Help get Dr. Reiner Fuellmich out of Jail fast

[ExomatrixTV]

• Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: April 5, 2024 – RE His Court Case, Incarceration & Recently-Revealed Dossier Detailing Secret Actions of His Accusers

April 7, 2024 update:



Dr. Reiner Fuellmich: April 5, 2024 – RE His Court Case, Incarceration & Recently-Revealed Dossier Detailing Secret Actions of His Accusers

sourced from Reiner Fuellmich telegram channel (English)

video is mirrored at TCTL BitChute, Odysee & Brighteon channels

Transcript edited by TCTL:

Dear friends,

This is an, in more than one way, hopeful message. It consists of three parts.

There’s another statement which I gave in court a few days ago, and of which we have an English translation that’s available for those of you who are interested.

Together, with the already now infamous secret dossier written by the intelligence services and its English translation, it provides both the official evidence and further supporting facts that now prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the criminal proceeding against me is nothing but a, I quote from the dossier, “construct” to shut me up and put me behind bars without any legal substance whatsoever.
So here’s the deal.

• Part One.

As I already told you a few times, I have always been very, very happy to receive your letters and postcards as they kept me going and my head above water in this very frustrating situation.

But what is happening now goes far beyond this lifeboat effect.

I am absolutely convinced that the incredible yet palpable, enormous push of positive energy that is all of a sudden reaching me is coming to me through your letters and postcards, but also through the vigils outside the prison, and the many of you who are supporting me by coming to the courtroom for the hearings, plus your many other actions in my support.

Up until a few years ago though, I, as a rational attorney, would have probably thought that maybe I’m just imagining things. But I don’t think that this is possible anymore. Never in my entire life have I been under such enormous pressure.

Six months of preliminary detention in a maximum security prison whose claim to fame, according to other more experienced inmates, is that here they do everything to break you, make you feel utterly powerless and helpless.

As an intended consequence of this detention, my capacity to defend myself is reduced to maybe five percent.

I have no access to my files, no access to my computer, and I cannot talk to the witnesses whom we want to hear.

However, as you already know, some crack under pressure, but we don’t. And I say “we” for a reason.

Despite this predicament I am always fully awake and focused when they take me to the courtroom. And believe it or not, it feels as though I am protected and clad in an impenetrable armor of energy and as though I carry an indestructible and invincible sword of energy.

There’s no doubt in my mind that it is your positive energy that does this. And I don’t think it’s fake.

No money in the world could buy me this, just like no money in the world can buy me the love of my wife, of whom I’m immensely proud.

Enough of these strange, emotional, spiritual ramblings of an otherwise rational attorney.

But I hope that through my sharing these feelings with you, I am giving you reason for hope and optimism too. In fact, I’m sure I do because I know who I’m talking to.

• Part Two.

Last week, I told you that the excellent German journalist Paul Schreyer won a huge victory in court under the German version of the Freedom of Information Act. His court victory forced the German equivalent of the CDC to make secret documents available, which proved that the so-called pandemic was in reality a plandemic.

In light of the fact that the same thing happened simultaneously all over the world, it is very likely that — I mean, it was a lockstep thing — that this victory will have massive implications and ramifications worldwide.

What’s even more important is this, however. This very, very important piece of news, this victory did not get stuck in the alternative media alone. Rather, it was impossible for the mainstream media to ignore it because now many people, many of them personally affected by the so-called measures, want to know the truth about Corona. And there will be more that they want to know.

And now there will be an official investigation here in Germany. Well, that is exactly what I did for three years. First with the Corona Committee and then with ICIC.

• Part Three.

This development is especially helpful for my defense in this staged criminal proceeding against me. And that’s because now, all of a sudden and out of the blue, a secret dossier written out by the German intelligence services, headed by the German version of the FBI, whose current leader, ironically, was trained by my father, landed in our laps.

This dossier explains everything and shows that the criminal case against me is a staged construct. In fact, a very famous, and of course highly esteemed German law professor, who for the time being wants to remain anonymous, looked at the facts of my case and the charges and provided us with a short legal analysis.

He comes to the conclusion that it is, of course, no violation of a fiduciary duty if we took out the loans in order to temporarily protect part of that money from imminent attachment by the authorities. The very same authorities, by the way, who are responsible for the dossier.

As long as we were both willing and capable of repaying the loan, no problem, he says. And all the textbooks and all the case books say the very same thing.

As an aside, and I don’t want to blow my own horn here, I might add that without my work there probably would not have been any donations.

An additional, very crucial piece of information, I think I gave it to you before, makes the whole dossier and everyone involved in its execution look even more like a criminal conspiracy. Indeed, it makes the whole thing look like food for a RICO case.

The famous Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act [RICO] designed to go after mafia crimes.

And here’s the thing. Less than two years ago, all the facts that are now relevant, including the loans, were brought to the attention of the senior DA, an experienced senior DA, district attorney in Goettingen.

She looked at the evidence and decided that there’s no basis for criminal investigation, let alone for a indictment and ordered the non-case to be closed.

So how can it be that less than two years later, based on a criminal complaint which real lawyers regard as obviously querulous and preposterous?

Another prosecutor, this time a very young, inexperienced assistant DA, had me kidnapped in Mexico so that I could be arrested at the Frankfurt Airport.

How can it be that this assistant DA never even tried to check the obviously insane charges in that criminal complaint?

For example, that I threatened the authors of the complaint with a Winchester rifle.

How can it be that that assistant DA refused to hear my side of the story while constantly communicating with my accusers? And why did he keep these many conversations with my accusers secret — a grave violation of his prosecutorial duty to include all the evidence, including such phone conversations in the files, and make all of this available to the defense?

Does this man have any what a fair trial means? Well, the dossier gives us all the answers.

It starts explaining about — actually in a very positive way — it starts explaining about how I had made a name for myself as an international attorney who fought both in court, through public interviews and speeches and through many publications for democracy, the rule of law and free speech and the protection of these values against attacks or overreach by private corporations and organizations. And it emphasizes that my international connections and friends made it possible for me to connect with an international community.

Despite of all this, they conclude that I present a danger to democracy because some people didn’t like what I was doing.

There’s no explanation as to who these some people are and on what basis they think that I presented danger for democracy.

So in order to stop me, and in particular to make it impossible for me to run for public office, the dossier advises that my immediate circle of people, those who I work with, should be infiltrated by an informant.

We know that this is a former politician who befriended the three Berlin attorneys, two of whom I had made the mistake of allowing them to work with us in the Corona Committee.

The idea behind this infiltration was to collect as much info about me as possible, and to then hire another agent, a prosecutor, to start a criminal proceeding against me.

The undercover informer who befriended the three attorneys manipulated them with false information about me into writing the above-mentioned, obviously idiotic, and as we know now, totally false complaint.

But the fact that the legal quality of the complaint was beyond the pale didn’t matter, as according to the dossier, another undercover agent, this time the assistant DA, would spring into action and make sure that none of the real experienced DAs in Goettingen would once again quash the case like the experienced senior DA had done based on the very same facts less than two years ago.

For this purpose, he was transferred from Hanover to Goettingen, intercepted the idiotic criminal complaint, and took charge of the matter. He proceeded with an illegal and unconstitutional secret investigation, which was actually limited to taking everything in the complaint as factually true without even trying to check either the allegations or the credibility of the three attorneys who filed it.

After more than a year of this so-called investigation, he made sure that none of his continuous telephone conversations with my accusers would show up in the file, and have me kidnapped in Mexico.

He then proceeded to write an indictment that matches the ineptitude of the three Berlin buffoons. Had he conducted an actual investigation, informed me about the charges, and given me an opportunity to respond, his case would have collapsed then and there like a house of cards.

Even if he had at least questioned the now totally destroyed credibility of my accusers, he would have immediately known that there was no case, only false accusations.

Why do I say this? Because on April 2nd and 3rd when the court, my attorneys, and I did what the assistant DA, who by the way never asked a single question, had failed to do — that is when we interrogated one of the three attorneys who filed the complaint, she admitted that the two central pillars of this totally false indictment on which it rests do not exist.

The first pillar is, in contrast to the indictment’s false central assumption, I as the director of the corporation that ran the Corona Committee, had the power to act completely independent of the others and did not need their approval for anything.

This is of course of special importance in cases of emergency situations which we were facing back then.

It is especially important when two of the four directors do not participate in anything, and as the files show now, and my former co-host has actually confirmed, do not respond to anything.

Asked why they have falsely informed the assistant DA, the witness shrugged and said, “Oh well, looks like we made a mistake.”

The second pillar on which the indictment rests was its false assumption that I never intended to repay the loan, even though it was transparently listed in the corporation’s books and even though I had been the international face of the Corona Committee and relied on the Corona Committee’s financial security to continue with its work and then use its evidence to produce in international legal proceedings.

Even the courts now admit that this is not the case. That means that I was both willing and able to repay the loan.

Asked if the accusers had any evidence for this false allegation, she admitted that she had none, except for my former co-host’s equally false assumptions that were based on nothing but thin air.

In light of the dossier, we now believe she too was just another one of the dossier’s puppets.

Now that the two cornerstones of the indictment have come crashing down, it’s clear that the famous law professor’s legal analysis is correct, of course.

Under the circumstances, the loan was not a violation of a fiduciary duty to protect the donations. Au contraire, as my French friends would say, on the contrary.

Through this dossier, it has also become clear why the assistant DA acted so utterly incompetent and brazenly illegal, and why, despite the fact that there’s clear and convincing evidence that the three buffoons stole my money, my client’s money, he did nothing, didn’t even attach the bank account where the money is in order to secure whatever’s left of it, if there is anything left.

The female attorney whom we interrogated over the last couple of days literally admitted that the three attorneys had threatened the buyer of my house and forced him to divert much more than one million euros of my purchase price into their account.

After all this, it is next to impossible to escape the conclusion that the deal between the three buffoons and the assistant DA is that they helped him kidnap me and put me behind bars, and in return he would allow them to keep the stolen money and help them get all the other assets of the Corona Committee, namely the gold.

And it is equally hard to escape the conclusion that the assistant DA, whose ineptitude would have kept him from having a real career in real life, was promised exactly that, a real career based on the heroic ingenuity that led to my incarceration.

There are many more instances of outright displays of insanity by the actors in this evolving crime and spy show, but I’ll save this for another day. One thing is certain though, the evil side that is the not-so-very-intelligent intelligence services that set me up with the help of their undercover buffoons, never expected that my work in the Corona Committee and then in ICIC would be vindicated by the above-mentioned recent developments.

There will be an official investigation of the plandemic. I’ll close by harkening back to the Winchester allegations.

Some of you may remember the TV show “The Rifleman” with Chuck Connors. Well, when I was a child and my father showed me the police academy’s rifle range, this was my favorite show. Watch the opening credits on YouTube and you’ll see Chuck Connors fire his rifle to bring justice. Well, that’s how I saw my father as a little boy.

Now, of course, I’m a grown man and I’m an attorney and that’s how I’ll make sure that justice will be done, as an attorney. But I still love that show, and my father of course.

See you later.
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich

• source

• Dr. Reiner Fuellmich's New Statement Regarding The Current Situation And The Bombshell News:

• source

[ExomatrixTV]

• source

THE FUELLMICH CONSPIRACY.

It sounds like the title of a good thriller. Instead it’s Wolfgang Jeschke’s accurate designation of what has happened, and is still happening, to Reiner Fuellmich.
Online in German 🇩🇪, English 🇬🇧 and French 🇫🇷:

• laufpass.com/gesellschaft/das-fuellmich-komplott

If you’re a regular reader, you likely know most of the content. Jeschke includes the dossier, which I’ve previously posted, so I’ve omitted that, except for the conclusion which bears repeating.

The Füllmich conspiracy
April 9, 2024 | Society

• The coordinated execution of a democratic enlightener

Was Dr. Reiner Füllmich under observation by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution? Of course. Are there any reports from the "security services" about the enlightener? Of course. Anyone who stands up to those in power is being watched. That's a truism. If a critic gains too much importance and reach, he is discriminated against, demonetized and, if none of this helps, arrested and imprisoned. In the case of Dr. Reiner Füllmich, the system even went so far as to illegally kidnap him from Mexico. That's how eager the system was to silence him. In doing so, the public prosecutor's office used the complicity of people close to Dr. Füllmich. However, this was not only proven by the ominous dossier that emerged at the beginning of April, but by the meticulous questioning of witnesses by Füllmich's lawyer Katja Wörmer and Dr. Füllmich himself. The first half of the trial at Göttingen District Court was already able to prove it: It is a plot by the public prosecutor's office and the people who are after the committee's money.

• by Wolfgang Jeschke

Is the paper that recently surfaced, which is supposed to prove the organized persecution of Füllmich, genuine? Nobody knows yet. But that is also irrelevant. Even without the dossier, which was leaked to Dr. Füllmich's co-counsel, the Cologne lawyer Dr. Christof Miseré, the plot against the German lawyer and investigator has already been proven. Whether authorities other than the Göttingen public prosecutor's office in the form of public prosecutor Simon Philipp John were involved, whether there were instructions from politicians or from overseas, is irrelevant. The Füllmich case is a fabricated case, his abduction from Mexico was illegal, the trial is based on false accusations. The complainants are quite obviously accomplices in the illegal abduction of the lawyer. The investigation into the facts of the case and the questioning of witnesses clearly showed this as early as the middle of the trial.

• BACKGROUND:

Three alleged comrades-in-arms of Dr. Reiner Füllmich filed a criminal complaint against the head of the former Corona Committee on 02.09.2022. The three port lawyers in question are Antonia Fischer, Justus Hoffmann and Marcel Templin. Hoffmann and Fischer were Füllmich's co-partners on the Corona Committee, Templin appeared in the context of Dr. Füllmich's planned class action lawsuit. The trial: The main accusation is that Füllmich did not repay loans amounting to EUR 700,000 to the committee, but used them for himself. The trial revealed that Füllmich did not use the money for himself. In agreement with his then assessor Viviane Fischer, he had kept it safe from the threat of seizure by the state.

The loans were to be returned to the committee when the risk of seizure by the state no longer existed. The port lawyers thwarted the return of the loans in cooperation with a notary. The money is now unlawfully in the hands of his persecutors, who are apparently being covered up by the public prosecutor's office, which had Füllmich kidnapped from Mexico with the help of the "port lawyers" - without an international arrest warrant and without any chance for Füllmich to defend himself against the deportation by legal means.

• The faltering constitutional state is resisting clarification.

Füllmich was abducted without an international arrest warrant in collaboration with the Mexican authorities, circumventing international law. In this illegal abduction, Füllmich was denied the right to appeal and thus prevent his deportation. In doing so, both the FRG and Mexico deliberately put themselves in the wrong. This is the behavior of dictatorships and not of democratic constitutional states.

The arrest that then took place in the FRG (at Frankfurt Airport) was based on fabricated accusations against the former head of the Corona Committee. These were raised by the three lawyers who supposedly wanted to fight with Füllmich against the coronavirus tyranny. After the scandal with Viviane Fischer, Füllmich set out with his own international project ICIC (ICIC.law) to identify the global actors of the staged crises in the world and uncover the perpetrator structures behind the wars, pandemics, poisonings and psychological operations.

In order to kidnap Dr. Füllmich from Mexico and put an end to his work as an investigator, accomplices were recruited from his entourage, according to the results of the questioning of prosecution witnesses Justus Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer, who did not cut a good figure at the trial. On the contrary. In the end, they admitted that the negotiations with Dr. Füllmich only served to put the head of the former Corona Committee behind bars.

It also became clear during the trial that the so-called "port lawyers", namely Justus Hoffmann, Antonia Fischer and Marcel Templin, who, together with the public prosecutor Simon Philipp John, were conducting the illegal prosecution of Dr. Füllmich, also wanted to relieve him of his savings and did so successfully. Documents prove the close cooperation between the public prosecutor's office and the "port lawyers". Even the illegal abduction was based on a coordinated action between the public prosecutor's office, the port lawyers and the Mexican authorities. A genuine conspiracy to destroy the investigator Füllmich.

A constitutional state would have arrested Reiner Füllmich with an international arrest warrant with the help of Interpol. Füllmich's whereabouts were known. The available documents prove that the public prosecutor's office, together with the "port lawyers", developed perverse moves to lure Dr. Füllmich into a trap. The available documents, correspondence and minutes prove that Dr. Füllmich was the victim of a conspiracy in which the public prosecutor's office was obviously involved.

As an agent of the persecutors, Antonia Fischer was the communicative bridgehead between the port prosecutors and the public prosecutor's office.

• Antonia Fischer and public prosecutor Philipp Simon John.

For months, Fischer passed on the correspondence with Reiner Füllmich and all internal details to the public prosecutor's office. The "port lawyers" were never interested in resolving the funding issues, but only in putting Dr. Füllmich behind bars and obtaining funds from the committee's coffers.

What is remarkable about the communication between public prosecutor John and his accomplices on the side of the port lawyers is the fact that public prosecutor John unlawfully did not keep any records of the numerous telephone conversations with his informants. However, even so, the existing mails provide a conclusive picture of the conspiracy, the aim of which was the arrest and destruction of Dr. Reiner Füllmich. It is safe to assume that there were further agreements between the public prosecutor's office and the port lawyers.

• Illegal abduction - a crime.

Füllmich's illegal arrest alone would, in a constitutional procedure, require his release and the restoration of the situation that prevailed before his illegal arrest:

"It goes without saying that detention initiated by an abduction is a deprivation of liberty in violation of the fundamental right under Article 2 (2) sentence 2 of the Basic Law (...). In the given case that the persecuting state does not seize the persecuted person through the prescribed extradition channels, but through deliberate criminal machinations, the construction apparently envisaged by the BVerfG of a deprivation of liberty that subsequently becomes lawful with the opening of the arrest warrant in Germany is also out of the question. Even under general state liability law, an unlawful encroachment on fundamental rights triggers a claim for the elimination of consequences, which, at least in the case of an intentionally unlawful encroachment on fundamental rights, may not be weighed against other interests unless an incentive to violate fundamental rights is to be created and thus the core area of the principle of the rule of law is to be attacked. (...) The kidnapping in violation of extradition law is a stain on the vest of the rule of law, which in extreme cases such as Eichmann's case may still count on a certain degree of understanding due to its historical and political uniqueness, but in everyday cases of violations committed by German authorities even threatens to shake confidence in the integrity of the administration of criminal justice as a whole."

Prof. Bernd Schünemann, from "Substantive examination of suspicion and abduction in violation of international law as nation-state explosive devices in international extradition traffic". Source: 140 years of Goldammer's Archive for Criminal Law, Festschrift for OPaul-Günter Pötz.

• The kidnapping from Mexico:

No extradition procedure under the rule of law, but tricks, deception and arbitrariness. This is how banana republics and dictatorships act.

• The execution of Dr. Füllmich:

However, the starting signal for the prosecution of the internationally active investigator was given by the number 2 of the former Corona Committee: the Berlin lawyer Viviane Fischer. With her as an assessor, Füllmich had turned the Corona Committee into a national authority of the Corona resistance. In the chain of intrigues against Dr. Füllmich, Viviane Fischer had begun the execution of her committee partner in September 2022 by publicly expelling him from the committee. She undoubtedly did this with the approval of her friend, the professional politician and medical doctor Wolfgang Wodarg, one of the "heroes" of the anti-measures movement and a former companion of Füllmich at Transparency International. Füllmich's disappointment with Wodarg is understandable. Wodarg could have intervened. But he did not. This opens up room for speculation.

Shortly after the stab in the back against Füllmich, Viviane Fischer's accomplices also reappeared out of nowhere: Justus Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer (who had been completely irrelevant to the committee's work up to that point and again afterwards). The two young lawyers and Wolfgang Wodarg joined forces with Viviane Fischer in a committee meeting against the head of the committee, Füllmich.

Wodarg was visibly satisfied as the new cock in the committee basket and delivered comfortable- sounding political phrases - the two port lawyers were present as "partners" of the Corona Committee and dutifully served their boss Fischer. In this broadcast, Hoffmann claimed that he was not interested in money at all - but later in the documented negotiations, it became clear that the port lawyers were, on the contrary, after the money.

This was one of the reasons why the negotiations over the release of funds dragged on for so long. Even more clearly: Hoffmann claims in this meeting (odysee.com/@-Ausschuss:3/s125de: MINUTE 10:57 ff.) that nobody had an interest in the individual prosecution of Füllmich. Another lie by the man who, together with the port lawyers, stood by the public prosecutor's office and deliberately provided it with false information or supplied it to order. At this point, the port lawyers had already filed the charges with the public prosecutor's office in coordination with their partners.

- In the video: "But that we want to start some kind of personal involvement, vendetta or anything else against individuals here, I don't see how anyone would want to come up with that." By then, Hoffmann had already filed charges against Füllmich.

- In court: "We knew that Rainer's arrest was imminent and we made sure that it happened."
- In court: "The day on which I will no longer have anything to do with Reiner Füllmich will be the best day of my life."

Video link to Justus P. Hoffmann's statement: odysee.com/@Corona-Ausschuss:3/s125de:

Standing shoulder to shoulder against Reiner Füllmich: photo (screenshot of committee meeting 125): Viviane Fischer, Justus Hoffmann, Wolfgang Wodarg, Robert Cibis, Antonia Fischer. Not in the picture: Marcel Templin, to whose accounts the proceeds from the sale of Dr. Füllmich's house ended up. The execution of the father figure has begun.

• "We wanted to put you in jail" (Antonia Fischer in court)

The negotiations between Dr. Füllmich and the port lawyers, which aimed to release the committee funds and return them to the committee's work, never had any prospect of success: Antonia Fischer said in court on 3 April 2024: "We didn't want a real agreement, we wanted to put you in jail." The accomplice to the conspiracy thus proves that she was never interested in a civil settlement of the various companies' property issues. It was all just a tactic to do her job for the system.

It is clear why the young prosecutor John has no problems with the bungling - and presumably even coordinated - "complaint" by the port lawyers. His job was to work with the port prosecutors to kidnap the dissident from abroad and bring him to prison. This also makes it clear why he was not bothered by the fact that the complainants deliberately claimed untrue facts, made demonstrably false accusations and deliberately omitted information. He was only ever concerned with the arrest of Dr. Füllmich - even if it was by illegal means and without a regular extradition procedure. John does not yet seem to realize that he himself will become a pawn in the investigation of the circumstances. The proverbial bus that his instructors are about to throw him under is rolling towards him.

Prosecutor John has so far only frozen the accounts of the Füllmich family - not the account of Marcel Templin, who, with the help of a notary, has taken large parts of the proceeds from the sale of the Füllmichs' private house. Füllmich wanted to use this money to transfer the agreed loans, which were intended to secure the committee's assets, back to the committee. According to trial observers, public prosecutor John and Viviane Fischer also appear to have a tacit understanding with each other. Why else is Viviane Fischer not charged with "breach of trust" like Füllmich? According to the indictment, Füllmich and Fischer allegedly committed the "acts" together in collusion. The suspicion that Viviane Fischer is in the same boat as the port lawyers is becoming ever stronger.

Almost all of the proceeds from the sale of the Füllmichs' family property (1,158,000 euros) ended up in Marcel Templin's account with the help of the notary who notarized the deed. Due to a land charge, which itself is still questionable and needs to be examined more closely, he would be entitled to a maximum of 600,000 euros, if at all.

Reiner Füllmich would have been in a position at any time to repay the committee funds protected from the state's access via the loans, as the proceeds from the sale of his property amounted to over 1.345 million euros - had it not been for the illegal detour of the sale proceeds to the account of one of the port lawyers. More precisely, the illegal detour of the sales proceeds by the port lawyers to the account of the accomplice Marcel Templin is the height of perversion: those who denounced Dr. Füllmich because he allegedly did not want to repay the loan deprived him of the opportunity to do so and at the same time illegally appropriated the private funds intended for this purpose.

• The example is being made

Reiner Füllmich is still being held in custody. He is led into the Göttingen court in handcuffs, as if he posed even the slightest danger. On the way to court, the handcuffs are also attached to a waist belt, depriving him of any possibility of movement. He is a political prisoner who is of course being made an example of. The undignified treatment of these prisoners is no longer very different from the treatment suffered by people in other totalitarian structures. The hijacked state power demonstrates its mercilessness. The message to the humanists and the last democrats in the country is clear: "This is what we will do to you if you rebel."

But Reiner Füllmich will not stop pointing out the abuses. And more and more people are gaining more knowledge through his work, which is still effective, in order to recognize the current danger to democracy, humanity and people's health. This danger does not come from critical minds, but from ruthless globalists, warmongers and mass murderers who have seized control of the structures in most countries.

• Previous articles:

- The prejudgement of Dr. Füllmich
- The procrastination of Dr. Füllmich

The following is the "dossier" on Reiner Füllmich, as forwarded to Dr. C. Miseré and distributed by Roger Bittel.

NOTE: THE DOSIER IS OMITTED EXCEPT FOR THE ENDING, AS IT HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED:

CRUCIAL DOSSIER. DOSSIER REINER FUELLMICH. Comprehensive analysis and recommendations for dealing with Reiner Fuellmich.

• truthsummit.substack.com/p/crucial-dossier-reiner-fuellmich

THE ENDING IS BEING REPUBLISHED - THE TRANSLATION IS SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT. MORE, THESE POINTS BEAR REPEATING.

Author: B**

Subject: Comprehensive analysis and recommendations for dealing with Reiner Fuellmich

• Introduction:

The B** has conducted a thorough investigation into the activities of Reiner Fuellmich, a person who is increasingly perceived as a potential threat to public security and the democratic order of the Federal Republic of Germany. Due to his public statements, political ambitions and the mobilization of a significant following, a detailed assessment of his actions and the resulting influence on the social climate is required.

• Facts:

Through his role, Reiner Fuellmich has created a platform that could enable him to exert far- reaching influence on the political and social climate. His messages, which often have anti- democratic tendencies and could incite unrest, require an adequate and tough response from the security authorities.

• Extended analysis:

There is a serious concern that Reiner Fuellmich's efforts to influence political processes or gain exposed political office could undermine the foundations of our democratic society. His activities are not only to be classified as potentially illegal, but also pose a threat to internal security. The awarding of or the possibility of obtaining politically exposed offices must be prevented by all means within the rule of law

Recommendations:

• 1. intensification of surveillance:

The recruitment and involvement of trusted persons from Reiner Fuellmich's closest environment is recommended. This should serve to gain deeper insights into planned activities, structures of followers and potential threat scenarios.

• 2. political incompatibility and legal steps:

Declaration of incompatibility: an analysis should be carried out to assess the possibility of a declaration of incompatibility prohibiting Reiner Fuellmich from holding political office due to proven anti-democratic tendencies.

• 3. criminal procedural measures:

The initiation of criminal procedural measures on the basis of the evidence collected against Reiner Fuellmich must be prepared. This includes cooperation with public prosecutors and the preparation of charges in the event of demonstrable violations of the law. Any necessary constructions must be weighed up and suitable third parties recruited.

• 4. public communication and prevention:

Educational outreach: developing a strategy to educate the public about the risks and negative impacts emanating from Reiner Fuellmich's actions is essential. The aim is to raise awareness and counteract disinformation.
Preventive measures: Promoting extremism prevention programmes that target Reiner Fuellmich's followers and working with civil society organizations are important steps to limit his influence.

• Note:

Reiner Fuellmich's activities represent a complex challenge for the security authorities that requires a coordinated and multi-layered response. The implementation of the recommended measures should help to prevent his political viability and protect the security and democratic values of the Federal Republic of Germany.
Wolfgang Jeschke E-Mail: info@laufpass.com Url: laufpass.com

• laufpass.com/gesellschaft/das-fuellmich-komplott

I am eager for the next steps from Reiner and his legal team. I am also interested in seeing if any of this will break into the mainstream media narrative.
_________________________________

The current remaining court dates - 6 in total:

• Friday, 19.04.2024 Start: 09.15 a.m.
• Wednesday, 24.04.2024 Start: 09.15 a.m.
• 4 more added, ending approximately May 15

Here is the address to write to Reiner:

• YOU CAN SEND LETTERS TO:
  

JVA Rosdorf
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
Am Grossen Sieke 8
37124 Rosdorf
Germany 🇩🇪

• postcards and cards allowed,
• no glitter on the envelopes,
• no stamps or money in the envelopes,
• no books or other objects - not permitted,
• nothing to be mentioned about the case,
• put your name of each page of the letter - letters are taken out of the envelopes.

source

[ExomatrixTV]

• video.icic.law/c/english/videos
  

[ExomatrixTV]

• Katja Wörmer: Intrigue against Reiner Fuellmich?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=fsGiOsAYP5Y

• The trial against Reiner Fuellmich, a vocal critic of the government's COVID-19 measures, has raised questions about the political dimensions of the case.
• The court's recent ruling suggests a reluctance to acknowledge any political aspect to the trial, despite clear indications.
• Fuellmich is accused of mishandling funds received by the Corona Investigation Committee, which collected substantial donations.
• The defense argues that the donations were managed to prevent potential government interference, given the committee's critical stance.
• The trial's proceedings have sparked debate over whether Fuellmich's actions warrant criminal charges or are more suited to civil litigation.
• The case involves complex legal and financial issues, including disputes over loan agreements within the committee.
• The defense asserts that the loans were arranged between committee members to safeguard funds, with legal oversight.
• The absence of interest rates on the loans was justified by the focus on preserving funds rather than generating profits.
• Despite financial disagreements within the committee, transitioning to a criminal trial hinges on factors such as failure to repay loans, which may not necessarily constitute criminal behavior.
• The transition from civil to criminal law in a case like this is complex, with political implications.
• Despite a valuable property being sold to repay loans, the full amount wasn't received due to interference from parties, including those who filed charges.
• The defense argues that the case is constructed and the client entrapped, considering external influences and the absurdity of recent legal cases.
• Unusual levels of contact between the complainants and the prosecutor raise questions about impartiality in the legal process.
• Charges against the defendant ranged from minor issues to major accusations like embezzlement.
• Prior to legal action, there were opportunities for pre-litigation negotiation and resolution.
• The loan, initially meant for security, was spent privately by both parties, leading to the need to sell the secured property.
• Legal options like registering a lien on the property were available but weren't pursued, leading to the property being sold.
• The focus of the investigation seems to be on allegations of embezzlement, although the accused was willing and able to repay the loans.
• The court is seemingly constructing a case rather than exonerating the defendant, indicating a lack of thorough investigation by the prosecution.
• Intervention from abroad in the ongoing legal proceedings is challenging due to the jurisdiction of the German court, though efforts to involve international organizations like Amnesty International are being considered for observation purposes.
• Despite a positive court decision allowing recordings from the defendant in prison, recent actions, such as searches and isolation, raise concerns of legal violations.
• An unexpected caller, Justus Hoffmann, raises questions about the defense's public relations strategy and suggests a biased presentation of facts in favor of Reiner Fuellmich.
• Concerns arise over the one-sided narrative presented by Fuellmich's defense, prompting questions about their public relations tactics and their demands, which include not only repayment of a loan but also the transfer of gold, seen as excessive and legally questionable.
• The caller affirms that the discussed events indeed occurred, despite efforts to resolve the situation before the filing of the criminal complaint on September 2, 2022.
• There's discussion about the adhesion plaintiffs, Dr. Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer, and their role in the proceedings, suggesting that adhesion litigation is sometimes misused.
• It's claimed that Reiner Fuellmich was allegedly lured to the consulate in Mexico under false pretenses, leading to his arrest in Germany, with accusations that Dr. Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer were involved in orchestrating this scenario.
• At the 53:33 mark, the speaker describes the extensive restraints used when transporting Reiner Fuellmich, involving handcuffs, a belly belt, and metal loops, which are removed only upon arrival at the courtroom, portraying him as a dangerous criminal.
• Despite Fuellmich being constantly escorted by multiple prison officers and having no means of escape, these restraints are justified based on the supposed risk of flight.
• The defense argues that such extreme measures are unnecessary, given Fuellmich's circumstances, but their request to remove the restraints has been denied.
• The discussion shifts to a dossier presented by the defense, alleging involvement of intelligence services in the case, particularly mentioning Marcel Templin and Marcel Luthe.
• The speaker affirms that while they personally did not receive the information regarding the dossier, they find their colleague's presentation credible and believe further investigation is warranted.
• There's mention of surveillance by intelligence agencies on critics of the government, implying a broader context of monitoring dissenting voices.
• However, the speaker acknowledges the gravity of the accusations and the need for validation before drawing conclusions about specific individuals named in the dossier.
• Despite being listed alongside Marcel Templin in a voter list, the speaker states minimal contact with Templin and no knowledge of the allegations against him.
• The source of the dossier and its recipients remain unclear, raising questions about the credibility and origin of the information presented.
• The dossier in question contains various passages, some of which have been selectively presented and potentially altered to protect individuals.
• The dossier suggests a plan to construct a criminal background for the defendant that would render them ineligible for political office in Germany.
• The defense has not yet received any formal evaluation or judgment from the court regarding the dossier's contents.
• The court has issued procedural orders implying skepticism towards the defense's claims, even suggesting the possibility of ceasing the defense altogether.
• The defense finds it unusual for the court to suggest abandoning the defense, especially when fundamental disagreements exist regarding the defendant's guilt.
• Despite the lack of concrete evidence beyond the defense's claims, there are indications that more evidence, possibly including witnesses, may be presented in the future.
• A caller, Mr. Foster, shares concerns based on his past experiences in East Germany, suggesting that current events could lead to worse outcomes.
• Mr. Foster highlights perceived discrepancies in how legal cases are handled, citing examples like Frau von der Leyen's situation, where allegations of embezzlement appear unresolved.
• The political dimension of the case is underscored, indicating potential challenges in the legal process.
• While some aspects of the trial have been procedurally fair, there are concerns about recent developments, including the court's tone and the possibility of further restrictions on the defense.
• The future of the trial remains uncertain, with outstanding witness testimonies and uncertainties regarding the court's handling of the case.
• The recent turn of events in the trial, including a procedural order seemingly attacking the defense, has shocked observers.
• The defense has been given a deadline to present further evidence by June 10, indicating a shift in the trial's direction.
• There's speculation that external pressure may be influencing the court's actions, potentially linked to the dossier issue.
• If needed, the next legal step after the regional court would be an appeal to the Federal Court of Justice.
• Questions arise about why Dr. Fuellmich's house wasn't seized, with comparisons drawn to another case involving swift asset seizure.
• Dr. Fuellmich believed his property was a secure way to protect the donated funds, along with purchasing gold, aiming to secure the donations.
• Most of the house sale proceeds were retained by Marcel Templin, a lawyer involved in the matter, suggesting a complex situation.
• A caller expresses belief in Dr. Fuellmich's innocence and accuses his associates of betrayal, refuting claims of a PR campaign by Katja Wörmer.
• A caller expresses strong support for Reiner Fuellmich, emphasizing his role in championing justice and alleging his innocence.
• The caller suggests a systemic effort to silence voices like Fuellmich's, highlighting the importance of defending critical viewpoints.
• The host acknowledges the emotional nature of the discussion, underscores the significance of Fuellmich's work, and stresses the need for clarity and evidence regarding the dossier issue.

[ExomatrixTV]

• This is how Reiner Füllmich is currently being held: 'It is a huge act of humiliation'

• dutch 🇳🇱 (+ Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳

[ExomatrixTV]

• Main witness Fischer: "Reiner Fuellmich did not harm Corona Ausschuss"

Posted August 5, 2024 by Djamila le Pair

The twenty-second hearing in the criminal trial against German lawyer Reiner Fuellmich took place on July 31 and was characterized by raised voices, slamming doors, a petition from the public gallery and many suspensions.

With the exception of the unexpected admission of two new witnesses, the direction of the presiding judge Schindler led to great dissatisfaction among the defense. In particular, Schindler's decision that further witness and evidence requests by the defense may only be submitted in writing and not verbally, caused a lot of commotion - including among the public.

The ban first concerned a request to be allowed to submit a modified position (including witness requests) from main witness Viviane Fischer. Her new lawyer, Frank Großenbach, had planned to read this request at a previous hearing, but this was postponed due to a lack of time and was now canceled completely due to the ban on verbal presentation. Viviane Fischer was denied a request to be added as a plaintiff (for the third time).

• The foundation that was not a foundation

The revised position of Fuellmich's ex-colleague and co-founder Viviane Fischer is that Reiner Fuellmich cannot have financially disadvantaged the information platform Foundation Corona Ausschuss, which was started in 2020 , because the foundation was never officially registered. The registration period has now expired and the foundation “is dead,” says Großenbach.

Because there was no official foundation, Foundation Corona Ausschuss also had no equity. Nor did it have its own bank account. The amounts of €200,000 and €500,000 borrowed by Fuellmich cannot therefore be considered as assets of Corona Ausschuss. This also means that the other two co-founders and plaintiffs in the lawsuit, Antonia Fischer and Dr. Justus Hoffmann, cannot rely on alleged rights and financial resources arising from their participation in a non-existent organization.

• Do the donors feel duped?

If Fuellmich does not actually repay the borrowed amounts, then at most the donors will suffer, Großenbach said in an email. The business guidelines, which were drawn up by Viviane Fischer in 2020, were particularly strict; those involved were not entitled to any personal payments, although Viviane Fischer and Reiner Fuellmich spent a lot of time and energy on the production of the broadcasts.

Donors will most likely be much more lenient about reimbursing time and labor from the donation pot. If they do accuse Fuellmich, the crime will be a different one and the punishment will be much less severe, Großenbach believes. (It is currently feared that Fuellmich will be jailed for five years). However, there is a good chance that the donors will not press charges.

• Twisted witness

Viviane Fischer's changed position is remarkable, because the criminal trial against Reiner Fuellmich is a consequence of the insinuations she made public in September 2022 that Fuellmich had unlawfully appropriated part of the Corona Ausschuss funds. During the trial it emerged that both Viviane Fischer and Reiner Fuellmich do not want the money to end up with the plaintiffs Antonia Fischer and Justus Hoffmann. The latter contributed virtually nothing to the Corona Ausschuss broadcasts. Moreover, the money was never intended to be divided among the four as loot, but was the oil that would keep the platform running.

• An eventful meeting

Because the chamber had rejected the request to add Viviane Fischer as a plaintiff a few days earlier, in writing, Großenbach was no longer allowed to take a seat in the courtroom as a party on July 31. Grumbling loudly, he handed his written request to Dr. Christof Miseré, Fuellmich's second lawyer, who had arrived early.

Even before the start of the hearing, Miseré had answered in a loud voice so that the audience seated behind glass could hear, that if the judges had accepted Großenbach's verbal input, the criminal act would immediately be canceled and the criminal trial would end. would be, “but of course the court does not want to hear [that amended position].

• Judge distorts precedent

He considered the judge's reading ban unlawful and relied on a judgment on a 'Selbstleseverfahren' case from Stuttgart dated September 24, 2014. If the court persisted in the “unlawful” process, the defense would no longer appear, the lawyer warned.

In the Stuttgart judgment, the failure to read out procedural documents is approved, but only for part of the burden of proof. The judgment related to a lawsuit involving many files, each containing many hundreds of pages of court documents. In that case it would have been impossible to read all the court documents, including tables and graphs. However, the parties retained the right to verbally comment on aspects of the procedural documents and to verbally submit new requests, which is no longer the case in Fuellmich's case.

• “Inquisitorial process!”

After a 15-minute suspension, Chairman Schindler said he would persist in his reading ban; it would be permissible and purposeful. Miseré disputed his assumption that the defense would be concerned with delaying the trial and emphasized that she was instead concerned with the publicity of the content of the trial. Miseré considered it important for the spectators that Viviane Fischer “has turned”.

Things really escalated when Miseré was denied the opportunity to read out Großenbach's input: “This is not a legal process but an 'Inquisition process'! I'm leaving the room now!” Apparently furious, the lawyer turned his words into action, slamming the door behind him

• Testimonials

Fuellmich's main lawyer Katja Wörmer, who had arrived during the second suspension and - somewhat surprised by the heated emotions - took over the defense, had invited three witnesses. German law allows lawyers to bring witnesses and ask the judges on the spot for approval for their questioning. Miseré, like Großenbach, sat behind glass in the public gallery.

After a third suspension, Miseré resumed his position in the courtroom. A petition, drawn up by the public during a third and long suspension, requesting that contributions be read out and thus maintain public access, was presented to the judges via Miseré.

Then two of the three witnesses – an old friend of Fuellmich, JB, and a urologist friend, AB – were heard. Their testimonies could only relate to the question of whether Reiner Fuellmich would always have been prepared to repay his loan.

Although both witnesses confirmed that Fuellmich had been willing to repay the loan amount and JB gave a favorable character sketch of Fuellmich, they could recall few dates that could have substantiated Fuellmich's statements about that willingness. JB said he had a blackout afterwards.

• Research phase ends

Schindler asked the defense whether the investigation could now be completed, to which Fuellmich and his lawyers replied that there are still some requests for evidence. The judge announced that he may incorporate his decision on whether to allow the current and future requests into his judgment.

After the conclusion of the investigation phase, the arguments of both parties will follow. These can be relatively short, says Katja Wörmer: “since most of it has already been said.”

The next hearings are on August 6 and 14, after which a two-week break has been scheduled, unless the judges have reached a decision.

• source dutch 🇳🇱 🦜🦋🌳

--o-O-o--

• Reiner Fuellmich Update August 5Th 2024:

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v57rgfx/?pub=ir01b

[ExomatrixTV]

• 'Spectacular' Hearing In Case Against Reiner Füllmich: Main Witness Makes A Striking Turn
  

Another remarkable turn in the criminal case against lawyer Reiner Füllmich. Key witness Viviane Fischer 'has turned', her new lawyer has announced. The revised position of Füllmich's former colleague is that he could not have harmed the corona committee that the pair founded together, Stiftung Corona Ausschuss, because the foundation was never officially registered. Because there was no official foundation, the committee had no equity, let alone a bank account. The money that Füllmich borrowed cannot therefore be considered as assets of the committee.

• Remarkable

If Füllmich does not actually repay the borrowed money, at most the donors will suffer. Chances are they won't press charges against him. Journalist Djamila le Pair, who follows the case closely and calls it a spectacular hearing, calls it 'remarkable' that Fischer has changed her position, because the process was started because of her actions. Was her conscience starting to bother her? Another remarkable thing happened: the court rejected the request to add Fischer as a plaintiff, with the result that her lawyer is no longer allowed to participate in the courtroom as a party.

• Inquisitorial process

If the judges had accepted her lawyer's input, the criminal act would immediately be dropped and the criminal trial would have ended, Christof Miseré, one of Füllmich's lawyers, told the press. “But of course the court does not want to hear [that changed position].”

• Miseré spoke of an 'Inquisition process'.

“Criminal trial of Reiner Füllmich in jeopardy. The main witness turns and the arrest is apparently unlawful,” summarizes Rico Brouwer of Potkaars. “What a story.”

• dutch 🇳🇱 (+ Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳

[Vicus]

Be docile as a dove and smart like a serpent... (he forgot that...)

The resume about his case, OK,BUT...WHY in Creator name make such comments about Ukraine and Gaza?

In Germany? knowing that this country support the 2 wrong side! ?

He has given fantastic first page news for tabloids like "Bild" !

About Ukraine: " Reiner Fuellmich is a Putin verstehen! (fan)"

About Gaza: "antisemit"

About all the above: "Conspiracy Theorist!"

He can say whatever he want AFTER the sh1t storm is over! and IF he will be free...as minimum waiting after his next "termine" by court...

I don't get it ...

[Satori]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

• Main witness Fischer: "Reiner Fuellmich did not harm Corona Ausschuss"

Posted August 5, 2024 by Djamila le Pair

The twenty-second hearing in the criminal trial against German lawyer Reiner Fuellmich took place on July 31 and was characterized by raised voices, slamming doors, a petition from the public gallery and many suspensions.

With the exception of the unexpected admission of two new witnesses, the direction of the presiding judge Schindler led to great dissatisfaction among the defense. In particular, Schindler's decision that further witness and evidence requests by the defense may only be submitted in writing and not verbally, caused a lot of commotion - including among the public.

The ban first concerned a request to be allowed to submit a modified position (including witness requests) from main witness Viviane Fischer. Her new lawyer, Frank Großenbach, had planned to read this request at a previous hearing, but this was postponed due to a lack of time and was now canceled completely due to the ban on verbal presentation. Viviane Fischer was denied a request to be added as a plaintiff (for the third time).

• The foundation that was not a foundation

The revised position of Fuellmich's ex-colleague and co-founder Viviane Fischer is that Reiner Fuellmich cannot have financially disadvantaged the information platform Foundation Corona Ausschuss, which was started in 2020 , because the foundation was never officially registered. The registration period has now expired and the foundation “is dead,” says Großenbach.

Because there was no official foundation, Foundation Corona Ausschuss also had no equity. Nor did it have its own bank account. The amounts of €200,000 and €500,000 borrowed by Fuellmich cannot therefore be considered as assets of Corona Ausschuss. This also means that the other two co-founders and plaintiffs in the lawsuit, Antonia Fischer and Dr. Justus Hoffmann, cannot rely on alleged rights and financial resources arising from their participation in a non-existent organization.

• Do the donors feel duped?

If Fuellmich does not actually repay the borrowed amounts, then at most the donors will suffer, Großenbach said in an email. The business guidelines, which were drawn up by Viviane Fischer in 2020, were particularly strict; those involved were not entitled to any personal payments, although Viviane Fischer and Reiner Fuellmich spent a lot of time and energy on the production of the broadcasts.

Donors will most likely be much more lenient about reimbursing time and labor from the donation pot. If they do accuse Fuellmich, the crime will be a different one and the punishment will be much less severe, Großenbach believes. (It is currently feared that Fuellmich will be jailed for five years). However, there is a good chance that the donors will not press charges.

• Twisted witness

Viviane Fischer's changed position is remarkable, because the criminal trial against Reiner Fuellmich is a consequence of the insinuations she made public in September 2022 that Fuellmich had unlawfully appropriated part of the Corona Ausschuss funds. During the trial it emerged that both Viviane Fischer and Reiner Fuellmich do not want the money to end up with the plaintiffs Antonia Fischer and Justus Hoffmann. The latter contributed virtually nothing to the Corona Ausschuss broadcasts. Moreover, the money was never intended to be divided among the four as loot, but was the oil that would keep the platform running.

• An eventful meeting

Because the chamber had rejected the request to add Viviane Fischer as a plaintiff a few days earlier, in writing, Großenbach was no longer allowed to take a seat in the courtroom as a party on July 31. Grumbling loudly, he handed his written request to Dr. Christof Miseré, Fuellmich's second lawyer, who had arrived early.

Even before the start of the hearing, Miseré had answered in a loud voice so that the audience seated behind glass could hear, that if the judges had accepted Großenbach's verbal input, the criminal act would immediately be canceled and the criminal trial would end. would be, “but of course the court does not want to hear [that amended position].

• Judge distorts precedent

He considered the judge's reading ban unlawful and relied on a judgment on a 'Selbstleseverfahren' case from Stuttgart dated September 24, 2014. If the court persisted in the “unlawful” process, the defense would no longer appear, the lawyer warned.

In the Stuttgart judgment, the failure to read out procedural documents is approved, but only for part of the burden of proof. The judgment related to a lawsuit involving many files, each containing many hundreds of pages of court documents. In that case it would have been impossible to read all the court documents, including tables and graphs. However, the parties retained the right to verbally comment on aspects of the procedural documents and to verbally submit new requests, which is no longer the case in Fuellmich's case.

• “Inquisitorial process!”

After a 15-minute suspension, Chairman Schindler said he would persist in his reading ban; it would be permissible and purposeful. Miseré disputed his assumption that the defense would be concerned with delaying the trial and emphasized that she was instead concerned with the publicity of the content of the trial. Miseré considered it important for the spectators that Viviane Fischer “has turned”.

Things really escalated when Miseré was denied the opportunity to read out Großenbach's input: “This is not a legal process but an 'Inquisition process'! I'm leaving the room now!” Apparently furious, the lawyer turned his words into action, slamming the door behind him

• Testimonials

Fuellmich's main lawyer Katja Wörmer, who had arrived during the second suspension and - somewhat surprised by the heated emotions - took over the defense, had invited three witnesses. German law allows lawyers to bring witnesses and ask the judges on the spot for approval for their questioning. Miseré, like Großenbach, sat behind glass in the public gallery.

After a third suspension, Miseré resumed his position in the courtroom. A petition, drawn up by the public during a third and long suspension, requesting that contributions be read out and thus maintain public access, was presented to the judges via Miseré.

Then two of the three witnesses – an old friend of Fuellmich, JB, and a urologist friend, AB – were heard. Their testimonies could only relate to the question of whether Reiner Fuellmich would always have been prepared to repay his loan.

Although both witnesses confirmed that Fuellmich had been willing to repay the loan amount and JB gave a favorable character sketch of Fuellmich, they could recall few dates that could have substantiated Fuellmich's statements about that willingness. JB said he had a blackout afterwards.

• Research phase ends

Schindler asked the defense whether the investigation could now be completed, to which Fuellmich and his lawyers replied that there are still some requests for evidence. The judge announced that he may incorporate his decision on whether to allow the current and future requests into his judgment.

After the conclusion of the investigation phase, the arguments of both parties will follow. These can be relatively short, says Katja Wörmer: “since most of it has already been said.”

The next hearings are on August 6 and 14, after which a two-week break has been scheduled, unless the judges have reached a decision.

• source dutch 🇳🇱 🦜🦋🌳

--o-O-o--

• Reiner Fuellmich Update August 5Th 2024:

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v57rgfx/?pub=ir01b

What, another **** show? This one in the arena of law and judicial proceedings, enhanced with all the attendant nonsense, wrangling and maneuverings that lawyers and their clients can conceive.

To be clear, I’m not suggesting Fuellmich did anything wrong. Not at all. I’m merely commenting on the processes that take place in litigation.

[gini]

21 Aug 2024--

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=l9v2S3AQh0g

---6 min---
'He still sounds strong and positive, from his cell at the JVA in Rosdorf, Germany. Here he speaks of his hope of a positive change in the next two weeks, and he speaks about American Politics, Israel, and when Trump mentioned a "****hole Country". Here Reiner at 3.30 minutes:

"A few years ago, Donald Trump spoke about a ****hole country, as he was, maybe with Joseph Conrad's book "the Heart of Darkness" in mind, referring to African countries. Well, if such a ****hole place does exist today, it can only be the town of Goettingen, with its, as was on display over the past ten months, obviously utterly corrupt judiciary. But what started with a New York times article some three years ago explaining how this place is the center of the destruction of free speech in Germany has only now, through this criminal proceeding, which by the way is representative of this judiciary, as I was able to explain in a French interview very recently, been exposed as the judiciary ****hole that it really is."

And here are a few things I learnt from listening to Roger Bittel's updates (in German ‪@bittel_tv‬ )
A friend of Reiner's who saw him in prison last week, Thomas Kuelken, said how surprised he was to see Reiner so strong, physically and mentally. Reiner is not allowed to use the gym anymore, and relies on simple exercises he can do in his cell, but he is keeping in good shape. This reminds me of what his beautiful grandma told him: To never let himself go! I can just imagine him doing push-ups and sit-ups to stay strong in his little prison cell. An example to us all!

To support Reiner: https://icic.law/
TO DONATE:
To donate, here is the link for donations for legal and other expenses: https://www.givesendgo.com/GBBX2

Here is the address to write to Reiner:

LETTERS;
JVA Rosdorf
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
Am Grossen Sieke 8
37124 Rosdorf
Germany

postcards and cards allowed,

no glitter on the envelops,

no stamps or money in the envelops,

no books or other objects - not permitted,

nothing to be mentioned about the case - though now, according to the latest information, his mail is no longer scanned,

put your name of each page of the letter, just in case - though at present letters are no longer taken out of the envelops.

_________________________________

For English Updates: Elsa's https://truthsummit.substack.com/
German Updates ‪@bittel_tv‬ and ‪@FREEReinerFüllmich‬

[gini]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=PE83NcaXHak

--7 min--28 Aug 2024
Video Source https://t.me/ReinerFuellmichEnglish/1571
Katja Woermer, one of Reiner's lawyers, speaks about Day 26, on the 23rd of August 2024, outside of Goettingen court, Germany.

Ex-Business Partner Lawyer Marcel Templin is accused of having unlawfully taken most of the money from Reiner Fuellmich's house sale, namely 1.15 Million Euros. Reiner's team has pressed charges. So far the public prosecutors have not responded.

Wishing Reiner and his legal team well! He now has an additional lawyer, Edgar Siemund, who specialises in corporate law, and who thinks that Reiner Fuellmich is innocent and should be released immediately.

For the opportunity to help free Reiner, please go to : https://icic.law/

[ExomatrixTV]

• Chilling: Reiner Füllmich Was Only Allowed To Visit His Dying Mother In This Way

Reiner Fuellmich's mother passed away this morning. Her departure had been a long time coming.


Fuellmich had recently submitted a request to visit his mother. The prison management allowed it, but Fuellmich had to go to her deathbed with her hands and feet shackled and accompanied by armed guards. He did not accept that offer; He wanted to spare his mother such a final horror. At the request of Reiner Fuellmich, his lawyer Katja Wörmer submitted a request this afternoon to postpone the hearing of Tuesday, September 3. The request was granted by Chairman Schindler in the evening.

He also offered his condolences to Fuellmich for this great loss. For now, the next hearing is on Friday, September 6th, 2024.

On Monday morning, the mother of lawyer Reiner Füllmich passed away. He had recently filed a request to visit his mother. The prison authorities allowed this, but Füllmich had to be carried to her deathbed with her hands and feet shackled and accompanied by armed guards. He did not accept that offer, says journalist Djamila le Pair , who reports on the criminal proceedings against him. He wanted to spare his mother such a final horror.

• Nearly four years in prison demanded

His lawyer filed a request with the court the same day to postpone the hearing, which was granted. The next hearing is next Friday. There have already been dozens of hearings.

The German 🇩🇪 prosecutor has demanded a prison sentence of three years and nine months against Füllmich. Earlier, Le Pair said the political kidnapping of the lawyer should be a legal scandal. “It stinks on all sides. It is simply the elimination of a platform that was doing very well.”

• Reprisals

Füllmich is accused by former colleagues of misappropriating a total of 700,000 euros. In order to be able to try him in Germany, the German 🇩🇪 government kidnapped him from Mexico. During the trial that began in January, written loan agreements showed that the loans were legitimate and lasted for a period of one year. The money was deposited in Füllmich's house in Germany, to secure it against financial reprisals from the German government.

• Urgently advised

He took this step after being strongly advised by an American journalist to keep the money out of the hands of an increasingly censorious government that blocks or confiscates accounts. It has emerged that the German 🇩🇪 secret services had already set themselves the goal of finally eliminating Füllmich politically in 2021. On October 9, 2022, he was to run in the elections on behalf of the new political party Die Basis.

• dutch 🇳🇱 (+ Multi-Language Options). 🦜🦋🌳

ICIC-Reiner-Füllmich-2024-09-01-CUT:


Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v5b0aju/?pub=ir01b

[Vicus]

The Resurrection of Nazi Germany September 4, 2024



The 21st century version is worse than the 20th century version. by Paul Craig Roberts

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is a renowned German attorney who has succeeded in holding elites accountable. He is widely appreciated by people for bringing justice to bear where it is needed.

During the years of the Covid hoax, Dr. Fuellmich organized a committee to investigate the lies about Covid and the “vaccine,” and was preparing to bring a lawsuit in behalf of those whose health and lives were lost to the “vaccine” that authorities said was “safe and effective.” This was going too far, and the ruling establishment took steps to stop him.

Possibly Washington was a participant in the plot against him. Dr. Fuellmich, who lives in Germany and in California, on his way to his California home was prevented from entering the US, and had to go to Mexico while waiting to sort out whatever the difficulty was. In Mexico he and his wife were tricked by the German embassy into going to the airport to have their passports renewed. The German government illegally kidnapped Dr. Fuellmich and flew him to Germany where he was arrested and since has spent much time in solitary confinement, which is used for the purpose of wearing down a victim’s will to resist.

All of this was done in violation of the German constitution and German law. His pre-trial detention is now double the length of pre-trial detention permitted under German law. As President George W. Bush declared, the German “justice system” has declared its right to detain a person indefinitely without trial and conviction. It seems that no government in the Western world is willing to follow a rule of law.

There was no real offense with which to charge Dr. Fuellmich. Based on false testimony by infiltrated police agents, Dr. Fuellmich’s effort to save his organization’s funds from being seized by the corrupt German government was misrepresented as fraud.

A whistleblower in the German secret services made information available to Fuellmich’s attorney that the German secret service was tasked with stopping Dr. Fuellmich at all costs and in every possible manner. The leaked document revealed that the plan was to place police agents among his collaborators who would bring false testimony against him.

During the long proceedings against Dr. Fuellmich, the judge has refused Dr. Fuellmich’s right to confront the “witnesses” against him with cross examination or even to allow them on the stand. The judge has refused the defense’s use of the evidence in its possession and has protected the fake evidence against Fuellmich from examination. Evidence is beside the point. The point is conviction of Dr. Fuellmich “at all costs.”

When the original charge fell apart despite the judge blocking evidence of innocence, the judge concocted a new charge, one completely nonsensical and said that he intended Dr. Fuellmich’s conviction.

Years ago I studied the operation of the Nazi courts in the 1930s. What is happening today to Dr. Fuellmich is worse than the misbehavior during the Hitler era. In my opinion, the Nazi courts were more honest than the court presiding over the show trial against Dr. Fuellmich.

I fear for Dr. Fuellmich. He believes in the system, but clearly the German “justice system” and the German government do not.

The purpose of the false proceedings against Dr. Fuellmich is to teach all others not to interfere with the agendas of the ruling elites.

You can acquaint yourself with the Resurrection of German Nazism here: https://kirschsubstack.com/cp/148480587

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/202...-nazi-germany/

[gini]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=dpuRKZZyl9Y

[gini]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=_VRHksf3mKo

--11/9/24. --25 min--english subtitles

[gini]

Rainer sounds optimistic about the future now that RFK joined Trump; he is convinced RFK will expose the criminals of the scamdemic and that he will end the war in Gaza as soon he is in office.

' without exposing the truth there is no justice and without justice there cannot be peace '

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=H8lir1b7tOE

. --8 min---12/9/24

[onawah]

Reiner Fuellmich issues four written statements - The Expose + Elsa
Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD
Oct 10, 2024
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.co...m_medium=email



"It is almost unfathomable that our colleague international attorney Reiner Fuellmich has been in jail without a trial as a political prisoner for one year now. Amongst all the chaos in the world, from military weather warfare against its own citizens with massive hurricanes in the US, withholding disaster relief in North Carolina to enhance the death counts, attacking republican states before the election, the war in the middle east itching to escalate to a more official World War, the war of deep state Ukraine and Russia… all of this on the heels of the COVID plandemic crisis where hospitals killed their patients with remdesivir, midazolam and mechanical ventilation.

It is challenging to keep up with it all, but if you understand the writing on the wall and the objective of DEPOPULATION - killing citizens every which way possible is what they are doing. Poison the air we breathe, the food we eat, the medications we take. This is exactly as it was written in the Sectret Covenant, that Sean from SGT report discussed in our interview and I posted here: https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.co...port-demons-of

Interview on SGT Report: Demons Of The MRNA VAX

Here is the text since it appears not to be available online at this time - please note that secrecy is important and the Satanists greatest fear is that we will wake up:

The Secret Covenant

An illusion it will be, so large, so vast it will escape their perception. Those who will see it will be thought of as insane.

We will create separate fronts to prevent them from seeing the connection between us.

We will behave as if we are not connected to keep the illusion alive.

Our goal will be accomplished one drop at a time so as to never bring suspicion upon ourselves. This will also prevent them from seeing the changes as they occur.

We will always stand above the relative field of their experience for we know the secrets of the absolute.

We will work together always and will remain bound by blood and secrecy. Death will come to he who speaks.

We will keep their lifespan short and their minds weak while pretending to do the opposite.

We will use our knowledge of science and technology in subtle ways so they will never see what is happening.

We will use soft metals, aging accelerators and sedatives in food and water, also in the air. They will be blanketed by poisons everywhere they turn.

The soft metals will cause them to lose their minds. We will promise to find a cure from our many fronts, yet we will feed them more poison.

The poisons will be absorbed through their skin and mouths, they will destroy their minds and reproductive systems.

From all this, their children will be born dead, and we will conceal this information.

The poisons will be hidden in everything that surrounds them, in what they drink, eat, breathe and wear.

We must be ingenious in dispensing the poisons for they can see far.

We will teach them that the poisons are good, with fun images and musical tones. Those they look up to will help. We will enlist them to push our poisons.

They will see our products being used in film and will grow accustomed to them and will never know their true effect.

When they give birth we will inject poisons into the blood of their children and convince them its for their help.

We will start early on, when their minds are young, we will target their children with what children love most, sweet things.

When their teeth decay we will fill them with metals that will kill their mind and steal their future.

When their ability to learn has been affected, we will create medicine that will make them sicker and cause other diseases for which we will create yet more medicine.

We will render them docile and weak before us by our power.

They will grow depressed, slow and obese, and when they come to us for help, we will give them more poison.

We will focus their attention toward money and material goods so they may never connect with their inner self. We will distract them with fornication, external pleasures and games so they may never be one with the oneness of it all.

Their minds will belong to us and they will do as we say. If they refuse we shall find ways to implement mind-altering technology into their lives. We will use fear as our weapon.

We will establish their governments and establish opposites within. We will own both sides. We will always hide our objective but carry out our plan.

They will perform the labor for us and we shall prosper from their toil.

Our families will never mix with theirs. Our blood must be pure always, for it is the way. We will make them kill each other when it suits us.

We will keep them separated from the oneness by dogma and religion.

We will control all aspects of their lives and tell them what to think and how.

We will guide them kindly and gently letting them think they are guiding themselves. We will foment animosity between them through our factions.

The hate will blind them totally, and never shall they see that from their conflicts we emerge as their rulers. They will be busy killing each other.

They will bathe in their own blood and kill their neighbors for as long as we see fit. We will benefit greatly from this, for they will not see us, for they cannot see us.

We will continue to prosper from their wars and their deaths.

We shall repeat this over and over until our ultimate goal is accomplished.

We will continue to make them live in fear and anger through images and sounds. We will use all the tools we have to accomplish this.

The tools will be provided by their labor.

We will make them hate themselves and their neighbors.

We will always hide the divine truth from them, that we are all one. This they must never know!

They must never know that color is an illusion, they must always think they are not equal. Drop by drop, drop by drop we will advance our goal.

We will establish a money system that will imprison them forever, keeping them and their children in debt.

When they shall ban together, we shall accuse them of crimes and present a different story to the world for we shall own all the media.

We will use our media to control the flow of information and their sentiment in our favor.

When they shall rise up against us we will crush them like insects, for they are less than that.

They will be helpless to do anything for they will have no weapons.

We will recruit some of their own to carry out our plans, we will promise them eternal life, but eternal life they will never have for they are not of us.

The recruits will be called "initiates" and will be indoctrinated to believe false rites of passage to higher realms. Members of these groups will think they are one with us never knowing the truth. They must never learn this truth for they will turn against us.

For their work they will be rewarded with earthly things and great titles, but never will they become immortal and join us, never will they receive the light and travel the stars.

They will never reach the higher realms, for the killing of their own kind will prevent passage to the realm of enlightenment. This they will never know.

The truth will be hidden in their face, so close they will not be able to focus on it until its too late.

Oh yes, so grand the illusion of freedom will be, that they will never know they are our slaves.

When all is in place, the reality we will have created for them will own them. This reality will be their prison. They will live in self-delusion.

When our goal is accomplished a new era of domination will begin.

Their minds will be bound by their beliefs, the beliefs we have established from time immemorial.

But if they ever find out they are our equal, we shall perish then.

THIS THEY MUST NEVER KNOW.

If they ever find out that together they can vanquish us, they will take action.

They must never, ever find out what we have done, for if they do, we shall have no place to run, for it will be easy to see who we are once the veil has fallen. Our actions will have revealed who we are and they will hunt us down and no person shall give us shelter.

This covenant is sealed by blood, our blood. We, the ones who from heaven to earth came.

This covenant must NEVER, EVER be known to exist. It must NEVER, EVER

be written or spoken of,

To me this is the perfect description of what we are living, a carefully planned satanic agenda.

This is the kind of warfare strategy, designed to mentally and emotionally overwhelm citizens as to become apathic and no longer able to rationally think or act. I am grateful to the UK Expose and Elsa for continuing to cover Reiners situation in Germany that sounds horrific… handcuffed on his hands and feet with armed police like a terrorist. It shows you how powerful those who speak the truth are and how afraid the authorities are of our ability to speak and think as free citizens. It also shows you how the judicial systems around the world are irreparably corrupted.

The price Reiner is paying for his courage is horrifying. It is revealing to observe a nation that should have learned its lesson from dictatorial history. But they have not. The rise of “Dark MAGA” in the United States is not exactly encouraging either, since the agenda of Musk et al sponsored by Silicon Valley executives is just a watered down version of the other deep state fraction - neuralink, fusing humans with AI, technocracy and wearing satanic emblems on Haloween are still on the horizon.

We are in pitch battle now, and the enemies are everywhere - furthering their depopulation and enslavement agenda 2030. Our ability to remember with love and respect our friends, those who stood with us and for us in this war and took upon themselves the brute force of repercussions, is a way to remember what they cannot take from us - our human strength of spirit.

Please see the action items on how you can help Reiner.

It has been almost one year since Dr. Reiner Fuellmich’s kidnapping from Mexico. In less than a week, it will be a year.

Dr. Reiner Füllmich (or Fuellmich) has been in custody for nearly 12 months after being arrested at Frankfurt Airport on 13 October 2023. Since early May 2024, he has been kept in solitary confinement. And when he appears in court his wrists and ankles are shackled and the courtroom is under heavily armed guard.

“The security measures ordered during the trial and in the defendant’s pre-trial detention are reminiscent of the criminal trials of earlier years against the RAF [Red Army Faction] terrorists,” defence attorney Katja Wörmer said.

In written statements recently released by Fuellmich, he said he had been denied his right to freedom of expression during his hearings and the presiding judge, along with others, has engaged in the obstruction of justice.

AfA press release 23 August 2024: Immediate release of lawyer Dr. Reiner Füllmich
The following has been translated from German to English using an online translator.

Göttingen lawyer Dr. Reiner Füllmich has now been in custody for over 10 months [now nearly 12 months] after he was arrested at Frankfurt Airport on 13 October 2023. The maximum duration for pre-trial detention in Germany may in principle be “only” 6 months (§ 121 para. 1 StPO). “There are no special or important reasons for extending the pre-trial detention beyond the 6 months,” said defence attorney Katja Wörmer in a statement to the Lawyers for Enlightenment.

Dr. Reiner Füllmich had previously been “kidnapped” from Mexico, where he had been staying until then. There was only one German and one European arrest warrant against him. A lengthy international extradition procedure was to be circumvented. For this purpose, the Göttingen public prosecutor’s office worked closely with liaison officers from the LKA Interpol Lower Saxony and the Federal Criminal Police Office, who were on-site in Mexico. They exchanged views on the “pretext” under which “pretext” “Reiner Füllmich” could be “lured” into the Mexican consulate so that he could sign his passport and then have him arrested by the Mexican migration authorities. This was done trickily on 11 October 2023.

“The unlawful expulsion from Mexico without a valid legal basis has been pointed out several times by the defence and also by Dr. Reiner Füllmich himself, already in the first presentation date before the Göttingen District Court and later repeatedly during the main hearings,” said lawyer Wörmer. “The kidnapping of my client from Mexico to Frankfurt raises significant national and international legal questions that stand in the way of continuing his pre-trial detention,” explains Katja Wörmer.

In the Rosdorf prison near Göttingen, Dr. Reiner Füllmich is isolated from all fellow prisoners, he has to carry out the daily courtyard walks alone, and he is completely forbidden to talk or otherwise contact his fellow prisoners. He is only allowed to make phone calls to his defence attorneys if the other prisoners on his ward are in their cells. Private visits are limited to 3 hours per month.

But not only the questionable deportation of Dr. Reiner Füllmich from Mexico and the long pre-trial detention with disproportionate prison conditions, but above all the criminal trial before the Göttingen Regional Court on suspicion of embezzlement has long since gone beyond the usual framework of criminal proceedings under the rule of law. The defence is convinced that this is a purely political trial and that one of the most prominent critics of Corona measures is to be muzzled in the long term.

During the trial, the court suddenly exchanged the legal and factual prerequisites for criminal liability without giving the defendant a legal hearing. All motions for bias against the presiding judge and the other members of the criminal chamber were rejected.

All motions for evidence by the defence have so far been rejected except for the questioning of two witnesses invited by the defence in the self-loading process. Since the beginning of May 2024, the 5th Chamber of Commerce of the Göttingen Regional Court has refused to conduct a further hearing of evidence with exonerating evidence. In the past 3 months, all the witnesses proposed by the defence could and should have been heard to speed up the procedure.

Since mid-July 2024, motions for evidence and all other motions as well as the submission of procedural statements in the main hearing have only been possible in writing, i.e. there will no longer be oral discussions in the main hearing. All motions for evidence will only be brought to the attention of the members of the 5th Criminal Chamber in the self-reading procedure and the other parties to the trial in writing. Spectators and trial observers no longer have any insight into the material of the trial due to this strict court order of the written procedure. An oral presentation of motions or statements by the defence or dictation in the minutes has been excluded since this date. In this way, the supreme principle of orality and the public nature of the main hearing, which applies in criminal law, is circumvented and undermined.

Legally highly questionable security measures stipulate that Dr. Reiner Füllmich is brought to the court hearings handcuffed by his hands and feet (!), even under strict guard by police officers armed with machine guns. During court hearings, several emergency vehicles with armed police officers are regularly parked in front of the Göttingen Regional Court. “The security measures ordered during the trial and in the defendant’s pre-trial detention are reminiscent of the criminal trials of earlier years against the RAF terrorists,” criticises lawyer Wörmer. Proportionality is no longer maintained overall. An immediate release of the colleague Dr. Reiner Füllmich is overdue.

Public Demand: Immediate Release of Political Prisoner RA Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
After AfA’s press release above, they issued the following statement to the public.

Demand: After the publication of the AfA (Anwälte für Aufklärung – Lawyers for Enlightenment) press release demanding the immediate release of Dr. Reiner Füllmich, we have decided to enforce this demand through the public.

Explanation: Anyone who signs this demand will help Dr. Reiner Füllmich take another step towards freedom. It is obvious that he is a political prisoner (see press release [above] from AfA e.V.). And because the public is largely excluded from the chamber’s decisions in these criminal proceedings, we should leave no stone unturned to get Reiner Füllmich out of prison. Finally, as when the verdict is announced, as they say, “In the name of the people.”

In order to generate the greatest possible attention for this injustice, many people must sign this demand and spread it all over social media. This is crucial!

If you are brave enough, make a video calling for people to sign this demand and post it on your social media with the hashtag #FreeReiner and the link to the demand.

We will push your video via our channels.

Together we are strong.

[You can sign the public demand for Dr. Fuellmich’s release by following THIS link, scrolling down to the bottom of the page and entering your name and email address. https://free-people.online/freereiner/]

Written Statements from Reiner Fuellmich
Elsa has been keeping readers updated about Fuellmich’s case on her Substack page. On Sunday she published an article noting where people can donate towards Fuellmich’s case, court dates, hyperlinks to articles of overviews of the case and written statements made by Fuellmich.

On 20 September, Fuellmich prepared four written statements that deal with the four central proceedings against him. These have now been uploaded onto his International Crimes Investigative Committee (“ICIC”) website. You can find a hyperlink to his statements HERE.

The four statements included in the one 27-page PDF document are:

Statement 1: The Abduction Disguised as a Mock Deportation.

Statement 2: A Timely and Complete Hearing is the Central Pre-requisite for a Fair Trial

Statement 3: Infringement of the Law through the Arbitrary Exchange of Facts and the Denial of the Right to Be Heard

Statement 4: Freedom of Opinion, Expression and Information in the “fight for justice”

The following are some of the arguments Fuellmich made in these statements.

An Abduction Disguised as a Mock Deportation
Statement 1 deals with the alleged abduction disguised as a mock deportation, where Fuellmich explains that the deportation order from the Mexican migration authorities does not apply to him and his wife, as they did not commit any of the six possible grounds for deportation listed in Section 144 of the Mexican Migration Act.

The German services, including the BKA (German Federal Criminal Police Office) and the Lower Saxony LKA (law enforcement agency in Lower Saxony), collaborated with the public prosecutor’s office in Göttingen to fake a deportation, allowing for his abduction in Mexico and arrest at Frankfurt airport.

Fuellmich argues that the authorities should have requested his extradition, which would have given him and his lawyers the opportunity to be heard by the Mexican authorities and potentially reveal the false and fabricated accusations.

According to an email from 24 August 2023, the BKA acknowledged that an arrest in Mexico would require a Mexican arrest warrant, which did not exist, and that extradition proceedings would be necessary. Fuellmich said that the German authorities did not pursue extradition proceedings because it would have revealed that the arrest warrant was issued without a valid basis and that the complainants had lied in their criminal complaint.

He asserts that his arrest in Mexico was not based on a Mexican arrest warrant, but rather on a German arrest warrant, which was issued without a valid basis.

He explained that he was kidnapped from Mexico and that an international court, the Common Law Courts in England, intervened and ordered his immediate release due to the lack of jurisdiction of the German court resulting from the abduction.

The Common Law Courts in England also awarded damages in Fuellmich’s favour, which he sees as proof that justice can be achieved outside of the system when it is perverted by system courts. He argues that the court in question is a genuine common law court that applies natural law, the same law applied in the Nuremberg trials and that justice will prevail based on the true facts brought to light.

A Timely and Complete Hearing
Statement 2 addresses the issue of a timely and complete hearing, which Fuellmich says is a central prerequisite for a fair trial. However, Fuellmich alleges, the public prosecutor’s office deliberately refused to grant him a legal hearing for over a year and three months, despite being in constant contact with the complainants.

The right to be heard in criminal proceedings is a special form of the right to freedom of opinion, expression, and information, guaranteed in Article 5 of the German Basic Law and the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Fuellmich was only given a legal hearing one month after the indictment was written and three months after his abduction, which he claims is far too late, and he has not had the opportunity to properly comment on the accusations due to incomplete investigation files.

The public prosecutor’s office is withholding important information, including notes from at least 80 telephone conversations and relevant documents, which Fuellmich compares to the case of US actor Alec Baldwin, where similar withholding of information led to the dismissal of charges.

Obstruction of Justice and Freedom of Expression
Fuellmich believes that the public prosecutor’s office and the presiding judge have engaged in obstruction of justice by exchanging facts and denying him the right to be heard in the proceedings against him.

He says that the presiding judge, along with public prosecutors John, Recha, and Dr. Kutzner, have committed a criminal offence under Section 339 of the German Criminal Code by replacing the original accused facts with new, allegedly fabricated facts in May 2024.

On 17 May 2024, presiding judge Schindler of the 5th Grand Criminal Chamber of the Göttingen Regional Court issued a procedural order that Fuellmich believes was an unconstitutional attempt to undermine his defence work, using intimidation, false allegations and condescending statements.

The court and public prosecutor’s office are allegedly trying to prevent the true facts of the case from becoming known, culminating in the presiding judge ordering the proceedings to be conducted in writing, violating the principles of orality and publicity.

Fuellmich was not allowed to recognise which motions were made by his lawyers, and Viviane Fischer’s lawyer was not allowed to speak, leading to accusations of legal malpractice.

As Fuellmich argued, the accused must be guaranteed the right to freedom of opinion, expression and information to ensure a fair trial, which includes being made aware of all allegations and having access to the complete investigation file. The fundamental right to freedom of opinion, expression and information is enshrined in Article 5 of the German Basic Law and the associated Article 103, which guarantees the right to a fair hearing and to make statements in their case.

The presiding judge, Schindler, is also accused of obstruction of justice by arbitrarily exchanging facts and refusing to hear witness Viviane Fischer, which is a crime punishable by at least one year’s imprisonment according to Section 339 of the German Criminal Code (StGB).

Schindler’s actions, including cancelling the taking of evidence, not hearing witnesses, excluding the public from the proceedings and pronouncing a judgement without a public hearing, are seen as a clear case of obstruction of justice.

The main hearing centred around the accusation that Fuellmich, as managing director of the Corona Committee, had committed a breach of trust by taking out a private loan from Corona Committee donations and using it for personal purposes, including investing in his property.

However, it was established during the hearing that the content of the charge was false, and as managing director, Fuellmich was authorised to manage the company, including taking out a loan to temporarily secure part of the donations against imminent confiscation, which was covered by the business judgment rule of company law.

Despite this, the presiding judge dropped the initial accusation and replaced it with a new assertion that no loan agreements had been concluded, but rather a sham transaction agreement between Fuellmich and Fischer to conceal a trust agreement.

Fuellmich accuses the presiding judge at the Regional Court, Mr. Schindler, of seriously departing from the law and committing an elementary offence against the administration of justice, and believes that he is doing so deliberately.

He concludes that the behaviour of the presiding judge, the public prosecutor, Mr. John, and other parties involved in the trial amounts to an attempt to commit a joint violation of the law in conjunction with a qualified deprivation of liberty.

Please see our official statement from the National American Renaissance Movement, of which I am a Board Member.

National ARM Statement Regarding Attorney Reiner Fuellmich - The COVID Criminals Run Free While The Freedom Fighter Is Still In Prison
Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD
·
Aug 13
National ARM Statement Regarding Attorney Reiner Fuellmich - The COVID Criminals Run Free While The Freedom Fighter Is Still In Prison
FREE REINER!

Read full story
Free Reiner Fuellmich!
Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD
·
October 18, 2023
Free Reiner Fuellmich!
I am reposting Peter Koenig’s article about Reiner Fuellmich’s arrest. I am still in shock to hear this news. Reiner has been our ally and a great freedom fighter who has helped awaken the world and has relentlessly fought for justice. Germany is a very challenging place to be now, as we know of a Judge (!)


Read full story: https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.co...iner-fuellmich

Humanity United Now - Ana Maria Mihalcea, MD, PhD is a reader-supported publication. "

[Lunesoleil]

Statement by Reiner Fuellmich "the criminal proceedings against me are a pure sham trial"
Reiner Fuellmich trial – Interview with Katja Wörmer – "Reiner is very combative, the tide is turning"
Reiner Fuellmich trial – on the 17th day, June 20, 2024, the hearing is interrupted

[ExomatrixTV]

It is one thing to hear, for instance, that Reiner is in solitary confinement. It is another to know the details. Here they are, from Laufpass. Reiner’s own words. Translated from German by Google.

Reiner Fuellmich – political prisoner

A report by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich about his prison conditions in the Göttingen high-security prison Rosdorf, in response to the author Kerstin Heusinger, Germany correspondent for the French-language online publication BAM! With exclusive photos from the courtroom and sketches.

7:00 a.m., court date for civil rights activist and lawyer Dr. Reiner Fuellmich:
Heavily armed officers with pistols and submachine guns, equipped with bulletproof vests, receive me. They try to convince me to put on a bulletproof vest, which I consistently refuse. They then make me sign a waiver that releases them from liability if I am injured or killed by gunfire.
One of the officers searches my body and then, as always, forces me to kneel on a stool while he puts shackles on my legs.



He ties a wide leather belt around my waist and then puts handcuffs on me that are attached to the belt with chains, which in turn are secured with a large padlock.

The shackles force me to take very small steps, which makes it difficult to get in and out of the transport vehicle. If I were to stumble while shackled like this, I would not be able to break my fall and would probably break my wrists.



Prison officials told me they had never seen a defendant held in pre-trial detention for more than 11 months for a minor offence (rather than a serious crime or an act of terrorism), kept in solitary confinement and, most importantly, brought to court with his hands and feet shackled.

In court I was taken to the basement, to a tiled cell with a simple wooden bench, the basement is cynically called "the cellar". Another body search. Then I have to wait until I am led into the courtroom in handcuffs. Every time the trial is interrupted I am handcuffed again and taken back to " the cellar".

Every time I returned from court, I was completely undressed in a transit room so that a thorough body search could be carried out.

• harassment, humiliation, punishment

Mr. D., the deputy director in charge of pre-trial detention, ordered my complete isolation on the grounds that my providing legal advice to other prisoners could incite them to revolt.

Rosdorf Prison is divided into two sections: criminal detention (400 inmates) and pre-trial detention (80 inmates), where I have been held since October 13, 2023.
Pre-trial detainees are distributed across 4 levels. Those deemed particularly dangerous or at risk are isolated on Level A0, where security is increased and additional restrictions are imposed. I was placed there.



Like the other inmates on Level A0, I am strictly forbidden from speaking to any other inmate.

For 11 months I have had no internet access, no computer and no cell phone. I am only allowed to watch TV. My only contact with the outside world is my lawyer and the 3 hours per month for visits or phone calls with my family. Yes, a total of 3 hours per month.

My isolation goes so far that even my daily walk in the yard must be done alone. This hour-long walk is suspended if I am caught communicating with another inmate, even if it is just a hand gesture. Yes, if I exchange a greeting with a fellow inmate through the bars of a window, even if I only nod my head - he and I are immediately punished.
All disciplinary measures are imposed without giving reasons and without the possibility of appeal.

• Everyone is guilty!

The treatment of pre-trial detainees is particularly bad and borders on torture. Mr. D., who manages pre-trial detention and also works as a social worker, makes no secret of his convictions: he believes that if you are in pre-trial detention, you are guilty.
His disregard for the presumption of innocence is the main reason for my placement in solitary confinement.

He committed serious and deliberate breaches of duty, which I witnessed. These breaches were covered up by the prison administration. With two exceptions, the security officers carry out the orders they receive without compunction, like robots.
On August 8, 2024, I asked to speak to the deputy director of the prison. I informed her that while I was away for court hearings, personal items and documents had disappeared from my cell. Cells are normally searched regularly according to strict rules. These thefts occurred outside of official inspections, which are recorded.

Persecution: Dr. Reiner Fuellmich refers to the Redzep case
"The full seriousness of the situation is shown by the attacks on a remand prisoner, Kevin Redzep, who was seriously injured. He has given me permission to publish his name and his story. He is from Montenegro and although he is intelligent and speaks several languages, he cannot write or read German fluently. He was placed in a section where there were several violent prisoners or those accused of premeditated murder. He was called a "gypsy" by his fellow prisoners, threatened and asked for help from Mr. D., who refused to take him to the vulnerable prisoners. The next day, Kevin Redzep was attacked by three fellow prisoners while out walking. He was hit in the head with a glass bottle so badly that the cheekbone above his left eye was crushed and his eyesight was at risk.
On July 9, 2024, Kevin Redzep had to undergo surgery before returning to Rosdorf prison, even before he had recovered. Another physical altercation ensued with five or six prison officers, who threw him to the ground and injured his head again. Mr. D. then ordered the isolation of Kevin Redzep, who was already severely traumatized.
Kevin Redzep, who wanted to sue Mr. D, the prison and the state of Lower Saxony for personal injury, asked me for help. When Mr. D learned that I had advised this prisoner and provided him with a lawyer, Kevin Redzep disappeared. It is assumed that he was transferred to another prison. Since then, Attorney Wörmer, my lawyer, has been trying in vain to find him, hoping that he is still alive.

• glimmer of hope

Despite the disciplinary punishments they face, the prisoners show their solidarity with me. They encourage me. For example, they tell me: "Don't give up, keep going."
Some prison officials have seen through the pandemic hoax and know that my trial is a sham justice staged by the secret services. They let me know this and wish me a good outcome.

What helps me most is the enormous support from the international public.
I receive a large number of letters that are no longer even read by the prison administration. I read all of them and am infinitely touched by the affection they show. I try to respond as best I can.
Sometimes I see the vigils and the people greeting me as I sit in the transport vehicle to court.

I feel a remarkably strong connection with all those who support me. It is this connection that allows us to overcome adversity together.

I have to go to the medical service twice a week to be examined because I refused to have blood drawn. I argued that any medical procedure, especially any invasive medical procedure, is a violation of physical integrity if the patient does not give his or her consent voluntarily. I am therefore examined regularly because a prisoner suffering from tuberculosis could potentially have infected people with whom he or she came into contact.

One of the prison doctors expressed his sympathy for my work. He also explained to me that the medical staff believes that the health of many prisoners is incompatible with imprisonment, but the prison administration prefers to ignore this fact.
Having personally seen what happens in pre-trial detention – the suspension of the defendants' fundamental rights, their difficulties in gaining access to a defence that genuinely cares about their fate – I am convinced that prisons only benefit those who profit from them, with pre-trial detention being more lucrative than post-trial detention.

I have not met any defendants whom I would describe as "evil". I have met many, many prisoners on remand who seem innocent to me, or who, above all, need therapeutic treatment, as one prison doctor admitted.

If we didn't need some more prisons for some sociopaths, for example those responsible for the pandemic, the wars, the massacres like in Gaza and the corrupt of the system, I would be in favor of abolishing prisons."
______________________________
This statement was recorded by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich on the phone of his lawyer, Katja Wörmer.
It was translated into French by Kerstin Heusinger
The translation from German to English was by Google.
Photos and sketches: Kerstin Heusinger
Plan of his cell: Dr. Reiner Fuellmich

Concept and design of the original article: Michel Caulea and KAroThis report first appeared on BAM!NEWS:

• bam.news/societe/liberte-democratie/reiner-fuellmich-prisonnier-politique-4-persecution-en-prison.

One thing is very clear. “They” aim to shame and break Reiner.
The shame is all theirs, for subjecting Reiner to this abuse.
And instead of breaking down, he is speaking out.
_________________________________
Note: if you are new to the ongoing updates on Reiner’s case, or just want a refresher, further down are links to excellent recent overviews.
_________________________________
Here is the address to write to Reiner:
LETTERS;
JVA Rosdorf
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
Am Grossen Sieke 8
37124 Rosdorf
Germany

• postcards and cards allowed,
• no glitter on the envelops,
• no stamps or money in the envelops,
• no books or other objects - not permitted,
• nothing to be mentioned about the case - though now, according to the latest information, his mail is no longer scanned,
• put your name of each page of the letter, just in case - though at present letters are no longer taken out of the envelops.

To donate, here is the link for donations for legal and other expenses:

• givesendgo.com/GBBX2

EXCELLENT OVERVIEWS OF THE REINER FUELLMICH CASE:

2 MUST-READ PIECES. 2 EXCELLENT OVERVIEWS OF "The Unjust and Evil Prosecution of Dr. Reiner Fuellmich"

• truthsummit.substack.com/p/2-excellent-overviews-reiner-fuellmich-case

Sept 5, 2024
MORE SUPPORT FOR REINER! Including from one of the last people he interviewed

• truthsummit.substack.com/p/support-for-reiner-peter-koenig-wolfgang-jeschke

Sept 6, 2024
EVEN MORE SUPPORT FOR REINER! Including a fabulous detailed timeline

• truthsummit.substack.com/p/more-support-for-reiner-fuellmich-timeline

Sept 7, 2024

source

[ExomatrixTV]

Free Reiner Fuellmich
Oct 2, 2024

• Janet Levy

This is one of the very few websites where you will read this story. Dr Reiner Fuellmich, a leading attorney, has been under arrest in Germany 🇩🇪 for almost a year now. From the silence in the mainstream media, it would seem he is a dangerous spy whose arrest cannot be made public. Try Google, and sparse details emerge. A Vice article that declares him a “conspiracy theorist” provides almost nothing of his side of the story, a right normally accorded even to gangsters and murderers.

So, who is Fuellmich? What has he done to be held in jail? And why is the media ignoring his case? Fuellmich is a German 🇩🇪 attorney who had a flourishing practice for over 20 years. He also has a license to practice in California. In 2009, his law firm was ranked among Germany’s top 20 for investor protection. He also played a major role in the Volkswagen emissions scandal and the Kuehne+Nagel bribery case.

What has brought the authorities’ wrath upon him is his spearheading “Nurenberg 2.0” a movement to sue the elite who orchestrated the Covid-19 pandemic as part of the Great Reset. Fuellmich was a co-founder of the German Corona Investigative Committee (GCIC). This non-government committee probed the virus’s spread, its actual danger, the PCR test’s reliability, and how much damage the anti-pandemic measures (including the vaccine) caused.

The committee also investigated if measures such as lockdowns, masking, social distancing, and quarantine protected people from Covid-19 or just caused panic so that Big Pharma could generate huge profits on the sale of PCR tests, antigen and antibody tests, and vaccines. As is well-known, independent scientists have cast doubt on the efficacy of the PCR test, saying it has at least ten major flaws.

The committee had received donations from many sources. Since members were afraid that governments might freeze the funds, it was decided to buy and hold gold worth a million euros. As another safekeeping measure, Fuellmich and another committee member, Viviane Fischer, withdrew funds as private, secured loans from the committee. Fuellmich, who borrowed €700,000 (about $782,000), was to pay it back by selling his house. Both, the gold purchase and the loans were clearly documented.

Some committee associates have charged Fuellmich with embezzling the amount he took on loan—even though (or perhaps because) the sale proceeds from his house (€1.158 million) ended up in the account of one of his accusers, Marcel Templin.


Another charge is that the gold purchase was without the committee shareholders’ knowledge. Again, the purchase is documented, and the gold cannot be sold without both Fuellmich’s and Fischer’s signatures. Fischer has now turned against him. An additional charge, which the prosecutor later added, is that his law firm obtained €15,000 in emergency aid during the pandemic by submitting false information.

Fuellmich was unceremoniously arrested last year in Mexico, where he was with his wife, Inka. They had lost their passports, so the embassy asked them to collect fresh ones on October 12 last year. When they arrived, Inka was given her passport and allowed to go, but Fuellmich was picked up by six men and brought to Germany 🇩🇪 via the U.S.

An arrest warrant was served against him only after he was brought to Germany. This was because there was no international warrant against him. Besides, he had not been notified, as required, of the warrants that Germany 🇩🇪 and the E.U. issued. Any court would have declared the arrest illegal and ordered action against those who took him into custody. But that has not happened. Clearly, a long-planned game is being played out.

Coverage of the court proceedings in Göttingen 🇩🇪 by Bam! News (available here and here) shows reason to suspect that Fuellmich has been set up and that the squabbles leading to the litigation are an act of sabotage. In fact, during the trial, Fuellmich testified that two of his accusers are infiltrators.

The details of the proceedings are shocking. At one point, Fuellmich’s defense lawyer presented a leaked document showing that either the BKA (the federal criminal police office) or the BNA (the internal intelligence service) worked to set him up. It’s not clear which agency, as the last two letters of the acronym are redacted. The document claims that Fuellmich is a “dangerous personality” owing to his “considerable following” and a “threat to public security and democratic order.”

In a statement from jail this July, Fuellmich says the security agencies have influenced the presiding judge and other members of the court. Therefore, the judges are hearing only the prosecution witnesses. They refuse to hear the defense witnesses brought to refute the charges against Fuellmich. The most recent news is that the trial continues and Fuellmich remains in detention.

As the West descends into the abyss of totalitarianism, Western governments are increasingly silencing, persecuting and imprisoning those heroes of truth and liberty who speak out against the degradations of our liberties and the proliferation of false narratives designed by a globalist oligarchy intent on destroying Western civilization.

Among the valiant paladins of the resistance who have suffered incarceration are former White House chief strategist and media executive Steven K. Bannon; former law school professor and dean, John Eastman; and former aide to President Trump, Peter Navarro. There are others, too numerous to mention.

Fuellmich stands tall in that pantheon of heroes. His committee interviewed over 150 experts—doctors, scientists, economists, psychologists, intelligence operatives, judges, and even former members of the WHO—and came to the following shocking conclusions:

1. With a survival rate of 99.97%, Covid-19 was no more dangerous than the common flu, did not cause excess mortality, and children were at no risk from the coronavirus. Research by Stanford professor and physician-researcher John Ioannides found that mortality was equivalent to that of the seasonal flu and that people were unnecessarily driven to panic.
2. The PCR tests were unreliable and were used to prove mass infection. According to former Pfizer vice-president and biotech leader Dr Michael Yeadon, the false positive rate was 89-94%.
3. The mandates, including lockdowns, had no impact on the incidence of Covid. Sweden, with its laissez-faire approach, and Britain, with its strict approach, had comparable rates of disease and mortality.
4. There were credible reports worldwide of doctors and hospitals receiving financial incentives for declaring deceased patients Covid victims.
5. Healthcare systems were never in danger of being overwhelmed. Many hospitals were empty. An example: the Hospital Ship Comfort, anchored outside New York City, took in no more than 20 patients when it could have accommodated 1,000.
6. The Covid mandates were designed to destroy regional economies, create dependence on global supply chains, reduce population, and install a world government under the aegis of the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the U.N.

Fuellmich and some of his committed colleagues resolutely worked to identify the guilty parties, including many financial, pharma, and tech companies. They were determined to prosecute them under criminal law and sue them for civil damages through a class action lawsuit. An international network of lawyers was to take up the cases and present the overwhelming evidence from experts. Live streaming would ensure that the public would decide on the political consequences for world leaders complicit in the global “plandemic.” So Fuellmich had to be stopped and stopped he was.

In his statement from prison, Fuellmich says, “In reality, it is freedom of expression and justice that are under attack here. Two pillars of democracy. Two pillars we will defend to the end.” If you agree with Dr Reiner Fuellmich and refuse to surrender freedom to fear and false narratives, please sign the petition to free him.

• source