+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 1 3 9 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 178

Thread: Global WHO Treaty for Pandemics with Digital ID and Digital Currency

  1. Link to Post #41
    Canada Avalon Member TomKat's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2017
    Posts
    2,616
    Thanks
    2,694
    Thanked 13,330 times in 2,365 posts

    Default Re: Global WHO Treaty for Pandemics with Digital ID and Digital Currency

    Last edited by Harmony; 26th May 2022 at 14:07. Reason: embed video

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to TomKat For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (31st May 2022), Ewan (30th May 2022), ExomatrixTV (26th February 2023), gnostic9 (31st May 2022), Matthew (26th May 2022)

  3. Link to Post #42
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Global WHO Treaty for Pandemics with Digital ID and Digital Currency

    WE WON!! STUNNING DEFEAT for Biden Administration to amend International Health Regulations against the will of "We the People"
    5/28/22
    James Roguskihttps://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/we-won?s=r
    (Many hyperlinks in the article not embedded here)



    You will NOT hear about this on mainstream media.
    Please watch the videos below to learn what happened on Friday May 27, 2022 at the 75th World Health Assembly



    https://live.childrenshealthdefense....ble/-vZsLzjMBI

    https://catchingfire.news/2022/05/28...en-at-the-who/

    Here is a brief summary of what happened:
    On January 18, 2022, the Biden administration proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations. They did their best to keep them hidden.

    On March 31, 2022 I published THIS ARTICLE to shine a bright light on this issue. For the next two months thousands of people helped to spread the word all around the world.

    On Friday May 20, 2022 a document filed in a United Kingdom court case revealed that the Working Group on Pandemic Response was “unable to reach consensus” regarding the amendments. The court case did not cause the lack of consensus, but it did reveal it to the public.

    On Tuesday May 24, 2022 a new set of REPLACEMENT amendments was submitted to the 75th World Health Assembly in complete violation of Article 55 of the IHR which requires amendments to be submitted at least 4 months prior to the World Health Assembly.

    On Friday May 27, 2022 the May 24 REPLACEMENT AMENDMENTS were revised and published by the World Health Organization.

    On Friday May 27, 2022 the REVISED REPLACEMENT AMENDMENTS were adopted by the World Health Assembly (see video below).

    In my humble opinion, the REVISED REPLACEMENT AMENDMENTS that were approved were absolutely illegitimate. They were merely an empty attempt by the WHO to “save face” in response to the absolutely stunning rejection of the original proposal made by the Biden administration.

    The events that occurred in “COMMITTEE A” during the 75th World Health Assembly were filled with intrigue and conflict that was masked by diplomatic politeness.
    Please watch the video clips below to see the highlights.
    Call me directly at 310-619-3055 if you would like to know more.
    SESSION 3 (May 24, 2022)
    BOTSWANA: 54:12 - 55:27

    IRAN: 1:17:14 - 1:20:03

    SOUTH AFRICA: 1:30:22 - 1:31:23

    BANGLADESH: 1:44:36 - 1:47:50

    NAMIBIA: 2:01:23 - 2:02:17

    PRESIDENT CUTTING DISCUSSION SHORT IN ORDER TO ALLOW PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURERS TO SPEAK: 2:26:30 - 2:28:18

    SESSION 4 (May 24, 2022)
    ADOPTING A DIFFERENT RESOLUTION AND CLAPPING LIKE FOOLS 1:17:42 - 1:19:00

    INDIA: 1:29:07 - 1:29:59

    BRUNEI: 1:45:29 - 1:48:16

    RUSSIAN FEDERATION: 2:14:05 - 2:17:04

    NON STATE ACTOR: 2:58:55 - 3:00:05

    SESSION 6:
    PRESIDENT OF COMMITTEE A TALKING ABOUT TRANSPARENT EMAIL: 2:33:58 - 2:35:14

    SESSION 12:
    Here’s the bizarre ending…



    Delegates from a number of African nations spoke out against this blatant attempt at a power grab.
    A well placed source shared: “The resolution on IHR amendments was not passed at the World Health Assembly, as African countries were concerned that there was inadequate consultation amongst member states, and the process was being rushed. Botswana read the statement on behalf of the 47 AFRO members and I was personally present.”

    "The African region shares the view that the process should not be fast tracked...," Moses Keetile, deputy permanent secretary in Botswana's health ministry, told the assembly on Tuesday on behalf of the Africa region.

    "We find that they are going too quickly and these sorts of reforms can't be rushed through," said a concerned African delegate in Geneva.

    SOURCE:

    Take Back Power with Shabnam Palesa Mohamed
    Africa objects to US proposal on controversial IHR amendments
    Africa Day, 25 May, has made an impact. In a rare show of African power and solidarity, several African member states objected to proposed International Health Regulations amendments, discussed at the World Health Assembly 75 this week - a move many believe might shake up the World Health Organization's dominance…
    Read more
    2 days ago · 19 likes · 14 comments · Shabnam Palesa Mohamed
    The 75th World Health Assembly (COMMITTEE A) adopted THIS RESOLUTION and THESE ILLEGITIMATE REVISED REPLACEMENT AMENDMENTS.
    The reason I state that the amendments were illegitimate is that they were first submitted on May 24, 2022 in clear violation of Article 55 of the International Health Regulations that clearly state the following:

    …the text of any proposed amendment shall be communicated to all States Parties by the Director-General at least four months before the Health Assembly at which it is proposed for consideration.

    CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE RECORDINGS OF THE ALL OF THE SESSIONS OF THE 75TH WORLD HEALTH ASSEMBLY.
    https://www.who.int/about/governance...ealth-assembly

    Please enjoy the music video below…

    Take the time to celebrate our victory and enjoy yourselves this Memorial Day weekend, but then get back to work.

    Stay tuned for upcoming articles.

    This is the Twentieth article in this series.

    Pandemic Treaty

    The People’s Treaty

    Speaking Truth To Power

    WAKE UP and Smell the Burning of Our Constitution

    Abolish the WHO

    Pandemic Mitigation Project

    An Open Letter to the WHO

    WE ARE IN A SPIRITUAL WAR

    SOUND THE ALARM

    Multilingual information regarding the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.

    THEY will control nothing, and WE will be free

    BREAK THE SPELL

    SEND THIS EMAIL TO CONGRESS

    URGENT: Speak Your Mind NOW

    NEWSPEAK

    SEEKING CLARIFICATION

    QUESTIONS

    Turn up the Heat

    We’ve Got Our Eye On WHO

    WE WON


    by James Roguski

    The old system is crumbling, and we must build its replacement quickly.

    If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help build a holistic alternative to the WHO, then feel free to contact me directly anytime.

    JamesRoguski.substack.com/about

    JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive

    310-619-3055 "
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  4. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Alecs (30th May 2022), Arcturian108 (29th May 2022), Bill Ryan (31st May 2022), Brigantia (30th May 2022), Ewan (30th May 2022), ExomatrixTV (8th August 2022), fifi (31st May 2022), gnostic9 (31st May 2022), modini (30th May 2022), mountain_jim (30th May 2022), wondering (30th May 2022)

  5. Link to Post #43
    UK Avalon Member Matthew's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th July 2015
    Location
    South East England
    Language
    English
    Age
    51
    Posts
    4,138
    Thanks
    25,644
    Thanked 36,189 times in 4,071 posts

    Default Re: Global WHO Treaty for Pandemics with Digital ID and Digital Currency

    Bravo Brazil 👏👏👏


    Klaus Schwab issues THREAT to Brazilian president for refusing to sign WHO pandemic treaty
    by Ramon Tomey

    https://2ndsmartestguyintheworld.sub...t-to-brazilian

    World Economic Forum (WEF) founder and Executive Director Klaus Schwab issued a thinly veiled threat toward Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro after the strongman refused to sign the World Health Organization‘s (WHO) pandemic treaty.

    “Let’s also be clear: The future is not just happening. The future is built by us, a powerful community – you, here in this room. We have the means to impose this state [of the future] on the world,” Schwab said in a video posted on Twitter.

    The German globalist’s message came amid remarks made by Bolsonaro on May 15. The strongman leading the Portuguese-speaking nation voiced out Brazil’s explicit refusal to sign the WHO’s pandemic treaty, which grants the global health body overarching powers in the guise of addressing public health issues. (Related: Stunning plan devised by Klaus Schwab, founder of World Economic Forum, to hand globalists control of the world using COVID pandemic.)

    “Brazil will not get into this [pandemic treaty]. Brazil is autonomous and will not get into this, you can forget that. I’ve already [spoken] to our foreign relations cabinet and if that proposal goes forward, it won’t be with Brazil,” said Bolsonaro.

    “Moreover, I was the only statesman that didn’t adhere to the lockdown policies. I said we had to take care of the elderly and people with comorbidities, and today’s studies outside of Brazil especially show that I was right.”

    He cited the Brazilian state of Sao Paulo as an example of the utter failure of lockdowns to curb the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19).

    “Check this out: Which state in Brazil locked [down] itself the most? Sao Paulo. Which state had the most deaths per 100,000 people? Sao Paulo. That’s a sign I was right.”

    ...

    <source twitter>

  6. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Matthew For This Post:

    Alecs (30th May 2022), Ankle Biter (31st May 2022), Arcturian108 (30th May 2022), Bill Ryan (31st May 2022), Brigantia (30th May 2022), Ewan (31st May 2022), ExomatrixTV (8th August 2022), gnostic9 (31st May 2022), Gwin Ru (30th May 2022), Harmony (30th May 2022), mountain_jim (30th May 2022), onawah (30th May 2022), wondering (30th May 2022)

  7. Link to Post #44
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Global WHO Treaty for Pandemics with Digital ID and Digital Currency

    George Webb Verifies--We Won!! :bumping:
    5/31/22
    https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/james-roguski-we-won/

    (Go to the article to see all the hyperlinks which are not embedded here)



    "George Webb is currently on the ground, in Geneva, Switzerland and he corroborates the reports of James Roguski, that the WHO’s attempt to usurp the national sovereignty of all UN members at the World Health Assembly over this past weekend has failed.

    This was largely due to Roguski’s incredible work in raising awareness about the treasonous amendments proposed by the Biden Regime and the rejection of same by a coalition of African nations, Brazil, Russia, Iran and others.

    Both George and James agree that we can celebrate our victory in this battle but both warn that the war is hardly over, with George tweeting, “We won this round. But you know more WHO subterfuge awaits.”

    George says that WHO Director Tedros Adhanom is a puppet and that, “Until you know that all the bids go to the WHO Secretariat and they also get back-doored over to the Wellcome Trust – and that’s who’s really running the show, you can’t unwind it.”

    In this Substack article, George suggests that Virginia Benassi, or rather “her” email address is a front for two NATO spy chief cousins, Pietro and Giuseppe Benassi, created as a dropbox to receive all of the vaccine bids, so that the two cousins can “compare the best of all the bids into a composite proposal of their own for the COVAX bid to the WHO for 1.2 Billion vaccinations…It is just a license to print vaccine money!”

    More recently, he has said, “We have traced Virginia Benassi as the key recipient of a variety of pandemic bids at the WHO Secretariat in Geneva including Zika, Ebola, a new, novel virus in China in 2009, and a host of other hemorrhagic fever viruses.”

    He says that the WHO Secretariat is implementing NATO’s blueprint. “They do the SAGE Group (Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies), alright? Virginia Benassi’s a member of both groups…Virginia Benassi is also the recipient of the Wellcome Trust bids, here.

    “So, benassiv@WHO.int leads directly to the Secretariat. That’s how you break the WHO. It’s also how you break the Wellcome Trust’s stranglehold…

    “In order to beat these guys…we need to focus in on the power structure, the Dark Hand. It’s sort of like going after Hitler with the Valkyrie Operation, rather than attacking the whole German Army, right?

    “We know who’s at the center of this thing. It’s the NATO Secretariat. It isn’t just Virginia Benassi, as a front person, it’s the whole little NATO cabal, UN cabal running this thing, Stoltenberg, etc. That’s the Dark Hand. We’ve got to get smart about this.”

    In my opinion, the nations of the world must cut all ties with the United Nations and ultimately, the UN and all of its related bodies must be permanently disbanded, including the WHO, the World Bank, the IMF and the World Economic Forum, which has been controlling the UN since 2019.

    As George says, it’s as simple as getting involved, doing research and getting the word out and that our failure to do so would lead to our demise.

    ***

    by James Roguski

    The Biden Administration suffered an absolutely STUNNING DEFEAT in their attempt to amend the International Health Regulations against the will of “We the People”.

    You will NOT hear about this on mainstream media.

    Here is a brief summary of what happened on Friday May 27, 2022 at the 75th World Health Assembly

    Spectacular news out of Geneva points to a complete and total victory for those who opposed the amendments to the International Health Regulations proposed by the Biden administration

    Official delegates from wealthy developed nations like Australia, the UK, the European Union and the United States spoke in strong support of the amendments and urged other states to join them in signing away their countries’ sovereignty.

    The first sign, however, that things might not be going the globalists’ way, came when Botswana stated that they would be collectively withholding their support for the ‘reforms’, which many African members were very concerned about.

    Multiple other countries also said they had reservations over the changes and would not be supporting them either. These included Brazil, Brunei, Namibia, Bangladesh, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and Iran. Brazil in particular said it would exit WHO altogether, rather than allow its population to be made subject to the new amendments.

    In the end, the WHO and its wealthy nation supporters were forced to back down.

    On January 18, 2022, the Biden administration proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations. They did their best to keep them hidden.

    On March 31, 2022 I published THIS ARTICLE to shine a bright light on this issue. For the next two months thousands of people helped to spread the word all around the world.

    On Friday May 20, 2022 a document filed in a United Kingdom court case revealed that the Working Group on Pandemic Response was “unable to reach consensus” regarding the amendments.
    On Tuesday May 24, 2022 a new set of REPLACEMENT amendments was submitted to the 75th World Health Assembly in complete violation of Article 55 of the IHR which requires amendments to be submitted at least 4 months prior to the World Health Assembly.
    On Friday May 27, 2022 the May 24 REPLACEMENT AMENDMENTS were revised and published by the World Health Organization.
    On Friday May 27, 2022 the REVISED REPLACEMENT AMENDMENTS were adopted by the World Health Assembly (see video below).
    The REVISED REPLACEMENT AMENDMENTS actually strengthened each nation’s ability to express their “reservations” to any future amendments.
    The Biden administration, the World Health Organization and the forces seeking to enact a globalist agenda suffered a stunning defeat.

    The events that occurred in “COMMITTEE A” during the 75th World Health Assembly were filled with intrigue and conflict that was masked by diplomatic politeness.
    Please watch the video clips below to see the highlights.
    SESSION 3 (May 24, 2022)
    BOTSWANA: 54:12 – 55:27

    IRAN: 1:17:14 – 1:20:03

    SOUTH AFRICA: 1:30:22 – 1:31:23

    BANGLADESH: 1:44:36 – 1:47:50

    NAMIBIA: 2:01:23 – 2:02:17

    PRESIDENT CUTTING DISCUSSION SHORT IN ORDER TO ALLOW PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURERS TO SPEAK: 2:26:30 – 2:28:18

    SESSION 4 (May 24, 2022)
    ADOPTING A DIFFERENT RESOLUTION AND CLAPPING LIKE FOOLS 1:17:42 – 1:19:00

    INDIA: 1:29:07 – 1:29:59

    BRUNEI: 1:45:29 – 1:48:16

    RUSSIAN FEDERATION: 2:14:05 – 2:17:04

    NON STATE ACTOR: 2:58:55 – 3:00:05

    SESSION 6:
    PRESIDENT OF COMMITTEE A TALKING ABOUT TRANSPARENT EMAIL: 2:33:58 – 2:35:14

    Delegates from a number of African nations spoke out against this blatant attempt at a power grab.

    A well placed source shared: “The resolution on IHR amendments was not passed at the World Health Assembly, as African countries were concerned that there was inadequate consultation amongst member states, and the process was being rushed. Botswana read the statement on behalf of the 47 AFRO members and I was personally present.”

    “The African region shares the view that the process should not be fast tracked…,” Moses Keetile, deputy permanent secretary in Botswana’s health ministry, told the assembly on Tuesday on behalf of the Africa region.

    “We find that they are going too quickly and these sorts of reforms can’t be rushed through,” said a concerned African delegate in Geneva.

    Shabnam Palesa Mohamed reported that, “In a rare show of African power and solidarity, several African member states objected to proposed International Health Regulations amendments, discussed at the World Health Assembly 75 this week – a move many believe might shake up the World Health Organization’s dominance. The reason I state that the amendments were illegitimate is that they were first submitted on May 24, 2022 in clear violation of Article 55 of the International Health Regulations that clearly state the following:

    …the text of any proposed amendment shall be communicated to all States Parties by the Director-General at least four months before the Health Assembly at which it is proposed for consideration.


    CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE RECORDINGS OF THE ALL OF THE SESSIONS OF THE 75TH WORLD HEALTH ASSEMBLY.
    Take the time to celebrate our victory and enjoy yourselves this Memorial Day weekend, but then get back to work.
    The old system is crumbling, and we must build its replacement quickly.

    If you are fed up with the government, hospital, medical, pharmaceutical, media, industrial complex and would like to help build a holistic alternative to the WHO, then feel free to contact me directly anytime.

    JamesRoguski.substack.com/about

    JamesRoguski.substack.com/archive "
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  8. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Ankle Biter (31st May 2022), Anna70 (1st June 2022), Arcturian108 (31st May 2022), Bill Ryan (31st May 2022), Ewan (2nd June 2022), ExomatrixTV (8th August 2022), fifi (1st June 2022), gnostic9 (31st May 2022), Gwin Ru (1st June 2022), Matthew (31st May 2022), mizo (31st May 2022), ulli (31st May 2022)

  9. Link to Post #45
    Ireland Avalon Member gnostic9's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd January 2014
    Age
    62
    Posts
    338
    Thanks
    2,433
    Thanked 1,971 times in 308 posts

    Default Re: Global WHO Treaty for Pandemics with Digital ID and Digital Currency

    This is a frightening article by Naomi Wolf. Worth reading.


    https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/dea...announce-a?s=r


    Love peace and joy to all!

  10. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to gnostic9 For This Post:

    Ankle Biter (31st May 2022), Bill Ryan (31st May 2022), Ewan (2nd June 2022), ExomatrixTV (8th August 2022), fifi (1st June 2022), Franny (10th June 2022), Gwin Ru (1st June 2022), Harmony (2nd June 2022), Matthew (31st May 2022), onawah (1st June 2022)

  11. Link to Post #46
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,723
    Thanks
    30,822
    Thanked 125,666 times in 20,818 posts

    Default Re: Global WHO Treaty for Pandemics with Digital ID and Digital Currency

    • W.H.O. Suffers Painful Defeat, Countries Massively Oppose Globalist Plans: 'Great News!'
    Last week the World Health Assembly was held in Geneva. The member states of the World Health Organization (WHO) met, among other things, about controversial amendments to the International Health Regulations.


    Countries such as Australia, Britain and the United States expressed support for the amendments and called on other countries to do the same, effectively giving away their sovereignty, writes Australian MP Stephen Andrew foot follows.
    • no support
    However, countries are massively opposing the plans of the globalists. "Great news!" says Andrew. On May 25, Africa Day, Botswana read a statement on behalf of 47 African member states. The country said it would not support the 'reforms', which Africans are very concerned about.
    Other countries also expressed reservations about the amendments and expressed no support, including Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Iran and Malaysia. Brazil said it would rather leave the WHO than subject its people to the new amendments.
    • Step back
    Ultimately, the WHO was forced to take a step back. “But they haven't given up yet. Rather, they have formed a new working group to 'provide technical recommendations on the proposed amendments', which will be retabled in 2024 at the 77th Health Assembly along with the pandemic treaty,” Andrew said.


    He notes that in the US the Republicans are strongly pushing back and have introduced bills that should prevent the WHO from gaining even more power. Andrew stresses that we must continue to increase the pressure and fight back at all costs.
    • source (Dutch 🇳🇱 + Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳
    cheers,
    John Kuhles aka 'ExomatrixTV'
    June 1st, 2022 🦜🦋🌳
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  12. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (10th June 2022), Brigantia (3rd June 2022), ClearWater (1st June 2022), Ewan (2nd June 2022), Franny (10th June 2022), Gwin Ru (3rd June 2022), Harmony (2nd June 2022), Matthew (3rd June 2022), onawah (1st June 2022), Reinhard (1st June 2022)

  13. Link to Post #47
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,723
    Thanks
    30,822
    Thanked 125,666 times in 20,818 posts

    Lightbulb Re: Global WHO Treaty for Pandemics with Digital ID and Digital Currency

    • Canada Also Opposes The W.H.O. With All Its Strength: 'This Is A Huge Victory For Canadians 🇨🇦 !'
    A huge win for Canadians who care about health sovereignty. The 13 Amendments to the WHO International Health Regulations Not Passed! Canadian MP Leslyn Lewis wrote this on social media on Wednesday.

    On her website, she says that citizens from around the world have worked very hard to ensure that the amendments were not passed at the World Health Assembly last week. These changes would give the World Health Organization (WHO) more power over pandemic policies in individual member states.

    “We have said NO to a group of unelected bureaucrats interfering with our pandemic response,” Lewis emphasizes.
    • Petition
    It all started on January 18, when the amendments were proposed by the Biden administration. The MP noted that those amendments were shrouded in secrecy.
    On May 17, Lewis launched the Stop the Treaty petition . A day later, she asked Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in parliament why Canada would consider signing these amendments. She explained on Facebook why they are so worrying.

    On May 19, CBC, which receives $1.2 billion annually from the government, published an article criticizing it. "Experts" spoke and accused her of deception, fomenting fear and spreading conspiracy theories.
    On May 22, Lewis discovered that those so-called experts are not neutral at all, but have ties to the Trudeau Foundation and even the WHO.


    source
    • Letter to the Minister of Health
    On May 23, the MP sent a letter to Health Minister Jean-Yves Duclos, who also heads the Canadian delegation to the World Health Assembly, urging him not to sign the amendments. She also referred to her petition, which had been signed more than 22,000 times.

    People in other countries also started to resist. On May 24, it emerged that the amendments tabled by Biden were no longer on the table and new amendments had been submitted to the Working Group on Pandemic Response (WGPR). That is against the rules, as amendments must be tabled at least four months before a World Health Assembly.
    • Victory!
    On May 27, the new amendments were published by WHO and adopted by the World Health Assembly.

    "Victory!" writes Lewis. She notes that the new amendments are likely to be illegal and a lot more lenient than the original amendments. “Partly because we sounded the alarm, no consensus could be reached and the WHA dropped the original amendments. We have won!"



    Now we need to watch the upcoming pandemic treaty very closely to make sure the WHO doesn't try to take more power again, Lewis emphasizes.
    • source (Dutch 🇳🇱 + Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳
    Engaged Citizens all over the world worked tirelessly to ensure that the changes to the International Health Regulations did not pass at the World Health Assembly last week. As you recall, those changes would have given the World Health Organization (the WHO, which is a United Nations organization) more power over pandemic designation and response within our country. We said NO to a group of global unelected bureaucrats meddling in our pandemic health care response.
    Here’s the timeline of how we won against WHO overreach:
    1. January 18, 2022, the US Biden administration proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR). There was a shroud of secrecy around these amendments and a lot of talk was generated about the Global Pandemic Treaty (which has not yet been drafted) in the following months.
    2. May 17, 2022, I launched a petition to Stop the Treaty.
    3. May 18, 2022, I questioned Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on why Canada would consider signing these amendments and asked for a national inquiry into our own pandemic response. Later that day, I hosted a Facebook Live event to explain the concerning parts of the IHR amendments.
    4. May 19, 2022, the CBC – which receives $1.2 billion annually from the government – ran an article criticizing my claims and had supposedly neutral experts suggest that I was misleading people, fear-mongering, and spouting conspiracy theories.
    5. May 22, 2022, I discovered that the so-called experts were not neutral at all, but boast ties to the Trudeau Foundation and even the WHO.
    6. May 23, 2022, I sent a letter to Minister Jean-Yves Duclos (the Minister of Health and Head of the Canadian delegation to the WHA meeting in Geneva) urging him not to sign the IHR amendments, and shared with him the overwhelming response to my petition, with over 22,000 Canadian signatures.
    7. I discovered that civil society groups around the world were fighting this too. On Friday, May 20, 2022 a United Kingdom resident took his government to court to find out what they were doing with the IHR amendments and to get documents disclosed to the public. Documents revealed a lack of consensus between countries in the Working Group on Pandemic Response.
      (Unconfirmed sources say many African and South American nations had serious concerns with the amendments). While we cannot attribute any one incident to the lack of consensus, we know that there was mounting pressure from civil society around the globe, including the court case.
    8. May 24, 2022, it appeared that Biden’s IHR amendments were no longer on the table and new amendments were submitted to the Working Group on Pandemic Response. However, these were submitted in violation of Article 55 of the IHR which requires all amendments to be submitted at least 4 months prior to the World Health Assembly. This notice period is necessary so that civil society can have time to review and respond.
    9. May 27, 2022 the replacement amendments were revised and published by the World Health Organization, and then adopted by the World Health Assembly (see video).
    10. Victory secured! While the replacement amendments are likely illegitimate because they break the notice requirement rule, they appear to be much milder than the original amendments. It seems the WHA felt the need to replace the old amendments with something else since they could not reach consensus. Our work to help sound the alarm contributed to the lack of consensus, prompting the WHA to drop the original amendments. We won!
    But we must not stop here. We must continue to watch the drafting process of the Global Pandemic Treaty to make sure there are no more attempted power grabs by the WHO. We must also be thankful that this was a window into what the WHO wants to do – reduce public consultation opportunity and harmonize and centralize pandemic response away from sovereign nations to the WHO elites. Now that we know, we must press for transparency in the WHO and WHA process going forward.
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 3rd June 2022 at 18:17.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  14. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (10th June 2022), Brigantia (3rd June 2022), Ewan (7th February 2023), Franny (10th June 2022), Gwin Ru (3rd June 2022), Matthew (3rd June 2022), onawah (3rd June 2022), Wookie (3rd June 2022)

  15. Link to Post #48
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Global WHO Treaty for Pandemics with Digital ID and Digital Currency

    BUT --It's Not Over Yet WHO Breaks Promise
    "The WHO has broken its promise to hold a public comment session regarding their proposed pandemic treaty.
    PLEASE post your opinions, feelings and suggestions in the comment section:
    From: James Roguski
    3 hr ago 6/4/22
    https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/...-requested?s=r

    The WHO promised to listen to “We the People” but they cancelled their scheduled public comment sessions.
    CLICK HERE to learn how the WHO lied.https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/...issed-off-?s=w
    For a quick overview of the WHO’s proposed pandemic treaty, visit http://StopTheWHO.com
    For a deep dive into the details of the proposed pandemic treaty, CLICK HERE https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/pandemic-treaty?s=w
    PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO LEARN ABOUT THE WHO’S PROPOSED PANDEMIC TREATY AND THEN POST YOUR OPINIONS, SUGGESTIONS AND FEELINGS IN THE COMMENT SECTION BELOW THe ARTICLE here: https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/...-requested?s=r



    Please watch the videos below: "

    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/jelwAdc9Myjf/



    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/5hTfoenvFQvJ/


    https://brandnewtube.com/watch/dr-vi...PUHLkBMHy.html



    Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v14555d/?pub=ijro7



    (continued)
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  16. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (10th June 2022), Ewan (7th February 2023), ExomatrixTV (5th June 2022), Franny (10th June 2022), Gwin Ru (4th June 2022), Harmony (9th August 2022)

  17. Link to Post #49
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Global WHO Treaty for Pandemics with Digital ID and Digital Currency

    continued from post above:
    "JOIN US
    We are working together to expose, defund, leave and abolish the World Health Organization.
    The politicians, organizations and individuals listed below deserve our support because they have either spoken out against the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations that were recently defeated or they have spoken out in support of defunding and/or leaving the World Health Organization.
    If you would like to help in this effort, contact me (James Roguski) directly at 310-619-3055.



    CONTACT ALL OF THE PEOPLE LISTED BELOW AND ENCOURAGE THEM TO KEEP UP THEIR GOOD WORK!
    POST YOUR OPINIONS, FEELINGS AND SUGGESTIONS IN THE COMMENT SECTION BELOW THIS ARTICLE.

    WHO Withdrawal Act:
    Twitter avatar for @RepAndyBiggsAZ
    Rep Andy Biggs
    @RepAndyBiggsAZ
    THREAD:

    My WHO Withdrawal Act is necessary more than ever.

    The World Health Organization has undermined American interests, remains one of the most corrupt international institutions, and has been compromised by China.
    June 3rd 2022

    302 Retweets998 Likes
    https://azfreenews.com/2022/06/congr...-organization/

    https://azfreenews.com/2022/06/congr...-organization/


    Who Withdrawal Act
    149KB ∙ PDF File
    Read now
    Twitter avatar for @RepAndyBiggsAZ
    Rep Andy Biggs
    @RepAndyBiggsAZ
    I’m grateful for my Republican colleagues who joined my effort.

    @RepMaryMiller, @RepGosar, @RepChipRoy, @RepNancyMace, @RepBobGood, @RepScottPerry, @RepMTG, @RepBoebert, @replouiegohmert, @RepClayHiggins, @RepRalphNorman, @RepThomasMassie, @RepGregSteube, @TXRandy14,
    June 3rd 2022

    34 Retweets159 Likes

    No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act:


    No Who Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act
    1.07MB ∙ PDF File
    Read now
    https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/se...E-216868A0DEDA

    Sen. Ron Johnson Leads Bill To Push Back On WHO Overreach, Ensure Senate’s Power Over Pandemic Treaty
    The bill was cosponsored by Republican Senators:

    John Barrasso

    Mike Braun

    Tom Cotton

    Ted Cruz

    Steve Daines

    Chuck Grassley

    Bill Hagerty

    John Hoeven

    Cindy Hyde-Smith

    Mike Lee

    Roger Marshall

    Marco Rubio

    Rick Scott

    Thom Tillis

    Tommy Tuberville.


    H.R. 419 - No Taxpayer Funding For The World Health Organization Act:



    No Taxpayer Funding For The World Health Organization Act
    265KB ∙ PDF File
    Read now
    As of May 28, 2022, 51 Members of Congress have signed on as co-sponsors of HR419.
    If your Congressional Representative is not listed as a co-sponsor please help organize people in your state to encourage your Representative and ask them to co-sponsor HR419.

    https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-...%5D%7D&r=1&s=2


    Rep. Stewart Introduces Bill to Stop Biden from Ceding Power to WHO
    Washington, May 31, 2022

    Today, Rep. Chris Stewart (R-UT) introduced legislation that would stop President Biden from moving power and control from America’s government to the World Health Organization (WHO). The bill would also defund U.S. contributions to the WHO unless the international organization takes steps to hold China accountable for the origin of COVID-19.

    https://stewart.house.gov/news/docum...ocumentID=1013


    House Resolution 116: Expresses the sense of the Louisiana House of Representatives with respect to any potential agreement with the World Health Organization relating to global pandemic response for the U.S.


    House Resolution 116
    39.2KB ∙ PDF File
    Read now
    BY REPRESENTATIVES EDMONSTON, AMEDEE, BUTLER, ECHOLS, FIRMENT, FRIEMAN, GADBERRY, HODGES, HORTON, MCCORMICK, CHARLES OWEN, SCHAMERHORN, SEABAUGH, AND TARVER

    https://legis.la.gov/legis/ViewDocument.aspx?d=1276808

    https://openstates.org/la/bills/2022/HR116/


    91 Members of Congress signed the document below. Please note the 6 requests!"

    *******************************************************************

    (MUCH, MUCH MORE INFO AT THIS LINK CHARTING THE NUMBER OF ACTIONS BEING TAKEN BY VARIOUS CONGRESSMEN AND SENATORS AND VARIOUS CITIZEN GROUPS WHO ARE STANDING UP TO THE WHO'S QUEST FOR TYRANNY.
    TOO MUCH TO POST HERE, BUT WORTH CHECKING OUT AT: https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/...-requested?s=r )
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  18. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (10th June 2022), Ewan (7th February 2023), ExomatrixTV (5th June 2022), Franny (10th June 2022), Harmony (9th August 2022)

  19. Link to Post #50
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,092 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: Global WHO Treaty for Pandemics with Digital ID and Digital Currency

    Just got suspended from Facebook for sharing that article from Naomi.
    She's pulled out all the stops, which is great since she used to be such a spokesperson for the Left leaning.
    They must not like her much now.... not to mention RFK Jr.!
    (I'll be sure to post this meme there in 3 days time.
    And then some articles about how ridiculous "fact checkers" are.)
    [/IMG]
    Quote Posted by gnostic9 (here)
    This is a frightening article by Naomi Wolf. Worth reading.


    https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/dea...announce-a?s=r


    Love peace and joy to all!
    Last edited by onawah; 10th June 2022 at 16:27.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  20. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (10th June 2022), Bill Ryan (10th June 2022), Ewan (7th February 2023), ExomatrixTV (8th August 2022), Franny (10th June 2022), Harmony (9th August 2022), Matthew (23rd February 2023)

  21. Link to Post #51
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,723
    Thanks
    30,822
    Thanked 125,666 times in 20,818 posts

    Default Re: Global WHO Treaty for Pandemics with Digital ID and Digital Currency

    • The Great Reset | World Health Organization Agreement | Why is the World Health Organization Seeking to Our US Constitutional Rights?:

    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  22. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Ewan (7th February 2023), Harmony (9th August 2022)

  23. Link to Post #52
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,723
    Thanks
    30,822
    Thanked 125,666 times in 20,818 posts

    Exclamation Re: Global WHO Treaty for Pandemics with Digital ID and Digital Currency

    • Senator Warns Of Dictatorial Power Grab WHO: 'Dystopian Nightmare'
    There is much ado about the proposed World Health Organization pandemic treaty and changes to international health guidelines. The proposal is a dystopian nightmare, says Australian Senator Malcolm Roberts . The treaty allows WHO to dictate health policy and can enforce mandatory vaccinations, lockdowns and border closures, Roberts says. People who don't cooperate can be imprisoned, he adds. The WHO can also force a company to stop making certain medicines. The senator refers to ivermectin, which was not allowed to be prescribed during corona in many Western countries.



    The WHO is demanding the power to dictate health policy worldwide, including:
    • compulsory jabs
    • lockdowns
    • business and border closures
    • detention of the noncompliant
    source video
    • Crippling Sanctions
    When the treaty comes into effect, the health authorities will be accountable to WHO, not parliament. We thereby sacrifice our sovereignty to the WHO, Roberts warns.
    And countries that do not listen to the WHO could face crippling sanctions, the senator emphasises.
    • Together We Can Defeat The Criminal Who
    This power grab is currently being prepared behind closed doors. It will be voted on in May next year. The treaty still has to be ratified by the parliaments of the individual member states, but that will probably only be a formality, says Roberts.

    “This is communist policy and the citizen pays the price.” The senator calls on the Australian government not to give away Australian sovereignty to unelected bureaucrats who have killed millions. “Together we can defeat the criminal WHO.”
    • dutch 🇳🇱 (+ Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  24. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Ewan (7th February 2023), Harmony (11th February 2023), mountain_jim (26th February 2023)

  25. Link to Post #53
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,723
    Thanks
    30,822
    Thanked 125,666 times in 20,818 posts

    Exclamation Re: Global WHO Treaty for Pandemics with Digital ID and Digital Currency

    • The WHO’s “Health Plan” Is All About SURVEILLANCE – Not Health!:
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  26. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Harmony (11th February 2023), mountain_jim (26th February 2023)

  27. Link to Post #54
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,723
    Thanks
    30,822
    Thanked 125,666 times in 20,818 posts

    Default Re: Global WHO Treaty for Pandemics with Digital ID and Digital Currency

    • Shocking update on the WHO Pandemic Convention:
    The World Health Organization is refraining from adjusting international health guidelines that allow for mandatory vaccination and lockdowns, among other things. Australian Senator Malcolm Roberts, who follows developments closely, speaks of a 'rare victory'.

    The pandemic treaty is not yet off the table, he notes.

    In December, the Australian government voted in favor of the amendments, but many other countries voted against. The WHO made another attempt this year to push through the changes.
    • Big win
    After months of heavy criticism, the critics won a major victory, according to Roberts.
    The final report of the International Health Regulations Review Committee waives the proposed amendments. The WHO remains an advisory body.

    This means that the WHO cannot oblige member states to, for example, require mandatory vaccination, quarantine procedures, vaccination passports and other freedom-restricting measures, the senator explains.
    • Infringement of sovereignty
    In the report, the commission writes that it is "concerned that the proposals may unnecessarily infringe on the sovereignty of state parties" and that the guidelines become "binding" rather than non-binding.

    When Roberts previously addressed this, he was called a "conspiracy theorist." “I was right,” he said. The senator calls the report a crucial first step to stop the unelected bureaucrats.

    In addition, there is the pandemic treaty, which Roberts sees as an attempt to transform the WHO into the world health police. Our 'leaders' only have to sign it. We must do everything we can to ensure that this pandemic treaty is rejected, the senator emphasizes.


    In a rare win, the World Health Organisation has backed down on proposed International Health Regulation amendments for compulsory vaccination and lockdowns. It is a win, yet the pandemic treaty that would do the same thing again is still waiting in the wings.
    In a rare win, the World Health Organisation has backed down on proposed International Health Regulation amendments for compulsory vaccination and lockdowns. It is a win yet the pandemic treaty, that would do the same thing again, is still waiting in the wings.
    • Transcript:
    This week represents a rare victory for Australian sovereignty.
    A victory for common sense, decency and humanity.

    And a victory against the sprawling monster of unelected, unaccountable foreign bureaucrats at the World Health Organisation.

    You will recall the WHO proposed to change their health regulations that guide member states in the event of a disease outbreak, like COVID, from guiding member states to being mandatory on member states, including Australia.

    This would have represented a complete destruction of Australian sovereignty, and a fundamental re-imagining of the powers of the World Health Organisation.
    Last December the Liberal/National Morrison Government voted in favour of these changes, yet many sensible countries voted against, and the proposal was lost.
    Undaunted the World Health Organisation tried again this year.

    After months of heavy criticism, One Nation and those opposing these measures have had a big win.

    The Final Report from the International Health Regulations Review Committee released this week has dropped the proposed changes.
    The World Health Organisation will remain an advisory body.
    Dystopian demands, such as allowing the World Health Organisation to make binding health orders overriding state and federal control, have been thrown out.

    This includes the proposed powers that would have allowed the WHO to control:
    • systems for proof-of-vaccination or vaccination status,
    • quarantine procedures,
    • citizen travel & mobility,
    • forced vaccination,
    • lockouts,
    • lockdowns,
    • mandatory detention and,
    • other unacceptable infringements on people.
    Gone is the universal ‘health passport’ – or vaccine passport – that was going to control the ability of citizens to travel between countries in a permanent capacity.
    It was decided that this would raise ‘ethical’ and ‘discriminatory’ concerns. A global digital vaccine passport will no longer be developed under the committee’s powers.
    For now.

    The committee will remain confined to actual public health emergencies rather than ‘potential health risks’ – removing the widely held fear that their scope could be extended to ‘climate lockdowns’ and other human rights abuses.
    Which would have been possible because WHO had proposed to remove human rights from the regulations.

    After a backlash the committee now strongly recommends the retention of the existing text, which is quote “full respect for the dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms of persons as an overarching principle”.
    This is a critical back down.

    The WHO committee working on these changes has just recommitted to its fundamental human rights pledge in defiance of the proposed amendments.
    The findings of the committee agreed with the concerns that One Nation raised regarding threat to sovereignty.

    In their final report, the committee said that it was, quote: “concerned that the proposals may unduly impinge on the sovereignty of state parties” and make recommendations “binding” instead of voluntary.

    In the end, the committee validated the fears raised on the international stage and within the free press.

    Fears I raised and for which I was called a conspiracy theorist.
    I was correct.

    Their decision to throw out this attempt to grab power from sovereign governments is a crucial first step in stopping unelected global bureaucracies from overstepping their purpose.

    Pauline Hanson first raised the UN’s treasonous work in parliament in 1996. In my first senate speech in 2016 I called for Australia to exit the UN – AusEXIT.

    We’ve been so strongly outspoken against ceding Australian sovereignty to the unhinged UN-WEF alliance that the WEF recently specifically called us out.
    We’re getting under their skin.

    This fight is not over.

    All of the terrifying proposed powers that have been summarily rejected this week, are duplicated in the proposed WHO Pandemic Treaty.

    The Pandemic Treaty is a second attempt to turn WHO into the world health police. The Pandemic Treaty is alive and well, sitting in the system waiting for our “leaders” to signed.

    If the Pandemic Treaty were to be approved, it would enforce all of the binding health powers that others in WHO have just rejected. What a mess.

    The World Health Organisation is too big, too bureaucratic, too removed from the people it is supposed to help, corrupt, incompetent, dishonest and above all else, too close to the Pharmaceutical industry.

    The next step to protect Australia’s health sovereignty is to make sure that the Pandemic Treaty is rejected and that the Prime Minister does not sign it.

    For concerned Australians who have written to their members of parliament and who received a stock reply saying the treaty has to go through Parliament first – that is actually not true.

    The WHO Pandemic Treaty includes a provision that it becomes binding on Australia the moment our WHO representative signs it.

    No Parliamentary oversight required.

    Scrxw that.

    One Nation’s work continues.
    • source
    • dutch 🇳🇱 (+ Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 10th February 2023 at 13:33.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  28. The Following User Says Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    mountain_jim (26th February 2023)

  29. Link to Post #55
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,723
    Thanks
    30,822
    Thanked 125,666 times in 20,818 posts

    Exclamation Re: Global WHO Treaty for Pandemics with Digital ID and Digital Currency

    • NEW Global "Pandemic Treaty" Would Give WHO Unprecedented Powers

    • Click here to download the November 25, 2022 “Conceptual Zero Draft” of the proposed “Pandemic Treaty.” (This is now out-of-date.)
    • Click here to download the February 1, 2023 “Zero Draft” of the proposed “Pandemic Treaty.” (This is the latest version.)
    • Click here to download the proposed amendments to the IHR December 14, 2022 (46 pages)
    • Click here to download the WGIHR version of the proposed amendments to the IHR February 6, 2023 (51 pages)
    • Click here to download the proposed amendments to the IHR December 14, 2022 (original nations’ submissions - 197 pages)
    • Click here to download the existing International Health Regulations (2005) (84 pages)



    I know that this article is long. Here is the short version:
    The World Health Organization is attempting a GLOBAL POWER GRAB by seeking to have the 194 member nations of the World Health Assembly a completely new international agreement commonly referred to as the proposed “Pandemic Treaty” in addition to seeking to adopt proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.

    The proposed “Pandemic Treaty” would give the WHO control over “pathogens with pandemic potential” as well as control over the means of production within the Pharmaceutical, Hospital, Emergency Industrial Complex. It is an absolute abomination that must be stopped.

    The proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations would make the WHO’s proclamations legally-binding rather than just advisory recommendations. The proposed amendments seek to institute global digital health certificates, dramatically increase the billions of dollars available to the WHO and enable nations to implement the regulations WITHOUT respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of people.

    Agreement by a simple majority of the 194 member nations is all that is needed to adopt the amendments because, as amendments to an existing agreement, neither the advice and consent of the United States Senate, nor the signature of the President would be required.

    These proposed amendments are being negotiated in secret without any opportunity for comment by people from around the world
    Download the '100 REASONS' Document by James Roguski: This is the 60th article in this series.
    1. Pandemic Treaty
    2. The People’s Treaty
    3. Speaking Truth To Power
    4. WAKE UP and Smell the Burning of Our Constitution
    5. Abolish the WHO
    6. Pandemic Mitigation Project
    7. An Open Letter to the WHO
    8. WE ARE IN A SPIRITUAL WAR
    9. SOUND THE ALARM
    10. Multilingual information regarding the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.
    11. THEY will control nothing, and WE will be free
    12. BREAK THE SPELL
    13. SEND THIS EMAIL TO CONGRESS
    14. URGENT: Speak Your Mind NOW
    15. NEWSPEAK
    16. SEEKING CLARIFICATION
    17. QUESTIONS
    18. Turn up the Heat
    19. We’ve Got Our Eye On WHO
    20. WE WON
    21. I AM SO PISSED OFF!
    22. YOUR OPINION IS REQUESTED
    23. TEN THINGS EVERYONE NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT THE WHO'S PROPOSED "PANDEMIC TREATY"
    24. Get the United States OUT of the United Nations and The World Health Organization A.S.A.P.
    25. What is the government of the United Kingdom hiding?
    26. StopTheWHO.com
    27. #ScrewTheWHO
    28. Speak Your Mind
    29. The Pandemic is Over
    30. WHO: Informal Focused Consultation #1
    31. I thought the Lancet was a medical journal
    32. Email and Call Your Delegate
    33. World Health Organization Virtual Press Conference on Global Health Issues
    34. Help Wanted Analyzing WHO Public Comments
    35. World Health Organization Public Hearings
    36. The Second WHO Informal Focused Consultation
    37. CANADA
    38. The People's Amendments to the International Health Regulations
    39. NO MORE SECRETS
    40. Secret Meetings at the WHO
    41. Why the Secrecy?
    42. Did You Know?
    43. Another Open Letter to the World Health Organization
    44. RIGHT NOW would be a very good time to wake up!
    45. CONCEPTUAL ZERO DRAFT
    46. PHEIC
    47. Pandemic Treaty Update
    48. NEW ZEALAND
    49. A friendly, open and urgent letter to Professor Lawrence Oglethorpe Gostin...
    50. Three Days That Will Live In Infamy
    51. The Proposed Amendments to The International Health Regulations
    52. An Inspired Conversation With Maria Zeee
    53. KISS - Keep It Short and Simple
    54. A Statement by Michele Bachmann
    55. A Brief Discussion With Jeff Crouere
    56. The WHO's Pandemic Treaty Just Broke Itself
    57. Giving Billion$ to the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex (PHEIC)
    58. Help Spread The Word
    59. SECRET NEGOTIATIONS
    60. 100 Reasons
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 23rd February 2023 at 16:37.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  30. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Matthew (23rd February 2023), mizo (23rd February 2023), mountain_jim (26th February 2023), Satori (23rd February 2023)

  31. Link to Post #56
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,723
    Thanks
    30,822
    Thanked 125,666 times in 20,818 posts

    Default Re: Global WHO Treaty for Pandemics with Digital ID and Digital Currency

    • WHO CA+ (The Pandemic Treaty):

    Download the '100 REASONS' Document by James Roguski

    ¤=[Post Update]=¤
    • Stop The WHO:


    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/jKCzznE8CK2r
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  32. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    mountain_jim (26th February 2023), Satori (23rd February 2023)

  33. Link to Post #57
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,723
    Thanks
    30,822
    Thanked 125,666 times in 20,818 posts

    Lightbulb Re: Global WHO Treaty for Pandemics with Digital ID and Digital Currency


    --o-O-o--
    • Stop The WHO "Negotiations":

    I am going to break these 100 reasons down into seven categories:

    • PART I: Ten things that everyone needs to know about the World Health Organization’s proposed “Pandemic Treaty.” (1-10)
    • PART II: The proposed amendments would seek to remove 3 very important aspects of the existing regulations. (11-13)
    • PART III: The proposed amendments a would implement a great number of changes that everyone should absolutely disagree with. (14-50)
    • PART IV: There are glaring contradictions and flaws in the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations. (51-60)
    • PART V: The proposed amendments are absolutely ignoring many of the things that really do need to be addressed. (61-80)
    • PART VI: The proposed amendments would trample our rights and restrict our freedoms. (81-90)
    • PART VII: The Ten Main Reasons why every nation on earth should #ExitTheWHO (91-100)
    The first and most important point that I would like to make is that I am about to discuss two very different things. First, I will talk briefly about the proposed “Pandemic Treaty.” More people seem to be aware of the so-called “Pandemic Treaty,” but, while I see it as being an important issue, I believe that it is also functioning as a decoy that is designed to distract people from the much larger and more immediate threat to our rights and freedoms, which are the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.

    #StopTheTreaty
    • PART I: Ten things everyone needs to know about the World Health Organization’s proposed “Pandemic Treaty.”
    001. Dramatically Expand the Role of the WHO

    The proposed “Pandemic Treaty” is the World Health Organization’s attempt to convince the 194 member nations to agree to hand over their national sovereignty to the WHO via a legally binding framework convention that would hand over enormous additional, legally-binding authority to the WHO.

    The WHO has published a 32 page document that they refer to as the “Conceptual Zero Draft” and on pages 10, 13 and 22 the WHO makes it very clear that the purpose of the document is to recognize the central role of the WHO in the prevention, preparedness, response and recovery from future pandemics. They want to be the directing and coordinating authority on global health and global governance over all health systems.
    Clearly, the actions of the WHO point to the fact that they are not focused upon the health of people. Instead, they are focused on funneling billions of dollars into building health systems. Their true purpose is to help finance and build the Pharmaceutical, Hospital, Emergency Industrial Complex (PHEIC) by redirecting funds via crony capitalism to corporations that profit from the declarations of Public Health Emergencies of International Concern and the fear-mongering that naturally follows such emergency declarations.

    002. Creating an Entirely New (Corrupt) Bureaucracy (COP)

    In order to facilitate the growth of the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex (PHEIC), the WHO would create an entirely new bureaucracy as defined in Article 19 of the Conceptual Zero Draft of the proposed “Pandemic Treaty.” It would create a governing body that is made up of a Conference of the Parties (COP), much like the system that has governed the discussion over climate change. Only nations that sign and adopt the treaty would become members of the Conference of the Parties. They would be directed by the Officers of the Parties which would include two presidents and four vice-presidents. There would also be an Enlarged Conference of the Parties (E-COP) that would include “relevant stakeholders” such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundations and others, so long as they were approved by a 2/3 majority of the Conference of the Parties.

    003. The WHO Is Seeking Tens of Billions of Dollars

    This already enormous bureaucracy seeks to have a yearly budget that is many times as big as the current entire budget of the WHO. While the Conference of the Parties associated with the proposed “Pandemic Treaty” would be connected to the WHO, it would also act independently from it.

    Article 18 of the Conceptual Zero Draft of the proposed “Pandemic Treaty” discusses the desire for sustainable and predictable financing. They seek collaboration between the health, finance and private sectors and they also want to establish new international mechanisms in order to ensure a stable source of financing on global, regional and national levels.

    One of the things that is absolutely lacking in the proposed “Pandemic Treaty” is any discussion whatsoever of the means by which decisions would be made regarding how all of these billions of dollars would be spent. It would essentially set up an enormous candy store through which the bureaucrats of the WHO would control the means of production in the Pharmaceutical, Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex.

    004. Expanding Rampant Censorship

    Article 16 of the Conceptual Zero Draft would essentially set up a Ministry of Truth that would give the WHO the power to study the behavioural barriers and drivers of adherence to public health measures. The WHO would be empowered to analyze social media to identify misinformation and disinformation in order to counter it with their own propaganda. They want billions of dollars to enable them to clamp down on free speech, freedom of the press and freedom of expression because they know that their recommendations and guidelines cannot stand the true test of scientific inquiry and they do not want any of their dictates to be criticized by public comment.

    005. Speeding Up the Unethical "Approval" for Experimental Drugs and Injections

    In Article 7(2)(b) it is very clear that they want regulatory bodies in nations around the world to accelerate the speed at which new drugs and injectables are authorized and approved. As if the disaster caused by the rapid authorization of the COVID-19 injections was not bad enough, they seek to dramatically speed up the process by which products are authorized and brought to the market.

    006. Support for Gain-Of-Function Research

    Rather than outlaw what may very well be the greatest threat to the survival of mankind on planet Earth, Article 8 of the Conceptual Zero Draft actually seeks to ensure that none of the measures put forth would create any unnecessary administrative hurdles for gain-of-function research. We need to completely and totally ban gain-of-function research immediately, not protect it from “unnecessary administrative hurdles.”

    007. More and More Tabletop Exercises (Simulations/Faulty Scaremonger Models)

    Article 12 of the Conceptual Zero Draft calls for an increase in funding for what are known as tabletop exercises or simulations, much like Agenda 201 or the more recent simulation that can be found on CatastrophicContagion.com. The WHO wants nations around the world to spend billions of dollars on biological war games rather than spend that money in ways that would actually improve the health of the general population.

    008. Seeking to Implement the Concept of "One-Health" (Tunnel Vision Pused Narratives)

    Article 17 of the Conceptual Zero Draft would implement a complex system known as One-Health in which control over human health, pet health, domesticated animal, farm animal and wild animal health and agricultural plant health and the overall health of the natural environment would be strictly controlled. In short, they want to have control over every aspect of everyone’s life.

    009. Whole-Of-Government, Whole-Of-Society Approach ("Global Governance")

    The whole-of-government and whole-of-society approach would give authority to every agency of government and every non-governmental organization to be involved in the control of every single aspect of everyone’s life. Their long term goal is complete totalitarian dictatorial control over every aspect of life on the planet.

    010. Global Review System to Oversee Health Systems

    In Article 12 and in Article 20 of the Conceptual Zero Draft of the proposed “Pandemic Treaty” they call for a Global Review Mechanism whereby the WHO would actively stick its nose into the manner in which individual sovereign nations support and structure their public health care systems. The oversight mechanisms in Article 20 fail to clearly define the metrics and other criteria by which any compliance review would be based. These details would be left to be decided at the first meeting of the Conference of the Parties which would occur long after the proposed “Pandemic Treaty” had already been adopted, ratified and entered into force. This would include the ability to monitor the nation’s progress in complying with the treaty and would require the submission of periodic reports and reviews to suggest remedies and actions as well as advice and assistance. While it does not specifically mention economic sanctions, it also does not rule them out.
    • The above are just ten reasons why We, the People of the World, must #StopTheTreaty.
    Now I will discuss the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations. Although the proposed “Pandemic Treaty” is very concerning and very important to pay attention to, I honestly feel that the amendments to the International Health Regulations are a much more immediate and direct threat to the sovereignty of every nation and the rights and freedoms of every person on earth.

    #StopTheAmendments
    • PART II: The proposed amendments would seek to remove some very important aspects of the existing regulations.
    011. Systematically removing respect for dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms.

    The most egregious, blatant and disgusting proposed amendment is to the first paragraph of Article 3 in the existing Regulations which describes the core principles of the International Health Regulations. The current version of the IHR does defend the unalienable rights of We the People. It currently states that the regulations must be implemented [with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of people], but the proposed amendment would cross out those 13 vitally important words. The proposal submitted by the delegation from India would replace those words with a focus on the transfer of wealth and would replace individual rights with inclusivity. This is a direct assault the rights and freedoms of every human being. This is a direct assault on humanity itself. (Page 3)

    012. From “non-binding” to “legally binding.”

    The proposed amendments would seek to remove the words “non-binding” from the definitions of temporary and standing recommendations that are made by the World Health Organization. When coupled with Article 42, (the Implementation of Health Measures) which says: “Health measures, including the recommendations made under Articles 15 and 16 shall be initiated and completed without delay by all States Parties.” That turns the WHO’s advisory role into a totalitarian dictatorship. The statements made by the WHO are currently recommendations, they are NOT commands upon the people of the earth. (Page 2)

    013. Nations Shall, Must, Are Obligated (Forced) and Have a Duty to Collaborate With and Assist other Nations

    In a direct assault on national sovereignty, the proposed amendments to Article 43 state that “Recommendations made pursuant to… this Article shall be implemented… within two weeks from the date of [the] recommendation… and the decision made [by the Emergency Committee] on the request for [any] reconsideration shall be final.
    Essentially, the WHO’s Emergency Committee would be given the power to overrule actions taken by sovereign nations. (Pages 21-22)

    While the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations seek to remove some very important rights and freedoms, the vast majority of the document seeks to add in new language, giving new authority to the WHO.
    • PART III: The proposed amendments a would implement a great number of changes that everyone should absolutely disagree with.
    So now, let’s turn to the many, many things that these proposed amendments would add to the International Health Regulations.

    014. Drugs and Jabs Health

    In Article 1, the definition of “health products” fails to include the very things that were shown to be effective in double blind, placebo controlled, clinical studies that have been ignored by the world.

    The definitions do not include vitamins, minerals, herbs and other beneficial nutrients that proved themselves to be supremely beneficial and truly safe. In lieu of using products that are truly safe and effective, the WHO seeks to redirect billions of dollars toward the Pharmaceutical Hospital, Emergency Industrial Complex for drugs and injections that are not proven to be safe and are only effective in increasing the risk of being diagnosed with the very dis-eases that these products are purported to protect people against. (Page 2)

    015. Expanded Scope

    The proposed amendments to Article 2 would dramatically expand the scope of the International Health Regulations from dealing with actual risks to dealing with anything that had the potential to be a risk to public health. This amendment would open up the doors wide to massive abuse beyond anything we have seen over the past 3 years. (Page 3)

    016. Protecting Unethical & Corrupt "Health Care" Systems Instead of People

    In the proposed amendment to the new second paragraph (bis) of Article 3, the focus of the WHO is subtly shifted away from the health of real people and would be guided to place primary preference upon the resilience of health care systems. We don’t need to focus upon the health of our health care systems so much as we need to focus upon the health of PEOPLE. Our health care facilities are no longer a place where people who are suffering from dis-ease go in order to regain their health. Our health care facilities have become killing fields to be feared. (Page 3)

    017. Common But Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities

    In the proposed amendments to Parts 1 and 2 of Article 3, the repeated use of the phrase “common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities” is used to mask what is inherently discriminatory, racist, sexist and unequal treatment of people around the world under the guise of “equity and inclusivity.” Please note that the phrase “common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities” is NOT defined in Article 1. (Page 3)

    018. All Powerful National Competent Authority

    The proposed amendments to Article 4, would seek to establish a National Competent Authority who would be given great power to implement the obligations under these regulations, while having absolutely no accountability for any of the harm caused by any of their official actions. This without precedent. (Pages 4-5)

    019. Developed Nations’ Obligation (Forced) to Provide "Assistance" to Developing Nations

    While the existing document fails to clarify which countries are considered to be on which list, in both Article 5 and in Annex 1, the proposed amendments would clearly obligate “developed nations” to assist “developing nations” to build their ability to detect, assess and notify the WHO regarding pathogenic, infectious outbreaks. (Pages 4 and 31)

    020. Loss of Sovereignty & Right To Self Determination

    IF the proposed amendments to Articles 9, 10 and 12 were to be adopted, the WHO will no longer need to consult any sovereign nation in which an event may, or may not be occurring within that nation before declaring that there is a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) within the borders of that nation. (Pages 6-10)

    021. Intermediate Public Health Alert

    The proposed amendments to Article 12 would also enable the Director General of the WHO to declare a Intermediate Public Health Alert. (Pages 8-10)

    022. World Alert and Response Notice

    The proposed amendments to Article 12 would also enable the Director General of the WHO to declare a World Alert and Response Notice. (Page 10)

    023. Public Health Emergency of Regional Concern (PHERC)

    Also, the proposed amendments to Article 12 would also enable the Regional Directors of the WHO to declare a Public Health Emergency of Regional Concern (PHERC). (Pages 8-10)

    024. The WHO Would Be Placed in a Position of "Global Authority"

    The proposed amendments seek to create a new Article 13A which would have the world community recognize the World Health Organization as the guidance and coordinating authority during international emergencies. (Pages 12-14)

    025. WHO Allocation Plan

    The proposed new Article 13A would also empower the WHO to craft an “Allocation Plan” to mandate the manufacturing, donation and distribution of various pandemic response products. If these amendments were to be adopted, the WHO would effectively be placed in control of the means of production of any and all nations of the world. Upon the dictate of the WHO, formerly sovereign nations would be obligated to ensure that the manufacturers within their borders gear up production and donate their products as directed by the WHO. (Pages 12-15 and page 21)

    026. Events That Are Only Potentially "Dangerous" Can Be Declared Emergencies

    The proposed amendments to Article 15 would empower the WHO to declare emergencies and make legally-binding recommendations or commands based on situations that merely had the potential to cause Public Health Emergencies of International Concern. (Page 14)

    027. The WHO Could be Empowered to Mandate Policy During Emergencies

    The existing Article 18 lists a number of “recommendations” that the WHO could make but, if the proposed amendments are adopted, these non-binding recommendations would no longer merely be suggestions, but would be legally-binding upon the member nations. (Page 16)
    1. Review travel history in affected areas;
    2. Review proof of medical examination and any laboratory analysis;
    3. Require medical examinations;
    4. Review proof of vaccination or other prophylaxis;
    5. Require vaccination or other prophylaxis;
    6. Place suspect persons under public health observation;
    7. Implement quarantine or other health measures for suspect persons;
    8. Implement isolation and treatment where necessary of affected persons;
    9. Implement tracing of contacts of suspect or affected persons;
    10. Refuse entry of suspect and affected persons;
    11. Refuse entry of unaffected persons to affected areas; and
    12. Implement exit screening and/or restrictions on persons from affected areas.
    13. Review manifest and routing;
    14. Implement inspections;
    15. Review proof of measures taken on departure or in transit to eliminate infection or contamination;
    16. Implement treatment of the baggage, cargo, containers, conveyances, goods, postal parcels or human remains to remove infection or contamination, including vectors and reservoirs;
    17. The use of specific health measures to ensure the safe handling and transport of human remains;
    18. Implement isolation or quarantine;
    19. Seizure and destruction of infected or contaminated or suspect baggage, cargo, containers, conveyances, goods or postal parcels under controlled conditions if no available treatment or process will otherwise be successful; and
    20. Refuse departure or entry.

    028. Traveler’s "Health Declaration" (ID)

    The proposed amendments to Article 18 also seek to create mechanisms to develop and apply a “Traveler’s Health Declaration” that would require personal information about one’s travel itinerary, possible symptoms and any prevention measures that had been complied with in order to facilitate contact tracing. (Page 16)

    029. Foreign “Health Care Workers”

    The proposed amendments to Article 18 also appear to make it mandatory for nations to allow foreign “health care workers” to enter their country. (Pages 16-17)

    030. Digital Global Health Certificates

    The proposed amendments to Articles 18, 23, 24, 27, 28, 31, 35, 36 and 44 as well as proposed amendments to Annexes 6, 7 and 8 would institute a global digital health certificate with a paper backup which would require people to show a QR code in order to continue to live their life as a human being on planet Earth, to travel, to shop, to do whatever it is that this may be used to prevent. It would set up an interoperable, world-wide digital health database system that would potentially enable bureaucrats from around the world to set requirements for prophylaxis, medications, treatment, injections and God only knows what else. This could potentially require people to undergo health treatments that are against their free will, in violation of their deeply held religious beliefs and their right of informed dissent just to enable them to participate in society. (Multiple pages)

    031. Passenger Locator Form

    The proposed amendments to Article 23 would set up a Passenger Locator Form that would require people to provide their travel itinerary and planned locations in order to facilitate contact tracing. (Page 18)

    032. Competent Authorities Given Command Over Ships and Aircraft

    The proposed amendments to Articles 27 and 28 would enable so-called “competent authorities” to actually command the captains of ships and aircraft to follow their orders. (Pages 18-19)

    033. Multiple "Health ID" Documents

    The proposed amendments to Articles 35 and 36 would dramatically expand the required health documents to require testing certificates, vaccine certificates, prophylaxis certificates and recovery certificates. (Page 20)

    034. Legally Binding “Recommendations”

    The proposed amendments to Article 42, as mentioned earlier, would require nations to implement the “recommendations” of the Dictator General of the World Hypocrisy Organization as though they were legally-binding orders, not just recommendations. (Page 20)



    035. Attain The Highest Achievable Level of Health Protection

    The proposed amendments to Article 43 seem to allow and encourage nations to go to the absolute extreme in responding to any so-called “emergency by striving to “attain the “highest achievable level of health protection.” This appears to encourage and give support to actions that were implemented by some nations which employed extremely severe lockdowns, travel restrictions and ZERO COVID policies. (Page 21)

    036. The Finality of Decisions Made by the Emergency Committee Would Be a Direct Attack on National Sovereignty

    The proposed amendments to Article 43 would make the decisions of the Emergency Committee legally-binding and final. They would seek to negate decisions made by sovereign member nations and limit the freedom of sovereign nations to enact legislation or regulations as they determine to be appropriate, as stated in Article 3, Section 4. (Pages 21-22)

    037. Loss of Privacy Regarding Health Records

    The proposed amendments to Article 44 would facilitate digital access to everyone’s private health records. The loss of one’s unalienable right to privacy regarding their health records is something that every human being on the planet must oppose. (Pages 22-24)

    038. Censorship

    The proposed amendments to Article 44 would also facilitate the censorship of any differing opinions under the guise of mis-information or dis-information. (Page 23)

    039. WHO Interference in the Crafting of Legislation

    The proposed amendments to Article 44 would also involve the World Health Organization in actually writing the laws that would be enacted in various nations in order to implement these regulations. (Page 23)

    040. Unlimited Money for the PHEIC

    The proposed amendments to Article 44A would organize massive financing on behalf of the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex with absolutely no estimate or limit on the proposed costs. (Page 25)

    041. Financing Rules to Remain Undetermined for 24 Months

    The proposed amendments to Article 44A also state that the details of the financing mechanism would NOT be decided upon until 24 months after the adoption of the amendments to the International Health Regulations. (Page 25)

    042. Loss of Privacy of Personal Health Data

    The proposed amendments to Article 45 would make it acceptable for private, personal health data to be shared. Again, this violation of our unalienable right to privacy in our personal health records must not be allowed to occur. (Page 25)

    043. Lack of Transparency with the General Public (Something Criminals Would Do!)

    The proposed amendments to Article 49 fail to stipulate that the reports of the Emergency Committee must be revealed to the general public. The reports of the Emergency Committee must be made publicly available, especially the dissenting voices that may disagree with the recommendations. The proposed amendment to Article 49 only requires the information to be shared with the member nations, who could then keep it secret from the general public. Personal experience has proven that the members of the delegations to the WHO are inaccessible and refuse to reveal such communications, even after numerous Freedom of Information Act Requests. (Pages 26-27)

    044. Implementation Committee & More Bureaucracy

    The proposed amendments to Articles 53A and 54 bis would redundantly establish an Implementation Committee or place implementation of the proposed amendments into the hands of the World Health Assembly. This Implementation Committee would just add to the bureaucracy along with the Compliance Committee, the Emergency Committee, the Review Committee, the Special Committee and the Standing Committee on Health and Emergency Prevention, Preparedness, and Response. Spending money on bureaucracy does not improve the health of the general public. (Pages 26-27)

    045. Compliance Committee (Psychopatic Controlfreaks)

    The proposed amendments to Article 53 bis-quater would create yet another bureaucracy in the form of a Compliance Committee. This committee would consist of at least 36 people (6 bureaucrats from each of the 6 WHO regions). The Compliance Committee would be empowered to make recommendations to nations regarding how they may improve compliance with the core capacities required by the amendments to the International Health Regulations. This is yet another attack on the sovereignty of nations and the freedoms of people. (Pages 28-29)

    046. Core Capacities

    The proposed amendments to Annex 1 are absolutely massive. They include seven (7) full pages of requirements that each and every member nation would be required to implement as changes to the “core capacities” of their nation’s public health system. These changes also seek to impose requirements on a local or community level, at an intermediate public health response level, at the national health governance level as well as at the global level. (Pages 31-37)

    047. Treatment "Guidelines"

    The proposed amendments to Annex 1 would seek to enforce clinical guidance and treatment guidelines. The doctor-patient relationship would be absolutely destroyed.(Page 32)

    048. Propaganda

    The proposed amendments to Annex 1 would also require the core capacity for “information dissemination” via “appropriate messages” and “communication management.” By any other name, this is propaganda that would be funded by billions of dollars allocated to the WHO. (Page 32)

    049. Surveillance Networks

    The proposed amendments to Annex 1 would set up surveillance networks within the territories of the member nations to “quickly detect public health events.” The definition of a “public health event” can be almost anything that they want it to be. (Page 32)

    050. Obligations of Duty to "Cooperate" (Forced!)

    The proposed amendments seek to create an entirely new Annex 10 which would create “Obligations of Duty to Cooperate” that would require nations to assist when asked to build infrastructure around the world. And most concerning, on the very last page of the proposed amendments is the requirement of “Developed States Parties” of which there is not yet a list of nations clarifying which nations are considered to be developed, to assist in the building and maintaining of facilities at points of entry and for the operations associated with the implementation of the International Health Regulations. (Page 46)

    What in the world could such facilities be planned to be used for?
    • PART IV: There are glaring contradictions and flaws in the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations.
    In addition to a number of blatant contradictions, many issues are missing, forgotten, overlooked or purposefully left out from the proposed amendments as well as missing from the entire process.
    Neither the Working Group to consider amendments to the International Health Regulations (WGIHR) nor the International Health Regulations Review Committee (IHRRC) seem to have the foggiest clue about the many things that We the People of the World are actually very concerned about.

    051. Lack of Input From The General Public

    The vast majority of the people of the world have no idea whatsoever that any of these negotiations are happening. They have been given no opportunity whatsoever to have any say or any input into these secret negotiations. All of these negotiations are being done without any form of democratic process or public comment. Those of us who have reached out in an attempt to have our voices heard realize that the WHO does NOT reply, they do NOT respond to members of the general public at all. They are only interested in the inputs from what are considered to be “relevant stakeholders” which are big-money organizations and foundations, many of which donate to the WHO and actually fund and thus control their activities. That is what gives them a seat at the negotiating table and a voice in these negotiations. The average person is completely shut out and is considered to have and offer no value to the people who are negotiating, supposedly on behalf of the people of their nations.

    052. Unknown and Unaccountable Delegates

    Most people do not have any idea of who their delegates to the WHO are. They have no idea regarding who may be pretending to represent them before the WHO. Most people in the world do not know that the World Health Assembly even exists and that the 76th meeting will be occurring at the end of May, 2023.

    053. The Negotiating Process has been Hijacked by the IHRRC

    At the 75th meeting in May of 2022, the World Health Assembly agreed to create a Working Group to consider amendments to the International Health Regulations (WGIHR). They scheduled an initial meeting of the WGIHR for mid-November 2022, but the negotiating process was hijacked by the WHO at the beginning of October. The WHO created an International Health Regulations Review Committee (IHRRC) that took over the job that should be directly under the control of the Secretariat of the WGIHR. The IHRRC is sworn to secrecy and confidentiality and answers only to the Director General. The IHRRC was put together in early October and has met several times for weeklong secret meetings to negotiate and craft the document that they plan to submit to the WHO for consideration at the 76th World Health Assembly in May of 2023.
    These are oligarchs and technocrats who are making rules to give more power, authority and money to oligarchs and technocrats.

    The WGIHR’s authority over this process appears to have been usurped by the IHRRC. As of the end of 2022 the WGIHR has failed to provide any insight into their upcoming schedule and they have not planned any means by which the public would be able to comment on these negotiations to amend the International Health Regulations. It appears that the entire negotiating process has been hijacked by a group of 18 “experts” who have been hand-picked to do the bidding of the Dictator General of the World Hypocrisy Organization.

    The entire process violates one of the fundamental principles in the Preamble of the WHO Constitution which states:
    “Informed opinion and active co-operation on the part of the public are of the utmost importance in the improvement of the health of the people.”
    054. Undefined Terminology

    In regards to the proposed amendments themselves, the WGIHR and the IHRRC have created a jargon of their own that they refuse to legally define. Dozens of undefined words and phrases are used throughout the proposed amendments and, since they are not defined, they can purposefully be misrepresented and skillfully re-interpreted at will.
    Undefined terms:
    1. Assessment and Risk Criteria
    2. Assistive Products
    3. Benefit Sharing Mechanism
    4. Common But Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities
    5. Conflict and Violence Elements
    6. Developed States Parties
    7. Developing States Parties
    8. Equity
    9. Event Information [Web]Site
    10. Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits
    11. Genetic Sequence Data
    12. Genome Sequence Data
    13. Guidance
    14. Inclusiveness
    15. Joint External Evaluation
    16. National IHR Competent Authority
    17. National IHR Focal Point
    18. Non-State Actors (an official list is needed)
    19. Pandemic
    20. Potential to Become a PHEIC
    21. Preparedness
    22. Prevention
    23. Public Health Interventions
    24. Recovery
    25. Response
    26. Risks With a Potential to Impact Public Health
    27. Solidarity
    28. Universal Health Periodic Review
    29. Vaccine
    Without proper legal definitions, these words can be interpreted and re-interpreted at will to mean whatever they want them to mean.

    055. Hypocrisy

    After rejecting numerous natural and inexpensive therapeutic agents due to false claims of a lack of peer-reviewed studies, the WGIHR and the IHRRC continue to fail to appreciate the irony that they are negotiating proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations, purportedly to improve pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery, and they have failed to provide a single peer-reviewed, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to back up any of their many recommendations. They are clearly NOT meeting their own supposed “gold standard.”

    056. Fatal Flaw #1 - There are NO Valid Criteria by Which to Measure Preparedness

    I will comment on just one of the several dozen undefined terms, which is the phrase “assessment and risk criteria.” During the first Informal Focused Conference, the WHO moderator asked several experts to explain which metrics could be used to determine a nation’s preparedness and thus, give them the ability to prevent and/or respond to a PHEIC. The experts clearly stated that no metrics, or assessment or risk criteria had been shown to accurately determine whether or not a nation could be confident that they were adequately prepared for the next pandemic.
    Ignoring the fact that the word pandemic itself is not legally defined, the point is this: The entire process of crafting amendments to the International Health Regulations in order to “be better prepared to prevent and respond to the next pandemic” is a useless exercise because NO ONE KNOWS HOW TO MEASURE PREPAREDNESS! The WHO’s own experts expressed it in the following words, and I quote:
    “We owe it to ourselves to not continue to rely on them in a dogmatic way until allowing scientific analyses to generate a new set of measurements. It’s a topic that I think has been marginalized, but is very important.”
    The WHO is purporting to negotiate legally-binding amendments to the International Health Regulations to improve the ability to prevent and prepare for the next pandemic, and they have NO IDEA how to measure the goals that they say they are trying to achieve.

    057. Fatal Flaw #2: National Sovereignty of Every Nation Directly Conflicts With the WHO’s Attempted Power Grab

    Many of the proposed amendments should be seen as null-and-void because they directly conflict with principle number 4 in Article 3, which clearly states the following:
    “States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the sovereign right to legislate and to implement legislation in pursuance of their health policies.”
    Sovereign states cannot be commanded by recommendations that have attempted to be converted into commands or orders by the Compliance Committee, by the Rulings of the Emergency Committee or by the proclamations found in Article 44, Annex 1, or Annex 10 or by a change in terminology in Article 1 that seeks to change non-binding recommendations into legally-binding “Obligations of Duty to Cooperate.”
    This makes the International Health Regulations self-contradictory and would make them null and void. The WHO seeks to have the member nations surrender their right to sovereign control over their own public health systems to the WHO. This is reason enough to #StopTheAmendments and #ExitTheWHO.

    058. No Way to Cancel or End a Declared "Emergency" (Perpetual Tyranny?)

    In much the same way that the Director General is free to declare an emergency even against the advice of his own expert Emergency Committee with essentially no valid data whatsoever, the opposite problem of being unable to bring an already declared emergency to an end is also under the sole control of the Dictator General. There is currently no way for We the People to insist that an emergency be brought to an end.

    059. The Proposed Funding Mechanism is Redundant With the World Bank’s Pandemic Fund

    Although the World Bank’s Pandemic Fund is as deeply flawed as the ill-defined funding mechanisms proposed by both the proposed Pandemic Treaty and the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations, the World Bank’s Pandemic Fund is currently in place and will begin serving as a mechanism that can be studied to see if the hoped for benefits may arise from the many billions of dollars that they plan to spend. To even consider wasting untold tens of billions of dollars before the pilot project being conducted by the World Bank has had a chance to succeed or fail, is ridiculous. The World Bank Pandemic Fund has had great difficulty raising the money that they had hoped for. To believe that the funds associated with the proposed treaty and amendments will be greeted any more favorably is sheer folly.

    060. Spending tens of billions of dollars diverts that money away from things that people are actually suffering from!

    Spending billions of dollars on the items and personnel that are currently undefined by the proposed amendments could and should absolutely be spent on health related issues that could truly have an impact upon people who are suffering from a wide range of dis-eases. Spending money to attempt to prevent or prepare for an event that may never come, and even if it does, is likely to be far different than what may have been planned for is simply bureaucratic malfeasance.
    • PART V: The proposed amendments are absolutely ignoring many of the things that really should be and need to be addressed.
    061. The Importance of Individual Health Over Public Health Systems

    Supporting Public Health Systems associated with the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex is not even remotely the same as supporting the health of individual people. The WHO seems to have forgotten that the good of any people is the sum total of the benefits enjoyed by each and every individual. The unalienable human rights of each individual, their personal sovereignty and their bodily autonomy, supersede the privileges of any and all international organizations, nations, states, provinces, cities or other groups that derive their existence from We, The Individual People Of The World.

    062. Failure to explain the "magical disappearance" of Influenza

    The WHO seems to be at a complete loss to explain how an why influenza magically disappeared from the health statistics over the past few years.

    063. Failure to Isolate the virus

    The WHO continues to be in absolute denial of the fact that no one has ever provided actual evidence of the existence of the supposed virus that has been given the name SARS-CoV-2 and its many supposed variants. Even though hundreds of Freedom of Information Requests for such evidence from around the world have been submitted, no one appears to have ever been able to properly isolate it and provide evidence of having done so.

    064. Failure to prove causality via Koch’s Postulates

    The WHO also continues to ignore the fundamental fact that SARS-CoV-2 has never been submitted to the scrutiny required according to Koch’s Postulates to determine whether or not it is actually the causal factor in the collection of EXTREMELY common symptoms that have come to be known as COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 has not been properly shown to be the sole cause of the symptoms associated with COVID-19 which has resulted in widespread mis-diagnosis, with massive numbers of false positive RT-PCR results.

    065. Two Weeks to Flatten The Curve Was An Absolute Failure

    The WHO is in complete denial that the concept of “two weeks to flatten the curve was a lie and that the lockdowns that resulted from that lie failed to stop the spread of whatever is causing the dis-ease that is known as COVID-19.

    066. Lockdowns, Curfews, Travel Restrictions

    The WHO is still failing to admit that lockdowns, quarantines, curfews, travel restrictions, social distancing and the wearing of masks only served to trigger severe economic devastation and caused an enormous mental health catastrophe. They still refuse to acknowledge that countless studies have shown that those actions failed miserably and have never been shown to reduce the spread of a respiratory pathogen.

    067. Using RT-PCR to Diagnose Disease is 100% Proven Fraudulent

    The WHO is still promoting the lie and pretending to determine cases of a disease via RT-PCR that is NOT of any benefit whatsoever to improving people’s health. Using RT-PCR is clearly NOT a valid way of diagnosing disease. All it does is generate a huge percentage of false positives that simply wastes resources on asymptomatic people who are actually more properly described as being healthy. Generating massive numbers of improperly diagnosed fake “cases” only serves to assist the fear-mongering that leads to feeding the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex. Using RT-PCR must be admitted to be the fraud that it has always been since the very beginning.

    68. Early Treatment

    The WHO still seems to believe that the early, inaccurate detection of disease via RT-PCR followed by lockdowns, quarantines and mask wearing is somehow a better strategy to prevent outbreaks from spreading into pandemics than early effective treatment with decades old essential medications that have exhibited a long history of safety and effectiveness in combination with vitamins, minerals, herbs and good nutrition.
    The WHO continues to fail to acknowledge that the blame for the death of millions of people must be placed directly upon the numerous health officials around the world who insisted that frontline clinicians follow pathetic treatment protocols which prevented the use of early, effective treatments. Millions of people died because their doctors were directed to tell them that “nothing could be done” and sadly, this situation still exists.
    The WHO appears to be completely ignore-ant of the fact that the intelligent early treatment with essential medications and natural substances that were provided by wise and experienced health professionals all around the world were far more successful in preventing hospitalizations and preventing deaths than the pathetic official protocol of do nothing, take a Tylenol and go to the emergency room if it gets really bad so we can put you in a drug induced coma in order to mechanically control your breathing with a ventilator and give you Medazolam so that you can have a “good death.”

    069. Wilfuilly Ignoring Nutritions

    The WHO continues to fail to recognize the benefits of treatment with vitamins and minerals such as vitamins C and D and the mineral zinc. There is no profit to be had by the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex in utilizing these proven, natural ingredients, and THAT is what clearly explains why they have not been used.

    070. Essential Medications

    The WHO continues to fail to recognize the benefits of repurposed essential medications such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. Every person who contributed to restricting the use of these life-saving essential medications is a criminal and should be charged with mass murder.

    071. Dangerous Authorized and Unethically Approved Medications

    The WHO continues to fail to address the deadly side effects of approved and authorized drugs such as remdesivir and medazolam that have contributed to kidney failure and death in thousands of individuals. The ongoing use of these drugs must be investigated to determine their true risk/benefit ratio.

    072. Ventilators are Deadly

    The WHO continues to deny that ventilators and the drugs that are administered as part of the ventilator protocol have actually caused the deaths of thousands of innocent victims of medical murder.

    073. In Silico Genetic Sequence Used for Experimental mRNA Injections

    The WHO still chooses to ignore the undeniable fact that the genetic sequence that was supposedly used to create the mRNA injections was clearly created in silico (in a computer) and is not a naturally occurring sequence. If a spike protein is produced in the human body due to the mRNA found in the injections, then it is clearly a non-natural, man-made biological weapon.

    074. Quality Assurance Failure

    The WHO has failed miserably to ensure that quality assurance testing was done to ensure the purity of the ingredients in the jabs that have been injected into billions of people. In the past, if any other product was found to have the levels of contamination reported by many researchers or exhibited the complete lack of the purported active ingredient, such mislabeled products could, should and would have been recalled from the market immediately.

    075. Vaccine "Equity" (Hallow Marketing Rethoric!)

    The WHO still seems to believe that equity in producing and distributing poisonous toxic drugs and deadly injections is more important than focusing on treatment protocols that actually save lives. Clearly, they believe that equity is about wealth, not about health.

    076. The So-called “Vaccines” are simply NOT effective.

    The WHO still fails to acknowledge that the COVID-19 gene-therapy biological weapons have failed miserably in their stated goals. Several billion people have had multiple injections and yet COVID-19 is rampant across the world, especially in those people who have received the most jabs. The WHO refuses to admit that the so-called COVID-19 “vaccines” were rushed into use and were never shown to be effective. They were never studied nor shown to reduce transmission of any virus. Statistics from all across the world have shown that those who have been jabbed are absolutely NOT protected from being diagnosed with COVID-19. How massive of a failure does this need to become before the WHO will recognize and admit that it has committed a gargantuan mistake?

    077. The So-Called “Vaccines” Are Absolutely NOT safe

    What will it take for the WHO to realize and admit that the jabs are damaging people’s immune systems and actually making the situation far worse than it was. The WHO refuses to admit that the so-called COVID-19 “vaccines” were rushed into use and were never shown to be safe. Lack of safety testing in pregnant women is an extremely egregious violation of the most basic ethical standards of health care.
    Anyone who states that these injections are “safe" is committing a crime against humanity and should be charged as an accessory to mass murder.

    078. Death, Disability and Dis-ease

    The WHO is in complete denial of the many thousands of people who have been killed by these injections, or who have suffered severe disability, heart attacks, strokes, myocarditis, pericarditis, turbocharged cancers, Bell’s Palsy and countless other adverse reactions to the injections. The WHO is ignore-ant of the tens of thousands of people who have suffered damaged immune systems, cardiovascular problems, liver, kidney and nervous system and other systemic damage due to the toxic effects of the poorly tested injections. Their injuries suffered by these people around the world are real, not rare.

    079. Fraudulent Causes of Death Listed on Death Certificates

    The WHO seems to be in complete denial that the ongoing practice of claiming that people who died with a positive RT-PCR test, but whose deaths were actually due to a wide variety of other causes should still be counted as COVID-19 deaths is actually a form of fraud of which many people are aware. The WHO refuses to even examine the fact that, while many people have died, the reasons behind the causes of their deaths are exceedingly unclear and multi-faceted and cannot reliably be attributed to COVID-19

    080. The Cover-Up the Facts and the Propensity to Attack the Messengers

    The WHO seems to be very much in favor of censoring those who seek to expose the truth in order to avoid holding themselves and other officials accountable for the financial devastation, mental anguish, physical harm and untold death that they have caused by their overreach, their ineptitude and their craven desire for power and control. Censorship is NOT a solution to the catastrophic failure that we have all witnessed over the past 3 years.
    • PART VI: The proposed amendments would trample our rights and restrict our freedoms.
    081. The Unalienable Right To Privacy

    All people have an absolute, unalienable right to privacy in their personal information, including health related data. Every individual human being has the unalienable right to be free from any requirement to have or present any “vaccine passport,” “digital-ID,” or “health certificate” of any kind, whether in printed, digital or any other form.

    082. The Unalienable Right To Express One’s Opinions

    Every individual human being must always be free to fully express their own personal opinion free from any threat of retribution. Only the free debate of different and competing opinions can provide an environment of informed decision-making by each country, state, county, community, family and individual. Each individual has the right to publicly express their own opinion regarding the effectiveness, or lack thereof, of any health related policy or treatment in spoken and/or written form. Every person's experience is a valuable scientific observation and must NOT be censored.
    As more free debate and free expression of ideas, facts and data are allowed to occur, each level of society will be better able to decide for itself what the best interventions to recommend are for the control and management of any disease. Any form of suppression of free public debate is strictly forbidden. Promotion of the public debate of competing points of view and access by the population to that debate, plus the personal dialogue between patients and doctors, will ensure each individual and family can be sufficiently informed to make their own choices and decisions regarding their health, under the principle of informed dissent. No uniform behavior of all of society can be required and the autonomy and free will of each individual must be protected.

    083. The Unalienable Right To Provide Information on Prevention & Healing

    Every individual human being has the unalienable right to provide information that is directed by their experience and wisdom, free from executive mandate, bureaucratic dictate, pressure or coercion. All people have an unalienable right to choose to ignore or to take action upon the information that they receive, free from any form of censorship or coercion.

    084. The Unalienable Right To Choose Treatment

    Every individual human being must always be free to use any preventive and/or therapeutic treatment interventions that they consider to be the best choice for them. This may include strategies such as lifestyle changes, food as medicine, vitamins, minerals, natural supplements and repurposed essential medications that were previously approved for other diseases and have a long safety record. Withholding any of those optional strategies is a violation of an individual’s unalienable right to choose. Health care decisions must ultimately be made based on the individual’s choice, not by bureaucratic dictate by government, academics, hospitals, clinics, medical practitioners or “public health experts.”

    085. The Unalienable Right To Refuse (Experimental) Treatment

    Every individual human being must always retain the unalienable right to refuse any intervention recommended by any institution, the World Health Organization, governments at all levels, medical associations, hospitals or health care providers. Each individual must be in control of the ultimate decision to utilize any and all health-related treatments, medications, and nutrition, as they themselves deem necessary to improve and/or maintain their health. The right of informed dissent by patients will always be placed above any political interests or centralized decision-making by any government or health agency.

    086. The Unalienable Right To Travel Freely Upon The Planet

    Every individual human being has the unalienable right to move about the planet and this right may NOT be made dependent upon health, testing, or treatment based requirements. Each individual has the right to travel, free from any lockdowns, quarantines, vaccine requirements, vaccine passports, digital-IDs, mask mandates, social distancing or any other attempt to impede their freedom of assembly or movement.

    087. The Unalienable Rights Of Parents To Protect The Unalienable Rights Of Their Children

    Every parent has the unalienable right and the solemn obligation to ensure that all the unalienable rights of their children are defended. No government or any other organization has the right to prevent any parent from defending the unalienable rights of their children.

    088. The Unalienable Right To Be With Family and Friends

    Every individual human being has the right to visit with family and friends, who may be suffering through an illness, in order to provide them with love and emotional support that they need, in any setting including, but not limited to, home, clinics or hospitals. The Freedom of Assembly shall NOT be denied.

    089. The Unalienable Right To Freedom From Discrimination

    Each individual human being has the right to be free from discrimination based upon any demand upon anyone to undergo any form of medical procedure, including testing. Discrimination based on personal health choices is absolutely unacceptable in employment or education matters, when accessing public and private institutions, organizations, private businesses or in other locations or in regards to any other issue. Discrimination based on medical status is wrong and must NOT be permitted in any form whatsoever.

    090. There May be NO Derogation of Rights During a Declared Emergency

    Every government, every corporation, every organization and every individual human being must respect and honor everyone’s unalienable rights despite any declaration of a “state of emergency” by anyone. Governments do NOT have the authority to suspend human rights because of so-called “emergencies.” The declaration of an “emergency” does not give anyone the right to infringe upon anyone else's unalienable human rights. Every individual human being has the right to withhold their consent and refuse treatment or intervention of any kind, at any time, regardless of whether there is a declared “emergency” or not. Regardless of the scope and/or severity of any disease outbreak or real pandemic, human rights remain unalienable and may not be abridged.
    • PART VII: The Ten Main Reasons why every nation on earth should #ExitTheWHO
    091. The WHO is Clearly Attempting a Power Grab

    The WHO is blatantly seeking to increase its power by pursuing a legally-binding “Pandemic Treaty” and proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations. The WHO seeks to turn its recommendations into legally-binding orders and control. The WHO seeks to have the 194 member nations surrender their sovereignty to the WHO. This must NOT be allowed to happen.

    092. Conflicts of Interest & Corruption Have Plagued the WHO for Decades

    The WHO is infiltrated by Big Pharma, Big Money, and Big Foundations and has been corrupted by financial donations from corporations and non-governmental organizations which have undue influence over WHO policies in ways that benefit the corporations and the organizations through a money-laundering and influence-peddling scheme of massive proportions. The WHO follows the dictates of it's so-called “relevant stakeholders” while ignoring the needs and desires of “We the People.” The global health architecture proposed by the WHO is much closer to an organized crime syndicate than it is to anything resembling public health

    093. The WHO is Plagued With Vaccine Madness

    The WHO is influenced by vaccine manufacturers and vaccine pushers such as GAVI and Bill Gates. The WHO has clearly lost sight of its core purpose of promoting health and has overemphasized the use of “vaccines” which have recently been switched and converted into gene-therapy treatments which have not improved health, but have actually degraded the overall health of billions of people around the world. Best practices designed to improve health are now being ignored in favor of actions that are ultimately designed to profit the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex.

    094. Stop the Criminal Expansion of Waste & Bureaucracy

    The WHO is dominated by bureaucrats and technocrats that are beholden to Big Pharma and are not knowledgeable health professionals that are dedicated to caring for patients and actually helping them to maintain and improve their health. The WHO wastes enormous amounts of money on salaries for their bloated staff and have allowed travel expenses to increase to such a degree that actual health related programs are chronically underfunded.

    095. The WHO Has Continuously Engaged in Perpetual Fear-Mongering

    The WHO has sounded the alarm and wasted time, effort and money by declaring fake Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEICs) and are now seeking to be able to increase that activity by being able to declare Public Health Emergencies of Regional Concern (PHERC) and Intermediate Health Alerts. The fear-mongering has got to stop, and the only way to ensure that happens is for each and every nation to #ExitTheWHO and to ignore their recommendations.

    096. The WHO’s Recommendations Have Been Horrible

    The WHO has made horrible and corrupt recommendations in support of the expanded use of pharmaceutical drugs such as opiates and they have actually been responsible for the untold millions of unnecessary deaths. Turning their recommendations into legally-binding obligations would be a mistake of epic proportion.

    097. The WHO Follows a False Model of Health

    The WHO is overly dependent upon the petro-chemical based practice of allopathic medicine that is designed to alter and mask symptoms with chemicals, rather than to actually improve health. The WHO does not offer a forum for clinical and scientific discussion or debate and clearly marginalizes natural healing modalities.

    098. Unwillingness to Learn From Mistakes Of the Past

    The WHO has repeatedly demonstrated that it is absolutely unwilling and incapable of learning from its mistakes and is destined to continue wasting money while providing horrible advice based on the corruptive influence of Big Pharma.

    099. WHO Delegates (Technocrats) are Unaccountable, Out-Of-Touch, They Operate in Secret and They Lack Transparency

    The delegates to the World Health Assembly are unelected, unaccountable, unknown to the people they purport to represent and they are completely out of touch with the needs and desires of the people of their respective nations. Far too much of what is done by the WHO remains hidden. What we know is horrible. What we don't know may be monstrous.

    100. The WHO has NO Authority Whatsoever Over We The People

    For the most part, the World Health Organization has been an advisory organization. Their attempt to expand the scope of their authority should be seen for what it is: a worldwide POWER GRAB designed to set up a one-world governing body that is unelected and unaccountable to the people.

    We the People must never allow authority to be handed over to any organization without demanding accountability.

    We must never allow organizations to spend billions of dollars without complete transparency.
    We must insist that each and every nation on earth #ExitTheWHO in order to chart their own course.

    We the People of the world must stand together and defend our rights, our freedoms and our dignity. We must…

    Chinese 100 Reasons
    708KB ∙ PDF File

    Download

    English 100 Reasons
    389KB ∙ PDF File

    Download

    French 100 Reasons
    402KB ∙ PDF File

    Download

    German 100 Reasons
    422KB ∙ PDF File

    Download

    Hindi 100 Reasons
    688KB ∙ PDF File

    Download

    Indonesian 100 Reasons
    395KB ∙ PDF File

    Download

    Italian 100 Reasons
    391KB ∙ PDF File

    Download

    Korean 100 Reasons
    525KB ∙ PDF File

    Download

    Japanese 100 Reasons
    603KB ∙ PDF File

    Download

    Malay 100 Reasons
    396KB ∙ PDF File

    Download

    Polish 100 Reasons
    467KB ∙ PDF File

    Download

    Portuguese 100 Reasons
    392KB ∙ PDF File

    Download

    Russian 100 Reasons
    510KB ∙ PDF File

    Download

    Slovak 100 Reasons
    442KB ∙ PDF File

    Download

    Spanish 100 Reasons
    399KB ∙ PDF File

    Download

    Swahili 100 Reasons
    372KB ∙ PDF File

    Download

    نمونه ایمیل
    1.39MB ∙ PDF File

    Download

    ده دلیل مهم برای رد کردن تجدید نظر در قوانین بهداشت بین المللی
    1.29MB ∙ PDF File

    Download

    --o-O-o--


    They changed the definition of the word: "pandemic" and they changed the definition of the word: "vaccines" TWICE just before the mass covid hysteria started, almost all mass media & alternative media ignored WHY they (the totally corrupt WHO) did that! ... Let that sink in for a moment! ... Experimental mRNA Injections with untested toxic additives & preservatives POSING as "vaccines" is the biggest SCAM on the planet right now, and everybody who uses the word: "vaccines" and/or "pandemic" must always add a DISCLAIMER how we all are psychologically played (hypnotized) on a massive scale ... Please be not a part of helping the deadly scam continue by spreading the correct insights of how they mass abuse us all.



    cheers,
    John Kuhles aka 'ExomatrixTV'
    February 16th, 2023 🦜🦋🌳

    * source and here
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 24th February 2023 at 16:00.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  34. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Harmony (26th February 2023), mountain_jim (26th February 2023), Satori (23rd February 2023)

  35. Link to Post #58
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,723
    Thanks
    30,822
    Thanked 125,666 times in 20,818 posts

    Default Re: Global WHO Treaty for Pandemics with Digital ID and Digital Currency

    KEY TAKEAWAYS:
    • The World Health Organization wants to control the way YOU manage YOUR health.
    • The WHO is attempting to grab even more power over your life. It is seeking to greatly expand its ability to control the entire world’s response to the next pandemic far beyond its current limited legal authority. The WHO wants to do more than merely advise countries. It wants complete control.
    • The WHO seeks to enforce an authoritarian, one size fits all, “One Health” approach to world health that is controlled by them and them alone.
    • The WHO is also seeking to greatly expand its financial resources and yearly budget.
    • This is not just about U.S. The effort must be worldwide. As of June 1, 2022, the “Pandemic Treaty” has not yet been drafted. NOW is the time to make your voices heard. We must ACTIVELY work to prevent these treaty negotiations from infringing upon the rights and freedoms of the entire world. Our voices must be heard. Our opinions must be considered. Our rights must be respected.
    • The negotiations toward this “treaty” are being controlled by technocratic bureaucrats, corrupt politicians, ruthless lawyers, puppet public health officials, non-government organizations and pharmaceutical representatives who want to place themselves in control of determining the future of the world’s “health.”
    • The input of independent minded doctors, nurses, scientists and health professionals who actually saved millions of human lives is being completely ignored.
    • The opinions and desires of “We The People” are totally being ignored.
    • As an international treaty, the WHO pandemic pact could be legally binding ABOVE the Constitution of the United States and thus it would infringe upon our rights and limit our freedoms. For countries around the world (and their internal states and provinces), this legally binding agreement would override their individual constitutions and pandemic response strategies.
    • The United States is a “co-sponsor” of the current negotiations but it is NOT a member of the working group that is guiding the process. (click here)
    • The International Negotiating Body (INB) is led by delegates from six countries, representing the world's main regions - Co-chairs Ms. Precious Matsoso (South Africa) and Mr. Roland Driece (the Netherlands), Ambassador Tovar da Silva Nunes (Brazil), Mr. Ahmed Salama Soliman (Egypt), Mr. Kazuho Taguchi (Japan) and Dr. Viroj Tangcharoensathien (Thailand)
    • A list of delegates to the Special Session of the World Health Assembly can be found here.
    • The Secretary of Health and Human Services (Xavier Becerra) leads the U.S. delegation to the World Health Assembly. Share your opinions with him directly: Xavier.Becerra@HHS.gov Twitter: @SecBecerra
    • We owe it to future generations to protect their sovereignty and their health freedoms. We must demand and ensure that the United States’ delegation to the WHO works to maintain the sovereignty of the people of the United States and maintain our health freedoms.
    • Instead of allowing centralized, authoritarian, dictatorial, biomedical fascism to take over and control our lives, we must ACTIVELY work to insist upon health freedom for everyone on earth.
    • A motherlode of documents are available via these links: IHR, IPPPR, Governing Pandemics, WGPR, INB, WHASS, WHO Contributors and Non-State Actors.
    • Click on the hashtag to learn more: #StopTheTreaty
    • Contact James Roguski at 310-619-3055 if you want to help oppose the “Pandemic Treaty” or if you have any questions. Instead, I propose that the people of the world support “The People’s Treaty.
    source
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 26th February 2023 at 14:45.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  36. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Harmony (26th February 2023), mountain_jim (26th February 2023)

  37. Link to Post #59
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,723
    Thanks
    30,822
    Thanked 125,666 times in 20,818 posts

    Default Re: Global WHO Treaty for Pandemics with Digital ID and Digital Currency

    • World Health Organisation Pandemic Treaty - Massive Power Grab!

    The World Health Organization has started drafting a global pandemic treaty on pandemic preparedness that would grant it absolute power over global biosecurity, such as the power to implement digital identities/vaccine passports, mandatory vaccinations, travel restrictions, standardized medical care and more.

    The WHO is not qualified to make global health decisions. As just one example, the WHO didn’t publicly admit SARS-CoV-2 was airborne until the end of December 2021, yet scientists knew the virus was airborne within weeks of the pandemic being declared. The WHO also ignored early advice about airborne transmission.

    More importantly, a one-size-fits-all approach to pandemic response simply does not work, because pandemic threats are not identical in all parts of the world. Even people in the same region do not have identical risk and may not need or benefit from identical treatment.

    The WHO will accept two more days of public comment on the treaty, June 16 and 17, so prepare your statements now. The World Health Assembly will also vote on amendments to the International Health Regulations May 22-28, which may also strip away more individual rights and liberties.

    The globalists that brought us the wildly exaggerated COVID pandemic in an effort to cement a biosecurity grid into place are now hard at work on the next phase of this New World Order.

    The World Health Organization has started drafting a global pandemic treaty on pandemic preparedness that would grant it absolute power over global biosecurity, such as the power to implement digital identities/vaccine passports, mandatory vaccinations, travel restrictions, standardized medical care and more.
    In “The Corbett Report”, above, independent journalist James Corbett reviews what this treaty is, how it will change the global landscape and strip you of some of your most basic rights and freedoms.

    Make no mistake, the WHO pandemic treaty is a direct attack on the sovereignty of its member states, as well as a direct attack on your bodily autonomy.
    • A back door to "Global Governance"
    As noted by anti-extremism activist Maajid Nawaz in an April 28 Twitter post, the “WHO pandemic treaty serves as a backdoor to global empire.”

    COVID-19, while potentially deadly to certain vulnerable groups, simply isn’t a valid justification for handing over more power to the WHO, especially in light of its many inexplicable “mistakes” in this and previous pandemics.

    As just one example, the WHO didn’t publicly admit SARS-CoV-2 was airborne until the end of December 2021, yet scientists knew the virus was airborne within weeks of the pandemic being declared. The WHO also ignored early advice about airborne transmission.

    So, it seems clear that the effort to now hand over more power to the WHO is about something other than them being the most qualified to make health decisions that benefit and protect everyone.

    It seems far more likely that the WHO is being installed as a de facto governing body for the global Deep State. Through the WHO, under the guise of biosecurity, the globalist cabal who seek to own everything and control everyone will then be able to implement their wishes across the whole world in one fell swoop.

    With this treaty in place, all member nations will be subject to the WHO’s dictates.
    If the WHO says every person on the planet needs to have a vaccine passport and digital identity to ensure vaccination compliance, then that’s what every country will be forced to implement, even if the people have rejected such plans using local democratic processes.

    As noted by Corbett, these negotiations are already well underway, and the treaty is expected to be fully implemented in 2024 — that is, unless the people of the world wake up to what’s happening and beat back this monstrosity.
    • WHO likely seeking to monopolize health care worldwide
    Under the guise of a global pandemic, the WHO, the World Economic Forum and all its installed leaders in government and private business were able to roll out a plan that had already been decades in the making. The pandemic was a perfect cover.

    In the name of keeping everyone “safe” from infection, the globalists justified unprecedented attacks on democracy, civil liberties and personal freedoms, including the right to choose your own medical treatment.

    Now, the WHO is gearing up to make its pandemic leadership permanent, extend it into the healthcare systems of every nation and eventually implement a universal or “socialist-like” healthcare system as part of The Great Reset.

    While this is not currently being discussed, there’s every reason to suspect that this is part of the plan. WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has previously stated that his “central priority” as director-general of the WHO is to push the world toward universal health coverage.

    And, considering the WHO changed its definition of “pandemic” to “a worldwide epidemic of a disease,” without the original specificity of severe illness that causes high morbidity, just about anything could be made to fit the pandemic criterion.

    The whole premise behind this pandemic treaty is that “shared threat requires shared response.” But a given threat is almost never equally shared across regions.
    Take COVID-19 for example. Not only is the risk of COVID not the same for people in New York City and the outback of Australia, it’s not even the same for all the people in those areas, as COVID is highly dependent on age and underlying health conditions.
    The WHO insists that the remedy is the same for everyone everywhere, yet the risks vary widely from nation to nation, region to region, person to person.

    They intend to eliminate individualized medicine and provide blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be addressed. Without a doubt, this can only result in needless suffering, not to mention the loss of individual freedom.
    • How the WHO has wielded previous pandemic instruments
    To give us an idea of how the WHO might end up misusing this new proposed international “instrument” on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, we can look at the International Health Regulations (IHR), which the U.S. signed on to in 2005.
    The IHR is what empowered the WHO to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). This is a special legal category that allows the WHO to initiate certain contracts and procedures, including drug and vaccine contracts.
    As noted by Corbett, the IHR allows the unelected director-general of the WHO to simply declare a PHEIC and, suddenly, all member states have to dance to his tune. It basically grants the WHO dictatorial powers over health policy.

    PHEICs have included the phony H1N1 swine flu pandemic in 2009, the inconsequential Zika outbreak in 2016, the overhyped Ebola outbreak in 2019, and, of course, the massively exaggerated COVID pandemic in 2020.

    All of these PHEICs were poorly handled and the WHO was criticized as inept and corrupt in their wake.

    So, to summarize, through the IHR, the WHO has already been significantly empowered to dictate global health policy with regard to pandemics, and they used that power to bamboozle the nations of the world into spending billions of dollars on countermeasures, especially drugs and vaccines, that didn’t work very well.

    In that sense, the WHO is really just another wealth-transfer instrument. The WHO’s Big Pharma collaborators make billions on the taxpayers’ dime, while the people of the world are left to suffer the consequences of fast-tracked vaccines.

    Its handling of the COVID pandemic in particular has been unprecedentedly bad, as they were behind the withholding of early treatment with safe medicines worldwide.

    As noted by ivermectin advocate Dr. Tess Lawrie, the WHO has also claimed the mRNA shots as safe as conventional vaccines, which is nowhere near the truth. Most all available data prove they are the most dangerous drugs ever created. Why would anyone expect the WHO to become less corrupt if given even more power and control?
    • IHR amendments may also restrict rights and freedoms
    Now, the IHR overrode and superseded the U.S. Constitution from the start, but in January, the U.S. also submitted regulatory amendments that will give the WHO even more power to restrict your rights and freedoms.

    May 22-28, the World Health Assembly will gather and vote on these amendments to the IHR and, if passed, they will be enacted into international law.

    These submitted amendments are in addition to the WHO pandemic treaty currently under discussion. As reported by Health Policy Watch February 23:

    “Washington wants to fast track a series of nitty-gritty, but far-reaching changes in the existing International Health Regulations that govern WHO and member state emergency alert and response — for consideration at this year’s World Health Assembly, 22-28 May.
    “The U.S. proposal for major IHR rule changes, obtained by Health Policy Watch, has been a topic of discussion in a series of closed-door meetings of WHO member states, which are considering ways to reform the existing IHR, as well as advancing a whole new WHO convention or other international instrument on pandemic prevention and response …

    “The U.S. is expected to lead a parallel track of tightly-paced ‘informal’ member state negotiations to reach consensus on an IHR reform resolution for approval at this year’s 75th WHA [World Health Assembly] …”

    The “new WHO convention or other international instrument” mentioned here refers to the WHO treaty currently under discussion.

    An intergovernmental negotiating body (INB) was established as a subdivision of the World Health Assembly in Dec. 2021, for the purpose of drafting and negotiating this new pandemic treaty. And, as mentioned, this INB has begun that work.

    However, as noted by Corbett, this is only the second time in the WHO’s history that an INB has been established. The first one was the INB of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, 22 years ago. So, this is not a well-established process, and it’s hard to predict how it will play out.
    • Bill Gates builds GERM team for the WHO
    Another clue about what the WHO intends to do with more power comes from its primary funder, Bill Gates. Gates recently announced he’s building a pandemic response team for the WHO, which he would like to be called the “Global Epidemic Response & Mobilization” or GERM Team.

    This team will be made up of thousands of disease experts under WHO’s purview, and will monitor nations and “decide when they need to suspend civil liberties, force populations to wear masks and close borders,” The Counter Signal reports.

    Of course, Gates is also the largest funder of the WHO (when you combine the donations from both his foundation and GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance). This and other relationships speak volumes about the corruption still ruling the WHO.

    At the end of the day, Gates is basically paying the WHO to dictate to the world what they must do to make Gates a ton of money. As noted by The Counter Signal:
    “Gates’ announcement of the GERM team coincides with the World Health Organization’s drafting of a global pandemic treaty … In the future, the pandemic treaty will not only ensure that member states abide by International Health Regulations but will also put the WHO in the driver’s seat, so to speak. Member states, including the US and Canada, will take their orders directly from the organization. As Conservative MP Leslyn Lewis explains:

    “‘The treaty includes 190 countries and would be legally binding. The treaty defines and classifies what is considered a pandemic, and this could consist of broad classifications, including an increase in cancers, heart conditions, strokes, etc. If a pandemic is declared, the WHO takes over the global health management of the pandemic.

    “Of even more concern, if this treaty is enshrined, the WHO would be in full control over what gets called a pandemic. They could dictate how our doctors can respond, which drugs can and can’t be used, or which vaccines are approved. We would end up with a one-size-fits-all approach for the entire world … A one-size-fits-all response to a health crisis doesn’t even work across Canada, let alone the entire globe’ …

    “It isn’t unreasonable to assume that the GERM team, as a new branch of the WHO, would oversee making sure member states comply with the pandemic treaty after the draft is finalized and member states sign on.

    “The next question, then, is how the WHO and Bill Gates would be able to monitor every individual in every country to determine whether enough people are sick to justify locking a region down.

    “To this end, the WHO has contracted German-based Deutsche Telekom subsidiary T-Systems to develop a global vaccine passport system, with plans to link every person on the planet to a QR code digital ID … Thus, there will be one pandemic treaty, one GERM team, one global vaccine passport and one World Health Organization to monitor every person on the planet.”

    Under WHO control, vaccine passports are a given
    Indeed, while countries around the world have scrubbed their COVID measures and backed away from vaccine passports, the WHO is still moving ahead with a global vaccine passport program.

    So, if the WHO is given the authority to dictate biosecurity rules for the world, you can bet they’ll insist on vaccine passports with built-in digital identity and readiness for a centralized programmable central bank digital currency.
    • As reported by the Western Standard:
    “The WHO fully intends to provide support to its 194 member states to facilitate the implementation of the digital verification technology for countries’ national and regional verification of vaccine status.

    “‘COVID-19 affects everyone. Countries will therefore only emerge from the pandemic together. Vaccination certificates that are tamper-proof and digitally verifiable build trust. WHO is therefore supporting member states in building national and regional trust networks and verification technology.

    “The WHO’s gateway service also serves as a bridge between regional systems. It can also be used as part of future vaccination campaigns and home-based records,’ said Garrett Mehl, unit head of the WHO’s Department of Digital Health and Innovation, on Deutsche Telekom’s website.”
    • Can we stop the international pandemic treaty?
    The question now is, can we stop this “international pandemic instrument” that the WHO is seeking? With short notice, the WHO announced it would accept public comment on the treaty for a total of five days.

    The World Council for Health was among the few that acted quickly enough to submit a comment in opposition to the treaty. Lawrie delivered the World Council for Health’s submission.
    • In an April 26 update on Substack, Lawrie wrote:
    “Despite the lack of notice, many grassroots organizations did what they could to spread the word and the World Council for Health’s #stopthetreaty campaign reached an astonishing 415 million people. Many of you made written submissions expressing your concerns. So many of you in fact, that I hear the WHO’s website crashed on the last day.”
    One person who missed the deadline was professor Robert Clancy, a leading clinical immunologist in Canada. He sent the comment he would have wanted to submit to
    • Lawrie, who included it in her post:
    “The proposal to take control of pandemics at a central WHO level is untenable and threatens a global society. I am in receipt of the World Council for Health response, and the superbly summarized view by Dr. Tess Lawrie. These concerns reflect the ‘across the board’ view of most Australian doctors …

    “The failure to understand the restrictions of systemic vaccination for mucosal infection and the dangers of accumulated suppression that follows mindless booster programs, and failure to interrogate the massive databases regarding adverse events of genetic vaccines are but two of the serious mistakes perpetuated by the WHO …

    “It is foolhardy to even suggest that a ‘one size fits all’ response to a pandemic crisis across geographic zones characterized by hugely different parameters, could possibly be covered by a central bureaucratic process — the need for local decision making is of prime importance.

    “The rule of science and the rule of the doctor-patient relationship must determine any response to a pandemic, and current experience where the rule of the narrative has so distorted disease outcomes — supported by the WHO — must make very clear the foolishness of rewarding incompetence and corruption with even greater powers.
    “I write this as the most experienced Clinical Immunologist in Australia, and a leading research scientist in Mucosal Immunology with a focus on ‘host-parasite relationship.’ Professor Robert Clancy AM FRS(N) MB BS BSc(Med) PhD DSc FRACP FRCP(A) FRCP(C)”
    • Make your voice heard in June
    While many, like Clancy, didn’t get a chance to participate, the WHO has announced it will allow for two more days of public comment, June 16 and 17. As noted by Lawrie:
    “Please also be aware of the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations, to be voted on this May at the World Health Assembly.

    “Like the pandemic treaty, this is another move to seize greater powers and override the sovereign laws of individual nations. Some say this is more significant than the pandemic treaty: if voted in, it means the loss of our sovereignty from this November. James Roguskihas written extensively about this on his Substack.

    “There seems to be a concerted effort by the WHO and its controllers to attack our sovereignty from all angles. It is important we make it clear that we do not recognize the WHO as an authority over us and that we will not tolerate this abuse of power.
    “We are sovereign and will not be bound by the undertakings of corrupt officials who pretend to act on our behalf when signing away the inherent rights of the World’s People. They do not act for us and we will not be bound.”

    I encourage you to make plans to have your voice heard June 16 and 17. Unfortunately, the WHO has not yet released any submission details. Your best bet right now is to sign up for the World Council for Health newsletter. The last time, they issued links and instructions on how to submit your comment, and are sure to do the same for the June submission window.

    To block the IHR amendments at the May 2022 World Health Assembly, we need to flood our respective delegations with opposition. A list of U.S. delegates can be found in Roguski’s Substack article, “Speaking Truth to Power.”

    For contact information for other nations’ delegates, I would suggest contacting the regional office and asking for a list (see “Regions” in the blue section at the bottom of the World Health Assemblywebpage). It’s also possible that the World Council for Health will publish guidance on it, so be sure to sign up for their newsletter.
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 26th February 2023 at 16:55.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  38. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    Harmony (26th February 2023), mountain_jim (26th February 2023)

  39. Link to Post #60
    Avalon Member mountain_jim's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th December 2010
    Posts
    8,756
    Thanks
    59,327
    Thanked 77,644 times in 8,594 posts

    Default Re: Global WHO Treaty for Pandemics with Digital ID and Digital Currency

    Well now I know what existing thread best maps to the posts I have made about these recent developments - thanks ExomatrixTV!
    I don't believe anything, but I have many suspicions. - Robert Anton Wilson

    The present as you think of it, and in practical working terms, is that point at which you select your physical experience from all those events that could be materialized. - Seth (The Nature of Personal Reality - Session 656, Page 293)

    (avatar image: Brocken spectre, a wonderful phenomenon of nature I have experienced and a symbol for my aspirations.)

  40. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mountain_jim For This Post:

    ExomatrixTV (27th February 2023), Harmony (26th February 2023)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 1 3 9 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts