Musk is not the answer

[Paul D.]

If only Musk would read this reply from Majid Nawaz .
He has a point or two.

Text:
May I suggest you:

1) stop being WAR-CRIMINAL Netanyahu’s little bitch

2) stop SHADOW BANNING genuine anti-globalist voices on this platform

3) stop hiring WEF agents to run this platform

4) stop personally promoting voices that bait against Islam & Muslims on this platform in order to divide & conquer on behalf of your Likudnik-Zionist friends

5) Address your porn not “link in bio” problem on this platform

6) curb your desire to turn this platform into a technocratic social-credit scoring WeChat ‘everything app’

7) Stop experimentally chipping the brains of animals & humans on behalf of your transhumanist eugenicist masters

8) stop coincidentally timing decisions such as allowing Nick Fuentes back on here just as Congress seeks to weaponise fears of anti-Semitism in order to ban criticism of maniacal Likudnik-Zionist war crimes in Gaza

[onawah]

Musk discredited by Whitney Webb on Jimmy Dore (start at 42 minutes into the interview)
Whitney Webb is interviewed by Jimmy Dore, and gives an overview of what she expressed in the long article she just published about JDVance.
JD Vance Deep Ties To The Surveillance State! w/ Whitney Webb!
The Jimmy Dore Show
1.38M subscribers
Jul 20, 2024

"In this extended, wide-ranging interview, Jimmy and Unlimited Hangout contributing editor and One Nation Under Blackmail author Whitney Webb discuss whether Trump’s VP pick JD Vance is a puppet of billionaire Peter Thiel, the real reason Elon Musk purchased Twitter, how the dystopian future of policing in the film Minority Report is becoming a reality, and much much more."

Whitney Webb on Twitter: https://twitter.com_whitneywebb
Whitney’s website: https://unlimitedhangout.com/

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=sGySygy0LWs

The whole long article by Webb is copied here:https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1623992

[Mike]

I think Elon Musk is a good man. His actions tell me so. And his speech. I'll put that up against whatever deep state connections Whitney Webb is always warning us about. You can't become Elon Musk (or anyone of note really) without tangling webs with deep state entities. So I'm not that alarmed when I hear this stuff.

If western civilization is salvaged, it will be in no small part due to his purchase of Twitter, which allowed the reintroduction of free speech into the social marketplace. Having seen quite a number of his interviews, I have to say I'm impressed with him and I remain convinced of his good intentions and willingness to fight those who wish to destroy the west.

I think Webb does some really fantastic work, but she is cynical about nearly everyone and everything. I just don't think it's a useful mentality.

[edina]

Thank you Mike, there's been something gnawing at me at the mentality you mention.
It's become almost as if it's wrong to look for the good in someone.

[onawah]

I think there is some good in most people, but those whose ambition have placed them in positions of great power, fame and wealth are greatly tempted, and often fail the tests.
I don't generally look for my role models among them, especially those who aspire to great power, for as the saying goes, "power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely".

Not that rich and powerful aren't also capable of doing good, but I don't think Musk has expunged his current karmic debt, certainly not yet, anyway.
His leadership role in transhumanism goes on, for one thing, and that is a huge black mark.
His ties with the CCP do him no credit, and he must have them or he would not have a Tesla factory in China.
Is Neuralink or are electric cars actually helping humanity?
Those two endeavors barely scrape the surface of Musk's involvements, but I don't want to go into that history, though Whitney Webb ties him to DARPA, and though she may be cynical (or at the very least, sketical), I think she is truthful, thorough and brilliant in her research work.
I just want to point out that people like Musk, in such positions of fame, wealth and power don't often get there without being ruthless, unscrupulous and self-serving along the way, and I would certainly say that is as true today as it has ever been.
I think to trust them is perilous and I bear this in mind:

Timothy 6:10 King James Version
"For we brought nothing into this world, and it is certain we can carry nothing out.
And having food and raiment let us be therewith content. But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition.
For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows."

Also:
The Four Enemies of Man
(The Teachings of don Juan)
https://toltecschool.com/toltec-inde...enemies-of-man

"In our conversations, don Juan consistently used or referred to the phrase “man of knowledge”, but never explained what he meant by it. I asked him about it.
“A man of knowledge is one who has followed truthfully the hardships of learning,” he said. “A man who has, without rushing or without faltering, gone as far as he can in unravelling the secrets of power and knowledge.”
“Can anyone be a man of knowledge?”
“No, not anyone.”
“Then what must a man do to become a man of knowledge?”
“He must challenge and defeat his four natural enemies.”
“Will he be a man of knowledge after defeating these four enemies?”
“Yes. A man can call himself a man of knowledge only if he is capable of defeating all four of them.”
“Then, can anybody who defeats these enemies be a man of knowledge?”
“Anybody who defeats them becomes a man of knowledge”
“But are there any special requirements a man must fulfill before fighting with these enemies?”
“No. Anyone can try to become a man of knowledge; very few men actually succeed, but that is only natural.
The enemies a man encounters on the path of learning to become a man of knowledge are truly formidable; most men succumb to them.”
“What kind of enemies are they, don Juan?”
He refused to talk about the enemies. He said it would be a long time before the subject would make any sense to me. I tried to keep the topic alive and asked him if he thought I could become a man of knowledge. He said no man could possibly tell that for sure. But I insisted on knowing if there were any clues he could use to determine whether or not I had a chance of becoming a man of knowledge. He said it would depend on my battle against the four enemies – whether I could defeat them or would be defeated by them – but it was impossible to foretell the outcome of that fight.
I asked him if he could use witchcraft or divination to see the outcome of the battle. He flatly stated that the result of the struggle could not be foreseen by any means, because becoming a man of knowledge was a temporary thing. When I asked him to explain this point, he replied:
“To be a man of knowledge has no permanence. One is never a man of knowledge, not really. Rather, one becomes a man of knowledge for a very brief instant, after defeating the four natural enemies.”
“You must tell me, don Juan, what kind of enemies they are.”
He did not answer. I insisted again, but he dropped the subject and started to talk about something else.

***

As I was getting ready to leave, I decided to ask him once more about the enemies of a man of knowledge. I argued that I could not return for some time, and it would be a good idea to write down what he had to say and then think about it while I was away.
He hesitated for a while, but then began to talk.
“When a man starts to learn, he is never clear about his objectives. His purpose is faulty; his intent is vague. He hopes for rewards that will never materialize, for he knows nothing of the hardships of learning.”
“He slowly begins to learn – bit by bit at first, then in big chunks. And his thoughts soon clash. What he learns is never what he pictured, or imagined, and so he begins to be afraid. Learning is never what one expects.
Every step of learning is a new task, and the fear the man is experiencing begins to mount mercilessly, unyieldingly. His purpose becomes a battlefield.”
“And thus he has stumbled upon the first of his natural enemies: Fear! A terrible enemy – treacherous, and difficult to overcome. It remains concealed at every turn of the way, prowling, waiting. And if the man, terrified in its presence, runs away, his enemy will have put an end to his quest.”
“What will happen to the man if he runs away in fear?”
“Nothing happens to him except that he will never learn. He will never become a man of knowledge. He will perhaps be a bully or a harmless, scared man; at any rate, he will be a defeated man. His first enemy will have put an end to his cravings.”
“And what can he do to overcome fear?”
“The answer is very simple. He must not run away. He must defy his fear, and in spite of it he must take the next step in learning, and the next, and the next. He must be fully afraid, and yet he must not stop. That is the rule! And a moment will come when his first enemy retreats. The man begins to feel sure of himself. His intent becomes stronger. Learning is no longer a terrifying task.”
“When this joyful moment comes, the man can say without hesitation that he has defeated his first natural enemy.”
“Does it happen at once, don Juan, or little by little?”
“It happens little by little, and yet the fear is vanquished suddenly and fast.”
“But won’t the man be afraid again if something new happens to him?”
“No. Once a man has vanquished fear, he is free from it for the rest of his life because, instead of fear, he has acquired clarity – a clarity of mind which erases fear. By then a man knows his desires; he knows how to satisfy those desires. He can anticipate the new steps of learning, and a sharp clarity surrounds everything. The man feels that nothing is concealed.”
“And thus he has encountered his second enemy: Clarity! That clarity of mind, which is so hard to obtain, dispels fear, but also blinds.”
“It forces the man never to doubt himself. It gives him the assurance he can do anything he pleases, for he sees clearly into everything. And he is courageous because he is clear, and he stops at nothing because he is clear. But all that is a mistake; it is like something incomplete. If the man yields to this make-believe power, he has succumbed to his second enemy and will fumble with learning. He will rush when he should be patient, or he will be patient when he should rush. And he will fumble with learning until he winds up incapable of learning anything more.”
“What becomes of a man who is defeated in that way, don Juan? Does he die as a result?”
“No, he doesn’t die. His second enemy has just stopped him cold from trying to become a man of knowledge; instead, the man may turn into a buoyant warrior, or a clown. Yet the clarity for which he has paid so dearly will never change to darkness and fear again. He will be clear as long as he lives, but he will no longer learn, or yearn for anything.”
“But what does he have to do to avoid being defeated?”
“He must do what he did with fear: he must defy his clarity and use it only to see, and wait patiently and measure carefully before taking new steps; he must think, above all, that his clarity is almost a mistake. And a moment will come when he will understand that his clarity was only a point before his eyes. And thus he will have overcome his second enemy, and will arrive at a position where nothing can harm him any more. This will not be a mistake. It will not be only a point before his eyes. It will be true power.”
“He will know at this point that the power he has been pursuing for so long is finally his. He can do with it whatever he pleases. His ally is at his command. His wish is the rule. He sees all that is around him. But he has also come across his third enemy: Power!”
“Power is the strongest of all enemies. And naturally the easiest thing to do is to give in; after all, the man is truly invincible. He commands; he begins by taking calculated risks, and ends in making rules, because he is a master.”
“A man at this stage hardly notices his third enemy closing in on him. And suddenly, without knowing, he will certainly have lost the battle. His enemy will have turned him into a cruel, capricious man.”
“Will he lose his power?”
“No, he will never lose his clarity or his power.”
“What then will distinguish him from a man of knowledge?”
“A man who is defeated by power dies without really knowing how to handle it. Power is only a burden upon his fate. Such a man has no command over himself, and cannot tell when or how to use his power.”
“Is the defeat by any of these enemies a final defeat?”
“Of course it is final. Once one of these enemies overpowers a man there is nothing he can do.”
“Is it possible, for instance, that the man who is defeated by power may see his error and mend his ways?”
“No. Once a man gives in he is through.”
“But what if he is temporarily blinded by power, and then refuses it?”
“That means his battle is still on. That means he is still trying to become a man of knowledge. A man is defeated only when he no longer tries, and abandons himself.”
“But then, don Juan, it is possible that a man may abandon himself to fear for years, but finally conquer it.”
“No, that is not true. If he gives in to fear he will never conquer it, because he will shy away from learning and never try again. But if he tries to learn for years in the midst of his fear, he will eventually conquer it because he will never have really abandoned himself to it.”
“How can he defeat his third enemy, don Juan?”
“He has to defy it, deliberately. He has to come to realize the power he has seemingly conquered is in reality never his. He must keep himself in line at all times, handling carefully and faithfully all that he has learned. If he can see that clarity and power, without his control over himself, are worse than mistakes, he will reach a point where everything is held in check. He will know then when and how to use his power. And thus he will have defeated his third enemy.”
“The man will be, by then, at the end of his journey of learning, and almost without warning he will come upon the last of his enemies: Old age! This enemy is the cruelest of all, the one he won’t be able to defeat completely, but only fight away.”
“This is the time when a man has no more fears, no more impatient clarity of mind – a time when all his power is in check, but also the time when he has an unyielding desire to rest. If he gives in totally to his desire to lie down and forget, if he soothes himself in tiredness, he will have lost his last round, and his enemy will cut him down into a feeble old creature. His desire to retreat will overrule all his clarity, his power, and his knowledge.”
“But if the man sloughs off his tiredness, and lives his fate through, he can then be called a man of knowledge, if only for the brief moment when he succeeds in fighting off his last, invincible enemy. That moment of clarity, power, and knowledge is enough.”

Posted by Mike (here)
I think Elon Musk is a good man. His actions tell me so. And his speech. I'll put that up against whatever deep state connections Whitney Webb is always warning us about. You can't become Elon Musk (or anyone of note really) without tangling webs with deep state entities. So I'm not that alarmed when I hear this stuff.

If western civilization is salvaged, it will be in no small part due to his purchase of Twitter, which allowed the reintroduction of free speech into the social marketplace. Having seen quite a number of his interviews, I have to say I'm impressed with him and I remain convinced of his good intentions and willingness to fight those who wish to destroy the west.

I think Webb does some really fantastic work, but she is cynical about nearly everyone and everything. I just don't think it's a useful mentality.

Posted by edina (here)
Thank you Mike, there's been something gnawing at me at the mentality you mention.
It's become almost as if it's wrong to look for the good in someone.

[Merlinus]

Musk is a puppet, controlled, as are all public figures. The REAL powers are hidden, they hide in the shadows. All public affairs are smoke and mirrors, roughly speaking.

[onawah]

There's a very interesting post from Ravenlocke here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1624091
...It's focus is Lex Wexner, but also others of his ilk who wrestle with the tempations of power and often seem to exhibit dual personalities (or possibly incarnate entities which try to control them), and I think parallels can be drawn to Musk as well.

Update:
Musk's ties as a "Young Global Leader" to the World Economic Forum should not be forgotten (even though Schwab himself eventually spoke out against Musk who hasn't completely toed the WEF's line.)
From 2022 (italics my emphasis) : "This may surprise some, but even Elon Musk is a listed YGL, and another PayPal co-founder, Peter Thiel – who’s also on the steering committee of the Bilderberg group – is also listed as a YGL. Thiel recently co-founded Strive Asset Management – an anti-ESG fund provider aimed at becoming the non-woke alternative to BlackRock – with “Woke, Inc.” author Vivek Ramaswamy. Well, Ramaswamy, a very vocal opponent of ESG, is also a named YGL.

Musk, Thiel and Ramaswamy are arguably the three most influential and outspoken anti-woke, anti-globalist businessmen on the planet. Yet, all three are YGLs and just so happen to also be business partners with each other. I’m not sure what to make of that strange fact (perhaps their public opposition to the WEF agenda is in part informed by their inside exposure to it?). Whatever the reason, their connection to the WEF shouldn’t be ignored – we should be able to recognize and appreciate some of the good work they are doing while reserving some skepticism given their history."
https://humanevents.com/2022/11/10/w...global-leaders
Do Musk's government subsidized projects like Star Link and pricey rockets actually benefit humanity? Or are they actually ambitious projects created to enhance Musk's personal fame while at the same time giving the Globalists ever more more ability to chainlink everyone into their "1984" scenario of total global control, and turning space into another warzone?
He wouldn't be getting subsidized if those projects weren't something the Globalists wanted--he is indeed another pawn, imho.

[Merlinus]

If musk spoke out of line, or got too cocky, he would be taken out/sorted out within a few days, he's simply a gatekeeper. He plays a role . Just like king charles isn't actually the king of Britain, it's only a front, the real king is hidden.

[Mike]

Posted by onawah (here)
There's a very interesting post from Ravenlocke here: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1624091
...It's focus is Lex Wexner, but also others of his ilk who wrestle with the tempations of power and often seem to exhibit dual personalities (or possibly incarnate entities which try to control them), and I think parallels can be drawn to Musk as well.

Update:
Musk's ties as a "Young Global Leader" to the World Economic Forum should not be forgotten (even though Schwab himself eventually spoke out against Musk who hasn't completely toed the WEF's line.)
From 2022 (italics my emphasis) : "This may surprise some, but even Elon Musk is a listed YGL, and another PayPal co-founder, Peter Thiel – who’s also on the steering committee of the Bilderberg group – is also listed as a YGL. Thiel recently co-founded Strive Asset Management – an anti-ESG fund provider aimed at becoming the non-woke alternative to BlackRock – with “Woke, Inc.” author Vivek Ramaswamy. Well, Ramaswamy, a very vocal opponent of ESG, is also a named YGL.

Musk, Thiel and Ramaswamy are arguably the three most influential and outspoken anti-woke, anti-globalist businessmen on the planet. Yet, all three are YGLs and just so happen to also be business partners with each other. I’m not sure what to make of that strange fact (perhaps their public opposition to the WEF agenda is in part informed by their inside exposure to it?). Whatever the reason, their connection to the WEF shouldn’t be ignored – we should be able to recognize and appreciate some of the good work they are doing while reserving some skepticism given their history."
https://humanevents.com/2022/11/10/w...global-leaders
Do Musk's government subsidized projects like Star Link and pricey rockets actually benefit humanity? Or are they actually ambitious projects created to enhance Musk's personal fame while at the same time giving the Globalists ever more more ability to chainlink everyone into their "1984" scenario of total global control, and turning space into another warzone?
He wouldn't be getting subsidized if those projects weren't something the Globalists wanted--he is indeed another pawn, imho.

Nat as I understand it the YGL thing is just sort of bestowed upon you, whether you want it or not (Vivek declined the nomination and they still insisted on keeping him on these WEF lists). It's not something that is sought out necessarily; you get nominated and you can either accept or decline. Not sure about Elon or the other guy, but I know Vivek declined his nomination.

He openly renounced it all, and wants nothing to do with it. He actually sued the WEF to get his name off that list. 4 mins:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=J7QoYsIFLtw

I don't know the details of Musk's YGL association, but I know he openly ridicules the WEF and avoids their meetings. That should tell you what he thinks of them.

[onawah]

Good to know! Thanks Mike. But are Musk and Vivek still in business with Thiel?

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by Mike (here)
I think Elon Musk is a good man. His actions tell me so. And his speech. I'll put that up against whatever deep state connections Whitney Webb is always warning us about. You can't become Elon Musk (or anyone of note really) without tangling webs with deep state entities. So I'm not that alarmed when I hear this stuff.

If western civilization is salvaged, it will be in no small part due to his purchase of Twitter, which allowed the reintroduction of free speech into the social marketplace. Having seen quite a number of his interviews, I have to say I'm impressed with him and I remain convinced of his good intentions and willingness to fight those who wish to destroy the west.

I think Webb does some really fantastic work, but she is cynical about nearly everyone and everything. I just don't think it's a useful mentality.

Elon Musk like many other "rebellious types" may have many real genuine authentic benevolent aspirations and want to do things in a certain way to, eventually, "get things done" ... the problem with that is >>> how much are you willing to sacrifice of yourself to sell that mission of yours using a compromise you are NOT proud of, but do it anyway "for the greater good" ...

On top of that problem you have that any really successful billionaire will (most likely) be threatened, coerced, bribed, seduced, manipulated, deceived maybe even blackmailed from almost all angles like the: CIA, NSA, FBI the whole Bi-Partisan Deep State Gang/Minions, The Chinese CCP etc. etc.

The moment you are hijacked, and you have to act you are not ... how long are you able to play along calling yourself an "independent" thinker? ... This severe problem/issue can happen to everybody, even to the best Souls of this planet ... We do not know how deep & far-reaching the threats are, how far ANY adversary are wiling to go to compromise pioneers like Elon Musk ... same for Donald Trump and other big key-players in the world.

* It is very easy for us to assume that someone "must" be evil promoting certain things that help WEF BBB Great (Dystopian) Reset "Global Governance" Agenda 2030 & NetZero 2050

If you were in their shoes you might think you can fight from within infiltrate into their inner circles and hope to find other like-minded rebels ... or you already decided to expose it all if the time is right but "play along" for a while waiting for the right moment to do so ... with the high risk of being killed or worse (long list of horror I do not wish to enlist here).

Again it is SO EASY to assume someone "must (somehow) be evil" ... to me that remains to be seen on the long run .... Same for all other key-players, especially all who seem 100% legit or 100% benevolent ... not everything is as it seems is more prevalent these days in 2020-2022 and beyond!

* I try to postpone the ultimate judgment and do not yet give the "benefit of the doubt" but rather be 100% neutral and see what happens ... studying all (!) good & bad signs! ...

• Maybe I need to make a list of "pro's" vs "con's" of Elon Musk and what most conspiracy researchers may have overlooked or "forgot" to think about ... Maybe it will my first real video production after long time being silent ... (having lost multiple big YT channels with total over 135.000+ subscribers).

cheers,
John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳

100% related:

• When an Accusation like 'Controlled Opposition' loses its value!
• Elon Musk, The Masterful Troll
• Elon Musk, Alex Jones, Vivek Ramaswamy, Andrew Tate Have A Chat
• See also this (...)
• Is Alternative Media a form of Group Therapy?

[arjunaloka_official]

Halloween

Holiday to celebrate indulgence and embrace the darkness and its aesthetic

Halloween is consistently described as evil, demonic, and satanic by those steeped in
religious dogma. Costumes, candy, and facing fears are to be embraced.

https://thesatanictemple.com/pages/holidays

[onawah]

What does this have to do with Elon Musk?
QUOTE=arjunaloka_official;1624726]

Halloween

Holiday to celebrate indulgence and embrace the darkness and its aesthetic

Halloween is consistently described as evil, demonic, and satanic by those steeped in
religious dogma. Costumes, candy, and facing fears are to be embraced.

https://thesatanictemple.com/pages/holidays[/QUOTE]

[jaybee]

.

This isn't about whether Elon Musk IS or IS NOT the answer..... no one man or woman can ever be THE answer anyway ... making the thread title a kind of 'non sequitur' ..

but this is about something that has affected him deeply and personally and influenced his politics + his contribution to 21st Century political struggles...

from the Infowars site...

Elon Musk Says Son “Dead” Thanks to Woke Mind Virus Putting Son on Puberty Blockers

"The reason it's called 'deadnaming' is because your son is dead. So my son Xavier is dead. Killed by the woke mind virus."

"So I vowed to destroy the woke mind virus after that."


Tech entrepreneur Elon Musk’s son is essentially dead due to the leftist transgender culture rot that infected his brain, the Tesla CEO said Monday.

Describing how the “woke mind virus” had taken over, Musk said his son “Xavier” was for all intents and purposes is dead, just like the transgender term “dead-name” implies.

“ It happened to one of my older boys, um, where I was essentially tricked into signing documents for one of my older boys, Xavier,” Musk said in a recent Daily Wire interview.

“This was before I had really any understanding of what was going on, and then we had COVID going on. And so there was a lot of confusion. And… I was told, oh, you know, say ‘Everyone might commit suicide if, if you don’t.'”

“That was a lie right from the outset. Incredibly evil,” Musk said, adding, “And I agree with you that people that have been promoting this should go to prison.”

Another reason for going along with the trendy transgender fad was that he hadn’t been informed “that puberty blockers are actually just sterilization drugs,” Musk said.

“And so, I lost my son, essentially.”

“You know, they call it ‘deadnaming’ for a reason,” he continued, adding, “The reason it’s called ‘deadnaming’ is because your son is dead. So my son Xavier is dead. Killed by the woke mind virus.”

The X owner explained the issue had steeled his resolve to combat trans insanity, saying, “So I vowed to destroy the woke mind virus after that.”

While Musk initially leaned left politically, he has since corrected his stance after observing the left’s destruction of society and culture, coming full circle to endorse former President Donald Trump’s re-election bid.

many many parents must be going through the same nightmare or something similar :- (

[bojancan]

Elon Musk RESISTS SUBPOENA In Epstein Related Legal Case | The Kyle Kulinski Show

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=XuoGyVEpJVE

[bojancan]

New... these moments!

Elon Musk backs down from $45 million a month pledge to Trump... says... he doesn't 'subscribe to cult
of personality'

[Mike]

Posted by bojancan (here)
New... these moments!

Elon Musk backs down from $45 million a month pledge to Trump... says... he doesn't 'subscribe to cult
of personality'

He never pledged to give $45 million a month in the first place.

He's voting for Trump.

He doesn't believe in the cult of personality but he believes Trump's policies are better for the country.

There's nothing true or dramatic about anything you've said.

[bojancan]

I am not for Kamala... but this Elon... will get back boomerang ... for sure! Not good for him and around him!
He is not honest great one... for sure!

Elon Musk Violates His Own Policy, Posts Kamala Harris Deepfake

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=zFq_ETc7bf0

Kamala Harris’ ‘Fake’ Campaign Video shared by Elon musk; AI Cloning Of Harris’ Voice

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=w_PXh0O1D40

[onawah]

This Is Why Elon Musk REALLY Bought Twitter! w/ Whitney Webb
The Jimmy Dore Show
1.4M subscribers
Aug 5, 2024

(One comment really resonated: "Elon is the definition of controlled opposition.")

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Dvw_NFCKzxY

Every Platform Is COMPROMISED!
The Jimmy Dore Show
1.4M subscribers
Aug 5, 2024

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=tD_H1oNnOWU

[bojancan]

Elon fell into the trap... shamming his child... he is absolute power corrupts..
Now, his daughter stepping out... I like her for her courage.. she is exposing him as a father and a man!He was never a good parent...


Elon Musk Brutally SHUT DOWN By Devastating Reality Check In Daughter's Post

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=XMkrub-PYNw