WORLD CHANGING EVENT? Clif High and Dick Allgire discuss looming cataclysm

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by ashva (here)
When my son was barely ten, he told me of a dream of his.
[ ... ]
(On questioning, he shared his view that the dream showed developments over what he thought was a two year period. He estimated a 30% possibility the duration was two months, and a 10% possibility of two weeks. As such, he deemed the 2 year period as a 60% probability).

Thank you for sharing this... that's clear, vivid, remarkable, and maybe very significant.

Two questions:

1. When did he have this dream?
2. When does he think or feel this might all start?

[ashva]

Five years ago.

Yes, it is remarkable, and it was remarkable to me then.

The images, their obvious meaning, and his understanding of their meaning was beyond his imagination and intelligence. The creativity coherence of the dream too was beyond him.

When? No date.

[mountain_jim]

https://x.com/TheWakeninq/status/170...654666235?s=20

[Kuperkai]

Posted by Franny (here)
Ed Riordan of the same RV group as Dick Algire, just posted this video. He describes an event he experienced in 1985 and hopes it isn't connected to the recent RVs they have had.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=xyKUbrGYJ24

Edward Riordan is an amazing remote viewer. I recommend everyone watch his short 14 minute video. If you have not watched it, you might not want to read the following as it might influence your own interpretation.

• Edward starts off the video with a RV session he did a year ago on 9-22-2022. In that session he describes a comet/meteor. The comet/meteor is a harbinger indicating the ending of one time and the starting of another and might possibly cause a lights out scenario.

• He then correlates this comet/meteor to a download he had in 1985. In that download he was walking down a street and saw a dead tree [drawn as a palm tree- my interpretation] behind the rubble of three buildings. He saw lots of rubble and felt no detectable life.
• In the Sept 2022 RV session he felt that the scene he saw in 1985 could happen in 2023. Looking into the details of the 1985 vision he saw that war and destruction exist at the time of seeing the dead tree. It was not necessarily a world war, but destruction.
• Interestingly, he felt that the sun was cold, but there was no snow on the ground. In my mind, that translates into winter depending on location. Considering Edward drew the dead tree as a palm tree, I would interpret this time frame as late fall or Dec/Jan/Feb in a place that does not usually get snow.
• In Edward’s 1985 download, the retirement system of 1985 would not be there for him at his retirement age. As of Sept 2022, Edward was 53- around 12 years away from the retirement age of 65 in the years 2034-2035.
• Edward remarks that the years 2023-2034 are the “battle years” with “heavy battle” for several years.
• In the Sept 2022 RV session he probed the chain of events that would lead to the destruction. The comet in the sky was a time marker [back to the idea of harbinger] and the season felt cold like a Nov-Feb time span. Next an explosive event occurs with a chain reaction. Several explosions. The world waits, and then the next round. Battle lines are drawn. Then what looks like two “maybe” nuclear exchanges, and a radioactive exchange, and then stop [Note- Edward drew a mushroom cloud at two different locations]. The nuclear/radioactive events are part of one event, and the use of these nuclear weapons rearranges affairs [of nations ?] and alliances. At these two targets, there is no power and everything stops. The event sends shockwaves around the world and the world stops. This is the end of event one.
• In a dream that Edward had in Sept of 2022, he saw the pop of a bullet coming from the end of a rifle and it is “an assassins bullet”. He also saw a green bird and blue bird flying away [the Green movement and Democrats ???].

Here are my big takeaways from Edward’s Sep 2022 RV session:
1) The comet is a harbinger, a time marker separating one era from the other. So, if/when we see a large/significant comet, the nuclear events are not far behind.
2) War and destruction will ensue from the nuclear event, leaving the world forever changed.

I believe the comet is important. Interestingly, so does The Economist magazine. On The Economist 2017 cover (after the Trump win) they put 8 tarot cards, all Major Arcana or Trump cards.

In case, I am not successful in uploading the cover, here is a link to cover photo.

Here are two articles that discuss the cover:
“THE WORLD IN 2017″…Economist Magazine 2017 Cover Page

Decoding The Economist 2017 Cover — “Planet Trump” | Tarot and the “Trump Cards”

You’ll notice that the last tarot card (bottom right) is entitled “The Star” and shows a comet, in the dead center. At the bottom of this tarot card is the surface of a reddish/purple cratered moon (perhaps this tells us where to look for the comet). I believe placing “The Star” tarot card last is significant, and it is meant to mark the end of this cycle, as Edward suggests in his remote viewing session.

Lyn Buchanan’s RVing of the future correlates with Edward’s work. Sean Patrick Hazlett did two great interviews with Lyn Buchanan on this subject, which are on Sean’s YT channel, “Through a Glass Darkly”.
What Causes The Massive Depopulation by 2040 That Lyn Buchanan Saw in 1998 (Episode 105)?- Oct 31, 2022 | Through A Glass Darkly
And
The Passive Revolt of 2040 with Lyn Buchanan (Episode 148)- March 29, 2023 | Through A Glass Darkly

From the first interview, this is what Lyn Buchanan saw in the future:

@7m 41s
in the year 2020, a series of man-made natural disasters was going to start happening. It would last for about 20 years. By the end of the 20 years, almost 75 percent of the population of the U.S, and generally the world, would have been killed off. So a resident [population] of about 25 percent, and that after that the governments would have to change. The economy would have to change everything. People would be more self-sufficient. Starting in 2020, I got that cities schools and things like that, would start emptying out. People would start teaching their kids at home. Any communication between people would be through technological means and all that, and that it was a man-made natural disaster, and a series. It was the start of a series of man-made natural disasters.

@19m 37s
and what I got was that after 2040 the population is culled out, the remnant of people are demanding honest government, fair economic situations. They still live separated, and they still have the technology that they didn't have back in the 1800s. So communication with each other through technology is so much easier and becomes the standardized thing. The personal meetings and all that generally wind up being a thing of the past.

Also the IQ level of, the general IQ level average goes very high. So, you know the remnant of the people are generally very high IQ, very demanding on honesty freedom and so on. And that for the next many, many decades it's really sort of an, earth is really sort of the ideal place to live, that mankind as a unit is better off for this whole thing.

The Anglo-Saxon Mission, The Economist and these RV sessions line up pretty well. Like Bill said here, I don’t think we can change these coming events. Using a Lyn Buchanan analogy (from the first video @5m22s), these upcoming events appear to be “a rock in the pond of time”. If that is the case, then we can only change how we react to what is coming. Given the data available, I think we should be preparing and forming like-minded communities. Psi skills like remote viewing will be important to navigating the future as will be many other homesteading/survival skills.

One of the big problems with nuclear events (after the blast that is) is the contamination of water and soil. Given the duration of the events, the only reliable source of clean water will be from deep underground sources. Take that into account when choosing where to move.

[Szymon]

Hi Guys,

I'm in the middle of listening to the latest Polish clairvoyant session that he did today. I've never seen this guy so nervous and worried about his vision. I think he even swore, which is very unlike him. I will post the translation in my usual PA thread once I am done with it.

Szymon

[Kuperkai]

I had another thought on The Economist's 2017 tarot cover.



What if each tarot card represents one year, starting with 2016 for the "The Tower" tarot card? This would make sense since the second tarot card "Judgement" has Trump sitting on the USA, holding a crown in his right hand and the scepter with eagle [symbolizing US] in his left hand. 2017 would be when Trump took office as POTUS. Following this logic, the "Death" tarot card would be 2020 and that is certainly when the pandemic hit. Now, while we didn't get the mushroom cloud in 2020, we did get death and pestilence as indicated by the two insects on the "Death" card. And lastly, the bottom right tarot card "The Star" would then correspond to 2023. Edward did say the event could happen in 2023.

I have very little experience with the tarot, but I know elites like the Rothschilds (one of major owners of The Economist) are heavily into the occult and the tarot fits right in with that kind of thinking. Given all of the predictive programming surrounding 9-11 and Covid, I can see how The Economist would reveal their eight year plan in plain sight for those with eyes wide open, as opposed to wide shut.

[Szymon]

Posted by Szymon (here)
Hi Guys,

I'm in the middle of listening to the latest Polish clairvoyant session that he did today. I've never seen this guy so nervous and worried about his vision. I think he even swore, which is very unlike him. I will post the translation in my usual PA thread once I am done with it.

Szymon

Here is the link to my post.

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1578943

[Elainie]

Posted by Kuperkai (here)
I had another thought on The Economist's 2017 tarot cover.

Attachment 51925

What if each tarot card represents one year, starting with 2016 for the "The Tower" tarot card? This would make sense since the second tarot card "Judgement" has Trump sitting on the USA, holding a crown in his right hand and the scepter with eagle [symbolizing US] in his left hand. 2017 would be when Trump took office as POTUS. Following this logic, the "Death" tarot card would be 2020 and that is certainly when the pandemic hit. Now, while we didn't get the mushroom cloud in 2020, we did get death and pestilence as indicated by the two insects on the "Death" card. And lastly, the bottom right tarot card "The Star" would then correspond to 2023. Edward did say the event could happen in 2023.

I have very little experience with the tarot, but I know elites like the Rothschilds (one of major owners of The Economist) are heavily into the occult and the tarot fits right in with that kind of thinking. Given all of the predictive programming surrounding 9-11 and Covid, I can see how The Economist would reveal their eight year plan in plain sight for those with eyes wide open, as opposed to wide shut.

Edward often uses tarot cards in his RV sessions as well, perhaps you know this
already. I vaguly remember this cover being discussed by the RV group.......some time ago.

[Violet3]

Interesting use of the Tarot idea, which seems a lot like programming by The Economist and whoever went to a lot of trouble to detail these images. They use the stylistic aspects of the most widely known Tarot cards in the modern West, the Waite-Smith deck (or Ryder Waite as it is usually called, ignoring the artist) however the symbolism has almost no relation to the original deck and in some ways, such as with the Star card, is a reversal of it.

[Kuperkai]

Posted by Elainie (here)

Posted by Kuperkai (here)
I had another thought on The Economist's 2017 tarot cover.

Attachment 51925

What if each tarot card represents one year, starting with 2016 for the "The Tower" tarot card? This would make sense since the second tarot card "Judgement" has Trump sitting on the USA, holding a crown in his right hand and the scepter with eagle [symbolizing US] in his left hand. 2017 would be when Trump took office as POTUS. Following this logic, the "Death" tarot card would be 2020 and that is certainly when the pandemic hit. Now, while we didn't get the mushroom cloud in 2020, we did get death and pestilence as indicated by the two insects on the "Death" card. And lastly, the bottom right tarot card "The Star" would then correspond to 2023. Edward did say the event could happen in 2023.

I have very little experience with the tarot, but I know elites like the Rothschilds (one of major owners of The Economist) are heavily into the occult and the tarot fits right in with that kind of thinking. Given all of the predictive programming surrounding 9-11 and Covid, I can see how The Economist would reveal their eight year plan in plain sight for those with eyes wide open, as opposed to wide shut.

Edward often uses tarot cards in his RV sessions as well, perhaps you know this
already. I vaguly remember this cover being discussed by the RV group.......some time ago.

@Elainie- No, I didn't know Edward uses tarot cards. I've been following him almost exclusively on YT and other free platforms. Frankly, I'm kind of surprised that he is into tarot because he seems to hate remote viewing anything with aliens. Thanks for the insight!

[Kuperkai]

Posted by Violet3 (here)
Interesting use of the Tarot idea, which seems a lot like programming by The Economist and whoever went to a lot of trouble to detail these images. They use the stylistic aspects of the most widely known Tarot cards in the modern West, the Waite-Smith deck (or Ryder Waite as it is usually called, ignoring the artist) however the symbolism has almost no relation to the original deck and in some ways, such as with the Star card, is a reversal of it.

@Violet3- Thanks for the insights as I'm illiterate when it comes to tarot. By creating tarot cards with almost no relation to the original and a Star card which is a reversal of it, what does that tell you? What message is being sent?

As a side note, I've seen quite a bit of of occult programming from The Economist and other "elite" bodies. IMF banker Christine LaGarde gave a rather "illuminating" speech on "magic 7's" and numerology.
Occult Message in Speech by Christine Lagarde of IMF- 5-24-2014 | ACITHWOTE

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Kuperkai (here)
@Elaine- No, I didn't know Edward uses tarot cards. I've been following him almost exclusively on YT and other free platforms. Frankly, I'm kind of surprised that he is into tarot because he seems to hate remote viewing anything with aliens. Thanks for the insight!

It might not matter... it seems to me that it all depends how things like this are used. Some make squiggles on whiteboards, others gaze into candle flames. It may be simply a matter of whatever external catalyst best helps the viewer to trigger their own insights and perceptions.

[Elainie]

From Dennis Nappi II of FFG

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=YZU68GjS3RQ

[Violet3]

Posted by Kuperkai (here)

Posted by Violet3 (here)
Interesting use of the Tarot idea, which seems a lot like programming by The Economist and whoever went to a lot of trouble to detail these images. They use the stylistic aspects of the most widely known Tarot cards in the modern West, the Waite-Smith deck (or Ryder Waite as it is usually called, ignoring the artist) however the symbolism has almost no relation to the original deck and in some ways, such as with the Star card, is a reversal of it.

@Violet3- Thanks for the insights as I'm illiterate when it comes to tarot. By creating tarot cards with almost no relation to the original and a Star card which is a reversal of it, what does that tell you? What message is being sent?

As a side note, I've seen quite a bit of of occult programming from The Economist and other "elite" bodies. IMF banker Christine LaGarde gave a rather "illuminating" speech on "magic 7's" and numerology.
Occult Message in Speech by Christine Lagarde of IMF- 5-24-2014 | ACITHWOTE

Hi Kuperkai
Well I am not an expert on Tarot but have used it on and off to enhance my limited intuition. But I can say a few things I've gleaned. Tarot is usually used to explore or expand upon a concept or situation, and can be used somewhat to outline a future path or set of potentialities, but I felt the Economist 'spread' was possibly predictive in a more leading and manipulative way, especially with such re-design of a familiar looking deck - anyone looking at those images with any experience at all of the Ryder Smith deck would know these are not spontaneous images but drawn and laid out to sell a plan or story. The reversals tell me that something dark is at play, as reversals are a signal of this- well known examples are the swastika and the pentagram. The images themselves are normally read in context of the question brought by the person asking for a reading and also the other cards, so there are no fixed meanings- but the Star usually sheds a positive light, for example symbolising the higher self. In the Economist spread there is no central star of the self but only a downward heading comet, often associated historically with heralding disasters. Other examples of reversals in the Economist spread include Death- often interpreted as major change or transformation- there is no scope for positive interpretation given the insects (disease vectors?) and distinct mushroom cloud; also the Magician, not a creative image but someone wired into a machine with controlled reproductions coming out of it; the Hermit, not lighting the path of wisdom but shining down on an army. Other of the images highlight these sorts of interpretations also- the Tower (destruction), and the wired up World etc.

[Violet3]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Kuperkai (here)
@Elaine- No, I didn't know Edward uses tarot cards. I've been following him almost exclusively on YT and other free platforms. Frankly, I'm kind of surprised that he is into tarot because he seems to hate remote viewing anything with aliens. Thanks for the insight!

It might not matter... it seems to me that it all depends how things like this are used. Some make squiggles on whiteboards, others gaze into candle flames. It may be simply a matter of whatever external catalyst best helps the viewer to trigger their own insights and perceptions.

yes, just different tools to explore in ways that help dial back the conscious mind and access a less entangled awareness

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Elainie (here)
From Dennis Nappi II of FFG

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=YZU68GjS3RQ

I listened to this, and I lost count of the times Dennis Nappi stated this was all super-scary, and that we mustn't drown ourselves in our own fear (my paraphrase).

But he was projecting — of course. He was very honest about his own fears of such a possible event (whatever it is!), and even referred to his "mental health".

A point to think about: A 'world-changing event' might not be a terrible thing in the very biggest picture. Most reading this might agree that the world really does need changing.

This might not be the thread to discuss this, but if humans really are collectively psychic (as I'm sure they are!), the vast preponderance of human feeling about the fairly near future, however vague and lacking in specific detail it might be, is that

1. Something pretty bad is going to happen quite soon.
2. Things will get much worse before they get better.
3. But then we'll collectively emerge into a relatively golden age after all the worst has passed.

If this really is the way it's going to be, then maybe we should just bring it on.

[Vicus]

[syrwong]

In the Ching Dynasty, there was a famous diviner who wrote a book on how to interpret the oracles, he called himself "The old man of wild storks". It was a well written book full of examples that inspired many masters of divination in later generations. There were a few examples that looked like this: A businessman came to him to predict if his venture would be successful. The master looked at the result and told him to take care of his health, not giving a direct answer. He wrote that the oracle was so devasting that he saw the man would probably die the following week, which indeed happened. To the master Heaven did not answer the man's question because it was totally irrelevant. The pressing event coming was revealed instead.

The Event from different views of the remote viewers had to be so significant that it outweighed any original requests twice. As if Heaven says, all things that will happen will be too trivial compared to this Event.

I therefore interpreter the event will happen in October, which agrees with various prophecies like Father Olivereira and also with many rational economic predictions. We do not know exactly the nature of this event, possibly the nuclear destruction of a city or an asteroid impact, but the goal is the take down the present economic system. It has the two-fold effect of forcing the NWO and depopulation.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by syrwong (here)
The Event from different views of the remote viewers had to be so significant that it outweighed any original requests twice. As if Heaven says, all things that will happen will be too trivial compared to this Event.

I therefore interpreter the event will happen in October, which agrees with various prophecies like Father Oliveira and also with many rational economic predictions. We do not know exactly the nature of this event, possibly the nuclear destruction of a city or an asteroid impact, but the goal is the take down the present economic system. It has the two-fold effect of forcing the NWO and depopulation.

Just a thinking-aloud comment here.

I'm sure like many others, I've been wondering why this RVed information, quite unconnected with the actual target, came to everyone together in that one session.

Not the session before, or the previous month, or last year sometime, or in a session next month not yet done. But all at once, right there and then.

One explanation might be that many possible futures are fluid and dynamic, not yet 'fixed'. But at some point — like after the car brakes have failed, you're still going fast, and the stationary truck is right in front of you — the future becomes determined and unavoidable.

So maybe what was previously a merely potential event 'solidified into reality', at the time of the session or just a little earlier, to became definitive, unavoidable and inevitable.

In which case, (a) it suddenly became clearly visible to those with the skills to 'see' it, and (b) meditating or intending that it won't happen won't make any difference, because the stationary truck is right there, and hard reality is hard reality even if the certain impact hasn't quite happened yet.

Three other points:

1. It's unlikely to be an asteroid. A large undetected incoming asteroid is theoretically possible, but asteroid tracking is really very accurate these days. I'd suggest that can be discounted.
2. A nuclear incident is far more likely, for a whole bunch of obvious reasons.
3. But we still don't know when this event will or might happen. I'd guess the group will be given the date as some future blind target (and will perceive it accurately), but if so they may not make the results public. (And if my guess above is correct about what was previously just a potential future event 'tipping' to now become determined and inevitable, it might still be many years away — but inevitable nonetheless.)

[Eric J (Viking)]

Hi all

Personally I don’t think a nuclear event would be allowed to happen. Planet Earth is too valuable to many other beings (we are being watched, trust me) and something as catastrophic as a nuclear incident or exchanges would be too much of an irreversible damage scenario. Also the damage to a human soul is irreversible, they wouldn’t allow that to happen.

I really don’t know how this will pan out but Mother Earth is getting tired and grumpy….Beam me up scotty!

Eric J