-
13th September 2022 02:20
Link to Post #21
Re: 9/11: Truth Still Matters, 21 Years Later
In post #13 on this thread I posted a link to a peer reviewed paper I wrote that was published in March of 2015. That paper argues for a critical review of the relevancy and reliability of expert opinions offered for or against the official explanation of the cause of the destruction of the WTC buildings on 9/11/2001.
The video in post #19 above points out what Gage called “the abuse of science regarding 9/11 and the pandemic”. (I’m paraphrasing.) The gist of his point is: experts were mustered to lie about the science and physics behind the collapse of the WTC buildings, and attack opposing experts opinions, just as experts were, and still are, mustered to lie about the science and medicine about the pandemic and the jabs, and attack opposing scientific and medical opinions.
To this I will add something I said on this Forum a year or so ago on a covid thread. That is, that the criminals took a lesson from 9/11. That lesson involved the need to be able to persuade and confuse the masses by means of the deployment of experts, so-called, and their expert opinions in connection with their pandemic and jab program they were going to launch against not just the US, but the world.
However, one problem the criminals faced with 9/11 was the visibility of what occurred. This problem was coupled with what people saw on that day, and on videos since that day, over and over again, year after year. People began to scratch their heads, wonder and question what destroyed the buildings. They began to form their own opinions, which began to differ from the opinions of the experts telling them to ignore what they saw and heard. This problem for the criminals was enhanced by the fact that while most people don’t fancy themselves a virologist, or an immunologist, or a medical doctor, or biologist or some such thing, they do fancy themselves to have a basic understanding, from experience, of the mechanics of fire, construction, and gravity. Also, far too many People had seen on TV and movies actual footage of buildings being brought down by controlled demolition. Thus, many of us can form and have formed our own opinions based upon our own experiences about buildings that collapse at free fall speed into their own footprint. The cause is controlled demolition of some sort. Even if we do not know the exact sort of explosive(s) actually deployed.
So, my belief is, that the criminals learned a lesson from 9/11. They understood they had a problem with the lay person acting as his and her own expert, not believing the governments’ experts and drawing conclusions contrary to the official narratives. This would lead to undesirable results, such as resistance, including vaccine hesitancy and other forms of noncompliance.
To address this, they realized that they need to get people to believe the experts about the pandemic and the jab so that most people will not feel they are qualified to question the experts and will comply. They also had to convince people to not trust any expert who came out against the official narrative. The media played an essential part in all of this, as it did with 9/11. To this very day.
A fix was needed for this problem. A virtually invisible “virus”, a global pandemic, shrouded in the mysteries of science, virology, immunology and the like, fit the bill perfectly. There’s nothing for anyone to see and question or doubt what they are seeing. The illness morphs, it is asymptomatic, it is wherever and whenever the experts say, it affects whomever and in myriad ways as the experts declare, and the symptoms vary and change and the treatment and cure is what the experts proclaim. If a real expert, not a paid shill, comes along who challenges the official narrative he or she is censored, or worse, just like 9/11.
Unlike 9/11, no layperson is going to feel qualified by experience within the kin of common people, or otherwise, to question the official narrative. Most people will be inclined to accept the opinions of the experts who are paraded about by the mainstream. People like Fauci.
Indeed as Neil deGrasse Tyson said on the Steve Colbert show in early 2020 when asked by Colbert about the so-called Corona virus and the pandemic, “I think we're in the middle of a massive experiment worldwide." To which Colbert replied, “You mean we're the guinea pigs?” To which deGrasse Tyson replied, nodding his head approvingly, "Maybe. The experiment is: will people listen to scientists." ... "Like Anthony Fauci." Colbert said....
Notably, deGrasse Tyson was wearing a tie that at up close appeared to be a NASA type rocket, but when the camera pulled back, it appeared very much to be a syringe and needle.
Predictive programming indeed.
Edit: To add video of the interview and to correct the quote. The discussion begins at the 54 second mark and goes on for about a minute. There may be a commercial before the interview starts.
https://www.cbs.com/shows/video/29D1...-B2D7D7FDB4AC/
Last edited by Satori; 30th September 2022 at 00:23.
-
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Satori For This Post:
Bluegreen (15th October 2022), Delight (13th September 2022), ExomatrixTV (13th September 2022), Jim_Duyer (14th October 2022), Johnnycomelately (13th September 2022), justntime2learn (15th October 2022), Mark (Star Mariner) (13th September 2022), mountain_jim (14th October 2022), Rizotto (15th October 2022)
-
13th September 2022 04:28
Link to Post #22