Charlie Kirk assassinated, 10 Sept 2025

[thepainterdoug]

So what are the oddities, anomalies , things that dont add up about this event? would anyone share their observations?

i dont understand the gun, the one perfect shot? the bullet? was it found? is the distance doable? then when running on the roof , where was the gun? when he jumped, i didnt see it? there are many strange things but as of yet , not enough to convince me it is not what it appears to be. but I really dont know?
what would be the purpose? who did it? whos covering it up? there a lot of complicated working parts in it. things need to align. not so easy
pd

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
The scumbag got off a lucky shot that hit its target, probably with his or his dads deer rifle that he shot many times through the years.

What I too am thinking currently, but provisionally, of course. Other possibilities exist, as T Smith alluded to.

The fact he hit him in the neck is also worth consideration. I'm no gun expert, but who aims for the neck? Likely, he aimed for the head or chest, and the inaccuracy of a Mauser over such a distance might account for the wayward neck-shot.

[SilentFeathers]

Posted by thepainterdoug (here)
So what are the oddities, anomalies , things that dont add up about this event? would anyone share their observations?

i dont understand the gun, the one perfect shot? the bullet? was it found? is the distance doable? then when running on the roof , where was the gun? when he jumped, i didnt see it? there are many strange things but as of yet , not enough to convince me it is not what it appears to be. but I really dont know?
what would be the purpose? who did it? whos covering it up? there a lot of complicated working parts in it. things need to align. not so easy
pd

It's hard to say what information being reported is actually "absolutely" correct.

Like right at first Cash Patel reported they have the shooter in custody and then they release the guy and say it wasn't the guy.

Someone then immediately reported they found the rifle in the woods and everyone ran with this claim. But, in the last 24hrs I've heard 3 different reports that a rifle with a scope was "recovered", with oddly no mentioning of exactly where it was recovered. For all we know it may of actually been recovered on the roof where the shot was taken.

Patels boo boo created all kinds of conspiracy theories and also the gun in the woods now has many confused.

I think more will become clear in the days to come, but right now what we are seeing is all kinds of sensational theories and speculation.

[SilentFeathers]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)

Posted by SilentFeathers (here)
The scumbag got off a lucky shot that hit its target, probably with his or his dads deer rifle that he shot many times through the years.

What I too am thinking currently, but provisionally, of course. Other possibilities exist, as T Smith alluded to.

The fact he hit him in the neck is also worth consideration. I'm no gun expert, but who aims for the neck? Likely, he aimed for the head or chest, and the inaccuracy of a Mauser over such a distance might account for the wayward neck-shot.

Anything is possible, that's for sure.

Not all Mausers are completely inaccurate, some do shoot better than others. The one I had was pretty accurate although I would of never taken a shot at a deer with it at 600ft. To hit a deer at 600ft I would of considered a "damn lucky shot" with the Mauser I had for sure. I never had a scope on mine though, which may of made me more likely to take a shot at a deer at such a long distance. (if I had it sighted in at, say, 100 yards or more.)

At a distance of 600ft he could of been aiming at the center of the chest and hit him in the neck. I highly doubt he was exactly aiming at Charlies neck. Like I said earlier, with that gun and at that distance, he got off a lucky shot that hit the target.

[thepainterdoug]

How odd the number of 911 calls and tips? first 7 thousand then up to 11 thousand? could anyone handle those calls in that time frame? thats bizarre. then walking in the street prior to the event, the suspect limping with a stiff leg allegedly hiding the gun.
well how did he get off the roof running , with the gun? its never seen? how could he jump down with a gun in his pants. or was it not there?
things starting to be troublesome.

sorry if repeating myself. Im not getting time to see all comments and answers

[TrumanCash]

Posted by thepainterdoug (here)
So what are the oddities, anomalies , things that dont add up about this event? would anyone share their observations?

i dont understand the gun, the one perfect shot? the bullet? was it found? is the distance doable? then when running on the roof , where was the gun? when he jumped, i didnt see it? there are many strange things but as of yet , not enough to convince me it is not what it appears to be. but I really dont know?
what would be the purpose? who did it? whos covering it up? there a lot of complicated working parts in it. things need to align. not so easy
pd

Yes, you ask good questions. As I pointed out in this post no fully assembled rifle can be seen as he runs across the roof, climbs over the side and jumps to the ground. When he hits the ground his body fully squats, due to a phenomenon known as gravity, showing that he had no assembled rifle and nowhere else does one see a rifle.

In the video in Bill Ryan's post here Larry Johnson indicates the rifle could have been disassembled and put in his back pack in five minutes.

However, I question that because as "Tyler" was climbing off the roof he swings his back pack and it appears quite small. In a cursory searching I found there are several models of Mausers but all I could find on barrel length was 22" and 24". Also, the solid, one-piece stock is about as long as the barrel. Could it fit in that small back pack?

Also, Michael Jaco, a former military Seal Team Six member and former CIA, explores "Was the Charlie Kirk Shooting a false flag?" He shows strange anomalies in the video of Charlie Kirk being shot including his t-shirt blowing upwards.

The photo does not show the whole back pack but it does look somewhat small to hide the barrel and stock of a Mauser. Given that the sound of the rifle shot would disclose his position, why would he want to spend five minutes taking the rifle apart? Wouldn't that pretty much make him a sitting duck? And then he stopped to reassemble the rifle and leave it in the woods nearby? I am not convinced. In fact, I think this may be the "smoking gun" (except their is no gun).

Additionally, this fellow had a 4.0 grade point average. Wasn't he smart enough not to leave the evidence lying nearby in the woods?



Additionally, this event just happened to occur one day before 9/11 which created a very major distraction for Americans to take their minds off 9/11 or from viewing events like "Turning the Tide -- 9/11 Justice in 2025", a 5 1/2 hour production shown on "Redacted News" (links below). The distraction worked very well.

https://www.youtube.com/live/_yBc8lXToTc

Rumble: https://rumble.com/v6yuhdu-turning-t...2Csrc_v1_ucp_a

Call me a "conspiracy theorist" but the words MKUltra mind control and the letters C.I.A come to my mind.

[Arcturian108]

What do the hand signals these two men are making right behind Charlie mean? Could be signaling the shooter. These videos are getting scrubbed from the net faster than I can put them up here. Video.

This is the second time I am seeing this video, and didn't realize how close they were to Charlie. They do not look like Mossad agents to me. I think that this murder was created much closer to where it occurred. I continue to believe that George Webb is correct in targeting disaffected ATF guys in Utah. Before this week I would have thought that Utah, being run by Mormons, would be one of the safest places to hold such events. But there is a dark side to the Mormon religion, especially with the breakaway polygamist group that Webb feels are running drugs from Mexico to Utah.

[SilentFeathers]

This is the reading and analysis of the Affidavit of Probable Cause for Arrest Warrant for the shooter.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=5FPvbOK38v8

[Rizotto]

It's significant, and regrettable, that Trump himself is catering to the 'divide & conquer' violence by making broad accusations against the 'radical left' following the tragic assassination of Charlie Kirk.

Remember, the spectacular assassination of Charlie Kirk has deflected public attention from the recent USA/Israel crime spree, such as:
- the horrific I$rael-USA genocide of Palestinians, which Trump himself is aiding and abetting.
- the outrageous I$rael-USA assassination of Hamas negotiators in Doha,
- the horrendous USA assassination of 11 people in a boat off Venezuela's coast,
- the cowardly I$rael attacks on an unarmed civilian aid flotilla to Gaza,
- the cover up of the Epstein files and their blackmail connection to I$rael (which Charlie Kirk himself had been denouncing),
- the Israel-USA surprise unprovoked attack on Iran which killed hundreds of Iranian civilians.
- I$rael's links to 9/11, evidence of which the important Tucker Carlson investigation is now in the process of releasing publicly.

Criminal violence has been USA-I$rael's mode of operation for decades, and we shouldn't be surprised when it spreads throughout society.
Add to that internet chat groups that can easily be infiltrated to manipulate individual members into committing drastic acts.
Which is what I think happened here. Never forget that Israel has a long track record for internet trolling and manipulation.

It's just a little too convenient timing that Trump is using the Charlie Kirk tragedy to whip up social unrest, while Trump's own murderous spree is taking back seat in the public discourse.

By the way, I personally oppose violence. Peaceful and transparent dialogue is the solution.

[thepainterdoug]

rizotto/ cannot agree regarding some of these, a boat of drug dealing low life criminal scumbags do not equate to C Kirk in any stretch
we have a president that right or wrong, extreme or not is in charge of protecting the american people. I see those actions you list as part of that job,

[ExomatrixTV]

source

source

source

[thepainterdoug]

erika kirk talk tonight. Profound

[sllim11]

this is replying to arcturian108's last post on this thread...


i posted about this #129 on this thread. to me it looks super suss, but what do i know. people been posted this all over tiktok questioning. people also saying the guy in the black shirt was actually the guy that was near trump when he DID NOT get assassinated. i've looked at pictures comparing the guy black tshirt guy to trump guy and i think the trump guy looks way older than the guy behind charlie... anyway on tiktok those videos are in abundance.

[sllim11]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=HEYxPrls8Qo

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by thepainterdoug (here)
erika kirk talk tonight. Profound

Here's the video. Erika starts talking at 13:45.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=e5SHpvRYg_o

[SilentFeathers]

Posted by thepainterdoug (here)
erika kirk talk tonight. Profound

It took extreme strength and courage for her to step up and speak as she did when the death of her husband is so fresh on her mind and spirit. I was quite moved.

It blows my mind that so many are celebrating Charlies death, this is a huge problem and it's extremely dangerous. Quite sickening....

[rgray222]

Posted by Rizotto (here)
It's significant, and regrettable, that Trump himself is catering to the 'divide & conquer' violence by making broad accusations against the 'radical left' following the tragic assassination of Charlie Kirk.

Remember, the spectacular assassination of Charlie Kirk has deflected public attention from the recent USA/Israel crime spree, such as:
- the horrific I$rael-USA genocide of Palestinians, which Trump himself is aiding and abetting.
- the outrageous I$rael-USA assassination of Hamas negotiators in Doha,
- the horrendous USA assassination of 11 people in a boat off Venezuela's coast,
- the cowardly I$rael attacks on an unarmed civilian aid flotilla to Gaza,
- the cover up of the Epstein files and their blackmail connection to I$rael (which Charlie Kirk himself had been denouncing),
- the Israel-USA surprise unprovoked attack on Iran which killed hundreds of Iranian civilians.
- I$rael's links to 9/11, evidence of which the important Tucker Carlson investigation is now in the process of releasing publicly.

Criminal violence has been USA-I$rael's mode of operation for decades, and we shouldn't be surprised when it spreads throughout society.
Add to that internet chat groups that can easily be infiltrated to manipulate individual members into committing drastic acts.
Which is what I think happened here. Never forget that Israel has a long track record for internet trolling and manipulation.

It's just a little too convenient timing that Trump is using the Charlie Kirk tragedy to whip up social unrest, while Trump's own murderous spree is taking a back seat in the public discourse.

By the way, I personally oppose violence. Peaceful and transparent dialogue is the solution.

I find it insensitive and callous that you seem unconcerned about the assassination of Charlie Kirk. You actually seem to believe that Trump is the cause of the "social unrest" and not the assassination of Charlie Kirk. We have been watching this movie for almost 10 years, and people can easily identify TDS. Also, all the Israeli stuff you're bringing up seems unrelated to the assassination itself, there are plenty of threads where that can go.

I watched Erika Kirk speak out tonight and it was moving and heartfelt.

[T Smith]

Not the most savvy sports commentating analyst out there, but after this broadcast, I'm now a fan.

Kudos to Steven Smith.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=M8QQTea3-qs

[RatRodRob...RRR]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by thepainterdoug (here)
erika kirk talk tonight. Profound

Here's the video. Erika starts talking at 13:45.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=e5SHpvRYg_o

That was hard to watch but what an amazing woman.

[gini]

This really make sense!Kim brings in a convincing analysis on the dynamics around CK death

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=eYTPkLVTEbA

. --31 min--13/9/25--'Why Nick Fuentes Will Be Blamed For Charlie Kirk's Death'