Boris Johnson is ousted

[samildamach]

At dispatches Boris Johnson mentions kier starmer is a deep state operative and wants to bring us back into eu.i had trouble inbedding the clip sorry

[ExomatrixTV]

• Awkward Boris Johnson Bids Farewell To Uk Parliament:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=zwugzdU1G-0

[pounamuknight]

The cream of the Tory crop

Gamblers think conservative party will choose another blonde genius

[Bill Ryan]

In under 14 minutes, here's everything you need to know about the next British Prime Minister (whoever it is) — even though you hoped it wasn't true.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=3uSAkreUVeU

[Violet3]

Hard to watch and harder to understand how such world powers as the UK, the USA and Germany just destroy themselves in order to undermine another country- Russia- which would mind its own business if it could. What stupendous power is held by the globalists running this operation? How to they have such remote control that no-one in the political classes anywhere in the West can or will stop them to save their own people? Australia is of course also being towed on the same line.... the brutal results everywhere have yet to be seen.

[Tintin]

Journalist and author Peter Oborne has actually set up a website devoted to the lies of Boris Johnson. Yes, that's real

Too many to list here but for the inquisitive here's the link: https://boris-johnson-lies.com/

[mizo]

New PM

[mountain_jim]

This article from Tom Luongo has some things to say about the New PM (and they are not flattering), as well as Boris and the whole Ukraine-Russia sanctions debacle for Europe.

[norman]

This is all irrelevant anyway.

They're all in the same cage and snarling at us.

Stay away from the cage.

The sun is shining and the wind is blowing outside, go out and get some air.

[Spiral]

Well, as far as I'm concerned we no longer have a PM, because the reigning monarch has to formally appoint the PM, and we don't have a monarch because the Queen passed over during lockdown.

By now I'm less certain they are waiting for the right moment to tell the nation, and more of the mind that it is for legal ramifications re the WEF, Agenda 21 & the ruddy "Reset".

We are entering totally uncharted waters.

[The Moss Trooper]

Posted by Spiral (here)
Well, as far as I'm concerned we no longer have a PM, because the reigning monarch has to formally appoint the PM, and we don't have a monarch because the Queen passed over during lockdown.

By now I'm less certain they are waiting for the right moment to tell the nation, and more of the mind that it is for legal ramifications re the WEF, Agenda 21 & the ruddy "Reset".

We are entering totally uncharted waters.

Interested in any confirmed sources you have for that info.

Care to share?

[Mari]

Posted by Spiral (here)
Well, as far as I'm concerned we no longer have a PM, because the reigning monarch has to formally appoint the PM, and we don't have a monarch because the Queen passed over during lockdown.

By now I'm less certain they are waiting for the right moment to tell the nation, and more of the mind that it is for legal ramifications re the WEF, Agenda 21 & the ruddy "Reset".

We are entering totally uncharted waters.

Wonder who this is then..
https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/a9bc5...fit=max&dpr=2&

[Spiral]

The source is myself.

Which is why I said "as far as I'm concerned".

On this subject I'm not interested in other peoples opinions or views, I have my reasons.



Obviously if there were "confirmed sources" the whole world would know of it.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by Mari (here)

Posted by Spiral (here)
Well, as far as I'm concerned we no longer have a PM, because the reigning monarch has to formally appoint the PM, and we don't have a monarch because the Queen passed over during lockdown.

By now I'm less certain they are waiting for the right moment to tell the nation, and more of the mind that it is for legal ramifications re the WEF, Agenda 21 & the ruddy "Reset".

We are entering totally uncharted waters.

Wonder who this is then..

https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/a9bc5...fit=max&dpr=2&

I'm getting a 401 on that.

[Mari]

Posted by Spiral (here)
The source is myself.

Which is why I said "as far as I'm concerned".

On this subject I'm not interested in other peoples opinions or views, I have my reasons.



Obviously if there were "confirmed sources" the whole world would know of it.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by Mari (here)

Posted by Spiral (here)
Well, as far as I'm concerned we no longer have a PM, because the reigning monarch has to formally appoint the PM, and we don't have a monarch because the Queen passed over during lockdown.

By now I'm less certain they are waiting for the right moment to tell the nation, and more of the mind that it is for legal ramifications re the WEF, Agenda 21 & the ruddy "Reset".

We are entering totally uncharted waters.

Wonder who this is then..

https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/a9bc5...fit=max&dpr=2&

I'm getting a 401 on that.

Sorry - I think then that the image (of Truss shaking hands with Her Maj at Balmoral) is copyrighted? Gleaned from the Guardian online.

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/AnOpenSecret/sta...ibjcrSIqKr95lA

[mizo]

Posted by Spiral (here)
Well, as far as I'm concerned we no longer have a PM, because the reigning monarch has to formally appoint the PM, and we don't have a monarch because the Queen passed over during lockdown.

By now I'm less certain they are waiting for the right moment to tell the nation, and more of the mind that it is for legal ramifications re the WEF, Agenda 21 & the ruddy "Reset".

We are entering totally uncharted waters.

Problem solved...

[Spiral]

Posted by mountain_jim (here)
https://twitter.com/AnOpenSecret/sta...ibjcrSIqKr95lA

Savile wrote about his exploits with school girls in his autobiography, he'd exposed himself.


Which everyone studiously ignored.

No idea LT was from around there !

*edit* Blimey ! she went to the same high school as me !

Plus father a lecturer at Leeds Uni, a right nest of Marxists ! They don't cover her parents political leaning up either, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liz_Truss

[9ideon]

Posted by Spiral (here)
Well, as far as I'm concerned we no longer have a PM, because the reigning monarch has to formally appoint the PM, and we don't have a monarch because the Queen passed over during lockdown.

By now I'm less certain they are waiting for the right moment to tell the nation, and more of the mind that it is for legal ramifications re the WEF, Agenda 21 & the ruddy "Reset".

We are entering totally uncharted waters.

Can you explain more about where these thoughts are coming from? Personally I have a hard time believing this could stay quiet for long, on the other hand if true this would be very interesting It clearly indicates they do not want Charles as King, I'd not be surprised if they go for William instead.

[Brigantia]

Posted by 9ideon (here)

Posted by Spiral (here)
Well, as far as I'm concerned we no longer have a PM, because the reigning monarch has to formally appoint the PM, and we don't have a monarch because the Queen passed over during lockdown.

By now I'm less certain they are waiting for the right moment to tell the nation, and more of the mind that it is for legal ramifications re the WEF, Agenda 21 & the ruddy "Reset".

We are entering totally uncharted waters.

Can you explain more about where these thoughts are coming from? Personally I have a hard time believing this could stay quiet for long, on the other hand if true this would be very interesting It clearly indicates they do not want Charles as King, I'd not be surprised if they go for William instead.

It's possible that it's a double; I don't know for certain, but in history royals have used doubles in order to avoid assassination and often more than one.

There was speculation that Philip died in the spring of 2020 (officially he died a year later and had a grand funeral). In the early days of the first lockdown there was a podcast/video thing of various royals, I remember Kate, William and Sophie and a few others, and apart from Sophie everyone had red, puffy eyes (I've got to go out soon so have no time to look it up but I can do that later). No explanation for how they looked, it was rumoured that Philip had died. Of course he could not have had a grand funeral during that early lockdown, so the rumour was that he was probably either in a morgue or discreetly buried until the time when the masses could take to the streets of London to give him a grand send-off.

Just because there is a news story about the royals with pictures doesn't mean that it's real; I posted my thoughts on Meghan Markle here and the reasons as I see them for her purpose to bolster the royals. In these days of photo fakery it is not impossible that the photo was not of the Queen.

(My 1000th post! Do I get a badge? )

[9ideon]

Posted by Brigantia (here)

Posted by 9ideon (here)

Posted by Spiral (here)
Well, as far as I'm concerned we no longer have a PM, because the reigning monarch has to formally appoint the PM, and we don't have a monarch because the Queen passed over during lockdown.

By now I'm less certain they are waiting for the right moment to tell the nation, and more of the mind that it is for legal ramifications re the WEF, Agenda 21 & the ruddy "Reset".

We are entering totally uncharted waters.

Can you explain more about where these thoughts are coming from? Personally I have a hard time believing this could stay quiet for long, on the other hand if true this would be very interesting It clearly indicates they do not want Charles as King, I'd not be surprised if they go for William instead.

It's possible that it's a double; I don't know for certain, but in history royals have used doubles in order to avoid assassination and often more than one.

There was speculation that Philip died in the spring of 2020 (officially he died a year later and had a grand funeral). In the early days of the first lockdown there was a podcast/video thing of various royals, I remember Kate, William and Sophie and a few others, and apart from Sophie everyone had red, puffy eyes (I've got to go out soon so have no time to look it up but I can do that later). No explanation for how they looked, it was rumoured that Philip had died. Of course he could not have had a grand funeral during that early lockdown, so the rumour was that he was probably either in a morgue or discreetly buried until the time when the masses could take to the streets of London to give him a grand send-off.

Just because there is a news story about the royals with pictures doesn't mean that it's real; I posted my thoughts on Meghan Markle here and the reasons as I see them for her purpose to bolster the royals. In these days of photo fakery it is not impossible that the photo was not of the Queen.

(My 1000th post! Do I get a badge? )

Yes, am aware of the possibility of doubles. Hiding deaths of Royals would be considered a scandal by many means, scandals and Royals have a way of finding its way onto the surface pretty fast. Can't see this story bearing any truth, however, these days nothing seems surprising anymore.

Philip was a **** so I do not care when or how he died (personal opinion).