+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: "How the state tried to silence my abusive agent exposé" (Daniel De Simone, BBC)

  1. Link to Post #1
    UK Avalon Member bogeyman's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th July 2012
    Location
    Norfolk UK
    Age
    54
    Posts
    1,537
    Thanks
    620
    Thanked 7,908 times in 1,388 posts

    Default "How the state tried to silence my abusive agent exposé" (Daniel De Simone, BBC)

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61528286

    No journalist enjoys attempts at censorship. We often face restrictions, but I had never encountered anything like this - a vast list of things the government wanted to ban me saying about an abusive MI5 agent I had spent a long time investigating.

    I received the list during the months-long legal battle between the BBC and the government. I had been investigating a state informant for some time, and when we put the findings to the government, they took us to court. It eventually ran to 54 pages and included a series of arguments about the government's demands. They wanted to stop our story about the agent who can only be referred to as X.

    The right-wing extremist had used his security service role to terrorise and coerce his British girlfriend, who we are calling Beth. In one incident, which she recorded on her mobile phone, he attacked her with a machete. Evidence we gathered establishes he had also threatened to kill women and children, and was a sexual threat to young girls.

    I was the main witness in the legal case to defend reporting on the story. The litigation process took over my life. The pressure was significant and I had many low moments. My journalism was under scrutiny - with government lawyers critically examining every detail in the large volume of evidence, and challenging the accuracy of our work.

    We argued that it was important to identify X so that other women he encountered could be warned about him and the abusive behaviour our investigation had uncovered. The security service, however, argued that naming X would create an unacceptable danger to him from extremists and discourage other people from acting as informants, which would damage national security.

    The government initially asked for the right to exercise written approval over our reporting. This would have amounted to ministers having editorial control over our story, which we argued in court would be "repugnant" to any media organisation but particularly the BBC, with its charter obligation of independence from government.

  2. The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to bogeyman For This Post:

    aoibhghaire (22nd May 2022), Blacklight43 (22nd May 2022), Blastolabs (22nd May 2022), Cognitive Dissident (23rd May 2022), East Sun (23rd May 2022), Ewan (22nd May 2022), Franny (23rd May 2022), Ivanhoe (23rd May 2022), O Donna (22nd May 2022), Orph (22nd May 2022), The KMan (23rd May 2022), TomKat (22nd May 2022), yelik (22nd May 2022)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Great Britain Avalon Member
    Join Date
    2nd May 2014
    Language
    English
    Posts
    1,282
    Thanks
    6,142
    Thanked 6,647 times in 1,188 posts

    Default Re: "How the state tried to silence my abusive agent exposé" (Daniel De Simone, BBC)

    Cross the UK Government / security forces at your own peril - they are monsters with little or no respect for anyone that might expose their corruption, lies and deception. Even if you are 100% correct they will hound you to deter others

  4. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to yelik For This Post:

    East Sun (23rd May 2022), Ewan (22nd May 2022), happyuk (22nd May 2022), O Donna (22nd May 2022), The KMan (23rd May 2022)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts