Are Banks going Belly Up?

[mountain_jim]

https://twitter.com/CaitlinLong_/sta...219045381?s=20

https://twitter.com/a1exwd/status/16...589009410?s=20

https://twitter.com/balajis/status/1...141988355?s=20

https://twitter.com/balajis/status/1...311735296?s=20

[ozmirage]

WARNING - indigestion may follow perusing this...
- - -
You have been warned
- - -
I will start with snippets without too much references / details, just to "warm up."

<1> The banks rule America and (most of) the planet. *(No surprise there....) The government doesn't make "regulations" for banks. Banks tell the government what to do, thus appear to be "doing something" 'bout the mess.

<2> Government will always "bail out" banks with YOUR labor and property. You agreed to it, didn't you? (See: Signature card, wherein you agreed to abide by the rules of "the Bank.") (See: "Contribution" with respect to the Federal Insurance CONTRIBUTIONS Act / SocSec - which is NOT insurance for you.)

<3> In case you weren't informed, "the Bank" refers to the conglomeration of creditors represented by their agent, the U.S. Governor of the World Bank, IMF, International bank for Reconstruction, etc (and a whole bunch of subgroups authorized by the Bretton Woods Treaty). And who shall NOT be paid by the US Gubmint, Title 22 USC Sec 286a. But shall be paid by fiduciary agent of said creditors : the Federal Reserve banks.

<4> The identity of the U.S. Governor / Executive officer is the Secretary of Treasury. And pursuant to the State of Emergency, codified in Title 12 USC Sec 95a, b, he is granted sweeping and pre-approved powers equal to the PRESIDENT OF THE U.S. (Which is how a president can emit "executive orders" without first getting Congressional authorization via law - the USCON is bypassed by the "emergency".)

<5> And some of his "rules" are in Title 26 (Income Tax), among other sections, that YOU have voluntarily agreed to abide. So there is no "right" to squawk about "constitutionality". He who consents cannot object.

We haven't had "constitutional" government since 1933. . . 90 years ago.
Didn't anyone notice or object?
Apparently not. They did "deify" Roosevelt and elected him FOUR times.


More (painful) details:
. . . .
Senate Report 93-549
https://archive.org/stream/senate-re...3-549_djvu.txt

War and Emergency Powers Acts
United States, Senate Report 93-549 states: "That since March 09, 1933 the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency." Proclamation No. 2039 declared by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on March 9, 1933. This declared national emergency has never been revoked and has been codified into the US Code (12 U.S.C. sec. 95a and b).

"A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years (as of the report 1933-1973), freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have, in varying degrees, been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency."

FREEDOMS ... GUARANTEED BY THE CONSTITUTION ... HAVE BEEN ABRIDGED BY LAWS ... UNDER EMERGENCY RULE ...

Constitutional U.S.A. (1789 - 1933) R.I.P.

REALLY? Here's the smoking gun - - -

Sometimes they "scrub" it from the net.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/95a (“txt omitted!”)

https://law.justia.com/codes/us/2000/title12/chap2/subchapiv/sec95b

Title 12 U.S. Code § 95b. The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March 4, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by section 95a of this title, ARE APPROVED AND CONFIRMED.

{Translation : the “SECRETARY OF TREASURY” -aka- U.S. Governor of the “Bank” and “Fund” - who is not paid by the US Gubmint - has been already approved to act or issue any orders, rules, etc., by the honorable U.S. Congress... FOREVER. And you “agreed to abide by the rules of the Bank” when you signed the signature card for your personal interest bearing bank account with an instrumentality of the Federal Reserve Banking system.}

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_Reserve_Act

The United States Gold Reserve Act of January 30, 1934 required that all gold and gold certificates held by the Federal Reserve be surrendered and vested in the sole title of the United States Department of the Treasury. It also prohibited the Treasury and financial institutions from redeeming dollar bills for gold.

[WHOA - the agent of the creditor - the US Governor / Sec'y of Treasury - got all OUR gold!]

[And repudiating their obligation to redeem their IOUs with lawful money abrogated 12 USC Sec. 411, thus declaring bankruptcy.]

[But that's OK - all those 334 million enumerated "human resources" are collateral. Explains why the rush to enroll INFANTS into SocSec and get their "brand" (ahem) "number". What could be wrong with selling your precious children into eternal servitude?]

Title 22 USC Sec 286(a)

(d) Compensation for services
(1) No person shall be entitled to receive any salary or other compensation from the United States for services as a Governor, executive director, councillor, alternate, or associate.

Compensated by the Fund

Title 22 USC 286a(d)
(2) The United States executive director of the Fund shall not be compensated by the Fund at a rate in excess of the rate provided for an individual occupying a position at level IV of the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of title 5.

{Translation: The “executive director” / U.S. governor shall be paid by the FUND, but not more than what a government drone would be paid.}

Who is the “fiscal agent” of “the FUND?”

22 USC Sec. 286d. Federal Reserve banks as depositories.
Any Federal Reserve bank which is requested to do so by the Fund or the Bank shall act as its depository or as its FISCAL AGENT, and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall supervise and direct the carrying out of these functions by the Federal Reserve banks.

According to page 494 of the U.S. Government Manual, 1993/1994 edition:

"In addition, the Secretary (of Treasury) has many responsibilities as chief financial officer of the Government. The Secretary serves as Chairman pro tempore of the Economic Policy council and as U.S. Governor of the International Monetary Fund, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the Inter-American Development Bank, and the African Development Bank."

http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/memdir/members.aspx

(Acting) Sec’y of Treasury (2021) = Andy Baukol aka “U.S. Governor”

(Feel free to check the site for yourself and look up previous "governors" whose signatures are on all those "Federal Reserve Notes", along with the Treasurer. Don't you feel secure with a pile of those "notes" in your wallet or safe? You're the surety for them! Gubmint ain't gonna pay a dime to redeem them.)

The PRESIDENT picks the "governor" but the U.S. doesn't pay him. Who does he REALLY work for? And who really benefits from his SWEEPING POWERS pre-approved by CONgress for the duration of this "temporary" emergency?
Who is perpetrating a GIANT fraud (aka "national debt") that no one can challenge?
And guess who is paying a monstrous yearly interest bill (debt service) currently larger than the whole cost of four years of World War 2?

It's OK - according to the law, in the public record, WE CONSENTED !
:: No law imposes citizenship ::
:: No law requires enrollment into SocSec ::
:: No law requires you to trade with the enemy (usurers) and open an interest bearing account ::

[Loud stream of obscenities and vulgar language deleted]

DO NOT BELIEVE ME - GO READ THE LAW FOR YOURSELF
If I told you what you will find in the law, you wouldn't believe me. Shucks, if I went back in time to 1990, and told myself, I wouldn't believe me, either. But if you do go to the courthouse, remember to wear knee pads and "Depends" (adult diapers) ... you may fall to your knees, weeping, or pee yourself.

They "hid" it in plain sight - in the public record.
We're just too arrogant, apathetic and ignorant to bother to read it for ourselves.

{I will stop now, since many readers are suffering from blood squirting from their eyes}

[ozmirage]

ADDENDUM :=:
Things That May Make You Pee Yourself

Like most Americans, I had no clue as to the facts of our demise, having only been exposed to what I was "allowed" to know, thanks to the World's Greatest Propaganda Ministry bar none.
Only after READING LAW for myself, did I learn the truth.

So, you’re thinking, “What fact would make one pee oneself?”
Discovering shocking facts - many many shocking facts.
Discovering the lies we all have been indoctrinated to believe.
...
[] Governments instituted to secure rights cannot tax rights - only privileges they bestow. So what privileges did government grant that makes us liable to pay taxes to live, travel, work, buy, sell, own land and a house, enter occupations, run a business, own a car, own a gun, and so on?
[] All land is NOT real estate. Private property and real estate are mutually exclusive.
[] Dollar bills (paper) are not dollars (coin)
[] Legal tender is not lawful money
[] The public debt can never be repaid
[] The debt, denominated in dollars (gold coin) cannot be repaid with dollar bills (debt that’s part of the national debt). A minus added to a minus is more minus.
[] There is no law that compels one to enroll in FICA / Social Security before one can live or work in the USA.
[] No one born in the 50 united States was born within the jurisdiction of the “United States” nor was U.S. citizenship imposed on them. (Mandatory civic duties would mean they were born “slaves”)
[] Americans are endowed with the birthright of sovereignty, freedom and independence - and are swiftly tricked into signing it all away.
[] Americans were tricked into leaving the republican form of government and transferring to the socialist democratic form of government.
[] Americans were tricked into becoming servants to the servant government.
[] Via FICA, participants diminish to paupers at law, and status criminals, guilty until proven innocent.
[] Via FICA, Americans have become collateral on an impossible public debt, eternally enslaved to the creditors of the United States government.
[] Via FICA, recipients will never ever vote against increasing their own benefit, no matter what it costs the nation, nor support any candidate that will diminish their bribes.
[] A legal residence is not a legal home (domicile) but a transient abode, and residents are redefined to be synonymous with vagabonds - an excepted class - and status criminals.
[] Every president and congress, since 1933, has been socialist / collectivist and co-conspirators in the wholesale robbery of the American people. (Even Ronny Reagan was a left winger! Ditto for Orange Man.)
[] Capitulation of the U.S. government to foreign usurers (international financial powers).
[] Capitulation of religious institutions to usurers, despite all scriptures condemning usury.
[] The Secretary of Treasury is the U.S. governor of the World Bank, IMF, and other financial institutions (usurers), and by law, shall not be paid by the U.S. government. (*Which means he doesn’t work for America - or at the least - has a conflict of interest!)
[] Confiscation of all privately held gold money, and the criminalization of the ownership of lawful money by “free” Americans (1933 - 1975).
[] Counterfeiting the fractional coin of America, but only after reducing the penalty for counterfeiting in 1965 (Just in case the people indicted the administration and CONGRESS!)
[] Transformation of the American military from a force to secure American liberty to an international mercenary force to protect the socialist-usurer alliance that rules the planet.
[] Every monument named after a socialist politician post-1933 is an insult to the founding generation and the sacrifices they made to endow their posterity with sovereignty, freedom and independence.
[] Worst of all, Americans have been tricked into giving consent to all this, so that the servant government can remain blameless. A host of interlocking self interest groups have thus conspired together to make it easy to become corrupted and perverted. And that’s enough to fill anyone’s diaper to the max.

And now, our only remedy is to withdraw consent, restore our status, and correct the record, where possible. After that hurdle, American nationals / American sovereigns have to endeavor to preserve the republican form and the perpetual union of 50 states, created to secure our rights. For if the union is dissolved by a civil war between socialist and usurer factions, the results will not be pleasant nor beneficial to the survivors. All this will take investigation, education and self-realization that without our consent, they cannot rule us. And by law, they have no power over us, without our consent.

[ozmirage]

Another "episode" of "how the nation was 'bleeped' " - - -
From John Nelson - - -
http://usa-the-republic.com/emergenc...0Bankrupt.html
Excerpt:
At the signing of the Coinage Act on July 23, 1965, then President Lyndon B. Johnson stated in his Press Release that:

"When I have signed this bill before me, we will have made the first fundamental change in our coinage in 173 years. The Coinage Act of 1965 supersedes the Act of 1792. And that Act had the title: An Act Establishing a Mint and Regulating the Coinage of the United States...."
"Now I will sign this bill to make the first change in our coinage system since the 18th Century. To those members of Congress, who are here on this historic occasion, I want to assure you that in making this change from the 18th Century we have no idea of returning to it."

With the enactment of that act, the Congress and president p!ssed on the U.S. Constitution. It is important to take cognizance of the fact that NO Constitutional Amendment was ever obtained to FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE, amend, abridge or abolish the Constitutional mandates, provisions or prohibitions of Art. 1, Sec. 8 and Sec. 10, wherein Congress is delegated power to coin money (stamp bullion), and States are prohibited from accepting anything but gold and silver coin as tender in payment of debt.

The eradication of constitutional lawful money was just another in a long line of actions under “emergency rules”.

(LBJ was aspiring to achieve the sainthood of FDR, in the Collectivist Pantheon)

FYI : The Coinage Act of 1965 initiated counterfeit fraction coins (non-silver). Ironically, the Congress reduced the penalty for counterfeiting - just in case the sheeple rose up and had them prosecuted.

Coinage Act of 1792, SEC. 19.

“And be it further enacted, That if any of the gold or silver coins which shall be struck or coined at the said mint shall be DEBASED or made worse as to the proportion of fine gold or fine silver therein contained, or shall be of less weight or value than the same ought to be pursuant to the directions of this act, through the default or with the connivance of any of the officers or persons who shall be employed at the said mint, for the purpose of profit or gain, or otherwise with a fraudulent intent, and if any of the said officers or persons shall embezzle any of the metals which shall at any time be committed to their charge for the purpose of being coined, or any of the coins which shall be struck or coined at the said mint, every such officer or person who shall commit any or either of the said offences, shall be deemed guilty of felony, AND SHALL SUFFER DEATH.”

Of course, the current slate of “public servants” are not at risk of capital punishment for their felonies, having changed the law in 1965.

18 U.S.C. § 485 : US Code - Section 485: Coins or bars

“Whoever falsely makes, forges, or counterfeits any coin or bar in resemblance or similitude of any coin of a denomination higher than 5 CENTS or any gold or silver bar coined or stamped at any mint or assay office of the United States, or in resemblance or similitude of any foreign gold or silver coin current in the United States or in actual use and circulation as money within the United States; or Whoever passes, utters, publishes, sells, possesses, or brings into the United States any false, forged, or counterfeit coin or bar, knowing the same to be false, forged, or counterfeit, with intent to defraud any body politic or corporate, or any person, or attempts the commission of any offense described in this paragraph - Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than FIFTEEN YEARS, or both.”

What LBJ & Congress did, in 1965, rated the death penalty - so they changed the law.

NOTE the limit on denomination - 5 cents.

FIVE copper cents.

Does this explain why the "golden dollar" passed without legal notice?

The Golden Dollar Coin Featuring Sacagawea - United States Mint
https://www.usmint.gov/coins/coin-me...-golden-dollar
The "golden" dollar= 8.1 grams in weight, 88.5% copper
{7.1685 gms. copper}

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penny_(United_States_coin)
Pennies issued before 1982: 3.11 grams of copper

5 x 3.11 gms = 15.55 gms. of copper (in five cents)
vs
8.1 gms. of copper in the 'golden dollar' coin.

THE NEW 'GOLDEN' DOLLAR CON (ahem) COIN IS A "BIG PENNY"! And squeaks by the 5 cent limit.
(Ironically, that’s close to the buying power of a current “dollar bill” versus a real dollar in 1910.)

Doff your hats to the statesmen and honorable public servants ! [/sarcasm]

[Rizotto]

Okay, so ultimately that's all about herding us into CBDC, and the end of privacy and total government control over every aspect of our life. Is there any way out of this? Is it possible for individuals from USA or Canada to connect to the BRICS system for banking purposes?

[ozmirage]

What facts support the claim that constitutional government ended in 1933?

https://mises.org/library/great-gold-robbery-1933

From 1933 forward, private possession and ownership of gold was illegal for U.S. citizens. Any refusal to return one’s gold was punishable by a fine of $10,000 and 10 years in prison. These exceptional measures were aimed at preventing the general public from storing gold.

. . .
“Free” Americans could no longer “own” constitutional money. Which meant they could no longer “pay their debts” as defined by Art. 1, Sec. 10, USCON. Thus be unable to establish that they owned PRIVATE PROPERTY, purchased with lawful money.
(Silver was demonetized in the Coinage Act of 1873.)
. . .
(On August 15, 1974, President Ford ended the forty-year ban on private gold ownership. But the government can always change its mind.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102

Executive Order 6102 is an executive order signed on April 5, 1933, by US President Franklin D. Roosevelt "forbidding the hoarding of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates within the continental United States." The executive order was made under the authority of the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917, as amended by the Emergency Banking Act in March 1933.

https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/docu...s-be-delivered

Section 2. All persons* are hereby required to deliver on or before May 1, 1933, to a Federal Reserve Bank or a branch or agency thereof or to any member bank of the Federal Reserve System all gold coin, gold bullion and gold certificates now owned by them. . .

(* Note : the term “person or persons” excludes the sovereign - the people - what few who didn't consent to be bankrupt socialist serfs.)

HOARDING - Act of holding and acquiring goods in short supply beyond the reasonable needs of the person so holding.
- - - Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Ed. P. 730

HOARD - A supply or store of something held or hidden for future use.

Owning lawful money is something held or hidden for future use - and a vile act, according to government.

From the Communist manifesto: "In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property."

Abolition occurred in 1933.

https://web.archive.org/web/20160323.../confiscation/

__"The private ownership of gold is a privilege, not a right. Congress revoked the privilege of private ownership in 1933 and restored it in 1974. Congress could easily revoke the privilege again. In fact, at no time during this century has the U.S. government recognized the right of private gold ownership. The Trading With The Enemy Act, which President Roosevelt invoked in 1933 to restrict private gold transactions, remains law. The government could reactivate the machinery, which The Trading With The Enemy Act established, to implement gold confiscation."
- - - Boston College International and Comparative Law Review 297, 320 (1982)

Congress and FDR declared that private ownership of gold was a privilege, not a right.

Welcome to the PDSRA!
The Peoples Democratic Socialist Republic of America
- sans that pesky "charter of negative liberties" (saith BHO, that "constitutional scholar" formerly in the White House, ably assisted by Chief Justice Roberts ). Your "right to life" has become a government granted privilege, as all other aspects of your life. All that is not mandatory, shall be licensed (+ taxed) or forbidden. You already need a license (or pay a tax) to live, work, travel, buy, sell, operate a business, transmit radio, fly a plane, trade in healthcare, buy medicine, cut hair, build a house, hunt, fish, marry and / or own a dog. You have to accept being groped to fly on commercial airliners. The worst is yet to come... oh, right, and when you die, they take a chunk of your estate, too.
And do not forget your papers-s-s-s-s-s-s-s-s-s-s!
{P.S. - it was all done by your consent, saith the law.}

Ironic, isn't it, to realize that staunch "anti-communists" in the many administrations were posturing, and hiding the fact that CONgress has been in harmony with the Communist Manifesto since 1933.

[ozmirage]

YES, if not now, there soon will be an eCONomic emergency, whether it's the banking system or some other excuse.
The current situation is untenable.

Americans are at the greatest risk of losing their most precious birthright, the republican form of government embodied in the Declaration of Independence.

The three principles of the Declaration that underpin American law:

1. Americans are born equal before American law, none can be born higher. Thus Americans are sovereigns, not subjects.
2. Americans are endowed with rights by their Creator, not the government, which was instituted to secure those endowed rights. (By prosecuting criminals who inflict deliberate injuries; adjudicating disputes; defending against all enemies, foreign or domestic)
3. Americans are served, not ruled, by government, unless they consent otherwise.

THE POWERS THAT BE (in all other nations, monarchies, etc) are frightened of the republican form, and have expended huge resources to ERADICATE any memory of it.
(I know this for a fact. I wrote an article on the republican form for WIKIPEDIA, and some agent in BELGIUM, put a hard link so that "republican form" would go to "republic" - forever barring access to the truth.)

If America's sovereign people prevailed, their success and prosperity would instigate revolutions world wide.

It was imperative that such a thing could not ever happen. A nation of sovereigns prospering and inciting other peoples to revolt against submission cannot be tolerated. America delenda est! (Poaching from the Latin)

American values, culture, and cohesion must be utterly destroyed. All memory of the republican form, of American individual sovereignty, and inalienable rights must be eradicated from the collective consciousness of the American people. And the mere thought that one could ABSOLUTELY own must be utterly erased.

I spent 30 years doing research, trying to find where "they" buried the truth in plain sight.
Americans were repeatedly misled to believe that :
_ _ America was a constitutional republic
_ _ America is a democracy and must make the world safe for democracy
_ _ Americans are born citizens, with mandatory civic duties, and must sign up with national socialism (FICA) to live and work in their own country
_ _ Americans were told to claim to be residents residing at residences
_ _ Dollar bills (Federal reserve NOTES) were dollars (coin), and "legal tender"
_ _ The Constitution was the supreme law of the land (and yet has been bypassed for the past 90 years - by "emergency")
_ _ Americans owe their "fair share" to the glorious Collective (uh) State.

Anyone who appeared to be supportive of the RFOG was given the "treatment" and pilloried by "revisionists". (Ex: Abe Lincoln)

You will find that any revered historical figure in American history will have been torpedoed and sunk, by the vile deceivers who seek our destruction. Worse, the vile traitors and quislings were elevated and honored, with homage paid to them... at public expense (of course).

THE BIG LIE WORKS.


BE FOREWARNED
Most of all, because of its republican form, America MUST be destroyed, erased and forgotten from history. Its name must be smeared with vile deeds and actions, so that no one will ever dare associate it with something as celestial as individual sovereignty, endowed rights and absolute ownership. (Much the same was done to the fasces, by the misnamed “fascists" who were left wing - opposed to traditional authority - not right wing - in support of traditional authority)

[ExomatrixTV]

• Boom! Silicon Valley Bank has Epstein Connection (and more!):

Silicon Valley Bank is more interesting than you think. I talk tentacles! Epstein, Biden, Peter Thiel, China and more.

• source
• banned.video/channel/Amazing-Polly-st-george
• rumble.com/user/AmazingPolly
• twitter.com/hashtag/AmazingPolly?src=hashtag_click
• bitchute.com/channel/ZofFQQoDoqYT
• AmazingPolly.net

[shaberon]

Posted by ozmirage (here)
United States, Senate Report 93-549 states: "That since March 09, 1933 the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency." Proclamation No. 2039 declared by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on March 9, 1933. This declared national emergency has never been revoked and has been codified into the US Code (12 U.S.C. sec. 95a and b).

"A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years (as of the report 1933-1973), freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have, in varying degrees, been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency."

Yes, there was concern the office of President was becoming a dictatorship. This went rather strangely.


1976

Terminating Existing Declared Emergencies= - States that all powers and authorities conferred by law upon the President, any other officer or employee of the Federal Government, or any department, agency, independent establishment, or any other body of the Federal Government, and all powers and authorities conferred by any Executive Order pursuant to law as a result of the existence of any national emergency in effect on the date of enactment of this Act are terminated two years from the date of such enactment.

Exempts designated provisions of law from this Act.


What was exempted? Emergency banking powers, of course.

But these were kibboshed.

1977



Permits non-war emergency regulations in effect as of July 1, 1977, to continue for two years after the enactment of the National Emergency Act, unless the President determines that continuation of such regulations is in the national interest.



95-223:


...the authorities conferred upon the President by section 5(b) of the Trading With the Enemy Act, which were being exercised with respect to a country on July 1, 1977, as a result of a national emergency
declared by the President before such date, may continue to be exercised
with respect to such country, except that, unless extended, the exercise
of such authorities shall terminate (subject to the savings provisions of the second sentence of section 101(a) of the National Emergencies Act) at the end of the two-year period beginning on the date
of enactment of the National Emergencies Act.


Any authority granted to the President by section
203 may be exercised to deal with any unusual and extraordinary
threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the
United States, to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of
the United States, if the President declares a national emergency with
respect to such threat.


In other words, there is no such thing as an ever-extending emergency. That part is gone. No need to revoke anything. Whatever the problems we face now are not produced by such a presidential emergency. It would have to keep getting declared. I have gone through many years of Emergencies and never found this one issued again.

There could be something related to Sec. of Treasury or in some Code that preserves the Fed's modus operandi, I imagine there is, but it is severed from the famous iron fist of Roosevelt. I guess it would have to be, if Sec. Treasury is a foreign agent, he would have to be treated as such.


It is true that it is now Code, but is only gratis during war.

95-223:


1977-Par. (1). Pub. L. 95–223, §§101(a), 102, substituted "During the time of war, the President may, through any agency that he may designate, and under such rules and regulations" for "During the time of war or during any other period of national emergency declared by the President, the President may, through any agency, that he may designate, or otherwise, and under such rules and regulations" in the provisions preceding subpar. (A), and, in the provisions following subpar. (B), struck out "; and the President may, in the manner hereinabove provided, take other and further measures not inconsistent herewith for the enforcement of the subdivision" after "control of such person".




Notes for currently omitted text include:


§5(b) of act Oct. 6, 1917, is also classified to section 4305(b) of Title 50, War and National Defense.

Section 95b, act Mar. 9, 1933, ch. 1, title I, §1, 48 Stat. 1 , which related to ratification of acts of President and Secretary of the Treasury, was omitted because §1 of act Mar. 9, 1933, is also set out as a note under section 4305 of Title 50, War and National Defense.


I am perhaps a bit mistaken about the declarations, for example 4305, Bush dusted such powers as applied to North Korea.


Act Mar. 9, 1933, ch. 1, title I, §1, 48 Stat. 1 , provided that: "The actions, regulations, rules, licenses, orders and proclamations heretofore or hereafter taken, promulgated, made, or issued by the President of the United States or the Secretary of the Treasury since March 4, 1933, pursuant to the authority conferred by subdivision (b) of section 5 of the act of October 6, 1917, as amended [50 U.S.C. 4305(b)], are hereby approved and confirmed."


It is, of course, available during war:


(b)(1) During the time of war, the President may, through any agency that he may designate, and under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, by means of instructions, licenses, or otherwise-



Lacking a war, we have apparently been stepping on Cuba since 1978:

Under section 101(b) of Public Law 95–223 (91 Stat. 1625; 50 U.S.C. 4305 note), and a previous determination on September 7, 2021 (86 FR 50831, September 10, 2021), the exercise of certain authorities under the Trading With the Enemy Act is scheduled to expire on September 14, 2022.

I hereby determine that the continuation of the exercise of those authorities with respect to Cuba for 1 year is in the national interest of the United States.


I am not sure about "war" vs. "national interests". This one has been renewed over forty times and:

The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized and directed to publish this determination in the Federal Register.


So, those should at least be findable, but it isn't anything domestic. If there was a domestic equivalent, we should be able to find that too.`

Ballotopedia has a list of ongoing NEA renewals, which somehow missed Cuba, but there are still several.

[shaberon]

On another note, the hamburgerization of Switzerland gives us a list which is most likely where most of the re-hypothecated derivatives lie:


UBS is Switzerland's biggest bank. Furthermore, it's the third largest bank in Europe. UBS is also one of the nine global "Bulge Bracket" banks. Bulge bracket banks are the world's largest multinational investment banks, serving large corporations and governments. The list includes Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs, Barclays Capital, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, and UBS.

[BluBeast]

Take a look at Jason Lowery. He just finished his MIT defense fellow thesis, published and available on Amazon, but by reading through his tweets, you'll get the idea. Bitcoin is not a USA phenomenon. It is global, fixed supply, has no trusted third party (banks), and I still haven't seen actual evidence that it was a DARPA operation. I have read through this thread and understand that Project Avalon has mixed feelings about Bitcoin. Nonetheless, it is a possible escape hatch from the global debt, petrodollar, central bank controlled world we have been backed into. Lots of great interviews with him are out there. I recommend the most recent ones, as he finally dissects the thesis for us laypeople.
https://twitter.com/JasonPLowery?s=20.

[ozmirage]

Posted by Rizotto (here)
Okay, so ultimately that's all about herding us into CBDC, and the end of privacy and total government control over every aspect of our life. Is there any way out of this? Is it possible for individuals from USA or Canada to connect to the BRICS system for banking purposes?

Is there any way out?
For Canadians, nyet. They are subjects of the English monarchy.

(In the movie "Fly Away Home" a Canadian game warden tells a bunch of school children, "These are the QUEEN'S GEESE.")

For Americans, they can withdraw consent from _ _ citizenship _ _ socialism _ _ usury (banking), and restore their status at law.
There is no law that voids any endowed right, and if there was such a law, there are mechanisms that skewer enforcement of said law.
(Ex: exemptions / exclusions (i.e. "private property"), trap doors ("do not apply"), catch-22s, and substitution of terminology {"shall" becomes "may"})

ENDOWED RIGHTS

"PERSONAL LIBERTY, or the Right to enjoyment of life and liberty, is one of the fundamental or Natural Rights, which has been protected by its inclusion as a guarantee in the various constitutions, which is not derived from, or dependent on, the U.S. Constitution, which may not be submitted to a vote and may not depend on the outcome of an election. It is one of the most sacred and valuable Rights, as sacred as the Right to private property...and is regarded as inalienable."
- - - 16 Corpus Juris Secundum, Constitutional Law, Sect.202, p.987.

The fundamental / natural / creator endowed rights we have include life, liberty (natural and personal), and private property ownership, all secure from any ‘democratic’ violation.

HAS ANYTHING CHANGED THE LAW?

“If all men are created equal, that is final. If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final. If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final.”
- - - Calvin Coolidge, Speech on the Anniversary of the Declaration of Independence (1926)

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Calvin_Coolidge

WITHOUT CONSENT - - -

"What I do say is that no man is good enough to govern another man without that other's consent. I say this is the leading principle, the sheet-anchor of American republicanism. Our Declaration of Independence says: "We hold these truths to be self-evident: That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."
- - - Abraham Lincoln, Speech at Peoria, Illinois (1854)

http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Abraham_lincoln

From this speech, it is obvious that Mr Lincoln KNEW exactly what the republican form of government was - one in which all men were born equal (before the law) and had Creator endowed rights that governments were instituted to secure.
HOWEVER, most Americans today are kept ignorant of the consequences of "consent." For example, the end of the Declaration we find that the Founders pledged their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor. Having pledged them, they no longer retained them. As did all citizens who followed.

Due to the Myths of American Democracy, American citizens believe that they retained endowed rights despite facts to the contrary.

To illustrate, mandatory militia duty consisted of the obligation to train, fight, and die, on command. Anyone so obligated cannot also retain a right to life and liberty. They only have PRIVILEGES.

This widespread belief in mythology underpins the false belief in “State’s Rights” and the “right to secede” (from a perpetual union). No servant government or its subject citizens have “rights.” They only have delegated powers and granted privileges.

The real beneficiaries of the Union were the sovereign people who had not consented nor were parties to the compacts. They were the only people who had "rights." Thus the “Civil War” was not about “Northern aggression” but a breach of the perpetual UNION - a union created by civil compact by subject citizens and servant governments... for the benefit of ALL AMERICANS who had not consented.

Any abuse of the democratic form, by partisan politicians or geographic rivalries, was not the fault of the republican form of government. And such abuses were not grounds to dissolve the Union created to secure the endowed rights of Americans. Regardless of what historical revisionists and apologists would like us to believe, Lincoln was right in preserving the UNION. The States and their citizenry aren't the beneficiaries of the republican form. The sovereign people are the beneficiaries.
The governments and their subject citizens are servants to the sovereign people. . . what few remained.

Under the republican form of government, the people are sovereign, absolutely owning themselves, their property, and their labor. . . unless they consent otherwise. Under the indirect democratic form of government, the consenting citizens are subjects, obligated to perform mandatory civic duties, in exchange for political liberties (voting and holding public office).

Can you recognize that an American national / non-citizen / free inhabitant domiciled upon his private property within the boundaries of the united States of America is an American sovereign?

But if you believe there is no such thing as an “American sovereign,” what is Ambrose Bierce referring to here:
.................................................................
ALIEN, n. An American sovereign in his probationary state.
- - - - “The Devil’s Dictionary” (1906), by Ambrose Bierce
(download available from gutenberg.org)
.................................................................

The unique sovereignty of Americans was once well known, and explains why Americans do not kneel nor bow to foreign monarchs (our social equals). It also explains why “common” Americans can marry foreign nobility and not violate their local laws that bar nobility from marrying commoners. (Ex: Grace Kelly)

The vulgar taunt, “Kiss my royal American @ss !” was technically and legally accurate. Americans were kings and queens, without subjects, an amazing quality once admired and envied by others, world wide.

Now, not 1 in 100,000 Americans can accurately define the republican form, its source and origin. Worse, disinformation agents keep pumping out such nonsense like "sovereign citizen" (an oxymoron) to further muddy up things.

DO NOT BELIEVE ME - GO READ THE LAW FOR YOURSELF...
The more eyes on the law, the better.

Write polite questionnaires to your public servants, judges, attorney generals, etc, and get more proof.

I have not read all law, but I have yet to find a law that trespasses upon the natural and personal liberty of the American national / free inhabitant domiciled upon private property within the boundaries of the united States of America. Every law is riddled with exceptions, catch-22s, and exclusions so that they do not “accidentally” violate the Republican Form. But this may be the last generation that enjoys the blessings of the Republican Form.


Because when the "SHTF", the first casualty will be the RFOG, so that the Peoples Democratic Socialist Republic will no longer be constrained.

[norman]

Whitney Web, Unlimited Hangout - Crypto & the SVB Banking Crisis with Marty Bent & Michael Krieger
Posted Mar 21, 2023 {Originally published 03/17/23}

SHOW NOTES
In this episode, Whitney is joined by Marty Bent and Mike Krieger to unpack the recent collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and the financial instability that has ensued and interrogate the flimsy narratives used to justify, among other things, the SVB bail-out and the shutdown of Signature Bank.


Follow Marty on Twitter @Martybent, TFTC.com, TFTC - YouTube, Rabbit Hole Recap

Follow Mike on Twitter @libertyblitz and LibertyBlitzkrieg.com

[ozmirage]

If you are infected with "money madness" - the belief that a money token has intrinsic value independent of the marketplace, you may be satisfied with "sound money" or "bitcons" or "cyber fraud."

However, in the history of money madness, there has never been a time that the money supply and value kept proportionality with the marketplace of goods and services. In short, those who control the money token system, control the muggles who have to pay taxes or trade with it. And if one borrowed them, at usury, one was surely at great risk.

The biggest problem with species coin is that the amount per capita drastically shrinks as the population doubles. In the USA, doubling has occurred every 50 years, so each century, the supply of gold / population has been reduced by one quarter (1/4). What seemed reasonable in the 18th century, and barely operational in the 19th century, collapsed in the 20th century.

Do the math.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold

World supply of gold : 6 billion ounces.
World population : 8 billion people.
6/8 = 0.75 ounces of gold per capita.
@$20 per one ounce gold coin (double eagle), that computes to $15 per capita.

If you think you run a world wide eCONomy on $15 per capita, okay.
But remember, the increase in population far outstrips the mining of new gold, so that amount per capita will keep declining.

Then there's the problem with "money madness" itself.

A few thought experiments - - -
MONEY. If YOU owned all the money in the world, would you be rich?
No.
Why?
Obviously, the world is trading their surplus goods and services without the need for YOUR MONEY. So all that money is worthless, useless and meaningless.

Poverty. If money cured poverty, let's go "all in." Give everyone 22 billion billion credits of money - so everyone is equally wealthy and no one ever "needs" more money. Of course, if no one needs more money, who will bother to work, mine, farm, transport, trade, and deliver goods and services? Even the starving children are phenomenally wealthy.

Note: for optimal results, money has to be scarce and in demand. It helps when governments require money to pay taxes.

But the fact remains, that prosperity is not based on money or wealth. Prosperity is based on the prodigious production of surplus usable goods and services, equitably traded and enjoyed.
Doing more with less so more can enjoy is superior to doing less with more so few can enjoy.
Only madmen fixate on "making money", "winning the Lotto", or marrying for money.

Still not sure?
Money is a medium of exchange to facilitate trade when barter is insufficient. It functions by passing value to a future trade.
Consider a coupon for one free MickyD burger. You tender it to the cashier, in exchange for one MickyD burger. It has "passed value" and now it is worthless and can be destroyed by the issuer.... or re-issued, and thus obligating the company to pay another burger.

But if you tendered money for the burger, the company doesn't destroy it.
So how did the money "pass value" and "retain value" at the same time?
At the end of the day, all trades are done, and the marketplace is empty, how does money "retain value"?
M.A.D.N.E.S.S.

Since there never is enough money, there is always a demand for loans. And thanks to usury, the interest charge creates a situation where not all debtors can repay their creditors. There isn't enough money. So a proportion default, and lose their pledged collateral, not realizing that the whole system was rigged from the start. (Which is what we're witnessing - the money drought - and collapse of the value of pledged collateral)

In addition to that abomination, the fact that money per capita keeps shrinking, means that trade is throttled.

In simpler terms, due to scarce money, workers can't find jobs. Merchants can't sell all they have. Factories can't find customers for all they can produce. And unemployment rises, creating more need.
I.N.S.A.N.E.

The propaganda ministry keeps us believing that gubmint "prints up money." But according to the law, CONgress only has the power to "coin money" (stamp bullion) or "borrow money." CONgress cannot create bullion. And if CONgress could create money, why would it need the power to "borrow" it?
Since 1933, only "borrowed" notes (IOUs) have circulated in lieu of lawful money (gold coin).
And those notes were repudiated in House Joint Resolution 192, June 1933, thus abrogating the terms of Title 12 USC Sec. 411, wherein all notes shall be redeemed in lawful money (gold coin) at any Fed Res bank, etc.

Obviously, no one is lending money (coin) to the CONgress. The Fed Res banks are extending CREDIT, that gubmint uses to pay its bills, but the outstanding debt is to be repaid in real dollars.

That's how there is a 31.2 Trillion dollar national debt, while the world supply of gold only amounts to $124 billion dollars, as defined by the Coinage Act of 1792.

Of course, what authorizes a Fed Res bank to issue credit?
Your consent. Your value as a "human resource" pledged as collateral.
In essence, dollar bills are people - - 334 million enumerated "contributors" (via FICA). Every deposit is a "promise" to the bearer that you will redeem "your" note with your valuable goods and or services.

FICA / Social Security.

No law compels participation and no law punishes non participants.

“The Social Security Act does not require an individual to have a Social Security Number (SSN) to live and work within the United States, nor does it require an SSN simply for the purpose of having one...”
- - - The Social Security Administration

http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/ScottSSNLetter.pdf
Get your own personalized letter from the SocSecAdmin . . .

Read the law for yourself . . .
SOCIAL SECURITY ACT OF 1935 FULL TEXT
https://www.ssa.gov/history/pdf/Down...%20Vol%201.pdf

SocSec is 100% voluntary - and everyone who signs up underwrites the profligate public servants in DC. In exchange for your civic sacrifice, they'll give you a "benefit" (public charity) if you qualify or live long enough.
But it was always a scam from day one. It has long been law that there is no legal right to Social Security. In two important cases, Helvering v. Davis and Flemming v. Nestor, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Social Security taxes are simply taxes and convey no property or contractual rights to Social Security benefits.
NO TRUST FUND. NO INSURANCE FOR YOU. JUST A NEW TAX ENACTED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE GREAT DEPRESSION.

AS long as you consent, no harm - no foul.

[ozmirage]

Things that make you go, "Hmmmmmm."

The Sec'y of Treasury aka U.S. governor of the "bank" and "fund" is in charge of the department that "protects" the president [Secret Service].

Coincidence?

[Ravenlocke]

https://twitter.com/Hawkeye1745/stat...40626415980546

[ozmirage]

Posted by shaberon (here)

Posted by ozmirage (here)
United States, Senate Report 93-549 states: "That since March 09, 1933 the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency." Proclamation No. 2039 declared by President Franklin D. Roosevelt on March 9, 1933. This declared national emergency has never been revoked and has been codified into the US Code (12 U.S.C. sec. 95a and b).

"A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years (as of the report 1933-1973), freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have, in varying degrees, been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency."

...
Yes, there was concern the office of President was becoming a dictatorship. This went rather strangely.
...
So, those should at least be findable, but it isn't anything domestic. If there was a domestic equivalent, we should be able to find that too.`

In case you were unaware, the code is NOT the underlying statute. What you find in Title 12 or Title 50 are codifications of the law. Always go to the statute. And the various executive orders empowered by the Emergency.

"They" are adept at hiding things in plain sight, obscured by bafflegab and legalsleaze.

An example of the art of words - RESIDENT

From the Official Code of Georgia Annotated-

OCGA 40-2-1. As used in this chapter, the term:
(2) "Resident" means a person who has a permanent home or abode in Georgia to which, whenever he is absent, he has the intention of returning. For the purposes of this chapter, there is a rebuttable presumption that any person who, except for infrequent, brief absences, has been present in the state for 30 or more days is a resident.

--- This is a prime example of the art of legal word twisting.
Note how the phrasing sounds like the definition for domicile.

Resident = "a person" + "permanent home".

If you quickly read the section, you might presume that it means one who is in the state 30 or more days is a resident, for motor vehicle code purposes.

But if you dissect it, the meaning is just the opposite.
"A person" + "permanent home" + "present for 30 or more days" = rebuttable presumption that HE IS A RESIDENT.

In plain English, a Georgia resident is one who has a permanent home but is in the state LESS than 30 days out of a year (A transient). If one is present in the state 30 or more days out of a year, he can REBUT THE PRESUMPTION that he is a resident.

If one is NOT a resident, but has a legal and permanent home in Georgia, is he not an inhabitant (domiciled) at his permanent home?

But a "RESIDENT" has no fixed dwelling (domicile) or if he has one, is not there most of the time.

That's a VAGABOND.

VAGABOND. A vagrant or homeless wanderer without means of honest livelihood. Neering v. Illinois Cent. R. Co., 383 111. 366, 50 N.E.2d 497, 502. One who wanders from place to place, having no fixed dwelling, or, if he has one, not abiding in it; a wanderer, especially such a person who is lazy and generally worthless and without means of honest livelihood. See also Vagrant.
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, 6th ed., p. 1549

Vagabundum nuncupamus eum qui nullibi domicilium contraxit habitationis. We call him a "vagabond" who has acquired nowhere a domicile of residence.
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, 6th ed., p. 1549

VAGRANT - At common law, wandering or going about from place to place by idle person who has no lawful or visible means of support and who subsisted on CHARITY and did not work, though able to do so.... One who is apt to become a PUBLIC CHARGE through his own laziness.
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, 6th ed., p. 1549

ONLY duly registered citizens / residents can participate in FICA, and be eligible for PUBLIC CHARITY (entitlements).

WHY is this a problem ?

"The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the different states in this union, the free inhabitants of each of these states, PAUPERS, VAGABONDS and FUGITIVES from Justice EXCEPTED, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several states; ...."
[Article IV of the Articles of Confederation (1777)]

Free inhabitants / non-residents appear to be those folks who retained their endowed rights, since they're not consenting citizens.
But anyone who is a pauper (accepting public charity), or a vagabond (transient), is EXCEPTED from protection.

STATUS CRIMINAL

"STATUS CRIME - A class of crime which consists not in proscribed action or inaction, but in the accused's having a certain personal condition or being a person of a specified character. An example of a status crime is VAGRANCY."
- - - Black's Law Dictionary, 6th ed., p.1410

A vagrant is vagabond and a pauper. And so is a “resident” by redefinition of the term to be synonymous with vagabond. Now you know why "residents" need licenses (permissions) and have to register property with their respective states.

Thanks to national socialism (FICA), all enumerated participants are "status criminals" and guilty until proven innocent (regarding status crimes). Which might explain why "the Homeless" are no longer prosecuted under the old vagrancy laws. The court itself is occupied by "vagrants" and would have to recuse itself.

Free inhabitants / sovereign people are domiciled upon private property, constitutionally protected.
Subject citizens / residents reside at a residence, subject to taxation and regulation.

Do states know the difference?

" No inhabitant of this state shall be molested in person or property ... on account of religious opinions..."
- - - Georgia Constitution, Article 1, Sec.1, Paragraph 4

If an inhabitant non-citizen does not wish to partake in the glorious socialist benefits program because of his religious beliefs, the state will not molest him or his property.
THANK YOU!

“ Citizens, protection of. All citizens of the United States, resident in this state, are hereby declared citizens of this state ; and it shall be the duty of the General Assembly to enact such laws as will protect them in the full enjoyment of the rights, privileges, and immunities due to such citizenship.”
- - - Georgia Constitution, Article 1, Sec.3, Paragraph 7

(U.S. citizens can only "reside" in a state. I have yet to find any code wherein citizens are "domiciled" in a state. A "legal residence" is not synonymous with domicile - a permanent, legal home.)

Check your own state constitution and statutes to verify that American nationals / non-citizens / free inhabitants / non-residents possess their endowed rights, liberties, powers, etc. And as such are excepted from the laws that only apply to U.S. citizens / residents / enumerated socialists / in contract with usurers for usury (interest).
You should find that the bulk of laws do not apply to the sovereign people, especially the EMERGENCY RULES that operate outside of the USCON.

The eCONomic emergency unfolding is but a part of the prosecution of the bankruptcy of the United States government, and the confiscation of wealth from the enumerated masses who are underwriting it (via FICA).

Suggested Remedy:
TL:DR version
_ _ Withdraw consent from [] citizenship [] socialism [] personal interest bearing accounts (banking, stock, insurance) [correct the record, where possible]
_ _ Establish a domicile upon private property* absolutely owned by an individual (you)
_ _ Enjoy your endowed rights, liberties, powers, etc., that are exempt from all taxation and regulation

Go "Punk Amish" - become self sufficient and prosperous. Stop spending 5 months out of the year funding the usurers and their pet government.

(* Private property and real estate are mutually exclusive. Make sure you're not following realty laws that do not apply to private property.)

[pyrangello]

So whats been being floated out there is the QFS - Quantum financial system associated with block chain and elon musk's starlink system, I'm hearing the 5g towers are being switched to work with the starlink system . The QFS will be backed by gold and have its own currency per country. I saw a video of the new currency . This system looks to implemented soon. Just as all the countries overseas are now seeing that our current system is backed by a sailors fart -poof! . Thats how they bailed out all these banks, press a button and poof! another fart ---------------- You think the fed CBDC will be backed by gold , lol, another fart-poof! This is exactly why more and more countries are turning to the BRICS, all backed by gold. 2 days ago 40 of the african countries leaders met with Putin , When the countries overseas stop by US treasuries thats the end of the road baby . All who are talking about the QFS are saying that the banks and stock market have to crash before this goes into effect. When they do crash there will be a set of days 10 days plus where no banking will be done at all, no credit cards, no atm just whoever has cash. Once the system is reset then the QFS goes up and running, will all have a certain amount of time here in the states to exchange the IOU federal reserve currency for a QFS dollar backed by gold.

If you have any money in the banks I suggest moving it to a credit union , try and keep some cash at home and food just to get thru the transition period. Nothing to be afraid of , it needs to happen. The banking system is so corrupt, look at all the corruption at that SVB bank 73 million to black lives matter, rumors of money being funneled thru their for Epstein's child trafficking, today I heard on a podcast there was money laundering thru this for drugs like fentanyl. Dont know whats true but as the bank closed where did the CEO go, not to jail but to his vacation home of 3.5 million dollars in Hawaii! Ah what a like to be a banker that is untouchable , and then there's lazer focused Biden that those responsible will be held accountable , as joe says " C'MON MAN!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL.

[ExomatrixTV]

• CBDCs | General Flynn Rewind (February 13th 2022) | "It's a Controlled Financial Collapse. I Think We Are Going to See Inflation Rates Hit 7%. More Controls By the Federal Reserve. We Are Going to See More Emergency Orders"

- General Flynn

[ExomatrixTV]

• Edward Dowd: Fed Raising Rates Would Be a Willful Demolition of the Banking System: