclear attack.

    Keith
    Visit my website Lost Age Secrets

  34. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to lightpotential For This Post:

    fifi (20th January 2022), Harmony (20th January 2022), jaybee (20th January 2022), onevoice (22nd January 2022), Sunny (20th January 2022), Vicus (23rd January 2022)

  35. Link to Post #18
    Australia Moderator Harmony's Avatar
    Join Date
    11th May 2020
    Language
    English
    Posts
    1,346
    Thanks
    48,445
    Thanked 9,927 times in 1,348 posts

    Default Re: Was the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption Artificially Engineered?

    lightpotential,


    Thank you Keith for the information and explaining further the dynamics. Is it possible that you could work out the sources of the scaler sites that would be able to initiate the explosion from the information you already have?
    Last edited by Harmony; 20th January 2022 at 11:02.

  36. The Following User Says Thank You to Harmony For This Post:

    jaybee (20th January 2022)

  37. Link to Post #19
    Avalon Member jaybee's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Midlands England
    Posts
    1,849
    Thanks
    4,508
    Thanked 8,637 times in 1,413 posts

    Default Re: Was the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption Artificially Engineered?

    Quote Posted by lightpotential (here)

    From careful consideration of the above, we can see a very close affinity between the arc length measures associated with the Tonga Volcano event, and those of known historical nuclear tests of great prominence. The basic fractional relations imply that the Tonga Volcano event was itself a nuclear event.

    Now this is something that you need to think very carefully about. All of the arc length measures as noted are dynamically established by the active movement of the sun's ground position over the Earth, which is dependent upon the rotation of the Earth on its axis. As the Earth is continually in motion, the arc length measures of all of the events listed are only fleetingly established.

    Many thanks, Keith for your epic post.... I've just lifted this small part out to rest an enquiry on....

    You have done extensive work on these findings and are used to dealing with the concepts and numbers etc - so I might have missed the answer to my enquiry with your post.... because I'm just dipping in...

    I'm still not sure what separates the Tonga volcanic event from a natural eruption... because if all the conditions for a natural eruption ie position of sun and harmonic distances would have to exist for a natural eruption as well... what makes it different...?

    I'm perfectly open for it being a scalar beam interference event and then the question would be who and why -

    In the Bruce Cathie video in my #15 he talks about ... 'volcanic activity is manifested by the same forces that they use for an atomic bomb...' and I'm guessing that it was by studying the sun positions and whatnot for historic volcanic eruptions that scientists learnt how to use nuclear material to get a significant detonation...?

    Bruce Cathie also said how nuclear testing could interfere with the natural harmonics and create volcanic eruptions in other (harmonically connected?) places - - which could involve another question regarding the Tonga Event - - could something have happened somewhere else, something unnatural involving Advanced Technology and the Tonga eruption was a by product rather than the direct target...?

    I might be making this more complicated than it already is so to try and clarify the question...

    If naturally occurring volcano eruptions need the same sun positions and harmonic conditions as artificial ones - what makes the Tonga one definitely artificial...?

    Sorry if I've missed the vital info in your post about it....

    cheers and thanks for your work -

  38. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jaybee For This Post:

    Harmony (20th January 2022), meat suit (20th January 2022), Sunny (20th January 2022)

  39. Link to Post #20
    UK Avalon Member lightpotential's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    England
    Language
    English
    Age
    45
    Posts
    149
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 883 times in 124 posts

    Default Re: Was the 15 Jan 2022 Hunga Tonga Volcano Eruption Artificially Engineered?

    Interestingly enough Harmony, it is something that I have thought about – though not with respect to this particular event. I do not think the Tonga volcano event is susceptible to the type of analysis that would be required to determine the direction of the scalar beams that converged upon the site. It least with the information I have seen.

    That being said, I do believe that 911 involved scalar beams also, and that they were the primary means by which the towers were disintegrated in mid-air. Dr Judy Wood did a lot of work in this area, and one of the things that she found was that there were certain car parks near the towers, where some of the cars had suffered some sort of disintegration of various metal parts e.g. their engines. It is as if certain metals were susceptible to the scalar beams - metals which were targeted directly within the twin towers.

    Now it is my contention that at least two facilities located many thousands of miles away from the two Towers were involved in generating the scalar beams used in the attack. And that each beam was fired through the Earth and came up through the ground to converge on the 2 targets (WTC1 & WTC2); the two beams intersecting one another over each tower, in sequence.

    If this is correct - and this is something that I have wondered about for some time - then it might be possible to take a line from each of the towers and extended to the cars that were affected, and so determine a direction line. You would then have to try to map out a great circle over the surface of the Earth extending the direction line even further, to see if it matched up with some sort of unusual military-type facility.

    It is something I've thought about for several years, though I have never attempted the analysis.

    Keith
    Visit my website Lost Age Secrets

  40. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to lightpotential For This Post:

    DNA (21st January 2022), Harmony (21st January 2022), jaybee (22nd January 2022), meat suit (20th January 2022), Sunny (20th January 2022), ThePythonicCow (21st January 2022)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts