Russell Brand - Trial By Media?

[gini]

Some facts about Brand ;
-He was never accused for any sexual misbehaviour before these allegations.

-He was demonetized from youtube for exposing the covidscamdemic ,despite his huge following

- People who met him descibe him as always being a warm ,caring person who excludes nobody & treating everybody respectfully.

-He has -unlike most celebrities-always been open about his sexual addiction and about his foolishnes in his past.

-He is one of the very few who is not afraid to ask painfull questions in front of a big audience and exposing the lies & the hypocracy of the establishment without hesitation.

-He is a succesful famous attractive comedian with popstar status of the highest level,women adore him ,men envy him.
-He is a freespeech fundamentalist,always in for debate and a peacelover who reminds his listeners to despite our differences always respect eachothers opinion.

-He states that we are all here to realize our divine nature and that we should all learn to not just believe but practice critical thinking .

[Matthew]

I don't take the allegations in good faith. Downing street have now commented. It's a police matter if anything but that wouldn't be an all-consuming distraction. We were being played with the Titan sub thing, and now we're being played again.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=NYCZJk2T-3w

[ExomatrixTV]

• 'He has upset some very powerful people!' | Nigel Farage gives his take on the Russell Brand saga:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=dQs3VVZyzsc

‘If you go out there and upset powerful people, you’ve got to be pretty clear that there’s nothing they can hit you back with!’

[Matthew]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

• 'He has upset some very powerful people!' | Nigel Farage gives his take on the Russell Brand saga:

...
‘If you go out there and upset powerful people, you’ve got to be pretty clear that there’s nothing they can hit you back with!’

But critics don't get such huge press exposure. That only happens after struggling against censorship, then the story breaks reluctantly. That didn't happen this time, it's been showtime from start to finish.

[Dorjezigzag]

It's funny I was just speaking to my son a few weeks ago and he was saying how he had seen some really interesting Russell Brand videos. He really has been reaching an audience outside of the usual choir. I was then saying how I agreed with him but I didn’t understand how they hadn't come after Russell Brand yet about his previous sexual relationships. I mean they got Assange with far less material to work with. We are all aware this is becoming an increasing tactic.

I don’t think Russell Brand has done anything legally wrong but justice seems to have been very much distorted of late especially for those challenging the establishment so he is in a very difficult situation.

I will say I do think his sexual behaviour has brought a lot of hurt and upset to some of his previous partners not necessarily by how he treated them but what their expectations were. Some of his many dalliances probably had hopes that it was something more, hopes of romance more than sex even if they played the part that it was just a bit of fun. Connections are made on a astral level through sex and a promiscuous lifestyle brings with it connections that are not easily severed, even if you think you have moved on.

As a young man, Brand was undoubtedly immersed in a rock and roll lifestyle, one that our culture often idealizes. However, the pursuit of sex without love can be a perilous endeavour. The saying, "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned," comes to mind.

I do worry that after the obvious excesses and sexual deviance of the last 50 years we are heading to a sexual puritanism. A bit like 1984 meets The Handmaid's Tale. The pendulum swinging in the other way that in my opinion could be far worse than a more libertine society.

[happyuk]

Going from the singular (he, alone is accused) to the need to highlight others, suggests guilt when a reliable denial is absent. Under an accusation, this is a psychological need to hide in a crowd. Narcissistic addicts routinely portray themselves as victims ("But mum, everyone else was doing it!").

To cite the "criminal accusation" but not address it with a denial is avoidance. The need for others in context of not addressing the specific allegation suggests that there is much guilt within the language.

Behavioural Analysis of a self-described sex addict and narcissist who is famous, wealthy and actively abusing substances suggests someone who will not accept the word "no." These factors alone do not address the possibility of illicit motive on the part of the accusers, the topic is that of being able to believe or disbelieve him. A good approach is to begin with the presumption that the subject is innocent and in order to discern deception, let the subject talk us out of believing him.

[Kryztian]

Glenn Greenwald dissects the media coverage of this incident. While acknowledging that the charges against Brand certain bear further investigation, he shows how the media is behaving in a most sleazy and unfair way to create a lynch mob.

While there is no proof (yet) that the media is intentionally doing this to assassinate Brand's character, Greenwald talks about how the media and politicians do indeed use trumped up allegations to destroy the reputations of those who challenge establishment narratives.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=oFHe6cPVoWY

(26 minutes)

[T Smith]

We have lost our way.

Russell Brand is innocent, until such time when he is proven guilty by a lawful trial by a jury of his peers. Or at least such was the way of Western Civilization since as far back as the Magna Carta. So now society is regressing back into the Dark Ages? Really? We're really going there?

I'm utterly shocked that Brand's YouTube channel has been cancelled and demonetized, based soley on accusations, and moreover, on accusations that have all the earmarks of being politically motivated. Whether he's guilty or not, I have no idea. Because I don't have any of the facts. Nor do any of the pontiffs spewing their vitriol or support. Accusations and opinions are not facts.

Don't misunderstand. My disgust does not conflate with my support of Brand, his character, or my belief in his innocence. My opinions are irrelevant. Or at least they should be. Whether the allegations are true or false, Russell Brand should be legally tried by a jury of his peers. Then--and only then--should anyone pass judgements that carry consequences on his liberties and life.

This war against the people, of dismantling our rights and freedoms, piece by piece, and right in the broad daylight and out in the open, appears as easy as taking candy from a baby. This is the only thing people should be discussing and talking about, IMHO

[gini]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=4la9jhkYvI0

--Judge, Jury and Executioner YouTube Demonetizes Russell Brand Over Unverified Allegations

Kim Iversen
Sep 20, 2023

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=vAWrYt1A73s

[gini]

Here’s Why They’re Coming For Russell Brand

Sep 20, 2023 #TheJimmyDoreShow
Back when he was a hard-partying movie star, Russell Brand was the darling of the mainstream media. But ever since the British comedian started turning hard against the establishment, exposing the mainstream narrative on COVID, the Ukraine War and empire, the knives have been out for him. And now we know how they plan to get him, with a series of questionable rape allegations emerging from anonymous sources in his distant past.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=iGt6tu3fp_U

[Parsi-X]

This world has become a sh!t show: world wars/.. Hiroshima.. 9/11.. Hawaii .. Earthquakes.. Floods...the plandemic and so many humans gone awry - but as clichéd as it sounds .. Where there's smoke, there's always bound to be fire.

[scotslad]

In one sense, it doesn't matter who the story is about. It's the "cancel, censor, punish" approach now being taken to "take out" those who are anti-establishment who are not accepting the "mainstream narrative".

I posted before about the Johnny Depp case, as for me personally. I "felt" a tsunami of human emotion across the globe of the injustice played out against Depp, in almost exactly the same way - cancel, censor, punish where he was dropped by Disney, other production companies dropped him and the mass rallying of the internet's ordinary folks wanting to help, and offer their support, even their own due dilligence and investigation to help J Depp's case.

Interestingly, as it turns out now, many of those hollywood coys that went against Depp lost hundreds of mlllions and Dior who supported Depp has gone on to make billions. I make mention of this not because of the money, but sometimes right and wrong are often "rewarded" exponentially.

For me it was a significant event and many small people standing together in unity to help one man, and I see a lot of parallels in this case of someone being accussed of things, "evidence" being manufactured (and found out), celebrity news and gossip being directed to negate publiciity and destroy someone's life, and the Main stream media going out of its way to achieve somene's agenda.


I think there will be more situations and cases like this (e.g. Joe Rogan) and many others who have large followers and the establishment are fearful of their influence on many millions of people with a single tweet, video or email to get their expose, message or "truth" out quickly, and so far for me, Russell appears to have beat them at their own game by sharing in advance what he said they were going to do, appears to have been done.

Remember,

1. The Brand documentary was commissioned by Channel 4 who employed Brand and had received no complaints about him.
2. Channel 4 stated they had not done an investigation, yet they made £45m in ad revenue, and still allowed the documentary to be aired.
3. If evidence has in deed been doctored that was aired and published by the broadcaster that will have implicaitons of its own.
4. Brand has always been full on transparent in his behaviour (of which not everyone likes) and has documented & publicised much of it
5. These allegations are 10 years old and had never been given to the police.
6. Brand has not been charged with any crimes by any legal authority.
7. He has been on a very interesting spiritual journey from many addictions to now amassing 6m followers from sharing his "truth"

Remember Margaret Thatcher's immortal words?

"A court of law is a place where you deal with these matters, If you ever get trial by television or guilt by accusations, That day is when freedom dies"

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=txbythH16-0

Will be interesting to see whose "truth" gets remembered in the long run, but one thing is sure I believe in "justitia omnibus", but as we know some very powerful people can go to great lengths to achieve their agenda and goals.

Whatever you think, believe and live your own "truth".

[jaybee]

Posted by Matthew (here)

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

• 'He has upset some very powerful people!' | Nigel Farage gives his take on the Russell Brand saga:

...
‘If you go out there and upset powerful people, you’ve got to be pretty clear that there’s nothing they can hit you back with!’

But critics don't get such huge press exposure. That only happens after struggling against censorship, then the story breaks reluctantly. That didn't happen this time, it's been showtime from start to finish.

On that point - about the excessive level of the attack on Russell Brand... the showtime...

I saw and watched this earlier and the video maker is highlighting the point about the dangers of discarding the 'innocent until proven guilty' foundation of the legal system...

But it was what he said about how Brand's past 'behavior' was perfectly ok with those ruthlessly attacking him now... when he was considered to be an asset + on their side and I think that is why the attack is so deep and deadly to his career now it has taken a different path - 'they' don't like anyone that (in essence) changes sides... a special level of viciousness is reserved for them - I don't think Russell would think of what he's done as 'changing' sides...just following the truth and evidence..... but his previous friends and supporters now turned deadly enemies....for example Channel 4.... will not see it like that and the billionaire globalist cabal are applying their very own Trial By Media to try and destroy him... plus sending out their paid Influencers / foot soldiers to flood social media ....

The level of viciousness being meted out to Russell now is like the total viciousness that Trump has been subjected to - (IMO) because he broke ranks as a billionaire and went the MAGA way rather than the Globalist way...

Russell Brand broke ranks and as InfoWars says.... 'there's a war on for your mind' and Russell could be compared to the soldier who is shot by their own superior officer on the battlefield if they disobey orders + desert -


just looked this up for interest's sake...

306 British and Commonwealth soldiers who were shot for desertion or cowardice during World War I. Most were sentenced after a short trial at which no real opportunity for defence was allowed. Today it’s recognised that many of them were underage and suffering from shell-shock.

edit to add - the death penalty for desertion was abolished in 1930 (Britain)... but there was prison and public ostracism/humiliation - this is a better comparison for what's happening to Russell maybe...


I'm going off on a tangent a bit but I do think the war aspect and what happens to deserters is relevant - Russell will be seen as someone who deserted the woke/left cause -( ironically and paradoxically a cause lead by the richest people on the planet seeking total domination -) and he is being punished for desertion -

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


It’s Not About Russell Brand, It’s About Our Rights

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=S-7wRIk09hA

[Matthew]

Posted by jaybee (here)
...

Yes to all of that. I'm not disputing its newsworthiness.

[jaybee]

Posted by Matthew (here)

Posted by jaybee (here)
...

Yes to all of that. I'm not disputing its newsworthiness.

Imagine how different it could all be if the MSM wasn't owned and controlled by..... 'them'....

Headlines.... 'Russell Brand praised for deeply exploring his spiritual side after a period of self confessed promiscuity..'

'Russell Brand finds God after beating crippling drug addition'

Russell Brand throws off the shackles of Political Correctness and interviews a wide range of Public Figures..'

Russell Brand remembers and grieves for his cat Morrissey with great respect and affection -

etc etc

[Matthew]

Imagine if this accusation didn't swamp out all other news.

Imagine if this was a legal matter with appropriate press coverage not a media circus.

What else has been happening while our focus is on this? Similar to the Titan sub where the implosion was heard early on, but the media pretended it was still a mystery and it also swamped out all other news.

Just have a peek at other news going on at the moment.

[Ben]

It's just another huge energy harvest to fuel their system.

Acknowledge it, then disengage and the whole thing will lose it's power a lot quicker.

[ExomatrixTV]

• YouTube Demonetizes Russell Brand Sparking Outrage From EVERYONE, Even The Left Says It's Wrong:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=f5M7QU018H4

[Szymon]

Hi Friends,

Just saw this regarding Russell.

Cheers,
Szymon

[ExomatrixTV]

• Russell Brand’s CANCELATION By Big Tech Is TERRIFYING, DYSTOPIAN: Max Blumenthal:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=n1Dup1ZseKI

The Grayzone's Max Blumenthal discusses a recent conversation between him and Russell Brand.