The design and methodology of the modRNA covid-19 injections

[Dennis Leahy]

There are so many negative aspects to the modRNA* injections gambit that it is difficult to figure out a succinct message to people, to warn them NOT TO TAKE any more modRNA injections. Ever.

I have 9 siblings. Of the 10 of us, 8 have had modRNA injections, and worse, even to this moment in time, none of the 8 will state that they will not get more injections. They listen to mainstream (mainscream) "news", and believe that what they hear is the truth. Goebbels was so right!

My attempts to convince them otherwise started out extremely gently, with me simply recommending different videos and websites and asking them to please check it out. None did (though I do have one brother that has realized it was a mistake, so maybe I'm down to 7.) Of course, these 7 have kids, and some of them have grandchildren too.

I have tried a number of approaches, but have not been effective. My logic is met with emotion (or silence.) I've been asked to stop promoting conspiracy theories or simply told that every health official tells them it's safe and effective, so it has to be, they could not possibly all be wrong or lying. I've been told to put my focus on pleasant things, and stop torturing myself with this nonsense.

(sorry for the long intro)

So, my next attempt revolves around them understanding what the modRNA "vaccine" was designed to do.

My very first question when Pfizer, Moderna and Fauci got Trump to warp speed a new vaccine and it was miraculously produced a few weeks later, was, how does it work? How was it designed to work?

I'm thinking that maybe if these 7 people, my sibs, can gain that understanding, then the rest of the big picture can come into focus.

It's not a vaccine, but I won't re-state that to them again until they understand how it was designed to work. (Of course, I'm not going into anything that highlights nefarious intent, as that simply closes their brains to shut me out as a conspiracy nutter.)

Does everyone here know how the shots were supposed to work, according to the pharmaceutical corporations?
==========================================

Just like the "common cold" corona viruses, the pharmaceutical corporations are unable to use the "inject dead virus and allow the immune system to learn how to detect and fight off the virus" trick - that vaccines before the "mRNA vaccines" are based on.

It was noted that the virus was virulent, and that the immune system was slow to react to the infection. (One aspect of the virus is that it evades the immune system for a while before the immune system catches on.) The shots were designed to insert tiny genetic mRNA 'factories', to detect a covid-19 infection and then produce massive amounts of a synthetic spike protein that mimics the spike protein on the covid-19 virus - once the body is infected with the virus. This was intended as a powerful "wake-up call" to the immune system, to kick-in and start fighting the real invaders - the actual covid-19 virus that has the same immunological signature as the mRNA produced spikes flooding the body. That's the method of action.

Along with this, I think it's also important to note that: The vaccine doesn't kill the virus; the vaccinated person's immune system kills the virus. (I suspect that a huge percentage of "vaccinated" people believe that the vaccine itself kills the virus.)

==============================================

If I can get them to understand this and actually verify it for themselves, then (I'm hoping), I can build on that foundation.

Then there is a foundation for logically explaining that:

The injection was not designed to keep you from getting covid-19, but rather to quickly put your immune system on overdrive to kill the infection.

The modRNA travels all over the body, and unfortunately releases massive amounts of a synthetic spike protein anywhere and everywhere: brain, kidneys, liver, heart. It's not a virus, but it's not innocuous either - it causes inflammation wherever it lands. Inflammation of the heart (myocarditis, pericarditis) is most obvious among the organs and can result in death, but all organs, tissues, and all systems are injured by these modRNA-produced synthetic spike proteins circulating and landing throughout the body. This is why no one should EVER take an mRNA "vaccine" for any reason. Calling this fatally-flawed technology "safe" is a bold lie.

There were no "breakthrough" cases. None. It would be disingenuous to pretend that the vaccine was designed to stop a person from catching covid-19 when the actual design is to start working once you have a covid-19 infection. (People who had taken the shot might have thought they were immune and upon getting covid-19, they thought that the virus "broke through" their vaccine, but the "vaccine" manufacturers knew full well that the shot did not protect anyone from contracting it. So the word "breakthrough" was ignorant to say for the jabbed population, but criminal for the pharmaceutical manufacturers to say it when they knew it was not true.

There is nothing in the design of the vaccine to stop transmission of the virus. Vaccinated and unvaccinated could equally spread the virus. Not allowing an unvaccinated person to travel, attend events, or cross over into Canada has no scientific foundation whatsoever, since everyone, vaccinated or not, has a 100% identical chance of transmitting covid-19.

Noting that the vaccine does not stop nor even lower your chances of catching covid-19, and that a vaccinated person can transmit the covid-19 virus exactly the same as an unvaccinated person, the mRNA covid-19 vaccine is designed only for personal protection, and does not meet the criteria of protecting others, so it is not a real vaccine but rather a treatment. You are told by the pharmaceutical corporations that the vaccine will keep you personally out of the ICU and off a ventilator, and then they slyly wordsmith the disingenuous notion that you can "help stop the spread" (by getting vaccinated) and to "protect others" (by getting vaccinated.) These are blatant marketing lies.

The pharmaceutical corporations, and the corporate media that they control with advertising dollars, repeat, ad nauseum, that the shots are "safe and effective", but forgot to tell you that by "effective", their (difficult to quantify) metric is: to keep you personally out of ICU and off a ventilator - not to prevent you from catching and transmitting covid-19 to the rest of the population.

Aspirin is a personal treatment - are we going to allow that and virtually all other medicines to gain protection from liability by calling the product a "vaccine?"

Mandating a personal treatment that does nothing to protect society is scientific administrative hogwash, and is corporate tyranny. Marketing a personal treatment as a vaccine allows the pharmaceutical corporations to enjoy an un-earned protection from any liability. I predict some lawyers are finally gonna grow a pair and file lawsuits against the pharmaceutical corporations for damages and wrongful deaths, on a personal treatment disingenuously mis-labeled as a "vaccine", that does not meet the legal criterion (protecting others) for exempting vaccines and vaccine producers from liability.

"Safe and Effective?"
Once someone understands how the shots were designed to work, they should be able to see that the shots were not effective. For the people that rolled up their sleeves as a duty to protect their fellow citizens, and now understand that was not true, they will understand that they were duped, marketed to disingenuously. At that point, they may be ready to read the scientific literature that shows how dangerous and UNSAFE the shots are, and realize that everyone that got the shots got injured and some died. The shots are unsafe and ineffective. (I believe that bringing up anything nefarious or conspiratorial will slam the door shut. Very few will chase the rabbit down the hole, but if they realize they were simply lied to with pseudoscientific hogwash and jingoistic marketing phrases, it should be enough to get them to stop taking substances labeled as mRNA vaccines.)


*(modRNA, for "modified RNA", is a more accurate way to describe the injectable substance. It's not the same as naturally produced mRNA that the human body produces.)

[Dennis Leahy]

tl/dr version:


The covid-19 mRNA vaccines were not designed to prevent infection, but rather to start working once a person is infected with covid-19. The vaccine does not stop or even lower the incidence of transmission; again, it was not designed to prevent transmission but rather to kick your own immune system into high gear. Taking the vaccine is not noble or public service, because the vaccine has no effect on transmitting the covid-19 virus to others - it is merely a personal pre-treatment to assist an individual once that individual contracts covid-19.

[Satori]

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)
There are so many negative aspects to the modRNA* injections gambit that it is difficult to figure out a succinct message to people, to warn them NOT TO TAKE any more modRNA injections. Ever.

I have 9 siblings. Of the 10 of us, 8 have had modRNA injections, and worse, even to this moment in time, none of the 8 will state that they will not get more injections. They listen to mainstream (mainscream) "news", and believe that what they hear is the truth. Goebbels was so right!

My attempts to convince them otherwise started out extremely gently, with me simply recommending different videos and websites and asking them to please check it out. None did (though I do have one brother that has realized it was a mistake, so maybe I'm down to 7.) Of course, these 7 have kids, and some of them have grandchildren too.

I have tried a number of approaches, but have not been effective. My logic is met with emotion (or silence.) I've been asked to stop promoting conspiracy theories or simply told that every health official tells them it's safe and effective, so it has to be, they could not possibly all be wrong or lying. I've been told to put my focus on pleasant things, and stop torturing myself with this nonsense.

(sorry for the long intro)

So, my next attempt revolves around them understanding what the modRNA "vaccine" was designed to do.

My very first question when Pfizer, Moderna and Fauci got Trump to warp speed a new vaccine and it was miraculously produced a few weeks later, was, how does it work? How was it designed to work?

I'm thinking that maybe if these 7 people, my sibs, can gain that understanding, then the rest of the big picture can come into focus.

It's not a vaccine, but I won't re-state that to them again until they understand how it was designed to work. (Of course, I'm not going into anything that highlights nefarious intent, as that simply closes their brains to shut me out as a conspiracy nutter.)

Does everyone here know how the shots were supposed to work, according to the pharmaceutical corporations?
==========================================

Just like the "common cold" corona viruses, the pharmaceutical corporations are unable to use the "inject dead virus and allow the immune system to learn how to detect and fight off the virus" trick - that vaccines before the "mRNA vaccines" are based on.

It was noted that the virus was virulent, and that the immune system was slow to react to the infection. (One aspect of the virus is that it evades the immune system for a while before the immune system catches on.) The shots were designed to insert tiny genetic mRNA 'factories', to detect a covid-19 infection and then produce massive amounts of a synthetic spike protein that mimics the spike protein on the covid-19 virus - once the body is infected with the virus. This was intended as a powerful "wake-up call" to the immune system, to kick-in and start fighting the real invaders - the actual covid-19 virus that has the same immunological signature as the mRNA produced spikes flooding the body. That's the method of action.

Along with this, I think it's also important to note that: The vaccine doesn't kill the virus; the vaccinated person's immune system kills the virus. (I suspect that a huge percentage of "vaccinated" people believe that the vaccine itself kills the virus.)

==============================================

If I can get them to understand this and actually verify it for themselves, then (I'm hoping), I can build on that foundation.

Then there is a foundation for logically explaining that:

The injection was not designed to keep you from getting covid-19, but rather to quickly put your immune system on overdrive to kill the infection.

The modRNA travels all over the body, and unfortunately releases massive amounts of a synthetic spike protein anywhere and everywhere: brain, kidneys, liver, heart. It's not a virus, but it's not innocuous either - it causes inflammation wherever it lands. Inflammation of the heart (myocarditis, pericarditis) is most obvious among the organs and can result in death, but all organs, tissues, and all systems are injured by these modRNA-produced synthetic spike proteins circulating and landing throughout the body. This is why no one should EVER take an mRNA "vaccine" for any reason. Calling this fatally-flawed technology "safe" is a bold lie.

There were no "breakthrough" cases. None. It would be disingenuous to pretend that the vaccine was designed to stop a person from catching covid-19 when the actual design is to start working once you have a covid-19 infection. (People who had taken the shot might have thought they were immune and upon getting covid-19, they thought that the virus "broke through" their vaccine, but the "vaccine" manufacturers knew full well that the shot did not protect anyone from contracting it. So the word "breakthrough" was ignorant to say for the jabbed population, but criminal for the pharmaceutical manufacturers to say it when they knew it was not true.

There is nothing in the design of the vaccine to stop transmission of the virus. Vaccinated and unvaccinated could equally spread the virus. Not allowing an unvaccinated person to travel, attend events, or cross over into Canada has no scientific foundation whatsoever, since everyone, vaccinated or not, has a 100% identical chance of transmitting covid-19.

Noting that the vaccine does not stop nor even lower your chances of catching covid-19, and that a vaccinated person can transmit the covid-19 virus exactly the same as an unvaccinated person, the mRNA covid-19 vaccine is designed only for personal protection, and does not meet the criteria of protecting others, so it is not a real vaccine but rather a treatment. You are told by the pharmaceutical corporations that the vaccine will keep you personally out of the ICU and off a ventilator, and then they slyly wordsmith the disingenuous notion that you can "help stop the spread" (by getting vaccinated) and to "protect others" (by getting vaccinated.) These are blatant marketing lies.

The pharmaceutical corporations, and the corporate media that they control with advertising dollars, repeat, ad nauseum, that the shots are "safe and effective", but forgot to tell you that by "effective", their (difficult to quantify) metric is: to keep you personally out of ICU and off a ventilator - not to prevent you from catching and transmitting covid-19 to the rest of the population.

Aspirin is a personal treatment - are we going to allow that and virtually all other medicines to gain protection from liability by calling the product a "vaccine?"

Mandating a personal treatment that does nothing to protect society is scientific administrative hogwash, and is corporate tyranny. Marketing a personal treatment as a vaccine allows the pharmaceutical corporations to enjoy an un-earned protection from any liability. I predict some lawyers are finally gonna grow a pair and file lawsuits against the pharmaceutical corporations for damages and wrongful deaths, on a personal treatment disingenuously mis-labeled as a "vaccine", that does not meet the legal criterion (protecting others) for exempting vaccines and vaccine producers from liability.

"Safe and Effective?"
Once someone understands how the shots were designed to work, they should be able to see that the shots were not effective. For the people that rolled up their sleeves as a duty to protect their fellow citizens, and now understand that was not true, they will understand that they were duped, marketed to disingenuously. At that point, they may be ready to read the scientific literature that shows how dangerous and UNSAFE the shots are, and realize that everyone that got the shots got injured and some died. The shots are unsafe and ineffective. (I believe that bringing up anything nefarious or conspiratorial will slam the door shut. Very few will chase the rabbit down the hole, but if they realize they were simply lied to with pseudoscientific hogwash and jingoistic marketing phrases, it should be enough to get them to stop taking substances labeled as mRNA vaccines.)


*(modRNA, for "modified RNA", is a more accurate way to describe the injectable substance. It's not the same as naturally produced mRNA that the human body produces.)

Outstanding Dennis! Bump.

[shaberon]

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)
I have tried a number of approaches, but have not been effective. My logic is met with emotion (or silence.) I've been asked to stop promoting conspiracy theories or simply told that every health official tells them it's safe and effective, so it has to be, they could not possibly all be wrong or lying. I've been told to put my focus on pleasant things, and stop torturing myself with this nonsense.

Sounds like the Amerilemmings...maybe 1 in 8 will listen to free speech.

I would agree that the current emergency we are confronted with is not the "Covid incident", but this mRNA project which is designed to envelop our future. And no, it's not even a vaccine by the usual parameters.

Usually nobody will listen, since they are trying to "be nice" or "do the right thing", which cannot stand to reason, but usually traces back to "someone said so".

I have actually never got any other explanation from the "nice people". It is all just authority. These people certainly do not put me at ease or make me feel particularly nice; and so this is very difficult.

The stuff needs to be pried out of their babes-in-the-woods hands. Put on display with big warning labels. I just don't think they can see how clumsy and sick they really are. Broken.

They might be polite most of the time, which is a ruse for suckers.

I don't know how to improve the basic message. Just dismissing a bunch of marketing lies. That is why I am pretty sure "we" collectively as Anglophones have a huge identity crisis in store, possibly combined with an approaching need to do our own agriculture and manufacturing.

[happyuk]

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)
tl/dr version:
it is merely a personal pre-treatment to assist an individual once that individual contracts covid-19.

And is there any compelling evidence that it assists any more "effectively" than our own immune system?

(As for the "safely" counterpart, I'm not even going to give it the benefit of the doubt...)

[Michel Leclerc]

It seems to me that you have your act together, Dennis.

I am quite interested by the results you will get when presenting your siblings with it.

Good luck!

[Sue (Ayt)]

That token effect using "brownie points" and "gold stars" etc. to steer behavior is very powerful! It is rather amazing what people will do just to get some worthless, devised "honor," but the social engineers have full comprehension of the phenom, and know how to use it.

I remember being so disgusted when I would venture onto FB and note that special frame that FB introduced around folk's profile pics that proudly proclaimed "I got my covid vaccine!"
UgggghHHity uggh uggh retch!
I watched the frames go up around friends and relatives faces, one by one, as they succumbed. Each time it sickened me!

I am not sure that any amount of reason, or even facts that can now easily be seen in retrospect, can trump this social engineering devised around the human need for social acceptance that has been so thoroughly studied by tptb.

Maybe making "rebellion" the new "in" thing would be a method? (Any celebrities available to do that, I wonder?)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=OOWO--z1S8A

[Dennis Leahy]

Posted by happyuk (here)

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)
tl/dr version:
it is merely a personal pre-treatment to assist an individual once that individual contracts covid-19.

And is there any compelling evidence that it assists any more "effectively" than our own immune system?

(As for the "safely" counterpart, I'm not even going to give it the benefit of the doubt...)

Yes, I am using the pharmaceutical industry's stated design parameters of the modifiedRNA injection, not what I believe to be the accurate (clandestine) truth of their intent. Again, I'm dealing with a group of people that would simply slam the door shut and would solidify their position supporting the pharma corporations if I try to educate them from the bottom of the rabbit hole.


I'm trying to at least plant the logical seed that explains that the injections were falsely marketed as helping others because they were not designed to help others (by preventing infection and subsequent transmission), but rather were designed to assist the individual's immune system. Just like an effective comedian can create a crack in even "thick-skulled" individuals, I'm hoping that pointing out this fact - this scientific fact - may create just such a crack in their belief system. There's no way they are going to miraculously suddenly realize that the whole plandemic was orchestrated and just how dangerous - permanently injurious to deadly dangerous - the injections really are, and how psychopathic and nefarious the modifiedRNA injection pushers really are. But maybe if I can help to create that little crack in the concrete, maybe temporarily break the spell they are under, it will be a seed or a catalyst toward further inquiry.

To answer your question happyUK, I have seen no evidence whatsoever to show that the injections actually saved anyone from dying, or kept anyone out of the hospital, or kept anyone from being intubated. I believe that this is the metric by which they would defend themselves in court (if there was a functioning justice system), that the pharmaceutical corporations would cling to some sort of statistics about hospitalization as to the "effective" part of their nebulous (and erroneous) claim of being "safe and effective." But, I haven't seen any scientific data supporting their claims - only that the virus took a normal path of mutation where it became less dangerous over time, and the injections were then given the credit for less hospitalizations. I should say, then Pfizer and Moderna took the credit, as if the injections had anything to do with natural virus mutation. The covid-19 plandemic lasted exactly as long as it would have without any modRNA injections.

[shaberon]

Posted by Sue (Ayt) (here)
Maybe making "rebellion" the new "in" thing would be a method? (Any celebrities available to do that, I wonder?)

Yes, one could perhaps start with the possibly first independent recording artist, Woody Guthrie.

From his relatively basic outlook, one might be swayed towards a dangerous Antifa mentality, quite similarly to many political punk bands who for instance--The Clash were influenced by Mr. Guthrie.

I, personally, am unaware of any music that may be particularly supportive of the status quo--I suppose they have it.

I have noticed for example Twisted Sister had to ask Trump to stop using their song, as did Golden Earring with Hillary Clinton--those count as "unauthorized use".


Extreme lyrics intact, here is a modern metal blast with Covid and Ukraine in mind:


Don't Feed Me Your Lies

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=9YzM2LsWYs0

Or perhaps:

Zombie Apocalypse

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=eSS10DNhI0c

[Pris]

.
.
Here's an excellent 21 minute video explaining the origins, design and methodology of "COVID" and the mRNA "vaccine":


💥 Dr. David Martin - Documenting Coronavirus Gain of Function Research at the Covid Summit in Brussels, Belgium - May 2023

https://rumble.com/v2mwrgm--dr.-davi...h-at-the-.html

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v2kbc0k

[Denise/Dizi]

Sadly, in my area, those that took the shot and later learned the truth, haven't changed much, if at all since then.... They chose to just rotate their focus to something they COULD claim some "Superior Ground" to "Soapbox on"... How dare we take this opportunity to educate them? They do not see it as a caring gesture, but more ... an "I TOLD YOU SO" type of exchange...

Once they learned that it doesn't stop them from getting Covid, they seemed to forget that they ever "arrogantly" claimed they're now "Immune"... And that WE, the UNVAXXED are "killing people".... (Many actually did this, and Marc even quit working for his parents when they tried to shame him into the shot. Marc's mother didn't want the shot, yet took it under pressure from Dad, and died June 19th of sudden heart failure.)

And once they learned that they could indeed "Spread it"... They grabbed ahold of the "Well I certainly won't get as sick as the next guy" as their last "life buoy..." Forgetting yet again, their accusatory claims towards the unvaxed of not "Being a SPREADER", as they waved that around like some "flag of honor.."

To study the topic, and learn that their behaviors and actions may have prompted a loved one to get the shots, that possibly later stopped their hearts, is a guilt they would never willingly put upon themselves, so they would never look such things up and ponder that it may be true...

Sadly these individuals do not WANT to know WHY they were wrong, or what really happened... They really don't.

After all of this, they are behaving as if nothing happened... Acting as if that was "Totally acceptable, and normal behavior"... and just ignoring it ever happened... It's a scary phenomenon when people can't even acknowledge to others that they may have been wrong. Or at least apologize for the way they behaved... And worse, in their ego driven reasonings for not looking into it, they may suffer even more as the effects of those shots remain with them, like a ticking bomb that they will never even try to diffuse...

Sadly, many vaxxed people in my community are now dropping like flies, or worse, quickly losing their cognitive abilities... It's really obvious too... And sad to watch... And even more frightening is the numbers of people whom I am SURE woud line up again for more rounds as "New Strains" come out... No matter WHAT the data shows... They just can't be wrong...

Good Luck Dennis... I woud hate to be looking at siblings as if they all were walking time bombs, it must be heartbreaking...

[Dennis Leahy]

Denise, you just catalyzed a thought, and that is to not use the word vaccine to speak of the "vaccine", but rather to call it an "immunization", which is a more powerful link to the concept of immunity. It's an easier pathway for the mind to recognize that with no immunity, it wasn't an immunization. It's just semantics, but then, so are magic spells and propaganda.

You're right - it is heartbreaking. 99.5% of my loved ones succumbed to the fear porn and simply could not believe that the "health authorities" and every TV talking head was wrong, much less lying.

Pris, hahahaha, I'm trying to sneak a seed of a thought into a side door in my sib's heads - Dr. David Martin kicks down the front door! Your post is certainly relevant to the thread title, and belongs in the thread, but I'm pretty sure that they "can't handle the truth" and Dr. Martin would send them over the edge immediately, and thicken their skulls with a fresh coat of "emotion-based truth repellent."

[Pris]

.

Posted by Dennis Leahy (here)
Pris, hahahaha, I'm trying to sneak a seed of a thought into a side door in my sib's heads - Dr. David Martin kicks down the front door! Your post is certainly relevant to the thread title, and belongs in the thread, but I'm pretty sure that they "can't handle the truth" and Dr. Martin would send them over the edge immediately, and thicken their skulls with a fresh coat of "emotion-based truth repellent."

I think you're right, Dennis, unfortunately. Someone sent me that 21 minute Dr. Martin COVID Summit video the other day... So far, it's the best video I've seen that really sums it all up. I, too, immediately thought of sending it off to jabbed-up, brainwashed relatives but haven't yet because I think they'll just ignore it like everything else I've sent. One of my relatives has a trip planned to Europe in October. I happened to talk to them today and asked if they're aware that the globalists are attempting to bring back COVID 2.0 (the masks, the lockdowns, the "vaccine" mandates) and that we're at war and it's probably not a good idea to travel. Nope, they had no idea what I was talking about and didn't want to hear anything else I had to say.

[Pam]

My brother is the "director" of the health department in the state I live in. I only remember having a single disagreement with him while growing up. When I felt morally obligated to him to discuss my hours and hours of study on this topic it was the only time he became really angry with me.

I challenged his role as savior of the people... The door just shut. He didn't want anything to do with an exchange of ideas, neither him or his "Doctor" wife. They bought and live by the dogma, the official narrative. Nothing and I mean nothing will change their intellectual minds.

[Frankie Pancakes]

https://margaretannaalice.substack.c...your-child-the

50 Reasons to Give Your Child the COVID Shot

[Dennis Leahy]

Posted by Frankie Pancakes (here)
https://margaretannaalice.substack.c...your-child-the

50 Reasons to Give Your Child the COVID Shot

Thank you Frankie Pancakes from Absurdistan!

Excellent article that aggregates way more than 50 links to eye-opening articles and includes heartbreaking embedded videos. The tone is "scolding" and the 50 reason titles are mocking the parents' ignorance, which is probably not the right psychology for many parents, but quite frankly, there are many parents that cannot be approached at all no matter how the information is presented. I don't have real numbers, but the 80/20 rule seems about right, and this article might have an impact on 20% of parents, the other 80% won't read past the first paragraph. Those 80% are under a spell, literally. Every trusted voice (media, government, corporate) in their lives is telling them the exact opposite of this, and they just repeat the incantation, "safe and effective... safe and effective...safe and effective..." in their minds. Maybe the Clockwork Orange technique of forcing these 80%'s eyes open, and forcing them to hear the truth repeated over and over and over might break the spell, but I'm not even sure about that.

I think I'll try to also embed the entire article including links here as well.

I note that, similar to the question that I posed to Dr. Meryl Nass, the article mentions efficacy and caves-in to using the term to describe the shots as having short-term efficacy. In other words, saying the "vaccine" is a vaccine, but it's short-lived. Pfizer has cleverly repeated the mantra "safe and effective", but what is the metric by which the shot is effective? Their answer is, "you won't have to go to an ICU and be intubated, and you won't die." Nothing whatsoever to do with efficacy against catching C-19, nor transmitting it.

Pfizer has cleverly prompted government officials and corporate media and corporate social media to do the spell-binding dirty work and to conflate Pfizer's word "effective" to mean not catching and not transmitting the virus, and then when that publicly shows itself to be bullsh!t, the cases are labeled as "breakthrough" cases. If the shot doesn't have the property of actually immunizing a person from catching and then transmitting covid-19, then how could they sell the concept of vaccine passports or sell the idea that an unvaccinated person is a greater danger to them than a person who has been injected with a treatment that was designed to work once a person is infected, not to prevent infection?

So, that is the one glaring flaw that I see in the 50 Reasons to Give Your Child the COVID Shot article, and for that matter, in Dr. Nass' interview. I don't believe we should let them get away with calling the shot "effective" or have "efficacy" as a vaccine. It's not a vaccine and has zero efficacy to prevent infection or to prevent transmission. It's a vaccine in name only. I believe that is a critical piece that has to be repeated and repeated - it is the core, central issue and simply provides the pharmaceutical corporations the protection - the immunity - from prosecution. The real efficacy of the covid-19 shots to provide immunity is 0%.

[Ratszinger]

My understanding of the spike protein is that it teaches the body to kill off the protein by injecting it and the body imeediately recognizes that this foreigner should not be there and doesn't belong there so it begins attacking it to remove it from the body right away. So it kicks the body into high gear to fight infection right off! It isn't waiting until it detects the real thing at all Dennis. In short the jab will instruct the body to produce spike proteins that teach the immune system to combat the spikes on the coronavirus, and experts say these proteins are not toxic and short lived. That is what you are up against. Two sciences. The hijacked science calling this a vaccine for purely liable reasons and the real science being shoved aside.

The AP covered a story a while back of Byramin Bridle. This was in May, Canadian radio host Alex Pierson interviewed Dr. Byram Bridle, an associate professor in viral immunology at the University of Guelph’s Ontario Veterinary College, about whether the vaccine was safe for children.

On the show, Bridle says that he is pro-vaccine, but goes on to discuss a fringe theory that the spike protein that the body produces from the vaccine is toxic and can damage certain organs.

“We made a big mistake. We didn’t realize it until now, we thought the spike protein was a great target antigen. We never knew the spike protein itself was a toxin and was a pathogenic protein so by vaccinating people we are inadvertently inoculating them with a toxin,” he says.

Though Bridle used the term “we” there is no indication that he was involved in any way in developing COVID-19 vaccines. Other scientists refute Bridle’s characterization of the spike protein.

“The spike protein is immunogenic, meaning it causes an immune response, but it is not a toxin,” said William Matchett, a vaccine researcher at the University of Minnesota Medical School.

I never got the jab and neither did my wife. My best friend never got it and his wife never did either. Their son? Well, he did get it to stay in active duty in the AF rather than separate. While lifting weights in the gym at his base he got light headed in the midldle of one lift and passed out ten days after getiting his booster because his heart was swollen and he fell face and head first into the squat rack fracturing his skull and getting lots of stitches in his head and face. HIs folks and both the wife and I blame the vaccine for this heart problem. The problem is that I don''t think the makers of this mRNA vax don't know all the possiblilities or even more sinister they do and it's all part of the plan.

Whatever the case I have a 17 year old nephew with a heart condition now that collapsed shortly after getting the jab, only his was on the basketball court. Now my best friends 21 year old son is still in the hospital for myocarditis and probably is on the fringe of being released from active duty anyway if my guess is correct!

All these poor kids will be shoved to the street now with their conditons and no recourse for anyone or the gov. to take responsibility or be held accountable! These are all tragic chain of events but trust me here when I tell you that even if like us there are doctors in the family and they ask for your advice they won't listen! None of them listened. My four sisters! Ignored me! My three brothes? Only one the youngest I practically raised after my dad's stroke and my son didn't get it! They listened instead to perfect strangers that said they were experts on the TV or that told a talking head on the TV everyone should get it and it's safe! So easy to do that when there is no accountablility at all isn't it!? What if that changed?

What if it was discovered that COVID didn't kill all those people but COVID protocol did? No accountability? Really? Something tells me we'll see about this!

[Frankie Pancakes]

It’s hard to get a man to understand something when his comfortable reality is threatened by that act of understanding.

You covered some of this. Makes good scientific proof.
But like you implied the blinders will not be removed.

https://www.sott.net/article/486181-...e-consequences

https://www.sott.net/article/475849-...ce-to-Covid-19

https://www.sott.net/article/484057-...in-study-found

https://www.sott.net/article/437207-...ly-meaningless

[onawah]

I can certainly empathize with your dilemma, Dennis.
I have no family members left to be concerned about, though I still have friends who don't understand what's going on and are consequently in danger.
But please consider this: even if the vaxxed finally understand the vaxx isn't at all what it's been portrayed as being, then what they have to face, ie what it really is, and how to reverse the damages that it's causing them, is even more daunting.
To put it in perspective, it's daunting even for the unvaxxed, most of whom are just beginning to understand what was really in those syringes and how much everyone is endangered now because the latest reports tell us the same toxins and AI tech (self-replicating nanobots among them ) are infecting everyone now via the environment, in air, water, food and other pharmaceuticals.
This is documented by the microscopy work of Dr. Ana Mihalcea and her colleagues who are finding many unnatural, inexpicable and weird things in the blood of the vaxxed and now the unvaxxed as well:
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.co...m_medium=email
Fortunately, there are remedies, but the infection process is ongoing and it takes discipline and monetary investment to deal with adequately, not to mention conviction, determination and good comprehension.

[onawah]

PS I should add to that list of toxins, the synthetic snake venom that Dr. Bryan Ardis found in the Vaxx and in public water, which means it too, could be found in food, air, etc. as well, and then there are reports of traces of the toxic and often fatal SV40 polio vaccine in the current Vaxx, as well other nasty viruses and whatnot, and reports that Marburg may be in the coming batches.