Fascism

[TomKat]

Per Mussolini, he definition of fascism is the merger of authoritarian government and big business (like Big Tech, Big Pharma for starters), as well as such niceties as censorship.
. Democrats say "Democracy is on the ballot"

After 2-1/2 years of textbook fascism under Biden, including the attempted Nuremberg crime of forced experimental injection of the population,especially those of fragile health, they are telling us that they will save us from fascism. Only Republicans, whom they are now (with Orwellian doublespeak) calling fascists, stood in their way.
So yes, Democracy IS on the ballot.

[Michel Leclerc]

True Tomkat.

But "democracy" is already the first stage of fascism. The whole idea of "one man one vote" is wrong. One should deserve one’s vote. People who are not interested in the improvement of the community as a community should not be able to sabotage the influence of those who are. Simply put: “sheeple” do not deserve voting rights – just as robots do not.

It dates back (at least) to the French Revolution. The “golden triad” “Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité” is wrong. It should not be “liberty, equality, fraternity” but “liberty or freedom, equity or fairness, fraternity”. Humans are not equal, and are not to be treated as equals. Being unequal, they should treat each other with fairness – that is something entirely different. (I refer to John Rawls.)

The total disruption of society as one can see happening in the United States, is clearly the degeneration of democracy into tyranny, precisely because people are considered “equal” so that all striving for or acknowledgement of, excellence is destroyed and, for example, "anti-racist" racism can surge.

It is often forgotten that the French Revolution ended in tyranny; Napoleon’s take-over was a form of enlightened despotism.

[shaberon]

Posted by Michel Leclerc (here)
But "democracy" is already the first stage of fascism.

Most transparent form of the Big Lie ever available.

They confess this crime every day and brag about it!

In this country, we fought the British, nominally against "monarchy", the result of which was the decision to prevent Democracy at all possible costs. This did not suit the Federalists, and such things were largely out of our hair until the time of Lincoln's Empire. On this, just take a little review of what Union troops did to what they called "their own people", such as Sherman's March, etc., and what you get is a big armed robbery. This was followed by increasingly tyrannical legislation, which in most senses surrendered the autonomy of the country to the Federal Reserve. Internally, the populace became a subject of statutory law, i. e. Democracy, which would not apply to anyone if you would keep the federal government in its place and assert your "state's rights".

Europe lost the intermediate step, monarchies were simply replaced by "countries", to whom, people are still subjects. From reading the German Constitution, for example, it very plainly makes all Germans subjects of the European Central Bank.

If I touch a ballot, I have just surrendered to fascist democracy, this whole "voting" thing is another stick-and-carrot so that you move voluntarily and obediently into whatever rat hole you are being marched into.

The job of Monarchy is to protect you from predatory forces such as high rents and other oppressive regimes spewed out by the "private sector". Because European monarchs started failing at this in the eighth century, it led to the conclusion that somehow monarchy is inherently bad, but all it really proves is a running theme of bad monarchs, with a few exceptions here and there.

Buzzwords like "Egalite'" are therefor extremely dangerous, in fact almost all of our problems derive from the ordinary person having no understanding of the technical meaning of words in the field of law. For example, whenever I check a box to agree that I am a "resident", I have just confessed to being a vagrant, a status criminal, presumed to be temporarily occupying a property to which I have no right. No one forced me to do that, they tricked me into it by saying it means "do you live here?", and we need to realize that our parents and policemen are far dumber than we are, and spread these dirty tricks like a mental disease, blindly, obediently, and willingly.

[TomKat]

It is interesting, perhaps ironic, that the Soviet-funded Democratic party of the 1970s and 1980s was kinder and more empathetic than the current China-funded Democratic party of the 1990s and beyond, which is more authoritarian. The collapse of the Soviet Union forced the Marxists in the Democratic party (Clinton, Gore) to turn to China for covert funding ,resulting in a fascistic China-like policy of clorporate merger as we see with Big Tech and Big Pharma.

[Michel Leclerc]

Posted by shaberon (here)

Posted by Michel Leclerc (here)
But "democracy" is already the first stage of fascism.

Most transparent form of the Big Lie ever available.

They confess this crime every day and brag about it!

In this country, we fought the British, nominally against "monarchy", the result of which was the decision to prevent Democracy at all possible costs. This did not suit the Federalists, and such things were largely out of our hair until the time of Lincoln's Empire. On this, just take a little review of what Union troops did to what they called "their own people", such as Sherman's March, etc., and what you get is a big armed robbery. This was followed by increasingly tyrannical legislation, which in most senses surrendered the autonomy of the country to the Federal Reserve. Internally, the populace became a subject of statutory law, i. e. Democracy, which would not apply to anyone if you would keep the federal government in its place and assert your "state's rights".

Europe lost the intermediate step, monarchies were simply replaced by "countries", to whom, people are still subjects. From reading the German Constitution, for example, it very plainly makes all Germans subjects of the European Central Bank.

If I touch a ballot, I have just surrendered to fascist democracy, this whole "voting" thing is another stick-and-carrot so that you move voluntarily and obediently into whatever rat hole you are being marched into.

The job of Monarchy is to protect you from predatory forces such as high rents and other oppressive regimes spewed out by the "private sector". Because European monarchs started failing at this in the eighth century, it led to the conclusion that somehow monarchy is inherently bad, but all it really proves is a running theme of bad monarchs, with a few exceptions here and there.

Buzzwords like "Egalite'" are therefor extremely dangerous, in fact almost all of our problems derive from the ordinary person having no understanding of the technical meaning of words in the field of law. For example, whenever I check a box to agree that I am a "resident", I have just confessed to being a vagrant, a status criminal, presumed to be temporarily occupying a property to which I have no right. No one forced me to do that, they tricked me into it by saying it means "do you live here?", and we need to realize that our parents and policemen are far dumber than we are, and spread these dirty tricks like a mental disease, blindly, obediently, and willingly.

Excellent. Alas. Glad to reread the essence of wat originally was meant to be monarchy (Order/Structure/Beginning by the One) on the basis of aristocracy (Power+Authority of the Excellent), and that it was perverted and subverted at the same time.

To get back to my hobbyhorse (although this irony ironises itself): it is the guileful substituting of the "equality" idea for the original "fairness" idea that was the first "fascist" step. The latest perversion of this is to state that only equality is fair. (And hence "positive discrimination" is equal – because it would be fair).

Your second point, Shaberon: not only do they not have any understanding of law, but neither, e.g. of statistics (the gigantic statistic first-grader’s mistake in counting the adverse effect incidence is not understood), nor of medicine, nor of religiosity (genuinely) nor of the difference between meaning and language (forgive me, I had to list this one) – because schooling is meant to kill learning, stereotyped behaviour meant to kill empathy and love, militarised sports and boot camp meant to kill sexual desire.

They do not want to understand, and they do not want to love. Wilful dumbness, wilful bluntness. The fascist troops that paraded through Italy, the SA that marched through Germany, the collective idiocy around sports events: it is already the tyrant-loving crowd that loves itself as tyrant in the effective tyrant.

As Hitler said: "Ich kann nichts tun ohne den Willen des Volkes, aber wenn ihr, das Volk, mir euren Willen gibt, dann kann ich euer Führer sein” (approximation of a speech statement): “I cannot do anything without the will of the people, but when you, the people, give me your will, I can be your leader.”

[TomKat]

Glenn Beck interviews Whitney Webb on how the efascists plan to enslave us all:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=w-d3jFIGxdQ

[ozmirage]

FASCISM ISN’T FASCIST
Fascism isn’t the “right” term

FASCISM - any political or social ideology of the extreme right which relies on a combination of pseudo-religious attitudes and the brutal use of force for getting and keeping power.
- - - Webster's Dictionary

FYI : right wing = traditional authority or opinion; left wing = opposed to traditional authority or opinion.

In America's case, "traditional authority" is Creator endowed rights secured by government, not compulsory charity and expropriation of surplus by the Peoples Democratic Socialist Republic of America.

But if “traditional authority” refers to the 89 years of the PDSRA, then the anti-fascists are actually fascists.

And the so-called Fascists of the 1930s were left wingers - opposed to traditional authority. (Socialists, communists, etc)

------------
The QUESTION : "WHAT" is traditional authority in these united States of America?

A. The government instituted to secure Creator endowed rights to life, liberty, inherent powers, absolute ownership, etc, etc from predators?
-or-
B. The perpetually bankrupt collectivist totalitarian police state government that imposes mandatory civic duties, compulsory charity (slavery) and expropriation of property (theft) for the benefit of another?

BTW - in a republican form, no democratic majority, elected official or constitution can tax, regulate, or trespass Creator endowed rights.