The film The Age of Disclosure

[Rawhide68]

So the film is finaly out.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt35520315/?ref_=fn_t_1

In my opinion it helps move the ball forward, not straight forward and not even faster then a turtle walks, but enough.
I think of it as a good starter for people new to the subject.

Daniel L and Steven G says it's totaly BS And I can see their point.

The film is easy to find if you use torrents

Otherwise you find it on Amazon Prime for 19.99$
https://www.amazon.com/Age-Disclosur...s%2C212&sr=8-2

Youre thoughts?

[ExomatrixTV]

• Final PSA for those who will watch The Age of Disclosure Documentary about UFOs:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=WVJDDjrPvPU

On the latest Psicoactivo, I share my final thoughts a day before the UFO documentary from Dan Farah that is titled 'The Age of Disclosure'. An opinion piece before I go watch the film, and a public service announcement for those who plan to watch it.

• Age of Disclosure X account: x.com/ageofdisclosure

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=b3tR6w1lL7Q

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=cTp-cgpIet8

An explosive documentary that reveals an 80-year global cover-up of non-human intelligent life, with testimony from 34 U.S. Government insiders. Coming 11/21.

• theageofdisclosure.com

• Director behind buzzy UFO Documentary hints the president could Confirm Aliens exist

The president has said he’s not a ‘believer’ when it comes to extraterrestrial life

Kelly Rissman New York - Friday 21 November 2025 22:25 GMT

• source
• see also: UFOlogy UAP Developments So Far... 2024-2025
• torrent - torrent 2 ("The Age of Disclosure 2025 1080p AMZN WEB-DL DDP5 1 H 264-FLUX", 5.5 Gb mp4)
• if you do not know how torrents work, study this

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

[onawah]

Daniel Lizst (Dark Journalist) is one if not the best and most credible researchers in the field of Disclosure that I am aware of, and if he says it's BS, I wouldn't waste my time on it.

Posted by Rawhide68 (here)
So the finaly film is out.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt35520315/?ref_=fn_t_1

In my opinion it helps move the ball forward, not straight forward and not even faster then a turtle walks, but enough.
I think of it as a good starter for people new to the subject.

Daniel L and Steven G says it's totaly BS And I can see their point.

The film is easy to find if you use torrents

Otherwise you find it on Amazon Prime for 19.99$
https://www.amazon.com/Age-Disclosur...s%2C212&sr=8-2

Youre thoughts?

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by onawah (here)
Daniel Lizst (Dark Journalist) is one if not the best and most credible researchers in the field of Disclosure that I am aware of, and if he says it's BS, I wouldn't waste my time on it.

Posted by Rawhide68 (here)
So the finaly film is out.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt35520315/?ref_=fn_t_1

In my opinion it helps move the ball forward, not straight forward and not even faster then a turtle walks, but enough.
I think of it as a good starter for people new to the subject.

Daniel L and Steven G says it's totaly BS And I can see their point.

The film is easy to find if you use torrents

Otherwise you find it on Amazon Prime for 19.99$
https://www.amazon.com/Age-Disclosure-Dan-Farah/dp/B0FMF7B3KS

Youre thoughts?

Even if it is partially BS, heck, even if "it is all BS" ... which I know is not the case, but let's assume it is "ALL BS" >>> you still can study HOW they do it and WHY they do it ... Why? ... Because that is always better than letting others do the thinking for you! ... And figuring out the mass psychology behind it, or sensing/seeing the long term (planned?) "after effects" of it ... What (tunnel vision) agendas are served? What did they purposely leave out etc. etc. ...

• In my personal view, honest & fair critical analyses can never be based on "hear say" or depending on an "authority" of any kind.

• ... and do not get me wrong here, I really like Daniel Lizst a lot, his style, his reasoning, his mannerism, his excellent deep research ... and he should be in the documentary too ... but I also know Daniel (just like me) is not "all knowing" and can make mistakes too, just like anyone else can. That is why I am never impressed with anyone calling for "not watching" because X or Y "said so" ... and it is even worse if anyone does not watch "because someone said so because if someone said so".

cheers,
John Kules 🦜🦋🌳

[onawah]

No argument and I agree, but I only have so much time to devote to that one subject, and it's not the most important subject to me, so that's why I make that choice. There's only so much time, and way too much going on to be able to make room for it all.

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

Posted by onawah (here)
Daniel Lizst (Dark Journalist) is one if not the best and most credible researchers in the field of Disclosure that I am aware of, and if he says it's BS, I wouldn't waste my time on it.

Posted by Rawhide68 (here)
So the finaly film is out.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt35520315/?ref_=fn_t_1

In my opinion it helps move the ball forward, not straight forward and not even faster then a turtle walks, but enough.
I think of it as a good starter for people new to the subject.

Daniel L and Steven G says it's totaly BS And I can see their point.

The film is easy to find if you use torrents

Otherwise you find it on Amazon Prime for 19.99$
https://www.amazon.com/Age-Disclosur...s%2C212&sr=8-2

Youre thoughts?

Even if it is partially BS, heck, even if "it is all BS" ... which I know is not the case, but lets assume it is "ALL BS" >>> you still can study HOW they do it and WHY they do it ... Why? ... Because that is always better than letting others do the thinking for you! ... And figuring out the mass psychology behind it, or sensing/seeing the long term (planned?) "after effects" of it ... What (tunnel vision) agenda is served? What did they purposley left out etc. etc. ...

• In my personal view, honest & fair critical analyses can never be based on "hear say" or depending on an "authority" of any kind.

• ... and do not get me wrong here, I really like Daniel Lizst a lot, his style, his reasoning, his mannerism, his excellent deep research ... and he should be in the documentary too ... but I also know Daniel (just like me) is not "all knowing" and can make mistakes too, just like anyone else can. That is why I am never impressed with anyone calling for "not watching" because X or Y "said so" ... and it is even worse if anyone does not watch "because someone said so because of someone said so".

cheers,
John Kules 🦜🦋🌳

[ExomatrixTV]

Posted by onawah (here)
No argument and I agree, but I only have so much time to devote to that one subject, and it's not the most important subject to me, so that's why I make that choice. There's only so much time, and way too much going on to be able to make room for it all.

Nothing wrong to say such things UPFRONT so that we see why you want others to do the same you do.

By the way, Daniel Lizst could easily make a better documentary, not in "special effects & special studios & special cameras & lighting" but in CONTENT we all need to know to see a more clear (bigger) picture that outshines them all!

... and maybe he will do exactly that at some point! ... I hope so!

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

[onawah]

I don't necessarily want others to do the same as I do, but the OP asked for our thoughts, so I obliged.
I would like more people to be aware of how thorough and painstaking a researcher Daniel is.
His reports are long, very detailed and require close attention, but that's something I'm willing to spend time on.
I think people are too willing to settle for the "quick fix" these days, and that leaves them wide open to obfuscation of facts.

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

Posted by onawah (here)
No argument and I agree, but I only have so much time to devote to that one subject, and it's not the most important subject to me, so that's why I make that choice. There's only so much time, and way too much going on to be able to make room for it all.

Nothing wrong to say such things UPFRONT so that we see why you want others to do the same you do.

By the way, Daniel Lizst could easily make a better documentary, not in "special effects & special studios & special cameras & lighting" but in CONTENT we all need to know to see a more clear (bigger) picture that outshines them all!

... and maybe he will do exactly that at some point! ... I hope so!

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Rawhide68 (here)
Daniel L and Steven G says it's totaly BS And I can see their point.

Can anyone briefly summarize why Daniel Liszt and Steven Greer say 'it's totally BS', and what in the film they take issue with? (I have no personal opinion on this, as I haven't yet seen it)

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Posted by Rawhide68 (here)
Otherwise you find it on Amazon Prime for 19.99$
https://www.amazon.com/Age-Disclosur...s%2C212&sr=8-2

Youre thoughts?

The fact that one has to pay to find out we've been lied to us all these years is immediately insulting to me. The government, or so-called 'white-hats' thereof who are pushing for disclosure, could've picked up the bill for making this film as a small conciliatory gesture. After all, that same institution committed this fraud in the first place, siphoning billions of taxpayer money to fund their secret programs. If they were really serious about educating the public, they could have done it for free and reached a far wider audience by doing so.

They lie for years and steal your money. Then, when they come clean (or rather, they're caught in the lie) they charge you again to tell you about it. This film smells fishy already, and I haven't even seen it yet. Disclosure is now money-making business. Beware of those selling snake-oil!

[Helvetic]

The CIA UFO threat documentary. Available for 7 days to download, MP4 format, 720p.

https://we.tl/t-SkY6Zhj7uK

And by the way, Harold E. Puthoff made the "Real disclosure" at the 38 min. timestamp where he mentioned "Time Travel technology".

" If time travel is possible, will be possible, has ever been possible it is with us now." - James Horak

[Rawhide68]

It's like asking AI, can you give me sweetpots x and y


Good try Bill

[ExomatrixTV]

• Among UFO doc’s revelations: Russia recovered nonhuman ‘Tic Tac’ craft | Elizabeth Vargas Reports:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=6-8xkZjyIrw

Director Dan Farah joins “Elizabeth Vargas Reports” as his new documentary, “The Age of Disclosure,” begins a theatrical run and starts streaming. The UFO exposé argues that the U.S. and rival nations have secretly recovered nonhuman craft and are in a race to reverse-engineer their potentially powerful secrets.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Rawhide68 (here)
It's like asking AI, can you give me sweetpots x and y

Good try Bill

You said it, not AI!

So, can anyone briefly summarize why Daniel Liszt and Steven Greer say 'it's totally BS', and what in the film they take issue with?
Or maybe, post a reference for what they say?

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

I've not heard or seen anything specific, but I guarantee it's the cast of characters behind this documentary. If you look at the doc's IMDb page you see this:




Clapper...Elizondo. Basically, it has CIA fingerprints ALL OVER IT.

[haroldsails]

After following this thread, I decided to watch this movie on Amazon today. The stream is $19.95 with the usual terms for video rental on Amazon. You have a couple of days of access to the stream.
My personal opinion is that it was worth the price of entry. I'm glad I watched the movie.
If you carry the burden of fundamentalist dogma, regarding our status as the only intelligent life in the universe etc, and or fear extraterrestrial life as "demons", you might struggle with the information within the movie. Personally,I don't have those restraints, so for me this was really an affirmation of what I already have thought for decades.
The production was very good, nothing to make me groan. I recommend watching it. I don't know enough to call it BS. I am aware that it could be sophisticated propaganda, but that's not my sense of it. An important movie IMO.

[ExomatrixTV]

• Does The Us Government Know About Aliens? New Documentary Seeks To Find Out:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=3PK6Fl4mvSs

New Documentary “The Age of Disclosure” claims that the U.S. government is hiding information on non-human intelligent life. Director Dan Farah shares a sneak peak.

[thepainterdoug]

anything with Hal Puthoff in it makes me wary. I heard enough about him thru my conversation with my abc friend over the years. I suppose I could also say that about some of the other players as well but I will refrain .

I wouldn't call the film BS. Thats an inappropriate comment in my opinion. Why is it BS ? What is bull s---? Opposite camps I guess. However it does rehash most already known .
But in its defense, its well done , keeps the conversation going, and will bring many who are not informed on the topic up to speed .

[onawah]

BS might be too strong a term. To skillfully obfuscate the truth the way the CIA does, for example, requires including enough factual info to make it all seem plausible. They are getting pretty good at that, but they get caught out by those who really do their research.
I don't think it's possible to demonstrate that convincingly enough with a "quickfix", however.

Posted by thepainterdoug (here)
anything with Hal Puthoff in it makes me wary. I heard enough about him thru my conversation with my abc friend over the years. I suppose I could also say that about some of the other players as well but I will refrain

I wouldn't call the film BS. Thats an inappropriate comment in my opinion. Why is it BS ? What is bull s---? Opposite camps I guess. However it does rehash most already known .
But in its defense, its well done , keeps the conversation going, and will bring many who are not informed on the topic up to speed .

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Rawhide68 (here)
It's like asking AI, can you give me sweetpots x and y
Good try Bill

You said it, not AI!
So, can anyone briefly summarize why Daniel Liszt and Steven Greer say 'it's totally BS', and what in the film they take issue with?
Or maybe, post a reference for what they say?

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Mark (Star Mariner) (here)
I've not heard or seen anything specific, but I guarantee it's the cast of characters behind this documentary. If you look at the doc's IMDb page you see this:




Clapper...Elizondo. Basically, it has CIA fingerprints ALL OVER IT.

~~~

Yes, that's the issue. "Featuring 34 U.S. Government insiders", boasts the IMDb page.

I watched it as well. (Well, just over half of it.) So far, it's Elizondo heading up the same cast of characters (many from the Biden administration, when work on the docu must have been started), and it's all very much the same story those following the tiresome AATIP/AAWSAP rollout have heard over and over again.

For me, the most credible and interesting statements came from Hal Puthoff and Eric Davis. I was pleased to see they were featured. Davis even refers to the 1964 Holloman AF Base Landing, and Hal Puthoff briefly mentions time travel.

And also, there are periodic references in the video to the very deep black, supra-governmental, behind-the-scenes, shadowy "Legacy Program", which of course is very real and is far more interesting than yet more videos of the Nimitz 'TicTac' encounters which have been replayed to the point of saturation and boredom.

But of course, the target audience is the many millions of barely-informed mainstream viewers, and NOT those who already know a lot about the subject.

That's why it's filled with 'trust-me' 'authority figures' like retired defense officials and politicians, and never anyone who's too 'off-the-wall' — like Chris Bledsoe, Travis Walton, Steven Greer, or even Richard Dolan.

[thepainterdoug]

on a personal level and as a primary witness, this assemblage of an object I shot outside my building happened about 15- 20 years ago. It lasted 15-20 minutes. It looked like a bright star in the morning daytime sky.

When I downloaded the images it showed it was not a single image but a moving morphing assemblage.
Fast forward to recent and we have these tic tac sightings. Are these images not similar, a rounded square, a tic tac etc and would be wise to take note of? . I think so!

I am amazed no one in the ufo community ever gave a damn about these pics. I sent them out and made them public. I even had a low flying black hawk heli over my apt building a day or two after I shared them.
I had a team of researchers study the sighting with the conclusion= unknown.

I have shown this image before, but I mention this because they keep going to the same "my gosh" images and seem to do their best at ignoring the hundreds of real compelling evidence. WHY?