The Best & Longest Fact-Checking The “Fact Checkers” Rant Ever

[ExomatrixTV]

• The Best & Longest Fact-Checking The “Fact Checkers” Rant Ever!

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=RE0djFW1aZc

You can support him here:

• youtube.com/An0malyhiphop/videos
• twitter.com/LegendaryEnergy
• facebook.com/An0malyMusic
• instagram.com/DreamRare
• legendary.vision

--o-O-o--

1. Who-Pays-Fact-Checkers
2. FactCheckers-PopulationGrowth
3. 30-Covid-Facts-MSM-ignores
4. OutDatedFactCheckers
5. FactCheck-Vaccines-Bill-Gates
6. Context-Checkers-Scam
7. When-Fake-News-Backfires
8. FactCheckFails-2021
9. FactCheckersLie
10. Fb-Fact-Check-Lies
11. CheckFactCheckers
12. PolitiFactCheckFails
13. FactCheckers-Scandal
14. Denzel-on-Fake-News
15. FactCheckersNotFactual
16. FactCechers-BackPedals
17. Fact-Checkers-Debunked
18. Politicized-Fact-Checkers
19. Deceptive-Fact-Checkers
20. Dishonest-Fact-Checkers
21. 5G-FactCheck-Debunked
22. Who-Fact-Checks-Snopes
23. FactCheckers-Ignore-Lies
24. Hilarious-FactCheck-Satire
25. TimPool-vs-FactCheckers
26. Facts-About-Fact-Checkers
27. Tired-of-Fake-Fact-Checkers
28. FactCheckers-Misleading-You
29. China-Funds-Fb-Fact-Checker
30. FactCheck-Vaccines-Bill-Gates
31. Lawsuit-German-FactCheckers
32. Birdwatch-FactChecking-Scam
33. Fb-Fact-Checker-Scam-Exposed
34. Lawsuit-Against-Fb-FactChecker
35. FactCheckers-Deceptive-Framing
36. FactChecking-Fake-Stream-Media
37. FactChecking-LouderWithCrowder
38. CandaceOwens-Sues-FactCheckers

cheers,
John Kuhles aka 'ExomatrixTV'
June 1st, 2022 🦜🦋🌳

[ExomatrixTV]

• How Propagandists Co-Opted ‘Fact-Checkers’ and the Press to Control the Information Landscape

• source

• Fact Checkers CAUGHT In INSANE Lie About Russia, The Narrative Is BREAKING As Ukraine War Escalates:

• source

• After "Fact Checkers" Covered For Him, Confused Biden Botches Exit Again

• source

• Fact-Checking the Fact-Checkers on 2000 Mules

• source

• D'Souza's '2000 Mules' sends 'Fact-Checkers' in Panic Mode

• source

[ExomatrixTV]

• Living in the Golden Age of "Fact-Checking":
  

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=4GbbSCqNTZA

Hey internet friends. This video is about the well-known fact-checking website called Snopes: detailing the history of the platform, the husband and wife team, Barbara and David Mikkelson who started it all, the inner-workings of the company, who finances the content, and more!

[ExomatrixTV]

• Connecting the Dots: Fact Checkers, Funding & Microchips:

Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/OtpXNRDrWGP9

• Big Tech & 'Fact Checkers':

Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/fjrOrQ9xADF2

• Whitewashed Lies

[onawah]

The President of Facebook’s Science Feedback is Hiding in Paris, Terrified of Appearing in Court
by Paul D. Thacker
Published June 6, 2022
https://thevaccinereaction.org/2022/...ring-in-court/
Emmanuel Vincent


"The following is an excerpt from The DisInformation Chronicle by Paul D. Thacker.

Emmanuel Vincent is a hunted man.

On June 24, an officer of the French Ministry of the Interior, acting under the terms of the Hague Convention, summoned him to a police station and served him papers to appear in court for posting false and misleading statements in his role as president of Science Feedback, a Facebook fact checking service.

On top of this, the beleaguered nonprofit has weathered multiple critiques for posting politicized, biased opinions that call themselves “fact checks”—including a Wall Street Journal editorial that called out Science Feedback for attacking Johns Hopkins physician-researcher Marty Makary, after he wrote an essay predicting the arrival of COVID-19 herd immunity.

“This is counter-opinion masquerading as fact checking,” the Wall Street Journal wrote, noting that Dr. Makary never made a factual claim; he had made a prediction based on his analysis of available evidence.

If you’re interested in falling down a science rabbit hole, feel free to read what Dr. Makary wrote and how Science Feedback responded. But here’s the thing, you don’t need a PhD in epidemiology to understand that when experts analyze studies and make predictions they might be wrong.

Man on the Run
Back in August of 2020, Vincent was first served a legal complaint at the address for Science Feedback, at 40 Rue Alexandre Dumas, 75011, Paris, France. He was then served at a second address in Paris, 16, rue Cecile Furtado Heine.

By September 2020, a French legal agent learned that Vincent had registered Science Feedback at a different address in Paris.

He then called Mr. Vincent on his cell phone and delivered him the documents at a completely new address. (I think we’re now at four addresses) Vincent confirmed to the legal agent that he had already received the documents at one of the addresses, and then refused to sign a receipt.

The court documents were then translated into French, and sent to various addresses for Vincent and Science Feedback. Vincent was then sent certified translations of other legal proceedings against him, and by July of last year, the French Ministry of Justice attested that Vincent was served the documents under the Hague Convention.

According to a certified translation of the French Ministry documents, Ms. Marie Fonquerne, a judicial police officer, requested that Mr. Vincent appear at a police prefecture where he confirmed that he is president of Science Feedback. Vincent then agreed to accept correspondence at an email for Science Feedback, but then gave this weird explanation for why he could not accept the documents:

[I]t is the company SCIIVERIFY that works in partnership with FACEBOOK and not the association SCIENCE FEEDBACK. SCIVERIFY is a subsidiary of SCIENCE FEEDBACK and is located at 40 Rue Alexandre Dumas 75011 PARIS and it is who must be assigned. I refuse to accept the act which is not addressed to the right entity.

—Emmanuel Vincent

Vincent’s absurdist game of hide and seek has thus far cost over $17,000—as it required the hiring of French legal agents to personally hand-deliver him documents which he refused to sign, and the pursuit of service under the Hague Convention, in which he was summoned to a police station and once again refused to sign for documents.

Emmanuel Vincent did not respond to multiple requests for comment. What is this man afraid of?

Colluding with the Government
If the federal government censored people for disagreeing with the National institutes of Health (NIH) or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), that would obviously violate the First Amendment. Instead, the government outsources this censorship to Facebook.

Facebook provides censorship through a network of contract “fact checkers” like Science Feedback which receive some funding and training through Facebook and follow guidelines set up by Facebook for how to identify “false” information.

If you’re wondering what Facebook consider the baseline of scientific truth against which the measure other information as false, just check the websites of federal agencies such as the NIH or the CDC. Deviations from the government is likely to get a Science Feedback “fact check.”

Science Feedback has never once called out a media report or Twitter account for using the “conspiracy theory” label to attack the credibility of people questioning if the pandemic started from a lab accident in Wuhan, China."

Read Thacker’s entire Substack article here:https://disinformationchronicle.subs...ks-science?s=r

[ExomatrixTV]

• Facebook In Trouble? How Vaccine Companies Finance The 'Fact Checkers'

FactCheck.org, a 'fact checker' used to combat 'disinformation' about vaccines, is indirectly funded by Johnson & Johnson, the manufacturer of one of the corona vaccines.

FactCheck.org, which claims to be "independent," is funded by, among others, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, an organization that owns more than $1.8 billion in shares in Johnson & Johnson, and is run by Richard Besser, a former director of the CDC

back up video

• Conspiracy

Michael Rectenwald, who was a professor at New York University until 2019, warns that the vaccine makers are funding fact-checkers. He previously spoke of a 'conspiracy' in conversation with RT UK. Images of the interview are currently circulating on social media.

In the meantime , work is being done on a far - reaching censorship law . The European Commission, the European Parliament and the EU Member States have agreed on stricter legislation to 'better protect consumers'. The so-called Digital Services Act (DSA) regulates, among other things, the removal of 'illegal messages and disinformation'.

• Much more

"We have a deal. The DSA will ensure that what is illegal offline is seen and treated as illegal online," said Margrethe Versstager, the European Commissioner for Competition.

State Secretary Alexandra van Huffelen of Digitization said: “This legislation is a breakthrough in how we tackle disinformation.” She added that big tech companies now have to do a lot more and work with "independent" fact-checkers.

• dutch 🇳🇱 (+ Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳

[ExomatrixTV]

• Project Veritas Pfizer Fact Check Leans Towards Truth In SHOCKING Admission From Corporate Press:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=nOLJ7yr1Ias