R F Kennedy Jr.'s Children's Health Defense News Watch

[onawah]

Breaking news from CHD's COVID News Watch
2/17/22
The Defender’s COVID NewsWatch provides a roundup of the latest headlines related to the SARS CoV-2 virus, including its origins and COVID vaccines.
By
The Defender Staff

Moderna Stock Crash: Losses Top $140 Billion as Insiders Sell Millions of Dollars in Shares + More
Forbes reported:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jonatha...h=39789279106b

"Shares of Moderna plummeted Monday as COVID-19 vaccine-makers led a turbulent market decline, pushing the stock to its lowest level in nearly a year after disappointing study results and a slew of sales from the firm’s top executives added to concerns that have made one of last year’s top-performing stocks crash more than 70%.

Moderna stock fell as much as 13% on Monday to a 10-month low of less than $140, pushing shares down more than 30% over the past month amid a sell-off largely centered on technology and healthcare firms that skyrocketed in value during the pandemic.

Moderna’s recent losses also follow a slew of regulatory filings released Friday evening which showed four Moderna executives — including billionaire CEO Stéphane Bancel — sold a combined 23,281 shares for about $3.6 million last week."

Pfizer Director Dr. Scott Gottlieb: Shots for Kids Under 5 Delayed Due to Low COVID Cases in Trial
CNBC reported:
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/14/pfiz...-in-trial.html

"The Food and Drug Administration’s plan to fast-track Pfizer’s COVID vaccine for children under 5 years old was delayed because of a “low number of cases overall in the clinical trial,” Dr. Scott Gottlieb told CNBC on Monday.

“Most kids are not getting symptomatic COVID,” said the current Pfizer board member and former head of the FDA. “One case in one direction or another can tip the perception of the vaccine’s overall effectiveness.”

“I suspect there’s only going to be 15% to 20% of parents who go out and get their young kids vaccinated,” should shots for children under 5 get emergency authorization, Gottlieb said.

Gottlieb said he expects the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to institute a “permissive recommendation,” rather than a mandate for children under 5 to get vaccinated."

White House Seeks Another $30 Billion for COVID Battle
Associated Press reported:
https://apnews.com/article/coronavir...dcae75e08cae25

"The Biden administration is telling Congress that it needs an additional $30 billion to press ahead with the fight against COVID-19, officials said.

Two people familiar with the administration’s plan confirmed key details on Tuesday: $17.9 billion for vaccines and treatments, $4.9 billion for testing, $3 billion to cover coronavirus care for uninsured people, and $3.7 billion to prepare for future variants. They spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss deliberations between the administration and lawmakers over the supplemental funding.

According to the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, Congress has already approved $5.8 trillion to battle the pandemic in a series of major bills spanning the Trump and Biden administrations. That’s not counting actions by the Federal Reserve to help keep the economy going."

A State Bill Will Allow Ivermectin Prescriptions, Though It’s Already Legal
Newsweek reported:
https://www.newsweek.com/state-bill-...-legal-1679643

"A Republican-held state House has passed a bill allowing the antiparasitic drug ivermectin to be prescribed, even though it was already legal in the state.

Lawmakers in the South Dakota House of Representatives passed House Bill 1267, legalizing the prescription of ivermectin by doctors, according to the Grand Forks Herald, 40 to 28 in favor. Following this vote, it will now head to the state Senate.

Despite the bill passing successfully, it was already legal in South Dakota, and the rest of the country, for doctors to prescribe ivermectin to patients for any reason."

Moderna’s CEO Says It’s ‘Reasonable’ to Suggest the COVID Pandemic Is in Its Final Stages
Business Insider reported:
https://www.businessinsider.com/mode...l-stage-2022-2

"Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel has said it is “reasonable” to consider the COVID-19 pandemic almost over.

Speaking to CNBC’s Squawk Box Asia on Wednesday about whether he believed that the pandemic was in its final stages, Bancel said: “I think that is a reasonable scenario.”

Bancel said he thinks there was “about an 80% chance” that as the virus evolves, it will become “less and less virulent.” If this were the case, Bancel still expects people older than fifty, and those at high risk of severe illness, to be boosted against COVID-19 each year.

“This virus is going to stay with humans forever, like the flu, and we’d have to live with it,” he said."

39% of Americans Approve of Biden’s Handling of the Pandemic: Poll
The Hill reported:
https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...f-the-pandemic

"Only 39% of Americans say they approve of President Biden’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a new poll released on Wednesday.

A new Politico-Morning Consult poll found that just 39% of Americans surveyed gave an excellent or good rating for the president’s handling of the pandemic, while 41% gave it a poor rating, and 16% said it was “just fair.”

COVID Booster Shot Uptake Is at All-Time Low in the U.S., CNN Analysis Finds
CNN Health reported:
https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/15/healt...-us/index.html

"The pace of people getting COVID-19 vaccine booster shots in the United States has dropped to the lowest it has ever been, and many public health experts are concerned.

As of Monday, about 64% of the U.S. population is fully vaccinated against COVID-19 with at least their initial two-dose series, and 28% have received a booster shot.

But the pace of booster doses going into arms is the lowest it has been in months — since the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention first recommended boosters for seniors and other at-risk adults in September, according to a CNN analysis of CDC data. The agency expanded its recommendation for booster doses in November to include all adults."

Exclusive: Short AstraZeneca Shelf Life Complicates COVID Vaccine Rollout to World’s Poorest
Reuters reported:
https://www.reuters.com/business/hea...ds-2022-02-16/

"The relatively short shelf life of AstraZeneca Plc’s (AZN.L) COVID-19 vaccine is complicating the rollout to the world’s poorest nations, according to officials and internal World Health Organization documents reviewed by Reuters.

It is the latest headache to plague the COVAX vaccine-sharing project, co-led by the WHO and aimed at getting shots to the world’s neediest people."

WHO: New COVID Cases Drop by 19% Globally, Deaths Stable
Associated Press reported:
https://apnews.com/article/coronavir...2ed5d19ed326a9

"The number of new coronavirus cases globally fell by 19% in the last week while the number of deaths remained stable, according to the World Health Organization.

WHO said that all other coronavirus variants, including Alpha, Beta and Delta, continue to decline globally as Omicron crowds them out. Among the more than 400,000 COVID-19 virus sequences uploaded to the world’s biggest virus database in the last week, more than 98% were Omicron."

Merck Struggles to Win European Approval for COVID Antiviral Pill
The Irish Times reported:
https://www.irishtimes.com/business/...pill-1.4803949

"The European Medicines Agency is unlikely to grant conditional marketing authorization to Merck’s COVID-19 antiviral pill this month as it grapples with “problematic” data, according to people familiar with the approval process.

It is “possible” the oral COVID drug Molnupiravir will not receive approval at all, one of the people said. The EMA declined to comment on its ongoing review.

According to European officials, national healthcare systems in Europe are favoring Pfizer’s Paxlovid, another COVID antiviral pill, whose efficacy in reducing death and hospitalisation has been confirmed at 89%."

UK to Offer COVID Vaccine to All Children 5 to 11
Associated Press reported:
https://apnews.com/article/coronavir...2ed5d19ed326a9

"British authorities will offer a coronavirus vaccine to almost six million children from age 5 to 11, officials said Wednesday. The government said young children will be offered a low-dose COVID-19 shot on a “non-urgent” basis beginning in April in England. Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland also announced similar measures.

“Parents can, if they want, take up the offer to increase protection against potential future waves of COVID-19 as we learn to live with this virus,” Health Secretary Sajid Javid said.

The government’s independent vaccine advisory committee said while the virus does not pose a threat to most children, a very small number who are infected will develop serious disease."

[onawah]

Gold Standard Covid Science in Practice – Interdisciplinary Symposium III: The Truth Shall Set You Free
02/18/22 - 10:00 AM

Mary Holland, Meryl Nass MD, and Polly Tommey Join World-Renowned Experts In Science, Medicine, Finance, Media And The Law To Speak At The Doctors For Covid Ethics + UK Column Symposium III

Watch the video:
https://live.childrenshealthdefense....nary-symposium

PROGRAMME
Programme Agenda: https://childrenshealthdefense.eu/wp...ram180222F.pdf

FRIDAY, 18TH FEBRUARY 2022
19:00 CET Program Overview with Taylor Hudak
Session I with Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi MD:
The Case Is Closed - The Final Evidence
19:03 CET Opening Statement by Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi MD
19:06 The Falling of The House of Cards
Plenary by Thomas Binder MD
19:25 Pathways to Vaccine Injury
Presentation by Prof. Michael Palmer MD
19:40 Three Major Consequences To Be Expected
Presentation by Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi MD
19:47 Expectations Fulfilled: The Scientific Evidence
Presentation by Prof. Arne Burkhardt MD
with Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi MD
20:12 Commentary and Closing Remarks by Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi MD
5’ break
Session II with Prof. Michel Palmer MD:
The Future Scientific and Legal Aspects
20:20 CET Variations of mRNA Technology
Presentation and Debate with Kati Schepis, Phamacist, and
Prof. Michael Palmer MD
20:45 Overview of Legal, Procedural Opportunities and Threats
Overview of the Legal Landscape with Mary Holland,
Renate Holzeisen, Meryl Nass MD with Polly Tommey
21:10 Controversies of Institutions (WHO, EMA and more)
Astrid Stuckelberger PhD with Prof. Michael Palmer MDSession III with Catherine Austin Fitts: Covid-19 and The Global Coup
21:30 CET Covid-19 and The Global Coup d’État
Catherine Austin Fitts with Michael Yeadon PhD
21:50 Covid-19 Survey
First Time Ever Presentation of a Survey of the Impact of Covid-19
Inoculations by Dr Mark Skidmore
22:20 CET The Financial Control Grid
Presented by Catherine Austin Fitts with Dr Richard Werner
22:35 Freedom Fighting on the Ground
Truckloads for freedom with Dr. Charles Hoffe, Dr. Emad Guirguis
with Stephen Malthouse
22:55 The Truth Shall Set You Free - Closing Remarks
by Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi MD
End of the Symposium

Watch Video:Session III with Catherine Austin Fitts: Covid-19 and The Global Coup
21:30 CET Covid-19 and The Global Coup d’État
Catherine Austin Fitts with Michael Yeadon PhD
21:50 Covid-19 Survey
First Time Ever Presentation of a Survey of the Impact of Covid-19
Inoculations by Dr Mark Skidmore
22:20 CET The Financial Control Grid
Presented by Catherine Austin Fitts with Dr Richard Werner
22:35 Freedom Fighting on the Ground
Truckloads for freedom with Dr. Charles Hoffe, Dr. Emad Guirguis
with Stephen Malthouse
22:55 The Truth Shall Set You Free - Closing Remarks
by Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi MD
End of the Symposium

[onawah]

The Extraordinary Story of How Governments Suppressed Effective COVID Treatments and Targeted Physicians Who Prescribed Them
02/23/22
By Meryl Nass, M.D.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...3-25ad5a65a680

"In 2020, I compiled a list of more than 50 ways authorities and pharma companies in multiple countries stopped the use of chloroquine drugs for COVID.:
https://merylnassmd.com/how-false-hy...ine-narrative/
This was (and is) a stunning collection, widely read and reproduced on many websites.

When you read it, you are astounded to learn that all the U.S. (and many international) public health agencies took many different actions that led to increased deaths and destruction from COVID and prolonged the pandemic.

“Avoiding the Trump drug” served as a great cover story. Taking hydroxychloroquine for COVID was equated to drinking bleach.

But here’s the kicker: The authorities knew all about chloroquine and other treatments for COVID-19 before there was a COVID-19 — because they had figured it out for the 2003 SARS epidemic and the 2012 MERS epidemic, both caused by related coronaviruses. But they hushed it up.

Five Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) U.S. scientists (employed by the U.S. government), along with three Canadian government scientists, in 2005 published a paper showing chloroquine was an effective drug against SARS coronaviruses. European scientists showed the same thing in 2004.



The CDC paper concluded: “… chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-COV infection … suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.”

Chloroquine looked very promising for both prevention and treatment of the first SARS. After all, it has been used for many decades to prevent and treat malaria. (I took it for prevention, and later for treatment, 50 years ago).

Nine years later, in 2014, scientists at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) — the agency run by Dr. Anthony Tony Fauci — published a study showing the same thing:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pm...es/PMC4136000/

Moreover, the NIAID study revealed that not only did chloroquine work in vitro against the MERS coronavirus, but dozens of existing drugs, which could have been tested in patients as soon as the pandemic started, were also effective against SARS and MERS coronaviruses.



This is what the NIAID authors wrote:

“Here we found that 66 of the screened drugs were effective at inhibiting either MERS-CoV or SARS-CoV infection in vitro and that 27 of these compounds were effective against both MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV. These data demonstrate the efficiency of screening approved or clinically developed drugs for identification of potential therapeutic options for emerging viral diseases, and also provide an expedited approach for supporting off-label use of approved therapeutics.”

Just in case you think these papers were flukes, two unrelated groups of European scientists found essentially the same thing. This 2014 European paper was published back-to-back with the NIAID paper:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24841269/
I have cited the 2004 European paper elsewhere, and these citations can also be found in Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s book, “The Real Tony Fauci,” which according to Amazon, has now sold more than 800,000 copies. Please read it.
https://www.amazon.com/Real-Anthony-.../dp/1510766804

On the other hand, if you are seeking misinformation on COVID, I’d recommend Fauci’s own book, “Expect the Unexpected.”
https://www.amazon.com/Expect-Unexpe...s%2C128&sr=1-8

I have to repeat myself because the information is so shocking and I don’t want you to miss it: Our governments already knew of options for treating COVID before it appeared — but instead of immediately trying these already identified, safe, cheap and available drugs, and offering early treatments, they did everything they could to stop people from obtaining the chloroquine drugs.

Please read my long article on this suppression:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...3-25ad5a65a680
and the two articles I wrote here:https://merylnassmd.com/who-trial-us...ntially-fatal/
and here:https://merylnassmd.com/even-worse-t...y-potentially/
...about how patients were administered borderline lethal doses of hydroxychloroquine to give the drug a black eye.

Check the links. Verify that what I have just written is correct.

Human beings planned and carried out these medical crimes against humanity. Who are those humans? What are they doing now? This has to be investigated and justice obtained, to prevent such crimes from happening to patients ever again.

The “Why?” and “How could this be?!!” requires people to take a huge leap, in order to understand the world we live in.

Many people don’t have the fortitude to dissect their worldview and rebuild it in accord with the facts that have spilled out over the last two years.

But I am about to present some more facts that I hope you can assimilate into your understanding of the world. It might require a stiff drink, or perhaps some chocolate.

Whatever it takes, read on. It might save your life or someone else’s.

Ivermectin sales explode

Ivermectin was not identified in the studies I mentioned above as a potentially useful coronavirus drug.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...vid-mortality/

But some people knew it was likely to work in early 2020, because the French MedinCell company;
https://www.medincell.com/en/2020/04...le-ivermectin/
... working with Monash University and supported by Bill Gates:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...ci-bill-gates/
...was developing an injectable version (which would be able to be patented).

MedinCell issued a press release about this on April 6, 2020: https://www.medincell.com/en/2020/04...ble-ivermectin
...and an informational paper on April 23, 2020:https://www.medincell.com/en/investors/

There was a brief run on the veterinary drug at this time in the U.S., according to a warning issued April 10, 2020, by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), indicating some people knew it might be an effective COVID treatment and were acquiring veterinary versions:
https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinar...ovid-19-humans

But there was not a lot of buzz and sales did not take off at that time.

Here is what the FDA said on April 10, 2020:

“FDA is concerned about the health of consumers who may self-medicate by taking ivermectin products intended for animals, thinking they can be a substitute for ivermectin intended for humans … Please help us protect public health by alerting FDA of anyone claiming to have a product to prevent or cure COVID-19 and to help safeguard human and animal health by reporting any of these products.”

In December 2020, a full eight months later, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) held a Senate hearing that was focused on ivermectin’s benefits for COVID. Intensive care specialist Dr. Pierre Kory, originally a New Yorker, gave a particularly compelling speech:
https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/med...2020-12-08.pdf

People began paying attention to the drug. YouTube then removed Kory’s speech — censoring a Senate hearing!

I think the authorities were initially scared to repeat the same tricks with ivermectin they had used to beat down the chloroquine drugs. And because ivermectin has efficacy late in the disease as well as at the start, and is not toxic at several times the normal dose, some of the tricks used against chloroquine (giving it too late in the disease course or overdosing patients) simply would not work with ivermectin. The U.S. authorities kept quiet.

South Africa was the trial balloon. On Christmas Eve 2020, South African authorities banned the importation of ivermectin. However, several local organizations mounted legal actions, and they won. Within several months ivermectin was back on the shelves.

Thanks in great measure to the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, ivermectin’s popularity gradually began to explode:
https://covid19criticalcare.com/
Then the CDC published a report in late August 2021, showing ivermectin prescriptions had quadrupled in a month, and the drug was now selling at 25 times the pre-COVID rate.



Business Insider reported, “More than 88,000 prescriptions for the drug were filled by pharmacies in the week ending August 13, the CDC said in a report published August 26.”
https://www.businessinsider.com/iver...us-cure-2021-8

Apparently, this terrified the powers that be. What if the pandemic got wiped out with ivermectin? It worked too well! Would that be the end of vaccine mandates:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...hcare-workers/
... boosters:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...ovid-boosters/
... vaccine passports:https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...rock-vanguard/
and digital IDs? The end of the Great Reset?
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...et-bill-gates/

Targeting doctors

Something had to be done and fast. It had to be big. It had to be effective. Public health officials couldn’t simply take the drug off the market — that would require a long process and would leave a paper trail.

What to do? There was probably only one option: Scare the pants off doctors. Loss of license is the very worst thing you can do to a doctor. Threaten their licenses and they will immediately fall into line. You can’t get a prescription if there is no doctor to write it.

The Philippines Department of Health tested the strategy:
https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/141142...losing-license

The powers that be could also scare the pharmacies. This required stealth — no paper trail. It required intimidation, backed by a one-two punch: actually suspending doctors’ (and maybe pharmacists’) licenses.

You couple that with a huge media offensive, and threats from an industry of medical “nonprofits.” You invent “misinformation” as a medical misdemeanor, studiously failing to define it. You make people think the legal prescribing of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine is a crime, even though off-label prescribing is entirely legal under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act:
https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-infor...ic-act-fdc-act

Did Fauci give the order? Was it CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky? Maybe it was acting FDA Commissioner Dr. Janet Woodcock?
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...d-kids-pharma/

It was probably some combination, plus the public relations professionals managing the messaging and the media.

Here’s what happened …

1. Sen. Ben Ray Lujan (D-N.M.), along with several other senators, introduced the “Health Misinformation Act” in July 2021, because “misinformation was putting lives at risk,” Lujan said. A huge supporter of COVID vaccinations, the 49-year-old senator suffered a stroke on Feb. 1.
https://www.lujan.senate.gov/press-r...isinformation/

2. The pharmacies suddenly could not get ivermectin from their wholesalers. No reason was given except “supply and demand.” But it seemed the supply was cut off everywhere. Ivermectin was dribbled out by the wholesalers, a few pills a week per pharmacy, not enough to supply even one prescription weekly.

Some powerful entity presumably ordered the wholesalers to make the drug (practically) unavailable — with no shortages announced. I called the main manufacturer in the U.S., Edenbridge, and was told they were producing plenty of ivermectin.

Hydroxychloroquine had been restricted in a variety of ways, determined by each state, since early 2020. It had also been restricted by certain manufacturers and pharmacy chains in 2020. Suddenly, in September 2021, it became considerably harder than it already was to obtain.

3. In late August 2021, the CDC sent out a major warning about ivermectin but provided only two examples of anyone having a problem with the drug: https://emergency.cdc.gov/han/2021/han00449.asp
One person overdosed on an animal version, and one overdosed on ivermectin bought on the internet. This should not have been news. However, pharmacists and doctors read between the lines and knew this was code for “verboten.” Almost all of them stopped dispensing ivermectin at that time. It should be of interest to everyone that our health agencies now speak in coded messages to doctors and pharmacies, presumably to avoid putting their threats on paper and being accountable for them. What a way for government to do business.

4. Also in August 2021, various “nonprofit” medical organizations started issuing warnings, in concert, regarding doctors prescribing ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine, and spreading misinformation — especially about COVID vaccines. These organizations included the Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB):
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...rn-physicians/
... the American Medical Association (AMA), the American Pharmacists Association and several specialty boards.

Here is an example of the AMA’s language:https://www.ama-assn.org/about/leade...n-must-end-now
“A handful of doctors spreading disinformation have fostered belief in scientifically unvalidated and potentially dangerous “cures” for COVID-19 while increasing vaccine hesitancy …”

These organizations told doctors they could lose their licenses or board certifications for such behaviors. Mind you, none of these so-called nonprofit organizations has any regulatory authority. Nor do I believe they have any authority to claw back a board certification. They were blowing smoke. And they were probably paid to do so. Who paid them?

5. Over the course of three days at the end of August 2021, national media reported on four doctors in three states whose boards were investigating them for the use of ivermectin.

Hawaii’s Medical Board went after Hawaii’s chief medical officer:
https://www.mauinews.com/news/local-...cer-physician/

“The Hawaii Medical Board has filed complaints against Maui’s top health official and a Valley Isle physician following reports that they backed COVID-19 treatments that state and federal health agencies advise against.”

They really wanted to make an example by going after the state’s chief medical officer, who had the guts to treat COVID patients. Clearly, the orders are coming from high up on the food chain.

Here were some of the other August headlines I collected about doctors who legally prescribed a fully approved drug off-label:



6. The FSMB is an organization that assists 71 state and territorial medical boards with policies, training, etc. Members pay dues and the organization accepts donations. FSMB has its own foundation, too. Its president earns $777,255/year — not bad for a backwater administrative job at an organization headquartered in Euless, Texas:
https://nonprofitlight.com/tx/euless...ted-states-inc

After the FSMB instructed its members that misinformation was a crime, somewhere between eight and 15 of its member boards began to take action. (Media have reported that eight, 12 or 15 boards of its 71-member boards did so, according to the FSMB, which is closely monitoring the results of its calumny.) https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/964643

7. On Feb. 7, 2022, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security issued its own dire warning about the spread of misinformation, disinformation and a neologism, “malinformation:
https://www.dhs.gov/news/2022/02/07/...-ntas-bulletin
”The United States remains in a heightened threat environment fueled by several factors, including an online environment filled with false or misleading narratives and conspiracy theories, and other forms of mis-, dis- and malinformation (MDM) introduced and/or amplified by foreign and domestic threat actors:
https://www.cisa.gov/mdm

“These threat actors seek to exacerbate societal friction to sow discord and undermine public trust in government institutions to encourage unrest, which could potentially inspire acts of violence. Mass casualty attacks and other acts of targeted violence conducted by lone offenders and small groups acting in furtherance of ideological beliefs and/or personal grievances pose an ongoing threat to the nation.”

Thus it appears that misinformation and disinformation have been selected to play an important role in a newly developing narrative, as the pandemic restrictions and accompanying narratives become long in the tooth.

8. I presume the majority of the 71 medical boards’ attorneys knew something about the U.S. Constitution, knew that every American has an inalienable right to freedom of speech, and simply ignored the FSMB’s exhortation to go after misinformation spreaders.

The Maine Board of Licensure in Medicine, however, went along. Three doctors in Maine, including me, recently had their licenses suspended or threatened for writing waivers for COVID vaccines, “spreading misinformation” and/or prescribing ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine (all of which are legal activities for doctors).

But boards have broad powers to intervene in the practice of medicine, and their members are shielded from liability as agents of the state. And so they went after a chronic Lyme doctor several years ago, who found, as expected, it would be too onerous to fight back, so he gave up his license.

9. Here is what the Maine Board claims about me:
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/cor...257335847.html

“The board noted that Ivermectin isn’t Food and Drug Administration “authorized or approved” as a treatment for COVID-19 in the suspension order …

“The board said that her continuing to practice as a physician ‘constitutes an immediate jeopardy to the health and physical safety of the public who might receive her medical services, and that it is necessary to immediately suspend her ability to practice medicine in order to adequately respond to this risk.'”

I am 70 years old, and my medical practice was set up as a service so that everyone could access COVID drugs who wanted them. My fee was $60 per patient for all the COVID care they needed.

I am sure the Maine Board had calculated that given all the above, I would not challenge the board’s suspension and would simply surrender my license as it would probably cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to fight the board’s actions in court.

However, I was surprised to find that on the day my license was suspended, there was massive national publicity about my case. The story was on The Associated Press wire and covered from the San Francisco Chronicle to the Miami Herald. And for some reason, it was not behind the usual paywall.
https://apnews.com/article/coronavir...52ac089cd19aa3
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/cor...257335847.html
The Hill:
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-w...preading-false
Newsweek:
https://www.newsweek.com/doctors-med...mation-1668679
the Daily Beast and many other publications all ran hit pieces about me.

I gathered that my situation was bigger than just a renegade Maine medical board: I had been selected to serve as an example to physicians nationwide who might be prescribing early treatment for COVID.

Once I realized I was being used as a poster child in a national fear campaign designed to purge doctors who think independently, I decided to fight back. Fortunately, Children’s Health Defense is helping with my legal expenses, which is what allows me to mount a strong attack against the bulldozing of free speech, patient autonomy and choice, and the doctor-patient relationship.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/

There is a lot riding on the outcome."

Meryl Nass, M.D., ABIM, is an internist with special interests in vaccine-induced illnesses, chronic fatigue syndrome, Gulf War illness, fibromyalgia and toxicology.

[onawah]

Children's Health Defense TOP NEWS OF THE Day
February 23, 2022
https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...b-cf84941660dc


The Extraordinary Story of How Governments Suppressed Effective COVID Treatments and Targeted Physicians Who Prescribed Them​​​​​​​
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...3-25ad5a65a680

California Bill Would Punish Doctors Who Promote COVID ‘Misinformation,’ as Other States Move to Protect Doctors’ Rights to Treat Patients​​​​​​​
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...3-25ad5a65a680

Psychologist Tells RFK, Jr.: Fear, Isolation Make People Cling to False Narratives, Become Hostile to Anyone Who Disagrees​​​​​​​
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...3-25ad5a65a680

It’s Not Uncommon for Viruses to Leak From Gain-of-Function Labs, History Shows
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...3-25ad5a65a680

Prenatal Exposure to Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals May Delay Children’s Language Development​​​​​​​
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...3-25ad5a65a680

Mother Whose Son Died After Being Prescribed Levaquin Forced FDA to Add Warning Label​​​​​​​
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...3-25ad5a65a680

‘This Week’ With Mary + Polly: FDA Officer (Unknowingly) Reveals Future of COVID Policy + More​​​​​​​
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...3-25ad5a65a680

Rare Hyper-Inflammatory Syndrome Reported in Teens After COVID Vaccination + More​​​​​​​
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...3-25ad5a65a680

More GOP States Now Wagering on Vaccine ‘Passports’ Technology + More​​​​​​​
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...3-25ad5a65a680

[onawah]

This is a MUST SEE, REALLY EXCELLENT, well-documented compilation of events charting the plandemic from the start, from RFKennedy Jr.'s website

Posted by onawah (here)
The Extraordinary Story of How Governments Suppressed Effective COVID Treatments and Targeted Physicians Who Prescribed Them
02/23/22
By Meryl Nass, M.D.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...3-25ad5a65a680

[onawah]

German Insurer Data Reveal 400,000 Vaccine Injuries + Pfizer Pushes Drug for Heart Conditions Caused by Vaccines + More
Children's Health Defense <team@childrenshealthdefense.org>
2/25/22
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/ui=...16363980&ser=1

400,000 Cases of COVID Vaccine Injuries Found in Data Analyzed by German Health Insurer
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...6-6b7742002a1f

Pfizer Steps Up Advertising for Its ‘Blockbuster’ Drug to Treat Heart Conditions, Including Those Caused by COVID Vaccines
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...6-6b7742002a1f

Basketball Great John Stockton Tells RFK, Jr. Why He Took a Stand on COVID Mandates
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...6-6b7742002a1f

New York Post Attacks RFK, Jr. as Sales of ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’ Soar
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...6-6b7742002a1f

‘The People’s Convoy’ Kicks Off at California Rally, Truckers Begin Trek to D.C.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...6-6b7742002a1f

Are COVID Vaccines Causing AIDS-Like Illness by Destroying Immune Function
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...6-6b7742002a1f

Supreme Court to Consider Granting Emergency Relief to NYC Teachers Denied Religious Accommodation From Vaccine Mandate
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...6-6b7742002a1f

Endless Booster Shots Can Lead to ‘Dead Zone’ and Increased Risk of Autoimmune Disease
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...6-6b7742002a1f

Fly High, Tanner: A Tribute to the Life of Tanner Welsh
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...6-6b7742002a1f

Texas Family Waits for Recourse After 21-Year-Old’s Rare, Severe Reaction to COVID Vaccine + More
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...6-6b7742002a1f

Facebook ‘Purposefully Poisoning’ Young Children, Analyst Warns + More
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...6-6b7742002a1f

REGISTER NOW: RFK, Jr., Mary Holland + Others to Speak at The Health Freedom Summit March 10-12
https://healthfreedomsummit.com/?ref...6-6b7742002a1f

[onawah]

Health Freedom Summit Launches March 10th-12th
https://healthfreedomsummit.com/?fbc...1X8DXpQXtFnRM4

"Leading health experts are now calling for a reformation of the pharmaceutical-industrial complex and a restoration of health freedom rights.
The Summit features in-depth discussions from doctors, researchers, and cultural commentators who are brave enough to offer solutions that “first, do no harm.”

Speakers like Dr. Peter McCullough, (the most published, most cited scientist on Sars-Cov-2) Dr. Pierre Kory, and Dr. Christina Parks, warn that decisions within the patient/physician relationship can never again be politicized.

Over 17,000 physicians are now calling for specific measures to protect the sacred physician/patient relationship; this number of verified signatures represents more medical counsel than currently informs the decisions of the FDA and the CDC.

These doctors of conscience are exposing political suppression of ​​repurposed drugs.

Some of the questions to be addressed in the Health Freedom Summit by medical professionals include:

Why were credible frontline doctors censored and canceled when they demonstrated perfect cure metrics using therapeutic drugs with reliable safety profiles?
Why are people being forced to take a medication with the highest rates of death and serious injury of any vaccine ever administered? Where there’s a risk there must be a choice– why is this being denied?
Why are vaccine manufacturers the only industry immune from lawsuits when their products injure or kill or injure?
Why are so many professional athletes, some of the healthiest people on the planet, suddenly having strokes and heart attacks?
You’ll also hear from whistleblowers on mandated vaccines, masks, and lockdowns exposing medical fraud, government overstep, and disinformation.

REGISTER HERE https://healthfreedomsummit.mykajabi...U4F6C/checkout

Health Freedom Summit Launches March 10th-12th
This FREE three-day summit will inspire and equip you:
Develop a true understanding of the plandemic as renowned doctors and scientists make connections and reveal agendas you won’t hear on the news.
Gain activist training on how to fight back effectively, and support yourself financially at the same time.
Learn to legally protect yourself from forced vaccinations, mask mandates, and other forms of medical tyranny by legal experts.
Learn from doctors who have put their lives and livelihoods on the line to help heal their patients and empower the public while defying pharma and empowering you to do the same.
Learn how to conquer "long haul" Covid and reclaim your vitality.
Gain valuable mindset training from some of the most brilliant communicators of our movement to help you win the cultural battle and change hearts and minds.
If you've already registered sign in here.

2022 HEALTH FREEDOM SUMMIT PRESENTERS INCLUDE:

Naomi Wolf
Dr. Robert Malone
Dr. Peter McCullough
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Del Bigtree
Dr. Pierre Kory
Dr. Joseph Mercola
Dr. Christina Parks
Dr. Paul Thomas
Dr. Christiane Northrup
Erin Elizabeth
Peggy Hall
Bishop Athanasius Schneider
Pam Popper
Connor Boyack
Peter Breggin
And many more + "


Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/vsqd7c/?pub=ijro7

[onawah]

RFK Jr. Discusses Fauci, Vaccines and Big Pharma’s Power
Dr. Joseph Mercola
April 02, 2022
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...rid=1450388925

Pt. 1

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=e3w8hzZIVZk

Pt 2

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=m91ULoQVSEA

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Hundreds of studies show mercury destroys health and causes dramatic reductions in IQ, and researchers have demonstrated that ethylmercury from vaccines accumulate in the brain to a far greater degree than the methyl-mercury you get from fish
In 1997, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration started removing mercury preservatives from childhood vaccines, but mercury-containing vaccines are still given to children in Africa.
The flu vaccine also contains mercury and is given to pregnant women
Thimerosal (ethylmercury preservative) was replaced with aluminum preservative, and aluminum is also a potent neurotoxin.
So, they simply replaced one brain-harming substance with another
Under Fauci’s direction, the National Institutes for Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) and its parent agency, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), went from being public health agencies to agencies focused on drug development, drug promotion and partnering with the pharmaceutical industry on profit-making enterprises
Public health has suffered as a result.
When Fauci took over the National Institutes for Allergy and Infectious Disease, 6% of American children had chronic disease. By 2006, it was 54%

March 21, 2022, Megyn Kelly of “The Megyn Kelly Show” interviewed Robert F. Kennedy Jr. about his position on vaccines, censorship, the claims made in his best-selling book, “The Real Anthony Fauci,” the power of Bill Gates and Big Pharma, and the global war on democracy and public health.

Megyn is quite the interviewer and I have never seen anyone push back so hard against Bobby during an interview. She has incredible self-confidence to frequently push back so hard against one of the leading intellects in understanding the sordid truth about what has happened in the global cabal’s intrusion into health care.

The problem is that it is beyond clear that she has largely swallowed the blue pill propaganda of mainstream media, and although she agrees with Bobby on a few points she refutes his well-researched facts with far less credible sources, using editorial insertions that Bobby does not have a chance to respond to.

The full interview was so long — four hours — that they divided it into two parts. Below, I’ll review some select highlights. For more, I urge you to listen to it when time allows.

RFK on the Vaccine Regime
While many are quick to dismiss Kennedy as an “anti-vaxxer,” he’s adamant that he’s never actually been against vaccines per se. “That is a pejorative that's applied to me in order to marginalize me and silence me,” he says, adding:

“What I've said is we should have safe vaccines. We should have good, robust science. We should have regulators that are independent of the pharmaceutical industry that is profiting [from] the vaccines.”

Kennedy’s initial foray into vaccines, which began 17 years ago, was to get mercury out of childhood vaccines, as mercury is a neurotoxin. Before that, he spent 35 years trying to get mercury out of fish, “and nobody called me anti-fish,” he says.

There are hundreds of studies that show mercury destroys health and causes dramatic reductions in IQ. He cites research done showing that ethyl-mercury from vaccines accumulate in the brain to a far greater degree than the methyl-mercury you get from fish.

In fact, monkeys exposed to mercury-containing vaccines had twice the amount of mercury in their brains as those exposed to dietary mercury. The mercury in vaccines also metabolizes into organic mercury, which is the most toxic kind.

“Mercury is cumulative and ... kids have many exposure to mercury. Vaccines are much worse [than dietary mercury], and we know this because of the FDA's own studies. Their internal studies show that kids ... are receiving huge amounts of mercury — hundreds of times the EPA max safe exposures — from these vaccines,” Kennedy says.

The Rise in Autism Is a Real Phenomenon
In 1997, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration started removing mercury preservatives from childhood vaccines, but mercury-containing vaccines are still given to children in Africa. The flu vaccine also contains mercury and is given to pregnant women.

This, Kennedy believes, may be one of the reasons why autism rates did not decline after ethylmercury was taken out of most childhood vaccines, because around the same time, pregnant women and babies 6 months and older were suddenly told to get an annual flu shot, and it provides a “huge bolus, 25 micrograms” of mercury.

While Kelly suggests autism rates kept rising simply because we got better at diagnosing it — a common industry talking point — Kennedy disagrees, saying:

“Here’s the thing, Megan ... It's simply not true that we're just noticing it more. You mean we missed it before? ... Missing autism is like missing a train wreck. You can't do it ...

My aunt, Eunice, who was my godmother, started Special Olympics, 10 miles from my home. I worked there every weekend, when I was a kid, from when I was 8 years old ... I [also] spent 200 hours during my high school years at Wassaic home for the retarded in upstate New York, as a helper, and I never saw a case of full-blown autism ...

Kids today with autism who are nonverbal, non-toilet trained, screaming, biting, head banging, violent, toe walking — we never saw kids like that in the ‘60s and ‘70s. To this day, I have never seen somebody my age, 68 years old, who has full-blown autism. Where are they?”

When Mercury Was Taken Out, Aluminum Was Put In
What’s more, ethylmercury was replaced with aluminum preservative, and aluminum is also a potent neurotoxin. So, they simply replaced one brain-harming substance with another. “So, now we're giving kids aluminum vaccines and in the same wellness visit, we're giving them a mercury flu shot,” he says, adding:

“Anybody who who's looked at the CDC’s, NIH’s and FDA's behavior during COVID pandemic understands that these are industries that are not doing public health. They're doing pharmaceutical profit promotion ...

These are [drug] companies that have ... paid the highest criminal penalties of any corporation in history. These are serial felons and they have captured the agency that's supposed to be protecting us from their behavior.”

Kennedy goes on to explain that, of the regulatory agencies in the U.S., the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is the only one that isn’t beholden to Big Pharma. They’re in the pocket of the oil industry, “but they don’t care about Pharma,” he says. When Congress asked the EPA to determine when the autism epidemic began, they came back with a very conclusive answer: 1989.

“What happened in 1989? We passed the National Vaccine Injury Act in 1986. We gave immunity from liability to all the [vaccine] companies. There was a gold rush, because suddenly the biggest cost of producing pharmaceuticals and marketing pharmaceuticals, which is downstream liability, had been eliminated.

They also didn't have to do upstream testing. So, two of the biggest costs were gone. Plus, they don't have to do advertising and marketing because the product is mandated to 76 million American children. So, it is a dream product for them and they can charge basically anything they want. It was a gold rush. They added all these new vaccines [to the childhood vaccine] schedule.

People, when they think of vaccines, think of polio and smallpox and the miracles of eliminating those [diseases]. But [it’s] completely unnecessary to vaccinate against things like hepatitis B, that are not even casually contagious ...”

What About the Measles Vaccine?
As for the measles vaccine, measles was indeed a lethal disease at the beginning of the century, but in 1963, it was killing only 400 children a year, mainly those who had malnutrition or some other devastating comorbidity. “A lot of them were Black children in the Mississippi Delta,” Kennedy says. “[There], the death rate was 1 in 500,000.”

When Tony Fauci came into office, 6% of American children had chronic disease. By 2006, it was 54%. ~ Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
The measles vaccine came out in 1963, and never contained thimerosal (mercury preservative) because it is a live virus vaccine. It wasn’t until the ‘90s that we started seeing an explosion in neurological disorders. Autism skyrocketed from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 44 today, but other neurodevelopmental disorders, such as ADHD, speech delays and ticks have also skyrocketed.1 We’ve also seen a rapid rise in food allergies.

“When Tony Fauci came into office, 6% of American children had chronic disease,” Kennedy says. “By 2006, it was 54%. Our kids today are swimming around in a toxic zoo. And I don't just work on vaccines. I was part of the trial team [against] Monsanto. I work on PBDEs, neonicotinoids, PFOS, PFAS ... EMFs — all of these different exposures that began on the same timeline.

Phil Landrigan, the most famous toxicologist in this country, [at] Mount Sinai in New York, made a list of 11 potential culprits of toxics that became ubiquitous in 1989. You have to find something that impacted every demographic in this country, the same year ... there's only a small number ... and one of them is vaccines.

I think it’s all of [these exposures]. Science shows all these impacts are cumulative. Our kids today are sick because we are bombarding their immune systems with these toxics that they simply cannot handle. Vaccines are part of that story. And it's probably, in my view, the largest single cause, although all of them are very big.”

Intentional Suppression of the Autism Signal
Kennedy goes on to tell the story of a secret meeting organized by the CDC in 1999 after they conducted an internal study of their database, which contains the medical records, including the vaccination records, of 10 million children from the 10 biggest HMOs. Specifically, they wanted to know whether mercury vaccines might be causing autism. Kennedy says:

“They can look at every vaccine record and they can look at your medical claims to see if you've had a seizure disorder or allergies, or if you have an autism diagnosis. They can do a cluster analysis and look for associations. They looked at the hepatitis B vaccine, which is loaded with mercury, [given] during the first 30 days of birth.

They compared them to kids who did not get it during the first 30 days, who got it later or didn't get it at all. And here's what they found. The relative risk [from smoking] a pack of cigarettes a day for 20 years and lung cancer is 10. This was 11.35. They knew thimerosal caused it.

This is the story that got me involved because they pushed the panic button and they had a secret meeting.2 They didn't want to do it on the CDC campus because they thought it would be susceptible to a freedom of information request. So, they did it in a remote Methodist retreat center on the banks of the Chattahoochee River in Norcross, Georgia.

They had a two-day meeting with 52 individuals, including all the major vaccine companies, regulatory agencies that administer vaccines, the FDA, the NIH, the HHS and the leaders of the leading academic vaccinators — the people who conduct clinical trials and make hundreds of millions of dollars from medical schools around this country.

Somebody recorded that meeting. We don't know why. We don't know if they knew they were being recorded, but I got a hold of the transcripts in 2005 and it is horrific. It's a nightmare. Any of your listeners can go to our website, see the Simpsonwood Documents, and read those transcripts and make up your own mind about what happened.”

Early on in that 286-page transcript, we find the following admission by Walter Orenstein, then-director of the National Immunization Program at the CDC:3

“Initial concerns were raised last summer that mercury, as methylmercury in vaccines, might exceed safe levels ... Analysis to date raise some concerns of a possible dose-response effect of increasing levels of methylmercury in vaccines and certain neurologic diagnoses.”

The remainder of the story was detailed in in a 2015 interview4 with Children’s Health Defense director of advocacy, Rita Shreffler. In that interview, Kennedy explained how the troublesome signal found in this database analysis was intentionally “vanished” by reworking the study no less than four times, “using dodgy statistical devices to make the autism signal disappear.”

After the fourth iteration, the signal linking thimerosal with autism and a half dozen other neurodevelopmental disorders was no longer detectable. The CDC published that version and announced thimerosal had been investigated and found to be safe. Alas, when people asked to see the raw data, the CDC claimed the data had been “lost,” so no one was ever able to verify the results. The fabrication stuck and has been peddled ever since.

When Kelly insists that there are many other studies from around the world that have also exonerated thimerosal, Kennedy reminds her to look at who funded them. Most were funded by the Wellcome Trust, the drug industry and the NIH.

“They are being funded by people who are funding them in order to cover up the association,” he says, “and you can easily design studies, particularly epidemiological studies, to conceal the impact to small subgroups of vulnerable populations. That is Epidemiology 101. Everybody knows that. And that's why they do those studies.”

The Real Anthony Fauci
Kelly’s and Kennedy’s conversation then moves on to “The Real Anthony Fauci,” which became a best seller and sold out 12 times despite the total media blackout. When asked what Kennedy believes motivates Fauci to do what he does, he replies:

“I would characterize Anthony Fauci as kind of the preeminent architect of the transfer of NIAID and its parent agency NIH from a public health agency to an agency that is primarily concerned with drug development, drug promotion and partnering with the pharmaceutical industry on profit-making enterprises.

Legally, he can make money [on this] and he does. We know of at least one patent he has. Any product that is developed by the NIAID, anybody who works on that product ... can get patent margin rights on that product that entitles them under the federal rules to collect $150,000 a year in royalty for life.

He has four of his top employees who each have margin rights, patent rights, royalty rights for the Moderna [COVID] vaccine ... so it stands to make billions of dollars for the agency, but also high level individuals in the agency.

People who are very loyal to Tony Fauci can get awarded, through Fauci, the rights to collect lifetime royalties on those products, and they make hundreds of products. They develop hundreds and hundreds of products and all of those are potential profit-making enterprises for high level people within the NIH.

I think [Fauci’s motivation] is power, [but] I don't know what motivates him. My job is to document their conduct. And if you look at his conduct, time after time after time, he does things that are consistent with making profits for his partners, which are these pharmaceutical companies, even at the direct and clear expense of public health.”

On Bill Gates
When asked about Bill Gates and his influence on public health, especially in developing countries, Kennedy tells the following story, which is detailed in his book:

“The World Health Organization, with Gates' influence, support and participation, administered 1 million vaccines to Kenyan women designed to sterilize them without their knowledge. It was a tetanus program that included, in the tetanus vaccine — without anybody knowing — human gonadotrophic hormones (HCG), which interact with tetanus toxoids [to act] as a chemical castration drug for women.

They had similar programs in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines. Clearly, they were doing that. We got the vials from Kenya, so we know what they were doing, and they've admitted ... If you read my book, you'll [learn] that for 20 years, WHO has been spending tens of millions of dollars developing these sterilization drugs ... It has paid researchers to find ways to castrate women.”

Kelly pushes back, saying “we’re on a thin thread, talking about the intentional sterilization of women in Africa without their consent or knowledge,” but Kennedy replies that the evidence for that “is very well documented.”

“They spent 20 years studying the inclusion of HCG in tetanus vaccines — as a way to sterilize women. Then they included HCG in a tetanus vaccine program that they gave to a million women without telling them. You can connect whatever dots you need to — or not.”

Similarities Between the AIDS Epidemic and COVID
Kennedy also addresses Kelly’s question about the similarities between Fauci’s handling of the AIDS epidemic and COVID. In the 1980s, Fauci pushed for the use of AZT — an extremely toxic drug — as a primary treatment for AIDS, while suppressing safer and less expensive treatments.

He’s followed the same modus operandi during the COVID pandemic, where he demonized inexpensive repurposed drugs such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, saying they don’t work, while pushing for remdesivir, an ineffective, exorbitantly expensive antiviral Ebola drug.

“It speaks for itself,” Kennedy says. “AZT was horrendously toxic. It was developed originally by the National Cancer Institute as a chemotherapy drug. It killed all the rats when they gave it to them ... They're designed to kill human cellular tissue.

The hope is it will kill the tumors before they kill the rest of you. And so, when you give somebody a chemotherapy drug, it's only given for a couple of weeks. But this drug was regarded as so horrendously toxic that they threw it on the junk pile and didn't even patent it.”

According to Kennedy, the AIDS epidemic was when Fauci transitioned the NIAID from a public health agency into a drug industry partner. Fauci partnered with GlaxoSmithKline to develop an AIDS drug, and installed loyalists on committees that approved new or experimental drugs. They then kept competition at bay while rushing Fauci’s drug of choice through.

When AZT started killing everyone in the treatment group, Fauci kept the study going by giving the participants blood transfusions to keep them alive longer. “The only reason those people survived a six-week drug trial was because they were getting these transfusions,” Kennedy says. Once the study was completed, AZT was approved, despite clear safety signals. AZT went on to kill some 330,000 AIDS patients over the next decade.

Reinventing Public Health
In his book, Kennedy discusses how, by the middle of the 20th century, most epidemic and infectious diseases had been more or less wiped out, thanks to improvements in nutrition, sanitation, clean water, refrigeration, road systems and less overcrowding.

In 2000, the CDC looked at this together with Johns Hopkins, and they concluded that this 80% reduction in mortality from infectious disease was not due to vaccines, but these other societal improvements. In fact, vaccines had played virtually no role. People were still getting sick, but they were no longer dying from diseases such as measles.

As a result, the CDC and NIAID were losing relevance. The budget director for the Reagan administration, David Stockman, in 1982 suggested we should abolish the CDC. In his book, Kennedy shares agency memos discussing how to bring attention back to infectious diseases to make themselves relevant again.

“What I show is that there's a series of fake pandemics that were done in 1976, right after Tony came to the NIAID. There was a bird flu epidemic that was fake in 2005 ... and there was a fake swine flu epidemic in 2009. Each time they gave the vaccine companies immunity from liability, and they sold tens of millions of dollars worth of unnecessary vaccines.

Many of them caused profound impacts. The Zika pandemic was a fake pandemic. There was Tony Fauci claiming that Zika might cause microcephaly, a smaller head. He caused panic around the country. People were terrified. They were advising women not to get pregnant.

Somebody from his agency actually made a March madness chart of all the phony pandemics he's been drumming up over the years, and the triumph is COVID on that [chart]. I reprinted that in my book and his [Fauci’s] signature is at the bottom of the page. So, you know, it’s something that they've done again and again and again.”

For clarity, Kennedy is not claiming that COVID-19 was a fake pandemic. “There were people dying of COVID 19 all over the world. It was a genuine pandemic,” he says. His point is that it served the same purpose as faked pandemics that posed no real threat to public health.

I would add that the COVID pandemic was extremely exaggerated, so while “real” in terms of there being outbreaks of infection, the panic surrounding it was intentionally manufactured. And why?

According to Kennedy, the reason for manufacturing fear about infectious disease is to allow the CDC and NIAID to stay relevant and keep pharmaceutical profit centers going, even though mortality from infectious diseases has dropped off the map.

Fauci’s ‘Biodefense’ Work
Kelly and Kennedy also discuss how Fauci and other public health leaders have misled the public about the origins of the COVID pandemic. Kennedy reviews how Dr. Ralph Baric had problems with pathogens escaping from his lab at UNC Chapel Hill, how the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) is actually a front for the CIA, and how Fauci managed to secure a 68% pay raise by adding “biodefense” to his workload.

“I have another book about to come out called ‘Wuhan Cover-Up,’ and it shows, that Dr. Fauci, along with other people with DTRA, a defense threat reduction agency, with the CIA ... was pumping hundreds of millions of dollars into the enterprise to develop pandemic superbugs that could cause pandemics.

And they were keeping them in areas that they all knew they were certain to escape ... His biggest fundee, Ralph Baric, had eight or 10 escapes and Fauci gave him 147 separate grants of tens of millions, hundreds of millions of dollars ...

Nixon had signed the biological weapons convention in ‘72 that made it illegal to handle, store or develop any kind of biological weapons, but there was a loophole in it. And the loophole said, if it's a dual use research, you can do that. A lot of the research that you use to develop bioweapons is identical to the research you use to develop a vaccine, or it can be.

And so, the Pentagon wanted to start doing this kind of research, but it was worried that the public would not believe that the Pentagon was doing all of this bioweapons research in order to develop vaccines. It just didn't seem plausible.

So, they outsourced it to Tony Fauci and they gave him a 68% raise, which is one of the reasons why, today, he is the highest paid person in the history of the federal government. He makes $430,400 a year and the president only makes $400,000. And a lot of that is money that's coming from his military weapons function ...

They gave him $1.7 billion to begin developing bioweapons that is now at $2.2 billion a year. He then distributes that to different labs around the country. In 2014, three bugs from U.S. labs escaped ... including smallpox, and 300 leading bioweapons experts ... signed a petition asking Obama to shut down Tony Fauci’s experiments because they feared that he would release a pandemic.

The Obama administration issued the cease and desist order to Tony Fauci. He defied the order and continued doing the experiments at Ralph Baric’s labs, which were the worst experiments because he was engineering these gain-of-function bugs and ways that nobody had ever devised before.

But he moved a lot of his operations to Wuhan where they would be out of sight of the White House, and he laundered the money through this zoologist named Peter Daszak, the EcoHealth Alliance.”

According to Kennedy, Fauci also funded Baric to develop a technique that allows you to hide the genetic engineering you’ve done. Normally, there are telltale signs that a pathogen was created in a lab. Baric developed a way to hide those traces of engineering. This, supposedly, will all be explained in Kennedy’s next book.

As noted by Kennedy, this is the precise opposite of what you would do if you were doing research for public health. There’s only one purpose for such a technique, and it’s a nefarious one.

How Do We Fix It?
The obvious question is, how do we fix this mess? As noted by Kennedy, we really need independent regulators, and that may require restructuring and legislative efforts. “We need regulators that are not getting money from pharma,” Kennedy says, “[regulators] that are not doing pharma’s bidding but are really working for public health ... using real science.” "

Sources and References
1 Neuroendocrinology Letters 2006; 27(4)
2, 4 Children’s Health Defense, Mercury, Vaccines and the CDC’s Worst Nightmare
3 Scientific Review of Vaccine Safety Datalink Information June 7-8, 2000, Simpsonwood Retreat Center Norcross, Georgia (PDF)

[xylo]

This is a great collection of current events and truths which are generally swept under the rug by msm regarding this issue, Onawah.

As a minor but hopeful example, various the truths are starting to leak through the cracks on censorship, and more mainstream uncensored Drs are beginning to subtly separate themselves from total adherence to the narrative. One example is otherwise totally mainstream, vax promoting Dr. Michael Osterholme who also has a podcast “the Osterholm report.” Osterholm reflects and supports a lot of of the points raised in this thread, and speaks honestly to the devastating result of suddenly having no access to known anti-viral medicines such as Ivermectin as of 03/20, insisting on new but unnecessary re-testing of the known antivirals just to placate the CDC, and the massive onset of ptsd within the healthcare system from workers sitting by helplessly while watching people being hooked up to death machines and then watching them die. Current result being the loss of 1/2 the number of healthcare workers nationwide than were present at the time of lockdown. Right now any show of critical non-hive mind thought from medical practitioners is hope for me. Here’s the doc on JRE:

https://open.spotify.com/episode/5VS...Q8yXfCKCLQvGyg

Thanks Again, great post and thread 🙏

xylo

[onawah]

Bill Seeks to Muzzle Doctors Who Tell the Truth About COVID
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola
May 05, 2022
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...rid=1481312976

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
A California bill is now threatening to strip doctors of their medical licenses if they express medical views that the state does not agree with. California Assembly Bill 2098 designates “the dissemination or promotion of misinformation or disinformation related to the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, or ‘COVID-19,’ as unprofessional conduct” warranting “disciplinary action” that could result in the loss of their medical license
Misinformation related to SARS-CoV-2 includes “false or misleading information regarding the nature and risks of the virus, its prevention and treatment; and the development, safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines.” But as far as what might constitute “misinformation” or “disinformation” is unclear and basically left open for interpretation by the state
Doctors have an ethical obligation to treat each patient as an individual, and to ensure each patient receives the safest and best care. Bill 2098 will turn doctors into government agents, leaving no one to advocate for patients’ health
California has also introduced six other bills seeking to enshrine tyranny into law, including bills to criminalize “amplification of harmful content,” create a centralized vaccination registry, strip funding from law enforcement that refuses to follow public health orders, mandate COVID jabs for school children, authorize minors to consent to vaccination, and require school districts to conduct routine COVID testing
If you live in California, please review these bills and VOTE NO

One of the most stunning parts of this pandemic has been the denial of basic science, and one of the most shocking developments from that has been the attack on medical doctors who try to set the record straight.

As reported by Dr. Jay Bhattacharya — professor of health policy at Stanford, research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research and coauthor of the Great Barrington Declaration, which calls for focused protection of the most vulnerable1 — a California bill is now threatening to strip doctors of their medical licenses if they express medical views that the state does not agree with.2

Bhattacharya’s Personal Battle
Bhattacharya has first-hand experience with this kind of witch hunt. He was one of the first to investigate the prevalence of COVID-19 in 2020, and found that by April, the infection was already too prevalent for lockdowns to have any possibility of stopping the spread.

Bhattacharya has called the COVID-19 lockdowns the “biggest public health mistake ever made,”3 stressing that the harms caused have been “absolutely catastrophically devastating,” especially for children and the working class, worldwide.4

After Bhattacharya co-sponsored the Great Barrington Declaration, Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and his former boss, now retired National Institutes of Health (NIH) director Francis Collins, colluded behind the scenes to quash the declaration from day 1.5

To that end, they set out to smear and destroy the reputations of Bhattacharya and the other coauthors of the declaration. In one email, Collins referred to the three highly credentialed and respected scientists as “fringe epidemiologists” and called for a press “takedown” of the trio.6,7,8,9 I detailed this treachery in “Authors of Barrington Declaration Speak Out.”

“Big tech outlets like Facebook and Google followed suit, suppressing our ideas, falsely deeming them ‘misinformation,’” Bhattacharya writes.10 “I started getting calls from reporters asking me why I wanted to ‘let the virus rip,’ when I had proposed nothing of the sort. I was the target of racist attacks and death threats.

Despite the false, defamatory and sometimes frightening attacks, we stood firm. And today many of our positions have been amply vindicated. Yet the soul searching this episode should have caused among public health officials has largely failed to occur. Instead, the lesson seems to be: Dissent at your own risk.

I do not practice medicine — I am a professor specializing in epidemiology and health policy at Stanford Medical School. But many friends who do practice have told me how they have censored their thoughts about COVID lockdowns, vaccines, and recommended treatment to avoid the mob ...

This forced scientific groupthink — and the fear and self-censorship they produce — are bad enough. So far, though, the risk has been social and reputational. Now it could become literally career-ending.”

Do You Want Your Doctor To Be Muzzled by the State?
California Assembly Bill 209811 — introduced by Assemblyman Evan Low, a Silicon Valley Democrat, and coauthored by Assembly members Aguiar-Curry, Akilah Weber and Wicks, and Sens. Pan and Wiener — designates “the dissemination or promotion of misinformation or disinformation related to the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, or ‘COVID-19,’ as unprofessional conduct” warranting “disciplinary action” that could result in the loss of their medical license.

This bill represents a chilling interference with the practice of medicine. The bill itself is full of misinformation and a demonstration of what a disaster it would be to have the legislature dictate the practice of medicine. ~ Dr. Jay Bhattacharya
Misinformation or disinformation related to SARS-CoV-2 includes “false or misleading information regarding the nature and risks of the virus, its prevention and treatment; and the development, safety, and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines.” But as far as what might constitute “misinformation” or “disinformation” is unclear and basically left open for interpretation — by the state. As noted by Bhattacharya:12

“Doctors, fearing loss of their livelihoods, will need to hew closely to the government line on COVID science and policy, even if that line does not track the scientific evidence.

After all, until recently, top government science bureaucrats like Dr. Fauci claimed that the idea that COVID came from a Wuhan laboratory was a conspiracy theory, rather than a valid hypothesis that should be open to discussion. The government’s track record on discerning COVID truths is poor.

The bill claims that the spread of misinformation by physicians about the COVID vaccines ‘has weakened public confidence and placed lives at serious risk.’ But how significant is this problem in reality? Over 83% of Californians over the age of 50 are fully vaccinated (including the booster) ...

What is abundantly clear is that this bill represents a chilling interference with the practice of medicine. The bill itself is full of misinformation and a demonstration of what a disaster it would be to have the legislature dictate the practice of medicine.”

The Shanghai Model
We don’t have to guess at what life might look like if this and other bills like it are implemented, Bhattacharya warns. The drama currently playing out in Shanghai offers a clear look into what can happen when public health is dictated by the state rather than by qualified medical professionals rooted in sound science.

“Shanghai is the model for the terrifying dangers of giving dictatorial powers to public health officials,” Bhattacharya writes.13 “The harrowing situation unfolding there is a testament to the folly of a virus containment strategy that relies on lockdown.

For two weeks, the Chinese government has locked nearly 25 million people in their homes, forcibly separated children from their parents, killed family pets, and limited access to food and life-saving medical care — all to no avail. COVID cases are still rising, yet the delusion of suppressing COVID persists.

In America, many of our officials still have not abandoned their delusions about COVID and the exercise of power this crisis has allowed. As the Shanghai debacle demonstrates, of all the many terrible consequences of our public health response to COVID, the stifling of dissenting scientific viewpoints by the state might be the most dangerous.”

The Science Deniers Are in Power
As stressed by Bhattacharya, the California bill includes a number falsehoods and fails to acknowledge basic science, starting with natural immunity. High-quality studies have repeatedly shown that natural immunity is equivalent or superior to the COVID shots. Were this bill to pass, a California doctor could lose his license for taking a patient’s COVID history into account when recommending the shot.

It also negates doctors’ ability to prescribe off-label drugs for the treatment of COVID, even though this has been a common and uncontroversial medical practice for many decades. It’s not uncommon for a drug intended for one condition to be used off-label for another. But for some reason, when it comes to COVID, this practice is now deemed hazardous and unprofessional.

The bill also falsely asserts that the “safety and efficacy of COVID vaccines have been confirmed through evaluation by the federal Food and Drug Administration.” Anyone who has followed this circus over the past year realizes that the FDA has completely ignored loud and clear warning bells showing the shots are far from safe and nowhere near as effective as initially claimed.

The bill also ignores the fact that the safety depends on the individual patient’s medical history and current state of health. “For example, there is an elevated risk of myocarditis in young men taking the vaccine, especially with the booster,” Bhattacharya notes.14

Doctors have an ethical obligation to treat each patient as an individual, and to ensure each patient receives the safest and best care. Bill 2098 will turn doctors into government agents, leaving no one to advocate for patients’ health.

“The false medical consensus enforced by AB 2098 will lead doctors to censor themselves to avoid government sanction. And it will be their patients, above all, who will be harmed by their silence,” Bhattacharya warns.

Californians, Vote NO on COVID Tyranny Bills
California Bill 2098 isn’t the only bill seeking to enshrine tyranny into law. Other pending California bills include:15

Senate Bill 1390,16 introduced by Sen. Pan, which seeks to criminalize “amplification of harmful content” on social media platforms.

Assembly Bill 1797,17 introduced by Assembly member Weber, which calls for the creation of a centralized vaccination registry.

Senate Bill 1464,18 introduced by Pan, which would strip state funding from any law enforcement agency that “publicly announces that they will not follow, or adopts a policy stating that they will not follow, a public health order.”

Those funds would instead be reallocated to the county public health department. Essentially, this bill would coerce sheriffs and police officers to violate their conscience or the law, or both, in the name of “public health policy.”

Senate Bill 871,19 introduced by Pan, which would mandate all school children, ages 5 and older, be “fully vaccinated” against COVID-19. The bill would also repeal exceptions to mandatory hepatitis B vaccination to attend school, and would remove the personal belief exemption against vaccination.

Senate Bill 866,20 introduced by Wiener and Pan, which would authorize minors, 12 years and older, to consent to vaccines without the consent of a parent or guardian.

Senate Bill 1479,21 introduced by Pan, which would expand “contagious, infectious, or communicable disease testing and other public health mitigation efforts to include prekindergarten, onsite after school programs, and child care centers,” and require each school district, county office of education, and charter school to create a COVID-19 testing plan, and report testing data to State Department of Public Health.

If you live in California, please review these bills and VOTE NO. In a Substack article, Margaret Anna Alice, offers the following guidance to Californians:22

“If you are a resident of California, please consider taking the additional step of contacting your respective senators and assembly members in addition to filling out the online portal. See Californians for Medical Freedom for step-by-step instructions on how to contact your local legislators as well as what to say if you decide to call (which is recommended).

The PERK website is also a very helpful way to track the hearing dates and status of these bills. In the comments, Donald Tipon has provided additional links for opposing AB2098 and AB1797 from A Voice for Choice Advocacy.”

Front Groups Marshal the Ignorant
Regulating the medical views a doctor can and cannot have is dangerous in the extreme, and hopefully the Californians who are left to vote in that state will quash such efforts. On the national level, we must also stay vigilant against similar legislative proposals, and push back against phony front groups that promote this kind of medical tyranny.

This includes the No License for Disinformation23 (NLFD) group, which promotes the false information disseminated by the dark-money group known as the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH).

As most now know, U.S. Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., a medical doctor in his own right, has been the primary challenger of Fauci’s lies, and the NLFD has been instructing individuals to report him to the Kentucky Medical Board, with the aim of getting his medical license revoked.24

Just who are the NLFD?25 In November 2021, I wrote about the NLFD, pointing out that the bottom of their website declared, “Created & Developed by EverydayAmericanJoe.”26 At the time, I took a screenshot of it, in case they’d wise up and change it. Good thing, because that notice has since been deleted.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=1ML-rQUPSpo

According to his LinkedIn profile,28 Gilroy created EverydayAmericanJoe.com — “the largest Biden-Harris grassroots website online” — as a freelance senior marketing consultant and designer for the Biden campaign. Since 2007, he’s been the president of The Microtechs LLC, an online marketing, web development and digital advertising firm that produces custom websites and apps “that our clients can manage themselves.”

Aside from the EverydayAmericanJoe clue, there’s no indication of who is actually running the NLFD. It simply claims to be a “nonpartisan grassroots coalition of Americans” whose goal it is to get state medical boards to “protect the public” from medical professionals “who spread medical disinformation.” In all likelihood, the NLFD is run by a coalition of one — Gilroy himself — who is far from nonpartisan.

Not surprisingly, the NLFD has promoted and relied on the CCDH’s fabricated “Disinformation Dozen” report, which has even been denounced as biased and flawed in the extreme by Facebook.29

It’s quite clear that the CCDH exists to fabricate “evidence” that is then used to destroy the opposition in order to control the information, and the NLFD uses the CCDH’s fabrications as justification to suppress First Amendment rights.30 Indeed, Biden himself has publicly promoted and relied on this dark money CCDH report.31

The point of all this is that the censorship is being authorized and directed from the very highest level of our government, and there’s only one reason for that. Democracy flourishes under free speech and dies under censorship, and anyone who claims differently has an ulterior motive for trying to confuse these simple truths.

In my view, the war against “misinformation” and “disinformation” is nothing less than a covert war against the citizens of planet Earth. It’s an attempt to seize power by controlling what people can know, and a number of high-profile world leaders, past and present, have shown their true colors.

Among them, former president Obama, who in April 2022 gave lectures at the University of Chicago and Stanford, arguing for the regulation of information — what people can and cannot view on social media and elsewhere — “to protect democracy.”32

However, as noted by nonresident senior fellow of the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research (AEI), Mark Jamison, “Such controls have done the opposite throughout history and would this time too.”33

An Open War on the Public
We find ourselves in a situation where asking valid questions about public health measures are equated to acts of domestic terrorism. It’s unbelievable, yet here we are. Over the past two years, the rhetoric used against those who question the sanity of using unscientific pandemic countermeasures, such as face masks and lockdowns, or share data showing that COVID-19 gene therapies are really bad public health policy, has become increasingly violent.

Dr. Peter Hotez, a virologist who for years has been at the forefront of promoting vaccines of all kinds, for example, has publicly called for cyberwarfare assaults on American citizens who disagree with official COVID narratives, and this vile rhetoric was published in the prestigious science journal Nature, of all places.34

Doctors and nurses are now facing the untenable position of having to choose between doing right by their patients and toeing the line of totalitarianism. This simply cannot go on. It’s profoundly unhealthy and dangerous in a multitude of ways.

While frustrating and intimidating, we must all be relentless in our pursuit and sharing of the truth, and we must relentlessly demand our elected representatives stand up for freedom of speech and other Constitutional rights, including, and especially, the rights of medical doctors to express their medical opinions."

- Sources and References
1 Great Barrington Declaration
2, 10, 12, 13, 14 Bariweiss.substack.com April 12, 2022
3 Newsweek March 8, 2021
4 Rumble, Ron DeSantis March 7, 2022, 32:00
5 Wall Street Journal December 21, 2021
6 YouTube Liberty Report, 7:13 minutes
7 The Blaze December 18, 2021
8 Daily Mail December 18, 2021, Updated December 19, 2021
9 ZeroHedge December 20, 2021
11 California Assembly Bill 2098
15, 22 Margaret Anna Alice Substack April 12, 2022
16 California SB1390
17 California AB1797
18 California SB-1464
19 California SB-871
20 California SB-866
21 California SB-1479
23 Twitter No License for Disinformation
24 Twitter Chass October 11, 2021
25, 26 nolicensefordisinformation.org
27 everydayamericanjoe.com
28 LinkedIn Chris Gilroy (Archived)
29 Facebook August 18, 2021
30 Twitter NLFD October 20, 2021
31 Daily Wire July 20, 2021
32, 33 AEI April 25, 2022
34 Nature April 27, 2021

[onawah]

CHD Demands D.C. Schools Rescind COVID Vaccine Mandate, Says It Violates Federal Law
07/25/22
By Megan Redshaw
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...1-543950374fe9

"Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., chairman and chief legal counsel for Children’s Health Defense, today told the superintendent of schools for the District of Columbia that CHD will sue the school district unless it rescinds its recently announced COVID-19 vaccine mandate for students ages 12 and up.

Schools in Washington, D.C., will require all students ages 12 and older to get the COVID-19 vaccine before they can attend school in the fall, despite warnings from legal experts who say the mandate violates federal law.

The Office of the State Superintendent of Education announced on July 19 that student immunization requirements for the upcoming 2022-2023 school year will include the COVID-19 vaccine for all students who are of an age for which there is a vaccine fully approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

“On July 8, 2022, the FDA fully approved the COVID-19 vaccine commonly known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for individuals 12 to 15 years old,” said State Superintendent of Education Christina Grant in a press release.

“The approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for individuals 12 to 15 means that, unless exempted, any student age 12-15 at the start of the 2022-23 school year must have received the primary COVID-19 vaccine series or have started receiving the shot by Sept. 16, 2022,” she said.

“We want to make sure that all of our students have everything they need for a healthy start to the school year,” Grant added. “This means making sure children see their primary medical provider for a well-child visit and receive all needed immunizations.”

D.C. law requires students in all area schools, including private, parochial and independent schools, to be fully compliant with mandated vaccinations, unless they have an approved exemption. The law also requires schools to verify immunization certification for all students.

The requirement was detailed in a law the D.C. Council approved last year and is the first legislation of its kind in the region.

CHD demands D.C. Schools rescind mandate

In a letter sent today to Grant, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., chairman and chief legal counsel for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), asked Grant to rescind the program or CHD would sue to overturn the mandate.

Kennedy said Grant’s press release was incorrect because the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was never fully approved and still remains under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).

The FDA earlier this month granted full approval to Pfizer’s Comirnaty COVID-19 vaccine for adolescents 12 through 15 years old, without convening its vaccine advisory panel.

In August 2021, the agency granted full licensing of the Comirnaty vaccine for ages 16 and older.

However, there are no Comirnaty-labeled vaccines available in the U.S., for any age group.

Although courts have upheld many childhood vaccination requirements for licensed and approved vaccines, no court has ever upheld a mandate for schoolchildren for an EUA vaccine, according to Kennedy.

Kennedy wrote:

“In fact, a District of Columbia United States District Court held that EUA vaccines cannot be mandated to soldiers in the U.S. military, who enjoy far fewer rights than civilians. Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 297 F.Supp.2d 119 (2003). That court held: ‘… the United States cannot demand that members of the armed forces also serve as guinea pigs for experimental drugs.’ Id. at 135.

“Federal law 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) requires that the person to whom an EUA vaccine is administered be advised, ‘of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.’

“The reason for the right of refusal stems from the fact that EUA products are by definition experimental.

“Under the Nuremberg Code, a universal legal norm, no one may be coerced to participate in a medical experiment. Consent of the individual is ‘absolutely essential.’ The liability for forced participation in a medical experiment, not to mention liability for injury from such coerced medical intervention, may be incalculable.”

Commenting on the D.C. mandate, CHD President Mary Holland said, “It violates fundamental human rights and international law to force people, and especially children, to take experimental medical products.”

“We sincerely hope the District will reconsider its misguided policy for schoolchildren,” Holland added.

Another organization — Liberty Counsel — said it may also challenge the District of Columbia’s vaccine mandate.

“There is no FDA-approved COVID shot available and therefore, individuals have a right under the emergency use authorization to refuse these shots,” Matthew Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel, told The Epoch Times.

Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, people receiving an EUA product must be advised that some benefits and risks “are unknown” and given the “option to accept or refuse administration of the product.”

“It is your choice to receive or not receive [the vaccine],” Staver said. “Should you decide not to receive it, it will not change your standard medical care,” according to FDA fact sheets on EUA COVID-19 vaccines.

Several other school systems have attempted, so far unsuccessfully, to implement a COVID-19 vaccine mandate:

• Louisiana: The Louisiana Department of Health in May said it would no longer seek to make COVID-19 vaccines mandatory for the upcoming school year because the shot had not received full FDA approval for people under the age of 16.

The decision came after CHD and thousands of concerned parents on March 16 filed an amicus brief in a lawsuit seeking to stop the Louisana Department of Health from adding COVID-19 vaccines to the state’s school immunization schedule.

The joint lawsuit was filed in December 2021, by Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry and state Rep. Raymond Crews against Gov. John Bel Edwards after he announced COVID-19 vaccines would be mandatory for all children age 5 and over at public or private schools.

• Los Angeles: Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) Superintendent Alberto Carvalho on April 28 recommended the district postpone its COVID-19 student vaccination mandate until at least July 2023 because the FDA had not fully approved the COVID-19 vaccine for all ages covering grades 7 through 12.

LAUSD officials announced last fall students 12 and older would be required to be vaccinated by the start of the 2022-2023 school year but delayed the mandate because tens of thousands of students still had not complied with the requirement.

• Washington: The Washington State Board of Health in April voted unanimously against adding COVID-19 vaccines to the requirements for students to attend K-12 schools this fall after its advisory group recommended against the requirement. The board said more data was needed about vaccines for ages 5 to 11 and raised concerns that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine has yet to be fully approved for ages 5 to 15.

Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is planning many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission."

Also posted here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1509130

[onawah]

Children Don’t Need COVID Vaccines, Canadian and Australian Groups Tell Public Health Officials
Julie Comber, Ph.D.
07/25/22
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...1-543950374fe9

"Groups in Canada and Australia are urging public health officials to reconsider rolling out COVID-19 vaccines for young children, following the authorization earlier this month in both countries of Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine for children ages 6 months to 5 years.

The Australian Vaccine-risks Network (AVN) https://www.facebook.com/avn.org.au/
...on July 19 sent an open letter
https://avn.org.au/open-letter-re-no...rough-4-years/
...to Dr. Brendan Murphy, secretary of Australia’s Department of Health and Aged Care, voting members of the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation https://www.health.gov.au/committees...nisation-atagi
...and members of parliament threatening to “move forward with preparations for seeking the intervention of the Federal Court of Australia” if officials don’t respond.

The Canadian COVID Care Alliance (CCCA) https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/
...on July 14 published an open letter https://www.canadiancovidcareallianc...-Jul-14-22.pdf
...to Canadian health officials stating their members would “be happy to meet you to discuss findings documented in this letter in greater detail.”

Both letters emphasized three arguments against authorizing the mRNA shots in young children and babies:

Children don’t need COVID-19 vaccination because they are at extremely low risk of COVID-19.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01897-w
In any case, the mRNA shots don’t work well.
The potential harm from the mRNA shots outweighs the benefits for young children.
Both letters also referenced the June 30 open letter to U.K. health officials from more than 70 physicians and scientists warning against vaccinating younger children against COVID-19.
https://childrensunion.org/6-month-t...ovid-vaccines/

The U.K. letter, written in response to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...ts-young-kids/
...in mid-June of the Moderna and the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 shots for children as young as 6 months, urged U.K. health officials to not “make the same mistake” the FDA made.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...-vaccine-kids/

All three letters referenced Søren Brostrøm, director of the Danish Health and Medicines Authority, who in June said, “We did not get much out of having children vaccinated against coronavirus last year.”
https://europe-cities.com/2022/06/27...-the-children/
Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration on July 18 provisionally approved a pediatric dose of Moderna’s Spikevax https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...kevax-vaccine/
...COVID-19 shot for children ages 6 months to 5 years old. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-07-...-tga/101250472
Rollout of the vaccines is contingent on input from the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation.

A few days earlier, on July 14, Health Canada authorized the use of Spikevax for children 6 months to 5 years of age.
https://www.canada.ca/en/health-cana...rs-of-age.html
According to the statement, “As a result of this authorization, approximately 1.7 million children are now eligible for vaccination against COVID-19.”

Risks ‘far outweigh’ benefits for children

The 11-page CCCA letter contains 117 references and six pages of figures and graphs to support the group’s argument that “the data shows that, in the Omicron era, when population-based immunity is widespread, the risks associated with COVID-19 mRNA vaccines far outweigh the benefits in children.”

The authors of the CCCA letter criticized the FDA, stating, “no gold standard, placebo-controlled disease endpoint trials, large enough [with at least 800,000 participants] to categorically establish the clinical safety and long-term efficacy of the Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations in children 12- to 15-years-old, 5- to 11-years-old, 2- to 4-years-old, and 6-months-old to 23-months-old have been undertaken.”

Instead, the EUA for Pfizer was “based on the preliminary results of four very small immuno-bridging trials, enrolling fewer than 3,000 participants each.” https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...ovid-vaccines/

The CCCA letter presented data from the Canadian province of Ontario, which “reported a negative dose-response effect for the COVID-19 vaccinations [original emphasis].”
https://www.canadiancovidcareallianc...-Jul-14-22.pdf

The letter continued:

“In other words, the proportion of cases of COVID-19 were highest among those who had been ‘boosted,’ lower among the ‘fully inoculated’ and least among the ‘not fully inoculated’ (which includes the ‘uninoculated’).”

The authors presented graphs from the Public Health Ontario website, https://data.ontario.ca/en/dataset?g...el-coronavirus
...noting a similar pattern was observed in the 12- to 17-year-olds and the 5- to 11-year-old age groups.

“Additionally, a greater proportion of ‘boosted’ Ontarians have died, revealing that the vaccinations may be associated with serious secondary effects.”

The CCCA letter concludes:

“We trust that our research has provided you with evidence needed to adjust Canadian health policy to protect our children from undue harm. We would be happy to meet you to discuss findings documented in this letter in greater detail.”

‘Huge gap’ in Pfizer’s vaccine trial documentation

According to the authors of the AVN letter, the Pfizer documentation presented to the FDA had huge gaps in the evidence provided. https://www.fda.gov/media/159195/download

For example, the letter stated:

“The protocol was changed mid-trial. The original two-dose schedule exhibited poor immunogenicity with efficacy far below the required standard. A third dose was added by which time many of the original placebo recipients had been vaccinated.”

The AVN letter
https://avn.org.au/open-letter-re-no...rough-4-years/
...argued the Moderna shot for young children fails to meet Australia’s regulatory requirements to be granted “provisional determination” (similar to EUA in the U.S.) under regulation 10L(1)(a) of the Therapeutic Goods Regulations.http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/leg...0300/s10l.html

To receive provisional determination, there must be “an indication of the medicine is the treatment, prevention or diagnosis of a life-threatening or seriously debilitating condition,” the letter stated.

The authors said Australia’s health department and TGA did not “show any data or science to support a conclusion that COVID-19, and particularly the Omicron variant now widespread across Australia, is ‘life-threatening’ to infants aged 6 months up through 4 years, nor indeed that infants 6 months up through 4 years suffer ‘seriously debilitating’ symptoms when infected with COVID-19.”

The authors also addressed the issue of manipulative strategies https://dailysceptic.org/archive/cal...ccine-adverts/
...used to promote COVID-19 vaccination of children, and said pushing unnecessary and novel mRNA-based vaccines onto young children risks undermining parental confidence in routine immunization programs." "

Also posted here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1509145

[onawah]

Lineup of compelling stories from CHD currently
8/14/22
https://childrenshealthdefense.salsa...b-cf84941660dc

TOP NEWS OF THE DAY

‘Stunning’ Link Between Pfizer Vaccine and Myocarditis in Teens, Study Shows

Pfizer Vaccine Efficacy in Teens Wanes 27 Days After Dose 2, Study Shows

Former College Football Coach Fired for Refusing COVID Vaccine Files $25 Million Claim Against Washington State

‘Beyond Chilling’: Homeland Security Seeks to Share Biometric Databanks With Foreign Countries

Pharmacy Giant Walgreens ‘Substantially Contributed’ to San Francisco Opioid Crisis, Judge Rules

Nearly Everyone at Risk of Cancer From Pesticide-Contaminated Drinking Water

U.S. Healthcare System Doesn’t Care if You Live or Die — as Long as It Gets Paid

New Science, Multiple Reports: COVID Vaccine Causes Lung Blockages + More

How Amazon Plans to Expand Into Mental Health Services With On-Demand Therapists + More

[onawah]

CDC Has 4 Days to Release Data on COVID Vaccine Injuries Collected via V-safe App, Court Rules
09/26/22
By Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...b-230b85c71cda

"A federal court in Texas is giving the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention until Friday to release the first batch of data on adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination collected by the agency via its V-safe app.

A federal court in Texas is giving the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) until Friday to release the first batch of data on adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination collected by the agency via its V-safe app.

The order by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas-Austin Division follows a series of lawsuits filed by the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN), an Austin-based nonprofit “focused on the scientific integrity of vaccines and [the] pharmaceutical industry.”

According to ICAN, the court order requires the CDC to release the first batch of 19 months’ worth of data collected from millions of participants who reported adverse events related to COVID-19 vaccination via the V-safe app between Dec. 14, 2020, and July 31, 2022.

In all, the CDC will be required to release more than 137 million health V-safe entries.

The CDC describes V-safe as a smartphone app that “provides personalized and confidential check-ins via text messages and web surveys,” enabling users to “quickly and easily share with CDC how you, or your dependent, feel after getting a COVID-19 vaccine.”

According to the CDC, “This information helps CDC monitor the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in near real time,” adding that the purpose of the V-safe app “is to rapidly characterize the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines when given outside a clinical trial setting.”

Public will ‘see for themselves the actual self-reported data’

The data collected via the V-safe app is “collected, managed, and housed on a secure server by Oracle,” with only the CDC having “access to the individualized survey data.”

Oracle’s access is limited to “aggregate deidentified data for reporting.”

This distinction led to the main thrust of ICAN’s lawsuits against the CDC. ICAN argued that “based on the CDC’s own documentation, the data submitted to V-safe is already available in deidentified form (with no personal health information) and could be immediately released to the public.”

ICAN submitted three Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for the deidentified data collected via V-safe, “in the same form in which Oracle can currently access it.”

However, ICAN said, the CDC “had apparently not read its own documentation regarding V-safe” and refused ICAN’s requests, claiming “information in the app is not deidentified.”

Even when ICAN clarified its FOIA request to specifically ask for “all data deidentified after [emphasis original] it was submitted to the V-safe app,” the CDC “administratively closed this request stating it was duplicative of the original request.”

ICAN responded by suing the CDC in federal court in December 2021, via its attorney, Aaron Siri, for the release of this data.

Siri also represented Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, the organization that sued the U.S. Food and Drug Association (FDA) for the release of data from the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine trials — a lawsuit that was successful.

Following a new FOIA request by ICAN in April 2022, for the release of “all data submitted to V-safe since January 1, 2020,” and the CDC’s subsequent refusal, ICAN filed a second lawsuit in May 2022.

ICAN said these successive refusals on the part of the CDC came “despite the CDC’s ability to immediately release this deidentified data pursuant to its own protocol,” based on the claim that “the information in the app is not deidentified.”

ICAN commented on the significance of the ruling, stating in a press release:

“This is a huge win for ICAN and for the American public, who will finally start to be able to see for themselves the actual self-reported nationwide data about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines.”

Brian Hooker, chief scientific officer for Children’s Health Defense, called the ruling an “absolutely huge development.”

Hooker told The Defender:

“This is an absolutely huge development and I’ll be waiting with anticipation as the V-safe data are released.

“With CDC’s reluctance to release this information, one can only imagine that it will not reflect well on the whole COVID-19 vaccination program, especially given irregularities seen with VAERS [the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System] reporting and the shifting narrative of the CDC regarding COVID-19 guidance.”

Hooker has faced similar obstacles to those encountered by ICAN when requesting data from the CDC. He said he “submitted a FOIA for the V-safe pregnancy data early in the process and was denied.”

“I’m glad that Aaron [Siri] and ICAN stuck with it,” Hooker said. “I can only think of the lives that could have been spared if the CDC would have been forthcoming with this information in the first place.”

The data collected via the V-safe app is distinct from the data submitted to VAERS. ICAN described the distinction:

“The FDA and CDC have admitted their existing safety monitoring program, VAERS, was incapable of determining causation and therefore unreliable.

“The CDC has therefore deployed a new safety monitoring system for COVID-19 vaccines called V-safe, and now claims that these ‘vaccines are being administered under the most intensive vaccine safety monitoring effort in U.S. history.’”

Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events."