+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 43

Thread: Is Project Veritas controlled opposition?

  1. Link to Post #1
    Ireland Avalon Member aoibhghaire's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th October 2015
    Location
    Valdepeñas de Jaén, SPAIN
    Posts
    872
    Thanks
    11,173
    Thanked 6,469 times in 858 posts

    Default Is Project Veritas controlled opposition?

    The operations of Project Veritas (PV), has only one goal, a money making activity with no interest in the truth when criminal evidence can be exposed but never to the media which they are part of.

    Over the years, whenever whistle-blower comes forward and presents verbal evidence that is crucial to what goes on in various establishments there are never any prosecutions after these events.

    PV exists to create a ' school play' that causes emotional triggers for the public and media. The sensation alone entraps people over such an emotional event. There is a pattern to a strategy to make announcements that come in 3 drip feeds. We have the current Walker event that has the first two. This last combined two gained huge views of 30M and income of 2M dollars over 7 days for PV.

    The third one may not come out as researchers are now finding out that PV is not what they represent. There is no rigur to there research, but an ala cart menu that only selects and supplies sensation without repercussions for themselves. They leave the criminals out of the equation even though they know they have the evidence to act.

    PV a niche media industry to announce significant events with a marketing strategic model of 3 drips and no follow through for prosecutions of any sort. It creates a sensation without serious repurcusions for its marketing model.

    In the recent viral video, James O’Keefe fantastically overstates the role of a Boston Consulting Group contractor as the Director of mRNA Scientific Planning. in this viral video. Jordon Walker, the Boston Consulting Group contractor, even yells at O’Keefe, “I’m a contractor! I’m a contractor! I’m a contractor!” in the video.

    A minor Boston Consulting Group contractor for Pfizer named Jordon Walker, grossly overstating his position at Pfizer as “Director of Worldwide R&D Strategic Operation and mRNA Scientific Planning”

    In a Project Veritas viral video, Jordon Walker explains to James O’Keefe he was fantastically exaggerating his position as a contractor at Pfizer to impress a date, explaining to O’Keefe, “I am literally a liar”. O’Keefe chose to publish the gross exaggerations as facts anyway.

    No matter, the Project Veritas video still garnered over 30 million views, and Project Veritas raised over two million dollars in the seven days the video ran.

    Walkers checkered background:

    Project Veritas did very little fact-checking of their story or they would have found out that Jordon Walker washed out of his first job as a doctor at an internship at Tufts University in Boston after only a few months. Walker had lied to his Project Veritas date that he was a urologist which requires a five-year residency - an easily verifiable fact. Walker had also completely lied about having an internship at Mass General Hospital in Boston, MA. Again, an easily verifiable fact.


    Walker never finished his medical degree and has had a series of odd jobs over the years that just don’t fit a Pfizer executive high position. For example, he was some years as an entertainer on a cruise liner, which included dancing. There is a dancing school nearby in Brooklin which he may have attended as he may live nearby. Walker may have been contracted by Pfizer for one day encompassed in an umbrella contractor role.
    Therefore he’s in that position to show his badge, but his credibility is lacking. When one explores Walkers background it doesn’t add up for a person that is portrayed in this recent PV event.

    Restaraunt scene:

    Similarly, PV’s portrayal scene of the Pizza restaurant beside the Brooklin bridge shows film footage inside and outside that are inconsistent. Interestingly enough, other restaurants nearby within a 300 metre radius from the first Pizza restaurant appear to have been selected and used to show a slightly different scene within the film footage. It appears to be inconsistency when one analyses the scene. Meaning the two or more restaraunts may have been used, in particular different paintings showing up. This is not important and it doesn’t mean its bad for PV but an interesting observation.

    Project Veritas filming locations have been identified as Deux Amis, 356 E 51st St. NY 10022. This may be where the second sitting took place. The first being the Ignazio Pizza Restaurant. Project Veritas has withheld the timing and locations of its undercover camera recordings,

    Boston Consulting Group

    Boston Consulting Group whitepaper which explained a Directed Evolution presentation to Pfizer that Jordon Walker had participated in shows that Jordon Walker actually participated in how the real heavy hitters of the whitepaper were Managing Partner Josh Kellor and ex-Moderna employee technical mRNA expert, Ciaran Lawlor.

    The Jorden Walker Near Term COVID Therapeutics paper is the one that pushed Remdesivir a few days after FDA emergency approval after remdesivir had failed already in several trials. In particular, the two failed trials with Hepatitis C and Ebola.

    Joseph Dana Hughes background:

    Boston Consulting Group did in fact make a Directed Evolution presentation to a Pfizer executive named Joseph Dana Hughes and other Pfizer executives in the Worldwide Business Group at Pfizer’s 42nd Street Headquarters in New York City.

    Joseph Dana Hughes had worked at Pfizer for twelve years in the Worldwide Business Unit of Pfizer after working at Boston Consulting Group, and his wife had worked for Hillary Clinton in the White House since 1997. Joseph Dana Hughes’ wife, Melissa Prober, left the White House staff only recently in 2021, and her father was a key founder of the New York Genome Institute.

    Joseph Dana Hughes had run the integration of Pfizer’s acquisition of Wyeth Pharmaceuticals at Pfizer’s Pearl River research lab. Joseph Dana Hughes has also become a Partner at Boston Consulting Group in New York in September of 2021, and Jordon Walker’s experience at Pfizer was limited to his interactions with Joseph Dana Hughes.

    It seems that Jordon Walker was taking on the identity of Joseph Dana Hughes, right down to assuming Pfizer has decided to implement the Boston Consulting Group Directed Evolution presentation. Interestingly enough Ignazio Pizza location where James O’Keefe filmed Jordon Walker, also has near by Joseph Dana Hughes residency location only 300 meters from the Ignatio Pizza restaurant. This may be part of the set up to have Walker being ‘the patsy’ to take on the identity of Hughes.

    Project Veritas left out the most important parts of the story, protecting the higher-ups at Boston Consulting Group that trace directly to their CEO and protege of WEF’s Klaus Schwab. Project Veritas should have corrected their Jordon Walker story and expose the Boston Consulting Group connections as key criminal elements?

    I was also surprised to see the interview of fraudser Dr Robert Malone immediately after the event on Fox news, who also has outstanding criminal links when properly researched and made exposed.

    There are many inconsistencies and intentional written off evidencial material implicating Malone leading to the whole pandemic. Even citing his work 20 years ago, on a milder note, he was involved not only with the tobacco industry but in recent times the vapour industry. Both these industries have been linked to suppressing health issues for the public.

    As a side note, one can speculate that the timing of Walker’s interview, may benefit Pfizer stocks, in particular falling stocks.

    James O’Keefe background when drilling down historically shows a link to one of the 3 letter agencies. PV may be a useful to them, even though PV may be unaware in its sourced infiltration. Again, further research may link the PV as a useful pysop/controlled opposition without PV realising it.

  2. The Following 21 Users Say Thank You to aoibhghaire For This Post:

    Arcturian108 (7th February 2023), Bassplayer1 (10th February 2023), cascadian (7th February 2023), Denise Ropota (6th February 2023), Denise/Dizi (11th February 2023), gini (7th February 2023), Hermoor (9th February 2023), Icare (6th February 2023), Journeyman (21st February 2023), lisalu (10th February 2023), Matthew (10th February 2023), meeradas (23rd February 2023), Michel Leclerc (11th February 2023), Mike Gorman (10th February 2023), modini (6th March 2023), O Donna (6th February 2023), onawah (6th February 2023), palehorse (7th February 2023), RunningDeer (10th February 2023), Seeclearly (6th February 2023), WhiteFeather (14th March 2023)

  3. Link to Post #2
    Avalon Member O Donna's Avatar
    Join Date
    9th January 2018
    Posts
    1,683
    Thanks
    12,362
    Thanked 13,159 times in 1,663 posts

    Default Re: Is Project Veritas controlled opposition?

    Embedded in so many things in so many ways.
    Funny, people often do not believe in controlled opposition when it supports their beliefs.
    It is only when someone they trust points it out will the consideration take hold.
    Think about it, a puppet without controlled opposition is a sign of a poor puppet master. Those strings need both tension and slack for believability.
    Knock Knock

  4. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to O Donna For This Post:

    aoibhghaire (7th February 2023), Arcturian108 (7th February 2023), cascadian (7th February 2023), Denise/Dizi (11th February 2023), Hermoor (9th February 2023), Journeyman (21st February 2023), meeradas (23rd February 2023), Michel Leclerc (11th February 2023), Mike Gorman (10th February 2023), onawah (6th February 2023), palehorse (7th February 2023), RunningDeer (10th February 2023)

  5. Link to Post #3
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,994
    Thanks
    31,370
    Thanked 127,218 times in 21,086 posts

    Default Re: Is Project Veritas controlled opposition?

    The label "controlled opposition" also used by some people disagreeing with certain tactics/methods/style and assume (possible) evil intent or (possible) hidden agendas because of a default list of unproven assumptions/conjectures/opinions & speculations.
    • I remember in the past that some people accused Bill Ryan being "controlled opposition" even if there was NO EVIDENCE given >>> it just feeds certain types of people's mind-sets.
    Another common insane "logic" some use is: "if you are not dead, you are not a legit whistleblower" ... because they let you live is for some "enough proof" you are "controlled opposition" ... thus having no clue why they want to prevent Martyrdom Effect.
    • Then you have people who think that some things are: "too good to be true" and that alone is enough for some that you are "most likely" controlled opposition.
    • Or the "Guilty by association" if you shook hands with someone in the past (not knowing anything about the context) you can jump to the utterly false conclusion that somebody supposedly "work" with that person in "secret" without giving any evidence for such a claim and I can go on and on and on ...
    • Or when people make genuine unintended mistakes, is also for some "evidence" of "controlled opposition".
    • Or when some of the real controlled opposition LOVES to use the label/accusation "controlled opposition" hoping (baiting) others to help spread their false accusations!
    The list of (made up) false accusations can be really long to make somebody to look like "controlled opposition" ... >>> even I was called that many times in The Netherlands 🇳🇱 and NONE of them showed any proof nor do they feel the need to share any evidence for their false claims ... They just claim it is their right to have that "opinion" and if enough repeat that false assumption some think "it must be true then" ...
    • Some just go along with "controlled opposition" accusations because he or she does not like that person's vibes and that is enough for some to be convinced.
    • Now you know why I am very reluctant to jump on any bandwagon using the "controlled opposition" accusation label.
    And yes, the real "controlled opposition" phenomena does exist, but that needs hard evidence & proof before you accuse anyone being that ... and if you only use: conjecture, hearsay, speculations, assumptions, opinions and "gut feelings" does not do the job!



    cheers,
    John Kuhles aka 'ExomatrixTV'
    February 6th, 2023 🦜🦋🌳
    Last edited by ExomatrixTV; 1st March 2023 at 13:29.
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  6. The Following 22 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    aoibhghaire (7th February 2023), Arcturian108 (7th February 2023), Bassplayer1 (10th February 2023), cascadian (7th February 2023), Delight (6th February 2023), Dennis Leahy (21st February 2023), DNA (7th February 2023), gini (7th February 2023), Ioneo (6th February 2023), Ivanhoe (10th February 2023), jaybee (6th February 2023), Lasuh (7th February 2023), Mark (Star Mariner) (11th February 2023), Matthew (10th February 2023), meeradas (23rd February 2023), Mercedes (9th February 2023), Michel Leclerc (11th February 2023), Mike Gorman (10th February 2023), NancyV (21st February 2023), palehorse (7th February 2023), ronny (7th February 2023), Tintin (11th February 2023)

  7. Link to Post #4
    Avalon Member O Donna's Avatar
    Join Date
    9th January 2018
    Posts
    1,683
    Thanks
    12,362
    Thanked 13,159 times in 1,663 posts

    Default Re: Is Project Veritas controlled opposition?

    You just can't help yourself, can you?
    Knock Knock

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to O Donna For This Post:

    aoibhghaire (7th February 2023)

  9. Link to Post #5
    Avalon Member jaybee's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Midlands England
    Posts
    2,637
    Thanks
    8,409
    Thanked 16,016 times in 2,210 posts

    Default Re: Is Project Veritas controlled opposition?

    Quote Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

    {post snipped - see #3 above}

    And yes, the real "controlled opposition" phenomena does exist, but that needs hard evidence & proof before you accuse anyone being that ... and if you only use: conjecture, hearsay, speculations, assumptions, opinions and "gut feelings" does not do the job!
    good post thanks - I'm not buying that PV is 'controlled opposition'....

  10. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to jaybee For This Post:

    aoibhghaire (7th February 2023), Dennis Leahy (21st February 2023), DNA (7th February 2023), ExomatrixTV (6th February 2023), Mercedes (10th February 2023), NancyV (21st February 2023), Nasu (7th February 2023)

  11. Link to Post #6
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,261
    Thanks
    47,755
    Thanked 116,543 times in 20,693 posts

    Default Re: Is Project Veritas controlled opposition?

    That all makes perfect sense to me, and thanks for posting that, Aoibhghaire.
    I've share it on another Project Veritas thread.
    Just wish I'd understood before...
    But I never did like James O'Keefe's vibe.

    Quote Posted by aoibhghaire (here)
    The operations of Project Veritas (PV), has only one goal, a money making activity with no interest in the truth when criminal evidence can be exposed but never to the media which they are part of.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  12. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    aoibhghaire (7th February 2023), Hermoor (9th February 2023), Journeyman (21st February 2023)

  13. Link to Post #7
    Canada Avalon Member TomKat's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2017
    Posts
    2,616
    Thanks
    2,694
    Thanked 13,331 times in 2,365 posts

    Default Re: Is Project Veritas controlled opposition?

    Veritas has embarassed the lestablishment a number of times. Good for them.

  14. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to TomKat For This Post:

    aoibhghaire (7th February 2023), Dennis Leahy (21st February 2023), DNA (7th February 2023), ExomatrixTV (7th February 2023), gini (7th February 2023), jaybee (9th February 2023), Mercedes (9th February 2023), palehorse (7th February 2023)

  15. Link to Post #8
    United States Avalon Member DNA's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th May 2011
    Location
    S.W. Missouri
    Language
    English
    Age
    51
    Posts
    4,616
    Thanks
    34,205
    Thanked 27,912 times in 4,329 posts

    Default Re: Is Project Veritas controlled opposition?

    Sounds to me like the OP of this thread might be controlled opposition.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	545c09a8e5a657d2.jpeg
Views:	31
Size:	139.9 KB
ID:	50410

  16. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to DNA For This Post:

    Dennis Leahy (21st February 2023), gini (9th February 2023), jaybee (9th February 2023), Matthew (10th February 2023), meeradas (23rd February 2023), Mercedes (9th February 2023), NancyV (21st February 2023)

  17. Link to Post #9
    United States Avalon Member Ratszinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    9th September 2018
    Posts
    1,455
    Thanks
    2,031
    Thanked 9,307 times in 1,401 posts

    Default Re: Is Project Veritas controlled opposition?

    Quote Posted by aoibhghaire (here)
    The operations of Project Veritas (PV), has only one goal, a money making activity with no interest in the truth when criminal evidence can be exposed but never to the media which they are part of.

    Over the years, whenever whistle-blower comes forward and presents verbal evidence that is crucial to what goes on in various establishments there are never any prosecutions after these events.

    PV exists to create a ' school play' that causes emotional triggers for the public and media. The sensation alone entraps people over such an emotional event. There is a pattern to a strategy to make announcements that come in 3 drip feeds. We have the current Walker event that has the first two. This last combined two gained huge views of 30M and income of 2M dollars over 7 days for PV.

    The third one may not come out as researchers are now finding out that PV is not what they represent. There is no rigur to there research, but an ala cart menu that only selects and supplies sensation without repercussions for themselves. They leave the criminals out of the equation even though they know they have the evidence to act.

    PV a niche media industry to announce significant events with a marketing strategic model of 3 drips and no follow through for prosecutions of any sort. It creates a sensation without serious repurcusions for its marketing model.

    In the recent viral video, James O’Keefe fantastically overstates the role of a Boston Consulting Group contractor as the Director of mRNA Scientific Planning. in this viral video. Jordon Walker, the Boston Consulting Group contractor, even yells at O’Keefe, “I’m a contractor! I’m a contractor! I’m a contractor!” in the video.

    A minor Boston Consulting Group contractor for Pfizer named Jordon Walker, grossly overstating his position at Pfizer as “Director of Worldwide R&D Strategic Operation and mRNA Scientific Planning”

    In a Project Veritas viral video, Jordon Walker explains to James O’Keefe he was fantastically exaggerating his position as a contractor at Pfizer to impress a date, explaining to O’Keefe, “I am literally a liar”. O’Keefe chose to publish the gross exaggerations as facts anyway.

    No matter, the Project Veritas video still garnered over 30 million views, and Project Veritas raised over two million dollars in the seven days the video ran.

    Walkers checkered background:

    Project Veritas did very little fact-checking of their story or they would have found out that Jordon Walker washed out of his first job as a doctor at an internship at Tufts University in Boston after only a few months. Walker had lied to his Project Veritas date that he was a urologist which requires a five-year residency - an easily verifiable fact. Walker had also completely lied about having an internship at Mass General Hospital in Boston, MA. Again, an easily verifiable fact.


    Walker never finished his medical degree and has had a series of odd jobs over the years that just don’t fit a Pfizer executive high position. For example, he was some years as an entertainer on a cruise liner, which included dancing. There is a dancing school nearby in Brooklin which he may have attended as he may live nearby. Walker may have been contracted by Pfizer for one day encompassed in an umbrella contractor role.
    Therefore he’s in that position to show his badge, but his credibility is lacking. When one explores Walkers background it doesn’t add up for a person that is portrayed in this recent PV event.

    Restaraunt scene:

    Similarly, PV’s portrayal scene of the Pizza restaurant beside the Brooklin bridge shows film footage inside and outside that are inconsistent. Interestingly enough, other restaurants nearby within a 300 metre radius from the first Pizza restaurant appear to have been selected and used to show a slightly different scene within the film footage. It appears to be inconsistency when one analyses the scene. Meaning the two or more restaraunts may have been used, in particular different paintings showing up. This is not important and it doesn’t mean its bad for PV but an interesting observation.

    Project Veritas filming locations have been identified as Deux Amis, 356 E 51st St. NY 10022. This may be where the second sitting took place. The first being the Ignazio Pizza Restaurant. Project Veritas has withheld the timing and locations of its undercover camera recordings,

    Boston Consulting Group

    Boston Consulting Group whitepaper which explained a Directed Evolution presentation to Pfizer that Jordon Walker had participated in shows that Jordon Walker actually participated in how the real heavy hitters of the whitepaper were Managing Partner Josh Kellor and ex-Moderna employee technical mRNA expert, Ciaran Lawlor.

    The Jorden Walker Near Term COVID Therapeutics paper is the one that pushed Remdesivir a few days after FDA emergency approval after remdesivir had failed already in several trials. In particular, the two failed trials with Hepatitis C and Ebola.

    Joseph Dana Hughes background:

    Boston Consulting Group did in fact make a Directed Evolution presentation to a Pfizer executive named Joseph Dana Hughes and other Pfizer executives in the Worldwide Business Group at Pfizer’s 42nd Street Headquarters in New York City.

    Joseph Dana Hughes had worked at Pfizer for twelve years in the Worldwide Business Unit of Pfizer after working at Boston Consulting Group, and his wife had worked for Hillary Clinton in the White House since 1997. Joseph Dana Hughes’ wife, Melissa Prober, left the White House staff only recently in 2021, and her father was a key founder of the New York Genome Institute.

    Joseph Dana Hughes had run the integration of Pfizer’s acquisition of Wyeth Pharmaceuticals at Pfizer’s Pearl River research lab. Joseph Dana Hughes has also become a Partner at Boston Consulting Group in New York in September of 2021, and Jordon Walker’s experience at Pfizer was limited to his interactions with Joseph Dana Hughes.

    It seems that Jordon Walker was taking on the identity of Joseph Dana Hughes, right down to assuming Pfizer has decided to implement the Boston Consulting Group Directed Evolution presentation. Interestingly enough Ignazio Pizza location where James O’Keefe filmed Jordon Walker, also has near by Joseph Dana Hughes residency location only 300 meters from the Ignatio Pizza restaurant. This may be part of the set up to have Walker being ‘the patsy’ to take on the identity of Hughes.

    Project Veritas left out the most important parts of the story, protecting the higher-ups at Boston Consulting Group that trace directly to their CEO and protege of WEF’s Klaus Schwab. Project Veritas should have corrected their Jordon Walker story and expose the Boston Consulting Group connections as key criminal elements?

    I was also surprised to see the interview of fraudser Dr Robert Malone immediately after the event on Fox news, who also has outstanding criminal links when properly researched and made exposed.

    There are many inconsistencies and intentional written off evidencial material implicating Malone leading to the whole pandemic. Even citing his work 20 years ago, on a milder note, he was involved not only with the tobacco industry but in recent times the vapour industry. Both these industries have been linked to suppressing health issues for the public.

    As a side note, one can speculate that the timing of Walker’s interview, may benefit Pfizer stocks, in particular falling stocks.

    James O’Keefe background when drilling down historically shows a link to one of the 3 letter agencies. PV may be a useful to them, even though PV may be unaware in its sourced infiltration. Again, further research may link the PV as a useful pysop/controlled opposition without PV realising it.
    It is looking more and more like yes it is controlled. O'Keefe` in my guess is a three letter agency asset.
    The genius consistently stands out from the masses in that he unconsciously anticipates truths of which the population as a whole only later becomes conscious! Speech-circa 1937

  18. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ratszinger For This Post:

    aoibhghaire (10th February 2023), Hermoor (9th February 2023), onawah (9th February 2023)

  19. Link to Post #10
    Avalon Member jaybee's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Midlands England
    Posts
    2,637
    Thanks
    8,409
    Thanked 16,016 times in 2,210 posts

    Default Re: Is Project Veritas controlled opposition?

    .

    re what's happening to James O'Keefe and Project Veritas - there is some discussion of it on this video - starting at 10:30... my guess is it's the coup theory that's correct (maybe there is more info elsewhere..) because the latest exposé was so damaging to not just Pfizer but the whole 'vaccine' agenda... which appears to be a major part of the coming long planned (if they get their way) Global Dictatorship... the main essential part of the covert plan to genetically alter the Human Race - the transhumanism bit of the NWO/Great Reset....and the 24/7 surveillance/brainwashing aspect using injected nano things linking to 5G - the Internet of Things and whatnot - if people refuse the coming 'slew' of mRNA jabs (Tony Blair made reference to the slew of mRNA injections coming down the line at the last WEF chummy get~together in Davos ..)

    probably all hell broke loose behind the scenes because getting people to accept the jabs and accept their babies and children to have them is fundamental to the Elite's Fiendish Plot -

    anyway... starting 10:30.... the cat is getting some very vigorous petting

    Last edited by jaybee; 9th February 2023 at 20:08.

  20. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to jaybee For This Post:

    aoibhghaire (10th February 2023), Dennis Leahy (21st February 2023), DNA (9th February 2023), gini (9th February 2023), Mercedes (10th February 2023), Mike Gorman (10th February 2023), Miller (2nd March 2023), mountain_jim (9th February 2023)

  21. Link to Post #11
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,261
    Thanks
    47,755
    Thanked 116,543 times in 20,693 posts

    Default Re: Is Project Veritas controlled opposition?

    Post #1 is making more and more sense to me. Lots of exposure, outrage, etc. but the information and source behind the Project Veritas report is so sketchy, probably nothing will come of it except lots of distraction, debunking, and making the alternative media look bad in general.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  22. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    aoibhghaire (10th February 2023), gini (9th February 2023), Hermoor (9th February 2023)

  23. Link to Post #12
    Avalon Member jaybee's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Midlands England
    Posts
    2,637
    Thanks
    8,409
    Thanked 16,016 times in 2,210 posts

    Default Re: Is Project Veritas controlled opposition?

    .

    Alex Jones is commenting on what's happening re James O'Keefe and Project Veritas -

    It's early days with it all and he says that he doesn't want to destroy/damage the Project Veritas Company and is waiting to hear more about what's going on but he is very supportive of James O'Keefe - and I mean VERY...

    Alex's impression at the moment is that there has probably been EXTREME pressure put on the PV organization because of the Pfizer exposé and that has resulted in them (being forced?) to get rid of James - put him on paid leave - and if anyone knows about extreme pressure it's Alex Jones...

    There is sure to be more coming out about this story in the coming days...

    (8:08)

    https://www.banned.video/watch?id=63...27cd2ea23e2a7d


  24. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to jaybee For This Post:

    aoibhghaire (10th February 2023), Denise/Dizi (11th February 2023), Dennis Leahy (21st February 2023), DNA (10th February 2023), ExomatrixTV (10th February 2023), gini (10th February 2023), Matthew (10th February 2023), Mercedes (10th February 2023), Mike Gorman (10th February 2023), NancyV (21st February 2023)

  25. Link to Post #13
    Ireland Avalon Member aoibhghaire's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th October 2015
    Location
    Valdepeñas de Jaén, SPAIN
    Posts
    872
    Thanks
    11,173
    Thanked 6,469 times in 858 posts

    Default Re: Is Project Veritas controlled opposition?

    Project Veritas was well aware of the underling where Gain of Function was really happening was in Rotterdam, Netherlands at the Erasmus Lab. The mRNA bid rigging was really happening at the Wellcome Trust and WHO, basically giving them the real places and real reporting for the mRNA Gain of Function story in contrast to the false story that Jordon Walker had erroneously attributed to Pfizer. The real monkey labs were doing Gain of Function on the 26th floor of the Erasmus Lab in Rotterdam.

    Despite all the Jordon Walker lying, and lack of specificity of where the “monkey mutation” was taking place at Pfizer it turns out it was pinpointed at the 26th Floor Monkey Lab in Rotterdam. The worldwide scientific consensus about the Erasmus Lab in Rotterdam has been internationally condemned for Gain of Function and torture of monkeys at their 26th Floor lab in Rotterdam.

    The key Boston Consulting Group whitepaper which explained a Directed Evolution presentation to Pfizer that Jordon Walker had participated in. Boston Consulting Group whitepaper would become obvious to Project Veritas but decided to leave out the most important parts of the story, protecting the higher-ups at Boston Consulting Group that trace directly to their CEO and protege of WEF’s Klaus Schwab.
    Why didn’t Project Veritas correct their Jordon Walker story and expose the Boston Consulting Group connections? Even going beyond Klaus Schwab as to who executed the start of the Pandemic campaign.

    The publishing of BCG white paper has caused massive untold injuries and deaths. PV was well aware of this paper and should really have been the key evidence leading to the most important individuals.

    This is the BCG paper ‘ The near term outlook for Covid therapeutics treatments’ by authors
    Josh Kellor, Jordan Walker, Ciaran Lawlor

    https://web-assets.bcg.com/img-src/B...cm9-246799.pdf
    https://www.bcg.com/publications/202...tic-treatments

    James O’Keefe and PV has driven any research that can be found by the public over the cliff with another agenda in operation. PV can’t recognize that Boston Consulting Group is the key to the case. BSG did the lockdowns, the track and trace, the limiting of vaccine bids to mRNA only, and the resurrection of Remdesivir. PV cannot claim ignorance of the BSG Remdesivir whitepaper.

    Why are they avoiding the most important part of the story, it’s not Walker. This whole story IMO can be construed as controlled opposition at this point.

    The Walker restaurant event can now be traced to the key Pfizer exec doing the integration at Pfizer Upjohn facility, it’s Kalamazoo plant that did both COVID 19 and Paxlovid processing. The persons could well be traced to the source of the Pfizer vaccine injuries. Veritas is not following up on these leads where they started shipping vaccines that has caused all this trouble.

    BCG seniors were paid over £6,000 a day on test and trace project for doing tag and trace software, no need for vaccines.

    These are the pay stubs for profiteering on lockdowns. May be Walker has pay stubs!

    https://www.consultancy.uk/news/2585...-trace-project

  26. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to aoibhghaire For This Post:

    gini (10th February 2023), Matthew (10th February 2023), onawah (10th February 2023), Reinhard (11th February 2023)

  27. Link to Post #14
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,261
    Thanks
    47,755
    Thanked 116,543 times in 20,693 posts

    Default Re: Is Project Veritas controlled opposition?

    Controlled Opposition is very tricky.You can't just fall for the obvious conclusions. At all.
    Thanks again Aoibhghaire.

    Quote Posted by aoibhghaire (here)
    Project Veritas was well aware of the underling where Gain of Function was really happening was in Rotterdam, Netherlands at the Erasmus Lab. The mRNA bid rigging was really happening at the Wellcome Trust and WHO, basically giving them the real places and real reporting for the mRNA Gain of Function story in contrast to the false story that Jordon Walker had erroneously attributed to Pfizer. The real monkey labs were doing Gain of Function on the 26th floor of the Erasmus Lab in Rotterdam.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  28. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    aoibhghaire (10th February 2023), ExomatrixTV (10th February 2023), gini (10th February 2023), Journeyman (21st February 2023), Reinhard (11th February 2023)

  29. Link to Post #15
    United States Avalon Member DNA's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th May 2011
    Location
    S.W. Missouri
    Language
    English
    Age
    51
    Posts
    4,616
    Thanks
    34,205
    Thanked 27,912 times in 4,329 posts

    Default Re: Is Project Veritas controlled opposition?

    Quote Posted by jaybee (here)
    .

    Alex Jones is commenting on what's happening re James O'Keefe and Project Veritas -

    It's early days with it all and he says that he doesn't want to destroy/damage the Project Veritas Company and is waiting to hear more about what's going on but he is very supportive of James O'Keefe - and I mean VERY...

    Alex's impression at the moment is that there has probably been EXTREME pressure put on the PV organization because of the Pfizer exposé and that has resulted in them (being forced?) to get rid of James - put him on paid leave - and if anyone knows about extreme pressure it's Alex Jones...

    There is sure to be more coming out about this story in the coming days...

    (8:08)

    https://www.banned.video/watch?id=63...27cd2ea23e2a7d

    I don't always agree with my heroes, but when I do it's Alex the man Jones.
    Alex likes him that's good enough for me.
    James O'Keefe is the man!
    He's turning into the next Julian Assange.
    That's pretty high praise.

  30. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to DNA For This Post:

    aoibhghaire (10th February 2023), Dorjezigzag (11th February 2023), ExomatrixTV (10th February 2023), gini (10th February 2023), Hym (10th February 2023), jaybee (10th February 2023), Matthew (10th February 2023), Mercedes (10th February 2023), NancyV (21st February 2023), Reinhard (11th February 2023), Vangelo (10th February 2023)

  31. Link to Post #16
    UK Avalon Member Mike Gorman's Avatar
    Join Date
    31st May 2010
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Language
    English
    Age
    65
    Posts
    1,872
    Thanks
    5,839
    Thanked 14,055 times in 1,753 posts

    Default Re: Is Project Veritas controlled opposition?

    James O'Keefe is sincere, whether or not the entire project Veritas is suspect is quite another question, obviously large media organizations need funding, and we know that money and power invites all kinds of involvement, I have heard people say that Infowars is also controlled opposition, Tucker Carlson, in fact all of the alternative journalism world is subject to this accusation, but I always think that whatever the medium, if people are motivated to think, and look beyond the narratives provided by the mainstream power structure it is valuable - in other words it does not really matter if opposing ideas are attempted to be controlled, ideas take on their own momentum, and if people can be encouraged to think, it is valuable and the 'Control' aspect becomes irrelevant. How far can ideas be controlled? Money and power are the ultimate drugs, but those of us who value all kinds of intoxication know that the message is the most important element, not the intent of the messenger.

  32. The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to Mike Gorman For This Post:

    aoibhghaire (10th February 2023), Delight (10th February 2023), Dennis Leahy (21st February 2023), DNA (10th February 2023), Dorjezigzag (11th February 2023), ExomatrixTV (10th February 2023), gini (10th February 2023), Hym (10th February 2023), Ivanhoe (10th February 2023), jaybee (10th February 2023), JohanB (11th February 2023), Mark (Star Mariner) (11th February 2023), Matthew (10th February 2023), Mercedes (10th February 2023), NancyV (21st February 2023), Reinhard (11th February 2023), Vangelo (10th February 2023)

  33. Link to Post #17
    Netherlands Avalon Member ExomatrixTV's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd September 2011
    Location
    Netherlands
    Language
    English, Dutch, German, Limburgs
    Age
    57
    Posts
    22,994
    Thanks
    31,370
    Thanked 127,218 times in 21,086 posts

    Default Re: Is Project Veritas controlled opposition?

    Quote Posted by Mike Gorman (here)
    James O'Keefe is sincere, whether or not the entire project Veritas is suspect is quite another question, obviously large media organizations need funding, and we know that money and power invites all kinds of involvement, I have heard people say that Infowars is also controlled opposition, Tucker Carlson, in fact all of the alternative journalism world is subject to this accusation, but I always think that whatever the medium, if people are motivated to think, and look beyond the narratives provided by the mainstream power structure it is valuable - in other words it does not really matter if opposing ideas are attempted to be controlled, ideas take on their own momentum, and if people can be encouraged to think, it is valuable and the 'Control' aspect becomes irrelevant. How far can ideas be controlled? Money and power are the ultimate drugs, but those of us who value all kinds of intoxication know that the message is the most important element, not the intent of the messenger.

    agree ... well said
    No need to follow anyone, only consider broadening (y)our horizon of possibilities ...

  34. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to ExomatrixTV For This Post:

    aoibhghaire (11th February 2023), Delight (11th February 2023), Dennis Leahy (21st February 2023), DNA (11th February 2023), Dorjezigzag (11th February 2023), Hym (10th February 2023), jaybee (11th February 2023), NancyV (21st February 2023), Reinhard (11th February 2023)

  35. Link to Post #18
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    6,090
    Thanks
    8,706
    Thanked 39,382 times in 5,726 posts

    Default Re: Is Project Veritas controlled opposition?

    I think James Okeefe IS Project Veritas. I sort of expect that this is one of the usual ways divide and conquer is deployed. It is so interesting to me to listen to twitter spaces. I hear bits and pieces and they will usually show me something.


  36. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    aoibhghaire (11th February 2023), Dennis Leahy (21st February 2023), DNA (11th February 2023), jaybee (11th February 2023), Reinhard (11th February 2023)

  37. Link to Post #19
    Avalon Member jaybee's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Midlands England
    Posts
    2,637
    Thanks
    8,409
    Thanked 16,016 times in 2,210 posts

    Default Re: Is Project Veritas controlled opposition?

    Quote Posted by DNA (here)
    I don't always agree with my heroes, but when I do it's Alex the man Jones.
    Alex likes him that's good enough for me.
    James O'Keefe is the man!
    He's turning into the next Julian Assange.
    That's pretty high praise.
    Indeed...

    and after the damaging exposé it's logic 101 that Pfizer will be in full damage limitation mode... including muddying the waters and punishing (threatening?) those responsible - I don't think we have heard from James O'Keefe yet - I just went to his Twitter page to see if there was anything ... nothing on the latest developments - but something (pinned) from January 29th can fill in for now ...





  38. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to jaybee For This Post:

    aoibhghaire (11th February 2023), Dennis Leahy (21st February 2023), DNA (11th February 2023), gini (11th February 2023)

  39. Link to Post #20
    United States Avalon Member Denise/Dizi's Avatar
    Join Date
    2nd July 2017
    Age
    54
    Posts
    1,718
    Thanks
    26,657
    Thanked 13,495 times in 1,695 posts

    Default Re: Is Project Veritas controlled opposition?

    I just wanted to add to the conversation about the video sparking all of this.

    Am I the only one who got a strange feeling about the context of the man's true involvement in this whole situation? I am speaking of Jordon Walker here... Who even spoke of "Sting operations", before he starts making claims that led to Him again being recorded... And the rest is public knowledge.

    It seemed to me as if the whole thing was a set up, in regards to the Pfizer supposed gain of function blame, placing it solely on the shoulders of Pfizer... It wasn't what was said, when he was having his little winky, giggle, "Innuendo" type conversation, that he later called "lying by way of only trying to impress someone on a date..." But more his reaction after the fact that he learned he was being filmed...

    I am going to have to watch the video another time...So I may not have the verbage correct, But he reacted as if he was indignent, upset to be recorded, then began to realize that it had gotten a bit "Out of control"... and then he threw out the whole "Call the police"... 'I don't feel safe"... looking around as if he expected the people around him to stop the situation...

    As if he felt he wasn't alone in what he was doing, and where was his "Backup" in case things went awry? As they quickly did...

    To me? All of that seemed as if he was hoping to throw blame on one company, when we all know several major pharmaceutical companies were doing the same thing, and many came to market with a "Vaccine" as they call it... All trying to advance "Gain of Function".. Yet he only threw Pfizer under the bus... And by innuendo at best...

    So was he hired to do this, and did he then looking for help from those that set the situation up? It all looked like he was more a paid actor than someone trying to get a date... It reeked of an operation to make Pfizer stand alone in the blame of what was going on. And quickly turned into something else, when he realized he was now the main character rather than his suggestions. And as the true impact of the situation and liability of his claims began to unravel in his mind, he panicked. truly he probably felt that he wouldn't be safe after making such claims against such a powerful company...

    It seemed as if he was hoping that the information would get out, but when he learned his face would be attached to it? His reaction was... "This wasn't the plan"... "Where is my safety net?".. That was the body language, as he scanned the room in a panic to get some safety support around him. No one was trying to physically harm him... And in fact, he was the one who once finding out he was alone in this filming, began to get physical with those filming him. Certainly he didn't want to be caught trying to take down a huge Pharmecutical company alone as the only scapegoat.

    The reaction was just so panicked, as if he had just realized someone shot the president, and he had just finished handling the gun out of curiousity, after someone offered him cash to hold it...

    The whole thing just smells fishy... This guy now the scapegoat, James O Keefe' possibly let go... What was the real plan? Surely big things have happened since the filming, but was this the desired effect? I suppose the truth will come out when we see if anything that Jordon did, comes back to bite him, or if he just disappears into the background noise...

    Did anyone else think that perhaps Jordon himself was the bait? Perhaps to set up James O Keefe' for not doing "Due Diligence?" I am not a big PV fan, but it all just seems orchestrated.
    Last edited by Denise/Dizi; 11th February 2023 at 16:15.

  40. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Denise/Dizi For This Post:

    aoibhghaire (11th February 2023), avid (11th February 2023), gini (11th February 2023), Journeyman (21st February 2023), Strat (11th February 2023)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts